← Back to City Council Digest

Meeting concluded — minutes pending. The agenda below is what the City posted; minutes haven't been published yet. Issaquah approves Council minutes at the next meeting and ships them embedded in that next meeting's packet, so they typically land here 1–3 weeks after the meeting. Transcript and recording will appear once the City posts the YouTube video and our pipeline catches it.
Park Board Auto captions

Thursday, September 25, 2025

7:00 PM · 1h 42m
Topics tracked across meetings:
Parks & Community Services- Summer Highlights 2025 (I) Jeff Watling- Parks and Community Services ID 1916 3/3
Urban Forestry Program Updates Dan Hintz, Urban Forest Supervisor 2/2
Section
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
2a
Park Board- June 23rd, 2025- Minutes
packet pp.3–5
Topics: Parks
Staff report:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) 06-23-2025 Park Board Minutes Page [1] CITY OF ISSAQUAH Park Board and Arts Commission Joint Meeting 7:00 PM Tibbetts Manor, 750 17th Ave June 23rd, 2025 MINUTES NW, Issaquah
2b
Park Board- July 28th, 2025- Minutes
packet pp.7–9
Topics: Parks
Staff report:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES b) 07-28-2025 Park Board Minutes Page [1] CITY OF ISSAQUAH Park Board Meeting 7:00 PM City Hall South, 135 E. Sunset July 28th, 2025 MINUTES Way, Issaquah
4. REGULAR BUSINESS
4a
Urban Forestry Program Updates Dan Hintz, Urban Forest Supervisor
Information · packet pp.11–30
Topics: Trees
Staff report:
Urban Forestry Program Updates SEPTEMBER 25, 2025 | PARK BOARD Dan Hintz, Urban Forest Supervisor
4b
Parks & Community Services- Summer Highlights 2025 (I) Jeff Watling- Parks and Community Services
Director · packet pp.31–44
Topics: Parks
Staff report:
Parks & Community Services Summer Highlights 2025 SEPTEMBER 27, 2025 | PARK BOARD MEETING JEFF WATLING, PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
5. REPORTS
5a
Director's Report
5b
Chairperson's Report
5c
Youth Representative Report
0:11 Tim,
0:14 >> boy, am I glad you guys sent the email
0:15 out. I was I had next Monday a lot and
0:19 until the email came out, I was like,
0:20 "Oh my gosh."
0:22 >> So did I. I was I was a wreck. I was a
0:24 mess.
0:25 >> I said to her, "Thank you, Ryan, for
0:28 sending me straight. If this is the
0:30 lonely people in here, at least go
0:33 closer to
0:36 all the
0:42 >> Hannah and Paul.
0:45 >> Hey, can you guys hear us?
0:47 >> Yep. Hi guys.
0:50 [clears throat]
0:50 >> Hello everybody. Sorry I got kids today,
0:52 so they may interrupt and I'll do my
0:54 best.
0:55 >> No [laughter] problem.
0:57 >> Life happens.
0:59 Baby.
1:02 >> Oh, yes.
1:06 >> It's dinner time. Snack time
1:10 in here.
1:13 >> Thank you.
1:18 >> Maybe I'll just
1:25 You approve both minutes at the same
1:27 time.
1:29 Is that a good idea? Um,
1:31 >> yeah, I think you can do it on one
1:33 motion. Just ask, you know, view of
1:36 both.
1:39 >> I move to approve the minutes from both
1:42 months.
1:44 >> We'll get there.
1:44 >> We'll get there.
1:46 >> Yeah.
1:55 >> 59.
1:57 I'm gonna test this.
1:59 >> Oh, Marlene doesn't be able to join us.
2:03 >> Why are we here on a seat?
2:07 [laughter]
2:07 >> Sorry.
2:10 >> We address the issue on the
2:12 >> meeting.
2:15 I would say
2:18 >> due to cultural calendar, we we released
2:20 our schedule before the CR.
2:22 >> Actually, that's
2:23 >> unfortunate.
2:28 Fair question.
2:29 >> Good.
2:32 >> All right, we're ready.
2:34 >> It is 7 o'clock. As chair, I'll call
2:38 this [snorts]
2:39 September 25th, 2025 meeting of the
2:42 Hispan Parks Board to order.
2:46 To start, we will do roll call. I say
2:49 your name. Please say here or present.
2:52 Brian Olsen here.
2:55 David Lou,
2:59 >> sorry, just got here.
3:02 >> Perfect.
3:02 >> Present.
3:04 >> Katie Bell,
3:05 >> present.
3:06 >> Thank you. Chris Kovac,
3:09 >> excused.
3:11 >> Excused.
3:14 >> Tim Mley.
3:19 >> Usually he jumps online.
3:22 Anna Nakovic.
3:27 >> Thank you.
3:28 >> Diana Ren,
3:30 >> present.
3:32 [snorts]
3:33 >> Jana Tushi,
3:36 >> excuse.
3:36 >> Excuse.
3:38 >> Arlene Waxy,
3:41 >> excused.
3:45 Paul Adair,
3:47 >> here.
3:49 [snorts]
3:49 >> Martha Gintner,
3:50 >> here.
3:52 Jeffrey Newell here.
3:57 >> Thank you.
4:00 Do we have on the board? I think
4:04 um has everybody had a chance to review
4:06 both sets of minutes from the June 23rd
4:08 and July 28th park tour
4:13 meetings.
4:16 Does anybody have any corrections or
4:17 edits?
4:23 Then if there are no corrections,
4:25 anybody like to make a motion to approve
4:28 both minutes?
4:29 >> I move to approve approve both sets of
4:32 minutes.
4:34 >> I'll second that.
4:36 >> Thank you. With no corrections, on
4:38 behalf of the board, the minutes are
4:40 approved.
4:42 Uh is anyone present
4:47 online for public comment?
4:52 double check.
4:55 Not
4:57 >> um I do know we had some emailed in
4:58 comments
5:01 um which
5:03 are part of the slide, the last bullet
5:05 point if I understand the slide
5:08 correctly.
5:09 >> Yeah. And if if you would like we can
5:11 have that email be part of the record.
5:13 >> Yeah, that'd be great. Part of the
5:14 minutes as as public comment. Yeah.
5:18 >> [clears throat]
5:22 >> Okay,
5:25 we can move on to regular business.
5:29 >> I think the first thing on our list
5:32 is the urban forestry program update.
5:37 >> I can super fast. Absolutely. Thank you,
5:40 Dan. Hence, our urban forest supervisor
5:41 is here. Uh thanks so much. Along with
5:44 um urban forest um uh program updates
5:48 with the adoption of the the management
5:50 plan earlier this year. Dan's also here
5:53 to give a I think a timely update on um
5:56 our heritage tree program. U you you may
5:59 recall a year and a half ago we came and
6:03 had a series of conversations with you
6:04 all about um the need to update the
6:08 heritage tree program. We're not here
6:09 tonight to provide a a draft or a
6:12 proposal of the heritage tree program.
6:13 We just thought with enough new park
6:15 board members this year, it'd be worth
6:17 just a reminder of what that program is,
6:19 what our intent is. Um, as Santi comes
6:22 back uh this fall, as Dan is back, we're
6:25 we're planning on bringing a draft uh to
6:27 you in November. Um so really meant to
6:30 just be an update um and some questions
6:33 and discussion tonight. So thanks D.
6:36 >> Thank you, Jeff. Um, thank you all for
6:37 having me tonight. Um, again, my name is
6:39 Dan Hints. I'm the urban forest
6:40 supervisor. I know I've met most of you,
6:42 but not quite everyone, but I've been in
6:44 this role for two and a half years. It's
6:46 a uh was a newly created role at the
6:48 time. So, really great to see the city
6:49 and within our parks and community
6:51 services department and investing in our
6:52 urban forests and all the great benefits
6:55 that our trees provide, but also, you
6:57 know, the uh, you know, some of the
6:58 challenges and responsibilities as
6:59 relates to tree risk, tree management,
7:02 uh, and tree care. So, um, this
7:04 presentation, uh, Robin, if you want to
7:06 go to the next slide, please. Um, is
7:08 going to provide some
7:13 >> for folks that
7:22 >> that's okay.
7:25 >> It's still
7:31 out there. I can't advance it.
7:38 >> Oh, there we go.
7:39 >> I'm used to it. I'm used to it.
7:42 >> Um,
7:44 so if Robin, if you wouldn't mind going
7:46 one up or one back. Uh, not expecting
7:49 anyone to read through all of this, but
7:51 if people are interested, I did bring a
7:52 couple printed copies if you want to
7:53 kind of look through this or hold on to
7:55 this. Um, but as Jeff mentioned, you
7:58 know, kind of as I came on our first,
8:02 um, when I first came on, you know,
8:05 being a new new program, new position,
8:08 really kind of building the foundation,
8:09 uh, and really in urban forestry, having
8:12 a management plan, this is kind of
8:14 intended to be a 10-year roadmap to how
8:16 we kind of build and develop this urban
8:18 forestry program. And it's certainly a
8:19 lot of work in our parks department to
8:21 work in cross departments with public
8:23 works, planning, sustainability. And
8:24 we'll uh essentially give a just a
8:26 couple slide overview of what this plan
8:28 looks like. So I know for some folks
8:29 this will be reviewed. You saw this in
8:31 development through most of 2024 into
8:33 adoption in February of 20 uh 25. Um but
8:37 essentially the plan is in three
8:39 sections. So Rob, if you don't mind
8:40 going to head one. Um current conditions
8:43 essentially what we have. It looks like
8:44 this might be loading. I apologize. A
8:47 bunch of stuff at a time here. So, if
8:49 you just want to [snorts]
8:51 >> just click through it,
8:52 >> scroll a couple scrolls through it.
8:55 >> Yeah.
8:56 >> Okay.
8:57 >> So, if you just want to do all of them,
8:58 I think. My bad. Um, so the first
9:01 section, like I said, it's kind of kind
9:03 of what we have. So, that's kind of
9:04 looking at the current composition. Um,
9:06 I'll say one of the other foundational
9:08 piece of any urban forestry programs,
9:10 public tree inventory. So, that's
9:11 something I'll talk about in a few
9:12 slides in terms of implementation of
9:14 this plan. you know having essentially
9:15 the road map but then a really good
9:17 understanding of what we have. So as
9:18 part of our green isn't qua
9:20 implementation plan we had some
9:21 composition analysis done for our 1500
9:24 plus acres of open spaces but we don't
9:25 really have that nuance detail for you
9:27 know individual park trees and rideaway
9:29 trees and that's where I think there's a
9:30 lot of room for uh uh growth uh and you
9:34 know kind of information there as it
9:35 relates to our urban forest and in more
9:38 of the truly built environment. Uh so
9:40 looking at management programs existing
9:42 and kind of ones that we need to build
9:43 towards alignment with existing plans.
9:45 So you've heard a lot of physical
9:46 climate action plan or 55% tree canopy
9:49 goal. Um you know some of the overlaps
9:51 that we have with kind of transportation
9:52 planning obviously park system plan as
9:55 well creeks to peaks. Um so you know
9:57 kind of this is kind of what that first
9:59 section really looks like if if you are
10:00 wanting to flip through that. Sorry, I
10:01 didn't bring more copies, but um staff
10:04 and community engagement, uh
10:05 vulnerabilities, you know, essentially
10:07 what are the challenges we see both from
10:08 a management point of view, but some
10:10 things are a little more difficult to
10:11 control, like obviously a change in
10:12 climate, some of the pests and diseases
10:14 that might be associated with that. Um
10:16 and then kind of an evaluation or audit
10:18 that we can kind of have currently and
10:20 kind of do uh systematically, you know,
10:22 on like two-year intervals is what we're
10:23 shooting for in the plan using a US
10:25 Forest Service urban forest audit. So um
10:29 Robin if you want to hop to the next
10:30 one. Thank you. So then it gets into the
10:33 vision recommendations kind of after
10:34 what we what we have and you know sort
10:36 of setting up what we need. This is kind
10:38 of getting into those recommendations.
10:40 So you all helped workshop this a little
10:42 bit probably gosh like a year and a half
10:44 now having kind of a a highlevel vision
10:46 for our urban forest. Um so I won't read
10:48 it out loud but that's kind of what's in
10:50 italics on the top half of this slide.
10:52 And then it's broken into five sections
10:54 for uh recommendations which include you
10:57 know goals, strategies and priority
10:59 actions. So that's you know equitable
11:01 and resilient canopy cover. That's
11:02 really the the forest the trees itself.
11:04 Um uh like I said we talk about that at
11:06 a macro level in terms of you know our
11:08 overall canopy cover in the city which
11:10 is currently about 51%. We do have that
11:12 55% goal by 2035 in the climate action
11:15 plan. Um, but really getting into some
11:18 of the kind of individual tree care,
11:19 like I said, you know, kind of how we're
11:21 working across departments, working with
11:22 our contractors, working with private
11:24 residents to educate around, you know,
11:26 proper tree care and maintenance and
11:28 ideally trying to incentivize, you know,
11:30 improving canopy on private property,
11:31 which I'll I'll talk about our tree
11:33 giveaway program that just launched last
11:34 week. I have a slide for that here in
11:36 just a little bit. Uh, maintenance and
11:38 management, that's where, you know, I
11:39 work uh out of our parks operations
11:41 building. So, uh, really trying to, you
11:43 know, kind of, uh, ingrain best
11:44 practices for tree care with our team
11:46 there, which is really great that
11:47 there's a lot of folks invested in that.
11:48 We actually have another certified
11:50 arborist on our parks operations team
11:51 who's really kind of taken on some of
11:53 this. Um, Christy Bishop, uh, and, you
11:55 know, trying to work more with public
11:56 works as they're working around trees
11:58 and sidewalks and some of the conflicts
11:59 we have with infrastructure and trying
12:01 to just find the right balance where we
12:02 can with obviously needing to, you know,
12:04 improve some of those, uh, you know,
12:06 kind of pieces of the built environment,
12:07 but also trying to preserve, care for
12:09 trees as best we can. Uh the third one
12:11 is really kind of getting into our code
12:13 or our treatable ordinances. So title
12:15 18, which is our land use code, had a
12:16 huge overhaul in 2023 and we're even
12:18 going through another sort of revision
12:21 of the tree code uh chapter in title 18
12:24 uh currently. So that is something that
12:26 is uh at this point kind of at the
12:27 council stage that uh the the planning
12:30 policy commission has really been kind
12:31 of working on with our planning
12:32 department. Funding is a level of
12:34 service is kind of how we get there, you
12:35 know, kind of what we're providing. Um,
12:37 and then the last one, something I'm
12:38 very passionate about is, you know, that
12:40 communitya education, engagement, and
12:42 stewardship. And I'll probably leave it
12:43 at that for now because I'll have a
12:45 couple slides in a bit touching on our
12:46 green program and our park ranger
12:48 program, which are big parts of that
12:50 community education and engagement. So,
12:52 lastly on the next slide, Robin, is um,
12:55 you know, essentially how do we
12:56 implement this? That's kind of where we
12:58 get more into the strategies, priority
13:00 actions, and you know, how do we
13:01 monitor? I kind of talked about the US
13:02 Forest Service audit. Um, you know,
13:05 there's some of these highle goals
13:06 around, like I said, tree canopy. Um,
13:08 you know, getting a tree inventory and
13:10 having better understanding of the
13:11 composition and, uh, you know, kind of
13:13 what to prioritize planting, what to
13:15 maybe pull back on. You maybe heard me
13:16 talk about emerald ashbor as a
13:18 preparedness plan, something that we're
13:20 likely to see in the near future and
13:21 it's going to be a really big challenge
13:22 for our ash population, but we don't
13:24 have an exact idea of how large of a
13:26 proportion that is of our urban canopy.
