Planning Policy Commission · Thursday, February 23, 2023 · City Council Digest

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

Minutes of Jan. 12, 2023

packet pp.3–9

Open packet at p.3 ↗

Staff report:

MINUTES PLANNING POLICY COMMISSION 6:30 p.m. - Thursday, January 12, 2023

Minutes of Jan. 19, 2023

packet pp.11–21

Open packet at p.11 ↗

Staff report:

MINUTES PLANNING POLICY COMMISSION SPECIAL JOINT MEETING 6:30 p.m. - Thursday, January 19, 2023

Minutes of Jan. 26, 2023

packet pp.23–31

Open packet at p.23 ↗

Staff report:

MINUTES PLANNING POLICY COMMISSION JOINT MEETING 6:30 p.m. - Thursday, January 26, 2023

4. REGULAR BUSINESS

Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update Overview, (D)

Stephen Padua, Long Range Planning Manager · packet pp.33–37

Topics: Land Use

▶ Watch from 3:20 Open packet at p.33 ↗

Staff report:

The purpose of the February 23, 2023, meeting is to

5. REPORTS

Council Update

Stephen Padua, Long Range Planning Manager

6. OTHER BUSINESS / ANNOUNCEMENTS

Upcoming Schedule

packet pp.39–40

▶ Watch from 1:14:47 Open packet at p.39 ↗

Staff report:

October

1983 segments .txt ↗

0:05 ↗ foreign

0:10 ↗ good evening everyone

0:12 ↗ I'd like to call the February 23rd

0:14 ↗ planning policy commission to order

0:16 ↗ it is currently 6 30 pm

0:19 ↗ as you can see tonight it's a more

0:21 ↗ intimate setting I do want to say

0:23 ↗ welcome to Thomas uh for any of you

0:25 ↗ don't know Thomas is one of our staff

0:26 ↗ Liaisons here at the city

0:29 ↗ um

0:30 ↗ Vice chair Bader and I know him because

0:31 ↗ he does a lot of the pre-planning work

0:33 ↗ with us so welcome Thomas

0:36 ↗ tonight we're going to have a hybrid

0:38 ↗ meeting the planning policy commission

0:40 ↗ is in person but staff or members of the

0:42 ↗ public may be attending virtually or in

0:44 ↗ person

0:46 ↗ Thomas do we have a quorum this evening

0:51 ↗ chair voice we do have a quorum

0:53 ↗ Commissioners Lewis Patterson and

0:56 ↗ Baltimore our excuse tonight

0:58 ↗ great thank you

1:00 ↗ so our first item of business is to take

1:02 ↗ care to approve

1:03 ↗ the minutes for three of our previous

1:06 ↗ meetings

1:08 ↗ so we'll begin with the January 12th

1:09 ↗ meeting are there any corrections to the

1:12 ↗ draft minutes that were provided in your

1:13 ↗ packet

1:16 ↗ hearing none these minutes are approved

1:19 ↗ as the same with the January 19th

1:21 ↗ meeting are there any corrections to

1:23 ↗ that set of notes

1:26 ↗ hearing none those minutes are approved

1:29 ↗ and then finally January 26th

1:32 ↗ are there any corrections I have a

1:35 ↗ really little typo that I don't even

1:36 ↗ know if it's worth but why not on page

1:40 ↗ six of nine of the minutes 28 out of 40

1:43 ↗ of our packet Vice chair Baden is listed

1:46 ↗ not Vader so for the record within our

1:53 ↗ all right thank you Vice chair Bader and

1:56 ↗ if staff could make that correction that

1:58 ↗ would be great any other corrections to

1:59 ↗ the January 26th minutes

2:02 ↗ all right with those noted Corrections

2:05 ↗ those minutes are approved

2:08 ↗ so our next item of business tonight is

2:10 ↗ the public comment uh these are general

2:12 ↗ public comments for the good of the

2:13 ↗ commission

2:15 ↗ tonight's comments can be made in person

2:17 ↗ or virtually and for all those who would

2:19 ↗ like to speak during public comments we

2:21 ↗ ask that you speak clearly and pause

2:23 ↗ frequently state your name each time

2:26 ↗ before speaking

2:27 ↗ and if you are attending virtually which

2:29 ↗ tonight it appears you will be if you're

2:31 ↗ making any comments at all

2:35 ↗ please

2:37 ↗ note these small concerns please mute

2:39 ↗ your microphone when you're not speaking

2:42 ↗ and if you're having any technical

2:43 ↗ issues try joining the meeting using a

2:45 ↗ different device such as a smartphone or

2:47 ↗ tablet

2:48 ↗ you can use the call-in information in

2:50 ↗ the meeting invite to call in

2:52 ↗ public comments are an important part of

2:54 ↗ the public process we take them

2:56 ↗ seriously and they're factored into the

2:57 ↗ decisions that we make

3:00 ↗ um please limit your comments to five

3:02 ↗ minutes or less Jared do we have anyone

3:04 ↗ signed up who would like to make public

3:05 ↗ comments this evening there is no one in

3:07 ↗ the room nor online who would like to

3:09 ↗ make a comment at this time okay thank

3:12 ↗ you Jared

3:13 ↗ all right we're going to jump into a

3:15 ↗ little Schoolhouse Rock

3:17 ↗ the comprehensive plan 101 as part of

3:20 ↗ our regular business tonight's staff

3:22 ↗ will be introducing the comprehensive

3:23 ↗ plan in the state mandated 2024 periodic

3:28 ↗ update

3:29 ↗ staff will provide an overview of this

3:31 ↗ project and ask for initial feedback

3:32 ↗ after their presentation

3:34 ↗ so staff please go ahead with your

3:36 ↗ presentation

3:40 ↗ voice good evening commissioners

3:43 ↗ uh Stephenville long range planning

3:45 ↗ manager and today I'm going to talk comp

3:47 ↗ plan

3:48 ↗ for tonight's presentation it is really

3:50 ↗ a 101 just to give you an overview of

3:52 ↗ what the comprehensive plan is how it's

3:54 ↗ used and the plan for the project for

3:57 ↗ doing the periodic update and explaining

3:59 ↗ what exactly that means

4:06 ↗ so as I'm going through the presentation

4:08 ↗ we have two general questions for you to

4:11 ↗ help us with our scoping and planning

4:13 ↗ for the update project itself Are there

4:16 ↗ specific topics that commission would

4:18 ↗ like to discuss as part of this update

4:20 ↗ or is there information or feedback that

4:22 ↗ would be helpful in this process as we

4:24 ↗ are discussing the different and various

4:26 ↗ topics that will be coming to the

4:27 ↗ commission

4:30 ↗ and at any point please stop me if you

4:33 ↗ have any questions about there there's a

4:34 ↗ lot of high level information when it

4:36 ↗ comes to the comprehensive plan I'm

4:37 ↗ happy to answer any questions we've got

4:39 ↗ plenty of time tonight to cover this

4:41 ↗ topic

4:43 ↗ um so for the comprehensive plan I have

4:46 ↗ to go back back to 1999 or 1990 when the

4:50 ↗ state adopted the growth management Act

4:53 ↗ and the reason why they adopted this is

4:56 ↗ that the state wanted to incorporate a

4:59 ↗ much more organized fashion to planning

5:01 ↗ throughout the state so that our

5:03 ↗ Incorporated areas are looking more

5:06 ↗ closely at population growth

5:08 ↗ sprawl and the quality of life as one of

5:10 ↗ the major concerns of why this even came

5:12 ↗ into place and the reason I bring that

5:14 ↗ up is because this really dictates what

5:17 ↗ goes into the comprehensive plan and how

5:19 ↗ we talk about certain things and so it

5:22 ↗ it trickles down into county-wide

5:24 ↗ regulations as well as our local

5:27 ↗ regulations as it relates to what we

5:30 ↗ want in our comprehensive plan

5:33 ↗ so the the growth management act itself

5:35 ↗ provides framework for regional

5:37 ↗ coordination in addition to what we want

5:39 ↗ to look at locally it requires counties

5:41 ↗ to adopt county-wide planning policies

5:43 ↗ that provide regulations for the cities

5:47 ↗ and it requires the establishment of the

5:49 ↗ urban growth areas which

5:51 ↗ restricts where growth can actually

5:53 ↗ happen in our region

5:56 ↗ so GMA itself and our referred growth

5:59 ↗ management act GMA

6:01 ↗ requires several topics to be covered

6:03 ↗ within your comprehensive plans and I'm

6:06 ↗ not going to test you on everything

6:09 ↗ that's going to be required but the main

6:11 ↗ thing to know that all these different

6:12 ↗ topics are covered in the elements

6:15 ↗ themselves and so we actually have nine

6:18 ↗ elements in our comprehensive plan

6:21 ↗ seven of which that are actually

6:22 ↗ required by the state and we have two

6:25 ↗ highlighted items the human services and

6:27 ↗ the cultural elements that aren't

6:28 ↗ required of the state but that we

6:30 ↗ incorporate as part of our conference

6:32 ↗ plans to recognize the importance of

6:35 ↗ these topics as part of our planning

6:37 ↗ processes

6:38 ↗ and every city is a little different in

6:40 ↗ terms of like which elements they in

6:42 ↗ addition to what's required they can

6:43 ↗ have uh any other types of elements some

6:46 ↗ cities look at Equity elements some

6:49 ↗ cities look at

6:50 ↗ different arts and culture elements so

6:54 ↗ it really kind of depends on how each

6:56 ↗ City wants to tackle each of the

6:57 ↗ different topics in terms of what's

6:59 ↗ important for those cities

7:05 ↗ how this works in the grand scheme of

7:07 ↗ things is the comprehensive plan

7:09 ↗ identifies the vision for how the city

7:12 ↗ wants to plan and grow and that develops

7:15 ↗ into the goals and policies that dictate

7:17 ↗ how we approach certain things

7:20 ↗ and that feeds into the functional plans

7:21 ↗ and I'm defining the functional plans as

7:23 ↗ things like the park strategic plan or

7:26 ↗ the mobility master plan or the Human

7:29 ↗ Services strategic plan so all those

7:31 ↗ functional what I'm calling functional

7:33 ↗ plans provide more of a framework on the

7:35 ↗ strategy of how we're achieving that

7:37 ↗ Vision now and it looks at specific

7:40 ↗ actions and resources and and I wanted

7:43 ↗ to outline this because it's important

7:45 ↗ to note that these are the typical

7:46 ↗ things you don't actually want

7:48 ↗ intercomprehensive plan because that

7:52 ↗ what's supposed to go on the conference

7:54 ↗ plan is primarily just that Vision it's

7:57 ↗ supposed to provide that guidance on how

7:58 ↗ you approach things and then you can

8:00 ↗ separately look at the implementation

8:02 ↗ through the functional plans in a

8:03 ↗ separate fashion and then all the what

8:06 ↗ gets developed in the functional plans

8:08 ↗ that feeds into the actual

8:10 ↗ implementation and financing as you see

8:13 ↗ on the graphic it goes into the city

8:14 ↗ budget it goes into the types of

8:16 ↗ regulations and so that's kind of the

8:18 ↗ flow of information when it comes from

8:20 ↗ the high level vision from the

8:22 ↗ confidence plan down to what hits the

8:24 ↗ ground from the city budget

8:29 ↗ commissioner Milligan is it okay are we

8:31 ↗ freewheeling here yes please uh part of

8:33 ↗ the way through thank you very much

8:34 ↗ Stephen uh part of the way through this

8:36 ↗ when you talked about the functional

8:37 ↗ plans and maybe we're referring to the

8:39 ↗ mobility master plan which I thought

8:41 ↗ became the transportation element are

8:43 ↗ you saying that we have put functional

8:45 ↗ plans in our comp plan and they should

8:47 ↗ not be there what did I hear you say no

8:49 ↗ it's so um I'm glad you're bringing it

8:51 ↗ up because I was on one of my next

8:53 ↗ slides so that to transition to that it

8:56 ↗ is the what we have in a lot of our

8:59 ↗ functional plans identifies what's our

9:01 ↗ vision goals and policies but it doesn't

9:03 ↗ specifically say why and that's what

9:05 ↗ goes into the confidence plan why this

9:07 ↗ is our vision why these are goals and

9:09 ↗ why these are our policies what goes

9:11 ↗ into the mobility master plan for

9:14 ↗ example or these functional plans is we

9:17 ↗ have these goals and policies this is

9:19 ↗ how we're going to implement them now

9:21 ↗ not necessarily why this is our goals

9:22 ↗ and policies but this is how we're gonna

9:24 ↗ how we want to implement it here's

9:26 ↗ resources that we know so it's just

9:28 ↗ taking that that next step of okay how

9:31 ↗ do we achieve that Vision now

9:33 ↗ and trying to bring a more realistic and

9:35 ↗ the reason why we go about talking about

9:37 ↗ goals and policies is because we're

9:39 ↗ looking at those resources and we're

9:41 ↗ because we're looking at what's

9:43 ↗ realistic for implementation that could

9:46 ↗ frame some of those goals and policies

9:48 ↗ in a different way so that's why you

9:49 ↗ have these Master plans like Mobility

9:51 ↗ master plan or the park strategic plan

9:53 ↗ where they look at it all together

9:55 ↗ because some of the it makes a

9:58 ↗ difference of we don't we want to shoot

9:59 ↗ for the sky but we also want to achieve

10:02 ↗ getting there too so we want to be able

10:04 ↗ to realistically Define what this vision

10:06 ↗ is as well as

10:08 ↗ trying to Define what that Vision should

10:11 ↗ be

10:12 ↗ does that help answer your question okay

10:15 ↗ any other questions on how this works

10:19 ↗ I guess for Stephen commissioner voice

10:22 ↗ just real quickly I was reading over one

10:25 ↗ of the elements that you sent over in

10:28 ↗ the packet so typically like the

10:30 ↗ transportation element or the human

10:31 ↗ resource element those will have part of

10:35 ↗ their introduction is basically laying

10:37 ↗ out the comprehensive Plan before they

10:39 ↗ start getting into their strategies and

10:40 ↗ finances finances so they're taking part

10:43 ↗ of the comp plan whereas the comp plan

10:45 ↗ is going to be an overview of all of

10:46 ↗ these elements without getting into the

10:48 ↗ strategies and financing correct

10:50 ↗ thank you yeah it's very difficult to

10:54 ↗ define the implementation without saying

10:56 ↗ oh here's an actual goal and policy

10:59 ↗ this is how we're going to implement it

11:00 ↗ and so there's going to be overlap

11:02 ↗ between these functional plans and

11:04 ↗ what's in the comprehensive plan there's

11:05 ↗ no way to really avoid that but at the

11:07 ↗ same time we don't want to put too much

11:09 ↗ detail of why this is our vision or

11:10 ↗ goals and policies and these functional

11:12 ↗ plans because that's really what the

11:14 ↗ comprehensive plan is supposed to do

11:15 ↗ because it's you it's strategically

11:17 ↗ trying to coordinate all the different

11:19 ↗ elements so that everything fits within

11:21 ↗ that framework of what our growth and

11:24 ↗ land use is supposed to look like all

11:26 ↗ right thank you commissioner has some

11:27 ↗ later

11:28 ↗ and tonight we're focused on the

11:30 ↗ comprehensive plan and then after that

11:33 ↗ you move into the functional plan and

11:35 ↗ then

11:36 ↗ so so tonight and for the very near

11:40 ↗ foreseeable future we're mostly just

11:43 ↗ focusing on the comprehensive plan we'll

11:45 ↗ have discussion about these functional

11:47 ↗ plans because I I think that helps with

11:48 ↗ some of the conversation yeah but we're

11:50 ↗ primarily just focusing on updating the

11:52 ↗ comprehensive plan okay thank you

11:58 ↗ any other questions on process

12:01 ↗ okay

12:05 ↗ so there's two types of updates for the

12:07 ↗ comprehensive plan we're currently going

12:09 ↗ to go through our periodic update which

12:11 ↗ occasion which typically happens every

12:13 ↗ eight years

12:15 ↗ um recently and there's a little arrow

12:18 ↗ pointing to a 10 on the screen because

12:20 ↗ the state just changed the rules on when

12:23 ↗ the periodic update is supposed to

12:24 ↗ happen from every eight years to

12:26 ↗ actually now every 10 years and part of

12:29 ↗ that change requires some uh some type

12:31 ↗ of monitoring report that goes to the

12:33 ↗ state every five years to show how

12:35 ↗ progress is going towards implementation

12:38 ↗ and so that'll change a little bit how

12:40 ↗ we're going to be doing these updates as

12:42 ↗ well as coming to you with how we want

12:43 ↗ to approach the updates in the coming

12:45 ↗ years

12:46 ↗ um what's optional for our updates is

12:49 ↗ annual updates to the comprehensive plan

12:52 ↗ the city has caused fairly unique in

12:54 ↗ terms of we don't just do minor updates

12:56 ↗ on an annual basis we we tend to update

12:59 ↗ entire elements or we tend to update

13:01 ↗ larger components of the comprehensive

13:04 ↗ plan with our updates so our our

13:06 ↗ comprehensive plan is fairly up to date

13:08 ↗ in terms of what we want in our land use

13:11 ↗ and growth and updates when it relates

13:14 ↗ to sustainability or mobility and master

13:16 ↗ plan or parks and so that's what I'll

13:20 ↗ get into next in terms of the functional

13:22 ↗ plans that play into how we're updating

13:25 ↗ the comprehensive plan

13:28 ↗ it it it changes how we approach each of

13:31 ↗ the different elements so on the top

13:33 ↗ level I show minor updates for the

13:36 ↗ translation element as it relates to the

13:38 ↗ mobility master plan the sustainability

13:41 ↗ goals and policies that relates to the

13:43 ↗ climate action plan and the Human

13:45 ↗ Services goals and policies as it

13:47 ↗ relates to the Human Services strategic

13:49 ↗ plan these are all recently updated

13:52 ↗ plans that updated all the goals and

13:55 ↗ policies so all we're doing is going

13:57 ↗ through those plans and making sure the

14:00 ↗ comprehensive plan is consistent while

14:02 ↗ they did go through those efforts when

14:04 ↗ those plans were updated we just want to

14:06 ↗ make sure since we're having to do the

14:08 ↗ periodic update that it is consistent

14:10 ↗ that there is some realistic viewpoints

14:13 ↗ on how we Implement what was adopted as

14:16 ↗ part of those plans especially as we're

14:18 ↗ now taking another look at land use and

14:19 ↗ growth

14:22 ↗ and then before I move on actually are

14:24 ↗ there any questions

14:27 ↗ commissioner Milligan

14:29 ↗ in looking

14:31 ↗ a functional plans and the ones that are

14:33 ↗ scheduled for 2023. do they come before

14:36 ↗ or after the update to the comp plan of

14:40 ↗ the element that's corresponding

14:42 ↗ the the ones that are highlighted for

14:45 ↗ 2023 will come before the comprehensive

14:47 ↗ plan is done and so what will happen is

14:49 ↗ once those get adopted

14:52 ↗ or or potentially adopted as part of the

14:54 ↗ comprehensive plan but finish before the

14:56 ↗ comprehensive plan is done those will

14:58 ↗ will just make sure that's incorporated

15:00 ↗ as part of the conference Plan update

15:03 ↗ so can I follow up uh so I'm just kind

15:05 ↗ of curious how the interaction is there

15:07 ↗ for consistency and and which informs

15:10 ↗ which and which you know is there some

15:12 ↗ kind of Premium preeminence of one or

15:14 ↗ the other in instructing the outcome of

15:17 ↗ the other it it seems it seems backward

15:21 ↗ but when I go back to my comment of how

15:24 ↗ these plan the functional plans get put

15:25 ↗ together or updated they start with

15:28 ↗ what's in the comprehensive plan on the

15:30 ↗ goals and policies and revisits how we

15:32 ↗ want to change the goals and policies we

15:34 ↗ just now have to go through the process

15:36 ↗ which is a more formal process for

15:38 ↗ updating the comprehensive plan to be

15:39 ↗ consistent

15:46 ↗ please feel free as Steven mentioned

15:49 ↗ earlier this is our time to ask

15:50 ↗ questions again we'll have plenty of

15:51 ↗ time to ask questions once we start

15:53 ↗ digging into this but tonight's all

15:55 ↗ about just

15:57 ↗ finding out what we're going to be doing

15:58 ↗ for I believe the next year to 14 months

16:01 ↗ so we all get a fresh start here

16:05 ↗ And to clarify it won't be the only

16:06 ↗ thing you're doing but it is one of the

16:08 ↗ bigger projects

16:09 ↗ thank you

16:13 ↗ okay I'll keep going so with the to

16:17 ↗ start with the second line where there's

16:19 ↗ the moderate updates that is really

16:20 ↗ looking at the master plans that have

16:22 ↗ started prior to the comp plan process

16:24 ↗ uh even starting and so we're just

16:27 ↗ catching up to the discussions that have

16:29 ↗ gone through into those master plan

16:31 ↗ updates or developments and making sure

16:35 ↗ the comprehensive plan is now consistent

16:36 ↗ and then it's the same will be said for

16:39 ↗ the economic Vitality plan the parks and

16:41 ↗ housing

16:42 ↗ straight housing strategy

16:45 ↗ action plan is making sure that we now

16:49 ↗ have these policies discussions as part

16:51 ↗ of the comprehensive plan that will now

16:53 ↗ influence what those plant updates look

16:55 ↗ like so every element is going to be

16:58 ↗ kind of taking its own little different

17:00 ↗ timeline depending on where they're at

17:02 ↗ in the update of the goals and policies

17:05 ↗ for those topics

17:09 ↗ please thank you student so I'm still

17:12 ↗ getting kind of hung up on the um the

17:14 ↗ sequencing and which informs which

17:16 ↗ because I'm thinking of the

17:17 ↗ comprehensive plan as being the what the

17:19 ↗ goals and the mission and the vision and

17:22 ↗ then the other is the more detailed

17:24 ↗ which seems subordinate to the

17:25 ↗ comprehensive plan so if you're having

17:28 ↗ the action plan

17:31 ↗ being based on the older version of the

17:34 ↗ comp plan while we're updating it seems

17:36 ↗ like they're going to fall out of sync

17:37 ↗ that's my first question and the other

17:39 ↗ is are we updating these action plans or

17:42 ↗ who is updating the action plans so when

17:45 ↗ it comes to the economic Vitality

17:47 ↗ that'll be updated with the economic

17:49 ↗ Economic Development Group with economic

17:51 ↗ Vitality commission and the park

17:54 ↗ strategic plan with the Parks Board

17:56 ↗ okay and so then can you speak to

17:59 ↗ we have a comprehensive plan now it's

18:02 ↗ informing these action plans and we are

18:04 ↗ going to update the comprehensive plan

18:06 ↗ how are they going to stay in sync

18:09 ↗ well so um the reason why it's it's it

18:13 ↗ seems backwards for how get things get

18:16 ↗ updated is because we can only update

18:17 ↗ the conference plan at least once a year

18:19 ↗ and if we wanted to update them every

18:22 ↗ time we were to change a goal or policy

18:25 ↗ it would be multiple times a year and so

18:27 ↗ that's why we need to go through the

18:29 ↗ master planning process for each of

18:31 ↗ these different topics or whatever

18:32 ↗ they're calling their plans and then you

18:35 ↗ go through the discussions of how you

18:36 ↗ want to update the goals and policies

18:38 ↗ and then you do it all and then you make

18:40 ↗ the update the conference fund all

18:41 ↗ together once those discussions have

18:43 ↗ been added

18:47 ↗ yeah so if I if I think I'm think I'm

18:50 ↗ there so as these functional plans are

18:53 ↗ being updated you actually are going

18:54 ↗ through the process of having the

18:55 ↗ conversations about updated goals and

18:57 ↗ policies correct just because formalized

19:00 ↗ in the comprehensive plan process at

19:02 ↗ that one point correct across all that

19:05 ↗ makes sense

19:06 ↗ yes okay yes

19:12 ↗ and when it comes to what's required by

19:14 ↗ the state they have to match

19:16 ↗ so that is part of the process with uh

19:20 ↗ that I'll get into later is there is a

19:21 ↗ certification process with our

19:24 ↗ Metropolitan planning organization psrc

19:26 ↗ as well as with the state

19:31 ↗ can I ask you a question that's not

19:33 ↗ quite

19:34 ↗ um related to this but kind of is just

19:36 ↗ on the update process so is there so I

19:39 ↗ thought our current comprehensive plan

19:40 ↗ is through 2035 does that then get I

19:44 ↗ think is that right you gave me a okay

19:45 ↗ yes um does that then get pushed eight

19:48 ↗ years or is it in 2035 then we do like a

19:52 ↗ big

19:53 ↗ I don't know if it's some other type of

19:54 ↗ update we'll be planning it for the next

19:56 ↗ growth targets which will go to 2044.

