← Back to City Council Digest

Human Services Commission Auto captions

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

6:30 PM · 1h 33m
Topics tracked across meetings:
Joint Human Services Commission Equity Training Workshop Follow Up 3/9
2027-2028 Human Services Grant Application Process Commissioner Check-In (D) 1/4
Minutes of May 27, 2022 3/4
Human Services Grant Review Follow Up - Applications, Review Card, Funding Allocation, (D) AB 7651 2/2
Homeless Outreach Program Updates and Shelter Options 2/2
Section
Topic
AGENDA
a
Commission Membership
packet pp.3
Staff report:
HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION Staff Liaison Monica Negrila, Human About Services Manager Created in 2007, this commission advises the Email Monica Mayor and City Council on matters concerning human services planning and funding. The Regular Members commission plays a vital role in studying emerging issues and concerns in the human services area to ensure that the basic survival 2023 - Jaime Fajardo needs of Issaquah residents are met and that 2023 - Patricia Sadate- support systems are in place to help people Ngatchou through economic and personal crisis. Each 2024 - Vacant year, the commission focuses on its workplan. 2025 - Trish Bloor 2026 – Kiran Singh 2026 – Manny Brown Membership The Human Services Commission is comprised Alternate Members of seven regular members, with four-year terms; and two alternates, with two-year terms. All members are appointed by the Mayor 2023 – Maury…
a
Election of Positions: Chair and Vice Chair, (A)
Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager · packet pp.5–7
Topics: Elections
Staff report:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) 05-18-22 Human Services Commission Minutes Page 1 CITY OF ISSAQUAH Human Services Commission 6:30 PM Virtual Meeting May 18, 2022 MINUTES
a
Minutes of May 18, 2022 9 - 10 Updates from Mayor and City Council, a)
Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager
b
Other Community & Human Services Updates, (I)
Hannah Roberts, Human Services Coordinator · packet pp.11–39
Topics: Equity
Staff report:
Human Services Grant Application Review Follow Up JUNE 15, 2022 HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION MEETING
a
Human Services Grant Review Follow Up - Applications, Review Card, Funding Allocation, (D)
50 min · Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager Hannah Roberts, Human Services Coordinator The regular Human Services Commission The next meeting is currently scheduled for Wednesday, August 17, 2022, at 6:30 PM.
Topics: BudgetEquity
CALL TO ORDER & WELCOME NEW COMMISSIONERS
a
SADATE-NGATCHOU called the meeting to order at
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a
Minutes of March 16, 2022 proposed edits, the minutes were approved by unanimous consent
b
Minutes of special meeting April, 7 2022 proposed edits, the minutes were approved by unanimous consent. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a)
c
Minutes of special meeting May 11, 2022 proposed edits, the minutes were approved by unanimous consent
STAFF REPORT
a
Updates from Mayor and City Council
Information · Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager
b
Other Community & Human Services Updates
Information · Hannah Roberts, Human Services Coordinator
Topics: Equity
AGENDA ITEMS
a
Joint Eastside Human Services Commission Equity Training Debrief
Discussion · Hannah Roberts, Human Services Coordinator
Topics: Equity
b
Human Services Grant Review Process
Discussion · Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager Hannah Roberts, Human Services Coordinator
Topics: Equity
c
Homeless Outreach Program Updates and Shelter Options
Information · Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager Motel 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a)
Topics: Housing
d
Election of Chair and Vice Chair
Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager
Topics: Elections
0:06 let's go
0:07 okay
0:10 so welcome everyone and actually due to
0:13 the virtual the virtual format of
0:15 today's meeting uh we like by
0:18 start by providing a couple of
0:19 guidelines and as a reminder
0:23 we like to say that this meeting is
0:24 being recorded and will be posted on the
0:26 human services commission webpage
0:29 and will be available for viewing
0:31 and um
0:33 we have been recording
0:35 the meetings for the human services
0:37 commission and moving forward i guess
0:39 that will remain
0:41 uh recorded uh correct anna monika
0:46 yes that's correct yeah good
0:49 so and we have participants that are
0:51 attending by computers but other also
0:53 may be attending by phone
0:55 and um
0:57 and for for all uh meeting attendees uh
1:00 please we'll like for
1:02 you to speak clearly and pause
1:05 frequently
1:06 state your name each time before
1:08 speaking
1:09 mute your uh microphone when not
1:13 speaking and so we have a clear
1:15 communication from other participants
1:18 and if we have technical issues please
1:21 try joining the meeting using a
1:23 different device either a phone or a
1:26 tablet
1:27 and use the calling information in the
1:29 meeting invite to call into the meeting
1:33 and please
1:34 when you have comments
1:37 please do speak
1:39 clearly
1:41 and
1:42 we use the chat simply by um
1:45 you know indicating whether or not we
1:47 have a question or a comment but all
1:49 comments we encourage everyone to make
1:51 comments by speaking clearly on the
1:53 microphone
1:58 we'll start with uh attendance as well i
2:01 don't know monica or
2:04 tana
2:05 we noted that money is not gonna present
2:07 today do we have any other attendance
2:10 updates
2:12 um thank you pat so commissioner manny
2:15 brown uh has an excused absent tonight
2:18 and we are still waiting for um kieran
2:20 singh so she'll be joining us hopefully
2:22 soon
2:36 and uh so we already talked about
2:39 guidelines for
2:41 uh comments from uh panelists please the
2:44 state your comments in the microphone
2:46 and and do not use the chat for lengthy
2:48 comments because we will like for any
2:51 community member who are not uh we can't
2:54 have access to the chat to
2:56 to um to follow our conversations
3:01 and um
3:03 and also we have our functions and
3:07 in this forum and uh please when you
3:10 like uh participants when you would like
3:12 to talk please uh raise your hand
3:15 and um or make a sign and uh you'll be
3:19 given um
3:21 the floor for uh your comments
3:25 and that is all for the guidelines
3:28 anything else
3:30 to add
3:35 that's it pat thank you so much okay
3:38 thank you
3:45 also i think the next item on the agenda
3:48 looking at the agenda is the selection
3:50 of the chair and vice chair so i'm happy
3:53 um to jump in and and take that
3:58 good evening um
4:01 commissioners this is monica grilla i'm
4:03 the human services manager here and
4:05 working with hannah and such a nice
4:08 evening to see you all
4:11 as you may recall at our previous
4:13 meeting last month
4:15 we had talked about
4:18 having a selection for a chair and vice
4:21 chair so it is customary for the city
4:24 that in may
4:26 or june in this case
4:28 each year we select a new chair and the
4:31 new vice chair
4:34 this is because it aligns well with the
4:37 city's recruitment process in april is
4:40 when we typically in board new
4:42 commissioners
4:43 and so and the first meeting in may is
4:46 when we select the new um
4:49 chair and vice chair typically they run
4:51 for a one-year term
4:53 with always the option to continue in
4:56 that term or it is also customary that
4:59 perhaps the vice chair after serving for
5:02 one or two terms can move into the chair
5:04 position and so forth so just providing
5:07 opportunities to all the commissioners
5:09 to to have leadership roles
5:12 and so with that the process that we are
5:13 going to use for selection uh selecting
5:16 the chair and vice chair
5:18 is first i will call for nominations
5:21 um and then when once we hear the
5:23 nominations um then we will close them
5:26 we can have we have if we have more than
5:28 one nomination we will have a discussion
5:31 and then we will vote on each of the
5:33 nominations if we have only one nominee
5:37 then
5:39 we will vote and we will consider just
5:40 of course that that person is our next
5:43 chair
5:44 um and following that we'll have we'll
5:47 use the same process for selecting the
5:49 vice chair as well
5:50 do you have any questions before we
5:52 start with this
5:54 well
5:55 no questions okay
5:59 and i what i can add as a brief note
6:02 before i uh request um
6:05 the nominations be made i just want to
6:07 say a few words about the role of the
6:10 chair it's typically um the the chair in
6:13 our commission would facilitate the
6:15 meetings uh we'll work with staff on
6:19 creating the agenda items
6:21 at times will also participate in
6:24 interviews
6:25 for the new
6:27 members
6:28 and then the vice chair of course
6:30 steps in in the chair role when the vice
6:32 chair is not available
6:35 so with that
6:38 i would like to open the floor for
6:40 nominations for the chair position
6:43 any nominations
6:44 if you have please notice
6:46 pad said please put comments in the chat
6:49 and i would love to call on you
6:55 or just raise your hand too i said oh i
6:58 see pat here i have a nomination for
7:00 trisha the chair
7:03 oh thank you so you're nominating trish
7:05 as a chair
7:07 any other nominations for chair
7:09 positions
7:13 [Music]
7:17 no don't be shy feel free to speak up if
7:19 no other nominations
7:21 are being made i will close the
7:23 nominations
7:25 and
7:26 then with that i would just ask that all
7:29 of those in favor or actually i should
7:31 ask trish if she accepts the nomination
7:36 i i accept the nomination
7:39 it's a highly coveted position
7:42 thank you so much trish and we
7:44 appreciate your service in the community
7:45 i know that uh prior to serving on the
7:48 human services commission you served for
7:50 multiple years on the arts commission
7:52 and you are so so involved in different
7:55 uh organizations and community
7:56 organizations non-profits work here uh
7:59 in in our city so we are truly truly
8:01 lucky to have you on on the commission
8:04 um and so with that i think all in favor
8:07 of um
8:08 having chairs our next having trish is
8:11 our chair for the next year
8:13 please say i or we can also do a roll
8:16 call
8:17 since we are virtual
8:21 hi hi
8:24 i think everyone said i pat you wanted
8:27 to say something or were you saying i
8:28 five okay
8:30 anyone
8:31 i think everyone said i yes and we have
8:33 madeline with some audio issues um
8:35 however she messaged i so she is also in
8:39 her voting thank you madeline
8:42 thank you hannah that's very helpful
8:45 um okay i don't think i need to to ask
8:49 if there are any objections because
8:50 everybody said i already so i'm just
8:52 gonna pass that and
8:55 thank you so much congratulations
8:57 trish you are our new chair
9:02 again thank you
9:05 okay and now on to selecting the vice
9:07 chair i think we use the same uh format
9:10 so i would like to open
9:13 uh call for open the floor and call for
9:15 nominations for the vice chair position
9:18 this is mori edwards i nominate pat to
9:21 be the vice chair
9:23 oh thank you maury any other nominations
9:27 i second it any second then okay great
9:30 thank you
9:32 any other nominations
9:36 here none was when it's also checking
9:38 with madeleine
9:41 but is madeline able to call in at least
9:44 so we can hear her or just there's no
9:46 way if we unmute her
9:50 i'm on mute let me see if i can unmute
9:53 her
9:56 okay
9:57 well then we can hear you it sounds like
9:59 can you
10:00 yeah
10:01 i just kind of unmute you okay i'm i'm
10:03 raising my hands and i was saying i for
10:06 the nomination for vice chair
10:09 okay um for pat
10:11 okay
10:12 thank you so yes if i see then i hear no
10:14 other nominations
