City Council Regular Meeting · Tuesday, January 16, 2018 · City Council Digest

3. PUBLIC HEARING

Transportation Benefit District AB 7250

Carried 5-1

Conduct Public Hearing; Adopt Ordinance · packet pp.5–70

Topics: Land UseTransportation

Open packet at p.5 ↗

Staff report:

CITY COUNCIL UPDATED AGENDA BILL AB 7250 - City Council Regular Meeting - 16 Jan 2018 Public Hearing

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by BETTISE

In favor: Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Paul Winterstein

Opposed: Ramos

7. CONSENT CALENDAR

Minutes: City Council Regular Meeting, Dec. 18, 2017

Approve · packet pp.173–181

▶ Watch from 1:39:08 Open packet at p.173 ↗

Staff report:

CONSENT CALENDAR b) 12-18-17 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 7952

Minutes: City Council Regular Meeting, Jan. 2, 2018

Approve · packet pp.183–185

▶ Watch from 1:39:11 Open packet at p.183 ↗

Staff report:

CONSENT CALENDAR c) 01-02-18 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 7961

Minutes: City Council Special Meeting, Jan. 5, 2018

Approve · packet pp.187–188

▶ Watch from 1:39:14 Open packet at p.187 ↗

Staff report:

CONSENT CALENDAR d) 01-05-18 City Council Special Meeting Minutes Page 7964

Amendments to IMC 16.04, Construction Codes AB 7295

Adopt Ordinance · packet pp.189–291

Topics: Land Use

▶ Watch from 1:39:17 Open packet at p.189 ↗

Staff report:

In June 2016, Council adopted Ordinance No. 2768, adopting the 2015 Washington State Building Code. Pursuant to RCW 19.27.031, these codes must be adopted as minimum standards and for enforcement purposes. Since adoption, certain discrepancies have been discovered in IMC 16.04 related to the State Building Code adoption. Intended amendments were to align smoke-control and high-rise provisions with the City of Bellevue since during an emergency or fire event, Bellevue Fire would support the City of Issaquah. Considering the alliance Eastside Fire & Rescue has with the eGov jurisdictions and our desire for consistency, it would be most effective from a fire- and life-safety standpoint that the City of Issaquah mimic the code provisions outlined in the City of Bellevue building code amendments. Many of these provisions were adopted under the 2015 International Fire Code local amendments in…

Anti-Aircraft Creek Culvert Replacement AB 7381

Refer to Council Land & Shore Committee · packet pp.293–294

Topics: Water

▶ Watch from 1:39:20 Open packet at p.293 ↗

Staff report:

Administration / Public Works Engineering Department:

Newport Way: SR 900 to SE 54th St., Design Contract Supplement No. 2 AB 7530

Authorize · packet pp.325–353

Topics: Transportation

▶ Watch from 1:39:23 Open packet at p.325 ↗

Staff report:

NEW CITY COUNCIL AB 7530 - AGENDA BILL Consent City Council Regular Meeting - 16 Jan 2018 Calendar

8. REGULAR BUSINESS

Senior Center Long-Term Operations AB 7401

Carried 6-0

Direct Administration; Authorize Additional · packet pp.355–409

▶ Watch from 1:39:26 Open packet at p.355 ↗

Staff report:

Based on the work of the Advisory Group and the subsequent staff work, Administration recommends that the City partner with a new operator for the Senior Center through a Management Agreement. For decades, the Senior Center has been operated in Issaquah by a non-profit entity. The City has historically not been the direct operator. Although the Parks and Recreation Department has done a quality job in this interim period and could transition to long-term operation, it is not Administration's preference to add this to the list of services that the City directly provides. There are agencies within the area positioned and experienced to manage the Senior Center, delivering the mix of social services and programs that our seniors need at that facility. It is recommended that this partnership be done through a Management Agreement, as opposed to a Lease Agreement as was previously done.

Roll call:

Moved by MARTS · seconded by BETTISE

In favor: Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Bill Ramos, Chris Reh, Paul Winterstein

Franchise Agreement with Seattle Limited Partnership d.b.a. Verizon Wireless AB 7495

Carried 6-0

Adopt Ordinance · packet pp.411–487

Topics: Land Use

▶ Watch from 1:40:13 Open packet at p.411 ↗

Staff report:

Council Infrastructure Committee / Bill Ramos, Chair:

Roll call:

Moved by RAMOS · seconded by WINTERSTEIN

In favor: Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Bill Ramos, Chris Reh, Paul Winterstein

