← Back to City Council Digest

Human Services Commission

Wednesday, January 18, 2023

6:30 PM · 1h 42m
Topic tracked across meetings:
2022 Human Services Grants - Report 3/3
Section
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3a
Minutes of October 19, 2022
packet pp.3–4
Staff report:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) 10-19-22 Human Services Commission Minutes Page 1 CITY OF ISSAQUAH Human Services Commission 6:30 PM Steelhead Room, 235 1st Ave. October 19, 2022 MINUTES SE, Issaquah
4. AGENDA ITEMS
4a
20 min. Input
Tisha Gieser, City Clerk · packet pp.23
Staff report:
During the 2021-2022 Human Services funding cycle, the City of Issaquah funded 57 programs. Of these, 29 were included in a pooled program with other cities on the eastside, to help create efficiencies and decrease contractual burden for organizations. Administration for these pooled contracts was done jointly by staff from the 5 eastside cities, Bellevue, Kirkland, Issaquah, Redmond, and Sammamish, with payment being coordinated by the City of Bellevue.
4b
2022 Human Services Grants - Report
15 min · Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager · packet pp.25
Topics: BudgetEquity
Staff report:
ISSAQUAH HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION 2023 WORK PLAN - Draft
4c
2023 Human Services Commission Workplan - Update
20 min · Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager
Topics: Equity
5. REPORTS
5a
Chair Report
Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager
0:00 okay so I'm calling to order the uh
0:03 January 18th Human Services Commission
0:08 and
0:09 um I guess I will start by asking Monica
0:13 if there's any reason are we having
0:15 public comment this evening we don't
0:18 have anyone signed up for public
0:19 comments and nobody submitted any public
0:21 comments okay and I've been standing on
0:23 online or in the room in the comments
0:25 all right and um okay then we need to
0:29 vote on the approval of the minutes and
0:31 I'm sure the minutes are very fresh
0:34 in everybody's mind from October
0:40 um does anybody want to make a motion
0:45 all right a second okay all in favor say
0:49 hi hi okay
0:53 all right anybody
0:54 Nays okay they're approved
1:03 okay and then I think the next thing
1:06 we're gonna do is just move right into
1:08 tisha's presentation wonderful and I am
1:12 going to hi everybody I'm Tisha Geezer
1:14 I'm the city clerk I've met most of you
1:16 at least virtually if not in person
1:19 um it's nice nice to see you and see
1:21 names with faces thank you for your
1:23 service I'm always impressed with the
1:26 number of individuals we have volunteer
1:29 to serve on we have 13 advisory boards
1:32 in the city so
1:34 um a lot of spoken Brett and we're
1:35 really grateful to have your your input
1:37 on um so many important issues that are
1:40 coming before the city all the time
1:43 um so tonight I'm talking here to talk
1:46 to you about and I'm sorry I'm pulling
1:48 up my PowerPoint right now so I have a
1:50 do you have a few visuals to go along
1:53 with my presentation
1:55 was some of that included in the packet
1:58 was that the yeah okay okay I just want
2:00 to make sure I'm in the right place
2:04 so in your packet it starts on page 17 I
2:09 think yeah
2:12 okay
2:15 now it actually starts on page five
2:19 five yes the actual policy starts on
2:22 page 17. yeah
2:28 thank you
2:30 um so uh as you recall during during the
2:34 covid pandemic the commission met
2:36 entirely virtually for um
2:39 I mean I'm close to two years so the uh
2:43 the commission is subject to the state's
2:45 open public meetings act and I know you
2:47 can't believe you recently received
2:49 training on the action so one of the
2:51 requirements in that act is that you
2:53 have to have your meetings have to be
2:54 open to the public and so during covid
2:57 um the governor suspended the
2:59 requirement that we have an in-person
3:00 open door location for you but said
3:04 instead we needed to have a phone number
3:06 people could call in too so that you'd
3:08 hear hear your meeting and in our case
3:10 we've we purchased some software and we
3:12 allowed people to join by computer
3:15 so during the coveted pandemic there was
3:17 a governor and eventually the
3:19 legislature kind of put a pause on that
3:21 in person requirement
3:23 and
3:24 um in June uh the governor announced
3:27 that he was suspending that sort of
3:30 exception uh to the open public meetings
3:32 act and we were kind of resuming the
3:34 normal course of business however we do
3:37 now have a stipulation or a
3:41 should I call it we do still have we
3:43 have a provision in the open public
3:45 meetings act that anticipates
3:48 um a need to go all virtual again so if
3:50 we need to do that there's now rules in
