City Council Regular Meeting · Monday, June 5, 2017 · City Council Digest

3. SPECIAL BUSINESS

Hall of Fame Recognition Hear Presentation AB 7427

packet pp.5

Open packet at p.5 ↗

Staff report:

Administration / Executive Department:

One Center City Update Hear Presentation AB 7423

packet pp.7

Open packet at p.7 ↗

Staff report:

Administration / Executive Department:

7. CONSENT CALENDAR

Accounts: Payables and Payroll, June 5

Approve · packet pp.2017

Topics: Budget

Open packet at p.2017 ↗

Minutes: City Council Work Session, May 8

Approve · packet pp.9

Minutes: City Council Regular Meeting, May 15, 2017

Approve · packet pp.2017

2017 Second Budget Amendments AB 7352

Set Public Hearing; Refer to Council Services · packet pp.13–21

Topics: Budget

Previously discussed: City Council Regular Meeting · Dec 19, 2016

Open packet at p.13 ↗

Staff report:

Administration / Finance Department:

Interlocal Agreement with Eastside Fire & Rescue for Tactical Emergency Medical Support AB 7419

Refer to Council Services & Safety · packet pp.23–28

Topics: Public Safety

Open packet at p.23 ↗

Staff report:

Page 23 of 399 CONSENT CALENDAR f)

Surplus City Equipment AB 7429

Approve · packet pp.29–30

Open packet at p.29 ↗

Staff report:

Administration / Public Works Operations Department:

2017 Maintenance Overlay Project, MC17-1 AB 7437

Award Bid · packet pp.31–34

Open packet at p.31 ↗

Staff report:

Administration / Public Works Operations Department:

PSE Green Direct Power Service Agreement AB 7438

Carried 7-0

Referred to Council Services & Safety · packet pp.35–42

Topics: ClimatePublic Safety

Open packet at p.35 ↗

Staff report:

The Administration recommends purchase of renewable power through Green Direct for a portion of the City's buildings and infrastructure over a 10 year term. A Service Agreement and proposed list of facilities are provided as Exhibits A and B, respectively. The 10 year term is recommended to balance an interest in current renewable energy sources while maintaining options for future renewable energy sources, such as solar, which continue to evolve. Securing this renewable power source for a portion of facilities and infrastructure allows for some laddering and cost averaging of power supply options over time. In addition, future analysis of buildings will provide additional information on potential candidates for solar photovoltaic system and other options.

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

8. PUBLIC HEARING

Capital Improvement Plan, including Transportation, 2018-2022 AB 7313

Conduct Public Hearing · packet pp.43–324

Topics: TransportationBudget

Open packet at p.43 ↗

Staff report:

CITY COUNCIL UPDATED AGENDA BILL AB 7313 - City Council Regular Meeting - 05 Jun 2017 Public Hearing

9. REGULAR BUSINESS

Financial Management Policy AB 7390

Carried 7-0

Refer to Various Meetings · packet pp.325–373

Open packet at p.325 ↗

Staff report:

Administration / Finance Department:

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Annexation of King County Island and Establishment of Pre-Annexation Zoning AB 7433

Carried 7-0

Approve Resolution of Intent; Refer to · packet pp.375–384

Topics: Land Use

Open packet at p.375 ↗

Staff report:

NEW CITY COUNCIL AB 7433 - AGENDA BILL Regular City Council Regular Meeting - 05 Jun 2017 Business

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Vertical Mixed-Use Consultant AB 7435

Authorize Additional Funding · packet pp.395–399

Topics: Budget

Open packet at p.395 ↗

Staff report:

Administration / Economic Development Department:

2534 segments

0:27 ↗ and ago

0:31 ↗ I'll call to order the June 5th 2017

0:35 ↗ regular Council meeting and ask those in

0:38 ↗ the audience would like to join the

0:40 ↗ council and myself in the Pledge of

0:41 ↗ Allegiance to please stand I pledge

0:47 ↗ allegiance to the flag of the United

0:50 ↗ States of America and to the Republic

0:52 ↗ for which it stands one nation under God

0:56 ↗ indivisible with liberty and justice for

0:59 ↗ all we have two items under special

1:06 ↗ business receiving the first agenda bill

1:09 ↗ 7 4 to 7 Hall of Fame recognition and so

1:15 ↗ I'm going to

1:29 ↗ this is one of the very very enjoyable

1:33 ↗ things that I get to do every year and

1:36 ↗ about this time and that's to recognize

1:39 ↗ our latest inductee into our Hall of

1:44 ↗ Fame this applause Hall of Fame program

1:47 ↗ has been around since 1987 and we're

1:52 ↗ very very fortunate this evening to have

1:54 ↗ a number of past recipients here and I'm

1:58 ↗ going to ask them to come up after I

2:00 ↗ recognize this year's recipient and just

2:05 ↗ provide a little bit of an overview the

2:09 ↗ criteria is the one person who has been

2:14 ↗ an inspiration provided service

2:16 ↗ leadership civil mindedness and activity

2:21 ↗ and drawing positive attention to the

2:24 ↗ community length of service is also a

2:30 ↗ primary component of our Hall of Fame

2:34 ↗ recognition so this year Joe come on up

2:38 ↗ here and Michelle why don't you join Joe

2:41 ↗ also because I learned a long time ago

2:44 ↗ that no one does it alone and behind

2:49 ↗ every great person there is typically

2:54 ↗ another great person at his or her side

2:59 ↗ so Joe Forster a former city council

3:04 ↗ member and longtime community volunteer

3:06 ↗ a dedicated advocate for a community and

3:09 ↗ a true example of a community leader for

3:16 ↗ many years of service to Sequoia in

3:18 ↗ public and private life he is an

3:21 ↗ outstanding candidate for this year's

3:25 ↗ selection to our Hall of Fame he

3:28 ↗ embodies the values of Versailles our

3:31 ↗ criteria civic mindedness inspiration

3:34 ↗ leadership and service befitting a

3:36 ↗ member of the physical Hall of Fame Joe

3:40 ↗ has worked with numerous government and

3:42 ↗ nonprofit

3:43 ↗ organizations to make our community a

3:46 ↗ better place including the downtown as

3:50 ↗ Association and Friends of Lake

3:54 ↗ Sammamish State Park his leadership

3:58 ↗ roles for the city the Sequoia includes

4:00 ↗ serving on the City Council city service

4:03 ↗ commission development commission

4:05 ↗ planning and policy Commission in Park

4:07 ↗ Board

4:07 ↗ Joe also served as chairman of the

4:10 ↗ central it's a quat plan task force

4:12 ↗ which worked with the community for more

4:16 ↗ than a year to re-envision as a close

4:20 ↗ commercial areas along Interstate 90 his

4:25 ↗ volunteer efforts include helping the

4:27 ↗ plan and execute vendors on Front Street

4:31 ↗ one of its applause signature events and

4:35 ↗ for many years he has worked for sunset

4:38 ↗ highway crews there's a local group that

4:41 ↗ collects cash and toys for local

4:43 ↗ charities so I'm going to invite this

4:51 ↗ time forward those here in the in the

4:56 ↗ audience that are previous hall-of-fame

5:00 ↗ recipients rose and Leo Finnegan David

5:06 ↗ Harris Shelly

5:08 ↗ fry please come on up and help me induct

5:14 ↗ Joe into this year's being so Joe got a

5:23 ↗ Joe got a plaque the other day but this

5:27 ↗ is quite as nice as that plaque was a

5:32 ↗ certificate of appreciation in addition

5:35 ↗ we have a board back there with all of

5:38 ↗ the names of our previous Ola and your

5:45 ↗ name will be up there so Joe it is

5:48 ↗ really a great pleasure

5:51 ↗ formally recognized you as a store word

5:55 ↗ in our community who has done so much

5:58 ↗ for our community thank you very very

6:02 ↗ much well thanks thanks to all of you

6:26 ↗ this is a very familiar place for me and

6:29 ↗ I have to say that volunteering for this

6:33 ↗ city and and serving this city has been

6:36 ↗ some of the most fun and adventurous

6:38 ↗ things I've done and to stand with the

6:41 ↗ group that was here as hall of previous

6:44 ↗ Hall in fade Hall of Fame inductees

6:46 ↗ makes me feel like I've really

6:48 ↗ accomplished something great by being

6:50 ↗ inducted into this and I wanted to thank

6:53 ↗ everybody including the mayor and the

6:55 ↗ council and thank the community for all

6:58 ↗ of the the fun times that I've had and

7:01 ↗ the fun times I intend to have and for

7:03 ↗ all the things that we can and have

7:05 ↗ accomplished in the past thank you Joe

7:08 ↗ [Applause]