2927 segments .txt ↗

0:22 ↗ welcome everyone I call the January 16th

0:25 ↗ regular City Council meeting to order

0:28 ↗ this evening a special council meeting

0:30 ↗ was held to hear presentations by

0:32 ↗ applicants to fill the current council

0:34 ↗ vacancy we started at 5:00 and we just

0:37 ↗ completed that meeting due to this an

0:41 ↗ earlier meeting our regular meeting is

0:43 ↗ starting an hour later than usual this

0:45 ↗ evening on the agenda the transportation

0:48 ↗ benefit district bill has been moved to

0:51 ↗ the first order of business to allow the

0:52 ↗ public hearing to be conducted before

0:54 ↗ the hour is too late

0:55 ↗ public comments on other topics can be

0:58 ↗ made after the public hearing and

1:00 ↗ deliberation on agenda bill 72 5-0

1:03 ↗ because of the lateness and number of

1:06 ↗ those in attendance I will be limiting

1:08 ↗ cop limiting all public comments this

1:11 ↗ evening to 3 minutes during audience

1:13 ↗ comments we recognize that we have a

1:17 ↗ really large crowd tonight and it seems

1:19 ↗ like many of you have come to talk about

1:21 ↗ a single issue a single topic what I

1:24 ↗ would ask when we get to audience

1:26 ↗ comments is that if there are those that

1:28 ↗ want to present on behalf of the group

1:31 ↗ to come up and also after that if you

1:35 ↗ have additional new information that

1:37 ↗ supports your reason the groups reason

1:39 ↗ for coming tonight

1:40 ↗ please also come up to the microphone

1:42 ↗ and add that additional information for

1:45 ↗ us while you are in the audience this

1:47 ↗ evening and hearing different audience

1:50 ↗ comments if you hear at the end of a

1:52 ↗ speaker if you are compelled to show

1:55 ↗ your support for the the message that

1:58 ↗ they're presenting the information

1:59 ↗ they're presenting it's very helpful for

2:01 ↗ council for you to raise your hand at

2:03 ↗ the end of the speakers so that they can

2:05 ↗ get an idea of how many people came for

2:08 ↗ that particular topic so if you could

2:09 ↗ help us out with that tonight that would

2:11 ↗ be great I'd like to ask so I'd like I'd

2:14 ↗ ask those who'd like to join the council

2:16 ↗ myself in the Pledge of Allegiance -

2:18 ↗ please stand

2:19 ↗ I pledge allegiance

2:38 ↗ first item on the agenda this evening is

2:41 ↗ a b725 zero transportation benefit

2:45 ↗ district at the December 18th council

2:48 ↗ meeting council directed the scheduling

2:50 ↗ of the public hearing and the

2:51 ↗ preparation of an ordinance to establish

2:53 ↗ the TBD before I open the public hearing

2:55 ↗ I'd like to invite attorney

2:58 ↗ I've got Palace here is that correct

3:01 ↗ I was Austin ethic from our bond council

3:05 ↗ to provide a presentation go good

3:10 ↗ evening members of the City Council my

3:12 ↗ name is Alice Austin I'm with straddling

3:14 ↗ I've been the city's bond council for

3:16 ↗ about 15 years give or take a few

3:20 ↗ I was asked here tonight to come back

3:22 ↗ and sort of revisit I was with you back

3:25 ↗ in July and gave a kind of a more

3:28 ↗ general presentation about

3:29 ↗ transportation benefit districts I

3:31 ↗ understand that many of you have been

3:33 ↗ studying this quite in-depth since then

3:36 ↗ and have had a number back-and-forth

3:39 ↗ with staff and with the city attorney

3:41 ↗ about this topic so I will give you kind

3:44 ↗ of the overview and review and provide

3:48 ↗ some context for what the transportation

3:49 ↗ benefit district is and what it can do

3:52 ↗ and then I'll answer any questions that

3:55 ↗ you have

4:01 ↗ yeah all right so the formation of a

4:04 ↗ transportation benefit district allows

4:07 ↗ this it allows the city to form a quasi

4:10 ↗ Municipal Corporation that is a separate

4:12 ↗ independent taxing district which has

4:15 ↗ certain specific authorities and it is

4:18 ↗ funded specifically or it is created

4:20 ↗ specifically to provide additional

4:22 ↗ funding for transportation improvements

4:24 ↗ within its boundaries the transportation

4:27 ↗ improvements that can be funded must be

4:29 ↗ in the city transportation plan they can

4:31 ↗ include state highways and local and

4:34 ↗ regional streets as well

4:37 ↗ and it may include the operation

4:39 ↗ preservation and maintenance of these

4:41 ↗ facilities and that's the basic kind of

4:43 ↗ legal overview I did mention that it is

4:46 ↗ a separate independent quasi Municipal

4:51 ↗ Corporation however the City Council's

4:54 ↗ acts as the board of directors of that

4:57 ↗ entity the formation steps which we are

5:03 ↗ in the midst of tonight involve

5:05 ↗ providing notice to the public which was

5:07 ↗ published in December having a public

5:10 ↗ hearing which is teed up for this

5:12 ↗ evening at the public hearing hearing

5:16 ↗ all of the feedback that is available

5:19 ↗ from folks who do want to participate

5:21 ↗ following that if the City Council finds

5:24 ↗ it to be in the public interest you may

5:26 ↗ adopt the ordinance that's before you

5:28 ↗ which establishes the boundaries which

5:30 ↗ in this case would be coterminous with

5:32 ↗ those of the city and so you're not

5:34 ↗ proposing anything that's larger or

5:37 ↗ small or it would simply be the city and

5:40 ↗ specifying the transportation

5:42 ↗ improvements to be funded in this case

5:47 ↗ in the notice and the ordinance are

5:49 ↗ consistent on this again the boundaries

5:51 ↗ would be coterminous coterminous with

5:53 ↗ the boundaries of the city governance

5:55 ↗ would be the members of the City Council

5:57 ↗ sitting as the board the improvements to

6:00 ↗ be funded there's a missing bullet point

6:02 ↗ here which is that it's the

6:04 ↗ transportation improvement plan that the

6:07 ↗ city has previously approved but

6:09 ↗ including what's up there preservation

6:11 ↗ maintenance and operations which is sort

6:14 ↗ of a specific highlight in there and

6:17 ↗ then funding sources in the ordinance

6:21 ↗ that allows the vehicle license fee it

6:23 ↗ also allows for the other taxes fees and

6:27 ↗ tolls that are permitted by statute

6:29 ↗ which could be imposed at a later date

6:32 ↗ the vehicle license fee is the only one

6:34 ↗ by statute that allowed that the board

6:36 ↗ is allowed to simply go ahead and impose

6:38 ↗ should it choose to do so once it's

6:40 ↗ constituted that's a maximum of twenty

6:43 ↗ dollars and then after two years you do

6:46 ↗ have the opportunity to increase that

6:50 ↗ under the state law in terms of other

6:53 ↗ funding sources the sales tax is

6:55 ↗ available it requires a simple majority

6:59 ↗ public vote or approval and then there

7:04 ↗ are other possibilities of city road

7:06 ↗ tolls again requiring majority voter

7:08 ↗ approval or property taxes which would

7:10 ↗ require a supermajority voter approval

7:14 ↗ in terms of voter approval you would

7:17 ↗ have to come back to the voters with a

7:19 ↗ proposition that would describe the

7:21 ↗ transportation improvements specifically

7:23 ↗ to be funded by those resources and they

7:28 ↗ describe what those taxes fees or tolls

7:31 ↗ would be and then finally I don't know

7:37 ↗ how much this has been discussed in your

7:39 ↗ deliberations but recently the

7:41 ↗ legislature authorized cities to simply

7:43 ↗ assume the operations of their

7:46 ↗ transportation benefit districts once

7:48 ↗ they have been formed and we've seen

7:50 ↗ since this statute was enacted many

7:52 ↗ cities doing that taking over for those

7:55 ↗ transportation benefit districts so that

7:56 ↗ you avoid having that duplicative sort

8:00 ↗ of level of governance and so you kind

8:03 ↗ of do away with the district inform and

8:06 ↗ take on the powers within the city and

8:09 ↗ so that requires a separate ordinance

8:12 ↗ that would be that would happen

8:13 ↗ somewhere down the road but that is also

8:15 ↗ available to the city should you choose

8:17 ↗ to go down that road that's the very

8:20 ↗ brief summary but I'm happy to answer

8:22 ↗ questions folks have or provide any

8:24 ↗ other context that's necessary Thank You

8:27 ↗ Alice mmm Oh Paul kind of councilmember

8:29 ↗ Wonderstone

8:30 ↗ Alice could you top a slide for of your

8:32 ↗ presentation your third bullet says

8:35 ↗ improvements funded you just did mention

8:36 ↗ something about this right it does in

8:40 ↗ quote it says preservation maintenance

8:41 ↗ and operations and in the proposed code

8:45 ↗ language that is repeated a number of

8:47 ↗ times preserve maintain and operate it's

8:51 ↗ when unite when I look closely at that

8:53 ↗ proposed language it's in 1207 Oh 40 and

8:58 ↗ 1207 Oh three

9:00 ↗ he never says it never really says

9:02 ↗ construct built it always talks about

9:05 ↗ preserve maintained operates right the

9:08 ↗ if you look at the notice and also

9:10 ↗ throughout the ordinance it also does

9:13 ↗ talk about the projects that are

9:16 ↗ included in the transportation

9:17 ↗ improvement plan which also include many

9:20 ↗ construction project just by the nature

9:22 ↗ of those projects being ones that might

9:24 ↗ be creating something new that that is

9:28 ↗ even though we use these words only in

9:30 ↗ our in the code that would by

9:33 ↗ implication that's allowed

9:34 ↗ I believe the reference there is to the

9:37 ↗ entire transportation improvement plan

9:39 ↗ okay the second question I had was

9:42 ↗ simply does you know it does talk about

9:45 ↗ streets city streets and can that does

9:50 ↗ that extend to non motorized corridors

9:53 ↗ as well is it just motorized streets and

9:57 ↗ does it go as far as the other related

9:59 ↗ improvements such as sidewalk and other

10:03 ↗ improvements so the transportation

10:05 ↗ benefit district itself really can

10:10 ↗ include really can include those kinds

10:14 ↗ of improvements that are within your

10:15 ↗ transportation improvement plan it's not

10:17 ↗ research into motorized types of

10:19 ↗ Transportation okay because the ordinate

10:22 ↗ of the proposed code does say city

10:24 ↗ streets so I think if we would maybe

10:26 ↗ want to clean something up if we want to

10:28 ↗ consider that and if that's possible but

10:30 ↗ I think the TIR RTI P does include both

10:34 ↗ motorized and non-motorized components

10:35 ↗ so city street seems to be a little bit

10:38 ↗ in conflict with that potentially thank

10:39 ↗ you you can't some everyone just thing

10:41 ↗ that's Myra Goodman

10:42 ↗ I'll up to Paul hello to Paul's question

10:45 ↗ and I'm not sure I heard something

10:48 ↗ correctly but well that's good a little

10:51 ↗ broader in a little different way so

10:53 ↗ this is there refers several references

10:56 ↗ to our CW's up there so was our code or

11:00 ↗ we since we're following the statutes

11:03 ↗ mhm

11:04 ↗ would it be expected is our code

11:06 ↗ expected to track those statutes or

11:08 ↗ there would be anything different so

11:10 ↗ whatever the statutes allow

11:12 ↗ our code would allow we're not doing

11:14 ↗ anything different or do we have we

11:15 ↗ changed a little bit well the statute is

11:17 ↗ drafted more broadly and and I'll turn

11:20 ↗ to the city attorney as well if he has

11:22 ↗ any thoughts on this question but the

11:25 ↗ statute is drafted broadly to permit

11:27 ↗ transportation benefits districts to you

11:29 ↗ know fund any number of kinds of

11:33 ↗ transportation improvements and sort of

11:34 ↗ adopts by reference regional plans and

11:37 ↗ so any transportation improvement that

11:39 ↗ is within a regional plan approved by

11:42 ↗ the city is technically eligible under

11:46 ↗ the statute now if your code has

11:48 ↗ something narrower or whenever your code

11:50 ↗ references so what's in this would

11:52 ↗ control as long as it's within that

11:55 ↗ broader context Jim I think what I'm

11:59 ↗ getting at is Paul reference Street so

12:01 ↗ Wood Street if you're building a street

12:03 ↗ could you also include building

12:05 ↗ sidewalks but then that conceals yeah

12:07 ↗ our trails and I would think that if

12:10 ↗ you're building a one of these projects

12:12 ↗ that Street would encompass what we

12:15 ↗ typically call as a complete Street but

12:17 ↗ oh the actual proposed ordinance states

12:21 ↗ that the board has all of the powers

12:24 ↗ which are granted by the statute so it

12:27 ↗ broadly gives the board those powers it

12:29 ↗ provides that the funds generated by

12:31 ↗ that transportation benefit district

12:33 ↗ shall be used for transportation

12:35 ↗ improvements that meet the requirements

12:37 ↗ of the statute so yes I believe they

12:39 ↗ would have the transportation with

12:41 ↗ benefit district would have the

12:42 ↗ authority to include sidewalks and other

12:45 ↗ improvements assuming that those are

12:47 ↗ authorized by the statute which they are

12:49 ↗ they'd have to be in the city's plan and

12:52 ↗ transportation plan but yes thanks any

12:55 ↗ other questions

12:56 ↗ what's my beret so just just a

12:59 ↗ clarification so we can establish the

13:03 ↗ transportation benefit district and not

13:06 ↗ impose any new vehicle taxes that at the

13:10 ↗ time of creation that's correct that's a

13:12 ↗ decision that would be made it's a

13:14 ↗ two-step process formation first and

13:16 ↗ then coming back once you constitute

13:19 ↗ yourselves as the governing board of

13:21 ↗ this new entity then you get to make

13:23 ↗ that decision later

13:24 ↗ about what if any taxes fees charges are

13:28 ↗ told you may want to impose any more

13:33 ↗ questions at this time I'll open the

13:37 ↗ public hearing the public hearing for

13:40 ↗ the transportation benefit agenda bill

13:42 ↗ the comments were accepting now are two

13:44 ↗ just to that particular bill digits and

13:48 ↗ comments are important part of our

13:49 ↗ process and when I'd like to make sure

13:52 ↗ everybody who wants to comment on this

13:54 ↗ agenda bill knows to come up to the

13:56 ↗ lectern state your name and address if

14:01 ↗ we put the public comment instructions

14:04 ↗ up on the overhead for those who haven't

14:06 ↗ participated before and do we have a

14:10 ↗ sign-up list sorry

14:12 ↗ opening the hearing at 8:14 and has

14:15 ↗ anyone signed up to speak this evening

14:17 ↗ yes Lindsey Walsh I made it through the

14:22 ↗ crowds Lindsey Walsh 1769 28 Avenue

14:25 ↗ Northeast up in the highlands I'm really

14:27 ↗ pleased to see that we're looking at

14:29 ↗ DVDs this is an option

14:31 ↗ I think I said hey we're not ready for

14:34 ↗ that I was thinking the decision related

14:37 ↗ to the car tabs I think it's fine to

14:40 ↗ create the transportation benefit

14:42 ↗ district we're gonna have to have a

14:43 ↗ robust community conversation about

14:46 ↗ funding I think looking at the

14:51 ↗ information in some of the packet that

14:54 ↗ you guys had received I noticed that

14:56 ↗ there was a lot of references to the CIP

14:59 ↗ there's several options on there that

15:02 ↗ are related to parks I would assume

15:04 ↗ that's not included but we were talking

15:07 ↗ about the transportation plan and the

15:10 ↗ CIP was listed in there so I was a

15:13 ↗ little bit confused on that and then

15:16 ↗ beyond that there was something I have

15:21 ↗ to get to page 36 of course it's not

15:27 ↗ going to show up in there I think it's

15:32 ↗ just really important to think about the

15:34 ↗ larger scope of this

15:37 ↗ we're looking at the $20 car tabs that's

15:39 ↗ only going to give us an estimated

15:43 ↗ 450,000 compared to the sales tax and so

15:47 ↗ it's really it's a small portion

15:49 ↗ it's a portion that we need in order to

15:50 ↗ four to spend on our transportation

15:54 ↗ stuff but I don't want to put make the

16:00 ↗ suggestion that that's going to make all

16:02 ↗ of the issues go away so thank you

16:05 ↗ Thank You Lindsay is anyone else signed

16:07 ↗ up is your okay hi Vicki come on up if

16:11 ↗ you have comments that you'd like to

16:13 ↗ present if you could queue up over here

16:16 ↗ because I think we have a lot of people

16:18 ↗ who are here to talk about some other

16:19 ↗ subjects as well thanks Vicki hello my

16:22 ↗ name is Vicki hunt I live at 95 Highwood

16:24 ↗ Drive south west on squawk Mountain and

16:28 ↗ I'm also a member of the Planning Policy

16:29 ↗ Commission but speaking as an individual

16:31 ↗ I was really glad to hear the

16:34 ↗ clarifications regarding that the

16:37 ↗ transportation benefit districts could

16:39 ↗ cover non-motorized walkways and roads

16:43 ↗ because I think as we become more dense

16:46 ↗ as a city we want to make sure that

16:48 ↗ people are able to get around using

16:50 ↗ transportation other than single

16:53 ↗ occupancy cars and there's a lot in our

16:57 ↗ visions for the city that will involve

16:59 ↗ Boehner or a pedestrian walkways tree

17:02 ↗ tree-lined streets and I think that that

17:04 ↗ is a great clarification to make that

17:07 ↗ this can also be used for non-motorized

17:09 ↗ improvements thank you Thank You Vicki

17:12 ↗ marina a marina Subbaiah one three four

17:19 ↗ one eight two hundred ninth Avenue south

17:21 ↗ east just south of the city limits

17:24 ↗ regarding a transportation district I

17:27 ↗ just say that I'd hope that this city if

17:29 ↗ it is established I'd hope that the city

17:31 ↗ would work collaboratively with

17:35 ↗ surrounding jurisdictions I believe

17:38 ↗ Puget Sound regional councils designate

17:41 ↗ it as a quite a city center or some I

17:43 ↗ don't have the exact language but a

17:44 ↗ recent regional transportation hub

17:47 ↗ you're a large gateway to i-90

17:50 ↗ so with potential for just recognizing

17:53 ↗ that your transportation decisions have

17:54 ↗ regional effects and potentials for

17:57 ↗ tolling your city streets and like

18:00 ↗ previous decisions with your truck

18:02 ↗ routes have have significant effects on

18:05 ↗ neighboring jurisdictions so I would

18:07 ↗ hope that that is a part of the actions

18:10 ↗ and consideration considerations and all

18:12 ↗ of the the establishment and actions

18:15 ↗ that they might take Thank You marina

18:17 ↗ would anybody up - oh you're agreeing

18:22 ↗ Thank You Linda anyone else wishing to

18:25 ↗ address the council tonight on this

18:26 ↗ topic a second time anyone wishing to

18:30 ↗ address the council on this subject and

18:32 ↗ a final call seeing no other people were

18:37 ↗ wanting to comment tonight we close the

18:39 ↗ public hearing at 818 and come back to

18:44 ↗ Council for questions councilmember

18:48 ↗ Goodman if there are no more questions I

18:51 ↗ was gonna make a motion I would move to

18:56 ↗ adopt ordinance number 2 8 to 3 mending

19:01 ↗ the Issaquah municipal code to enact a

19:03 ↗ new chapter 12 0.70 Issaquah

19:06 ↗ transportation benefit district

19:07 ↗ establishing a transportation benefit

19:09 ↗ district specifying the boundaries for

19:11 ↗ the transportation benefit district and

19:12 ↗ specifying the maintenance and

19:14 ↗ preservation of existing transportation

19:15 ↗ improvements second it's been moved and

19:19 ↗ seconded to adopt ordinance number 2 8 2

19:21 ↗ 3 amending the MU knispel code to act

19:24 ↗ enact a new chapter 12 point 7 o is

19:27 ↗ saccade transportation benefit district

19:29 ↗ that's been moved in oh the motion so it

19:31 ↗ has been moved and seconded is there any

19:33 ↗ council discussion on this it comes more

19:36 ↗ months so I would actually like to

19:39 ↗ consider I would like to move an

19:41 ↗ amendment so let me explain to you this

19:43 ↗ amendment so as we have talked about I

19:46 ↗ had have some concerns around whether

19:51 ↗ we're getting into specific remedies

19:55 ↗ before we've had a holistic conversation

19:58 ↗ about the entire package so I would like

20:01 ↗ to propose the foie

20:02 ↗ amendment so I would like to add in

20:05 ↗ addition direct the city administration

20:08 ↗ and the council ad hoc long term Finance

20:11 ↗ Committee to propose a comprehensive

20:13 ↗ funding strategy for transportation

20:16 ↗ capital projects for the for the full

20:18 ↗ City Council's consideration by June

20:21 ↗ 2018 is there a second second chicken

20:28 ↗ scratch here so amendment has been

20:31 ↗ proposed it's moved and seconded to add

20:34 ↗ the language in addition direct the city

20:38 ↗ administration in the council ad hoc

20:40 ↗ long term financial committee to propose

20:43 ↗ a comprehensive funding strategy or

20:48 ↗ transportation transportation capital

20:51 ↗ projects for the full City Council's

20:53 ↗ City Council consideration by June 2018

20:58 ↗ is there any discussion

21:01 ↗ council president Mertz so this if if

21:06 ↗ this amendment is approved I would be

21:08 ↗ able to support the bill as written this

21:11 ↗ is a conversation that I've had with the

21:13 ↗ administration about how to on how to

21:16 ↗ address my fundamental concern which is

21:18 ↗ around us getting to this the broad what

21:22 ↗ the broad package would look like an in

21:24 ↗ timely fashion

21:25 ↗ I'd be more comfortable enabling this

21:27 ↗ mechanisms I recognize that tonight

21:29 ↗ we're not deciding on any particular

21:32 ↗ funding dollar amount or anything but I

21:35 ↗ want to have I want to make sure that we

21:36 ↗ have a date certain to a conversation

21:39 ↗ about the the broader funding strategy

21:41 ↗ this would enable that to do so so I'm

21:43 ↗ hoping you will support this amendment

21:46 ↗ council member Goodman so my question is

21:50 ↗ about what what this amendment in the

21:54 ↗ direction would do how is this different

21:56 ↗ from what the administration's plan is

21:58 ↗ already does do we have any maybe that's

22:03 ↗ a question for Emily and then and and I

22:06 ↗ think what if the work if the if the

22:10 ↗ workload that we

22:12 ↗ have can accommodate that we as in terms

22:14 ↗ of the administration city staff so I

22:19 ↗ want comprehensive packages as well but

22:22 ↗ since we're not doing any packaging or

22:25 ↗ funding tonight I don't think there is

22:27 ↗ any proposal to do so I just want to

22:28 ↗ know what the ramification of the memo

22:30 ↗ would be sure I think you're correct and

22:34 ↗ assuming that we were going to have this

22:36 ↗ conversation at the ad hoc committee

22:38 ↗ along with examining all of our

22:41 ↗ long-term financial sustainability

22:43 ↗ issues I think in part the motion gives

22:47 ↗ a deadline for us to have that

22:49 ↗ conversation and then return with some

22:52 ↗ recommendations to the council okay so

22:55 ↗ it's it places a deadline on the

22:58 ↗ intention that was already there yes

23:00 ↗ does it change the timeline dramatically

23:02 ↗ no that's my red booties so I I would be

23:08 ↗ in support of the amendment when we were

23:11 ↗ have been talking about the

23:13 ↗ transportation benefit district really I

23:16 ↗ to go back to what I've talked about

23:19 ↗ before I think that this is putting

23:21 ↗ another tool in our tool belt for lack

23:26 ↗ of a better way to describe that and a

23:28 ↗ lot of conversation needs to be had

23:30 ↗ around what what we would do going

23:32 ↗ forward but I think that putting a

23:35 ↗ timeline on this and having that

23:37 ↗ strategy come forward together along

23:40 ↗ with that conversation makes really good

23:42 ↗ sense thank you

23:43 ↗ anybody else wanting to comment on this

23:45 ↗ councilmember we understand question

23:46 ↗ about the amendment timing how do you

23:49 ↗ see that inter playing with potential

23:54 ↗ tasks or activities for the TVD we were

23:59 ↗ you know should we form this then we

24:03 ↗ would we could we could identify one to

24:06 ↗ three specific projects and say let's

24:09 ↗ let's go forward with a plan on how to

24:12 ↗ fund those there may be their unfunded

24:14 ↗ portion right now in our capital

24:17 ↗ improvement plan how do you see this

24:20 ↗ this date certain for this more

24:22 ↗ comprehensive

24:24 ↗ question-how it may are you intending it

24:27 ↗ to affect the actual course of action

24:30 ↗ and the options and the timing of the

24:33 ↗ options for the DVD yes it is motion

24:38 ↗ maker so one make sure is for making out

24:40 ↗ for administration well yeah I mean my

24:46 ↗ my fundamental concern is that as I've

24:50 ↗ stated before we have the most

24:51 ↗ regressive tax structure west of the

24:54 ↗ Rocky Mountains we have more regressive

24:56 ↗ tax structure than Idaho and sales taxes

25:00 ↗ aren't as bad as head taxes or tabs but

25:03 ↗ they're there at that end of the

25:05 ↗ spectrum and so I'm hoping that we will

25:07 ↗ develop a comprehensive funding strategy

25:09 ↗ that has both progressive and less

25:12 ↗ progressive elements to it rather than

25:14 ↗ relying just on the expedient but ultra

25:16 ↗ progressive form of sales tax so I'm

25:20 ↗ hoping that that I don't have to make a

