← Back to City Council Digest

Equity Board Auto captions

Wednesday, May 3, 2023

6:00 PM · 2h 7m
Topics tracked across meetings:
Cemetery 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan AB 9006 16/35
Prioritization of Future Long Range Planning Work COM 0169 1/3
Virtual Attendance Policy: Follow Up 1/2
Section
Topic
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3a
Minutes of April 26, 2023 meeting
packet pp.3–4
Staff report:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) 04-26-23 Equity Board Minutes Page [0000] CITY OF ISSAQUAH Equity Board 6:00 PM Steelhead Room, 235 1st Ave. April 26, 2023 MINUTES SE, Issaquah
4. AGENDA ITEMS
4a
Virtual Attendance Policy: Follow Up
15 min · Mayor Mary Lou Pauly Tisha Gieser, City Clerk · packet pp.5–115
Staff report:
Draft CIP: Focus on Equity MAY 3, 2023 EQUITY BOARD
4b
Capital Improvement Plan: Follow Up
90 min · Andrea Snyder, Deputy City Administrator · packet pp.117–124
Topics: Budget
Staff report:
The purpose of the May 3, 2023, info update is to brief the Board on the Comprehensive Plan and the state mandated 2024 periodic update.
4c
Comprehensive Plan Overview: Informational Update [n/a] Staff memo prepared by: Stephen Padua, Long Range Planning Manager
Topics: Land Use
4d
Board Processes & Chair/Vice-Chair Selection
10 min · Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager
5. STAFF REPORT
5a
Updates from Mayor & City Council, and Other Updates
Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager
6. OTHER BUSINESS / ANNOUNCEMENTS
6a
Celebrating and Honoring Cultural Events
Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager · packet pp.125–128
Topics: Arts & Culture
Staff report:
This is an active document that will be updated with more specific timelines and details.
0:02 good evening
0:12 good evening everyone welcome to today's
0:15 Equity board meeting with sixth floor
0:18 6 p.m on Wednesday May the 3rd
0:22 members
0:24 and we have formed so we can go ahead
0:25 and get started on today's agenda
0:29 or you're going to call to order we have
0:31 our
0:32 set time for public comments as
0:35 a minute
0:36 most important today though we do have a
0:39 number of agenda items which is to uh
0:48 Patricia
0:49 our support as well as the capital
0:52 improve D plan
0:54 okay I'm not going to run through every
0:56 agenda item right now before
0:59 agenda but
1:01 that's really good and welcome our new
1:03 members
1:06 would you like to introduce yourself sir
1:13 very soon
1:15 [Music]
1:38 foreign
1:50 inspired National
1:52 results
2:17 but now they're established
2:20 here tonight to
2:22 share some news talk about birth
2:24 Defender that I probably would be
2:36 used to be part of the
2:39 Food Services Commission
2:42 established
2:47 and
2:59 volunteers a lot in the community yeah
3:06 this week
3:10 [Music]
3:18 [Music]
3:36 foreign
3:40 laughs
3:55 [Music]
3:58 every city
4:16 welcome
4:18 yeah
4:34 there
4:48 foreign
4:51 I also um
4:58 welcome my name is Kelly
5:04 Katie support and uh I am retired and
5:09 have in the past
5:11 organizing a community members typically
5:14 locally but also
5:16 around education
5:22 California
5:30 thank you
5:38 this is
5:42 actually
6:06 oh okay
6:10 I'm actually walking up this week before
6:13 they changed
6:26 I am a veteran US Army currently I work
6:28 for Microsoft
6:32 background is technically
6:51 so it's great to see me
6:54 another a new member on the board
6:57 starting to transformed because I've
6:59 been here in 2015.
7:02 San Francisco
7:06 so to see it transform
7:09 from a town which I meet
7:22 was about face everything
7:25 [Music]
7:26 so it's nice to see now people better
7:28 come down here
7:35 a smile like hey how you doing what
7:39 it's it's just amazing
7:47 and uh online uh shape would you like
7:50 some introduce yourself
7:55 sure
8:00 I mean Hillary
8:10 uh I'm sorry Monica none of us are able
8:14 to hear very clearly uh I believe Shea
8:17 is nodding but but Christina said that
8:20 the volume isn't high enough to hear and
8:22 neither can we hear to interpret
8:25 okay thank you for letting us know we'll
8:27 try to problem solve a little bit here
8:28 yeah
8:33 and we can hear you well Monica we just
8:37 can't hear others around you
8:44 we can hear it seems like we can hear
8:46 better now
8:49 Tony can you try saying something
8:50 seriously Tony Curry test test one two
8:53 three testing one two three yes we can
8:55 hear now much better thank you so much
8:57 thank you
9:04 um Shay our illustrious leader
9:10 for those of you
9:15 I'm the equity board chair and Karthik I
9:18 think um if you remember I helped
9:20 interview you
9:22 um so I am happy that you decided to
9:25 join
9:26 um I have been with the Equity Group
9:29 since its Inception as well
9:31 um and I was voted in as the chair
9:34 um which I'm very honored to have been
9:36 able to serve
9:38 um I am originally a transplant from St
9:41 Louis Missouri
9:43 um I have lived here for almost five
9:46 years now and
9:48 um my kids attend school in the Issaquah
9:50 school district and um I have deep roots
9:54 in De and I work so I was eager to be a
9:59 part of this team and it was important
10:01 for me to
10:02 um help develop a presence for our group
10:05 to be able to share ideas and become
10:07 what we are today so welcome to the team
10:12 um and thank you for joining us tonight
10:18 oh Christina
10:27 Christina your spirit on mute
10:37 we can see you Christina but we can't
10:40 hear you you're still on yeah
10:50 hello good afternoon it's nice to see
10:53 you all uh my name is Christina abonce
10:59 um I am happy to be here
11:06 Monica we have another new members no we
11:10 have a new uh youth member they were not
11:13 able to join tonight they have a college
11:14 class that they are taking as part of
11:16 their High School class but they are
11:19 hoping to be able to adjust and start
11:21 joining next month that sounds great
11:23 hopefully we'll see our new member our
11:25 new youth member next month that's great
11:27 okay so I'm assuming Monica this will be
11:30 this will serve as our roll calls so to
11:32 speak okay that sounds great all right
11:34 so as we welcome our new members are
11:37 there any um public comments anyone else
11:40 no one signed up for money for public
11:42 comments I do have of a public comment
11:45 follow-up that we received a few weeks
11:48 ago that I would like to discuss with
11:50 you briefly and then I'm hoping that we
11:52 can postpone it towards the end of the
11:53 meeting to have a more uh conversation
11:55 uh you may recall it a few weeks ago we
11:59 received a public comment via email and
12:01 actually a public comment was sent
12:03 directly to city council the equity
12:05 board was included in that feedback and
12:07 it had to do with the community
12:10 engagement toolkit and there was a
12:13 request that the communication staff
12:14 will bring that item back to you as an
12:16 equity board member as an equity board
12:19 so I checked in a little bit with the
12:21 communications staff
12:23 um uh they they took your input they
12:26 gathered input from other departments
12:28 and they also went to city council to
12:29 gather input they are now working on
12:31 finalizing the toolkit but since that is
12:34 an internal
12:35 um document they did not feel that it
12:37 needed to come back to the equity board
12:39 before going to council since it wasn't
12:41 anything that needed to be adopted with
12:43 that the communication team will bring
12:47 back information to you in a couple of
12:49 months once that implementation is going
12:51 to start to see what Corrections need to
12:54 be made so that's the feedback from
12:55 public comment and I would love to take
12:58 a second piece of information that I
13:00 learned from the public member that made
13:03 that that comment that public comment
13:05 because they give us actually some
13:07 helpful information about the process of
13:09 the equity board and I would like to
13:11 have the opportunity to discuss with you
13:13 towards the end of the meeting if that's
13:15 okay
13:16 um so it was just a process suggestion
13:18 and I think it's definitely helpful
13:23 thank you very much for that Monica okay
13:25 so everyone in the room I'd like to draw
13:27 your attention to the meet the minutes
13:30 that Monica passed out and for those of
13:32 you online please have a look at the
13:35 remaining minutes that was sent out in
13:37 the invite online so
13:39 um go ahead and give some time for you
13:42 to overlook the minutes from the last
13:44 thing and with that I
13:47 for that I would like to request as a
13:50 staff if we could postpone the minutes
13:52 from tonight and review them only next
13:54 month reasoning for that since we had a
13:57 meeting just last week just a week ago
13:59 we didn't have enough time uh to receive
14:01 the Spanish translations and so
14:03 Christina did not have a Spanish version
14:06 of the minutes so our translators are
14:08 working on that as soon as possible and
14:10 we'll have them for next month if that's
14:12 okay and if you don't mind just saying
14:14 that thank you all right so we'll do
14:16 that next month all right so let's move
14:18 on to our next agenda item which is the
14:20 virtual attendance policy follow-up
14:23 presented by our Boston mayor
14:28 thanks um Tisha do you want to start off
14:31 or can I do some introductory comments
14:33 first okay great well thank you for
14:36 giving me a spot on the agenda this
14:38 evening I appreciate it at least once a
14:41 year I try and get face to face in the
14:44 room with all of you time to chat
14:45 outside and if I get to stay long enough
14:47 time to chat after so thank you for that
14:51 um Monica I'm gonna stray off the
14:53 attendance policy for just a little bit
14:54 with everybody's everybody's okay with
14:56 that Monica has kept me up to date on
15:00 the amazing work that you've been doing
15:01 from the beginning and I this is just
15:04 such a point of Pride for me that we
15:07 have stood up this board that you are
15:09 working on Amazing items on your work
15:12 plan and I get to go share that out with
15:14 other cities who have not yet stood up
15:17 aboard or started this work almost all
15:20 jurisdictions have started some sort of
15:22 training but haven't really embraced the
15:25 idea of having an advice reward like
15:28 this take a hard look at other things
15:31 besides just training opportunities on
15:34 Equity inclusion and diversity and
15:36 welcoming so thank you you were Pioneers
15:39 for us but you are also Pioneers in the
15:41 region and I get to share a lot of your
15:44 work with them one of the items that
15:46 just gets totally wowed about is the
15:49 calendar that you came up with and the
15:52 fact that we were able to remove certain
15:54 days off of our scheduled calendar to
15:57 ensure that everybody could participate
15:59 that might like to participate and as
16:02 you see many times people do not choose
16:04 to come to these meetings but you are
16:06 providing the opportunity for them too
16:08 so I appreciate that very much thank you
16:11 for all the work and welcome again when
16:14 I got to Issaquah 30 years ago I moved
16:17 from a suburb of Toronto that was very
16:21 um diverse and my kids went to a very
16:24 diverse school where they were in the
16:27 majority by about three or four percent
16:29 so it was a fantastic opportunity and
16:31 one of my big concerns coming to
16:34 Issaquah was the reputation for the
16:36 school district was great but it was
16:39 also 97 Caucasian and I thought that's
16:43 that's challenging for me having had
16:45 them in a district in a in a community
16:48 that was so diverse
16:51 um Issaquah has grown its diversity
16:53 mostly through adding new neighborhoods
16:56 so adding the highlands and adding Talus
16:59 and adding that population there
17:01 has really Diversified our population
17:03 more than I could have hoped for and
17:07 that's great
17:08 um however we still kind of feel like
17:11 different areas we do not feel like one
17:14 large Blended City and we have tons of
17:16 opportunity not just within our city
17:18 organization but within our community to
17:22 work on being more welcoming I still get
17:25 anecdotal stories I got a lot during
17:28 covert I got a lot during the death of
17:31 George Floyd about things that actually
17:33 happened in town that had impacts on
17:35 people I still get those stories I
17:38 didn't used to get them so I know we
17:41 have a lot of work to do and some
17:43 organizations are now asking me to come
17:45 and just tell them what we're doing as a
17:48 city with our Equity board and our
17:49 Administration so that smaller
17:51 organizations may start to embrace some
17:53 of the stuff and the work that you were
17:55 doing so I am invited to a future
17:58 downtown disco association meeting uh
18:01 they're one of their members Works in
18:03 diversity equity and inclusion and
18:05 doesn't want to be the board for heard
18:09 you know she signed up to do board work
18:11 but she doesn't want to be their Dei
18:13 consultant and so I'm just going to come
18:15 and tell them about some of the work
18:17 that you're doing some of the training
18:19 I'm getting I serve on a professional
18:22 association's diversity Equity inclusion
18:24 team the sound cities Association which
18:25 is all the cities around Seattle 38
18:28 cities one million population and I work
18:31 on their Equity cabinet I'm hoping at
18:34 some point in time to get on the
18:36 association of Washington cities which
18:38 represents all the cities diversity
18:40 Equity inclusion board as well so just
18:43 sharing a lot of the stuff that I
18:44 learned from you all sharing the work
18:46 that you do it's very inspiring
18:49 um so the attendance poll the virtual
18:51 tendency
18:55 but we stood up two new boards the
18:57 equity board and the environment board
18:59 and we started off in all virtual world
19:02 and you guys just hit the ground running
19:06 um coming back many of our boards who
19:09 existed pre-covered we're excited to get
19:13 back in the room they wanted to have
19:16 those parking lot conversations before
19:18 and after again as well as the
19:22 opportunity to talk to community members
19:24 who might come in early they're coming
19:25 to talk to you but they catch it out
19:27 here and they catch it here for five
19:28 minutes on three other things that
19:30 they're not going to mention in their
19:31 comments and so our city clerk worked
19:34 really hard with all of our boards and
19:36 commissions to adopt virtual attendance
19:39 policies your adopted version is a
19:42 little different than others and for a
19:44 good reason you want to make sure that
19:46 we don't take steps that start to put up
19:49 walls and barriers again to coming in
19:52 practice you are actually a very similar
19:57 in your practice to the other board's
20:00 policies
20:01 you usually have more of your members in