3:52 place which is wonderful but that
3:54 in-person meeting requirement came back
3:56 into being July 1st believe your board
3:59 resumed in-person meetings in September
4:02 because we were trying to get this room
4:04 ready to just kind of figure things out
4:07 so all of our boards and commissions
4:09 came back
4:10 um in either July or in September and
4:12 the mayor um if you recall she sent a
4:14 few emails out and she really emphasized
4:16 she wanted boards and commissions
4:19 commissioned nurse in seats in in
4:22 physical meeting spaces but that we
4:25 would be offering a virtual uh option
4:27 for members of the public and presenters
4:30 that was the initial expectation
4:33 uh however the mayor's office and US
4:36 city staff heard feedback over those
4:38 first few months of coming back the
4:41 boarding commission members liked to
4:42 have the flexibility to attend virtually
4:45 as well we aren't running a virtual uh
4:48 meeting for all of our boards and
4:49 commission so your commission was one of
4:51 the ones selected to have that hybrid
4:53 meeting option and we purchased
4:55 equipment set up these rooms we have
4:57 three meeting rooms in the city that can
5:00 accommodate this
5:02 um so after hearing some feedback from
5:04 board and Commissioners the mayor asked
5:06 me to draft a policy to because no one's
5:09 rules sort of allow for virtual
5:11 participation it was just something we
5:13 started doing during covid so she asked
5:15 me to draft a policy to allow for
5:17 virtual uh participation button really
5:19 limited circumstances is
5:21 so I'm going to talk to you about this
5:23 draft policy which was in your packet
5:25 which is sort of you know coming coming
5:28 from the city
5:29 um but I I also want to start by saying
5:31 that the
5:32 um the rules about how the Commissioners
5:35 attend meetings are in the commission's
5:37 rules and regulations those are
5:39 controlled by you the Commissioners you
5:42 vote to make changes to those rules so
5:44 tonight I'm hoping you think about
5:46 expectations the group of you have both
5:49 now and in the future and for future
5:50 Commissioners and what you're looking
5:52 for and after I talk about the
5:54 maintenance of the draft policy I'll
5:56 share with you I've been taking this
5:58 Ranch to
5:59 I think I've been to about five or six
6:01 boards so far and so they're all
6:04 adopting slightly different versions you
6:06 know they all have salt share um some of
6:08 what the other boards are doing
6:11 so the policy is it's pretty short but
6:14 in case you didn't have a time time to
6:16 look at it let me tell you about some
6:18 key components so the draft policy says
6:21 that
6:22 um a essentially you would need to
6:25 request permission to attend virtually
6:27 and you would do that if if you are
6:29 unable to attend the meeting and you
6:32 know you could interpret unable to
6:34 attend in different ways the idea behind
6:37 that is if you have you know sort of a
6:39 medical situation you're recovering from
6:41 a procedure you're in quarantine you're
6:43 not feeling well you have a
6:44 transportation issue a child care issue
6:46 you're maybe traveling for a business
6:48 trip
6:49 um and not not in Issaquah so those are
6:52 some of the reasons that were intended
6:54 by that wording
6:56 um but it's meant to really emphasize
6:58 that if you're you're around and you
7:00 don't have any of those things impeding
7:03 your ability to attend that you would be
7:04 in person
7:10 um the policy also says that for a
7:13 quorum would be in person so that means
7:15 four of you would need to be here
7:17 physically for the need to proceed and
7:20 that's sort of for two reasons that's
7:21 one to again encourage that in-person
7:23 attendance and the second reason is we
7:25 have an issue with the technology
7:29 and we don't have four of you
7:31 that it needs to stop because we lose a
7:34 form so if there was a technical issue
7:36 we do have some awesome I.T stuff but if
7:38 there's a problem and pillow
7:41 um and we can't get the um equipment
7:44 working or if there's some sort of you
7:46 know internet outage or something like
7:48 that
7:49 um so that's the reason for the the
7:51 Quorum uh required in person
7:55 and then there's um some language in the
7:57 draft policy about if you do attend
7:58 virtually so if you reach out to Monica
8:00 and say you know I'm in Eastern
8:02 Washington but I'd like to still
8:03 participate at the meeting or I'm not
8:04 feeling well but I'd like to participate
8:06 in the meeting she would kind of confirm
8:08 that a quorum would be in person and uh
8:11 she would then know that you would be
8:13 virtual while attending virtually you
8:15 would be encouraged to indicate you're
8:17 there and able to participate in the