25:24 ↗ big decision on a big funding mechanism

25:26 ↗ that's super regressive before we've had

25:28 ↗ that comprehensive plan in place

25:34 ↗ I'm gonna go to councilmember Rea next

25:37 ↗ now come back I am just really a point

25:39 ↗ of clarification on the amendment and it

25:41 ↗ seems to we have more than one purpose

25:43 ↗ then in this this motion and so my

25:47 ↗ question is so if the administration

25:49 ↗ doesn't deliver the comprehensive

25:51 ↗ funding material by the end of June does

25:55 ↗ that unravel this adoption of this

25:57 ↗ amendment or of this ordinance the ideas

26:06 ↗ I just don't like them together great so

26:09 ↗ I'm gonna call a friend likely a lawyer

26:12 ↗ friend to address this one it's Jim if

26:18 ↗ they are made as the same motion then

26:20 ↗ yeah motion is amended then you're

26:23 ↗ voting on both issues at once and if you

26:26 ↗ disagree with one then that would be a

26:30 ↗ problem for voting on both of them in

26:32 ↗ the same way you could separate them

26:34 ↗ into two motions if you wish to do that

26:37 ↗ the two are related but not necessarily

26:41 ↗ dependent upon one another at least

26:43 ↗ perhaps from mr. Marta's standpoint they

26:46 ↗ are dependent on one another so well I'm

26:50 ↗ fine with separating them into into two

26:53 ↗ motions as long as we can address the

26:54 ↗ the the topic of my interest first

26:58 ↗ because I'm trying to get to YES on the

27:00 ↗ other piece I'm not a guess right now

27:02 ↗ but if we if I know that by June we're

27:05 ↗ going to have a comprehensive plan then

27:09 ↗ I could be yes on the other piece so I

27:12 ↗ would like to change I don't know the

27:16 ↗ specific language that I would use to

27:17 ↗ make it into two separate so you're

27:19 ↗ causing me a little pain here

27:20 ↗ no we have a motion on the table that

27:23 ↗ deals with the formation the TBD and

27:25 ↗ then the amendment if we split it into

27:27 ↗ two motions we cannot vote on your

27:29 ↗ motion first we have to finish the

27:30 ↗ business at hand if I'm so you will not

27:34 ↗ know the answer about the second motion

27:36 ↗ the one that seems to be more important

27:37 ↗ until we finish our business on forming

27:39 ↗ the transportation industry

27:42 ↗ that's one member Goodman I don't know

27:44 ↗ Robert's Rules of Order is very well but

27:47 ↗ is it possible for the maker of the

27:49 ↗ amendment to withdraw and then the maker

27:51 ↗ of the original motion to withdraw the

27:52 ↗ original motion and then go back to

27:55 ↗ making motion you made first and make

27:59 ↗ that decision and then make a motion on

28:01 ↗ the dole that's I don't know the public

28:09 ↗ you go ahead Jim well yes if you would

28:13 ↗ through the amendment and then if the

28:15 ↗ initial motion was withdrawn as well so

28:18 ↗ that there is nothing on the table then

28:19 ↗ you could make them in the order that

28:21 ↗ you wish under Robert's Rules of Order

28:22 ↗ so we'll start with the amendment first

28:24 ↗ Council are white with drama and the

28:27 ↗ second degrees and who do you withdraw

28:32 ↗ the motion I will withdraw the main

28:34 ↗ motion to give an opportunity for the

28:37 ↗ discussion second degrees yes thank you

28:40 ↗ and now councilmember Mertz would like

28:43 ↗ to put a motion on the table thank you

28:45 ↗ madam mayor I move to direct the city

28:49 ↗ administrator and the council ad hoc

28:51 ↗ long term Finance Committee to propose a

28:53 ↗ comprehensive funding strategy for

28:55 ↗ transportation capital projects for the

28:57 ↗ full city council consideration by June

29:00 ↗ 2018 there a second second it's been

29:05 ↗ moved and seconded you direct the city

29:11 ↗ administration and direct yes direct the

29:16 ↗ city administration and the council ad

29:18 ↗ hoc long-term financial committee to

29:21 ↗ propose a comprehensive funding strategy

29:23 ↗ for transportation capital projects for

29:25 ↗ the full city council consideration by

29:28 ↗ June 2008 is there any discussion let's

29:33 ↗ remember almost yeah so total you and I

29:36 ↗ agreed on this last time we were the

29:38 ↗ dissenting votes and and I I know what

29:41 ↗ you're trying to do it's not quite

29:42 ↗ getting there for me first of all we

29:45 ↗ talked about regressive taxes and a

29:46 ↗ total agreement with with that part of

29:48 ↗ it but I do think also that we're just

29:52 ↗ not there yet I don't think there's been

29:53 ↗ in

29:54 ↗ public involvement before we go to

29:57 ↗ setting up a taxing district and that's

29:59 ↗ my big hang-up is we're setting up a

30:01 ↗ taxing district before you've done that

30:03 ↗ so a little bit of the cart before the

30:04 ↗ horse I think there needs to be a lot

30:06 ↗ more of public involvement before we

30:08 ↗ take this step and the timing of

30:11 ↗ something still says we've taken this

30:12 ↗ step and that says we're still going to

30:14 ↗ do that but it doesn't get to anywhere

30:16 ↗ I'm saying the public really wants us to

30:17 ↗ set up this transportation district so I

30:20 ↗ I understand what you're trying to do

30:22 ↗ but but it doesn't quite get me there

30:24 ↗ because I'm we're back to progressive

30:26 ↗ taxes and not enough debate discussion

30:28 ↗ before we start have the authority to

30:31 ↗ impose taxes because once you set up

30:33 ↗ that district the authority is there to

30:35 ↗ impose taxes and do that so I can't get

30:37 ↗ there yet any other councilmen

30:39 ↗ councilmember Goodman I have a question

30:43 ↗ about a question before was does it

30:48 ↗ doesn't speed up anything does it does

30:50 ↗ it delay any plans the administration

30:52 ↗ had if we were to establish the TBD to

30:54 ↗ come forward with earlier projects or

30:58 ↗ was the plan to hopefully get a tool in

31:01 ↗ place so that we could use it in the

31:03 ↗ future if there was a decision by the

31:05 ↗ council sort of a different question

31:09 ↗ sure that we have not yet discussed

31:12 ↗ timing on bringing forward you've acted

31:15 ↗ on the capital improvement plan for the

31:17 ↗ year so that's our short-term focus is

31:22 ↗ implementing those projects that long

31:24 ↗ term discussion about how to fund the

31:28 ↗ overall transportation plan is one

31:30 ↗ that's been ongoing

31:31 ↗ I think we'd love to try to bring

31:33 ↗ recommendations to you as quickly as

31:35 ↗ possible we have some projects in in

31:39 ↗ short-term that still lack some funding

31:42 ↗ or partially funded projects in our CIP

31:45 ↗ so that would be the next area focus for

31:48 ↗ us would be to fill provide some

31:51 ↗ opportunities to fund those near-term

31:53 ↗ projects okay so it doesn't change

31:57 ↗ anything and so respectful of told us

32:02 ↗ concern I at this point I would support

32:05 ↗ the amendment

32:07 ↗ that's my beret I think it

32:11 ↗ councilmember President Marx's idea our

32:15 ↗ motion to direct the city staff is is

32:18 ↗ solid I think it is good business

32:20 ↗ practice I think is something we should

32:22 ↗ have before making just decisions about

32:24 ↗ revenue so I am fully supportive of this

32:27 ↗ motion councilmember a anymore

32:29 ↗ councilmember comments discussion if

32:33 ↗ there is no further discussion all those

32:35 ↗ in favor of the motion to direct city

32:37 ↗ administration and the council's ad hoc

32:39 ↗ long-term financial committee to propose

32:41 ↗ a comprehensive funding strategy for

32:43 ↗ transportation capital projects for the

32:46 ↗ full City Council's consideration by

32:48 ↗ June 2018 please signify by saying aye

32:53 ↗ as opposed that passes Sixto with

33:00 ↗ someone care to make a motion on the on

33:03 ↗ the ordinance make any cast member

33:05 ↗ Goodman I'd moved to adopt ordinance

33:07 ↗ number 2 8 to 3 amending the Issaquah

33:10 ↗ Municipal Code to enact a new chapter 12

33:12 ↗ point 7 o Issaquah transportation

33:14 ↗ benefit district establishing a

33:16 ↗ transportation benefit district

33:17 ↗ specifying the boundaries for the

33:19 ↗ transportation of benefit district and

33:20 ↗ specifying the maintenance and

33:21 ↗ preservation of existing transportation

33:24 ↗ improvements second it's been moved and

33:27 ↗ seconded to the motion to I'm not going

33:32 ↗ to repeat the motion right now it's been

33:33 ↗ moved and seconded council discussion

33:35 ↗ sounds member Goodman I support this you

33:38 ↗ know we've had you three at least

33:41 ↗ meetings on this and I've said several

33:43 ↗ times that I support this because it is

33:46 ↗ it's it provides flexibility for the

33:49 ↗ city there's no funding that would take

33:54 ↗ place now that those are for future

33:56 ↗ decisions but I fully support providing

33:59 ↗ flexibility for our transportation

34:02 ↗ projects or which we do need funding and

34:06 ↗ we may choose to use this tool later on

34:08 ↗ but that's a decision to be made in the

34:10 ↗ future thank you any other council

34:13 ↗ members let's remember we're interesting

34:14 ↗ I agree with councilmember Goodman and

34:17 ↗ I'll add that

34:18 ↗ with establishing this special-purpose

34:22 ↗ district does add to the options that we

34:25 ↗ can consider and potentially propose in

34:29 ↗ that June time frame without it we would

34:32 ↗ be more limited thank you any other

34:34 ↗ councilmembers if there's no further

34:37 ↗ discussion all those in favor of

34:39 ↗ adopting ordinance number to 8 to 3

34:42 ↗ amending the Issaquah Municipal Code to

34:45 ↗ enact a new chapter 12 point 7 Oh is the

34:48 ↗ quad transportation benefit district

34:49 ↗ signified by saying aye aye those

34:52 ↗ opposed okay

34:54 ↗ five in favor and council member Ramos

34:57 ↗ opposed thank you

35:01 ↗ the next item on the agenda this evening

35:04 ↗ is audience comments and in case folks

35:07 ↗ at home can't see we have a huge

35:08 ↗ audience tonight so the rules and

35:11 ↗ guidelines that apply to public hearing

35:13 ↗ also applied to audience comments

35:16 ↗ because of the late start this evening

35:18 ↗ we're asking each person coming to the

35:22 ↗ microphone to spend no more than three

35:24 ↗ minutes addressing the council and if

35:28 ↗ you are here speaking on behalf of a

35:31 ↗ group and there are members in the

35:33 ↗ audience who support what you're saying

35:35 ↗ please raise your hand at the end of the

35:37 ↗ speakers time so that the rest of

35:39 ↗ council can understand how many of you

35:42 ↗ are here to support that particular

35:43 ↗ speaker and the topic they're talking

35:45 ↗ about has anyone signed up to speak this

35:48 ↗ evening yes

35:49 ↗ Bruce simple followed by Ed Hanson and

35:52 ↗ Dave Wagner if you can please queue up

35:54 ↗ behind the podium thank you

36:02 ↗ thank you

36:03 ↗ my name is Bruce temple and I live at

36:07 ↗ 102 Burr Ridge Way Northwest within the

36:11 ↗ talus development

36:12 ↗ I'm a resident Lovisa PO my comments are

36:15 ↗ primarily about health which is

36:17 ↗ understandable given that I'm a retired

36:19 ↗ physician and who's passionate about our

36:22 ↗ Issaquah Alps in which I regularly hike

36:24 ↗ there's a substantial amount of ongoing

36:28 ↗ parcel development here and I have no

36:30 ↗ doubt that the council spends

36:31 ↗ considerable time evaluating as it must

36:33 ↗ the many associated engineering aspects

36:37 ↗ for roadways retaining walls house sites

36:39 ↗ and related services my concern relates

36:43 ↗ to the health aspects of any associated

36:45 ↗ loss of green spaces and forests and I'm

36:48 ↗ not alone in this the regional open

36:51 ↗ space strategy for the central Puget

36:53 ↗ Sound region states we cannot afford to

36:56 ↗ underestimate the importance of open

36:58 ↗ space in supporting human health and

37:00 ↗ goes on to say that would despite 40

37:03 ↗ years of evidence the benefits of health

37:06 ↗ are often not part of the planning

37:08 ↗ efforts I ask Ken konigsmark about this

37:11 ↗ and the substantial and growing

37:13 ↗ literature on the health benefits that

37:15 ↗ open green spaces and forests provide he

37:19 ↗ responded that in addition there are

37:21 ↗ also other studies that show the

37:23 ↗ enormous value of ecosystem services

37:25 ↗ provided by forests and open spaces such

37:28 ↗ as clean and accessible drinking water

37:30 ↗ flood control and air quality etc to

37:33 ↗ which I would add landslide avoidance

37:36 ↗ and mitigation of stormwater runoff

37:38 ↗ which is so necessary for our iconic

37:41 ↗ salmon after having replaced the open

37:44 ↗ spaces with homes and streets these

37:47 ↗ ecosystem services functions have to be

37:50 ↗ replaced with human measures such as

37:52 ↗ water filtration dikes and other

37:54 ↗ engineered means the costs of these are

37:57 ↗ immensely greater and require ongoing

38:00 ↗ operations and maintenance expenditures

38:02 ↗ that never end

38:03 ↗ I provided a sampling of studies for

38:06 ↗ your reference that describes the

38:08 ↗ substantial benefits of health of open

38:11 ↗ spaces and wood land forests

38:13 ↗ one of these from the Department of

38:15 ↗ Environmental Conservation of New York

38:17 ↗ State lists eight benefits of forests

38:19 ↗ with the relevant references from the

38:22 ↗ scientific literature ranging from the

38:24 ↗ boosting of the immune system to

38:25 ↗ lowering blood pressure reducing stress

38:27 ↗ etc I would commend the council's

38:31 ↗ perusal of this representative sample

38:33 ↗ from the science literature and hope

38:35 ↗ that you will be encountered to always

38:37 ↗ incorporate the potential health

38:39 ↗ benefits of green spaces and woodland

38:41 ↗ forests into your future evaluation of

38:44 ↗ proposed developments I thank you thank

38:47 ↗ you mr. Hampel forty to fifty people in

38:51 ↗ the audience have raised their hand to

38:53 ↗ show support for the speaker's comments

38:54 ↗ if you have written copies of your

38:57 ↗ comments please drop them off with the

39:00 ↗ clerk at the end of your turn at the

39:01 ↗ podium and the next speaker ed hansen

39:07 ↗ counsel I'm ed Hansen I reside at Timber

39:11 ↗ Ridge 110 Ridgeway and Issaquah I'm

39:16 ↗ president of the resident Council there

39:19 ↗ of about 425 residents and most recently

39:24 ↗ you might expect what might be occurring

39:27 ↗ there with people who have acknowledged

39:30 ↗ the fact that the moratorium has gone

39:34 ↗ away and that settled the agreements of

39:37 ↗ surrounding Timber Ridge are no longer

39:41 ↗ in existence so there's some degree of

39:43 ↗ concern and I might say anxiety about

39:46 ↗ what happens now and I think my comment

39:49 ↗ so basically oriented toward maybe what

39:52 ↗ what happens now and and maybe hope that

39:55 ↗ maybe you think about some of these

39:56 ↗ things that I mentioned the population

39:59 ↗ they are as very versatile and as a wide

40:04 ↗ range of professional backgrounds that

40:08 ↗ we have there and people there have

40:10 ↗ lived all over the country and in

40:12 ↗ various places so they have a pretty

40:14 ↗ broad spectrum of what what's happened

40:17 ↗ and some of the discussions I've had and

40:19 ↗ had

40:20 ↗ do with their experience with city

40:22 ↗ councils and cities and towns that they

40:25 ↗ lived in and I'll just share with you a

40:27 ↗ little bit of what what some of the

40:29 ↗ feedback I got on that these experiences

40:34 ↗ basically had basically to regard to

40:37 ↗ land entitlements zoning building

40:41 ↗ heights floor area ratios and road

40:44 ↗ access

40:46 ↗ they've been remarkably similar I think

40:49 ↗ and the people I've talked to residents

40:51 ↗ come in an appeal for fair balance and

40:55 ↗ considering proposals to develop land

40:57 ↗ parcels which are seen as open space

41:00 ↗ green belts unbuildable locations due to

41:06 ↗ terrain contours the presence of family

41:10 ↗ trails through wooded areas and I would

41:15 ↗ think roads that are already crowded as

41:18 ↗ well so people who've come here to live

41:20 ↗ from all over the country see this and

41:22 ↗ over and over and these cases as well as

41:26 ↗ what they see here they've found out

41:29 ↗ that a council can be persuaded that a

41:34 ↗ good chain saw a bulldozer and

41:38 ↗ outstanding retaining wall contractor

41:42 ↗ can make almost any parcel of land

41:44 ↗ buildable and for that reason it becomes

41:48 ↗ very as we know very attractive to a

41:52 ↗ developer likewise the addition of a

41:54 ↗ stop light what would be another way

41:56 ↗ well I remember your former mayor Fred

42:00 ↗ the butler who came to Denver Ridge

42:05 ↗ several times and he would listen to

42:07 ↗ some of our concerns and he would always

42:09 ↗ not his head in agreement and and would

42:12 ↗ give a very favorable approach but he

42:15 ↗ always said and I thought this was very

42:17 ↗ important and I was glad I'm persuaded

42:20 ↗ to agree but I have to tell you he would

42:23 ↗ say that when I take these issues back

42:25 ↗ to the City Council

42:27 ↗ they often changed my mind

42:30 ↗ and I think that just wrap it up mr.

42:32 ↗ Hanson sir again if you could wrap it up

42:34 ↗ with a concluding statement I'm finished

42:37 ↗ at the present time anyway I think

42:39 ↗ that's sort of the foundation of our

42:41 ↗ concerns and we really understand your

42:44 ↗ challenge during this year and we're

42:47 ↗ grateful very thankful for your service

42:49 ↗ thank you

42:50 ↗ Thank You mr. Hanson mr. Wagner I

42:56 ↗ counsel good evening mayor

43:01 ↗ I'm here as a 3-minute reminder standing

43:04 ↗ back there buried in the voice of

43:07 ↗ freedom it's quite warm it's nice up

43:10 ↗ here you guys the voice of freedom is

43:16 ↗ extremely important as we well know in

43:19 ↗ this city but that voice is paid for by

43:23 ↗ duty service and sacrifice and reminder

43:27 ↗ that I want to tell you is that tomorrow

43:29 ↗ Daniel McCartney our Paris County

43:33 ↗ Sheriff will be buried and his funeral

43:39 ↗ is at my alma mater PLU tomorrow at 1:00

43:42 ↗ p.m.

43:43 ↗ and we don't want to forget those voices

43:47 ↗ of democracy those voices of freedom but

43:51 ↗ we surely don't want to forget those

43:53 ↗ people who provide that safety sacrifice

43:57 ↗ and service so that we can do this

44:01 ↗ tomorrow is a sad day for his family for

44:05 ↗ his children but it's one more reminder

44:08 ↗ that we live in a free country because

44:12 ↗ of the brave men and women who serve

44:15 ↗ Daniel was a six-year Navy veteran who

44:19 ↗ was involved in electronics and

44:22 ↗ supported the army the best service

44:24 ↗ there is and we just don't want to

44:29 ↗ forget that service as well not only did

44:31 ↗ he serve his community but he served his

44:33 ↗ country next Wednesday the 24th I'm

44:37 ↗ inviting this city flintoff funeral home

44:40 ↗ has

44:41 ↗ asked us if we would in fact bury a

44:43 ↗ veteran at the Holman National Cemetery

44:45 ↗ that has no family one remaining family

44:49 ↗ member is dying of cancer in a hospital

44:52 ↗ and will not be able to attend

44:54 ↗ so our VFW post will be there to bury

44:57 ↗ Daniel sorry Charles Danielson on the

45:02 ↗ 24th at 2:00 p.m. if you're would like

45:06 ↗ to come down City it would be wonderful

45:09 ↗ to have you any of you that can make it

45:11 ↗ to be there to to say farewell to

45:14 ↗ another Air Force veteran who paid that

45:17 ↗ price for freedom thank you thank you

45:20 ↗ mr. Wagner a show of hands in the

45:23 ↗ audience

45:24 ↗ I'm tisha do we have anyone else signed

45:25 ↗ up for comment we do we have Tina

45:27 ↗ Conforti followed by Janet wall followed

45:30 ↗ by Jim Lippincott absolutely when we get

45:38 ↗ to the end of the list I'll I'll let

45:40 ↗ other people indicate that they'd like

45:42 ↗ to come speak good evening everyone

45:44 ↗ my name is Tina Conforti and I live at

45:48 ↗ 12:20 awkward place northwest Issaquah

45:52 ↗ well I'm here tonight for the same

45:55 ↗ reason of everyone is here I believe

45:59 ↗ he's a guar is a unique historical

46:02 ↗ culture and natural heritage located in

46:07 ↗ the he's a co helps cougar Munter park

46:11 ↗ service in part why the life habit while

46:15 ↗ offering ample opportunities for

46:19 ↗ recreation we needed to preserve and

46:22 ↗ stay behind other more dense soil

46:27 ↗ vegetated area of the park away from the

46:31 ↗ side and the sons of a nearby urban area

46:36 ↗ regularly see a the cooker cooker monden

46:42 ↗ along with a wider life such as black

46:46 ↗ bear bobcats and many birds and other

46:51 ↗ species

46:53 ↗ we needed to save the importance of the

46:56 ↗ culture and be more responsible to the

47:01 ↗ natural heritage located in the hyssop

47:04 ↗ ahab's I am a proud resident of hosaka I

47:09 ↗ came from the bigger huts and I find the

47:13 ↗ little hearts I I invite all of you to

47:19 ↗ to save Kruger mountains we need we need

47:26 ↗ a fresh air we needed to restore the

47:30 ↗ land the way the way it is for long for

47:35 ↗ a long time so please save a coger

47:37 ↗ mountains thank you miss conforte a

47:41 ↗ large raise of hands everybody that's

47:44 ↗ here raised their hands miss wall I'm

47:50 ↗ Janet wall and I live in the over Dale

47:52 ↗ Park neighborhood at 2-2 seven-four-zero

47:54 ↗ South East 56th Street after having read

47:58 ↗ the geotech report by Reilly I feel that

48:02 ↗ the proposed development of the Bergsma

48:04 ↗ property would be a grave mistake I have

48:07 ↗ learned a lot about landslides and

48:09 ↗ retaining walls since moving to Issaquah

48:11 ↗ 23 years ago at the end of my driveway

48:14 ↗ there is a 40 foot retaining wall put in

48:17 ↗ by the Sammamish Water District to help

48:20 ↗ protect the water tower that was not the

48:23 ↗ original wall an earlier wall had

48:26 ↗ collapsed because there was inadequate

48:27 ↗ drainage from behind the wall and it

48:30 ↗ caused a major landslide which went half

48:32 ↗ way down the hillside fortunately there

48:35 ↗ weren't any homes directly below when

48:37 ↗ that happened years later a housing

48:40 ↗ development did come in below the water

48:42 ↗ tower

48:42 ↗ but the drainage they put in was not

48:45 ↗ adequate residents complained that their

48:47 ↗ marshy lawns so dish they complained

48:50 ↗ about their marshy lawns so additional

48:52 ↗ drainage was put in which deposited

48:54 ↗ stormwater on the steep slope itself I

48:58 ↗ investigated and found out that the

49:00 ↗ additional drainage was put in without a

49:02 ↗ permit yet I couldn't get anyone from

49:05 ↗ the city to be concerned about it

49:07 ↗ until the near collapse of a retaining

49:09 ↗ wall further down the hillside the

49:13 ↗ residents of Park Hill apartments were

49:15 ↗ given 15 minutes in the middle of the

49:17 ↗ night to evacuate their apartment

49:21 ↗ building because the be the retaining

49:24 ↗ wall above was giving signs of

49:26 ↗ collapsing the wall had to be replaced

49:30 ↗ and was giving sigh the wall had to be

49:32 ↗ replaced in the drainage from the

49:35 ↗ development above was tight lined at

49:38 ↗ their expense the geotech report for the

49:43 ↗ Bert's Mott property indicated that

49:45 ↗ there are layers of sand and gravel

49:47 ↗ above impervious impervious soil

49:50 ↗ probably clay creating perched

49:53 ↗ groundwater in places when that occurs

49:56 ↗ on a hillside it can be a recipe for

49:58 ↗ disaster

50:00 ↗ especially when trees are removed and

50:02 ↗ the ground disturbed clearing the Heat

50:04 ↗ trees which soak up water and stabilize

50:07 ↗ the hillside with their roots

50:09 ↗ exasperates

50:10 ↗ the issue we've all heard recently what

50:13 ↗ happened in the Santa Barbara area when

50:15 ↗ the tree canopy was destroyed by fire

50:18 ↗ and lives were lost when the hillsides

50:21 ↗ turned to mud and destroyed the homes

50:23 ↗ below it was a clear example of how

50:26 ↗ important trees can be in stabilizing a

50:28 ↗ hillside I don't believe it's a quiet

50:31 ↗ present has the staff expertise to

50:33 ↗ properly evaluate and inspect

50:35 ↗ construction activities on steep slopes

50:37 ↗ to prevent landslides from happening on

50:40 ↗ this site look what happened recently at

50:43 ↗ Allis the geotech report had numerous

50:47 ↗ cautions about construction activities

50:49 ↗ one of the things that mentioned that

50:51 ↗ advised proof rolling and you Janet if I

50:56 ↗ could get you to conclude that would be

50:58 ↗ great okay so I I really feel that we

51:02 ↗ should learn something about the history

51:03 ↗ of landslides that we've had in the area

51:06 ↗ see whether there is other methods of

51:09 ↗ preserving this land using possibly the

51:15 ↗ tdq transfer of development rights or

51:20 ↗ other methods

51:21 ↗ raising funds to compensate the owners

51:24 ↗ Thank You Janet

51:27 ↗ all hands up in the air

51:29 ↗ [Laughter]