13:28 So that's the type of data that we're
13:30 really hoping to to collect to make more
13:32 informed decisions, more efficient
13:33 decisions as it relates to managing our
13:35 trees and urban forest.
13:36 >> And ashore, sorry, Dan, is a is a bug.
13:40 >> It's a pest. It it it, you know, burrows
13:43 in and then the larae as it comes out,
13:45 you know, feeds on the cambian or the
13:46 living layer of the bark and essentially
13:48 kills ash trees uh top down. So there's
13:51 becoming better technology to stem
13:53 inject trees to actually maybe prolong
13:55 their life or kind of keep them going,
13:56 but you have to catch it really early.
13:58 So there's kind of an early detection
13:59 process to this too. But it is been an
14:01 estimated $4 billion of resource damages
14:04 in the Midwest and East Coast from, you
14:06 know, entire populations where ash trees
14:07 are a bigger part of their forest, but
14:09 it's not insignificant here in terms of
14:10 our native Oregon ash and then a lot of
14:12 ornamental ash trees we plant in streets
14:14 and parks. So looking at some, you know,
14:16 information cost supporting resources
14:18 and like I said, you know, that
14:19 evaluation, monitor, revise. So right
14:21 now, we're looking at this as a 10-year
14:23 plan with, you know, potentially an
14:24 update after that. And we were really,
14:26 you know, not even quite finished with
14:27 year one. So still pretty early in that
14:29 process. So um, and folks, if you have
14:32 questions online or now, please just
14:34 jump in. I I'm happy. But this is kind
14:36 of the transition from real high level
14:38 what the urban forestry plan looks like
14:40 and a couple of the handouts here at
14:42 least the folks in person. Um, and then
14:44 getting into a few what we've kind of
14:46 looked at as priority implementation
14:47 items on the next few slides here. So,
14:50 we'll hop through those next. Um, so I
14:54 mentioned, you know, one of the ideas is
14:55 how do we incentivize uh tree canopy
14:57 improvements on private property? I
14:59 mean, we're pretty dang lucky in Isiqua
15:01 to have almost 20% of our land mask in
15:03 our public park system. And that
15:05 actually doesn't include some of the
15:06 other publicly managed lands like
15:07 lakesam state park or the bit of King
15:09 County or DNR uh managed land within the
15:12 city. So we we are really fortunate to
15:14 have that but that still means 75% or at
15:17 least 2/3 is in private land ownership.
15:20 So how do we work with residents?
15:22 Obviously tree code is a big part of
15:23 that but how do we do that in maybe a
15:25 more engaging exciting less regulatory
15:27 way and this has been a great
15:29 partnership with uh the sustainability
15:31 department. I'm not sure if any folks
15:33 have met David Reedi that uh our manager
15:35 Stacey McKinstry. It's a really powerful
15:37 twoperson team in our executive
15:39 department. Uh, so sustainability team I
15:41 should say. Um, and we're really kind of
15:43 launching this and hoping to make this
15:44 an annual event, but we're partnering
15:46 with, as I mentioned, sustainability.
15:47 300 trees is a great kind of grassroots
15:50 nonprofit that popped up in Belleview at
15:52 their supporting tree giveaways with
15:53 City of Belleview, City of Redband, and
15:54 now Isiqua. Uh, and then Friends of
15:56 Physical Salmon Hatchery has kind of
15:57 been a late partner to this effort,
15:59 which has been great. And I really like
16:01 how they've kind of uh, uh, coined kind
16:04 of the effort. They're working with us
16:05 from canopy to curve. So they're looking
16:07 at how tree canopy benefits storm water
16:09 and water quality and ultimately how
16:11 that uh is is really you know critical
16:13 for salmon. Um so they are working both
16:16 with this tree giveaway program and also
16:17 with public works on adopt a drain which
16:19 is you know working with folks in the
16:21 neighborhoods to be keeping uh
16:23 pollutants leaves all that stuff out of
16:25 out of storm drains and and the benefits
16:27 that provides for water qualities water
16:29 quality. So we're looking to distribute
16:31 uh 275 trees. This just launched last
16:33 Friday actually. So, it's been really
16:34 great getting uh daily updates from 300
16:37 trees. They really do the backend
16:38 application. We've been pri uh promoting
16:40 it mainly to um priority neighborhoods
16:44 uh uh through a tree equity tool. So, we
16:46 identified about nine census blocks in
16:48 the city that have um fairly significant
16:51 uh summer heat disparity temperatures.
16:53 So, um, uh, neighborhoods that all have
16:56 three and a half or four degree plus
16:58 temperature differences because of lack
17:00 of canopy, usually impervious surfaces,
17:02 a lot of asphalt work, just, you know,
17:04 the sun kind of radiates and creates
17:05 what you hear sometimes the term a heat
17:07 island or heat island effect. Um, so our
17:10 initial outreach has not been huge in
17:12 terms of citywide. We've been doing some
17:14 targeted yard signs, a few email blasts
17:16 with Highlands Community Association.
17:18 Essentially, a lot of the areas that
17:20 have that lower canopy and the higher
17:21 heat disparity are are the highlands,
17:23 Oldtown, a little bit of central Isiqua.
17:26 Um, this is geared towards residents in
17:28 small organizations. We do have a
17:29 definition for that. So, we're not
17:30 necessarily giving it away to, you know,
17:33 commercial properties or things like
17:34 that, but we had a condominium on Isle
17:36 Creek that just reached out to us and
17:37 ordered 10 trees, which is great. Um,
17:39 but we are probably going to be ramping
17:41 up the promotion of this over the next
17:42 few weeks and ultimately have a giveaway
17:44 event on November 15th at Pickering
17:46 Barn. So, really, really great way. We
17:48 have some funding from S sustainability,
17:50 some funding from our team um that's
17:52 putting this together for that pickup
17:54 event uh on November 15th. So if any of
17:56 you are interested in a tree or know
17:58 people, we do have a website. If you
18:00 just search tree giveaway, it's pretty
18:01 easy to find, but we'll you'll see it in
18:03 more communications from the city uh
18:05 here pretty soon. I can just reiterate,
18:07 Dan, this this program represents a
18:10 really cool opportunity. So many we do
18:11 so much tree planting. We plant
18:13 thousands of trees a year, but this is a
18:15 really cool opportunity for us, as Dan
18:18 said to
18:20 help. We can't mandate planting trees or
18:22 private property, but we want to
18:23 incentivize and and realize um as you
18:27 said, those parcels and the compilation
18:29 of those private parcels play a big role
18:31 in canopy cover uh for for
18:35 >> So, I'll probably have a quick update on
18:37 that in November in terms of we already
18:38 forming a map of where those trees are
18:40 being ordered from. It's really neat to
18:41 see some of the other results. has given
18:42 away somewhere around 20, not quite 25%
18:45 of our trees. So, um, that's just in a
18:47 few days. We're pretty optimistic we'll
18:49 reach that number of 275 and hopefully
18:51 maybe be able to grow that in in future
18:52 years. Uh, so one of the other planning
18:54 efforts that I think is really
18:56 important, and I'll admit this was
18:57 something that I kind of nudged to
18:58 include in our forest management plan,
19:01 um, if if folks aren't familiar,
19:02 hopefully most people are, but Tradition
19:04 Plateau is a very flat sort of uh, uh,
19:08 part of Tiger Mountain, kind of just
19:10 south of Interstate 90. you can see on
19:11 that photo on the top there. Um, a lot
19:14 of people don't necessarily know the
19:16 city has a lot of land up there that we
19:18 manage. It is part of the traditional
19:19 plateau natural resource conservation
19:21 area. So, meaning it is an area that's
19:23 intended for, you know, passive
19:25 recreation, but really conservation long
19:27 term in terms of the, uh, forest
19:29 resources up there. So, uh, one of the
19:32 most amazing trees and locations on
19:34 Tradition Plateau that's on city
19:35 property is the Big Tree uh, on the Roof
19:38 Keys Big Tree Trail. So that's the photo
19:39 on the bottom there. That is probably a
19:42 200 plus year uh old growth Douglas fur
19:45 tree. Um that uh is you know 8 n feet
19:48 diameter. So as I mentioned we have you
19:51 know 15 to600 acres of forested open
19:54 space in our park system. Uh almost a
19:56 quarter of that if not a little bit more
19:58 is within the traditions plateau uh
20:01 NRCA. So it's an area that we you know
20:05 if you're going by the canopy metric it
20:06 has a 91% tree canopy. He's like, "Oh,
20:08 that's great." But this is an area that
20:10 has had multiple generations of logging.
20:13 It's had a lot of other uh impacts that
20:15 have, you know, essentially degraded the
20:17 uh complexity or biodiversity of some of
20:19 the forests where we might have, let's
20:21 say, a standard Douglas fur that's
20:22 uniform age, uniform species from uh
20:25 resulting from, you know, logging in the
20:27 1980s. So, so we're really looking, this
20:29 is probably even more of a 20 to 30year
20:31 kind of management plan. Really focused
20:33 on kind of sounds like a buzz term, but
20:35 ecological forestry. We're not looking
20:37 at doing timber harvest for the sake of
20:38 obviously selling timber. There could be
20:40 recommendations around thinning areas
20:42 for the health of the forest long term.
20:44 Um you'll hear that term ecological
20:45 thinning. Um we're working with a group
20:47 called Northwest Natural Resource Group
20:49 that specializes or a nonprofit that
20:51 works uh up and down the Washington
20:53 coast. Uh in Oregon as well uh
20:55 specializes on ecological forestry and
20:57 they've done a lot of consulting work
20:58 with Department of Natural Resources and
21:00 and several tribes uh based in
21:02 Washington state. So really really great
21:04 group to be working with and we're
21:05 actually going to be kicking off that
21:06 planning process here in about a week or
21:08 two which is really exciting. So uh
21:11 really like kind of a better assessment
21:13 of that 435 or so acres and hopefully
21:15 some good strategies around how we can
21:17 continue to care and improve the forest
21:19 health and what is a really you know
21:21 kind of big contiguous forest there on
21:23 the plateau and some of the slopes
21:25 coming down to I90.
21:26 >> Would you agree Dan? I think this is a
21:28 good this assessment is a good example
21:30 of when we talk about tree canopy often
21:34 canopy is talked about solely as volume
21:36 like the most important thing about
21:37 canopy is volume but what's really
21:39 important is also the health and
21:41 condition of the canopy. So though this
21:43 has a great volume number this
21:45 assessment is really going to help us
21:48 ensure that the health of that canopy.
21:50 >> We heard and I know I don't think Zach's
21:52 on the park board anymore. or if like
21:53 there might have been other folks that
21:54 were really kind of emphasizing
21:56 understory species, wildlife, you know,
21:58 uh how we're controlling invasive
22:00 species like holly and ivy. So, it's
22:01 it's looking at more than literally the,
22:03 you know, the top of the forest, the
22:04 tree canopy, and as Jeff's saying, kind
22:06 of that holistic approach to, you know,
22:08 both the different structures and levels
22:10 of the forest and everything that
22:11 interacts with that, you know,
22:12 especially uh uh you know, kind of
22:14 wildlife and and also, you know, there's
22:15 a lot of tribal interest in this in
22:17 terms of, you know, plants that are
22:19 historically used for foraging or other,
22:20 you know, kind of cultural practices,
22:22 too. So that's definitely going to be
22:23 kind of an element of the of the plan,
22:25 too. So, um, yeah, once again, yeah,
22:27 focusing on forest health and looking at
22:28 kind of that 20 to 30year time frame.
22:31 Um, so this kind of comes back to uh
22:33 what I kind of already talked about a
22:34 little bit, so I'll try to keep this
22:35 pretty quick and I know it's a text
22:36 heavy slide. Um, I'm working on a update
22:39 to our canopy assessment. So, when I
22:41 talk about that current 51% tree canopy,
22:44 that is what 2021 data. This uses
22:46 satellite uh, you know, essentially
22:48 imagery, which usually lags one or two
22:50 years. So even if we wanted 2025, it's
22:52 probably not available yet. Um, so we'll
22:55 be updating this with 2023 data. Um, we
22:58 weren't necessarily planning on doing
22:59 this soon, uh, after, you know, having
23:01 just done it as part of the forest
23:02 management plan, but there are some, uh,
23:04 custom geographies within the city that
23:06 will really help inform some of the tree
23:08 code updates. So essentially at the
23:10 zoning level, at the neighborhood level,
23:11 at the storm water level where we'll
23:13 also have tree canopy uh assessed at
23:16 those kind of areas, like I said, custom
23:18 geographies, plus we'll have an updated
23:20 citywide uh canopy cover number. So um
23:23 if folks are familiar, King Conservation
23:24 District um is a great great quasi
23:28 governmental organization uh within King
23:30 County that essentially supports the
23:32 member jurisdictions, which are the
23:33 cities like Isiziqua. Uh so we all pay
23:36 taxes into that fund and we essentially
23:38 can ask that money back for conservation
23:40 related projects. So this is going to be
23:42 a really small uh cost being leveraged
23:45 across many member jurisdictions that
23:47 are doing updates. So this saves us
23:49 probably uh you know we're probably
23:51 doing this at 20% of the cost if we had
23:53 just contracted this out directly by
23:54 ourselves. So it's it was just a great
23:56 opportunity to do that and you know kind
23:57 of track how we're doing citywide and
23:59 like I said at some of these levels as
24:00 it relates to to tree code too and some
24:02 storm water management requirements we
24:04 have through department of ecology and
24:06 then contrasting like I said the really
24:07 two foundations
24:08 >> yeah
24:10 make sure
24:11 >> yeah sure Paul
24:13 >> uh yeah I was curious because you
24:14 mentioned this update to the canopy
24:16 cover since you have 2021 data and that
24:17 it might be up to 2023 data will the
24:21 bomb cyclone affect that at all like if
24:23 it's uh that the canopy at all since
24:26 obviously there were a lot of trees lost
24:27 in that or is that not kind of
24:29 negligible in terms of what this will
24:30 tell you?
24:31 >> Gosh, Paul, that's such a good question.
