← Back to City Council Digest

Planning Policy Commission Auto captions

Thursday, April 10, 2025

6:30 PM · Council Chambers, 135 E. Sunset Way, Issaquah WA
Topics tracked across meetings:
Arts Commission Vice Chair Election 9/11
Review of Rules & Regulations 10/11
2025 Title 18 Policy Amendments 4/5
Section
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
2a
Minutes of March 27, 2025
packet pp.3–9
Staff report:
MINUTES PLANNING POLICY COMMISSION 6:30 p.m. – Thursday, March 27, 2025
4. REGULAR BUSINESS
4a
Chair and Vice-Chair Election
Action · 15 min · 6:50 PM Valerie Porter, Associate Planner · packet pp.11–12
Topics: Elections
Staff report:
Community Planning & Development P.O. Box 1307 Issaquah, WA 98027 425-837-3450 issaquahwa.gov
4b
Rules and Regulations Review
Action · 15 min · 7:05 PM Tisha Gieser, City Clerk · packet pp.13–23
Staff report:
Each year, following an election of Chair and Vice-Chair, the Commission is provided an opportunity to review the Rules and Regulations.
4c
Planning 101
Information · 30 min · 7:20 PM Christen Leeson, Principal Planner · packet pp.25–26
Staff report:
The purpose of this topic is to review and understand the role of planning, planning in Issaquah, and the role of the Planning Policy Commission.
4d
Title 18 Policy Amendments
Discussion · 20 min · 7:50 PM Christen Leeson, Principal Planner · packet pp.27–35
Topics: Land Use
Staff report:
The Planning Policy Commission (PPC) will review, discuss, and provide feedback on some of the proposed 2025 policy amendments to Title 18, Land Use Code.
5. REPORTS
5a
Council Update
6. OTHER BUSINESS / ANNOUNCEMENTS
6a
Upcoming Schedule
packet pp.37–38
Staff report:
Staff Support: Stephen Padua Staff Support: Christen Leeson 4/10/25 4/24/25  Chairs Election  Title 18 Annual Policy Amendments  Rules and Regulations Review
0:04 Well, good evening everyone. I want to
0:06 thank you for uh bearing with us uh
0:08 through some technical difficulty
0:10 difficulties to our viewing public. Um
0:13 I'd like to call this meeting of the
0:14 planning policy commission to order and
0:16 it currently is 6:36 p.m. Today's
0:20 meeting is a hybrid meeting. The
0:22 planning policy commission is in person,
0:24 but staff or members of the public may
0:26 be attending virtually or in person. Uh
0:29 Kristen, do we have a quorum this
0:31 evening? Yes, we do. All right. Thank
0:33 you. So, the first item of business this
0:36 evening is to approve the minutes of our
0:39 March 27th meeting. Are there any
0:41 corrections to the draft March 27th
0:44 meeting minutes provided in your
0:48 packet? Hearing none, those meeting
0:50 minutes are approved. And Commissioner
0:52 Adair, if you could turn your camera
1:02 on. Okay, we're going to move on to
1:05 public
1:06 comment. Amanda, has anyone signed up
1:09 for public comment this evening? No,
1:11 chair. There are no signins for public
1:13 comment. Okay. Thank
1:17 you. All right. Right. So, our first
1:19 item of business this evening is the
1:20 chair and vice chair
1:23 elections.
1:24 Um, we do have four different items of
1:27 business. It's going to little bit more
1:30 items than to normal, but it is kind of
1:31 a light lift uh other than some policy
1:34 discussion towards the end, but we're
1:36 going to kick it off with our chair and
1:37 vice chair elections. And the way this
1:40 process is going to work is first I will
1:43 call for nominations. And when all of
1:45 those nominations have been made, we'll
1:47 close those nominations. If only one
1:49 nomination is made, that member is
1:51 considered elected to the position by
1:53 unanimous consent. If multiple
1:56 nominations are made for a position,
1:58 we'll hold time at our next meeting for
2:00 an election process. At that meeting,
2:03 commissioners will have the opportunity
2:05 to discuss the nominees. will then ask
2:08 commissioners to cast votes on the
2:09 nominees in the order that they were
2:11 nominated by a roll call a roll call
2:14 vote. Commissioners may vote for only
2:17 one nominee, but they may vote for
2:19 themselves. The first commissioner
2:21 receiving a majority vote is elected to
2:23 the position and we will repeat that
2:25 entire process for the vice chair as
2:27 well. So, we will begin. Are there any
2:30 nominations for
2:33 chair? Uh, Commissioner Crass, I
2:36 nominate uh uh Jason Voice for a chair.
2:41 Are there any other nominations?
2:48 All right. By unanimous consent. Thank
2:50 you, Katya. Um, yeah, thank you very
2:54 much. I appreciate it. It's been great
2:56 to be your chair this past year. I'm
2:57 looking forward to the next year working
2:59 with our new commissioners as well as
3:01 with our older commissioners. It's a
3:04 great privilege and I tell people quite
3:06 often it's the best job in Isiqua and I
3:08 truly believe that. So we have a lot of
3:10 fun here at this particular commission
3:12 and uh yeah looking forward to this next
3:15 year. So thank
3:17 you. Now we are going to move on to vice
3:20 chair. So same process. Are there any
3:23 nominations for the vice chair? Uh
3:25 commissioner Zachro. Thank you. I
3:28 nominate the current vice chair Jesse
3:29 Patterson.
3:31 Are there any other
3:37 nominees? All right. Well, by unanimous
3:39 consent, congratulations. Vice Chair
3:41 Patterson, is there anything you'd like
3:43 to say?
3:45 I'll just say thank you. I appreciate
3:46 the opportunity. Uh I've been doing this
3:50 role for a couple months now and I've
3:51 really enjoyed uh being able to support
3:53 Jason as chair as well as representing
3:56 our our commission as well. So looking
3:58 forward to continuing that for the next
3:59 year.
4:02 All right. Thank you, Vice Chair
4:03 Patterson, and thank you,
4:05 commissioners. Okay, this correlates,
4:08 but this is going to be um presented by
4:12 our city clerk and this is going to be
4:15 our rules and regulations, which we
4:17 basically update once a year after the
4:19 election of chair and vice chair. This
4:22 evening, uh city clerk Tisha Gizer will
4:25 be um presenting. So, Tisha, when you're
4:28 ready, please go ahead.
4:34 Hi, planning commission members. My name
4:35 is Tisha Geyser, city clerk. It's nice
4:37 to see you again. And just so you're
4:39 aware, it does sound like our alternate
4:41 member may not be able to hear the room
4:44 right now. So, we're working on that,
4:46 but um wanted you to be aware of that.
4:48 Um, so the planning policy commission
4:51 has a very healthy practice of putting
4:54 their rules and regulations on the
4:55 agenda once a year just sort of so you
4:58 see that they exist. You can look
5:00 through them if you'd like to and uh the
5:04 uh Steven Padua reach always reaches out
5:06 to the clerk's office to say is there
5:08 anything that you know you'd like us to
5:10 consider changing this year um which I
5:12 really appreciate because it means
5:13 you're you're following these um which
5:15 is how it is intended. Uh so uh there
5:18 are a few minor things that I wanted to
5:21 propose to you tonight. These are just
5:23 some minor kind of cleanup provisions.
5:25 Uh the first one is that and this comes
5:27 up at multiple of our advisory boards
5:29 and commissions is whether an alternate
5:31 can serve as a chair or vice chair. And
5:34 our sort of policy has been that no they
5:38 can't but it isn't in writing anywhere.