51:33 ↗ hi I'm Jim Whipple cotton two two five

51:37 ↗ eight Newport we're northwest part of

51:40 ↗ the Sammamish Point community thank you

51:44 ↗ for taking the consideration of our

51:45 ↗ neighborhood to not develop the bergna

51:48 ↗ Hill so much Issaquah for me as a fairly

51:54 ↗ recent resident is tied to the the

51:58 ↗ visual beauty of the hills around and

52:00 ↗ the hidden development tucked here and

52:04 ↗ tuck there that starts stripping away

52:07 ↗ the hillside so close to the visual

52:11 ↗ corridor that you've taken so much time

52:14 ↗ to preserve I think this is just you

52:19 ↗ know the first straw to ruining is a

52:23 ↗ quarte to what it could be and continue

52:25 ↗ to be and thank you for considering that

52:29 ↗ keep the keep the trees thank you thank

52:33 ↗ you very much all hands up

52:36 ↗ I appreciate the speakers who have come

52:38 ↗ so far we've heard about health concerns

52:41 ↗ drainage concerns and protection of

52:43 ↗ trees is Tina our to show there are

52:46 ↗ others on the list there are next we

52:49 ↗ have Janie Swift following followed by

52:52 ↗ Francesca Aguilera and Lisette Aguilera

53:03 ↗ yeah sure

53:12 ↗ case you wanna

53:22 ↗ ambi Malkowski part of the Tallis

53:25 ↗ development eight nine zero lingering

53:27 ↗ pine lane northwest and speaking as a

53:30 ↗ residence I heard earlier during

53:35 ↗ petitions for applying for the council

53:37 ↗ position how awesome your

53:39 ↗ responsibilities are because the

53:40 ↗ decisions you make affect the community

53:42 ↗ not this year but 20 30 40 maybe even 50

53:45 ↗ years from now and what I found is that

53:49 ↗ there's a outspoken community here

53:51 ↗ willing to work to preserve some of this

53:53 ↗ and some of the most recent ideas were

53:56 ↗ like participating in land conservation

53:58 ↗ advisory groups where King County is

54:01 ↗ working with cities to preserve over

54:03 ↗ sixty thousand acres of high

54:06 ↗ conservation value lands including farm

54:08 ↗ lands nature's trails the Bergsma

54:11 ↗ property is arguably considered some of

54:14 ↗ that high-value land the King County

54:17 ↗ effort also includes potential funding

54:20 ↗ sources which may allow for an equitable

54:24 ↗ distribution the only negative is of

54:28 ↗ course it requires action from the

54:30 ↗ council and it won't happen

54:31 ↗ automatically and unlike a developer

54:33 ↗ they don't come calling on a regular

54:34 ↗ basis to do something the negatives of

54:37 ↗ building the 57 homes have been talked

54:41 ↗ about a number of times but just quickly

54:42 ↗ you know it's misaligned with the plan

54:45 ↗ vision of everything from the growth

54:47 ↗ management act Mountains to sound

54:49 ↗ greenways the King County lands

54:51 ↗ conservation initiatives you know just

54:53 ↗ the whole large clearing large sections

54:55 ↗ of visible growth and arguably it's not

54:58 ↗ even in line with the a comprehensive

55:00 ↗ plan for reducing sprawls and protecting

55:02 ↗ the environment or creating pedestrian

55:04 ↗ friendly communities again arguably it's

55:07 ↗ not even within its supposed own design

55:09 ↗ standards in the green edge of acquiring

55:12 ↗ it's already been talked about at least

55:14 ↗ once the risky development 50 percent of

55:17 ↗ the land is high-risk slide potential we

55:19 ↗ have very adjacent land immediately

55:21 ↗ adjacent that has slid before and within

55:24 ↗ eyesight of that Heslin there's been a

55:28 ↗ home damage on land very similar to that

55:31 ↗ additionally the amount of development

55:34 ↗ here is just unbelievable in some ways

55:36 ↗ you're talking about eighty eight

55:37 ↗ hundred truckloads you know ten minutes

55:40 ↗ twelve hours a day is a hundred twenty

55:42 ↗ days just think about how much the land

55:44 ↗ is getting displaced and the argument

55:46 ↗ that there may not be any slides is

55:48 ↗ almost laughable critical areas are

55:50 ↗ being affected it's a twenty seven acres

55:52 ↗ of wetland stream slopes two of three

55:55 ↗ streams are being crossed two of six

55:57 ↗ wetlands are being filled in all that's

55:59 ↗ been talked about as of yesterday the

56:02 ↗ variances are not listed on the State

56:04 ↗ Environmental Protection Act site

56:05 ↗ obviously it decreased the safety of

56:08 ↗ continually interrupting any potential

56:10 ↗ trails or pads or anything with more

56:12 ↗ cars and development and and not really

56:16 ↗ aligned with the sequester survey again

56:18 ↗ of loving of the environment and

56:21 ↗ complaining about traffic so that's what

56:23 ↗ the fifty seven homes buys you the

56:26 ↗ alternative is a little action on the

56:28 ↗ council side thank you thank you very

56:29 ↗ much Andy all hands in the air

56:33 ↗ tisha would Francesco or Lisette like to

56:38 ↗ make comments okay qu so then next we

56:45 ↗ have Kay Haines followed by Susan de

56:47 ↗ Ville and Julie Clark

57:00 ↗ Kanes 2830 Northwest pine cone drive

57:03 ↗ Issaquah I want to address the Bergsma

57:10 ↗ windward property and why we think it

57:13 ↗ should be given emergency acquisition

57:15 ↗ funding status the city has many funding

57:22 ↗ requirements and priorities we

57:24 ↗ understand that and we respect that but

57:28 ↗ looking ahead five twenty fifty years

57:31 ↗ from now how many of those funding items

57:34 ↗ will seem as important as the loss of

57:37 ↗ our forested hillsides and the prominent

57:39 ↗ scar that's going to be left on Cougar

57:42 ↗ Mountain and the Gateway to the Issaquah

57:46 ↗ elves we ask you to consider the Bergsma

57:51 ↗ windward plat as an emergency

57:53 ↗ acquisition is it late in the

57:56 ↗ development process yes is it going to

57:59 ↗ be costly yes but maybe this is the

58:02 ↗ price we have to pay for having no teeth

58:04 ↗ in our vision and here's the higher

58:08 ↗ price that we'll pay a much higher price

58:11 ↗ in addition to the permanent loss of the

58:13 ↗ current view shed there will also be a

58:15 ↗ complete clear-cutting of 22 acres of

58:18 ↗ tree canopy in a critical area a 12%

58:21 ↗ access road that gains 350 feet in

58:24 ↗ elevation through the property over a

58:26 ↗ thousand feet of retaining wall is up to

58:28 ↗ 20 feet in height and for water

58:29 ↗ retention vaults 14 acres of site

58:32 ↗ grading through 40% slopes the removal

58:35 ↗ of 88,000 cubic yards of the mountain

58:38 ↗ 2:06 wetlands filled in and stream

58:40 ↗ buffers reduced a major removal of

58:42 ↗ existing forests along Newport Way homes

58:45 ↗ perched right on the edge of previously

58:46 ↗ heavily wooded slopes the addition of a

58:49 ↗ hundred cars and 543 daily vehicular

58:52 ↗ trips along newport a slight to this

58:55 ↗ neighborhood already deluged with the

58:57 ↗ coming five hundred and seventy two

58:58 ↗ units of new housing with over a

59:00 ↗ thousand additional cars and over 3500

59:03 ↗ added daily vehicular trips this would

59:06 ↗ also be the loss of a truly rare

59:08 ↗ opportunity to connect mass transit to

59:10 ↗ an urban trail that had

59:11 ↗ cougar Mountain leave your cars in the

59:13 ↗ highlands or anywhere in the region and

59:15 ↗ take a bus to the trailhead we are all

59:19 ↗ stewards of the land and environment in

59:21 ↗ Issaquah but the City Council and staff

59:24 ↗ are the leaders of the stewardship

59:27 ↗ please consider the Bergsma windward

59:29 ↗ plat and emergency as well as a great

59:32 ↗ opportunity for the city put together

59:35 ↗ the staff citizens elected officials

59:38 ↗ regional groups form a reader group seek

59:41 ↗ out partnerships partnerships explore

59:44 ↗ all the pieces of the financial puzzle

59:46 ↗ together quickly so that this

59:48 ↗ opportunity is not lost thank you thank

59:52 ↗ you Kay oh hello Susan deville I'm from

59:59 ↗ the Newport corridor 2825 Northwest pine

1:00:03 ↗ cone Drive hello just City Council and

1:00:06 ↗ mayor Polly I've been I'm going to refer

1:00:10 ↗ to the Bergsma windward development as

1:00:12 ↗ Bergsma and I've spent the last year

1:00:14 ↗ trying to figure out how the Bergsma

1:00:17 ↗ property application for development was

1:00:20 ↗ even approved it has been an interesting

1:00:22 ↗ yet frustrating journey in my research I

1:00:26 ↗ became acquainted with the comprehensive

1:00:28 ↗ and central Issaquah plans the city put

1:00:31 ↗ a huge amount of time and resources into

1:00:35 ↗ creating these plans which established

1:00:37 ↗ the city's future vision and policy

1:00:39 ↗ direction but how does the Bergsma

1:00:43 ↗ proposal line up with these plans it is

1:00:46 ↗ my belief they do not this development

1:00:50 ↗ is in direct opposition to concentrating

1:00:52 ↗ density on the valley floor which is one

1:00:56 ↗ of the primary issues stated in the

1:00:57 ↗ comprehensive plan so how did this

1:01:00 ↗ happen during a recent meeting I had

1:01:03 ↗ with city staff concerning his property

1:01:05 ↗ I asked a city planner

1:01:08 ↗ how will they insure cougar Mountains

1:01:11 ↗ tree canopy and tree retention will be

1:01:14 ↗ in compliance with the comprehensive

1:01:17 ↗ plan and I was told by this staff person

1:01:20 ↗ he explained that they are bound by the

1:01:23 ↗ zoning laws

1:01:24 ↗ in land-use codes associated with the

1:01:28 ↗ property the zoning laws bind them the

1:01:32 ↗ comprehensive plan is only a guide so

1:01:37 ↗ going forward what is the city doing to

1:01:40 ↗ protect our forested hillsides

1:01:42 ↗ developers will never build to meet a

1:01:44 ↗ vision they build to meet meet required

1:01:47 ↗ codes and standards and they build to

1:01:49 ↗ maximize their profit when will City

1:01:52 ↗ Council update our land use codes to

1:01:55 ↗ meet our vision until then it is up to

1:01:58 ↗ you to protect our forests to do sides

1:02:00 ↗ and preserve our Issaquah gateway and

1:02:02 ↗ view shed thank you Thank You Susan

1:02:05 ↗ all hands raised Julie

1:02:13 ↗ good evening and I'm also speaking about

1:02:17 ↗ the Bergsma windward property and we've

1:02:21 ↗ heard about many of the problems with

1:02:24 ↗ the Bergsma property and some of the

1:02:26 ↗ frustrations and limitations in trying

1:02:28 ↗ to work with the city and its codes I

1:02:32 ↗ would like to talk about some solutions

1:02:35 ↗ my belief is the best use of the 45

1:02:38 ↗ acres is for public open space because

1:02:41 ↗ the Bergsma property is special this is

1:02:45 ↗ one of the last parcels of forested

1:02:48 ↗ cougar mountain hillside in Issaquah

1:02:51 ↗ acquiring the property would be

1:02:53 ↗ consistent with the vision of the

1:02:55 ↗ Comprehensive Plan by the city taking

1:02:58 ↗ the lead to protect this land we will

1:03:01 ↗ keep the northeast corner of Cougar

1:03:03 ↗ Mountain forested and open to the public

1:03:06 ↗ this parcel is just steps away from the

1:03:09 ↗ Issaquah Transit Center and accessible

1:03:12 ↗ to many residents the Bergsma property

1:03:16 ↗ connects to existing city and county

1:03:18 ↗ open space and by acquiring the property

1:03:22 ↗ and providing the link to the existing

1:03:25 ↗ open space it allows for safer

1:03:27 ↗ activities to those utilizing our trails

1:03:31 ↗ so in addition

1:03:35 ↗ so the solution is in purchasing the

1:03:39 ↗ property and I am bringing forth a few

1:03:42 ↗ funding options in addition to applying

1:03:46 ↗ for numerous grants that are available

1:03:48 ↗ through King County the city has

1:03:50 ↗ excellent credit and could consider

1:03:52 ↗ selling bonds or using bank credits

1:03:54 ↗ acquiring Bergsma could be excuse me

1:03:59 ↗ acquiring Bergsma should provide the

1:04:01 ↗ city with TDRs that could help fund the

1:04:04 ↗ acquisition but when the city gives out

1:04:07 ↗ free up zones the TDRs lose their value

1:04:11 ↗ it is our understanding that the city

1:04:14 ↗ excuse me that King County is interested

1:04:17 ↗ in partnering with the city please step

1:04:20 ↗ up show initiative creativity and a

1:04:24 ↗ willingness to work with others Issaquah

1:04:28 ↗ is not an isolated island members of

1:04:31 ↗ Issaquah and surrounding cities such as

1:04:34 ↗ Seattle Bellevue Sammamish Snoqualmie

1:04:37 ↗ Ridge have expressed support let's

1:04:41 ↗ accept their help it feels like the

1:04:45 ↗ residents of Issaquah are not being

1:04:47 ↗ heard and there is not a serious effort

1:04:49 ↗ by the city to acquire and protect this

1:04:52 ↗ area as open space we want to know are

1:04:56 ↗ you doing anything and if so what thank

1:05:01 ↗ you thank you Julie

1:05:03 ↗ all hands are raised anyone else on the

1:05:06 ↗ sign-up list tisha yes next we have

1:05:08 ↗ Rachel a thought followed by Hart

1:05:10 ↗ Sugarman and Joe Verner

1:05:22 ↗ good evening Rachel a font my address is

1:05:26 ↗ 1 7 7 0 7 South East 60th bellevue i

1:05:30 ↗ live adjacent to the city of Issaquah

1:05:32 ↗ and myself and my family spend about 90%

1:05:35 ↗ of our time in Issaquah so I often

1:05:37 ↗ forget that I'm not a resident here I am

1:05:40 ↗ a resident of Cougar Mountain and so I'm

1:05:42 ↗ speaking as a resident my first time do

1:05:46 ↗ not have polished notes my 9 year old

1:05:48 ↗ actually asked me to come tonight he

1:05:50 ↗ looks around almost every day and asks

1:05:52 ↗ why are they tearing down more trees why

1:05:55 ↗ are we not stopping all the destruction

1:05:58 ↗ of our forests and of our mountain and

1:06:01 ↗ so I'm really here on his behalf

1:06:04 ↗ supporting him completely to ask you to

1:06:07 ↗ consider the future generations that

1:06:10 ↗ will be in Issaquah and our communities

1:06:11 ↗ and to please do everything within your

1:06:13 ↗ power to maintain as many green spaces

1:06:16 ↗ as possible thank you Thank You art and

1:06:21 ↗ all hands were raised just in case there

1:06:23 ↗ was a doe good evening mayor and

1:06:25 ↗ councilmembers my name is Hart Sugarman

1:06:28 ↗ I live at 255 0 Northwest Oak Crest

1:06:31 ↗ Drive I've been here for living here for

1:06:34 ↗ 21 years I'd like to talk about the

1:06:36 ↗ development and construction along

1:06:38 ↗ Newport Way which is west of State Road

1:06:41 ↗ 900 current construction projects are

1:06:44 ↗ underway and others are in the pipeline

1:06:46 ↗ we don't know yet the impact it will

1:06:49 ↗ have on the traffic and the neighboring

1:06:50 ↗ community therefore please put a hold on

1:06:53 ↗ any new projects that are in the area

1:06:55 ↗ including the Bergsma when we're

1:06:57 ↗ property thank you Joe

1:07:00 ↗ all hands raised and Joe's hand is

1:07:04 ↗ raised - Thank You mayor City Council

1:07:08 ↗ I'm just going to take a brief moment

1:07:11 ↗ Newport Way Northwest is a main

1:07:14 ↗ east-west thoroughfare into Issaquah and

1:07:19 ↗ out of this aqua that is not the i-90

1:07:22 ↗ freeway but parallel is a freeway should

1:07:27 ↗ there ever be a slide

1:07:32 ↗ on Cougar Mountain that comes down

1:07:36 ↗ across Newports way that would be a

1:07:41 ↗ major impact on the city not just for

1:07:45 ↗ the residents we have to figure out how

1:07:47 ↗ to get out of the Newport Way area but

1:07:52 ↗ to our past through traffic and then

1:07:59 ↗ we'd end up being listened to watched on

1:08:03 ↗ world television and news and that

1:08:07 ↗ wouldn't be good for us so I don't

1:08:09 ↗ begrudge the birds my family and the

1:08:11 ↗ Windward Development Corporation they

1:08:15 ↗ took their risk they were betting on to

1:08:18 ↗ come but I'd sure like to see the city

1:08:21 ↗ in the county step up the pace to

1:08:24 ↗ acquire the property for the use of the

1:08:27 ↗ public thank you thank you Joe all hands

1:08:30 ↗ in the air

1:08:31 ↗ yes the last two commenters who've

1:08:34 ↗ signed up are Teresa marks and Steve

1:08:36 ↗ Pereira

1:08:46 ↗ hello my name is Teresa Marx I live at

1:08:48 ↗ to 500 third Avenue Northeast I'm

1:08:51 ↗ actually an aqua city resident but I'm

1:08:54 ↗ speaking on behalf of the Eastside

1:08:56 ↗ Audubon Society you may not know that we

1:08:59 ↗ connected we conducted a survey in the

1:09:02 ↗ area around the Harvey Manning Park from

1:09:04 ↗ November of 2015 to September of 2016 we

1:09:09 ↗ followed 1.5 miles of trail and we were

1:09:12 ↗ asked at that time to conduct the survey

1:09:14 ↗ because of development that was

1:09:15 ↗ happening on the nearby parcels of land

1:09:17 ↗ during this survey we had experienced

1:09:20 ↗ team members that noted all birds seen

1:09:22 ↗ or heard as they walked along those

1:09:24 ↗ trails they did a total of 10 walks over

1:09:28 ↗ the eleventh month period over this

1:09:31 ↗ period of time they found 43 species of

1:09:33 ↗ birds 15 of which were year-round

1:09:36 ↗ residents 14 were migrants and 14 either

1:09:40 ↗ visited or flew over the site while they

1:09:42 ↗ were there a total of 22 species were

1:09:45 ↗ seen in the area on just one day in May

1:09:48 ↗ during the breeding season breeding

1:09:51 ↗ birds were confirmed by presence of