19:58 ↗ all right

20:00 ↗ um

20:01 ↗ and

20:02 ↗ I'll go into more about that a little

20:04 ↗ bit later because there is a little bit

20:05 ↗ confusion about that

20:07 ↗ any other questions before I move on

20:11 ↗ okay

20:13 ↗ so with this update we we're looking at

20:15 ↗ three different layers of updates for

20:17 ↗ the comprehensive plan we're looking at

20:19 ↗ compliance with the state and any other

20:21 ↗ change regulations from the county we're

20:23 ↗ looking at coordination across the board

20:24 ↗ in terms of making sure that each of the

20:27 ↗ elements are actually coordinating with

20:29 ↗ each other and that they align with our

20:32 ↗ land use and growth projections and the

20:35 ↗ design of the conference plan one thing

20:38 ↗ that has been a gripe for several people

20:41 ↗ is is the accessibility of our

20:44 ↗ comprehensive plan is very hard to find

20:45 ↗ and when you find it you don't actually

20:47 ↗ know that you have it so we want to make

20:50 ↗ sure that people can actually access the

20:52 ↗ comprehensive plan and that it's a

20:54 ↗ usable tool for staff as well as the

20:56 ↗ community and so that's one of the big

20:58 ↗ goals out of this project is making sure

21:01 ↗ that we are designing this well

21:05 ↗ so on the topic of compliance is

21:08 ↗ with the growth management act there

21:10 ↗ have been recent updates that house bill

21:12 ↗ 1220 is a a recent

21:16 ↗ legislation that requires a new elements

21:20 ↗ to be or new portions to be required

21:22 ↗ into the housing element

21:24 ↗ and we'll have more discussions on what

21:26 ↗ that means

21:27 ↗ um in the next in the coming months and

21:29 ↗ then we also have updated growth targets

21:31 ↗ that'll go to 2044.

