Transportation Advisory Board Special Meeting · Monday, March 25, 2019 · City Council Digest

1. CALL TO ORDER

Commission Membership

packet pp.3

Open packet at p.3 ↗

Staff report:

Transportation Advisory Board About Created in 2017, this board — yet to be Staff Liaison initiated — will provide additional expertise and Stephen Padua, advice on the City’s transportation system and Senior Transportation Manager goals. Email Membership Regular Members The Transportation Advisory Board will be 2020 – Cynthia Krass comprised of nine regular members, and up to 2020 – Kyle Ochs three alternates. Initial terms will be staggered. 2021 – Tom McDonald All members are appointed by the Mayor and 2021 – Nina Milligan subject to confirmation by the City Council. Terms 2021 – Kobi Sunday* expire April 30 of the year listed. For more 2022 – Sujata Goel information, see IMC 2.92. 2022 – Stephanie Salemann 2023 – AJ McGauley 2023 – Marisol Visser

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

Minutes of February 6, 2019

packet pp.5–6

▶ Watch from 0:40 Open packet at p.5 ↗

Staff report:

a) Introductions, (I) Presented by: Stephen Padua, Senior Transportation Planner Kurt Seeman, Transportation Manager Sheldon Lynne, Public Works Engineering Director

Minutes of February 25, 2019

packet pp.7–8

▶ Watch from 1:00 Open packet at p.7 ↗

Staff report:

a) Group Exercise, (I) Presented by: Stephen Padua, Senior Transportation Planner

Minutes of March 12, 2019

packet pp.9–10

▶ Watch from 1:20 Open packet at p.9 ↗

Staff report:

a) Public Records Act and Open Public Meetings Acts, (I) Presented by: Tina Eggers, City Clerk

4. AGENDA ITEMS

Chair Vote

Director · 10 min · Stephen Padua, Senior Transportation Planner Sheldon Lynne, Public Works Engineering · packet pp.11–13

▶ Watch from 42:20 Open packet at p.11 ↗

Staff report:

Public Works Engineering 1775 – 12th Ave NW | P.O. Box 1307 Issaquah, WA 98027 425-837-3400 issaquahwa.gov

Strategic Plan Survey

Information · 20 min · Bennett Ashbaugh, Public Works Streets Operations Manager · packet pp.15–54

▶ Watch from 46:24 Open packet at p.15 ↗

Staff report:

AGENDA ITEMS b) ISSAQUAH STRATEGIC PLAN Page 15 of 76 Board & Commission Presentation • Focus and alignment on vision and strategy • Community-based priorities GOALS FOR • More strategic decision- STRATEGIC making PLANNING • Bridge near term actions with long-term vision • Better use of performance metrics

Rules and Regulations

Action · 20 min · Stephen Padua, Senior Transportation Planner Tina Eggers, City Clerk · packet pp.55–60

▶ Watch from 54:32 Open packet at p.55 ↗

Staff report:

Table of Contents ARTICLE I – BOARD NAME _____________________________________________________________ 2 ARTICLE II – MEMBERSHIP _____________________________________________________________ 2 ARTICLE III – OFFICERS AND DUTIES______________________________________________________ 2 SECTION 1: OFFICERS _______________________________________________________ 2 SECTION 2: CHAIR __________________________________________________________ 2 SECTION 3: VICE-CHAIR _____________________________________________________ 3 SECTION 4: SUPPORT STAFF __________________________________________________ 3 ARTILE IV – MEETINGS ________________________________________________________________ 3 SECTION 1: REGULAR MEETINGS ______________________________________________ 3 SECTION 2: SPECIAL MEETINGS _______________________________________________ 3 SECTION 3: QUORUM…

Mobility Master Plan Intro

Discussion · 35 min · Stephen Padua, Senior Transportation Planner · packet pp.61–76

Topics: Transportation

▶ Watch from 1:02:40 Open packet at p.61 ↗

Staff report:

 Project Schedule  Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) Engagement  Community Engagement

5. REPORTS

Staff Report

Chair's Report

Youth Report

6. OTHER BUSINESS / ANNOUNCEMENTS

The next meeting is currently scheduled for April 8, 2019 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers

▶ Watch from 1:16:53

1745 segments .txt ↗

0:20 ↗ all right everyone we're gonna go ahead

0:22 ↗ and get started

0:24 ↗ all to order where Marcel called in sick

0:27 ↗ she got that weird bug that was getting

0:30 ↗ around so Maddie you were the first one

0:33 ↗ through the door so you're gonna fill in

0:34 ↗ for today first item for us is the

0:40 ↗ approval of minutes that everybody get a

0:41 ↗ chance to take a look at that any edits

0:45 ↗ other than the ones I already received

0:47 ↗ via email okay the way the voting

0:52 ↗ procedures will work is I will ask for a

0:54 ↗ motion and one of the members will move

0:57 ↗ to approve the minutes and I'll ask for

1:00 ↗ a second motion and another member will

1:02 ↗ second and then we'll go to a vote okay

1:05 ↗ we have a motion I'll move to approve

1:12 ↗ the minutes okay second second all right

1:20 ↗ all those in favor of approving the

1:22 ↗ minutes say aye all those opposed Hey

1:34 ↗ and it's very proved for first action

1:37 ↗ everybody congratulations second item

1:39 ↗ that we have is public comment do we

1:41 ↗ have public comment today

1:54 ↗ very fine okay my name is Connie Marsh

1:57 ↗ and I live up on squawk I suppose three

2:05 ↗ points first one is going to be a little

2:08 ↗ bit about strategic plan second is the

2:12 ↗ presentation on the master mobility plan

2:16 ↗ I'm a little confused but I don't get to

2:18 ↗ speak after the presentation so I'm

2:20 ↗ going to speak about it now and then the

2:23 ↗ next one is the cities the city that I

2:28 ↗ prefer they gave you a different option

2:30 ↗ from varieties of cities okay so we're

2:32 ↗ going to start with this strategic plan

2:34 ↗ I don't know if everyone is done there's

2:37 ↗ this their survey but you will notice in

2:40 ↗ the mobility area that the sort of

2:43 ↗ actions are counting right we are going

2:48 ↗ to count how many people do this or that

2:52 ↗ now just counting might inform you of

2:56 ↗ what's happening but it doesn't give you

3:00 ↗ a decision tool for change what you need

3:03 ↗ is you need a goal that you're trying to

3:07 ↗ get to and then you count to see how

3:10 ↗ you're doing toward that goal I'm

3:13 ↗ hopeful that the master mobility plan

3:15 ↗ will actually give you those goals but

3:17 ↗ the way the strategic plan is written

3:19 ↗ you're successful if you count and if

3:22 ↗ you're just counting after five years I

3:25 ↗ don't think you're getting there

3:26 ↗ are you getting towards something so

3:29 ↗ that would be if you haven't done the

3:31 ↗ survey if you can tickle that in your

3:33 ↗ brain now the presentation for the

3:36 ↗ master mobility plan has sort of a line

3:39 ↗ like this with funding like five boxes

3:45 ↗ downstream and funding because of the

3:49 ↗ way the state has sort of set up the

3:51 ↗ system that it's easier to get capital

3:53 ↗ funding rather than it is service

3:56 ↗ funding your maintenance funding funding

3:58 ↗ seems to swirl all through your plans

4:02 ↗ you can make as many priorities as you

4:04 ↗ want to but if you have no capacity

4:07 ↗ to fund those priorities then you might

4:09 ↗ just be spitting in the wind so I would

4:12 ↗ prefer to see sort of a circle that

4:14 ↗ would allow more of a weaving and not a

4:19 ↗ time order now it may be that that is

4:22 ↗ the intent and it just came across as a

4:24 ↗ line but I haven't seen the presentation

4:26 ↗ yet to comment on so I don't know and if

4:29 ↗ this sounds like gibberish to you it's

4:31 ↗ basically all decisions would be spiking

4:35 ↗ out from one another having to look at

4:37 ↗ all the component parts instead of

4:39 ↗ making your decisions saying we decided

4:42 ↗ then then moving on and saying oh how do

4:44 ↗ we fund that and you say it's not

4:45 ↗ possible and you start over so I'm

4:47 ↗ trying to to get rid of that and then

4:50 ↗ the last one is Kirkland and I can tell

4:53 ↗ you why because Kirkland has said

4:55 ↗ congestion is here to stay and we must

4:58 ↗ accept the fact that we cannot build our

5:00 ↗ way out of congestion and we want to

5:03 ↗ accommodate cars and make it as good as

5:05 ↗ we can but we are not going to make it

5:07 ↗ so you can get through town quickly ever

5:10 ↗ again and I think that is the moment

5:13 ↗ that our town has to get to before we

5:16 ↗ can start making reasonable decisions

5:19 ↗ Kirkland has already already been

5:20 ↗ through it our community is not there

5:22 ↗ half of them say you can't build your

5:24 ↗ way out half of them say you can and to

5:27 ↗ me that is the crux of the conversation

5:30 ↗ that you would have and that is why I

5:32 ↗ would consider Kirkland to be the best

5:38 ↗ manual so to speak ok that's it thank

5:41 ↗ you ok thank you honey

5:45 ↗ if you don't mind could you fill in the

5:47 ↗ sign-in sheet at the front just so we

5:49 ↗ have it on all right thank you all right

5:55 ↗ for our next item we have our chair is

6:03 ↗ everybody been able to read the letters

6:06 ↗ of acceptance ok we have to make this

6:10 ↗ easy we have one nomination for each

6:13 ↗ position and to make the official we

6:16 ↗ still have to go through a boat so we

6:18 ↗ will go through the boat unless

6:20 ↗ any questions about that okay oh do I

6:25 ↗ have a motion on I'm sorry we're gonna

6:29 ↗ first vote on the chair position AJ has

6:31 ↗ been nominated and accepted the position

6:35 ↗ do we have any questions about that I

6:38 ↗ have a motion so moved

6:44 ↗ okay no second I can't great all of

6:48 ↗ those in favor of voting AJ as a chair

6:51 ↗ say hi turning off AJ congratulations

7:00 ↗ thank you you want to take it over and

7:03 ↗ get started for vice-chair yeah sir so

7:05 ↗ can we have a motion to vote on what on

7:08 ↗ the vice chair so moved

7:12 ↗ if a second second okay if there's no

7:17 ↗ further comments we'll go ahead and vote

7:19 ↗ so all in favor of Nena as in the vote

7:33 ↗ passes graduation designer as I

7:38 ↗ apologize we will move on to the next

7:42 ↗ item in the agenda which is the streets

7:44 ↗ strategic plan serve him

7:50 ↗ I think you're just down to just the

7:54 ↗ gray pronounced oil was that this is the

7:59 ↗ great printout right yeah

8:06 ↗ good evening can you hear me

8:09 ↗ I got a duck down a little bit not

8:20 ↗ better all right well thank you for

8:23 ↗ having me my name is Bennett Ashbaugh I

8:25 ↗ am Public Works operations streets

8:28 ↗ manager I was part of the original

8:32 ↗ strategic plan team that got together to

8:36 ↗ start putting this this whole process

8:38 ↗ together so I'm one of the

8:40 ↗ representatives from that team and

8:42 ↗ basically we're going to do a I'm here

8:45 ↗ to present what's included in the

8:47 ↗ strategic draft the draft strategic plan

8:50 ↗ which is now out for community review

8:52 ↗ this presentation will cover three areas

8:55 ↗ I'll provide an overview of what's in

8:58 ↗ the draft strategic plan we also talked

9:00 ↗ briefly about community engagement and

9:02 ↗ how we can get involved and finally the

9:05 ↗ next steps in the strategic plan process

9:10 ↗ work on the strategic plan started over

9:13 ↗ a year ago we established some key goals

9:17 ↗ that would help the city make a more

9:19 ↗ strategic approach to our work

9:21 ↗ they include provide a clear vision and

9:24 ↗ a strategy of how to achieve that vision

9:27 ↗ at its core the strategic plan wanted to

9:30 ↗ work from community priorities it is

9:35 ↗ seeking to strengthen the city's ability

9:36 ↗ to make deliberate forward-looking and

9:38 ↗ informed strategic decisions allowing

9:42 ↗ for near-term actions which can be

9:44 ↗ understood with a strategic context

9:47 ↗ increasing the use of metrics and

9:50 ↗ performance indicators to regularly

9:52 ↗ gauge processes and better inform

9:54 ↗ decision making and ultimately the

9:58 ↗ strategic plan is an important means of

10:00 ↗ communicating to the communicating to

10:02 ↗ the community

10:04 ↗ about the public's plans and how they

10:06 ↗ will work to meet community goals and

10:08 ↗ aspirations because community priorities

10:14 ↗ are so critical to this plan we started

10:17 ↗ with a broad community-wide engagement

10:18 ↗ process to gather a wide range of

10:21 ↗ thoughts and perspectives from all

10:23 ↗ corners of the community we established

10:27 ↗ both qualitative and quantitative goals

10:29 ↗ and checked in on our progress

10:32 ↗ throughout the initial engagement

10:33 ↗ process this slide shows the internal

10:38 ↗ progress report which we monitored on a

10:40 ↗ weekly basis and adjust our strategy

10:42 ↗ accordingly a part of the approach was

10:46 ↗ to check back with the community

10:48 ↗ throughout the process to date we've

10:50 ↗ Reese receives 1,650 responses this

10:55 ↗ presentation is a continuation of this

10:57 ↗ process to check back on this draft

11:00 ↗ strategic plan early community

11:05 ↗ engagement last March and April shaped

11:07 ↗ our vision mission and guiding

11:09 ↗ principles and helped to identify our

11:12 ↗ strategic priorities the draft vision

11:15 ↗ that came out of this process is ASA

11:18 ↗ quads as a welcoming community creating

11:20 ↗ a sustainable legacy for future

11:22 ↗ generation that honors its rich history

11:24 ↗ and passion for the natural environment

11:28 ↗ we will now get on to the plan itself

11:31 ↗ and explain a little about the parts and

11:34 ↗ pieces and how they interact this was is

11:38 ↗ a plan on the page that is included in

11:42 ↗ the draft plan it details vision mission

11:45 ↗ and guiding principles the center

11:48 ↗ graphic shows our six strategic

11:51 ↗ priorities that were identified through

11:53 ↗ community input outside consultant

11:56 ↗ expertise staff senior leadership and

11:59 ↗ then council review and refinement the

12:03 ↗ bottom of the page lists six goals one

12:06 ↗ for each priority area the goal

12:08 ↗ statements represent a future condition

12:11 ↗ and and are an intermediate step towards

12:15 ↗ achieving the vision

12:17 ↗ the objectives are the building blocks

12:20 ↗ of the plan and describe the key

12:21 ↗ outcomes that need to be achieved in

12:23 ↗ order to make progress toward the goal

12:25 ↗ the potential actions are meant to

12:28 ↗ illustrate that work that could be

12:31 ↗ undertaken to make progress on on the

12:34 ↗ objectives the success measures are

12:36 ↗ meant to help gauge progress in each of

12:39 ↗ the goal areas move going forward as you

12:42 ↗ will see the plan covers a lot of topics

12:44 ↗ but not everything the city does the

12:47 ↗ plan will help focus on the cities will

12:50 ↗ help focus the city's work over the next

12:52 ↗ five years but it does not mean we won't

12:54 ↗ be doing other important work in the

12:57 ↗ city such as police services so we have

13:02 ↗ our six strategic areas we have mobility

13:04 ↗ growth and development social and

13:07 ↗ economic vitality city leadership and

13:09 ↗ services and infrastructure first one

13:14 ↗ we'll get into is mobility the goal

13:19 ↗ statement is getting around town it's

13:21 ↗ easier for people who work live and play

13:23 ↗ here traffic affects many aspects of

13:28 ↗ life in Issaquah alright Benny you might

13:30 ↗ have to cover this so these so this is

13:33 ↗ the goal statements that we've already

13:36 ↗ developed we're seeking feedback on okay

13:39 ↗ so this so these pages you're walking

13:40 ↗ into these aren't new this is this is