20:04 person you usually have a quorum of your
20:06 members in person and the room feels
20:08 filled out and if I was coming to talk
20:10 to you I'd feel really good tonight
20:12 because there's a lot of you here and I
20:15 can you know grab one of you in the
20:16 parking lot if I feel I need to hammer
20:18 on my point a little bit more after but
20:20 you did adopt a different policy and
20:22 Tish is just here to explain it we're
20:24 not asking you to change it which she
20:27 just wants to talk to you about what is
20:30 going on with the other boards and
20:31 commissions and where they are and at
20:33 some future date if you feel like your
20:36 practice matches the broader policies
20:38 that are out there and you want to
20:39 adjust your policy go ahead but it's
20:41 really just to do that just to let you
20:43 know where everybody else landed and
20:45 especially with the environment we're in
20:46 the equity board because you grew up in
20:48 a computer instead of doing this
20:51 um and so one thing that would help me
20:52 before we we move on to this the
20:56 professional staff of people who know
20:57 what they're talking about is tell me
20:59 your personal experiences is with the
21:02 in-person and the virtual would you like
21:04 what you don't like what is working
21:07 why having a this virtual option is
21:11 important and what it feels like just to
21:12 be in the room and so informally anybody
21:15 wants to chat let's do that and then
21:17 I'll bring the profession to the table
21:20 and I love it that you have translation
21:22 services and that they work
21:24 whether it's virtual or in person
21:27 um we don't have that right now
21:29 on our other birds and commissions
21:31 so well because they are not as diverse
21:34 as the sport
21:36 yes good good yes so mayor Paulie I do
21:40 have a
21:42 um it's just for me so I'm not speaking
21:43 for the whole board it's just Tony Curry
21:45 talking
21:46 um the virtual component is important to
21:48 me because of my work
21:51 um I'm frequently busy like sometimes
21:54 stopping work at 11 PM and so what helps
22:00 me is that it was advantageous and
22:02 fortuitous that I was able to actually
22:04 come here tonight
22:05 but some nights I'm not able to like
22:09 spark down some food real quick and then
22:12 just get into the meeting and so if we
22:15 went to a
22:17 a format in which it was in person only
22:20 there'd be a lot of meetings out of your
22:22 business to me personally I would have
22:23 to resign yeah I would have to
22:25 um so I think it's having that mix and
22:28 that you know and I think we're all and
22:30 I'm not speaking for the board it's just
22:32 um I think we're all professional we're
22:34 all we're definitely all adults and I
22:36 think as long as we
22:38 make sure that if we can't be here in
22:41 person that we notify Monica or we
22:44 notify Shea is the chair or me as Vice
22:47 chair and there's some type of
22:48 notification or something like that but
22:51 um that's just me too that's just me
22:52 telling me that's awesome you know the
22:54 council did adopt on Monday night their
22:56 own virtual policy
22:58 um and Tisha can probably explain that
23:00 when she's up here too but coming out of
23:02 covid we've kind of decided virtual is
23:05 just part of us it's just how much
23:07 virtual so
23:09 um you know they there are a lot of
23:12 entities that I work with that are
23:14 demanding everybody come back I don't
23:16 see us ever doing that ever we have
23:18 opened so many doors with virtual
23:20 attendance that in one way shape or form
23:23 we're going to do it as mayor what I'm
23:26 hoping is that we can have as much
23:27 consistency and that is so that those
23:31 who do participate
23:32 get the same sense of vibrancy they get
23:36 with meeting to meeting meetings so it's
23:38 here forever I mean I would never
23:40 Advocate uh for all in person I just I
23:43 think those days are gone and I'm
23:45 frankly quite happy that they're gone
23:46 thank you for that thank you very much
23:50 anyone else sure yeah
23:55 um so for me it's always about
23:57 asking the question like who's not in
23:59 the room who would we like okay and so
24:03 when I put it in under that lens for me
24:05 I think of people who can't drive people
24:09 who need to use public transport
24:12 whatever the reason being that they need
24:15 to do it virtually and wanting them to
24:18 be able to participate
24:20 um and in addition to that I can tell
24:22 you that I have been able to participate
24:25 I'm from the Netherlands and I think
24:28 even some other part of the country I
24:30 can't remember or part of the world and
24:32 so when I think about like being able to
24:35 draw in a diverse pool of people
24:38 participate on this board for me it's
24:41 just very imperative that we have that
24:43 flexibility and also there's like an
24:46 unspoken I believe I don't know that
24:48 it's part of the policy that we all make
24:51 of consorted effort to be here right if
24:54 we're able to be here we will be here
24:57 I don't know that it needs to be spelled
24:59 out but if for whatever reason be it
25:01 Transportation be it child care be it
25:03 whatever it is right
25:05 um making sure that the people that
25:09 we're trying to include
25:11 are given that opportunity gives me that
25:14 opportunity and I think that that goes
25:17 hand in hand with the um policy that we
25:20 have regarding the stipend right yeah
25:22 making sure that we have a diverse pool
25:24 of people and not just people who happen
25:27 to have yeah
25:29 the time or whatever you know to be here
25:32 well said so that's why I think I voted
25:35 the way that I did very listening I was
25:38 exactly what she said and I would add I
25:41 think
25:42 I think there is a difference in policy
25:44 or practice because you see we've got
25:46 very programmed but I think it's really
25:48 important to have the policy and people
25:50 through so it is inclusive and welcoming
25:54 for folks who don't have the same types
25:56 of accessibility
25:59 um to be able to participate in this
26:02 type of Engagement with city government
26:06 so it's to me it's really important that
26:08 it stays in policy uh regardless of the
26:11 practice that's great
26:15 okay
26:18 hi yes
26:19 um and as the chair I can probably Echo
26:23 a lot of the things that everyone in the
26:24 room said
26:25 um including the fact that my work
26:27 schedule can be a little crazy sometimes
26:29 but um I also have kids that sometimes
26:32 their schedules interrupt mine and uh
26:35 for example even tonight
26:37 um I was unable to make it in person
26:38 because my son's sick
26:40 um and unfortunately I just didn't want
26:42 to bring any germs into anybody so that
26:46 we could all remain healthy
26:50 um but not only that
26:51 um this option gave me uh the ability to
26:55 be able to still participate and still
26:58 join my colleagues and help our city as
27:01 much as I possibly can despite the fact
27:04 that I can't be there and yes there are
27:06 recordings and yes there are other ways
27:07 that I can certainly get that
27:09 information but there's nothing like
27:11 being a part of the group when things
27:13 are happening and being able to express
27:17 any comments that I have even in the
27:19 virtual setting
27:21 um which is really kind of nice and I
27:23 think that our group does a really great
27:24 job of making sure that everyone's voice
27:26 is heard whether they're in the room or
27:29 virtually and I know that sometimes that
27:31 can be hard but um I think we've done a
27:34 good job of making it work
27:36 okay that's great you brought up
27:38 something that I hear everywhere is that
27:40 we'll never be able to make it work well
27:42 enough that the people on the screen who
27:44 were talking about this three months
27:46 into covet the people on the screen will
27:49 never have the same experience they will
27:51 feel like it's not fair they're not
27:53 being heard and I think we're way past
27:56 that I I think I've heard from Monica
27:59 you guys do a great job making sure
28:02 everybody's heard all the voices are
28:04 heard and that's great but it was a
28:06 really big sort of you know uh downside
28:10 that people were talking about before we
28:12 had the opportunity to come back but I
28:13 think we've worked it out and I've heard
28:15 you guys do a good job
28:17 that's great
28:18 anybody else
28:22 awesome well thank you for letting me
28:23 come tonight I'm going to give my chair
28:25 over to the professionals she's going to
28:28 talk a little bit about where we are as
28:30 a city and uh thanks for all that you're
28:34 doing and all that you're working on
28:36 it's nice to see everybody and welcome
28:38 and thank you yeah
28:58 kartik I'm Tisha Geezer I'm the city
29:01 clerk I think I've met everyone else in
29:03 here a few times it's nice to be with
29:04 you again so I'll just follow up on the
29:06 mayor's comments that yes you have
29:07 emerged as as you a somewhat unique
29:10 among our other boards in commissions so
29:12 we had we have had seven boards and
29:15 commissions adopt a virtual attendance
29:16 policy and yours is definitely far more
29:19 flexible and um emphasizing that uh your
29:23 policy says we don't care how you
29:24 participate virtually or in person all
29:27 of our other boards really emphasize
29:28 that in-person attendance and some of
29:30 them most of them have a requirement
29:32 that a certain number be in the room
29:33 which was you know is is the mayor's has
29:36 been her position she wants to make sure
29:38 that as our community comes to these
29:40 meetings they see folks together and
29:43 that Synergy that she talked about with
29:45 the public and with each other is there
29:48 um also respecting that you you had some
29:50 clear Direction and I um and respecting
29:53 that so I'll just say that um in the
29:56 over the next year maybe towards the end
29:58 end of 2023 or first quarter 2024 it
30:02 would be good to talk again about your
30:04 virtual attendance policy see how things
30:06 are going see what some of the Norms
30:07 have been
30:09 um and see if any adjustments uh might
30:11 be made so that's that's all I have to
30:14 say you have a big agenda tonight so yes
30:16 real quick I think that I just want to
30:18 drop
30:19 just
30:20 so that like a buzz in your ear that I
30:23 would challenge the other boards to
30:25 actually look at our policy because our
30:28 policy is more inclusive and I would
30:30 like those boards to consider if you
30:32 want to diversify your board you need to
30:35 be flexible in terms of who you're
30:37 including how you're including them and
30:39 why you're including people so yes I
30:42 welcome
30:43 you know us having this discussion again
30:45 in the hopes that we can model that this
30:48 works and encourage other boards to
30:51 actually change their policy
30:54 I will hardly agree with that I'm glad
30:56 you said that but
30:58 um because
30:59 we as an equity board this is kind of
31:01 what we do Model Behavior that and and
31:04 encourage behaviors in the city so yeah
31:07 I definitely Echo that that yeah and
31:09 really encourage every board to follow
31:11 because that model fits
31:14 Equity so that everyone can be included
31:17 all voices heard everyone is heard
31:19 everyone can participate
31:21 people want to come into a room like me
31:24 then yeah by all means do so
31:28 noted
31:30 thank you I have something something
31:34 anyway it would be interesting to track
31:37 somehow
31:40 um the diversity within the boards and
31:43 now we are obviously starting to be more
31:44 diverse but do they if there's some that
31:48 have lesser
31:49 strong strong do they add more people
31:52 right it would be worthwhile if nothing
31:55 else to know what the ratio is now and
31:57 what the ratio is next recruitment
31:59 right again we are tracking some of that
32:02 information now in our application yeah
32:04 and to also ask people why they you know
32:07 somehow to ask those who may have been
32:10 interested why they didn't apply or why
32:11 they decided not to do it right yeah I
32:15 know that's my word I'm just trying to
32:17 figure out how to you know because
32:18 that's that's the real deal
32:24 I mean the problem is the people who
32:26 they just think they can't do it right
32:28 that they're blind when there's more
32:30 problems
32:30 or don't know about it
32:32 so yeah and
32:34 and now have seven boards and I expect
32:36 to have up to nine who do have virtual
32:38 attendance so there is some a lot of
32:40 people yeah yeah it is it is not quite
32:43 as as open ended as that keyboards yeah
32:48 yeah okay any other questions comments
32:54 or Tisha thank you very much thank you
32:57 again
33:00 okay well let's move on to our next
33:03 agenda item the capital Improvement plan
33:06 follow-up and this will be presented by
33:08 Andrea Snyder our Deputy City
33:10 administrator yes and Andrea do you
33:15 prefer questions at the end or do you
33:17 prefer questions as people have them
33:18 questions as you have them or rates or
33:22 great my uh I think so before this
33:26 meeting my laptop was
33:29 starting to heat up and wasn't charging
33:32 it may be solved we'll see if it starts
33:35 to melt the table
33:38 um her burst into flames we might have
33:40 to switch to maybe Monica can share my
33:42 slides but we'll try this for now and
33:44 see how far it takes us okay so good
33:47 evening thank you for having me here
33:48 also with me is Robert hamoud who is our
33:51 Chief Financial Officer
33:53 um and so he'll be uh he'll be assisting
33:56 with the presentation today I'm so happy
33:59 to be here this is a follow-up to the
34:01 discussion for those of you who were
34:03 able to join us at what we called our
34:05 board Summit in February to talk about
34:07 the CIP CIP
34:10 Capital Improvement plan that's the plan
34:12 that
34:14 um we make it's a six-year plan and then
34:17 some uh to plan out our infrastructure
34:19 needs and how we're going to supply
34:22 um all of our infrastructure needs
34:23 across the city so that's what we're
34:25 here to talk about today we started off
34:27 this conversation back in uh February to
34:30 talk about what are some of the criteria
34:32 we should be thinking about
34:34 um to evaluate these projects that go
34:36 into our infrastructure planner CIP
34:40 um and so many of you participate in
34:42 that conversation thank you and this is
34:45 a follow-up we now uh finally have a
34:47 draft it just got issued on Monday so
34:51 many of you in your packets because the
34:52 packet was actually uh published really
34:55 before our CIP was even out you'll see
34:58 it in your packet you have a bunch of
35:00 different attachments
35:02 um that's because that was before we
35:04 even had a compiled draft and so we gave
35:07 you what we had at the moment
35:10 um so apologize for all those