7:30 ↗ our next item under special business is

7:33 ↗ agenda bill seven four two three one

7:36 ↗ city one center city update and we are

7:41 ↗ fortunate this evening to have with US

7:46 ↗ representatives from King County Metro

7:47 ↗ and Sound Transit and that would be Paul

7:51 ↗ royal of King County Metro and Wesley

7:53 ↗ King of Sound Transit to provide an

7:57 ↗ update on a significant planning effort

8:01 ↗ that is going on at this time both short

8:03 ↗ term and long time and Bill's do you

8:05 ↗ want to provide a short intro or just

8:11 ↗ have them begin just a welcome we

8:15 ↗ encourage to have them come as a member

8:18 ↗ of RTC where we first started talking

8:20 ↗ about the once inner city and when they

8:22 ↗ have everybody else on the council get

8:24 ↗ this information a little more directly

8:25 ↗ because it's going to be a large effect

8:27 ↗ on the region as a whole in Issaquah

8:29 ↗ citizens so I'm happy you're here to get

8:32 ↗ everybody up to date so they can hear

8:34 ↗ all this so thank you for coming great

8:36 ↗ well thank you so much for having us

8:38 ↗ mayor council staff and and citizens my

8:42 ↗ name is Paul Roybal I'm a senior transit

8:45 ↗ planner with King County Metro and I am

8:47 ↗ the agency lead for King County Metro on

8:49 ↗ this for agency planning project with me

8:53 ↗ today is Wesley King of Sound Transit hi

8:57 ↗ thank you Paul I'm Leslie king I'm the

8:59 ↗ transit expansion program manager for

9:01 ↗ Sound Transit and I'm the lead for Sound

9:04 ↗ Transit Atlas project so like I

9:06 ↗ mentioned this is a four agency joint

9:08 ↗ project between Metro Sound Transit the

9:11 ↗ city of Seattle and the downtown Seattle

9:15 ↗ Association so a public-private

9:17 ↗ partnership it's been ongoing through a

9:20 ↗ study over the last year so to look at

9:23 ↗ how the region moves through connects to

9:26 ↗ and experiences the Center City of

9:29 ↗ downtown of Seattle we have a handout

9:32 ↗ that is in front of the members of the

9:35 ↗ council and there may be a few s just

9:37 ↗ around the room the the handout depicts

9:43 ↗ a few key

9:44 ↗ things that everybody may not be fully

9:46 ↗ aware of

9:47 ↗ first of all Center City itself what is

9:51 ↗ that those are the ten densest

9:52 ↗ neighborhoods around the center core of

9:55 ↗ downtown Seattle it is a region the area

9:58 ↗ of the cities that we're focused mostly

10:02 ↗ on but the effort is really a regional

10:05 ↗ effort there are about 250,000 people

10:08 ↗ who come through the Center City on a

10:12 ↗ daily basis so anything that happens in

10:14 ↗ these ten neighborhoods really affects

10:16 ↗ the entire region and its viability

10:19 ↗ where the the project is really looking

10:22 ↗ at a two-fold - time frame scenario one

10:26 ↗ dealing with the near-term what might

10:29 ↗ happen over the next couple years as

10:31 ↗ many different transportation and

10:34 ↗ private and public construction projects

10:38 ↗ are implemented and it really will

10:41 ↗ change the face of the downtown area the

10:47 ↗ this area is growing significantly as

10:50 ↗ you can imagine currently it's home to

10:53 ↗ about 70,000 residents and 250,000 jobs

10:58 ↗ but over the next 20 years or so there

11:01 ↗ will be about 25,000 additional

11:04 ↗ residents in this area and over 55

11:07 ↗ additional jobs just that growth in

11:09 ↗ itself is going to put some tremendous

11:11 ↗ demands on this area requiring us to

11:15 ↗ think more creatively about how we use

11:17 ↗ the public space there is not going to

11:20 ↗ be any more streets built through the

11:23 ↗ downtown area and so we need to learn to

11:26 ↗ use those streets the most effectively

11:29 ↗ ways possible and accommodate as many

11:32 ↗ people as we can through that limited

11:34 ↗ capacity the the project as I mentioned

11:39 ↗ is over looking at two different time

11:42 ↗ horizons in the near term up through

11:44 ↗ around September of 2018 we're looking

11:47 ↗ at the impact of all the work that's

11:48 ↗ happening in the area today we have the

11:51 ↗ state route 99 project that's being

11:54 ↗ built the tolling that will

11:56 ↗ we associated with that we have work on

11:59 ↗ the waterfront

12:00 ↗ we have Madison BRT coming online we

12:03 ↗ have a number of different public

12:05 ↗ initiatives that are underway and in

12:07 ↗ addition there's about 70 active

12:09 ↗ projects right now in the city in the

12:11 ↗ downtown in this Center City area that

12:14 ↗ is affecting both in the near term

12:17 ↗ mobility how people are getting around

12:19 ↗ as these projects are being built but

12:21 ↗ bringing that growth to the to the

12:23 ↗ downtown area and again as I stressed

12:27 ↗ earlier this is affecting the region

12:28 ↗ because so many people are moving to and

12:31 ↗ through this this constrained area the

12:34 ↗ project however has the longer term

12:36 ↗ focus as well and we'll be looking out

12:38 ↗ out towards the next 20 years and all

12:40 ↗ the growth that's going to happen over

12:42 ↗ that time frame so while we want to

12:44 ↗ address immediate actions that or

12:47 ↗ develop immediate actions to address the

12:50 ↗ immediate need we also want to look

12:52 ↗ forward to that time frame and envision

12:55 ↗ what we want this area to look like in

12:57 ↗ the future what the mobility needs of

13:00 ↗ the area are and as well as what how the

13:03 ↗ public realm looks and feels how people

13:05 ↗ experience the public realm which is the

13:08 ↗ public space that everybody bus riders

13:11 ↗ people who drive people who bike and

13:14 ↗ walk all experience on a daily basis so

13:18 ↗ I will shift my focus quickly to talk a

13:22 ↗ little bit about the near term and what

13:24 ↗ we've been planning for is the eventual

13:28 ↗ time frame when buses will come out of

13:30 ↗ the downtown Seattle transit tunnel this

13:33 ↗ is something that's been envisioned

13:35 ↗ since the tunnel was built light rail is

13:37 ↗ coming coming online and we've always

13:40 ↗ known that asked Light Rail trains

13:42 ↗ increase in their frequency there will

13:45 ↗ be less room available for buses to

13:47 ↗ operate through this with now a joint

13:49 ↗ use facility when those buses come out

13:52 ↗ of the tunnel we need to find out what

13:54 ↗ to do with them if they came up and we

13:56 ↗ did nothing that we would experience a

13:59 ↗ tremendous amount of traffic delay for

14:01 ↗ all users people who drive ride the

14:04 ↗ buses and more people on the city

14:06 ↗ streets so those sidewalks would be more

14:08 ↗ crowded by people waiting

14:10 ↗ to catch their buses and so forth

14:13 ↗ that's if we did nothing and so we're

14:16 ↗ looking at ways that we might be able to

14:18 ↗ address that through a number of

14:19 ↗ different actions that are described on

14:21 ↗ the back sheet backside of the sheet

14:24 ↗ that I handed out there's really five

14:26 ↗ major areas of action that we're looking

14:29 ↗ at street operational changes potential

14:33 ↗ bus service restructuring improvements

14:36 ↗ to the pedestrian and public realm

14:38 ↗ looking at ways to implement the center

14:41 ↗ city bike network and looking at

14:43 ↗ transportation demand management

14:45 ↗ strategies how to encourage more people

14:48 ↗ to adopt alternatives to driving alone

14:55 ↗ over we are at the point where we've

14:59 ↗ been it's in an engagement phase for

15:01 ↗ many months now since that since January

15:03 ↗ primarily and have talked with over 70

15:07 ↗ community groups as well as had an

15:09 ↗ online open house different venues for a

15:12 ↗ variety of people to give input into

15:14 ↗ this plan and we've gotten a lot of

15:15 ↗ feedback one of the things that we've

15:17 ↗ heard most strongly from everybody is to

15:20 ↗ make sure that the system is safe and

15:22 ↗ usable for all you all user types and

15:24 ↗ that's really something that we're

15:26 ↗ striving to achieve in the near term and

15:28 ↗ it's a goal that we will continue to

15:30 ↗ have as we develop the long term work as

15:32 ↗ well that outreach continues we will we

15:37 ↗ are as I mentioned developing some

15:40 ↗ strategies that now become actions that

15:44 ↗ we will take forward to the public for

15:46 ↗ more detailed analysis and discussion I

15:48 ↗ talked about the bus potential bus

15:51 ↗ service restructuring we are now in a

15:54 ↗ process jointly King County and Sound

15:57 ↗ Transit looking at alternatives to the

15:59 ↗ bus service that operates on State Route

16:01 ↗ 520 and ways that that service might be

16:04 ↗ reconfigured so that fewer of those

16:06 ↗ buses come into the downtown area and

16:09 ↗ operate all the way through the downtown

16:11 ↗ what we're relying on in this case is to

16:14 ↗ encourage people or require people in

16:17 ↗ some cases to make a transfer from buses

16:20 ↗ to light rail and that transfer for the

16:22 ↗ 520 services

16:24 ↗ would use de Montlake the University of

16:27 ↗ Washington station near Husky Stadium

16:31 ↗ other bus restructure concepts that

16:34 ↗ would result in fewer buses to the

16:36 ↗ downtown core would rely on transfers to

16:39 ↗ link through the downtown core as well

16:41 ↗ as trans potential transfers to other

16:43 ↗ high frequency bus routes that are

16:45 ↗ already operating on the surface streets

16:48 ↗ that's where we are right now

16:51 ↗ over the next year we'll be looking at

16:52 ↗ the long-range aspect of this plan and

16:55 ↗ developing some ideas concepts about how

16:58 ↗ that the public realm and mobility will

17:00 ↗ function in the long term and we'll

17:02 ↗ continue to bring that out to the public

17:04 ↗ through more engagement and we look

17:06 ↗ forward to coming back to this group and

17:08 ↗ answering answering questions and

17:10 ↗ providing more information about that

17:12 ↗ I'm going to turn it over to West's go

17:15 ↗ second

17:16 ↗ I think Paul did an excellent job of

17:18 ↗ covering all the main points of the

17:19 ↗ supper it really was early on that esta

17:23 ↗ in King County Metro and sound trans in

17:26 ↗ that DSA started talking and seeing the

17:28 ↗ cumulative impacts of all these projects

17:31 ↗ coming down the pipeline occurring at

17:32 ↗ the same time we realized we needed to

17:35 ↗ work together get a joint effort the

17:37 ↗ last thing we want to do is while we're

17:39 ↗ trying to build better transit systems a

17:41 ↗ more efficient transportation system as

17:44 ↗ well overall is to turn people off to

17:46 ↗ transit so this effort is about trying

17:49 ↗ to expand or at least keep transit

17:53 ↗ access as efficient as we can into and

17:55 ↗ out of downtown I have a feeling some of

17:58 ↗ your questions off the bat are going to

18:00 ↗ go towards the five five four we have

18:03 ↗ not started that outreach effort yet and

18:05 ↗ that will be coming this summer right

18:07 ↗ now the focus is on 520 then we're going

18:10 ↗ to take a step back regroup and come

18:12 ↗ with another outreach effort to engage

18:15 ↗ with your community and your riders that

18:17 ↗ utilize that service as well and I would

18:20 ↗ also add that the five five four has not

18:22 ↗ looked at as a truncation option u-dub

18:25 ↗ provides a unique opportunity because

18:27 ↗ there's capacity there there's good

18:29 ↗ connections with 520 and what we'll be

18:33 ↗ looking at related to the five five four

18:34 ↗ is more

18:36 ↗ impacts related to East link

18:38 ↗ construction and how that route will

18:40 ↗ have a new route into and out of

18:41 ↗ downtown but staying on surface streets

18:43 ↗ and been continuing through the center

18:45 ↗ city with that we like to open it up to

18:50 ↗ questions are there questions did a

18:55 ↗ great job of setting the stage

18:58 ↗ Toula so I want to make sure I heard

19:01 ↗ right 554 is intended to continue to

19:05 ↗ operate from Issaquah to downtown

19:07 ↗ Seattle let's just give you a question

19:09 ↗ of operationally where it goes and how

19:12 ↗ it goes yeah because the dedicated bus

19:16 ↗ lanes are going to be closing so then

19:17 ↗ that will require that results are there

19:20 ↗ gotcha

19:21 ↗ but we don't have to if you if you want

19:23 ↗ to take five five four and you don't

19:25 ↗ have to likes to take transfer to a

19:27 ↗ train in Mercer Island or any of that

19:28 ↗ kind of stuff

19:29 ↗ no right Thanks okay additional

19:33 ↗ questions no I'm just checking on if

19:38 ↗ there's any change in the date of when

19:39 ↗ you're looking at the the bus tunnel

19:42 ↗ possibly closing there was some

19:43 ↗ discussion on various dates on that so

19:45 ↗ see that's still open or where that's

19:47 ↗ going it is still open but we've been

19:49 ↗ planning for September 2018 as the

19:52 ↗ that's the worst case scenario the

19:54 ↗ earliest date that the tunnel would

19:55 ↗ close so all of our efforts our analysis

19:59 ↗ are really around that date and our

20:01 ↗ project delivery schedule will be

20:03 ↗ working at building these projects and

20:06 ↗ implementing that any sort of outcomes

20:09 ↗ by that date September 2018 I would add

20:13 ↗ we're keeping in mind that if if things

20:16 ↗ change we want the flexibility to change

20:18 ↗ with it so if 2018 slides we slide these

20:22 ↗ changes as well and I think another

20:27 ↗ important aspect of this especially as

20:29 ↗ we talk about these regional impacts is

20:31 ↗ that esta isn't driving any of these

20:33 ↗ services or potential truncations on 520

20:37 ↗ it's through this effort and we are

20:40 ↗ working with a sounding board and going

20:43 ↗ through the King County Council the

20:45 ↗ Sound Transit board so the normal

20:47 ↗ process is

20:48 ↗ and the normal representatives will make

20:50 ↗ the final decision on what happens with

20:52 ↗ these no more than just when you

20:57 ↗ mentioned Street operations that's

20:59 ↗ talking about actually really changing

21:01 ↗ like one-way streets to or two way to

21:03 ↗ one way or bus way it's like third

21:05 ↗ Avenue now is currently you know buses

21:07 ↗ only certain times a day you're talking

21:08 ↗ about Street operations talking about

21:10 ↗ changes of that nature you're not we are

21:12 ↗ while we've we looked at a variety of

21:15 ↗ different options right now we're

21:17 ↗ settling on really looking at signal

21:20 ↗ operational changes that will keep the

21:22 ↗ buses moving more efficiently rate well

21:28 ↗ bill I want to thank you for suggesting

21:30 ↗ that we breathe that we debriefed on

21:35 ↗ this topic and we are very very

21:38 ↗ fortunate to have you on the King County

21:41 ↗ Regional Transit Committee and know that

21:43 ↗ you'll be keeping a close watch as

21:45 ↗ things evolve like supposed to be all

21:49 ↗ for coming out this evening thank you we

21:52 ↗ look forward to addressing you again in

21:54 ↗ the future yes they will now move to

22:01 ↗ audience comments citizen comments are

22:07 ↗ an important part of the public process

22:08 ↗ we take them seriously and factor them

22:11 ↗ into the decisions we make anyone from

22:14 ↗ the public who wishes to comment on

22:16 ↗ tonight's agenda items or other topics

22:19 ↗ should do so at this time there is a

22:23 ↗ public hearing later in our proceedings

22:28 ↗ on the capital improvement plan

22:31 ↗ including transportation 2018 - 2020 -

22:35 ↗ and if you're here to speak to that

22:38 ↗ topic later in our agenda would be the

22:44 ↗ best time to do that please direct your

22:48 ↗ comments to the whole council and not

22:50 ↗ individuals while this is not a question

22:52 ↗ and answer session will contact you to

22:55 ↗ follow up if needed if you did not have

22:58 ↗ an opportunity to include your email

23:01 ↗ address

23:02 ↗ on the sign-in sheet you may lose leave

23:05 ↗ that information on the clipboard at the

23:08 ↗ front table after speaking and recognize

23:12 ↗ use the lectern and speak into the

23:14 ↗ microphone state your name address and

23:16 ↗ any relationship to the city limit your

23:19 ↗ comments to 5-minutes if you have

23:21 ↗ written comments please submit those to

23:24 ↗ the city clerk a visual timer has been

23:27 ↗ placed on the lectern when it turns

23:28 ↗ yellow you are within the last minute of

23:31 ↗ your comment period if you use the full

23:35 ↗ five minutes the timer will sound to

23:37 ↗ indicate the end of your allotted

23:39 ↗ comment time as a reminder personal

23:43 ↗ attacks obscene language derogatory

23:45 ↗ remarks and disruptive behavior will not

23:47 ↗ be permitted again citizens comments

23:51 ↗ both written and verbal are an important

23:53 ↗ aspect of the public process we take

23:56 ↗ them seriously and we thank members of

23:59 ↗ the public for taking the time to

24:01 ↗ address us during our meetings and with

24:04 ↗ that I'd ask everyone has signed up to

24:08 ↗ speak yes Susan Haas good evening

24:24 ↗ Council I am sitting down because of my

24:27 ↗ feet made that my name is Susan half and

24:33 ↗ my address is one nine five two four

24:35 ↗ southeast 24th place in Sammamish and my

24:40 ↗ relationship with Issaquah there are two

24:42 ↗ one I make original art and turn it into

24:45 ↗ 100% post-consumer recycled greeting

24:48 ↗ cards that are for sale at the Recology

24:52 ↗ clean escapes tour in gilman village and

24:55 ↗ also I volunteer on Thursdays at the

24:58 ↗ food and clothing bank and lately in the

25:03 ↗ last eight weeks or so I've been

25:04 ↗ volunteering about thirty four hours a

25:06 ↗ week for my interest in saving the

25:09 ↗ providence Heights campus for

25:11 ↗ preservation it's been a really

25:14 ↗ wonderful experience I have a

25:15 ↗ masters in regional planning from UNC

25:18 ↗ Chapel Hill from 1995 and this has just

25:22 ↗ been a great way to use that education

25:23 ↗ and also develop it further and tonight

25:30 ↗ what I'm really interested in talking

25:32 ↗ about is carbon specifically this last

25:36 ↗ week a lot of those hours have gone into

25:39 ↗ reading your words in our goals for the

25:44 ↗ city the city vision a comprehensive

25:48 ↗ plan especially the land-use element

25:50 ↗ goals and the sustainability writing

25:56 ↗ that you've all adopted and I'm so

25:59 ↗ impressed I'm just so proud to be here

26:02 ↗ and say all that work going on in the

26:03 ↗ Parks and Recreation Department

26:04 ↗ daylighting creeks and making more

26:07 ↗ opportunities for enjoying the earth and

26:10 ↗ a very like carbon minimal way and I'm

26:14 ↗ really hoping the Providence Heights can

26:16 ↗ turn into something that just grows and

26:20 ↗ develops future city of Hall of Famers

26:22 ↗ and Metro users and that it can all fit

26:27 ↗ together I think that would be just

26:28 ↗ great so in with carbon I like in all

26:34 ↗ your documents it talks about having a

26:36 ↗ minimal effect on greenhouse gases and

26:39 ↗ global warming and climate change it's

26:42 ↗ been so sensitizing to read all that

26:45 ↗ I've been thinking more about oh do I

26:47 ↗ really need that trip you know do it so

26:52 ↗ thank you for inspiring me and what I'm

26:56 ↗ also been learning from a national in

26:58 ↗ start preservation expert is it reuse is

27:00 ↗ almost always better and in this case it

27:03 ↗ is Providence Heights in the light of

27:06 ↗ carbon you know I start preservation on

27:08 ↗ this side there's a lot of carbon that

27:11 ↗ went into creating Providence Heights

27:14 ↗ concrete is extremely carbon intensive

27:17 ↗ to mine to make and it's also very

27:20 ↗ intensive to demolish a new construction

27:25 ↗ it would be more intensive Carbon wise

27:28 ↗ then just for using what's there and

27:31 ↗ repurposing it so I know it's a really

27:33 ↗ hard thing to figure out how to do this

27:36 ↗ with all the factors and I wish you had

27:40 ↗ more authority in this but it wasn't

27:43 ↗ more than a level zero permit but I am

27:45 ↗ heartened that your planning director

27:46 ↗ has a master's in environmental planning

27:49 ↗ so perceptual shifts have to do with

27:54 ↗ global warming people are you looking

27:55 ↗ from when I know this is all the stuff

27:57 ↗ you know so I apologize but from the

27:59 ↗ smokestack to the globe not just

28:03 ↗ localized smokestack effects but what

28:05 ↗ does this have to do with the global

28:07 ↗ atmosphere and how does that impact

28:10 ↗ Issaquah residents and employees and

28:14 ↗ also incremental changes how does one

28:17 ↗ little demolition affect the whole

28:20 ↗ planet and whether it survives soar is

28:23 ↗ destroyed and also with exponential

28:26 ↗ feedback loops it's just a perceptual

28:28 ↗ shift when you have ocean acidification

28:33 ↗ greenhouse effect climate change dark

28:36 ↗ water without ice absorbing more heat

28:38 ↗ methane from the melting Tundra where it

28:42 ↗ was locked in frozen it's coming out and

28:45 ↗ at all it all feeds on each other and

28:48 ↗ can create some exponential effects so

28:52 ↗ I'm going to send this guys are tomorrow

28:55 ↗ a couple of documents to do just add to

29:00 ↗ this talk and also tomorrow night from

29:03 ↗ 7:00 to 8:00 there's a public gathering

29:05 ↗ at the Issaquah library in a large

29:07 ↗ meeting room for anybody interested any

29:10 ↗ of you or anybody who's watching this on

29:12 ↗ TV thank you so much Susan

29:16 ↗ thank you Steve Christensen hi my name

29:26 ↗ is Steve Christensen and with the mouse

29:28 ↗ Co

29:31 ↗ oh okay

29:40 ↗ and I'd like I live at two three four

29:43 ↗ one six southeast seventeen placements

29:45 ↗ management I'd like to show you this

29:47 ↗ slideshow on the sisters of Providence

29:50 ↗ and also on the provinces thanks

29:54 ↗ [Music]

30:01 ↗ [Music]

30:08 ↗ the love of the Lord we are called to be

30:16 ↗ light for the kingdom live in the

30:22 ↗ freedom of the video

30:27 ↗ we are with Justin

30:34 ↗ we are call you loft and

30:40 ↗ me

30:44 ↗ [Music]

30:53 ↗ ha

31:02 ↗ [Music]

31:05 ↗ Oh

31:13 ↗ your might be all those in fear we are

31:19 ↗ called

31:25 ↗ called

31:27 ↗ hatred and Linus

31:30 ↗ Oh

31:31 ↗ [Music]

31:57 ↗ Hey

31:58 ↗ [Music]

32:11 ↗ and

32:20 ↗ [Music]