10:16 unless uh jaime or jamie have other
10:18 nominations but if not then
10:21 then we can uh
10:23 go ahead and vote but before that pat
10:25 would you like to accept the nomination
10:28 to be vice chair for another term
10:31 yes it's an honor thank you
10:34 thank you and it is an honor as well um
10:37 we also appreciate you and i'm so so
10:39 glad that you are serving on the
10:41 commission
10:42 um okay commissioners um let's then all
10:46 those in favor please say i
10:52 anyone
10:53 who um
10:57 what i'm trying to say what's the word
10:59 i'm trying to use um
11:00 opposed
11:02 opposed there you go thank you mari
11:04 sometimes english is at the end of the
11:06 day it's my
11:08 anyone opposed or having any objections
11:14 i hear none
11:16 speak now or forever hold your peace i
11:18 think i heard everyone say i though
11:20 thank you congratulations pat and trish
11:25 as the new leadership for the human
11:27 services commission
11:29 thank you
11:30 and so with that we have the option
11:32 again as we said the role of the chair
11:35 is to facilitate meetings uh trish if
11:37 you feel comfortable um
11:39 and you would like you can continue to
11:41 facilitate the
11:43 the meeting or if pat would like to
11:45 continue whoever wants to continue to
11:47 facilitate the meeting for the evening
11:49 please go ahead
11:52 pat you're welcome too if you want
11:54 no yo please go ahead trish and i will
11:57 support you if there is a need but i
11:59 don't think there will be
12:00 oh okay
12:02 all right good you can be my backup all
12:04 right okay well we're moving into public
12:06 comments right
12:08 okay well i'm just going to make the
12:11 general comment that public comments are
12:13 an important part of the public process
12:16 we take them seriously and we factor
12:18 them into the decisions we make so i'm
12:20 going to ask hannah if we've received
12:23 any written public comments or if we
12:24 have anybody that's called in to make
12:26 public comments
12:28 thank you trish no we did not receive
12:30 any public comments uh written
12:33 um and we do not have any public in
12:35 attendees to make a public segment
12:40 okay
12:41 um let me see
12:43 now we're um okay and
12:46 monica and hannah you guys jump in as
12:48 well as as you pat if if there's
12:49 something i missed um but we're moving
12:52 into the approval of the minutes now
12:53 right
12:55 so um has everybody had a chance to look
12:57 over the uh may 18th minutes
13:00 and i can give people
13:02 i mean ideally we all need to look at
13:04 them before we come to this meeting but
13:05 if people want a little time to brush up
13:08 feel free to look at them
13:10 and then and then um
13:12 somebody needs to make a motion
13:15 i move that we this is more edwards i
13:17 move that we approve the minutes as
13:19 written
13:21 this is jamie ii
13:26 okay they're approved oh no we have to
13:28 vote we have to vote right
13:30 okay
13:32 okay what monica so trish if i made you
13:35 have the option to vote but you also
13:37 have the option to just ask the
13:39 commission if there are no objections
13:41 and if you don't if to to invite the
13:44 commission to speak up if there are
13:45 objections or edits and if they are none
13:48 then you can just consider the the
13:50 minutes approved anonymously it's just
13:53 one easier and quicker way to do it for
13:55 the minutes
13:56 you're right you're right okay so you
13:59 you guys heard what monica just said
14:00 does anybody have um any comments or
14:04 edits they would like to make
14:09 okay with that um i i will assume that
14:13 all
14:14 everybody has approved the minutes
14:16 and we can move on is that
14:19 the quickest way to do it
14:22 okay
14:23 great
14:24 um okay now we're moving into
14:26 the staff report and i'll give the floor
14:29 to monica
14:32 thank you trish um this is monika again
14:36 um so i would like to start with a brief
14:39 update from mayor and city council and
14:42 um giving you an update that next week
14:45 on june 22nd uh
14:47 human services staff will be presenting
14:50 uh the city's
14:52 newly created services safety and parks
14:55 committee
14:56 we have several human services items
14:59 that
15:02 to be discussed with the committee
15:05 one of them it's the emergency housing
15:09 program project that we shared with you
15:11 last month
15:13 if you recall
15:15 at that time we were sharing with you
15:16 that
15:18 our homeless outreach program has had
15:20 the the the chance to work with quite a
15:23 few homeless persons in issaquah over
15:26 the last year and one of the needs that
15:28 we identified during this time was
15:30 really lack of services in issaquah so
15:32 we would like to go and discuss with
15:34 city council
15:36 the possibility of considering an
15:38 emergency housing program
15:40 in collaboration with motel 6
15:44 and what we propose is to pilot for one
15:47 year
15:49 renting let's say 10 a dozen rooms at
15:52 motel 6 that we would um
15:55 kind of like turn into an emergency
15:57 uh housing shelter type program
16:01 so we are excited about that we received
16:03 your feedback last time uh that you were
16:08 excited about the project as well
16:11 if you have time and interest to watch
16:13 the the meeting or to attend the meeting
16:16 we would definitely love to have you
16:18 there
16:20 so that's one item that's gonna be
16:21 discussed uh next week
16:23 um another item
16:25 that also directly
16:27 uh impacts the work that you do uh we
16:30 are gonna continue conversation
16:32 um with uh the committee on creating the
16:36 formula for human services grants
16:38 allocations so the funding amount um
16:42 is decided by city council so we are
16:44 discussing
16:45 that as well
16:47 and last but not least we are gonna
16:49 discuss with city council
16:52 recommendations that we the city
16:54 received from arch arch being a
16:57 coalition
16:59 original coalition for housing here on
17:01 the east side
17:03 regarding some tenant
17:06 protection options so we will be
17:07 discussing those with the committee as
17:09 well
17:10 so once again if you have um capacity
17:14 and interest feel free to to watch the
17:16 meeting live or of course all of those
17:18 meetings are also recorded so you can
17:21 watch it at a later time as well
17:23 and of course we will be providing
17:25 updates to you at these meetings as well
17:28 so that concludes my
17:30 my update and i'm gonna invite hannah to
17:32 provide you with some other updates
17:35 thank you so much monica
17:37 real quick
17:39 the june 22nd city council meeting
17:41 around the human service strategic plan
17:43 is that in person or is that still just
17:46 being you know via
17:47 you know zoom webex uh
17:50 kind of thing
17:52 great great question jaime thank you for
17:54 that uh so all of our council meetings
17:56 now are in hybrid option so uh
18:00 participants can attend um online or in
18:03 person typically the council members are
18:06 in person
18:07 but um
18:08 as an attendee the community can attend
18:11 both ways
18:12 and we will send you that information on
18:14 friday how to attend virtually the link
18:16 and whatnot great questions other
18:18 questions maury
18:19 i was just going to ask if you were
18:21 going to send us out the uh the link
18:23 yes it's typically uh it's going to be
18:26 published either tomorrow or on friday
18:28 so when it's published we will forward
18:30 it to you
18:31 thank you
18:33 i i have a question monica i'm assuming
18:35 that you will be um at council chambers
18:38 presenting in person yes okay i plan to
18:41 be there yes
18:43 thank you
18:45 great questions
18:50 and hannah i think the floor is yours i
18:51 just wanted to mention that i see that
18:53 we have a phone number calling in it may
18:55 be madeline
18:56 yeah i just
18:58 yeah i just confirmed that is madeline
19:00 so um
19:02 you can mute and uncommute herself now
19:04 so and welcome kieran i see that you're
19:06 able to to join us well good evening
19:13 hi karen did you can you can you hear us
19:16 okay
19:20 all right it looks like you're on you
19:22 but i don't know if we can hear you so
19:24 i'll have to work with your audio here
19:27 well i'll go ahead and move us forward
19:30 um onto our staff report so our next
19:32 section here is our human services uh
19:34 commission updates so i have a few
19:36 exciting events uh to share with you all
19:39 you may have seen some of my emails i
19:41 sent but kind of wanted to spend a
19:43 little time to talk about these upcoming
19:46 events that we are so excited to be
19:47 hosting um honoring juneteenth is our
19:51 first event coming up on this monday on
19:54 the 20th this will be in person at the
19:57 senior center in issaquah um it's going
20:00 to be uh starting at 5 p.m but we will
20:03 be having food trucks arrive at 4 30. so
20:06 just want to encourage you all to uh
20:08 please consider joining us in person for
20:10 this event bring your friends bring your
20:12 family
20:14 it's going to be
20:15 just an incredible
20:17 evening of just community and fellowship
20:20 together we will be featuring um delbert
20:23 richardson um
20:25 and he is from the unspoken truth
20:29 um and we will also be having members
20:32 from the equity board there i'm sharing
20:34 stories and experiences the mayor will
20:37 be there as well
20:39 and then one thing i want to mention
20:41 here is we will be having a silent
20:44 auction for art pieces by actually manny
20:47 brown so he's not here today but i am
20:50 telling you they are
20:51 gorgeous absolutely beautiful artwork
20:54 and pieces he's very talented so
20:56 um please consider joining us for um the
20:59 in-person event on the 20th um lots
21:03 going on and and things to be excited
21:05 about so
21:06 that is that event and then we have one
21:09 shortly afterwards for honoring pride
21:11 month uh that'll be thursday june 23rd
21:14 that's going to be a virtual
21:16 conversation we will have be having
21:19 featuring panelists from different
21:21 organizations
21:22 um who work with the
21:25 lgbtqia plus community
21:27 and
21:28 we'll be having a um some great
21:31 conversations around um
21:33 around that that community and um that
21:36 partnership that we have with our
21:38 organizations
21:39 and um so just want to invite you again
21:42 that it's a virtual event um
21:45 and so please consider registering for
21:46 both of those
21:48 so those are events that we're looking
21:50 forward to and then a few other just
21:52 housekeeping items here
21:54 um you may have also seen some emails
21:56 from our human resources
21:59 in regards to deconstructing our biases
22:02 training for boards and commissioners um
22:04 so if you have not signed up and
22:06 registered for one please consider doing
22:08 that
22:09 um we have one that they're looking to
22:11 fill a few spots tomorrow at 6 00 p.m
22:14 otherwise we have another one late in
22:17 june and then the next there's there'll
22:19 be another cycle in september
22:21 um so again
22:23 great training opportunity we did it
22:24 internally and i'm excited to now offer
22:27 it to our board and commissions
22:29 so please considering um consider just
22:33 registering for one of those
22:34 and then if you have not already um you
22:37 can email our human uh resource analysts
22:40 candy um lorenzo you and if you feel
22:44 comfortable giving some of your
22:45 demographic information um the city is
22:48 collecting um some information
22:50 i think new commissioners may have
22:52 provided uh the this information but if
22:56 you have not um please consider doing so
22:59 as soon as you can
23:00 and
23:01 um just any questions
23:05 uh yeah i do
23:07 yes this is mori edwards i'm wondering
23:09 what time the pride month virtual
23:10 conversation starts hannah thank you
23:13 so that's going to be starting at 6 30.
23:16 thank you
23:17 yeah
23:18 and monica saw your hand
23:20 thank you again i just wanted to add to
23:22 your comment that commissioners
23:24 uh we realized that you just um finished
23:28 an equity training with the other east
23:30 side cities and so
23:32 i also understand and see that
23:35 also we are gearing up to a busier
23:38 summer however um if you do have the
23:40 capacity i would so so strongly
23:43 recommend that that you also attend the
23:45 internal city equity trainings um i
23:47 think it will just provide for a better
23:50 understanding of what city staff what
23:52 kind of trainings they are doing and
23:54 just providing that opportunity for all
23:56 of us to kind of like move in the same
23:58 direction
23:59 it may feel especially for you that you
24:01 conducted training it may feel maybe a
24:04 little bit like okay this is um equity
24:06 training 101 uh once again um but um
24:10 again uh just for for for the reasons i
24:13 mentioned i would encourage you if you
24:15 have the opportunity to to attend one of
24:17 those
24:18 so thank you
24:20 great thanks monica
24:23 i have no other questions that concludes
24:24 my portion of the staff report so i'm
24:26 going to hand it back to church to keep
24:28 us moving along
24:30 okay i think we're moving to our first
24:33 agenda item um
24:35 and i guess it's going to be a
24:37 presentation by both monica and hannah
24:41 the grant review follow-up
24:46 great thank you so much trish so i'm
24:48 going to go ahead and if you want to
24:49 give me a minute just share my screen
24:50 here
24:53 one second
24:57 my calendar all right let me get this
24:59 presentation up
25:01 one second
25:04 okay
25:07 all right so i'm going to go ahead and
25:08 get us started so thank you everyone um
25:11 again for joining us this evening um
25:13 tonight for this agenda item we are
25:15 going to just really be looking at our
25:17 human services grant application
25:20 review follow-up from our last
25:21 commission meeting
25:23 really what we want to do is spend a
25:25 little more time and detail in reviewing
25:28 um the applications and understanding
25:31 that
25:32 i received some great questions from
25:33 commissioners that i included in this
25:35 presentation so we can have a larger
25:37 discussion
25:38 um so i'll be presenting those q a and
25:42 then um
25:44 and then also we're going to move
25:46 forward and look at the review card i
25:47 review receipts just a little a few
25:50 recommendations on that i just want to
25:51 make sure everybody has a great
25:53 understanding of the review card and
25:55 again there's going to be time on this
25:57 evening to bring up any questions or
25:59 comments i would love to hear some
26:02 feedback and make sure that everybody
26:05 feels
26:06 confident in this review process
26:09 and then one of the topics that we
26:11 received some of your feedback from last
26:13 meeting was our funding allocation
26:15 process
26:17 and so we're going to uh
26:19 also
26:20 spend a little time there with
26:22 recommendations and some
26:24 further information on that
26:27 i'll keep us going here um so again just
26:30 as a background and reminder we received
26:32 81 applications with 49 organizations
26:37 and we had a total request amount of
26:39 over 1.3 million dollars
26:43 again we currently have 500 000 dollars
26:47 per annual cycle
26:50 what we've done so far is we have
26:52 divided um our commissioners into groups
26:55 and so we have three groups uh with two
26:57 commissioners that sign for our housing
26:59 continuum
27:00 that includes our housing affordable
27:03 affordability and homelessness programs
27:06 we have a large group here with three
27:08 commissioners reviewing 34
27:11 applications that go under the physical
27:13 and behavioral health
27:15 um category and then the other category
27:18 they are reviewing is language access
27:20 and cultural services
27:22 we also have another group with 27
27:25 programs who will be reviewing our
27:26 community resources applications
27:29 so thank you all for being very
27:30 responsive in those emails and with some
27:33 great questions
27:35 so again i just want to step back again
27:37 and just provide a reminder of what's
27:39 your role in this as you have now been
27:40 stepping into looking at these
27:43 applications and possibly feeling a
27:44 little bit overwhelmed in this process
27:47 just want to get you back to the roots
27:48 of okay i'm a commissioner what's my
27:51 role so again the biggest thing is
27:54 reviewing these applications spend time
27:56 get to know these organizations through
27:58 their applications
28:00 within the assigned category that you
28:02 have
28:03 um the next thing is
28:05 use the review card tool that we've
28:07 created we really set that up so that
28:09 way it could be a helpful guidance tool
28:11 for commissioners
28:13 to help them understand what are support
28:15 priorities and to help determine which
28:18 category
28:19 should we fund them should we not should
28:21 we have discussions so i just encourage
28:24 you all to continue to use that review
28:26 tool card to help determine
28:28 how to use um how to fund um and
28:31 allocate
28:33 and then ultimately right our goal is to
28:35 provide these recommendations to our
28:36 mayor and city council of how we think
28:39 we can use our funding um to best
28:42 support our community
28:48 excuse me
28:50 we um are going to dive into our
28:52 questions and answers and again i
28:53 received some great questions from
28:55 commissioners i'm going to provide some
28:57 questions
28:58 um or sorry some answers here and what
29:00 i'd like is if you have additional
29:02 questions um within that one question
29:06 please raise your hand and we can
29:08 continue dialogue on that question
29:11 after i go over all of our q a we'll
29:13 have a further time where i'll stop
29:16 sharing and we can have a further
29:17 discussion for other folks to ask
29:19 different questions
29:23 so monica if you could help me monitor
29:25 and just pause me if there's a hand
29:27 since i can't quite see that would be
29:28 great
29:29 sounds good
29:32 okay
29:35 one of the questions here was what do
29:37 contracts and reimbursement requests
29:39 look like so basically that's asking
29:42 okay we have provided our funding
29:44 recommendations they've been approved by
29:46 the mayor in the city council so now
29:48 what
29:49 so now what happens is human services
29:51 staff monica and i we work with these
29:53 non-profit organizations to create a
29:56 contract which then will go into a scope
29:58 of work and a scope of work is a defined
30:02 and measurable amount of service units
30:05 so what i'm going to do here is i will
30:08 i will share what that looks like as a
30:10 review i'm also going to share what
30:13 these invoices and reimbursement
30:15 requests look like and go over that
30:18 as well as our annual reports that we do
30:20 require
30:22 so let me take this off
30:27 and i will go ahead and set us up into a
30:30 contract
30:37 okay just so you can see a little bit
30:38 better
30:40 okay so our contract is a pretty
30:43 standardized form that you can see here
30:46 that we do fill in
30:48 ultimately it's an agreement between the
30:50 city of issaquah and our community
30:53 partners and organizations organizations
30:56 so they're agreeing to the terms of the
31:00 duration
31:02 liability terms contract terms
31:07 insurance
31:09 details that i don't need to go too much
31:11 into
31:12 tonight but just wanted to have a high
31:14 level overview so you can
31:16 see what it looks like
31:19 what i want to spend a little more time
31:21 in is our scope of work here you can see
31:23 which is a part of the contract
31:27 and our scope of work
31:30 is ultimately measuring the outcomes
31:34 of the organization
31:36 so i will pull up here this is what a
31:39 reimbursement form looks like so the
31:41 organizations put their information and
31:43 the amount that they're requesting oops
31:47 sorry hold on
31:52 it's freezing
31:57 technical issues folks one second thank
32:00 you
32:01 and really what i want to focus on is
32:03 here is our service units
32:05 so many of you have asked
32:07 you know ultimately did they meet their
32:09 service unit goals so this is how we can
32:12 measure it
32:13 and and we can ultimately measure our
32:15 residence
32:16 so for i put in some examples here
32:20 you have a for example if a shelter it's
32:22 measured by bed nights and they measure
32:24 number of beds so we set an annual goal
32:27 and they tell us each quarter how many
32:31 nights did they have in their shelter as
32:33 an example
32:35 have for another example financial aid
32:37 and household number of households
32:39 helped with rent
32:41 and again we review the quarterly goals
32:44 we meet them and we help them determine
32:47 if they're meeting uh if they're on
32:49 track to meet their annual goals
32:51 another thing that they measure here is
32:53 residence and so every quarter they
32:56 measure unduplicated residents so we can
32:58 know every quarter and annually how many
33:01 issaquah residents are they serving
33:05 so in addition to the reimbursement
33:07 forms we do require
33:09 at the end of the year an outcome report
33:12 and this is determined again on the
33:14 scope of work so did their they meet
33:16 their outcome goals for their
33:17 organization organization
33:21 and then we also look at their
33:22 demographics
33:24 how many households they met age gender
33:26 that information
33:30 great work hannah i would like to add
33:32 commissioners that all of the contracts
33:35 that the city enters in
33:37 with other organizations
33:40 let's say your recommendations are to
33:45 fund agency x for ten thousand dollars
33:49 when we enter into an agreement the
33:51 agreement is going to ask for
33:54 number of issaquah residents that are
33:55 going to be served with that amount that
33:58 that he recommended and city council
34:01 approved so all of the money that the
34:03 city
34:06 provides two organizations goes to serve
34:08 directly is acquired residents and this
34:11 as hannah showed you on on those
34:13 spreadsheets typically we have a list of
34:16 different cities and may require that
34:19 number of residents for our city for our
34:21 purpose are always highlighted so we
34:23 know exactly how many residents they
34:25 served in in our city and how many
34:27 services they provided to those
34:28 residents
34:30 um so that's by default for for each of
34:32 the cities really and for all of our
34:35 contracts
34:36 here in issaquah
34:39 right thanks monica i appreciate that
34:41 and trish it looks like you have a
34:42 question
34:45 so theoretically it's possible
34:48 for
34:49 us to enter into contract with an agency
34:53 and have a goal of you know let's say
34:56 100 residents served for the year
34:59 and theoretically
35:01 zero residents could be served right
35:07 you're saying yes
35:09 yes but they would not be paid
35:11 right so so
35:13 that money would be
35:15 basically set aside because we had
35:17 entered into contract with them but they
35:19 would never because it's a reimbursement
35:21 grant they would not be paid okay
35:23 exactly yes and that money any leftover
35:26 money at the end of the year would go
35:28 back into the general fund
35:30 capital city
35:37 thank you
35:39 okay great
35:40 all right looks like we
35:43 you have a question it's not going in on
35:45 you there hannah i know oh okay so uh
35:49 then uh for us to know as we're
35:52 evaluating these things on our um our
35:55 sheets that uh that you sent us this
35:59 and we're looking at their budget then
36:01 we can go to their 223 requested dollar
36:05 amount
36:06 and we can also compare that to
36:09 their projected service units is that is
36:12 that
36:12 what i'm looking for is service units
36:15 but that's the number of people
36:16 that they've been serving
36:18 so service units is it can be measured
36:21 in depending on what their
36:22 organization's goals are and services
36:25 are so for example some service units
36:27 can be measured in appointments right
36:31 sure or packages of groups of things
36:34 yeah
36:35 so then in that case then it would be
36:36 you look at residents served is that
36:39 that's that's pretty much what it is is
36:41 that that's the number we're looking at
36:42 is how many residents are served yes
36:47 yes okay
36:48 i'm sorry no i got just distracted
36:50 monica go
36:52 it's both mari so we always look at how
36:54 many services and how many residents
36:57 right and they can have depending on how
36:59 many services they can have multiple
37:01 services but always we look at
37:03 because sometimes we have let's say they
37:05 they do meet the
37:07 number of residents served but perhaps
37:09 they are low in services right let's say
37:11 they did um they did uh provide services
37:14 to 20 residents but perhaps they weren't
37:16 able to provide as many services to to
37:19 those or the other way around so we look
37:21 at both
37:22 i see okay
37:23 thank you monica yeah thank you
37:29 okay
37:31 great well i'll keep us moving along
37:34 then um to our next question here that
37:37 was brought up
37:41 sorry one second
37:48 all right another question here is do we
37:50 look at outcomes from previous funding
37:52 cycle and consider outcome performance
37:55 um great question here um so so in past
37:59 funding cycles um commissioners really
38:02 did not consider previous cycle
38:04 performance um but that is something
38:07 that as staff we do monitor closely um
38:10 as we're working with reimbursements
38:12 and we provide uh commissioners with a
38:15 performance
38:17 outcomes uh biannually
38:20 um so this is something that if it's if
38:23 it's information that you are interested
38:24 in we can certainly provide that for you
38:27 um but the one thing that we do want um
38:30 to have is again the equity lens
38:32 and
38:33 really just that question of you know
38:35 how how would you like to approach past
38:37 performances for organizations that did
38:40 not receive funding in the past
38:42 so who so really the question is is
38:44 who's the most impacted
38:47 so if for example if we have a new
38:49 organization coming in we don't have a
38:51 necessarily comparison right we don't
38:53 have the previous year outcome
38:54 performance um so that is something that
38:57 we want to keep in mind
39:00 as as we're we're considering our equity
39:03 lens and reviewing the applications
39:06 so again ultimately um it's an outcome
39:09 we typically don't look at but we have
39:11 the information and happy to provide
39:13 that for you
39:18 and if there's any questions if you just
39:19 want to unmute yourself and
39:23 and go ahead and just jump in
39:27 and while you do that commissioners i'm
39:29 gonna add to what hannah just said so
39:31 well the fact is that when we work with
39:34 you we would absolutely let you know if
39:37 there are any organizations that we have
39:40 serious concerns about let's say saying
39:42 they never met any outcomes or so right
39:44 because one we would not wait for two
39:47 years for that to pass typically we uh
39:50 at the end of each quarter as we receive
39:52 reports we always look at performance
39:54 and if um if people don't meet the goals
39:57 in the contract typically we contact
39:59 them and we problem solve with them we
40:01 provide technical assistance we try to
40:02 support them in any way to make sure
40:04 that they meet their goals so we would
40:06 work with them and of course if there
40:08 are serious concerns then then we would
40:10 not let you make recommendations if
40:12 that's the case
40:15 i'm sorry i hope that helps a little bit
40:17 yeah thank you
40:19 i have a quick question
40:20 um my question is um when you do these
40:25 quarterly check-ins with them um
40:28 do they provide like financial
40:30 information to you guys that like show
40:33 hey these are the this is the amount of
40:35 this is the cost of the services that we
40:37 provided each individual
40:43 is it okay if i take this one hannah yes
40:45 please
40:46 uh thank you jamie great question so
40:49 typical financial information we only
40:51 request every two years where we ask for
40:54 the um
40:58 financial information for the entire
40:59 agency and we also ask for go deeper
41:02 into the financial information when we
41:04 do on-site monitoring or virtual
41:06 monitoring uh so it typically doesn't
41:09 happen every quarter but it's at least
41:11 every year every other year we do
41:12 monitoring of the agencies and at that
41:15 time we asked for financial information
41:17 and any previous reports that they might
41:19 have had against them
41:29 i'll keep us moving forward then
41:32 i have a question but maybe this is not
41:34 the right time to ask for it i might
41:36 wait until the end of the presentation
41:38 because it's really on the
41:41 on the card the the review card so i'll
41:44 wait till the end then
41:46 thanks pat yes i do have a section right
41:48 after this that we're gonna have a
41:50 further discussion on that thank you
41:53 um so the next one is do we consider
41:56 previous funding history with city
42:00 so um staff does provide input of
42:03 organizations that are heavily utilized
42:05 in the city for consideration
42:07 um so
42:09 but we really do want to keep an
42:10 equitable approach
42:12 um and should be based on meeting the
42:14 needs of this aqua community and again
42:17 those really have been highlighted in
42:18 our strategic plan which have also been
42:20 included in the review tool um so it's
42:23 it's really you know when we meet with
42:26 you in the review groups we can really
42:28 help inform you of organization
42:30 organizations that um again are heavily
42:33 used by issaquah residents
42:37 but again it's it's really should be
42:39 approached um of what is what is our
42:42 need for our community and does this
42:44 program meet those needs
42:50 anything else
42:53 for any
42:56 questions right another question here
42:59 uh do we consider funding history and or
43:01 requests made to other cities so you can
43:04 see here in the budget um you're you're
43:06 seeing other city
43:08 um requests
43:10 um so as far as other cities goes um
43:13 short answer is no um we do not consider
43:15 funding requests made these other cities
43:18 so each city has its its own review
43:21 process um and it's
43:24 their independent priorities it's
43:26 something that we do not within issaquah
43:28 consider um we just focus on
43:31 really what benefits our city and
43:34 coordinate funding for those programs
43:38 so here really um coordinating funding
43:41 is would be in an ideal world would be a
43:44 very helpful um goal to have and that's
43:47 something that we can certainly visit
43:49 for our next funding cycle
43:52 um and then as far as funding history um
43:55 it does not um imply so if we have
43:59 provided them funding last cycle it
44:00 doesn't automatically imply that we need
44:03 to or will fund them for
44:05 this next funding cycle it certainly may
44:08 be considered um
44:11 but it's it's something that is not
44:13 necessary
44:14 um again continuing that equity lens of
44:17 what ultimately meets our community
44:19 needs
44:26 okay and then our last question here
44:28 before i really open it up
44:32 do you organize organizations that don't
44:35 have a physical address in issaquah
44:37 provide services physically in issaquah
44:41 that question i think is great in
44:42 regards to our review tool right we
44:45 are prioritizing um
44:48 services that are accessible
44:51 which can mean um physically located in
44:54 issaquah
44:56 the answer to this is some organizat
44:58 organizations if they don't necessarily
45:00 have a
45:02 physical building in issaquah
45:05 it really just depends um some
45:07 organizations do and some organizations
45:09 don't have that um capability
45:12 um if they are providing services to
45:14 issaquah residents
45:16 um it's going to be either
45:18 first you know online virtual services
45:21 has been really utilizing these last
45:23 couple years
45:24 um there are some organizations that
45:26 have what we call pop-up sites
45:30 so um some organization organizations
45:32 will use the senior center for example
45:35 and have monthly meetings there to meet
45:37 with residents um in person
45:41 um there's also satellite offices in
45:43 issaquah
45:44 excuse me and then if not then um it is
45:49 uh residents would need to travel to
45:51 their physical location
45:53 and that's why we consider um if it's
45:55 accessible for public transportation
46:03 okay i'm going to stop sharing to see if
46:04 there's any other questions
46:10 i just had a comment this
46:12 these are all really helpful so thank
46:14 you everybody that submitted questions
46:16 because this is a good collection of
46:18 questions and it's helping me now as i
46:20 think through the batch of grants i'm
46:23 reviewing
46:27 yeah so i have a couple of questions the
46:29 first question
46:31 on uh around and it's still just detail
46:35 around the scoring card
46:37 um as we when we provide a score and you
46:41 know how you have the category
46:43 you know the green
46:44 the yellow and the red
46:47 for each of the information are we
46:49 supposed to say something in each of the
46:51 squares about the grant we've reviewed
46:54 or not at all
46:58 such a great question uh pat i think
47:01 absolutely yes it would be great for you
47:04 to provide comment under let's say you
47:06 have organization a
47:08 and you assign them a yellow category it
47:10 would be nice to have a brief
47:11 explanation as to why you did that and
47:14 we will we will keep though that
47:16 information we will um
47:18 um ask you that you share that
47:20 information with us and we will keep it
47:22 in archives instead in case later on we
47:24 will be asked for um information on why
47:27 we decided one way or the other so you
47:29 don't need to provide in each square for
47:32 the one agency but the one agency just
47:35 uh explaining like why you chose that
47:37 color or what not would be helpful and
47:39 it can also help in the deliberations
47:41 with your with your group right because
47:44 the way we envision it is that you're
47:45 going to spend some time individually to
47:47 review them make some comments then we
47:49 are going to meet in the smaller groups
47:51 all together and we are going to start
47:53 the liberations right and then you might
47:55 have a yellow note assigned to
47:57 organization x whereas maybe another
48:00 commissioners might have a green uh
48:02 green assigned and then we will
48:04 deliberate on on why one or the other so
48:06 it's going to be very helpful for you to
48:08 have those comments
48:09 thanks monica now i recall you saying
48:12 something like that maybe two months ago
48:14 and it's just now now that i'm i'm going
48:17 through the process it's coming back to
48:18 me okay
48:21 no worries absolutely it makes sense
48:23 it's like there's just so much
48:24 information and in the end the pieces of
48:26 the puzzles come together right but yes
48:29 it's yeah thank you great great
48:31 questions
48:32 one more question and i'd like someone
48:34 else ask the question um
48:37 i was i was reviewing the grants and i
48:40 wanted to understand for specific
48:42 organizations what were
48:44 the overheads well what
48:46 was used uh as salaries or compensation
48:51 and that wasn't going directly into into
48:53 service right
48:55 and and then i realized at one point
48:58 everything for this specific
49:00 organization everything was lumped into
49:01 let's say 10 or 13 people and all the
49:04 salary
49:05 and and and further you know
49:09 this is disaggregated into benefits and
49:11 all that right and i thought well
49:14 if there are 13 people getting 900
49:18 k for instance right
49:20 what is executive getting compared to
49:22 the people who are really doing the work
49:25 but i couldn't find that information
49:28 is it something we can request or not at
49:29 all at this point or maybe in the next
49:31 round right no great great questions pat
49:35 so we have a couple of options on one
49:37 end i definitely am so glad you brought
49:39 it up if there are questions that you
49:41 have about specific applications as you
49:43 read them perhaps something is not clear
49:46 you would like more information on
49:47 something please make a list write them
49:49 down send them to us and then as we get
49:52 all the questions from commissioners we
49:54 will connect with the agencies and send
49:56 them one list of questions so that's
49:58 definitely an option to ask further
49:59 questions
50:01 typically
50:02 now in particular regarding the
50:04 financial information certainly if
50:06 there's something that catches your eye
50:09 and you feel like oh this doesn't add up
50:10 or i would like to understand more
50:12 absolutely we will ask
50:13 the note that i would like to make is
50:16 regardless though of the salary
50:18 information we as a city we do not pay
50:22 for their salaries for an agency salary
50:25 we pay as
50:26 we talked earlier we only pay for the
50:28 residents served so basically um we are
50:31 looking at what's the cost for service
50:34 for one resident right so let's say if
50:37 we find an organization
50:39 funds them with for ten thousand dollars
50:41 and they um
50:43 they serve uh ten residents uh for that
50:47 ten thousand dollars we do the math and
50:49 we say ah the cost of service for that
50:51 resident it's about a thousand dollar
50:53 and we're gonna look what kind of
50:54 services are you providing for a
50:56 thousand dollar for service and if it's
50:59 not in the market range then we would go
51:01 to them and contin can and have a
51:04 conversation and say you know it may
51:06 make sense to have a service for a
51:07 thousand dollars for this medical
51:09 procedure that's very but you know for
51:11 perhaps this type of service thousand
51:13 dollars seems like too much so then we
51:15 wouldn't go for that does that make
51:17 sense
51:20 okay thanks thank you thank you yeah
51:23 so thank you
51:24 yeah great questions julia please do put
51:26 together those questions and we can
51:28 follow up with the organizations
51:32 the mari looks like you have a question
51:34 here okay so more edwards again
51:37 uh i wanted to convey the three things
51:39 that
51:40 that uh
51:42 that manny brown had concerns about uh
51:45 just so that you know
51:46 uh his concerns
51:48 uh first of all um we had uh when manny
51:51 and trish and i met
51:53 trish developed a sheet that we could
51:55 use
51:56 and um we were discouraged from using
51:58 that sheet
51:59 uh and we're not using it
52:02 but
52:03 manny and i both feel that the city of
52:05 issaquah should look at that and perhaps
52:07 consider that and uh develop it or uh
52:11 vet it as it is us for future people to
52:14 use we both feel like it was a it was a
52:16 pretty good tool uh secondly um
52:20 manny wanted to just say that each of us
52:22 have our own biases
52:24 um he's focusing on how many bipark are
52:28 employed and how many by park are being
52:30 served
52:32 and
52:33 he wanted to just to
52:36 talk about that just to bring that into
52:38 the conversation
52:40 the last thing was
52:43 he said as a whole we can't just uh
52:45 disregard those
52:47 who aren't um
52:50 serve who aren't serving issaquah
52:52 directly
52:54 um that there's got to be some way where
52:57 we can
52:58 because the surrounding communities
53:01 affect what happens in isigua
53:03 and if we
53:05 if um
53:07 an example that he used was um
53:10 you have a neighborhood where a house is
53:12 on fire and it happens to be
53:14 the
53:15 people of color's house you don't
53:17 sprinkle the water on the white people's
53:19 house to make sure that it's going to be
53:22 okay
53:23 and keep it from burning while the black
53:26 people's house burns down
53:28 that we need to keep that uh keep those
53:31 kinds of things in mind that um
53:34 that even though we're not served
53:35 directly we are impacted by uh
53:38 surrounding communities
53:40 so those are his three concerns
53:45 thank you so much maury for bringing
53:46 them up um may i make a couple of
53:49 comments to them and respond perhaps
53:51 with some clarifications
53:53 yeah
53:55 so thank you so much for the first
53:56 comment thank you so much for bringing
53:58 up the uh the tool that the three of you
54:01 used and i want to clarify that uh it
54:03 wasn't for us to discourage you to use
54:06 that i think the comment that we're
54:08 trying to make was that
54:10 amazing work in trying to get we were
54:13 not at the point yet to meet in threes i
54:15 think we are just now scheduling
54:17 meetings to meet in the groups i think
54:19 the intent for us was to encourage
54:22 everyone for the first time between last
54:24 month and now
54:25 to just individually access the
54:27 applications review perhaps up to five
54:30 of them to see kind of like how it works
54:34 see what questions do you have about the
54:35 application process and now that we
54:37 discuss all of these next we are going
54:39 to move into meeting with the small
54:41 groups so that's what that was for us
54:44 because what we noticed was
54:46 you were very very excited and you met
54:48 in the groups of three but you had a lot
54:50 of questions that we did not have an
54:52 opportunity to provide you with support
54:54 for so absolutely i think the tool that
54:57 trish created i think it's amazing and
54:59 we should use it and then absolutely we
55:01 would love to share it with if others
55:02 would like to use it we are going to use
55:04 something similar but i think what trish
55:06 has is even better so that's not the
55:08 point was not about uh not using the uh
55:12 the spreadsheet if that makes sense
55:14 okay so just that thank you and then
55:18 um absolutely i think as a board we did
55:21 an equity training for the second
55:23 comment equity training that we should
55:25 consider
55:27 our biases we all have them we should
55:30 consider the communities that are most
55:31 impacted and i think it's always great
55:34 to look at organizations at their staff
55:36 component and who they serve
55:38 so absolutely i think that should be
55:41 something that we all look into and
55:43 consider
55:44 and last but not least absolutely
55:46 understand also the regional aspect once
55:48 again we always fund organizations
55:51 whether they are local or regional or we
55:53 always find organizations that serve
55:55 issaquah
55:57 the issaquah community and there are
56:00 many wonderful organizations that don't
56:02 have a location here in issaquah yet
56:05 provide really really really helpful uh
56:08 services to our issaquah residents so
56:11 absolutely other thing definitely those
56:13 are things to consider
56:15 so thank you for bringing those up and
56:17 we miss manny looking forward to seeing
56:19 him next time
56:21 yeah and i wanted a second that thank
56:23 you for um first of all for manny
56:26 talking to you and asking for you to
56:29 bring those forward and those are really
56:31 good comments that manny brought up
56:33 thanks
56:42 okay great so if there's no other
56:44 questions then we're gonna go ahead and
56:46 move on to our
56:49 our review tool
56:54 let's see
56:57 so again i just want to go over the
56:58 review cards um i made one edition um
57:02 and i'll be sure to send everybody the
57:04 updated um version
57:06 um you can use um if you've already used
57:09 the old versions that's okay
57:11 um it wasn't a huge change and so what i
57:13 want to do here is
57:16 kind of review it and make sure that
57:18 everybody ultimately feels comfortable
57:20 using this review card and understand
57:22 really the purpose
57:24 and so again this is just a way to help
57:26 you stay organized um and guide you in
57:29 determining you know ultimately these
57:31 three things do i recommend funding this
57:33 organization
57:35 do we need to discuss it further in a
57:36 small group or do i not recommend
57:39 funding and ultimately what's been
57:41 listed here are um
57:43 what would allocate something to be in
57:45 the green yellow or red category
57:50 and the one thing um that was added was
57:52 here under issaquah residents
57:55 so ultimately um we're just
57:58 one question and recommendation was
57:59 brought up is um we have here
58:02 accessibility um but ultimately right
58:05 our goal
58:06 is to serve issaquah residents that's
58:08 where the funding is going and so we
58:11 wanted to include that just clearly
58:13 stating um does this program really
58:17 serve and is accessible to issaquah
58:19 residents
58:20 or is this program
58:22 accessible with possible barriers to
58:24 accessing services or is this not very
58:27 clearly stated and is not very
58:29 accessible to sequal residents
58:31 so that ultimately was the main thing
58:33 that was added
58:35 um but ultimately the the idea of to use
58:39 this is kind of go through the list as
58:41 you're looking up at the application and
58:43 just see um you can
58:46 commissioners use this in different
58:47 forms um you could like
58:50 circle okay it's under this category oh
58:53 this this program description it feels
58:55 like maybe a yellow category
58:58 um it's accessible so you can kind of
59:01 maybe go through and circle it or you
59:03 can just check it or just make a mental
59:05 note um
59:07 what i want to note here is additional
59:10 notes this is really where you can put
59:11 some of your kind of bullet
59:14 thoughts
59:15 uh why you are recommending it to be
59:18 green yellow or red or what questions
59:20 you might have and again this is to help
59:23 you stay organized um
59:25 the whole point of or the intention is
59:28 that one
59:29 application should have one review card
59:34 and so i just want to stop here and just
59:37 see if there's any questions or if
59:40 anybody else wants to add anything