24:32 I've been asked that a few times and you
24:34 know, my my best answer is, you know,
24:37 partly TBD. I don't think we're talking
24:39 like multiple percentage points. I'm
24:41 thinking it's probably in the
24:42 neighborhood of tenths of percentage
24:43 points. Uh once again, 2023 will predate
24:46 the storm, so it won't really give us
24:47 the uh the the you know, update there.
24:50 But, you know, hopefully the next round
24:52 we'll kind of see that and that'll be
24:53 interesting to see uh you know, if we do
24:55 see a little kind of blip there. It's
24:56 it's it's just yeah, it's hard to judge
24:58 exactly and you know, places we lost
25:00 trees might have had overhanging canopy,
25:01 especially in our open spaces. Uh I
25:04 don't feel like there's giant canopy
25:05 gaps in, you know, areas like Tradition
25:07 Plateau, but certainly some of our
25:08 developed parks and rightways, we have
25:10 lost a significant amount of trees. So,
25:12 yeah, I you know, try to do some math.
25:14 Our GIS manager Brian Overberman does
25:17 some really he started in the forestry
25:19 field does some really good analysis of
25:20 like he's the one that told me he's like
25:22 yeah city limits probably have 250,000
25:24 trees so we're talking a fraction of a
25:26 percentage of trees lo I mean it's still
25:28 significant we're talking about several
25:29 hundred trees lost in the built
25:31 environment from the storm but as it
25:32 relates to the amount we have citywide I
25:34 don't think it's gigantic um so that's
25:37 my best answer probably not percentage
25:38 points but maybe tenths of percent uh
25:41 would be my best guess for for what was
25:43 lost there.
25:45 That's a great question and and I think
25:47 your your response
25:49 this this canopy analysis isn't
25:51 necessarily going to have the data to to
25:55 understand the effects of the bite.
25:57 >> It's going to need to be a later one.
26:00 >> Well, we're hoping to do this at minimum
26:01 on four-year intervals. Like I said,
26:03 this is kind of jumping that a little
26:04 bit, but it was a really great
26:05 opportunity to do this with King
26:06 Conservation District and kind of
26:08 leverage some of the resources that
26:09 they're pulling together from other
26:10 cities in the county. Um, and then they
26:12 talked about the tree inventory. So,
26:13 this is something I'm working on with
26:14 Jeff to kind of figure out. There's, you
26:16 know, fortunately a lot of the funding
26:17 for urban forestry comes through DNR's
26:19 community forestry assistance program. A
26:21 lot of their grant funding has been put
26:22 on hold some of the state budget
26:24 challenges a little bit related to
26:25 federal funding, too. So, we're trying
26:27 to get a little creative possibly
26:28 working with King Conservation District,
26:30 possibly working through our tree fund
26:32 um to see how we can kind of put
26:33 together funding to do at least do a
26:35 first big initial phase for a tree
26:36 inventory. was like I already said
26:38 foundational piece unlike canopy
26:40 assessment it's data on individual trees
26:42 so that's going to be the species of
26:43 tree the size usually the diameter
26:45 possibly the height condition of trees
26:47 so kind of knowing hey are these trees
26:49 young and really vigorous or these trees
26:51 kind of on the tail end where we need to
26:52 start thinking about replacement and a
26:54 huge huge tool for kind of prioritizing
26:56 more proactive management versus
26:58 sometimes is the reactive management
26:59 when we have storms or we just get calls
27:01 from neighbors that are concerned about
27:02 trees or we're just trying to kind of
27:04 trying to catch up. So having this data
27:05 will be a great public education tool
27:07 because you look at other cities uh big
27:09 cities but even Samish just published
27:11 theirs you know where you can actually
27:12 be on a GIS map walking along a sidewalk
27:14 click on a tree and you know identify
27:16 what it is what I my dream is to also
27:18 have management responsibility because
27:20 it's very tricky in the city what is
27:22 park what's the public works what is the
27:23 adjacent land owner um so I'm always
27:26 fine if people call me and then I have
27:27 to figure it out and kind of either be
27:28 like that's us or not but um the goal
27:30 would be to have a publicly available
27:32 map where you know you someone could
27:33 click on it and kind of figure out who
27:35 is at the HOA, what department, the
27:37 city, and kind of have contact. And so,
27:39 like I said, that's the public education
27:40 tool. And then a big part that I'm I'm
27:42 guessing maybe the park board's heard
27:44 about, uh, the asset management system,
27:46 cardograph. So, really tracking
27:48 materials, labor, equipment, you know,
27:50 hours towards tasks like mowing, tasks
27:52 like prepping baseball fields. Uh, we
27:55 want to be able to do that for tree
27:56 work, too. So that would be having this
27:58 essentially inventory integrated with
28:00 our asset management system which is a
28:02 software cardograph uh is definitely a
28:04 big goal of the public tree inventory as
28:06 well. [clears throat] Um and then I
28:08 think yeah thanks Robin I believe two
28:12 more slides on greenisle and park board
28:14 before a few uh wrapping up on heritage
28:15 trees as Jeff kind of prefaced earlier.
28:18 So hopefully most folks most folks on
28:20 this call are familiar with our greenle
28:22 program but the green cities network has
28:24 been around for a couple decades. that
28:25 started with Seattle, but there's 15 or
28:27 so cities in this network that really
28:29 the goal of it is engaging the community
28:31 in hands-on stewardship and education
28:34 around our uh natural areas and and
28:36 forested parks and open spaces. So,
28:39 that's uh Taylor Nichols pouring some
28:41 wood chips there, Alex Anderson, our
28:42 park ranger. Um and myself, that's kind
28:45 of our small team. Taylor is our
28:47 greenest volunteer coordinator. Um all
28:49 three of us started similar times in the
28:51 last three years kind of building out uh
28:53 you know essentially a natural resource
28:55 team uh within our parks uh department
28:57 here. Uh and just figured I'd share some
28:59 quick accomplishments on on green. We've
29:01 had 53 events uh to date. This is
29:03 actually probably a little higher since
29:04 I did this slide about a week ago. Uh
29:07 2,000 volunteer hours. We've really been
29:08 trying to focus on youth engagement. So
29:10 we're actually really proud. A third of
29:12 those hours have been uh uh from from
29:14 youth under 18. Uh forest stewards are
29:17 dedicated recurring volunteers that kind
29:19 of have like an adopt an area model. So,
29:21 you know, we train them up. We try to
29:23 find maybe a neighborhood park they live
29:24 near or maybe they're happy to travel
29:26 and really take on sometimes that's just
29:28 working independently or with partners,
29:30 family, friends. Uh but a lot of them
29:32 have kind of taken on leading events on
29:34 our behalf. We provide tools. We kind of
29:35 help support. Often we're out there for
29:37 the first few events and and more and
29:38 more of our forest stewards are kind of
29:40 running with that where they're leading
29:41 small events on behalf of the city and
29:43 green is aqua. So that's been really
29:44 great to see that expand here over the
29:46 last few years where we have like a
29:47 really really great cohort of of forest
29:49 stewards. Uh and then we're really
29:51 trying to build out the kind of
29:52 environmental education too. So kind of
29:54 knowing that pulling weeds, planting
29:56 trees, dealing with blackberry is really
29:58 physically tough and tedious and there
30:00 might be people that either just don't
30:02 want to do that and want to engage in
30:03 different ways or just you know physical
30:04 abilities too can be challenging for
30:06 some of that. So, we're trying to
30:07 provide a lot of educational events that
30:09 still touch on a lot of the same uh kind
30:11 of topics of work we're doing, but might
30:13 be in a more casual setting like the
30:15 classroom or a walk or hike um or
30:18 different tableabling events. So, uh
30:20 we've been really really uh proud that
30:22 our small little team leading on some
30:24 great community partners have led 30
30:26 plus education events, you know,
30:27 engaging with 400 people. And that
30:29 doesn't even count some of our uh bigger
30:31 events we table like the sustainability
30:32 fair, our first annual wildlife
30:34 coexistence day we had back in June
30:36 where we probably had three or 4 hundred
30:37 people visit uh the city table and about
30:39 another dozen or so partners that were
30:41 talking about wildlife that's local to
30:43 the area and how we best you know kind
30:45 of coexist as as neighbors from you know
30:47 big bears down to salmon down to uh you
30:49 know pollinators and and snails and and
30:52 uh all sorts of small creatures too. So,
30:54 we're really looking at that really
30:55 broadly as this kind of wildlife
30:57 coexistent effort that's really led by
30:58 our park ranger, which will be the next
31:00 slide, but the last plug I'll put on
31:01 green is October 18th, we're going to
31:03 celebrate our annual Green Aqua Day at
31:05 three sites. I love that Taylor this
31:07 year, Confluence Park. We're doing trees
31:08 and tops. So, we're doing an event
31:09 dedicated uh to families and young kids,
31:13 six or so and under. It's not a hard
31:14 rule, but that's about what we're
31:15 shooting for. Then we'll have a project
31:17 at our Miawalki Forest, which is another
31:19 great project that's maybe a whole
31:20 another conversation for another time.
31:22 uh and at the anthology open space. Uh
31:24 so those are a lot of our big partners.
31:26 Apologize for the acronyms. Mount Sound
31:28 Greenway as well Trails Club, Trout
31:30 Unlimited, uh Gibson High School. We've
31:32 been doing a lot of work with a couple
31:33 interns there, which has been cool. And
31:35 then we've had great engagement from
31:36 Costco, REI, more recently from Seaman.
31:38 So, you know, really engaging uh the
31:40 general public, community groups, um
31:43 schools, and corporate groups is is
31:45 really kind of what the program does.
31:46 So, um, probably the next one, one more
31:49 plug as we're transitioning. Just green
31:51 isqua. Great work by Dan, by by Taylor,
31:55 um, and by Alex.
31:57 That program multiplies our efforts to
32:00 deal with invasives. And sort of the
32:03 edges of our forests that are so
32:05 vulnerable to um, becoming unhealthy in
32:09 a hurry. and we've um taken out volumes
32:13 of invasives and and really are
32:15 transforming transforming some key areas
32:18 of our urban forest. Um so it's yeah a
32:21 huge huge success.
32:23 >> Yeah, thanks Jess. Um so yeah, always
32:25 happy to chat more about that and you
32:27 know if you ever have individuals or
32:29 groups or businesses you're associated
32:30 with we're always happy to try to you
32:32 know uh put put events together. So
32:34 we're we're kind of transitioning into
32:35 planting season which people really love
32:37 those type of projects too. So, um, but
32:39 yeah, last I I supervised our park
32:41 ranger. This is Alex Anderson. Um, nice
32:44 little shot we staged here recently at
32:46 Confluence Park. Um, he's like, I need a
32:48 new head shot. Uh, but anyway, so I I
32:50 think it's it's important to kind of
32:51 start with Alex is not a commissioned
32:53 ranger. Uh, he does not have any law
32:55 like uh, you know, uh, authority to
32:57 write tickets or citations or obviously
32:58 arrest anyone. We really focus on
33:00 enforcement through education. So, how
33:02 do we enforce our park rules, our park
33:04 code in a way that's try not to, you
33:06 know, be too wagging your finger to uh,
33:09 you know, just kind of, hey, we're going
33:11 to find you. We're going to charge you
33:12 for this and and really kind of focus
33:13 on, as Alex describes really well, the
33:15 authority of the resource that we all
33:17 are are uh, you know, need to be
33:19 stewards of these public lands. we are
33:21 all invest in these is this is our
33:23 public land and how do we you know
33:24 educate why hey hey you know maybe these
33:26 actions we're doing maybe you're just
33:28 not aware of the impacts that might have
33:29 on on you know salmon you know as people
33:32 are you know still wanting to put their
33:33 dogs in the stream as salmon are
33:34 migrating upstream right now or or or
33:36 just different examples like that. So um
33:39 that that is really kind of the model we
33:40 have and um another huge area of Alex's
33:43 job is supporting our human services and
33:45 the behavioral health team. So for our
33:48 uh unhoused people in our park system,
33:50 Alex is working on contacts working with
33:52 human services and ultimately you know
33:55 depending how that moves along you know
33:56 we do post notice to vacates and you
33:58 know we we are you know get a little bit
34:00 more strict about it but we provide a
34:01 lot of leeway provide a lot of
34:02 opportunity for resources and Alex is
34:04 really kind of the front line of that
34:06 with our behavioral health as it relates
34:08 to our parks and open spaces and a lot
34:10 of neighboring private properties where
34:12 Alex is kind of the the kind of first
34:14 kind of contact there too as we get
34:16 calls. or complaints about camps or
34:18 dumps and things like that. So, yeah, uh
34:20 I forget exactly the amount he told me.
34:22 You know, I had it in the notes there,
34:23 but um Alex does track the amount of
34:25 pounds of illegal dumping he pulls out
34:27 of parks, which is not insignificant,
34:28 but it's actually been really great to
34:30 see that with this program in place, the
34:32 large camps where stuff overflows and
34:35 just kind of piles up is not really the
34:37 same problem we had even just two
34:39 summers ago or certainly in the past.
34:41 So, so that number is actually going
34:42 down in terms of these kind of large
34:44 scale cleanups where we're just pulling
34:46 truckloads of garbage and debris, you
34:48 know, from our open spaces. Um, but it's
34:50 still in the neighborhood of, you know,
34:51 hundreds of hundreds of pounds of
34:53 material that, you know, Alex, you know,
34:55 and our team haul out and, you know,
34:57 keep out of our park system. Um, 230
34:59 contacts is what he shared with me so
35:01 far to date. So that might be things as
35:02 simple as reminding people of uh uh you
35:05 know uh our our unleash uh dog rules to
35:08 like said wildlife education to homeless
35:11 uh you know can't make contacts. Uh all
35:14 sorts of stuff that Alex is tracking
35:15 through his parks enforcement map.
35:17 >> Ebikes.
35:18 >> Yes. Ebikes on our turf has been a
35:20 problem.
35:20 >> Motorcycles.