1:09:53 ↗ breeding pairs male singing on territory

1:09:56 ↗ adults feeding young active nest and

1:09:59 ↗ nesting behavior breeding birds

1:10:01 ↗ consisted of both resident and migratory

1:10:03 ↗ species nesting birds used the entire

1:10:06 ↗ forest area from the ground to the

1:10:08 ↗ understory to the canopy 13 species were

1:10:12 ↗ thought to be breeding in the area and

1:10:14 ↗ these included the hairy woodpecker the

1:10:16 ↗ Pacific slope fly catcher the backed

1:10:18 ↗ capped chickadee the Pacific wren the

1:10:20 ↗ chestnut backed chickadee the brown

1:10:22 ↗ creeper the brown crowned kinglet the

1:10:25 ↗ American Robin the back floated grey

1:10:27 ↗ Warbler Wilson's Warbler dark-eyed junco

1:10:29 ↗ z-- and spotted toe he's my grits found

1:10:33 ↗ at the site who may have used the area

1:10:34 ↗ as a stopover include the olive sighted

1:10:37 ↗ flycatcher

1:10:37 ↗ the Western wood peewee the violet green

1:10:40 ↗ swallow the warbling very very oh the

1:10:42 ↗ orange crowned Warbler and the Western

1:10:44 ↗ Tanager black-headed grosbeak and the

1:10:46 ↗ purple finch

1:10:47 ↗ most of these were seen in the spring

1:10:50 ↗ because migration patterns in the fall

1:10:52 ↗ require a little bit different route for

1:10:54 ↗ them in order to find foraging they also

1:10:56 ↗ noted that a

1:10:58 ↗ King County regulated wildlife species

1:11:00 ↗ the bald eagle was seen flying near the

1:11:02 ↗ park in both April and July due to the

1:11:05 ↗ difficulty in seeing and hearing birds

1:11:07 ↗ in the forest the team that did this

1:11:09 ↗ survey considered the results of this

1:11:11 ↗ survey to be an undercount of the

1:11:13 ↗ numbers of birds in the area the flora

1:11:16 ↗ in the area consisted of big leaf maple

1:11:18 ↗ western red cedar Western hemlock and

1:11:21 ↗ dumb list Douglas fir with native shrubs

1:11:23 ↗ planted near the landscaping of the park

1:11:27 ↗ these surveys were all reported online

1:11:30 ↗ to eBird and online database and we did

1:11:33 ↗ this survey to hope that this

1:11:34 ↗ information can assist in future

1:11:36 ↗ land-use decisions including what will

1:11:39 ↗ happen to the Bergsma property as an

1:11:41 ↗ organization whose mission is to protect

1:11:43 ↗ preserve and enhance natural ecosystems

1:11:45 ↗ on our communities for the benefits of

1:11:47 ↗ birds other wildlife and people

1:11:48 ↗ we support open space green space and

1:11:51 ↗ limited development in natural areas

1:11:54 ↗ thank you very much Teresa all hands

1:11:57 ↗ raised

1:11:57 ↗ Steve steeper down old town for about

1:12:04 ↗ ten years now so first of all thanks to

1:12:07 ↗ the 13 people put their had a name and

1:12:09 ↗ consideration for this new council in

1:12:11 ↗ addition that though there's all kinds

1:12:13 ↗ of opportunities to volunteer for the

1:12:14 ↗ city and I just done City Council

1:12:16 ↗ Commission's boards committees coming to

1:12:20 ↗ and speaking your mind before the City

1:12:22 ↗ Council to say you know what you think

1:12:23 ↗ so this is more of a plug for everybody

1:12:25 ↗ in the audience please get involved with

1:12:26 ↗ your city

1:12:28 ↗ second topic on January 10th I had the

1:12:30 ↗ opportunity to attend a presentation at

1:12:33 ↗ the Issaquah Senior Center on group

1:12:36 ↗ called hero house which is a

1:12:38 ↗ organization that does community meeting

1:12:42 ↗ places and there's one here in Kirkland

1:12:45 ↗ factorio in Bellevue and one in Seattle

1:12:48 ↗ but a sudden international organization

1:12:49 ↗ where people with diagnosed mental

1:12:51 ↗ illnesses can come and work on daily

1:12:53 ↗ maintenance activities not just have

1:12:57 ↗ meals but plan the meals make the meals

1:12:59 ↗ hospitality I think was a great chance

1:13:01 ↗ for the city to have an opportunity

1:13:03 ↗ where people could come and meet and

1:13:04 ↗ learn about this opportunities I want to

1:13:06 ↗ say thanks to zoo quest Senior Center

1:13:08 ↗ and for the

1:13:09 ↗ for making that opportunity available

1:13:11 ↗ lastly on saving Cougar Mountain I

1:13:15 ↗ support the idea but I think if there

1:13:16 ↗ ever a poster child that says there's a

1:13:18 ↗ piece of property that we don't want to

1:13:19 ↗ develop it would be Bergsma property so

1:13:22 ↗ I think we need a firm look at city code

1:13:24 ↗ enforcement and changes that say and

1:13:26 ↗ prevent this from happening not just

1:13:28 ↗ having to use the city funds which are

1:13:31 ↗ limited for the broader scope I support

1:13:34 ↗ the preservation I just think we need to

1:13:35 ↗ be thinking 5 10 30 years down the road

1:13:38 ↗ and making that happen thank you thank

1:13:40 ↗ you very much Steve all hands and

1:13:43 ↗ support to show anyone else must sign up

1:13:45 ↗ this No

1:13:46 ↗ before I ask if there's anyone else that

1:13:49 ↗ would like to talk I wanted to thank all

1:13:51 ↗ those who came tonight and spoke about

1:13:53 ↗ Save Cougar Mountain we have heard about

1:13:55 ↗ health concerns drainage preservation of

1:13:57 ↗ trees working with land conservation

1:13:59 ↗ groups cooperatively that Bergsma

1:14:03 ↗ proposal is not in line with the

1:14:05 ↗ Comprehensive Plan vision and goals it

1:14:06 ↗ has impacts to critical areas a request

1:14:09 ↗ for emergency city funding the desire to

1:14:12 ↗ protect forested hillsides open space

1:14:15 ↗ designation being the best and highest

1:14:17 ↗ use for this property the enjoyment of

1:14:19 ↗ future generations the concern of

1:14:21 ↗ development pacts on existing

1:14:23 ↗ neighborhoods the concern of slides on

1:14:25 ↗ existing neighborhoods and safety and

1:14:27 ↗ road closures and the effects on

1:14:28 ↗ wildlife if there is anyone else who has

1:14:30 ↗ not signed up and would like to add to

1:14:32 ↗ this list of items that you've presented

1:14:34 ↗ to Council tonight I see two hands I'm

1:14:38 ↗ actually gonna start with Linda and then

1:14:41 ↗ I'll get to marina I'm Melinda Shepherd

1:14:50 ↗ at 1 4 9 8 5 to 56 Avenue southeast

1:14:55 ↗ Issaquah I'm in miramont so I'm not a

1:14:58 ↗ resident of Issaquah but I identify

1:15:03 ↗ myself with Issaquah and I spend a lot

1:15:07 ↗ of my time in Issaquah both hiking and

1:15:10 ↗ shopping so supporting business in

1:15:11 ↗ Issaquah the riley geotech report has

1:15:15 ↗ numerous cautions about construction

1:15:17 ↗ activities after removing trees it

1:15:19 ↗ advised proof rolling and calm

1:15:22 ↗ acting the soil only during specific

1:15:24 ↗ soil moisture periods when the soil had

1:15:28 ↗ a specific plus or minus 2% moisture

1:15:30 ↗ content

1:15:31 ↗ I doubt that the city staff would be

1:15:34 ↗ able to ensure these conditions were

1:15:35 ↗ always met under our changeable weather

1:15:37 ↗ I'd like to point out that I've lived in

1:15:41 ↗ Miramon for the past thirty years and

1:15:44 ↗ the past several years three to five

1:15:47 ↗ years our weather patterns have changed

1:15:50 ↗ dramatically and we've been had we used

1:15:52 ↗ to have mist constantly all through the

1:15:55 ↗ winter and we had the rainy season and

1:15:59 ↗ then there's August now we have day

1:16:03 ↗ losses and we have much more flooding

1:16:05 ↗ than we used to so assumptions that we

1:16:08 ↗ made before about weather patterns are

1:16:11 ↗ not valid in these times do the city

1:16:18 ↗ staff know how many tests borings are

1:16:20 ↗ needed and where on this property to

1:16:22 ↗ locate perched water tables and other

1:16:25 ↗ locations of concern an original SEPA

1:16:29 ↗ determination for this property

1:16:30 ↗ recommended mount maintaining the

1:16:33 ↗ forested character of the hillsides

1:16:35 ↗ protecting and preserving the existing

1:16:38 ↗ tree canopy it is recommended the use of

1:16:42 ↗ off-site transfer of development rights

1:16:45 ↗ as a means to achieve that end we should

1:16:49 ↗ look into ways of protecting the

1:16:52 ↗ hillside to reject proposed development

1:16:54 ↗ is too risky oppose the impact of

1:16:58 ↗ endless eighty eight hundred truckloads

1:17:01 ↗ of dirt that would have to be carried

1:17:04 ↗ off adding to our traffic and congestion

1:17:06 ↗ x' you may have seen the signs along the

1:17:09 ↗ valley road that say Issaquah keep your

1:17:11 ↗ dirt so it's not making friends in the

1:17:14 ↗ community we must finally learn

1:17:18 ↗ something from the history of landslides

1:17:20 ↗ in the area the fall of the water

1:17:23 ↗ district retaining wall in and the other

1:17:28 ↗ the other cases that janet wall

1:17:31 ↗ mentioned in her talk let's not

1:17:34 ↗ underestimate the power of water

1:17:36 ↗ the difficulty in evaluating soil

1:17:38 ↗ structure and where soil conditions

1:17:41 ↗ warrant some hillsides are better left

1:17:43 ↗ forested and undisturbed thank you give

1:17:47 ↗ in to all hands and many many signs

1:17:50 ↗ raised Marina marina Subbaiah

1:17:58 ↗ one three four one eight two hundred

1:18:01 ↗ nine thousand new cell theast i'm

1:18:02 ↗ representing dozens of residents along

1:18:05 ↗ may Valley Road with Issaquah addresses

1:18:08 ↗ technically south of the city limits

1:18:11 ↗ concerned specifically about trucking

1:18:14 ↗ effects from the potential bergman

1:18:17 ↗ development in addition to adding

1:18:18 ↗ support to all the other previous

1:18:20 ↗ speakers the decisions by this council

1:18:25 ↗ to ban trucks from Issaquah city streets

1:18:28 ↗ last November has had a devastating

1:18:30 ↗ effect on May Valley Road we are not in

1:18:33 ↗ your jurisdiction and County site state

1:18:36 ↗ law firm making it difficult for us to

1:18:38 ↗ restrict traffic on our Road but the

1:18:41 ↗ proposed Bergsma development has eighty

1:18:44 ↗ eight thousand cubic yards of dirt to be

1:18:46 ↗ removed we would like to ask that a

1:18:50 ↗ condition be placed on the permit for

1:18:52 ↗ the permit I guess when it's presented

1:18:55 ↗ to the Hearing Examiner that specifies

1:18:58 ↗ that may Valley Road is not a haul route

1:19:00 ↗ for the development should it go through

1:19:03 ↗ grey get from when word committed

1:19:07 ↗ verbally on October 30th that he was

1:19:10 ↗ plant or they were planning on using

1:19:11 ↗ i-90 for some dump site east but that

1:19:16 ↗ obviously is meaningless if not in

1:19:18 ↗ writing or not specified in conditions

1:19:21 ↗ so asking that a SEPA condition Council

1:19:26 ↗ resolution condition to the permit be

1:19:28 ↗ placed that me Valley Road is not on the

1:19:30 ↗ Hal route that the whole route uses SR

1:19:32 ↗ 900 to interstate 90 the interstates and

1:19:35 ↗ highways are used as efficiently as

1:19:38 ↗ possible for removal and bringing in all

1:19:41 ↗ material to the site the and

1:19:48 ↗ the I don't understand how SEPA I don't

1:19:51 ↗ super resolutions can claim that

1:19:54 ↗ eighty-eight thousand cubic yards of

1:19:57 ↗ dirt can all be mitigated or that

1:19:59 ↗ trucking has no environmental impact but

1:20:01 ↗ somehow they do someone could explain

1:20:03 ↗ that to me later but second point being

1:20:08 ↗ that your current truck ordinance closes

1:20:12 ↗ most of your city streets to local truck

1:20:15 ↗ traffic but I would just consider that a

1:20:18 ↗ local construction project in your city

1:20:20 ↗ limits is local traffic and I would like

1:20:23 ↗ the city to take responsibility for

1:20:25 ↗ developments that you approve that if

1:20:28 ↗ you are collecting the money and

1:20:31 ↗ approving developments that technically

1:20:34 ↗ all of your roads are on the table for

1:20:36 ↗ any haul routes needed for those

1:20:38 ↗ developments and consider that in your

1:20:39 ↗ decisions and in summary I presented the

1:20:43 ↗ safety concerns along may Valley Road to

1:20:46 ↗ the increased truck traffic thousands of

1:20:48 ↗ gateway trucks that we saw over the past

1:20:50 ↗ year than me would middle school bus was

1:20:53 ↗ literally inches away from being

1:20:55 ↗ rear-ended by a fully loaded tandem dump

1:20:57 ↗ truck on May 5th and on July 11th the

1:20:59 ↗ semi truck rolled over on the road I'm

1:21:02 ↗ just a few hundred feet from the Liberty

1:21:05 ↗ High School bus stop and not on my belly

1:21:08 ↗ Road but I'm sure we're all aware

1:21:09 ↗ December 28th the truck rolled over on

1:21:13 ↗ State Road 900 and that was a driver

1:21:15 ↗ admittedly was supposed to see on the

1:21:18 ↗ interstate and took SR 900 as a shortcut

1:21:22 ↗ and was driving too fast and the road

1:21:23 ↗ was closed for I believe almost eight

1:21:25 ↗ hours so thank you for the consideration

1:21:29 ↗ lots of hands lots of signs is there

1:21:32 ↗ anyone else who would like to provide

1:21:34 ↗ some comments or additional information

1:21:36 ↗ on topics we've heard tonight sir

1:21:50 ↗ thank you I'm Bruce Bailey I live at two

1:21:52 ↗ to four seven Northwest Boulder Way

1:21:53 ↗ Drive in Issaquah I'm in talus and thank

1:21:57 ↗ you mayor councilmembers I think you

1:22:00 ↗ have a rare opportunity ahead of you

1:22:02 ↗ right now and that's to make a

1:22:03 ↗ difference what it's going to requires

1:22:04 ↗ you to step up and make a difference

1:22:06 ↗ right now you have a vision for Issaquah

1:22:10 ↗ and a zoning code that the don't align

1:22:13 ↗ they don't intersect and that's why

1:22:15 ↗ these projects keep coming up right now

1:22:18 ↗ your your vision is really written on

1:22:21 ↗ paper and it's not really your culture

1:22:23 ↗ in order to have a culture it's got to

1:22:26 ↗ be a belief it's got to be followed by

1:22:28 ↗ behavior then that produces an effect

1:22:30 ↗ that becomes your culture and that gets

1:22:32 ↗ the results we're looking for it's a

1:22:34 ↗ quad developed the way it's written on

1:22:36 ↗ paper so I I passed by a landslide

1:22:40 ↗ anywhere from two to six times a day

1:22:43 ↗ that has a nickname to it it's called

1:22:45 ↗ shower curtain Hill because it's covered

1:22:47 ↗ in a shower curtain so if you want to

1:22:50 ↗ know how long a landslide takes to

1:22:52 ↗ resolve that happened I was in the

1:22:54 ↗ council meeting when that was with that

1:22:56 ↗ when that was approved and the City

1:22:58 ↗ Council said that this is something

1:22:59 ↗ that's going to be a sound decision

1:23:02 ↗ it's got sound engineering twenty six

1:23:04 ↗ months later it's still covered by

1:23:06 ↗ shower curtain

1:23:07 ↗ I urge anybody to go up to that hill and

1:23:10 ↗ see what it takes to stabilize a hill

1:23:12 ↗ the engineering is unbelievable so

1:23:15 ↗ please look at this partner with King

1:23:18 ↗ County and make this an acquisition

1:23:20 ↗ thank you thank you

1:23:22 ↗ lots of hands I'll do another call is

1:23:26 ↗ there anyone else who would like to add

1:23:27 ↗ information this evening Elizabeth

1:23:42 ↗ Elizabeth mapa I live at 100 Big Bear

1:23:45 ↗ place on squawk Mountain and I'd like to

1:23:48 ↗ speak for the residents who don't have

1:23:54 ↗ mailing addresses or street addresses on

1:23:59 ↗ Cougar Mountain there are people who are

1:24:02 ↗ living up on that property who will be

1:24:07 ↗ forced closer down to the road they

1:24:14 ↗ don't have any place else to go

1:24:18 ↗ they're not wildlife but they still need

1:24:23 ↗ a place to live I'd also like to address

1:24:28 ↗ the piece of property called Providence

1:24:32 ↗ Heights campus that's a place that has

1:24:37 ↗ currently a whole lot of buildings that

1:24:42 ↗ were designed to provide affordable

1:24:44 ↗ housing that aren't being used but could

1:24:48 ↗ be used if the city had the willingness

1:24:52 ↗ to save them we are now back where we

1:24:57 ↗ were

1:24:57 ↗ after the Hearing Examiner made his

1:24:59 ↗ decision and the property owner will

1:25:06 ↗ still fight you but you have a chance to

1:25:09 ↗ rethink the city's position that's a

1:25:14 ↗ beautiful piece of property it has woods

1:25:16 ↗ on it that are holding back water which

1:25:19 ↗ when they're removed will run down into

1:25:22 ↗ the residential areas across the road

1:25:29 ↗ some of what they've just said about

1:25:31 ↗ Cougar Mountain applies thank you very

1:25:34 ↗ much thank you Elizabeth

1:25:35 ↗ lots of hands lots of signs I see Dave

1:25:40 ↗ Kapler hanging around in the background

1:25:42 ↗ thank you David Kepler 255 southeast

1:25:45 ↗ andrás I know nothing to quote sergeant

1:25:48 ↗ Schultz about all these people out here

1:25:51 ↗ so Senior Center is on the agenda

1:25:53 ↗ tonight you do have something else to do

1:25:55 ↗ tonight and I think you're going in the

1:25:57 ↗ right direction the idea of having a

1:25:59 ↗ nonprofit organization take over the

1:26:01 ↗ long term operation of the Senior Center

1:26:03 ↗ is fine I know the contract and the

1:26:09 ↗ visibility of the operation will be

1:26:13 ↗ completely different than it was in the

1:26:15 ↗ past and I think that's a fine course

1:26:17 ↗ and carry on thank you Thank You mr.