13:42 ↗ the as is this is the draft plan that

13:46 ↗ has been through Council and has been

13:49 ↗ sent out for community response and

13:53 ↗ staff response and everybody who we can

13:56 ↗ get to respond and provide their input

13:58 ↗ so there is a survey out where each of

14:02 ↗ these categories mobility growth and

14:04 ↗ development etc you can read through

14:08 ↗ them and provide input based on how you

14:12 ↗ feel about them yes so the key elements

14:19 ↗ of mobility traffic affects many aspects

14:21 ↗ of life in Issaquah as we all know

14:23 ↗ future growth in and around Issaquah is

14:26 ↗ not going anywhere it's it's going to

14:28 ↗ continue to get higher

14:31 ↗ we want consideration for multiple modes

14:34 ↗ of travel focus on moving ahead with

14:37 ↗ plans for transportation system

14:39 ↗ improvements our objectives are centered

14:44 ↗ around a plan for the overall

14:45 ↗ transportation system is in place along

14:50 ↗ with funding secured to allow for major

14:53 ↗ projects to proceed near-term measures

14:57 ↗ make connections and improve

15:00 ↗ efficiencies in the existing system not

15:03 ↗ just about planning and preparation but

15:05 ↗ near-term action the vision and location

15:10 ↗ for Light Rail is established which

15:13 ↗ recognizes the strategic importance of

15:15 ↗ light rail some performance measures for

15:19 ↗ key performance measures of an outline

15:21 ↗ travel mode share system connectivity

15:24 ↗ system access and community satisfaction

15:31 ↗ under each of these objectives as you

15:34 ↗ can see on the slide there are potential

15:36 ↗ actions as well growth and development

15:43 ↗ growth is proactively managed planned

15:46 ↗ and communicated in a responsible way

15:48 ↗ that retains our strong sense of

15:51 ↗ community and livability some of the key

15:55 ↗ elements of this this area are rapid

16:00 ↗ growth and desirable community policies

16:05 ↗ such as growth and management act

16:06 ↗ directly influence how much we're

16:08 ↗ required to grow City choosing to

16:12 ↗ protect hillsides and neighborhoods and

16:14 ↗ focus on growth on the valley floor as

16:17 ↗ growth occurs protecting the community's

16:21 ↗ character and providing amenities

16:22 ↗ housing choices and services is

16:24 ↗ important for key objectives maintaining

16:30 ↗ neighborhood character and putting

16:31 ↗ protections in place effective

16:34 ↗ implementation of plans with proactive

16:35 ↗ adjustments with emphasis on livability

16:38 ↗ and balancing of jobs and housing

16:41 ↗ infrastructure planning for growth

16:43 ↗ working to increase the availability of

16:46 ↗ public amenities housing options and

16:48 ↗ services towards a more complete City

16:50 ↗ for a community of our size performance

16:54 ↗ measures balance growth ratio jobs

16:56 ↗ housing relative to plan growth

16:58 ↗ community livability infrastructure

17:02 ↗ investment growth related sorry could

17:07 ↗ you repeat those four again sure the

17:10 ↗ four objectives maintaining neighborhood

17:14 ↗ character and putting protections in

17:16 ↗ place effective implementation of plans

17:19 ↗ with proactive adjustments with emphasis

17:22 ↗ on livability and balancing of jobs and

17:25 ↗ housing infrastructure plan planning for

17:29 ↗ growth working to increase the

17:32 ↗ availability of public amenities housing

17:35 ↗ options and services towards a more

17:37 ↗ complete City for a community of our

17:40 ↗ size how does the the first goal that

17:46 ↗ maintaining character reconcile with the

17:50 ↗ with the growth center well isn't the

17:53 ↗ intent of the urban core to change the

17:58 ↗ urban core to change on the valley floor

18:00 ↗ and central Issaquah isn't the intent

18:03 ↗ that over the next couple decades the

18:04 ↗ character of that neighborhood will

18:05 ↗ change there has there is a zone of

18:09 ↗ central Issaquah that has been

18:10 ↗ identified as our urban growth area

18:13 ↗ which is where the focus will be for

18:16 ↗ growth right so there the way they are

18:19 ↗ looking at is two different ways there's

18:21 ↗ the character exists now but there is

18:23 ↗ the character that kind of the vision

18:25 ↗ looks at for what the area is going to

18:28 ↗ look like 20 years from now and so the

18:30 ↗ vision for this is aiming for that

18:32 ↗ future vision so the character versus

18:34 ↗ central area is going to change in terms

18:37 ↗ of if you compare now to 20 years from

18:39 ↗ now yes that will change but for a lot

18:42 ↗ of the surrounding neighborhoods the

18:43 ↗ idea is since the growth isn't gonna be

18:45 ↗ going in those areas but more in the

18:46 ↗ central area okay does that answer your

18:48 ↗ question yes okay

18:50 ↗ yes ma'am I had a general question about

18:53 ↗ the document and the part that has

18:56 ↗ success measures and they identify what

18:59 ↗ sort of thing they're measuring but not

19:01 ↗ how much would success how much is

19:05 ↗ success and when does that come into

19:08 ↗ play do you know how we define success

19:11 ↗ yeah well under it's a success measures

19:13 ↗ and certain things that you're gonna

19:14 ↗ measure but it doesn't say it's as a

19:16 ↗ percentage of this will be that or what

19:18 ↗ is that percentage does that come in

19:21 ↗ that I think that those measures will be

19:24 ↗ more defined as we move into the final

19:26 ↗ versions of these plan in this plan as

19:30 ↗ this is as we get feedback back from the

19:34 ↗ community this still needs to be able to

19:38 ↗ morph a little bit that's why we have

19:40 ↗ potential actions verse we're going to

19:43 ↗ do this we're not there yet we're still

19:46 ↗ in draft form this is still area for you

19:49 ↗ to be able to provide that feedback and

19:51 ↗ and the survey is really a great place

19:53 ↗ to do it is this venue here also

19:55 ↗ supposed to be an opportunity for

19:56 ↗ feedback in some senses it's more of a

20:00 ↗ presentation but I'm happy to answer

20:02 ↗ what I can any questions you have on so

20:07 ↗ and it was I'm on the mobility team

20:09 ↗ talking through the mobility section of

20:11 ↗ the strategic plan we probably can

20:13 ↗ answer the questions on the other

20:14 ↗ sections but we can write those

20:17 ↗ questions sounds get those answers back

20:19 ↗ to you okay yeah absolutely

20:21 ↗ so we all had focus areas can we then

20:26 ↗ bounce back to the mobility I know we

20:27 ↗ looked at it but there's a lot there so

20:29 ↗ I think giving it could I go could I

20:31 ↗ finish this and then we'll go back okay

20:33 ↗ could we do could we just get through

20:35 ↗ the just the general areas and I'll go

20:37 ↗ back to mobility traffic at all so thank

20:42 ↗ you we've got three growth and

20:45 ↗ development kind of right environmental

20:49 ↗ stewardship environmental resources are

20:54 ↗ proactively enhanced protected and

20:55 ↗ stewarded some of the key elements of

20:58 ↗ this this area our environment is a

21:01 ↗ defining feature for Issaquah

21:04 ↗ natural settings strong community

21:06 ↗ environmental values engagement of

21:08 ↗ community development of partnerships to

21:11 ↗ steward the Issaquah environment and

21:12 ↗ land acquisition for preservation and

21:15 ↗ recreation three objectives protection

21:20 ↗ and enhancement stewardship activities

21:24 ↗ partner partnerships and work with the

21:27 ↗ community strategic acquisition for

21:30 ↗ parks trails open space critical areas

21:32 ↗ flood protection etc performance

21:36 ↗ measures forest health and development

21:40 ↗ Natural Area restoration protection

21:43 ↗ lands restored and protected salmon

21:47 ↗ habitat health community stewardship

21:56 ↗ social and economic vitality an economic

22:00 ↗ and economically vital and diverse

22:02 ↗ community is is supported by robust

22:04 ↗ businesses affordable housing and

22:06 ↗ supportive services some of the key

22:09 ↗ elements of this this area is

22:12 ↗ residential growth outpacing job

22:14 ↗ creation housing affordability hard for

22:17 ↗ people who work in Issaquah to afford

22:19 ↗ housing in the community likewise more

22:23 ↗ jobs that provide the ability to live

22:25 ↗ and work in the community more

22:27 ↗ businesses to support more services

22:30 ↗ improved access to supportive services

22:33 ↗ increased possibilities to live work and

22:36 ↗ thrive in town four objectives increase

22:42 ↗ in range of living wage jobs in Issaquah

22:46 ↗ housing affordability across an income

22:49 ↗ across the income range increase live

22:52 ↗ and work in Issaquah services to reduce

22:57 ↗ inequities in health and well-being

22:59 ↗ increase in new businesses and retention

23:02 ↗ expansion of existing businesses

23:04 ↗ performance measures would be job growth

23:07 ↗ business growth housing cost burden and

23:11 ↗ access to support services supportive

23:14 ↗ services

23:16 ↗ two more city leadership and services

23:23 ↗ leadership and accountability in the

23:25 ↗ delivery of public services for our

23:27 ↗ growing and diversifying community key

23:30 ↗ elements community is becoming more

23:32 ↗ diverse good engagement diverse methods

23:35 ↗ clear communication must be well

23:38 ↗ integrated in the city processes service

23:41 ↗ delivery investment into internal

23:43 ↗ operations and systems to better deliver

23:45 ↗ services and focus on continuous

23:48 ↗ improvement to objectives equitable and

23:53 ↗ a welcoming welcoming city government

23:56 ↗ fostering meaning full engagement

23:59 ↗ utilizing high-performing systems for

24:02 ↗ effective and efficient service delivery

24:04 ↗ there's two success measures community

24:07 ↗ satisfaction and community engagement

24:12 ↗ last but not least last of the six is

24:16 ↗ infrastructure and infrastructure their

24:20 ↗ goal statement is an infrastructure

24:22 ↗ system that is planned designed built

24:24 ↗ and well maintained supports current and

24:26 ↗ future community needs some of the key

24:30 ↗ elements of this this area

24:32 ↗ infrastructure provides underpinnings

24:34 ↗ the underpinnings of local economic

24:37 ↗ vitality environment and daily lives

24:39 ↗ city has leveraged growth but it needs

24:42 ↗ to shift focus and consider not just

24:44 ↗ expansion but also ongoing maintenance

24:46 ↗ and replacement plan for recent growth

24:49 ↗ and planned and a planned future

24:53 ↗ objectives one key objective but it is

24:55 ↗ significant basically put plans and

25:00 ↗ resources into place to operate maintain

25:02 ↗ and replace infrastructure throughout

25:04 ↗ its lifecycle effective asset management

25:07 ↗ policy to manage portfolio streets to

25:10 ↗ manage the portfolio streets utilities

25:12 ↗ buildings and parks the performance

25:15 ↗ measure is an asset and maintenance

25:16 ↗ deferral rate

25:23 ↗ the plan concludes with an

25:25 ↗ implementation framework that's

25:26 ↗ described that describes tools for

25:28 ↗ success and an overall framework for the

25:30 ↗ strategic plan since this is the first

25:33 ↗ strategic plan for Issaquah describing a

25:36 ↗ disciplined approach to implementation

25:37 ↗ helps to outline expectations and

25:40 ↗ provide avenues for making changes there

25:43 ↗ are three components to this framework

25:44 ↗ strategic plan work critical services

25:47 ↗ work plan and timely opportunities the

25:51 ↗ city has many lines of businesses and

25:53 ↗ ongoing necessary functions the