35:21 >> Yeah. Yep. Uh those are harder to track
35:23 down and make contacts as you might
35:25 imagine. But um but still that has
35:27 certainly something he's worked with a
35:29 lot. Uh and then a big park that Alex
35:30 and I love working on together like said
35:32 I already kind of talked about wildlife
35:33 coexistence. This I'll just say really
35:35 quickly started out as a program
35:36 actually out of our isquent middle
35:38 schools about a decade ago and then
35:39 Woodland Park Zoo came in and they've
35:41 been a huge partner as part of this and
35:42 we have a great series of wildlife
35:44 trails throughout some of our parks and
35:46 open spaces that catches amazing footage
35:48 and we love to share it for the sake of
35:49 people just getting excited about
35:50 animals and wildlife but certainly
35:52 through an educational lens of you know
35:54 how how do we best coexist in
35:56 residential settings. So, it's a lot of
35:57 work with Recology, our service
35:58 provider, on like bear cans and and, you
36:01 know, being smart about bird feeders
36:02 and, you know, your pets outside at
36:04 certain times of day, certain times of
36:05 year. And then the recreational setting,
36:07 too, where folks might just be nervous
36:08 about going out because they know
36:09 there's bears, cougars, and kind of how
36:11 to educate, you know, the likelihood of
36:12 spotting them, what you do if you do
36:14 actually happen to come across a big uh
36:16 carnivore like that. So, Alex regularly
36:18 leads outdoor 101 hikes that really
36:20 focus on that kind of basic education
36:22 and uh we've been doing more with our
36:24 public works team uh solid waste um uh
36:27 person with public works on some of the
36:29 residential trash stuff as it relates to
36:30 wildlife too. So, uh going to continue
36:33 to host this annual wildlife coexistence
36:35 day in partnership with the farmers
36:36 market which has a great built-in
36:37 audience of course and we kind of took
36:39 over the meadow for the first Saturday
36:40 in June and had had really good turnout
36:42 for it. Um yeah and then you know kind
36:45 of just tying back to the previous slide
36:46 leading educational interpretive events
36:48 and really supporting green as well. Um
36:51 I'll pause there for a second before we
36:53 go to the next slide or Robin if you
36:54 would go to the next slide which is kind
36:55 of transition into heritage trees. Any
36:57 kind of general questions comments for
37:00 the the program forest management plan
37:02 before we kind of dive into the specific
37:04 program here for the last few slides.
37:07 >> Pretty thorough Dan as usual.
37:09 >> Thanks Martha. [laughter]
37:11 Um, yeah. So, a few of these slides you
37:14 may have seen because these are borrowed
37:15 from as Jeff mentioned, uh, you know,
37:17 some folks that were with with the park
37:18 board, you know, a year and a half or so
37:20 ago, shortly after I came on, we had two
37:22 great interns that did a lot of work
37:23 capturing photos, capturing measurements
37:25 of our, uh, 25 or so current heritage
37:28 trees, but really just want to talk
37:29 that, you know, this is not an Isqua
37:31 specific program. These programs exist
37:32 in a lot of cities across the country,
37:34 even across the across the globe. Um,
37:37 really recognizing, you know, trees for
37:38 their significance in the community. So
37:40 that's celebrating, educating around
37:43 unique trees, trying to get people
37:44 inspired to connect with, learn about,
37:47 and hopefully care for some of these
37:48 broader efforts that we've been talking
37:50 about here for the first part of the
37:51 conversation. Um, so the program was
37:53 developed initially in 2005. I believe
37:55 it was to celebrate the 10-year
37:57 anniversary of our Tree City USA status,
37:59 which is a uh a recognition from the
38:01 Arbor Day Foundation that we've had for
38:03 now 30 or so years running. Um, and like
38:07 I said, yeah, trees that promote
38:08 identification and recognition of trees
38:10 that have that unique character of is
38:11 aqua. Pretty vague, but at the same
38:14 time, we have some criteria for that
38:15 that we'll have in a new slide here.
38:17 But, uh, we initiated a review, an
38:19 update of the heritage tree program at
38:21 the park board that stalled a little
38:22 bit, kind of focused on trying to
38:24 complete adopt the forest management
38:25 plan. And now, as Jeff said, this is
38:27 kind of a little tease preview before
38:28 maybe diving into this a little bit more
38:30 deeper in November. Um, next slide,
38:32 please Robin.
38:37 So, this is just one example. This can
38:38 be really quick, but this is the GKO
38:40 tree uh near if you know Coffee Sutra or
38:43 the dollar store um kind of in the mall
38:45 there across from I guess Kitty Corner
38:47 to the library there at Front Street in
38:49 Sunset. This is a this is a great tree.
38:51 It's not gigantic as far as a ginko tree
38:53 it is, but it is a tree that's probably
38:55 over a hundred years old. It was planted
38:57 by Isiqua's first mayor, uh Doc Gibson.
39:00 Um,
39:01 and uh, yeah, so it has both the
39:03 history, even though the diameter of it
39:04 is only about 3 feet and a lot of our
39:06 trees are a lot bigger than that, but
39:07 this is not necessarily a fig tree
39:09 program. That's kind of where we're
39:10 talking about the heritage. Um, and
39:12 yeah, so to have that kind of story,
39:13 working with the history museum on some
39:15 of these stories, if you all, some of
39:16 you might know Paul Winterstein, the
39:17 director there. We've led some kind of
39:20 uh, both natural cultural history tours,
39:22 kind of weaving heritage trees with
39:24 stories of the early uh, you know, kind
39:26 of at least European settlers. You know,
39:28 we'll talk a little bit here about
39:29 obviously uh indigenous or Native
39:31 American history and kind of their uh
39:33 huge significance of place on the
39:35 landscape in what is now is aqua, but
39:37 this is a great example of, you know, a
39:38 tree that has that history prominent
39:40 location. It it's technically on private
39:42 property, so the trees are a mix of
39:43 publicly and privately owned trees. Um
39:46 but just, you know, we have so we have
39:47 slides for all the trees like this, but
39:49 I just figured I'd put one in there for
39:50 just kind of an example. And I believe
39:52 this was actually one of the first
39:53 nominated and um selected for the
39:55 program in 2005.
40:00 so just this is a really quick
40:01 reiteration of the park board role uh at
40:03 least currently and we don't see this
40:05 changing dramatically. I think there's
40:06 going to be some more nuance process
40:08 type stuff that we'll discuss more in
40:10 November. But um this is also a I don't
40:12 see a little higher level reminder
40:14 outside of heritage trees. The park the
40:15 park board does serve as our tree board
40:17 too. And if there's interest, we've had
40:20 a few fits and starts and I certainly
40:21 can be more uh committed or be provided
40:24 more opportunities for like even like an
40:25 ad hoc committee that talks about tree
40:27 stuff as a subset of the park board.
40:29 Brad Book who's no longer a member. Him
40:31 and I have met on some of that stuff
40:32 recently. Gosh, I feel like David maybe
40:35 has been involved that a little bit too.
40:36 Zach when he was on the board u have
40:39 been folks that have you know really
40:40 kind of been a good sounding board as we
40:42 kind of work this stuff through and
40:43 bring it back to the the full park board
40:45 for actual you know decisions on on some
40:47 uh the programmatic elements. Um so so
40:50 that is a good reminder that you know as
40:51 part of that Trees USA uh designation
40:53 that we do need to have a tree board and
40:55 you know that is the park board and
40:56 there's a lot of cities that have uh
40:58 similar boards and commissions that will
40:59 serve kind of multiple roles uh maybe
41:02 not a specifically designated tree board
41:04 but like a park board that also carries
41:06 that responsibility. So I figured that's
41:08 worth mentioning because [snorts] maybe
41:09 a lot of folks aren't aware of that. Um,
41:11 and then kind of coming back to heritage
41:12 trees, it's it's reviewing and
41:14 recommending uh usually coming from me,
41:17 coming through citizens first, of
41:18 course. So, we're not asking you just to
41:20 you know, select them out of thin air.
41:21 Uh, but ultimately the boards uh does
41:24 move forward those nominations to the
41:25 mayor for a mayoral proclamation and
41:27 that's ultimately how they get uh you
41:29 know uh officially adopted into the
41:31 heritage tree program. So, I have a
41:33 slide here and a couple that that is
41:34 kind of a flow graph for kind of that
41:36 process. But those are two just good
41:38 high level reminders. It's kind of
41:39 parkboard rule as it relates to trees
41:41 and and heritage tree program
41:42 specifically. That's one of our uh the
41:45 last slide was one of sorry Robin just
41:46 to say that's one of our uh that's our
41:48 native dairy oak kind of right near the
41:50 fish hatch trees. So that tree that
41:51 almost looks like upright the football
41:53 field goal there is is a uh is a
41:56 beautiful Oregon white oak which we
41:58 don't have a lot of in Isiqua. Um
42:02 >> how many heritage trees do we have? I
42:04 [snorts] I so I think technically it's
42:06 like 26 or 27. Several of them several
42:08 by that I think about three are dead but
42:11 still remnants of them. Like we have a
42:13 giant cotton wood on the Pickering Reach
42:15 that just kind of now lays down like
42:16 this but that was probably a 5ft
42:18 diameter tree that came down at the
42:19 storm some point in the last couple
42:21 decades. We have a cherry tree also near
42:22 the Pickering Bar that stands as a snag.
42:24 So essentially a a deadstanding tree. So
42:27 still provides habitat. It looks kind of
42:29 cool, but yeah, there's a few trees that
42:31 are not technically living that are
42:32 still posted and you can still find
42:34 them, but it feels a little different
42:36 than obviously uh uh living trees like
42:38 these three buro trees that are in the
42:40 Sycamore neighborhood on private
42:41 property that were probably planted by
42:43 really really early uh is residents. Um
42:45 so yeah, it's it's in the mid-upper 20s,
42:47 I should say. Yes, this program started
42:49 in 2005, had pretty consistent
42:50 nominations and selections through about
42:52 2012 and has been pretty dormant for the
42:54 last decade plus. So in that seven or
42:57 eight year period
42:59 early on is something we'll discuss
43:00 maybe a little bit tonight but certainly
43:01 November is the number of trees to
43:03 nominate. We did have a restriction of
43:05 three just not to let this turn into
43:06 just like oh every tree we think is cool
43:08 we want to put in this program. Uh so
43:10 yeah at 8 years about three or so yeah
43:12 it's it's in the mid20s um is is kind of
43:14 where we're at. So,
43:15 >> another important part of this review is
43:17 going to be as we learn, you know, in
43:18 that seven-year period where those
43:20 nominations were coming in, 95% of those
43:23 nominations were by one city staff
43:25 person. So, so it it wasn't a didn't
43:29 feel like a program that was
43:32 out there and something that residents
43:34 felt like they could be part of
43:36 nominations. So, we would like to
43:38 improve that as part of this. So I think
43:40 process
43:41 >> the goal is a few process updates for
43:43 yes the nomination selection but then a
43:45 big part of it will be hey let's roll
43:46 this out in 2026 as a goal and how do we
43:49 better get that word out better get
43:51 people I've had a few people contact me
43:52 in the meantime which has been great.
43:53 We've done some really nice updates to
43:55 our website to make it look more visual
43:56 versus this kind of bulleted list that
43:58 used to exist. Um, but yeah, engaging
44:01 the public, trying to get them excited
44:03 about this is is definitely a big part.
44:04 And we kind of want to use some of our
44:06 big events like Arbor Day,
44:07 sustainability fair in the spring to
44:08 really kind of advertise that, kind of
44:10 have nominations. I'll come back to
44:11 that. That's in a slide here. I do not
44:13 need to be saying this all right now.
44:14 Um, so this is uh I guess kind of
44:17 discussions we had uh with the park
44:18 board in the past. Uh, and by that, you
44:21 know, about a year and a half or so ago.
44:23 Um, you know, one thing that we're
44:25 really missing is any acknowledgement of
44:26 tribal history in this program. And
44:28 we'll see on the next slide how it talks
44:29 about like early Isqua settlers. I mean
44:31 that's still a really interesting
44:33 important part of the the history here.
44:36 But it does kind of talk about this
44:37 place being like 1880s on. And so
44:40 culturally modified trees if people
44:41 aren't aware of are trees that were
44:43 modified by cultural practices by
44:45 indigenous people. Sometimes I was
44:46 peeling cedar bark for products.
44:48 Sometimes I was manipulating branches of
44:50 trees for wayinding and route finding.
44:52 And the more I've kind of learned and
44:54 talked mainly with staff at the Noami
44:56 Indian tribe is that it's not even
44:57 necessarily the tree itself, even though
44:59 those trees are likely pretty old
45:01 because these practices maybe haven't
45:02 been happening as recently. These trees
45:05 might be cedar trees that are 75 to 100
45:07 years old. Um, but just really what it
45:09 signifies for place and significance for
45:11 those families and those tribes. So,
45:14 culturally modified trees. When we
45:15 started this conversation, there was a
45:16 lot of interest like yes, let's include
45:18 this in heritage trees. this is a great
45:19 great opportunity to acknowledge and
45:21 kind of celebrate indigenous history.
45:23 Um, but the more I've kind of worked
45:25 with them, they would like to see
45:27 highlevel education around essentially
45:30 the concept of what uh culturally
45:31 modified trees are. But they are a
45:33 little worried about having individual
45:35 trees in a publicly available database
45:37 as it relates to you know ne negative
45:39 side be vandalism or or or actually
45:41 destruction of trees and the other side
45:43 would be just too much curiosity too
45:45 much kind of loving to death and you
45:47 know people trampling in areas where
45:49 there might not be good trail access or
45:50 sustainable access. Uh so so the the
45:53 really the strong messages we've had in
45:54 the last year and a half since this
45:55 conversation is we want to work together
45:57 on education really at a high level but
45:59 not at an individual tree level. So, we
46:02 still want to weave this into the
46:03 program details, but it will not be
46:05 likely that there'll be actually CMTs uh
46:08 nominated and selected as heritage trees
46:10 and and very much wanting to respect and
46:13 uh work with the tribes on that. So, uh
46:15 tree code clarifications as we talked
46:17 about title 18, there is a there's a
46:21 small added uh protection for heritage
46:23 trees once they reach that status. And
46:25 this was some confusion and we were kind
46:27 of working through the 2023 updates as
46:29 this was being presented. Um so
46:32 essentially heritage trees if they are a
46:34 nuisance tree if they are dead disease
46:36 dying provide a hazard to homes people
46:39 you know valuable targets um they can be
46:41 removed but essentially you know as part
46:43 of uh development projects they do have
46:46 some added protection in there. So
46:47 that's something that we've been trying
46:49 to work through is if you have a
46:50 heritage tree designated on private
46:52 property, it does limit a little bit
46:53 what you can necessarily do directly
46:55 around and with that tree. Uh so how do
46:57 we, you know, incentivize people to join
47:00 this program? Recognition, plaques, you
47:02 know, education, you know, kind of
47:03 celebration of those trees that are on
47:05 private property, knowing that, you
47:06 know, that person is taking a little bit
47:08 of a uh you know, trade-off on their
47:10 land there in terms of, you know, having
47:12 that tree a little additional protection
47:14 from, you know, let's say development or
47:15 redevelopment of that property. So, so
47:17 land owners kind of need to know that
47:18 going in. That's part of the education.
47:20 Something that was kind of confusing
47:22 when I first started is like is that
47:23 deed down? And that's been really clear
47:25 that, you know, you sign off on that as
47:27 a land owner, but as soon as you want to
47:28 sell your home or sell your property or
47:30 something like that, the new owner would
47:32 have to then, you know, essentially kind
47:33 of sign off to continue that program.
47:35 So, it's not something that is like in
47:36 perpetuity necessarily. So, that's
47:39 something that we've clarified. But
47:40 it's, you know, essentially the the tree
47:42 preservation's there to to do that and
47:43 heritage trees is really there kind of
47:45 as that, like I said, education
47:46 celebration. Um, but there is, like I
47:48 said, a little added uh protection
47:50 around development projects in heritage
47:52 trees in our current tree code. Um, so
47:55 that's something that was a little
47:56 unclear as that was being developed, but
47:57 has has been kind of um something that
47:59 I've been able to work with our
48:00 community planning department to just
48:01 get that clarity on and what that means,
48:03 you know, from it's not deed on the
48:05 property or anything like that. The city
48:07 can't do that. Um uh so that is
48:09 essentially a a owner's decision to have
48:11 that uh you know nominated and and and
48:13 carry that um carry that tree on their
48:16 property with that designation. Uh
48:18 mentioned the website updates uh so
48:19 that's just kind of graphically visually
48:21 looks a lot better than it did. We
48:23 didn't really have any photos initially
48:25 uh tour as I mentioned with the history
48:26 museum and then you know kind of this
48:28 conversation of you know limited
48:29 individual trees being nominated
48:31 historically is there and this is kind
48:33 of a little bit of a just pun we do not
48:35 certainly need to use this or do this at
48:37 all but like groves of trees or stand of
48:39 trees. Do we want to have maybe a
48:41 parallel process that doesn't maybe have
48:43 that same uh added level of protection
48:46 necessarily but still recognize
48:48 celebrates educates around unique groves
48:50 or collections of trees? Um, and I have
48:52 some ideas of what those could look
48:53 like, but that's part of the kind of
48:55 conversation a little bit starting
48:56 tonight and then certainly uh moving
48:58 forward in November two. Um, so I'll try
49:01 to go I think I have two or three more
49:03 slides I'll try to go through kind of
49:04 quickly, but that's kind of recapping.
49:05 This is essentially what the process
49:07 looks like right now on our website.
49:08 This is kind of out of date having an
49:10 online form, but it's looking at size or
49:12 age, historic significance, ecological
49:14 value. I'll say really quickly, historic
49:16 significance, a tree that's notable
49:17 because of its association with early
49:19 settlers of the region or historic
49:20 events. So that's where we're saying,
49:21 you know, tribal history, stuff like
49:23 that. We want to better weave in there
49:25 with what is kind of the current uh
49:27 historical significance description. And
49:29 then it's kind of talking about how you
49:30 can nominate, you know, there's an
49:32 approval process for the the land owner.
49:34 Um, and then kind of what the heritage
49:36 tree status looks like. So this this is
49:38 out of date, but this is, you know,
49:39 essentially what currently exists. So
49:41 Ron, if you hop to the next one,
49:43 >> that being the brochure sort of confirms
49:46 it's time to do a little repression
49:48 update. time. So that yes, um this this
49:52 is, you know, essentially what I just
49:53 kind of called out looking at specimens
49:55 for the size of trees. But I've had some
49:57 really good feedback just talking to
49:58 Brad Book recently, other folks. It's
50:00 like this shouldn't be purely a big tree
50:01 program. We should be celebrating older
50:03 trees that might not get to that size or
50:05 trees that have, you know, maybe
50:07 importance in ecological settings. Like
50:09 I can think of cottonwood trees that
50:10 bald eagles nest in annually near the
50:12 farmers market. They may not be that
50:13 different than other cottonwood trees,
50:15 but that kind of gets to the ecological
50:16 value one there. Um, so, uh, this is
50:20 essentially just kind of focusing in on
50:21 those three existing categories for
50:23 nominations, which open a conversation.
50:25 You know, this is pretty typical for a
50:27 lot of these programs. I think we're not
50:29 necessarily looking at creating new
50:30 categories, but we could have that
50:32 conversation. But it's like how do we
50:33 kind of tweak, update, and and adjust
50:35 these a little bit for the program here.
50:37 Um, and then I think this is the last
50:39 kind of slide of content next. Um this
50:42 is this is essentially kind of what we
50:44 had started to propose for a process is
50:46 you know having spring kind of outreach
50:48 arbor event sustainability which is
50:50 usually sustainability fair in April. So
50:53 having about a three-month roll out
50:54 April May June where we're you know
50:56 really trying to you know encourage a
50:58 community to submit nominations
51:00 something that I would review kind of
51:01 initially put together little reports do
51:03 tree health assessments you know if
51:04 trees are on their last legs maybe
51:05 that's not the appropriate tree for
51:07 heritage tree program. um you know, kind
51:09 of working with Jeff on director level
51:11 approval for public trees, but for
51:13 private trees, that would obviously be
51:14 the homeowner. I mean, someone can
51:16 nominate a tree on someone else's
51:17 private property, but it needs to be
51:18 signed off on by that land owner. Um, so
51:21 that's kind of the blue bubble to the
51:22 side there. coming back to the park
51:23 board in September with a presentation.
51:26 The number of three, we can talk about
51:27 that, but you know, we're maybe looking
51:29 at still keeping this a little bit
51:30 selective in terms of how many
51:32 nominations move forward to approve
51:33 trees to a fall council meeting where
51:35 the mayor declares the uh, you know,
51:37 heritage tree status and then it goes to
51:39 the, you know, project map website and
51:41 that really, you know, how do we build
51:43 the public facing, the outreach, you
51:44 know, the programs, little plaques,
51:46 little identifiers, things like that
51:48 that, you know, people can, you know,
51:49 walk through. The best email I got
51:51 recently was from a mom whose
51:53 seven-year-old daughter, seven-year-old
51:54 daughter loves trees and asked to have
51:56 like Matt more details when they want to
51:58 visit all the heritage trees. And like
52:00 unless you know that they're designated
52:02 or go to our website and have heard
52:04 presentations like this, like you might
52:05 see a tree and not know that it's part
52:06 of this program. And to me that was just
52:08 really awesome for something that is a
52:10 bit dormant to have someone reach out,
52:11 try to get more information and just
52:13 say, "Hey, my my young kid really wants
52:14 to see all his heritage trees." So to me
52:16 it's like how do we how do we get more
52:18 of that out of this program. Um so
52:20 that's that's essentially not something
52:22 we're asking to vote on. We can
52:23 certainly discuss it a little bit as you
52:25 all want to tonight but I think Robin
52:27 the next slide kind of addresses some
52:29 questions kind of related to process
52:30 some kind of higher level questions and
52:32 essentially this is the end of the
52:33 presentation and and up to you all how
52:34 much you really want to dive into this
52:35 right now versus kind of knowing that
52:37 this is going to be the uh you know kind
52:39 of focus of the November meeting. But um
52:41 you know kind of talking about that
52:42 process on the last slide which you can
52:44 always go back to. How do we continue to
52:46 publicize this program once we kind of
52:48 you know kind of settle in on some
52:49 updates to the process? Um how do we
52:51 communicate the intent of the program
52:53 around education celebration community
52:56 engagement? Um and then kind of this
52:58 separate category distinction. You know
53:00 what what do we do for stands of trees
53:02 of trees? Um for instance those are
53:05 three Douglas furs at lower hillside
53:07 cemetery that are each uh nominated
53:09 individually. So that's not considered a
53:10 stand. Those are three standalone
53:12 heritage trees that just happen to be
53:14 part of a a grove there in the cemetery.
53:16 So I'll stop there and see if anyone has
53:19 any thoughts or just kind of general
53:20 questions and and also knowing that yes,
53:22 this is kind of the starting point of
53:23 this and and really trying to come back
53:25 to this with a bit more depth and detail
53:27 in in November.
53:30 this now be an appropriate time to kind
53:32 of address the question that was
53:34 presented by uh Connie because you know
53:37 one one this is what we're talking about
53:40 and she just has a a a question about um
53:43 whether a community member can nominate
53:45 a publiclyowned tree without specific
53:49 authorization by the city. So I think do
53:52 you want to go ahead what Conniey's
53:55 asking I think the crux of Conniey's
53:56 question is so so yes anyone can
53:59 nominate a tree but then who has
54:02 authority to approve that nomination to
54:04 move forward through a review through
54:06 myself the park board and ultimately to
54:08 the mayor. So I think that's where
54:10 Connie would like to see more
54:13 ownership of the community. you know,
54:14 her kind of philosophy is these are
54:17 publicly owned and managed trees, but
54:19 also there's a lot of us that are
54:21 thinking through a lot of considerations
54:22 of public use and park use and, you
54:24 know, kind of wanting to make sure that
54:27 um both they fit the intent of the
54:29 program and, you know, as we talk about,
54:31 you know, Tibbitz Valley Park because
54:34 where this came up is, you know, kind of
54:35 what implications designation would have
54:38 for like say future park use and
54:39 development too. So, um, so yes. So, so
54:42 to to answer the question, and that's
54:44 what she was kind of challenging when
54:45 she did this a while ago and in her
54:47 email was that, you know, nominating
54:49 it's one thing, but then I think she
54:50 would like to see that just kind of go
54:52 straight through the review approval
54:53 process with the park board and not
54:54 necessarily [snorts] be something that
54:56 either Jeff's signing off on, I'm
54:58 signing off on. I think that's kind of
55:00 the crux of what she's
55:04 >> just going to, you know, going back to
55:06 her email. So she was saying that um her
55:08 applications for those tweets were
55:10 rejected and and was there like I I
55:14 don't remember we was something we
55:16 discuss as a
55:18 >> Yeah, we did we did discuss it. We did
55:20 discuss it. Um and absolutely I I think
55:22 she brings up a great question. Um I
55:25 think as we review this process, we
55:27 absolutely want to encourage more
55:30 community involvement. We want residents
55:32 to submit nominations. We don't want it
55:34 to be like it was for the first seven
55:37 years of really just being one a single
55:40 staff person doing this. Um so we very
55:43 much want to invite that. Um I would say
55:45 we very much as a department echo the
55:48 sentiment that we we're stewards of your
55:50 park system. This isn't our park system.
55:53 Um, I think where we would want to
55:56 clarify and play a role and and think
55:58 it's important that if it is a
56:01 nomination on a city park or city
56:04 property, it's not that we're trying to
56:06 control the nomination. We want to
56:09 inform you. uh we want, you know, to
56:12 have an urban forest supervisor and a
56:15 park planning manager have a chance to
56:17 say, "Hey, here's something on the park
56:20 CIP that we need to be thinking of with
56:22 this nomination. Hey, here's the
56:25 condition of that tree. It's in its last
56:28 five years of life or, you know, to to
56:31 be able to bring that information to you
56:34 um to to think about." So much like that
56:36 nomination, we didn't we didn't keep
56:38 that nomination from we we had that
56:41 conversation and said, "Hey, the the you
56:43 know what Connie was suggesting, I think
56:45 it's a very valuable collection of trees
56:48 um is all of the London pines um that
56:51 line Titz Valley Park, a really
56:53 prominent stand of trees. Um ultimately,
56:57 and it kind of leads to the discussion
56:59 is we didn't move forward with
57:01 recommending it because we didn't have a
57:03 way of
57:05 nominating a whole stand of trees. Um
57:08 that that's not something that's in the
57:10 program. And so um not to make an excuse
57:14 for it, but I guess just responding that
57:19 I don't think we're in a place of much
57:20 difference with Connie. We would agree
57:24 uh that we want community-led
57:26 nominations. We think vetting them is
57:29 important. We want to vet them. We don't
57:31 want to hide them from you. Hey, here's
57:33 all the nominations we received. Here's
57:35 our position or here's here's what's
57:38 happening within that park or may be
57:40 happening within that park. Here's the
57:42 condition of that tree. We want to be
57:44 able to inform you.
57:46 >> So, go so going forward. I mean, I guess
57:49 is that still in the conversation for
57:51 her to renominate those or I guess I I
57:54 like have we decided that because we
57:57 don't have a way to for a person to
58:01 nominate those many trees that we're not
58:04 doing it or I guess just like to to ask
58:06 her questions like okay, how do we move
58:08 forward to kind of get kind of a balance
58:11 to answer what she's asking for? Yeah,
58:13 we'd either need to dramatically expand
58:16 the number of nominees per year um
58:18 because there's probably 30 to 40 London
58:21 plane trees along that stretch of um
58:24 Newport and then it wraps around I
58:26 believe that's 12th Avenue there too. Um
58:28 that's where we kind of proposing there
58:30 are other cities that do you know kind
58:32 of groves of trees and then yeah what is
58:34 the level of is that does that get the
58:36 same you know development protection or
58:38 is that just purely an educational uh
58:41 way to celebrate these kind of unique
58:43 collections or stands of trees. So
58:45 that's that's I think where the last um
58:47 question or bullet point there is
58:48 getting at um are these kind of parallel
58:50 processes where yeah they're not maybe
58:52 technically designated heritage trees
58:53 but we're still kind of celebrating and
58:55 kind of um putting that out there and
58:57 then um yeah because if if not you know
59:00 if we're going the the uh you know kind
59:02 of adjusting the number I mean that that
59:04 pretty dramatically alters the program
59:06 but you know that's something too that's
59:09 certainly up for conversation but would
59:11 love discussion tonight like you said I
59:13 think November is we start bringing
59:15 together a draft. We're not expecting to
59:17 bring a draft in November and have you
59:20 adopt it. Much like our typical process,
59:22 we'd love to bring a draft, discuss it,
59:25 vet it, get your thoughts uh before
59:27 we're taking any sort of final action on
59:29 it. But as Dan said, um we we want to
59:32 put our heads together and then present
59:34 something to you and discuss with you
59:36 what how do we deal with these stands of
59:38 trees and groves of trees versus
59:41 individual trees. Yeah. Yeah. So, more
59:44 to come.
59:46 >> Yeah.
59:48 >> Hi Anna.
59:50 >> Hey guys. Um,
59:53 one of my questions and this is moving
59:54 off of the Grove question and kind of
59:57 the process and more about kind of
59:59 looking at the questions that are on the
1:00:03 slide and just something that came up in
1:00:05 my mind. um as part of the nomination
1:00:09 process and part of these heritage
1:00:11 trees, do they get named right like do
1:00:15 we do we say this is you know I I can't
1:00:19 think of a name of a tree right now
1:00:21 because my brain is not totally there
1:00:24 but do they do they get special names as
1:00:26 a way to kind of help for example
1:00:28 children relate to them right to kind of
1:00:31 um give them an identity that's really
1:00:34 relatable and Um, I don't know. I I
1:00:38 think that would help with with this
1:00:40 intent and also with the connection with
1:00:42 the community, but uh also kind of a
1:00:45 side question.
1:00:46 >> That's a great that's an awesome
1:00:47 question. I think that's exactly how how
1:00:49 do we make this more engaging? How do we
1:00:51 celebrate this more? How do we So, so to
1:00:53 answer your question, it's it's no right
1:00:54 now it's it's very much the the the
1:00:57 common names are given to them. Douglas
1:00:59 fur, you know, giant sequoia, you know,
1:01:02 large leaf magnolia, uh, you know, some
1:01:04 of the different different ones we have
1:01:06 in our program. So, they're they're very
1:01:07 much through the kind of botanical just,
1:01:09 you know, naming conventions. But, um, I
1:01:12 think that's really really cool. It
1:01:13 could be a great way that, you know, we
1:01:15 could promote them and yeah, especially
1:01:17 talking about youth education and
1:01:18 engagement, too. And maybe there's even
1:01:20 a process where people can give [snorts]
1:01:21 them. I It's funny you say that because
1:01:23 often when we're planting little trees
1:01:25 with kids, it's like, "Hey, name the
1:01:26 tree." and we get some of the silliest
1:01:27 fun answers, but it's a great way to
1:01:29 kind of feel ownership of like, hey, I I
1:01:31 am planting this. I am, you know,
1:01:32 hopefully giving this tree decades or
1:01:35 even centuries of life. And uh um so
1:01:37 yeah, some of the some of the kind of
1:01:39 names we come up with are really really
1:01:40 fun. But that's that's a great
1:01:41 suggestion. I think kind of sort of
1:01:43 talking about this two-part. Yeah. Where
1:01:45 we're really trying to kind of pin down
1:01:46 the process, pin down some of these
1:01:48 parameters, and then once we feel good
1:01:50 moving forward with that, then how do we
1:01:52 Yeah. continue to make this more
1:01:53 engaging and and you know kind of fun
1:01:55 with the public
1:01:56 >> public facing side map and a tour and
1:01:59 tours. Yep.
1:02:04 I mean this is actually just to add to
1:02:06 Hannah and say that I do think that's a
1:02:08 really the names or at least just really
1:02:09 giving them a focus is a very good idea
1:02:11 and that my experience like I'm uh with
1:02:13 my kids I'm at the troll all the time
1:02:15 and I just see people come you know
1:02:18 they've clearly been doing the maps of
1:02:19 looking at all the trolls around the PMW
1:02:22 or whatever and obviously this is not to
1:02:23 that extent but that having that kind of
1:02:26 focus that identity that specific thing
1:02:28 you are after that's really clearly
1:02:30 marked and has a moment. It really
1:02:32 works. Kids, adults, everybody really
1:02:35 loves that. So, I just I think they have
1:02:37 a name or any other way to really
1:02:39 identify them, I think is a really good
1:02:40 idea and really encouraging for this
1:02:42 program.
1:02:43 >> Yeah. No, thank you, Paul. I think
1:02:45 having small someone with a troll.
1:02:46 There's that rock with the little kind
1:02:48 of square plate that has the number has
1:02:50 Jacob two trees, you know, I think
1:02:52 that'd be a great way. We could we
1:02:53 could, you know, both have the actual
1:02:55 plant name or tree name. If we want to
1:02:56 give it a a personal name and then, you
1:02:58 know, kind of maybe a, you know, number
1:03:00 so people want to go collect or visit
1:03:02 all the heritage trees, at least the
1:03:03 ones that are truly publicly accessible.
1:03:05 A few of them are in people's backyards,
1:03:07 so you have to get permission permission
1:03:08 and stuff. But, um, I think I think
1:03:11 that's a great idea. So that's where
1:03:12 really really looking forward to like
1:03:14 these, you know, ways to to better
1:03:16 promote the program once we like said
1:03:17 kind of kind of finalize some of the the
1:03:20 process stuff here over hopefully the
1:03:21 fall and winter with with I'll say my
1:03:23 personal goal of really trying to kind
1:03:24 of launch this that kind of type of
1:03:26 outreach into spring.
1:03:28 >> Yeah. as your question regarding like
1:03:32 groves of trees or collections of trees
1:03:33 or small batch of trees whatever you
1:03:36 want to call it [cough]
1:03:38 [clears throat] is I don't think I
1:03:40 necessarily see an issue with having
1:03:42 that as a change to the uh to the
1:03:47 program
1:03:50 from a standpoint of the sheer number of
1:03:53 trees um but I think it's still the onus
1:03:57 or The expectation of the submitter
1:04:00 would be that you still have to show or
1:04:03 explain why that entire collection of
1:04:06 trees meets the criteria or why the
1:04:09 entire collection of trees should be
1:04:12 designated heritage versus if you're
1:04:15 pointing out this is the oldest largest
1:04:18 specimen or this tree is super unique to
1:04:22 this area and it or the bald eagles you
1:04:25 know. Yeah, you know, it's not a tree,
1:04:26 but the the Timbitz Valley central light
1:04:28 pole that has, you know,
1:04:32 seven years in a row or whatever now on
1:04:34 it. Right? If you could if you could say
1:04:36 this is why I believe this gro trees is
1:04:40 significant specimen historical whatever
1:04:42 then I think that that still fills the
1:04:46 criteria but it also kind of changes the
1:04:49 bar for the person submitting of that
1:04:51 that's a much larger burden of proof
1:04:53 almost if you will to say that it's not
1:04:56 just this one tree it is this whole all
1:04:58 40 of these trees I'm telling you are
1:05:01 important
1:05:01 >> in this way and I think it's But as a
1:05:04 group, if we were the ones that sit and
1:05:06 and review those nominations, that's a
1:05:08 much more burden of proof for us to pick
1:05:11 if it's three trees or a collection as
1:05:15 one of your submissions. Yeah.
1:05:16 >> Is you can easily be like, well, this
1:05:18 one tree,
1:05:19 >> you can clearly say XYZ whereas this 40
1:05:22 trees,
1:05:23 >> half of them are your end of life or,
1:05:25 you know, etc. is I think that I don't
1:05:27 see the problem with the submitt part of
1:05:28 it. I think it's just that you really
1:05:31 want to submit something that you feel
1:05:33 though would fit all those things. It's
1:05:36 a lot hard to review or hard to
1:05:38 challenge
1:05:42 >> on your publicize the program to
1:05:44 residents. Uh I don't I don't remember
1:05:46 exactly where it was, but I was in the
1:05:48 car with my children earlier today and I
1:05:51 heard you can get a you can it's called
1:05:54 donating a tree to you. So, wherever
1:05:57 that sign was, that works great.
1:05:59 >> For a previous program, they discuss
1:06:02 >> sign the yard sign because your yard
1:06:04 sign at a minimum is perfect.
1:06:07 >> So, even something like that for for a
1:06:09 heritage tree or something that
1:06:10 >> is near those hight traffic areas like
1:06:12 the one
1:06:13 >> by um uh his squat coffee or whatever.
1:06:17 >> Yeah. I mean, it could be something you
1:06:18 have a tree you're proud of or excited
1:06:19 about, you know, here. Yeah. Yeah. Know
1:06:21 it can be as simple as that. You're
1:06:22 right. And actually it's been great to
1:06:23 see we you know the people that have
1:06:25 been requesting trees say how they've
1:06:26 heard he heard about the program and so
1:06:27 far it's like 50% plus from those yard
1:06:29 signs.
1:06:31 >> Yeah.
1:06:33 >> Thanks Ryan.
1:06:34 >> Awesome Dan. Thank you. Thank you for
1:06:37 the presentation. Thanks for your great
1:06:39 work. Thanks for your feedback
1:06:41 everybody. Um
1:06:43 again I you know appreciate the
1:06:46 discussion. Uh, like we said, we look
1:06:48 forward from the Heritage Street
1:06:49 standpoint of of bringing something in
1:06:51 November so we can really start diving
1:06:54 into some specifics and look to ideally
1:06:57 adopt something beginning of next year
1:06:59 so that we can
1:07:01 sort of start that first cycle of this
1:07:04 renewed program uh in the spring.
1:07:08 >> Awesome. Appreciate it. Thank you
1:07:10 everyone for taking the time tonight.
1:07:14 >> Excellent. Yes, as said, thank you very
1:07:16 much. I do believe our next piece of
1:07:19 business arts and community services
1:07:21 summer highlights 2025.
1:07:23 >> Yeah,
1:07:25 new Sarah. [laughter]
1:07:28 [snorts]
1:07:31 >> Thanks for that, Jeff. Uh Ryan, thank
1:07:33 you. Um boy, um looking at time, I look
1:07:38 forward to giving this presentation.
1:07:40 We'll try not to go uh too long. Um, I
1:07:43 had the pleasure of uh providing this
1:07:45 update to city council earlier this
1:07:47 month on September 2nd. Um, just so
1:07:51 excited to u do the best I can to give
1:07:54 an overview of what uh this department
1:07:56 did this summer. Um, uh, this department
1:08:00 continues to do amazing work and um, one
1:08:04 of the the phrases we use a lot in the
1:08:06 department is, hey, community just
1:08:07 happened. Hey, community is happening.
1:08:10 um when we think about our programs,
1:08:11 when we think about um condition of
1:08:13 parks, when you see um how spaces are
1:08:16 being used, when you see how community
1:08:18 events are happening and um uh just that
1:08:21 ability and that recognition that we uh
1:08:25 we can do a lot to help foster community
1:08:28 um in Isiqua, that's really meaningful
1:08:30 work to us. And um not to get too sappy,
1:08:34 but in I think a day and age in a time
1:08:36 right now when there's so much
1:08:37 uncertainty internationally, nationally,
1:08:40 locally, um the more community we can
1:08:42 foster um in Isiqua, that's um that's
1:08:46 helpful. So with that, why don't we jump
1:08:50 in? I kind of did this division by
1:08:51 division. I'm going to start with the
1:08:53 divisions you probably are most familiar
1:08:55 with. So, I'll I'll go relatively quick
1:08:57 and then uh jump into some of our
1:08:59 recreation teams that also done some
1:09:01 great work. Uh you're familiar with a
1:09:03 lot of this work. Um you were very much
1:09:05 part of this as we did public engagement
1:09:07 for Hillside, completed that, cut a
1:09:10 ribbon. Uh great work by Robin managing
1:09:13 that project. Um and then lo and behold,
1:09:16 we also completed pedestrian park and
1:09:18 senior center plaza. What a a fun event.
1:09:21 Uh so fun to see the community beginning
1:09:23 to embrace and just get familiar with
1:09:25 those uh re-energized spaces. Again, uh
1:09:29 Robin, outstanding work managing a very
1:09:32 complex project. Um anytime you do urban
1:09:35 work, right, Hillside Park was complex.
1:09:38 Anytime you do work in an urban area,
1:09:40 it's that much more uh that much more
1:09:42 complicated. And so uh great work there.
1:09:45 Um some acquisition news. you know that
1:09:48 we're um hard at work with an
1:09:50 acquisition strategy. Um you're familiar
1:09:53 earlier this spring uh city council
1:09:56 approved a 17 acre purchase and sale
1:09:58 agreement um on 17 acres. Um we call it
1:10:02 called KCARI 3. It was a planned um
1:10:06 third phase of a development project on
1:10:08 the uh sort of lower side of Squawk
1:10:11 Mountain uh just off of uh Sunrise. Um,
1:10:15 but we received just got news. We
1:10:17 applied for uh it was a $2.5 million
1:10:20 acquisition that we're uh set to close
1:10:23 on next uh early next year. We have uh
1:10:26 received $2 million in grant funding. Uh
1:10:28 so again, our strategy of being really
1:10:32 aggressive with grant funding,
1:10:33 leveraging our local dollars with grant
1:10:35 dollars to stretch our acquisitions. Uh
1:10:38 some some great news, great work there.
1:10:41 Um and then uh we're estimating we're
1:10:43 going to be going out to bid um uh next
1:10:46 week as we uh finalize some of our our
1:10:50 permanent questions with the dog park
1:10:51 and look forward to hopefully being
1:10:53 under construction this uh this fall.
1:11:00 >> Yeah, park operations. So, our park
1:11:03 operations team always hard at work
1:11:05 throughout the year. Summer's an
1:11:07 incredibly busy time for them.
1:11:09 uh you often don't see the magnitude of
1:11:12 their work in in data, but when you look
1:11:14 at um the acres of turf that this is
1:11:18 literally a big backyard that that team
1:11:20 maintains. When you look at 53 acres of
1:11:22 turf, 7.2 acres of landscaping beds that
1:11:26 uh we're we're stewarding um again owned
1:11:28 by all the residents of Isqua and uh
1:11:32 maintained by that team. Um 13,000 bags
1:11:35 of trash collected uh year to date. Um,
1:11:39 we like that data. We like a lot of
1:11:41 trash. Not that we're big fans of trash,
1:11:43 but that tells us our parks are being
1:11:44 used, our trails are being used, our
1:11:46 public spaces are being used. So, uh,
1:11:48 really really important. Uh, a lot of
1:11:50 dog lovers and dog owners in this
1:11:52 community. When you think of the volume
1:11:54 of doggy bags that um are our um doggy
1:12:00 stations go through. Um, over 250 picnic
1:12:03 shelter rentals. Um, and that's just our
1:12:06 our shelter rental season, which is the
1:12:09 summer or basically May through uh
1:12:12 September. Um, all other times our
1:12:14 shelters are obviously available for
1:12:16 anyone to use on a drop in basis. Um,
1:12:19 Lake Sam State Park. I'll give a little
1:12:21 bit more detailed update um under the
1:12:24 director's report, but um we are well on
1:12:26 our way. We have a signed agreement. Uh
1:12:29 we've begun maintenance. Uh soccer's
1:12:31 already begun. cricket pitches have been
1:12:32 put in and cricket is going to begin uh
1:12:36 this weekend.
1:12:38 Uh team has led some tree replacement
1:12:41 projects both in Central Park.
1:12:43 Confluence Park was really our first
1:12:45 step um um to bomb cyclone impacts. Um
1:12:49 um it might be interesting. I don't know
1:12:51 if you're you're nerd out on on data,
1:12:54 but I'd love to bring a map as we've
1:12:56 mapped the damage of of the bomb
1:12:58 cyclone. It's fascinating. It's
1:13:01 literally a strip that went from sort of
1:13:04 the I90 corridor if you think of all the
1:13:07 damage on the Sunset Trail Head through
1:13:10 Confluence Park uh right through
1:13:12 Newport. It's it's fascinating to see um
1:13:15 what what where and how that damage sort
1:13:18 of mapped through town.
1:13:21 Uh some d some drainage improvements at
1:13:23 the community center lawn that were well
1:13:24 appreciated and loved. the upper leftand
1:13:27 corner just in time for concerts uh
1:13:29 which ends up becoming uh the dance um
1:13:33 uh the dance area uh it it held up
1:13:36 really really well far better than uh it
1:13:38 has in prior years uh than our just
1:13:41 annual some annual maintenance of
1:13:43 playgrounds and etc. So
1:13:46 hardworking team.
1:13:48 Next one. Dan really highlighted much of
1:13:50 this so I I will I will jump past this
1:13:53 one. really duplicates a lot of what Dan
1:13:55 and our and our natural resource team
1:13:57 have done. Again, just um what they're
1:14:00 leveraging is amazing. Um our human
1:14:03 services team, a really really important
1:14:05 part of the department, obviously not
1:14:07 something we talk a lot about. Um we do
1:14:09 residually there is a human services
1:14:11 commission that uh Brenda and Hannah um
1:14:15 and our behavioral health team work
1:14:17 really closely with. uh they're doing
1:14:19 amazing work and and I think the value
1:14:22 of having human services in our parks
1:14:24 and community services department is
1:14:27 those adjacencies um not only to our
1:14:29 recreation facilities but our parks and
1:14:32 park ownership um the behavioral health
1:14:34 and homeless outreach program that we've
1:14:36 been able to put together um is pretty
1:14:39 amazing for a town of our size and
1:14:41 that's thanks to really great work by
1:14:44 Alex our park ranger by our behavioral
1:14:46 health staff by some really key
1:14:48 relationships uh that both of those
1:14:50 groups have with our um police
1:14:52 department. Um um some really impactful
1:14:56 positive work has happened. Doesn't mean
1:14:58 homelessness is gone. We as a city are
1:15:01 never going to solve homelessness on our
1:15:03 own, but I think we really want to
1:15:06 respond uh to to uh that situation in as
1:15:11 positive way as we can.
1:15:14 >> Sorry.
1:15:15 >> Oh, yeah. Go ahead.
1:15:16 >> It's all right. I haven't seen the
1:15:17 picture. How does that roller skating
1:15:19 thing go?
1:15:20 >> Is that coming later?
1:15:22 >> It's coming later, but it's going it's
1:15:24 going.
1:15:26 >> Okay.
1:15:26 >> It's going and it's all good. It's going
1:15:28 light. It's going It's going great. Gang
1:15:30 busters. Um that Pickering Barn sign is
1:15:33 um a community clothing event that our
1:15:35 human services team did with our again
1:15:38 adjacencies with the recreation staff to
1:15:41 house that at Pickering Barn. Um huge
1:15:44 huge support, huge number of donations
1:15:46 from residents. Uh another another event
1:15:48 is going to be coming up this October.
1:15:50 Um Culture Fest occurred at the
1:15:52 beginning of September. Um uh doubled
1:15:56 our our um um participation in that
1:16:00 event uh this last year. Really becoming
1:16:02 a great great event that the community
1:16:04 embraces.
1:16:06 Arts, another another um group that has
1:16:09 the arts commission. Uh, I know we've
1:16:11 had our joint meeting earlier this year.
1:16:13 Amy Dukes, our arts manager, just does
1:16:15 an amazing job and such a key part of
1:16:17 our team. Um um I think what's happened
1:16:20 at Pedestrian Park is a great example of
1:16:23 the adjacency of Robin and Amy working
1:16:26 so closely together and actually
1:16:28 incorporating art early in a design and
1:16:31 early in a in a park project of that
1:16:34 scale. I think has really produced um
1:16:36 more meaningful art and not just plop
1:16:39 art that that feels like it just
1:16:41 suddenly shows up. Uh the upper left is
1:16:44 an aerial if you haven't been by um um
1:16:48 the three trails intersection on Gilman.
1:16:50 Um the the mural has been painted.
1:16:53 Hopefully you've seen that where now we
1:16:56 have a consensus with public works on um
1:17:00 some markings that we're going to have
1:17:01 on the crossings themselves within the
1:17:04 rideway. Working with public works um on
1:17:06 getting that done. Um, but between the
1:17:09 art and the um the the crossing
1:17:13 designations, it's really going to make
1:17:15 a a big big difference and I think
1:17:17 pedestrians feeling super safe and
1:17:19 understanding sort of their intuit
1:17:21 intuitive connections there. Big
1:17:24 Shakespeare in the park event film
1:17:26 festival. I don't know if you're any any
1:17:28 film fans here, but that's become a
1:17:30 really really great um event. first time
1:17:33 we partnered with Isqua School District
1:17:35 and we're able to use the performing
1:17:36 arts center. That's a partnership we
1:17:38 want to to further expand so the
1:17:41 community can have access to that
1:17:43 performing arts center.
1:17:46 You're familiar with obviously the
1:17:47 public art that was at um part of
1:17:50 pedestrian park.
1:17:53 Next slide. Now jumping into really our
1:17:55 recreation team and and um just amazing
1:17:58 work by uh by all the divisions uh
1:18:01 within our community center team. They
1:18:04 really spearhead our summer camp program
1:18:06 them and the athletics teams. Um we had
1:18:09 1,200 over 1,200 reg registrations and
1:18:12 participants of our of our summer day
1:18:14 camps. Um what we did this summer was I
1:18:18 think really substantial for ye the last
1:18:20 couple years we've had such an extensive
1:18:22 weight list. We've had um registration
1:18:25 day for day camps I think can be maybe
1:18:27 some of the most stressful days for
1:18:29 parents in town and we don't necessarily
1:18:31 like that. Um um camps were filling up
1:18:35 that fast. Camps still up fill up really
1:18:38 really fast. We can't totally control
1:18:39 that. But what the team did is really
1:18:41 looked at what are the key targeted age
1:18:44 groups that we really need to try and
1:18:46 add capacity to. Um um and we added um a
1:18:51 substantial amount of capacity to to
1:18:53 camps and um community responded and and
1:18:57 um certainly filled those filled those
1:18:59 spots. Um you'll see a thread through
1:19:01 all of a number of these recreation
1:19:03 updates. Teen employment is a really
1:19:05 really big thing to us. We're a
1:19:07 first-time employer for many. We're
1:19:09 probably the largest teen employer um in
1:19:11 town when you look at what we do with
1:19:13 camps and athletic programs and and the
1:19:17 pool um etc. So 39 teens and young
1:19:20 adults uh worked at day camp. Um uh we
1:19:24 take that reality that this is their
1:19:25 first job really really seriously. Um
1:19:28 they're likely going to turn pro in
1:19:30 something else. They're going to have a
1:19:32 career in something else. But the
1:19:34 leadership that's learned uh through
1:19:36 being a camp leader or being a referee
1:19:38 or being a lifeguard is um can be
1:19:41 carried um through their whole life. Um
1:19:45 I think I've shared this, the mayor is
1:19:47 proud to say her first job as a
1:19:48 15year-old was a lifeguard. Um and that
1:19:51 led to her being an amazing engineer and
1:19:54 an amazing mayor. Um uh just one more
1:19:58 one example, I was I was a flag football
1:20:00 referee for Kent Parks as I was growing
1:20:02 up and the things I learned uh there
1:20:05 have carried me um along all the ways.
1:20:10 Steam camps is our is our creative way
1:20:12 of adding arts to STEM. So um these are
1:20:16 our science, tech, uh um and math camps,
1:20:20 but as well as arts. Lots of great
1:20:23 enrollment there. huge enrollment in our
1:20:25 sports camp programs. Many of those
1:20:26 sports cramps camps are contracted camps
1:20:29 that we're contracting with a a third
1:20:31 party provider. Uh but again, huge huge
1:20:34 numbers this year.
1:20:36 A lot of happy families and happy happy
1:20:39 participants. Events uh not short on
1:20:41 those. Uh the Isiqua Kids Triathlon was
1:20:44 back. um largest um largest attendance
1:20:48 with over 250 kiddos swimming, biking,
1:20:51 and running uh around the community
1:20:53 center lawn and and using the Julius
1:20:56 Bone Pool. Uh just a great event and a
1:20:58 partnership we do with the youth
1:20:59 advisory board. Um Fourth of July, we we
1:21:04 took a little softer touch uh with the
1:21:06 parade and a community picnic following
1:21:08 the parade. I don't know if any of you
1:21:10 attended that, but um it was a great
1:21:13 great afternoon. Um uh great event. You
1:21:16 see the the photo there in the lower
1:21:18 right. Extremely well attended. Next
1:21:20 year is America 250. It's the 250th.
1:21:25 Um um
1:21:27 I I there's a name for it. I'm not going
1:21:29 to try. 200 was easy. It was the
1:21:31 bicesentennial. It's a much fancier name
1:21:33 for 250, but um I know Isig is going to
1:21:38 look forward to to celebrating that um
1:21:40 next year as well. concerts, uh, record
1:21:43 attendance, literally record attendance
1:21:44 this year, um, uh, to those eight
1:21:47 events. Um, along with the long-standing
1:21:51 partnership we have with Kowanas, we
1:21:52 partnered with Rotary, um, and doing,
1:21:55 uh, food collection at a number of those
1:21:57 events. Over 200,000, 200, 2,000 pounds
1:22:01 uh, were were collected um, and a great
1:22:04 way to support the the food bank. Um,
1:22:06 the photo that you'll see there is the
1:22:09 the last concert uh was um, oh my
1:22:13 goodness, Red Karma. Am I getting that
1:22:14 name right? A a Taylor Swift cover. Um,
1:22:18 say we had a very young audience there.
1:22:20 A lot of young girls and uh, a lot of
1:22:23 screaming and just a a great great great
1:22:26 um, great atmosphere, great environment.
1:22:31 Adaptive recreation. Uh you might recall
1:22:35 postcoid as we began to sort of rethink
1:22:40 staffing and as revenues were coming
1:22:42 back, we uh reimagine staffing a little
1:22:44 bit and for the first time um hired a an
1:22:48 exclusive adaptive recreation
1:22:50 coordinator. Whereas before um our
1:22:52 adaptive programs were done by many many
1:22:55 staff. Um Cali Weber is our adaptive
1:22:58 recreation coordinator. She has just
1:23:00 done an amazing job and has allowed us
1:23:02 to really I think focus on adaptive
1:23:04 programs. Um how we integrate those
1:23:07 programs into our other programs whether
1:23:08 it's dayc camp programs um summer
1:23:11 concerts on the green uh we partner with
1:23:14 with Tavon and um allow many of our
1:23:17 adaptive rec participants to come and
1:23:20 enjoy the concerts. Not a separate
1:23:22 concert but it just it it it's
1:23:25 awesome. Thank you Martha. Totally
1:23:27 agree. Totally agree. So great great
1:23:29 work by Calie
1:23:32 and the community center team that
1:23:33 supports her.
1:23:37 Senior center continues to to thrive and
1:23:39 and grow. Trips have always been
1:23:42 extremely popular. um um 111 or 100 yeah
1:23:47 111 new members um at the senior center
1:23:51 tells us even in the summer months we're
1:23:53 seeing uh more people coming to the
1:23:55 senior center wanting to be part of
1:23:57 what's happening and going on. Um
1:23:59 Kristen, who's our Kristen May, who's
1:24:02 our supervisor there, began a veterans
1:24:04 breakfast that's been really popular and
1:24:08 um just a great way to partner with our
1:24:10 um our veterans and the and the local
1:24:15 Um you're familiar obviously if you were
1:24:17 there at the at the ribbon cutting for
1:24:19 the senior center plaza how meaningful
1:24:21 it was to the veterans that um along
1:24:24 with that plaza project we were able to
1:24:26 really open up and I think invite the
1:24:28 community to see uh the the memorial
1:24:32 there uh in front of the senior center
1:24:34 in new ways.
1:24:36 Fitness classes continue to be really
1:24:38 popular. um athletics group uh doing
1:24:41 amazing work. Gliders track and field
1:24:43 and gliders cross country which happen
1:24:45 is happens in the fall uh continues to
1:24:48 grow. Um again rep record participation
1:24:51 we're seeing in that program um as
1:24:53 that's a number of years old now.
1:24:56 Tomorrow night if you happen to be going
1:24:57 by Tivotsz Valley Park we call it Friday
1:25:00 night lights. We're hosting a cross
1:25:02 country meet under the under the lights.
1:25:04 Uh, so kiddos will be running um running
1:25:07 through Tibbitz Valley Park. Um, I'm
1:25:10 having a a fun meet under the lights.
1:25:13 Huge teen employer with our athletics
1:25:15 program. Over 70 plus teens employed uh
1:25:18 through um all the programs that they
1:25:20 do, whether that's gliders, um camps, um
1:25:24 classes, etc. Some new new programming
1:25:27 the team has done. Ball hockey at the
1:25:28 community center has been a huge huge
1:25:30 hit. Um maybe that's having an NHL team.
1:25:34 locally. Uh hockey seems to be uh
1:25:36 certainly uh catching stronger interest.
1:25:40 Some large tournaments we hosted at
1:25:42 Tibis Valley Park in Central Park. Uh
1:25:44 something we want to continue to try and
1:25:46 foster uh just given how that um not
1:25:50 only is a great way to use the parks,
1:25:51 but it's a great uh economic um uh
1:25:54 development incubator as well.
1:26:00 the pool. Uh certainly not last but
1:26:02 least. Um huge number of swim lessons.
1:26:05 The the volume of work and the volume of
1:26:07 participation and the volume of use that
1:26:09 goes through that little pool on the
1:26:10 hill is mindboggling. Um Katie, I know
1:26:14 you are a frequent user and have a young
1:26:16 swimmer. Um Zach and the team do some
1:26:20 amazing work. some new programs that
1:26:22 we've begun to incorporate. A water polo
1:26:25 is beginning to take off with 41
1:26:27 participants in classes this summer. Um
1:26:30 we've also started a junior lifeguard
1:26:32 program. Um we're always looking for new
1:26:35 ways of just engaging youth in this
1:26:37 community, but helping to foster. We're
1:26:39 going to be a lifeguard employer as long
1:26:41 as we have a pool. So getting that
1:26:43 interest um I think the again the
1:26:46 leadership that that um kids learn
1:26:48 through the what lifeguarding means and
1:26:51 represents uh we just think it's a great
1:26:54 a great program to foster. Um there's
1:26:56 that teen employment again um over 85
1:26:59 teens are employed um at the pool either
1:27:02 as lifeguards um or lesson instructors.
1:27:07 Zach and team um, again take that very
1:27:11 very seriously. Um, and u, it's not only
1:27:14 a key part of offering a quality
1:27:15 program, but again um, um, we hope that
1:27:19 those teams are taking a lot more than
1:27:21 just a paycheck away from uh, the years
1:27:24 that they're doing that doing that work.
1:27:30 >> Greening Barn. Um, hey look, they're
1:27:32 skating. Jen, great question. Um I'll
1:27:35 I'll pop to that at the end. Yes, the
1:27:36 rock and roll at the rink um is um
1:27:40 proving to be very popular. Um um uh the
1:27:44 the the partners we're working with have
1:27:46 been excited to do that in cooperation
1:27:48 with farmers market. They've been uh
1:27:50 maxing out their session uh
1:27:52 registrations um with market ending this
1:27:56 Saturday. We're looking to continue to
1:27:58 partner with them uh to make sure
1:28:00 there's access. Um some evening use and
1:28:03 other uses throughout the winter. Um uh
1:28:07 Rock and Roll Rink will be part of our
1:28:09 Boo at the Barn uh festival uh at the
1:28:11 end of October. So uh that's been a
1:28:14 great a great partnership and a great
1:28:16 relationship that we hope um I think is
1:28:19 a great example of how a community space
1:28:21 can incubate business. I know this is a
1:28:24 this is a group that would love to find
1:28:25 a permanent rink and we would love to
1:28:28 help them see that through and if that
1:28:30 rink happened to be in Isiqua, we think
1:28:32 it'd be a great asset for this
1:28:34 community.
1:28:36 So exciting. Um numbers at the farmers
1:28:39 market, uh we had record numbers last
1:28:41 year. We've we've broken those record
1:28:42 numbers from last year. So, uh, this
1:28:45 market truly has become a really,
1:28:47 really, uh, uh, special place and and
1:28:50 great work by Kella Dean and the team.
1:28:56 So, that's a super fast overview of a a
1:28:58 great summary. I hope you recognize this
1:29:00 photo. This is the our group shot from
1:29:03 Hillside Park. Um, um, and this phrase
1:29:07 is something really really meaningful
1:29:09 for us as a as a department. We had in
1:29:11 fact had our city all staff meeting and
1:29:12 I reminded the whole the whole city
1:29:14 staff of what we're about in parks and
1:29:16 community services and we really
1:29:18 everything we do boils down to one of
1:29:20 these two core values. We we invest in
1:29:22 your public spaces owned by the
1:29:25 residents of Isiqua and we invest in
1:29:27 people through through programs and
1:29:29 services.
1:29:32 So that's a summer. Then we go into
1:29:34 fall.
1:29:37 >> Thank you.
1:29:42 >> Um,
1:29:44 do we have questions about anything that
1:29:46 we just saw?
1:29:48 >> Follow up.
1:29:49 >> That's the only question. I would have
1:29:50 check like any big challenges, any big
1:29:54 learnings, anything that just, wow, that
1:29:58 didn't work or boy, we should have
1:30:00 considered this or
1:30:03 >> Yeah, great great question. I I think
1:30:05 anytime at all you know yes there are a
1:30:08 number of programs that we um
1:30:11 continually evaluate. Um we talk a lot
1:30:15 as a team any program even the most
1:30:17 successful ones have a life cycle uh and
1:30:20 you either need to as that life cycle
1:30:22 begins to decline sort of reinvent the
1:30:24 program or maybe it's time to dismount
1:30:27 and offer something new. So you're right
1:30:30 I listed hey there's some new programs
1:30:31 that we're offering in athletics.
1:30:33 there's some other things that we've um
1:30:35 sort of let go of. Um so um like our our
1:30:40 mix of recreation programs are are
1:30:42 constantly evolving and need to
1:30:44 constantly be evolving. Um um I think
1:30:48 departmentwide
1:30:50 um um
1:30:52 yeah, we're constantly challenged. We're
1:30:55 challenged with resources. And I don't
1:30:56 mean to say woe was us, but um we are,
1:31:00 you know, we did all this work with
1:31:03 through [snorts] some budget reductions
1:31:04 uh that needed to be made that the city
1:31:06 needed to be made. So, we needed to be
1:31:08 really thoughtful. Um I want to make
1:31:10 sure um we talk a lot as a leadership
1:31:13 team that we're not um we're not burning
1:31:16 staff out. We're not we're not we're not
1:31:18 being so ambitious with the work plan
1:31:20 that it's not sustainable. Um we're
1:31:23 constantly bumping up against that. Um,
1:31:26 again, I don't say that as a negative,
1:31:28 but it's just a operational challenge
1:31:31 and a reality that we that we need to
1:31:33 make. I I think on the park planning
1:31:35 side, we've had to readjust this
1:31:39 cutting this many ribbons um has been a
1:31:42 years in the making and even in itself,
1:31:45 it's been really hard and I and I and I
1:31:48 um I say this to you and I I think you
1:31:50 all know this, but um you know, we went
1:31:54 from two park planners to one park
1:31:56 planner. Um, as we now venture off into
1:32:00 doing master planning for Tivitis Valley
1:32:02 Park and Central Park and and a number
1:32:05 of things in our capital plan, we're
1:32:06 going to be really cognizant of it. It
1:32:09 might not be at a rate and a pace that
1:32:12 everyone wants
1:32:14 >> that quite frankly we even want. But we
1:32:16 need to be really realistic um and and
1:32:19 practical in understanding that that
1:32:22 work is important. Um that work takes
1:32:25 time and energy and and we can only go
1:32:27 at um the the resource pace the pace
1:32:31 that our resources allow. So
1:32:34 >> not a wine just a
1:32:37 something Yeah.
1:32:39 >> We're con Yeah. Yeah. Like parks and
1:32:42 recreation professionals we we we would
1:32:45 we are masters of taking a um full-time
1:32:49 job and and doubling it. [laughter]
1:32:52 I think like anybody, right? I mean,
1:32:54 we're not the only ones, but we really
1:32:56 um to try to be cognizant of of our
1:33:01 working within our resources.
1:33:05 >> I think it sounds like it was a
1:33:07 successful.
1:33:08 >> Yeah.
1:33:10 >> Anybody else have any questions or
1:33:12 feedback throughout?
1:33:15 >> All right. Well, that'll move on from
1:33:17 regular business to reports. You get to
1:33:20 keep talking with the director's report.
1:33:22 All right. All right. Um yeah, first uh
1:33:26 just again further a few further
1:33:28 comments on Lake Sam State Park. Um
1:33:31 again for something that came up um on
1:33:33 our work plan, wasn't on our work plan
1:33:35 in last fall uh but became a strategic
1:33:39 moment that we really needed to to take
1:33:41 action. Um um really appreciate the
1:33:45 conversations that we had with you that
1:33:47 really help shaped uh how we frame that
1:33:50 agreement uh with state parks. We now
1:33:52 have a signed agreement with them. As I
1:33:54 said um uh maintenance and scheduling
1:33:57 has already begun um on the on the site.
1:34:01 Um exciting to see how Cricut um is
1:34:04 going to begin using it. Um we've also
1:34:07 worked with the state park on the
1:34:09 parking lot. Um, I know many of you have
1:34:11 probably driven into that over your
1:34:13 years and and know that feels like a
1:34:15 craters of the moon kind of experience.
1:34:18 Um, and so, um, thanks to partnering
1:34:22 with public works, uh, we are going to
1:34:26 be working with state parks to do some,
1:34:28 um, some maintenance improvements on,
1:34:31 um on
1:34:33 the parking lot. So, that should be
1:34:35 coming a little bit later this fall. But
1:34:38 um we really look forward uh to sort of
1:34:41 seeing how use looks. Um the agreement
1:34:44 itself, much like we talked about, it is
1:34:46 an 18-month agreement. So this is a of a
1:34:48 short-term agreement that gets us
1:34:50 through the the end of next year, gives
1:34:53 us this year to to sort of test it,
1:34:55 trial it, see how the community is using
1:34:57 it. Um at the same time, as I said, the
1:35:00 state park is going to be doing their
1:35:01 management plan update for the entirety
1:35:04 of the park. Um
1:35:06 um so
1:35:09 we will um sometime next year be
1:35:13 bringing back to you and having the
1:35:14 conversation of hey how did it go? How
1:35:16 how did we see the community using this
1:35:19 as we start flushing out and thinking of
1:35:21 the 20 27 2028 budget. Um we want to
1:35:25 begin preparing that conversation with
1:35:27 city council. What what is this what
1:35:29 does our role look like um in 2027 and
1:35:32 beyond? So, um I think we're set up
1:35:34 really, really well. I'm glad we didn't
1:35:36 do a long-term agreement. I'm glad we
1:35:38 didn't try and um map this out and
1:35:41 understand what the long-term
1:35:42 implications are going to be. Um this
1:35:44 gives us a chance to to again test it,
1:35:47 live with it for a little while, um and
1:35:49 then go from there. So um excited and
1:35:52 again thank you for um your support in
1:35:55 moving so quickly um on on that um the
1:36:00 strategic moment that came up that um I
1:36:03 think we all agree and felt like we
1:36:04 needed to act um to make sure those
1:36:06 those fields still have community use.
1:36:09 The exciting thing is and I' I've shared
1:36:11 this multiple times. I'll share it with
1:36:13 you. For the first time, those fields
1:36:16 have access
1:36:18 to the whole community and not just one
1:36:20 soccer club. And I I think we all agree
1:36:23 that's really really meaningful. Um that
1:36:26 that's public fields. Those are public
1:36:28 fields that having multiple sports and
1:36:30 multiple sports groups and even just the
1:36:33 community when the fields in use can go
1:36:36 utilize those fields. So exciting.
1:36:40 Um, one other update I have, um, and
1:36:44 that I'm I'm going to be talking about
1:36:46 something that isn't necessarily managed
1:36:48 by us, but I just want to give you all a
1:36:50 heads up. Um,
1:36:53 have you are you familiar with POS?
1:36:56 Pifos is one of those forever chemicals
1:36:59 that uh if you recall a number of years
1:37:02 ago was
1:37:04 really has taken a lead u recognize POS
1:37:07 in its water supply um uh this was a
1:37:11 number of years ago now since I think
1:37:12 it's been certainly been understood that
1:37:15 much every city in the country has some
1:37:17 degree of POS um um given the
1:37:20 proliferation of POS that's happened uh
1:37:23 really throughout the world and around
1:37:25 this this country. Um, a lot of that POS
1:37:29 work focused on water quality. Um, the
1:37:33 reason I'm bringing this up is is that
1:37:35 this next step that public works is
1:37:37 working on with the department of
1:37:38 ecology. Uh, they've been looping us in
1:37:40 in that they're now going to be looking
1:37:43 at ecology, trying to better understand
1:37:46 um, PAS in the soil and what that means.
1:37:50 So, not just in the water supply, but
1:37:51 the soil. Um,
1:37:54 later this fall and in October, there's
1:37:57 going to be some community awareness and
1:37:59 community information that's going to be
1:38:00 going out by public works and by ecology
1:38:03 about some of the sites that we're going
1:38:05 to be doing some testing on. A couple of
1:38:07 those are park sites. um park sites that
1:38:11 happen to coincide with where a lot of
1:38:13 the the origins of this POS here in
1:38:15 Isiqua were uh the foam the fire foam uh
1:38:19 that was um tested. A lot of that was
1:38:21 tested sort of where fire stations were.
1:38:25 So coincidentally uh the fire station
1:38:27 near Memorial Field, there's a lot of
1:38:30 foam that was sprayed out onto a certain
1:38:32 section of Memorial Field. Uh so there's
1:38:34 going to be some test pits. We want to
1:38:36 better understand uh what what uh those
1:38:39 volumes are and what it really means um
1:38:43 for having that chemical not just in
1:38:45 water but in soil. Um all the water
1:38:49 level testing of POS has been um deemed
1:38:53 to be really super minimal here in
1:38:55 Isiqua. So I don't mean to bring this up
1:38:57 as a huge alarm but um being better
1:39:01 informed is really really important. So,
1:39:03 there's going to be some testing going
1:39:05 on at Memorial Field. There's also going
1:39:07 to be some testing along a really small
1:39:10 portion of the Reineer Trail right in
1:39:12 front of what's known as City Hall
1:39:14 South. Um, City Hall South happened to
1:39:17 be a fire station before it was uh the
1:39:19 city council chamber. So, again, there
1:39:21 was probably some foam that was tested
1:39:25 right there in that lawn area by Reineer
1:39:28 Trail. So, both of those areas are
1:39:29 really, really important. There's some
1:39:31 other testing sites that'll be happening
1:39:33 around town. Those park areas aren't the
1:39:35 only ones, but uh I just wanted to make
1:39:37 sure you were aware of that.
1:39:38 [clears throat] Um as you start to see
1:39:40 and the community starts to get
1:39:41 information on that.
1:39:44 >> That's all I have.
1:39:45 >> That's great. Thank you. Does any
1:39:47 questions?
1:39:50 >> Excellent. Next up would be our youth
1:39:52 representative report. Oh, Hannah.
1:39:57 >> Oh, I just wanted to take a moment. Um,
1:39:59 I probably should have said something
1:40:00 after the summer update. Um, but just to
1:40:03 say like how amazing I think all of the
1:40:05 work that um, everyone has done this
1:40:09 summer um, has been. And I just wanted
1:40:12 to pass that on from my community. I've
1:40:14 heard of like so many wonderful comments
1:40:15 about our parks department and also
1:40:17 about like the summer concerts and
1:40:19 everything. Um, before I forgot, I just
1:40:21 wanted to make that comment of praise
1:40:23 and um, yeah, just say thank you.
1:40:27 >> Awesome. Thanks, Hannah. I will I will
1:40:29 pass that on to the team. [snorts]
1:40:33 >> Yes, thank you. Um, as noted that we
1:40:36 don't have a youth representative here
1:40:38 tonight. Do we have a youth
1:40:39 representative?
1:40:41 >> Yeah, I will I will check with the youth
1:40:42 advisory. I'll check with Kathy Jones of
1:40:45 the community center oversees the youth
1:40:46 advisory board. Um,
1:40:49 >> yeah, it's it's it's a new school year,
1:40:52 isn't it?
1:40:53 >> This is usually the time.
1:40:54 [clears throat]
1:40:55 >> Um, excellent. Uh I do not have a
1:40:57 chair's person report. I have a chair's
1:41:00 person challenge
1:41:02 >> and that is we've been informed and
1:41:03 notified that in November we're going to
1:41:06 discuss the heritage tree program in
1:41:08 further detail. So my challenge is
1:41:09 everyone get out see a heritage tree.
1:41:13 When you're out walking your your dog
1:41:14 when you're out bicycling around town
1:41:16 when you're out walking one of our parks
1:41:18 or open spaces or downtown look around.
1:41:22 Look at things you wouldn't normally
1:41:23 look at. Look at trees in a different
1:41:24 light. and see if there's something that
1:41:27 we can bring back to the table in two
1:41:30 meetings.
1:41:32 >> Awesome. [clears throat]
1:41:34 Does anyone have any items they wish to
1:41:36 bring up or discuss that were not on the
1:41:39 agenda?
1:41:44 Okay.
1:41:45 Um I guess with that, I don't remember
1:41:49 what our next meeting is cuz I didn't
1:41:51 look at it before, but it'll be in the
1:41:53 minutes. October 27th.
1:41:55 >> Thank you.
1:41:57 [clears throat]
1:41:57 >> Um and with that no further business at
1:42:01 8:39 this meeting is adjourned.
1:42:03 >> Thanks everybody. Have a great night.
1:42:06 >> Thank you.
1:42:08 >> Bye guys.
1:42:10 >> Bye.
1:42:10 >> Paul, we didn't see your kiddos at all.
1:42:12 >> She went on. She said hello off camera.
1:42:15 >> Yeah, I I turned off when I went to deal
1:42:16 with them.
1:42:19 >> Have a great night.
1:42:20 >> Good night everybody. Anybody want some
1:42:22 pizza for the
1:42:26 [clears throat]
1:42:26 >> home your family?
1:42:30 They're going to keep the music.
Minutes for this meeting haven't been published yet. Council and committee minutes are approved at the next meeting and embedded as a consent-calendar attachment in that meeting's agenda packet — they will appear here once that next packet is processed.