35:11 attachments but hopefully that helps you
35:14 focus on uh the things that we're really
35:16 talking about today
35:17 and
35:20 foreign
35:21 so the agenda for for this item tonight
35:24 we want to first talk to you about well
35:27 what kind of feedback are we looking at
35:29 um receiving from you tonight then we're
35:31 going to go into a little bit of
35:32 background on the CIP process as a
35:34 refresher uh we will also give an
35:37 overview of the draft or proposed CIP
35:40 that covers the years 2024 to 2029 uh
35:44 we'll have that discussion and feedback
35:46 section and we'll also talk about next
35:48 steps as well
35:50 so what we're hoping to hear from you
35:52 tonight here's our general discussion
35:54 questions first we want to have feedback
35:57 on how the criteria were applied we're
36:00 specifically going to be focusing on the
36:02 equity criteria tonight that is your
36:05 area of expertise it's a brand new
36:07 criteria for us that we hadn't had
36:09 before in this process so we want to
36:11 hear from you how how have we applied it
36:14 uh do you have feedback for us should we
36:16 consider things differently uh were
36:18 there things that surprised you and
36:20 taking a look at the materials for
36:22 tonight
36:23 um and then if we were to use these
36:25 criteria to get again specifically the
36:27 equity criteria again what changes
36:30 should we consider should we consider
36:32 changes to the equity criteria itself
36:34 should we consider changes to how we
36:36 applied that criteria or thinking about
36:42 um so a little background uh before we
36:45 get to that discussion is just a
36:47 reminder of what the CIP is the CIP is
36:50 not a budget it is a planning document
36:52 so this is something that covers the
36:54 next six years of
36:57 um of our planning for infrastructure
36:59 but also some out years past those six
37:01 years
37:02 and so
37:04 this graphic should look familiar to
37:06 those of you who are part of the board
37:08 Summit that we had in February at the
37:11 top of the graphic shows that 20-year
37:14 big Vision picture we have a lot of
37:16 infrastructure plans that talk about 20
37:19 years or several years out so we have
37:22 our Master Mobility plan that talks
37:24 about transportation we have Park
37:27 strategic plan all types of different
37:29 infrastructure plans that give a big
37:31 Vision an idea for what types of
37:33 projects we could should consider to
37:35 improve our infrastructure during that
37:37 process there's a lot of community
37:38 engagement to form those plans
37:41 um they're also that's a time when we
37:44 think about what are these policies it's
37:46 time to think about Equity it's time to
37:48 think about environmental sustainability
37:50 and all of our other values and
37:52 incorporate them in that Master planning
37:53 process then once we have those big
37:56 Master plans for our infrastructure we
37:58 use those to populate the 60-year CIP
38:02 and that's really the document that
38:04 we're discussing tonight and so
38:06 um that is that's where we are on this
38:09 on this uh a graphic we're in that
38:11 middle trapezoid uh lighter green box
38:15 and so that's where we form the CIP
38:18 that's based off of those Master
38:19 infrastructure plans that's based off of
38:22 community feedback during the CIP
38:23 process that we're forming right now
38:25 where we're in right now and Community
38:27 engagement we've had over the years you
38:29 know sometimes we'll get neighborhoods
38:31 that come before us and say well this
38:33 isn't in a master plan but we really
38:35 think we need sidewalks here or
38:36 something like that
38:37 okay so we incorporate all that feedback
38:39 and figure out what we can afford to do
38:43 but we have the time and capacity to do
38:46 and put that into our six year CIP along
38:49 with the criteria that we'll talk about
38:50 in a second and then out of that
38:53 six-year CLP how does that get to
38:55 implementation then we form our two-year
38:57 budget so it's a planning document the
39:01 CIP it's not a budget so but we use it
39:04 to help form our budget our budget
39:06 covers uh two years we're in our first
39:09 year of our budget right now so we take
39:10 items out of those CIP and say okay here
39:12 are the projects that we had planned for
39:15 2023 uh our Revenue picture may be
39:18 better than what we had thought maybe
39:20 it's worse now it really becomes a lot
39:23 more real in terms of what we can afford
39:25 what we have the capacity to do so
39:28 sometimes you'll find that things change
39:29 from the sixth year CIP to the two-year
39:32 budget that can happen because it's just
39:34 a planning document it's not an
39:36 implementation document
39:38 so so uh then
39:42 then what's in the budget then becomes a
39:44 funded Capital project then that's
39:46 something that goes on our work plans
39:48 when we start to really implement
39:50 so that's kind of the the process for
39:53 how we get to actually Paving a road or
39:57 putting in a new water line that's kind
39:59 of the flow of that process and again
40:01 we're in that middle
40:03 um light green trapezoid area right now
40:06 and all throughout this process we want
40:09 to be thinking as I said about Equity we
40:11 want Community engagement we want to be
40:13 thinking about all of our other values
40:14 too so this isn't just the one point in
40:16 time where we have to get it right we
40:19 have to get it right in every step and
40:22 so any questions on the planning process
40:25 for our Capital infrastructure you might
40:28 be discussing this in your presentation
40:30 but how do you prioritize like once you
40:33 have
40:34 you know
40:36 the items for the six year plan but then
40:39 you meet up with the finances like
40:42 yeah well it's almost like you're a fan
40:51 slide so hold on to it I'm not quite
40:54 there but great question and if I'm
40:56 going to come back to that question how
40:58 we prioritize
40:59 um I want to make just a little note to
41:01 make sure I do that okay
41:04 yes please do please do
41:07 um before we get to that excellent
41:08 question a little bit more background so
41:11 the CIP we update every two years
41:15 um we go through a big update process
41:17 and
41:19 um so here we are within that two-year
41:21 cycle and a couple of things have
41:23 changed since the last time we adopted
41:25 the CIP one of the things that have
41:27 changed is this lovely group of people
41:29 we didn't have an equity board two years
41:31 ago certainly not uh the way that you're
41:34 functioning now
41:36 um we also didn't have an environmental
41:38 board uh the way that they are
41:40 functioning now so we have two new
41:42 boards to help inform these projects and
41:45 inform how we think about our Capital
41:47 infrastructure
41:49 um part of that uh has affected the
41:52 criteria that we use to prioritize those
41:54 projects so we have new and improved
41:56 criteria that's what we started that
41:58 conversation about in February
42:00 um we also as part of those new and
42:02 improved criteria have a different
42:04 grading system so you'll recall maybe if
42:06 you have excellent memories uh before we
42:09 had project selection criteria but it
42:11 was like check the box yes or no is this
42:14 okay for the environment yes or no uh is
42:19 this
42:22 you know uh I'm now forgetting what the
42:25 other criteria because I'm so used to
42:26 the new ones but we've really wanted to
42:29 raise the bar and looking at these
42:31 projects and how we prioritize them
42:34 um is this something that is really
42:36 improving our conditions
42:39 um so that's what we want to do with
42:40 this year with the criteria so the
42:41 criteria themselves are very different
42:43 than what we've done in the past
42:45 the other thing that's new since last
42:47 time is uh in 2021 late of 2021 into
42:51 2022 we had a Capital Finance Community
42:54 task force so they were volunteers much
42:57 like yourselves some of them were from
42:59 other boards and commissions we have in
43:01 the city some of them were community
43:03 members who had not who were not on the
43:05 board
43:05 the mayor appointed this task force and
43:08 uh they provided some recommendations on
43:11 what we should do for our infrastructure
43:12 we have so many needs and in government
43:15 it's very common uh we have more needs
43:18 than we have revenue for so how do we
43:20 figure this out what how do we invest in
43:23 stuff where should we prioritize
43:25 and the Capital Finance Community task
43:28 force came forward with a couple of
43:30 recommendations on simplifying them here
43:32 but they recommended that in general the
43:35 study should do more to invest in
43:38 infrastructure and uh they really wanted
43:41 us to do more than we have in the past
43:43 and they felt like in order to do that
43:45 we should pursue new Revenue tools they
43:48 felt that we didn't have enough existing
43:50 revenue or current revenues to be able
43:52 to pay for all the things that we need
43:54 in the community so they wanted us to
43:57 look at in Revenue tools they also
43:59 stated that mobility and transportation
44:01 were our first priority
44:03 um so instead of kind of spreading the
44:05 peanut butter out and trying to address
44:07 Everything at Once in an equal way we
44:09 should really be focusing on
44:10 Transportation mobility and that's
44:12 because every couple of years we do a
44:15 community survey we are finishing up
44:17 that process
44:19 um this year for our community survey
44:20 and we've heard from our community year
44:21 after year
44:23 um since we started this process that
44:24 mobility and transportation are their
44:25 number one concern
44:27 and so that's why the task force said we
44:29 should do this we should consider this
44:31 as a first priority when it comes to
44:32 infrastructure investment
44:34 and then um but parks and trails and
44:37 also City facilities Municipal
44:39 facilities are really important too
44:40 uh so they wanted us to address those as
44:42 well and look at new Revenue tools to be
44:45 able to provide more for parks and
44:47 trails and Facilities
44:50 so those are some of those
44:51 recommendations so as we look at how do
44:54 we form this CIP what are the things we
44:55 need to consider as we pick these
44:57 projects how do we prioritize
45:00 um we wanted to take those
45:01 recommendations from the task force uh
45:04 we wanted to look at those criteria
45:05 combine them together with things we've
45:07 heard from the community and also with a
45:10 lens of what can we realistically do
45:14 because we also say especially in
45:18 Issaquah we want to do it all and we
45:21 have a habit of biting off more than we
45:23 can chew we are Eternal optimists
45:25 sometimes to our own detriment and um we
45:29 can't seem to ever get as much done as
45:31 we want to and so we wanted to make sure
45:34 that this was a little bit more
45:35 realistic and that we were actually
45:37 identifying the resources we need to get
45:39 the work done and then
45:41 um not being overly ambitious
45:46 as well
45:48 this is the first time I believe the
45:50 city's gone to the boards into
45:52 merchandise
45:53 um to soliciting the nation and it's
45:55 very unique for City students that
45:57 usually students will have maybe a
45:59 community planning process Community
46:00 survey and then develop a CIP for their
46:02 insurance but here we're really trying
46:04 to make this the most inclusive CIP that
46:07 we can by getting as many stakeholders
46:09 starting with the community task force
46:10 last year but also coming to you with
46:12 the criteria and the project list to
46:14 probably selected the kind of explain
46:16 what a process is how we got there and
46:18 how it impacts here's residents in a
46:20 Citizens period and it's been a very
46:23 good process so far I think this is like
46:24 the third or fourth board that's third
46:26 yes
46:28 and so that going back to just the
46:31 principle of equity that's really
46:33 something that we're really trying to
46:34 focus on is that the interestingness of
46:36 this process thank you
46:41 um new criteria these may look uh
46:44 familiar to those of you who were there
46:47 for the February meeting and there was a
46:48 follow-up memo um talking about how what
46:51 we did with the feedback we heard from
46:53 you all in February so this is where we
46:56 landed with the new criteria
46:58 each one of these has kind of a red
47:01 yellow green threshold and how well the
47:04 projects meet these criteria so we
47:07 looked at the the projects for that six
47:10 year plan we wanted to make sure that
47:12 each of those projects responded to
47:15 these criteria in some way so we have
47:18 you can see them here I don't think I
47:20 need to read them out loud but there is
47:22 more in your packet so if you're
47:23 wondering what those red yellow and
47:25 green thresholds are that's an
47:27 attachment that's in your packet so you
47:28 can take a look at those we will be
47:31 referring to some of the ones
47:32 specifically on Equity this evening and
47:36 um the feedback that we heard especially
47:38 from this board was we had the equity
47:42 criteria way wrong when we first came to
47:44 you which we knew we did so we were very
47:47 happy to have your feedback and
47:49 incorporate that and we'll be talking a
47:52 lot more about that tonight
47:54 any questions on oh I should mention
47:58 um you may recall this last uh criteria
48:01 long-standing commitment that was
48:03 something that our Council really wanted
48:05 us to include in the criteria and so
48:08 they uh they didn't fully Define it
48:12 um we uh don't have a definition for it
48:15 we have a meeting coming up with city
48:17 council where they will be able to
48:20 identify which projects meet this meet
48:24 this criteria so they kind of have a
48:25 better idea of this it's a criteria they
48:27 wanted us to include but they also said
48:29 let us figure it out so we still have
48:32 conversations with Council to to figure
48:34 that out
48:36 um are they aware that we were concerned
48:38 about it yes
48:40 yes
48:43 I have passed on that information I will
48:45 continue to pass it on
48:47 um I think it's I think it's really good
48:49 feedback the concerns I'm from we heard
48:52 from many uh of you in February was that
48:55 this isn't very transparent what does
48:57 this really mean and
48:59 um the city council is going to have a
49:01 public meeting where they talk about
49:02 this in particular so they'll have those
49:04 discussions out in public you can see
49:06 how they're thinking about it
49:08 um I think they're trying
49:10 uh to make it as transparent as possible
49:12 but it's something that has been
49:13 difficult to Define
49:15 um up to this point so they they have
49:18 more conversations coming up about that
49:20 um let me ask one more question about it