1:26:20 ↗ Kapler anyone else one hand up Thank You

1:26:25 ↗ Linda so I can ask for a second time do

1:26:31 ↗ we have anyone else desiring to speak

1:26:33 ↗ this evening and we do I counsel I'm

1:26:38 ↗ Christopher Fisher I'm a resident of

1:26:39 ↗ shoreline I'm out here to speak on

1:26:42 ↗ behalf of anybody who may not have

1:26:44 ↗ transportation like myself and those

1:26:48 ↗ that couldn't be out here tonight to

1:26:49 ↗ speak in favor of keeping the Berg's my

1:26:51 ↗ property wild I come from a rural area

1:26:55 ↗ before this and it's very difficult

1:26:56 ↗ sometimes to deal with the noise and

1:27:00 ↗ confusion that the city can bring and I

1:27:01 ↗ think that it's very important for

1:27:03 ↗ people to have a space like cougar

1:27:05 ↗ Mountain to remain wild and for there to

1:27:09 ↗ be a place for people to go for a sense

1:27:11 ↗ of health and well-being like was talked

1:27:13 ↗ about earlier so I'd like you to

1:27:16 ↗ consider that thank you thank you very

1:27:17 ↗ much

1:27:19 ↗ lots of hands up in the air anyone else

1:27:22 ↗ wishing to speak this evening this is a

1:27:25 ↗ second call for anyone are you wishing

1:27:27 ↗ to speak this evening seeing none a

1:27:29 ↗ third call I'm going to close audience

1:27:33 ↗ comments for this evening but before I

1:27:35 ↗ do I would like to thank all of the

1:27:38 ↗ people who came tonight I tracked about

1:27:40 ↗ six different items that were discussed

1:27:42 ↗ but by far and away the save Cougar

1:27:45 ↗ Mountain group of speakers had almost 20

1:27:48 ↗ people providing comments to council

1:27:50 ↗ today I appreciate that you covered a

1:27:53 ↗ long and extensive list of issues and

1:27:55 ↗ concerns and thank you for bringing that

1:27:57 ↗ to the council this evening thanks to

1:28:00 ↗ everybody who came in we are going to

1:28:02 ↗ move on to their regular busy

1:28:04 ↗ portion of our meetings so if you're not

1:28:06 ↗ staying for that exciting and riveting

1:28:08 ↗ part I would ask if you could hold your

1:28:10 ↗ conversations until you get outside so

1:28:13 ↗ that we can continue with the business

1:28:14 ↗ meeting thank you very much the next

1:28:17 ↗ item on the agenda this evening is

1:28:19 ↗ committee and regional reports and we'll

1:28:21 ↗ start with councilmember Rea nothing to

1:28:24 ↗ report this evening Thank You

1:28:25 ↗ councilmember Ramos

1:28:26 ↗ thank you I'll try to make this quick on

1:28:30 ↗ the 10th of January we had my emergency

1:28:34 ↗ management advisory council meeting and

1:28:36 ↗ we're setting up next week or next month

1:28:38 ↗ I say on the 14th of February

1:28:40 ↗ Valentine's Day to have a full-day

1:28:42 ↗ workshop for the council to work on

1:28:46 ↗ resiliency and preparedness and that

1:28:48 ↗ coordination across the county last

1:28:52 ↗ Friday the 12th I was a did Eastside

1:28:54 ↗ transportation I think the other council

1:28:57 ↗ members are having hard time sold off

1:28:59 ↗ take a couple minute break and let

1:29:01 ↗ everybody so we'll just recess for a

1:29:04 ↗ couple minutes so everybody's gone

1:29:20 ↗ you

1:30:37 ↗ we're back in session and council member

1:30:40 ↗ Ramos if you want to begin over with

1:30:42 ↗ your regional and community reports that

1:30:44 ↗ would be great

1:30:44 ↗ thank you just quickly again the

1:30:46 ↗ emergency management advisory committee

1:30:48 ↗ is working on setting up a retreat next

1:30:50 ↗ month be a full day on February 14th

1:30:54 ↗ trying to coordinating in across the

1:30:56 ↗ county to better yet set things up for

1:30:57 ↗ our preparedness and resiliency so we're

1:30:59 ↗ gonna really get together spend the day

1:31:01 ↗ versus you know an hour and a half

1:31:02 ↗ meeting a month that was last Wednesday

1:31:06 ↗ was a regular meeting set up for next

1:31:07 ↗ month on last Friday was at Eastside

1:31:09 ↗ Transportation Partnership we had

1:31:11 ↗ updates on the 405 they had some

1:31:14 ↗ interesting data on how those carpool

1:31:17 ↗ lanes are working the double carpool

1:31:19 ↗ lanes and all that through mouthful and

1:31:20 ↗ so forth and interestingly enough they

1:31:22 ↗ seem to be improving that the flow that

1:31:26 ↗ they had predicted and so it's getting

1:31:27 ↗ better than it was and there's been some

1:31:29 ↗ changes of course it was helped out too

1:31:31 ↗ as well as the other item there was PSR

1:31:34 ↗ C funding coming up this next year in

1:31:35 ↗ some of the criteria so if they're

1:31:36 ↗ looking at their tomorrow I will be at

1:31:40 ↗ the regional transit committee meeting

1:31:41 ↗ continued work on development of work

1:31:43 ↗ and that'll make King County Council

1:31:44 ↗ tomorrow at 3 o'clock and that concludes

1:31:47 ↗ my report

1:31:48 ↗ Thank You councilmember we're

1:31:49 ↗ interesting thank you my first report is

1:31:51 ↗ about the lodging tax Advisory Committee

1:31:53 ↗ there is an open house or a public

1:31:56 ↗ engagement opportunity to discuss

1:31:58 ↗ tomorrow at the at 7:00 p.m. at the

1:32:02 ↗ train depot to talk about the possible

1:32:05 ↗ formation of a destination marketing

1:32:08 ↗ organization funded by the LTAC funds

1:32:11 ↗ the the committee has is making that

1:32:15 ↗ recommendation this is an opportunity to

1:32:18 ↗ hear more for members of the public or

1:32:22 ↗ anybody who's interested businesses or

1:32:24 ↗ residents to learn more about the

1:32:26 ↗ proposal and to provide feedback and

1:32:30 ↗ comments members of the LTAC will be

1:32:32 ↗ there will be a short presentation to do

1:32:35 ↗ kind of an introduction

1:32:38 ↗ and cue a question-and-answer

1:32:39 ↗ opportunity and the committee will be

1:32:44 ↗ collecting the comment and the feedback

1:32:46 ↗ making adjustments to the plan meeting

1:32:49 ↗ again to make adjustments to the plan

1:32:51 ↗ and then forwarding that a revised plan

1:32:54 ↗ in lieu of those changes back to

1:32:56 ↗ services and safety for consideration in

1:32:59 ↗ in the February meeting so that's

1:33:01 ↗ tomorrow that meeting is at 7 p.m. at

1:33:04 ↗ the train depot

1:33:04 ↗ that's LTAC and then back on January 4th

1:33:09 ↗ there was a meeting of the growth

1:33:13 ↗ management policy board and new major

1:33:21 ↗ issues or items on the agenda some of

1:33:25 ↗ you may be aware of something that PSR C

1:33:27 ↗ calls vision 2040 and that is a guiding

1:33:31 ↗ document about growth and transportation

1:33:34 ↗ evolution here in the Puget four-county

1:33:36 ↗ Puget Sound region that's so homage King

1:33:41 ↗ Pierce in Kitsap counties we're kicking

1:33:44 ↗ off a two plus year process to update

1:33:47 ↗ that vision we're calling it it's going

1:33:49 ↗ to be called vision 2050 and I've

1:33:53 ↗ formally kind of kicked off back in the

1:33:55 ↗ meeting on the 4th and the very first

1:33:57 ↗ item to complete is to actually define

1:34:00 ↗ the scope of the of the work to redefine

1:34:03 ↗ the vision so there will be am a draft

1:34:06 ↗ by february 1st will open up a 45-day

1:34:09 ↗ comment period and there will be members

1:34:13 ↗ of PSR C will be traveling around the

1:34:15 ↗ region and a number of public engagement

1:34:17 ↗ opportunities I don't have the schedule

1:34:19 ↗ or locations for that now but they will

1:34:23 ↗ be publishing that so that is actually

1:34:25 ↗ just to set the scope for this two-year

1:34:27 ↗ exercise and then the other major item

1:34:30 ↗ for discussion we continue conversations

1:34:32 ↗ about the regional centers framework

1:34:34 ↗ update and there are a number of

1:34:37 ↗ probably half a dozen outstanding issues

1:34:40 ↗ that the GMTV has not come together on

1:34:43 ↗ yet and our SCA caucus did did come

1:34:48 ↗ together on three that were actually

1:34:50 ↗ then

1:34:51 ↗ brought up during the regular meeting

1:34:53 ↗ and one of them had to do with some area

1:34:54 ↗ planning we here in Issaquah do have a

1:34:58 ↗ sub area plan that covers our regional

1:35:01 ↗ growth center but not all do and so for

1:35:04 ↗ us there isn't as much of a deal here

1:35:07 ↗ but all other existing regional centers

1:35:10 ↗ the discussion point is whether or not

1:35:13 ↗ they must complete a sub area plan by

1:35:15 ↗ 2020 and so that has not been voted on

1:35:18 ↗ but that is something that we and the

1:35:20 ↗ SCA caucus supports and it's consistent

1:35:23 ↗ with what we've already done the other

1:35:25 ↗ thing has to do if is the potential of

1:35:29 ↗ completing a market study if by the year

1:35:32 ↗ 2025 there are certain kind of

1:35:35 ↗ performance metrics for growth centers

1:35:37 ↗ both manufacturing and industrial

1:35:39 ↗ centers and for regional growth centers

1:35:41 ↗ that if yours or any one of them don't

1:35:45 ↗ meet these performance metrics we're

1:35:48 ↗ debating whether or not to require a

1:35:50 ↗ market study that can actually

1:35:51 ↗ demonstrate that the growth targets

1:35:53 ↗ whether that being jobs

1:35:54 ↗ or whether it be in population and/or

1:35:56 ↗ jobs is actually viable given the market

1:36:01 ↗ so that is a very contentious issue for

1:36:04 ↗ GMP B and what exactly is a market study

1:36:07 ↗ I can they're hoping to finish this up

1:36:09 ↗ in the may meet excuse me in the

1:36:11 ↗ February meeting the next meeting but I

1:36:14 ↗ have my doubts about that and then the

1:36:15 ↗ last issue we discussed with the mix of

1:36:17 ↗ uses currently there is no prescription

1:36:20 ↗ or even target mix of jobs to housing

1:36:22 ↗ ratio and there's a incredible

1:36:27 ↗ misbalance

1:36:29 ↗ in a number of them especially Seattle

1:36:31 ↗ where they're the jobs there are so

1:36:35 ↗ outweigh the housing that's there

1:36:36 ↗ they'll never even get to a 2080 mix for

1:36:40 ↗ Issaquah within our regional center we

1:36:43 ↗ have according to PSR C in our regional

1:36:45 ↗ center where the we're the one that has

1:36:47 ↗ zero residents in our regional center

1:36:49 ↗ and we're 100% jobs so I think the

1:36:53 ↗ direction that this is going to go is

1:36:55 ↗ it'll be kind of a target mix of 2080

1:36:59 ↗ population to jobs and

1:37:03 ↗ but it will probably not be an enforce

1:37:05 ↗ it'll just be used as a planning tool

1:37:06 ↗ not anything part of the performance

1:37:08 ↗ measures so those are the major issues

1:37:11 ↗ there that we discussed at that last

1:37:13 ↗ meeting and our next one is on February

1:37:16 ↗ this coming February first I don't have

1:37:18 ↗ I have not seen the full agenda for that

1:37:20 ↗ yet

1:37:20 ↗ thank you that's more of a Goodman I

1:37:23 ↗ thank you madam mayor the council an

1:37:27 ↗ inch or committee typically meets the

1:37:29 ↗ first Thursday of the month and as I am

1:37:33 ↗ maybe probably likely the chair for the

1:37:36 ↗ 2018 and in short committee I'm helping

1:37:38 ↗ to organize the meeting and we are

1:37:42 ↗ looking at the second Thursday of the

1:37:43 ↗ month and because there is a conflict

1:37:45 ↗ with one of the potential members and so

1:37:47 ↗ all I don't have it confirmed watch the

1:37:49 ↗ calendar landed chores next meeting will

1:37:51 ↗ likely be February 8th thank you thank

1:37:54 ↗ you

1:37:54 ↗ council member at ease thank you just a

1:37:58 ↗ couple of quick announcements the

1:38:00 ↗ Eastside Human Services forum board

1:38:02 ↗ meeting will be Thursday January 18th in

1:38:06 ↗ Seattle I'm sorry in Bellevue and the

1:38:11 ↗ King County 2018 homeless point and time

1:38:14 ↗ count is happening On January 26 2018

1:38:18 ↗ from 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. and they are

1:38:21 ↗ looking for volunteers who can get more

1:38:23 ↗ information on the King County website

1:38:25 ↗ that concludes my report

1:38:27 ↗ Thank You council president marts thank

1:38:29 ↗ you madam mayor the council services and

1:38:33 ↗ Safety Committee met on Tuesday January

1:38:36 ↗ 9th we looked at agenda bill 75 22 the

1:38:40 ↗ creating visit Issaquah organization as

1:38:42 ↗ councilmember winter Stein mentioned

1:38:44 ↗ there's going to be community outreach

1:38:46 ↗ tomorrow night then it's coming back to

1:38:48 ↗ services in February and then with an

1:38:51 ↗ intention to come back to full Council

1:38:53 ↗ on February 19th

1:38:54 ↗ agenda bill 72 95 was a conversation

1:38:58 ↗ about amendments to IMC 1604

1:39:00 ↗ construction codes a spellbinding

1:39:02 ↗ conversation necessitated by some state

1:39:06 ↗ requirements and the long and the short

1:39:08 ↗ is it's on tonight's consent agenda but

1:39:12 ↗ there is nothing remotely controversial

1:39:14 ↗ about it and then

1:39:16 ↗ was a walk-on regarding and influenced

1:39:18 ↗ the choice grant application and

1:39:20 ↗ basically the long and the short of it

1:39:22 ↗ was that the committee after some

1:39:24 ↗ discussion recommended to come back to

1:39:26 ↗ the February 5th regular business so we

1:39:28 ↗ didn't take a formal recommendation in

1:39:30 ↗ committee but levy but believe it can be

1:39:32 ↗ addressed

1:39:33 ↗ generally in in regular business on the

1:39:35 ↗ fifth and then Sound city's association

1:39:38 ↗ public issues committee met on Wednesday

1:39:40 ↗ January 10th at Renton city hall there

1:39:44 ↗ were no substantive action items

1:39:46 ↗ discussed my report next item on our

1:39:50 ↗ agenda this evening is the mayor's

1:39:52 ↗ report a special meeting was held

1:39:54 ↗ earlier this evening at 5 o'clock p.m.