21:34 ↗ now the confusing part with this is we

21:36 ↗ have to be consistent with the regional

21:37 ↗ Vision which goes to 2050 but our growth

21:41 ↗ targets are actually for 2044 and so all

21:44 ↗ that means with 20 Vision 2050 is we

21:47 ↗ have to be consistent with the regional

21:48 ↗ policies that's all don't get too

21:50 ↗ confused by the date which is different

21:52 ↗ and then the King County

21:55 ↗ um the planning policies that is where

21:59 ↗ there is kind of a trickle effect from

22:01 ↗ the state in terms of like how the

22:03 ↗ growth projections might change and

22:04 ↗ that's what we got to be consistent with

22:06 ↗ with our land use chapter

22:09 ↗ any questions on compliance

22:17 ↗ now for coordination like I said we want

22:20 ↗ to make sure that all these different

22:21 ↗ elements since they're they're getting

22:24 ↗ updated or developed at different

22:25 ↗ timelines we want to make sure through

22:27 ↗ this periodic update they're consistent

22:29 ↗ with each other and they coordinate and

22:31 ↗ that they complement each other and that

22:33 ↗ they support our land use and our growth

22:35 ↗ projections because if they don't the

22:38 ↗ certification process and the

22:40 ↗ discussions with the state will be

22:41 ↗ fairly difficult because that's what

22:43 ↗ they're really looking for

22:51 ↗ and design design for the comprehensive

22:54 ↗ plan like I said we want to make sure

22:55 ↗ the comprehensive plan is accessible and

22:57 ↗ it works with the performance metrics

23:00 ↗ the city is defined for how we are

23:02 ↗ progressing as a city and so the city of

23:05 ↗ Redmond's website has put an example

23:07 ↗ that you should be able to go to some

23:10 ↗ type of online

23:12 ↗ location with our comprehensive plan and

23:15 ↗ right there in front of you should be

23:16 ↗ the conference plan and it should be

23:18 ↗ easy to find the vision it should be

23:20 ↗ easy to figure out where the goals and

23:22 ↗ policies Branch out for any particular

23:25 ↗ topic and it should be a fairly easy

23:28 ↗ experience for navigating what the city

23:31 ↗ is doing and how it's going to do it

23:34 ↗ so we are going to be working with a

23:36 ↗ consultant to come up with different

23:37 ↗ options for how to make this accessible

23:39 ↗ but also a tool for the city as it

23:42 ↗ relates to the work that we're doing on

23:45 ↗ the ground in terms of like the city

23:46 ↗ budget the projects that are going out

23:48 ↗ in the city as well as the programs that

23:50 ↗ staff manage

23:53 ↗ any questions on design

23:57 ↗ a quick question for you on design

23:59 ↗ Steven as far as that you guys are

24:01 ↗ working with a consultant is that

24:02 ↗ something that's going to be brought or

24:04 ↗ is that something you guys are going to

24:05 ↗ do internally as staff

24:08 ↗ everything that we change with the

24:10 ↗ conference plan will be bringing to the

24:12 ↗ planning call Planning Commission okay

24:15 ↗ thank you

24:19 ↗ any other questions

24:25 ↗ so another new update that you can

24:27 ↗ expect through the comprehensive plan uh

24:29 ↗ periodic update is that we're going to

24:31 ↗ be creating a new environment chapter

24:32 ↗ and what this will look like is actually

24:35 ↗ splitting the land the existing land use

24:37 ↗ chapter into two and then working with

24:39 ↗ the environmental board on if there's

24:41 ↗ anything that should be different so

24:43 ↗ when we adopted the climate action plan

24:46 ↗ a few years ago we incorporated all the

24:49 ↗ sustainability elements into the land

24:51 ↗ use chapter as well as some of the other

24:53 ↗ elements in the comprehensive plan but

24:55 ↗ that really made a really large land use

24:57 ↗ element and because of the complex

25:01 ↗ nature of a lot of the

25:04 ↗ environment related policies and goals

25:06 ↗ it doesn't make sense to us to keep that

25:08 ↗ as part of the land use when it's not

25:10 ↗ necessarily land use goals and policies

25:12 ↗ and so we actually want to separate that

25:14 ↗ out so that it's clear in terms of what

25:16 ↗ our sustainability goals what our

25:18 ↗ climate action goals what are any other

25:21 ↗ environmental related goals that are

25:23 ↗ more of a standalone as part of the

25:25 ↗ Standalone element rather than

25:27 ↗ um

25:28 ↗ in as part of the land use element now

25:31 ↗ if there's Mobility related

25:34 ↗ sustainability goals or if there's Parks

25:36 ↗ related climate action goals that's

25:39 ↗ going to stay in the Parks or the

25:40 ↗ mobility element because it is more

25:42 ↗ specific to those elements but if it is

25:45 ↗ really only about the environment or

25:48 ↗ anything that doesn't influence or

25:51 ↗ direct provide guidance for any of the

25:54 ↗ other elements and then it'll go in the

25:56 ↗ environment element

26:00 ↗ is there any questions on that

26:03 ↗ and we'll probably have some overlapping

26:05 ↗ conversations with the planning policy

26:07 ↗ commission as well as the environmental

26:08 ↗ board

26:10 ↗ right just to follow up that with that

26:12 ↗ Stephen so one of the things that uh

26:14 ↗ what I noticed when we were doing the

26:15 ↗ title 18 update is the idea is to pull

26:18 ↗ those apart is because land use and I

26:20 ↗ think you and I have had this

26:21 ↗ conversation before is because it's much

26:23 ↗ more than just environmental it's also

26:25 ↗ economic it's how we use our land for

26:28 ↗ everyone here not just about creating

26:30 ↗ regulations and

26:32 ↗ broader borders and things like this for

26:35 ↗ specific critical areas so the idea is

26:37 ↗ to pull those two apart

26:39 ↗ okay

26:41 ↗ yeah and and it's not to say like one is

26:43 ↗ more important than the other it's

26:44 ↗ primarily just uh transparency of what

26:47 ↗ we're doing most people don't know that

26:49 ↗ our sustainability goals are in our land

26:51 ↗ use element and so just being able to

26:53 ↗ separate them out makes it a much more

26:54 ↗ usable plan

26:59 ↗ any other questions on this one okay

27:02 ↗ the other big discussions that we're

27:04 ↗ going to be having with the commission

27:05 ↗ is on neighborhood boundaries and

27:07 ↗ neighborhood planning uh this is

27:08 ↗ something that the city has discussed

27:10 ↗ for several years in terms of being able

27:12 ↗ to develop a neighborhood plan for each

27:13 ↗ of the city neighborhoods but it's not

27:16 ↗ very clear in the comprehensive plan how

27:18 ↗ we're going to do that so we're going to

27:19 ↗ have that conversation with this update

27:21 ↗ what is neighborhood planning look like

27:23 ↗ what what are the goals and policies

27:25 ↗ behind it how do we want to approach

27:27 ↗ each of the neighborhood plants and

27:29 ↗ develop a template so that when we start

27:31 ↗ developing neighborhood plans we have

27:33 ↗ something moving forward from with

27:35 ↗ guidance from the comprehensive plan on

27:37 ↗ how best to do that

27:41 ↗ and if you look in the existing

27:43 ↗ comprehensive plan now you won't even

27:44 ↗ find a neighborhood map you'll find the

27:47 ↗ sub area map which is on your screen so

27:49 ↗ what we need to now talk about is

27:51 ↗ establishing a neighborhood map in the

27:54 ↗ in the comprehensive plan

28:00 ↗ this question you'd like me to YouTube

28:01 ↗ what's the difference between a sub area

28:02 ↗ and a neighborhood uh the title

28:08 ↗ Kristen did you want to add anything on

28:10 ↗ this one

28:11 ↗ did I also wanted to note that right now

28:14 ↗ even the sub area map as we're calling

28:16 ↗ it isn't right

28:18 ↗ um you know things like Central Issaquah

28:20 ↗ changed we annexed the King County donut

28:21 ↗ which still shows up in there so there

28:24 ↗ are some areas that aren't even in there

28:26 ↗ um and then some people think that the

28:28 ↗ neighborhoods map people identify better

28:29 ↗ with that one so it's a matter of

28:31 ↗ talking to people and seeing where

28:32 ↗ people really belong here and and Jason

28:36 ↗ you may remember and Joy would remember

28:37 ↗ that a few years ago we talked about

28:40 ↗ revisiting some of the boundaries

28:42 ↗ um for Central and Old Town

28:45 ↗ um once the standards were done

28:47 ↗ so just just looking at things like that

28:49 ↗ that haven't been touched in a long time

28:58 ↗ any other questions on this one

29:01 ↗ uh this is commissioner

29:03 ↗ um will these boundaries affect also

29:06 ↗ like school zones as well

29:10 ↗ no so the school zones have their own uh

29:14 ↗ boundaries when it comes to how like the

29:16 ↗ school bus routes or what where students

29:19 ↗ attend schools and that's managed by the

29:21 ↗ school district okay

29:24 ↗ may I jump in one one more time yes

29:27 ↗ please this is Kristen Leeson senior

29:29 ↗ planner um I had a call several years

29:31 ↗ ago from someone when we were talking

29:33 ↗ about boundaries and

29:35 ↗ they thought that boundaries also are

29:38 ↗ where

29:39 ↗ Council prioritized capital projects or

29:41 ↗ where they spent their money and I just

29:43 ↗ want to be clear that that's not it

29:44 ↗ either these are simply neighborhood

29:47 ↗ boundaries that are used

29:50 ↗ for planning purposes so that we know

29:52 ↗ where things are being built and we look

29:54 ↗ at populations in those areas and that

29:55 ↗ kind of thing but also just where people

29:58 ↗ relate to where they live you know I

30:00 ↗ live in this neighborhood as well now

30:02 ↗ call them so anyway I just as well since

30:05 ↗ you asked about the School boundary I

30:06 ↗ thought other things may come up as well

30:07 ↗ so I wanted to be clear that no it

30:09 ↗ doesn't affect any of those things

30:14 ↗ thank you Kristen any other questions on

30:17 ↗ neighborhood planning and those

30:18 ↗ discussions to come

30:22 ↗ right

30:23 ↗ so for the engagement

30:25 ↗ um like I said a lot of the different

30:27 ↗ elements are going to be going on there

30:29 ↗ on different tracks but we are going to

30:32 ↗ be engaging all the different boards and

30:33 ↗ commissions as part of this project

30:35 ↗ because it's such a big project but not

30:38 ↗ so big like Title 18 where you're going

30:40 ↗ to be tackling everything but you're

30:42 ↗ going to be talking your more specific

30:43 ↗ topics and and each of the poison

30:45 ↗ commissions will be doing the same we

30:48 ↗ will be having interest interest group

30:50 ↗ conversations and going out to community

30:52 ↗ groups and having conversations as it

30:54 ↗ relates to the conference plan and these

30:56 ↗ topics and bringing that to you as part

30:58 ↗ of this process but we're not going to

31:01 ↗ go out or our team is not going to go

31:03 ↗ out and talk to different Community

31:04 ↗ groups about parks and

31:07 ↗ economic Vitality that's going to be up

31:10 ↗ to the economic Vitality team and the

31:13 ↗ parks team and we're going to coordinate

31:15 ↗ as much as we can because as you can

31:16 ↗ imagine it's going to be a lot of

31:18 ↗ community engagement fatigue and we want

31:21 ↗ to try to minimize that as much as

31:23 ↗ possible

31:25 ↗ so in my questions is are there things

31:29 ↗ that you're looking for this is also

31:30 ↗ specific to this is is there any

31:33 ↗ um methodologies of Engagement or

31:36 ↗ anything that you would like to see in

31:37 ↗ terms of the information you want from

31:38 ↗ the community

31:45 ↗ I don't know if this is a direct answer

31:47 ↗ to that question but um

31:50 ↗ I see the equity board on there kind of

31:53 ↗ applying Equity policies throughout and

31:55 ↗ assuming that one of the goals of this

31:57 ↗ update is to ensure that we have a plan

31:59 ↗ that is equitable

32:01 ↗ um and fair and just

32:03 ↗ um

32:04 ↗ it strikes me that like that needs to be

32:06 ↗ at the Forefront of all of these

32:08 ↗ conversations and not just something

32:09 ↗ that the equity board does and goes and

32:11 ↗ like sticks you know an equity policy

32:14 ↗ um into each one of these

32:16 ↗ um elements so I'm curious just what how

32:19 ↗ that will look

32:20 ↗ um and evolve because I think it needs

32:21 ↗ to be something that's embedded

32:22 ↗ throughout and not just kind of the

32:25 ↗ equity board is tasked with

32:28 ↗ that's a great question thank you

32:30 ↗ um so we plan to look at each of the

32:33 ↗ different elements on how to incorporate

32:35 ↗ new policies as released to equity and

32:37 ↗ Equitable access to uh to city services

32:39 ↗ and amenities the city is in development

32:43 ↗ of what they're calling an equity

32:44 ↗ framework to help provide that lens but

32:47 ↗ it's not going to be ready by the time

32:49 ↗ this project is going to be done and so