49:23 um it's generously that since that's
49:26 more council's purview it's coming at
49:29 the end of a rigorous process that you
49:33 all have done with the other Hearts here
49:35 yet and so that also feels a little bit
49:38 like rigorous process something that's
49:41 coming late that doesn't have the same
49:44 type of Engagement and visibility for
49:47 phones so it feels like
49:50 okay the Optics of you know really
49:54 sketchy I'll just saying language so I
49:57 just want to kind of say that I expect
49:59 we had a lot of conversations I can't
50:01 speak for everybody in the city but we
50:02 had a lot of internal conversations
50:04 about what exactly what it defines
50:07 Equity how do we apply it so
50:09 um there's no right answer sometimes so
50:11 that's why the board in this case is
50:13 very helpful to us to get a second set
50:16 of ISO
50:17 um if you're trying our best but again
50:19 we don't have as much of the broader
50:23 inputs and so
50:25 um really you know there was an effort
50:27 maybe just say that there's a very
50:29 strong effort made and then we want
50:30 products you to get more of that
50:32 information that's why it made some
50:33 changes and yeah and I also um
50:37 the next slide will show this better
50:40 um but city council is adopting this
50:42 document they have uh the ultimate say
50:45 and what's included in the CIP and so
50:48 it's it
50:50 um I'm taking your note down I'm going
50:52 to convey that to council
50:54 um but you know they it's also their
50:56 privilege to be able to change
50:59 um what's in the document anytime
51:00 because that is what they have been
51:03 elected to do so but I I will I'll
51:05 certainly pass that on to them um the
51:07 other thing to note about these criteria
51:09 is that we decided not to wait them uh
51:12 so not one criteria outweighs another
51:15 necessarily
51:17 um but it is it is something that we
51:19 look at where in some cases and we'll
51:22 talk about this a little bit more we do
51:25 have to consider life and safety first
51:27 and foremost and so so and not every it
51:31 just depends on how much of an issue of
51:34 life and safety or what is that legal
51:36 mandate sometimes times it does I'll
51:39 wait some concerns sometimes something
51:42 is a life and safety concern in one year
51:44 but not in another year and
51:47 um you know we think about the black
51:49 nugget wall are you familiar with this
51:50 large wall above Fred fire right
51:53 um you know five years ago no life
51:57 safety concerns with it right
52:00 um 10 years from now if we don't do
52:01 anything maybe we'll start to worry
52:04 about life safety concerns so things
52:06 kind of way differently in different
52:08 years and so my point is when we apply
52:11 these criteria it is much more of an art
52:14 than it is a science
52:15 there are just individual conditions we
52:18 have to consider so we can't necessarily
52:20 uh provide numerical values to these
52:23 things and have it always make sense
52:25 um because we're looking at long-term
52:27 planning then six years and really just
52:29 trying to make sure we're applying them
52:32 right and so because it is an art that's
52:34 why we're here asking you did we get the
52:36 art right
52:37 what's your feedback uh you know is
52:42 there another way that we should be
52:43 looking at this
52:49 so uh we have
52:53 so this is an overview of the CIP as I
52:56 said it's a six-year planning window and
52:59 just in general some themes uh want to
53:01 make sure that you're aware of we have
53:04 more funding for maintenance programs
53:05 than in the past
53:07 um that's something that we have heard
53:09 uh from community and from Council to
53:11 make sure that we are maintaining our
53:13 infrastructure so that is a general
53:15 theme in the CIP
53:18 um this VIP also responds to feedback as
53:21 I mentioned we've heard from the Capital
53:23 Finance Community task force to make
53:25 more investments in our infrastructure
53:27 while also taking extra care to make
53:29 sure that the plan is achievable
53:31 um and the way that we do that is by
53:33 asking for more revenues
53:35 and so this CIP assumes and anticipates
53:39 new revenues for transportation in
53:41 particular We'll be asking for a 0.1
53:45 sales tax to help fund some of our
53:48 transportation needs that's something
53:50 that Council and other uh and we'll be
53:54 discussing a lot more in the future to
53:57 see if we get approval of that but
53:59 that's what we're proposing with this
54:00 dip
54:03 um we also have been looking at our
54:04 Public Safety facilities and so
54:07 um we have a municipal court that is uh
54:11 long past its lifespan that does not
54:13 have modern security uh measures in
54:16 place which we are concerned about
54:19 um we have and that's too small for a
54:22 growing municipality like Issaquah we
54:25 have
54:27 a police department that is only in half
54:31 of the building that it was originally
54:32 intended to occupy and has not increased
54:36 their square feet despite us more than
54:38 doubling in population
54:40 we have
54:42 um we have a fire station we need to
54:45 build in North Issaquah
54:46 and we need to figure out how to fund
54:48 that fire station
54:49 and by North Issaquah I mean just north
54:51 of 90 is where we're looking and so
54:55 um and then parks and trails we've heard
54:56 that we need to invest more in parks and
54:58 trails
54:59 um as well so we have a lot of different
55:01 types of needs and we are trying to
55:03 figure out a way to raise revenues for
55:05 each of these things to meet at least
55:07 some of those needs better
55:11 any questions about any of that
55:17 has there been any talk about what the
55:20 additional possible revenue streams
55:22 could be yeah that because something
55:25 that I have experienced in another city
55:30 is that
55:31 tickets
55:32 has been a revenue stream
55:35 oh I'm hoping that we'll see what this
55:39 is not looking through that matter no no
55:41 no no in fact no we're not
55:45 um we're not uh what we're I I don't
55:49 know that uh tickets would provide for a
55:51 huge amount of Revenue that we're really
55:53 looking for that's going to build us 32
55:55 million dollar fire station
55:57 um but no um it's a good question yes we
56:01 are starting these conversations now
56:02 about what Revenue sources we have and
56:05 the reality is in Washington state we're
56:06 very limited with what Revenue sources
56:09 uh we have as a city and so generally
56:13 the two most common Revenue sources are
56:16 sales tax and property tax and you know
56:20 each have Equity implications frankly
56:23 right absolutely
56:25 um we are limited so we are looking at
56:27 different versions of that that's why I
56:28 mentioned the 0.1 percent sales tax
56:30 already we think that that's a good tool
56:33 for uh transportation funding because
56:36 there's a lot of people who come to
56:37 Issaquah and go to the Costco and access
56:42 goods and services
56:44 um they're all using our our
56:45 transportation infrastructure whether
56:47 they walk bike drive a car ride the bus
56:50 they're all using our transportation
56:52 infrastructure to get to issaquad access
56:54 goods and services in Issaquah
56:56 um so when they buy something that I
56:59 would apply towards sales tax they're
57:01 all also using that transportation
57:03 system so you come up with a system
57:04 where users are helping to pay for the
57:06 infrastructure instead of putting that
57:09 entire Transportation infrastructure
57:11 burden on our residents
57:13 um uh and those who would pay property
57:16 taxes so that's one of the reasons why
57:18 we're proposing uh Transportation sales
57:20 tax
57:21 but property taxes too uh there are some
57:24 property tax forgiveness for low-income
57:27 households and so there's uh there's
57:31 other
57:31 uh considerations for that
57:34 um so we're looking at all of that but
57:37 generally those are the two types of
57:39 Revenue sources that we look at to pay
57:41 for this type of infrastructure
57:43 and the sales tax uh just catch up and
57:46 playing a little bit we estimate at
57:48 least three percent of the sales tax
57:50 comes from non-city of the support
57:52 residents and compared to other cities
57:53 we're more of a hug for retail so we
57:56 have a lot of retail that if you look at
57:57 Cinemas you can look at Stockholm if you
57:59 look at some of our neighbors Newcastle
58:01 they don't have the amount of retail so
58:03 a lot of those people come here to shop
58:04 and like
58:06 Andrea said they they use our roads or
58:08 you look at our daytime population you
58:09 look at the people that are working here
58:10 from REI now from Costco Microsoft
58:14 they're using our roads too they're
58:15 shopping here as well and so
58:18 it the sales tax
58:22 can be Equitable the one thing is with
58:24 sales tax yes it is regressive however
58:28 there's most of the items you buy every
58:30 day if you go to the store and you buy a
58:32 basic that's groceries they're not
58:34 taxable so a lot of the items that you
58:36 are buying on a daily basis are not
58:37 taxable gas is also about subject to
58:40 sales tax that's a fixed excise tax so
58:42 that would not go up with with anything
58:45 that we the specific Council decides to
58:47 add a transportation benefit District
58:49 tax
58:53 earlier but I'm not sure if she still
58:55 does yeah actually you all answered the
58:58 question about the sale because my
59:01 question was going to be about sales tax
59:03 and um essentially I also wanted to ask
59:06 how you would develop buy-in from the
59:09 community because
59:11 um I find that community members often
59:15 don't see the value in those kinds of
59:17 things and feel that it's unfair to tax
59:22 them for uh things like that despite the
59:27 fact that they may benefit from it
59:30 that is a great question and a challenge
59:34 of us as Municipal professionals so
59:38 um the first thing we want to do is have
59:40 a conversation well if you have strong
59:43 feelings we'd love to hear those
59:45 um but then we also need to have that
59:46 conversation with our city council to
59:48 see is this even worth exploring further
59:52 um we're proposing it in the CIP this is
59:54 a starting point for that conversation
59:56 and so if city council says yeah explore
59:58 that further then we need to have a lot
1:00:00 more conversations a lot more Community
1:00:02 conversations about okay well what does
1:00:04 this really look like
1:00:06 um so some of the taxation methods the
1:00:10 revenue generating methods that we have
1:00:12 require uh voter approval
1:00:16 and so nothing's going to get past if
1:00:18 the community isn't behind it right so
1:00:21 we would need to have you know for some
1:00:23 of these Revenue options we would need
1:00:25 to have a lot of community meetings we
1:00:27 would need to have a lot of we'd do
1:00:29 surveys all kinds of Outreach to see how
1:00:32 does the community feel about this what
1:00:34 is the level of Taxation that people are
1:00:36 willing to pay for what amenities do
1:00:40 they want to see what particular project
1:00:43 um no decisions have really been made at
1:00:45 this point this is just the start of the
1:00:47 conversation or these things and we
1:00:50 talked specifically about Transportation
1:00:54 um again back to Andrea's point
1:00:56 we're very limited on revenues weekends
1:00:58 so the city and our staff really
1:01:00 aggressively tries to go for as many
1:01:03 grants as we can get the federal
1:01:04 infrastructure act that came out we're
1:01:06 trying to work with our local lawmakers
1:01:07 so that has the mayor's doing a lot of
1:01:09 work with the National Conference on
1:01:11 Mayors the national league cities to try
1:01:13 to tap into some of those funds for our
1:01:15 projects and also tagging the fact that
1:01:18 we have a lot of Mobility projects we
1:01:20 have a lot of green projects Trails
1:01:23 connections at pedestrian access on our
1:01:25 busy streets here trying to get some
1:01:28 outside funding but absent that the
1:01:30 funding for the state has ruined over
1:01:31 time and if you look at the the gas tax
1:01:34 we get a we get a fixed percentage of
1:01:37 the gas tax excise tax back that you pay
1:01:39 at the on from the state every year it's
1:01:41 been decreasing for the past few years
1:01:43 we've been with the gas prices even when
1:01:45 they go up it's been steadily decreasing
1:01:47 because fuel efficiency is going higher
1:01:50 the state did pass a charge or vehicle
1:01:54 charge for hybrids and electrics yeah
1:01:57 and every year if you have one of those
1:01:58 vehicles that applies you do have to pay
1:02:00 an extra charge to the state however the
1:02:03 city gets receives none of that money
1:02:04 back yeah yeah the state has taken all
1:02:07 of it so that has also decreased our our
1:02:10 excise taxes over time
1:02:15 and Christina also has a question
1:02:19 do you have time for oh
1:02:25 um let's go into Christina first and
1:02:27 we'll go back to you
1:02:31 okay buenos themes you never came
1:02:38 you mentioned that we don't have the
1:02:40 funds like you know you've been saying
1:02:41 about you've been talking about
1:02:48 [Music]
1:02:54 and I was wondering what type of
1:02:57 inclusion is uh from the community
1:03:10 and so I'm thinking uh in my experience
1:03:13 with the school I didn't even know what
1:03:16 a PTA was or what it stood for
1:03:20 cuando estamos
1:03:28 and when we're thinking about money you
1:03:30 know that's what really
1:03:33 um makes the our world go all right
1:03:53 and so why don't we use the uh means
1:03:59 that we have internally with uh the
1:04:04 sustainability uh issues or points that
1:04:08 we already have
1:04:24 perhaps if we look through that
1:04:29 way of thinking maybe we could reduce
1:04:33 cost from the city and that maybe that's
1:04:36 the way we should go about doing this
1:04:39 valorado
1:04:55 I know that in this country uh volunteer
1:04:58 services uh viewed in a very positive
1:05:01 light and I know of different
1:05:03 organizations that have used volunteer
1:05:04 volunteer workers in a very positive way
1:05:08 and then you all are doing that too I
1:05:09 think
1:05:32 and I hope that you take the point the
1:05:35 meaning that I'm trying to say here
1:05:38 because I
1:05:40 I think it helps people I think it helps
1:05:43 it's been helping people to feel better
1:05:45 about themselves and feel more involved
1:05:47 with the community
1:05:49 foreign
1:06:17 to integrate them because sometimes less
1:06:20 is more that's my point is
1:06:32 I've seen people here in our community
1:06:34 that own like beautiful huge houses you
1:06:38 know you could call them mansions and
1:06:40 they're still not uh half happy or
1:06:42 comfortable within the community
1:06:51 where
1:06:56 that's what I'm talking about you know
1:06:58 have that interchange with idea uh be
