City Council Regular Meeting · Monday, October 2, 2017 · City Council Digest

7. CONSENT CALENDAR

Minutes: Council Committee Work Session, Sept. 11, 2017

Carried 6-0

Approve · packet pp.175–176

▶ Watch from 1:29:37 Open packet at p.175 ↗

Staff report:

CONSENT CALENDAR b) 09-11-17 Council Committee Work Session Minutes Page 7899

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Minutes: City Council Special Meeting, Sept. 18, 2017

Carried 6-0

Approve · packet pp.177

▶ Watch from 1:30:08 Open packet at p.177 ↗

Staff report:

The purpose of the special meeting was to allow the City Council to recess into Executive Session to discuss potential litigation.

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Minutes: City Council Regular Meeting, Sept. 18, 2017

Carried 6-0

Approve · packet pp.179–183

▶ Watch from 1:30:40 Open packet at p.179 ↗

Staff report:

CONSENT CALENDAR d) 09-18-17 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 7902

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Vertical Mixed-Use (Re: Development Moratorium) AB 7317

Carried 6-0

Accept Grant · packet pp.185–204

Previously discussed: City Council Regular Meeting · Sep 28, 2017

▶ Watch from 1:31:11 Open packet at p.185 ↗

Staff report:

The Planning Policy Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments on Sept. 28, 2017. The Commission recommended the proposed amendments with one change: to maintain the maximum building height at 125' (using bonus density) instead of the recommended 135'. The Administration supports this change. The Commission's findings are attached to the proposed ordinance.

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Appointment of Municipal Judge AB 7426

Carried 6-0

Confirm · packet pp.235–240

Topics: Boards & Commissions

▶ Watch from 1:31:42 Open packet at p.235 ↗

Staff report:

Administration / Executive Department:

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Amending School Impact Fees AB 7462

Carried 6-0

Refer to Council Services & Safety · packet pp.241–267

Topics: Public SafetyBudgetSchools

Previously discussed: City Council Regular Meeting · Aug 1, 2016

▶ Watch from 1:32:13 Open packet at p.241 ↗

Staff report:

Administration / Development Services Department:

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

WSDOT Right-of-Way Easement Request for Maintenance Purposes (Portion NE Gilman Blvd.) AB 7463

Carried 6-0

Authorize · packet pp.269–278

Topics: Transportation

▶ Watch from 1:32:45 Open packet at p.269 ↗

Staff report:

Council Infrastructure Committee / Bill Ramos, Chair:

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Interlocal Agreement with Sammamish Plateau Water and Sewer District for Adjusted Sewer Service Area AB 7468

Carried 6-0

Authorize · packet pp.279–290

Topics: Water

▶ Watch from 1:33:16 Open packet at p.279 ↗

Staff report:

Council Infrastructure Committee / Bill Ramos, Chair:

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Franchise Agreement with Clear Wireless, LLC AB 7469

Carried 6-0

Adopt Ordinance · packet pp.291–317

Topics: Land Use

▶ Watch from 1:33:47 Open packet at p.291 ↗

Staff report:

Council Infrastructure Committee / Bill Ramos, Chair:

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

2017 Third Budget Amendment AB 7482

Carried 6-0

Refer to Council Land & Shore Committee · packet pp.319–328

Topics: Budget

Previously discussed: City Council Regular Meeting · Dec 19, 2016 City Council Regular Meeting · Jun 19, 2017

▶ Watch from 1:34:18 Open packet at p.319 ↗

Staff report:

NEW CITY COUNCIL AB 7482 - AGENDA BILL Consent City Council Regular Meeting - 02 Oct 2017 Calendar

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

8. REGULAR BUSINESS

Annexation of King County Island and Establishment of Pre-Annexation Zoning AB 7433

Carried 6-0

Adopt Ordinance · packet pp.363–552

Topics: Land Use

Previously discussed: City Council Regular Meeting · Jul 17, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting · Sep 5, 2017

▶ Watch from 1:42:15 Open packet at p.363 ↗

Staff report:

UPDATED CITY COUNCIL AB 7433 - AGENDA BILL Regular City Council Regular Meeting - 02 Oct 2017 Business

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

2018 Community Fund Grant Recommendations AB 7431

Carried 6-0

Approve · packet pp.553–660

Topics: Budget

▶ Watch from 2:24:48 Open packet at p.553 ↗

Staff report:

Council Services & Safety Committee / Tola Marts, Chair:

Roll call:

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by WINTERSTEIN

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

3659 segments .txt ↗

1:55 ↗ call to order the October 2nd 2017 City

2:00 ↗ Council regular meeting and ask those in

2:02 ↗ the audience who'd like to join the

2:04 ↗ council and myself and the pledge of

2:06 ↗ allegiance to please stand

2:30 ↗ moving now to special business first

2:36 ↗ item agenda bill seven three nine one

2:40 ↗ proposed 2018 budget and I'll be making

2:45 ↗ a presentation on that as soon as I find

2:51 ↗ it

3:15 ↗ I had originally thought that everyone

3:17 ↗ was here this evening to hear my

3:21 ↗ presentation on the 2018 budget and so I

3:24 ↗ think this is the largest audience I

3:27 ↗ have ever had it's across citizens

3:33 ↗ community members employees and city

3:36 ↗ council tonight I'm pleased to present

3:39 ↗ my proposed 2018 budget each year I'm

3:43 ↗ fortunate to stand before you and

3:45 ↗ present my financial plan for the coming

3:49 ↗ year this is my opportunity to highlight

3:53 ↗ how we'll provide quality services that

3:56 ↗ support safe and vibrant communities

4:01 ↗ before I share some highlights of this

4:04 ↗ year's proposed budget I'd like to

4:07 ↗ extend my thanks to our hard-working

4:09 ↗ staff who face the challenging task of

4:13 ↗ meeting current needs and preparing for

4:16 ↗ future ones

4:18 ↗ our team is motivated to keep the most

4:21 ↗ diverse business in Issaquah our city

4:24 ↗ government running smoothly they are

4:28 ↗ invaluable in assisting me with this

4:31 ↗ proposed budget while we don't have a

4:34 ↗ crystal ball for 2018 the proposal

4:37 ↗ before you tonight is physically sound

4:40 ↗ responsible and balanced this year I

4:45 ↗ gave our team a list of parameters to

4:46 ↗ the guide to guide this development of

4:49 ↗ our budget in addition to responding to

4:52 ↗ new regulations contractual requirements

4:56 ↗ and the city's fiscal policies my budget

5:00 ↗ is aligned with these parameters first

5:05 ↗ this is financial sustainability

5:09 ↗ including not relying on general fund

5:12 ↗ balance maintaining community safety

5:17 ↗ focusing on quality over quantity

5:21 ↗ implementing post moratorium action

5:24 ↗ plans

5:26 ↗ enhancing our investment in staff

5:28 ↗ development continuing our investment in

5:32 ↗ technology including the munis system

5:34 ↗ and lean principles for process

5:37 ↗ improvements evaluating new funding

5:41 ↗ sources or expanding existing revenue

5:45 ↗ maintaining existing assets and levels

5:48 ↗ of service and limiting new staff

5:52 ↗ positions or modified modifications to

5:55 ↗ current staffing positions to those that

5:58 ↗ address these budget parameters you'll

6:03 ↗ hear me feature several of those

6:06 ↗ parameters tonight as I share my budget

6:09 ↗ highlights as well as how the newly

6:11 ↗ adopted five-year capital improvement

6:14 ↗ plan is integrated into our financial

6:17 ↗ roadmap for next year one of my main cut

6:21 ↗ budget goals is to ensure the

6:23 ↗ maintenance of our assets and current

6:25 ↗ levels of service that is no easy task

6:29 ↗ in a community with a growing population

6:32 ↗ expanding business sector and

6:35 ↗ ever-changing complicated demands nor

6:40 ↗ does it mean that we simply continue

6:44 ↗ with the status quo status quo does not

6:48 ↗ keep us on pace and does not reflect our

6:51 ↗ commitment to continuous improvement as

6:55 ↗ we've added nearly 4,000 new residents

6:58 ↗ and as employers in this robust economy

7:02 ↗ have added new jobs and as this Accor

7:05 ↗ continues to beckon those who seek

7:07 ↗ outdoor and indoor adventures our

7:11 ↗ service demands increase with 92% of

7:16 ↗ Issaquah resident residents recently

7:19 ↗ stating that the city is an excellent or

7:21 ↗ good place to live we have a high bar to

7:26 ↗ uphold we embrace that challenge some of

7:31 ↗ those increased demands can be met

7:33 ↗ through implementing new technologies

7:36 ↗ that enhance

7:38 ↗ our efficiencies and customer service

7:41 ↗ this budget includes several exciting

7:44 ↗ outward-facing programs and applications

7:48 ↗ that will significantly improve our

7:50 ↗ customers options for self-service and

7:54 ↗ online access to information including

7:58 ↗ recreation registration online utility

8:01 ↗ billing and a tool for budget

8:04 ↗ development and reporting my proposed

8:08 ↗ budget also includes the addition of a

8:11 ↗ position called a senior ERP or

8:15 ↗ enterprise resource planning Solutions

8:18 ↗ Architect that will boost the

8:20 ↗ connectivity and performance of our

8:23 ↗ software solutions and enable more lean

8:27 ↗ practice practices citywide another

8:32 ↗ example is from our Police Department

8:34 ↗ where I propose adding a third dispatch

8:37 ↗ console to help our emergency

8:40 ↗ communications staff handle an increased

8:45 ↗ call volume on a more technical note my

8:49 ↗ budget reflects new information

8:51 ↗ technology cost allocation changes in

8:53 ↗ department budgets and a consolidation

8:56 ↗ of tech related funding ni TS internal

8:59 ↗ service fund budget this is one of the

9:03 ↗ first steps we are taking to achieve

9:05 ↗ better internal cost allocation to meet

9:11 ↗ our growing demands we're adding or

9:13 ↗ expanding several services in 2018 we

9:17 ↗ propose expanding the operating hours of

9:20 ↗ the Issaquah community center and julius

9:22 ↗ bone pool to Sundays and we've included

9:26 ↗ funds to provide lunch service five days

9:29 ↗ a week as well as more transportation

9:33 ↗ services at the Issaquah senior center

9:36 ↗ and as we head into 2018 we will be

9:41 ↗ working side by side with King County

9:44 ↗ Metro and the community to develop a

9:49 ↗ pilot program

9:50 ↗ that enhances transit options to and

9:54 ↗ from Tallis and squawk Mountain we also

9:58 ↗ plan to add hours to our neighborhood

10:01 ↗ engagement program which recently

10:04 ↗ completed a successful first year

10:06 ↗ implementing a range of new

10:10 ↗ communication tools and connection

10:14 ↗ opportunities as our community grows and

10:19 ↗ its demographics change we will be

10:23 ↗ focusing on developing our equity and

10:26 ↗ culture competency skills which may lead

10:30 ↗ to more service improvements in the

10:34 ↗ future I've also included funds for an

10:38 ↗ old town parking study to respond to

10:41 ↗ City Council's request to provide

10:43 ↗ recommendations on this issue in

10:47 ↗ addition I'm excited to start master

10:51 ↗ planning based on recommendations that

10:53 ↗ we will receive from the park strategic

10:56 ↗ plan which will be completed this year

11:00 ↗ as I've mentioned the top priority for

11:03 ↗ my 2018 budget is community safety to

11:07 ↗ that end I have proposed adding three

11:11 ↗ full-time police officers a police

11:14 ↗ communications supervisor additional

11:17 ↗ hours to make our emergency preparedness

11:19 ↗ quarter coordinator a full-time position

11:23 ↗ and as previously stated a third

11:27 ↗ dispatch console Issaquah remains a very

11:32 ↗ safe community this is clear from our

11:36 ↗ reported crime statistics and from the

11:39 ↗ perception of our residents our

11:42 ↗ community continues to enjoy a lower

11:45 ↗ crime rate than other state averages

11:49 ↗ just this year ninety percent of our

11:52 ↗ residents gave overall safety in

11:54 ↗ Issaquah good or excellent ratings and

11:57 ↗ 98 percent

11:59 ↗ gave positive scores to safety in our

12:03 ↗ neighborhoods however the volume of

12:07 ↗ calls our police department receives has

12:10 ↗ grown with our population and our

12:13 ↗ residents seek increased visibility of

12:17 ↗ our Police Department's for crime

12:19 ↗ prevention and traffic enforcement

12:23 ↗ purposes meanwhile the rise in police

12:28 ↗ activity requires the support of

12:30 ↗ additional resources within our 9-1-1

12:34 ↗ dispatch center that increased

12:37 ↗ visibility and response to community

12:43 ↗ demands can only be achieved through

12:46 ↗ building the capacity of the department

12:51 ↗ other departments are also working to

12:54 ↗ keeping the cause safe place for example

12:57 ↗ our Public Works engineering team will

13:00 ↗ be hard at work next year designing a

13:02 ↗ long list of a da that's Americans with

13:06 ↗ Disability Act improvements the

13:09 ↗ sidewalks as part of our payment

13:10 ↗ management program our office of

13:14 ↗ sustainability will begin advancing

13:16 ↗ strategies from the healthy community

13:19 ↗ needs assessment that was completed this

13:21 ↗ year and our public works operations

13:24 ↗ department will increase its sidewalk

13:26 ↗ inspection program our citywide team

13:30 ↗ will oversee the design and construction

13:33 ↗ of many projects that have safety

13:36 ↗ components such as continued work on

13:39 ↗ Newport Way Gilman Boulevard north

13:42 ↗ Sammamish Road telemetry upgrades

13:46 ↗ replacement of emergency radios and

13:49 ↗ Providence point intersection our water

13:55 ↗ system has and others one area that is

14:00 ↗ easily recognized as a top priority for

14:04 ↗ the city is transportation

14:08 ↗ as this across its new transportation

14:11 ↗ advisory board I've included funding in

14:14 ↗ the 2018 budget for the boards first

14:17 ↗ assignment the development of a mobility

14:20 ↗ master plan over the course of the next

14:25 ↗ year our team will continue working with

14:28 ↗ our strategic partners to advocate for

14:31 ↗ improvements that could help Issaquah we

14:36 ↗ plan to further develop partnerships and

14:39 ↗ lobby for improvements to state route 18

14:41 ↗ and state route 900 which would help

14:46 ↗ keep pass through traffic to state

14:52 ↗ highways and from passing through

14:57 ↗ Issaquah at the state level we will work

15:01 ↗ with the Washington State Department of

15:03 ↗ Transportation and the Federal Highway

15:05 ↗ Administration on the i-90 interchange

15:08 ↗ justification report and shoulder lane

15:11 ↗ use projects and we will continue to

15:15 ↗ play an active role in convening and

15:18 ↗ participating in regional solutions

15:21 ↗ seeking efforts such as the regional

15:23 ↗ transportation system initiatives as

15:26 ↗ well as Sound Transit and King County

15:30 ↗ Metro transit projects inside our

15:35 ↗ borders we will also advance several

15:37 ↗ local improvements including the 62nd

15:41 ↗ Street extension and intersection

15:43 ↗ improvements of SR 900 12th Avenue and

15:46 ↗ 17th Avenue which were part of the

15:50 ↗ Costco development agreement traffic

15:53 ↗ mitigation plan

15:59 ↗ the city continues to be an excellent

16:02 ↗ financial health with our new financial

16:06 ↗ management policy in place the target

16:10 ↗ range for our general fund reserves

16:12 ↗ increased from 8 to 15 percent to 15 to

16:17 ↗ 20 percent we will begin 2018 with an

16:21 ↗ estimated fund balance of over 16

16:24 ↗ million dollars in the general fund

16:26 ↗ which represents 36 percent of our total

16:31 ↗ expenditures and we will achieve a

16:34 ↗ balance between current anticipated

16:37 ↗ revenues and expenditures our team has

16:42 ↗ an impressive track record for managing

16:44 ↗ public funds

16:46 ↗ Itzik wise one of the few cities in

16:50 ↗ Washington State to achieve the triple a

16:54 ↗ bond rating from Standard & Poor's my

17:02 ↗ proposal proposed budget for the general

17:06 ↗ fund includes the 2.2 percent decrease

17:11 ↗ of expenditures primarily due to last

17:14 ↗ year's one-time transfers from the

17:16 ↗ general fund to support capital projects

17:20 ↗ proposed revenues are anticipated to

17:23 ↗ increase 9% no general fund balance has

17:27 ↗ been used and one of my budget

17:30 ↗ parameters being physical sustainability

17:33 ↗ will update our developer mitigation

17:39 ↗ fees charged for fire parks police

17:44 ↗ transportation and general government in

17:48 ↗ addition we will conduct a review of

17:50 ↗ solid waste services and rates and

17:52 ↗ perform a building and solar evaluations

17:57 ↗ so that we can look for opportunities to

18:00 ↗ reduce energy cost and continue our

18:04 ↗ investment in environmental

18:07 ↗ sustainability

18:11 ↗ turning our focus to internal operations

18:14 ↗ the second phase of our classification

18:17 ↗ and compensation study will begin to

18:19 ↗ illustrate how our compensation system

18:23 ↗ should be structured to ensure both

18:25 ↗ proper storage stewardship of public

18:28 ↗ funds but also effective strategies for

18:31 ↗ attracting and retaining our most

18:33 ↗ critical asset high quality employees we

18:38 ↗ will also invest in space planning to

18:40 ↗ address concerns about cramped

18:43 ↗ facilities in v inefficient use of space

18:46 ↗ and operating from multiple aging

18:52 ↗ facilities major changes in revenues

18:56 ↗ include increased collections from our

18:59 ↗ business and occupancy tax building

19:02 ↗ permits and plan check fees and property

19:05 ↗ taxes while the city's limited 1%

19:09 ↗ property tax increase will only generate

19:12 ↗ eighty six thousand three hundred

19:14 ↗ dollars next year we anticipate that new

19:18 ↗ construction will add value to the base

19:20 ↗ and generate two hundred and twenty

19:23 ↗ three thousand dollars in new revenue

19:27 ↗ next year we will launch a purchasing

19:30 ↗ card program for staff that will

19:33 ↗ generate rebates which is a new source

19:36 ↗ of revenue as well as improve our

19:40 ↗ procurement processes as we look to the

19:45 ↗ future we must develop strategies for

19:48 ↗ responding to revenue losses such as the

19:52 ↗ state legislators intent to reduce the

19:55 ↗ amount of streamlined sales tax

19:57 ↗ misuk WA and other cities received

20:02 ↗ revenue diversification will continue to

20:05 ↗ be an important solution to that end we

20:09 ↗ will continue to seek grants and

20:21 ↗ we will continue to seek grants and

20:24 ↗ evaluate other revenue possibilities in

20:28 ↗ 2018 we anticipate receiving 1.9 million

20:32 ↗ dollars from intergovernmental and

20:34 ↗ granting agencies to help us pay for

20:37 ↗ programs services and capital projects

20:41 ↗ on the expenditure side of the budget

20:45 ↗ our most significant increases are for

20:48 ↗ our cost of business expenses such as

20:52 ↗ salaries and benefits the proposed

20:56 ↗ budget includes an additional 5.25

20:59 ↗ full-time equivalent employees in the

21:03 ↗ general fund with overall salary and

21:06 ↗ benefits increasing 4.2 percent other

21:13 ↗ significant expenditure increases

21:15 ↗ includes our payment to each side fire

21:19 ↗ and rescue of some two hundred and

21:23 ↗ seventy five thousand dollars and new

21:34 ↗ recreation registration software and

21:38 ↗ city facilities space planning the

21:42 ↗ proposed budget also reflects a

21:44 ↗ significant expenditure of our real

21:46 ↗ estate excise tax or Reid funds for the

21:50 ↗ purpose of supporting a robust capital

21:53 ↗ improvement plan next year we plan to

21:57 ↗ update the city sign code and train

22:00 ↗ staff on the new regulations this need

22:04 ↗ results from a US Supreme Court decision

22:08 ↗ that

22:13 ↗ but that all municipalities should must

22:22 ↗ must implement I've also included an

22:26 ↗ allocation for staff and City Council to

22:28 ↗ begin a citywide

22:29 ↗ strategic planning effort which will

22:32 ↗ provide greater clarity on how to

22:34 ↗ prioritize future initiatives projects

22:38 ↗ programs and budgets as I proposed my

22:43 ↗ final budget as mayor I am confident

22:46 ↗ that this squaws team including our

22:48 ↗ dedicated elected leaders and talented

22:52 ↗ staff can second successfully address

22:55 ↗ any challenges that lie ahead by

22:59 ↗ focusing on transportation and

23:00 ↗ technology investments enhance customer

23:03 ↗ service Public Safety and long-range

23:07 ↗ planning my proposed budget positions

23:10 ↗ Issaquah for a bright and successful

23:13 ↗ future

23:36 ↗ okay our next item under special

23:40 ↗ business is agenda bill 747 King County

23:45 ↗ property prop 1 levy lid lifts for

23:49 ↗ veterans seniors and vulnerable

23:52 ↗ populations ballot item and here to

23:56 ↗ present that information yes I'm looking

24:13 ↗ for your name I know and I thank you for

24:18 ↗ coming

24:18 ↗ would you please introduce yourself yes

24:21 ↗ sir Thank You mr. mayor and members of

24:23 ↗ the council my name is Leo floor and I

24:25 ↗ work at the King County Department of

24:28 ↗ Community and Human Services and I'm

24:30 ↗ here tonight at your invitation thank

24:32 ↗ you to provide a informational

24:35 ↗ presentation about the veterans seniors

24:37 ↗ and human services levy which will be on

24:39 ↗ the ballot in November of this year as I

24:42 ↗ just alluded to the scope of the

24:45 ↗ presentation is informational it being a

24:48 ↗ currently considered ballot measure

24:50 ↗ public employees are limited to

24:52 ↗ providing facts and not acting to favor

24:55 ↗ or disfavor about measure so we do have

25:00 ↗ a current veterans and Human Services

25:02 ↗ levy in King County

25:03 ↗ it was first approved in 2005 and then

25:07 ↗ again in 2011 the basic contours of the

25:11 ↗ levy as it currently exists it's a

25:12 ↗ property tax six-year levy would lift

25:14 ↗ approved at six year duration each time

25:17 ↗ at a rate of five cents per thousand

25:19 ↗ dollars of assessed valuation the

25:21 ↗ current levy generates proceeds that are

25:23 ↗ then divided into two groups one for

25:26 ↗ veterans and their families and then

25:28 ↗ another for what the ordinance refers to

25:30 ↗ as vulnerable populations a collection

25:32 ↗ of persons throughout the community who

25:34 ↗ benefit from the additional Human

25:35 ↗ Services support so examples of that

25:37 ↗ include mothers who are participating in

25:40 ↗ the

25:41 ↗ the WIC program they have integrated

25:43 ↗ mental health screening for those

25:44 ↗ mothers there are also playing learned

25:46 ↗ groups that provide parenting assistance

25:50 ↗ for low-income families who participate

25:52 ↗ in those programs

25:53 ↗ the current levies goals to prevent and

25:56 ↗ to reduce homelessness to reduce the

25:59 ↗ unnecessary expensive use of jails or

26:02 ↗ emergency rooms and then to increase

26:04 ↗ self-sufficiency amongst the populations

26:06 ↗ that it serves for folks who are

26:11 ↗ interested in learning more about what

26:13 ↗ the levy has done for the last 12 years

26:15 ↗ that it's been in effect we do have

26:17 ↗ reporting we are required by ordinance

26:19 ↗ to report twice per year both on the

26:22 ↗ fiscal management and then performance

26:24 ↗ management of the levy according to its

26:27 ↗ goals and I'll get to what its goals

26:29 ↗ look like on the next slide but all that

26:31 ↗ is publicly available so that somebody

26:32 ↗ could see every six months how the levy

26:35 ↗ is spending relative to its allocated

26:37 ↗ proceeds and then again how each

26:39 ↗ individual program performs relative to

26:42 ↗ its performance measures the levy does

26:44 ↗ in its current form have a set of more

26:48 ↗ than 80 performance measures so each

26:50 ↗ program that is funded by the levy in

26:53 ↗ the contracting process the requirements

26:56 ↗ of that particular program are set out

26:57 ↗ and those are publicly available at the

26:59 ↗ website that's on the list there

27:01 ↗ prospective Lea so that somebody can see

27:03 ↗ what standards a particular program is

27:05 ↗ to meet this year if it's to comply with

27:07 ↗ the terms of the contract and then to

27:09 ↗ receive its full funding amount as

27:14 ↗ proposed so this now transitions from a

27:17 ↗ brief description of the current

27:18 ↗ veterans and human services levy to the

27:19 ↗ proposed veterans seniors in human

27:22 ↗ services levy it's been proposed for the

27:25 ↗ November ballot as a 6-year levy lit

27:27 ↗ lift with a rate of 10 cents per

27:30 ↗ thousand dollars of assessed valuation

27:32 ↗ and then as the name implies rather than

27:35 ↗ the current two population structure

27:37 ↗ which has half of proceeds allocated

27:39 ↗ towards veterans and their families and

27:41 ↗ the other half towards vulnerable

27:42 ↗ populations this current structure adds

27:44 ↗ a third focus population so veterans and

27:47 ↗ their families seniors and their

27:49 ↗ caregivers and then vulnerable

27:51 ↗ populations

27:54 ↗ to get into the specifics and these are

27:56 ↗ all really just this is a sort of one

27:58 ↗ slide embodiment of the confines of the

28:00 ↗ ordinance itself so proceeds are

28:03 ↗ collected at ten cents per thousand

28:04 ↗ dollars of assessed value which and the

28:05 ↗ projected proceeds for one year would be

28:07 ↗ fifty two point three million dollars

28:09 ↗ those proceeds are then divided into

28:12 ↗ three parts after reserving small amount

28:15 ↗ one percent for what the ordinance calls

28:17 ↗ capacity building and then reserving an

28:19 ↗ additional three hundred thousand

28:20 ↗ dollars per year that would be used by

28:22 ↗ the County Council to mitigate Pro

28:24 ↗ rationing if pro rationing or

28:25 ↗ suppression were to occur to any junior

28:27 ↗ taxing district and then the remainder

28:29 ↗ divided into three so that's the

28:31 ↗ seventeen that you see there so

28:33 ↗ essentially seventeen million dollars of

28:35 ↗ proceeds that would be allocated for

28:36 ↗ veterans and their families seventeen

28:39 ↗ million dollars for seniors and their

28:40 ↗ caregivers where there's an additional

28:42 ↗ condition that I'll explain momentarily

28:44 ↗ and then the the last third seventeen

28:46 ↗ billion dollars for vulnerable

28:47 ↗ populations where the ordinance lists in

28:51 ↗ detail quite a few potential vulnerable

28:54 ↗ populations examples that are listed

28:57 ↗ within the ordinance are persons with

28:58 ↗ disabilities and their caregivers

29:00 ↗ survivors of domestic violence or sexual

29:02 ↗ assault the the yellow house that you

29:06 ↗ see in the center is the first of two

29:08 ↗ conditions so one of what that basically

29:11 ↗ says is that in the first year of the

29:12 ↗ levee at least fifty percent of the

29:14 ↗ proceeds from each of the Third's must

29:16 ↗ be spent to promote housing stability

29:18 ↗ for the recipient population so 50

29:20 ↗ percent of the seventeen million dollars

29:21 ↗ to promote housing stability for

29:23 ↗ veterans and their families for example

29:25 ↗ there's a slide that will follow shortly

29:27 ↗ that describes what housing stability

29:30 ↗ within the context of the ordinance

29:31 ↗ refers to the second condition and this

29:34 ↗ is specific to the seniors third is that

29:37 ↗ half of the seniors third must be spent

29:39 ↗ to promote Regional Health and Human

29:41 ↗ Services for seniors who are veterans or

29:44 ↗ their families are their caregivers so

29:47 ↗ in other words half of the proceeds from

29:48 ↗ that third for seniors to be spent on

29:50 ↗ seniors who are veterans and their

29:51 ↗ families and that that restriction

29:54 ↗ remains in effect every year until one

29:56 ↗ of two things happens and this is the

29:58 ↗ the two boats at the very bottom

29:59 ↗ left-hand corner of the slide one that

30:02 ↗ 75% of

30:04 ↗ a number of seniors who were homeless

30:05 ↗ veterans at the time the ordinance was

30:07 ↗ enacted in July 21st of this year until

30:10 ↗ 75% of those persons are housed or until

30:16 ↗ King County has expended twenty four

30:17 ↗ million dollars in an attempt to house

30:19 ↗ senior veterans once either of those two

30:22 ↗ conditions are met then the full senior

30:25 ↗ allocation would then be unrestricted so

30:27 ↗ far for any senior regard irregardless

30:29 ↗ of their of their veteran status any

30:34 ↗ questions on the the structure that I

30:35 ↗ could answer before proceeding does it

30:40 ↗ look like it so proceed thank you sir

30:43 ↗ another question just what does the

30:46 ↗ ordinance provide for I mentioned the

30:48 ↗ phrase Regional Health and Human

30:50 ↗ Services so what types of things does

30:52 ↗ the ordinance allow proceeds to be spent

30:54 ↗ on what you see on the slide here is

30:57 ↗ really five categories of expenditure

30:59 ↗ and so that's top to bottom on the

31:01 ↗ left-hand side where the populations

31:03 ↗ that the levies intended to serve are

31:05 ↗ you know from left right on the top so

31:06 ↗ healthy living fiscal stability housing

31:10 ↗ stability social engagement and then

31:12 ↗ service system access and improvement

31:13 ↗ and these are categories that are based

31:15 ↗ on the five most frequently brought up

31:19 ↗ issue areas that a series of community

31:22 ↗ engagement events last year surfaced as

31:25 ↗ we went through so 44 community meetings

31:27 ↗ over a thousand participants and the

31:30 ↗ answers really sort of aggregated into

31:32 ↗ these five categories with the exception

31:34 ↗ of a few outliers results based

31:37 ↗ accountability so this is the the

31:39 ↗ planning methodology that King County is

31:40 ↗ really using for a number of the

31:42 ↗ initiatives that are going forth right

31:45 ↗ now so the mental illness and drug

31:46 ↗ dependency sales tax the best starts for

31:48 ↗ kids property are levy property tax and

31:51 ↗ now the veterans seniors and human

31:53 ↗ services levy as proposed would all use

31:54 ↗ this results based accountability

31:56 ↗ methodology there's a notation to the

31:58 ↗ the book that sort of lays that out for

32:00 ↗ folks who are interested but the idea

32:02 ↗ being to start with results to ensure

32:05 ↗ that there's a mechanism to measure

32:06 ↗ whether or not outcomes are being

32:08 ↗ achieved and to not rely on output or

32:10 ↗ throughput of the system as the measure

32:11 ↗ of whether or not the levy itself is

32:13 ↗ successful

32:17 ↗ briefly as to what is housing stability

32:20 ↗ if you'll recall there was that yellow

32:21 ↗ house in the middle of the Venn diagram

32:23 ↗ a few slides ago so housing stability

32:26 ↗ refers potentially to the actual

32:28 ↗ construction of housing through capital

32:30 ↗ could also refer to the operation of

32:33 ↗ previously constructed housing so the

32:34 ↗ veterans and Human Services levy to date

32:36 ↗ has contributed to the construction of

32:38 ↗ over 2,000 units of affordable housing

32:40 ↗ so many of those continue to require

32:44 ↗ operating funds to continue providing

32:46 ↗ some permanent supportive housing to

32:47 ↗ families and then it could also mean a

32:50 ↗ number of services that could either

32:51 ↗ prevent homelessness or assist somebody

32:54 ↗ in stabilizing once they're housed so

32:56 ↗ examples of that are shallow rent

32:59 ↗ subsidies or home modifications for

33:01 ↗ seniors to allow seniors to remain in

33:03 ↗ place

33:04 ↗ it could be service-connected our system

33:07 ↗ connected housing which is a concept

33:09 ↗ that is embedded within the ordinance

33:11 ↗ and that refers to for example we have a

33:14 ↗ number of veterans who are incarcerated

33:15 ↗ in King County right now for whom King

33:18 ↗ County invests in reentry training so

33:21 ↗ services to assist them in the

33:23 ↗ transition from incarceration to the

33:24 ↗ community right now depending on when

33:27 ↗ you take a look at it somewhere between

33:28 ↗ 52 and 62% of them actually released

33:31 ↗ from jail into homelessness and so an

33:34 ↗ example of system connected housing

33:35 ↗ would be housing that's intended to

33:37 ↗ provide a place for transitioning

33:39 ↗ veterans from incarceration into a

33:41 ↗ housed situation to promote their

33:43 ↗ stability another question just to

33:50 ↗ provide the information on is how much

33:51 ↗ is ten cents per thousand dollars our

33:53 ↗ assessed valuation some of the feedback

33:55 ↗ that we've previously heard is that just

33:57 ↗ talking about the median is not

33:58 ↗ necessarily helpful in accounting where

34:00 ↗ the prices are really I should say the

34:02 ↗ values are as diverse as they are so

34:04 ↗ what I've depicted here is the assessed

34:07 ↗ values just as a factual matter King

34:11 ↗ County levies its property taxes on

34:14 ↗ assessed values and not sales prices and

34:15 ↗ in some markets those can vary from each

34:18 ↗ other significantly so the six hundred

34:21 ↗ and twenty six thousand dollar median

34:24 ↗ 2017 residential value in Issaquah ten

34:27 ↗ cents per

34:28 ↗ thousand dollars is a sixty-two dollars

34:30 ↗ and sixty cent a total levy cost and

34:34 ↗ that is total so there is a current led

34:37 ↗ to cost very everybody who's within King

34:40 ↗ County and that's assess that

34:41 ↗ approximately four cents per thousand

34:43 ↗ dollars right now so the difference

34:44 ↗ between that four cents rate and the

34:46 ↗ rate that's depicted here would be the

34:48 ↗ additional six cent rate I can get into

34:50 ↗ I'm saying four cents that a five cents

34:52 ↗ of the council members are you mister

34:53 ↗ mayor would like me to otherwise I can

34:54 ↗ continue moving all right

34:59 ↗ process wise so the executive just last