8:19 meeting by having your camera on as much
8:21 as possible
8:22 um and engaging with the group
8:24 um one thing this virtual attendance
8:26 option isn't meant to replace is is
8:28 needing an excused absence so if you're
8:30 really unwell if you are taking a
8:33 vacation and some time away for yourself
8:35 or with your family you know we want you
8:37 to to let us know and and request an
8:39 excused absence
8:41 um we don't want the virtual tenants to
8:43 make you feel like you need to attend
8:45 every in all meeting no matter where you
8:46 are
8:47 uh so back to the draft policy another
8:50 provision in it is that if you're the
8:53 chair
8:54 um you would be expected to be in person
8:55 or if you needed to attend virtually you
8:57 would ask if I share or have the
8:59 commission um nominate another person to
9:01 chair that meeting the chair would
9:03 always be someone in the room
9:11 talks about is it it sort of formalizes
9:14 the fact that your regular meetings um
9:16 will have this virtual option it is
9:18 something the city is committed to doing
9:21 um and barring some major unforeseen
9:24 issue we'll have all of your regular
9:26 meetings we'll have we'll publish that
9:28 WebEx link
9:29 um and ensure virtual attendance there
9:32 could I will say there could be some
9:34 special meetings if you decide to have
9:35 you know a social Gathering or a meeting
9:38 with a joint meeting with another board
9:39 or permission or a tour or something
9:41 like that we probably wouldn't offer a
9:43 virtual option
9:44 um but one of the real changes is to
9:46 just sort of document that intention
9:49 um and also clarify that the public can
9:51 make comments virtually and attend
9:52 virtually and also staff I don't know if
9:54 you've had any staff present to you
9:56 virtually but it is happening at some of
9:58 our other boards and commissions
10:00 um and then I added
10:01 um some language I noticed as I was
10:04 looking through the commission's rules I
10:06 was just kind of skimming it and we we
10:09 try and keep parity uh between our 13
10:11 board and commission's rules and I
10:14 noticed there was not a lot of language
10:16 around public comment and while all of
10:19 your meetings need to be open to the
10:21 public
10:23 um the the parameters under which people
10:25 provide public comment are up to you and
10:28 I would recommend adding some of this
10:30 language about what could be procedures
10:32 inappropriate so if someone is saying
10:35 um let's see the word the word in here
10:37 is pretty
10:38 um what page are you on oh I'm off sorry
10:41 I don't have your packet open I'm on
10:44 this Redline copy of the document okay
10:47 okay very good got it the last page so
10:52 actually the bottom of the second to
10:54 last so I added some language that's in
10:56 our other boarding commission rules that
10:58 just sort of say you know we'd like you
11:00 to state your name we'd like you to
11:01 limit your comments to five minutes but
11:03 the chair can adjust that time frame
11:05 we'd like you to give Monica if you come
11:08 with prepared comments it could be
11:09 helpful for her to have the written
11:11 comments
11:12 um and then we it talks a little bit
11:14 about the virtual attendance and then
11:16 lastly it has some parameters around you
11:19 know things that aren't allowed during
11:21 your public personal attacks I've seen
11:22 yeah exactly and that just gives the
11:25 chair some something to stand on if
11:27 there is someone that comes in is
11:29 disruptive you know you have this
11:30 published uh policy for your public
11:33 comment and it talks about what the
11:35 chair can do
11:37 um you know direct the person to their
11:38 seat and you have the staff and you
11:40 their microphone so this is sort of
11:42 separate from the virtual attendance
11:44 piece but it's something I'd recommend
11:45 adding or a version of this
11:49 uh so uh you've gotten the rundown of
11:54 this draft policy let me uh share with
11:56 you uh what some of the other boards and
11:58 commissions are are thinking about
12:00 related to this policy and my
12:02 expectation for tonight
12:04 I'd love to hear your input and um do
12:07 some tweaking if you have some tweaking
12:09 um to this policy and ask that you have
12:12 actually adopt these amendments to your
12:14 rules at your next meeting I'd like to
12:16 we want to have the language you know
12:18 um solidified so uh we can talk more
12:21 about it but that was my expectation for
12:23 uh tonight
12:25 uh so let me share some input we from
12:28 the other boards and commissions that
12:29 I've met with so far so two of the
12:31 boards um pretty much adopted the policy
12:34 as is
12:35 um that was our development commission
12:36 and our transportation Advisory Board