25:56 ↗ framework recognizes there is work for

25:58 ↗ the city that will align with a

25:59 ↗ strategic plan but there is other work

26:03 ↗ there's other work that meets critical

26:06 ↗ needs and that are also emergent needs

26:09 ↗ and opportunities that arise this

26:13 ↗ includes five key criteria to help

26:16 ↗ assess the relative favorability and

26:18 ↗ timing of our particular actions the

26:21 ↗ graphic depicts an annual calendar

26:23 ↗ connecting strategic planning with the

26:25 ↗ budget process it provides an avenue for

26:28 ↗ adjustment deliberation on current

26:30 ↗ issues it includes a period for

26:32 ↗ reporting out to the community on

26:34 ↗ progress and increases accountability in

26:37 ↗ the plan overall it follows a scientific

26:39 ↗ process of planning doing evaluating and

26:41 ↗ adjusting plan do check a just and

26:44 ↗ establishes continuous improvement at a

26:47 ↗ central tenant of the strategic plan and

26:49 ↗ the organization more broadly we are now

26:53 ↗ seeking input from the community on

26:55 ↗ overall strategic plan as well as the

26:57 ↗ goal area objectives and collecting of

27:00 ↗ potential actions we have looped back

27:03 ↗ with many of the people who participate

27:04 ↗ in the process thus far including survey

27:07 ↗ respondents focus groups meeting in a

27:09 ↗ box Charette participants and community

27:11 ↗ members we're collecting feedback

27:14 ↗ through an online survey survey found on

27:16 ↗ the city's web page the survey is open

27:18 ↗ until March 31st and we'd like to hear

27:21 ↗ your input City Council be reviewing

27:24 ↗ this feedback in April and will be

27:25 ↗ moving toward adoption of the plan in

27:27 ↗ May now let's go back to mobility I

27:40 ↗ think before I jump in I'll open up the

27:43 ↗ rest to you guys if you want asking

27:44 ↗ questions I think well I think we'll try

27:49 ↗ to do is again to stick your hand up or

27:51 ↗ stick your thing on your side any

27:55 ↗ questions I'm gonna be stick with what

27:57 ↗ we've done before we'll turn those sites

27:58 ↗ who are consistent sounds good

28:08 ↗ so I will I will start one thing so I

28:12 ↗ know you guys can tell I'm excited

28:15 ↗ so one thing so like for instance this

28:16 ↗ talks a lot about transit and light rail

28:19 ↗ and whatnot which is great is it going

28:22 ↗ to talk specifically around motor

28:24 ↗ vehicle circulation or is that intended

28:26 ↗ to be implied since that's still the way

28:30 ↗ most people are going to move around are

28:32 ↗ you referring to what what exactly

28:35 ↗ referring to look at like the the

28:37 ↗ specific actions it talks about transit

28:40 ↗ plan bike plan uh-huh

28:44 ↗ can you make friends is a good example

28:46 ↗ would be like what are gonna do with I

28:47 ↗ nineteen what are we gonna do with high

28:49 ↗ ninety yeah and so one cuz when we did

28:51 ↗ when we did our strategic planning for

28:53 ↗ Central in Sequoia we talked about how

28:54 ↗ one of the one of our vision statements

28:57 ↗ was we wanted I 90 to be more permeable

28:59 ↗ the idea that there would be more ways

29:01 ↗ to get across i-90 mmm-hmm both both

29:04 ↗ vehicle and non vehicle would that be

29:06 ↗ the kind of thing that would show up in

29:08 ↗ a document like that or is that too

29:10 ↗ specific for a city wide vision as

29:16 ↗ Sheldon to help answer that question

29:18 ↗ because there's there's no there's work

29:20 ↗ items already going on beyond just what

29:22 ↗ the strategic plan is gonna be outlining

29:24 ↗ for actions and I think my question I'm

29:28 ↗ trying to get at is how specific is this

29:32 ↗ cuz we're gonna be kind of dealing with

29:34 ↗ obviously a lot more specificity here at

29:36 ↗ the tab and how do we close the gap

29:38 ↗ between the detail which we're working

29:40 ↗ on and then this very high-level

29:42 ↗ one-pager the strategic plan is not that

29:47 ↗ granular to get down to that level of

29:49 ↗ detail it sets the broader goals

29:52 ↗ action items in the different areas it

29:57 ↗ is not going to get down to the project

29:58 ↗ by project manually already there are

30:05 ↗ other like Stephen said there are other

30:07 ↗ facets of our work plans existing work

30:09 ↗ plans that are addressing those those

30:12 ↗ type of specific projects in terms of

30:15 ↗ i90 the light rail itself we felt as a

30:18 ↗ mobility team needs to be

30:21 ↗ identified and addressed not only based

30:24 ↗ on public comment but based on the fact

30:27 ↗ that it's likely coming and we want to

30:30 ↗ be prepared for it because it'll change

30:31 ↗ the dynamics of mobility through this

30:35 ↗ town in a very drastic way so that was

30:39 ↗ the intent of light rail and transit

30:42 ↗ system and mobility master plan and all

30:45 ↗ of that are all taking a stab and

30:50 ↗ hopefully going to help define our

30:53 ↗ mobility system in the future so yeah

31:04 ↗ one of the things I'd like to say is in

31:06 ↗ your mobility master plan des actually

31:08 ↗ and I provided this feedback online as

31:10 ↗ well so that was me but one of the

31:13 ↗ things I really liked was in your

31:14 ↗ success measures the way you sort of

31:17 ↗ because you measure for what is

31:19 ↗ important to you and I really

31:21 ↗ appreciated the fact that the city

31:23 ↗ through this effort was well one focused

31:26 ↗ on sort of multiple measuring multiple

31:28 ↗ modes so it's not just our roads like a

31:32 ↗ you know level F service or XYZ but it

31:35 ↗ was really getting to the point where

31:37 ↗ you're looking at all the different

31:38 ↗ modes and measuring that and so I think

31:41 ↗ that's really important as a city

31:42 ↗ especially as one that's sort of trying

31:44 ↗ to create density create better options

31:48 ↗ for mobility I am as somebody who's a

31:51 ↗ non-motorized transportation nerd I

31:52 ↗ really appreciated that and then also

31:56 ↗ just sort of looking at some of that

31:57 ↗ smart system connectivity so we have

32:00 ↗ some major pieces of infrastructure

32:02 ↗ investment and how do we sort of

32:04 ↗ piggyback off of that to create better

32:06 ↗ value for our residents through you know

32:08 ↗ finishing links here and there so

32:10 ↗ absolutely and that is the intent of how

32:14 ↗ our objectives and mobility are laid out

32:16 ↗ we have the long-term larger projects

32:20 ↗ that we want to work towards being able

32:24 ↗ to build those and then we also have the

32:27 ↗ near term action I our near-term

32:29 ↗ objectives which is we want to close

32:32 ↗ gaps in sidewalks we want to connect

32:34 ↗ bike lanes

32:35 ↗ to transit and all of that so it's not

32:38 ↗ just you know concrete and asphalt we're

32:42 ↗ also looking at the programmatic aspects

32:44 ↗ of how do we how do we close the gaps

32:47 ↗ and get people around town using

32:48 ↗ different modes because as you heard in

32:52 ↗ the other areas growth and development

32:55 ↗ there's a lot of growth and we're going

32:58 ↗ to get more dense density so but that's

33:02 ↗ where we're trying to head so please do

33:07 ↗ the survey especially this group that

33:11 ↗ would be very helpful in helping define

33:13 ↗ this going forward is there anything

33:18 ↗ else all right thank you for your time

33:25 ↗ you

33:39 ↗ it's a Stephen Europe next to talk rules

33:42 ↗ regulations don't have a presentation

33:50 ↗ for this so I'll just pull up the the

33:54 ↗ rules and regulations that are in your

33:55 ↗ packets for those of you that read

33:59 ↗ through it there there are quite a bit

34:00 ↗ of changes but in terms of context not

34:02 ↗ really a whole lot changed except for

34:05 ↗ the main sections that we have talked

34:06 ↗ about the last time we went through this

34:08 ↗ so that's that's where I want to

34:09 ↗ actually start is on those highlighted

34:11 ↗ sections in your packets and then I'm

34:13 ↗ gonna ask Tina occasionally to help me

34:16 ↗ answer any questions that you may have

34:17 ↗ the clerk's office was worked with those

34:20 ↗ very closely to make sure that we were

34:23 ↗ consistent with a lot of the other rules

34:26 ↗ and regulations of the other boards and

34:27 ↗ commissions and that was the primary

34:30 ↗ reason for a lot of the changes so we'll

34:35 ↗ start with section 4c with this section

34:44 ↗ the board had originally asked if we

34:47 ↗ could identify a certain percentage of

34:51 ↗ regular attendance to monitor basically

34:54 ↗ those who have a large number of excused

34:58 ↗ absences and and the reason why it

35:00 ↗ wasn't included in the language for the

35:03 ↗ rules and right

35:04 ↗ was it wasn't gonna be consistent with

35:06 ↗ all the other boards and commissions and

35:08 ↗ particularly with the City Council so

35:09 ↗ that we didn't want to go that direction

35:10 ↗ but that is something that we can look

35:14 ↗ at later on but for right now we're

35:16 ↗ wanting to kind of try this out to see

35:18 ↗ we we don't want to identify as a

35:20 ↗ problem before it's an actually a

35:21 ↗ problem are there any questions on that

35:24 ↗ okay with the the next section we were

35:28 ↗ we were identifying the the municipal

35:32 ↗ code that defines how regular absences

35:38 ↗ are actually tracked and that's that's

35:39 ↗ also gonna because with the other boards

35:41 ↗ and commissions agent and and that's

35:45 ↗ specific to regular meetings yes

35:53 ↗ actually it's gonna be all meetings I'm

35:56 ↗ sorry yeah that's why I have I mean I

35:59 ↗ want to be consistent with the Municipal

36:01 ↗ Code yeah it feels like that word yeah

36:02 ↗ better if you struck regular so make it

36:05 ↗ sure it's consistent with the function

36:06 ↗ in the second one

36:07 ↗ it'll be just three consecutive

36:09 ↗ unexcused meetings all meetings yeah

36:13 ↗ that's good and then unable to attend

36:14 ↗ just meetings in general you're saying

36:17 ↗ mm-hmm

36:18 ↗ three consecutive unexcused get all the

36:21 ↗ meetings yeah yeah I mean do you need to

36:26 ↗ modify you say meetings you know teenage

36:30 ↗ you have something to I am see yeah

36:36 ↗ excuse me readings

36:38 ↗ mm-hmm so could it just say an excuse

36:43 ↗ just meetings

36:44 ↗ I believe yours you can't be less

36:50 ↗ restrictive I think there would be more

36:54 ↗ restrictive yes sorry you cannot be more

36:58 ↗ restrictive than your code so let's see

37:01 ↗ what says and we said two-point 92020

37:09 ↗ membership II

37:16 ↗ and it states regular meetings so for

37:23 ↗ right now we'll keep the language

37:25 ↗ consistent and then visit that later if

37:27 ↗ there is an issue that we can and you

37:30 ↗ know the intent behind that is your

37:31 ↗ regular meetings are known as scheduled

37:34 ↗ is set for the year special meetings

37:37 ↗ come up but it's still the spirit of it

37:40 ↗ is we're looking for you to tend you

37:43 ↗ know all the meetings that you possibly

37:45 ↗ can and recognize there will be moments

37:47 ↗ where you're ill and we don't want you

37:50 ↗ here where you need to be resting or

37:53 ↗ where you just have conflicts and it's

37:55 ↗ about in being providing as much advance

37:59 ↗ notice as possible

38:00 ↗ so that alternates can be prepared and

38:03 ↗ staff has an expectation that there'll

38:06 ↗ be a quorum all right

38:10 ↗ any more questions about that move on to

38:14 ↗ the next highlighted section which is

38:16 ↗ section 7c x 7c be sorry it's a little