34:17 ↗ you

34:25 ↗ thank you thank you Steve Paula Harper

34:34 ↗ Kristensen good evening my name is Paula

34:44 ↗ Harper Christian family two three four

34:47 ↗ one six southeast 17th place Sammamish

34:50 ↗ and I live very close to Providence High

34:53 ↗ Chapel and after watching that it must

34:57 ↗ have been a true hallelujah moment to

34:59 ↗ finally open that campus to women for

35:03 ↗ those Sisters of Providence in the past

35:07 ↗ several months many of us have been

35:11 ↗ deeply drawn to the Providence Haight

35:13 ↗ campus we've been looking to it with

35:16 ↗ future possibilities as a historic site

35:20 ↗ repurposed school museum wedding venue

35:23 ↗ women's shelter conference in our Music

35:26 ↗ Hall Child Advocacy Center Art Center

35:30 ↗ and countless other possibilities it's

35:36 ↗ made me even greater appreciate the 12

35:38 ↗ years that I was blessed to worship in

35:42 ↗ that Chapel with my church and it truly

35:47 ↗ has heightened my appreciation for the

35:51 ↗ city of Issaquah the city of Sammamish

35:54 ↗ we had a number of charming historic

35:57 ↗ sites like Gilman Village Front Street

36:01 ↗ and the Pickering barn in fact it was

36:06 ↗ 1983 that the Pickering barn was listed

36:09 ↗ on the National Registry of Historic

36:12 ↗ Places and in 1994 the good city of

36:17 ↗ Issaquah had a vision to invest two

36:21 ↗ million dollars into the restoration of

36:24 ↗ the barn and it is now our own very own

36:29 ↗ landmark that buzzes constantly with

36:32 ↗ weddings

36:33 ↗ art shows and farmers market I love it

36:38 ↗ but to get real it's a barn it's not a

36:44 ↗ chapel with magnificent 30-foot sting

36:50 ↗ glass windows by world-renowned glass

36:54 ↗ artist Gabriel lawar it's hard for me to

36:59 ↗ say that D word demolish but I'm pretty

37:04 ↗ sure it would cost an even even greater

37:07 ↗ fortune to demolish it than it would to

37:13 ↗ buy it in the first place here's an

37:16 ↗ example Port Authority of st. Paul spent

37:21 ↗ three million dollars on a piece of

37:23 ↗ property and then they had sticker shock

37:26 ↗ when they divided discovered the cost of

37:29 ↗ demolishing it would be thirteen million

37:32 ↗ dollars instead they repurposed the

37:36 ↗ building which turned out to be really

37:38 ↗ good for the economy and certainly good

37:41 ↗ for the citizens Providence Heights and

37:44 ↗ the Space Needle were under construction

37:47 ↗ at exactly the same time I've been

37:50 ↗ wondering what Washingtonians would be

37:52 ↗ saying if we were trying to B word

37:55 ↗ demolish the Space Needle some people

38:00 ↗ come from all over the world to visit us

38:02 ↗ to visit Pike Place Market to visit

38:05 ↗ Pioneer Square Seattle underground and

38:08 ↗ none of those places are as lovely or as

38:12 ↗ serene as Providence height campus and

38:16 ↗ those forty acres last month M in may in

38:21 ↗ the Seattle Times there was an article

38:25 ↗ about what happened to civil rights

38:30 ↗ leader Rosa Parks home after Rosa Parks

38:37 ↗ refused to give up her seat on the bus

38:40 ↗ there was quite a hoop law in Alabama

38:42 ↗ and certainly the hoopla was accompanied

38:46 ↗ with me

38:47 ↗ death threats so many death threats that

38:51 ↗ she was forced to move to Detroit to

38:55 ↗ live with her brother she lived there in

38:57 ↗ a little tiny house wooden house square

39:00 ↗ salt box type and after she died for

39:05 ↗ years people have been discussing what

39:07 ↗ to do with her house

39:09 ↗ well Museum teaching tool Centre for

39:14 ↗ children nobody could really decide

39:16 ↗ finally someone did just see the yellow

39:19 ↗ light did just purchase it took it down

39:23 ↗ dismantled it piece by piece took it to

39:27 ↗ a new location rebuilt it and the new

39:31 ↗ location is Berlin yeah Rosa Parks home

39:35 ↗ is in Berlin the burden laners love it

39:38 ↗ jazz music is played and children tour

39:42 ↗ and they learn about Rosa Parks I can't

39:47 ↗ help but think we let a real gem

39:49 ↗ slip through our fingers thank you Thank

39:53 ↗ You Paula

39:55 ↗ no one further has signed up to speak

39:58 ↗ David

40:00 ↗ [Laughter]

40:10 ↗ good evening David Kaplan 255 southeast

40:13 ↗ and Rose Street you have a gender bill

40:16 ↗ have being referred to the future about

40:19 ↗ the County Island it's actually County

40:22 ↗ property and washed out property I while

40:28 ↗ back I spoke and said I thought some of

40:30 ↗ those trees and more eastern part could

40:32 ↗ come down to make sure we had some kind

40:33 ↗ of park facility on the western part of

40:35 ↗ the Highlands so kids didn't have to

40:38 ↗ cross busy streets to get to the parks

40:40 ↗ that are still a distance away but I

40:44 ↗ didn't imagine the cff zone for that

40:50 ↗ property which as it says in the code

40:56 ↗ it's for services and a recreation Orion

40:59 ↗ development that serves the larger

41:01 ↗ community includes uses that generate

41:03 ↗ high levels of traffic conference

41:06 ↗ centers reception halls public-private

41:09 ↗ projects are all listed it seems really

41:12 ↗ inappropriate to look at that part of

41:14 ↗ that property for CFF zoning certainly

41:20 ↗ the top part there is more realistic the

41:24 ↗ recreation zoning CFR the open space

41:29 ↗ zoning is certainly appropriate for this

41:31 ↗ the highly visible slope there has been

41:36 ↗ some tree death up there in one place at

41:39 ↗ the north northwest corner of the forest

41:41 ↗ and much it could be laminated root rot

41:45 ↗ which is common around here it could be

41:47 ↗ something else but you know the whole

41:48 ↗ hydrology has been changed dramatically

41:51 ↗ up in the highlands in that Park

41:53 ↗ Camp Creek was there a flowing Creek

41:55 ↗ coming out of the hillside before the

41:58 ↗ Highlands project was ever started and

42:00 ↗ then they tried to put too much water in

42:02 ↗ that area in a blue out and now it's

42:05 ↗ back to some kind of a flow but there's

42:08 ↗ Springs have been been on that hillside

42:11 ↗ for a long time

42:13 ↗ naturally it goes way back but then

42:16 ↗ there were a whole bunch of Springs in

42:18 ↗ an unnatural situation when they were

42:20 ↗ charging too much water up above

42:22 ↗ but we got to make sure the forest and

42:24 ↗ the hillside can stay green and healthy

42:27 ↗ at the bottom certainly some things can

42:30 ↗ happen down there that would be not

42:32 ↗ interfering with the the view corridor

42:35 ↗ and could be well used properly if done

42:39 ↗ correctly but that top part doesn't

42:42 ↗ belong in cff zoning thank you thank you

42:48 ↗ yeah but I because it's quasi-judicial

42:51 ↗ it complicates people actually getting a

42:55 ↗ tour or whatever of that site but I

42:57 ↗ think it's really important that every

42:58 ↗ council member somehow get up and be

43:00 ↗ familiar with that that land at the

43:03 ↗ bottom and the top thank you

43:26 ↗ [Music]

44:00 ↗ my name is Mary Lynch and I recited to

44:03 ↗ 6:9 Oh North West Oak Crest Drive

44:04 ↗ Issaquah Washington I wanted to come

44:07 ↗ before you tonight because I wanted to

44:08 ↗ first address my car that I sent in last

44:12 ↗ week and I appreciate the city

44:13 ↗ responding quickly on it but I'm really

44:15 ↗ concerned because every car that we've

44:17 ↗ submitted from our development we've

44:19 ↗ never got to talk with the city before

44:21 ↗ action is taken and really never had a

44:24 ↗ chance to review after it's happened and

44:26 ↗ it's kind of closed quickly and I my

44:30 ↗ second part of my car that I submitted

44:32 ↗ was not responded to at all and so I'm

44:34 ↗ following up and that yes I did visit

44:36 ↗ the site this weekend and would like to

44:37 ↗ show you and this is on the state park

44:40 ↗ for those of you that are in the

44:43 ↗ audience and the car requested that the

44:47 ↗ city look at the crosswalk at the

44:52 ↗ intersection of Newport Way and where

44:54 ↗ the new skate park was going up and my

44:56 ↗ concerns was that pedestrians cannot see

44:59 ↗ and cars cannot see pedestrians waiting

45:01 ↗ to cross and I requested that that we

45:04 ↗ looked at the sight lines be improved

45:06 ↗ for not only the pedestrians but also

45:08 ↗ for the cars using that intersection

45:10 ↗ because it's a heavily used intersection

45:12 ↗ and cars can be going over 30 to 40

45:14 ↗ miles an hour along that stretch of the

45:16 ↗ road I know I Drive it every day what

45:21 ↗ did happen is the site the fence got

45:23 ↗ moved back slightly but I took this

45:26 ↗ picture from where I recommend people

45:28 ↗ stand when you cross the street

45:30 ↗ especially on a busy intersection that's

45:33 ↗ my viewpoint as a pedestrian from that

45:35 ↗ intersection this is after the sidewalk

45:38 ↗ or the fence was moved back what I asked

45:40 ↗ was that they look at removing some of

45:42 ↗ the screening to improve the sight line

45:44 ↗ I didn't really ask for the fence to be

45:46 ↗ moved because I know that is a

45:48 ↗ construction site none of the screening

45:51 ↗ was removed here's another view where

45:55 ↗ you can safely wait to walk if you begin

45:59 ↗ to get towards the sloped area where

46:03 ↗ you're actually in coming in contact

46:04 ↗ equipment to potentially be hit by a car

46:06 ↗ this is still the view this is if you

46:11 ↗ are across the way

46:12 ↗ a and want to make a turn out of the

46:17 ↗ parking lot there to make a left-hand

46:19 ↗ turn this is your line of sight where

46:21 ↗ you're required to stop by law to wait

46:24 ↗ stop now yes you can edge forward and

46:31 ↗ you begin to see a little bit more but

46:34 ↗ by then you've committed yourself if a

46:36 ↗ car has not stopped or you're making a

46:38 ↗ right turn on red

46:39 ↗ you're hit and you're in danger I would

46:42 ↗ request going forward when citizens

46:44 ↗ submit citizens actually request that

46:47 ↗ they are contacted they are talked to

46:50 ↗ and when they volunteer to go and visit

46:51 ↗ a site but they that request is accepted

46:55 ↗ and before it is closed and nicely we're

46:59 ↗ done you know thank you that the

47:02 ↗ complete car be addressed I would like

47:04 ↗ to see for this one in particular what

47:07 ↗ decision that it was made what standards

47:11 ↗ this is based on the sight line is

47:12 ↗ adequate for the pedestrians what codes

47:15 ↗ were used foot city standards the other

47:17 ↗ thing that I've requested several times

47:19 ↗ of the past year is what construction

47:21 ↗ site safety inspection guidelines and

47:26 ↗ best practices the cities are using

47:28 ↗ because if you walk along our street a

47:31 ↗ Newport way right now we cannot safely

47:33 ↗ get from our entrance over to the

47:35 ↗ trailhead there is no walkway that is

47:38 ↗ safe

47:39 ↗ we were told when construction was going

47:41 ↗ to start a Newport way that we could

47:43 ↗ safely get to the trailhead and it's

47:45 ↗ just not our neighborhood that's using

47:47 ↗ the trailhead it's other ones along that

47:49 ↗ way so when we submit cars I would

47:52 ↗ appreciate some respect and when we ask

47:56 ↗ for requests or specifics on when a

47:59 ↗ decision is made on what standards codes

48:02 ↗ and decision that's based on a request

48:05 ↗ that's included with the follow up

48:07 ↗ because I have no idea who decided what

48:11 ↗ decisions were made and on what

48:12 ↗ standards that spaced so the next time I

48:15 ↗ see something like this which I've

48:16 ↗ already done three times in the past two

48:19 ↗ years it happens over and over it's

48:21 ↗ getting tiring and very concerning that

48:25 ↗ our concern

48:26 ↗ are not addressed and a request for

48:28 ↗ information on when decisions are made

48:30 ↗ and on what facts are based are not

48:32 ↗ addressed thank you thank you Mary

48:36 ↗ anyone else

48:38 ↗ singing Steve

48:51 ↗ I could even in steeper 170 Northeast

48:54 ↗ dogwood Street about nine and a half

48:56 ↗ years so I guess three things I add my

49:00 ↗ congrats to Joe partner for his

49:01 ↗ contributions to the city and for all

49:03 ↗ those who have contributed so that's

49:05 ↗ worthy of a shout-out next two issues

49:07 ↗ the first word was the Providence height

49:11 ↗ preservation as mentioned there's a

49:13 ↗ meeting tomorrow from 78 and the

49:15 ↗ Issaquah Public Library meaning room

49:18 ↗ just kind of good background for you and

49:20 ↗ for anybody who might be listening there

49:22 ↗ was a public hearing that was held on

49:23 ↗ May 31st at 10:00 a.m. the public

49:25 ↗ hearing examiner counted there were some

49:28 ↗ discrepancies in the appeal process and

49:31 ↗ a new meeting has been scaled for July

49:33 ↗ 11th at 10:00 a.m.

49:36 ↗ and folks are encouraged to attend that

49:38 ↗ one of the things that was found to be

49:40 ↗ at odds were there wasn't an appeal of

49:43 ↗ the demolition process so I just think

49:47 ↗ that there's if this is going to happen

49:49 ↗ and the approval of the not to demolish

49:54 ↗ the site it's going to take a lot of

49:56 ↗ hard work and effort a commitment from

49:57 ↗ people and from cities of Issaquah and

50:01 ↗ Sammamish and perhaps King County and

50:03 ↗ perhaps state level some philanthropic

50:05 ↗ efforts so it's going to take a lot of

50:07 ↗ good efforts we just wanted to apprise

50:08 ↗ you of the status and anybody listening

50:11 ↗ if you have a homeowner's association or

50:14 ↗ some of the community meeting please

50:15 ↗ feel free to reach out to us and we'll

50:16 ↗ try to go there to inform you and invite

50:20 ↗ you and involve you in the process

50:21 ↗ because we think there's a cultural

50:22 ↗ heritage site here that's worthy of

50:24 ↗ preservation so just wanted to give that

50:26 ↗ appeal real quick the second issue was

50:29 ↗ is the vertical mixed-use issue now

50:33 ↗ council president goodman seems like

50:34 ↗ you've been the kind of the leading

50:36 ↗ advocate for this site from for a number

50:39 ↗ of years so thank for that one of the

50:41 ↗ questions I keep hearing is why is this

50:43 ↗ work for sites like webmin and Kirkland

50:45 ↗ and one thing they cursed me is that

50:47 ↗ when I think Redmond I think of

50:48 ↗ Microsoft headquarters in campus and

50:50 ↗ take more people with more disposable

50:51 ↗ income than us I don't know I'm not an

50:53 ↗ expert expert on the the area I do like

50:59 ↗ again council president Goodman you and

51:01 ↗ others have asked question why does it

51:03 ↗ work for Redmond and Kirkland but not

51:05 ↗ I don't know the answer but I'd like to

51:08 ↗ believe looking at I ask that you direct

51:10 ↗ the whole council okay I'm sorry I

51:12 ↗ wasn't trying to criticize anybody I

51:14 ↗ would just give them kudos for for

51:16 ↗ leading that effort so thank you I think

51:23 ↗ it's a worthy effort to consider not

51:25 ↗ just looking at the results being

51:27 ↗ vertical mixed use but how do we get a

51:29 ↗ community gathering speights and

51:30 ↗ community involvement so I think that

51:32 ↗ needs to be the focus going forward not

51:33 ↗ just measuring what we have vertical mix

51:35 ↗ use but how do we get this thing as a

51:39 ↗ community amenity so I look forward to

51:41 ↗ the approval of the request that's

51:44 ↗ pending later this evening for that for

51:46 ↗ the study of that site so thank you

51:48 ↗ thank you

51:49 ↗ anyone else desiring to speak this

51:51 ↗ evening anyone else third and final call

51:56 ↗ anyone else seeing no one then audience

51:59 ↗ comments are closed and will now move to

52:02 ↗ committee and regional reports beginning

52:05 ↗ with Mariah Thank You mr. mayor

52:08 ↗ on May 17th I attended the is across

52:12 ↗ Schools Foundation breakfast with many

52:15 ↗ of you as always it was a great event

52:19 ↗ describing all the important work done

52:21 ↗ by the is across Schools Foundation also

52:25 ↗ that same day May 17th I attended the

52:28 ↗ Eastside Human Services forum board

52:30 ↗ meeting in Bellevue there was a

52:32 ↗ presentation given regarding best starts

52:35 ↗ for kids and then just a lot of work on

52:39 ↗ by laws and policies the June event I

52:44 ↗ we've talked about it before but I just

52:46 ↗ wanted to give the information the June

52:49 ↗ event sponsored by the Eastside Human

52:51 ↗ Services forum is on June 14th at 4 p.m.