35:04 ↗ Friday actually transmitted his

35:06 ↗ initiative are his a plan for the first

35:09 ↗ year of levy expenditures so that's an

35:11 ↗ available document now that was

35:13 ↗ transmitted it's called the veterans

35:14 ↗ seniors and Human Services levy proposed

35:16 ↗ transition plan and contingent upon the

35:19 ↗ outcome of the election and then

35:20 ↗ contingent upon County Council and

35:22 ↗ regional policy committee consideration

35:24 ↗ of the plan and then if they chose to

35:26 ↗ adopt it it would control the first year

35:29 ↗ expenditures and that's where the plan

35:31 ↗ that really describes what the first

35:33 ↗ year fifty percent for housing stability

35:35 ↗ funds would do going backwards there has

35:38 ↗ also been the plan that if adopted would

35:43 ↗ recertify the current citizen oversight

35:46 ↗ board so there are two citizen oversight

35:47 ↗ boards that sit and review led the

35:50 ↗ expenditures on a bi-monthly basis on

35:52 ↗ review its annual performance and so a

35:54 ↗ separate ordinance has been transmitted

35:56 ↗ to continue those boards and to add one

35:58 ↗ for seniors and then the next big phase

36:01 ↗ which is the now the bottom right hand

36:03 ↗ purple bar is the implementation plans

36:07 ↗ that would be the plan again contingent

36:10 ↗ upon the outcome of the election in

36:11 ↗ november that would if adopted by the

36:14 ↗ county council the regional policy

36:15 ↗ committee controlled the final five

36:17 ↗ years of the levy period

36:22 ↗ and I see questions up there are there

36:26 ↗ questions of Leo just for background

36:31 ↗ information

36:33 ↗ this presentation was requested by the

36:37 ↗ council leadership and I want to thank

36:40 ↗ you for responding very very quickly to

36:42 ↗ come provide information this was an

36:45 ↗ informational only presentation unless

36:49 ↗ the council directs any other action and

36:53 ↗ seeing none then thanks for coming all

36:56 ↗ the way to this I call this evening

36:57 ↗ Thank You mr. mayor

36:59 ↗ Thank You council members moving now to

37:02 ↗ audience comments before we I'm going to

37:09 ↗ ask our city attorney to provide some a

37:12 ↗ little bit of context here before

37:15 ↗ audience comments and if you would Thank

37:19 ↗ You mr. mayor yes as you can see up on

37:23 ↗ the overhead the there are certain rules

37:27 ↗ that we have to continue to follow with

37:29 ↗ respect to this annexation and

37:31 ↗ pre-annexation zoning question because

37:35 ↗ the pre-annexation zoning itself is

37:39 ↗ quasi judicial and the hearing on the

37:41 ↗ pre-annexation zoning has closed the

37:44 ↗ council may not take new information on

37:47 ↗ that issue and members of the public may

37:50 ↗ not comment on that particular issue in

37:54 ↗ items from the audience members of the

37:57 ↗ public can comment on the decision as to

38:02 ↗ whether or not to annex the property

38:05 ↗ annexation itself is a legislative and

38:08 ↗ you may hear from the public relating to

38:11 ↗ annexation members of the public may

38:14 ↗ also comment on the Comprehensive Plan

38:17 ↗ designations that are proposed for the

38:19 ↗ property again those are legislative and

38:22 ↗ you can hear comment on them what you

38:25 ↗ cannot hear comment on is the pre

38:29 ↗ annexation zoning the actual setting of

38:33 ↗ the zoning on the property

38:35 ↗ and in its uses so other matters we can

38:40 ↗ talk about as people come up but that's

38:42 ↗ the basic parameters for the public

38:45 ↗ comment period this evening thank you

38:48 ↗ now citizen comments are an important

38:51 ↗ part of the public process we take them

38:52 ↗ seriously and factor them into the

38:54 ↗ decisions that we make anyone from the

38:57 ↗ public who wishes to comment on

38:58 ↗ tonight's agenda items or other topics

39:00 ↗ should do so at this time please direct

39:03 ↗ your comments to the entire council and

39:07 ↗ not individuals while this is not a

39:09 ↗ question-and-answer session we will

39:11 ↗ contact you to follow up if needed if

39:15 ↗ you did not have an opportunity include

39:17 ↗ to include your email address please jot

39:22 ↗ that down on the clipboard that will be

39:25 ↗ on the table in front of me in a few

39:29 ↗ minutes when recognized please come to

39:32 ↗ the lectern speak into the microphone

39:34 ↗ state your name address and any

39:36 ↗ relationship to the city limit your

39:39 ↗ comments to 5-minutes when the yellow

39:41 ↗ light comes on you're within the last

39:44 ↗ minute of your comment period if you use

39:47 ↗ the full five minutes the timer will

39:49 ↗ sound to indicate the end of your alone

39:51 ↗ time again public public comments

39:57 ↗ citizen comments written and verbal are

39:59 ↗ an important aspect of the public

40:01 ↗ process we take them seriously in fact

40:03 ↗ they're then into the decisions that we

40:06 ↗ make as anyone signed up to speak yes

40:10 ↗ Ron Thule

40:17 ↗ good evening rondalee superintendent at

40:20 ↗ Issaquah school district council mayor

40:23 ↗ Butler because I have not had an

40:26 ↗ opportunity to address the council since

40:28 ↗ your last meeting I wanted to thank the

40:30 ↗ council and the city staff for the

40:32 ↗ collaborative work that you did with the

40:34 ↗ school district on the compact school

40:37 ↗ building codes your approval of these

40:39 ↗ new codes will allow us to move forward

40:41 ↗ with some potential projects within the

40:43 ↗ city and we thank you very much for

40:46 ↗ those efforts I also wanted to share

40:49 ↗ some information related to timelines

40:51 ↗ for the opening of a new elementary

40:53 ↗ school by September of 2020 we've talked

40:56 ↗ a lot about that publicly about our need

40:58 ↗ to build a Elementary School by 2020 I

41:02 ↗ previously shared that we've been

41:06 ↗ growing by some four to five hundred

41:07 ↗ students each year our official count

41:10 ↗ day is October 1 or the first day of the

41:13 ↗ month working day of the month which was

41:15 ↗ today and we are in fact up nearly 500

41:17 ↗ students from this time last year so

41:21 ↗ what does it take for us to get a school

41:24 ↗ built by 2020 I'm gonna give you some

41:27 ↗ approximate dates but I want you to know

41:30 ↗ that these approximations are based on

41:32 ↗ our experience building a number of

41:33 ↗ schools over the years and I'm going to

41:36 ↗ work kind of from the end backwards so

41:40 ↗ first of all it's about 15 to 16 months

41:44 ↗ from ground breaking to occupancy or the

41:47 ↗ actual construction time of an

41:49 ↗ elementary school the design again is

41:53 ↗ approximately 12 months of design and

41:55 ↗ permitting from the time of purchase of

41:57 ↗ a piece of property the our due

42:01 ↗ diligence what we would do once we can

42:04 ↗ go forward and really dig into a piece

42:07 ↗ of property can typically takes around

42:10 ↗ three to four months that's our due

42:12 ↗ diligence feasibility on a potential

42:15 ↗ piece of property and about a 1 to 3

42:18 ↗ month for a purchase and sale

42:20 ↗ negotiations and then a time for

42:24 ↗ in if it's a city purchased piece of

42:27 ↗ property like then that would require

42:29 ↗ City Council action and of course it

42:31 ↗ requires school board action to actually

42:34 ↗ do that so we believe we only have a

42:37 ↗ month or two of wiggle room in this

42:40 ↗ schedule to complete a project in

42:42 ↗ elementary school by 2020 in order to

42:45 ↗ provide the desperately needed

42:47 ↗ additional classroom space for our

42:49 ↗ community so I thought it would just be

42:51 ↗ good because a lot of times you say well

42:53 ↗ thirty five months because that's what

42:55 ↗ it would be from today seems like a long

42:57 ↗ time but we have been you know and again

43:00 ↗ these are approximations but we feel

43:02 ↗ like we're getting pretty close to that

43:05 ↗ window too we need to start moving on

43:07 ↗ some of these things so that's all I

43:09 ↗ wanted to share tonight again thank you

43:11 ↗ to the council for your public service

43:13 ↗ and your willingness to tackle some very

43:16 ↗ difficult issues thank you thank you

43:18 ↗ wrong Robert Swanson

43:26 ↗ I didn't know I was gonna be able to

43:28 ↗ speak tonight I I just want to thank the

43:31 ↗ City Council mayor and the City Clerk's

43:34 ↗ office I I'd like to claim I had a

43:36 ↗ little effect on that right there I

43:37 ↗ think it's a good policy to have right

43:39 ↗ there so hope that helps any future

43:41 ↗ novelist

43:43 ↗ anyway I it's great to be here I have a

43:47 ↗ friend that's up in the Highlands

43:49 ↗ his name is Paul just met him a few

43:51 ↗ weeks ago he told me about the traffic

43:53 ↗ going up there so I you know I went

43:54 ↗ around taking some pictures

43:55 ↗ the I'm just gonna say that the traffic

43:58 ↗ go on by the school up there Grand Ridge

43:59 ↗ I think that's make good guy write it

44:01 ↗ it's terrible I couldn't believe it

44:03 ↗ people were flying right by it's not in

44:05 ↗ my neighborhood in any way shape or form

44:07 ↗ but you know what the kids in Issaquah

44:08 ↗ anywhere United States are our kids and

44:10 ↗ so that has to be dealt with I don't

44:14 ↗ know how you deal with that I think I

44:15 ↗ don't know if they have little flashing

44:16 ↗ lights you know saying hey you stop or

44:19 ↗ people guards the two policemen you're

44:21 ↗ gonna hire you're a great location to

44:23 ↗ put one of them because the kids I from

44:26 ↗ what I hear somebody somebody died

44:30 ↗ three-three said - okay three that's

44:34 ↗ great more for the kids so I think

44:37 ↗ that's an excellent idea

44:39 ↗ next thing I just want to say is I think

44:40 ↗ when I last meeting you guys were

44:43 ↗ talking about how you're going to get

44:43 ↗ with the the school board I give you two

44:45 ↗ big thumbs up I'd give you ten if I had

44:47 ↗ ten thumbs

44:48 ↗ I think okay I'm gonna be honest here

44:50 ↗ that should have happened about five

44:51 ↗ years ago you say what you want on that

44:54 ↗ it I think we I think the school board I

44:57 ↗ think the City Council the city itself

44:59 ↗ probably wouldn't be in such an

45:00 ↗ emergency if we would have had some

45:02 ↗ communication but that's just not just

45:05 ↗ me I'm glad it's happening but it should

45:06 ↗ have happened earlier anyway that's all

45:09 ↗ I have to say I think it's great to get

45:11 ↗ those policemen up there help out those

45:12 ↗ kids thank you Robert Lauri Pittman

45:31 ↗ see if I can get my readers to work well

45:34 ↗ I needed those a little while ago I know

45:37 ↗ it's difficult I understand city of

45:41 ↗ Issaquah councilmembers and mayor thank

45:46 ↗ you for allowing me to speak tonight my

45:48 ↗ name is Laurie Pittman and I am a

45:50 ↗ resident of Issaquah I am here

45:53 ↗ representing excuse me I am here

45:55 ↗ representing several members of a local

45:57 ↗ running club from Paragon training

45:59 ↗ center on Gillman Boulevard got a few of

46:02 ↗ us here as you know a recent fatality

46:07 ↗ collision has occurred on September 22nd

46:11 ↗ at the intersection of East Lake

46:13 ↗ Sammamish and southeast 56th Street my

46:17 ↗ comments are intended to express our

46:19 ↗ condolences to the family of the

46:21 ↗ deceased and also to call on the city to

46:25 ↗ make the intersection safer the

46:29 ↗ collision resulted in the death of a

46:31 ↗ bicyclist a sports and outdoor

46:34 ↗ enthusiast it could have been any one of

46:38 ↗ us here today myself or my

46:43 ↗ daughter-in-law and her newborn child

46:46 ↗ for several years this intersection has

46:49 ↗ been recognized as a dangerous one and

46:53 ↗ in need of additional resources to make

46:55 ↗ it safer initial reports including

46:59 ↗ eyewitness reports indicate the cyclist

47:02 ↗ was riding his bicycle normally through

47:05 ↗ the crosswalk with a solid walk signal

47:08 ↗ and also in accordance with Allstate and

47:13 ↗ pedestrians with Allstate pedestrian and

47:16 ↗ bicyclist laws there was also an

47:19 ↗ additional information given that

47:22 ↗ another bicyclist was going along the

47:24 ↗ crosswalk in the opposite direction

47:27 ↗ the bicyclist was killed as he was

47:33 ↗ riding in the same direction as traffic

47:35 ↗ turning to the right our running group

47:38 ↗ knows to be vigilant as the at this

47:41 ↗ intersection

47:42 ↗ because drivers do not look for

47:45 ↗ pedestrians that due to the engineering

47:48 ↗ of the intersection drivers see a green

47:51 ↗ light and just go

47:53 ↗ I have almost been hit by a car myself

47:57 ↗ many times too many to count I have seen

48:03 ↗ other running group members almost

48:04 ↗ struck by vehicles at a low speed at

48:09 ↗ times we have had to scream and make

48:12 ↗ exaggerated hand movements just to get a

48:14 ↗ driver's attention to prevent a

48:16 ↗ collision it is a repetitive problem

48:20 ↗ stemming from the design and method of

48:22 ↗ how that intersection is controlled

48:26 ↗ police enforcement could help but it's

48:30 ↗ not reasonable to expect the police to

48:32 ↗ ticket their way out of this situation

48:34 ↗ we need long-term solutions that to

48:38 ↗ increase the safety of this intersection

48:40 ↗ via Road engineering the city did

48:44 ↗ authorize a pedestrian safety crossing

48:47 ↗ crossing study in 2015 and we appreciate

48:50 ↗ that

48:51 ↗ at that time the study indicated the

48:54 ↗ intersection suffered from the exact

48:56 ↗ problems outlined above and all of this

49:02 ↗ while still meeting federal regulatory

49:03 ↗ guidelines for safety it did recommend

49:08 ↗ flashing beacons to be installed at the

49:10 ↗ intersection and if this did not address

49:13 ↗ the issue the study recommended

49:15 ↗ installing pedestrian activated buttons

49:18 ↗ that turns on an electronic no right

49:23 ↗ turn signal at the intersection the

49:26 ↗ beacons have been installed and were

49:28 ↗ operational during this fatality

49:30 ↗ collision unfortunately those yellow

49:35 ↗ flashing beacons and lights had no

49:37 ↗ effect on a life lost due to inattentive

49:40 ↗ driving and poor intersection design the

49:45 ↗ flashing beacons have clearly not worked

49:47 ↗ and drivers only focus on that green

49:52 ↗ light therefore we are

49:54 ↗ urging the council to immediately take

49:58 ↗ steps to implement additional options to

50:02 ↗ install pedestrian activated no turn

50:05 ↗ signal this would either turn the signal

50:08 ↗ red or cause the green light to turn to

50:11 ↗ blinking yellow with additional

50:13 ↗ electronic signed activated preventing a

50:17 ↗ red turn the cost to install this option

50:21 ↗ is far outweighed by the increased

50:24 ↗ probability of preventing yet another

50:27 ↗ death the city is in a position to

50:30 ↗ ensure the safety of our running group

50:32 ↗ and other outdoor enthusiasts

50:34 ↗ enthusiasts that visit the city of

50:37 ↗ Issaquah we encourage you to make the

50:40 ↗ right decision

50:43 ↗ it looks like my times up we encourage

50:45 ↗ you to make the safe division the safe

50:47 ↗ to decision so that everyone can live

50:50 ↗ and work and play here

50:51 ↗ with within safety thank you for your

50:54 ↗ time and we respectfully submit these

50:56 ↗ comments for consideration with proper

50:59 ↗ City and recommendations to forward to

51:01 ↗ proper City departments Thank You Laurie

51:04 ↗ and you can drop those off with the city

51:07 ↗ clerk if you would like next is Chris

51:11 ↗ Williams

51:19 ↗ hi my name is Chris Williams I've been

51:22 ↗ in there's a quiet area for about ten

51:23 ↗ years and I have been a member of this

51:25 ↗ running group that just so articulated

51:28 ↗ the thoughts of our membership so I've

51:31 ↗ been a member of that group for about

51:33 ↗ five years and have used this trial

51:35 ↗ extensively and I just wanted to add my

51:38 ↗ personal comments to this this wonderful

51:40 ↗ presentation that Laurie just did

51:43 ↗ I won't take very long what I'm going to

51:47 ↗ do is edge each member of the Council on

51:50 ↗ you now to take 20 minutes of your time

51:52 ↗ this coming weekend you know Saturday or

51:55 ↗ Sunday morning somewhere between nine

51:57 ↗ and 11 o'clock and spend stare look

52:02 ↗ South and do three runs through of the

52:04 ↗ lights be on the north side and go

52:08 ↗ through three runs of the lights twenty

52:11 ↗ minutes of your time maximum I can

52:12 ↗ assure you in six run throughs of those

52:15 ↗ lights you will have at least one what

52:18 ↗ the foe moment this was not unfortunate

52:22 ↗ this was not sad the death of this

52:25 ↗ cyclist was an inevitable lottery the

52:29 ↗ trail is going to be used even more when

52:31 ↗ we open up the other side with with the

52:34 ↗ restoration and work that's been done

52:35 ↗ which we are very very grateful for as

52:38 ↗ we use that trial a lot it's a wonderful

52:41 ↗ wonderful addition to this community and

52:43 ↗ should be used but in the use of it this

52:46 ↗ problem will become even more difficult

52:48 ↗ if you are humanitarian if you're

52:51 ↗ concerned about your citizenship if you

52:53 ↗ are purely risk management on the

52:55 ↗ insurance side these comments are public

52:58 ↗ now please regardless have you come to

53:01 ↗ this please take twenty minutes of your

53:03 ↗ time and go and stand at their traffic

53:06 ↗ light and watch what happens you will be

53:08 ↗ shocked it is a very very busy you've

53:11 ↗ got two groups coming together you've

53:14 ↗ got a very very busy intersection a lot

53:16 ↗ of people coming and going and you have

53:18 ↗ a wonderful trail and those two are

53:21 ↗ clashing and something needs to be done

53:23 ↗ and I urge you to take a look before

53:25 ↗ even more lives are lost thank you very

53:27 ↗ much for your time

53:29 ↗ thank you Chris Lisa Callen

53:48 ↗ good evening council members mayor

53:51 ↗ Butler my name is Lisa Kallen and I'm

53:53 ↗ here representing these two Crosse

53:54 ↗ school district school board this

53:56 ↗ evening there are many factors that make

54:00 ↗ us City successful and a great place to

54:03 ↗ live a community that cherishes and

54:06 ↗ supports all its people and their values

54:08 ↗ is no easy thing to accomplish building

54:12 ↗ and providing schools is a

54:13 ↗ responsibility of the school district

54:16 ↗ ensuring schools can be and will be

54:19 ↗ built to support the citizenry is a

54:22 ↗ responsibility of the City Council by

54:26 ↗ ensuring schools can be built and are

54:28 ↗ built within our city limits you're

54:31 ↗ making sure our community will continue

54:33 ↗ to thrive you are saying our children

54:36 ↗ matter and they're a top priority you

54:40 ↗ are saying great schools our core value

54:43 ↗ that defines who we are as a city and a

54:47 ↗ community it takes both of us a strong

54:50 ↗ school district and strong city

54:52 ↗ leadership to provide for and educate

54:54 ↗ our youth to their very fullest

54:55 ↗ potential you the City Council you've

55:02 ↗ done this you did this this last council

55:04 ↗ meeting by helping us and working with

55:06 ↗ us to pass the compacted school land use

55:10 ↗ code amendment changes that actually

55:12 ↗ will allow the school district to build

55:13 ↗ schools in a manner that are required in

55:16 ↗ today's environment of scarce land high

55:18 ↗ costs and a high demand for classroom

55:20 ↗ space and we thank you for that we ask

55:23 ↗ that every decision you make and you

55:25 ↗ continue to do you continue to value

55:31 ↗ that partnership and to know that it

55:34 ↗ takes both of us to make this happen for

55:36 ↗ our children the Izzard squad school

55:39 ↗ district needs to build four new schools

55:41 ↗ as soon as possible to meet the needs of

55:43 ↗ the schools the schools and the students

55:46 ↗ that live here in Issaquah this acquire

55:49 ↗ lands alone has 1,200 elementary age

55:53 ↗ children today demanding a need for two

55:56 ↗ elementary schools and that neighborhood

55:58 ↗ just that area by itself so right now

56:01 ↗ need that space please with every

56:04 ↗ decision in every turn we ask that you

56:07 ↗ ask yourselves in your decisions what

56:09 ↗ can be done now to support the education

56:13 ↗ of our youth this across school district

56:20 ↗ certainly values your strong partnership

56:23 ↗ we appreciate all that you have done we

56:24 ↗ appreciate all of the opportunities

56:26 ↗ we're going to have working and going

56:27 ↗ forward and we value being a part of a

56:31 ↗ strong community and we certainly value

56:33 ↗ being a good neighbor and we thank you

56:35 ↗ for your time and service because we

56:36 ↗ know you have tough and hard decisions

56:38 ↗ to make and setting all back up to the

56:41 ↗ my point earlier that creating a

56:45 ↗ community that cherishes and supports

56:47 ↗ all of its people and all their values

56:49 ↗ is no easy thing to accomplish so thank

56:51 ↗ you for it thank you Lisa

56:57 ↗ Shalini Bassel

57:13 ↗ good evening City Council members and

57:15 ↗ honorable mayor I'm here to talk to the

57:20 ↗ construction of new schools in the city

57:23 ↗ I live in the sequel Highlands area and

57:27 ↗ I've been a property owner and a

57:29 ↗ resident for the last 10 years I reside

57:32 ↗ at 1790 26th Avenue Northeast I have two

57:38 ↗ children one is a first grader and the

57:40 ↗ other one is rate for 8th grader a few

57:43 ↗ years ago when we came to Aqua Highlands

57:46 ↗ the community was very attractive to us

57:50 ↗ and it's attractive to two families with

57:53 ↗ young children my children went to the

57:56 ↗ schools in the neighborhood and I was I

57:59 ↗ wasn't happy to see how crowded it was

58:03 ↗ at the schools there are 10 portables at

58:06 ↗ grindage elementary and the community

58:10 ↗ cannot accommodate the students the

58:13 ↗ elementary age students we are seeing

58:15 ↗ this problem continue into the middle

58:19 ↗ schools also and the population has been

58:22 ↗ growing it hasn't reduced so as you

58:25 ↗ consider decisions for for new schools

58:29 ↗ in West Highlands area keep in mind the

58:32 ↗ population is growing for the new

58:35 ↗ students and you're commuting them out

58:38 ↗ of West Highlands currently they're

58:41 ↗ coming to Clark Elementary which

58:43 ↗ recently opened up and it was remodeled

58:46 ↗ and it has also ten portables so the

58:49 ↗ need for a new school or new schools is

58:52 ↗ well established and as a resident that

58:56 ↗ has two children in the school's I will

58:59 ↗ say I was not happy to see how crowded

59:02 ↗ the schools have been that they are

59:05 ↗ doing a very nice job of educating the

59:07 ↗ kids

59:08 ↗ despite that but our children deserve

59:11 ↗ better also for parents to commute kids

59:14 ↗ out you're you're adding trips which are

59:18 ↗ not that great for the environment the

59:20 ↗ the value of having a school in the

59:23 ↗ neighborhood where you can walk to the

59:24 ↗ school cannot be overemphasized

59:26 ↗ so I'm here in support of schools in our

59:30 ↗ neighborhoods shalini Thank You

59:37 ↗ Elizabeth my pal

59:41 ↗ just a reminder that if you look up

59:45 ↗ there it talks a little bit about what

59:48 ↗ what you can comment on and what you

59:51 ↗ shouldn't a specific location of the

59:54 ↗ school is one of those things that

59:57 ↗ should not be discussed during all these

1:00:01 ↗ comments they'll start the clock thank

1:00:07 ↗ you my name is Elizabeth moped I reside

1:00:11 ↗ at 100 Big Bear place Northwest in

1:00:14 ↗ Issaquah I am here partly to say thank

1:00:19 ↗ you for the promise of a bus on squawk

1:00:24 ↗ Mountain and Talas appreciate that a lot

1:00:28 ↗ I'd also like to bring you a little bit

1:00:31 ↗ of information the public health people

1:00:36 ↗ in King County have discovered that in

1:00:42 ↗ our area there are now fake painkillers

1:00:46 ↗ that are laced with fentanyl this is the

1:00:50 ↗ drug which has caused a great many

1:00:52 ↗ overdose deaths in British Columbia if

1:01:00 ↗ we had a safe injection site that is a

1:01:05 ↗ place where drugs can be tested that is

1:01:09 ↗ a place where it's possible to build

1:01:13 ↗ relationships with people who are using

1:01:16 ↗ illicit drugs and possibly to find out

1:01:21 ↗ where the supplies of these fentanyl

1:01:26 ↗ laced drugs are coming from

1:01:29 ↗ I hope that someday we will have such a

1:01:34 ↗ site maybe more than one and that we

1:01:38 ↗ will be able to stop what is likely to

1:01:42 ↗ be a very deadly epidemic I'd also like

1:01:47 ↗ to speak to you about something that

1:01:49 ↗ came up with the community needs

1:01:52 ↗ assessment and that was there is annex

1:01:56 ↗ we we want equity in this community but

1:02:01 ↗ there is an extreme disparity that needs

1:02:04 ↗ to be investigated and that is why is it

1:02:08 ↗ that people who identify as black or

1:02:13 ↗ african-american experience eight times

1:02:17 ↗ the unemployment rate of other groups it

1:02:25 ↗ may be that this is a very small number

1:02:27 ↗ and something is skewing the statistics

1:02:29 ↗ but I think we really need to know

1:02:32 ↗ what's going on there and in this

1:02:38 ↗ vibrant community we want to save things

1:02:42 ↗ that speak to our heritage recently a

1:02:47 ↗ landmark local landmark Commission

1:02:50 ↗ committee designated the Providence

1:02:54 ↗ Heights campus as a landmark it is a

1:02:58 ↗ treasure for our community I understand

1:03:02 ↗ that currently the current owners of

1:03:07 ↗ that property are suing the city and the

1:03:11 ↗ county on the basis that they see

1:03:19 ↗ themselves as a religious institution

1:03:21 ↗ Plateau campus LLC has not acted as a

1:03:29 ↗ religious institution it has acted much

1:03:32 ↗ more as a group

1:03:37 ↗ seeking to make a real estate investment

1:03:42 ↗ into profit by that I hope the city will

1:03:46 ↗ seriously fight to keep our landmark

1:03:50 ↗ status for Providence Heights campus

1:03:53 ↗ thank you very much thank you well as

1:03:58 ↗ the best food

1:03:59 ↗ Steve Pereira

1:04:05 ↗ I could evening mayor Butler council

1:04:09 ↗ steeper era 117 northeast dogwood Street

1:04:12 ↗ is Groff about 10 years so first I'd

1:04:15 ↗ just echo Elizabeth mo ponds comments on

1:04:18 ↗ Providence Heights and its deserving of

1:04:21 ↗ vigorous defense of its landmark status

1:04:25 ↗ and can you reaching out to each of you

1:04:28 ↗ to help us maybe identify who were how

1:04:30 ↗ to preserve that campus site second and

1:04:34 ↗ I commend the proposed additional three

1:04:36 ↗ police officers for traffic enforcement

1:04:38 ↗ I'm sorry that folks need to be reminded

1:04:40 ↗ to go the speed limit to go to speed

1:04:42 ↗ limit and in neighborhoods it's

1:04:46 ↗ unfortunate that's needed but I think

1:04:47 ↗ it's a good call thank you

1:04:49 ↗ third item item e on the consent

1:04:53 ↗ calendar the vertical mixed-use again

1:04:55 ↗ just asking that each of you it's great

1:04:57 ↗ that it go forward to committee I just

1:05:00 ↗ think it needs a much broader comment

1:05:02 ↗ and discussion for the whole citywide

1:05:04 ↗ before it gets enacted pros cons I'm not

1:05:06 ↗ taking position at this point it just is

1:05:08 ↗ something that's going to impact us all

1:05:11 ↗ the bulk of my comment still have to do

1:05:13 ↗ with the kakari development phase 2 and

1:05:17 ↗ phase 3 I attended the said but

1:05:19 ↗ September 20th Development Commission

1:05:21 ↗ meeting and I had a couple thoughts I

1:05:23 ↗ just wanted to share the first was a

1:05:26 ↗ sense of deja vu from a lot of people

1:05:29 ↗ that talked about it we're not really

1:05:32 ↗ that versed in land use or zoning and

1:05:35 ↗ all those types of things it they talked

1:05:37 ↗ about in things like the deer play here

1:05:39 ↗ and we're a fun friendly community we

1:05:42 ↗ don't really want to I just would like

1:05:45 ↗ to see a much better way of engaging

1:05:48 ↗ informing the community and how to reach

1:05:51 ↗ out to the City Council and city

1:05:52 ↗ officials and staff in gaining that

1:05:55 ↗ knowledge and conversations I know that

1:05:58 ↗ one of the puzzles the mayor talked

1:06:00 ↗ about was increasing the community

1:06:03 ↗ engagement person and one of her

1:06:07 ↗ suggestions was a citizen's Academy that

1:06:09 ↗ could be a great thing but I think there

1:06:10 ↗ needs to be something much more robust

1:06:12 ↗ to engage the community and

1:06:14 ↗ how to engage with the PPC or with the

1:06:17 ↗ Development Commission or with city

1:06:18 ↗ staff and how to talk about the things

1:06:20 ↗ that they need or that they want in the

1:06:23 ↗ language that makes that happen a second

1:06:27 ↗ thought on that was as part of any

1:06:30 ↗ development goes forward there are fees

1:06:33 ↗ that get assessed for development

1:06:34 ↗ impacts in schools and parks and then

1:06:39 ↗ those fees get paid in the city and the

1:06:40 ↗ city has something like 10 years to

1:06:42 ↗ decide how to use those to decide how

1:06:44 ↗ the impacts will be implemented it seems

1:06:49 ↗ like this would be more of a direct

1:06:50 ↗ correlation between the here's our

1:06:53 ↗ proposal and can this proposal can the

1:06:56 ↗ schools accommodate this the number of

1:06:58 ↗ students are going to go with that

1:07:00 ↗ proposed development will there be a

1:07:03 ↗ part for those local residents used

1:07:04 ↗ locally and not that should be there

1:07:07 ↗ should be a linked correlation between

1:07:08 ↗ those happening and the development

1:07:11 ↗ being approved not just having 10 years

1:07:12 ↗ as a long term to decide how to do that

1:07:18 ↗ so I'd like to see more of a connection

1:07:21 ↗ between those two pieces as we go

1:07:23 ↗ forward thank you thank you Steve

1:07:28 ↗ no one further has signed up to speak

1:07:32 ↗ yes sir

1:07:42 ↗ good evening mr. mayor and council my

1:07:45 ↗ name's Hal Ferris I've spoken to you

1:07:47 ↗ before and I came to today just to give

1:07:49 ↗ you an update of how we're progressing

1:07:50 ↗ with the Tod project and progress that's

1:07:52 ↗ been made since our last council meeting

1:07:54 ↗ as you recall when the Council passed

1:07:57 ↗ the to adopt the mo use and execute

1:08:00 ↗ those which we did in September we had

1:08:04 ↗ not yet engaged gotten CenturyLink to to

1:08:07 ↗ sign their part of the agreement and

1:08:09 ↗ they've done that they did that shortly

1:08:10 ↗ after they made minor modifications to

1:08:12 ↗ what the council approved we got that

1:08:14 ↗ done in time so that we could make our

1:08:16 ↗ application to King County for the ten

1:08:20 ↗ million dollar set aside for the

1:08:22 ↗ Issaquah corridor so that was the key

1:08:25 ↗ thing that we were working towards other

1:08:28 ↗ other things that accomplished is that

1:08:30 ↗ since that time the city has completed

1:08:33 ↗ their minor remediation of the King

1:08:37 ↗ County site which with the replacement

1:08:38 ↗ site for the Century Link to locate to

1:08:42 ↗ they've then submitted the report to the

1:08:45 ↗ Department of Ecology for a no further

1:08:49 ↗ action letter all of which are required

1:08:50 ↗ for us to be able to move forward

1:08:52 ↗ there's still much work to be done

1:08:53 ↗ before the December 15th deadline when

1:08:57 ↗ King County will make their ward of the

1:08:59 ↗ transitorium a transit oriented

1:09:01 ↗ development funding for the project and

1:09:05 ↗ some of those will continue to need

1:09:08 ↗ engagement with the council and the

1:09:10 ↗ staff and we also look forward to

1:09:12 ↗ engaging the community in the first

1:09:13 ↗ quarter as I said the last time to talk

1:09:15 ↗ about what the transit oriented

1:09:17 ↗ development project is about and to

1:09:19 ↗ share our ideas and the vision of what

1:09:22 ↗ this of what the potential development

1:09:24 ↗ would be for that site so there's a lot

1:09:27 ↗ of work to be done and will continue to

1:09:28 ↗ be back in front of the council and

1:09:30 ↗ engaging the community the key for us as

1:09:32 ↗ we said before is to be able to be

1:09:34 ↗ successful with that award from the

1:09:36 ↗ transfer from the King County funding

1:09:39 ↗ that's going to be enabled the

1:09:40 ↗ affordable housing at the CenturyLink

1:09:42 ↗ site which we're looking forward to

1:09:45 ↗ developing so that's just a quick update

1:09:47 ↗ and I wanted to come and fill you in

1:09:49 ↗ before we keep moving along they

1:09:51 ↗ I'll thank you for that update anyone

1:09:54 ↗ else Mary my name is Mary Lynch and I

1:10:00 ↗ recited to 6:9 own Northwest Oh Chris

1:10:02 ↗ Drive Issaquah Washington I just want to

1:10:05 ↗ come back because on the 6th of

1:10:07 ↗ September I presented you a slide show

1:10:09 ↗ I'm not going to do it to you or

1:10:11 ↗ presented again on vision 0 I presented

1:10:14 ↗ it a year prior to that I also followed

1:10:17 ↗ up with a letter to you mayor Butler

1:10:19 ↗ asking for the status of where we were

1:10:21 ↗ with that because I was promised in Tina

1:10:23 ↗ good for Dee and I both were promised

1:10:25 ↗ over a year ago that the city would have

1:10:28 ↗ a vision zero like program in place and

1:10:31 ↗ I think if we had a vision zero like

1:10:34 ↗ program in place we might have prevented

1:10:36 ↗ what happened with the death where we

1:10:39 ↗ could go we still are not implementing

1:10:43 ↗ the for ease we're not doing the reach

1:10:45 ↗ out for education and enforcement and

1:10:48 ↗ engineering I don't know how many of our

1:10:51 ↗ streets is just not that intersection

1:10:53 ↗ there at 56 it's the target

1:10:55 ↗ it's front street it's every place we

1:10:58 ↗ have a crosswalk and a green light

1:11:00 ↗ people are not abiding by the

1:11:04 ↗ pedestrians in the crosswalk and the

1:11:06 ↗ near misses and the accidents that we've

1:11:09 ↗ had over the last several years I think

1:11:11 ↗ is unconscionable and we need if we have

1:11:14 ↗ to just put a police officer at each one

1:11:17 ↗ of those intersections for a number of

1:11:18 ↗ days and start ticketing cars that do

1:11:22 ↗ not yield to pedestrians they've got to

1:11:24 ↗ start receiving tickets we've got to be

1:11:26 ↗ let it known throughout the community

1:11:27 ↗ and through all our pass throughs that

1:11:30 ↗ we really mean business and we need to

1:11:32 ↗ enforce our pedestrians in the crosswalk

1:11:36 ↗ to deaths and a lot of other accidents

1:11:41 ↗ that have happened over the last several

1:11:43 ↗ years is just atrocious and it shows our

1:11:46 ↗ lack of follow-through on really

1:11:49 ↗ committing to safety and a pedestrian

1:11:51 ↗ safety and yet we say we want to make

1:11:54 ↗ this a pedestrian friendly City I don't

1:11:57 ↗ see where I've seen any action that have

1:12:00 ↗ taken place

1:12:01 ↗ took out for that thank you thank you

1:12:05 ↗ Mary anyone else yes please thank you

1:12:13 ↗ City Council and mayor for the

1:12:14 ↗ opportunity to speak my name is Jenny

1:12:17 ↗ Bingham I live at 375 southeast Anders

1:12:20 ↗ Street and I have spoke about this

1:12:23 ↗ before and I know there's a study going

1:12:27 ↗ on but we continue whether the light is

1:12:30 ↗ functioning or it was a four-way stop we

1:12:34 ↗ continue to have Andrews and Bush as our

1:12:38 ↗ bypass I don't know where we're at in

1:12:44 ↗ finally getting some answers on what

1:12:46 ↗ they're going to do but it is needed and

1:12:50 ↗ it just seems like we're getting ignored

1:12:51 ↗ on this talking about pedestrian

1:12:54 ↗ friendly

1:12:55 ↗ I've also for two years talked about

1:12:58 ↗ missing sidewalks and people to be able

1:13:02 ↗ to walk on the sidewalk or special needs

1:13:05 ↗ people in wheelchairs use Andrews Street

1:13:08 ↗ and have to go out in the road where it

1:13:11 ↗ ends right about 4th Avenue go out on

1:13:14 ↗ the road then cars come off a sunset way

1:13:17 ↗ do not adhere to the stop sign that is

1:13:21 ↗ there and can hit that wheelchair person

1:13:24 ↗ because there is no sidewalk going up to

1:13:27 ↗ 4th Avenue off a sense that way I don't

1:13:32 ↗ know what the plan is here pedestrian

1:13:34 ↗ friendly bypass Andrews and Bush Street

1:13:38 ↗ we did we just need some answers

1:13:40 ↗ we is it going to be another fatality I

1:13:43 ↗ would sure hate to see that with a

1:13:45 ↗ special needs person anyway thank you

1:13:49 ↗ for the opportunity

1:13:51 ↗ Thank You Jenny

1:13:56 ↗ even followed by Connie thank you

1:14:01 ↗ David Kapler 255 southeast Andrews

1:14:03 ↗ Street our new signal here is kind of

1:14:06 ↗ interesting but one thing I've noticed

1:14:08 ↗ is that people see that green light from

1:14:11 ↗ a long distance away and get their

1:14:13 ↗ speeds up I've seen number of cars below

1:14:17 ↗ this that blow the old stop signs

1:14:19 ↗ completely but the speeds we're getting

1:14:21 ↗ right here across which I've even

1:14:24 ↗ noticed tonight when people see those

1:14:26 ↗ green lights from a distance whether

1:14:28 ↗ they're coming northbound on second or

1:14:30 ↗ east or west on sunset they get those

1:14:33 ↗ speeds up so enforcement is going to be

1:14:36 ↗ necessary because I'm sure a lot of

1:14:38 ↗ those cars end up running the red light

1:14:39 ↗ because they're speeding up well ahead

1:14:42 ↗ of that green I do support the eventual

1:14:48 ↗ annexation of the County Island I

1:14:50 ↗ supported that for a long time the

1:14:54 ↗ existing parcel boundaries make no sense

1:14:58 ↗ however I hope that's safe to say I'm

1:15:01 ↗ not suggesting any about their zoning if

1:15:05 ↗ you look at the comp plan guidance you

1:15:07 ↗ would get and you look at the whole

1:15:09 ↗ island property you know things fit in

1:15:12 ↗ to the comp plan a reasonable way single

1:15:15 ↗ parcels could have a single zoning and

1:15:18 ↗ that kind of thing this the council I'd

1:15:22 ↗ really needs to know the ground up there

1:15:25 ↗ the top in the bottom there's a lot of

1:15:28 ↗ complications there with pencil res at

1:15:30 ↗ reservoir site Road to that you know

1:15:34 ↗ where where we're going to have that

1:15:36 ↗ open space and those things there's a

1:15:37 ↗ lot to think about

1:15:39 ↗ I would hope that the council comes up

1:15:44 ↗ with the proper zoning and redoes the

1:15:49 ↗ property the parcel boundaries so we end

1:15:52 ↗ up with each parcel having a single zone

1:15:54 ↗ rather than multiple zones as it looks

1:15:57 ↗ like now thank you thank you David

1:16:02 ↗ Connie

1:16:09 ↗ Connie Marsh I did a bond squawk I'm

1:16:14 ↗ going to talk about the process which is

1:16:17 ↗ not on your list but I think it's ok so

1:16:23 ↗ zoning as compared to code has become

1:16:28 ↗ very complex process wise in the last

1:16:32 ↗ few months where everyone is a little

1:16:35 ↗ confused on what they can say and they

1:16:37 ↗ cannot say and I was just reading the

1:16:40 ↗ budget over there in my corner and what

1:16:42 ↗ I would like to propose for this next

1:16:45 ↗ year's budget is some money that we can

1:16:48 ↗ actually start to have our code

1:16:54 ↗ accurately and consistently supply the

1:16:57 ↗ process so the community knows that they

1:17:01 ↗ can even talk and when they can talk

1:17:04 ↗ without splitting hairs to the enth

1:17:06 ↗ degree because I think this is a this

1:17:09 ↗ has been an example of a process that we

1:17:11 ↗ never ever ever ever want to repeat

1:17:14 ↗ again so I think we can do so much

1:17:19 ↗ better and so soon you're going to be at

1:17:22 ↗ those budget meetings now I'm going to

1:17:23 ↗ try to remember to tickle your ear about

1:17:25 ↗ this process and remind you of the pain

1:17:28 ↗ and so then next year when we do

1:17:31 ↗ something else again it'll be better

1:17:32 ↗ thank you

1:17:35 ↗ Thank You Connie Brian

1:17:42 ↗ thank you my name is brian weinstein my

1:17:45 ↗ address is on file i want to talk about

1:17:49 ↗ two things the first is a decision that

1:17:52 ↗ was handed down in superior court about

1:17:54 ↗ the Tallis property and the landslide

1:17:57 ↗ there specifically i think i can talk

1:18:00 ↗ about that it's not on this list it's

1:18:04 ↗ interesting because if you read that

1:18:06 ↗ particular decision it talks about the

1:18:08 ↗ truthfulness and the completeness of

1:18:10 ↗ what are known as critical area reports

1:18:14 ↗ sometimes I think when the city makes

1:18:16 ↗ decisions on potential acquisition of

1:18:19 ↗ property or selling property critical

1:18:21 ↗ area reports must be included in the

1:18:24 ↗ packet that the council looks at buyers

1:18:27 ↗ and sellers should be aware that in this

1:18:30 ↗ particular lawsuit a critical area

1:18:32 ↗ report wasn't very truthful the second

1:18:36 ↗ thing I'd like to talk about is the

1:18:38 ↗ comprehensive plan and included in the

1:18:42 ↗ comprehensive plan I think should be a

1:18:44 ↗ principle that when citizens wish to

1:18:47 ↗ speak about city transactions regarding

1:18:50 ↗ policies public land public money

1:18:55 ↗ citizens should be able to do so

1:18:58 ↗ citizens should not have to read through

1:19:01 ↗ opinions from a city attorney about

1:19:04 ↗ Robert's Rules of Order and

1:19:06 ↗ parliamentary procedure about what is

1:19:09 ↗ supposed to happen at a council meeting

1:19:12 ↗ I think residents should be able to

1:19:14 ↗ understand transactions that involve

1:19:16 ↗ their land and their money and not need

1:19:20 ↗ a degree in soil biology the atmosphere

1:19:26 ↗ traffic or have a degree in urban

1:19:29 ↗ planning to understand what is being

1:19:32 ↗ proposed for their community our

1:19:35 ↗ comprehensive plan should make it very

1:19:38 ↗ clear how communities facilities

1:19:41 ↗ including schools are being included in

1:19:44 ↗ our future where they should be sited

1:19:47 ↗ and why and that the council work fully

1:19:51 ↗ and collaboratively and on a continual

1:19:54 ↗ basis

1:19:54 ↗ with the school board so that they never

1:19:57 ↗ have to play catch-up again with the

1:20:00 ↗ city that was continuing to grow as much

1:20:03 ↗ as this aqua finally well not quite

1:20:07 ↗ finally when when the city is looking at

1:20:11 ↗ its comprehensive plan and considering

1:20:14 ↗ projects that are beneficial for example

1:20:17 ↗ transit or oriented projects should be

1:20:21 ↗ very clear and the citizens should know

1:20:24 ↗ without question what the exact benefit

1:20:28 ↗ these such projects will bring to the

1:20:31 ↗ community as well as the cost including

1:20:35 ↗ the cost to the school district

1:20:38 ↗ if such projects are being made to have

1:20:41 ↗ certain affordable or multifamily tax

1:20:44 ↗ exemptions that will allow them to have

1:20:47 ↗ a higher degree of population that does

1:20:50 ↗ not pay taxes and benefits the school

1:20:53 ↗ district and the city should be able to

1:20:56 ↗ identify and delineate this clearly to

1:20:59 ↗ us especially for a city that's already

1:21:03 ↗ met its 2030 population goal and finally

1:21:08 ↗ resolutions that come before this

1:21:10 ↗ council that fail any of these tests

1:21:14 ↗ should be rejected and not gone over and

1:21:18 ↗ over and over again until a predefined

1:21:21 ↗ objective that nobody knows about has

1:21:26 ↗ been met the process is not what

1:21:30 ↗ citizens are here for but we are a

1:21:33 ↗ victim of the process and the process

1:21:38 ↗ needs to benefit the citizens not a

1:21:41 ↗ select few thank you

1:21:46 ↗ thank you Brian Dave are you good

1:21:57 ↗ evening Council Mayor David Wagoner 360

1:22:00 ↗ Northwest dogwood Street department Kate

1:22:02 ↗ 204 and Issaquah I wasn't going to talk

1:22:05 ↗ about this but I want you to know that

1:22:09 ↗ you don't have to go down and take that

1:22:11 ↗ lady's word for it and go down and stand

1:22:12 ↗ on the corner because bill Frey Singh

1:22:14 ↗ and I were writing our bicycles the same

1:22:18 ↗ place the same way and not only did they

1:22:21 ↗ not stop but we got punked at and the

1:22:25 ↗ one finger salute

1:22:27 ↗ so I saluted back okay it's it's true it

1:22:32 ↗ happens every day of the week take the

1:22:36 ↗ time and go down there I promise you

1:22:38 ↗ you'll have an eye-opening get on a

1:22:40 ↗ bicycle try to ride across the street

1:22:42 ↗ you'll have an eye-opening experience

1:22:45 ↗ I'm a veteran and I'm here tonight as a

1:22:48 ↗ veteran many of you know I served on the

1:22:50 ↗ King County veteran's advisory board for

1:22:53 ↗ 12 years I also was on the first levee

1:22:57 ↗ that was instituted for King Council

1:23:00 ↗ back in 2005 and worked with a guy by

1:23:03 ↗ the name of Bob Patterson and he is now

1:23:07 ↗ our Attorney General for the state now

1:23:09 ↗ I'm not saying that as a name-dropper

1:23:10 ↗ I'm saying that simply because it was

1:23:12 ↗ true we believe then we believe now that

1:23:16 ↗ this Veterans and Human Services levee

1:23:18 ↗ is wonderful and I can stand here and

1:23:21 ↗ talk to you as a veteran about all the

1:23:24 ↗ things that it's done I'll start by

1:23:26 ↗ talking about what the levee has done so

1:23:29 ↗ far we've got years of real impact and

1:23:32 ↗ data that tells us we're using the money

1:23:34 ↗ in a smart way for folks who want the

1:23:38 ↗ details you can go to Yes on Prop 1.com

1:23:42 ↗ but I'll hit a few things or you can

1:23:45 ↗ pick up a report that comes out every

1:23:47 ↗ year just like this report and I can

1:23:50 ↗ tell you that there's bricks and mortar

1:23:53 ↗ that have taken veterans off of the

1:23:55 ↗ street and if I can get anybody to hell

1:23:59 ↗ take a veteran off the street on there

1:24:02 ↗ men 35,000 people are served every year

1:24:07 ↗ by the levee and that number will

1:24:09 ↗ increase if it's renewed in November

1:24:13 ↗ since 2006 the levee has helped fund

1:24:16 ↗ more than 2,000 units of affordable

1:24:19 ↗ housing throughout King County with some

1:24:22 ↗ great examples like the William J Wood

1:24:25 ↗ Veterans Home in Federal Way bill wood

1:24:28 ↗ was a good friend of mine that served on

1:24:30 ↗ the King County Veterans Advisory Board

1:24:32 ↗ he passed away four years ago and what

1:24:35 ↗ he helped get start that I hope will

1:24:39 ↗ continue for another six years and I'm

1:24:43 ↗ really not talking to the council now

1:24:45 ↗ now I'm talking to the voters you've got

1:24:48 ↗ to do it you've got to stand behind us

1:24:50 ↗ I'm telling you it's taken veterans off

1:24:52 ↗ of the street so if we pass this thing

1:24:56 ↗ what can we expect for the next six

1:24:57 ↗ years for starters we'll be able to

1:25:01 ↗ expand on great veteran's employment

1:25:03 ↗ programs that take advantage of all

1:25:06 ↗ great skills that vets learn while

1:25:09 ↗ they're in the service with a little

1:25:13 ↗ boost then they can get jobs in our

1:25:16 ↗ economy and start paying the taxes that

1:25:19 ↗ we need in the tax base we also know

1:25:23 ↗ there's a homeless vets problem in the

1:25:25 ↗ area and it'll be a whole lot worse if

1:25:28 ↗ we put them out on the street please

1:25:30 ↗ don't do that

1:25:31 ↗ lastly well I could go on and on for a

1:25:35 ↗ long time about this so the last thing I

1:25:38 ↗ want to say is vote Yes on Prop 1 as a

1:25:41 ↗ veteran I'm telling you it works it has

1:25:45 ↗ worked for the last 12 years let's make

1:25:47 ↗ it work for another six we need your

1:25:50 ↗ support thank you thank you Dave

1:25:54 ↗ anyone else desire to speak this evening

1:26:00 ↗ seeing no one that audience comments are

1:26:03 ↗ closed that will move now to committee

1:26:05 ↗ and regional reports

1:26:07 ↗ Araya Thank You mr. mayor I attended the

1:26:11 ↗ Eastside Human Services forum board

1:26:14 ↗ meeting on Wednesday September 20th we

1:26:17 ↗ had two presentations one was on the

1:26:21 ↗ Medicaid transformation project done by

1:26:26 ↗ the King County accountable community of

1:26:28 ↗ Health and it's all about innovation to

1:26:31 ↗ work to improve health health outcomes

1:26:35 ↗ for Medicaid beneficiaries the second

1:26:39 ↗ presentation and we spent a lot of time

1:26:41 ↗ on this is a popular topic tonight which

1:26:43 ↗ was the veterans and human services

1:26:46 ↗ levee the veterans seniors and human

1:26:49 ↗ services levee and I just wanted to

1:26:53 ↗ point out a couple different things and

1:26:55 ↗ and I'm following David so that's that's

1:26:58 ↗ great

1:26:58 ↗ that the last levee did since 2012 has

1:27:04 ↗ helped over 35,000 people one important

1:27:09 ↗ piece about the veterans and human

1:27:12 ↗ services levee from before is that now

1:27:14 ↗ it adds seniors a really critical I feel

1:27:19 ↗ an important point and this is something

1:27:22 ↗ that the Eastside Human Services forum

1:27:24 ↗ has not decided if they're going to take

1:27:27 ↗ an official vote and and asked for

1:27:32 ↗ support but they may be so I may be

1:27:34 ↗ coming back to council during the good

1:27:36 ↗ of the order and asking for feedback in

1:27:40 ↗ regard to this and I just you know

1:27:44 ↗ wanted to say just personally after 18

1:27:47 ↗ years of helping out in the human

1:27:50 ↗ services area that it really it really

1:27:53 ↗ does take a village so I've got like a

1:27:57 ↗ two page which is a really handy piece

1:28:02 ↗ of

1:28:05 ↗ information about this so if anybody

1:28:07 ↗ wants to see that I can pass that out so

1:28:09 ↗ I was glad to see the group come and

1:28:11 ↗ talk tonight

1:28:13 ↗ and then also Friends of Youth is

1:28:15 ↗ starting a new initiative and it's all

1:28:18 ↗ all about that there has been a decline

1:28:20 ↗ in terms of people that are signing up

1:28:25 ↗ to be foster parents and they're really

1:28:27 ↗ they have a brand new initiative to

1:28:30 ↗ encourage people to think about being a

1:28:33 ↗ foster parent I also attended the

1:28:36 ↗ Eastside Economic Development Council of

1:28:39 ↗ Seattle and King County on Wednesday

1:28:41 ↗ September 20th and there are some

1:28:43 ↗ interesting things in terms of

1:28:45 ↗ partnership development around several

1:28:48 ↗ groups including the economic

1:28:50 ↗ development council and I there's going

1:28:54 ↗ to be more to come and more to talk

1:28:56 ↗ about in regard to this I think they're

1:28:58 ↗ right in the middle of sort of trying to

1:29:01 ↗ figure out if it would be a good idea

1:29:02 ↗ for some of these groups to come

1:29:04 ↗ together to better help economic

1:29:08 ↗ development in King County and there

1:29:11 ↗ were a lot of questions surrounding

1:29:13 ↗ smaller cities outside of Seattle and

1:29:15 ↗ how that would impact that group so more

1:29:19 ↗ to come in regard to that and that

1:29:22 ↗ concludes my report thank you Bill Thank

1:29:25 ↗ You mr. mayor on September 21st I

1:29:29 ↗ attended the I rank chaired the council

1:29:32 ↗ Infrastructure Committee and we had

1:29:35 ↗ three items on that agenda that are now

1:29:37 ↗ on the consent calendar tonight I'll

1:29:39 ↗ just mention briefly they'll be written

1:29:41 ↗ later but we talked about a renewal

1:29:43 ↗ agreement franchise agreement with clear

1:29:45 ↗ Wireless I was a b-70 for 69 Sammamish

1:29:49 ↗ plat Toole interlocal agreement may be

1:29:52 ↗ 74 68 in 1874 63 was the watch state

1:29:56 ↗ department transportation right away

1:29:57 ↗ easement so there on the consent

1:29:59 ↗ calendar tonight there were two other

1:30:02 ↗ presentations we had one was mentioned

1:30:04 ↗ earlier about the solid waste collection

1:30:06 ↗ contract that's coming up so we had our

1:30:08 ↗ first presentation on that on how to

1:30:10 ↗ look at that in the future this is we

1:30:12 ↗ have some lot of time to deal with that

1:30:13 ↗ so options with that and

1:30:15 ↗ we collect waste for citizens and the

1:30:20 ↗ other one probably the most attention

1:30:21 ↗ was Issaquah Hobart Road study you know

1:30:24 ↗ I remember we partnered with Issaquah

1:30:26 ↗ with King County to do a study on that

1:30:29 ↗ road at this point they had gotten to

1:30:32 ↗ gathering data and so they just took

1:30:35 ↗ that point to share the data with us

1:30:37 ↗ okay and so it's the traffic flow is

1:30:40 ↗ where it is where it is it's in those

1:30:41 ↗ pinch points of congestion so that's

1:30:45 ↗ what we shared at that point and now

1:30:46 ↗ these next couple months they will be

1:30:48 ↗ looking to take that data and start

1:30:51 ↗ looking at analyzing it and what what

1:30:54 ↗ may come of that and we don't know but

1:30:56 ↗ they had some ideas some objectives on

1:30:58 ↗ things to look at and they'll be coming

1:30:59 ↗ back to us with suggestions in

1:31:02 ↗ approximately 2 months or so and that

1:31:06 ↗ was was on that agenda on September 27th

1:31:09 ↗ I was at the regional transit committee

1:31:11 ↗ and there we approved three items to

1:31:14 ↗ move forward to council all related to

1:31:16 ↗ the simplifying the Metro fare so it's

1:31:22 ↗ been talked about a little bit around

1:31:23 ↗ here but simplifying it to 275 $2 Center

1:31:26 ↗ 5 cents per trip no matter where you go

1:31:28 ↗ so you don't have peak trips and

1:31:29 ↗ off-peak trips and zone trips and

1:31:32 ↗ everything else that gets people

1:31:33 ↗ confused also included with that when

1:31:36 ↗ they did that was two other items which

1:31:39 ↗ was to add four hundred thousand dollars

1:31:41 ↗ to the Human Services funding of transit

1:31:44 ↗ took passes so they'd add more funding

1:31:49 ↗ to get more transit passes to Human

1:31:51 ↗ Services things so that would help

1:31:53 ↗ alleviate some of that increased cost of

1:31:57 ↗ some folks would have an increased light

1:31:58 ↗ increased cost and the other one was to

1:32:00 ↗ offset the cost of the orca card also a

1:32:03 ↗ slight reduction in net cost so those

1:32:05 ↗ three things went from our committee to

1:32:08 ↗ council from there they had another one

1:32:09 ↗ to go to as well but they'll be they've

1:32:11 ↗ been moving forward quite a bit and

1:32:12 ↗ they're working their way down and that

1:32:16 ↗ concludes my report

1:32:17 ↗ thanks Bill Paul Thank You mr. mayor on

1:32:20 ↗ Thursday I well come this coming

1:32:22 ↗ Thursday October 5th I'll be attending

1:32:24 ↗ the Puget Sound Regional Council's

1:32:26 ↗ growth management policy board meeting

1:32:29 ↗ the primary agenda item of interest for

1:32:31 ↗ Issaquah this meeting will be a review

1:32:32 ↗ of the draft of the regional centers

1:32:34 ↗ framework update and then possibly

1:32:37 ↗ action to direct the staff to release

1:32:40 ↗ the update for public comment and then

1:32:44 ↗ the next steps in this process would be

1:32:46 ↗ for the review board to review all

1:32:48 ↗ public comments at our regularly

1:32:50 ↗ scheduled November meeting and we have

1:32:52 ↗ an extra meeting at the end of November

1:32:54 ↗ to discuss any further public comments

1:32:57 ↗ and to possibly take action then last

1:33:02 ↗ Thursday on September 28th we held the

1:33:06 ↗ meaning of the lodging tax advisory

1:33:07 ↗ committee and/or LTAC and just a

1:33:12 ↗ reminder earlier this year LTAC put out

1:33:15 ↗ an RFQ for proposals for proposals to

1:33:18 ↗ provide event recruitment to Issaquah

1:33:21 ↗ events such as conferences or sporting

1:33:23 ↗ events like the professional volleyball

1:33:25 ↗ tournament that's now run for three

1:33:27 ↗ years at State Lake Sammamish State Park

1:33:30 ↗ events like that which do drive activity

1:33:33 ↗ and business for our local hotels we did

1:33:37 ↗ not select any of the submittals for

1:33:39 ↗ that wood that we received so we've gone

1:33:43 ↗ almost two years now trying to get event

1:33:46 ↗ recruitment in place and haven't been

1:33:49 ↗ successful this last meeting we have a

1:33:53 ↗ new staff liaison Tim dinner and we have

1:33:56 ↗ kind of discussed a slightly different

1:34:01 ↗ tactic about perhaps putting what the

1:34:05 ↗ Roger Brooke study had recommended as a

1:34:07 ↗ kind of like a visit Issaquah

1:34:09 ↗ organization creating such a structure

1:34:11 ↗ first and then get into the staff that

1:34:14 ↗ and get into the event recruitment we're

1:34:16 ↗ gonna continue to discuss that and have

1:34:18 ↗ another meeting before the end of

1:34:19 ↗ October with for the purpose of

1:34:21 ↗ potentially providing that plan and its

1:34:25 ↗ vision and a 2018 budget proposal for

1:34:28 ↗ the council to consider before we

1:34:29 ↗ complete the this full budget process so

1:34:33 ↗ we'll cut back to the council with the

1:34:35 ↗ LTAC recommendation while this is still

1:34:36 ↗ in process that concludes my report

1:34:39 ↗ thank you Paul Eileen Thank You mayor I

1:34:44 ↗ attended the September 21st meeting of

1:34:46 ↗ Huayra 8 we had our updates and

1:34:50 ↗ committee reports including a letter to

1:34:52 ↗ Senator Murray thanking her for her

1:34:54 ↗ leadership in restoring the Pacific

1:34:56 ↗ coastal salmon recovery fund including

1:34:59 ↗ sixty five million dollars for the

1:35:01 ↗ program in the 2018 Senate science

1:35:04 ↗ appropriation bill we welcomed welcoming

1:35:07 ↗ to Colonel ger Aldi our new Army Corps

1:35:10 ↗ of engineer district commander we also

1:35:12 ↗ reviewed the final draft of the yr8

1:35:15 ↗ 10-year plan that's plan that up updates

1:35:18 ↗ and an for approval it's a salmon

1:35:22 ↗ conservation plan for ten years also had

1:35:27 ↗ a briefing on the Ballard Locks economic

1:35:29 ↗ impact study and reviewed the draft

1:35:32 ↗ regarding that one success stories the

1:35:36 ↗ success stories was a presentation from

1:35:38 ↗ King County on a recent Bear Creek

1:35:40 ↗ in-stream riparian habitat restoration

1:35:43 ↗ project and then I also attended the

1:35:47 ↗ kokanee workgroup we had a report on an

1:35:49 ↗ application of a 2d and 3d temperature

1:35:53 ↗ modeling of Lake Sammamish this was to

1:35:55 ↗ help evaluate the future climate impacts

1:35:58 ↗ of the kokanee habitats we have we also

1:36:01 ↗ had a quick overview of Lake Sammamish

1:36:03 ↗ study on water quality graphed and data

1:36:05 ↗ on the water temperatures on bacteria on

1:36:08 ↗ LJ toxins and their measurements that

1:36:12 ↗ concludes my report

1:36:14 ↗ Thank You Eileen Mary Lou Thank You mr.

1:36:17 ↗ mayor on September 14th the cascade

1:36:19 ↗ water Alliance's resource management

1:36:21 ↗ committee met I was not in attendance

1:36:23 ↗ but I got an update they focused on the

1:36:26 ↗ elements of the Lake Tapps water quality

1:36:28 ↗ work program cascade water Alliance has

1:36:32 ↗ purchased Lake Lake Tapps sort of as an

1:36:34 ↗ insurance policy on our water supply and

1:36:37 ↗ this resource group is responsible for

1:36:39 ↗ both making sure that the water quality

1:36:41 ↗ is maintained and they also review

1:36:43 ↗ contracts dealing with the operation of

1:36:45 ↗ the dam on September 27th I attended the

1:36:49 ↗ cascade water Alliance board meeting

1:36:50 ↗ with the mayor and

1:36:51 ↗ any issues significant Cisco would be

1:36:54 ↗ reported out by the mayor next seat for

1:36:57 ↗ board meeting is October 12 4 o'clock at

1:36:59 ↗ the Eastside Fire and Rescue

1:37:00 ↗ headquarters on the agenda items are the

1:37:03 ↗ approval of the 2018 budget and just as

1:37:05 ↗ a you should have note the this agency

1:37:09 ↗ is also proposing to eventually maybe in

1:37:12 ↗ the next budget cycle moved to a

1:37:13 ↗ two-year budget cycle as well

1:37:15 ↗ we got a brief introduction to a

1:37:17 ↗ proposal for a new fee for motor vehicle

1:37:21 ↗ accidents we're gonna get that referred

1:37:23 ↗ to committee and I'll bring back a

1:37:25 ↗ report on what that might mean in the

1:37:26 ↗ future and we also got a briefing on the

1:37:29 ↗ east Metro training group on September

1:37:31 ↗ 28th I attended the King County Fire

1:37:33 ↗ Chiefs annual conference on leadership

1:37:36 ↗ development I was a guest speaker

1:37:38 ↗ representing expectations from electeds

1:37:41 ↗ on the next generation of leadership and

1:37:43 ↗ fire service that concludes my report

1:37:45 ↗ thank you Mary Lou Stacy Thank You mr.

1:37:48 ↗ mayor council and in short committee

1:37:51 ↗ will meet this Thursday at 6:30 p.m.

1:37:53 ↗ right here on council chambers on the

1:37:55 ↗ agenda as we have over the last year had

1:37:58 ↗ a moratorium update first and then we

1:38:01 ↗ will be have next on our agenda agenda

1:38:05 ↗ bill 7317 which is vertical mix used

1:38:08 ↗ related to the development moratorium

1:38:12 ↗ then we will have agenda bill 73-42

1:38:16 ↗ which is about architectural fit and

1:38:19 ↗ urban design also regarding the

1:38:20 ↗ development moratorium then we will have

1:38:23 ↗ another discussion on the end of

1:38:25 ↗ development agreements and we will be

1:38:27 ↗ have agenda bell 73 26 back before us

1:38:31 ↗ Old Town sub area plan which we are

1:38:37 ↗ reviewing changes to and then the last

1:38:42 ↗ item is agenda bill 74 83 2017

1:38:45 ↗ amendments to the comprehensive plan

1:38:47 ↗ it's my right oh I did want to mention

1:38:50 ↗ the Issaquah Hobart Road study to let

1:38:54 ↗ the council know that the data that bill

1:38:57 ↗ has talked about is coming to committee

1:39:01 ↗ sorry council work session I believe

1:39:03 ↗ October 9th

1:39:04 ↗ yes Emily's nodding your head yes so we

1:39:07 ↗ will have that data as well the whole

1:39:09 ↗ council thank you

1:39:10 ↗ Thank You Stacy briefly I attended the

1:39:15 ↗ cascade water Alliance finance and

1:39:16 ↗ management committee meeting on

1:39:18 ↗ September 20th where we discussed 2018

1:39:21 ↗ rates and charges and the Cascade water

1:39:25 ↗ Alliance board approved their

1:39:28 ↗ recommendation on September 27th

1:39:31 ↗ formally adopting the 2018 rates and

1:39:34 ↗ charges which were no change on in what

1:39:39 ↗ was assumed in their biennial budget and

1:39:44 ↗ on September 29th I attended the Sound

1:39:47 ↗ Transit board meeting and we took action

1:39:49 ↗ on several items related to link

1:39:51 ↗ extension projects in Tacoma West

1:39:54 ↗ Seattle Ballard Lynwood and Federal Way

1:39:57 ↗ and that concludes my report and I'll

1:40:01 ↗ now ask the clerk to read the consent

1:40:05 ↗ calendar end of the record the consent

1:40:10 ↗ calendar was distributed to council in

1:40:12 ↗ advance for study if authorized council

1:40:14 ↗ action will occur by single motion

1:40:15 ↗ regarding the following items item a

1:40:17 ↗ seeks approval of approval of the

1:40:19 ↗ accounts payables in payroll of October

1:40:21 ↗ 2nd items B C and D seeks approval of

1:40:24 ↗ the minutes of the work session of

1:40:25 ↗ September 11th a special meeting of

1:40:27 ↗ September 18th and the regular meeting

1:40:29 ↗ of September 18th item E a b7 307

1:40:33 ↗ vertical mixed use seeks referral to

1:40:35 ↗ council and in short committee item F a

1:40:37 ↗ b7 3 5 7 Washington State Department of

1:40:40 ↗ Transportation commute trip reduction

1:40:42 ↗ agreement seeks to accept grant item G a

1:40:45 ↗ B 7 4 2 6 appointment of municipal judge

1:40:47 ↗ seeks to confirm item H a B 7 4 6 2

1:40:51 ↗ amending school impact fees seeks

1:40:53 ↗ referral to council services and Safety

1:40:55 ↗ Committee item I a B 7 4 6 3 washed-out

1:40:59 ↗ right-of-way easement requests for

1:41:01 ↗ maintenance purposes seeks authorization

1:41:03 ↗ item J a B 7 4 6 a interlocal agreement

1:41:07 ↗ with Sammamish Plateau Water and Sewer

1:41:08 ↗ District for adjusted sewer service area

1:41:11 ↗ seeks authorization item kab 7 4 6 9

1:41:15 ↗ franchise agreement with clear Wireless

1:41:17 ↗ seeks to adopt or

1:41:18 ↗ if approved the ordinance will be

1:41:20 ↗ assigned number two 807 item lab7 for 8

1:41:24 ↗ - 2017 third budget amendment seeks to

1:41:27 ↗ set public hearing and refer to council

1:41:29 ↗ services and safety committee item M a

1:41:32 ↗ b7 4 8 3 2017 amendments to the

1:41:35 ↗ comprehensive plan seeks referral to

1:41:37 ↗ Council and into our committee this

1:41:39 ↗ concludes the reading thank you to have

1:41:44 ↗ the accounts payable and payroll of

1:41:46 ↗ October 2nd been reviewed

1:41:48 ↗ they have thank you

1:41:52 ↗ this any council member desire to remove

1:41:55 ↗ an item from the consent calendar and

1:41:57 ↗ consider it separately under regular

1:41:59 ↗ business Stacey I would move to adopt

1:42:04 ↗ the consent calendar as presented second

1:42:07 ↗ moved and seconded all those in favor

1:42:10 ↗ signify by saying aye those opposed that

1:42:14 ↗ carries unanimously

1:42:15 ↗ moving now to regular business agenda

1:42:18 ↗ bill 743 annexation of King County

1:42:22 ↗ Island and establishment of pre annexing

1:42:25 ↗ pre-annexation zoning keeping even

1:42:29 ↗ director of development services and

1:42:32 ↗ economic vitality divisions for staff

1:42:37 ↗ update

1:42:45 ↗ Thank You mr. mayor City Council good

1:42:48 ↗ evening

1:42:49 ↗ so tonight is I'm gonna give a brief

1:42:52 ↗ presentation really to get us back into

1:42:56 ↗ thinking about this agenda bill and then

1:42:59 ↗ I'm gonna turn it over to you to do

1:43:01 ↗ whatever it is you want to do with it so

1:43:03 ↗ as just to remind you what we're talking

1:43:08 ↗ about is this area that's in black and

1:43:11 ↗ what it is is it's basically been an

1:43:13 ↗ island of unincorporated King County

1:43:16 ↗ within the city of Issaquah Issaquah as

1:43:19 ↗ you can see from our zoning map has

1:43:23 ↗ boundaries all the way around this

1:43:24 ↗ property and the reason why this has not

1:43:27 ↗ been part of our city up until this

1:43:28 ↗ point is has the property has been owned

1:43:31 ↗ by King County and by wash dot and the

1:43:34 ↗ city took ownership of the King County

1:43:37 ↗ parcel and wash dot is in agreement with

1:43:41 ↗ annexation so you initiated the

1:43:47 ↗ annexation proceeding with resolution 20

1:43:50 ↗ 1706 and that was passed in June 6th of

1:43:54 ↗ this year and then we basically said we

1:43:59 ↗ started to notice I'm intent filed with

1:44:00 ↗ the boundary review board to be

1:44:02 ↗ consistent with our cw35 a14 295 that

1:44:07 ↗ calls for the holding of two public

1:44:10 ↗ hearings which we held July 17th and

1:44:16 ↗ September 5th and then in talking

1:44:19 ↗ through where we were then you've heard

1:44:25 ↗ some public testimony tonight about

1:44:27 ↗ process and I'm going to take just a

1:44:29 ↗ second to say that this has been a

1:44:31 ↗ complicated process is complicated

1:44:34 ↗ because annexations don't happen all the

1:44:37 ↗ time because it got even more

1:44:40 ↗ complicated because we owned one of the

1:44:42 ↗ parcels and it got even more complicated

1:44:45 ↗ because we had two parties wanting to

1:44:47 ↗ potentially buy part of the property

1:44:49 ↗ that we own so we had a very complicated

1:44:52 ↗ conversation on September 5th the

1:44:57 ↗ landed with the city council not having

1:45:01 ↗ a past motion and so what we've done

1:45:04 ↗ since then has been try to nail down

1:45:06 ↗ some of the pieces about this proposal

1:45:11 ↗ in this agenda bill to make it easier

1:45:13 ↗ for the City Council to have a clearer

1:45:14 ↗ conversation about this and so one of

1:45:18 ↗ the things that has happened is the City

1:45:21 ↗ Council as you heard earlier adopted the

1:45:24 ↗ compact school standards and that is

1:45:28 ↗ important because as you know the school

1:45:31 ↗ district has asked to or has expressed

1:45:34 ↗ an interest in potentially purchasing a

1:45:36 ↗ piece of our property we have also

1:45:39 ↗ worked with the potential partner on our

1:45:45 ↗ partner on the Century Link Tod project

1:45:48 ↗ and so we also know the exact dimensions

1:45:50 ↗ of the parcel that we would like to be

1:45:54 ↗ zoned intensive commercial so the

1:45:58 ↗ administration's recommendation is again

1:46:02 ↗ this parcels and I apologize for the

1:46:06 ↗ numbering I noticed it after I did this

1:46:08 ↗ 1 2 3 & 5 so 1 2 3 & 5 this is the

1:46:12 ↗ property we own for 6 & 7 are owned by

1:46:17 ↗ Washington State Department of

1:46:19 ↗ Transportation what has been identified

1:46:22 ↗ so far is parcel 1 is the parcel that

1:46:27 ↗ we've talked about as part of our

1:46:29 ↗ transit oriented development project

1:46:31 ↗ parcel 3 is the potential elementary

1:46:35 ↗ school site if the council so desires

1:46:37 ↗ parcel floor has been discussed by our

1:46:40 ↗ engineering department as the potential

1:46:43 ↗ location for a new 297 zone reservoir

1:46:47 ↗ and then 2 5 6 & 7 I think at this point

1:46:52 ↗ we see as being permanent open space so

1:46:55 ↗ with that I'm going to stop talking and

1:46:58 ↗ see what questions you might all have

1:47:04 ↗ thanks Paul was great question thank

1:47:07 ↗ Keith since we last met on September in

1:47:10 ↗ September fifth there was a meeting of

1:47:11 ↗ the PPC could you and they did look at

1:47:14 ↗ some of the questions related to this

1:47:17 ↗ item could you summarize for us what

1:47:19 ↗ happened in that meeting sure so as we

1:47:22 ↗ talked about and I've identified so as

1:47:27 ↗ we talked about the our CW's related to

1:47:30 ↗ annexation what it talks about is that

1:47:33 ↗ the city should the ideal is for the

1:47:37 ↗ city to have a land-use vision

1:47:40 ↗ established for an annexation before it

1:47:42 ↗ moves into annexation we did not have

1:47:45 ↗ that for the King County Island we we

1:47:49 ↗ identified it in the comprehensive plan

1:47:51 ↗ as being a potential annexation area and

1:47:55 ↗ something that we expected to come into

1:47:57 ↗ the city but we did not include any

1:48:01 ↗ [Music]

1:48:02 ↗ land-use direction on our land use map

1:48:05 ↗ and so what staff did is after

1:48:08 ↗ consulting with the city attorney we

1:48:11 ↗ went ahead and changed the agenda item

1:48:14 ↗ at the Planning Policy Commission to

1:48:16 ↗ have a conversation with them about what

1:48:20 ↗ would be the appropriate land-use for

1:48:23 ↗ the island to make a recommendation to

1:48:26 ↗ the City Council and so that was

1:48:29 ↗ included in the update of the agenda

1:48:31 ↗ bill so and I can talk about that if you

1:48:34 ↗ would like for me to talk about their

1:48:35 ↗ recommendation so because all of the

1:48:40 ↗ property is publicly owned currently we

1:48:43 ↗ own a parcel and and washed-out owns the

1:48:46 ↗ other parcels their take on it was that

1:48:50 ↗ they should make a recommendation for

1:48:52 ↗ community facilities for all of the

1:48:55 ↗ properties so we've we've when we talk

1:48:58 ↗ about zoning we actually talk about the

1:49:00 ↗ next layer down from that so within

1:49:02 ↗ community facilities there could be

1:49:04 ↗ community facilities facilities or

1:49:06 ↗ community facilities open space and

1:49:08 ↗ we've kind of debated back and forth the

1:49:11 ↗ appropriate designation for different

1:49:13 ↗ parcels within that community facilities

1:49:16 ↗ designation the only

1:49:18 ↗ nuance is the planning policy Commission

1:49:21 ↗ did not recommend commercial for what's

1:49:26 ↗ parcel one on this map and that was the

1:49:32 ↗ only place they differed from the

1:49:33 ↗ administration's recommendation the

1:49:36 ↗ reason why they did not identify or want

1:49:41 ↗ to support the commercial on parcel one

1:49:43 ↗ is because they felt like they did not

1:49:46 ↗ know enough about the transit oriented

1:49:48 ↗ development project to provide a a

1:49:54 ↗ different recommendation for that but

1:49:57 ↗ they recognized as part of their motion

1:49:59 ↗ that if the council had more information

1:50:02 ↗ or sod that differently that they

1:50:04 ↗ expected you guys to make that decision

1:50:08 ↗ okay thank you

1:50:09 ↗ sure Stacy Keith there's a memo in the

1:50:16 ↗ packet my original packet I didn't look

1:50:19 ↗ on the website the memo regarding the

1:50:22 ↗ PPC is recommendation under scenario 2

1:50:26 ↗ says that PPC recommended a land use

1:50:29 ↗ designation of cff for the entire parcel

1:50:32 ↗ so that's not correct that's not correct

1:50:36 ↗ so they so cff would actually be a zone

1:50:39 ↗ they actually recommended CF so

1:50:42 ↗ community facilities for the island and

1:50:45 ↗ so there was a corrected memo that came

1:50:48 ↗ out today there was did that get updated

1:50:51 ↗ and go into the city web site into the

1:50:53 ↗ agenda packets great thank you other

1:50:59 ↗ questions of Keith

1:51:02 ↗ Stacy I'm gonna make a motion

1:51:13 ↗ Jeff questions dude oh I thought nobody

1:51:16 ↗ had questionable Araya

1:51:18 ↗ so I Keith I just wanted to clarify when

1:51:22 ↗ when the PCC when they were talking

1:51:25 ↗ about vision for annexation were were

1:51:29 ↗ they talking in general that there

1:51:31 ↗ should be a vision for any annexation

1:51:34 ↗ that would happen or just that they

1:51:36 ↗ hadn't had an opportunity to put the

1:51:38 ↗ vision together for this particular

1:51:41 ↗ annexation so so with this annexation so

1:51:47 ↗ they so what the administration

1:51:49 ↗ recommended was cf four parcels two

1:51:54 ↗ through seven on this map but to do

1:51:57 ↗ commercial for parcel one because we

1:52:00 ↗ knew that part of the transfer

1:52:04 ↗ sorry transit oriented development

1:52:06 ↗ project was to relocate century links

1:52:09 ↗ garage slash offices to the bottom of

1:52:12 ↗ this property and you guys have executed

1:52:15 ↗ a couple memorandums of understanding

1:52:16 ↗ related to that project that that would

1:52:20 ↗ be commercial but the rest would be

1:52:22 ↗ community facilities because we have not

1:52:24 ↗ done a Tod presentation to PPC they did

1:52:29 ↗ not have that level of understanding of

1:52:33 ↗ the potential use for parcel one so they

1:52:37 ↗ they went ahead and just said all of the

1:52:40 ↗ parcels one through seven should all be

1:52:43 ↗ community facilities so that was my

1:52:46 ↗ second question that that they had not

1:52:49 ↗ seen the presentation or any

1:52:50 ↗ presentation on transit oriented

1:52:53 ↗ development they have not yet I offered

1:52:55 ↗ that we would be more than happy to give

1:52:58 ↗ them a presentation if they wanted to do

1:53:00 ↗ that at one of their future meetings but

1:53:02 ↗ no they had not had it up to this point

1:53:04 ↗ okay thanks

1:53:08 ↗ all another question yeah question about

1:53:10 ↗ before we move on to a potential motion

1:53:12 ↗ in the packet today there is a memo from

1:53:17 ↗ our city attorney and I took a look at

1:53:22 ↗ that it explains kind of uh it's titled

1:53:25 ↗ well it's it talks about kind of a

1:53:28 ↗ pathway forward from where we were on

1:53:30 ↗ September 5th we had we have any letter

1:53:33 ↗ from you Jim on September 9th

1:53:35 ↗ it looks really similar to this but I

1:53:39 ↗ noticed they're different and I don't

1:53:41 ↗ and I wanted to hear what is the

1:53:46 ↗ difference between these if there's any

1:53:47 ↗ anything that have note that we should

1:53:49 ↗ be aware of but it's not the exact same

1:53:50 ↗ memo but it looks like it covers a lot

1:53:52 ↗ of the content is the same yes as you'll

1:53:56 ↗ recall I wrote a memo to the council

1:53:59 ↗ that was a turn and client privileged

1:54:01 ↗ memo that I submitted on September 9th

1:54:05 ↗ and I was asked to prepare a document

1:54:09 ↗ which was for public consumption

1:54:12 ↗ I believe we talked about it at council

1:54:14 ↗ leadership he'll recall and so this

1:54:18 ↗ document was a little bit pared down

1:54:19 ↗ from a lot of the nuances that I believe

1:54:23 ↗ I I put in the original memo so this

1:54:28 ↗ memo was one that I did simply for a

1:54:32 ↗ public memo that laid out the essentials

1:54:35 ↗ but didn't go into as much detail okay

1:54:39 ↗ thank you for that

1:54:40 ↗ and just for full disclosure I didn't

1:54:42 ↗ see anywhere in your September 9th email

1:54:44 ↗ or on the letter itself that it said it

1:54:46 ↗ was for privileged my attorney-client

1:54:49 ↗ privilege well yeah I you know I I

1:54:53 ↗ suppose that I I probably should have

1:54:56 ↗ put more into that but I know I was

1:54:59 ↗ asked if we should if we should disclose

1:55:01 ↗ that memo in its entirety and I was a

1:55:04 ↗ little bit concerned about all of the

1:55:07 ↗ contents and so I was asked to prepare a

1:55:10 ↗ version which was a little more

1:55:12 ↗ streamlined and that's what this is

1:55:19 ↗ okay so there's no material others

1:55:22 ↗ because there's you get to the options

1:55:25 ↗ of moving forward it looks pretty much

1:55:27 ↗ the same correct okay so it's just the

1:55:31 ↗ backstory stuff alright thank you other

1:55:35 ↗ questions Mary Lou Thank You mr. mayor

1:55:38 ↗ so Keith in the packet we have tonight

1:55:40 ↗ it talks about parcel 3 being 6.6 acres

1:55:46 ↗ and not having the other information on

1:55:49 ↗ what the compact school standards look

1:55:51 ↗ like is that a number that came directly

1:55:53 ↗ from that packet and included the 90%

1:55:58 ↗ impervious and the tree retention and

1:56:00 ↗ it's six point six is where it lands so

1:56:05 ↗ yes and no so if so with compact school

1:56:11 ↗ regulations in place the school district

1:56:15 ↗ because you know there's also some

1:56:18 ↗ critical area limitations on this parcel

1:56:21 ↗ the their belief is they need

1:56:24 ↗ approximately seven acres and you say

1:56:26 ↗ well how come this is only six point six

1:56:28 ↗ well there's actually the parcel due

1:56:32 ↗ north of this is city-owned now and what

1:56:37 ↗ they would do is is it actually would

1:56:42 ↗ bleed into this parcel a little bit as

1:56:45 ↗ well because what that does is it allows

1:56:47 ↗ this to be bigger which from a visual

1:56:50 ↗ standpoint as you come around this

1:56:52 ↗ corner of i-90 having more trees left in

1:56:55 ↗ this location seems an advantage from an

1:56:58 ↗ aesthetic perspective so we've been

1:57:01 ↗ supportive of the school and doing about

1:57:06 ↗ it would be ultimately a boundary line

1:57:07 ↗ adjustment to include some parcel that

1:57:09 ↗ weaker some property we currently own

1:57:11 ↗ where the pond is you know where the

1:57:13 ↗ pond is so there's some space in between

1:57:16 ↗ this parcel line and the pond where they

1:57:19 ↗ could actually kind of push the school

1:57:22 ↗ up by another half of an acre on to this

1:57:24 ↗ other parcel okay so follow-up question

1:57:27 ↗ the question in a comment

1:57:30 ↗ and maybe it's two comments I don't know

1:57:34 ↗ I guess I'm not concerned that we

1:57:37 ↗ actually still don't have certainty on

1:57:39 ↗ the parcel size because that would have

1:57:40 ↗ caused a lot of concern with some

1:57:42 ↗ council members the last time it was

1:57:43 ↗ here so not knowing if it's six point

1:57:48 ↗ six or seven okay I'm glad you brought

1:57:50 ↗ that up but that's not a huge concern I

1:57:52 ↗ would ask that any kind of adjustments

1:57:56 ↗ that are made understanding how much

1:57:58 ↗ concerned citizens have expressed about

1:58:01 ↗ this if it's something administrative

1:58:03 ↗ like a boundary line adjustment I really

1:58:06 ↗ you know would make want to make sure

1:58:08 ↗ that your counsel has advised and

1:58:10 ↗ informed of this because again it kind

1:58:12 ↗ of seems like we're being asked maybe to

1:58:13 ↗ make a decision tonight and it might

1:58:16 ↗ look different and so if the school is

1:58:19 ↗ asking for more land or something like

1:58:20 ↗ that

1:58:21 ↗ that kind of throws a little bit of

1:58:22 ↗ uncertainty back into the picture game

1:58:24 ↗ time so so because you're the landowner

1:58:27 ↗ of both all of this as well as this land

1:58:31 ↗ to the north that that decision will

1:58:35 ↗ ultimately have to come back to you in

1:58:37 ↗ the form of a short plat and boundary

1:58:40 ↗ line adjustment and the council it will

1:58:42 ↗ and then it will come back to you again

1:58:44 ↗ when when and if they offer to buy that

1:58:48 ↗ land from us you guys would ultimately

1:58:49 ↗ have to make a decision to sell that so

1:58:51 ↗ you guys get two more touches on this if

1:58:55 ↗ you decide to zone parcel three CFF

1:58:58 ↗ thank you other questions Stacey so I'm

1:59:06 ↗ gonna look at Jim a little bit do I

1:59:07 ↗ renew or do I make any motion either one

1:59:10 ↗ you can simply make a motion okay and is

1:59:15 ↗ this the same way okay I wouldn't move

1:59:17 ↗ to adopt revised ordinance number 2803

1:59:21 ↗ annexing certain property known as the

1:59:23 ↗ King County Island establishing

1:59:25 ↗ pre-annexation zoning of said property

1:59:26 ↗ as presented says an exhibit B I'm going

1:59:31 ↗ to be specific about page 528 of the

1:59:35 ↗ ordinance requiring assumption of

1:59:36 ↗ existing indebtedness and establishing

1:59:39 ↗ an effective date second

1:59:41 ↗ moved and seconded discussion or further

1:59:45 ↗ questions question mr. mayor I know last

1:59:49 ↗ time when we went through this process

1:59:52 ↗ we also before we voted or discussed had

1:59:55 ↗ to go through a series of questions

1:59:56 ↗ about disclosures and I'm not sure I

2:00:00 ↗ have two questions why I wanted to

2:00:02 ↗ repeat that process and two is there an

2:00:04 ↗ opportunity to provide comment if we

2:00:06 ↗ don't repeat that process if you have

2:00:11 ↗ any disclosures that are different from

2:00:13 ↗ the last time then then yes you should

2:00:16 ↗ disclose those now prior to having yes

2:00:24 ↗ mr. mayor I wanted to make just a

2:00:28 ↗ general statement before we started with

2:00:29 ↗ our deliberations today so as a

2:00:32 ↗ councilmember and a candidate in this

2:00:34 ↗ fall's election I have been meeting with

2:00:36 ↗ residents almost every day I was asked

2:00:39 ↗ to meet with a dozen or so neighbors

2:00:40 ↗ about city issues in the highlands

2:00:42 ↗ including a request to explain the

2:00:45 ↗ city's process with regard to annexing

2:00:47 ↗ land into the city and selling that land

2:00:49 ↗ to others I advised most the resident

2:00:52 ↗ who had invited me before the meeting

2:00:54 ↗ and the attendees at the meeting that I

2:00:56 ↗ could talk about many things but there

2:00:58 ↗ were two items I could not talk about

2:01:00 ↗ those items were anything to do with

2:01:02 ↗ this agenda bill that was in front of us

2:01:04 ↗ this evening and that was discussed in

2:01:06 ↗ our first meeting in September with

2:01:08 ↗ regards to pre-annexation zoning for

2:01:10 ↗ King County and any parcel that the it's

2:01:12 ↗ across school district might be

2:01:13 ↗ interested in buying related to this

2:01:15 ↗ annexation they were fine with that when

2:01:18 ↗ someone at the meeting looked like they

2:01:20 ↗ wanted to comment on either of those I

2:01:21 ↗ asked them to stop and reminded them

2:01:23 ↗ that all seven council members or six

2:01:25 ↗ that are here this evening citizen this

2:01:27 ↗ issue and we need to decide on the same

2:01:30 ↗ body of information this was not an

2:01:33 ↗ issue for them at the meeting the topics

2:01:35 ↗ at this meeting were similar to

2:01:36 ↗ questions I get asked at most forms

2:01:38 ↗ while doorbell and also at neighborhood

2:01:40 ↗ gatherings I also subscribed to the

2:01:43 ↗ Issaquah daily blog an online blog which

2:01:45 ↗ recently posted a flyer on Friday issued

2:01:48 ↗ by the ASIC West cool district I saw

2:01:50 ↗ this on the blog and as far as I know

2:01:52 ↗ it's not part of the

2:01:53 ↗ submitted record for the public hearing

2:01:55 ↗ it was issued after the closing of the

2:01:57 ↗ public hearing and I'm not aware that it

2:01:58 ↗ contained any new information we as

2:02:01 ↗ council have also received numerous

2:02:03 ↗ emails from residents since our meeting

2:02:05 ↗ in September on these two topics

2:02:07 ↗ currently covered under the agenda bill

2:02:09 ↗ and the quasi judicial process I have

2:02:11 ↗ filed all these on my computer but have

2:02:13 ↗ not read these emails since the hearing

2:02:16 ↗ was closed I've reviewed my attendance

2:02:19 ↗ at community meetings and those

2:02:20 ↗ discussions I have had with residents

2:02:22 ↗ since our first meeting in September

2:02:24 ↗ with our city attorney I just wanted to

2:02:27 ↗ make sure that all these contacts were

2:02:29 ↗ appropriate during a quasi judicial

2:02:30 ↗ process I was advised today that they

2:02:33 ↗ were thank you

2:02:36 ↗ additional discussion or questions Oh

2:02:43 ↗ so Jim thinking you're gonna go back to

2:02:45 ↗ your email and your letter you talked

2:02:49 ↗ about options for path going forward one

2:02:53 ↗ of the things I learned since September

2:02:55 ↗ 5th that when we consider a motion and

2:03:01 ↗ the and it doesn't pass that doesn't

2:03:07 ↗ necessarily mean the question fails it

2:03:11 ↗ means the motion failed and so your

2:03:15 ↗ email explained options available to us

2:03:18 ↗ so I think what's I'm trying to

2:03:23 ↗ understand what just happened with with

2:03:25 ↗ the motion that came how does it fit

2:03:26 ↗ within the context was that is that the

2:03:29 ↗ exact same motion we experienced or

2:03:33 ↗ considered excuse me I guess this is

2:03:35 ↗ first Stacy as much as anything is that

2:03:36 ↗ the exact same motion we considered back

2:03:38 ↗ on September 5th go back and compare

2:03:43 ↗ language exactly

2:03:46 ↗ so Jim you tried to address it so I'm

2:03:48 ↗ just wondering where we are

2:03:49 ↗ I mean you laid out it can be the same

2:03:51 ↗ thing it can be different it could be

2:03:52 ↗ something a third option so I'm trying

2:03:55 ↗ to see how that all that all fits in

2:03:56 ↗ this process right when a motion fails

2:04:01 ↗ all it means is that the motion has

2:04:03 ↗ failed anyone can make a new motion so

2:04:06 ↗ until you make an affirmative motion

2:04:08 ↗ until you make an actual emotional to

2:04:11 ↗ deny something or to take an affirmative

2:04:16 ↗ action no action has been taken in this

2:04:19 ↗ case all that was done on September 5

2:04:21 ↗ was that a motion was made to approve

2:04:23 ↗ the ordinance with specific zoning that

2:04:25 ↗ was I think the motion was amended

2:04:28 ↗ several times but ultimately it ended up

2:04:31 ↗ to be a a motion to approve the

2:04:34 ↗ ordinance with specific zoning and that

2:04:36 ↗ motion failed 1 2 5 and all that means

2:04:40 ↗ is that that motion failed at that point

2:04:43 ↗ anyone could have made a motion to do

2:04:46 ↗ something different if they wanted to do

2:04:48 ↗ it

2:04:48 ↗ anyone could have under Robert's Rules

2:04:54 ↗ you can't make the same motion at the

2:04:56 ↗ same session but you can renew the

2:04:59 ↗ motion and make the same motion at a

2:05:01 ↗ subsequent session or you can make a new

2:05:04 ↗ motion because the motion that was on

2:05:06 ↗ the floor failed so I realize it's a

2:05:09 ↗ it's a nuance of parliamentary procedure

2:05:12 ↗ and frankly I think most parliamentary

2:05:14 ↗ procedure is far too complicated to be

2:05:17 ↗ used in city council meetings but I the

2:05:21 ↗ parliamentary procedure was meant for

2:05:23 ↗ large bodies and it wasn't really meant

2:05:26 ↗ for in an organisation as small as a

2:05:30 ↗ city council which has seven members but

2:05:34 ↗ the point is that when a motion fails

2:05:37 ↗ all it means is that the motion has

2:05:40 ↗ failed and so the appropriate three

2:05:44 ↗ motions or options that I laid out for

2:05:47 ↗ you were one you could renew the motion

2:05:50 ↗ someone could make the same motion that

2:05:53 ↗ failed at this meeting that's allowed to

2:05:57 ↗ enter Robert's

2:05:58 ↗ second because the motion that was made

2:06:01 ↗ on September 5 failed any new motion is

2:06:05 ↗ appropriate and so if there is a motion

2:06:09 ↗ that is different from what was made on

2:06:12 ↗ September 5 that would be an appropriate

2:06:13 ↗ motion as well and I believe that the

2:06:17 ↗ last option I laid out was a a motion

2:06:22 ↗ whereby you trying to remember what my

2:06:26 ↗ third option here totally completely

2:06:33 ↗ kind of different kind of things yes it

2:06:42 ↗ would be to annex the property without

2:06:45 ↗ establishing pre-annexation zoning and

2:06:47 ↗ under the city's code when that happens

2:06:50 ↗ when you annex the property without

2:06:52 ↗ establishing pre-annexation zoning it

2:06:54 ↗ comes in with the most comparable city

2:06:57 ↗ zoning and then it is eligible for you

2:07:00 ↗ to go through a rezone process to

2:07:02 ↗ ultimately zone it the way you want so

2:07:04 ↗ the two options are the three options

2:07:06 ↗ are one make the same motion as last

2:07:09 ↗ time which was to adopt the

2:07:12 ↗ pre-annexation zoning as it was in the

2:07:14 ↗ last motion second make a new motion

2:07:17 ↗ that adopts pre-annexation zoning that

2:07:21 ↗ doesn't have to be the same as was made

2:07:24 ↗ on September 5th or 3rd just limit your

2:07:28 ↗ motion to annexation in which case the

2:07:31 ↗ property will come in with the most

2:07:33 ↗ comparable city zoning to the county

2:07:35 ↗ Sony okay thank you

2:07:38 ↗ okay so then the motion in France I

2:07:40 ↗ noticed that it does already have an

2:07:41 ↗ ordinance number in it

2:07:45 ↗ and so that's the same ordinance that we

2:07:48 ↗ were considering and then just for

2:07:49 ↗ clarification Stacy I appreciate you

2:07:51 ↗ givin the the page number but there are

2:07:54 ↗ multiple exhibit bees in the packet

2:07:58 ↗ below it so one of them is the whole

2:08:03 ↗ city and one of them is this map or

2:08:06 ↗ something similar to this map so right

2:08:08 ↗ so it's actually exhibit B of exhibit J

2:08:13 ↗ the parties are clear so if you find

2:08:16 ↗ exhibit J which is the ordinance its

2:08:18 ↗ Exhibit D to exhibit J and it is

2:08:27 ↗ actually the last page of the agenda

2:08:30 ↗ bill for this item as I understand it

2:08:32 ↗ its page 528 if if that's the intent

2:08:37 ↗ then I understand the intent that's why

2:08:41 ↗ I say page 520 it's actually page the

2:08:44 ↗ same map is in the packet twice but

2:08:46 ↗ Exhibit B to the ordinance is on page

2:08:48 ↗ 457 but it is the same map as is on page

2:08:51 ↗ 528 well I need to revise the motion

2:08:56 ↗ light okay

2:09:09 ↗ okay Ryan Mariah so I just wanted to

2:09:15 ↗ follow up when we were in in regard to I

2:09:19 ↗ I too have been out talking to many

2:09:22 ↗ members of the community as I'm running

2:09:24 ↗ for election and I did sit in a forum

2:09:29 ↗ for a City Council where questions came

2:09:33 ↗ from people walking in the door one of

2:09:35 ↗ the questions had to do with the role of

2:09:38 ↗ City Council in finding land for schools

2:09:42 ↗ and the role of the school board I had

2:09:47 ↗ an opportunity to talk with Jim about my

2:09:52 ↗ answer my answer focused on compact

2:09:56 ↗ schools and what we had talked about in

2:09:59 ↗ our last council session so I just

2:10:02 ↗ wanted to make sure that that I had that

2:10:04 ↗ out out there as well other questions or

2:10:09 ↗ discussion also just because this has

2:10:21 ↗ been a very long and complicated process

2:10:23 ↗ before it was quasi-judicial officially

2:10:26 ↗ and based in my mind so there's been a

2:10:28 ↗ lot of discussion about this and when we

2:10:31 ↗ were acting quasi-judicial ii to me it's

2:10:34 ↗ a much higher standard of ethics that

2:10:37 ↗ we're supposed to apply here we're

2:10:38 ↗ supposed to be on the record and dealing

2:10:41 ↗ with just Iowa times on the record not

2:10:42 ↗ with our biases and prejudgments and I

2:10:46 ↗ just want to say that's almost

2:10:47 ↗ impossible thing for me to do tonight

2:10:49 ↗ because I have those in there and

2:10:51 ↗ because this has been long and hard

2:10:53 ↗ those are there and I'm just it's

2:10:56 ↗ there's where I am it's a very difficult

2:10:58 ↗ thing to step that up at this point not

2:11:00 ↗ just step in a place where you have a

2:11:01 ↗ record you look at the record and you

2:11:03 ↗ deal with it this has been much more

2:11:05 ↗ involved in that and there's been a lot

2:11:06 ↗ of items in the community as many as

2:11:08 ↗ others have mentioned and I'm out in the

2:11:11 ↗ community quite a bit too so there's

2:11:12 ↗ been a lot of that going on and I can't

2:11:14 ↗ list them all you did an amazing list

2:11:16 ↗ Maryland

2:11:17 ↗ but that's there and I'm just going to

2:11:19 ↗ say I don't think I can quite be as as

2:11:23 ↗ perfectly clear in the quasi-judicial

2:11:26 ↗ way as I think I should be to my ethical

2:11:29 ↗ standards it's just a statement of fact

2:11:33 ↗ [Applause]

2:11:35 ↗ other questions or discussion

2:11:37 ↗ Marylou did you ever come in question I

2:11:41 ↗ have a comment so if there's questions

2:11:43 ↗ I'll wait I don't understand so bill I

2:11:49 ↗ don't understand what you said are you

2:11:51 ↗ abstain well I've been I've been told

2:11:56 ↗ pretty much that I cannot and I don't

2:12:00 ↗ know what to say to that so I'm in a

2:12:01 ↗ statement of fact that I don't think I

2:12:03 ↗ can do my job here as well as I expect

2:12:05 ↗ my me to do my job but I've been told

2:12:08 ↗ that I cannot not do it so I'm just

2:12:12 ↗ gonna say that I wanted to put that on

2:12:13 ↗ the record

2:12:14 ↗ okay thank you mr. marriage this time

2:12:20 ↗ that we could actually make statements

2:12:22 ↗ for against the motion on the table

2:12:24 ↗ before we vote I was going to make a

2:12:25 ↗ statement sure thanks no additional

2:12:30 ↗ questions so you're off oh great thanks

2:12:33 ↗ so I'm in support of the motion that's

2:12:35 ↗ on the table this evening I'm looking

2:12:37 ↗ through the packet I agree with staff

2:12:39 ↗ that parcel one should be zoned

2:12:42 ↗ intensive commercial which discipline

2:12:45 ↗ disagreement with the Planning Policy

2:12:47 ↗ commission's rationale for that I do

2:12:50 ↗ agree that a proposed designation for

2:12:53 ↗ parcel three of CFF is appropriate I'm a

2:12:56 ↗ little shocked that we still don't know

2:12:57 ↗ the size but we have let me have a ways

2:12:59 ↗ to go and this is an extremely unusual

2:13:04 ↗ process and actually very difficult vote

2:13:07 ↗ as well the reason I'm supporting this

2:13:10 ↗ AFF on that parcel three at this point

2:13:13 ↗ in time is because the school and the

2:13:15 ↗ community is in a crisis we do not have

2:13:17 ↗ enough seats in our schools right now

2:13:20 ↗ and typically I would totally in most

2:13:22 ↗ normal circumstances follow our past

2:13:25 ↗ practice which would be to bring it in

2:13:26 ↗ with this

2:13:27 ↗ most similar to the county but I think

2:13:29 ↗ we have extraordinary circumstances here

2:13:31 ↗ so I am in support of the CFF on parcel

2:13:35 ↗ three and also a couple of follow-up

2:13:37 ↗ comments are that you know the school

2:13:40 ↗ district is still going to proceed with

2:13:42 ↗ their own process and they've been able

2:13:43 ↗ to hear the majority of the board is

2:13:45 ↗ here this evening a variety of seriously

2:13:48 ↗ serious concerns related to lack of

2:13:51 ↗ school capacity erosion and slight

2:13:55 ↗ hazard concerns with the person we're

2:13:56 ↗ looking at access to hospital emergency

2:13:58 ↗ routes negative impacts on adjacent

2:14:01 ↗ neighborhoods and these all need to be

2:14:04 ↗ evaluated during their due diligence

2:14:06 ↗ process so if they are to come to the

2:14:08 ↗ city and make an offer on the property

2:14:09 ↗ there's a lot of concerns out there that

2:14:12 ↗ need to be addressed and just want the

2:14:14 ↗ public to know they will not be coming

2:14:15 ↗ back to Council to be addressed they

2:14:17 ↗ will be addressed at school board

2:14:18 ↗ meetings and worked through the school

2:14:20 ↗ board's community process I have asked

2:14:23 ↗ the council president whether or not it

2:14:26 ↗ makes sense since we we were the body

2:14:29 ↗ that received an enormous number of

2:14:31 ↗ comments both before and after the

2:14:32 ↗ public hearing closed whether or not

2:14:34 ↗ that information should be passed on to

2:14:37 ↗ the school district since we had

2:14:38 ↗ residents who are confused with the

2:14:40 ↗ process did not understand whether it

2:14:42 ↗ was our public hearing or the School

2:14:44 ↗ Board's public hearing to talk to and

2:14:45 ↗ they took the time and effort and energy

2:14:47 ↗ to write us to talk to us to stay late

2:14:51 ↗ into the evening and I want to make sure

2:14:53 ↗ that their voice is heard as this

2:14:54 ↗ process continues with the school board

2:14:57 ↗ so I'm I'm excited that staff and the

2:15:02 ↗ administration was able to present a

2:15:04 ↗ much clearer picture this evening and

2:15:05 ↗ I'm supportive of the proposal that

2:15:07 ↗ you've shown Thank You Stacy thank you

2:15:13 ↗ so

2:15:18 ↗ several things I want to talk about the

2:15:21 ↗ first one is the process actually the

2:15:24 ↗ first one is that Keith you buried the

2:15:26 ↗ lede about the the administration will

2:15:28 ↗ move forward with short plan on the city

2:15:30 ↗ parcel to create the four parcels as

2:15:31 ↗ shown in the map and the City Council

2:15:33 ↗ gets to decide that this is that was not

2:15:36 ↗ that process that procedure has not been

2:15:39 ↗ talked about but this has been I'll call

2:15:43 ↗ it a very tortured process and there's

2:15:45 ↗ several reasons for that number number

2:15:47 ↗ one is the the choice that was made that

2:15:52 ↗ this was going to be quasi judicial

2:15:54 ↗ that's a very difficult process it is

2:15:58 ↗ not the same as legislative where that's

2:16:01 ↗ 99.9% of our decisions are made

2:16:03 ↗ legislatively that and we can talk to

2:16:05 ↗ each other as long as we don't have a

2:16:06 ↗ quorum we can talk to the public as many

2:16:09 ↗ times as we want to and you know we're

2:16:12 ↗ just kind of free to discuss we don't

2:16:14 ↗ have the benefit of that we are hearing

2:16:16 ↗ each other's comments for the very first

2:16:18 ↗ time on set on September 5th and then

2:16:21 ↗ another round of comments from each

2:16:23 ↗ other tonight so that is a if you've

2:16:28 ↗ ever tried to make decisions almost

2:16:30 ↗ totally in the dark

2:16:32 ↗ yeah I know it looks awkward for you to

2:16:37 ↗ sit and watch us be so awkward because

2:16:40 ↗ it is very awkward and it's and I just

2:16:43 ↗ do not there was another way I think

2:16:45 ↗ there was another way but methought this

2:16:51 ↗ that's not the decision that was made we

2:16:55 ↗ also could have started this process

2:16:57 ↗ many many many months ago and not have

2:17:00 ↗ the school concept day lighted in July

2:17:03 ↗ both the district and city staff have

2:17:06 ↗ known about more details than the

2:17:08 ↗ council has known for a very long time

2:17:10 ↗ and so as we sit here it has felt to me

2:17:13 ↗ like we're trying to you know fix a put

2:17:16 ↗ a square peg in a round hole because it

2:17:19 ↗ hasn't been framed very well it hasn't

2:17:21 ↗ been explained very well and there are

2:17:24 ↗ going to be two very very important

2:17:26 ↗ council touches that

2:17:28 ↗ we haven't hadn't talked about and those

2:17:31 ↗ are I thought about this every single

2:17:34 ↗ day since September 5th so if anybody

2:17:36 ↗ thinks that this the that we don't take

2:17:39 ↗ our decisions seriously then you would

2:17:45 ↗ be wrong because these are very

2:17:47 ↗ important decisions I'm sure to all of

2:17:49 ↗ us including me I also think that the

2:17:54 ↗ messaging has been the wrong messaging

2:17:57 ↗ the message has been a please zone to

2:18:00 ↗ allow for a school that's not the right

2:18:03 ↗ message the message really is what the

2:18:06 ↗ district would like to do because of the

2:18:08 ↗ process where the district is in the

2:18:10 ↗ process

2:18:11 ↗ I watched the PPC meeting the 90 minutes

2:18:14 ↗ and I have a quote from Lisa

2:18:17 ↗ Callen that says exactly where the

2:18:20 ↗ district is in this process the district

2:18:23 ↗ has done and I'm and I listened to it a

2:18:25 ↗ few times and I was in communications

2:18:27 ↗ journalism for a long time so this is an

2:18:29 ↗ exact quote Lisa the district has done

2:18:31 ↗ extensive land searches for suitable

2:18:34 ↗ land that would be on the initial

2:18:36 ↗ checkbox list of what would be suitable

2:18:39 ↗ for the district to try to do a deeper

2:18:42 ↗ dive so what the district wants us to do

2:18:47 ↗ and what the city staff has asked us to

2:18:49 ↗ do is to Zone this in a way that allows

2:18:52 ↗ the district to continue to do the

2:18:54 ↗ deeper dive I think that's very very

2:18:56 ↗ important and that is different from

2:18:58 ↗ please Zone at CF F so this district can

2:19:01 ↗ build a school that's very different the

2:19:04 ↗ process going forward would be what

2:19:06 ↗ Keith mentioned and that is that

2:19:08 ↗ accounts of the city could and probably

2:19:11 ↗ will if this is passed start a short

2:19:13 ↗ plat process which is a subdivision code

2:19:16 ↗ 18 point 13 and because it's the city's

2:19:19 ↗ city owns the property the council gets

2:19:22 ↗ to decide happens to that property I

2:19:27 ↗ don't know when that would come forward

2:19:30 ↗ I don't know who would be sitting up

2:19:31 ↗ here and then the next step would be if

2:19:37 ↗ we get to that point where there is a

2:19:40 ↗ requested by the land then the council

2:19:42 ↗ has another touch and the council gets

2:19:44 ↗ to decide whether or not it wants to

2:19:46 ↗ sell the land to the school district at

2:19:50 ↗ whatever price has been negotiated so we

2:19:53 ↗ have two significant touches I am

2:19:58 ↗ because of that I I made the motion

2:20:03 ↗ because I support it and I'm comfortable

2:20:11 ↗ with that because of the touches that

2:20:13 ↗ have to come back I'm I also support the

2:20:17 ↗ tents of commercial because the city has

2:20:21 ↗ made some obligations already and there

2:20:25 ↗ are future decisions to be made about

2:20:27 ↗ that the city I think also has a survey

2:20:30 ↗ the Keith told PPC we also have definite

2:20:32 ↗ boundaries for that but different reason

2:20:35 ↗ we have obligations that we need to live

2:20:37 ↗ up to in terms of further exploring and

2:20:41 ↗ there is a potential huge grant that is

2:20:45 ↗ that needs to be applied for and unless

2:20:48 ↗ we show our good faith in in meeting our

2:20:53 ↗ obligations under the to mo use that

2:20:55 ↗ we've already signed then I think that

2:20:57 ↗ that project is dead in the water and I

2:20:59 ↗ don't want to see that happen

2:21:00 ↗ we've not taken a vote on any of that

2:21:02 ↗ but it needs to continue to move forward

2:21:04 ↗ so I do board member

2:21:13 ↗ justice across School District Board

2:21:14 ↗ Member morale doe came to the council

2:21:17 ↗ and asked us whether the city was

2:21:21 ↗ compliant with an RC W and I looked cute

2:21:25 ↗ computer's not working very well so I

2:21:28 ↗ tried to find that again while I was

2:21:30 ↗ here tonight but I couldn't find it

2:21:31 ↗ however I did ask on September 6th the

2:21:35 ↗ day after the meeting I did ask

2:21:40 ↗ whether we are compliant with that and I

2:21:43 ↗ don't have an answer back yet

2:21:44 ↗ but I wanted you to know that I have

2:21:45 ↗ asked I do have concerns about the site

2:21:51 ↗ I have some of the concerns resonated

2:21:54 ↗ with me and so I'm glad that district

2:21:57 ↗ administration and board members are

2:21:59 ↗ here to to hear and have been here to

2:22:01 ↗ hear what the community has been

2:22:04 ↗ concerned about the access you know I've

2:22:07 ↗ been up there I live up there it's a

2:22:09 ↗ concern

2:22:10 ↗ you've got we've got Grand Ridge that's

2:22:12 ↗ a deep in the middle of visco Highlands

2:22:14 ↗ and traffic is a concern and I think

2:22:17 ↗ traffic would be concerned at this site

2:22:19 ↗ as well that's not we're judging here

2:22:21 ↗ tonight I just but because there are two

2:22:24 ↗ more council decision making points

2:22:27 ↗ there you're going to get a lot of

2:22:28 ↗ questions I would imagine so like I said

2:22:34 ↗ I'm come I want to make I'm gonna wait I

2:22:37 ↗ have a another comment to make but least

2:22:42 ↗ I wanted to thank you for being so clear

2:22:44 ↗ and where the district is with the

2:22:46 ↗ process because that made me feel

2:22:47 ↗ comfortable

2:22:48 ↗ combined with like I said the two more

2:22:51 ↗ council touches that we have Thank You

2:22:57 ↗ Mariah so I I wanted to just echo some

2:23:04 ↗ of some of the comments that have been

2:23:06 ↗ talked about already I really do feel

2:23:08 ↗ that we have a great need for for

2:23:13 ↗ schools in Issaquah and it's really

2:23:16 ↗ reached a crisis point and so much of

2:23:19 ↗ that has been tied into this the the

2:23:22 ↗ process has been so incredibly difficult

2:23:26 ↗ to get through it's been complicated it

2:23:28 ↗ seemed rushed and it's just not the way

2:23:32 ↗ that I would envision that we would we

2:23:34 ↗ would want I wouldn't want to go through

2:23:36 ↗ this again

2:23:37 ↗ I would I would really like to see more

2:23:41 ↗ planning I about the fact that that I

2:23:45 ↗ really do think that council and the

2:23:49 ↗ school board should be meeting more

2:23:51 ↗ than they are that would be important to

2:23:55 ↗ me and I do I I hope that the that the

2:23:59 ↗ school board is is able to go forward

2:24:02 ↗ and do all of the deep dives and the due

2:24:05 ↗ diligence that they'll need to do

2:24:07 ↗ because there have been just so many

2:24:08 ↗ concerns that have come to us in in

2:24:12 ↗ terms of traffic and stability and

2:24:15 ↗ emergency access and all of that so I'm

2:24:19 ↗ I'm supporting this but this was just

2:24:22 ↗ really difficult to to get through very

2:24:26 ↗ complicated matter so and and the

2:24:28 ↗ quasi-judicial piece of it just just

2:24:31 ↗ made it harder to not be able to really

2:24:34 ↗ talk about that

2:24:36 ↗ on the on the flip side I also wanted to

2:24:39 ↗ mention that I feel comfortable with the

2:24:42 ↗ icy zoning that is for something that

2:24:48 ↗ will allow the trans transit oriented

2:24:51 ↗ development project to go through once I

2:24:53 ↗ heard that the PCC was they were talking

2:24:57 ↗ about that because they they hadn't had

2:25:00 ↗ a touch with that they hadn't had a

2:25:01 ↗ presentation we've had several and just

2:25:05 ↗ through my time on economic vitality I

2:25:08 ↗ would say that that's something that I

2:25:09 ↗ feel comfortable with so I'll be

2:25:12 ↗ supporting this motion thank you are you

2:25:19 ↗ ready to act Oh a couple comments thank

2:25:23 ↗ you just a reminder to for the record

2:25:27 ↗ our first touch on this was July 17th

2:25:29 ↗ and it's it's absolutely wonderful the

2:25:32 ↗ whole different tenor and atmosphere

2:25:35 ↗ that's here this evening compared to

2:25:36 ↗ that evening on July 17th and I and I

2:25:40 ↗ really think all the public comments

2:25:42 ↗ that were made during the public hearing

2:25:43 ↗ on the 17th and again on the 5th and all

2:25:46 ↗ the the emails that have been submitted

2:25:48 ↗ and are part of the public record I

2:25:49 ↗ think I want to commend people for

2:25:52 ↗ speaking out because all of us have

2:25:55 ↗ heard quite a few voices many for some

2:25:59 ↗ against all offering I think valuable

2:26:02 ↗ input

2:26:03 ↗ and in expand helping all parties

2:26:06 ↗ involved better understand the concerns

2:26:08 ↗ of the citizens so I think this process

2:26:11 ↗ since July has been has really changed

2:26:15 ↗ quite a bit and I'm really pleased what

2:26:18 ↗ I'm hearing tonight because this is the

2:26:22 ↗ this is kind of a stage that back on

2:26:27 ↗ September 5th I'd hoped to achieve back

2:26:31 ↗ then so I'm glad that the focus is now

2:26:35 ↗ back on doing what's right for our

2:26:39 ↗ community for our schools for our

2:26:41 ↗ families both now and into the future

2:26:44 ↗ and I will I probably will stand out as

2:26:48 ↗ a little bit different than the rest as

2:26:49 ↗ well at least those have spoken I I have

2:26:55 ↗ it this has been theirs many items but I

2:26:58 ↗ haven't really found this that confusing

2:27:00 ↗ I've understood what we are doing as I

2:27:04 ↗ I've known that annexation we've done

2:27:07 ↗ annexation before I know about the the

2:27:11 ↗ zoning restrictions we've we've covered

2:27:15 ↗ that stuff before it's I think it's been

2:27:17 ↗ through conversation the first proposal

2:27:20 ↗ actually isn't this there was community

2:27:24 ↗ facilities facilities back in July that

2:27:26 ↗ was presented to us where there is a

2:27:28 ↗ open space now we took the zoning off we

2:27:32 ↗ put it back on I think the council has

2:27:35 ↗ made this process pretty confusing but

2:27:37 ↗ their zoning there is there's the

2:27:39 ↗ question of annexation there is zoning

2:27:41 ↗ there's a potential subplot there's the

2:27:43 ↗ use of those it's related to the Tod

2:27:47 ↗ and we've also known that going forward

2:27:50 ↗ that this is there are other steps there

2:27:55 ↗ is potential sale there is due diligence

2:27:57 ↗ of the school district so I think those

2:27:59 ↗ have been out in front of us I'm glad

2:28:01 ↗ that we've had the more time I'm glad to

2:28:05 ↗ hear my colleagues coming around and

2:28:08 ↗ thinking that you know that's we can

2:28:10 ↗ make this work it's not a final this is

2:28:13 ↗ just a decision we're considering

2:28:15 ↗ tonight about the annexation it ended

2:28:16 ↗ kate's that our intent to move in a

2:28:20 ↗ certain direction but the final

2:28:23 ↗ conclusion has not been cast yet and so

2:28:26 ↗ I'm glad we're taking that step and I'm

2:28:30 ↗ going to be supporting this motion thank

2:28:33 ↗ you no I like to think council president

2:28:39 ↗ Goodman for stating all you did there

2:28:41 ↗ earlier very well all your concerns and

2:28:44 ↗ and statement of the process and just

2:28:46 ↗ iterate a couple of those that I think

2:28:50 ↗ the question got state framed poorly

2:28:53 ↗ with the community that as the council

2:28:56 ↗ was here to approve us new school

2:28:58 ↗ location and and that stirred up a lot

2:29:01 ↗ of concern and and problem process

2:29:04 ↗ issues of what what that means and as

2:29:07 ↗ you mentioned that's not what we're

2:29:09 ↗ doing here tonight by any means we're

2:29:11 ↗ just allowing the one step in a process

2:29:13 ↗ with a lot more things to go and as you

2:29:15 ↗ heard from many members of the community

2:29:17 ↗ there are a lot of concerns still with

2:29:18 ↗ this if it's gonna get to that point

2:29:21 ↗ traffic and and open space and all those

2:29:23 ↗ all those issues and so forth

2:29:25 ↗ I don't really rate them here but there

2:29:27 ↗ there's a lot to deal with so I am

2:29:29 ↗ concerned about that it has been an

2:29:31 ↗ awkward and concerned and compressed

2:29:34 ↗ almost crisis like process because of

2:29:37 ↗ pressure on ourselves as a city and from

2:29:41 ↗ the school district and so forth this

2:29:42 ↗ has to be done right now and I think we

2:29:44 ↗ could have done much better as a city

2:29:46 ↗ and a council that I would like to see

2:29:49 ↗ us improve a lot more I'd like to work

2:29:51 ↗ with the school district more often I

2:29:53 ↗ think I've been on the council here long

2:29:55 ↗ enough and only had one meeting

2:29:56 ↗ officially with the school district

2:29:58 ↗ I'd like to come and talk to you folks

2:29:59 ↗ but I haven't been able to for the last

2:30:01 ↗ few months because of this process so I

2:30:05 ↗ think we need to do that much more ahead

2:30:07 ↗ of time then as in what's happened here

2:30:10 ↗ so thank you Eileen

2:30:15 ↗ thank you I will be supporting this

2:30:18 ↗ annexation this evening it's been

2:30:21 ↗ compressed there's been a lot of

2:30:22 ↗ information that's been brought forward

2:30:24 ↗ but this is you know hopefully it does

2:30:27 ↗ go forward and become a school I I do

2:30:31 ↗ some work in the school district and

2:30:32 ↗ it's amazing how they'll open up a new

2:30:34 ↗ school and almost instantly they're

2:30:36 ↗ already in portables and it just doesn't

2:30:38 ↗ seem to stop so I know the need is there

2:30:41 ↗ and hopefully that this will be one more

2:30:43 ↗ step in which we can get to a little bit

2:30:46 ↗ better education for our kids which is

2:30:49 ↗ already a fabulous education but

2:30:51 ↗ portables sometimes are not the best of

2:30:56 ↗ offers so I'll be supporting this this

2:30:58 ↗ evening and hopefully we'll have some

2:31:01 ↗ new school soon Marylou I just wanted to

2:31:07 ↗ clarify one thing that councilmember

2:31:09 ↗ winter Stein said I got the impression

2:31:11 ↗ that there may be thought out there that

2:31:14 ↗ it took council members time to come

2:31:16 ↗ around to whether or not we needed new

2:31:17 ↗ schools or they're important and that's

2:31:19 ↗ just absolutely not true I speak for

2:31:21 ↗ myself but you can see head nods from

2:31:23 ↗ the other council members we need to

2:31:25 ↗ have the information in front of us so

2:31:27 ↗ we understand so we can make the right

2:31:28 ↗ decision so thank you for being here and

2:31:30 ↗ I want you to understand because most of

2:31:32 ↗ our school board and our superintendent

2:31:34 ↗ here

2:31:34 ↗ you haven't got anybody up on this

2:31:36 ↗ council who doesn't recognize the crisis

2:31:38 ↗ and anyone on this council who doesn't

2:31:40 ↗ support schools thank you for what you

2:31:41 ↗ do I think everyone has added an

2:31:46 ↗ opportunity to speak at least once Stacy

2:31:50 ↗ so I was just going to ask if if so I

2:31:53 ↗ have one last comment sort of question

2:31:57 ↗ that's not related to the motion and its

2:32:01 ↗ really did the agenda but it's not

2:32:02 ↗ related to the motion so I can either

2:32:03 ↗ make it now or do we vote and then I say

2:32:06 ↗ afterwards it's up to you can you can

2:32:10 ↗ say it now let's simplify okay all right

2:32:13 ↗ let's take care of this in its entirety

2:32:16 ↗ this evening except when it comes back

2:32:18 ↗ the council where there are two

2:32:20 ↗ additional touches sure so

2:32:26 ↗ so we've talked a lot we've heard a lot

2:32:30 ↗ of comments about the district in the

2:32:32 ↗ city working better together to plan for

2:32:34 ↗ schools and cities planned for growth

2:32:40 ↗ and are supposed to accommodate for

2:32:43 ↗ growth and the district has a little

2:32:48 ↗ narrower role in that your planning and

2:32:52 ↗ building schools and we all want to work

2:32:56 ↗ together and I think we've started to do

2:32:58 ↗ a better job at that and you came to us

2:33:01 ↗ with a request to change code which we

2:33:03 ↗ did and we're glad we can I think we are

2:33:07 ↗ all glad that we can help make it easier

2:33:09 ↗ for you

2:33:10 ↗ the we plan differently I realize you

2:33:16 ↗ know we plan on the city plans on like

2:33:18 ↗ 20 30 year planning horizon but the

2:33:22 ↗ district plans for schools when the

2:33:25 ↗ population is actually here I don't know

2:33:28 ↗ have much detail about what you do but

2:33:31 ↗ but those but when you're planning for

2:33:34 ↗ when a population is already here the

2:33:37 ↗ district is then it seems to me that

2:33:38 ↗ there's a sort of an inherent behind

2:33:41 ↗ miss so so I get that that we're not

2:33:45 ↗ necessarily on the same page that makes

2:33:47 ↗ it very very difficult I also know that

2:33:52 ↗ you have as I understand it all of that

2:33:55 ↗ data that we have about growth and that

2:34:00 ↗ district and city staff do talk so I

2:34:03 ↗ have a 11 an uncomfortable question and

2:34:09 ↗ but you know you do what we do you sit

2:34:13 ↗ up and you listen to uncomfortable

2:34:14 ↗ questions sometimes so my question is

2:34:16 ↗ how I and I and I don't know the answer

2:34:20 ↗ and it's just kind of rhetorical how do

2:34:22 ↗ we get to the place where we're at that

2:34:24 ↗ the place where we are now where certain

2:34:26 ↗ schools are so woefully order

2:34:28 ↗ overcrowded I don't understand I don't

2:34:30 ↗ know why and I'm not suggesting that

2:34:33 ↗ this magic answer but I I would think

2:34:41 ↗ that there is an opportunity at this

2:34:42 ↗ point just as you have asked us to

2:34:45 ↗ change our code and have wanted to work

2:34:47 ↗ together for us and have suggested maybe

2:34:51 ↗ we're not doing everything we can do or

2:34:54 ↗ things that were completely should maybe

2:34:56 ↗ not complying with things my question

2:34:58 ↗ for the board and the district is maybe

2:35:00 ↗ this is an opportunity at this time for

2:35:04 ↗ you all to have a conversation about

2:35:06 ↗ whether your policies need to be

2:35:08 ↗ reviewed I don't know the answer to that

2:35:10 ↗ and I'm not suggesting they do but I've

2:35:13 ↗ been asked that question many times on

2:35:15 ↗ council about why the city allows the

2:35:20 ↗ schools to get so bored crowded I don't

2:35:22 ↗ have control over that and I know you

2:35:24 ↗ that you don't largely have control over

2:35:26 ↗ that too but I think it's an opportune

2:35:28 ↗ time to revisit that and I also think it

2:35:31 ↗ would be a great service to the

2:35:34 ↗ community to let them know what what

2:35:40 ↗ what happens behind the tent because I

2:35:42 ↗ don't know and I would imagine that most

2:35:43 ↗ people don't know they think it's our

2:35:45 ↗ fault but I can tell you that I don't

2:35:47 ↗ think the answer is overcrowding crises

2:35:52 ↗ it laid before us in council chambers

2:35:55 ↗ that somehow we failed the plan because

2:35:58 ↗ I think we have to do it together really

2:36:00 ↗ do it together

2:36:01 ↗ and as we're asking ourselves tough

2:36:03 ↗ questions about how we can do it better

2:36:04 ↗ I would suggest that maybe this is the

2:36:07 ↗ time for you all to ask questions so

2:36:10 ↗ that was just my comment thank you oh I

2:36:16 ↗ appreciate those comments very much

2:36:17 ↗ Stacey and I agree and I think this you

2:36:23 ↗ can say we're in the middle of something

2:36:25 ↗ right now which we're trying to make up

2:36:27 ↗ for some lost ground because of the

2:36:29 ↗ covert crowding that has today and I may

2:36:32 ↗ be a form of and that can take in the

2:36:34 ↗ future is is whether you have a policy

2:36:38 ↗ or procedures and I'm addressing the

2:36:40 ↗ school board and the superintendent

2:36:41 ↗ right now we do I would welcome that as

2:36:44 ↗ well we do have a forecast or where we

2:36:46 ↗ expect to funnel growth and into the

2:36:48 ↗ future and and I hope that the City this

2:36:52 ↗ the administration the council and is

2:36:56 ↗ all everyone is willing to to and I

2:37:00 ↗ think I've had this conversation just in

2:37:03 ↗ general with Keith as well is is some

2:37:06 ↗ forward-looking planning about what the

2:37:12 ↗ needs might be and what we together can

2:37:15 ↗ do to get in front of and not be caught

2:37:18 ↗ in the same situation again I don't know

2:37:20 ↗ what that looks like but I I echo

2:37:22 ↗ councilmember Goodman's requests and I

2:37:25 ↗ would gladly participate with you are

2:37:31 ↗ you ready to vote all those in favor of

2:37:35 ↗ adopting revised ordinance number two

2:37:38 ↗ 8:03 annexing certain property known as

2:37:40 ↗ the King County Island establishing pre

2:37:44 ↗ annexing of set property as presented in

2:37:48 ↗ Exhibit B on page 457 of the ordinance

2:37:54 ↗ requiring assumption of existing

2:37:55 ↗ indebtedness and establishing an

2:37:58 ↗ effective date signify by saying aye

2:38:01 ↗ those opposed that carries unanimously

2:38:07 ↗ moving now to agenda bill 7 4 3 1 2018

2:38:14 ↗ Community Fund grant recommendations and

2:38:20 ↗ before we get to that we're gonna take a

2:38:23 ↗ oh my gosh the time sure flies when

2:38:27 ↗ you're having fun

2:38:28 ↗ feedback in your seats please at a

2:38:31 ↗ quarter till

2:38:45 ↗ you

2:47:22 ↗ hi way over here we're back in regular

2:47:28 ↗ session at 9:49 with that our next item

2:47:35 ↗ is agenda bill 7 for 31 2018 Community

2:47:42 ↗ Fund grant recommendations this is

2:47:45 ↗ coming back from the administration and

2:47:48 ↗ the services and Safety Committee city

2:47:52 ↗ administrator Bob Harrison will provide

2:47:55 ↗ staff update Thank You mayor so this did

2:48:00 ↗ go to the services committee and all the

2:48:02 ↗ various grantees did have the

2:48:05 ↗ opportunity to do a full-blown

2:48:06 ↗ presentation to the services committee

2:48:08 ↗ at that meeting was the chair Toula

2:48:11 ↗ marts and Mariah batise right and oh

2:48:17 ↗ yeah that's right Newman was Eileen and

2:48:20 ↗ then Stacy Goodman was filling in for

2:48:21 ↗ Mariah and so we had the opportunity to

2:48:24 ↗ to do that review and we'll show you the

2:48:28 ↗ recommendations based on the original

2:48:30 ↗ recommendations from the mayor and then

2:48:32 ↗ what the Services Committee forwarded

2:48:35 ↗ out but before we did that one of the

2:48:37 ↗ questions that came up which the

2:48:39 ↗ committee asked we review with the

2:48:40 ↗ council is the criterion that we use

2:48:43 ↗ with the community fund and so there is

2:48:46 ↗ a process that we go through we issue

2:48:47 ↗ the city issues in RFP those partners

2:48:50 ↗ end up submitting those request for

2:48:52 ↗ proposals for funding with a detailed

2:48:55 ↗ description of the project and then

2:48:58 ↗ there's a variety of staff that work

2:49:02 ↗ with you know very closely and directly

2:49:04 ↗ with those various agencies that receive

2:49:06 ↗ the funding and they do the evaluation

2:49:09 ↗ of the recommendations and they provide

2:49:11 ↗ that final recommendation to the mayor's

2:49:14 ↗ office which Fred and I then review with

2:49:17 ↗ that team for the final recommendations

2:49:20 ↗ so as part of that criterion that the

2:49:23 ↗ staff uses in scoring the applications

2:49:26 ↗ it meets these they look at these

2:49:29 ↗ various items so first of all furthers

2:49:31 ↗ the city's mission to support a

2:49:32 ↗ sustainable safe and vibrant community

2:49:35 ↗ the project strengthens the city

2:49:37 ↗ partnership to support the community

2:49:39 ↗ project provides organizational learning

2:49:41 ↗ development and mission completion the

2:49:43 ↗ project demonstrates compelling reason

2:49:45 ↗ to engage in city in capacity building

2:49:47 ↗ work

2:49:48 ↗ there's relevant technical managerial

2:49:50 ↗ and staff ability and capacity

2:49:52 ↗ demonstrated there's a strategy for

2:49:54 ↗ achieving and measuring impact provided

2:49:56 ↗ the applicant demonstrate outcomes and

2:50:00 ↗ strong performance and the costs are

2:50:01 ↗ detailed with good estimates and so

2:50:08 ↗ based on that criterion and that

2:50:10 ↗ evaluation the those projects were

2:50:14 ↗ evaluative with funding and so here's

2:50:18 ↗ the list the recommendation reflects and

2:50:22 ↗ I'll go through the mayor's

2:50:24 ↗ recommendation and then services and

2:50:26 ↗ safety committee recommendations so that

2:50:28 ↗ you're aware so Artiste for maintaining

2:50:31 ↗ sustainability for the artis education

2:50:33 ↗ program there was a $15,000 request the

2:50:37 ↗ mayor's recommendation was $10,000 and

2:50:39 ↗ services committee also concurred with

2:50:42 ↗ that at $10,000 at work for staff

2:50:45 ↗ training and professional development

2:50:46 ↗ there was 20 sorry $18,200 requested

2:50:51 ↗ mayor recommended 15,000 and the

2:50:53 ↗ committee also recommended 15,000 Cougar

2:50:56 ↗ Mountain Zoo for computer hardware and

2:50:58 ↗ software upgrades there was a 17,500 $3

2:51:02 ↗ request with $5,000 from the mayor's

2:51:05 ↗ office recommended recommended and the

2:51:08 ↗ Services Committee following that

2:51:09 ↗ presentation from the zoo recommended

2:51:12 ↗ that the city increased that

2:51:15 ↗ contribution to $10,000 was a $5,000

2:51:18 ↗ adjustment Eastside baby corner had

2:51:21 ↗ requested 17,000 750 recommendation from

2:51:25 ↗ Mayor was 15,000 and 15,000 from the as

2:51:28 ↗ well from the Services Committee friends

2:51:31 ↗ at Lake Sammamish State Park there was a

2:51:34 ↗ request for $30,000 the previous funding

2:51:38 ↗ had been at 25,000 the mayor had

2:51:40 ↗ recommended 20 and then the Services

2:51:42 ↗ Committee

2:51:44 ↗ recommend in matching the original

2:51:46 ↗ request so that would been 30 $30,000 so

2:51:50 ↗ that's a $5,000 increase from this

2:51:52 ↗ year's funding level but it's $10,000

2:51:55 ↗ variance in our the city's funding wreck

2:51:58 ↗ the mayor's recommended funding and in

2:52:00 ↗ the variant the the balance there

2:52:02 ↗ Highlands Council for Blakeley Hall

2:52:04 ↗ conference room remodel they had

2:52:05 ↗ requested 10 this mayor had recommended

2:52:09 ↗ 7,500 and the committee recommended 7500

2:52:12 ↗ as well as clubs Trail Club this would

2:52:15 ↗ be the first year we funded that

2:52:16 ↗ organization had requested 22,000 for

2:52:20 ↗ outreach engagement the mayor had

2:52:22 ↗ recommended 10 and the committee had

2:52:25 ↗ recommended 10,000 as well

2:52:27 ↗ the tavon's Center for fundraising and

2:52:31 ↗ constituent management software their

2:52:34 ↗ request was for 20 the recommendation

2:52:38 ↗ from the mayor was 5,000 and the

2:52:39 ↗ committee agreed with that at $5,000 and

2:52:43 ↗ in the village theater which has kind of

2:52:45 ↗ been a for a newest club production

2:52:48 ↗ warehouse they when they originally

2:52:51 ↗ applied last year they kind of laid out

2:52:52 ↗ a goal for the city of about $100,000

2:52:55 ↗ for funding which you know we said we

2:52:58 ↗ can't give you a hundred what we do do

2:53:00 ↗ though is have this process where you

2:53:01 ↗ can apply for these funds on an annual

2:53:03 ↗ basis and so you know we would suggest

2:53:06 ↗ that you in your original application

2:53:09 ↗ you can talk about it further that you

2:53:11 ↗ talked about is kind of a four year

2:53:12 ↗ arrangement that's $25,000 a year for

2:53:15 ↗ four years to meet that arrangement

2:53:17 ↗ again the council can't commit future

2:53:20 ↗ councils to funding so you know our

2:53:21 ↗ recommendation again it was at $25,000

2:53:24 ↗ for this level

2:53:25 ↗ so this funds a little bit yes there's a

2:53:28 ↗ mistake in the gender belt village the

2:53:29 ↗ other one it says services a safety

2:53:32 ↗ committee recommendation 2,500 it should

2:53:34 ↗ be 25,000 should be 25,000 okay thank

2:53:37 ↗ you for catching that so as there were a

2:53:45 ↗ couple questions last year regarding the

2:53:47 ↗ fund and what it's set up for now this

2:53:49 ↗ is a different fund and some of the

2:53:52 ↗ other funding the city provides to our

2:53:55 ↗ partners so the Human Services

2:53:57 ↗ Commission for example we offer Human

2:53:59 ↗ Services grants there's a full-blown

2:54:01 ↗ process and usually those programs are

2:54:04 ↗ with nonce with Human Services providers

2:54:07 ↗ that are providing a direct service to

2:54:09 ↗ whatever the clientele that they serve

2:54:11 ↗ at so we've got that pot of money

2:54:14 ↗ there's also the LTAC so even though

2:54:18 ↗ there weren't any grants awarded in the

2:54:19 ↗ past if it meets certain criteria and

2:54:21 ↗ there are some grants it could be

2:54:22 ↗ awarded through the LTAC committee that

2:54:24 ↗ meets those recommended awards the Arts

2:54:27 ↗ Commission is another option and a

2:54:29 ↗ couple of these agencies have gotten

2:54:31 ↗ funding through the Arts Commission for

2:54:34 ↗ different types of programs so there are

2:54:37 ↗ opportunities for some of these agencies

2:54:39 ↗ depending upon the program and what

2:54:41 ↗ they're proposing to get funding for

2:54:45 ↗ that other those other potential

2:54:47 ↗ programs so with that and I don't know

2:54:51 ↗ if Eileen or Stacey want to speak to the

2:54:54 ↗ variance in since Phil is not here this

2:54:56 ↗ evening the funding requests from the

2:55:00 ↗ Cougar Mountain Zoo or the the Friends

2:55:04 ↗ of Lake Sammamish State Park sure as a

2:55:07 ↗ committee if we're gonna speak to that

2:55:11 ↗ do it should I make a motion first sure

2:55:12 ↗ that would be great

2:55:13 ↗ I didn't have questions first before oh

2:55:16 ↗ and I did forget one thing thank you so

2:55:18 ↗ at the meeting that night we were at the

2:55:21 ↗ final stages of finalizing the budget

2:55:24 ↗ and I did mention that night as as long

2:55:27 ↗ as there's changes that are within

2:55:29 ↗ reason that we would be able to

2:55:31 ↗ incorporate those into the final mayor's

2:55:32 ↗ budget based on the committee because we

2:55:34 ↗ got an earlier start this year and so

2:55:36 ↗ the good news is we were able to

2:55:39 ↗ incorporate the committee's

2:55:41 ↗ recommendations into the budget so that

2:55:42 ↗ extra $15,000 essentially the services

2:55:46 ↗ and safety committee recommendations

2:55:47 ↗ reflect the funding that's in the budget

2:55:49 ↗ that got presented this evening to you I

2:55:53 ↗ would move to approve the 2018 community

2:55:56 ↗ fund recommendations as amended by the

2:55:58 ↗ council services the safety committee

2:56:00 ↗ for inclusion in the 2018 budget thank

2:56:03 ↗ you even and seconded questions or

2:56:06 ↗ discussion

2:56:07 ↗ Stacy I just want to make a couple of

2:56:10 ↗ quick comments as I recall Poulos

2:56:15 ↗ suggested an additional $5,000 to the

2:56:17 ↗ Cougar Mountain Zoo because they had

2:56:19 ↗ nothing last year I think that was the

2:56:21 ↗ reason and I requested an increase for

2:56:24 ↗ Friends of Lake Sammamish the Friends

2:56:27 ↗ group for Lake Sammamish State Park from

2:56:29 ↗ 20 to 30 the reason being that this is I

2:56:33 ↗ think what I stated there or what I did

2:56:37 ↗ state there is it seems to be punishing

2:56:39 ↗ that group to get less than they got

2:56:43 ↗ last year for a group that's been I

2:56:46 ↗ can't imagine any group that's been more

2:56:48 ↗ successful than the Friends of Lake

2:56:49 ↗ Sonoma State Park and they had asked for

2:56:51 ↗ an increase for additional hours for

2:56:55 ↗ their executive director because they

2:56:56 ↗ need those additional hours in order to

2:56:59 ↗ to grow and their needs there's a lot of

2:57:04 ↗ work that that executive director needs

2:57:08 ↗ to do to prepare for grants projects in

2:57:12 ↗ order to go out for donations and they

2:57:16 ↗ don't have enough time right now to do

2:57:18 ↗ that she doesn't have enough time right

2:57:19 ↗ out do that so those are the reasons

2:57:22 ↗ that those were and those amounts were

2:57:26 ↗ recommended to be increased and the

2:57:28 ↗ committee supported those three you know

2:57:31 ↗ and I guess the only other comment I

2:57:34 ↗ want to make maybe it's clear to the

2:57:37 ↗ council but not clear to the public is

2:57:40 ↗ that these are recommendations that go

2:57:41 ↗ into the budget and then we further

2:57:44 ↗ deliberate on the budget over the next

2:57:47 ↗ couple months thank you other questions

2:57:50 ↗ or discussion all

2:57:55 ↗ could either whoo Stacy or Arlene who

2:57:59 ↗ participated on the in the committee

2:58:02 ↗ review of these speaker 2 or maybe even

2:58:06 ↗ staff because the administration and

2:58:08 ↗ even an original recommendations did not

2:58:13 ↗ recommend anything for imagine housing

2:58:16 ↗ or life enrichment options in particular

2:58:19 ↗ I've just just would like to hear what

2:58:22 ↗ about those applications that didn't fit

2:58:27 ↗ the criteria so on the Leo this was a

2:58:33 ↗ very new step in their progress is kind

2:58:37 ↗ of a completely new program they were

2:58:38 ↗ looking at finding a develop essentially

2:58:42 ↗ a development professional to help raise

2:58:43 ↗ funds in the future and the amount of

2:58:48 ↗ the request at that time was fairly

2:58:50 ↗ significant and so our conversations

2:58:52 ↗ with Leo was that perhaps a smaller

2:58:58 ↗ incremental step would have been you

2:59:01 ↗ know a way to fund a smaller incremental

2:59:03 ↗ step or way to find some partnership

2:59:06 ↗ money rather than having the city pay

2:59:08 ↗ for the majority of the cost of the

2:59:10 ↗ development officer would have been a

2:59:12 ↗ good first step and so that's why we

2:59:15 ↗ just felt like the the Leo house just

2:59:18 ↗ wasn't quite ready yet for the city

2:59:20 ↗ funding under that proposal but we did

2:59:23 ↗ say we'd work with him over this next

2:59:25 ↗ year to see how we could maybe get them

2:59:26 ↗ to that level and then in terms of was

2:59:31 ↗ it the imagined housing mm-hmm

2:59:34 ↗ it just felt that that was the

2:59:37 ↗ replacement of the balconies wasn't yeah

2:59:45 ↗ it wasn't capacity building so there's

2:59:47 ↗ there's some of the other it was like a

2:59:49 ↗ maintenance type of proposal the village

2:59:54 ↗ theater for example which would be a

2:59:56 ↗ comparable kind of capital improvement

2:59:58 ↗ that we've done in the past there

3:00:00 ↗ some enhancement capacity for the

3:00:03 ↗ village theater in turn in terms of

3:00:05 ↗ being able to produce their programming

3:00:07 ↗ so it was slightly different than what

3:00:12 ↗ was proposed by the imagined housing

3:00:15 ↗ program is that your Stacey you have

3:00:25 ↗ anything to add you guys talked about

3:00:27 ↗ this I think it was presented very well

3:00:30 ↗ especially for the imagined housing that

3:00:33 ↗ was a difficult one but it was

3:00:35 ↗ definitely following our process okay

3:00:40 ↗ the one the one just to follow that on I

3:00:43 ↗ remember when we this formerly known as

3:00:47 ↗ the mayor's fund set of recommendations

3:00:49 ↗ just had to mention that when we

3:00:54 ↗ established this criteria one of the

3:00:56 ↗ things to do was the idea that we wanted

3:00:58 ↗ to be known that it that could be for

3:01:00 ↗ capacity development and expansion so

3:01:03 ↗ that concept is I think is relatively

3:01:06 ↗ new in this process that it could be

3:01:08 ↗ about you know the development of staff

3:01:11 ↗ for example or some capacity of the

3:01:14 ↗ organization so that was relatively new

3:01:16 ↗ I hope we don't make it just that but

3:01:19 ↗ one of the things I do see in the list

3:01:21 ↗ then is that it will by by changing the

3:01:23 ↗ process making an application and

3:01:25 ↗ remember one of the goals was from your

3:01:27 ↗ your tier staff team that recommended

3:01:29 ↗ this last year was that we might catch

3:01:33 ↗ some organizations that we hadn't before

3:01:36 ↗ and there's a number of them here so it

3:01:39 ↗ went through the vetting process and

3:01:40 ↗ through the council committee process so

3:01:43 ↗ I'm actually glad to see that because I

3:01:45 ↗ know that was we didn't know going in

3:01:46 ↗ whether or not we would continue to fund

3:01:49 ↗ the same or there'd be some change and

3:01:51 ↗ there's clearly the word is getting out

3:01:53 ↗ there and there's some change so I'm

3:01:55 ↗ really glad to see that I think that's

3:01:58 ↗ an indication to me that the process is

3:02:00 ↗ working through our intent was to get a

3:02:03 ↗ wider look at the needs of capital and

3:02:06 ↗ capacity building needs of more

3:02:08 ↗ nonprofits for so we can make a fair

3:02:12 ↗ meant of their application so it's

3:02:14 ↗ reflected in this list no yes I'm glad

3:02:22 ↗ to hear it seemed like a more more

3:02:25 ↗ organized process this year which is

3:02:27 ↗ nice because that's some of the concerns

3:02:29 ↗ from last year

3:02:30 ↗ and a couple questions through that did

3:02:37 ↗ you look back and did the Human Services

3:02:40 ↗ Commission look at these at all or you

3:02:42 ↗ just did services and safety and you I

3:02:45 ↗ mean your your city group and then the

3:02:48 ↗ service and Safety Committee correct

3:02:50 ↗ yeah so the Human Services Commission

3:02:52 ↗ doesn't look at these these are

3:02:54 ↗ different pot they look at the Human

3:02:56 ↗ Services Commission grants and that as

3:02:58 ↗ you may know we've worked for a long

3:03:00 ↗ time to get that up to like $10 per

3:03:02 ↗ capita funding which is kind of where

3:03:03 ↗ they're at now right and so then I guess

3:03:06 ↗ the the one of the advantages of this

3:03:09 ↗ type of funding in addition to our Human

3:03:12 ↗ Services Commission funding is to fill

3:03:15 ↗ those gaps really look at that in

3:03:18 ↗ comparison that what who and what

3:03:19 ↗ they're funding and sometimes there's

3:03:21 ↗ gaps that don't fit well under that

3:03:23 ↗ program that would fit better under this

3:03:24 ↗ program and the capacity kind of work

3:03:26 ↗ because the stuff there were that's a

3:03:28 ↗ lot more towards the service side maybe

3:03:30 ↗ and so that we'd want to look at how

3:03:32 ↗ these compare back to each other and

3:03:34 ↗ look at some of those gaps in in what's

3:03:36 ↗ being provided

3:03:37 ↗ because sometimes we'd see that so we

3:03:39 ↗ want don't want to have the same you

3:03:42 ↗ know organizations getting through there

3:03:44 ↗ and then comes through here and so we

3:03:45 ↗ want to look to get that broadened and

3:03:48 ↗ and hit those areas that that doesn't

3:03:50 ↗ hit so they these complement each other

3:03:52 ↗ and I'd better work so I hope that we're

3:03:58 ↗ looking back at that with the Human

3:03:59 ↗ Service Commission when they is they do

3:04:01 ↗ their process I think this year also all

3:04:03 ↗ right coming up to to just somebody to

3:04:05 ↗ go back and look at the two together and

3:04:07 ↗ how they line up and if there are other

3:04:08 ↗ missing places or not or how well we did

3:04:11 ↗ fill in some of those gaps

3:04:14 ↗ Mariah so I just wanted to echo both

3:04:18 ↗ council member Winter Stein and

3:04:21 ↗ comments about about this first of all

3:04:28 ↗ I'm I was really happy to see that there

3:04:31 ↗ were additional groups that were being

3:04:34 ↗ funded so I think some of the smaller

3:04:36 ↗ groups are starting to understand that

3:04:38 ↗ there that in terms of capacity building

3:04:41 ↗ that they would have an opportunity to

3:04:44 ↗ take a look at this I would want the

3:04:46 ↗ Human Services Commission and I I would

3:04:49 ↗ like a broader look across there I just

3:04:53 ↗ for example when I see that life

3:04:55 ↗ enrichment options was trying to do some

3:05:00 ↗ capacity building for example and was

3:05:03 ↗ not funded under this and was also not

3:05:05 ↗ funded under the Human Services grant if

3:05:10 ↗ I'm remembering that correctly from last

3:05:12 ↗ that we looked at that that my concern

3:05:16 ↗ is always both from the Human Services

3:05:19 ↗ Commission side and these Community Fund

3:05:22 ↗ recommendations that if there's a small

3:05:28 ↗ group that's doing great work but they

3:05:31 ↗ just don't have the money to have a

3:05:34 ↗ professional grant writing that their

3:05:36 ↗ grant writer that there may be losing

3:05:39 ↗ out on opportunities and I just want to

3:05:42 ↗ make sure and I know I know we're very

3:05:44 ↗ keyed into that but I just want to bring

3:05:47 ↗ that up as something additional to think

3:05:49 ↗ about and I would like to see a broad

3:05:52 ↗ view and comparisons when we're we're

3:05:55 ↗ talking about this it is really

3:05:56 ↗ important to have this in terms of

3:05:58 ↗ capacity building but just to take all

3:06:02 ↗ of that into consideration I think is

3:06:04 ↗ important

3:06:04 ↗ thank you

3:06:09 ↗ the only comment I want to make is I'm

3:06:11 ↗ not quite sure we have the right

3:06:13 ↗ criteria laid out I'm a it wasn't in the

3:06:20 ↗ packet when we were looking at it

3:06:22 ↗ initially at services but in so many of

3:06:26 ↗ the

3:06:27 ↗ the request could have gone different

3:06:29 ↗ ways and I also think that there is so

3:06:31 ↗ much overlap with human services that I

3:06:34 ↗ think it's possible that we don't have

3:06:36 ↗ the right criteria for whatever this

3:06:38 ↗ Community Fund and I don't know what

3:06:41 ↗ that looks like right now but I think

3:06:43 ↗ that's part of the part of the issue

3:06:47 ↗ which I'll call some confusion about

3:06:49 ↗ what these different funds are for and

3:06:51 ↗ why we seem to have similar questions

3:06:53 ↗ year over year saying no further

3:07:01 ↗ questions all those in favor of

3:07:03 ↗ approving the 2018 community fund

3:07:05 ↗ recommendations as amended by the

3:07:07 ↗ council services Safety Committee for

3:07:09 ↗ inclusion in the 2018 budget signify by

3:07:12 ↗ saying aye those opposed that carries

3:07:16 ↗ unanimously

3:07:17 ↗ moving now to go to the order anyone

3:07:21 ↗ have anything for good of the order bill

3:07:24 ↗ I just want to mention that last week I

3:07:27 ↗ think many of us were at the Issaquah

3:07:29 ↗ food and clothing bank breakfast which

3:07:31 ↗ was a raucous success and I think they

3:07:34 ↗ raised over $150,000 this year and it's

3:07:37 ↗ our just our local nonprofit that is a

3:07:39 ↗ stone's throw from here that we support

3:07:41 ↗ in many ways all of us in many ways and

3:07:43 ↗ just want to mention that because I love

3:07:44 ↗ the day of their breakfast and bringing

3:07:48 ↗ some money on one day it's beautiful

3:07:49 ↗ thank you thank you

3:07:51 ↗ anyone else seeing none then we are

3:07:54 ↗ adjourned

3:08:08 ↗ you

Approved minutes

Extracted from the next meeting's packet, where this meeting's minutes were approved as a consent-calendar attachment.

Open PDF

Attendance

Council / Members (6)

Eileen Barber

Mariah Bettise

Stacy Goodman

Mary Lou Pauly

Bill Ramos

Paul Winterstein

Excused

Tola Marts

Motions and votes (3)

Adopt revised Ordinance No. 2803 annexing certain property known as the King County Island; establishing pre-annexation zoning of said property as presented in Exhibit B of the ordinance; requiring assumption of existing indebtedness; and establishing an effective date. .

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

Carried 6-0

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

Approve the 2018 Community Fund recommendations, as amended by the Council Services & Safety Committee, for inclusion in the 2018 budget. [0000] .

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by WINTERSTEIN

Carried 6-0

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein

APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED

Moved by GOODMAN · seconded by PAULY

Carried 6-0

In favor: Eileen Barber, Mariah Bettise, Stacy Goodman, Mary Lou Pauly, Bill Ramos, Paul Winterstein