38:31 ↗ confusing it's about public comment and

38:35 ↗ what the commenters will be stating

38:39 ↗ before they actually take part in public

38:43 ↗ comment and what the board had requested

38:46 ↗ last time was for the commenter to state

38:51 ↗ name address and relationship to the

38:53 ↗ city but in addition to that stating

38:55 ↗ their relationship to any items and the

38:58 ↗ reason why the language didn't go in was

39:00 ↗ again we were trying to be more

39:02 ↗ consistent with what the City Council

39:03 ↗ and the other boards and commissions are

39:04 ↗ going to be requiring in their rules and

39:06 ↗ regulations and until it becomes an

39:08 ↗ issue that we want to try to stay

39:10 ↗ consistent with that are there any

39:13 ↗ questions on that Nina I just wanted to

39:17 ↗ bring up the it was brought up in public

39:19 ↗ comment that requiring somebody to say

39:21 ↗ their address yeah this is 14 in my

39:26 ↗ come in is perhaps not allowed by state

39:31 ↗ law

39:32 ↗ no we we're not requiring someone to

39:37 ↗ identify their address we're simply

39:38 ↗ asking them to state their name address

39:41 ↗ and/or relationship so as much as they

39:44 ↗ can give us that more informed we can be

39:47 ↗ and that's the the intent there I think

39:51 ↗ what you heard was there is not a

39:55 ↗ requirement for an individual to sign up

39:58 ↗ on a desk or indicate that that's

40:05 ↗ optional right and then it would be on

40:09 ↗ the the chairs responsibility to say or

40:13 ↗ when you're asking for an address

40:16 ↗ I mean sometimes folks like like to you

40:18 ↗ know provide a general neighborhood of

40:20 ↗ where they're from and I think when

40:23 ↗ folks are commenting you'll hear what

40:27 ↗ item that they're speaking to and how it

40:29 ↗ impacts them or affects them are there

40:36 ↗ any more questions on that

40:41 ↗ so that was pretty much all we had

40:43 ↗ covered for last meeting was there

40:45 ↗ anything else that stood out to any of

40:46 ↗ you that was able to read through this

40:48 ↗ prior to the meeting Nina I just wanted

40:53 ↗ to bring up in my review of this we had

40:55 ↗ a lengthy discussion about whether you

40:58 ↗ need to be present or whether we could

41:00 ↗ have dial-in meetings and I appreciated

41:03 ↗ that we're making use of our alternates

41:05 ↗ alternates and that you have to be

41:07 ↗ present to participate any other

41:16 ↗ questions comments great could i

41:22 ↗ interject so there was a an inquiry

41:25 ↗ offline about minutes and the types of

41:30 ↗ minutes that are taken so I just wanted

41:31 ↗ to clarify the city has an existing

41:35 ↗ policy that says we take action minutes

41:37 ↗ so I peeked at your packet that's pretty

41:40 ↗ insane

41:41 ↗ this isn't about capturing debate and

41:44 ↗ dialogue it's really capturing the

41:46 ↗ outcome and the action and next steps so

41:51 ↗ that's the intent of your minutes that's

41:53 ↗ the document that lives on right thank

42:00 ↗ you

42:04 ↗ they do public comment we have to

42:06 ↗ require that it's on topic I'm sorry for

42:11 ↗ public comment do we have to require

42:12 ↗ it's on topic I know I've seen that at

42:15 ↗ some other board meeting some guy go to

42:17 ↗ where the so you have to have to speak

42:20 ↗ something on the agenda item is that so

42:26 ↗ you could restrict the agenda to agenda

42:30 ↗ items only you might be eliminating

42:34 ↗ yourself to hearing future item so we we

42:39 ↗ lifted information for that section that

42:43 ↗ was consistent with our other boards

42:44 ↗ okay thank you okay

42:51 ↗ if there are no other edits comments as

42:57 ↗ it stands you can actually take action

42:59 ↗ on this tonight if you want to I'll

43:02 ↗ leave that to the chair all right so do

43:04 ↗ I hear I know I'm sorry okay I said do I

43:09 ↗ have a motion to adopt the rules and

43:12 ↗ regulations for the transportation

43:14 ↗ advisory board I know thank you I move

43:17 ↗ that we adopt the rules and regulations

43:19 ↗ for the transportation advisory board as

43:20 ↗ presented tonight have a second a second

43:25 ↗ phone okay do we have any further

43:27 ↗ comments we'll move to vote all those in

43:31 ↗ favor say aye

43:36 ↗ okay motion passes

43:39 ↗ thank you do we need to have a clean one

43:44 ↗ of the Senate version to sign at our

43:46 ↗ next meeting all right practice your

43:50 ↗ signatures we'll do that later

43:52 ↗ what we can do is actually take

43:54 ↗ secretaries tonight and then I'll just

43:58 ↗ put this page on a fixed page right okay

44:01 ↗ so everybody can get signature all right

44:05 ↗ we'll do that then okay all right so

44:09 ↗ move on to the next item in the agenda

44:10 ↗ which is the

44:12 ↗ the mobility master plan

44:28 ↗ all right so that's about it so for this

44:37 ↗ presentation this is the presentation I

44:38 ↗ actually gave to the City Council at

44:41 ↗ their work session earlier this month

44:44 ↗ what I explained to them was it is is

44:57 ↗ that better

44:57 ↗ okay so it's the same presentation I

45:01 ↗ gave to the City Council at their work

45:02 ↗ session earlier this month what I

45:04 ↗ explained to them is gave them the

45:07 ↗ purpose of the project up into you know

45:11 ↗ a few years ago the City Council gave

45:12 ↗ staff direction to develop a mobility

45:15 ↗ master plan and budget for up until you

45:18 ↗ know for the last couple years has just

45:19 ↗ been updates from the city

45:21 ↗ administrators getting them know what's

45:24 ↗ going on on the staff side it wasn't

45:26 ↗ until earlier this month they actually

45:27 ↗ got a presentation on what was being

45:29 ↗ planned and so I walked them through the

45:31 ↗ project schedule and that's that's what

45:33 ↗ the timeline is that I'll walk through

45:34 ↗ in a minute and then also how this

45:38 ↗ relates to the Tres stage advisory board

45:40 ↗ and how the mobility master plan will

45:42 ↗ get developed and which is why the MMB

45:46 ↗ is the advisory boards main objective

45:50 ↗ for this year in terms of like the work

45:52 ↗ plan is this is going to be a really

45:54 ↗ huge load to to pick up to help staff

45:57 ↗ put this plan together and because I'm

46:04 ↗ giving you the same presentation I'll

46:05 ↗ give you the same project purchase

46:07 ↗ purpose and that is to help align the

46:10 ↗ city priorities for transportation as

46:12 ↗ you all know us as we've talked about in

46:15 ↗ our previous meetings there are a lot of

46:16 ↗ different plans outlined goals and

46:19 ↗ objectives and even action items and

46:21 ↗ policies around what transportation

46:23 ↗ means for the city one of the handouts

46:25 ↗ that you have outlines a lot of those

46:27 ↗ policies and goals which is a lot and

46:30 ↗ some of them aren't necessarily

46:33 ↗ consistent with each other and so this

46:35 ↗ process is to

46:36 ↗ simplify that and align everything so

46:38 ↗ that we can actually work from a much

46:41 ↗ more clear vision of what translation

46:44 ↗ should look like for the future AJ I

46:49 ↗ think this is Rebecca my I was confused

46:52 ↗ with my question that Sheldon answered

46:54 ↗ what's so the one on the right the

46:56 ↗ purple one that's from that's the

46:59 ↗ comprehensive plan the translation

47:00 ↗ element on in the comprehensive plan

47:02 ↗ okay so that conference of plan words

47:03 ↗ this is the strategic plan yes yes

47:06 ↗ trying to get my plans yes so the the

47:07 ↗ biggest difference is the comprehensive

47:09 ↗ plan is that 20-year vision have the

47:12 ↗ goals objectives in that the strategic

47:14 ↗ plan is our five-year vision of what the

47:18 ↗ city can accomplish in the next five

47:19 ↗ years that's the biggest difference

47:20 ↗ between why we're trying to do this Gigi

47:23 ↗ plan and what what the difference is

47:26 ↗ with the mobility master plan being

47:27 ↗ basically replacing that vision from the

47:30 ↗ Comprehensive Plan so when we're done

47:32 ↗ the mobility master plan the vision the

47:36 ↗ goals and the objectives in that are

47:38 ↗ gonna essentially replace what's in the

47:40 ↗ comprehensive plan

47:41 ↗ so the aim MP's timeframe is also more

47:45 ↗ or less 20 years yes okay mm-hmm Cynthia

47:53 ↗ do you have a question okay

47:59 ↗ yeah I'm picking out whether your name

48:02 ↗ cards up or your mics on a tread so make

48:05 ↗ sure it's off so I I don't cook like you

48:07 ↗ please alright so for project schedule

48:12 ↗ this outlines what we're gonna be doing

48:15 ↗ for this year in terms of working on the

48:17 ↗ mill video master plan there are five

48:20 ↗ major phases of this project which we've

48:23 ↗ already started the existing conditions

48:25 ↗ analysis that's something that the

48:27 ↗ essentially the consistent the

48:29 ↗ consultant team collects all existing

48:31 ↗ information and data of what's going on

48:34 ↗ now what we've been doing and they're

48:36 ↗ gonna do an analysis of where we stand

48:38 ↗ today and then we're gonna start then we

48:41 ↗ move into the phase of talking about

48:43 ↗ city priorities and that's something

48:44 ↗ that we're transitioning to now and that

48:46 ↗ that will

48:48 ↗ that's essentially what the conversation

48:50 ↗ with the City Council will be on April

48:51 ↗ 8th is having that conversation what the

48:54 ↗ city priorities should be for the city

48:56 ↗ and and you saw some examples from the

48:58 ↗ other cities and in your handout of what

49:02 ↗ some other cities have outlined as their

49:04 ↗ major priorities and I I gave that to

49:06 ↗ you just so you have an idea of what a

49:08 ↗ product of that process looks like just

49:11 ↗ just to help you think about the type of

49:13 ↗ ideas where we're awning to bring up at

49:16 ↗ the City Council conversation the next

49:20 ↗ phase of that process is a little going

49:22 ↗ a little more detail of now we have

49:24 ↗ these city priorities what do we need to

49:26 ↗ do in terms of what policies support

49:28 ↗ those priorities what programs and

49:31 ↗ projects support those priorities and

49:33 ↗ what's existing that can stay what's new

49:36 ↗ should we introduce what should be

49:38 ↗ changed and so that that's that's why

49:40 ↗ it's a much longer phase of the

49:42 ↗ processes because we're actually going

49:44 ↗ to be doing a much deeper dive of what's

49:46 ↗ existing and any new ideas that we need

49:48 ↗ to introduce from there we go to the

49:51 ↗ plan drafting and plan review process

49:52 ↗ and then we move into the council

49:55 ↗ adopted process I said what we put

49:58 ↗ together there will be a final draft by

50:00 ↗ the end of the year but there still

50:01 ↗ needs to go through approval process

50:03 ↗ with the City Council and getting the

50:05 ↗ legislation through any questions on the

50:08 ↗ process Nina

50:10 ↗ oh yeah I wanted to ask about the

50:12 ↗ consultant pre-planning have we already

50:15 ↗ seen the products of that or is that

50:16 ↗ something that's still coming that's

50:19 ↗ something that's still coming well we'll

50:20 ↗ get a existing conditions analysis

50:23 ↗ report from them in the next month and

50:25 ↗ when you say conditions analysis one of

50:29 ↗ my big questions was how we have so many

50:33 ↗ inconsistencies in our existing

50:34 ↗ documents and how am I going to chart

50:36 ↗ that as an individual are you saying

50:39 ↗ that somebody's going to help me with

50:40 ↗ that and bring me some way of yelling it