52:56 ↗ in the old redmond schoolhouse community

52:59 ↗ center and that is titled the growing

53:02 ↗ opiate and heroin crisis moving from

53:06 ↗ awareness to actions so that's an

53:08 ↗ important date to remember really hoping

53:11 ↗ to get a lot of participation at that

53:13 ↗ event and the next meeting is September

53:16 ↗ 20th Bellevue City Hall

53:18 ↗ 8:30 a.m. also upcoming is the economic

53:22 ↗ development councils board meeting on

53:24 ↗ Wednesday June 14th in Bellevue that

53:27 ↗ concludes my report

53:28 ↗ thank you I do bill Thank You mayor I'll

53:32 ↗ start with the Infrastructure Committee

53:34 ↗ we last met on May 18th and the items

53:39 ↗ were discussed when the big ones was the

53:41 ↗ Newport Way 902 54th and brought that up

53:45 ↗ and that is in the process of our public

53:49 ↗ engagement policy process and so I

53:52 ↗ definitely encourage folks there's two

53:54 ↗ workshops coming coming up on that now

53:56 ↗ these next two Wednesday's the 7th and

53:58 ↗ the 14 from 609 30 those are it going to

54:02 ↗ be working workshops so we're

54:04 ↗ encouraging this and it's a really big

54:05 ↗ demand go to not just show up for one

54:07 ↗ but both of them they'll be continuing

54:09 ↗ working so if they can make both of may

54:11 ↗ be great to really get their input and

54:13 ↗ follow-through it'll be a progression of

54:15 ↗ work not just two separate events so we

54:18 ↗ want to encourage the most part

54:19 ↗ participation and that is possible we

54:22 ↗ continue working on our Complete Streets

54:23 ↗ policy program and budgets we'll be

54:26 ↗ working on that a little more before we

54:27 ↗ bring it back to Council and the other

54:30 ↗ item wanting some information on was a

54:33 ↗ transportation advisory board the status

54:37 ↗ of that so far it's been with us for a

54:38 ↗ while and we've been working try and

54:41 ↗ develop things there's kind of a lot of

54:42 ↗ questions and how that works and where

54:45 ↗ we are now is that the original agenda

54:47 ↗ bill that came to us had basically the

54:51 ↗ goal was discussion and development and

54:53 ↗ where that that would go so at this

54:55 ↗ point we've gotten to a point where we

54:57 ↗ have a draft if you will so we working

55:00 ↗ with administration to they're preparing

55:03 ↗ a new agenda bill to just close out the

55:06 ↗ old one which was discussion and what

55:08 ↗ we're going to do and actually bring

55:09 ↗ forth a new agenda bill back to council

55:12 ↗ so the plan is that hopefully I leave on

55:16 ↗ the 19th it'll come back to council with

55:20 ↗ referral back to infrastructure and

55:23 ↗ finalize the details on that and back to

55:26 ↗ council here

55:28 ↗ maybe the in July over first of all part

55:31 ↗ of August approximately so it's coming

55:33 ↗ back it took a while to get the some of

55:35 ↗ the details down I think we've got them

55:37 ↗ corralled pretty well but it's still

55:38 ↗ we're going to put some polishing points

55:39 ↗ on it and bring it back to you all in

55:44 ↗ the last bit on that information is uh

55:47 ↗ remind everybody that East Lake

55:49 ↗ Sammamish has a closure coming up this

55:52 ↗ Friday through Tuesday the 9th to 13th

55:54 ↗ so please remember to plan because you

55:58 ↗ can get on the freeway if you're heading

55:59 ↗ from the south and you can get on i-90

56:02 ↗ but for you coming from the north you

56:03 ↗ cannot so plan your routes this Friday

56:06 ↗ through Tuesday please and then and the

56:13 ↗ next counselor structure meeting will be

56:14 ↗ on the 15th of June the agenda we have

56:17 ↗ not said the agenda yet on that that

56:19 ↗ will be coming up shortly on the 17th of

56:23 ↗ May I was at the regional transit

56:24 ↗ committee and we work in there when main

56:27 ↗ things work on there as fairs changing

56:29 ↗ the fare structure and we're getting

56:31 ↗ towards that we're not finalizing that

56:32 ↗ yet also had discussions on parking and

56:34 ↗ alternative services on the 9th here I

56:40 ↗ will be attending the cascade earthquake

56:44 ↗ resiliency workshop it'll be part of my

56:47 ↗ emergency management advisory council

56:49 ↗ work it'll be an all-day event in in I

56:53 ↗ believe in May Bauer and so I'll be

56:55 ↗ there doing that and so I will probably

56:57 ↗ miss let you TP that morning so I'll

57:00 ↗ talk to our mayor about covering that

57:02 ↗ one and then on the 14th of June will be

57:05 ↗ the actual emergency management advisory

57:07 ↗ council meeting at the emergency center

57:10 ↗ there in Renton and that I believe

57:13 ↗ concludes my report those states again

57:17 ↗ for the full closure for closures in 9

57:19 ↗ to the 13th which is Friday through

57:21 ↗ Tuesday no actually they changed well

57:25 ↗ June the 13th to the 19th full closure

57:29 ↗ Alvie all right like Sammamish Parkway

57:32 ↗ the comments that Phil made including

57:35 ↗ adjusting your route a week later but

57:39 ↗ does some extra time to plan for

57:42 ↗ - super thank you Thank You mr. mayor on

57:46 ↗ june 1st last thursday there's a meeting

57:49 ↗ of the Puget Sound Regional Council's

57:50 ↗ growth management policy board and the

57:52 ↗ main item money agenda was our ongoing

57:54 ↗ discussion and debate about the regional

57:57 ↗ centers framework update this particular

58:00 ↗ meeting just focused on what are known

58:02 ↗ as manufacturing and industrial centers

58:04 ↗ also known as mix so a mik like a

58:09 ↗ regional growth center like we have are

58:11 ↗ are two of the types of centers that are

58:14 ↗ whose framework is being updated so

58:16 ↗ there was just discussion there was a

58:18 ↗ working group that had made a

58:20 ↗ recommendation of actually three

58:22 ↗ proposals to update the mix didn't have

58:25 ↗ a clear favorite though if it's actually

58:28 ↗ quite elaborate but there's a there's

58:30 ↗ alternatives a b1 and b2 and it seemed

58:34 ↗ that our SDA caucus seemed to folk favor

58:38 ↗ alternative B - and the comments through

58:41 ↗ from most of the GMP B seem to favor

58:44 ↗ alternative B - I'm looking at mr. marks

58:47 ↗ because I know that for SC a it'll

58:50 ↗ probably go back to the pic for some

58:51 ↗ conversation as well on that

58:55 ↗ recommendation this was just discussion

59:00 ↗ there's many months away before any

59:01 ↗ policy decision including time for it to

59:03 ↗ go through the pic also on Thursday June

59:08 ↗ 1st we had a meeting of the lodging and

59:10 ↗ tax advisory committee our Commission in

59:14 ↗ 2004 2017 this council appropriated

59:17 ↗ among other things from LTAC $50,000 for

59:20 ↗ event recruitment marketing and this

59:24 ↗ coming month later in the month the

59:26 ↗ Association for volleyball professionals

59:28 ↗ or AVP will be having an event at Lake

59:32 ↗ Sammamish State Park on June 23rd 24th

59:36 ↗ and 25th and the LTAC approves spending

59:40 ↗ up to $13,000 for to co-sponsor a

59:43 ↗ welcoming hospitality gathering of

59:45 ↗ athletes and sponsors

59:48 ↗ the evening before the event on the 22nd

59:51 ↗ with the aim of convincing everyone that

59:53 ↗ they want to come back and do this event

59:55 ↗ next year

59:56 ↗ that was LTAC that concludes my report I

59:59 ↗ do

1:00:00 ↗ Ola Thank You mr. mayor council services

1:00:04 ↗ and Safety Committee will be meeting on

1:00:06 ↗ Tuesday June 13th at 6:30 p.m. here in

1:00:09 ↗ Council Chambers the agenda is still to

1:00:11 ↗ be determined

1:00:12 ↗ the next night Sam cities Association

1:00:14 ↗ public issues committee will meet at

1:00:16 ↗ Renton city hall we're going to have a

1:00:18 ↗ pre pick workshop on the veteran seniors

1:00:21 ↗ and human services levy King County King

1:00:28 ↗ County Council transmitted a plan

1:00:33 ↗ forward 12 cents per thousand assessed

1:00:35 ↗ value that represents about a hundred

1:00:39 ↗ and forty percent increase from the five

1:00:41 ↗ cents per thousand that was previously

1:00:43 ↗ as I've mentioned a little bit earlier

1:00:45 ↗ it's now veterans seniors and human

1:00:48 ↗ services levy so there's an idea that

1:00:51 ↗ there's an expansion with that levy

1:00:52 ↗ would be for but I will be getting more

1:00:54 ↗ details at the pic next week we'll also

1:00:57 ↗ be discussing regional centers and I'm

1:01:00 ↗ eager to hear about the b2 option and

1:01:03 ↗ see what that all entails so that should

1:01:05 ↗ be a good conversation and then there's

1:01:08 ↗ also a discussion of regional

1:01:09 ↗ transportation system initiative so

1:01:11 ↗ those are the major topics but there are

1:01:13 ↗ no there are no items explicitly called

1:01:17 ↗ out for potential action at the meeting

1:01:18 ↗ it's just discussion updates and

1:01:21 ↗ informational items then the regional

1:01:23 ↗ 9-1-1 strategic plan scoping leadership

1:01:25 ↗ group will meet on Thursday June 20th

1:01:28 ↗ we're going to receive a draft of the

1:01:29 ↗ Technology Group Report and GNPC

1:01:33 ↗ is still a ways out that concludes my

1:01:35 ↗ report thank you Eileen

1:01:37 ↗ now we report this evening Mary Lou

1:01:40 ↗ Thank You mr. mayor on June 1st

1:01:43 ↗ a student for council land and Shore

1:01:45 ↗ Committee Chair Goodman who is absent on

1:01:47 ↗ the land and Shore meeting and we have

1:01:49 ↗ three items at night a be seven two one

1:01:52 ↗ five combined with a B seven four one

1:01:54 ↗ seven was a discussion of the ninth

1:01:57 ↗ major amendment to

1:01:58 ↗ it's equivalence development greement

1:02:00 ↗ and the use of transfer of development

1:02:01 ↗ rights by polygons and also the first

1:02:04 ↗ amendment to the wash dot or Park Point

1:02:07 ↗ TDR development agreement there were two

1:02:10 ↗ proposals that were put on the table for

1:02:12 ↗ the committee to consider proposal B

1:02:16 ↗ because a was put aside quite a while

1:02:19 ↗ ago proposal B was the use of 100

1:02:22 ↗ transferred development rights that

1:02:24 ↗ would create additional affordable

1:02:28 ↗ housing units on top of the 138 housing

1:02:32 ↗ units and some construction of market

1:02:37 ↗ rate homes on a city-owned parcel called

1:02:39 ↗ track D proposal see that was also

1:02:42 ↗ presented that night was the use of 100

1:02:45 ↗ transferred development rights on this

1:02:47 ↗ prop on polygons property with ten

1:02:51 ↗ affordable units included in the hundred

1:02:53 ↗ TDRs at the 60% ami level and did not

1:02:56 ↗ include any construction on part on the

1:02:59 ↗ city land parcel D the committee voted 2

1:03:02 ↗ to 1 in favor to move forward to the

1:03:04 ↗ council with proposal B and that will be

1:03:07 ↗ on a future council agenda in June

1:03:10 ↗ second item was a b7 1 1 0 windward

1:03:15 ↗ Bergsma development agreement committee

1:03:17 ↗ voted through you know to ensure that

1:03:22 ↗ connection between talus and the

1:03:25 ↗ proposed Bergsma property if constructed

1:03:28 ↗ would only be emergency access would be

1:03:31 ↗ emergency access only and they also

1:03:33 ↗ voted three to three a note to deny the

1:03:36 ↗ development agreement which used a

1:03:38 ↗ clustered housing provision and so that

1:03:42 ↗ is going to come to future council

1:03:44 ↗ meeting as it did a request to deny that

1:03:47 ↗ development agreement last item was a

1:03:49 ↗ discussion vertical mixed-use staff

1:03:52 ↗ brought a presentation in with a

1:03:54 ↗ recommendation to review a scope of work

1:03:58 ↗ and a proposal to hire a consultant to

1:04:00 ↗ complete the work and that is actually

1:04:01 ↗ on our agenda this evening next meeting

1:04:04 ↗ for Landon Shore is unfortunately soon

1:04:07 ↗ it's June 7th there are far too many

1:04:10 ↗ landed Shore meetings this year

1:04:11 ↗ on Friday May 19th I attended the

1:04:14 ↗ greatest acclaim BIR of Commerce meeting

1:04:16 ↗ myself and the city administrator took

1:04:19 ↗ questions on road closures and progress

1:04:21 ↗ on the moratorium work plan items on

1:04:22 ↗ Saturday May 20th I attended the

1:04:25 ↗ Eastside fire and rescue fired round 101

1:04:27 ↗ this is an event at the Bellevue

1:04:29 ↗ training facility for elected officials

1:04:31 ↗ and it will be hopefully going forward

1:04:33 ↗ an annual event and different members

1:04:36 ↗ representing the city on Eastside fire

1:04:38 ↗ and rescues board are encouraged to

1:04:39 ↗ attend next year and Wednesday May 24th

1:04:42 ↗ they attended the cascade water Alliance

1:04:44 ↗ board meeting on Tuesday May 30 I

1:04:46 ↗ attended the city's Coast audit meeting

1:04:48 ↗ and later in the afternoon I attended

1:04:51 ↗ the Eastside Fire and Rescue Finance and

1:04:53 ↗ Administration Committee meeting and the

1:04:56 ↗ topics that were discussed that day were

1:04:59 ↗ fire chief performance evaluation and

1:05:01 ↗ compensation and also a discussion of

1:05:04 ↗ the capital facilities maintenance fund

1:05:05 ↗ and new business was a discussion of a

1:05:08 ↗ board policy looking at criteria for

1:05:10 ↗ adding additional partners to efer the

1:05:14 ↗ next eeper board meeting will be June

1:05:16 ↗ 8th at 4 p.m. headquarters on Newports

1:05:18 ↗ way just a heads up for the other

1:05:20 ↗ members that serve looking at the

1:05:23 ↗ calendar it looks like the August Ephrem

1:05:25 ↗ meeting will be canceled at this point

1:05:27 ↗ in time so you can take that data for

1:05:28 ↗ calendar that's all I have

1:05:30 ↗ Thank You mr. mayor thank you Thank You

1:05:33 ↗ mr. mayor the next land and Shore

1:05:36 ↗ meeting his June 7th at 6:30 here in

1:05:39 ↗ Council Chambers on the agenda for that

1:05:42 ↗ night moratorium update which is a

1:05:45 ↗ standing item we also have three items

1:05:49 ↗ that are scheduled for action

1:05:52 ↗ the first one is agenda bill 73 16

1:05:55 ↗ sustainable building action strategy

1:05:57 ↗ second one is agenda bill 73 26 old town

1:06:01 ↗ sub area plan and the third one is the

1:06:03 ↗ regional agenda we also will have a

1:06:04 ↗ discussion of the central Issaquah

1:06:06 ↗ dashboard I also wanted to thank Mary

1:06:09 ↗ Lou for chairing for me last week and

1:06:11 ↗ Tola for rounding out the committee of

1:06:14 ↗ three thank you thank you I will be

1:06:19 ↗ calling a Hall of Fame recipient Bob

1:06:23 ↗ justice

1:06:25 ↗ unfortunately I failed to recognize at

1:06:30 ↗ our Hall of Fame ceremony earlier and

1:06:36 ↗ give her my most humble apologies for

1:06:40 ↗ that oversight there will be an

1:06:43 ↗ executive session deceiving for the

1:06:44 ↗ purpose of discussing potential

1:06:46 ↗ litigation for RCW 42.3 0.11 0 / n 1 /

1:06:52 ↗ ni this item is expected to take

1:06:55 ↗ approximately 15 minutes action is

1:06:58 ↗ anticipated to follow in open session

1:07:02 ↗ and said to share the news that Ernie

1:07:05 ↗ Smith the former is across city council

1:07:08 ↗ member recently passed away early served

1:07:12 ↗ on the council in the 1980s and was an

1:07:14 ↗ act was active in our community is say

1:07:17 ↗ youth sports coach and a member the

1:07:20 ↗ Kiwanis Club of 5 izikoff on May 25th

1:07:26 ↗ ribbon was cut to celebrate our newest

1:07:30 ↗ amenity at confluence park it includes a

1:07:35 ↗ pedestrian bridge and playground with

1:07:38 ↗ designs chosen by our community if I had

1:07:42 ↗ not had an opportunity to visit

1:07:44 ↗ confluence park I certainly encourage

1:07:48 ↗ you to do so it is a real gem at Costco

1:07:53 ↗ Saturday morning someone stopped me to

1:07:57 ↗ tell me how great that project turned

1:08:02 ↗ out and so I would encourage you to do

1:08:05 ↗ so on May 25th I attended Sound Transit

1:08:09 ↗ board meeting where we approved several

1:08:11 ↗ projects related to link extensions and

1:08:15 ↗ amended the adopted 2017 annual

1:08:18 ↗ operating budget to accommodate

1:08:20 ↗ resources needing needed for Sound

1:08:23 ↗ Transit 3 and

1:08:30 ↗ I attended along with Bill Ramos the