12:38 both groups um had a tendency and a real
12:42 um desire we were enjoying that
12:45 in-person element and I should I I
12:47 didn't talk about this earlier I should
12:49 mention one of the I talked a little bit
12:51 about that desire to have in-person
12:53 attendance for the Quorum and so if
12:55 there's we have a you know an internet
12:57 issue or computer issue your meeting can
13:00 proceed some other reasons why the mayor
13:03 was Advocate it continues to advocate
13:06 for that
13:07 um is there's just Synergy that comes
13:10 when you're in person and I think during
13:12 covid it was perceived that it was
13:14 difficult for some of the board and
13:16 commission members to just you know
13:18 connect with each other especially for
13:19 newer members and newer boards
13:21 um another reason why the mayor um has
13:24 has been an emphasis on that is just you
13:27 know one of the expectations of these
13:29 advisory boards is that they're a place
13:30 that the public can come and share their
13:32 input and so having people come into the
13:34 meeting room of course they can always
13:36 come virtually from the comfort of their
13:37 home but wanting to make sure that they
13:39 have some
13:40 people to connect with in the room so I
13:43 didn't share that earlier so those are
13:45 some of her
13:48 some of some of her rationale for that
13:50 interest not in person attendance and so
13:52 the first two words I mentioned really
13:54 that
13:56 that aligned with their feelings since
13:58 they adopted this policy almost as is
14:01 however I've since gone to the park
14:04 board environmental board and Equity
14:06 board and those three boards have really
14:09 um really liked the flexibility of the
14:12 virtual attendance and for for different
14:14 reasons so on the park boards one of our
14:16 larger boards so lots of board members
14:19 lots of newer board members and they are
14:20 really enjoying that flexibility you
14:23 know that some of them are parents are
14:25 dealing with commuting and have just
14:27 said that that's an element that they
14:29 want to retain and they feel that um
14:32 that it works well for their board so
14:35 um they haven't adopted a final version
14:36 but it will be modified from this
14:39 um the environmental board adopted the
14:41 policy last week and they um changed it
14:44 so they removed the requirement that a
14:47 certain number of board members be in
14:49 the room but instead said that all board
14:53 members would be expected to attend half
14:55 of the yearly meetings in person and
14:58 just and included some language really
15:00 emphasizing the in-person attendance but
15:03 took away the minimum number they also
15:05 took away sort of any kind of rap
15:08 for not attending so the wording
15:10 currently says if you're unable to
15:12 attend a person they wanted that removed
15:13 they wanted it to be flexible but they
15:16 want to encourage people to
15:18 come
15:18 um the equity board which I talked to a
15:20 few weeks ago really felt that to allow
15:22 for broad participation
15:25 um in recruiting members that they felt
15:27 it was important to have that virtual
15:29 attendance option for someone who might
15:31 have transportation issues a disability
15:33 be working multiple jobs just
15:36 um they felt that that is really
15:38 in-person attendance could be a barrier
15:40 and they want to remove barriers and
15:42 please if you have any other thoughts
15:44 but so they have not adopted a final
15:47 policy but we'll be making some changes
15:48 as well so
15:50 um that's what I have I welcome your
15:53 input
15:54 so I have a question you said one of the
15:58 other commissions they added language
16:01 that at least
16:02 they put in a number I'm I don't know 50
16:04 percent
16:05 you had to attend in person 50 of the
16:08 time but was there anything about just
16:10 attending meetings in general
16:12 I mean I think and most all of our
16:15 boards have an expectation that regular
16:17 members attend all meetings unless they
16:19 request an excused absence and actually
16:21 in most most of the boards have rules
16:23 actually in the ordinances that created
16:26 them saying if you miss three
16:28 consecutive meanings it could be caused
16:30 for removal so okay and one I'll just
16:33 share one thing that came up in the
16:35 conversation for the boards that want to
16:37 remove that minimum is you know thinking
16:39 about
16:40 um so is it are you okay if you're one
16:42 of two people you know in a meeting room
16:45 because if we if you take away that
16:46 minimum
16:48 um so their their compromise was you
16:51 know six roughly six meetings a year the
16:53 Commissioners will tend to be in the
16:55 room it could be that it's the same six
16:57 meetings I'm sure some of them will