5:40 And so uh we added a set are proposing
5:43 that uh a sentence be added to the
5:45 officer section to clarify that. Uh the
5:48 second change is regarding some language
5:51 that's and it's in a lot of places a lot
5:53 of our advisory boards and some of our
5:55 city council rules. Um but we'd like to
5:57 take the opportunity to improve yours.
5:59 Um, your conflict of interest language
6:01 says that if you have a conflict of
6:03 interest on an item before the
6:05 commission that a majority of the
6:07 commission has to vote to allow you to
6:10 not vote. Um, as you can imagine, that's
6:14 that's a little uh, in my opinion, a
6:16 little strange. If you have a financial
6:18 conflict of interest under state law,
6:20 you're not you're supposed to recuse
6:21 yourself from voting on that issue
6:23 regardless of whether a majority of the
6:25 commission agrees with that or not. So,
6:27 uh, the proposed language would remove
6:29 that and just say if you are are
6:31 determined to have a conflict of
6:33 interest and if you're unsure, we always
6:35 recommend you reach out to CPD staff who
6:38 can put you in touch with our city
6:39 attorney to talk through. Um, but that
6:41 you would uh leave the room for that
6:44 portion of the meeting and not be part
6:46 of voting on the issue. And the proposed
6:49 rules also include a few common commonly
6:52 um I don't what's the right way to say
6:54 this? a few uh situations that are not
6:58 conflicts because often individuals
7:00 think they may have a conflict. It's not
7:02 and they are still allowed to vote under
7:04 state law. If you have a situation like
7:07 that, you have a relationship with a
7:09 nonprofit. This isn't likely to happen
7:10 with the planning commission, but it
7:12 could, I suppose.
7:13 Um, you do not have to abstain from
7:16 voting just because you're on a board,
7:17 but you may choose to put that on the
7:20 record and say before you take action on
7:23 an item. Um, just for on the record, I'd
7:26 like to share that I have this
7:28 relationship with this entity and I have
7:30 it has been determined this isn't a
7:32 conflict of interest, so I'll be voting.
7:34 So, I just described two scenarios to
7:36 you. one where you have a conflict of
7:38 interest under state law in which you
7:40 would leave the room and the second uh
7:42 under which you would just uh kind of
7:44 for the minutes or whatever you would
7:46 just sort of put on the record your
7:47 conflict of interest and the section in
7:49 the rules now spells that out more
7:51 clearly um and provides for what I think
7:55 is an improved process.
7:57 The third change that we are proposing
7:59 is something else that's been in our
8:02 documents as a city for a long time and
8:04 I suspect it started when our city was
8:06 much smaller and uh people maybe were
8:09 uncomfortable voting on hard issues. So
8:13 it's a rule related to abstaining. So uh
8:17 under Robert's rules when you abstain
8:18 from voting you don't vote. You just
8:21 haven't voted at all. But isquas had
8:23 this unique rule. Again, it's pervasive
8:26 in our uh rules for our advisory boards
8:29 and council that if you abstain, it's
8:31 considered to have been a yes vote. But
8:33 a lot of times commissioners don't
8:35 understand that. That's a nuance that is
8:36 aqua has. And so, uh I'm recommending
8:39 that that be removed and that if you
8:40 choose to abstain from voting, you just
8:43 don't vote. Now, we encourage you to
8:46 vote. um we want seven people voting on
8:50 these issues, but if for some reason uh
8:53 it is a problem for you to do so and
8:57 you're present at the meeting and you're
8:59 a regular member, you could choose to
9:01 abstain, but you would need to verbalize
9:03 that because uh as you've probably
9:05 heard, the chair isn't calling for
9:07 abstensions. So during the debate, you
9:09 would want to be on the record as
9:11 saying, "I plan to abstain from the vote
9:13 for one reason or another.
9:22 Oh, I can't tell if my flag is up.
9:25 My looked at me. Is my Okay. Um, so what
9:32 if there is a tie vote? So therefore, an
9:35 abstension would be a no vote. If you've
9:38 got seven people voting, that may be why
9:41 the abstension was a yes vote.
9:44 Well, there's there's lots of reasons
9:46 that it could have been a yes vote, but
9:48 yes, there's there's implications here.
9:50 So, there's implications when you
9:52 abstain from voting that can impact the
9:54 outcome of the vote. Yes. Because it
9:56 also reduces your vote threshold. So,
9:59 let's say that there um you have
10:01 wonderful attendance tonight, but let's
10:03 say there were only uh six of you in
10:06 attendance, six members total in
10:09 attendance at a meeting. To pass a
10:11 measure, to pass a recommendation on to
10:13 the city council, you need a majority of
10:15 those six members, which would be four.
10:17 Majority of those present in voting,
10:18 that'd be four members. But if one of
10:20 the six decided to abstain, a majority
10:22 of those present in voting would only
10:24 need to be a majority of five, which
10:26 would be three votes. So, it has
10:28 impacts. Abstaining has impacts and
10:30 we're certainly not recommending it, but
10:32 I do think um when people the general
10:34 understanding of an abstension is that
10:36 you're not on record. And so I do see
10:39 that it's a bit confusing as the rule is
10:42 now because me a member could abstain
10:44 not realizing how it's impacting the
10:46 vote. So if there was an So if you have
10:50 two alternates seated Mhm. then and a
10:53 regular member abstains, would it not
10:56 make sense for an alternate then to then
10:58 vote because that would standardize the
11:02 yes nos? I think that's a wonderful idea
11:04 and I think if I think first of all I
11:07 think the situation is uh hopefully not
11:09 highly uh common but yes I think as a
11:13 member if you knew there was an issue on
11:14 your agenda that you weren't comfortable
11:16 voting on you might consider uh either
11:19 not being present for part of the
11:20 meeting or checking with staff to see
11:22 about or the chair about an alternate
11:24 serving in your seat. Our rules don't
11:26 your rules don't really provide for
11:27 that. They say an alternate member
11:29 serves in the absence of a regular
11:30 member. So technically you'd need to not
11:32 be here um for them to uh move into your
11:37 chair and vote, but yes. So could you
11:40 change the language to read absence of a
11:43 member or
11:44 abstension? Just simply insert the words
11:47 or abstension.
11:48 Um you you could do that. I see a few
11:52 issues with that possibly um which is
11:55 that if an alternate you know was coming
11:57 to a meeting not prepared to vote on a
12:00 particular item and then could
12:02 potentially at the last minute be put in
12:04 a situation where they were expected to
12:06 vote that could create an awkward
12:08 situation. So I think and you know these
12:11 are recommendations and this that was
12:12 the conclusion of my presentation. Those
12:14 are the three recommendations I have
12:16 tonight. There are certainly multiple
12:18 ways to approach your rules, leaving
12:20 them as is, um, putting some other
12:22 language in there. Uh, so you could
12:24 choose to approve these tonight. You
12:25 could choose to approve one or two of
12:27 the three, none of the three. Um, I'm
12:30 open to any questions the other
12:32 commissioners might have.
12:35 Okay, great. Thank you, Tisha. And I do
12:37 want to remind the commissioners, please
12:39 let me call on you. Um, because there is
12:41 a process and an order to this. So, the
12:43 first thing we have to do is actually
12:44 make a motion before we can even debate
12:46 or ask questions. So, we want to make
12:48 sure we're doing the process
12:50 correctly because there's amendments.