1:08:35 ↗ PSoC General Assembly meeting which

1:08:38 ↗ includes all mayor's County execs and

1:08:40 ↗ commissioners and council members of key

1:08:43 ↗ SRC members jurisdictions in the four

1:08:50 ↗ County areas plus Snohomish King

1:08:54 ↗ piercing except at that meeting big

1:08:59 ↗ Snohomish exact dave subbers was elected

1:09:03 ↗ to chair the PSR C for the next two

1:09:08 ↗ years and executive dannemeyer from

1:09:11 ↗ Pierce County and that concludes my

1:09:17 ↗ report

1:09:19 ↗ moving now to the consent calendar I

1:09:24 ↗ would ask if the accounts payables and a

1:09:28 ↗ role for June the 5th 2017 have been

1:09:32 ↗ reviewed at a queue with that I would

1:09:38 ↗ ask the clerk to read the consent

1:09:40 ↗ calendar into the record the consent

1:09:44 ↗ calendar was distributed to council in

1:09:46 ↗ advance for study if authorized council

1:09:48 ↗ action will occur by single motion

1:09:50 ↗ regarding the following items item a

1:09:51 ↗ seeks approval of the accounts payables

1:09:53 ↗ and payroll of June fist items B C and D

1:09:57 ↗ seeks approval of the minutes of the

1:09:58 ↗ city council work session of May 8th the

1:10:01 ↗ special work session of May 10th and the

1:10:03 ↗ regular meeting of May 15th

1:10:05 ↗ with the correction to page 7 8 4 5

1:10:09 ↗ striking Eastside Fire and Rescue

1:10:11 ↗ resource committee and inserting cascade

1:10:13 ↗ water Alliance resource committee item E

1:10:16 ↗ a be 735 to 2017 second budget

1:10:20 ↗ amendments

1:10:20 ↗ seeks to set the public hearing for June

1:10:22 ↗ 19th and referral to council services

1:10:25 ↗ and Safety Committee item F a b7 41:9

1:10:28 ↗ interlocal agreement with Eastside Fire

1:10:30 ↗ and Rescue for tactical emergency

1:10:32 ↗ medical support seeks referral to

1:10:34 ↗ council services and Safety Committee

1:10:36 ↗ item G a B 749 surplus City equipment

1:10:39 ↗ seeks approval item H a b7 437 20

1:10:43 ↗ 17 maintenance overlay project seeks to

1:10:46 ↗ award bid item I a be seven four three

1:10:49 ↗ eight Puget Sound Energy green direct

1:10:52 ↗ power service agreement seeks referral

1:10:54 ↗ to council services and Safety Committee

1:10:56 ↗ this concludes the reading thank you

1:10:58 ↗ does any councilmember desire to remove

1:11:01 ↗ any item professor said calendar for

1:11:03 ↗ separate consideration under regular

1:11:06 ↗ business Stacy I move to adopt the

1:11:10 ↗ consent calendar as presented second

1:11:12 ↗ moved and seconded all those in favor

1:11:15 ↗ signify by saying aye aye those opposed

1:11:18 ↗ that carries unanimously

1:11:19 ↗ moving now to public carrying agenda

1:11:24 ↗ bill seven three one three capital

1:11:27 ↗ improvement plan including

1:11:28 ↗ transportation 2018 - 2020 - a brief

1:11:34 ↗ introduction from finance director Jim

1:11:39 ↗ Olsen before I opened us public hearing

1:11:51 ↗ Thank You mayor good evening

1:11:53 ↗ councilmembers tonight's agenda item is

1:11:56 ↗ the public hearing on the proposed 2018

1:11:59 ↗ through 2022 capital improvement plan

1:12:03 ↗ the council has been discussing under a

1:12:08 ↗ first work session about the proposed

1:12:11 ↗ capital improvement plan or some

1:12:13 ↗ referred to it as the capital budget the

1:12:16 ↗ plan objectives are to support community

1:12:19 ↗ vision for growth and service levels

1:12:20 ↗ ensure planning effort changes with

1:12:23 ↗ demand and provide for a financial

1:12:25 ↗ assessment of funding sources that are

1:12:28 ↗ available or not necessarily available

1:12:30 ↗ and to maintain a high level of service

1:12:34 ↗ infrastructure for the community the

1:12:38 ↗ proposed five-year plan is estimated at

1:12:42 ↗ one hundred eighty eight million two

1:12:44 ↗ hundred $15,366.00 this covers capital

1:12:49 ↗ investments in a number of different

1:12:52 ↗ categories from technology and systems

1:12:54 ↗ capital equipment municipal facilities

1:12:57 ↗ parks and recreation trails

1:12:58 ↗ transportation and the utilities the

1:13:02 ↗ capital the proposed capital improvement

1:13:04 ↗ plan for this five-year period is

1:13:06 ↗ available on the city's website for

1:13:09 ↗ review funding sources then that are

1:13:16 ↗ proposed to accommodate or for the

1:13:19 ↗ five-year plan come from a variety of

1:13:22 ↗ sources and those include reap

1:13:25 ↗ mitigation dollars grant sources

1:13:28 ↗ developer contributions cash on hand

1:13:31 ↗ from and through the utility operations

1:13:35 ↗ those are business enterprise funds

1:13:37 ↗ which have revenues coming from

1:13:39 ↗ ratepayers as well as those capital

1:13:41 ↗ connection charges donations internal

1:13:45 ↗ funds for fleet IT general cash on hand

1:13:50 ↗ or contributions coming from the general

1:13:52 ↗ fund for a particular capital project

1:13:54 ↗ and then funds coming from streets

1:13:57 ↗ operating or cash on hand the final

1:14:01 ↗ category of proposed sources include the

1:14:03 ↗ potential for issuing

1:14:05 ↗ debt in order to provide for those

1:14:07 ↗ capital investments that are included in

1:14:10 ↗ the plan and those needs are for the

1:14:19 ↗ 2018 through 2022 period the five-year

1:14:23 ↗ plan it's identified in the proposed

1:14:25 ↗ plan that approximately thirty five

1:14:27 ↗ million dollars would be needed for park

1:14:29 ↗ and recreation type capital investments

1:14:32 ↗ and forty six million dollars for

1:14:33 ↗ proposed transportation improvements

1:14:36 ↗ there are future years that are

1:14:38 ↗ identified in the capital improvement

1:14:41 ↗ plan that is to provide for a big

1:14:45 ↗ picture look at the investments that may

1:14:47 ↗ be needed for the community however the

1:14:50 ↗ plan is identified as a five-year plan

1:14:53 ↗ with a future five-year outlook the

1:14:55 ↗ total ten-year outlook has identified

1:14:57 ↗ almost two hundred and fifty million

1:15:00 ↗ dollars in bonds that would be needed

1:15:04 ↗ and that would be addressed as the

1:15:07 ↗ council's going to go through future

1:15:09 ↗ work sessions and other discussions

1:15:11 ↗ about the capital budget these were the

1:15:16 ↗ questions that had been identified at

1:15:18 ↗ the council workshop they would still be

1:15:20 ↗ the questions that the council will be

1:15:22 ↗ entertaining as you continue to go

1:15:24 ↗ through the deliberations with regards

1:15:27 ↗ to the capital budget

1:15:28 ↗ so certainly ensuring that capital

1:15:32 ↗ investment priorities are met the role

1:15:35 ↗ of debt in financing the capital

1:15:36 ↗ improvement plan and then of course the

1:15:38 ↗ organizational capacity in order to

1:15:41 ↗ complete projects in a timely manner so

1:15:43 ↗ with that again tonight's is the public

1:15:46 ↗ hearing to take testimony on the

1:15:48 ↗ proposed plan the the next meetings that

1:15:51 ↗ are set for discussion on the capital

1:15:54 ↗ budget is June 12 in a council work

1:15:57 ↗ session and then June excuse me July 17

1:16:00 ↗ that would be the continuation of this

1:16:03 ↗ public hearing and that is would be for

1:16:05 ↗ consideration an adoption of the

1:16:09 ↗ proposed capital improvement plan so

1:16:13 ↗ with that I would recommend then moving

1:16:18 ↗ forward with public testimony then thank

1:16:20 ↗ you very much I just a reminder that the

1:16:24 ↗ guidelines for public participation or

1:16:27 ↗ audience comments are the same as I

1:16:30 ↗ earlier outlined and with that I'll open

1:16:35 ↗ the public hearing at 8:17 as anyone

1:16:41 ↗ signed up to speak

1:16:42 ↗ now there anyone who has not signed up

1:16:46 ↗ to speak desire to speak this evening

1:16:50 ↗ very

1:17:00 ↗ my name is Mary Lynch and I recite at 2

1:17:02 ↗ 6 9 own Northwest Oak Crest Drive

1:17:04 ↗ Issaquah Washington I already had sent

1:17:07 ↗ some comments into you earlier when this

1:17:09 ↗ was I think presented the first time it

1:17:11 ↗ would want your subcommittee's but one

1:17:14 ↗ of my concerns is the priority of some

1:17:16 ↗ of the park projects that are in place

1:17:19 ↗ there with putting so much emphasis on

1:17:21 ↗ Central Park and the build-out of

1:17:23 ↗ Central Park and thus needing to have

1:17:26 ↗ all the street improvements and turning

1:17:29 ↗ Central Park into a regional park I

1:17:33 ↗ highly concerned about that because it's

1:17:37 ↗ number one spending a lot of park funds

1:17:39 ↗ up front versus an elsewhere in the city

1:17:42 ↗ especially with the central area plan

1:17:44 ↗ what's coming on board over in the

1:17:46 ↗ western region where we still don't have

1:17:47 ↗ a park would like to see the priorities

1:17:50 ↗ put and some of the other areas that

1:17:52 ↗ don't have parks I think they should

1:17:54 ↗ look at that before you put so much

1:17:55 ↗ money in the central area Park and then

1:17:58 ↗ that in turn demands infrastructure to

1:18:00 ↗ be built there where the infrastructure

1:18:02 ↗ has not been completed elsewhere because

1:18:05 ↗ if you look at that Providence point

1:18:07 ↗ light is still way out there what I also

1:18:09 ↗ notice this time round is Newport way is

1:18:13 ↗ still pushed out there and my concern is

1:18:17 ↗ with Newport way from s900 to south 54th

1:18:20 ↗ we really should have the funding to do

1:18:23 ↗ that when it's all being done by the

1:18:25 ↗ developers because it makes sense to do

1:18:28 ↗ it all at once it's much more economical

1:18:29 ↗ and from a living out there it just

1:18:33 ↗ needs to be done at the same time and

1:18:35 ↗ you ought to be looking at funding that

1:18:36 ↗ so it does happen at the same time the

1:18:39 ↗ other thing that seemed to have fallen

1:18:40 ↗ off the list and maybe it's tucked back

1:18:43 ↗ in some of the others but I couldn't

1:18:44 ↗ find it is the rest of Newport way from

1:18:47 ↗ South 54th to the gate with the Western

1:18:51 ↗ gateway and in reading the central area

1:18:54 ↗ plan and the last concurrency model

1:18:59 ↗ Newport way that and is the concurrency

1:19:03 ↗ is all based upon as having the center

1:19:05 ↗ turn lane and if that route is not

1:19:07 ↗ complete then you're out of concurrence

1:19:09 ↗ and so to drop it off completely off the

1:19:12 ↗ list your

1:19:13 ↗ already admitting that you're not going

1:19:15 ↗ to be concurrent and we know it hasn't

1:19:17 ↗ been funded for a number of years so

1:19:19 ↗ we've really been out of concurrency for

1:19:21 ↗ a long time but I'm kind of concerned

1:19:24 ↗ that that's just a completely dropped

1:19:26 ↗ off the list so I really think the

1:19:28 ↗ priorities of both the parks and the

1:19:32 ↗ transportation needs to be looked at

1:19:33 ↗ priorities the other thing I couldn't

1:19:36 ↗ find anyplace is the pea sauce and that

1:19:38 ↗ whole issue that seems to have all

1:19:40 ↗ sudden gone back underground we were

1:19:43 ↗ supposed to have I thought a review

1:19:44 ↗ study of what was going to happen and

1:19:46 ↗ we've got rental equipment and then I

1:19:48 ↗ thought we were going to have to

1:19:49 ↗ purchase long-term and I don't see

1:19:51 ↗ anything mentioned in the CIP that was

1:19:56 ↗ presented now maybe it's in there and I

1:19:58 ↗ missed it because there's a lot to read

1:19:59 ↗ but I'm kind of concerned that it's not

1:20:01 ↗ what's going to happen with the

1:20:04 ↗ filtration system has not been

1:20:06 ↗ identified and the big capital cost to

1:20:09 ↗ make that an ongoing effort has not been

1:20:10 ↗ identified the other thing is the mixing

1:20:13 ↗ and blending for the central area we've

1:20:15 ↗ been identified that that's going to

1:20:16 ↗ have to happen and I still think the

1:20:18 ↗ city should be looking at how to remove

1:20:21 ↗ Florin a or fluoride from the water

1:20:23 ↗ we're going to get from cascade because

1:20:25 ↗ I don't think we should be having

1:20:26 ↗ fluoride in our water thank you thank

1:20:28 ↗ you Mary

1:20:30 ↗ Steve were you leaning forward

1:20:41 ↗ same thing as I said before still apply

1:20:43 ↗ still which is the same place so as I

1:20:47 ↗ went through the CIP portion of this

1:20:50 ↗ several thoughts occurred to me one was

1:20:54 ↗ there's in the listing is a play

1:20:58 ↗ guidance it talks about a numerical

1:21:00 ↗ score and a level of determination of

1:21:04 ↗ how soon want to be that I'd like to see

1:21:06 ↗ in the documentation what the metric is

1:21:09 ↗ that you uses to determine whether what

1:21:12 ↗ that score is and what it gets done so

1:21:13 ↗ that it's better for transparency for

1:21:15 ↗ having be more visible for what we want

1:21:18 ↗ to improve when I was at the policy

1:21:22 ↗ Planning Commission meeting one of the

1:21:23 ↗ things I heard was we make these scores

1:21:26 ↗ but a lot of times things come up and

1:21:27 ↗ get approved that aren't in the higher

1:21:29 ↗ rated items and get done because things

1:21:32 ↗ get moved round as funds get moved round

1:21:34 ↗ and I think from a transparency in a

1:21:36 ↗ public conversation there needs to be

1:21:38 ↗ better communication of what that is and

1:21:40 ↗ how the process is so citizens don't get

1:21:43 ↗ blindsided having a low priority item

1:21:45 ↗ done well bigger items don't happen so I

1:21:49 ↗ think that process needs to be looked at

1:21:50 ↗ better and more thoroughly one of the

1:21:54 ↗ things I would like to see is their

1:21:55 ↗ number of items - talked about

1:21:57 ↗ connecting communities on both sides by

1:22:00 ↗ 90 those seem to be some lower score

1:22:03 ↗ items I'd like to see those

1:22:05 ↗ consideration given to be moved up so we

1:22:07 ↗ work better as one community not just as

1:22:10 ↗ individual pieces so I bring that for

1:22:14 ↗ your consideration going forward two

1:22:17 ↗ other things that I guess I didn't like

1:22:18 ↗ on that I would like to see removed

1:22:20 ↗ because they don't really talked about

1:22:23 ↗ moving transportation as much as others

1:22:25 ↗ one is the widening of Northeast dogwood

1:22:28 ↗ Street and the other is the proposed

1:22:30 ↗ parking structure for current foreign

1:22:32 ↗ cars which I think don't bully move

1:22:34 ↗ people those two items I think funds to

1:22:37 ↗ be better used in other areas thank you

1:22:41 ↗ thank you Steve

1:22:43 ↗ anyone else desiring to speak

1:22:47 ↗ I can call anyone else third and final

1:22:51 ↗ call seeing no one then audience

1:22:53 ↗ comments are closed at 8:23 and Casey

1:23:01 ↗ I'd moved to continue the public hearing

1:23:03 ↗ to the July 17 2017 council meeting ii

1:23:08 ↗ moved in seconded discussion or

1:23:11 ↗ questions the public comment that we

1:23:18 ↗ heard tonight if somehow summarized and

1:23:20 ↗ attached in the next version of the bill

1:23:23 ↗ just wondering go okay

1:23:26 ↗ typically we publish minutes of the

1:23:29 ↗ meeting and we have riddles the

1:23:34 ↗ additional questions or comments seeing

1:23:37 ↗ none all those in favor of continuing

1:23:41 ↗ the public hearing to the July 17th

1:23:43 ↗ council meeting signify by saying aye I

1:23:45 ↗ was opposed that carries unanimously

1:23:49 ↗ moving now to regular business item

1:23:52 ↗ agenda bill seven three nine zero

1:23:56 ↗ financial management policy then welcome

1:24:00 ↗ back thank you very red lured council

1:24:03 ↗ members tonight is the kickoff for

1:24:05 ↗ discussions on updating the financial

1:24:08 ↗ management policy a proposed draft is

1:24:12 ↗ been provided with the agenda bill as

1:24:14 ↗ well as the current financial policy for

1:24:17 ↗ your review I'm just going to do a brief

1:24:19 ↗ presentation as this is a kickoff and

1:24:21 ↗ the the action today is to refer this to

1:24:27 ↗ council work session so financial

1:24:30 ↗ management policy is serves as our

1:24:31 ↗ operational guide for administration to

1:24:34 ↗ carry out City Council strategic intent