16:59 attend all the meetings in person or
17:01 most you know it's just kind of what
17:03 dynamic you're looking for and think you
17:05 think works well for
17:07 um this commission and the work of your
17:09 commission
17:15 hey Brad
17:17 um when I first read this I thought my
17:19 first thought was that
17:22 kind of like the other uh committees is
17:24 that I'd like to see it opened up
17:28 um but being the fact that if you're
17:31 going to have a public coming in
17:34 you don't want an empty room when I'm
17:36 sitting in those chairs you know
17:39 but things are going more virtual so
17:43 this is going to be the only place where
17:44 there'd be an empty room and you're
17:45 looking at a screen
17:47 either so
17:49 yeah I I understand why the equity board
17:53 would want the flexibility
17:57 um I think
17:58 um you know that is moving towards being
18:02 able to pull more people in and
18:05 best thing that would go here too I
18:08 think for for the Human Service
18:11 Commission
18:12 so I'm I'm flexing back and forth right
18:17 there now he said that you mentioned uh
18:21 that we we were one of the only
18:22 commissions that went with the virtual
18:26 recently is that
18:28 um Ashley I may have misstated that if I
18:32 so we have 13 advisory boards currently
18:35 not all of the city
18:38 um committed to maintaining a like a
18:41 virtual component to about eight of them
18:43 three or nine because it takes a lot of
18:46 additional resources right
18:48 um so
18:50 Monica and I and I spent a lot of time
18:52 you know we spend a lot of time setting
18:54 up meetings in our virtual meeting
18:55 software we need specially equipped
18:57 rooms so a few of the boards that tend
19:00 to have less
19:01 um frequent public participation we've
19:04 we've just left as purely and they've
19:06 gone back to fully in person
19:09 um occasionally they're choosing to have
19:11 a hybrid meeting so that's what I meant
19:13 by that you are one of the eight or so
19:15 boards where the city felt it was
19:17 important that you have the continual
19:19 virtual option at least for the public
19:22 and then that's what you're discussing
19:24 is what that might look like for the
19:25 Commissioners so was The Advisory
19:27 board's choice to stay with the in
19:31 person
19:32 answer me
19:33 and not have the virtual element so of
19:36 the of the four or five that went where
19:40 the city said
19:41 um go ahead and just you know go back in
19:44 person I'll be honest most of them have
19:47 uh one of them is meeting tonight and
19:49 actually could not find a meeting room
19:51 that had this virtual we only have a few
19:53 meeting rooms with this technology so
19:55 um they're over at the community center
19:57 without a virtual element but we've been
19:59 trying to accommodate if they have a
20:01 higher profile meeting or have some
20:03 guested like to attend virtually we've
20:05 been accommodating that so they're kind
20:07 of a mix say
20:09 and we're still work and we're also
20:11 still figure you know to some extent
20:13 figuring this out
20:15 um those boards have not um
20:18 interestingly I haven't met with them to
20:20 discuss this yet I'm meeting with one of
20:22 one of them is our economic Vitality
20:24 commissioner I'm meeting with them next
20:25 month to talk about the policy and I'll
20:27 be really interested to hear what they
20:29 have to say because they have not had
20:31 the virtual option at every meeting like
20:33 you like your board has
20:36 so let me just I wanna for me I I've
20:40 really enjoy the flexibility for my
20:42 personal reasons but also thinking about
20:44 that flexibility I do recognize and I
20:48 see how the equity board will say let's
20:50 have it um have the flexibility here of
20:53 hybrid the hybrid system
20:56 um now I think we're gonna have to gauge
21:00 in terms of you know mostly this okay I
21:03 really recognize the human factors
21:05 coming together you know
21:08 um this certain element of us
21:09 interacting together however there's
21:12 also the other element of flexibility so
21:14 as many people as possible can
21:16 participate and not eliminating some of
21:18 the people who can say I really want to
21:20 be on the human condition but I can't
21:22 because of
21:23 XYZ personal reason or tonight
21:27 um if I if I I made an effort to come
21:30 here but I see how akola stayed home for
21:33 whatever reason for the reason I'm late
21:35 I'm sorry sorry so
21:38 so is like resources versus flexibility
21:43 um we have probably have to give
21:45 somewhere and it seems to me that many
21:48 of us who volunteer on this board come
21:51 with good faith in that we want to
21:54 invest we want that human connection
21:56 that's why we are doing this and uh just