12:52 Um, would someone like to make a motion
12:54 to open discussion for these amendments
12:56 as far as our rules and regulations?
13:01 Commissioner, I move to open discussion.
13:05 Uh, do we need it to be more formal than
13:06 that? Okay. Looking for staff for help
13:09 there. Phone a friend. Um, all right. is
13:12 do we need a second?
13:14 Um, chair, before the before you vote on
13:16 these, you would want a more formal
13:18 motion, but I don't see a problem with
13:20 asking questions at this point and
13:21 having some initial discussion if you'd
13:23 like before formally moving the and the
13:26 wording for the proposed motion is in
13:27 the staff memo that was included. Okay.
13:31 Our staff is fantastic. It's why we keep
13:33 them around.
13:34 Um, all right. So, let's open it up for
13:36 discussion and questions. Does anyone
13:39 have Yes, Commissioner Matthews. I'd
13:41 like to go back to I'm sorry I forgot
13:43 your last name. Helen's uh
13:46 okay um on her question. I'm not sure if
13:49 it was answered but what does happen if
13:51 there is a tie in the
13:53 voting? That's a great great question. A
13:56 mo a motion fails. So there needs to be
13:58 a majority of members voting and present
14:02 in voting to pass a measure unless
14:04 there's some other rule in place. I'm
14:06 not aware of any other rules for the
14:08 planning commission except actually
14:10 amending your rules. It says it requires
14:13 a majority of the full membership. So
14:15 four members present. But for all your
14:17 other recommendations to the city
14:19 council, it would be that majority
14:22 needed. So if here's a follow-up
14:24 question. If it fails, does it come back
14:27 up in the next meeting or does someone
14:28 have to propose that it be added back
14:31 into the agenda?
14:34 We're we're getting um into
14:35 parliamentary procedure 2011 here. No,
14:38 that's okay. I love talking about
14:40 parliamentary procedure. Um I mean there
14:42 are a couple mechanisms. So one of the
14:44 things at the meeting there's actually a
14:45 tool you can use where you reconsider
14:47 the vote which brings it back before if
14:49 that passes brings the same vote back
14:51 before the group and people can choose
14:53 to vote differently. Um another thing
14:55 would be it could be renewed at a
14:57 subsequent meeting.
15:01 Thank you Commissioner Matthews.
15:04 Anyone else have any questions um
15:07 regarding the three amendments that
15:09 Tisha has
15:14 proposed? And I'm also just uh so you
15:17 know I am looking also at Commissioner
15:19 Adair and there is a yellow hand icon in
15:24 case you do want to make comments. So I
15:25 am also I I've got my vice chair here to
15:27 keep me honest. So we're not going to
15:30 miss you.
15:31 These all seem pretty standard to me.
15:33 This chair voice um it seems like good
15:36 housekeeping best practices. I'm not too
15:37 worried about abstensions. They don't
15:39 happen often. When people do their
15:40 homework, they usually are going to go
15:41 one way or the other. If it becomes a
15:43 problem, it is something we can address
15:45 next year. So, I think we're going to be
15:49 okay. Any other discussion?
15:54 can't. You can see that I'm asking.
15:57 Maybe somebody can show you later. You
15:59 can just do one of these. use my real
16:00 hand. Okay. Um, so there may be some
16:04 matters before this commission where I
16:06 will need to abstain. I still need to
16:09 find out from the city attorney if that
16:10 is the case and it would not be a matter
16:13 of not having an opinion. It may be a
16:15 matter of personal interest. Well, at
16:17 the moment you're an alternate. Remember
16:18 that. So, but if you are a regular
16:21 member that night, then that would be
16:22 obviously something you'd need to
16:24 consider. Okay.
16:29 Is there any other discussion around
16:30 these three
16:33 amendments? Okay. Now, we need some
16:35 formality.
16:36 Correct. Would somebody like to read the
16:40 motion on the floor? And we'll get a
16:42 second and a
16:45 vote. Uh, Commissioner Zacharov,
16:49 I move to adopt the rules and
16:51 regulations with the proposed amendments
16:53 as presented tonight. Is there a second?
16:58 All in favor, please say I. I. I. All
17:02 right, that's unanimous. Those rules and
17:05 rags uh amendments have passed. So,
17:07 thank you, Tisha. Appreciate it. Always
17:10 fantastic presentations. I saw the last
17:12 one uh last Thursday, and I know they
17:14 are always exciting. So, they don't ever
17:16 think we ever get tired of hearing them.
17:21 yeah, right. Planning 301, parliamentary
17:24 rules 301. Okay, we are going to move on
17:28 and this is actually planning 101. So
17:30 that's apt. Uh and tonight our principal
17:35 planner Kristen Leon is going to be
17:37 presenting. So Kristen, when you are
17:39 ready, please take it away.
18:07 All right, good evening. My name is
18:09 Kristen Lee and I'm a principal planner
18:10 with the community planning and
18:12 development department. And we are we're
18:14 going to talk about planning
18:16 101.
18:17 So, let me make this bigger for
18:22 you. There we
18:24 go. You know, just some there are basics
18:28 in learning. There's so many different
18:30 levels of governments and jurisdictions
18:32 to what we do. So, it's important that
18:35 you all understand how it works and
18:37 where we're coming from and where it
18:38 goes after it leaves you. So, we just
18:40 wanted to introduce some of that to you
18:42 all tonight. For a lot of you, this is
18:43 new. For some of this is a refresher.
18:46 So, planning it does it shapes land use.
18:48 It shapes infrastructure. It shapes
18:50 develop community development and
18:51 transportation. it. We do our very best
18:54 to maximize health and safety safety of
18:56 all those who live and work here. We
19:00 particularly the planning policy
19:02 commission take a very broad view and
19:04 say what do we want the city to look
19:06 like as a whole and how are these things
19:08 going to work together and how are we
19:10 going to get there and it ensures that
19:12 we have choices when it comes to
19:14 transportation and types of houses that
19:16 they want to live in and where they want
19:17 to live. So it's it's it's big. It forms
19:20 the way we
19:22 live. So the state of Washington has the
19:26 growth management act that was adopted
19:27 back in
19:28 1990 and it is concerned with 13
19:32 different topics a lot. So environmental
19:35 protection, historic preservation,
19:37 community or public participation,
19:39 ongoing public participation, affordable
19:41 housing, um concentrated urban growth,
19:44 so preventing sprawl, natural resources,
19:47 transportation, it covers the
19:50 gamut, but that's sort of what guides us
19:53 in every agency and what they
19:56 do. So big picture, you start with the
19:59 state legislature, right? They had their
20:01 legislative session every year and they
20:03 proposed new legislation that has become
20:07 more and more related to planning and
20:09 what we do uh than it has in the past.
20:12 Then you have the Department of
20:14 Commerce. Then you narrow it down a
20:16 little bit to Puet Sound Regional
20:17 Council, often most often referred to as
20:20 PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council. Then
20:24 King County and then Little Olysqua.
20:27 Okay. So legislature, like I said, they
20:31 establish and enact bills. And back in
20:35 2021, they enacted House Bill
20:39 1220. And
20:41 it it was a huge umbrella for what was
20:43 to come next. It talked about different
20:46 types of affordable housing, emergency
20:48 housing, emergency shelters,
20:50 transitional housing,
20:52 um coming up with regulations to prevent
20:55 or mitigate displacement of people,
21:00 um uh diversity, accessory dwelling
21:02 units, just covered everything. And from
21:04 that point on, what now this is my
21:06 opinion, but I think this is what
21:08 happened.