32:51 ↗ we are going to be doing some

32:53 ↗ preliminary looks as it relates to

32:54 ↗ equity and then doing more analysis

32:56 ↗ later once that Equity framework is

32:58 ↗ available

33:00 ↗ and that's something that the equity

33:01 ↗ board is also helping with

33:09 ↗ commissioner

33:10 ↗ Mulligan I do want to hear from share a

33:12 ↗ voice about economic Vitality I thought

33:15 ↗ you might have something to say there

33:16 ↗ but I have something related and that is

33:19 ↗ how do we look at

33:21 ↗ the sustainability in a different the

33:25 ↗ different like economic sustainability

33:27 ↗ for the city so one thing that we talk

33:30 ↗ about is the tax base or you know how we

33:33 ↗ distribute certain objectives or even

33:37 ↗ land use decisions and how they impact

33:39 ↗ our revenues how do we do that how do we

33:43 ↗ know we're going the right direction in

33:45 ↗ that way

33:47 ↗ it depends on the conversations we have

33:49 ↗ with those interest groups so we'll

33:51 ↗ likely if those topics come up in our

33:55 ↗ commission meetings we'll probably have

33:56 ↗ joint discussions with economic Vitality

33:58 ↗ commission to kind of tackle some of

34:00 ↗ those topics because it's not something

34:01 ↗ that staff can tell you what how best to

34:05 ↗ achieve is it's got to be able to be

34:07 ↗ achieving what each of the community

34:09 ↗ groups are also looking for

34:11 ↗ so that's something that we'll be kind

34:12 ↗ of tackling throughout the project as we

34:15 ↗ go through each of the various topics

34:20 ↗ thank you I think that'll be wonderful

34:22 ↗ and I guess my request might be to as we

34:26 ↗ go into each element you know thinking

34:28 ↗ about how aspirational we can all be and

34:31 ↗ to find a way to fine-tune our

34:35 ↗ policies in a way that's sustainable say

34:39 ↗ for instance

34:40 ↗ um

34:42 ↗ we wish to incorporate some kind of

34:45 ↗ infrastructure that would create a huge

34:48 ↗ cost burden maybe it's a storm water

34:50 ↗ infrastructure I don't know what it is

34:52 ↗ but it's something that becomes a

34:53 ↗ municipal asset or something and then

34:56 ↗ that becomes

34:58 ↗ that would be too specific but yeah do

35:01 ↗ you know where I'm going here is is to

35:02 ↗ kind of keep us off the rails from from

35:04 ↗ being aspirational to a point that we

35:06 ↗ cannot fulfill it over the long term as

35:09 ↗ we go through the project and do kind of

35:11 ↗ our analysis of each of the policies

35:13 ↗ we'll be doing our reality check staff

35:15 ↗ will be doing that reality check

35:16 ↗ throughout the project of saying you

35:18 ↗ know do we do we want green

35:21 ↗ infrastructure as it relates to storm

35:23 ↗ water management great this is how we

35:25 ↗ can achieve that but if we are wanting

35:27 ↗ specific saying we want a storm water

35:29 ↗ Vault Under every Park in the city

35:31 ↗ you're going to be being very specific

35:33 ↗ that we're like well

35:35 ↗ this is how much that costs and do we do

35:39 ↗ we really want to make that a priority

35:40 ↗ and have that conversation with you

35:42 ↗ saying well here's these other options

35:44 ↗ we can consider at a higher level policy

35:46 ↗ level

35:51 ↗ any other questions on

35:54 ↗ and and one thing I do want to know and

35:57 ↗ I I appreciate the question on this is

36:00 ↗ because all the different topics are

36:02 ↗ being tackled by all the different

36:04 ↗ Boards of commissions

36:06 ↗ the planning policy commission won't be

36:08 ↗ able to cover all every line

36:10 ↗ that they're going to be doing

36:12 ↗ we're hoping to bring you the land use

36:14 ↗ related conversations as it relates to

36:16 ↗ those elements because that's within

36:18 ↗ this commission's purview but we won't

36:20 ↗ be able to bring you everything and so I

36:22 ↗ just want to make sure that expectations

36:23 ↗ thereof we won't be able to say

36:27 ↗ all the economic Vitality policies but

36:31 ↗ we will want to work with economic

36:32 ↗ Vitality commission as it relates to

36:34 ↗ land use policies right and I think I

36:36 ↗ think that might be getting to the heart

36:37 ↗ of the matter is what is our lane as far

36:40 ↗ as the planning policy Commission

36:41 ↗ because again the way first of all the

36:44 ↗ entire project is basically a 30 000

36:46 ↗ foot view again we're talking about

36:48 ↗ visions and goals we're not talking

36:50 ↗ about particular strategies and then

36:52 ↗ second I think it'll be helpful for this

36:54 ↗ conversation and also going forward as

36:55 ↗ to you know know what the planning

36:57 ↗ policy rules is in this one of the

36:59 ↗ questions I was going to have for you is

37:00 ↗ how are we going to be working with

37:02 ↗ other boards to your point the

37:03 ↗ environmental board is going to take the

37:05 ↗ lead on their element

37:06 ↗ doesn't mean we probably won't have some

37:08 ↗ crosstalk or even possibly a joint

37:10 ↗ meeting but ultimately I think and tell

37:12 ↗ me if I'm wrong Stephen the idea is for

37:15 ↗ us is wherever land use is involved

37:17 ↗ that's going to come directly to the

37:18 ↗ planning policy

37:19 ↗ um like that's why I asked the design

37:21 ↗ question too because that really doesn't

37:22 ↗ fall under on any board so I would

37:25 ↗ imagine that might even come to us too

37:27 ↗ but it's really more about how's the

37:29 ↗ land used into commissioner Milligan's

37:31 ↗ Point um you know that's one thing that

37:33 ↗ I'm looking forward to because again we

37:35 ↗ just spent over a year talking about

37:37 ↗ environmental constraints for land use

37:39 ↗ which is good it's appropriate but

37:42 ↗ there's also the part that I didn't feel

37:44 ↗ we got enough time to talk about which

37:45 ↗ is one you know we have to be careful

37:47 ↗ about what we tell people they can do

37:48 ↗ with their land and two also the

37:50 ↗ economic impacts that our decisions up

37:53 ↗ here have on people's land because again

37:55 ↗ that was one part of the conversation

37:57 ↗ and again after having conversations

37:59 ↗ with staff I get it it's not what we

38:01 ↗ were focused on during the title 18

38:02 ↗ update because we were dealing with

38:04 ↗ critical areas and things like that

38:06 ↗ But ultimately there is another side to

38:08 ↗ that coin which is you know are we you

38:12 ↗ know I'm not won't use examples that

38:14 ↗ wouldn't be appropriate but uh are we

38:16 ↗ are we making it difficult for people to

38:18 ↗ use their land appropriately to get the

38:21 ↗ biggest economic impact from it

38:23 ↗ and that was some of the conflict I had

38:26 ↗ previous months but I think that would

38:29 ↗ be helpful Stephen it's just kind of

38:30 ↗ letting the planning policy know what's

38:32 ↗ going to be expected from us and it

38:34 ↗ might be in one of your slides coming up

38:35 ↗ so I don't want to steal your thunder

38:36 ↗ but that I think is is kind of driving

38:39 ↗ the matter what are we going to be doing

38:40 ↗ up here

38:43 ↗ for the most part I'm covering kind of

38:46 ↗ how the the scope of how the planning

38:50 ↗ policy commission will be involved in

38:51 ↗ this project throughout the all the

38:53 ↗ slides but for the most part you're

38:54 ↗ correct it's it's primarily going to be

38:56 ↗ discussing a lot of the land use and

38:57 ↗ growth discussions uh we'll be bringing

39:00 ↗ the website or the design of the

39:02 ↗ comprehensive plan to you but we'll also

39:04 ↗ be bringing that to the other boards of

39:05 ↗ commissions as well because it impacts

39:06 ↗ them and so there will be we'll be kind

39:09 ↗ of looking at it comprehensively of

39:11 ↗ which policies impact which boards and

39:14 ↗ commissions and having those discussions

39:15 ↗ with them keeping in mind PPC only meets

39:19 ↗ twice a month

39:21 ↗ um the other boards of commissions meet

39:23 ↗ maybe once a month and so making sure

39:25 ↗ that we're also not overloading you with

39:27 ↗ too many projects there might be

39:30 ↗ consideration of subcommittees of boards

39:32 ↗ commissions to tackle kind of those

39:33 ↗ bigger topics so those questions will

39:36 ↗ also come to you of do you want to dive

39:39 ↗ into this more or do you want to defer

39:40 ↗ to another board commission to provide

39:42 ↗ the recommendation on those topics right

39:44 ↗ I think something that you know just

39:46 ↗ from my memory in the last two years

39:48 ↗ which again I I think is great for the

39:51 ↗ city it's helpful to planning policy but

39:53 ↗ I think for people that maybe either

39:56 ↗ don't know this is planning policy also

39:58 ↗ seeded some of their responsibilities to

39:59 ↗ create new boards so prior to 2020 we

40:03 ↗ didn't have an equity board I don't

40:04 ↗ think we had a standalone environmental

40:06 ↗ board so more of those issues were

40:07 ↗ coming here in a very broad roundabout

40:10 ↗ way the planning policy like you said

40:13 ↗ those new boards were created so some of

40:14 ↗ those responsibilities that we

40:16 ↗ originally had in 2018 have now been

40:18 ↗ seated to new boards and commissions

40:20 ↗ so learning to play well with uh our

40:23 ↗ other boards and commissions but yeah I

40:25 ↗ think so and I know Vice chair Bader had

40:27 ↗ a comment because I see you're going for

40:28 ↗ the microphone one thing about this free

40:30 ↗ wheeling conversation If people could

40:31 ↗ please remember to introduce themselves

40:33 ↗ it will help our secretary with the

40:36 ↗ minutes

40:39 ↗ Vice chair

40:40 ↗ here

40:41 ↗ um going back to the like how do we stay

40:44 ↗ on the rails piece in my mind and

40:47 ↗ correct me if I'm wrong here that some

40:49 ↗ of that is kind of like bounded for us

40:51 ↗ by like the vision then goals then

40:53 ↗ policy and piece on my when I think

40:55 ↗ about this the vision is that place to

40:57 ↗ be big and bold right it's it's what we

41:00 ↗ want to achieve

41:01 ↗ um kind of holistically right across

41:03 ↗ these elements and then that can get

41:05 ↗ narrowed down right and so by X date we

41:07 ↗ want to accomplish this to get to that

41:10 ↗ vision and so I think I'm excited for

41:12 ↗ the vision conversation I'm curious what

41:14 ↗ that's going to look like

41:15 ↗ um because as I've sat in those before

41:17 ↗ you know that's where like the ideas can

41:18 ↗ start flowing and then you know what do

41:20 ↗ we actually want the city to look like

41:22 ↗ you know as it relates to this element

41:25 ↗ um and like go to some of those moonshot

41:28 ↗ sort of places and so I don't know if

41:29 ↗ it's structured that way or if I'm

41:31 ↗ thinking of this right and then bound it

41:34 ↗ by the goals and the policies it will be

41:36 ↗ but we'll also be writing providing you

41:37 ↗ some data so what are our growth

41:39 ↗ projections what what does zoning look

41:41 ↗ like now what is how does growth been

41:43 ↗ changing in the city more recently have

41:46 ↗ those conversations of how the city has

41:48 ↗ been kind of forming to then take

41:50 ↗ another look at the vision to see do is

41:52 ↗ do we need to make any changes is it

41:54 ↗ actually say exactly what do we want to

41:56 ↗ do and have the conversation of do we

41:58 ↗ want to make that conversation or do we

42:00 ↗ want to make that tweak that Vision a

42:01 ↗ little bit and those will be coming in

42:03 ↗ the next couple months as we talk about

42:04 ↗ housing as we talk about land use and

42:08 ↗ growth and look at what's existing on

42:10 ↗ the ground and what we see coming in the

42:12 ↗ in the short term as well as the long

42:14 ↗ term

42:15 ↗ for data informed decisions and

42:17 ↗ visioning and then parallel to that I

42:20 ↗ should probably know the answer to this

42:21 ↗ but I don't is there like a City Mission

42:24 ↗ guiding this work or a mission for this

42:27 ↗ comprehensive planning update process

42:30 ↗ there is in that where we're trying to

42:32 ↗ make sure that the the full vision for

42:34 ↗ the city is consistent with each other

42:36 ↗ across the different elements but there

42:38 ↗ isn't

42:39 ↗ um a mission for the comprehensive plan

42:41 ↗ if that's what you're asking yeah

42:48 ↗ any other questions on

42:55 ↗ commissioner Milligan here uh to that

42:57 ↗ thank you chair Bader Vice chair Bader

43:00 ↗ um the do we get marching orders from

43:03 ↗ the city council or something that

43:07 ↗ um just the city-wide strategic plan

43:10 ↗ provide a foundation or do we provide to

43:13 ↗ that through the comprehensive plan is

43:15 ↗ the company what's just what's who's up

43:18 ↗ so looking at you know that process flow

43:21 ↗ chart

43:22 ↗ the the Citywide strategic plan kind of

43:25 ↗ sits in that area between resources and