1:24:37 ↗ the policy is intended to define courses

1:24:40 ↗ of action as well as established

1:24:42 ↗ perimeters so those are targets those

1:24:44 ↗ are benchmarks those are in the proposed

1:24:47 ↗ policy and in the format that we used

1:24:50 ↗ for the capital budget section was the

1:24:52 ↗ red font are the areas for specific

1:24:56 ↗ specifically for council to address well

1:24:58 ↗ certainly the entire language of the

1:25:00 ↗ policy is for discussion but those are

1:25:03 ↗ the key areas that we want to focus on

1:25:05 ↗ on setting those parameters the current

1:25:08 ↗ financial policy is certainly adequate

1:25:10 ↗ the best practices are telling us that

1:25:15 ↗ perhaps we need to provide some updates

1:25:18 ↗ and to establish comprehensive policy

1:25:21 ↗ you'll find from the current to the

1:25:24 ↗ proposed there are its realigned there's

1:25:27 ↗ additional sections it's intended to

1:25:30 ↗ specifically address subsections of

1:25:34 ↗ sections according to the government

1:25:37 ↗ finance Officers Association best

1:25:39 ↗ practices on financial policy and that

1:25:41 ↗ is a very new guidebook for local

1:25:45 ↗ governments with regards to the art of

1:25:48 ↗ fiscal policy so just a brief overview

1:25:53 ↗ about the proposed policy there are

1:25:56 ↗ goals in financial management policy to

1:26:00 ↗ to attempt to achieve and those are to

1:26:04 ↗ set forth financial principles to reduce

1:26:07 ↗ our risks to maintain capacity for

1:26:10 ↗ levels of service to ensure that we are

1:26:13 ↗ legally compliant through the use of

1:26:16 ↗ internal controls and to provide

1:26:18 ↗ financial transparency to the public so

1:26:21 ↗ overall policy goals for financial

1:26:24 ↗ management policy very important one of

1:26:28 ↗ the the things I wanted to do was to

1:26:30 ↗ provide just a brief overview of some of

1:26:32 ↗ the changes from the current policy to

1:26:34 ↗ the the proposed policy again we'll be

1:26:39 ↗ meeting in work session to start the

1:26:41 ↗ discussions on those proposed changes

1:26:43 ↗ but certainly with regards to policy we

1:26:46 ↗ always want to ensure that we have the

1:26:47 ↗ right level of flexibility flexibility

1:26:50 ↗ versus control there is an expanded

1:26:53 ↗ reserve guideline section and this is

1:26:55 ↗ something that I will loop back to after

1:26:58 ↗ my presentation here about a risk

1:27:00 ↗ assessment there are separate and

1:27:03 ↗ outdated policies that are intended to

1:27:07 ↗ be combined into one

1:27:09 ↗ comprehensive financial management

1:27:10 ↗ policy and that will be identified in

1:27:13 ↗ the work session discussions the

1:27:15 ↗ expenditure section is new as a

1:27:17 ↗ simplified purchasing authority and

1:27:20 ↗ commitment levels that our proposed

1:27:22 ↗ budget scope and basis is proposed to

1:27:25 ↗ change for a financial policy new

1:27:29 ↗ section on cost allocation plan this is

1:27:32 ↗ a very important piece that is required

1:27:35 ↗ and auditors certainly like to tackle

1:27:39 ↗ that as topics when they are doing their

1:27:42 ↗ audit and testing work the proposed

1:27:45 ↗ policy refines the debt section

1:27:47 ↗ investment policy long-term financial

1:27:50 ↗ planning and internal controls these are

1:27:56 ↗ the the next discussions that are

1:27:58 ↗ scheduled

1:27:59 ↗ so certainly tonight we've got an

1:28:01 ↗ introduction and referral to the council

1:28:03 ↗ committee work session on June 12th July

1:28:06 ↗ 10th August 7th isn't council meeting

1:28:10 ↗ and that is a public hearing the August

1:28:13 ↗ 14th council committee work session and

1:28:15 ↗ then it is intended that the public

1:28:19 ↗ hearing be continued from the August 7th

1:28:22 ↗ to the September 5th and that would be

1:28:24 ↗ where the council would be considering

1:28:26 ↗ full adoption of the revised policy so I

1:28:33 ↗ wanted to circle back to also in the

1:28:35 ↗ agenda bill was information about risk

1:28:38 ↗ assessment that is in the reserve

1:28:41 ↗ section our current policy states that

1:28:44 ↗ it is based on best practices best

1:28:48 ↗ practices we have a bit of an update and

1:28:51 ↗ what that means is that reserve policy

1:28:54 ↗ should be essentially defined based on

1:28:59 ↗ the unique needs of the community and so

1:29:01 ↗ the GFO a has prepared this pretty neat

1:29:05 ↗ tool called the risk assessment and a

1:29:07 ↗ sample of that is was provided for the

1:29:09 ↗ council with the agenda bill so it

1:29:12 ↗ essentially provides for a way to do

1:29:16 ↗ some brainstorming do some some thought

1:29:20 ↗ into the

1:29:22 ↗ various areas of risk and so what I'd

1:29:25 ↗ like to do is I'd like to assign the

1:29:28 ↗ council some homework and for you to

1:29:31 ↗ read through the assessment I can I'll

1:29:34 ↗ be sending it electronically to the

1:29:35 ↗ council because at the end of that

1:29:37 ↗ assessment is a way for us to put some

1:29:40 ↗ numbers to is to be able to quantify

1:29:42 ↗ where is your individual council member

1:29:45 ↗ of level of risk at we'll combine those

1:29:49 ↗ and one of the ways and one of the

1:29:52 ↗ reasons that I use that assessment is

1:29:54 ↗ that what we can do is we can come up

1:29:56 ↗ with a quick look into what is the

1:30:00 ↗ combined level of risk we get to a

1:30:03 ↗ number and we can plug that into where's

1:30:06 ↗ where's a proposed level of reserve for

1:30:11 ↗ the general fund and so that essentially

1:30:14 ↗ is a quick way to do that there's

1:30:16 ↗ certainly more conversation with regards

1:30:18 ↗ to setting reserve policy and to setting

1:30:21 ↗ reserve targets but this is one way to

1:30:23 ↗ start the discussion on what are the the

1:30:26 ↗ risk associated uniquely with the city

1:30:28 ↗ of Issaquah and then we can continue to

1:30:32 ↗ discuss how that final policy reserve

1:30:35 ↗ section looks so if there's no questions

1:30:38 ↗ of the council I am pleased to be able

1:30:41 ↗ to kick off our financial management

1:30:43 ↗ policy update and I'd be happy to answer

1:30:45 ↗ any questions that you have at this time

1:30:48 ↗ Lucy did you have one question I'm glad

1:30:51 ↗ you brought up the risk assessment I

1:30:55 ↗ guess this wasn't sort of a

1:30:57 ↗ questionnaire and I was reading through

1:31:00 ↗ the questions earlier today and I think

1:31:06 ↗ as I read these I felt like maybe I was

1:31:11 ↗ didn't know that I was the right person

1:31:13 ↗ to be answering many of these questions

1:31:17 ↗ so for example what are sources of

1:31:19 ↗ potential expenditure spikes it seems to

1:31:22 ↗ me that that's a something that the

1:31:23 ↗ administration would answer what is the

1:31:26 ↗ potential cost of the spikes

1:31:27 ↗ I wouldn't know that those are just a

1:31:29 ↗ couple of examples but I think

1:31:31 ↗ I would suggest that perhaps I don't

1:31:40 ↗ know where I don't know who else is

1:31:42 ↗ going to be filling out this assessment

1:31:44 ↗ but I I can't help but think the council

1:31:47 ↗ shouldn't be the only ones providing

1:31:49 ↗ information you're correct the council

1:31:51 ↗ is Council members are not the only ones

1:31:53 ↗ providing that information it is also

1:31:57 ↗ and will be distributed to members of

1:31:59 ↗ the administration to provide their

1:32:03 ↗ thoughts into the assessment and so the

1:32:07 ↗ method for seeing administration is

1:32:09 ↗ certainly that the council would see

1:32:12 ↗ that and to help you if you do have

1:32:15 ↗ questions about some of those because it

1:32:16 ↗ is a one of those things exactly as you

1:32:19 ↗ said is that you you may not know those

1:32:21 ↗ things but when we have that discussion

1:32:23 ↗ about what are some of the examples of

1:32:26 ↗ where you would see expenditure spikes

1:32:29 ↗ things like unknown repair and

1:32:31 ↗ maintenance so those would be sources of

1:32:34 ↗ expenditure spikes but certainly if a

1:32:37 ↗ council has questions about what is what

1:32:40 ↗ is this particular category or type of

1:32:43 ↗ risk mean I certainly welcome a phone

1:32:46 ↗ call email certainly be happy to meet

1:32:49 ↗ with Council so that that you have a

1:32:51 ↗ real clear understanding of any of those

1:32:53 ↗ questions that are in the risk

1:32:54 ↗ assessment thank you other questions or

1:32:59 ↗ comments

1:33:01 ↗ seeing none been spacing I move to refer

1:33:05 ↗ agenda bill 7 3 9 0 to the following

1:33:08 ↗ meetings for review and recommendation

1:33:09 ↗ June 12th work session

1:33:11 ↗ July 10th work session August 7th

1:33:14 ↗ regular council meeting with a public

1:33:16 ↗ hearing open August 14 work session

1:33:20 ↗ additional work sessions if needed and

1:33:22 ↗ returning to the City Council regular

1:33:25 ↗ meeting on September 5th fifth with a

1:33:28 ↗ continued public hearing and

1:33:29 ↗ consideration for adoption ii questions

1:33:35 ↗ or discussion

1:33:38 ↗ seeing none then all those in favor of

1:33:41 ↗ approving a motion signify by saying aye

1:33:45 ↗ aye aye those opposed varies unanimously

1:33:50 ↗ moving now to agenda bill seven four

1:33:53 ↗ three three annexation of King County

1:33:57 ↗ Island and establishment of

1:33:59 ↗ pre-annexation zoning the zoning element

1:34:04 ↗ is quasi-judicial and as is second

1:34:09 ↗ agenda bill and I'd ask the city

1:34:12 ↗ attorney to just provide a brief

1:34:15 ↗ refresher on what quasi-judicial

1:34:18 ↗ means Thank You mr. mayor I'm happy to

1:34:21 ↗ do that council the city is indicated in

1:34:24 ↗ the staff reports is treating the

1:34:25 ↗ pre-annexation zoning associated with

1:34:28 ↗ the annexation resolutions before you

1:34:31 ↗ tonight as quasi-judicial in that

1:34:33 ↗ context the council will essentially be

1:34:35 ↗ acting in an adjudicative role

1:34:38 ↗ essentially as a judge of the proposed

1:34:40 ↗ zoning measure rather than in your usual

1:34:42 ↗ legislative policy linking role and as a

1:34:45 ↗ quasi-judicial measure there are certain

1:34:48 ↗ rules excuse me under state law that

1:34:51 ↗ should be followed to ensure the

1:34:52 ↗ appearance of fairness specifically the

1:34:54 ↗ council should to the extent possible

1:34:56 ↗ avoid any ex parte communications or

1:34:59 ↗ one-sided context with proponents or

1:35:01 ↗ opponents of the zoning and to the

1:35:04 ↗ extent that those those communications

1:35:06 ↗ do occur at the time of your

1:35:08 ↗ pre-annexation zoning hearing later this

1:35:10 ↗ summer you'll be asked to place the

1:35:11 ↗ substance of those communications on the

1:35:13 ↗ record for purposes of rebuttal I would

1:35:16 ↗ also advise the council against making

1:35:17 ↗ any public statements that could be

1:35:21 ↗ construed as indicating some type of

1:35:22 ↗ bias or prejudice with respect to either

1:35:25 ↗ the measures themselves or the the

1:35:28 ↗ proponents or opponents of the zoning I

1:35:31 ↗ thank you very very much are there any

1:35:33 ↗ questions of Zack seeing none then push

1:35:39 ↗ Hayden

1:35:41 ↗ from development services our long-range

1:35:44 ↗ planning manager for the staff report I

1:35:49 ↗ don't have a presentation tonight but

1:35:51 ↗ I'm here to answer questions it's a very

1:35:54 ↗ straightforward annexation that actually

1:35:57 ↗ you've seen before but in 2000 you

1:36:00 ↗ approved us moving forward but then King

1:36:02 ↗ County backed out so we're trying it

1:36:05 ↗ again as you're aware or in the process

1:36:09 ↗ of getting that site to help us with our

1:36:12 ↗ trance our transit oriented development

1:36:15 ↗ project that we're working on and so so

1:36:19 ↗ this annexation resolution is in front

1:36:21 ↗ of you tonight it's so just to add to

1:36:25 ↗ that the proposed resolution that you

1:36:28 ↗ will be considering would allow the city

1:36:31 ↗ to proceed with the annexation process

1:36:35 ↗ specifically the resolution declares the

1:36:39 ↗ city's intent to annex the King County

1:36:42 ↗ Island includes the boundaries of the

1:36:45 ↗ annexation area States the annexation

1:36:48 ↗ area will assume its prorated share the

1:36:52 ↗ cities and deadliness existing as of the

1:36:56 ↗ effective date so it's two public

1:36:58 ↗ hearing dates for consideration of

1:37:00 ↗ pre-annexation zoning sets a public

1:37:04 ↗ hearing date for the annexation hearing

1:37:07 ↗ and authorizes the administration to

1:37:10 ↗ proceed with the annexation process by

1:37:14 ↗ submitting the notice of intent to annex

1:37:16 ↗ to the Washington state boundary Review

1:37:19 ↗ Board of King County and with that are

1:37:23 ↗ there any questions or comments Mary Lou

1:37:26 ↗ mr. mayor Church I think you were here

1:37:28 ↗ earlier when we had some public comments

1:37:31 ↗ on the annexation are you able to answer

1:37:33 ↗ those questions for us tonight the

1:37:35 ↗ question on why the zoning is the way it

1:37:38 ↗ is that or the he had several questions

1:37:40 ↗ I didn't write them down then that was

1:37:43 ↗ the one that I heard was wired the the

1:37:46 ↗ middle is open space but the top is

1:37:48 ↗ facilities and that's what I had learned

1:37:51 ↗ through the

1:37:52 ↗ the transit-oriented development project

1:37:54 ↗ that was the map I was given so I I'm

1:37:58 ↗ not sure I just knew that its facilities

1:38:05 ↗ vision so if I read the gender Bell

1:38:10 ↗ correctly this is the resolution would

1:38:12 ↗ approve an intent it would allow the

1:38:14 ↗ mayor to move forward and submit the

1:38:15 ↗ required notice of intent to annex to

1:38:18 ↗ the Washington state boundary review

1:38:20 ↗ board but this also would go to land and

1:38:22 ↗ Shore correct and I could find out that

1:38:24 ↗ the answer to that question by Landon

1:38:27 ↗ Shore July 6 which I would actually find

1:38:31 ↗ it out before the first public hearing

1:38:32 ↗ on the the zoning lie which is still

1:38:35 ↗ alive and the resolution is about an

1:38:40 ↗ intent and it's to also to consider

1:38:43 ↗ establishing pre-annexation zoning of

1:38:45 ↗ community facilities facilities so

1:38:48 ↗ approval of this agenda bill starts the

1:38:50 ↗ process correct which will be public

1:38:53 ↗ correct I just want to make make that

1:38:57 ↗ clear that this doesn't set any zoning

1:38:59 ↗ approving a zoning it starts the process

1:39:02 ↗ quran and john wayne make that clear it

1:39:07 ↗ also would come back to the full council

1:39:09 ↗ for public hearings july since july 17th

1:39:11 ↗ of september september correct um one of

1:39:15 ↗ the comments if Sapru one of the

1:39:16 ↗ comments I would make is that I don't

1:39:18 ↗ see anything in the agenda packet that

1:39:23 ↗ has the definitions of the community

1:39:27 ↗ facilities facilities or the c-fos or

1:39:31 ↗ that I might be right and that would be

1:39:33 ↗ coming for the public hearing that's

1:39:35 ↗ actually on the pre-annexation zoning

1:39:37 ↗ you would have all that information this

1:39:39 ↗ was just to get started just to do the

1:39:41 ↗ start no so I think that in the area was

1:39:44 ↗ a little late since it's going to land

1:39:46 ↗ in short that information needs to come

1:39:48 ↗ to land in Shore okay thank you thank

1:39:54 ↗ you other questions no just I noticed on

1:40:00 ↗ the map that one piece does not indicate

1:40:02 ↗ what the zoning would be that's the

1:40:04 ↗ washed out right

1:40:06 ↗ and right-of-way is not zoned so it'll

1:40:09 ↗ be updated that map will show that its

1:40:11 ↗ right-of-way in the future but that's

1:40:14 ↗ the right-of-way parcel that's described

1:40:16 ↗ in that agenda bill good catch other

1:40:24 ↗ questions or discussion seeing none then

1:40:29 ↗ Stacy I move to approve resolution

1:40:32 ↗ number 20 1706 20 1706 declaring the

1:40:40 ↗ council's intent to consider annexing an

1:40:42 ↗ area commonly known as the bellevue oh

1:40:52 ↗ [Laughter]