1:39:57 ↗ to interview possible candidates for

1:39:59 ↗ vacant council position three and some

1:40:02 ↗ of them are still here an executive

1:40:04 ↗ session was held afterwards to discuss

1:40:07 ↗ appointments there will be an executive

1:40:10 ↗ session held this evening to discuss

1:40:12 ↗ acquisition of real estate and pending

1:40:14 ↗ and potential litigation per RCW forty

1:40:17 ↗ two point three zero point one one zero

1:40:19 ↗ bracket one bracket B and forty two

1:40:22 ↗ point three zero point one one Oh

1:40:24 ↗ bracket one bracket I these items are

1:40:26 ↗ expected to take approximately 45

1:40:28 ↗ minutes action is anticipated to follow

1:40:31 ↗ an open session on January 5th we hosted

1:40:35 ↗ the 2018 legislative breakfast and we

1:40:37 ↗ council and Mayor and staff were met

1:40:40 ↗ with district legislators about the 2018

1:40:42 ↗ legislative priorities on January 9th I

1:40:45 ↗ attended a ribbon-cutting for bridge

1:40:47 ↗ data solutions January 11th I attended

1:40:51 ↗ the cascade water Alliance resource

1:40:53 ↗ committee meeting sorry it was not able

1:40:56 ↗ to attend the cascade water resource

1:40:58 ↗ Alliance resource committee meeting they

1:41:00 ↗ did hold an executive session their next

1:41:02 ↗ meeting is February 8th at 2 p.m. at

1:41:05 ↗ cascades office in Bellevue and no

1:41:07 ↗ agenda has been set yet the next board

1:41:09 ↗ meeting for cascade water Alliance is

1:41:11 ↗ the annual meeting on February 7th at

1:41:14 ↗ 3:30 p.m. in Bellevue they have not set

1:41:17 ↗ the agenda yet on January 11th I

1:41:19 ↗ attended the Puget Sound Regional

1:41:21 ↗ Council transportation policy board as a

1:41:23 ↗ sound city's association alter alternate

1:41:26 ↗ there were a couple of items on their

1:41:29 ↗ event

1:41:29 ↗ justise aqua the board recommended the

1:41:33 ↗ approval of the Transportation

1:41:34 ↗ Alternatives program to the Executive

1:41:36 ↗ Board if this is approved by the

1:41:39 ↗ Executive Board Issaquah would receive

1:41:41 ↗ 1.5 million dollars for engineering and

1:41:43 ↗ design of the bike facilities and

1:41:45 ↗ sidewalk on the south side of Newport

1:41:47 ↗ and the multi-purpose trail on the north

1:41:49 ↗ side of Newport for that section from

1:41:51 ↗ State Route 900 to southeast 54th Street

1:41:54 ↗ the next meeting of the transportation

1:41:57 ↗ policy board is February 8th at 9:30

1:41:59 ↗ a.m. the major topics for that day will

1:42:02 ↗ be the review of the regional

1:42:04 ↗ transportation plan and the summary of

1:42:06 ↗ public comments as well as discussing as

1:42:10 ↗ similar as councilmember winter Stein

1:42:12 ↗ said the vision 250 there'll be a

1:42:14 ↗ briefing on the scope a January 11th

1:42:17 ↗ they attended the greater is Sequoia

1:42:18 ↗ Chamber of Commerce luncheon and

1:42:20 ↗ provided some comments on the State of

1:42:21 ↗ the City January 11th I attended the

1:42:24 ↗ East Side Fire and Rescue Board meeting

1:42:26 ↗ the fire chief provided a briefing on

1:42:28 ↗ the following topics work of the joint

1:42:32 ↗ ecology Sammamish plateau water district

1:42:35 ↗ city of Issaquah and East Side Fire and

1:42:37 ↗ Rescue P Faust study and investigation

1:42:39 ↗ discussions with Maple Valley Fire for

1:42:42 ↗ contracted services and discussions with

1:42:45 ↗ fire district 27 for a potential future

1:42:47 ↗ partnership the next meeting of Eastside

1:42:49 ↗ Fire and Rescue Board is the coil will

1:42:52 ↗ be the rotating board member and will be

1:42:54 ↗ required to attend one of the directors

1:42:57 ↗ will be required to attend the January

1:42:58 ↗ 24th p board meeting at 1:30 p.m. at

1:43:01 ↗ headquarters the next full board meeting

1:43:03 ↗ is February 8th at 4 p.m. at

1:43:05 ↗ headquarters and no agenda has been set

1:43:07 ↗ yet On January 12th I hosted an all-city

1:43:10 ↗ staff meeting at Pickering barn and

1:43:12 ↗ provided some comments on the year ahead

1:43:14 ↗ and took some questions and that

1:43:16 ↗ concludes the mayor's report

1:43:22 ↗ next item of business is the consent

1:43:24 ↗ calendar have the payables and payroll

1:43:27 ↗ for January 16th been reviewed

1:43:29 ↗ thank you I now ask the clerk to read

1:43:33 ↗ the consent calendar into the record the

1:43:35 ↗ consent calendar was distributed to

1:43:37 ↗ council in advance for study if

1:43:39 ↗ authorized counsel action will occur by

1:43:41 ↗ single motion regarding the following

1:43:42 ↗ items item a seeks approval of the

1:43:44 ↗ accounts payables in payroll of January

1:43:46 ↗ 16th items B through D seeks approval of

1:43:49 ↗ the minutes of the City Council regular

1:43:51 ↗ meetings of December 18th in January 2nd

1:43:54 ↗ and the City Council's special meeting

1:43:56 ↗ of January 5th item e a be 70 to 95

1:43:59 ↗ amendments to I MC 16 0.04 construction

1:44:03 ↗ codes seeks to adopt ordinance if

1:44:05 ↗ adopted it will be assigned number 282

1:44:07 ↗ for item F a b7 381 anti-aircraft Creek

1:44:11 ↗ culvert replacement seeks to approve

1:44:13 ↗ change order and accept project item G a

1:44:15 ↗ b7 507 amendments to I MC in central

1:44:19 ↗ Issaquah standards regarding

1:44:20 ↗ inclusionary zoning requirements for

1:44:22 ↗ central Issaquah seeks referral to

1:44:24 ↗ council an inch or committee item H a b7

1:44:27 ↗ five-30 Newport way SR 902 southeast

1:44:30 ↗ 54th Street design contract supplement

1:44:34 ↗ number 2 seeks to authorize this

1:44:36 ↗ concludes the reading thank you madam

1:44:40 ↗ mayor I moved to to approve the consent

1:44:43 ↗ agenda as listed or it's described

1:44:45 ↗ second it's been moved and seconded all

1:44:48 ↗ those in favor actually

1:44:51 ↗ didn't give me a chance to ask if

1:44:53 ↗ anybody wanted to move anything down or

1:44:55 ↗ as moved in second day it's no great

1:44:57 ↗ it's been moved and seconded all those

1:44:59 ↗ in favor signify by saying aye those

1:45:02 ↗ opposed that passes next item on the

1:45:07 ↗ agenda is regular business and our first

1:45:09 ↗ item under regular business is a b7 4:01

1:45:13 ↗ Senior Center long term operations and

1:45:16 ↗ this was last in services and safety I'd

1:45:21 ↗ like to invite our Parks and Recreation

1:45:23 ↗ Director Jeff Watling to provide a brief

1:45:25 ↗ presentation all right I will emphasize

1:45:27 ↗ brief good evening Jeff Watling Parks

1:45:30 ↗ and Recreation Director yeah this is an

1:45:33 ↗ item that was before

1:45:34 ↗ services and safety in December as I

1:45:36 ↗ stated at that meeting when I introduced

1:45:38 ↗ this this agenda bill and the proposed

1:45:41 ↗ action tonight does not reflect a final

1:45:47 ↗ decision on long-term operation of the

1:45:49 ↗ the senior center but rather it allows

1:45:52 ↗ us to get some direction as staff to

1:45:56 ↗ pursue seeking a long-term operating

1:45:59 ↗ partner as you know interim operation of

1:46:04 ↗ the facility began January of last year

1:46:07 ↗ since that time it has been the

1:46:09 ↗ intention as we move this facility

1:46:13 ↗ forward into its desired future that

1:46:17 ↗ interim operation allows us this time to

1:46:20 ↗ discuss explore determine policy on what

1:46:24 ↗ we want long term operation to look like

1:46:26 ↗ in March of last year we began work with

1:46:30 ↗ an advisory group at the senior center a

1:46:32 ↗ tremendous amount of work it was done by

1:46:34 ↗ that group over five months time their

1:46:38 ↗ advisory report is in your packet I've

1:46:40 ↗ had the chance to go over that a number

1:46:42 ↗ of times at services and safety the

1:46:46 ↗ group did a fantastic job of researching

1:46:49 ↗ exploring evaluating discussing various

1:46:53 ↗ long-term operating models and which one

1:46:55 ↗ we felt make them up made the most sense

1:46:57 ↗ as a community for the Issaquah senior

1:47:00 ↗ center in that time and discussion I

1:47:03 ↗ think it also a very important element

1:47:05 ↗ was created and that was the creation of

1:47:08 ↗ six guiding principles that this group

1:47:11 ↗ felt strongly and staff felt strongly

1:47:13 ↗ really became the anchors became the

1:47:15 ↗ tenants for what we want successful

1:47:18 ↗ operation of that Senior Center to be

1:47:20 ↗ the group was unanimous in consensus on

1:47:23 ↗ those guiding principles where they

1:47:26 ↗ weren't and and where I think we'll

1:47:28 ↗ always understand there's going to be

1:47:30 ↗ differences of opinion as is what

1:47:34 ↗ operating model made the most sense

1:47:36 ↗ whether it be direct City operation or

1:47:40 ↗ seeking operating partner what was

1:47:43 ↗ understood by that group

1:47:45 ↗ and what the report really points out

1:47:46 ↗ though is either those models that group

1:47:50 ↗ felt very strongly would be very very

1:47:52 ↗ successful in the senior center as long

1:47:55 ↗ as those guiding principles were met I

1:47:57 ↗ emphasize those guiding principles

1:47:59 ↗ because as we move forward into this

1:48:02 ↗ request and into this action in terms of

1:48:05 ↗ seeking an operating partner those

1:48:06 ↗ guiding principles really become anchors

1:48:09 ↗ for what request for qualifications and

1:48:12 ↗ a request for proposal would look like

1:48:14 ↗ they become really anchors for how we

1:48:18 ↗ measure what a successful partner might

1:48:20 ↗ look like so following that work of the

1:48:24 ↗ advisory group staff in administration

1:48:27 ↗ and the Parks Department and that

1:48:29 ↗ explore discussed recommended action

1:48:33 ↗ moving forward that action that's here

1:48:35 ↗ tonight now like I stated before is

1:48:38 ↗ pursuing seeking an operating partner

1:48:42 ↗ what that would mean is putting out a

1:48:46 ↗ request for qualifications request for

1:48:49 ↗ proposal really a sort of a hybrid of

1:48:51 ↗ both and that we will seek to find any

1:48:54 ↗ interested partners that would like to

1:48:56 ↗ come alongside and operate with us going

1:48:59 ↗ through that work this this first

1:49:03 ↗ quarter and second quarter will allow us

1:49:06 ↗ to determine ideally in the timeline by

1:49:08 ↗ June or July if we have a successful

1:49:12 ↗ operating partner and we would certainly

1:49:15 ↗ update you at that time and then go into

1:49:19 ↗ negotiations it's the recommendation as

1:49:21 ↗ you see in the staff report that we

1:49:23 ↗ would be pursuing should we find it a

1:49:25 ↗ successful operating partner to cement

1:49:29 ↗ this through a management agreement as

1:49:31 ↗ opposed to a lease agreement which was

1:49:33 ↗ the the prior template we feel a

1:49:36 ↗ management agreement really gives us the

1:49:39 ↗ tools and the ability to understand as

1:49:41 ↗ owners of that public building we want

1:49:44 ↗ to partner with a successful operator

1:49:46 ↗ and moving this forward should we as we

1:49:50 ↗ go through this process not find an

1:49:53 ↗ operating partner that we

1:49:55 ↗ I'm more interested in alternatives we

1:49:58 ↗ see with certainly at that time

1:50:00 ↗ exploring other alternatives one of

1:50:03 ↗ those being City operation but we felt

1:50:06 ↗ it was imperative in this recommendation

1:50:08 ↗ given the history that this facility has

1:50:11 ↗ been operated by a non-profit partner

1:50:13 ↗ given the professional agencies that we

1:50:17 ↗ see in this area that operate senior

1:50:19 ↗ centers that pursuit of this seemed to

1:50:22 ↗ be a first priority before considering

1:50:26 ↗ adding this to our spectrum of services

1:50:29 ↗ that we provide directly one last item

1:50:32 ↗ before I open it up for questions

1:50:35 ↗ something we discussed it services and

1:50:37 ↗ safety should we approve this tonight

1:50:39 ↗ and proceed with this action we would

1:50:43 ↗ very much want to stay in communication

1:50:45 ↗ with our customers as we've enjoyed

1:50:47 ↗ establishing some strong relationships

1:50:50 ↗ with our senior customers every Monday

1:50:52 ↗ morning we have coffee talks this would

1:50:54 ↗ be certainly an opportunity to present

1:50:56 ↗ what this path forward what this pursuit

1:50:59 ↗ ournament of an operating partner would

1:51:00 ↗ look like we would also plan on in

1:51:03 ↗ probably early February hosting a QA

1:51:06 ↗ session either right after lunch but

1:51:08 ↗ something that would be a little bit

1:51:10 ↗ bigger and would certainly make sure

1:51:12 ↗ you're aware of that and if you're

1:51:13 ↗ interested in attending to come to that

1:51:15 ↗ as well

1:51:16 ↗ so with that any questions thank you

1:51:19 ↗ does counsel have any questions until

1:51:22 ↗ president Mertz madam mayor I'd like to

1:51:25 ↗ move to direct the administration to

1:51:27 ↗ initiate a request for qualifications

1:51:29 ↗ proposal process for an operating

1:51:31 ↗ partner for the long-term operation of

1:51:33 ↗ the Issaquah senior center and direct

1:51:35 ↗ the finance director to include $25,000

1:51:37 ↗ in a subsequent 2018 budget amendment

1:51:39 ↗ utilizing general funds for professional

1:51:42 ↗ services support in completing this work

1:51:44 ↗ second point of order we're gonna do

1:51:47 ↗ questions yeah we were

1:51:52 ↗ so if there's no seconds there's no

1:51:57 ↗ second so we have a couple of options

1:51:58 ↗ here councilmember Rey we can either ask

1:52:01 ↗ the questions once it's been moved and

1:52:03 ↗ seconded or I can actually we can have

1:52:05 ↗ questions beforehand whatever your

1:52:06 ↗ preference is I second the motion

1:52:09 ↗ there you go okay it's been moved and

1:52:11 ↗ seconded to direct the administration to

1:52:12 ↗ initiate a request for qualifications

1:52:14 ↗ proposal council discussion

1:52:16 ↗ councilmember Rea just a quick question

1:52:19 ↗ when do you expect to have the

1:52:20 ↗ management agreement in place should you

1:52:22 ↗ reach an agreement where they qualified

1:52:24 ↗ partner through the RFP RFQ process we

1:52:28 ↗ would anticipate negotiating that this

1:52:30 ↗ summer

1:52:31 ↗ probably having it in place bring it

1:52:34 ↗ before you sometime in the fall the

1:52:36 ↗ transition time would be one that would

1:52:39 ↗ to be dependent upon the Managing

1:52:40 ↗ Partner but we would anticipate towards

1:52:43 ↗ the latter part of 2018 probably having

1:52:45 ↗ some type of handoff between us and a

1:52:47 ↗ new operator and to follow up on that do

1:52:49 ↗ you anticipate that you would have any

1:52:51 ↗ cost savings associated with

1:52:53 ↗ transitioning from a city operated model

1:52:56 ↗ to a partner operated model still to be

1:53:00 ↗ determined given that we are not in a

1:53:02 ↗ full city operation right now council

1:53:04 ↗ member array we're really in a and

1:53:06 ↗ council members have also heard me say

1:53:08 ↗ this sort of a two-cylinder low budget

1:53:11 ↗ interim operation I hard to say but I

1:53:15 ↗ wouldn't anticipate it being a

1:53:17 ↗ significant savings or a significant

1:53:19 ↗ increase either way right thank you

1:53:21 ↗ additional questions that's a member we

1:53:25 ↗ understand thank you that's member

1:53:27 ↗ Goodman previous nonprofit did some of

1:53:32 ↗ their own fundraising do you are you

1:53:35 ↗ going to be seeking any type of

1:53:36 ↗ qualification to our past history with

1:53:38 ↗ for doing development in this hour

1:53:41 ↗ absolutely those fun developments yep

1:53:44 ↗ and seeking partnerships both financial

1:53:46 ↗ and programmatic

1:53:47 ↗ would be a requirement thank you thank

1:53:51 ↗ you so I have a question about the

1:53:55 ↗ $25,000 typically that city

1:53:58 ↗ administration manages its own process

1:54:00 ↗ so

1:54:02 ↗ this is the 25,000 to have an outside

1:54:07 ↗ organization manage this process or

1:54:10 ↗ what's tell me how this would be spent

1:54:13 ↗ No thank you for that question I'm sorry

1:54:14 ↗ I didn't mention in the staff report

1:54:15 ↗ this would be consultant services to

1:54:18 ↗ assist us so this wouldn't be an outside

1:54:20 ↗ group solely managing it we would still

1:54:23 ↗ be managing it this would certainly be

1:54:24 ↗ under my task but just given our work

1:54:29 ↗ plan and given everything on our plate

1:54:31 ↗ and given the timeline we want to

1:54:33 ↗ accomplish this work this would be a

1:54:35 ↗ consultant that could help us with

1:54:37 ↗ framing the RFQ someone with experience

1:54:39 ↗ in non-profit senior services we find

1:54:44 ↗ that very important okay thank you

1:54:48 ↗ yeah other questions any discussion

1:54:54 ↗ that's member Goodman well I support the

1:54:58 ↗ taking this step which is the next step

1:55:01 ↗ which will have us making decisions

1:55:09 ↗ based on when we find out and I'm I'm

1:55:12 ↗ excited to be at this point and looking

1:55:15 ↗ forward to the results of this process

1:55:17 ↗ all right Thank You councilmember Wray I

1:55:20 ↗ too like this direction that we're going

1:55:22 ↗ and I particularly like the idea of

1:55:25 ↗ bringing in some outside expertise to

1:55:27 ↗ help frame this because I don't think we

1:55:29 ↗ get a lot of shots at this Apple if you

1:55:32 ↗ will or bites of this Apple and I just

1:55:34 ↗ want to make sure that we do take

1:55:35 ↗ advantage of this situation and that we

1:55:37 ↗ are thorough and that when we put

1:55:39 ↗ together our procurement or our

1:55:40 ↗ qualifications and proposal that we are

1:55:42 ↗ considering all of the things that are

1:55:45 ↗ possible in a partner Batista's yes so I

1:55:52 ↗ I just I know all of the hard work that

1:55:56 ↗ has gone into putting all of this

1:55:58 ↗ together both from staff and the senior

1:56:01 ↗ center advisory group and just a lot of

1:56:04 ↗ time and effort put into the guiding

1:56:07 ↗ principles that would guide any kind of

1:56:10 ↗ an agreement that would go forward so I

1:56:12 ↗ just think it's exciting that we're at

1:56:14 ↗ this point

1:56:15 ↗ and I would be in support of this Thank

1:56:19 ↗ You councilmember Ramos yes I thank you

1:56:23 ↗ and Parks Department for all the work

1:56:25 ↗ that's been done all the seniors that

1:56:26 ↗ have gathered up and advisory work it's

1:56:29 ↗ great I'm really happy to get to this

1:56:30 ↗ point also so I want to move right ahead

1:56:33 ↗ along with this I do have one concern I

1:56:35 ↗ just want to mention and it's not

1:56:36 ↗ anything on you at all it's on the

1:56:39 ↗ budgeting process that I had some

1:56:41 ↗ concerns with previously and here were

1:56:43 ↗ January 16th and we're asking for

1:56:45 ↗ amendments to our budget and I find that

1:56:47 ↗ strange that 16 days into our our budget

1:56:51 ↗ we're asking to make amendments so I

1:56:53 ↗ just like a little reflection on our

1:56:55 ↗ budgeting process we spent three months

1:56:56 ↗ working really hard on that

1:56:57 ↗ and two weeks into it we need to ask for

1:57:00 ↗ amendments so that's that's a concern

1:57:01 ↗ for me on how that that went but I am

1:57:03 ↗ totally supportive of this process and

1:57:05 ↗ the money you need is as you said to do

1:57:08 ↗ it right is very important and so go

1:57:11 ↗ forth and do it right council president

1:57:15 ↗ Mertz I just wanted to make a comment

1:57:18 ↗ for council member Ramos because it's

1:57:20 ↗ probably something that most of the

1:57:22 ↗ council is not aware of by the

1:57:24 ↗ scheduling of how we approved the

1:57:25 ↗ process the actual formation of the 2018

1:57:28 ↗ work plan for the year begins after the

1:57:31 ↗ approval of the budget and because it

1:57:33 ↗ happened late in December this year I

1:57:35 ↗ believe what's going on is that there

1:57:37 ↗ are some items that still need to

1:57:39 ↗ proceed and so as the work plan gets

1:57:41 ↗ prioritized about which work in which

1:57:43 ↗ section and we review which staff levels

1:57:45 ↗ we have that is why it seems like it's

1:57:47 ↗ coming out of nowhere rather quickly but

1:57:50 ↗ that was why the request is coming now

1:57:53 ↗ kind of a workload balancing thing but

1:57:55 ↗ thank you for bringing that up that's

1:57:57 ↗ what President Mertz I just want to say

1:57:59 ↗ that I'm really excited that the citizen

1:58:02 ↗ group had unanimous agreement on the

1:58:05 ↗ principles on the six principles and I'm

1:58:07 ↗ confident that it's going to help guide

1:58:08 ↗ our review of proposals that come in and