43:27 ↗ financing implementation where it

43:29 ↗ provides the priorities from the

43:31 ↗ functional plans filtering down into how

43:35 ↗ the city budget should get how the city

43:37 ↗ budget should get put together how we

43:40 ↗ put our programs and projects together

43:42 ↗ and what gets prioritized

43:44 ↗ uh the original part of the question is

43:46 ↗ does the city council like we had with

43:48 ↗ the title 18 update we got instructions

43:51 ↗ we got a chart of of objectives and and

43:55 ↗ priorities that were given to us by the

43:57 ↗ city council do we have the same sort of

43:58 ↗ thing here it's a little bit different

44:00 ↗ with the comprehensive plan because this

44:01 ↗ is more of a Community Driven type of

44:03 ↗ project rather than the city council

44:05 ↗ saying we want the vision to look like

44:07 ↗ this it's more of what does the

44:09 ↗ Community Vision how should that change

44:11 ↗ and and some of that feedback's coming

44:13 ↗ from the planning policy commission and

44:15 ↗ so if there's direction from the um from

44:17 ↗ the council it's to make sure that the

44:19 ↗ commission has a comprehensive view of

44:22 ↗ what the vision should be

44:25 ↗ Stephen may I jump in again yes please

44:28 ↗ sorry this is Kristen Leeson senior

44:30 ↗ planner we all we also will have our

44:32 ↗ docket like we have every year we didn't

44:34 ↗ do one for 2023 because we're not doing

44:36 ↗ any comprehensive plan updates but the

44:38 ↗ docket will include a list and we hold a

44:40 ↗ public hearing with planning policy

44:42 ↗ Commission on the docket of amendments

44:44 ↗ that will be done and then that goes to

44:46 ↗ city council and city council yes it or

44:49 ↗ Nays it adds things takes things away a

44:52 ↗ lot of what's going to most of we will

44:54 ↗ absolutely have on there all of the GMA

44:57 ↗ requirements that we have to meet all of

44:59 ↗ the counting requirements that we have

45:00 ↗ to meet on the docket but then you all

45:03 ↗ may want to add things to the docket the

45:04 ↗ city council may want to add things to

45:06 ↗ the docket and then that gets approved

45:07 ↗ and that's what we work from

45:13 ↗ commissioner Sim with a I guess one

45:16 ↗ question that I have is will we have

45:18 ↗ data like historical data to help guide

45:21 ↗ us in looking at the vision forward and

45:25 ↗ because there's always that balance

45:26 ↗ between the environment and the the the

45:29 ↗ um economic vitality and whatnot because

45:31 ↗ they're both very important so that we

45:34 ↗ have a pulse of the community to know

45:37 ↗ what they're looking at going forward

45:39 ↗ like whether it's the development of

45:41 ↗ businesses and whatnot or homes in the

45:44 ↗ different land uses that

45:46 ↗ um that that that we've that we've

45:48 ↗ proposed

45:50 ↗ yes so we'll we'll have a multitude of

45:53 ↗ data available for you we don't want to

45:54 ↗ show you everything but as it relates to

45:57 ↗ land use and growth and housing we'll

46:00 ↗ have plenty of data to show you in terms

46:01 ↗ of like what the project growth

46:03 ↗ projections will be what does the

46:05 ↗ housing market look like what does uh

46:08 ↗ the different

46:09 ↗ um what do the the growth in other

46:11 ↗ cities look like within our region

46:13 ↗ because that kind of plays into the

46:14 ↗ context of what our growth protections

46:16 ↗ look like

46:17 ↗ and then also for like businesses as

46:20 ↗ well the other types of Zone in and

46:22 ↗ whatnot yeah yeah okay

46:27 ↗ any other questions on

46:32 ↗ I'm gonna find the slide I was back on

46:34 ↗ so going to the schedule

46:37 ↗ what you can expect for the early part

46:40 ↗ of this year into mid-year is at the

46:43 ↗ first phase of Engagement which is the

46:44 ↗ discussions on the vision and that'll be

46:47 ↗ talking with all the different boards

46:49 ↗ and commissions and having potentially

46:51 ↗ joint boards and commissions on what the

46:53 ↗ vision might be or if there needs to be

46:55 ↗ any particular change the second phase

46:58 ↗ will start to work into the discussions

47:01 ↗ and goals and and policies and we'll be

47:03 ↗ doing some initial work based on the

47:05 ↗ discussions on the vision to guide some

47:08 ↗ potential changes Beyond any statement

47:10 ↗ state or Regional mandates that go into

47:12 ↗ the changes and then we'll have the

47:14 ↗ public hearings in early 2024

47:17 ↗ to work into the city council adoption

47:20 ↗ process

47:21 ↗ and then once city council adopts it

47:24 ↗ then we work into the state and Regional

47:26 ↗ certification process for the

47:28 ↗ comprehensive plan

47:30 ↗ any there's a pretty high level but is

47:32 ↗ there any questions on the schedule

47:35 ↗ in the next month or so we'll have a

47:37 ↗ more detailed schedule for you but uh

47:40 ↗ the plan is to meet with the planning

47:42 ↗ Planning Development environment Council

47:45 ↗ committee uh later next month to

47:48 ↗ finalize that scope and schedule for the

47:50 ↗ project

47:53 ↗ any information that you have now would

47:56 ↗ be helpful for us as we're kind of

47:57 ↗ putting these initial planning steps

47:59 ↗ together

48:00 ↗ so getting back to the questions we have

48:03 ↗ for the commission is there any slides

48:04 ↗ you want me to go back to or um

48:07 ↗ any additional questions that we can

48:09 ↗ help answer

48:12 ↗ all right

48:13 ↗ Commissioners staff is asking for our

48:15 ↗ help so this is the opportunity and of

48:18 ↗ course you always have an opportunity to

48:20 ↗ email or call but it's always fun doing

48:23 ↗ it amongst friends so please feel free

48:27 ↗ maybe we can even do a red robin here in

48:28 ↗ a few minutes I'll start real quickly I

48:31 ↗ do have a a question as far as how

48:34 ↗ conflicts resolved if there's like a

48:36 ↗ state Target or

48:38 ↗ estate regulation or something that's

48:40 ↗ coming from the state that maybe we just

48:42 ↗ feel strongly like no watch they've got

48:44 ↗ it wrong in Olympia how what's the

48:47 ↗ recourse for something like that because

48:48 ↗ again otherwise we're we're really just

48:50 ↗ rubber stamping what Olivia wants from

48:52 ↗ us which that doesn't sound quite right

48:54 ↗ if there's a disagreement with like a

48:56 ↗ state mandate there's legal

48:59 ↗ ramifications that we have to consider

49:00 ↗ and we would have to

49:02 ↗ discuss uh most of most of the time we

49:05 ↗ would come up with other options in

49:07 ↗ terms of like how we might want to

49:08 ↗ approach it so that we could still meet

49:09 ↗ the state mandate while still trying to

49:12 ↗ go with any recommendations that might

49:14 ↗ be coming from the city so those are

49:17 ↗ discussions that kind of depend on the

49:19 ↗ topic

49:24 ↗ um my question as far as how we're going

49:26 ↗ to be working with boards I know we have

49:28 ↗ a meeting coming up with the economic

49:31 ↗ Vitality board so we can probably see

49:33 ↗ one of these once every two months with

49:36 ↗ a different board uh it's working on one

49:39 ↗ of these elements or another at any

49:40 ↗ given time correct and and there might

49:43 ↗ be even instances where we're invited to

49:45 ↗ attend another border commissions

49:46 ↗ meeting as as in contrast to them coming

49:49 ↗ always coming to our meetings do we ever

49:51 ↗ get invited we did we we did at the tail

49:55 ↗ end of the title 18 project they started

49:57 ↗ inviting us to their meetings uh rather

50:00 ↗ than them coming to ours

50:02 ↗ so we've been so we're gonna hopefully

50:05 ↗ explore that as part of the conference

50:06 ↗ Plan update

50:07 ↗ it's always fun getting asked for the

50:08 ↗ ball

50:10 ↗ but again we're trying not to overload

50:13 ↗ you with you know four meetings in a

50:15 ↗ month as well so that's part of the

50:17 ↗ consideration

50:18 ↗ appreciate it

50:20 ↗ all right we can start this round robin

50:23 ↗ in a second uh one other thing I think

50:25 ↗ as far as timeline this is going back to

50:27 ↗ I believe Vice chair Bader's question as

50:30 ↗ far as like the 2044 goals it's kind of

50:33 ↗ like the it's like the housing targets

50:36 ↗ they're always moving I mean they're

50:37 ↗ they're continually moving targets so

50:40 ↗ like you said don't get hung up on the

50:41 ↗ actual year because by the time

50:44 ↗ 2044 comes along we've already revised

50:47 ↗ this thing two or three times already

50:48 ↗ and it's just going to keep pushing that

50:50 ↗ date out it's just that it's the number

50:52 ↗ we're working with the numbers and the

50:55 ↗ data that they provide

50:56 ↗ But ultimately it's going to be reworked

50:58 ↗ two times before that and that number

51:00 ↗ will it's not like we're making this

51:02 ↗ plan and then it's it's just safe and

51:05 ↗ it's good for until 2044 it's always

51:07 ↗ continually moving correct okay

51:12 ↗ yeah

51:14 ↗ um

51:15 ↗ a lot I'm trying to formulate my

51:17 ↗ question here so this kind of gets to

51:19 ↗ like the data that we'll be given um

51:22 ↗ do we update our plans so often that

51:24 ↗ like our goals like our goal post is

51:27 ↗ constantly moving or do we know like are

51:30 ↗ we actually meeting the goals that we're

51:31 ↗ setting or do we change them before we

51:33 ↗ like get the chance to I think that'd be

51:35 ↗ like helpful information to have if you

51:38 ↗ and that that'll be some of the data

51:40 ↗ that will provide you

51:41 ↗ um you know more recently we've we've

51:43 ↗ established more performance metrics for

51:45 ↗ the city that help us take a look at how

51:47 ↗ we're actually achieving our goals yeah

51:48 ↗ it could be it'd be interesting to know

51:50 ↗ like are there things that we're really

51:51 ↗ good at as a city um and then can we

51:53 ↗ push it right going back to that like

51:55 ↗ how do we put the rails on thing like

51:56 ↗ can we push ourselves a little bit more

51:58 ↗ in the areas where we're you know

51:59 ↗ blowing our targets out of the water and

52:01 ↗ you know do we need to be more

52:02 ↗ conservative in areas where you know we

52:05 ↗ haven't historically performed as as

52:07 ↗ well compared to whatever metrics we

52:09 ↗ measure correct yeah

52:14 ↗ um this commissioner Sam would uh I

52:16 ↗ think one question with that with the

52:17 ↗ data is for like human services we we

52:20 ↗ understand that whether it's uh

52:23 ↗ treatment for certain ailments you may

52:25 ↗ not be able to get treatment let's say

52:27 ↗ in Issaquah but you may have to go to

52:29 ↗ Bellevue or Seattle

52:31 ↗ um getting data to see the population

52:33 ↗ here per se of course HIPAA laws and

52:36 ↗ whatnot

52:37 ↗ um on what would be needed to be treated

52:40 ↗ here it is a cause well I think that's a

52:42 ↗ that's one good topic for this to

52:46 ↗ develop a vision on that

52:49 ↗ you know we can look at the available

52:51 ↗ information as you indicated some

52:53 ↗ information not be available to us by

52:56 ↗ law but we can look at how our Human

52:58 ↗ Services team might look into their

53:00 ↗ operations and how they collect data and

53:02 ↗ how they kind of prioritize what they're

53:04 ↗ doing uh to influence some of our

53:06 ↗ conversations if that's what you're

53:07 ↗ looking for no very well thank you

53:15 ↗ and then it's going to be your turn

53:18 ↗ commissioner Milligan here so I have is

53:20 ↗ this my the time for my wish list yes

53:23 ↗ yeah okay here's my wish list and

53:25 ↗ Stephen you already know my wish list I

53:27 ↗ I want at the I'd like to see some of

53:30 ↗ the things that we have goals for I'd

53:33 ↗ like to see how we measure up now say in

53:35 ↗ housing mix and one of the things I'm

53:37 ↗ thinking about just as an example is

53:40 ↗ what is the proportion of middle housing

53:43 ↗ in our housing mix for instance or

53:46 ↗ affordable housing and I'd like to have

53:48 ↗ those things earlier rather than later

53:50 ↗ you know kind of a set the table thing

53:52 ↗ because they could be pervasive through

53:55 ↗ some other considerations and may take

53:57 ↗ some time to think about so that's one

54:00 ↗ and and details on affordable housing

54:02 ↗ mix of what our current inventory is so

54:05 ↗ I'd love to have those two things and

54:06 ↗ then another thing on my oh and Kristen

54:08 ↗ wants to talk is that why you're on

54:09 ↗ there and then another thing I want to

54:12 ↗ see is yeah are we going to get we got

54:14 ↗ such great help from the development

54:16 ↗ commission and this isn't usually their

54:18 ↗ thing but boy they're so good if if

54:22 ↗ they're so if there's a time that's

54:24 ↗ convenient to have them participate with

54:26 ↗ the site I'd enjoy that