1:40:55 ↗ sorry

1:40:57 ↗ too many of these approve resolution

1:41:01 ↗ number 20 1706 declaring the council's

1:41:04 ↗ intent to consider annexing an area

1:41:06 ↗ commonly known as the Keene County

1:41:08 ↗ Island and requiring the same to assume

1:41:10 ↗ its share of indebtedness declaring the

1:41:12 ↗ council's intent to consider

1:41:13 ↗ establishing pre-annexation zoning of

1:41:15 ↗ intensive mercial community facilities

1:41:18 ↗ open space and community facilities

1:41:20 ↗ facilities for the land within such

1:41:22 ↗ island setting two public hearings for

1:41:24 ↗ public input on the pre-annexation

1:41:26 ↗ floating zoning and one public hearing

1:41:28 ↗ on the question of annexation and

1:41:30 ↗ authorizing the mayor to submit a notice

1:41:32 ↗ of intent to the Washington state

1:41:33 ↗ boundary Review Board for King County

1:41:35 ↗ and to refer a b7 433 to the July 6 2017

1:41:39 ↗ council land and Shore committee for

1:41:41 ↗ review and recommendation returning to

1:41:43 ↗ the full council for related public

1:41:45 ↗ hearings on July 17 and September 5th

1:41:47 ↗ 2017 second moved and seconded Paul an

1:41:53 ↗ additional request Trish so as the

1:41:55 ↗ packet evolves please include if you get

1:41:59 ↗ a map that shows the topographic relief

1:42:02 ↗ so with the contour lines so we can see

1:42:04 ↗ slope and in perhaps even a satellite

1:42:09 ↗ type view as well so we can actually see

1:42:11 ↗ what kind of vegetation what's on the

1:42:13 ↗ ground there now it would complement the

1:42:17 ↗ map that's in the current

1:42:18 ↗ bakit okay Thank You Stacy and similar

1:42:24 ↗ information on the surrounding adjacent

1:42:27 ↗ properties zoning and current uses

1:42:29 ↗ please other questions or discussion

1:42:40 ↗ seeing none then all those in favor of

1:42:44 ↗ the motion as read signify by saying aye

1:42:47 ↗ those opposed that carries unanimously

1:42:52 ↗ moving now to the next item under

1:42:57 ↗ regular business agenda bill seven four

1:43:04 ↗ four two annexation of bellevue utility

1:43:08 ↗ island and establishment of

1:43:10 ↗ pre-annexation zoning again the zoning

1:43:14 ↗ element is quasi-judicial

1:43:17 ↗ and with that Trish are you going to

1:43:22 ↗ speak to this one chorus all right this

1:43:24 ↗ is a fairly straightforward one as you

1:43:26 ↗ recall we assumed to the Bellevue Water

1:43:30 ↗ and Sewer District if you will in

1:43:35 ↗ January and this is the site of the Lake

1:43:39 ↗ Sammamish reservoir that is a little

1:43:41 ↗ blip and that's not in the city limits

1:43:43 ↗ yet and so now that we've assumed

1:43:45 ↗ Bellevue's the water and sewer in our

1:43:47 ↗ city now it's time to bring that parcel

1:43:50 ↗ under our jurisdiction so it's a very

1:43:52 ↗ small little parcel with a very big

1:43:54 ↗ reservoir on it and it's the same

1:43:58 ↗ question as the King County Island but a

1:44:00 ↗ lot there's a lot less to it since it's

1:44:02 ↗ just a little 2 acre parcel but I'm here

1:44:07 ↗ for if you have any questions nor Lou so

1:44:11 ↗ Trish we've already assumed the utility

1:44:13 ↗ itself so we're already responsible for

1:44:15 ↗ the water tower so is this something

1:44:18 ↗ that we forgot to do or just it's such a

1:44:21 ↗ different process that happens later

1:44:23 ↗ than the assumption of the system itself

1:44:25 ↗ when Bryan Overman and Public Works was

1:44:27 ↗ trying to trace when the other pieces

1:44:29 ↗ around it came it looked like we

1:44:32 ↗ didn't annex it when we were annexing

1:44:34 ↗ different parts and then it was in Bell

1:44:37 ↗ V Bell V owns that owned it and so now

1:44:39 ↗ it's the time that we thought we just

1:44:41 ↗ clean it up and make it part of the city

1:44:43 ↗ I don't remember seeing this parcel

1:44:45 ↗ before right it's very very tiny on a

1:44:48 ↗ map it's just like a little a little

1:44:51 ↗ dock up there that's not in the city

1:44:53 ↗ limits other questions or discussion

1:45:02 ↗ facing I'm going to make a motion but

1:45:05 ↗ it's the same same deal proposal and

1:45:09 ↗ that the motion would refer it to among

1:45:13 ↗ other things refer to the July six land

1:45:15 ↗ and sure meeting I moved to approve

1:45:18 ↗ resolution number twenty 1707 declaring

1:45:23 ↗ the council's intent to consider

1:45:24 ↗ annexing an area commonly known as the

1:45:26 ↗ bellevue utility parcel island and

1:45:28 ↗ requiring the same to assume its share

1:45:30 ↗ of indebtedness declaring the council's

1:45:32 ↗ intent to consider establishing

1:45:34 ↗ pre-annexation zoning of community

1:45:36 ↗ facilities facilities for the land

1:45:38 ↗ within such island setting two public

1:45:40 ↗ hearings for public input on the

1:45:41 ↗ pre-annexation zoning and one public

1:45:43 ↗ hearing on the question of annexation

1:45:44 ↗ and authorizing the mayor to submit a

1:45:46 ↗ notice of intent to the washington state

1:45:47 ↗ boundary Review Board for King County

1:45:49 ↗ and to to refer a b7 4-4-2 to the July

1:45:53 ↗ July 6 2017 council land and shore

1:45:56 ↗ committee for review and recommendation

1:45:57 ↗ returning to the full council for

1:45:59 ↗ related public hearings on July 17 and

1:46:01 ↗ September 5th 2017

1:46:03 ↗ second moved and seconded questions all

1:46:07 ↗ I'm in case you were wondering no I

1:46:10 ↗ don't request a topographic map with

1:46:12 ↗ relief lines in case you were wondering

1:46:15 ↗ okay I was even trying to get an aerial

1:46:19 ↗ view to see the reservoir and it's

1:46:21 ↗ really hard to actually find a picture

1:46:24 ↗ that shows that because there's so many

1:46:25 ↗ trees so you I would again request us

1:46:31 ↗ definitions of that mm-hmm

1:46:33 ↗ and not just community facilities

1:46:35 ↗ facilities that's surrounding but the

1:46:38 ↗ definitions of the other community

1:46:42 ↗ possibilities even though maybe

1:46:44 ↗ even be appropriate and okay of all the

1:46:46 ↗ information other questions or

1:46:51 ↗ discussion seeing none then all those in

1:46:57 ↗ favor of approving the motion as read

1:47:00 ↗ signify by saying aye aye those opposed

1:47:03 ↗ that carries unanimously

1:47:06 ↗ thank you for Thank You Trish moving now

1:47:10 ↗ to agenda bill 7 for 35 vertical

1:47:14 ↗ mixed-use consultant Jen Hays

1:47:18 ↗ development services for and

1:47:23 ↗ introduction of this one and excuse me

1:47:26 ↗ it's Jen Davis Hays

1:47:30 ↗ that's okay I'm good evening council

1:47:33 ↗ members my name is Jen David Hayes with

1:47:36 ↗ economic development and I am here to

1:47:40 ↗ talk to you about the scope you have the

1:47:42 ↗ scope for a vertical mixed-use

1:47:45 ↗ consultant and you're in your packets

1:47:48 ↗ we've been working on the vertical

1:47:50 ↗ mixed-use project as part of the

1:47:52 ↗ moratorium actually a little before the

1:47:54 ↗ moratorium was enacted to look at why we

1:47:57 ↗ weren't getting vertical mix used within

1:47:59 ↗ the central Issaquah area and as a

1:48:01 ↗ reminder these are the product project

1:48:03 ↗ motivations to move forward we have been

1:48:06 ↗ to council suffered several times over

1:48:08 ↗ the past year to talk about the research

1:48:11 ↗ findings that we hired Eko Northwest to

1:48:14 ↗ look at the actual market data so we

1:48:17 ↗ wanted to make sure we were getting

1:48:19 ↗ information about the actual

1:48:20 ↗ construction cost the rental rates etc

1:48:23 ↗ to better understand why this because a

1:48:26 ↗ building type isn't being built here in

1:48:28 ↗ Issaquah and basically the results

1:48:30 ↗ showed that the according to the

1:48:32 ↗ financial model now it's a model so it's

1:48:34 ↗ not applicable to every single parcel

1:48:36 ↗ but that for the model basically the

1:48:38 ↗ extra cost that it requires to build

1:48:41 ↗ that type of building did not did not

1:48:45 ↗ was not covered by the rental and the

1:48:48 ↗ operating income for to lease out the

1:48:51 ↗ residential and the commercial space on

1:48:53 ↗ the bottom floor so we went and explored

1:48:55 ↗ different options ever

1:48:57 ↗ we're from looking at alternatives to

1:48:59 ↗ encourage through some incentives are

1:49:01 ↗ also regulate or required in some areas

1:49:05 ↗ and at the last discussion I guess at

1:49:07 ↗ the May fourth discussion rather of the

1:49:09 ↗ Landon Shore committee it was requested

1:49:12 ↗ to look at getting additional expertise

1:49:15 ↗ around the vertical mixed-use discussion

1:49:18 ↗ because it it as the more discussion we

1:49:20 ↗ had it was determined that it wasn't so

1:49:22 ↗ much about the building type itself the

1:49:25 ↗ residential with the commercial space on

1:49:27 ↗ the bottom but make ensuring that we

1:49:29 ↗ have all the pieces in place to ensure

1:49:32 ↗ its vibrancy so when a building is built

1:49:34 ↗ that it has it may be that it needs

1:49:37 ↗ certain amount of slide so I walk with

1:49:39 ↗ to be successful and needs to maybe have

1:49:41 ↗ some streetscape elements and need to be

1:49:43 ↗ successful knees did look at public

1:49:45 ↗ amenities to be successful so we went

1:49:49 ↗ and and got a consultant scope scope and

1:49:54 ↗ worked with a Crandall Aram Beulah who

1:49:58 ↗ is working on our architectural fit work

1:50:04 ↗ and they have they have done a really

1:50:06 ↗ good job at determining the needs of the

1:50:10 ↗ central squat plan area and what what

1:50:12 ↗ concerns and issues were addressing and

1:50:15 ↗ so we worked with them to develop a

1:50:17 ↗ scope and so here's the the general

1:50:19 ↗ purpose is again to look at the vibrancy

1:50:22 ↗ and I did not change this from last time

1:50:24 ↗ but he says mixed-use but should say

1:50:25 ↗ vertical mixed-use or looking at the

1:50:27 ↗ vertical mixed-use community within

1:50:29 ↗ Central Issaquah and at the end of the

1:50:32 ↗ work they would come back with

1:50:34 ↗ recommendations that we would then

1:50:35 ↗ implement into code or policy or such

1:50:39 ↗ and just to let you know that we were

1:50:42 ↗ under the schedule to be completed and

1:50:44 ↗ back to you as full council on September

1:50:47 ↗ 5th to adopt any changes in the vertical

1:50:50 ↗ mixed-use and we go forward with this

1:50:52 ↗ scope of work the timeline would change

1:50:55 ↗ and our final presentation for adoption

1:51:00 ↗ of code or policy changes would be on

1:51:02 ↗ October 16th

1:51:05 ↗ are there any questions or comments yes

1:51:08 ↗ Marilu so it might be a little bit of a

1:51:12 ↗ confusing question but as we're sort of

1:51:14 ↗ learning with all these components in

1:51:15 ↗ the moratorium that there's significant

1:51:17 ↗ overlap and when we first started the

1:51:19 ↗ vertical mixed-use thing with the

1:51:22 ↗ consultants they had presented a graphic

1:51:25 ↗ to us that showed a dollar per square

1:51:27 ↗ foot for apartment renting and if you

1:51:31 ↗ hit the certain number it meant that you

1:51:33 ↗ had the density to support it and we

1:51:36 ↗ thought originally that with some of our

1:51:38 ↗ new projects in town like Atlas we're

1:51:40 ↗ going to be at that number and what we

1:51:42 ↗ found out was that Atlas built fewer

1:51:44 ↗ large apartments and we actually shifted

1:51:48 ↗ down the graphed a bit and fell out of

1:51:49 ↗ that range of where vertical mixed-use

1:51:52 ↗ might make sense is there a possibility

1:51:54 ↗ when you're looking at a strategy on how

1:51:56 ↗ to do it that you somehow bring housing

1:51:58 ↗ density into it that there's a crossover

1:52:00 ↗ between if all we ever build is large

1:52:03 ↗ apartments it's just never going to

1:52:05 ↗ pencil out and so that vertical

1:52:07 ↗ mixed-use success actually is linked

1:52:10 ↗ somehow to housing and density and I

1:52:12 ↗ just I'm asking that because we saw the

1:52:13 ↗ graph move and I was really disappointed

1:52:15 ↗ when that happened because that meant

1:52:17 ↗ that we were years and years away

1:52:19 ↗ instead of a few years away yeah I know

1:52:21 ↗ I'm not sure we say we saw the graph

1:52:22 ↗ mood after Atlas was built you're saying

1:52:25 ↗ no or in we saw an earlier version of

1:52:27 ↗ the graph and I talked about I can't

1:52:29 ↗ remember the numbers two dollars and

1:52:30 ↗ thirty-five cents a square foot versus

1:52:32 ↗ two dollars and 15 cents a square foot

1:52:34 ↗ okay and at one point we had assumed

1:52:36 ↗ that some of the new projects coming in

1:52:37 ↗ like Atlas would hit that mark and move

1:52:41 ↗ that little center's part over so that

1:52:44 ↗ vertical mixed-use then could be a

1:52:46 ↗ possibility but when they came back and

1:52:48 ↗ they looked at actual construction they

1:52:50 ↗ found out we never actually slid that

1:52:51 ↗ far over and I remember hearing an

1:52:53 ↗ answer to a question why didn't we make

1:52:55 ↗ it over there and the answer was because

1:52:57 ↗ we built fewer larger apartments in

1:52:59 ↗ Atlas instead of smaller apartments if

1:53:01 ↗ there had been more smaller apartments

1:53:03 ↗ that line would have moved yeah I don't

1:53:06 ↗ remember that that question or answer so

1:53:08 ↗ I can look at that lit more I guess I'm

1:53:10 ↗ just wondering about the crossover with

1:53:12 ↗ housing in general is there a nexus with

1:53:14 ↗ that that somehow while they're looking

1:53:16 ↗ at this they also have to consider

1:53:18 ↗ Populi

1:53:19 ↗ density so population density yes

1:53:21 ↗ because when that's looking at who's

1:53:24 ↗ around it so basically has the

1:53:25 ↗ murderesses right so the look of

1:53:28 ↗ confusion my face a little bit is these

1:53:30 ↗ numbers are by square footage so it

1:53:32 ↗ wouldn't matter if it was one you know

1:53:34 ↗ two apartments at eight hundred square

1:53:37 ↗ feet or one apartment at 1600 square

1:53:39 ↗ feet because of leaders say you know it

1:53:40 ↗ would be this is the current market rate

1:53:42 ↗ and then also the cost for construction

1:53:44 ↗ per square foot so but I do understand

1:53:47 ↗ like obviously if we have a larger

1:53:50 ↗ apartments that were studio may not rent

1:53:53 ↗ out for exactly or one bedroom a not ran

1:53:55 ↗ out exactly for a half of what a

1:53:57 ↗ two-bedroom does and so that does play

1:53:59 ↗ with the somebody provided that answer

1:54:02 ↗ whatever okay the reason why were