21:09 Um people have taken bits of this, the
21:12 legislature has and now we have
21:15 um we
21:17 have House Bill 1337 which you all just
21:20 um acted on regarding additional or
21:23 accessory dwelling units 1110 which
21:25 regarding middle housing. Uh we talked
21:28 briefly a while ago about co-l
21:29 livingiving house bill 1998 52 5240
21:33 which controls our timelines and when
21:35 those you know when things have to be
21:37 done. There are already things in place
21:38 but those have been sped up quite a bit.
21:40 On the right is a list of and some of
21:42 these are duplicates yes but are a list
21:44 of real bills that are coming through
21:45 now. The legislature just finished um so
21:47 we'll be busy next year. I'm not sure
21:49 which of these all passed but you'll
21:51 find out soon enough.
21:54 So then you have the department of
21:56 commerce part of the state. They provide
21:59 guidance to the cities when we are
22:00 writing our ordinances. If we have
22:02 questions they help us out. We uh
22:06 particularly with middle housing had
22:08 numerous discussions with the department
22:09 of commerce. They then later on ensured
22:12 that what we are proposing and what we
22:15 adopted is consistent and complies with
22:18 the state law with our um RCWs. then a
22:21 revised um code of Washington. They also
22:24 provide grants. So the state enacts all
22:27 these laws and we need people to help us
22:29 do it. So they provide grants for
22:30 consultants or for extra staffing in
22:33 order to get these things
22:34 done. Hi
22:37 Tim Pu Sound Regional Council PSRC they
22:41 have jurisdiction over four counties.
22:44 They have jurisdiction over Kitnap
22:46 Kitaps, Snomish, Pierce and King
22:48 counties. They also have their own
22:51 comprehensive plan which is now vision
22:53 2050 and we need to comply with their
22:56 comprehensive plan. They certify our
22:59 comprehensive plans every 10 years. So
23:01 the big overhaul that we just did that
23:03 has to be certified by the Puget Sound
23:05 Regional Council before it can it's
23:07 fully in place. They provide us grants
23:10 as well primarily uh for infrastructure
23:13 but for some other things that come out.
23:15 And then they also approve and monitor
23:17 regional growth centers. Now, I don't
23:19 know if a lot of you knew this, but we
23:20 have a regional growth center. It's in
23:22 purple here. It goes from west of SR900
23:26 up to Southeast 56th, east to Pickering
23:29 Barn down to 7th and then back over to
23:32 past SR900. This is where we want all of
23:36 our or the most of our growth. This is
23:38 where we want our densest growth to
23:39 occur in the next by 2044.
23:42 So several years ago, I you I think
23:44 Stephen told you all this, we adopted
23:46 the central Isiqua plan and central
23:48 Isiqua standards um which would help
23:51 hopefully allow for and guide denser
23:54 developments in this
23:55 area. Being a regional growth center
23:59 um if we apply for grants, we have an
24:02 advantage. We don't that doesn't
24:04 necessar it doesn't guarantee us grant
24:07 funding but it gives us a little heads
24:10 up in in uh applying for
24:16 applications. Next we have King County.
24:18 Yes, they too have their own
24:20 comprehensive plan which we must abide
24:21 by. So we do that. King Countywide
24:24 planning policies or the CPPs, that's
24:27 how they're often referred. We have our
24:30 they provide the urban growth capacity
24:33 report which again every 8 to 10 years
24:37 the city's jurisdictions are required to
24:40 accept growth targets. We have we accept
24:43 housing targets and we accept uh job
24:46 targets and we come up with how much
24:49 capacity we have in our city for both
24:51 jobs and housing. takes us about a year
24:54 and a half to do this and then we go
24:55 through another year and a half of
24:57 negotiations with all of the other
24:58 jurisdictions within King County to
25:00 decide who gets what. I think I've
25:02 mentioned this before, but for 2044, our
25:05 targets for housing are 3500 units and
25:08 for jobs at 7,950 units. That's the new
25:12 units that we need to
25:15 achieve. They also have Metro. You know
25:18 about Metro? We work a lot, our
25:20 transportation planner, Jason, works a
25:22 lot with
25:25 Metro. So, this is a rundown of how
25:28 things work in the city. We have our
25:30 comprehensive plan, which is the
25:32 overarching vision. It has visions,
25:34 goals, and policies. You all have seen
25:35 that. From those, we have functional
25:38 plans like our parks and recreation
25:40 plan, our storm water plan, our mobility
25:43 action plan. Those all are five-year
25:47 guidelines of what we need to get done
25:49 to implement the comp comprehensive plan
25:51 in the next five years. From that we
25:53 have our citywide strategic plan that
25:55 also looks at the next five years but
25:57 says what actions are we going to take
25:59 from these functional plans to make this
26:00 happen and then that goes to the budget
26:04 and council says we need to get all
26:06 these things done. Some of them are on
26:07 the capital improvement plan. We need to
26:10 fund it all. That's how that comes
26:12 about. And then we have and the land use
26:14 code helps to implement all of this as
26:16 well. And then we have our performance
26:17 metrics. So at the end of every year,
26:20 it's on our website. We have our
26:21 performance metrics page and you can
26:22 look at see how we're doing. Here's our
26:24 goal. Here's what we've done. And it
26:26 goes all the way back to the comp plan.
26:28 What's not working and what do we need
26:30 to fix? So it comes full circle every
26:36 year. Then it comes to you. You all are
26:39 actually a group that is required by the
26:41 state and so thank you for volunteering
26:44 to do this. You are responsible for the
26:48 maintenance of the comprehensive plan,
26:50 all of the neighborhood plans which are
26:52 part of the comprehensive plan. Right
26:54 now we have central Isiqua and we have
26:57 Oldtown, but in the very near future we
26:59 plan on doing several more. You're also
27:02 responsible for anything in title 18,
27:04 which are the land use code amendments.
27:06 So all of those you all review and make
27:08 recommendations to our city
27:11 council. So here's this is my last
27:14 slide. So here's how it goes. So state
27:16 legislation sets and sets an agenda of
27:19 things that we need to do through bills
27:22 that they've enacted as well as council
27:24 has priorities that we need to look at
27:26 and administrative priorities that we
27:28 need to carry out. So we filter through
27:30 those and we come up with our work
27:32 plan. Excuse me. Some of those go
27:35 through PPC, some do
27:37 not. You all review what is supposed to
27:40 come through
27:41 you. We notify Congress and we say,
27:43 "This is what we're proposing." Every
27:45 time we have a proposed amendment coming
27:47 through, we notify commerce and say,
27:48 "This is what we're proposing." And if
27:50 they have comments, they will send them
27:51 back to us or again, we meet with them.
27:54 Then you all hold a public hearing and
27:56 you re make a recommendation to city
27:58 council. That recommendation actually
28:00 goes to a council committee which is
28:02 typically the planning, development and
28:03 environment committee. We work with them
28:06 for one two meetings. They make a
28:09 recommendation to the full city council
28:11 who then takes action and then we send
28:14 that to commerce for final approval to
28:17 show them that we
28:18 comply. So that's the process and I
28:22 should have told you in the middle ask
28:23 stop me and ask me anything anywhere but
28:25 um I am open to questions now. Yeah. I
28:27 know. I think we want to uh definitely
28:29 ask a few questions, I would imagine. Um
28:31 I'm thinking of that what is that that
28:33 schoolhouse rock? I'm a bill. I'm a bill
28:35 on Capitol Hill. So yeah, the long
28:38 strange process, right? Um but yeah,
28:41 we've got some time and I definitely
28:43 this is a lot for anybody even for
28:46 someone like who's seen this multiple
28:48 times. So let's open it up for questions
28:51 and um we could probably spend 10
28:53 minutes on this at least. So again, if
28:56 anyone has questions, please just let me
28:57 know. Commissioner Mole.