1:07:02 able to communicate within uh ourselves
1:07:04 with each other and that way we can
1:07:08 achieve the changes that we're seeking
1:07:11 thank you
1:07:19 thank you Christina okay Shay um let's
1:07:21 go ahead and go to you for your question
1:07:25 um yes I wanted to ask if you could
1:07:27 share any other ways you all used to
1:07:30 gain funding aside from taxation
1:07:36 so we can we can talk about that I do
1:07:39 want to make sure that we move on
1:07:40 because we have a lot of other things to
1:07:42 talk about it tonight
1:07:44 um so there's there are uh many ways
1:07:48 that we raise revenues the main ones are
1:07:51 really
1:07:52 um are really property tax and and sales
1:07:55 tax those are our main revenues there's
1:07:57 many others we can go into uh we don't
1:07:59 have time for it all we do also have
1:08:02 um to help fund some of these things
1:08:04 what we're talking about with City
1:08:06 Council next week is to sell SimCity
1:08:08 properties that doesn't require taxation
1:08:11 um we don't have a ton of city property
1:08:13 to sell but we can do that we have some
1:08:17 um we have impact fees so when there is
1:08:20 a development in town
1:08:23 um like with the new Costco headquarters
1:08:25 Costco helped pay for a number of the
1:08:28 roads and Road improvements around their
1:08:30 headquarters Costco pays any new big
1:08:34 development that happens they help pay
1:08:35 for their impacts to the infrastructure
1:08:37 so they'll pay a fee for impacts to
1:08:40 Transportation sewer water
1:08:42 infrastructure
1:08:44 even the use of government facilities to
1:08:46 help support their facilities and so
1:08:50 um so there's different fees that we
1:08:51 charge for development
1:08:54 um you know to use the pool you have to
1:08:55 pay a fee
1:08:57 um so we we charge a lot of different
1:08:59 fees across the city many of those fees
1:09:03 go towards operations of of those
1:09:06 facilities and programs that we offer
1:09:09 when we talk about Capital expenses
1:09:12 these are a big one-time dollars for
1:09:14 certain projects and so
1:09:17 um so there's many ways that we can
1:09:18 raise revenues
1:09:20 um but uh we can when we get further
1:09:23 along like I said in the beginning of
1:09:25 this presentation at this graphic we're
1:09:29 really just at that six-year CIP
1:09:31 planning process so
1:09:34 things are subject to change even within
1:09:37 the six-year Plan and there's a lot more
1:09:39 conversations we need to have about
1:09:41 Revenue so I anticipate coming back here
1:09:43 before we go out to a vote
1:09:46 um you know on any type of package or
1:09:48 anything and making sure that you all
1:09:49 are involved and have the ability to
1:09:51 provide feedback
1:09:52 um but if it's all right I'd like to
1:09:55 move on I do see that there is another
1:09:58 okay but we can check Christina is your
1:10:02 hand up as a new question or comment or
1:10:04 is it left from
1:10:06 the previous comment
1:10:08 it is previous thank you Monica
1:10:11 thank you
1:10:14 Shay I just want to check in did I
1:10:16 answer your questions enough for now yes
1:10:19 yes you did thank you
1:10:21 okay great
1:10:22 great so let's move on to the equity
1:10:25 criteria itself and have a conversation
1:10:27 about that because I really I think that
1:10:30 you have a lot of expertise and
1:10:33 perspective to bring to this and frankly
1:10:35 nobody is going to look at this the way
1:10:36 that you were going to look at it so I
1:10:38 really want to take advantage of your
1:10:40 time tonight here so
1:10:42 um as I said earlier we had those
1:10:45 red yellow green thresholds for what
1:10:48 um for how to apply the equity criteria
1:10:52 and green we've defined as the project
1:10:57 improves Equitable access to services
1:10:59 and amenities for historical
1:11:01 underrepresentative or underserved
1:11:03 residents so we take a look at that
1:11:05 Equity framework that you have developed
1:11:07 and we think about who benefits who is
1:11:10 harmed and if who and so we need to look
1:11:13 at does this improve Equitable access
1:11:18 um to those Services amenities for those
1:11:19 who have been harmed in the past
1:11:23 um that's really what the green is about
1:11:24 so it has to improve
1:11:28 um so when we looked at that and applied
1:11:30 that green criteria there is
1:11:33 um an attachment in your packet that
1:11:35 goes through all the scoring
1:11:37 um for the project so you can see how
1:11:39 different projects scored against the
1:11:41 equity criteria and what was green and
1:11:44 what was red and mug was yellow
1:11:45 and so as we look at the themes from
1:11:48 that process of the projects that made
1:11:51 it into the six-year plan
1:11:53 many of the transportation projects
1:11:56 scored really high in equity and the
1:11:58 reason for that is because we looked at
1:12:00 where are there long-standing
1:12:01 deficiencies in in certain neighborhoods
1:12:04 different parts of town where are these
1:12:06 long-standing deficiencies and how can
1:12:08 we then improve them so that's why some
1:12:10 of the transportation projects scored
1:12:12 high in equity
1:12:15 um and then also a trend skipping to the
1:12:19 last bullet here also a trend is that we
1:12:21 noticed uh that those projects that
1:12:24 scored high in equity also scored high
1:12:27 in community priority and livability and
1:12:30 quality of life and our ability to
1:12:33 deliver those projects and I think that
1:12:35 that's really good because that means
1:12:37 that not only are we trying to correct
1:12:39 deficiencies in our infrastructure
1:12:41 um but and not looking at just gaffes
1:12:44 but also knowing that it's a community
1:12:46 priority it's been adopted in other
1:12:48 plans we talked about those Master plans
1:12:50 at the top of that inverted pyramid and
1:12:54 it's been adopted in those Master plans
1:12:56 it's been something we've heard from the
1:12:57 community is important and they also
1:13:00 score high in equity and so I just
1:13:03 thought that was pretty cool it is and I
1:13:06 also thought and that also leads to more
1:13:08 livability more quality of life I mean
1:13:10 it just makes sense right but it's nice
1:13:13 to see that it all that it all scored
1:13:15 that way and and worked together that
1:13:17 way I feel like that means that we're on
1:13:19 to something good uh and then even
1:13:22 better that I was highly encouraged by
1:13:25 was that these aren't just projects that
1:13:28 are necessarily we think we should do
1:13:30 because they're the right thing we think
1:13:31 we should do because it's a community
1:13:33 part in quality funds we also have a
1:13:34 high ability to deliver on these
1:13:36 projects that means we have grant
1:13:39 funding or other funding for them we
1:13:41 have internal staff capacity to do it
1:13:44 um and so that means that we can turn
1:13:46 them into reality and it's not just
1:13:48 ideas
1:13:50 and so I was very encouraged by that
1:13:52 that all of these things seem to work
1:13:54 together and relate to each other
1:13:57 um I and in particular what I would love
1:14:00 to hear your feedback on tonight is I
1:14:03 believe we took a conservative approach
1:14:05 to scoring uh Park projects in
1:14:07 particular with equity and I'm going to
1:14:09 talk about that so
1:14:11 um Park projects again that definition
1:14:14 of making green a green score means that
1:14:17 they have to directly
1:14:19 improve Equitable access for those who
1:14:22 have been harmed in the past that's
1:14:24 really what we're looking at so to score
1:14:26 granny how to do that and
1:14:28 um for Park projects I think that's a
1:14:31 really high bar and I'll tell you why we
1:14:33 look at uh let's say let's use the
1:14:36 example of the community center the
1:14:38 community center's right outside and
1:14:40 let's say the community center needed a
1:14:41 new room or the pool needed a new roof
1:14:46 um those aren't facilities that are used
1:14:48 by everyone
1:14:49 so it's not particularly target targeted
1:14:52 at somebody who has been harmed but if
1:14:54 we look at fast forward into the future
1:14:56 if we don't maintain the community
1:14:58 center if we don't maintain the pool and
1:15:01 we have to shut these facilities down
1:15:03 who is the most harmed by the lack of
1:15:06 maintenance who is the most harmed by
1:15:08 lack of investment uh people who can't
1:15:11 afford other options people who have
1:15:13 Country Club passes or a vacation home
1:15:17 in Hawaii
1:15:18 whatever they are not the most harmed
1:15:21 it's the people who can cannot afford
1:15:23 other options right and so we didn't we
1:15:28 chose a very conservative approach when
1:15:31 we scored these so park projects like
1:15:33 investments in the community center like
1:15:35 investments in the pool unless they were
1:15:38 improving Ada access
1:15:40 for example we scored them as as yellow
1:15:44 they weren't green up at the top but we
1:15:46 scored them kind of as yellow we'll talk
1:15:48 about yellow projects in a minute but I
1:15:50 wanted to um
1:15:52 as we go to the discussion part of
1:15:54 tonight's agenda I would love to get
1:15:56 your feedback on that are we applying
1:15:58 these criteria correctly do you think
1:16:00 that's the correct lens to not score
1:16:02 those projects as high to have a really
1:16:04 high threshold when we consider how does
1:16:07 this project
1:16:09 how does this project improve at
1:16:11 portable access for those who maybe have
1:16:13 been harmed or could be harmed so I'd
1:16:15 love to hear feedback on that thank you
1:16:18 I don't know if I'm thinking on it in
1:16:19 the right way but for me the park at
1:16:22 improving Community Center is very high
1:16:24 because we are getting a lot more
1:16:26 families that have low socioeconomic
1:16:29 access and because of that they're not
1:16:32 able to access as many sports in the
1:16:36 area so I see a lot of Select teams a
1:16:39 lot of teams that are very expensive
1:16:41 that a lot of our families can't access
1:16:44 using our parks and I'm assuming you're
1:16:47 collecting fees on that to help us but
1:16:49 what I don't see is access for students
1:16:52 who don't have money to use those parks
1:16:56 in the same way because we don't have
1:16:59 things like Boys and Girls Clubs or YMCA
1:17:02 or our community center doesn't have
1:17:04 like Rec teens organized teams and so
1:17:09 I'm struggling a little bit with the
1:17:10 project because I don't see
1:17:12 representation like I get that they you
1:17:15 know yeah those family you're talking
1:17:17 about just general important great space
1:17:19 but you're not talking about concrete
1:17:21 examples where students K-12 can go and
1:17:25 access and get support and that is very
1:17:28 much lacking in my opinion in our city
1:17:31 we have a lot of access for families who
1:17:34 can afford paying for services for that
1:17:39 so I'm looking at it more in that light
1:17:41 so when you're looking at selling City
1:17:43 Properties or you're improving
1:17:46 transportation and Parks I'm hoping that
1:17:49 all of that is also going to improve
1:17:52 transportation and park so that kids can
1:17:54 get to a facility and use that facility
1:17:58 to play games to to build community to
1:18:00 have access to sports also the Park area
1:18:04 like the community center really doesn't
1:18:06 have any before and after school care
1:18:08 services or day care which again is
1:18:11 something I got they
1:18:14 it doesn't feel like it has changed
1:18:15 since my kids approve here we're up here
1:18:18 and now it feels like there's a greater
1:18:20 than me so I I feel like Parks could
1:18:23 score higher if it was looked at through
1:18:26 that list
1:18:30 having like better transportation for
1:18:34 kids after school and more after school
1:18:35 programs dedicated like programming time
1:18:37 at the new say you're building a park
1:18:39 you're setting a set of field what might
1:18:42 be used for an outside third party
1:18:44 sports team you're setting a site for a
1:18:46 couple hours at least for and a facility
1:18:48 for kids to access it and then go home
1:18:51 to the apartments and talents so
1:18:54 somewhere up in you know in different
1:18:57 regions because right now they're very
1:18:59 much trapped to their facility so great
1:19:01 to get transportation to bring them down
1:19:03 to do what what are they going to do
1:19:06 right and so when you bring them down we
1:19:08 have to have give them the ability to
1:19:11 access different spaces what's the point
1:19:14 you know besides that is moiety for
1:19:17 their parents to go grocery shopping but
1:19:19 what can kids do so kids kids 12 per
1:19:22 week especially I walk around I drive
1:19:25 around the highlands and it's downtown I
1:19:28 see a lot of lack of
1:19:31 things to do for kids 6 through 12 and
1:19:34 that is a big concern for me and so when
1:19:36 you talk about Park I want to know what
1:19:38 exactly that means and I see that it
1:19:41 doesn't really impact what I want it to
1:19:45 do for our kids
1:19:47 okay thank you for coming
1:19:49 yeah I I totally see your exam with your
1:19:52 example of the community center like
1:19:54 that criteria might need some tweaking
1:19:57 and so I was trying to think of like
1:19:58 what is the refunding of the criteria
1:20:00 and I wrote this down because I like it
1:20:02 confused to my head so thinking about
1:20:04 what is beef is there a disproportionate
1:20:08 impact to not funding a project and is
1:20:13 it disproportionate impact on the groups
1:20:16 that have been historically
1:20:18 underrepresented or underserved
1:20:24 well for example
1:20:28 thank you thank you Robert do you guys
1:20:30 have time for a few more questions I
1:20:32 think we have we have a few more slides
1:20:35 in fact
1:20:38 so uh yes but I know I know that there's
1:20:40 other things you want to get to so I
1:20:42 don't want to eat up all of your time
1:20:43 but I I love that conversation
1:20:47 for you
1:20:53 okay uh great so
1:20:57 um yellow the project does not so this
1:21:00 is how we've defined that threshold that
1:21:02 yellow threshold project does not
1:21:03 provide benefits or harm to underserved
1:21:06 or historically underrepresented
1:21:07 community members so yellow is kind of
1:21:10 like neutral right it doesn't
1:21:12 specifically help doesn't specifically
1:21:16 and most projects within that six year
1:21:21 overall scored neutral so most of our
1:21:24 projects are kind of neutral this yellow
1:21:26 color but we look at what is in the CIP
1:21:30 and there's a lot of things that our
1:21:32 general government purposes right like
1:21:35 equipment so how how is this bulldozer
1:21:40 itself as a bulldozer
1:21:43 yes you know right
1:21:46 um how how is this uh how's the software
1:21:49 program that helps us manage our
1:21:51 finances
1:21:53 um what's how do we how does that really