59:48 so everybody feels confident moving
59:50 forward with their review card they're
59:52 happy with it
59:54 it makes sense
59:56 and it's helpful
59:59 oh there we go
1:00:01 no no no it's just a comment that i
1:00:04 found uh
1:00:06 maybe some of you have done gone through
1:00:08 the same i find myself reading uh some
1:00:11 of uh application they're they're good
1:00:14 they're strong but now at one point i
1:00:16 said oh they're very interesting they're
1:00:17 good but then oh
1:00:19 are there really a need for our
1:00:22 community although they're strong and
1:00:24 they're well written they are good
1:00:27 and the bottom line after i mean there
1:00:29 are two of them and i had to go first
1:00:31 was like oh yeah i didn't really need
1:00:34 had yes yes yes yes but i have to go
1:00:36 back to that strategic plan and look
1:00:39 into the strategic plan and you know
1:00:42 that was
1:00:44 i just wanted to give it as a comment to
1:00:48 thank you so much pat yeah i imagine i
1:00:50 mean like
1:00:51 like we warn you all these are all
1:00:53 incredible organization organizations
1:00:55 and programs offering incredible
1:00:57 services that are needed um so how do we
1:01:00 narrow 1.3 plus million dollars how do
1:01:03 we squeeze that into
1:01:05 500 000
1:01:08 so yeah i appreciate it is it's a hard
1:01:10 task and i appreciate you getting back
1:01:12 to the strategic plan because that's
1:01:14 really what it's there for
1:01:16 but yeah hard decisions ahead of us
1:01:20 thank you pat
1:01:21 and then madeline here had um
1:01:25 a question so i'm going to
1:01:27 you i think can you hear me if i use my
1:01:29 phone
1:01:31 now madeline
1:01:34 my question was around the review card
1:01:36 in your in your perfect world when we
1:01:38 meet in our smaller groups would we all
1:01:42 have completed
1:01:45 would we all have individually completed
1:01:47 one card for every grant that we looked
1:01:50 at within our subgroups
1:01:52 yes so we'll be reviewing that in our um
1:01:56 as we finish this presentation on for
1:01:58 our timeline and what next steps are but
1:02:01 yes in our ideal world where we would be
1:02:04 at is when we have our next small
1:02:07 subgroup
1:02:08 review groups with monica and i
1:02:11 that ultimately that you will have
1:02:13 reviewed the applications and
1:02:15 determined your green yellow and red and
1:02:19 then we can have further discussion on
1:02:21 that um in our ideal world so that would
1:02:24 be um in probably the second or uh the
1:02:28 second week of july um so more
1:02:31 information to come on that
1:02:33 very good thank you
1:02:35 quick question hannah um
1:02:38 for the grant review card i like what
1:02:40 you what i think pat talked about
1:02:42 looking at the strategic plan going back
1:02:43 and forth
1:02:45 do we send a grant review card to you
1:02:47 all like in real time or do we save them
1:02:50 great question jaime um so go ahead and
1:02:53 save them um so save them you know on
1:02:55 your computer whatever that may look
1:02:57 like for you and we will um we will be
1:03:00 reviewing that um and the list that you
1:03:02 have created in the review group so do
1:03:06 not send you do not need to send it to
1:03:07 us in real time unless you have any
1:03:09 questions
1:03:11 so hold on to them and that was my i
1:03:13 think i read was don't make uh like a
1:03:16 recommendation in terms like the the
1:03:18 funding it's either either recommended
1:03:20 for the discussion or no funding in
1:03:23 terms of the review card
1:03:25 my next question would be is uh
1:03:28 if i do have questions i just contact
1:03:30 you and just say hey here's where i'm at
1:03:31 and as i as i navigate some of the some
1:03:33 of the
1:03:35 i guess my my portion
1:03:39 yes you're welcome to send us
1:03:41 individually you can send me or monica
1:03:43 or both of us um questions
1:03:46 or if you want in like the additional
1:03:48 box you can kind of maybe write your
1:03:50 questions um there so that way when we
1:03:53 are reviewing the individual program
1:03:55 you'll remember oh yeah i had this
1:03:57 question and we can discuss it in the
1:03:59 review groups um that might be the most
1:04:01 efficient way but by all means if you
1:04:03 need to
1:04:04 um if you have a burning question of
1:04:06 course please feel free to contact us
1:04:08 thank you sounds good
1:04:15 thank you for these comments and
1:04:16 questions everyone
1:04:18 um again the really the goal is
1:04:20 we understand this is a lofty task and
1:04:23 um reviewing these applications uh it
1:04:26 can be difficult and challenging so
1:04:28 we're trying to create a tool that makes
1:04:30 sense um and that can help simplify this
1:04:32 process for everyone so
1:04:34 um this feedback is always helpful
1:04:40 there are no other questions at this
1:04:42 time i'm going to go ahead and go back
1:04:43 to our presentation
1:04:45 and i believe we are
1:04:48 in our next
1:04:50 portion which i'm going to go ahead and
1:04:52 pass off to monica
1:04:58 thank you hannah well done
1:05:00 uh hello commissioners again such great
1:05:02 questions and
1:05:04 i want to share actually with you that
1:05:06 i've been pondering and on
1:05:09 the suggestion that we heard from manny
1:05:12 through mari one of them and i'm gonna
1:05:14 just bring it up here in a moment
1:05:16 for further discussion um
1:05:19 so i wanted to go over a little bit with
1:05:21 you some input that we received from
1:05:23 city council when in april we first
1:05:26 discussed the human services grants
1:05:29 funding allocations with them and
1:05:31 perhaps
1:05:32 a formula for those allocations
1:05:35 and i wanted to share with you some of
1:05:37 the the thoughts that city council
1:05:38 members had
1:05:40 um of course they uh they appreciate the
1:05:42 work that we did on the human services
1:05:44 strategic plan and uh they wanted to
1:05:46 remind us that you know we should ensure
1:05:49 alignment and focus on the goals that
1:05:52 were identified in that so we already do
1:05:54 that i know we just want i just wanted
1:05:56 to highlight that from from council
1:05:58 um also we had council members who uh
1:06:01 did encourage us to prioritize local
1:06:03 services in the isoqua community as much
1:06:07 as possible
1:06:09 then they they said that we should
1:06:11 consider increasing the funding
1:06:14 level in particular the average grant to
1:06:17 a level that would make an impact so um
1:06:20 that would be possible for us if uh uh
1:06:23 you know with our funding allocation
1:06:25 that we have currently um that would
1:06:27 mean for us to consider funding fewer
1:06:29 organizations to provide larger grants
1:06:33 than more organizations with lower
1:06:35 grants right
1:06:36 and so they were encouraging us to keep
1:06:38 in mind and identify those agencies and
1:06:40 programs that we think that might yield
1:06:42 more strategic results
1:06:44 so we actually can can see uh that
1:06:47 impact
1:06:50 and then as we consider those local and
1:06:52 regional approaches uh we received
1:06:54 encouragement to really identify where
1:06:56 we can make a difference knowing that
1:06:59 you know in human services we can never
1:07:02 have enough resources to meet all the
1:07:04 needs uh but considering all the other
1:07:06 funding that's available at regional
1:07:08 levels and in other
1:07:10 programs and areas where where are those
1:07:12 areas where we as a city can make a
1:07:14 difference and perhaps consider those
1:07:16 for funding
1:07:18 and so with that i can't help but as i
1:07:20 mentioned to you i was pondering on on
1:07:23 the great feedback received from many as
1:07:26 he was saying you know for us to
1:07:27 consider the other jurisdictions and
1:07:30 when we apply that equity lens what what
1:07:32 i started thinking was
1:07:34 you know um issaquah
1:07:37 is a community where it's really
1:07:41 difficult to find an affordable place to
1:07:44 live and it's also challenging to find
1:07:47 an affordable rent if you are an
1:07:49 organization providing services
1:07:53 um that being said probably
1:07:57 the most diverse communities live in
1:08:00 neighboring jurisdictions and also have
1:08:02 uh nonprofit organizations in
1:08:05 neighboring jurisdictions that might be
1:08:06 more affordable right
1:08:09 um and as long as they serve isaqah
1:08:11 residents it might be valuable for us to
1:08:14 consider that from an equity perspective
1:08:16 so that's my interpretation for what
1:08:19 manny um
1:08:20 was recommending so definitely just um
1:08:23 much much value to that
1:08:25 and uh i wanted to share with you what
1:08:28 i was pondering there um
1:08:30 as an equity lens right
1:08:34 i have a comment
1:08:36 go ahead thank you
1:08:39 so but it's kind of a catch-22 using
1:08:42 that example you just gave
1:08:44 affordable housing so if somebody moves
1:08:47 if there's more affordable housing in a
1:08:49 com a neighboring community
1:08:51 if they move to that neighboring
1:08:53 community they're no longer a resident
1:08:55 of issaquah
1:08:58 yes no and i was not considering the
1:09:00 issaquah residence i think i was
1:09:02 considering the comment that many made
1:09:04 was the employees of an organization and
1:09:07 the location of an organization you're
1:09:10 absolutely right regardless we would no
1:09:12 matter where an organization is we would
1:09:14 serve we would provide support only for
1:09:17 issaquah residents right
1:09:19 got it right yeah no great comment trish
1:09:22 yeah absolutely yeah we wouldn't
1:09:25 support if they were not residents of
1:09:27 issaquah
1:09:29 monica about that really quickly um for
1:09:32 me it was it's helpful that i go through
1:09:35 all these grants and then i'm looking
1:09:37 i'm doing my review cards and
1:09:39 a lot of these are really good grants
1:09:41 and i'm like oh yeah i would definitely
1:09:42 recommend this for funding and i'm just
1:09:44 gonna you know for me i found it very
1:09:46 helpful to just continue to go through
1:09:48 them and you know if i like them and
1:09:50 they fit everything and they fit within
1:09:52 the strategic plan then i'll still
1:09:54 recommend them for funding but then when
1:09:56 i'm done i can go through and make a
1:09:59 based on prioritize you know and and
1:10:02 that's an easier way for me and just a
1:10:04 suggestion to everybody else if that
1:10:06 might help them
1:10:08 yes that's a great great um thank you so
1:10:11 much for for that example
1:10:14 um and also not that i want to make it
1:10:16 more challenging for you commissioners
1:10:18 but i want to bring forward some of the
1:10:20 things we we all learned in equity
1:10:21 trainings right you may find or may not
1:10:24 but you may find very well well written
1:10:28 grant applications
1:10:30 and you may find some other ones that
1:10:32 may not be well written
1:10:34 when when that's the case before
1:10:36 you know let's do a check in on biases
1:10:39 and let's dive a little bit deeper in
1:10:40 learning more about the organization
1:10:42 right because sometimes smaller
1:10:45 organizations or organizations that
1:10:48 maybe have volunteers mainly or
1:10:52 diverse
1:10:53 employees or community members might not
1:10:55 have the capacity or funding to have a
1:10:58 grant writer and may just equally
1:11:01 provide just as quality services as
1:11:04 someone who who has that opportunity so
1:11:07 again i don't want to make it more
1:11:08 challenging but definitely i would
1:11:09 encourage you to keep that in mind as as
1:11:12 as you
1:11:13 as you make um your as you yeah work on
1:11:16 your reviews
1:11:19 okay if other any other questions for
1:11:21 now or if not here now we can move to
1:11:23 the next slide
1:11:25 thank you
1:11:27 and so this is a little bit from last
1:11:29 month when we discussed um kind of like
1:11:32 how we go how should we go about making
1:11:35 recommendations for funding um i want to
1:11:37 mention first of all between now and
1:11:39 next month when we meet in small groups
1:11:42 um our role is going to be to go through
1:11:45 a first review through the organizations
1:11:47 as hina mentioned earlier um let's do
1:11:50 the first review and we are going to
1:11:52 work together in trying to prioritize
1:11:54 them and narrow them and it's going to
1:11:55 be only
1:11:57 after in the second round of reviews
1:11:59 that we are going to start allocating
1:12:01 money once we have a small pool enough
1:12:04 to where we feel that it's manageable so
1:12:06 i don't want you to start worrying about
1:12:07 adding um funding to them now however as
1:12:11 we we consider the bigger picture as
1:12:14 last month we were also talking we said
1:12:16 that we can have smaller amounts and
1:12:18 support more programs or we can have
1:12:20 larger amounts and support perhaps fewer
1:12:23 programs or it was also proposed like a
1:12:26 third option that maybe we can perhaps
1:12:28 consider a combination of seed funding
1:12:31 with also more impactful grants
1:12:36 from what we heard from city council and
1:12:38 what we heard from you last month i
1:12:40 think it makes sense for us to consider
1:12:42 option two or three
1:12:44 um or a combination something like that
1:12:47 um and again we don't need to have yet
1:12:48 final um decisions i think we are going
1:12:51 to take final decisions as we are going
1:12:52 to start um looking at how much
1:12:55 organizations requested and and how much
1:12:58 funding we have
1:12:59 but for now i think just a reminder of
1:13:02 these options and
1:13:05 if anyone disagrees with perhaps looking
1:13:08 at option two and three
1:13:13 comments questions
1:13:18 i see a thumbs up from trish
1:13:22 monica we did have a question from
1:13:25 madeline um
1:13:26 [Music]
1:13:28 i cannot see i might have to stop
1:13:30 sharing one second
1:13:34 madeline i'm gonna go ahead and unmute
1:13:37 you here
1:13:38 okay go for it
1:13:39 okay can you hear me
1:13:41 yes yes okay so based on um what you
1:13:45 were just saying
1:13:46 about the city of issaquah
1:13:48 considering perhaps bigger grants
1:13:51 for more impact but that would be
1:13:54 fewer organizations and looking at the
1:13:56 one two three that was on that most
1:13:58 recent slide is the city of isquad in
1:14:01 general kind of
1:14:03 moving a slightly different direction
1:14:05 would this be considered a transition
1:14:07 year in how
1:14:08 these decisions are made
1:14:11 great question madeline i think it could
1:14:13 be considered a little bit of a
1:14:14 transition for sure because i think
1:14:16 historically the human services
1:14:18 commission
1:14:22 recommend most often a large number of
1:14:25 organizations with smaller amounts and i
1:14:27 think
1:14:28 as the city
1:14:29 uh has adopted its own large human not
1:14:32 human but as the city adopted its own
1:14:34 large strategic plan and as the city is
1:14:37 moving towards more metrics and um
1:14:41 tracking data for impact
1:14:43 i think yes the city itself it is in a
1:14:46 transition where there's more interest
1:14:48 to look for impact and seeing where we
1:14:50 can make a difference
1:14:56 thank you that that
1:14:57 that answers my question
1:14:59 yeah thank you
1:15:02 any other questions commissioners
1:15:06 no okay thank you i think we are getting
1:15:10 close to the end here so thank you
1:15:13 i know it's a lot um but you uh are
1:15:17 bringing such great questions such a
1:15:19 good conversation
1:15:21 so michael real quick
1:15:25 i would like more discussions around the
1:15:26 one two three i i i actually i'm on the
1:15:29 other side prefer more than one
1:15:31 um but i can see you know
1:15:33 to the population to the mass of like
1:15:35 hey for instance like homelessness or
1:15:37 folks that don't have shelter you put
1:15:39 more money to the impact
1:15:41 but there is also a lot of plus to the
1:15:43 number one
1:15:44 um for a lot of grassroots organizations
1:15:46 that don't get a lot of attention that
1:15:48 do rely on those few amounts of dollars
1:15:51 that do impact those individuals a lot
1:15:53 of those larger organizations are admin
1:15:55 heavy
1:15:56 um and so i just want to put that out
1:15:58 there is um for me
1:16:01 i would like to have more discussion on
1:16:02 maybe down the road i might probably do
1:16:04 that when i do my review scorecards and
1:16:06 questions and so forth
1:16:08 but i i get it i think that's where a
1:16:11 lot of human services are moving towards
1:16:12 right impact target but also
1:16:15 at the discretionary at the cost of a
1:16:16 lot of grassroots organizations that
1:16:18 maybe don't have
1:16:21 impact like that so i just wanted to
1:16:24 put that out there
1:16:25 thank you so much jaime for bringing
1:16:27 that up and i think that's what that's
1:16:29 exactly i think why we would have option
1:16:31 number three right because that provides
1:16:33 a combination of seed funding for those
1:16:36 smaller organizations right um but then
1:16:39 also selecting a few that make some more
1:16:42 impact that's at least that's how i
1:16:44 would see it like trying because you're
1:16:45 absolutely right we don't want to hurt
1:16:47 those small grassroots organizations
1:16:49 that can provide such meaningful impact
1:16:52 um so that's why my personal preference
1:16:54 would be for an option three rather than
1:16:56 just one or two right
1:16:59 because i feel like three
1:17:01 you know provides like a good
1:17:03 combination
1:17:08 but yeah so great great comment yes we
1:17:10 will continue some more i think we are
1:17:12 going to be able to have more meaningful
1:17:14 and in-depth conversations once all the
1:17:16 applications have been reviewed and and
1:17:19 all of you have a better sense of of um
1:17:22 the organizations and the program
1:17:24 services that they provide
1:17:28 so thank you more to come on this
1:17:31 i i had two real quick questions um off
1:17:34 of that conversation one is um
1:17:37 did did isaquad do any kind of recent uh
1:17:41 community needs assessment survey
1:17:44 yes we did it last year prior to the
1:17:46 human services strategic plan so the
1:17:48 foundation for the human services
1:17:49 strategic plan was a pretty robust
1:17:51 community needs assessment
1:17:52 survey interviews focus groups yes
1:17:56 i feel like that would be really helpful
1:17:57 in making the decision for the one two
1:17:59 and three
1:18:00 uh you know in that discussion when we
1:18:02 when we have more of a discussion around
1:18:04 that i think that us
1:18:06 maybe you guys can send that to us
1:18:07 because for me that would be really
1:18:09 helpful and and i do appreciate jaime's
1:18:11 comment and i totally agree with them i
1:18:13 i help run a small grassroots
1:18:15 organization that is grasping for any
1:18:18 amount of dollars that we can get
1:18:20 and um so i i get that but
1:18:23 being a resident of issaquah i'm like
1:18:26 i know that there's some serious
1:18:27 definite needs in this community and for
1:18:30 me i'm like i'd really like to focus on
1:18:33 those too oh my other question based off
1:18:36 of jaime's comment um
1:18:38 do we offer any kind of services for
1:18:41 maybe doing a pilot program for
1:18:43 grassroots organizations
1:18:45 such a great question jamie thank you so
1:18:47 much actually last funding cycle we had
1:18:50 a pilot for grassroots fund
1:18:53 organizations this year we did not
1:18:55 create a pilot because from the
1:18:58 engagement that we do we didn't see that
1:19:00 there were smaller new organizations
1:19:02 newer organizations that that would
1:19:04 qualify so we just went through the the
1:19:06 traditional granting process
1:19:08 uh but within this traditional granting
1:19:10 process we can identify the new
1:19:12 organizations that might be smaller
1:19:14 uh and uh you know um they have not
1:19:17 received funding from us and just
1:19:18 looking at piloting something with them
1:19:21 so that would be an option if we you
1:19:23 know let's say we did go with option two
1:19:25 right but this this new grassroots um
1:19:29 you know we really like it and we think
1:19:31 it would be impactful to our community
1:19:32 that's a possibility
1:19:34 absolutely yes that's why like none of
1:19:36 these options i think they are more for
1:19:37 us to consider as we review those grants
1:19:39 but none of these options will be like
1:19:41 we are not going to lock ourselves in in
1:19:43 in a blog to say oh we chose this so
1:19:46 because of this now we cannot fund this
1:19:48 organization that seems to provide such
1:19:50 great services right
1:19:51 great
1:19:52 yeah thank you great comments trish
1:19:55 yeah and i just want to say number two
1:19:58 which is um
1:20:00 give a lot of money to you know to fewer
1:20:02 organizations to make an impact
1:20:05 okay one of those i mean those
1:20:06 organizations don't have to be
1:20:08 hope link or you know the big ones the
1:20:11 big i mean it could be grassroots
1:20:13 organizations that meet the strategic
1:20:15 plan for issaquah
1:20:18 i mean so yeah
1:20:22 thank you
1:20:29 okay so um just a brief review of our
1:20:33 timeline moving forward today is june 15
1:20:36 we are meeting as a commission
1:20:38 in july we were um going to replace the
1:20:42 large
1:20:43 human services commission meeting with
1:20:45 small groups meetings we might have one
1:20:48 or we might have two in july depending
1:20:51 on the group depending on how the first
1:20:52 set of deliberation uh goes we we will
1:20:55 decide during that first meeting and see
1:20:57 how how much we are able to get done and
1:21:00 if we need we will schedule a second
1:21:02 meeting
1:21:04 then our hope is again in august
1:21:06 depending on on how the deliberations
1:21:08 work we might continue a subgroup
1:21:10 meeting
1:21:11 but we do would like to come back as a
1:21:13 larger group for the human services
1:21:15 commission regular meeting uh scheduled
1:21:17 for august 17th um at that time i think
1:21:21 we would like to have an opportunity for
1:21:23 the small groups to share with one
1:21:25 another uh where they are at with the
1:21:27 liberations and then kind of like
1:21:29 putting those smaller group information
1:21:32 together with the larger group um to to
1:21:35 work on finalizing the recommendations
1:21:37 uh at that time again we may decide at
1:21:40 that meeting
1:21:41 depending on how much information the
1:21:43 other commissioners need from the other
1:21:45 groups if we may need a separate special
1:21:48 meeting
1:21:50 towards the end of august to finalize
1:21:52 those recommendations hoping that again
1:21:55 end of august early september we will be
1:21:57 able to make our recommendations to the
1:22:00 mayor
1:22:02 and it's not on this screen but once we
1:22:04 as a commission so your job hopefully
1:22:07 it's going to be done at the end of
1:22:09 august and we can celebrate what happens
1:22:11 next once the mayor receives your
1:22:13 recommendations
1:22:15 she will include those recommendations
1:22:17 in the city's budget process that
1:22:19 typically she she presents the mayor
1:22:23 presents her budget
1:22:24 proposal to city council in september so
1:22:27 she will include your recommendations in
1:22:28 that budget proposal um and then a city
1:22:33 council will um
1:22:35 deliberate on the budget typically
1:22:37 between september and november their
1:22:39 budget deliberations
1:22:41 um and so
1:22:43 those are the next steps here
1:22:47 then i thought trish did you have a
1:22:48 question
1:22:50 well um yeah um and i realized that this
1:22:54 is still kind of high level but um
1:22:56 monica and hannah
1:22:58 in your timeline where do you envision
1:23:02 um each group is going to know how much
1:23:05 money they have
1:23:07 to use
1:23:08 um probably in probably in july
1:23:12 in the second meetings in july
1:23:15 or early august yeah we will also share
1:23:18 them though with the entire commission
1:23:20 so it's not going to be that the
1:23:21 commission the small groups will know
1:23:22 something that the other commission will
1:23:24 not know okay but yeah we will share
1:23:26 that with the other commission so i
1:23:28 envision that it's gonna be after the
1:23:29 first meeting that we have in small
1:23:31 groups
1:23:34 i mean do you envision that and i can't
1:23:36 remember the names but i'm going to call
1:23:38 our groups a b and c i mean do you
1:23:40 envision coming back
1:23:42 and telling everybody okay group a has
1:23:46 50 000 no actually no that would be too
1:23:48 little but anyways you know group a has
1:23:50 200 000 group b has 300 blah blah blah
1:23:54 yes yes okay that's how you would have
1:23:57 or what we did last time we had a range
1:24:00 that it was like now
1:24:02 you had a range between this much and
1:24:04 this much and then we provided the range
1:24:07 um but we did learn that probably it
1:24:08 might be easier just to have one amount
1:24:10 and just work with that
1:24:13 yeah we just don't want to provide that
1:24:15 information right now since um we are
1:24:18 still discussing with city council we
1:24:20 don't want to put the carriage in front
1:24:21 of the horse um and assume that any
1:24:23 final decisions have been taken by city
1:24:25 council um
1:24:27 and and so then we don't we don't want
1:24:29 to do that we just want to wait for that
1:24:31 process to end and then um work once we
1:24:34 know the information
1:24:36 that that makes sense yeah yeah thank
1:24:38 you yeah no thank you such great
1:24:40 questions from all of you tonight thank
1:24:46 monica
1:24:48 uh you said that our work would be done
1:24:50 the end of august we have other tasks to
1:24:53 do after that yes
1:24:55 oh yes absolutely the commission will
1:24:57 continue you you will have uh regular
1:24:59 meetings with the human services
1:25:00 commission it's just your task for the
1:25:02 grants
1:25:04 will be will be done you had me worried
1:25:06 there for a minute monica
1:25:08 no no no just your grand task
1:25:12 questions i i have one more question too
1:25:14 i'm sorry i know we're running out of
1:25:15 time here um
1:25:17 when we get together with our little
1:25:18 subgroups um
1:25:20 will will you guys have some kind of
1:25:22 outline or structure for the way that we
1:25:24 should okay great yeah
1:25:26 yeah we'll help with that yes absolutely
1:25:29 and tracking and all of that so yeah
1:25:32 thank you yeah that's why we are here to
1:25:33 support and try to make it as easy as
1:25:35 possible for everyone
1:25:38 and that's why we might actually take uh
1:25:40 we we have our own spreadsheet that we
1:25:42 use but we might take uh trish's
1:25:44 spreadsheet because it's uh it's fancier
1:25:48 it's well done
1:25:52 uh so yes in terms of next steps this is
1:25:55 the time um
1:25:57 if you didn't start reviewing we
1:25:59 definitely encourage you to review uh
1:26:01 the the grants that were assigned to you
1:26:03 uh start writing down questions that you
1:26:05 have about each application um
1:26:10 start um you know making your initial
1:26:12 recommendations
1:26:14 uh hannah will reach out to you i
1:26:16 believe that she already started
1:26:17 reaching out to you to work on the
1:26:19 scheduling the the small group meetings
1:26:22 um and then at the first
1:26:24 you know the first meeting as we said
1:26:26 phase one at the first meeting uh will
1:26:28 will work and basically we are gonna get
1:26:30 together and we are gonna share with one
1:26:32 another uh your initial reactions your
1:26:35 initial
1:26:37 categories
1:26:38 and then following that um we will
1:26:42 prepare for the next meeting
1:26:44 where we are going to continue in more
1:26:46 depth deliberations if we are not able
1:26:48 to agree
1:26:49 and or start assigning amounts
1:26:52 to those
1:26:55 top organizations
1:26:58 next slide you know i think we are done
1:27:02 so any other final questions
1:27:06 um i just wanted to make um a comment
1:27:10 well first of all this was great lots of
1:27:12 good information and i hope everybody's
1:27:14 you know ready to dive in if they
1:27:15 haven't already but i wanted you know
1:27:18 manny and maury and i
1:27:20 dove in early and maury and i were ready
1:27:22 to get on the horn and call a bunch of
1:27:25 agencies you know after going through
1:27:27 that last equity training where that um
1:27:30 facilitator was wonderful and she kept
1:27:32 on saying you know if it's if you have
1:27:35 questions if it doesn't seem like a
1:27:36 well-written grant get on the phone and
1:27:38 call the agency so i wanted to um
1:27:43 i we you know we reached out to you
1:27:44 maury reached out to you and we got your
1:27:47 opinion on whether
1:27:48 the commissioner should call the agency
1:27:50 so i thought you should maybe mention it
1:27:52 to everybody
1:27:55 thank you trish so yeah i think as we
1:27:57 mentioned earlier tonight and when you
1:27:58 have questions about the agency
1:28:00 definitely write them down and send them
1:28:01 to us i think we want to be mindful of
1:28:04 the agencies that that work with several
1:28:07 commissions several cities so just
1:28:09 imagine that we have we are in a
1:28:10 collaborative with 15 other cities each
1:28:13 of them if they have commissions all of
1:28:15 them have at least minimum seven people
1:28:17 so if you have starting hundreds of
1:28:19 people contacting agencies we are just
1:28:21 doing them a disservice so that's why we
1:28:24 would prefer that we you don't contact
1:28:26 agencies directly you would make a list
1:28:29 of those questions let's gather them all
1:28:31 together perhaps trish might have the
1:28:33 same question that that maury has or pat
1:28:36 right so then we can just coordinate and
1:28:38 make it easier for the agencies we will
1:28:40 contact them what's missing from this
1:28:42 due to covet and you don't have and
1:28:44 that's why like if we feel like we
1:28:46 certainly there there are options for us
1:28:49 following the funding
1:28:51 recommendations is for for you as a
1:28:53 commission to start visiting those
1:28:55 organizations so typically
1:28:58 when we before covet
1:29:00 in the off years as mori said earlier in
1:29:03 august
1:29:04 one part of your job is done but
1:29:06 typically what we call in off years so
1:29:09 mainly in 2023 is where you would spend
1:29:12 a year in visiting those organizations
1:29:15 so at the end of the year in september
1:29:18 october we will work on the work plan
1:29:20 for 2023 and part of that it's going to
1:29:23 be going to get to know those
1:29:24 organizations so then at the next
1:29:27 funding cycle you have a better
1:29:29 understanding of who does what you're
1:29:31 missing this part some of it because
1:29:34 some of you are new but partly also we
1:29:36 had coveted and during covet everything
1:29:38 was closed so um we could not visit
1:29:41 those organizations
1:29:44 so i hope that's helpful
1:29:47 in providing the why we encourage you
1:29:49 not to connect or contact organizations
1:29:51 right now on your own but um yeah
1:29:55 don't take it as like oh my gosh you
1:29:57 cannot because we
1:29:59 yeah pat
1:30:01 yes i uh and uh thanks trace for that
1:30:04 question and i know myself had questions
1:30:07 for specific organizations
1:30:10 but i think it makes sense for uh all
1:30:12 the questions to go through a single
1:30:14 channel but i also would like to to say
1:30:17 that um
1:30:18 [Music]
1:30:19 i mean for my line of work we also know
1:30:22 that when you reach out on a
1:30:24 an organization it's an advantage you're
1:30:27 giving to that organization because they
1:30:29 get the chance to explain things to you
1:30:32 that they were not on paper and that
1:30:34 introduces that my introduced bias
1:30:36 and and that that's why usually when a
1:30:39 grant is out no more talking to anybody
1:30:42 but we are a bit different here right
1:30:45 so i see maybe the way to mitigate that
1:30:47 will be to have all the questions
1:30:50 channeled
1:30:51 to the human service and then you you
1:30:53 reach out to the organizations yeah
1:30:56 i'm so glad that you brought it up
1:30:58 because it completely i completely
1:31:00 forgot about that aspect because yes
1:31:01 that's exactly the reason why we prefer
1:31:03 to do it as staff as we are not the ones
1:31:05 making the recommendations and taking
1:31:07 decisions you're absolutely right once
1:31:09 uh on organization um
1:31:12 you you connect with them you connect on
1:31:13 a personal level and you don't have that
1:31:15 chance with the others so then yes you
1:31:17 do create automatically bias absolutely
1:31:19 thank you for bringing that up pat
1:31:25 thank you everyone for such a
1:31:28 helpful conversation again our goal is
1:31:31 after this meeting that now you can dive
1:31:33 deeper into these applications
1:31:35 confidently and know how to use our
1:31:37 review uh tool card and and make some uh
1:31:40 recommendations so um great questions
1:31:43 and conversation tonight
1:31:45 um so as we are over time i'm going to
1:31:47 go ahead and pass it back to trish to um
1:31:51 continue us through the packet and wrap
1:31:53 us up
1:31:54 okay well yeah we are over time so i
1:31:57 will hopefully
1:31:59 quickly adjourn us but i do want to
1:32:02 encourage
1:32:03 folks to
1:32:05 attend
1:32:07 june 22nd meeting
1:32:09 because
1:32:11 i'm hearing some scuttle but
1:32:14 we might get more money so i think it
1:32:16 would be really
1:32:17 very important and helpful just to have
1:32:20 a good flank of human service
1:32:22 commissioners
1:32:23 there so
1:32:25 and if you can't attend you can always
1:32:26 watch the youtube later so
1:32:29 um and um does anybody have anything
1:32:32 else they want to contribute before we
1:32:34 sign off
1:32:36 i want to thank hannah for contributing
1:32:39 for amending the the review card i think
1:32:42 that's a really good addition thank you
1:32:48 thank you for the recommendation trish
1:32:53 okay well i will adjourn us at 806.
1:32:58 thanks everybody
1:33:00 bye thanks everybody