50:43 ↗ yes so that's exactly what they're going

50:45 ↗ to be doing is they're looking at all

50:47 ↗ planning documents and they're looking

50:49 ↗ at all the different policies that

50:50 ↗ relate to transportations things that

50:52 ↗ the the tab will be considering in the

50:54 ↗ future meetings and they're gonna point

50:56 ↗ out to say okay the planning policies in

50:59 ↗ this document say this but in this other

51:01 ↗ planning document it's actually in a

51:03 ↗ it's saying something a little bit

51:04 ↗ different so that's something that needs

51:05 ↗ to be discussed in this process are

51:09 ↗ there any questions

51:10 ↗ Sujatha so my question pertains to

51:14 ↗ looking at your project schedule so when

51:17 ↗ you have the blue dots that say joint

51:19 ↗ bores and commissions meetings yes and

51:21 ↗ it looks like there's that one in April

51:23 ↗ that's coming up and then the one in

51:25 ↗ November so are we like are we gonna

51:28 ↗ meet with the Parks Commission or is it

51:30 ↗ is that what you mean by a joint yes so

51:32 ↗ for those two blue dots sorry I'll get

51:35 ↗ to the dots in a second yeah sorry for

51:37 ↗ the for the two blue dots we're

51:39 ↗ organizing a joint meeting with the

51:41 ↗ other boards and commissions so we will

51:43 ↗ either have the full board or in

51:44 ↗ Commission or we'll have just a few

51:46 ↗ members from them for instance because

51:48 ↗ our right now the parks board is meeting

51:50 ↗ over in the Pickering room they just

51:53 ↗ might have one or two representatives

51:54 ↗ actually come to our joint meeting on

51:55 ↗ April 22nd since so because they'd want

51:58 ↗ to continue with their own work plan as

51:59 ↗ well but they'll bring feedback as part

52:01 ↗ of that but because these are gonna be

52:03 ↗ organized with the public engagement

52:05 ↗ process a survey is actually going to be

52:07 ↗ available to them prior to that meeting

52:10 ↗ so they can actually give us a little

52:11 ↗ feedback prior to the meeting and not

52:13 ↗ just depend on the members that are

52:15 ↗ attending okay any other questions I'll

52:20 ↗ go to the dots now to kind of explain

52:23 ↗ the wild colors so you know starting

52:26 ↗ with the counsel session giving them an

52:27 ↗ introduction to this process in March

52:29 ↗ we'll going in March with the basically

52:33 ↗ starting our public outreach process so

52:35 ↗ doing a public survey going to

52:37 ↗ neighborhood meetings pushing the survey

52:38 ↗ going to other existing events to get

52:42 ↗ people to know the project is going on

52:44 ↗ but also asking for feedback from the

52:46 ↗ process to get the community's feedback

52:49 ↗ on what the priorities should be for

52:51 ↗ transportation citywide or within their

52:54 ↗ own neighborhoods but trying to get an

52:56 ↗ idea of what should this vision actually

52:59 ↗ look like with as much feedback as

53:01 ↗ possible and and I'm hoping to get some

53:04 ↗ of your help to get some of that

53:06 ↗ engagement from the community the other

53:08 ↗ items that we'll be doing is is the the

53:12 ↗ advisory board and the council joint

53:15 ↗ session that that's starting that

53:16 ↗ conversation so we had a workshop with

53:20 ↗ staff earlier this month to talk about

53:22 ↗ those priorities that kind of started a

53:25 ↗ very preliminary draft of priorities

53:27 ↗ we'll bring that to the city council

53:28 ↗ meeting on April 8th and then whatever

53:31 ↗ revisions or changes or complete new

53:35 ↗ priorities that come out of that that

53:36 ↗ will get introduced to the public

53:37 ↗ engagement process so that's what will

53:39 ↗ be in the public survey later in April

53:42 ↗ and the in May or actually I'm planning

53:49 ↗ field trips for staff EMA so or the like

53:55 ↗ sessions to get survey feedback would we

53:59 ↗ just do the online or would we also do

54:01 ↗ like different modes of like getting

54:05 ↗ feedback I know that you were talking

54:07 ↗ about like studying up a station at our

54:10 ↗ school were you planning on doing that

54:11 ↗ with other schools in the district or

54:13 ↗ like community centers yes so there's

54:17 ↗ events like lunches at the Senior Center

54:19 ↗ there's events that there's trying to

54:23 ↗ think of all the different events going

54:24 ↗ on in April I'm working with our

54:26 ↗ communications group to look at what all

54:27 ↗ the existing events are that we can kind

54:29 ↗ of piggyback off

54:30 ↗ I plan on waking up very early go to the

54:32 ↗ transit centers in the park and rides a

54:33 ↗ handout slips for people to fill out the

54:35 ↗ survey while they're on the bus

54:36 ↗ we're gonna go to any community center

54:38 ↗ events Senior Center events any events

54:41 ↗ that happen to be going at the schools

54:43 ↗ it's primarily gonna be is Squa high

54:45 ↗ school since that's the one that's

54:46 ↗ within the city but I hope to talk to

54:49 ↗ the administration to try to get

54:50 ↗ feedback from the broader school

54:53 ↗ community because even though students

54:57 ↗ or parents don't live in a squall they

54:59 ↗ certainly travel in a squall whether

55:01 ↗ it's for business work or for school so

55:04 ↗ getting feedback around around how to

55:06 ↗ get around better is gonna be important

55:09 ↗ to any other quarter

55:21 ↗ see hon I'm sorry I don't have recorded

55:24 ↗ specifically what we're doing on April

55:26 ↗ 8th are we meeting with the City Council

55:29 ↗ I have both of them on I have our

55:31 ↗ meeting and I have the council meeting

55:33 ↗ in my calendar and our few our meeting

55:35 ↗ is the joint meeting with the City

55:37 ↗ Council on April 8th yes it's it's still

55:44 ↗ being decided so it doesn't matter it's

55:46 ↗ either gonna be in council chambers 6:30

55:49 ↗ and I'll update the calendar invite that

55:52 ↗ went out to all of you about that on the

55:55 ↗ location but it's either gonna be this

55:56 ↗ room or the Pickering room because those

55:58 ↗ are the only two locations that have

56:00 ↗ video capabilities 6:30 yes so I'll

56:05 ↗ update the calendar invites that one

56:07 ↗ I'll tell you once we have a final

56:09 ↗ location figured out any other questions

56:14 ↗ in May we're gonna be planning field

56:17 ↗ trips for staff and potentially some

56:19 ↗ council members to go to some of our

56:21 ↗ neighbor cities who have gone through

56:24 ↗ this process before and kind of learn

56:26 ↗ from their experience on putting

56:29 ↗ together a master plan but also the

56:31 ↗ implementation of the master plan what

56:33 ↗ what did they learn afterward are some

56:36 ↗ of the bigger important lessons that I'm

56:38 ↗ hoping to get out of that process so

56:40 ↗ staff can figure out what kind of

56:43 ↗ changes do we need to make internally to

56:45 ↗ be able to support a lot of the

56:46 ↗ priorities that are coming out of this

56:48 ↗ process and I'm hopefully gonna be able

56:52 ↗ to plan a field trip with all you

56:54 ↗ depending on schedules too and and I'll

56:57 ↗ discuss that more with you later in

56:59 ↗ terms of where where do we want to go

57:01 ↗ what do we want to discuss okay

57:03 ↗ and June I'll give the City Council an

57:07 ↗ update on how the process is going and

57:08 ↗ and answer any questions they may have

57:11 ↗ potentially give them a little bit of an

57:14 ↗ update of how the community or the the

57:17 ↗ public engagement process go but by that

57:19 ↗ point there the full report won't be

57:21 ↗ ready yet so they'll just get pretty

57:23 ↗ much a high-level update of how

57:24 ↗ everything went well as we're working

57:28 ↗ through the third phase of the project

57:31 ↗ we'll be taking

57:33 ↗ another public engagement process to

57:35 ↗ gain a little more feedback of where the

57:38 ↗ major issues are and how we can relate

57:39 ↗ to our priorities was that gonna be your

57:41 ↗ question Tom yeah my question was on the

57:44 ↗ public engagement of the sex and open

57:46 ↗ house or survey that's time that we

57:47 ↗ would send a survey yeah so well instead

57:51 ↗ of going out to everybody again we're

57:52 ↗ gonna go out to specific stakeholders

57:54 ↗ and have that big open survey again

57:56 ↗ primarily because what we've learned

57:59 ↗ through even the strategic plan process

58:00 ↗ you really introduce the idea reach out

58:03 ↗ to everybody but you don't want to go

58:05 ↗ through the same effort again because

58:07 ↗ not everybody is really going to stay

58:08 ↗ interested and so you really want to

58:10 ↗ keep those who are interested engaged

58:11 ↗ and so you you take their contact

58:14 ↗ information you you kind of keep them

58:15 ↗ engaged and you do that with the

58:18 ↗ remainder of the project any other

58:22 ↗ questions on the public engagement okay

58:25 ↗ so in September

58:27 ↗ that's when September October ish time

58:31 ↗ we'll have another joint meeting with

58:33 ↗ the the City Council and that is we will

58:36 ↗ meet with the City Council that meeting

58:38 ↗ will primarily be a discussion to update

58:42 ↗ the City Council on everything that's

58:43 ↗ been worked on thus far but also talk

58:46 ↗ about the funding component for the

58:48 ↗ mobility master plan not necessarily to

58:51 ↗ say what should be fun and what

58:52 ↗ shouldn't but more of just deciding on

58:54 ↗ what the prioritization criteria should

58:57 ↗ be for funding since that's the level

58:59 ↗ that the tab is really going to be

59:00 ↗ discussing throughout this process and

59:04 ↗ then when we get to the plan drafting

59:06 ↗ phase we'll have another update with all

59:08 ↗ the other boards and commissions to talk

59:11 ↗ about the full process and get their

59:12 ↗ feedback on how it relates to some of

59:14 ↗ their work plans and then also engage

59:17 ↗ the community of with the review of the

59:20 ↗ draft plan are we going to have a

59:22 ↗ framework that how we're supposed to

59:23 ↗ prioritize or is that gonna be

59:25 ↗ relatively open-ended a framework

59:27 ↗ framework will get proposed coming from

59:29 ↗ the priorities so everything will kind

59:30 ↗ of just flow for the discussion

59:36 ↗ and then from the draft review process

59:38 ↗ well we'll have that public engagement

59:41 ↗ together everybody who wants to stay

59:43 ↗ engaged does they engage in and that

59:45 ↗ everything they commented on was heard

59:48 ↗ and reflected in the plan and so that's

59:50 ↗ that's something that we'll work through

59:51 ↗ and then we'll go through the plan

59:52 ↗ adoption process any questions on the

59:58 ↗ project okay

1:00:04 ↗ and then this schedule was more specific

1:00:07 ↗ to the tab it relates a lot to how we'll

1:00:12 ↗ be working on the mobility master plan

1:00:14 ↗ but it gives a little more detail of

1:00:15 ↗ some of the items that will actually be

1:00:17 ↗ discussing so what we already know needs

1:00:21 ↗ to be updated are those three three

1:00:23 ↗ items at the bottom of the schedule so

1:00:26 ↗ the Complete Streets policy the

1:00:28 ↗ pedestrian crossing guidelines and then

1:00:30 ↗ the traffic calming program three major

1:00:32 ↗ items that have already been flagged by

1:00:34 ↗ staff that need to update so we want to

1:00:37 ↗ get actually started on that sooner

1:00:39 ↗ rather than later through the mobility

1:00:40 ↗ master plan process or any questions on

1:00:45 ↗ those three items when when we get to

1:00:49 ↗ those parts on our work plan we'll

1:00:52 ↗ discuss more of what they actually are

1:00:54 ↗ and what they what we want them to be

1:00:55 ↗ and so this right now is just kind of a

1:00:58 ↗ high-level this is what's coming up

1:01:08 ↗ and what we have planned for engaging

1:01:11 ↗ the community includes a lot of the this

1:01:14 ↗ so the survey right now for the

1:01:16 ↗ strategic plan that uses a platform

1:01:18 ↗ called peak democracy and we'll be using

1:01:20 ↗ that same platform to to put out surveys

1:01:23 ↗ to the community to do online but also

1:01:24 ↗ to help us do analytics of the kind of

1:01:28 ↗ feedback we're getting back and are

1:01:29 ↗ there parts of the community that we're

1:01:31 ↗ not hearing from so we can actually try

1:01:32 ↗ to put a little more effort to engage

1:01:34 ↗ them a little bit more and then we'll be

1:01:36 ↗ using a lot of the same platforms that

1:01:38 ↗ our communications groups uses for

1:01:40 ↗ social media emails any any pop-up

1:01:44 ↗ events that are pre-existing that we can

1:01:46 ↗ show up and actually talk with the

1:01:47 ↗ committee and potentially have focus

1:01:49 ↗ groups a little deeper dive discussion

1:01:52 ↗ on a lot of the topics related to

1:01:54 ↗ transportation any questions on this all

1:02:01 ↗ right

1:02:03 ↗ are there any questions on the mobility

1:02:06 ↗ mesh plan and and the tabs roll it on

1:02:12 ↗ the the three things that we that we

1:02:15 ↗ touch on the

1:02:18 ↗ police treats policy pressure and

1:02:20 ↗ crossing traffic on me yes so it sounds

1:02:23 ↗ like the the big lift of the mobility

1:02:25 ↗ master plan is to lay out a prioritized

1:02:29 ↗ project pipeline think is that but so

1:02:34 ↗ there's so you're you're laying out what

1:02:36 ↗ are you mean you start with prayer

1:02:38 ↗ priorities and policies and eventually

1:02:40 ↗ you get to what are the programs and

1:02:42 ↗ projects that they want to work on and

1:02:44 ↗ how would we fund that but then maybe

1:02:47 ↗ maybe can you just cuz we haven't done

1:02:50 ↗ this yet it'll it'll be this should

1:02:52 ↗ probably be more clear and a couple in a

1:02:53 ↗ couple more months mm-hmm but is is is

1:02:55 ↗ the intent primarily around that or is

1:02:57 ↗ it more on the policy side because these

1:02:59 ↗ three bars here to me really struck me

1:03:02 ↗ much more as were providing guidance on

1:03:08 ↗ like city policies that then get

1:03:12 ↗ implemented through the course of

1:03:13 ↗ another project is the master plan which

1:03:17 ↗ which is it or is it or is it very much

1:03:19 ↗ both yes it's both so yes we'll be

1:03:25 ↗ talking about kind of the citywide

1:03:27 ↗ mobility master plan policies but as

1:03:29 ↗ because these three are flags as being

1:03:32 ↗ done a little bit sooner rather than

1:03:33 ↗ later we're gonna be having more

1:03:35 ↗ specific discussion on those ones which

1:03:37 ↗ have kind of citywide implications to it

1:03:42 ↗ are those are those three all city code

1:03:45 ↗ that ultimately will be looking to

1:03:47 ↗ actually modify the Complete Streets

1:03:50 ↗ policy yes the pedestrian crossing

1:03:52 ↗ guidelines I don't think that's code and

1:03:55 ↗ the track and yeah

1:04:01 ↗ actually I think the traffic calming

1:04:02 ↗ program isn't code there is a formal

1:04:04 ↗ program for that so - yes one no any

1:04:11 ↗ other questions on the schedule

1:04:13 ↗ Stephanie did you have a question okay

1:04:18 ↗ all right

1:04:21 ↗ there's nothing else thank you

1:04:29 ↗ actually I didn't get to walk through

1:04:32 ↗ the the handouts so let's let's do that

1:04:46 ↗ so is everybody take a look at this

1:04:49 ↗ handout prior to the meeting it's okay

1:04:51 ↗ if you didn't well just walk through it

1:04:52 ↗ now the consultant team put this

1:04:56 ↗ together for us as we're kind of talking

1:04:58 ↗ through the priorities workshops when

1:05:00 ↗ you know with the staff the next one

1:05:02 ↗ being with the city council and you guys

1:05:04 ↗ just to help you visualize the process

1:05:09 ↗ but also visualize the the amount of

1:05:13 ↗ work this is going to take the first

1:05:16 ↗ page being the every step that we're

1:05:20 ↗ gonna be taking for this project and all

1:05:24 ↗ the topics we'll be discussing and then

1:05:26 ↗ the second and third page and fourth

1:05:29 ↗ page identifying all the existing goals

1:05:33 ↗ in the city related to transportation

1:05:38 ↗ one thing that I've learned in the

1:05:41 ↗ transportation profession and the

1:05:43 ↗ consultant team will agree on this is

1:05:44 ↗ the more you can simplify your goals the

1:05:47 ↗ easier it is for implementation because

1:05:49 ↗ if you can't go to a community member

1:05:51 ↗ and ask them hey what's your city's goal

1:05:54 ↗ for transportation they're not gonna be

1:05:56 ↗ able to list off three pages worth of

1:05:58 ↗ goals they'll be a list off five or six

1:06:02 ↗ maybe six which is the direction that

1:06:04 ↗ you see with all the other cities you

1:06:06 ↗ see really that sweet number around five

1:06:09 ↗ or six being those priorities or goals

1:06:12 ↗ to identify the vision for

1:06:15 ↗ transportation and that first one being

1:06:18 ↗ the City of Redmond five keys I'm sorry

1:06:22 ↗ the first one being the city of

1:06:24 ↗ kirklands vision for I think it's eight

1:06:28 ↗ nine so hold on so these so the first

1:06:31 ↗ three pages were just you did the survey

1:06:35 ↗ that you bunch in tanana that this is

1:06:36 ↗ what's already there

1:06:37 ↗ yes and then these last

1:06:39 ↗ or paid three pages are these are the

1:06:42 ↗ pimples from other city yes thank you

1:06:46 ↗ so this first city is city of kirklands

1:06:48 ↗ it's it's their manger goals also the

1:06:52 ↗ major chapters in their translation

1:06:53 ↗ master plan that's what you did I helped

1:07:01 ↗ with the finalization of this so I came

1:07:02 ↗ on board right as they were finalizing

1:07:06 ↗ the final draft and the so the second

1:07:15 ↗ page the five key strategies asks for

1:07:17 ↗ the City of Redmond and I what I like

1:07:26 ↗ about the city of ribbons is they

1:07:28 ↗ they're actually very similar when they

1:07:31 ↗ had these conversations there were

1:07:32 ↗ similar place as city as squall being

1:07:34 ↗ that they were planning for light rail

1:07:36 ↗ and you see that being that's their

1:07:38 ↗ number one priority on this on this list

1:07:41 ↗ of five and what we can learn from the

1:07:45 ↗ CRM is is being that they're also a

1:07:47 ↗ fringe city of being on the outside of

1:07:50 ↗ that urban area of the Puget Sound of

1:07:53 ↗ where major developments gonna be

1:07:55 ↗ happening and so they've had these

1:07:57 ↗ conversations twenty years before

1:07:59 ↗ Issaquah has and so they've we can learn

1:08:01 ↗ a few lessons from what they've

1:08:04 ↗ experienced getting from starting the

1:08:06 ↗ conversation of do we even want light

1:08:08 ↗ rail to where do we put it to now we

1:08:11 ↗ have it now what do we do so they've

1:08:13 ↗ gone through a lot of different steps to

1:08:15 ↗ get to where they are today and and

1:08:17 ↗ they're getting light rail service and

1:08:18 ↗ starting in 2023 so we're gonna be able

1:08:21 ↗ to learn a little bit from their

1:08:23 ↗ experience and then with the city Acoma

1:08:28 ↗ very similar to city of kirklands but

1:08:31 ↗ more specific to just the six main

1:08:33 ↗ priorities and then on the last one

1:08:37 ↗ that's actually a master plan in

1:08:40 ↗ development currently with the city of

1:08:41 ↗ Sammamish they outlined this is to give

1:08:44 ↗ an example of decision-making criteria

1:08:48 ↗ of evaluation criteria that they came up

1:08:50 ↗ with in their process

1:08:52 ↗ not that we're gonna follow this but

1:08:54 ↗ just to give you an idea of the

1:08:55 ↗ discussion the type of product that will

1:08:57 ↗ kind of give us are they any questions

1:09:06 ↗ on any of these

1:09:11 ↗ okay the main reason I want to give you

1:09:15 ↗ all this is to help kind of come up with

1:09:19 ↗ any questions that you may have and I

1:09:21 ↗ can help answer them prior to the

1:09:22 ↗ meeting with the City Council or you can

1:09:25 ↗ bring them to the city council meeting

1:09:26 ↗ if if you have questions specifically

1:09:27 ↗ for the city council on when we're

1:09:29 ↗ discussing what the city priorities for

1:09:31 ↗ transit station should be you have a

1:09:37 ↗ question okay so I apologize maybe I'm

1:09:43 ↗ being too specific but I guess I'm

1:09:45 ↗ trying to figure out so we have these

1:09:47 ↗ components right and each one of these

1:09:49 ↗ components I'm assuming I mean I've

1:09:51 ↗ worked on funding in the past so I'm

1:09:53 ↗ assuming there's like these are the 12

1:09:55 ↗ options and blah blah blah so every

1:09:57 ↗ single one of these boxes will get

1:09:58 ↗ unpacked at some point with all of the

1:10:00 ↗ various components of it but I guess I

1:10:03 ↗ guess what I'm confused about and I

1:10:06 ↗ apologize and being really dense but so

1:10:09 ↗ how did these boxes relate to how we've

1:10:13 ↗ laid it out on the time on the timeline

1:10:15 ↗ are these the priorities or I mean like

1:10:19 ↗ so you know these are sort of how we're

1:10:22 ↗ gonna work through are these the

1:10:25 ↗ policies and programs

1:10:26 ↗ so we'll start working on these

1:10:27 ↗ different boxes yeah so the the main

1:10:30 ↗ schedule you're looking at now where you

1:10:32 ↗ have the calendar and the breakdown of

1:10:34 ↗ the box that's kind of grouping a lot of

1:10:36 ↗ things together okay so this this one

1:10:39 ↗ that you're looking at is kind of that

1:10:40 ↗ process flow for discussion so once we

1:10:43 ↗ get through the translation priorities

1:10:45 ↗ we'll start talking about the metrics

1:10:47 ↗ and then it'll also start talking about

1:10:49 ↗ project lists some of it will be

1:10:51 ↗ happying at the same time but that is

1:10:52 ↗ just kind of the flow will be going all

1:10:54 ↗ the way to the final plan okay thank you

1:10:59 ↗ and then the idea is the ledges are e

1:11:01 ↗ mm-hmm and then the idea is the

1:11:03 ↗ legislative process so as we're sort of

1:11:06 ↗ completing priorities we're checking

1:11:07 ↗ back in with Council and then you know

1:11:11 ↗ silver as we're sort of moving through

1:11:13 ↗ completion of these different work

1:11:14 ↗ programs we're sort of doing an

1:11:17 ↗ immediate check back versus waiting till

1:11:19 ↗ we finish the whole thing and doing okay

1:11:22 ↗ yeah

1:11:22 ↗ you Cynthia so I'm just sort of curious

1:11:30 ↗ it may be too much but one thing that

1:11:34 ↗ strikes me is um is there some kind of

1:11:36 ↗ articulation of the values driving some

1:11:40 ↗ of these priorities like you know equity

1:11:43 ↗ and social justice or you know I mean

1:11:45 ↗ are there is there ever a statement of

1:11:49 ↗ guiding values or values or guiding

1:11:51 ↗ principles even before we talk about

1:11:55 ↗ priorities sort of frame those you can

1:12:00 ↗ you can bring that up actually as with

1:12:03 ↗ the discussion with the City Council of

1:12:05 ↗ should we actually call that out as as a

1:12:07 ↗ priority

1:12:09 ↗ typically for like translation you'll

1:12:12 ↗ say access to all as kind of a broader

1:12:15 ↗ statement but underneath that you'll go

1:12:16 ↗ a little more specific than saying

1:12:17 ↗ identifying that the health implications

1:12:19 ↗ or the equity implications related to