29:03 Yep. You want a microphone? You You had
29:05 said that the city is considering other
29:07 developing other districts. What would
29:09 those other districts perhaps be?
29:12 They're not We're not interested in
29:14 developing other districts. We're
29:15 interested in developing plans,
29:18 neighborhood plans for the existing
29:19 neighborhoods that we have. So, in our
29:21 most recent comprehensive plan, we
29:23 updated our neighborhoods, but we have
29:24 Oldtown, we have central Isiqua, we have
29:27 Isiqua Valley, we have Talis, Isiqua
29:29 Highlands, uh, North Isiqua, there
29:32 there, I think, 13 different
29:34 neighborhoods that we have and only two
29:35 have plans. Two are planned
29:37 neighborhoods already. Um, but then only
29:39 two of those have two outside of those
29:41 have plans. So, we have about nine
29:43 different areas where we want to work
29:45 with the neighborhoods and say, "What
29:47 what do you want this to look like?"
29:49 Thank you. You're welcome,
29:53 Commissioner Matthews. Yeah, sorry. This
29:55 is probably because you haven't worked
29:56 on these plans yet, but I know like
29:58 Montro and Talis have HOAs. So, out of
30:02 curiosity, what kind of overlays, you
30:05 touched a little bit on this on the last
30:06 meeting. How does the your neighborhood
30:09 plan work with those HOAs? Does it like
30:12 they go away and don't take priority if
30:14 they do some major developments or how
30:18 does that work really? So, we've sort of
30:21 started we've started to come up with
30:23 criteria, but we haven't worked them
30:24 through the administration yet. But
30:26 those communities with HOAs, yes, they
30:28 they know what they want their housing
30:30 to look like and they know what they
30:31 want their landscaping to look like, but
30:33 is there maybe some transportation route
30:36 or is there some public art that they
30:39 really really want to get and we can
30:40 find a way to help them? Is there
30:42 something else in their neighborhood
30:43 that they're HOAs don't control that the
30:45 city can help with? Maybe there's a
30:47 toolbox. So you have a neighborhood that
30:50 needs, you know, it I used to work in
30:53 Houston and we had toolboxes for
30:54 neighborhoods and they could come and
30:55 borrow tools and go do maintenance on
30:57 their houses, that kind of thing that we
30:58 used to work with. So that kind of
31:01 thing. Thank you. But you're right. When
31:03 it comes to Talis and Isqua Highlands,
31:05 those are planned neighborhoods and at
31:07 this time don't need to be there. They
31:09 would not rise to the top of the
31:10 priority list.
31:21 I think Kristen got off
31:24 light. Uh, any other questions for
31:26 Kristen on this
31:28 topic? It's a lot to digest. I mean,
31:31 it's it's a it's it's a pretty unique
31:33 process, but obviously staff's here to
31:35 help. If anyone uh wants to find out
31:37 more information about the process, um,
31:40 I know Stephen I know Kristen would be
31:41 happy to help. So, again, feel free to
31:43 reach out. And I do see another hand.
31:45 Commissioner
32:02 Adair. She's trying to talk.
32:09 Commissioner Dear, are you muted? We
32:11 can't hear you.
32:19 We can't hear you.
32:23 You could type it into the chat.
32:34 No.
32:37 Yes. Oh, there we go.
32:39 Yes.
32:43 Do you have a Do you have a
32:44 question? Commissioner Dair, do you have
32:46 a question?
32:49 One second.
33:01 Yes, I'm typing it in. Oh, we could hear
33:04 you now. We can hear
33:06 you. So, you can just speak.
33:11 Oh,
33:14 so she did put it in chat and I'll just
33:16 um repeat it out. I heard Oh, wait. You
33:18 can hear me now. Okay, great. Sorry. So
33:20 So I heard a mention of the
33:22 environmental committee, but I don't see
33:24 where it is on the slide or did I mishar
33:27 that or where does that come? So the the
33:30 environmental board is just a it's a
33:31 separate board from us. They're not
33:35 involved in our process. If we have
33:36 things that need to go to if there is
33:40 anything have involving parks, anything
33:42 involving economic vitality, anything
33:43 involving the environment such as the
33:45 tree code which is about to come to you
33:47 all, then we will take those to those
33:49 other boards and commissions first and
33:51 get their feedback before we bring it
33:53 back to planning policy commission.
33:54 That's how they fall in.
33:58 Okay. Well, thank you, Commissioner
34:00 Dare. I know there's some some technical
34:02 problems. Um but uh thankfully we record
34:06 all this. Commissioner Matthews, I'm
34:09 glad you asked that question because I
34:10 did have I did see someone sent in um a
34:14 letter to the environmental committee.
34:16 So then I started going down the rabbit
34:17 hole. So I wondered how do so they over
34:21 they view those items before they come
34:23 to us and kind of work through some of
34:25 the issues first. Is that how it goes?
34:27 They often do.
34:28 So planning policy commission's primary
34:31 purviews are over housing and land use
34:35 and the land use
34:37 code and there are other boards and
34:40 commissions that cover things such as
34:42 parks and the environment and
34:45 transportation. So those boards and
34:48 commissions are advisory boards. So they
34:51 make recommendation make recommendations
34:53 or comments to the planning policy
34:55 commission. Planning Policy Commission
34:57 then makes the final recommendation
35:00 to the city council. If it's part of the
35:03 comprehensive plan or land use code, if
35:05 it's not part of those, then this
35:07 commission has nothing to do with
35:10 it. You're welcome.
35:14 All right. Well, thank you, Commissioner
35:15 Adair, and thank you, Commissioner
35:17 Matthews, and everybody, Commissioner
35:18 Mole, for your questions. Um, and I also
35:22 do want to say thank you to our unsung
35:24 heroes this evening, Tim and Chance. You
35:26 guys are doing great. Uh, my mic gave
35:29 out, so I'm now I'm borrowing Jesse's as
35:31 well. So, it's just one of those
35:33 evenings. Um, but I if that's it, we're
35:36 going to move on to our last order of
35:38 business this
35:39 evening. Okay. And I believe Kristen is
35:42 also presenting this, but this part of
35:45 our evening is going to be a discussion
35:48 around the additional tit title 18
35:51 policy amendments. Uh Kristen's going to
35:53 walk us through these as our final item.
35:56 So Kristen, one more time.