1:21:56 have impacts right yes there's all
1:21:58 there's 136 projects on our CIP
1:22:01 um over the next six years not all of
1:22:04 them have that direct impact they're all
1:22:07 necessary for us to run as a city and
1:22:10 serve you but
1:22:12 so so there's a lot of them that were
1:22:14 neutral
1:22:16 um and importantly no project scored red
1:22:19 so so scoring red means
1:22:22 harm doing harm so nope no projects were
1:22:27 included that did any harm from that
1:22:30 Equity lens that's cool so that seems
1:22:33 like a basic
1:22:35 um threshold to establish but I just
1:22:36 wanted to make sure that was there can
1:22:39 we give an example of a project that
1:22:40 scored red was it like maybe a Parks
1:22:43 project that was located in a very
1:22:44 affluent Community or something like
1:22:46 that or what
1:22:48 what would be right
1:22:50 uh I don't think we had any of that
1:22:52 sport read
1:22:56 what would a project let's say like in
1:22:58 the highlands watch what I was happy
1:23:01 though but it isn't
1:23:02 um where the highlands got free Wi-Fi at
1:23:05 Grand Ridge Plaza in my mind I think
1:23:07 that probably should be red
1:23:10 City didn't pay for that oh really oh
1:23:13 okay there we go
1:23:15 so the highlands has their own larger
1:23:19 HOA type organization that provides for
1:23:22 the internet service in the highlands I
1:23:23 would also mention that there are a
1:23:25 number of low-income households in the
1:23:27 island there's a lot of affordable
1:23:29 housing in the highlands so ten thousand
1:23:31 household
1:23:33 there's a lot of affordable housing in
1:23:35 the highlands in fact that's probably
1:23:36 our highest concentration in affordable
1:23:38 housing so so yeah but but the city
1:23:41 didn't didn't pay for that and the other
1:23:44 the other thing is if you consider
1:23:45 investments in uh Central Park in these
1:23:48 violence yeah uh there are many soccer
1:23:51 teams or the community center operates
1:23:55 summer camps right many of them will go
1:23:58 up and use that field so it's not just
1:24:00 for uh the
1:24:03 Mansion uh that live around Central Park
1:24:07 I I know but it it yeah so um but we you
1:24:11 know but we do look at things like okay
1:24:14 the highlands just had a lot of they're
1:24:15 that's a newer Park Central Park is much
1:24:17 newer it's like great investment right
1:24:19 uh than say Tibbetts Valley Park and so
1:24:22 as we look at geographical disparities
1:24:25 areas that have had less investment
1:24:28 um maybe you know we want to focus on
1:24:30 these other parks that haven't had that
1:24:32 recent investment level the way that uh
1:24:34 maybe some of our newer Parks have so
1:24:36 that's also things that we looked at
1:24:38 when we were scoring things are
1:24:40 um where where are those gaps where are
1:24:42 those disparities and let's make sure
1:24:43 we're addressing them thank you yes
1:24:47 um so I'm just gonna scoot up next steps
1:24:51 um where are we in the process so we
1:24:54 refined the criteria uh we use this
1:24:56 criteria to form that CIP
1:24:58 um we're in that black boldened area on
1:25:00 this on this slide so boards are
1:25:02 providing feedback how does our draft
1:25:04 CIP meet the criteria how have we been
1:25:06 applying it any feedback for us
1:25:09 um then we even start next week going to
1:25:11 city council committees to talk about
1:25:15 um the different sections of the CIP so
1:25:17 next week I'm meeting with mobility and
1:25:18 infrastructure Council committee to talk
1:25:20 about Transportation sewer and water
1:25:22 infrastructure
1:25:24 and then the council committees provide
1:25:27 their feedback and then we all get
1:25:28 together at what we affectionately call
1:25:30 the cow meetings they are Committee of
1:25:34 the whole that's what that stands for
1:25:35 it's not uh where we all like little
1:25:39 cows or anything
1:25:41 um so a committee of the whole that's
1:25:43 all of council getting together to
1:25:45 discuss the entire CIP and that's
1:25:46 something we'll talk about
1:25:48 um the whole whole thing together and
1:25:50 then we look at Council adoption we do
1:25:52 have state requirement to adopt
1:25:55 um rcip by July 1st so that's what we're
1:25:58 aiming for trying to meet that state
1:26:00 requirement
1:26:01 and that's the next steps so we've been
1:26:05 having questions throughout I'm going to
1:26:07 ask these questions again for you for
1:26:09 any additional feedback you have to
1:26:11 offer how have we applied this criteria
1:26:13 if there were changes that we should
1:26:15 consider at this point let us know that
1:26:17 those are
1:26:18 um pretty I appreciate the language that
1:26:21 you provided is there a disproportionate
1:26:23 impact of not funding a project and you
1:26:26 know who does that impact really affect
1:26:29 um I'd love to hear other board members
1:26:31 reactions to that language or any other
1:26:33 feedback that you have
1:26:38 I do have a question about the scoring
1:26:42 how has that been
1:26:45 defined like who defines I mean you
1:26:48 engage with the definitions right but
1:26:50 when you're looking at a project who
1:26:52 defines
1:26:53 is there kind of an internal Equity
1:26:56 commission that's saying okay great
1:26:59 project
1:27:00 it's green
1:27:02 uh so
1:27:04 we have
1:27:07 part of that process starts at the very
1:27:09 top of this pyramid
1:27:13 and looking at many of these Master
1:27:15 plans have projects in them that are
1:27:17 suggested so some of that process
1:27:19 happens there
1:27:20 um while we were in this green light
1:27:22 green box here of drafting the CIP that
1:27:26 uh was
1:27:28 first we had the project managers kind
1:27:32 of self-scored they're the ones that are
1:27:33 most familiar with the projects so apply
1:27:37 these different thresholds look at their
1:27:39 scoring then we had
1:27:41 um Robert actually as CFO and the one
1:27:43 who sees all of these projects has more
1:27:46 of an eagle eye view he's not as vested
1:27:49 in any one particular project can make
1:27:53 sure that those criteria
1:27:59 but um
1:28:00 look at it and say okay this person
1:28:02 really is this the right way of scoring
1:28:04 this project yeah I'm not so sure they
1:28:07 might have inflated the score let's
1:28:08 let's talk about it right and so and so
1:28:12 Robert was able to just take a look at
1:28:14 all of 136 projects and make sure that
1:28:17 we're applying these things equally and
1:28:19 that power replying that makes sense and
1:28:21 so working internally to do that
1:28:24 and then uh so that was kind of our
1:28:27 internal process and now we're at that
1:28:29 external process of going to four boards
1:28:32 to see
1:28:34 did we do a good job did we are the
1:28:37 things we should change what do you
1:28:38 think
1:28:39 okay thank you thank you it's kind of
1:28:42 scared me when you said the project
1:28:43 managers just did yeah I'm a project
1:28:45 manager by trade originally yeah project
1:28:47 yeah it's great yeah let's go yeah yeah
1:28:49 I scored in everything yeah exactly no
1:28:52 there was there was some there was some
1:28:54 critique applied and just well wait a
1:28:56 second are we sure and you know there
1:28:58 there was still the the thought of
1:29:01 um it's it's a starting place looking at
1:29:05 these criteria and thinking okay
1:29:08 um you know how we apply them uh and
1:29:11 then what what can we do right so
1:29:14 how do I don't know what they're called
1:29:17 in the city but how do the program
1:29:18 managers
1:29:20 right uh do they get do they have
1:29:23 influence in this process so for example
1:29:26 who's the person in charge of the
1:29:28 programs for parts and Rec right how do
1:29:30 they influence because that goes to your
1:29:33 question when they
1:29:36 you know if if they look at it and they
1:29:38 say I'm not so sure the roof matters
1:29:40 because we don't have kids that fellow
1:29:42 showing up right or we have plans to do
1:29:46 you know more work in
1:29:49 in the pool with you know expanding to
1:29:53 who but we're going to need uh buses to
1:29:55 get the kids here
1:29:56 right I'm trying to say so so there's
1:29:59 like these great ideas up here but the
1:30:02 people who fill that are they involved
1:30:05 in this process
1:30:07 uh we had a couple of levels
1:30:12 levels first and and these these
1:30:15 projects aren't just projects we invent
1:30:17 right out of thin air right they're
1:30:19 Guided by a larger Community process and
1:30:22 we created those Master plans yeah and
1:30:24 so so it's not just like somebody coming
1:30:26 along because
1:30:28 um one person called them up on the
1:30:30 phone one day and said you should make
1:30:31 this investment right that's not how it
1:30:32 happens but
1:30:34 um so we have the project managers take
1:30:36 these plans and look at okay uh you know
1:30:40 this uh for whatever reason makes sense
1:30:43 to do within the next six years so they
1:30:45 they make the proposal and then uh we
1:30:48 have a larger team sift through those
1:30:51 proposals and say okay
1:30:54 looking at the criteria again and how
1:30:56 they apply them looking at
1:30:59 um what's our capacity to do what do we
1:31:01 have grant funding to do what do we
1:31:03 think we can get grant funding to do
1:31:06 um and and then uh the feedback from the
1:31:09 Capital Finance Community task force uh
1:31:12 Etc so all those things are kind of
1:31:13 combined with this other internal team
1:31:15 to form what's in that six year plan
1:31:19 did that answer your question
1:31:22 so there's a lot of people internally
1:31:23 that are involved and then the oversight
1:31:26 happens that's it there's a lot of
1:31:28 people internally that are involved and
1:31:30 then the oversight happens when we meet
1:31:31 with you so we've met with the park
1:31:33 board we've met with the transportation
1:31:35 Advisory Board
1:31:36 um we're meeting with you next week we
1:31:38 meet with the environmental board and
1:31:40 then City Council so there's a large
1:31:43 public process a lot of ability for
1:31:46 public oversight over the projects that
1:31:48 are selected right
1:31:51 I did have one
1:31:53 quick um
1:31:54 the where we talk about areas within
1:31:57 Issaquah there was a focus on the
1:31:59 highlands I would never have guessed
1:32:00 that there's there's
1:32:02 um Financial issues up there you know
1:32:05 things like that so is there data that's
1:32:08 that's able to segregate different areas
1:32:10 within our city that we can
1:32:13 like Talus as another example
1:32:16 there is an affordable housing there's a
1:32:19 number of units of affordable housing in
1:32:21 Dallas as well so that might help um
1:32:23 from a strategy perspective like the
1:32:25 State Transportation
1:32:27 um if there's not efficient
1:32:28 transportation in these areas that have
1:32:29 low income housing letting the United
1:32:31 line so we can apply it absolutely is it
1:32:34 absolutely is so um we have an idea of
1:32:36 where these affordable housing projects
1:32:38 are that we know are tax subsidized that
1:32:41 were part of like a development
1:32:43 agreement between the developer and the
1:32:46 um and then we have census data that we
1:32:48 can look at by census lock or census
1:32:51 trap to show us incomes because you know
1:32:54 could be maybe you live in a fancy house
1:32:57 but maybe you inherited it from somebody
1:32:58 and you don't actually make a lot of
1:33:00 money right so we have you never know
1:33:03 um so we have census data to also help
1:33:05 guide our decision making and that's we
1:33:07 use them for our programs um and where
1:33:10 we uh think about Transportation or
1:33:12 other other type of services and
1:33:14 District City define specific regions I
1:33:16 just mentioned two of them but how is
1:33:18 how does the city separate regions is it
1:33:21 we have neighborhoods neighbors so we
1:33:23 have defined neighborhoods in the city
1:33:25 and then on our website there's a
1:33:27 neighborhood map showing how our
1:33:29 neighborhoods have been defined but even
1:33:30 within a neighborhood there can be great
1:33:32 diversity like in the highlands is a
1:33:34 great example and so
1:33:36 um that's when we rely on census data
1:33:38 and known uh uh public housing projects
1:33:43 but also I mean there's me even like in
1:33:46 the areas the least expected it could be
1:33:48 in a senior own fixed their club we have
1:33:52 a lot more multi-generational households
1:33:54 yeah and especially with the cost of
1:33:56 living rights we've receive more and
1:33:58 more of that and that's where students
1:33:59 to State it really helps
1:34:05 it's for you or Monica or someone else
1:34:08 but can I get a sense of like what the
1:34:11 criteria were and 136 projects
1:34:16 yes so in your packet tonight there is a
1:34:19 link to the criteria and the definitions
1:34:22 um I think that's the last uh item
1:34:25 that's linked in your packet so you can
1:34:27 take a look at that then uh there is
1:34:30 also in your packet a list of all the
1:34:33 projects and how they were evaluated
1:34:36 against those criteria there's also a
1:34:38 list of project summaries so all that
1:34:41 information is there in your in your
1:34:43 packet we also because we just posted
1:34:46 the CIP actually if you go to the
1:34:49 Issaquah website in the search bar right
1:34:52 Capital Improvement plan or CIP our
1:34:55 proposed CIP will will show up in the
1:34:57 search results as well so if you wanted
1:34:58 to see it all as that much more polished
1:35:00 document that's all together we that's
1:35:03 available as well but the information
1:35:04 you're seeking is is uh in your packet
1:35:06 thank you
1:35:08 thank you I feel like this one is really
1:35:10 well thought of it's using a lot of the
1:35:13 data because I I remember when I was
1:35:15 survey where that's the community and I
1:35:18 see that reflected in this work and so
1:35:20 for me Community input the promise chart
1:35:22 is always important and I say that it
1:35:25 definitely seemed like it's starting
1:35:29 invented and so I appreciate all of the
1:35:33 because part of our conversations has
1:35:36 always been are they looking at
1:35:38 different perceptions and different
1:35:40 viewpoints and I see that in your
1:35:42 presentation
1:35:44 thank you thank you
1:35:48 are there any questions online
1:35:51 all right so no questions online
1:35:55 okay so um I would love to talk about
1:35:59 next steps
1:36:04 I will take the feedback that you've
1:36:06 provided in your comments tonight uh and
1:36:09 provide them to city council uh in by
1:36:12 upcoming meetings with them so I'd love
1:36:15 to include that as part of
1:36:17 um my presentation and written materials
1:36:19 for them and unless this board feels
1:36:23 strongly that you want to communicate
1:36:25 with them directly and you'd prefer to
1:36:26 write a letter