54:31 ↗ Kristen go ahead

54:33 ↗ hi Kristen Leeson senior planner and I

54:36 ↗ just wanted to tell

54:37 ↗ um commissioner Milligan that should

54:39 ↗ she'll be very happy to know that the

54:41 ↗ housing report card comes out in about

54:43 ↗ March or April of every year which has

54:46 ↗ the affordable housing information and

54:47 ↗ the types of housing that we have and

54:49 ↗ all sorts of information that will help

54:51 ↗ inform the housing element

54:55 ↗ and then in the in your comment about

54:57 ↗ getting the development commission out I

54:59 ↗ think I think it's great to get uh up

55:01 ↗ particularly their technical expertise

55:03 ↗ in our conversations but again they only

55:06 ↗ meet maybe once a month so we want to be

55:08 ↗ strategic on when we invite them out or

55:10 ↗ maybe invite them to maybe a subgroup

55:12 ↗ discussion on any particular topic

55:17 ↗ yeah and and I'm just remembering my

55:19 ↗ progression as a volunteer with the city

55:21 ↗ I was about started with the land use

55:22 ↗ commission like them the Urban Village

55:24 ↗ commission and what I learned in

55:28 ↗ approving applications was that there's

55:30 ↗ stuff behind these applications policy

55:33 ↗ decisions that have made it difficult or

55:35 ↗ easier for the commission to act and so

55:37 ↗ that's why it would be a really great

55:39 ↗ way to Great to interact with them at

55:41 ↗ this time to anticipate outcomes of the

55:43 ↗ policies that we're talking about

55:45 ↗ in that way I'd especially love to have

55:47 ↗ them

55:50 ↗ okay our wish list commissioner Kennedy

55:53 ↗ um I guess the first thing is I love to

55:55 ↗ see the 30 000 30 000 foot level look at

55:58 ↗ all this and looking at the vision

56:01 ↗ um I've been in many many

56:04 ↗ um planning meetings where Vision

56:06 ↗ divulges into tactics very very quickly

56:09 ↗ so I'll love to see how you keep us on

56:11 ↗ the rails on at that higher level in the

56:14 ↗ discussion

56:16 ↗ um and then my more specific request

56:18 ↗ would be details on the growth

56:20 ↗ management act I'd really love to

56:22 ↗ understand that better

56:25 ↗ who sets what parts of it

56:27 ↗ and how we're just how all that works I

56:30 ↗ would love more details on that

56:35 ↗ I have a I have a really good response

56:37 ↗ to that but I want to make sure that I

56:38 ↗ get it to everybody's questions first

56:41 ↗ I think go ahead and answer maybe we'll

56:43 ↗ have a few more questions I'm going to

56:46 ↗ follow up tonight's meeting with

56:47 ↗ actually a couple links for the

56:48 ↗ commission to consider one is through

56:50 ↗ the Department of Commerce they actually

56:51 ↗ have a teaching series on comprehensive

56:54 ↗ plans in terms of how these are put

56:56 ↗ together how they're managed by this

56:58 ↗ data looked at by the state and what

57:00 ↗ goes into them as well as resources from

57:03 ↗ the Puget Sound Regional Council are our

57:05 ↗ regional our Metropolitan planning

57:08 ↗ organization they will be actually

57:10 ↗ having some courses in the coming months

57:12 ↗ on the comprehensive plan for

57:14 ↗ planning commissions as well as elected

57:16 ↗ officials too so you'll have two

57:18 ↗ resources coming up that help answer a

57:20 ↗ lot of many potential questions that you

57:23 ↗ might have for the comprehensive plan

57:27 ↗ but she asked about the growth

57:29 ↗ management act

57:30 ↗ um and they'll dive into the growth

57:32 ↗ management sorry

57:35 ↗ I mean aren't those usually formulated

57:37 ↗ in Committee in the state house and that

57:39 ↗ how the GMA kind of works or

57:42 ↗ committee or Consultant Group something

57:44 ↗ something to that effect yeah it goes

57:46 ↗ through the legislature that he'll get

57:47 ↗ adopted um in terms of like amendments

57:49 ↗ to the growth management Act

57:56 ↗ this is our time it's only 7 28. Kristen

58:00 ↗ did you have anything to add

58:03 ↗ that's why I popped it's Kristin leasing

58:05 ↗ senior planner again

58:07 ↗ um one thing that we had talked about I

58:09 ↗ hope this is okay if I bring this up but

58:10 ↗ one thing that we had talked about

58:11 ↗ particularly for the housing element was

58:13 ↗ to have our lobbyists come who goes to

58:17 ↗ the legislative sessions and we work

58:20 ↗ with her regularly and she watches all

58:23 ↗ these bills as they go through and all

58:25 ↗ the Amendments that are being made and

58:26 ↗ keeps track of it so she would be able

58:28 ↗ to explain too

58:30 ↗ GMA and the legislature and what they've

58:32 ↗ done each year if you all would like her

58:34 ↗ to do that that's been offered up for us

58:36 ↗ as an option and that might help you

58:38 ↗ understand a little better how these

58:39 ↗ things come about

58:42 ↗ I think I mean I don't want to speak for

58:43 ↗ everybody but I we always love guest

58:45 ↗ speakers right

58:47 ↗ yeah

58:48 ↗ I mean I know you love hearing from me

58:50 ↗ every month but uh it would be great to

58:52 ↗ have Shelley come out too especially

58:53 ↗ since we're in our current legislative

58:55 ↗ session there might be some changes that

58:57 ↗ might influence how we approach the

58:58 ↗ comprehensive plan so she can also speak

59:00 ↗ to the latest the latest legislative

59:02 ↗ agenda as well

59:06 ↗ pleasure Bader

59:08 ↗ yeah it's a theravator a couple more I

59:11 ↗ guess requests or questions on the

59:13 ↗ housing piece um

59:15 ↗ I mean I just got my property tax bill

59:18 ↗ last week that the I just think

59:21 ↗ affordability in general

59:22 ↗ um you know outside of like official

59:24 ↗ affordable housing is that something

59:26 ↗ that will be

59:28 ↗ touched on um in this housing plan or

59:31 ↗ how do we kind of account for probably

59:33 ↗ the historical data that we have is

59:35 ↗ probably not really accurate

59:37 ↗ um I don't know what the time frame of

59:38 ↗ like those report cards are but just

59:41 ↗ given what's happened

59:42 ↗ um you know in the last year in terms of

59:44 ↗ property values and the call like the

59:47 ↗ Baseline cost to move into issaquah's

59:49 ↗ crazy

59:50 ↗ um and so how do we Factor kind of that

59:52 ↗ into the conversation are we really only

59:53 ↗ talking about like 80 Ami affordable

59:57 ↗ housing um in this conversation

59:59 ↗ Kristen do you want to speak to that one

1:00:01 ↗ since you're working

1:00:04 ↗ um yeah is it

1:00:07 ↗ it will come up

1:00:09 ↗ um one of the topics that Congress has

1:00:11 ↗ not been able to settle on yet is

1:00:13 ↗ missing middle yeah they've talked about

1:00:15 ↗ different variations and that's that's

1:00:17 ↗ their attempt to address affordability

1:00:19 ↗ without

1:00:21 ↗ covenants attached to it so without the

1:00:24 ↗ 30 60 80 100

1:00:26 ↗ area median income

1:00:28 ↗ this is their way of trying to get that

1:00:32 ↗ affordability market rate affordability

1:00:34 ↗ built in to the systems so yes it'll

1:00:38 ↗ come up as a topic we can have Arch the

1:00:40 ↗ arch will be back um to talk about that

1:00:42 ↗ as well and they have a lot of historic

1:00:44 ↗ data not just our report cards they go

1:00:46 ↗ way back so they can help fill in some

1:00:48 ↗ of those blanks as well

1:00:50 ↗ does that help yeah

1:00:51 ↗ yeah and the other question I had on the

1:00:53 ↗ housing piece and this just came to me

1:00:55 ↗ um in this meeting so I'm not like fully

1:00:57 ↗ prepared I hope you know what I'm

1:00:58 ↗ talking about when I say this you're

1:01:00 ↗ probably not going to but at some point

1:01:02 ↗ in our packet I think it was like the

1:01:03 ↗ first time we were introduced to the

1:01:05 ↗ housing topic there was a bill that had

1:01:07 ↗ just passed and I think it was on

1:01:09 ↗ permanent Supportive Housing or

1:01:10 ↗ something like that um in the city and I

1:01:12 ↗ remember at the time it was like pushed

1:01:14 ↗ back

1:01:16 ↗ um and we didn't talk about it and I'm

1:01:18 ↗ curious if this is something

1:01:20 ↗ um that we'll be talking about too

1:01:22 ↗ it is

1:01:23 ↗ um it's House Bill 1220 that Stephen

1:01:25 ↗ mentioned earlier and it's regarding

1:01:27 ↗ permanent and Supportive Housing and it

1:01:29 ↗ also regards it's also talking about

1:01:30 ↗ affordability just allowing it within

1:01:32 ↗ your city which we already do but yes

1:01:34 ↗ well that's a big part of what we'll be

1:01:36 ↗ talking about

1:01:47 ↗ any further questions commissioner

1:01:49 ↗ Milligan please oh I'm sorry Kristen

1:01:51 ↗ come back

1:01:52 ↗ um did you just say that house bill uh

1:01:56 ↗ 1220 is about Supportive Housing what do

1:02:00 ↗ you what are you trying to say there I

1:02:01 ↗ don't understand what you're saying

1:02:02 ↗ isn't it

1:02:03 ↗ housing density isn't there something

1:02:06 ↗ about housing density and affordability

1:02:08 ↗ there are so many different things

1:02:11 ↗ um that are out there 12 20 specifically

1:02:13 ↗ when they say Supportive Housing they

1:02:14 ↗ mean affordable affordable housing which

1:02:16 ↗ we already allow but they also mean

1:02:19 ↗ shelters so they're talking about

1:02:21 ↗ permanent shelters and temporary

1:02:22 ↗ shelters so that's what 1220 is about so

1:02:25 ↗ we do a part of this we don't do the

1:02:27 ↗ other part of it regarding the shelters

1:02:29 ↗ then you have the density that's when

1:02:31 ↗ they talk about missing middle and

1:02:33 ↗ that's where they've gone back and forth

1:02:34 ↗ and back and forth and haven't actually

1:02:35 ↗ approved anything yet but there are

1:02:38 ↗ several bills out there addressing it

1:02:40 ↗ and how to get more density into

1:02:42 ↗ neighborhoods and into cities

1:02:44 ↗ so two different topics

1:02:49 ↗ yeah there was the house bill told to

1:02:50 ↗ any of those adopted back in 2021 and

1:02:53 ↗ then that didn't include the missing

1:02:55 ↗ middle and then there's current bills in

1:02:57 ↗ the legislative session now that ends

1:03:00 ↗ next month

1:03:02 ↗ um that are talking about missing middle

1:03:04 ↗ so that's where

1:03:06 ↗ um where Chris is saying the two

1:03:07 ↗ different topics depends on if something

1:03:09 ↗ gets adopted in this legislative session

1:03:15 ↗ oh please as commissioner Simon I think

1:03:19 ↗ yeah when we talk about affordable

1:03:20 ↗ housing it's just for a small percentage

1:03:23 ↗ of the population but that missing

1:03:25 ↗ middle would would apply to a larger pot

1:03:29 ↗ a larger portion of the population right

1:03:33 ↗ yes and no I mean it would be a larger

1:03:37 ↗ portion of the population as it relates

1:03:39 ↗ to everyone but it's missing middle is

1:03:42 ↗ going to be looking at uh more of the

1:03:44 ↗ diversification of housing all the

1:03:46 ↗ different housing options that are

1:03:47 ↗ available to provide

1:03:49 ↗ um different levels of affordability but

1:03:52 ↗ not of specifically affordable housing

1:03:54 ↗ that'll be a separate topic exactly yeah

1:03:57 ↗ I think it's it's you know in building

1:03:58 ↗ affordable allows and

1:04:01 ↗ um and I know it as it's it's more so

1:04:03 ↗ for assertance like population per se as

1:04:09 ↗ opposed to the general population and

1:04:11 ↗ also I think that that missing middle is

1:04:13 ↗ a little given that diversity in the

1:04:15 ↗ types of housing to be able to allow

1:04:18 ↗ individuals or enable individuals to be

1:04:20 ↗ able to get the housing that that's

1:04:24 ↗ right for them essentially

1:04:26 ↗ yeah and then we'll we'll have those

1:04:28 ↗ conversations on the difference between

1:04:30 ↗ all the different housing diversity

1:04:33 ↗ affordable housing as well as House Bill

1:04:35 ↗ 20 12 20 and what that's uh needing us

1:04:38 ↗ to do with this update thank you

1:04:42 ↗ yeah sure boy so if this is my

1:04:45 ↗ understanding is the idea is the city

1:04:47 ↗ with these bills the idea is to provide

1:04:50 ↗ a different amount of for example condos

1:04:53 ↗ Town Homes different type of things not

1:04:55 ↗ just Mansions up on Harrison Street

1:04:57 ↗ that's the idea is to give people a

1:04:59 ↗ broad range of different housing to

1:05:01 ↗ choose from it's not that you're saying

1:05:04 ↗ 30 of our population population needs to

1:05:07 ↗ fall in this income level I mean that's

1:05:08 ↗ we're not trying to do that type of

1:05:10 ↗ social engineering here I certainly hope

1:05:12 ↗ not I mean one of the reasons is aqua is

1:05:14 ↗ a great place is because people desire

1:05:15 ↗ to live here that's what unfortunately

1:05:17 ↗ drives up Vice chair Bader's taxes and

1:05:20 ↗ my taxes because people want to be here

1:05:23 ↗ so

1:05:24 ↗ um yeah I hope there's no type of social

1:05:25 ↗ engineering in that aspect the idea is

1:05:27 ↗ to have a broad for zoning reasons

1:05:30 ↗ things like that to allow Zoning for

1:05:32 ↗ I don't know about tiny houses but

1:05:34 ↗ that's the idea condos more Apartments

1:05:36 ↗ more units like that I have that kind of

1:05:40 ↗ correct correct yeah

1:05:42 ↗ I I should note that one of the things

1:05:45 ↗ that hasn't been figured out yet but is

1:05:47 ↗ going to be a requirement of cities is

1:05:50 ↗ that we adopt

1:05:51 ↗ targets for affordable housing at

1:05:55 ↗ 30 60 80 at those different levels we

1:05:59 ↗ already have a Target that says that 40

1:06:02 ↗ of our housing needs to be affordable to

1:06:04 ↗ people up to 80 percent

1:06:06 ↗ and but that's we adopted the King

1:06:09 ↗ County targets and now the state or psrc

1:06:13 ↗ Puget Sound Regional Council is looking

1:06:15 ↗ at

1:06:16 ↗ requiring targets uh city city specific

1:06:20 ↗ targets

1:06:22 ↗ that we would need to adopt how do you

1:06:24 ↗ do that when people are building on

1:06:26 ↗ either private land or their own land I

1:06:28 ↗ mean I can understand how you build them

1:06:29 ↗ into covenants with development

1:06:31 ↗ agreements right so for example the

1:06:33 ↗ development that went up in the

1:06:35 ↗ highlands the Taylor Morrison you can

1:06:36 ↗ have X amount that goes to affordable

1:06:39 ↗ housing but if someone's building

1:06:41 ↗ condos I mean again is is that the idea

1:06:44 ↗ is that they now have to have X Y and Z

1:06:46 ↗ in order to build period

1:06:48 ↗ well I think the idea is that we have to

1:06:50 ↗ accommodate for it just like our housing

1:06:52 ↗ targets and just like our job targets we

1:06:54 ↗ have to accommodate for it but the

1:06:56 ↗ Market's going to do what the Market's

1:06:57 ↗ going to do but we can find other ways

1:07:00 ↗ to try and incentivize through

1:07:02 ↗ inclusionary zoning which we have

1:07:04 ↗ or through you know we've done it

1:07:05 ↗ through development agreements in the

1:07:07 ↗ past right through a development bonus

1:07:09 ↗ so there are different programs out

1:07:11 ↗ there to incentivize

1:07:12 ↗ right and sometimes require yeah I

1:07:14 ↗ remember the last growth Target report

1:07:16 ↗ card we did really well

1:07:18 ↗ um I don't know to

1:07:19 ↗ I don't know the percentages of our

1:07:21 ↗ affordable housing but it's it's not

1:07:23 ↗ zero I mean I know we've been working

1:07:26 ↗ with Arch for I believe Kristen you told

1:07:28 ↗ me 20 something years so it's been a

1:07:31 ↗ long time

1:07:32 ↗ I don't think it's at zero by any means

1:07:35 ↗ commissioner simota

1:07:37 ↗ the commissioner Sam Woulda

1:07:40 ↗ um the other aspect is also look at it

1:07:42 ↗ like the population as well like the

1:07:45 ↗ median income and I'll be able to also

1:07:48 ↗ look to see what the population within

1:07:51 ↗ Issaquah could actually afford if they

1:07:53 ↗ could actually afford to live in the

1:07:55 ↗ city that they're from or that they live

1:07:57 ↗ it or they have to move out as well you

1:08:00 ↗ know so that that's one thing that I

1:08:03 ↗ think a good discussion would be good on

1:08:05 ↗ as well

1:08:09 ↗ yeah as part of the housing discussions

1:08:11 ↗ and our growth discussions we'll have

1:08:13 ↗ that in terms of like our job growth

1:08:15 ↗ targets and and the affordability in

1:08:17 ↗ terms of that median income of issquar

1:08:21 ↗ residents and what that affordability

1:08:23 ↗ looks like or lack of affordability

1:08:25 ↗ looks like

1:08:29 ↗ thank you

1:08:30 ↗ any other questions or wish lists

1:08:34 ↗ lots of discussion you bet uh yeah and

1:08:37 ↗ it's hard not to just Dive Right In

1:08:39 ↗ right now and

1:08:40 ↗ then

1:08:42 ↗ I don't know how you can work this into

1:08:44 ↗ policy language but home ownership is a

1:08:48 ↗ is another issue that's really difficult

1:08:50 ↗ for communities to tackle and often

1:08:53 ↗ depend on

1:08:54 ↗ you know affordable home ownership you

1:08:57 ↗ know we talk about affordability we talk

1:08:58 ↗ about form the middle housing is a form

1:09:02 ↗ type but it doesn't say whether it's you

1:09:05 ↗ know whether it's got home ownership and

1:09:08 ↗ and something a trend or not a trend but

1:09:10 ↗ a characteristic that Issaquah used to

1:09:13 ↗ have was very high home ownership now we

1:09:16 ↗ weren't this big a town then we were

1:09:18 ↗ just a suburb but uh homeownership uh

1:09:20 ↗ seems to provide qualities that we might

1:09:23 ↗ want to look at to see if there's a way

1:09:25 ↗ to preserve or enhance or Foster that's

1:09:28 ↗ a family ownership I'm not sure just

1:09:30 ↗ something to talk about thank you for

1:09:32 ↗ that comment that was fantastic thank

1:09:33 ↗ you commissioner million

1:09:41 ↗ as commissioner said I think that's a

1:09:43 ↗ great point you brought up of commission

1:09:46 ↗ Milligan because I know we talk

1:09:47 ↗ affordable house it includes Apartments

1:09:50 ↗ but you may have a certain portion of

1:09:53 ↗ the population that wants to actually

1:09:54 ↗ own a home

1:09:56 ↗ um for the foreseeable future as well so

1:09:59 ↗ that that has to be something that's

1:10:00 ↗ part of this discussion where we talk

1:10:03 ↗ about the affordable houses

1:10:10 ↗ I know it's not a vote but I second that

1:10:13 ↗ that's a great metric I mean it's been

1:10:15 ↗ proven uh through multiple studies

1:10:18 ↗ home ownership enhances the communities

1:10:20 ↗ around them so if we could look into

1:10:22 ↗ that I'll put that on my wish list too

1:10:28 ↗ any other questions for Stephen uh

1:10:31 ↗ Kristen staff

1:10:34 ↗ I'm gonna have lots of time to ask you

1:10:35 ↗ guys lots of questions I'm sure we will

1:10:38 ↗ we will have plenty of time to dive into

1:10:40 ↗ these topics

1:10:42 ↗ okay well going once going twice does

1:10:44 ↗ anybody want to do a round robin one

1:10:45 ↗ more time

1:10:47 ↗ nope okay I think we are good Stephen so

1:10:50 ↗ again I appreciate the presentation uh

1:10:53 ↗ thank you Kristen for chiming in

1:10:55 ↗ and we will move on with our next item

1:10:57 ↗ on the agenda which is reports

1:11:03 ↗ do we have any reports

1:11:04 ↗ I just have a quick city council update

1:11:07 ↗ do you want me to do that now or as part

1:11:09 ↗ of the reports

1:11:10 ↗ God please okay uh so city council is

1:11:14 ↗ going to be

1:11:15 ↗ the Planning Development environment

1:11:17 ↗ Council committee is going to be taking

1:11:19 ↗ the their last look at the title 18

1:11:21 ↗ project next week on Tuesday and then

1:11:23 ↗ they're going to be forwarding their

1:11:24 ↗ recommendations to the city council

1:11:26 ↗ which on March 13th the city council

1:11:29 ↗ Committee of the whole will be taking

1:11:30 ↗ their first look at title 18.

1:11:32 ↗ do we get a little bit of a sneak

1:11:34 ↗ preview get a little bit of inside

1:11:35 ↗ baseball at the you know what I think

1:11:37 ↗ the Planning Development Committee uh

1:11:39 ↗ liked what they saw they they loved

1:11:42 ↗ everything they saw there's nothing but

1:11:43 ↗ kudos to a lot of the hard work to the

1:11:46 ↗ uh what the commission has done and

1:11:48 ↗ working with staff to work through the

1:11:50 ↗ uh monster amount of work on policy

1:11:53 ↗ discussions and level of detail that

1:11:55 ↗ went into the update to the development

1:11:58 ↗ regulations is is has made them very

1:12:01 ↗ happy and they're wanting to continue

1:12:03 ↗ kind of that praise and the

1:12:05 ↗ recommendations to the city council

1:12:08 ↗ excellent that's always good to hear

1:12:10 ↗ that was a big part of our work for the

1:12:13 ↗ last

1:12:15 ↗ year and some odd months almost 18

1:12:16 ↗ months I believe

1:12:19 ↗ um you know what's interesting is that

1:12:21 ↗ one was so into the minutia into the

1:12:23 ↗ whereas here now we're going to be

1:12:24 ↗ taking a step back and really doing

1:12:26 ↗ again the

1:12:28 ↗ 30 000 foot view to give goals and

1:12:30 ↗ vision and direction towards for the

1:12:32 ↗ city correct so looking forward to

1:12:34 ↗ starting this journey with all of you

1:12:35 ↗ guys with staff

1:12:37 ↗ and it'll be a fun 12 to 14 months to

1:12:40 ↗ get this project to the finish line and

1:12:43 ↗ one thing to know with like uh the

1:12:45 ↗ calendar for the commission is is

1:12:47 ↗ there's a lot of TBD items and that's

1:12:50 ↗ that's actually intentional for

1:12:52 ↗ providing flexibility

1:12:54 ↗ um as part of the comprehensive planning

1:12:56 ↗ process one thing we learned through the

1:12:57 ↗ title 18 project uh with giving you so

1:13:00 ↗ many topics and with limited amount of

1:13:02 ↗ time is it was very uncomfortable for a

1:13:05 ↗ lot of people and we want to make sure

1:13:06 ↗ that you're comfortable in these

1:13:07 ↗ conversations for the comprehensive plan

1:13:09 ↗ so the TBD topics are really just to

1:13:12 ↗ provide wiggle room for Comfort

1:13:13 ↗ additional conversations if if we want

1:13:16 ↗ to get more information on a particular

1:13:17 ↗ topic or if you want to have a

1:13:20 ↗ additional discussion on any particular

1:13:22 ↗ topic we have that flexibility this year

1:13:24 ↗ that's great yeah appreciate that

1:13:26 ↗ Stephen staff everybody

1:13:30 ↗ yes please can you tell us what we're

1:13:32 ↗ doing at our very next meeting for us in

1:13:34 ↗ the viewing public

1:13:37 ↗ now I have to take a look at the

1:13:38 ↗ calendar

1:13:41 ↗ Thomas are you able to pull that up

1:13:42 ↗ really quick

1:13:45 ↗ I don't know if you have the website

1:13:46 ↗ open I got you guys covered I got it

1:13:48 ↗ right here it is uh we're looking at

1:13:51 ↗ March 9th comp plan housing and land use

1:13:54 ↗ commission Equity discussion tentative

1:13:57 ↗ and our staff support will be senior

1:14:00 ↗ planner Leeson

1:14:05 ↗ hope I read the right date yes yes you

1:14:08 ↗ have it correct

1:14:09 ↗ um a lot of what will be happening at

1:14:11 ↗ that is really the introductions to

1:14:12 ↗ those elements and we we might dive into

1:14:15 ↗ some uh of a little more of what you can

1:14:19 ↗ expect in terms of updates to those

1:14:21 ↗ elements but really trying to focus on

1:14:23 ↗ the vision portions for those elements

1:14:25 ↗ and answer any questions about that so

1:14:27 ↗ we'll be now diving into more specific

1:14:29 ↗ elements from this point on

1:14:34 ↗ all right well thank you everybody for

1:14:37 ↗ participating in our 101 class tonight

1:14:40 ↗ are there any additional business items

1:14:42 ↗ from staff the commission

1:14:45 ↗ and from Staffing

1:14:47 ↗ any announcements for the good of the

1:14:48 ↗ order I know we're missing a few

1:14:50 ↗ participants actually I do have one more

1:14:53 ↗ please uh so the applications for Board

1:14:56 ↗ of commissions are open please if you

1:14:58 ↗ have know anybody that's interested in

1:15:00 ↗ boards commissions let them know the

1:15:01 ↗ applications are due next week on the

1:15:04 ↗ first

1:15:06 ↗ um and please forward them to me if they

1:15:08 ↗ have any questions okay so you can

1:15:10 ↗ forward them to Stephen correct okay

1:15:13 ↗ that's it all right I promise

1:15:18 ↗ we've got plenty of time

1:15:20 ↗ um all right well if there's no further

1:15:22 ↗ comments from the staff or from the

1:15:24 ↗ commission itself

1:15:26 ↗ we will adjourn this meeting tonight at

1:15:28 ↗ 7 45 PM good night everyone thank you

Approved minutes

Extracted from the next meeting's packet, where this meeting's minutes were approved as a consent-calendar attachment.

Open PDF

Attendance

Staff (4)

Thomas Valdriz, Senior Transportation Planner Christen Leeson, Senior Planner Stephen Padua, Long Range Planning Manager 2. Approval of Minutes CHAIR VOISS asked for corrections regarding the January 12, 2023 meeting minutes

there were none. The minutes were approved. CHAIR VOISS asked for corrections regarding the January 19, 2023 meeting minutes

there were none. The minutes were approved. CHAIR VOISS asked for corrections regarding the January 26, 2023 meeting minutes. VICE-CHAIR BADER stated that, on page six of nine, the name BADER is spelled BADEN. Staff would make the correction

the minutes were approved. 3

Recommendations & actions (4)

Sentences extracted from the narrative containing words like recommended, requested, directed, moved, or approved. Best-effort — verify against the full minutes for context.

Staff would make the correction and the minutes were approved.
Padua replied that HB 1220 was adopted in 2021 without missing middle, but that there are current bills now addressing missing middle.
Leeson replied that targets will be required to be adopted for affordable housing at 30%, 60%, 80%.
Questions can be forwarded to Padua.