1:54:03 ↗ actually and it could be gone because

1:54:05 ↗ I'm not for us I can't remember who did

1:54:06 ↗ it okay that's why we slid this way yeah

1:54:09 ↗ a large writing I know the ratio we

1:54:11 ↗ looked at multiple things that talked

1:54:12 ↗ about financial feasibility but I don't

1:54:15 ↗ remember the sliding for that but I know

1:54:16 ↗ and I'll just leave the question on the

1:54:18 ↗ table it's just that when the housing

1:54:19 ↗ strategy come back comes back if there's

1:54:21 ↗ a linkage with the stock that we're

1:54:24 ↗ building then that's some time we also

1:54:26 ↗ should take into consideration in code

1:54:28 ↗ other ways we can do whatever we want

1:54:29 ↗ with the vertical mixed use code if we

1:54:31 ↗ don't have the density it's still not

1:54:32 ↗ going to come so the density I guess

1:54:35 ↗ what we did talk about density as part

1:54:37 ↗ of the initial study and that looked at

1:54:39 ↗ the population density of the area so

1:54:42 ↗ but I don't know that we looked at the

1:54:43 ↗ housing unit size but that's something

1:54:46 ↗ like I made a note of other questions or

1:54:52 ↗ discussion

1:54:57 ↗ species I move to authorize the mayor to

1:55:02 ↗ enter into and execute a contract with

1:55:04 ↗ Crandall

1:55:05 ↗ Aram Beulah for consulting services and

1:55:07 ↗ direct the finance director to include

1:55:09 ↗ $60,000 in a subsequent 2017 budget

1:55:12 ↗ amendment

1:55:12 ↗ utilizing funds from the general fund I

1:55:14 ↗ can't moved and seconded any additional

1:55:18 ↗ questions Paul Jen could you make a

1:55:21 ↗ comment maybe you did earlier about this

1:55:24 ↗ date and how also how it's related

1:55:26 ↗ relative to our timeline for the

1:55:29 ↗ moratorium because the next the current

1:55:32 ↗ six-month period will expire on what

1:55:35 ↗ date I believe it's September 5th or

1:55:38 ↗ sick and so so that is I think a further

1:55:42 ↗ discussion that we plan on having that

1:55:44 ↗ that needs to be had regarding for when

1:55:48 ↗ I understand so all the topics are

1:55:50 ↗ actually on different timelines right so

1:55:52 ↗ parking is coming forward in July for

1:55:54 ↗ approval architectural fit audist

1:55:57 ↗ affordable housing will be after the

1:55:59 ↗ September 5th deadline as well as well

1:56:01 ↗ as district visions and so I think the

1:56:03 ↗ conversation isn't it will be had if we

1:56:05 ↗ are far enough along in the work plan

1:56:10 ↗ that you feel that it's caught you're

1:56:11 ↗ confident enough to remove the

1:56:12 ↗ moratorium you'd like to amend it for

1:56:14 ↗ another month or two or a different

1:56:17 ↗ option so that's I think part of the

1:56:19 ↗ discussion it will happen regarding the

1:56:21 ↗ moratorium itself so you have obviously

1:56:23 ↗ you have the ability to lift it at any

1:56:25 ↗ time but you want to make sure the

1:56:28 ↗ things are addressed of course yeah

1:56:30 ↗ thank you I just want to make sure

1:56:31 ↗ everybody on the council was aware of

1:56:33 ↗ the timeline presented here and how it

1:56:35 ↗ what it was relative to the current

1:56:37 ↗ timeline for the moratorium so we

1:56:39 ↗ actually essentially you know states can

1:56:42 ↗ change but we're we're giving a green

1:56:45 ↗ light and approving some funding for a

1:56:46 ↗ timeline that does bring this in after

1:56:49 ↗ the current six-month period expires yes

1:56:53 ↗ that's true thank you Casey

1:56:57 ↗ so for some reason I had in my memory

1:56:59 ↗ that there would be something back to

1:57:02 ↗ the council in early September because

1:57:04 ↗ the expiration of the moratorium was

1:57:07 ↗ early October didn't know that it

1:57:12 ↗ expired in early September in any event

1:57:14 ↗ I think one of the items that needs to

1:57:19 ↗ eat

1:57:21 ↗ September 6th is when it expires ok

1:57:25 ↗ so it needs to be on the work plan for

1:57:32 ↗ the council to consider at some point

1:57:35 ↗ whether they want to extend the

1:57:37 ↗ moratorium to cover make sure that it's

1:57:40 ↗ not lifted before some or all of the

1:57:43 ↗ items are complete all right Lou and

1:57:50 ↗ this is the one item were there and the

1:57:53 ↗ original timeline I thought there were

1:57:54 ↗ some items that we're going to be

1:57:56 ↗ completed till November December the

1:57:59 ↗ district visions and Christmas and was I

1:58:02 ↗ believe it was November but I might have

1:58:05 ↗ able to push it up a bit

1:58:07 ↗ the affordable housing strategy

1:58:10 ↗ affordable housing piece as I went to so

1:58:12 ↗ September 21st and that's by memory not

1:58:14 ↗ by having in front of me so that was

1:58:16 ↗ again after the November

1:58:19 ↗ September 21st after the September 6th

1:58:22 ↗ date that's you know the moratorium

1:58:25 ↗ expires so the vision piece I'm not sure

1:58:28 ↗ exactly where that last thing stands

1:58:30 ↗ maybe I could but it's Ola and then a

1:58:36 ↗ general comment sure so I seem to recall

1:58:39 ↗ this came up I was sitting in my manager

1:58:42 ↗ last week and this came up and there was

1:58:44 ↗ something about December there was

1:58:45 ↗ something that was Glee done in early

1:58:47 ↗ December because Keith mentioned

1:58:49 ↗ December because I remember thinking oh

1:58:50 ↗ good because you know some years we

1:58:52 ↗ don't have a lot going on in December

1:58:54 ↗ and this will make sure that our

1:58:55 ↗ December's are we have something too

1:58:58 ↗ much about Christmas or the holidays

1:58:59 ↗ will be a star

1:59:00 ↗ at work I'm looking at Titian though she

1:59:03 ↗ knows scheduler at all but I again that

1:59:07 ↗ that's that we're actually updating the

1:59:10 ↗ calendar pretty much weekly and so that

1:59:13 ↗ piece I'm not behind ever Centurion

1:59:14 ↗ looks like we have an answer and so that

1:59:17 ↗ was my comment will provide the council

1:59:21 ↗ an updated calendar on the different

1:59:24 ↗ work products and completion dates as

1:59:28 ↗ envisioned at this time other questions

1:59:31 ↗ or discussion Mary Lou just to comment

1:59:33 ↗ about the calendar update I think that'd

1:59:35 ↗ be really helpful can we keep the

1:59:36 ↗ original dates in no too so that we can

1:59:38 ↗ see how things have changed

1:59:39 ↗ Hurley great thank you thank you well I

1:59:44 ↗ wholeheartedly and very excitedly

1:59:46 ↗ support this tonight Thank You Jen for

1:59:49 ↗ being such a trooper over the last few

1:59:50 ↗ months as we struggled with what to do

1:59:53 ↗ and I for one made it pretty clear that

1:59:56 ↗ I struggled with knowing what to do it's

1:59:58 ↗ not my area of expertise expertise I

2:00:01 ↗ think that this was needed for a long

2:00:04 ↗ time and just very very glad that we're

2:00:09 ↗ going to be digging into this with some

2:00:11 ↗ outside help so that we can get this

2:00:15 ↗ done right well thank you yeah

2:00:18 ↗ Mary Lou last question for Jen Jen so

2:00:22 ↗ when the work products come out and we

2:00:24 ↗ see a report or a study or final paper

2:00:27 ↗ before the moratorium is lifted

2:00:30 ↗ is there code in place yeah we would we

2:00:33 ↗ when we come to the final piece here now

2:00:36 ↗ you know adoption of it would be yes

2:00:38 ↗ because we're going to be going through

2:00:39 ↗ planning policy Commission and and

2:00:43 ↗ landish or to make sure that's all

2:00:45 ↗ vetted so yes so that you know so as you

2:00:49 ↗ look at when we come back to the council

2:00:51 ↗ work session on August 14th we're going

2:00:54 ↗ to be you know really busy for that

2:00:56 ↗ month getting revised from what we heard

2:00:58 ↗ from you as well as then going back to

2:01:00 ↗ Leland Shore and kind of saying okay

2:01:02 ↗ this is what we we are now looking at

2:01:04 ↗ and getting that code actually written

2:01:05 ↗ and make sure it didn't that's because

2:01:08 ↗ Keith mentioned something about the

2:01:09 ↗ September date and Landon sure that said

2:01:11 ↗ that if we were far enough long along

2:01:14 ↗ there might be a request to lift the

2:01:15 ↗ moratorium and allow the rest of the

2:01:18 ↗ schedule to carry out and so is that not

2:01:20 ↗ the intent

2:01:21 ↗ well September is after the moratorium

2:01:23 ↗ end or efficient so I'm not great if you

2:01:26 ↗ made it sound like that if the work

2:01:27 ↗ products are far enough along yeah on

2:01:29 ↗ September 6 but we might decide to do

2:01:31 ↗ the staff might propose we lift the

2:01:34 ↗ moratorium and enact the code in the

2:01:37 ↗ months after yes that's that as an

2:01:39 ↗ option you again if you feel that we're

2:01:41 ↗ on the right path because they already

2:01:42 ↗ been through for any of these topics for

2:01:44 ↗ the affordable housing strategy so I

2:01:46 ↗ brought it up because if you look at the

2:01:48 ↗ schedule

2:01:48 ↗ it looks like codes in place before the

2:01:50 ↗ more trains lifted but what Keith made

2:01:52 ↗ it sound like is that that's one of two

2:01:55 ↗ options Council could release the

2:01:57 ↗ moratorium without any code in place you

2:01:59 ↗ could decide to that yes yes you could

2:02:01 ↗ decide tonight you know at any time but

2:02:03 ↗ I guess that the I think I believe that

2:02:05 ↗ keith was saying that if you feel like

2:02:07 ↗ you've seen enough work that you know

2:02:09 ↗ it's on the right path and feel

2:02:10 ↗ comfortable that we're going to address

2:02:12 ↗ the issues that could you know you could

2:02:14 ↗ decide to do that okay thanks anything

2:02:17 ↗ else on the motion before us seeing none

2:02:20 ↗ all those in favor of approving the

2:02:24 ↗ motion as read signify by saying aye

2:02:27 ↗ aye as opposed it carries unanimously

2:02:31 ↗ we will now move to good of the order

2:02:36 ↗ does anyone have anything for good of

2:02:39 ↗ the order this evening Oh miss we're do

2:02:44 ↗ we want to make an announcement about

2:02:46 ↗ the council retreat this afternoon once

2:02:48 ↗ again if the council retreat happening

2:02:52 ↗ this weekend's a telephone retreat this

2:02:54 ↗ weekend

2:02:54 ↗ it's a team-building exercise Friday

2:02:58 ↗ evening the public notices have gone out

2:03:01 ↗ and the actual retreat itself Saturday

2:03:05 ↗ morning up at Swedish hospital it's near

2:03:10 ↗ mm-hmm anything else we're go to the

2:03:13 ↗ order seeing none then we will move into

2:03:16 ↗ executive session this executive session

2:03:21 ↗ is being held this evening for the

2:03:23 ↗ purpose of discussing potential

2:03:25 ↗ litigation

2:03:27 ↗ CW 42.3 0.11 0 / n1 / ni the item is

2:03:33 ↗ expected to take approximately 15

2:03:35 ↗ minutes

2:03:37 ↗ action is anticipated to following the

2:03:41 ↗ following open session it's that we will

2:03:45 ↗ move into executive session

2:03:57 ↗ you

2:25:11 ↗ we are back in a regular session coming

2:25:16 ↗ out of our executive session Spacey I

2:25:22 ↗ move that the City Council authorized

2:25:25 ↗ the mayor to execute the proposed

2:25:26 ↗ interlocal agreement with the Sammamish

2:25:28 ↗ plateau Water and Sewer District

2:25:30 ↗ regarding the southeast 62nd Street

2:25:32 ↗ extension improvement project in

2:25:34 ↗ substantially the form presented to

2:25:36 ↗ council together with such minor

2:25:37 ↗ revisions as the mayor may deem

2:25:39 ↗ necessary and appropriate second it's

2:25:41 ↗ moved and seconded questions or

2:25:44 ↗ discussion seeing none then all those in

2:25:49 ↗ favor of the motion signify by saying

2:25:51 ↗ aye aye those opposed at motion carries

2:25:57 ↗ unanimously that concludes our business

2:26:00 ↗ this evening is there anything else to

2:26:02 ↗ come before the council tonight being

2:26:06 ↗ done we are adjourned

2:26:19 ↗ you

Approved minutes

Extracted from the next meeting's packet, where this meeting's minutes were approved as a consent-calendar attachment.

Open PDF

Attendance

Council / Members (7)

Eileen Barber

Mariah Bettise

Stacy Goodman

Tola Marts

Mary Lou Pauly

Bill Ramos

Paul Winterstein

Motions and votes (6)

Continue the public hearing to the July 17, 2017 Council meeting. .

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

Carried 7-0

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Refer AB 7390 to the following meetings for review and recommendation, • June 12, 2017 Council Committee Work Session • July 10, 2017 Council Committee Work Session • Aug. 7, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting, Public Hearing • Aug. 14, 2017 Council Committee Work Session • Additional (special) work …

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

Carried 7-0

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

1) Approve Resolution No. 2017-06, declaring the Council’s intent to consider annexing an area commonly known as the King County Island and requiring the same to assume its share of indebtedness; declaring the Council’s intent to consider establishing pre-annexation zoning of Intensive Commercial (I…

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

Carried 7-0

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

1) Approve Resolution No. 2017-07, declaring the Council’s intent to consider annexing an area commonly known as the Bellevue Utility Parcel Island and requiring the same to assume its share of indebtedness; declaring the Council’s intent to consider establishing pre- annexation zoning of Community …

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

Carried 7-0

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Authorize the Mayor to enter into and execute a contract with Crandall Arambula for consulting services and direct the Finance Director to include $60,000 in a subsequent 2017 budget amendment utilizing funds from the General Fund. . 06-05-17 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 7855

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

Carried 7-0

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Authorize the Mayor to execute the proposed Interlocal Agreement with the Sammamish Plateau Water and Sewer District regarding the S.E. 62nd Street Extension Improvement Project, in substantially the form presented to Council together with such minor revisions as the Mayor may deem necessary and app…

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

Carried 7-0

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Tola Marts, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein