DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Staff Liaison Lucy Sloman, Land About Development Manager Created in 1983, this commission reviews all Email Lucy Sloman land use actions requiring a Level 3 review. The Commission further serves as an advisory Regular Members board to the City Council on land use actions 2022 – Michael Brennan requiring council approval (Level 5 review). 2022 – Richard Sanford 2022 – Richard Sowa The appearance of fairness doctrine prohibits 2023 – Patty Dillon Development Commission members and City 2023 – Brooke Shore Council members from discussing the merit of 2024 – Kevin Price specific land use development applications 2024 – Arthur Schulte outside of the formal public meeting process. Citizens, however, may discuss any issue with Alternate Members the City's Development Services
Table of Contents I. Application Information 3 II. Site Conditions Description 4 III. Project Description 4 IV. Background 4 V. Public Notification 5 VI. Review Process 5 VII. City Department Review 5 VIII. Site Development Permit Review 6 1. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ....................................................................................................... 6 2. Development and Design Standards ................................................................................................. 6 3. Transportation Concurrency............................................................................................................ 12 4. Impact and Mitigation Fees ............................................................................................................. 13 IX. SEPA Review 13 X. Public Comments 13 XI. Administration’s Recommendation 13 XII.
Valerie Porter, Associate Planner, CP&D Lucy Sloman, Current Planning Manager 2. Approval of Minutes a) Chair Brennan asked if there were any comments or changes to the February 5, 2020 minutes
there were none. The minutes were approved. b) Chair Brennan asked if there were any comments or changes to the February 10, 2020 minutes
there were none. The minutes were approved. c) Chair Brennan asked if there were any comments or changes to the February 12, 2020 minutes
there were none. The minutes were approved. d) Chair Brennan asked if there were any comments or changes to the January 20, 2022 minutes
there were none. The minutes were approved. Page 7 of 5080 APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) 02-02-22 Development Commission Meeting Minutes e) Chair Brennan asked if there were any comments or changes to the October 28, 2021 minutes
there were none. The minutes were approved
Recommendations & actions (12)
Sentences extracted from the narrative containing words like
recommended, requested, directed,
moved, or approved. Best-effort — verify
against the full minutes for context.
Staff recommended approval with conditions outlined in the staff report and an outdoor lighting standard condition in the presentation.
Staff believes the project is feasible but cannot be approved as currently proposed.
COMMISSIONER SANFORD asked if signage was planned to ensure cars are directed to the alley.
Wecker replied that the building would be similar to a city approved trash enclosure with gate access to equipment.
Any exterior can be designed as approved by the city, typically what would be applicable to a dumpster enclosure.
Street standards are approved by the Public Works department.
CHAIR BRENNAN asked if the process were still under consideration and Porter replied no, a decision was made two years ago; that sidewalk width reduction and landscape modifications were approved.
COMMISSIONER MORGAN asked if the bear sculpture on Southeast 56th Street was considered a sign and approved as such.