36:05 So yes, we continue with amendments
36:07 tonight and we will be back I believe
36:10 next week or the week after that with
36:12 amendments as well. And then the public
36:15 hearing is at the end of May for all of
36:18 the policy amendments that we were
36:19 doing. As with the last amendments we
36:21 brought to you at the last meeting,
36:24 there's not a lot of policy discussion
36:25 to be had with these. They are more
36:27 minor amendments, but we still want to
36:29 preview these with you before you have
36:30 to ever make a decision on
36:34 them. So again, for you all and for the
36:37 public, we did a land use code overhaul
36:40 in 2023 and we continue to review to
36:43 make sure to that it's good, that it's
36:46 right,
36:47 that there aren't mistakes. And when you
36:50 have this many people working together
36:52 to totally overhaul a 450 page document,
36:56 there are bound to be mistakes and we
36:57 have found them or things that could be
36:59 better. So, we're working on it. So,
37:01 tonight we're talking about more policy
37:04 amendments. So, again, just like last
37:06 time, are the proposed changes clear or
37:09 are there additional changes needed for
37:12 clarity? The first one that we have, we
37:14 have several levels of review, one
37:17 through five. Four goes to the
37:19 development commission. Five comes
37:22 to the planning policy commission for
37:25 recommendation to city
37:27 council. Most of what we do is
37:29 legislative. So it is not sight
37:32 sightspecific. You know quasi judicial
37:34 sight specific legislative which is more
37:36 citywide. That is what we do. There is a
37:38 requirement right now that we provide a
37:40 notice of application to the public.
37:43 Well, since most of
37:45 our initiatives are initiated by the
37:48 city, not quite sure who, you know, who
37:50 we would notify. So, we're trying to
37:52 exempt that from this requirement. The
37:54 other one is that there's a comment
37:56 period on applications sub submitted, a
37:58 14-day comment period because usually
38:00 when you do something, an application is
38:02 submitted on or posted on the site.
38:04 You've seen the big white signs. We
38:06 don't have a place to propose to post a
38:08 sign for things all over the city. So,
38:10 we are hoping to become exempt from that
38:12 as well. And the last one is notice of
38:14 decision. We post it on our website that
38:17 it's been completed. We send it to
38:18 commerce if we need to. Um, but as far
38:21 as sending it out to parties of
38:23 interest, which is where the notice of
38:24 decision usually goes. That again is
38:26 something that we feel the city should
38:28 be exempt from doing just for legisl
38:30 legislative items only, not for the site
38:33 specific building a new building,
38:35 building a new park. These are
38:39 different. You will see more added to
38:42 this when it comes to comes through for
38:43 the public hearing. Last in our old
38:46 code, banquet meeting and reception
38:49 halls were allowed in mixed use and
38:51 mixed use central Isiqua. They were
38:53 inadvertently left out of this code.
38:55 They will be added back in. We have a
38:57 similar situation with dry cleaners and
39:01 pressing pressing stations. and one
39:05 other one came up. So, we were we are
39:07 actually now going to sit go through and
39:09 go through the entire all four of the
39:12 old codes and the new one one last time
39:14 to make sure that we've gotten them all.
39:15 But for now, this is the one
39:17 tonight. The last one is another House
39:20 bill. This
39:22 is it essentially lists all the things
39:24 that we can't do in order to allow for
39:27 residential uses to move into commercial
39:29 and mixeduse buildings that exist. And
39:33 this is this all applies to buildings
39:35 that do not change or expand. They can
39:38 change say the facade or the windows
39:40 that kind of thing but they cannot
39:41 expand the building. So this is all
39:44 allowing for residential within the
39:46 existing
39:48 footprint. So things that we may not do
39:51 are impose density restrictions that
39:53 prevent the addition of an 50% more
39:57 density than that underlying zone would
39:59 typically allow. We are not allowed to
40:02 impose parking, architectural, or
40:04 permitting requirements beyond what
40:06 currently exists. We are not allowed to
40:08 prohibit units within any part of a
40:10 building except on the ground floor
40:12 where commercial and is required. That
40:15 would be along parts of Front Street and
40:18 parts of central Isiqua.
40:22 We are not allowed to deny a permit for
40:24 the addition of units within an existing
40:25 non-conforming building due to
40:28 nonconformities such as say maybe they
40:30 don't have enough parking for the
40:31 existing use or they don't have the
40:33 setbacks that we would typically
40:35 require. Usually we would say no you
40:37 can't do that. In this case we can't say
40:39 that and we cannot require a concurrency
40:41 report for buildings that were permitted
40:44 three or more years prior to. So the
40:46 items that you see in green were items
40:48 that we need to address. the items in
40:49 black are already in our code and don't
40:51 need to be
40:52 addressed. So the first one is the 50%.
40:56 This is really interesting.
40:58 Um so pretend we have a zone say that
41:02 allows for a maximum of 10 units per
41:05 acre and in that zone there is a
41:08 commercial use building. Instead of only
41:11 allowing 10 residential units per acre,
41:14 we have to allow 15 per acre. So that's
41:18 what the state's telling us and that's
41:19 what this amendment would
41:23 do. Parking exemptions,
41:27 we cannot require them to increase the
41:30 amount of parking that is there. Even if
41:33 there are 100 residents and only 50
41:36 parking spaces, we
41:38 cannot require them to increase the
41:40 number of parking spaces.
41:43 What we can do is require them to keep
41:45 the existing parking spaces that are
41:47 there if they meet the commercial use
41:49 that was already
41:56 there. This isn't parking exemptions.
41:59 This is concurrency. I had the wrong
42:00 title. I apologize.
42:04 Um, this is anyway uh this is
42:07 concurrency. We cannot require
42:09 concurrency report for a project that
42:12 was
42:13 permitted three or more years ago. So
42:16 concurrency is what keeps our
42:19 infrastructure, our roads from
42:22 being totally overcrowded with the with
42:25 three exceptions, I believe, maybe four.
42:27 There are a few places where we can do
42:28 it.
42:31 But typically when people come in they
42:34 have to tell us how many units or how
42:35 many trips their development is going to
42:37 produce if it produces a certain number
42:40 of unit trips and I think that's 30 they
42:42 are pro they are required to provide us
42:44 with a concurrency or a traffic study
42:47 and from that we determine what their
42:49 mitigation are going to be for the
42:52 traffic they are going to produce but in
42:54 this case we are not allowed to do it.
42:55 They can tell us how many trips they're
42:57 going to provide or they're going to c
42:59 they are going to make. My words are
43:03 gone. I apologize.
43:05 But they we cannot require them to do
43:08 the additional work after that even if
43:10 it's over
43:13 30. Got my titles wrong. The last one is
43:26 I got my titles mixed up. So now I'm all
43:28 confused. But um
43:34 we Okay, I feel horrible. This happened
43:37 right before I came here and I
43:44 apologize.
43:48 Concurrency I believe this is Oh, this
43:51 is parking.
43:52 exemptions. They are I'll have to look
43:54 at this one and I really I apologize. Um
43:57 they are exempt. They have an exemption
44:00 in parking and I apologize off the top
44:03 of my head. These are mixed up and I
44:05 tried to do something fancy right before
44:07 we came to the meeting and that's my
44:08 lesson learned. So um but I will get
44:11 back to you on that one.
44:13 So, like I said, you're going to see
44:15 these again on well on
44:18 April on April, the second meeting in
44:21 April and the first meeting in May.
44:23 We'll come back for a public hearing.
44:24 These dates are wrong. We'll come back
44:25 for a public hearing at the end of May,
44:27 then to PL planning and development uh
44:29 PTE planning development environment
44:31 committee and then to council uh in
44:36 June. I apologize. And are there any
44:39 thoughts on the proposed changes?
44:41 Thank you, Kristen. Um, yeah, that
44:44 that's a lot. Yeah, please. Commissioner
44:46 Crass. Hi, Kristen. Um, Commissioner
44:49 Crass, is just to help some context, are
44:52 there any examples of what's been done
44:55 in the past of this conversion of
44:57 commercial to multifamily or anything
44:59 that's in the pipeline that's in the
45:01 city? So, you can say, oh, this building
45:02 over here is doing just I'm trying to
45:05 wrap my head around what this would be
45:07 like. Do you take the like the Lazy Boy
45:09 furniture store? Is that an example?
45:11 That would that would be an example. And
45:13 we No one shops there. Um and they have
45:16 a big parking lot. The um I'm just
45:17 curious if there's anything in the
45:19 pipeline that's actually there's
45:20 something in the pipeline, but it's not
45:22 been applied for yet. So, okay. So, it's
45:23 not on the development site list.
45:26 Correct. It would not be there yet. When
45:28 because that helps
45:29 dimensionalize what we're talking about.
45:31 Like is this like a commercial one
45:33 that's going to four units or is this
45:36 something like a big box store that can
45:38 go to a 100 units? It could be anything.
45:40 It could be something on Sunset that is
45:42 c currently a commercial building that
45:44 was be going to be converted uh
45:46 converted to residential. It could be an
45:48 office building. You've got, you know,
45:49 12th and Maple office building that
45:51 could be
45:52 converted. Yeah. There all different
45:56 sizes. Yeah.
45:59 Yeah. Please. I assume we're not the
46:01 only um municipality or wherever is
46:04 dealing with this. Is there an examples
46:05 like that you've seen that's where it's
46:06 been done in Redmond or Belleview. I'm
46:08 just trying to wrap my head around what
46:09 these Not yet, but I know that the city
46:12 of Seattle has is trying to do that
46:14 right now with a lot of their vacant
46:16 office buildings. So, when if you ask if
46:18 it can be big office buildings, yes, it
46:19 can. Yeah. I'll see if I can find some
46:22 in Seattle and and get those to you. But
46:24 the idea is like if Home Depot were to
46:26 sell, that could be turned into
46:27 residential. It could
46:30 got to thank Olympia for this one.
46:32 Commissioner Miller Irwin, thank you. I
46:35 had a question in regards to the uh the
46:37 parking exemptions and the note that I
46:39 had flagged for myself is it would
46:41 certainly be nice to uh modify the
46:44 existing parking plan and it looks like
46:46 that's an exemption or cannot be done.
46:49 Can you just offer an explanation as to
46:52 why the parking is restricted to be asis
46:55 when there might be an opportunity to
46:57 possibly expanded for um I guess
47:00 development of multifamily housing.
47:05 So it's a state requirement so we can't
47:07 do that. Okay, which is why we're not.
47:10 But we're also the state is also there
47:13 are a lot of there's a lot of state
47:16 legislation that has come through
47:18 recently that is actually not allowing
47:20 us to provide any parking within a
47:22 certain distance of a transit
47:25 stop or a a major transit stop. Not all
47:28 transit stops, just major um that are
47:31 limiting the number of parking spot
47:34 stalls that we can have per unit. One
47:36 that just came through the pipeline as
47:38 you and
47:40 Not saying these are happening now that
47:42 it came it came through. I'm not sure if
47:43 it passed but to provide to you only
47:45 allowed 0.5 parking stalls per multif
47:48 family unit and only one parking parking
47:51 space per single family unit. So the
47:53 state is really trying to limit the
47:55 number of parking spaces in hopes that
47:57 more people will rely on transit rather
47:59 than cars. Makes sense. Thank you. There
48:02 it is. Uh Commissioner Mole, how does
48:05 this intersect with zoning? Because in
48:09 some of the zoning within the city,
48:12 multif family is not allowed or rather
48:14 residential is not allowed. So does this
48:17 mean that this supersedes all
48:20 zoning? Housing is
48:24 allowed in almost every zone in the
48:27 city. And yes, it would supersede the
48:29 zoning, but it is allowed in almost
48:31 every zone in the
48:34 city. I think we have
48:39 four maybe where it's not allowed. That
48:42 would be up in Isiqua Highlands in the
48:47 one of the zones up there
48:50 um commercial in the Isco Highlands
48:52 commercial zone UBCOM.
48:57 Yes. What What about do we have any land
48:59 that is zoned industrial? Because I know
49:01 in the city of Seattle residential is
49:04 not allowed in industrial zoning. It's
49:06 not allowed in the industrial zone. And
49:07 so that's a good question. I need to
49:09 double check. The state didn't say
49:10 anything on that. So when their guidance
49:11 comes out, I need to double check. It's
49:13 not out yet. But right now, the way it's
49:15 stated, you have to allow residential.
49:18 So I need to I'll need to see if they
49:19 follow up on that and get more guidance.
49:20 We do have industrial zones though.
49:27 Yeah, that does seem odd that again if
49:29 you have a commercial district that just
49:30 because a um a
49:33 commercial owner decides to sell that
49:36 you could turn that into residential,
49:38 but I know you guys are dealing with a
49:40 flood of bills from Olympia. We're all
49:43 finding out what's in these fantastic
49:44 bills.
49:48 Um yeah, I mean again I think for the
49:50 most part again with the permitted table
49:52 use as well as the review process, this
49:55 is pretty standard stuff. Obviously the
49:57 third item is really something more from
50:00 this uh state. But as far as again the
50:03 permitted use table um and the review
50:06 process table that's just house cleaning
50:08 I mean ultimately is what we're talking
50:09 about. So, right, and because we missed
50:12 it, we still have to go through the
50:14 formal process to add it back. So, when
50:17 you're talking about those two things
50:18 that we missed as far as a permitted use
50:20 table. So, again, there's nothing
50:21 nefarious, there's nothing bad here,
50:23 it's just uh there has to be a formal
50:25 process to put them
50:26 back. Um, is there anyone else like
50:29 you'd like to comment as far as
50:31 Kristen's presentation? And then this is
50:33 going to come back no more times. This
50:36 will come back at the public hearing,
50:38 correct? where we'll have u action on
50:41 it. So again, it's pretty
50:42 straightforward, but if you do have more
50:44 questions, you can feel free to reach
50:45 out to staff about it. But again, it it
50:48 seems like house clean house cleaning
50:51 and
50:52 um uh some guidance from our
50:58 capital. Would anyone else like to
51:01 comment before we uh close this part of
51:04 our regular
51:06 business? Vice Chair Patterson, quick
51:08 question on the review process table.
51:11 Um, how are those legislative decisions
51:15 being communicated today? How are you
51:17 meeting the requirement today? I guess
51:20 we do publish it in the paper when we're
51:23 about to have a public hearing. um every
51:25 meeting where these are going to be
51:27 discussed are they're they're on our
51:30 website and then the public hearing
51:32 notices
51:34 and then yeah through public meetings.
51:37 Yeah. And then when it's done we send it
51:39 to commerce
51:41 and I would imagine some of those things
51:43 will continue like we do our our PPC
51:46 meeting announcements or agenda stuff
51:48 like that that'll continue. I'm assuming
51:51 it just won't be a requirement. Correct.
51:53 And and when we do things like the
51:55 comprehensive plan that goes that's a
51:58 bigger notice we do I don't do social
52:01 media but you know you have your
52:03 neighborly
52:04 and I really don't do social media but
52:07 you have all these other platforms where
52:09 they're advertised and so our our
52:11 communications department advertises
52:13 those on as many platforms as they can
52:17 when when we have something bigger when
52:18 it's something like the clarifying
52:20 amendments. This is it. But otherwise,
52:23 we had neighborhood plans. I know for
52:24 Oldtown, when we did Oldtown, we sent
52:26 out postcards to all of the residents to
52:28 let them know of upcoming things and
52:29 what it meant and websites and so forth.
52:36 No, not at all. Commissioner Matthews,
52:38 um, it just occurred to me a little
52:39 confused about the whole footprint. Is
52:42 it when they're converting a building,
52:43 say you brought up Home Depot as an
52:45 example, are you saying the footprint
52:47 has to stay the same, but the envelope
52:49 it could be like three stories instead?
52:51 You knew this was coming. You busted me
52:53 as soon as the word footprint came out
52:55 of my mouth. I thought that was the
52:57 wrong word. Envelope. Envelope. So
53:00 envelope. You have to reuse the existing
53:02 envelope. Yes. So no, you cannot go up.
53:05 If you're going to go up, then you have
53:06 to meet our regulations. Okay. All
53:08 right. Thank you, Commissioner Mole.
53:10 When you say
53:12 envelope, do you mean that the structure
53:15 needs to remain? Because one of the
53:18 issues the city of Seattle is having
53:19 with converting office buildings to
53:22 residential is windows are very
53:24 different in residential than they are
53:26 in office. And the plenum you you have a
53:30 you don't have any place to run your
53:33 plumbing in a normal office building. So
53:36 are you saying that it needs to be that
53:40 that the the exterior structure remains?
53:44 I'm saying that the exterior structure
53:45 remains, but clearly you it needs to be
53:48 safe. It needs to be livable. So if you
53:51 need to put in more lines and more
53:52 toilets, that's great. But the outside
53:54 walls have to remain the same. You can
53:56 change out the windows. You need more
53:57 windows, you can do that, but the
53:59 framing of the building needs to remain
54:00 the same. So you can cut holes in a
54:03 cement wall. Yes. Okay. Yes. Yeah. I I
54:07 guess just for my own edification, I
54:09 mean, is this something people wanted or
54:10 is this just a a great idea that came
54:13 from nowhere? I mean, I I I don't really
54:14 see how people would want to convert a
54:16 box store. I mean, I guess I suppose
54:19 again, if it's a push for density, I
54:21 understand it. I mean, that's basically
54:22 what the last two years have been, but
54:25 practically it it doesn't make a whole
54:27 lot of sense. I mean, I would see
54:29 someone that would sell a commercial
54:31 piece of property, they would probably
54:33 most likely try to sell it to another
54:35 commercial owner. I mean, Lazy Boy was a
54:38 used to be staple. So, but uh but you
54:41 know, I would assume they would
54:44 right, but I assume it would it would
54:46 transfer into those hands. I'm just
54:47 wondering is there a big is there a big
54:49 ask for this? Not here, not in Isiqua
54:51 that I've seen. And I don't think it's a
54:53 push for density as it is just a push
54:55 for housing. It's just another option
54:58 for housing. Yeah. Yeah. Commissioner
55:00 Krauss. Hi. So, you know, you woke us
55:02 all up about this, so that's good.
55:04 Um, so what do you guys have a a
55:08 preference? Do you guys want to see this
55:09 happen? Like, do you have a point of
55:11 view that staff wants to see some of
55:14 these conversions happen or are we just
55:17 following what the state says? If it
55:19 happens, here's the rules. So, I'm
55:20 curious if you guys have a point of
55:21 view. No, it's it's a state requirement
55:24 and we welcome it. If someone wants to
55:27 come in, great. more places for people
55:30 to live. Let's build up the supply.
55:32 Yeah. Okay. Before I get to Commissioner
55:34 Millinder Irwin, is anyone else like to
55:36 speak that hasn't spoken
55:38 yet? I want to make sure we offer
55:40 everyone an opportunity to speak. It's
55:43 uh again, this is also me getting used
55:45 to a much bigger deis, so you'll have to
55:48 excuse me. It's going to take me a
55:49 meeting or two, but no one else would
55:51 like to speak.
55:54 Commission. I'm Yeah, I just want to
55:55 make sure other people. No, I used you
55:57 called me a different name than my last
55:59 I thought last time it was Commissioner
56:00 Mole. Oh, I thought I heard Mill
56:02 Commissioner Miller Erland. Yeah, that's
56:04 me. I have no further comment. Okay.
56:06 Thank you, Commissioner Miller.
56:08 Commissioner Mole. Yes. What I was going
56:10 to say was that in we we are in the path
56:13 of growth. There are plenty of areas in
56:16 the state where there is no where where
56:18 the grow there is a limited amount of
56:20 growth. And it is those areas of the
56:24 state that they that they run into
56:26 problems with converting with with
56:29 having a use for those old buildings and
56:31 B malls and things like that and see
56:33 malls that are just dying and I'm sure
56:36 the push came from areas that are not in
56:38 the path of growth.
56:43 Yeah. No, it's it's all interesting. it
56:44 just uh you know I know Isiziqua is
56:47 limited by our own topography and
56:49 there's a lot of reasons why we can't
56:51 expand. So yeah, it's just interesting.
56:55 He said a lot's happened in the last two
56:56 years I think as far as planning goes.
57:00 So uh yeah, it's been busy the last two
57:03 years. Any other further questions or
57:05 comments for
57:08 Kristen? I'm looking on the TV too for
57:10 Commissioner
57:13 Adair. Okay. Well, thank you Kristen for
57:17 that presentation. We'll be looking
57:18 forward to seeing this come back to us
57:20 uh what do you say? May the public
57:23 hearing end of May. Okay. Correct. All
57:26 right. Well, thank you. That takes care
57:28 of our regular business this evening.
57:30 So, we're going to move on to reports
57:32 and uh we'll start with city council
57:34 updates.
57:42 I don't have any tonight.
57:45 Okay. Any other business or
57:47 announcements?
57:51 Oh, nothing I can think of. Thank you.
57:54 That's perfectly fine. So, okay.
57:58 Um, I'm looking at the commission. Is
58:00 there anything for the good of the
58:01 order? Anything that you guys would like
58:03 to bring up before we adjourn?
58:09 All right. Well, again, thank you all
58:11 very much. It's great to meet uh
58:13 Commissioner Mole in person. Um
58:15 Commissioner Dar, we miss you. And
58:17 again, want to say thank you. I think I
58:19 can speak for uh Vice Chair Patterson
58:21 and myself. Thank you again for
58:23 entrusting us for another year. Um and I
58:25 also want to thank our incredible staff.
58:27 Uh we don't often say it enough, but
58:29 Amanda, Kristen, Valerie, Tisha, and of
58:33 course our unsung heroes tonight, Tim
58:35 and Chance. Thank you again for working
58:36 through these problems. It's amazing how
58:38 many of these meetings really go well
58:41 and then on one night it just everything
58:43 simply just does not work and it but
58:45 it's amazing for how many how much this
58:47 room changes hands. Everything does go
58:49 pretty smooth. So again, thank you uh to
58:53 the gentleman
58:54 upstairs. So with all business
58:57 concluded, we're going to adjourn our
58:59 meeting this evening quite early. So
59:01 hopefully you guys can go get some
59:02 dinner or you can get to your lacrosse
59:05 game. Um and we'll adjourn at 7:35 p.m.
59:08 Thank you.
59:14 Yeah, I think you'll make it.
59:16 You

Attendance

Council / Members (9)
Voiss
Vice-Chair Patterson
Commissioners Adair (virtual)
Krass
Matthews
Millender-Irwin
Mohl-Barouh
Oliner
Zakharoff
Staff (1)
Minnie Dhaliwal, Director, Community P & D Amanda Jackson, Meeting & Records Assistant Christen Leeson, Principal Planner 2. Approval of Minutes a) Minutes of March 27, 2025