Attachment A includes the full set of draft targets and actions for the 2026 ICAP update. Staff have worked to incorporate feedback from the Environmental Board as well as from Park Board, Planning Policy Commission, Transportation Advisory Board and the Council PDE Committee.
Sentences extracted from the narrative containing words like
recommended, requested, directed,
moved, or approved. Best-effort — verify
against the full minutes for context.
Board Member DAVIDSON recommended the City consider more quantitative metrics related to advocating for PSE grid resiliency.
Board Chair MCQUILLIAMS supported the discussion of dedicated funding streams but requested staff document which funding streams are evaluated (Attachment A: Row #9).
Board Member SMITH asked staff to update the language of the action to clarify the word “sustainable” and avoid confusion with other meanings of the word in the ICAP.
Board Chair MCQUILLIAMS and Board Members GONZALEZ and DAVIDSON supported example details in the action but requested it stay general to keep flexibility in implementation.
Board Chair MCQUILLIAMS and Board Members DAVIDSON and GONZALEZ, expressed concerns related to the cost and impact of a time of replacement mandate and requested that this concern is made clear in the action language.
Board Member SMITH asked staff to clarify the language for ease of understanding.
Following discussion, the Environmental Board recommended adjusting the Tree Canopy Target to 53% by 2035 to preserve an ambitious target while recognizing constraints and concerns raised by other board members.
Board Member DAVIDSON recommended adjusting the language of the innovative tree protection action to include the possibility of agreements in addition to acquisitions.
Board Member ANDERSON recommended staff measure miles of bike lanes as a high priority metric.
Board Chair MCQUILLIAMS asked staff to add reference to social media campaigns and individual actions in the action related to public engagement (Attachment A: Row #3).