1:12:21 ↗ transportation is that I just think it

1:12:25 ↗ might be useful and it may be captured

1:12:27 ↗ it it may be the answer is its captured

1:12:30 ↗ elsewhere but it does seem to me to make

1:12:32 ↗ sense to have a clear identification of

1:12:35 ↗ some of the values driving the

1:12:38 ↗ objectives and that is a little

1:12:39 ↗ different than some of the

1:12:42 ↗ characteristics or some of the reasons

1:12:44 ↗ but I think to be over about some of the

1:12:47 ↗ values that are driving the priorities

1:12:48 ↗ if maybe they're captured elsewhere but

1:12:52 ↗ I guess I just want to make sure that we

1:12:54 ↗ are all we're not making assumptions and

1:12:57 ↗ we're pretty clear on that

1:12:58 ↗ yeah so one other project that's going

1:13:01 ↗ on this year that the off sustainability

1:13:03 ↗ is taking on is is working with regional

1:13:06 ↗ partners to identify healthy needs

1:13:09 ↗ indicators for the community and that's

1:13:12 ↗ something that we'll be working with

1:13:13 ↗ them on to make sure that we we're

1:13:16 ↗ consistent like the language in the

1:13:17 ↗ mobility plan are consistent in terms of

1:13:19 ↗ knowing what those needs are and how

1:13:21 ↗ we're going to be a attacking that in

1:13:24 ↗ the Millennium the implementation of the

1:13:26 ↗ mobility master plan hopefully that gets

1:13:28 ↗ at a little of what you're asking about

1:13:30 ↗ as we kind of work through this process

1:13:33 ↗ more detail will be revealed

1:13:36 ↗ not a lot I'm not able to answer a lot

1:13:39 ↗ because we haven't really started those

1:13:41 ↗ conversations yet once we start those

1:13:42 ↗ conversations it'll be a little bit

1:13:44 ↗ easier for me or the consultant to be

1:13:45 ↗ able to answer a lot of that nine I

1:13:48 ↗ think was next thank you and thank you

1:13:52 ↗ Cynthia for bringing that up because

1:13:53 ↗ when I was looking through our packet I

1:13:55 ↗ was wondering if during our meetings if

1:13:58 ↗ we could always have plan on a page

1:14:01 ↗ visible somewhere in this room that

1:14:04 ↗ maybe it's our splash screen when we

1:14:06 ↗ don't have something else up on the

1:14:08 ↗ computer screen because to have the

1:14:09 ↗ vision mission and the guiding

1:14:11 ↗ principles which include equity and

1:14:12 ↗ other priorities can help ground us as

1:14:16 ↗ we go through a very creative process to

1:14:20 ↗ stay consistent with the work that's

1:14:24 ↗ been done for the strategic plan and it

1:14:26 ↗ would it would include some of those

1:14:28 ↗ things you're just talking about us I

1:14:30 ↗ think that would be really nice if we

1:14:31 ↗ could work that and somehow to have this

1:14:32 ↗ summary easily accessible while we're

1:14:36 ↗ working that's possible okay yeah I'll

1:14:43 ↗ talk to the consultants see how we can

1:14:45 ↗ start that conversation with City

1:14:47 ↗ Council to give you a better a firmer

1:14:50 ↗ foundation for when you're talking with

1:14:53 ↗ them is that reasonable

1:14:58 ↗ get anything more more tactically when

1:15:03 ↗ we when the time comes for us to

1:15:04 ↗ prioritize having those values we know

1:15:07 ↗ tank our priorities upon I think would

1:15:09 ↗ be very useful

1:15:11 ↗ Jovian gets some guidance from counsel

1:15:14 ↗ in terms of what our aims are because I

1:15:16 ↗ think if it's interesting when you look

1:15:17 ↗ at this he likes what we have in the in

1:15:23 ↗ in the strategic plan and the central

1:15:26 ↗ plan are very tactical outcomes which

1:15:29 ↗ are great but then when you compare that

1:15:31 ↗ with worth with what like Tacoma and

1:15:33 ↗ Sammamish have these are much more more

1:15:38 ↗ articulating of value that they want to

1:15:40 ↗ realize as opposed to what we have as a

1:15:43 ↗ lot of things about like mode share and

1:15:45 ↗ I feel like these kind of metrics a

1:15:46 ↗ little more derivative of because

1:15:48 ↗ there's a valley that's implied behind

1:15:50 ↗ it mmm-hmm we can be a little bit more

1:15:52 ↗ explicit about that particularly within

1:15:53 ↗ the group and when the time comes to

1:15:55 ↗ make difficult trade-offs that we will

1:15:57 ↗ need to make prioritizing the work plan

1:16:00 ↗ we have we're all on the same page about

1:16:03 ↗ what should be driving those priorities

1:16:05 ↗ it should in theory help help make these

1:16:08 ↗ conversations more efficient if we're

1:16:12 ↗ all on the same page about what exactly

1:16:13 ↗ we're trying to trade off okay I mean

1:16:17 ↗ can't counsel my untap back to us until

1:16:19 ↗ it's our job but we can really ask yeah

1:16:22 ↗ no I I think that's a fair question to

1:16:24 ↗ ask any other questions all right any

1:16:30 ↗ questions for on what to expect for the

1:16:33 ↗ April 8th meeting okay

1:16:38 ↗ like I said I'll update calendars on

1:16:41 ↗ where the look final location will be so

1:16:43 ↗ that you all know and then I'll also

1:16:45 ↗ follow what the same email reminders on

1:16:47 ↗ locations if you want to talk for the

1:16:49 ↗ other handouts real quick yes yeah so

1:16:51 ↗ that those we're gonna come through our

1:16:53 ↗ next item which is announcements oh okay

1:17:00 ↗ or the staff report yeah okay sorry not

1:17:04 ↗ announcements staff report

1:17:27 ↗ all right so for reports I'm going to

1:17:32 ↗ turn it over to Sheldon real quick to

1:17:33 ↗ talk about our financial ad hoc

1:17:37 ↗ committee that has been that it made a

1:17:41 ↗ recommendation City Council on funding

1:17:43 ↗ for capital projects related to

1:17:46 ↗ transportation Thank You Steven so in

1:17:50 ↗ your packet there was a copy of the city

1:17:53 ↗ council packet item agenda bill seven

1:17:57 ↗ seven five zero which they had a

1:17:59 ↗ thorough discussion on on March the

1:18:02 ↗ fourth and what that was was it was the

1:18:05 ↗ council finance ad hoc committees

1:18:08 ↗ recommendation back to the full City

1:18:09 ↗ Council on how to fund certain unfunded

1:18:14 ↗ transportation projects this is a work

1:18:18 ↗ program item that the City Council has

1:18:20 ↗ in front of them and has had for about a

1:18:22 ↗ year and a half or so so these are items

1:18:26 ↗ that they are going to continue and

1:18:27 ↗ finish on their own in their own

1:18:30 ↗ discussions one moment AJ and so out of

1:18:35 ↗ the discussions there were seven

1:18:40 ↗ projects that were on the list from the

1:18:44 ↗ finance ad-hoc committee you can look at

1:18:47 ↗ the agenda bill and see those those are

1:18:49 ↗ multi-million dollar projects with the

1:18:52 ↗ exception of the concept development for

1:18:55 ↗ Northwest Gilman Boulevard in the

1:18:59 ↗ conversation they requested additional

1:19:01 ↗ information at their meeting and the

1:19:04 ↗ administration is currently preparing

1:19:06 ↗ responses to that and the ad hoc

1:19:09 ↗ committee is planning to meet on May the

1:19:11 ↗ 13th for a follow-up conversation excuse

1:19:18 ↗ me I'm sorry that's the council workshop

1:19:20 ↗ on May the 13th where the administration

1:19:23 ↗ is going to prepare and provide the

1:19:25 ↗ answers to those questions

1:19:28 ↗ and so feel free go to the March 4th

1:19:33 ↗ YouTube video of the council meeting if

1:19:37 ↗ you want to see that agenda item they

1:19:39 ↗ spent about an hour plus or minus on the

1:19:42 ↗ topic and so I guess with that I'll open

1:19:46 ↗ for questions where did the seven

1:19:52 ↗ projects come from did that come out of

1:19:53 ↗ an existing document or that just comes

1:19:55 ↗ here from Council on those projects are

1:19:58 ↗ actually on the existing Transportation

1:20:00 ↗ Improvement Plan those are projects that

1:20:05 ↗ were put on by the administration a

1:20:07 ↗ number of years ago and some of them are

1:20:11 ↗ concurrency related projects other ones

1:20:13 ↗ are projects that are needed for safety

1:20:16 ↗ and other purposes all designed to

1:20:19 ↗ increase mobility was the main reason

1:20:23 ↗ these are unfunded is because they were

1:20:25 ↗ so big and so they just kind of carried

1:20:27 ↗ out from year to year or carried all

1:20:28 ↗ about not executed the size and

1:20:30 ↗ magnitude of the cost of the project is

1:20:33 ↗ one of the major reasons why they're on

1:20:34 ↗ that unfunded list yeah which of these

1:20:38 ↗ projects were in the levee that got

1:20:40 ↗ rejected in 2013 great team whatever

1:20:43 ↗ that was the projects that were on the

1:20:50 ↗ list that were on the ballot measure I

1:20:52 ↗ believe it's 2015 or 16 you're correct

1:20:55 ↗ one was the southeast 43rd project

1:20:59 ↗ that's aka Providence point

1:21:01 ↗ signalization the other was Newport

1:21:04 ↗ maple to sunset and I believe those are

1:21:09 ↗ the two that were on the two of the

1:21:12 ↗ three that were on that list what

1:21:17 ↗ happened the other ones are they now off

1:21:19 ↗ the out of the queue there's me they're

1:21:25 ↗ still on the transportation improvement

1:21:27 ↗ plan

1:21:27 ↗ the other one was East sunset Way and

1:21:30 ↗ that one has since had some work

1:21:34 ↗ with the pavement overlay program

1:21:51 ↗ Tom do you have question alright well if

1:22:00 ↗ there's no other questions the other

1:22:01 ↗ items that we added to your packet were

1:22:03 ↗ maps at your last meeting you all

1:22:05 ↗ actually requested to see what the

1:22:08 ↗ central is so call regional growth

1:22:10 ↗ center and the boundaries there's B so

1:22:11 ↗ for you have one map of all the sub

1:22:13 ↗ areas in as well the other map is the

1:22:16 ↗ identified regional growth center in

1:22:18 ↗ Issaquah which is primarily located in

1:22:21 ↗ the central Issaquah sub area there's

1:22:24 ↗ nothing to explain about it we just want

1:22:26 ↗ to give it to you since they're a little

1:22:27 ↗ hard to find then I apologize there's no

1:22:31 ↗ binders today we'll have that at your

1:22:33 ↗ next meeting shipment doesn't come till

1:22:36 ↗ tomorrow the other reports were just

1:22:48 ↗ placeholders the chairs were partly to

1:22:52 ↗ have to AJ if he has anything to put but

1:22:54 ↗ that's typically something if he attends

1:22:56 ↗ any other board Commission meetings and

1:22:58 ↗ just report out on anything and he

1:23:00 ↗ attends or if he has meetings staff or

1:23:04 ↗ something related to some of our work

1:23:07 ↗ plan then he'll report out on that for

1:23:09 ↗ the youth report that is typically I'll

1:23:11 ↗ give it to Kobe or Emma or Maddie to

1:23:15 ↗ actually talk about and give any updates

1:23:17 ↗ on anything going on you don't actually

1:23:22 ↗ have to give any reports tonight since

1:23:24 ↗ it's kind of thrown at you but if you

1:23:26 ↗ have actually anything now feel free I

1:23:30 ↗ don't think we have anything okay given

1:23:37 ↗ I've spent my entire chairmanship in

1:23:39 ↗ your presence today and I have nothing

1:23:41 ↗ nothing to announce so I have we've done

1:23:44 ↗ a staff report

1:23:45 ↗ I have no chair report Kobe's no youth

1:23:48 ↗ report is there any other business or

1:23:50 ↗ announcements okay so we will close we

1:23:56 ↗ will adjourn the meeting at 7:29

1:24:00 ↗ think you're all for coming out tonight

1:24:04 ↗ gratulations and thanks

1:24:15 ↗ you

Minutes for this meeting haven't been published yet. Council and committee minutes are approved at the next meeting and embedded as a consent-calendar attachment in that meeting's agenda packet — they will appear here once that next packet is processed.