1:36:28 um so I I want to help facilitate your
1:36:31 feedback as best as I can I don't want
1:36:33 to dictate how you speak to council but
1:36:36 I'm happy to just if it's okay with you
1:36:39 if it's easiest for you I will I've
1:36:41 taken your comments down and I can
1:36:42 convey them to Counsel on your behalf
1:36:45 that sounds fun to me everyone in the
1:36:47 room in agreement okay all right great
1:36:50 well thank you so much for your your
1:36:53 attention tonight we went over a lot and
1:36:56 all of your questions I love questions
1:36:58 and feedback so really thank you for
1:37:01 your time and I just appreciate you all
1:37:04 here and the way that you're helping
1:37:06 contribute to the city thank you thank
1:37:08 you today
1:37:15 so our next item on the agenda today is
1:37:18 the well actually next time is the Apple
1:37:21 grading for our next item on the
1:37:22 experience is the board processes and
1:37:24 chair slash Vice chairs selection
1:37:27 percentage Highmark
1:37:30 thank you so much Tony so board members
1:37:33 um it looks like um we are okay on time
1:37:36 so if you feel like you still have
1:37:37 energy we can go on I wasn't sure and I
1:37:40 still would like to ask the question uh
1:37:43 we didn't research on the item I have
1:37:46 um two items actually so board processes
1:37:49 it was what I talked earlier in in the
1:37:52 meaning about the public members uh
1:37:55 comments that I wanted to discuss with
1:37:57 you a little bit so that I would
1:37:59 estimate it probably takes us 5-10
1:38:01 minutes and then this is May this is
1:38:04 your first
1:38:06 um pretty
1:38:08 um I think so we didn't skip that that
1:38:10 agenda item is just an informational
1:38:12 item in your packet you don't have a
1:38:15 formal presentation for that I'm gonna
1:38:17 jump a little bit to to what you said
1:38:19 you skip so comprehensive plan overview
1:38:21 in your agenda packet you have a memo
1:38:24 from from our staff uh the manager
1:38:27 Stephen Padua uh it's just an
1:38:29 informational item for you uh he didn't
1:38:31 have any questions he's working they are
1:38:33 still working on a lot of preparations
1:38:35 and they are scheduled to come to you as
1:38:37 a board for actual feedback and input
1:38:39 and the meeting in August so for now it
1:38:42 was just like an overview we are
1:38:43 starting to work on it we don't have any
1:38:45 questions or anything substantial to you
1:38:48 uh but they will return in August so
1:38:51 that's that yes
1:38:53 um okay so going down to the next agenda
1:38:55 item so I have about 5-10 minutes to
1:38:57 talk about a input receipts from our
1:38:59 community member and also this is the
1:39:01 month of May so this is uh the first
1:39:04 time we have terms uh end and expiry in
1:39:06 April in may we have new terms and also
1:39:09 that's the time when we select new chair
1:39:11 and vice chair so if the time permits
1:39:13 and you're ready for that would love to
1:39:14 have that conversation probably it's
1:39:16 gonna take 10-15 minutes
1:39:18 um if you don't feel as a board that you
1:39:19 have the time and energy we can always
1:39:21 postpone it for next month but let's see
1:39:23 how it goes with that
1:39:26 okay so fourth process I wanted to talk
1:39:30 uh in an actual agenda item because I
1:39:32 wanted to hear ideas and comments from
1:39:34 you but I I spoke with a resident uh
1:39:38 Connie Marsh you may remember uh Connie
1:39:40 was also here a couple of months ago
1:39:42 presenting and then she occasionally
1:39:44 provides input via email in my
1:39:46 conversation with her uh about the
1:39:50 um a Communications toolkit she said
1:39:54 that she also had a suggestion for you
1:39:56 as a board and I thought it was very
1:39:58 intriguing and I found it actually very
1:39:59 helpful so I said oh let me talk to
1:40:01 board because I don't think they're
1:40:02 going to be very open to that
1:40:04 um so and she gave the example as what
1:40:08 happened at that meeting with the
1:40:09 communication toolkit uh brief summary
1:40:12 we had Thomas he joined he presented uh
1:40:15 he had a presentation he had formal
1:40:17 questions for you feedback and then the
1:40:19 item ended and Thomas left after Thomas
1:40:22 left you as a board continued the
1:40:25 conversation about the item and you told
1:40:27 me to engage with commas from a public
1:40:30 perspective and from a Public's meeting
1:40:32 um uh issue this was the issue that
1:40:34 Connie brought up and she said it's not
1:40:37 right it's not fair it's not Equitable
1:40:39 if you have a comment or feedback to
1:40:42 someone you should do it while they are
1:40:44 present in the room and you should
1:40:46 discuss it at the item when the item
1:40:48 ends you should move to the next item in
1:40:50 it's you shouldn't have further
1:40:52 conversation so I thought I'd bring this
1:40:55 up to you I know typically you are open
1:40:57 to ideas and suggestions but I realized
1:40:59 that it sometimes happens that in in you
1:41:02 I don't think intentionally but I did
1:41:04 notice that sometimes it happens in our
1:41:06 board meetings that we have we have an
1:41:08 agenda item we talk about it people
1:41:10 leave and then oh let's talk about it
1:41:12 again and and we probably should be more
1:41:15 careful as a board not to do that so
1:41:18 do you have any thoughts concerns or
1:41:20 comments about that anything that
1:41:22 I think I lean into doing it because I
1:41:25 feel like before I voice my opinion I
1:41:27 want to hear what the other members of
1:41:30 the board are doing and so the question
1:41:31 I guess for me to learn is it's doesn't
1:41:35 mean that everyone in the Board needs to
1:41:37 be in agreement that is just my thoughts
1:41:40 I lean too because I think this meeting
1:41:42 today and I think also with Stephanie I
1:41:45 think we discussed more clearly with
1:41:48 them right and one of my thoughts when
1:41:50 we didn't have any conversation about
1:41:52 what they presented after they left but
1:41:55 I think
1:41:56 in our younger days as a board I think
1:41:59 we were still learning and at least for
1:42:01 me I didn't feel like I could post
1:42:04 questions and concerns but I completely
1:42:06 hear um I feel like we we are doing that
1:42:10 and we did that last meeting and this is
1:42:12 yeah and thank you and that's a very
1:42:14 valid question and you're absolutely
1:42:15 right this and sometimes it is a
1:42:17 struggle because sometimes I hear
1:42:19 and you're absolutely right if you make
1:42:21 a recommendation as uh you should be in
1:42:24 agreement as a board right so then if
1:42:26 let's say
1:42:28 um pretty made the suggestion earlier to
1:42:30 Andrea right about reframing you know in
1:42:32 an Ideal World it February you as board
1:42:35 you should have a conversation and say
1:42:37 are you all in agreement with this
1:42:39 proposal right or if let's say one of
1:42:41 you asks hey Monica can you add this to
1:42:44 the agenda item I will be looking at all
1:42:46 of you to say are you all in agreement
1:42:47 right so you as an individual member can
1:42:50 make suggestions but you always would
1:42:52 want to kind of like have formally a
1:42:54 kind of like agreement from most of you
1:42:56 uh but yes do and I'm so glad you're
1:42:59 absolutely right I think as you grow and
1:43:01 continue to grow as a board you do feel
1:43:02 more comfortable with whoever is in the
1:43:04 room to look at your fellow members and
1:43:06 say okay uh how are we doing and having
1:43:09 that conversation with with the guest in
1:43:11 the room right so yeah
1:43:15 I also want to reiterate that it's
1:43:18 important sometimes for us to voice
1:43:20 different opinions so that the community
1:43:23 hears maybe a lesser heard voice
1:43:28 you know being spoken and then discussed
1:43:31 right so
1:43:34 I think it's important as long as it yes
1:43:37 it's important and that's why for what I
1:43:39 said it's not that you always need to be
1:43:40 in agreement for any type of feedback
1:43:42 you're absolutely right on that right so
1:43:44 I I hear that I think it's just when you
1:43:47 make a recommendation as a board
1:43:50 I think at least that's a discussion you
1:43:52 would want to make sure that even if
1:43:54 let's say you continue to disagree that
1:43:57 I'm not sure
1:43:59 but at least others heard you I guess I
1:44:02 don't know you know sometimes for me I
1:44:03 feel like to guess like just leave kind
1:44:06 of abruptly at least for me and so
1:44:09 sometimes I need a little more time like
1:44:12 right now like a prime example was when
1:44:16 we were talking about
1:44:18 um the virtual non-virtual policy that
1:44:22 we came up with right like I I didn't
1:44:25 want to interrupt mayor Paulie but she
1:44:28 was also facing in that direction and so
1:44:30 she kind of just left and so but I felt
1:44:33 like what I needed to say still needed
1:44:35 to be said right like I I wouldn't have
1:44:37 been okay with myself had I not stated
1:44:40 what I stated right and so it happened
1:44:43 after she left but I also didn't you
1:44:46 I honestly don't know how I could have
1:44:48 done it differently
1:44:50 so yeah I'll have to look back to when a
1:44:53 police chief polish Vaughn was here I
1:44:56 honestly don't think I could have had a
1:44:57 conversation with her no
1:44:59 so I think there are going to be times
1:45:02 for us to discuss a little bit more and
1:45:05 they can come back because just to get
1:45:08 hard thinking on that like because we're
1:45:11 processing but I feel like we were also
1:45:13 processing
1:45:15 with each other and just thinking of our
1:45:18 thinking and it is a recorded thing so
1:45:21 we could have them back and like
1:45:23 continue having the discussion because
1:45:25 or they could just sit there for the 20
1:45:28 minutes and have the conversation like
1:45:30 as we did the conversation yeah but
1:45:32 would you be open as a board to just
1:45:36 even voice those concerns in the moment
1:45:38 to say either like to either ask them
1:45:41 hey we need a little bit time to process
1:45:43 you're welcome to stay or can we just
1:45:45 come back next month to you or can we
1:45:47 follow up uh or yeah so just like you
1:45:50 know just just address address the time
1:45:53 that you need more time
1:45:55 um right because all of those valid
1:45:58 points
1:45:59 kind of the communication presentation I
1:46:01 remember two things happened at once we
1:46:02 got the email about communication and it
1:46:04 presented all and say to everyone wait
1:46:07 now we're seeing an exact example of
1:46:09 what you're talking about and so then I
1:46:12 think we are hopefully going to be able
1:46:15 to talk to the people and I'd be like we
1:46:17 did at this meeting in the previous
1:46:18 meetings we're learning and we can do
1:46:20 better I think that's a good point and
1:46:23 that I don't feel comfortable if
1:46:24 someone's okay we just need a little one
1:46:26 more meeting and then get down
1:46:29 yeah can you just hang on what we could
1:46:31 have talked to each other and you and
1:46:33 that's one question
1:46:34 and also to also your um
1:46:37 Lucrezia
1:46:40 as as the board grows and us different
1:46:43 departments who bring in items I've been
1:46:46 trying to work with them to make sure
1:46:47 that they always have a clear goal and
1:46:50 purpose for for what they want to ask
1:46:53 from you so they have clear questions
1:46:55 ahead of time at the end so it's also
1:46:57 clear for you as a board and knowing
1:47:00 like okay what's being asked from you
1:47:02 but that also like you're right there
1:47:04 are times when like oh on my drive home
1:47:07 in the evening at nine o'clock I still
1:47:09 have an idea so at least there's always
1:47:10 gonna be that option and possibility to
1:47:13 have some sort of follow-up right and
1:47:15 check I see your hand up there
1:47:19 yes thank you
1:47:20 um I just wanted to say too I think that
1:47:23 sometimes our guests get hung up on the
1:47:27 um and although I know time is important
1:47:29 to all of us and we all want to leave on
1:47:31 um I think it's important for them to
1:47:33 understand that
1:47:35 um in some instances we can go over
1:47:38 um there are options to move times
1:47:40 further back if need be or move
1:47:42 conversations further back and
1:47:45 we often have a buffer that they may not
1:47:48 be aware of
1:47:50 um so maybe encouraging them to stay a
1:47:54 little bit longer or give us some
1:47:55 opportunities to kind of go through uh
1:47:58 our our thinking processes might
1:48:00 encourage them to not leave so abruptly
1:48:03 and not run away from us before we have
1:48:05 a chance to really kind of dig into what
1:48:07 they're asking about
1:48:15 this comes up for me pretty often when
1:48:17 we uh reflect on Equity related topics
1:48:20 is that at first there's like this just
1:48:25 weird feeling like something's not
1:48:27 Landing right and it just takes time to
1:48:30 unpack what it is and you don't always
1:48:33 know if it's gonna
1:48:34 um if you're going to be able to
1:48:36 articulate what's giving or what's for
1:48:39 me it's like what's causing me I mean
1:48:40 CPL and that could be 20 minutes later
1:48:43 or it could be you know evidence meeting
1:48:45 or yeah shower you know who knows right
1:48:48 so I think there's some of that
1:48:50 for me but I do appreciate with that and
1:48:53 yeah I'll be happy for someone it does
1:48:56 mainland
1:48:58 not very respectable to be talking about
1:49:01 it after the box so I think we should
1:49:02 try that
1:49:04 figure out how to even if it's later to
1:49:08 be able to provide that feedback to the
1:49:09 individuals
1:49:10 okay so thank you thank you for that
1:49:13 great conversation I just yeah
1:49:16 um I I thought that would share this
1:49:18 video and
1:49:19 um always appreciating comments from
1:49:21 from residents and sometimes they come
1:49:24 up with great ideas that's what you
1:49:25 didn't think about them
1:49:27 okay so next uh selection of chair and
1:49:31 vice chair so
1:49:34 um Shane has been serving uh as the
1:49:37 chair of the board uh and Tony has been
1:49:41 serving as the advisor of the board
1:49:43 um so much heart and and work and
1:49:45 commitment put into this
1:49:48 um moving forward say has maternity lead
1:49:51 coming out for a few months uh it's just
1:49:55 expecting uh uh quite soon in a few
1:49:59 weeks now right how many more weeks five
1:50:02 weeks left six weeks six weeks a little
1:50:06 baby boy
1:50:08 congratulations congratulations thank
1:50:19 he of course he's gonna stay as a board
1:50:21 member she's probably going to be
1:50:23 attending virtually more often uh uh but
1:50:27 she expressed that she would love to
1:50:30 um provide an opportunity for others
1:50:32 just to step in uh as chairs there might
1:50:34 be others who are interested and have
1:50:38 the time commitment have a chance to