1:58:13 ↗ help us make a really smart decision

1:58:15 ↗ that the community is going to wind up

1:58:18 ↗ having a lot of support for you know

1:58:20 ↗ it's possible that we won't get

1:58:21 ↗ unanimity of support when that when that

1:58:24 ↗ time comes but we'll certainly have

1:58:26 ↗ we'll certainly have been guided by

1:58:28 ↗ principle

1:58:28 ↗ everybody agreed on so I'm eager to see

1:58:31 ↗ the responses that we get going for it

1:58:33 ↗ thank you

1:58:34 ↗ any other discussion if there's no

1:58:38 ↗ further discussion all those in favor of

1:58:40 ↗ directing the administration to initiate

1:58:43 ↗ a request for qualifications proposal

1:58:45 ↗ process for an operating partner for the

1:58:48 ↗ long term operation of the Itzik West

1:58:49 ↗ Senior Center and directing the finance

1:58:52 ↗ director to include $25,000 in a

1:58:54 ↗ subsequent 2018 budget amendment

1:58:57 ↗ utilizing general funds for professional

1:58:59 ↗ services support in completing this work

1:59:01 ↗ signify by saying aye opposed that

1:59:06 ↗ passes unanimously

1:59:08 ↗ next item on the agenda this evening is

1:59:11 ↗ a b7 495 franchise agreement with

1:59:14 ↗ Seattle limited partnership DBA Verizon

1:59:17 ↗ Wireless and this is coming from

1:59:19 ↗ infrastructure yes thank you and I've

1:59:23 ↗ got a little bit of stuff here to

1:59:25 ↗ describe to those of you who weren't on

1:59:27 ↗ infrastructure right to give you the

1:59:29 ↗ background because we took quite a while

1:59:30 ↗ to discuss through this this so

1:59:33 ↗ basically this franchise tax aren't for

1:59:37 ↗ Verizon question I was just wondering if

1:59:41 ↗ we have a presentation no this is it

1:59:44 ↗ actually we do have a presentation as

1:59:46 ↗ well have our public works engineering

1:59:52 ↗ director for a presentation but he's

1:59:58 ↗ present as Manny chair rama proceeds

2:00:01 ↗ okay so again it infrastructure we took

2:00:06 ↗ a couple meetings to get through this

2:00:08 ↗ and and so just give you a little bit of

2:00:11 ↗ the background as we got through it if

2:00:13 ↗ you remember a while back there was some

2:00:15 ↗ attempted legislation at the state level

2:00:17 ↗ to try to remove local control over

2:00:20 ↗ franchise agreements on small cells so

2:00:22 ↗ that's a piece of history that happened

2:00:24 ↗ didn't get passed and so now

2:00:26 ↗ individually these franchise agreement

2:00:28 ↗ requests are going to be coming to us

2:00:29 ↗ this is the first one with Verizon and

2:00:33 ↗ so we had some concern with that the

2:00:35 ↗ original request was for citywide

2:00:37 ↗ franchise tax agreement and

2:00:40 ↗ the infrastructure community was very

2:00:44 ↗ concerned with the broad scope of it and

2:00:47 ↗ not well enough defined controls so we

2:00:52 ↗ actually went back a second time we

2:00:55 ↗ looked at this very closely and the the

2:00:57 ↗ proposal now before you is specifically

2:01:00 ↗ for one area is a call fall city wrote

2:01:03 ↗ and one site on Pine Lake Road it's for

2:01:05 ↗ seven sites along there it's

2:01:08 ↗ specifically for those seven sites only

2:01:10 ↗ it is there are photo simulations for

2:01:14 ↗ all those seven sites of what it will

2:01:15 ↗ look like because we don't have code

2:01:18 ↗ written that defines all this yet so we

2:01:20 ↗ went with photo simulations to describe

2:01:23 ↗ what we wanted and it includes things

2:01:26 ↗ such as like no ground equipment being

2:01:27 ↗ there and so forth so it's very specific

2:01:30 ↗ for that area it's kind of our pilot if

2:01:34 ↗ you will now the plan in the future is

2:01:37 ↗ that they'll be working with Sheldon and

2:01:39 ↗ Keith on getting code written so that we

2:01:42 ↗ will have code in place so when we do

2:01:44 ↗ these that that will be there and it can

2:01:46 ↗ be well defined it won't have to have

2:01:47 ↗ all these photo simulations and things

2:01:49 ↗ of that nature so we'll simplify that a

2:01:50 ↗ little bit and we expect there will be

2:01:55 ↗ more requests of these coming from other

2:01:57 ↗ companies as well as additional requests

2:01:58 ↗ possibly from this company because they

2:02:01 ↗ want more areas of the city to have put

2:02:04 ↗ put these small cell sites up on so

2:02:07 ↗ there's probably more coming we don't

2:02:09 ↗ know what but the way things aren't we

2:02:11 ↗ these are so also time limited when

2:02:14 ↗ someone does a request the city really

2:02:15 ↗ has about 120 days to react to those

2:02:19 ↗ were already past that a little bit

2:02:20 ↗ because it stayed in committee for a

2:02:21 ↗ while so we're actually just past that a

2:02:23 ↗ little bit and so anyway hopefully these

2:02:26 ↗ will come a little bit better with a

2:02:27 ↗ little more definition as they go and

2:02:31 ↗ actually we can expect more and also

2:02:34 ↗ just another background piece I've also

2:02:35 ↗ heard there's further attempts at the

2:02:37 ↗ state level to get some laws passed

2:02:40 ↗ again to limit local control on these

2:02:44 ↗ things so we don't know where that will

2:02:46 ↗ be in the future - I just want to

2:02:47 ↗ mention that another thing mentioned

2:02:49 ↗ that the community was concerned about

2:02:50 ↗ was net neutrality

2:02:53 ↗ there wasn't anything done about that

2:02:54 ↗ and Paul if you went to a farm done if

2:02:56 ↗ you want to add more of that you can but

2:02:58 ↗ request that if they're doing these

2:03:00 ↗ things then you try to was a concern to

2:03:02 ↗ us and many folks but there's nothing

2:03:04 ↗ right this level that we thought we

2:03:05 ↗ could do with that and so sum it up you

2:03:10 ↗ look at this it's for seven sites very

2:03:12 ↗ controlled very limited and very

2:03:14 ↗ specific and with photo simulations of

2:03:16 ↗ what it will look like those are in your

2:03:18 ↗ package I hope you saw them so if you

2:03:19 ↗ have any questions ask me or Sheldon's

2:03:22 ↗ or two and if I was gonna add anything

2:03:23 ↗ to that I may have missed there was a

2:03:25 ↗ lot talked about in those two meetings

2:03:26 ↗ you want to add go right ahead

2:03:28 ↗ yeah any council member actually with

2:03:30 ↗ questions for council member Ramos as

2:03:32 ↗ chair or for Sheldon Paul did you have

2:03:35 ↗ something you might dad two weeks ago I

2:03:39 ↗ had the opportunity to give the

2:03:41 ↗ committee report and I touched upon that

2:03:43 ↗ but just as a reminder yes we did we did

2:03:47 ↗ learn we we had representative from

2:03:50 ↗ Ogden Murphy Wallace there who was

2:03:52 ↗ assisting us with this plan and did

2:03:55 ↗ answer the question about whether or not

2:03:58 ↗ we could in our own local control in

2:04:02 ↗ call for enforcement of net neutrality

2:04:04 ↗ as through this agreement and we were

2:04:08 ↗ told that no the way that the FCC issued

2:04:11 ↗ their ruling local not even states have

2:04:14 ↗ control and then we do know that we were

2:04:17 ↗ advised that a number of Western states

2:04:21 ↗ Washington State and as well perhaps are

2:04:25 ↗ considering court action to challenge

2:04:28 ↗ that FCC ruling so we were advised to

2:04:31 ↗ just follow what that process rather

2:04:34 ↗ than go out on our own so that's what we

2:04:36 ↗ did we did not ask for any inclusion

2:04:38 ↗ into the contract thank you

2:04:40 ↗ are there any council member questions

2:04:45 ↗ okay shall I make a move in here to

2:04:48 ↗ adapt ordinance number 2 8 2 5 8 to 5

2:04:53 ↗ granting to CMS a limited partnership

2:04:57 ↗ doing business as Verizon Wireless a

2:04:59 ↗ non-exclusive franchise to construct

2:05:02 ↗ operate and maintain a telecommunication

2:05:04 ↗ system because

2:05:05 ↗ you know small cell facilities in the

2:05:07 ↗ public rights-of-way of the city and

2:05:09 ↗ prescribing certain rights duties terms

2:05:11 ↗ and conditions with respect there too

2:05:14 ↗ there a second second

2:05:17 ↗ it's been moved and seconded is there

2:05:19 ↗ any council discussion

2:05:21 ↗ councilmember winters thing the language

2:05:26 ↗ of that motion

2:05:28 ↗ I noticed doesn't refer to the agreement

2:05:35 ↗ or attachments I'm just wondering about

2:05:40 ↗ how tight this really is mr. Haney the

2:05:49 ↗ motion adopts the ordinance and the

2:05:51 ↗ ordinance adopts by reference the

2:05:53 ↗ exhibit that has all all of the

2:05:56 ↗ attachment so I think it includes

2:06:01 ↗ everything that you're looking at

2:06:07 ↗ is there any additional discussion yeah

2:06:12 ↗ until president Mertz

2:06:14 ↗ I just want to thank you for all the

2:06:15 ↗ working committees sounds like you guys

2:06:16 ↗ spent a lot of time getting it very

2:06:18 ↗ specific and so that it wouldn't allow

2:06:20 ↗ asked fields of these things all over

2:06:23 ↗ the city so thank you any additional

2:06:27 ↗ discussion if there's no further

2:06:31 ↗ discussion all those in favor of

2:06:32 ↗ adopting ordinance number two eight two

2:06:34 ↗ five granting to Seattle SMS a limited

2:06:38 ↗ partnership DBA Verizon Wireless a

2:06:40 ↗ non-exclusive franchise to construct

2:06:43 ↗ operate and maintain a telecommunication

2:06:45 ↗ system consisting of small cell

2:06:48 ↗ facilities in the public rights-of-way

2:06:49 ↗ of the city signify by saying aye it was

2:06:53 ↗ opposed it passed unanimously

2:06:57 ↗ next item on the agenda is for good of

2:07:00 ↗ the order does anyone have anything for

2:07:04 ↗ good of the order oh I do if council

2:07:10 ↗ members don't I've had discussions

2:07:13 ↗ recently with council president Mart's

2:07:15 ↗ about some updates that we may provide

2:07:18 ↗ on a regular basis during for good of

2:07:19 ↗ the order just sort of to set the stage

2:07:21 ↗ for what's coming in the next few weeks

2:07:23 ↗ our next council meeting is February 5th

2:07:25 ↗ and we have a draft agenda that includes

2:07:27 ↗ the following items under regular

2:07:29 ↗ business proposed off the rate

2:07:31 ↗ authorization of a grant extension for

2:07:33 ↗ the influence of choice program an

2:07:35 ↗ update on our solid waste contracts

2:07:38 ↗ proposed adoption of an ordinance

2:07:40 ↗ amending the collection of delinquent L

2:07:42 ↗ ID assessments and there will be likely

2:07:46 ↗ be an executive session this is just a

2:07:49 ↗ proposed agenda and it's subject to

2:07:51 ↗ change over the next few weeks I also

2:07:53 ↗ wanted to provide a quick update on the

2:07:55 ↗ moratorium work items since we don't

2:07:57 ↗ necessarily touch on those these council

2:08:00 ↗ meeting but I know there are many

2:08:01 ↗ members of the public and many

2:08:02 ↗ businesses that are tracking that one of

2:08:05 ↗ the work items which was reviewing the

2:08:08 ↗ central istrico plan district visions

2:08:10 ↗ the next touch in public for this will

2:08:13 ↗ be at the Planning Policy commission

2:08:15 ↗ slash task force meeting

2:08:18 ↗ they met last Thursday to discuss the

2:08:22 ↗ updated visions and their next meeting

2:08:24 ↗ is scheduled for January 25th at 7 p.m.

2:08:27 ↗ and council chambers second work item

2:08:30 ↗ that is still outstanding for the

2:08:31 ↗ moratorium is inclusionary zoning this

2:08:34 ↗ is covered in agenda bills 7 505 which

2:08:36 ↗ was on the consent calendar this evening

2:08:38 ↗ is that correct issue and it is looking

2:08:41 ↗ to refer it to the February landed Shore

2:08:43 ↗ committee meeting the agenda bill looks

2:08:45 ↗ to set the next steps for this

2:08:47 ↗ continuing discussion on this item

2:08:49 ↗ and I did talk earlier about the council

2:08:53 ↗ vacancy process at 5:00 p.m. this

2:08:56 ↗ evening we did have interviews with 13

2:08:59 ↗ candidates seeking to fill the vacant

2:09:01 ↗ council seat there is an opportunity for

2:09:03 ↗ the public to meet the candidates on

2:09:05 ↗ January 23rd at 5:30 in the Eagle room

2:09:08 ↗ across the street as they meet and

2:09:10 ↗ mingle with our current six council

2:09:12 ↗ members and that was all I had for good

2:09:15 ↗ of the order last night I'm on business

2:09:19 ↗ this evening is executive session there

2:09:21 ↗ will be an executive session held this

2:09:23 ↗ evening to discuss acquisition of real

2:09:25 ↗ estate and pending potential litigation

2:09:27 ↗ per RCW forty two point three zero point

2:09:31 ↗ one one zero rocket wine bracket B and

2:09:35 ↗ forty two point three zero point one one

2:09:37 ↗ zero bracket one bracket I these items

2:09:39 ↗ are expected to take approximately 45

2:09:41 ↗ minutes action is anticipated to follow

2:09:43 ↗ an open session we will now recess

2:09:45 ↗ recess into executive session at 10:10

2:09:49 ↗ p.m.

2:10:00 ↗ you

3:13:38 ↗ we are back in open session at 11:13

3:13:43 ↗ continuing under regular business is

3:13:46 ↗ there motion

3:13:47 ↗ yeah madam mayor I move to authorize the

3:13:50 ↗ mayor to enter into a purchase and sale

3:13:52 ↗ agreement for the property located at

3:13:53 ↗ 275 Front Street in the amount of four

3:13:56 ↗ hundred and fifty thousand dollars plus

3:13:57 ↗ closing costs

3:13:59 ↗ I would like to amend that as I as I

3:14:02 ↗ move it to include forty five thousand

3:14:04 ↗ dollars in demolition costs for a grand

3:14:06 ↗ total of four hundred ninety five

3:14:07 ↗ thousand dollars is there a second

3:14:09 ↗ second

3:14:12 ↗ been moved and seconded to authorize the

3:14:15 ↗ mayor to enter into a purchase and sale

3:14:16 ↗ agreement for the property located at

3:14:18 ↗ 275 Front Street in the amount of four

3:14:21 ↗ hundred and fifty thousand dollars plus

3:14:22 ↗ closing cost plus forty five thousand

3:14:24 ↗ dollars in demolition costs that's forty

3:14:27 ↗ five thousand dollars in demolition

3:14:29 ↗ costs did you do for a total a grand

3:14:31 ↗ total of four hundred ninety five

3:14:33 ↗ thousand dollars plus a total of four

3:14:36 ↗ hundred and ninety five thousand dollars

3:14:38 ↗ that's the closing cost is there a

3:14:42 ↗ second second okay it's been moved in

3:14:46 ↗ seconded discussion they see

3:14:49 ↗ councilmember Goodman has a look on her

3:14:51 ↗ face I it just does not just don't

3:14:59 ↗ remember us doing the so sale and then

3:15:04 ↗ it seemed to me that the demolition what

3:15:06 ↗ we're gonna do with property would be

3:15:07 ↗ sign would be separate right

3:15:09 ↗ conversation about that

3:15:10 ↗ I don't just feels odd to me we done it

3:15:15 ↗ this way before

3:15:18 ↗ yeah I don't know that it has to be done

3:15:22 ↗ this way is would the if the forty five

3:15:24 ↗ thousand dollars is demolition cost

3:15:28 ↗ would that even have to come to the City

3:15:30 ↗ Council since you've got a $45,000

3:15:33 ↗ public bidding limit not sure under your

3:15:37 ↗ purchasing policies but you know the two

3:15:39 ↗ are really separate issues but

3:15:42 ↗ I guess okay okay I understand

3:15:53 ↗ councilmember Mart's intention which is

3:15:54 ↗ transparency and to be able to let the

3:15:57 ↗ public know what a total project cost

3:15:58 ↗ this council member who interesting you

3:16:00 ↗ to comment yeah we are with the

3:16:02 ↗ demolition we are presupposing what

3:16:04 ↗ we're gonna do with the land we hadn't

3:16:05 ↗ had any conversational all right we're

3:16:09 ↗ presupposing demolition am I alone I'm

3:16:15 ↗ questioning that no cuz I questioned it

3:16:19 ↗ first thank you sorry what Stacy so I I

3:16:28 ↗ would know it's not something that I'm

3:16:31 ↗ gonna and I suppose kick and screen and

3:16:34 ↗ allow isn't of anything I've ever kicked

3:16:36 ↗ in the dream but screamed about it just

3:16:38 ↗ seems it would be a separate

3:16:39 ↗ conversation about specifically what

3:16:42 ↗ when you say to encompass the whole

3:16:44 ↗ project I don't think that encompasses

3:16:46 ↗ the whole project because at some point

3:16:48 ↗ will do something else with that land

3:16:50 ↗ and so I don't I think that that's a

3:16:53 ↗ misstatement the president mark I

3:16:59 ↗ withdraw my motion the second degree yes

3:17:03 ↗ I moved to authorize the mayor to enter

3:17:05 ↗ into a purchase and sale agreement for

3:17:06 ↗ the property located at 275 Front Street

3:17:08 ↗ in the amount of $450,000 plus the

3:17:10 ↗ closing costs for a second second I

3:17:13 ↗ moved in second did to authorize the

3:17:16 ↗ mayor to enter into a purchase and sale

3:17:17 ↗ agreement for the property located 275

3:17:19 ↗ front street in the amount of $450,000

3:17:22 ↗ plus closing closing costs is there

3:17:23 ↗ discussion or fifty plus closing costs

3:17:28 ↗ is there a discussion Nicki Toa

3:17:32 ↗ councilmember Ray I just thinking it's

3:17:35 ↗ really important given the public

3:17:37 ↗ comments we heard tonight that we

3:17:39 ↗ recognize that entering into this

3:17:41 ↗ agreement doesn't have any bearing on

3:17:43 ↗ subsequent land purchases we may or may

3:17:46 ↗ not make so I just want to you know be

3:17:50 ↗ real clear that we're not doing this at

3:17:52 ↗ the exclusion of something else

3:17:54 ↗ mmm-hmm any other comments that's member

3:17:57 ↗ Ramos and then I'd like maybe to state

3:17:59 ↗ for the record that where the funds are

3:18:01 ↗ coming from so my understanding is it's

3:18:05 ↗ 50% from Parkman and 50% from King

3:18:09 ↗ County conservation futures so it's only

3:18:13 ↗ half of that is coming out of a park

3:18:15 ↗ bond that's connected to the city the

3:18:17 ↗ other half is coming from King County

3:18:18 ↗ thank you any other comments any other

3:18:21 ↗ discussion all those in favor of

3:18:25 ↗ authorizing the mayor to enter into a

3:18:27 ↗ purchase and sale agreement for the

3:18:28 ↗ property located at 275 Front Street in

3:18:31 ↗ the amount of four hundred and fifty

3:18:32 ↗ thousand dollars plus closing costs a I

3:18:35 ↗ suppose passes unanimously

3:18:40 ↗ there being no further business the

3:18:42 ↗ meeting is adjourned at 11:18

3:18:57 ↗ you

Approved minutes

Extracted from the next meeting's packet, where this meeting's minutes were approved as a consent-calendar attachment.

Open PDF

Attendance

Council / Members (6)

Mariah Bettise

Stacy Goodman

Tola Marts

Bill Ramos

Chris Reh

Paul Winterstein

Motions and votes (5)

Direct City Administration and the Council’s Ad Hoc Long-term Financial Committee to propose a comprehensive funding strategy for transportation capital projects for the full City Council’s 01-16-18 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page [0000] consideration by June 2018. .

Moved by MARTS · seconded by BETTISE

Carried 6-0

In favor: Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Bill Ramos, Chris Reh, Paul Winterstein

Adopt Ordinance No. 2823, amending the Issaquah Municipal Code to enact a new Chapter 12.70 Issaquah Transportation Benefit District, establishing a Transportation Benefit District, specifying the boundaries for the Transportation Benefit District and specifying the maintenance and preservation of e…

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by BETTISE

Carried 5-1

In favor: Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Paul Winterstein

Opposed: Ramos

Direct the Administration to initiate a Request for Qualifications/Proposal process for an operating partner for the long-term operation of the Issaquah Senior Center; and direct the Finance Director to include $25,000 in a subsequent 2018 budget amendment utilizing General Funds for Professional Se…

Moved by MARTS · seconded by REH

Carried 6-0

In favor: Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Bill Ramos, Chris Reh, Paul Winterstein

Adopt Ordinance No. 2825, granting to Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership d.b.a. Verizon Wireless, a non-exclusive franchise to construct, operate, and maintain a telecommunications system consisting of small cell facilities in the public rights-of-way of the City, and prescribing certain rights, dutie…

Moved by RAMOS · seconded by WINTERSTEIN

Carried 6-0

In favor: Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Bill Ramos, Chris Reh, Paul Winterstein

Authorize the Mayor to enter into a purchase and sale agreement for property on 275 Front St. for $450,000 plus closing costs. .

Moved by MARTS · seconded by RAMOS

Carried 6-0

In favor: Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Bill Ramos, Chris Reh, Paul Winterstein