1:50:40 talk with Tony
1:50:41 uh Tony is uh also very busy but very
1:50:45 open to remain as a vice chair uh don't
1:50:49 wanna I was gonna say feel free go ahead
1:50:51 go ahead
1:50:53 um I mean I guess you know obviously the
1:50:55 obvious thing would be possibly a vice
1:50:57 chair moving into chair unfortunately I
1:51:00 don't have the bandwidth
1:51:02 um to do that with my current job and my
1:51:05 family commitments
1:51:07 um so uh I would like to remain on his
1:51:10 last year but if someone would like to
1:51:11 actually step up into my room hey
1:51:18 but I will not be moving into a chair
1:51:24 um so thank you and so with with all of
1:51:26 that said board members
1:51:31 so if you're ready and interested like
1:51:33 the process is
1:51:35 um we open the floor to nominate or
1:51:39 um a chair you can nominate yourself uh
1:51:43 you can nominate someone else
1:51:46 um and then we might have more than one
1:51:49 nomination let's say if you have three
1:51:52 members nominating three people then you
1:51:54 would have a discussion on that and and
1:51:57 uh once you feel like you're ready for
1:52:00 voting you can formally take a vote or
1:52:03 just have an agreement amongst
1:52:05 yourselves you don't need to use the
1:52:08 actual voting system
1:52:10 and then we would do the same for a vice
1:52:13 chair position
1:52:16 so I have two questions
1:52:18 um can you remind me Monica
1:52:22 um if when a seat is vacated if the
1:52:27 alternates are brought into that seat
1:52:30 that is vacated or do they remain as the
1:52:33 alternates for the remainder of their
1:52:35 tenure
1:52:36 or how does that work and is this for
1:52:38 General members in general correct yes
1:52:41 very good question so actually with that
1:52:44 I'm glad that you brought it up because
1:52:45 we did have some changes in in seeds uh
1:52:48 in the previous terms Kelly and pretty
1:52:50 were alternate members uh as both of
1:52:54 their terms expired
1:52:56 um and we had a transition
1:52:59 um Elisa as a regular member left
1:53:02 um pretty was moved and into a regular
1:53:04 position
1:53:06 um Kelly remained into an alternate role
1:53:10 Karthik coming in
1:53:13 um as just brand new then he took
1:53:15 pretties
1:53:17 role as an alternate thank you that's
1:53:21 the new
1:53:22 configuration or the alternate positions
1:53:25 and regular members so that's great
1:53:27 because and great question because it
1:53:29 impacts typically alternate members
1:53:32 cannot serve internship or vice chairs
1:53:35 and then my second question is is there
1:53:38 anyone in the room or online who would
1:53:42 not like to serve as a chair or vice
1:53:45 chair so that we don't nominate someone
1:53:47 who just doesn't have the time doesn't
1:53:49 want to do it that sort of thing
1:53:52 think I would like to take myself
1:54:00 anyone else
1:54:02 Christina
1:54:07 yeah me neither thank you
1:54:17 that was really funny
1:54:25 well I would like to try if you want to
1:54:28 try Spanish but sometimes just just
1:54:32 joking thank you
1:54:37 so without any other questions board
1:54:40 numbers before we open the floor for a
1:54:42 nomination yes there's are there missing
1:54:44 remember
1:54:46 Heaven is missing
1:54:48 and I think that's it that's it yeah
1:54:51 wish you an excuse me
1:54:54 um well it doesn't matter I don't think
1:55:00 so can we nominate now
1:55:02 um yes if you don't have other questions
1:55:04 yes please start nominations yes I'd
1:55:06 like to nominate Richie for for chair
1:55:10 thank you we have a nomination for
1:55:12 praying for a chair anyone else
1:55:14 before we need to also ask uh pretty if
1:55:17 she'll uh accept the nomination
1:55:20 yes okay thank you say
1:55:25 um I also nominate Preeti for chair
1:55:29 thank you shay
1:55:31 we have two nominations for preview
1:55:34 any other nominations or any other
1:55:36 discussion if there are no other
1:55:38 nominations I was actually going to
1:55:40 Second the knowledge
1:55:43 not there yet
1:55:46 open the air it's like I'm pretty okay
1:55:53 it's already been nominated I've never
1:55:55 attended on the nominated
1:55:57 or two yeah
1:56:00 okay right would you like to accept the
1:56:02 nomination I respectfully decline do you
1:56:10 any other nominations before we go to
1:56:13 Second and discussion I guess or
1:56:15 actually we should have had a second
1:56:18 Christina
1:56:20 I would like to nominate to Kelly
1:56:29 okay see this respectfully declined
1:56:33 Christine Hansard
1:56:36 okay so we have
1:56:39 any other nominations before this
1:56:41 or second
1:56:45 the jet building is the Korean
1:56:49 okay so I think we do need to have a
1:56:51 second we probably should have had the
1:56:52 second before discussion but yeah second
1:56:54 and then discussion or I need to just
1:56:57 point out yeah
1:56:59 [Laughter]
1:57:02 athletic
1:57:06 further discussion that's needed or
1:57:09 anything else before you are you all in
1:57:11 agreement or I'll just make a comment I
1:57:13 I really appreciate that these um
1:57:16 thoughts input research and perseverance
1:57:19 in many of the discussions and so that
1:57:23 was one of the committed success
1:57:31 and I would like to say one thing as
1:57:33 well so um yeah I was really just kind
1:57:36 of up in the air for who should I choose
1:57:37 and I I it's not that everyone's really
1:57:40 that everyone's not connected in every
1:57:42 meeting but I'm kind of a watcher and I
1:57:44 learned I picked it up in my military
1:57:45 background and I always sleep quickly
1:57:48 and Rey just so connected to what's
1:57:50 going on so like intelligent on their
1:57:53 questions and their comments and whatnot
1:57:55 so I have the utmost confidence
1:57:58 that uh I I will take for these
1:58:01 leadership and um and serve you well as
1:58:05 your co-chair
1:58:08 if you accept them
1:58:11 selves yeah I just wanted to say that
1:58:14 since I'm So Into You I'm gonna abstain
1:58:16 from Omni not because I don't think
1:58:20 people are worthy of being nominated or
1:58:23 just that I don't know people so and if
1:58:25 you don't interpret that it's like
1:58:27 always
1:58:33 thank you
1:58:37 okay board members any other comments
1:58:38 before you move on to voting or just the
1:58:42 green however you would like to build
1:58:43 and Define voting
1:58:46 other comments okay
1:58:48 so everyone in agreements that pretty
1:58:52 can serve as the next year for the next
1:58:54 year bye
1:58:59 anyone opposed
1:59:03 Antonio post congratulations
1:59:17 thank you for staying on the check yes
1:59:20 you're welcome it's my pleasure
1:59:23 so the formal process of the vice chair
1:59:25 would be to open it also for nominations
1:59:27 is everyone in agreement with we can
1:59:29 also just just ask for earnings opposed
1:59:33 to let's just go downstair
1:59:45 congratulations Tony thank you so much
1:59:47 for continuing
1:59:52 looking forward to working
1:59:56 oh I appreciate y'all that was nice and
1:59:58 smooth I can't believe we are you know I
2:00:01 thought we would be like 8 30 already so
2:00:02 you're only about 803 uh we have two
2:00:06 more agenda items not big it's just a
2:00:08 brief staff report
2:00:10 um and then other business and
2:00:12 announcements just basically we can
2:00:13 update you on juneteen events I guess so
2:00:16 I think in two minutes or less we can be
2:00:18 done if that's okay work
2:00:26 you know what I didn't put it on the
2:00:28 agenda because the agenda was so full uh
2:00:31 but if you have if you want to we can do
2:00:34 it impromptu a little bit to provide it
2:00:36 with update if not I was thinking just
2:00:37 have a further along uh but yes please
2:00:40 write pretty Alyssa and I have been
2:00:42 working and unless I have been killing a
2:00:44 lot of work uh although she's no longer
2:00:47 on the board on on the reporting Hayden
2:00:49 bias project that you are
2:00:50 self-identified as a work plan item so
2:00:53 then hopefully with a little bit more
2:00:54 time we'll have a lengthier conversation
2:00:57 hopefully next month and and provide you
2:00:59 an update on where we are and even just
2:01:01 some questions for you yeah
2:01:04 um a quick brief updates from mayor and
2:01:06 city council this is where typically is
2:01:08 to come and tell you like what else
2:01:09 that's Human Services related Equity
2:01:12 um related on in our department uh we've
2:01:16 been taking to city council I do have a
2:01:18 few Human Services updates uh for you
2:01:21 um uh as I uh I know that I updated you
2:01:25 last week actually do I have from my
2:01:27 sick because it's just that week has
2:01:28 passed
2:01:31 we just recently I have something to do
2:01:33 that if we went to city council so we
2:01:35 are going back to City Council on May 15
2:01:39 to formal receipt adjustments to the
2:01:40 Motel 6 project the emergency housing
2:01:43 project on that last week so actually
2:01:45 I'm good with updates
2:01:47 [Laughter]
2:01:57 I can tell you we are now in the
2:02:00 interview process for to Seeker Staffing
2:02:03 for for that project so I'm very very
2:02:05 excited
2:02:07 thanks to HR staff we've working really
2:02:10 fast and having some pixie depth
2:02:14 um and so we also had a great
2:02:15 conversation in the past five days with
2:02:17 some of you uh Tony Shay Lorna
2:02:21 I feel like there's someone else from
2:02:22 like a short that she was sharing with
2:02:25 the meeting sure from the school
2:02:26 district we have uh it wasn't another
2:02:29 Equity board member I feel like there
2:02:31 was someone else we were talking about a
2:02:33 pride event we were also talking about
2:02:34 the private events so Rey is has been
2:02:37 taking a lead on the pride event both
2:02:39 coming up for June
2:02:42 um you're right and so you and I still
2:02:43 need to connect on that
2:02:46 um but on the June teens we so we have a
2:02:49 small working group uh working on
2:02:52 hopefully a Juneteenth event
2:02:57 schedule tentatively for extra June 19th
2:03:00 uh I heard back the community center
2:03:03 might be an option for the event so
2:03:05 working out through those details uh we
2:03:08 are meeting now weekly to
2:03:11 um to really work out the details of the
2:03:15 event and as a board we will update you
2:03:17 and we have more substantial
2:03:19 um so it sounds like it's going to be
2:03:21 June 19th between four to six or five to
2:03:24 seven so in the afternoon
2:03:26 at the community center and we're
2:03:29 looking at having some performances some
2:03:33 students either coming to dancing things
2:03:37 food trucks
2:03:40 I know we have talked about having
2:03:42 something like a silent auction but I'm
2:03:45 not sure if that's even possible because
2:03:46 we would be I mean that'd be more of a
2:03:49 question for you Monica because as
2:03:50 always maybe obviously these staffers
2:03:52 we've been taking it as a monetary
2:03:53 amounts for this I'm not sure
2:03:56 the way she were planning it out for
2:03:58 last year was that
2:04:01 was the very information but if the art
2:04:04 let's say the artist who was gonna
2:04:06 present their art to to have Silent
2:04:08 Action or whoever was going to donate
2:04:10 items they were gonna be there they
2:04:12 could just facilitate directly this way
2:04:13 so we don't as a city staff we wouldn't
2:04:16 take money but so there's a way to work
2:04:18 around that if you want and so I did
2:04:20 reach out to the artist that uh um
2:04:23 provided the Arts last year and so they
2:04:26 are working around their schedule they
2:04:28 were invited at another juneteen event
2:04:29 so they're gonna see what works out but
2:04:31 yeah that sounds great absolutely and I
2:04:34 know that uh Ray rightfully so
2:04:37 um was the lead last year in a pride
2:04:40 month event we had a great panel virtual
2:04:42 panel conversation and you had some some
2:04:46 conversations already with with
2:04:48 potential other the same yeah yeah I
2:04:52 I've reached out to a few folks and I
2:04:54 really wanted to be another robust
2:04:57 uh online event so um I think I need to
2:05:00 talk to you a little bit further I have
2:05:01 some folks from last year who have not
2:05:04 been able to connect to but I know I
2:05:06 just found out that there is a um
2:05:08 Community event next door at the garage
2:05:12 btq which I plan to go to it's next
2:05:15 Wednesday May 10th and I would like a
2:05:17 youth in this panel
2:05:19 um I really feel like we need that voice
2:05:21 I think we had one last year but um I'd
2:05:23 like to work on that a little bit more
2:05:24 so you know there's a lot of stuff going
2:05:27 on in the lgbtqi community these days
2:05:30 that I think work and I would recommend
2:05:32 because it always feels very full youth
2:05:35 to be on a panel it can be scary and so
2:05:38 usually we recommend having at least two
2:05:40 or three so then they have yeah
2:05:43 absolutely yeah yeah and a sense of
2:05:45 community for our students is always
2:05:47 okay for in fact I had a note to check
2:05:49 in on with you video connection with the
2:05:51 school if you had a recommendation I
2:05:53 think starting with the garage is great
2:05:54 but uh this for high school and I'm sure
2:05:57 I know several other high schools you
2:05:59 can contact the principles and see look
2:06:01 up the advisor like okay we can find
2:06:03 that to find out for the advisors yeah
2:06:06 for those clubs and see if any of them
2:06:10 want to participate but really
2:06:12 importantly is to share the fact that
2:06:14 there's an event
2:06:16 so we have to pick a date yes so once
2:06:19 you have that just you know getting that
2:06:22 information to the schools to those Club
2:06:24 advisors so that they shared in school
2:06:25 and at the same time asking the students
2:06:28 if they're interested
2:06:30 in fact the one of the panelists Monica
2:06:32 which do I work with you on that to
2:06:34 narrow this date down yeah
2:06:36 okay and even now after the meeting if
2:06:39 you have five ten minutes I think it can
2:06:40 go a long way okay let's see that
2:06:43 started out last year that's really
2:06:45 powerful and I know the the youth uh
2:06:48 person there was amazing yes thank you
2:06:58 we are yes all right so
2:07:02 um let's go to our endurance so uh thank
2:07:04 you everyone for joining online we
2:07:06 appreciate your attention your comments
2:07:09 your questions and uh just staying
2:07:12 connected with us thank you very much
2:07:13 Jay and Christina thank you very much to
2:07:15 our interpreters we always appreciate
2:07:17 everything you do to keep us all
2:07:20 connected with each other so thank you
2:07:21 very much so on behalf of everyone in
2:07:24 the room I consider this meeting adjourn
2:07:26 our next scheduled meeting is currently
2:07:28 scheduled for June 7
2:07:29 2023. all right we'll see everyone in
2:07:32 our next meeting have a great night talk
2:07:34 to you soon
2:07:36 foreign