21:59 by that it's like I think having a
22:01 flexible a hybrid situation uh
22:05 people who really still try to come in
22:07 person until they can't right so that's
22:10 those are the premises from which I'm
22:12 going we gain with that flexibility and
22:15 yes there are situations where okay if
22:18 only one or two people are in the room
22:20 you know
22:22 what happens but again it's all all
22:25 comes back to communication so if in
22:27 advance a week before we know that that
22:29 the uh this particular commission are we
22:33 all going to have one or two people and
22:35 they might not be okay then we have it
22:37 virtual and uh
22:40 knowing the Good Will of most of us
22:43 we're gonna just do those kind of things
22:46 when it's really needed and hopefully
22:48 we're gonna be together more than uh
22:51 more times and lesser time
22:53 you know
22:56 well I have a question oh no you go
22:59 ahead no you spoke first well I was just
23:01 gonna ask if just to start from the
23:04 Baseline would anybody
23:07 not be favorable to adapting the draft
23:11 as is
23:14 I mean does somebody feel strongly about
23:15 you know starting with the draft and
23:18 then making some amendments well rather
23:20 than getting to that why don't we have
23:21 everybody give their opinions first okay
23:23 because I have one okay but that's why I
23:26 was going to say you go Laurie Edwards
23:28 here yeah
23:29 um I
23:31 I do a lot of virtual stuff and uh in
23:34 fact
23:35 um have been doing a lot of virtual
23:37 stuff for a couple of years now and I
23:39 find that when I do that I have and
23:43 believe it or not I do other things
23:45 other than the Human Services Commission
23:49 I find that I can have a meeting from
23:51 four to six and then another meeting
23:54 from six till eight
23:56 um if I have to be someplace in person
23:59 that becomes real problematic
24:02 um and now the the flip side of that is
24:06 the the counter to that is in order for
24:09 me to participate I have to have a
24:11 computer I have to have the internet uh
24:14 and if I don't have those things then
24:16 that kind of precludes me being part of
24:19 the of the whole thing the other thing
24:21 is is I really get the idea I get the
24:23 the thing of being together in the same
24:27 room
24:30 and all the nuances that you get from
24:33 that
24:35 um however I can say that after two
24:38 years of being on the computer virtually
24:40 you know I get that now anyway I mean
24:43 I'm able to
24:45 zoom in on my Hollywood Squares screen
24:47 and and uh and and see people and know
24:52 that oh that's you know this is what
24:55 they're thinking or
24:57 so I like the flexibility I really do I
25:01 would like to be more virtual rather
25:04 than have to take the time to
25:06 drive down here drive home it just means
25:11 it's it's easier and more convenient to
25:13 be virtual
25:18 that one fish I when I read the your The
25:22 Proposal I thought it was very practical
25:25 I thought it made a lot of sense and I
25:27 appreciate having the flexibility but I
25:29 also appreciate having some parameters
25:31 around what virtual participation looks
25:33 like so having the chairperson present
25:35 here having a quorum present here I
25:38 think that's all very practical having
25:39 people that are participating virtually
25:42 having their screens on as much as
25:44 possible not that I ever would have
25:46 taken advantage of that to sweep the
25:47 kitchen with the screen off that was not
25:50 me but I I just thought I felt like
25:51 there was a lot of practical thoughtful
25:54 um parameters included in this I thought
25:58 it was great I appreciate having the
25:59 flexibility but I I'm I'm a fan of in
26:02 person and that's that's just me
26:05 oh Danny Brown here um
26:08 we also think about
26:10 new people coming in and age difference
26:14 in in their expectations right uh
26:18 virtual is nothing to
26:21 to the younger group right and if we
26:24 want that group to take over
26:27 this type of uh
26:29 agenda from the committee I think we
26:32 need to be open to the possibility that
26:36 they got their own world right and
26:39 that's part of the world is virtual and
26:42 if we fight that then we're not going to
26:44 get the participation from that group
26:53 um well
26:55 personally I think that it's nice to
26:58 have like flexibility because it's like
27:00 you said like implementation in like the
27:03 online world is like a must right now in
27:06 the younger generation Our Lives revolve
27:09 around our screens but um
27:13 I also think that it um
27:16 it's also important to have
27:19 um people in person again for that human
27:22 connection and also personally having
27:26 gone through school online I just feel
27:29 like it's better to have people and see
27:32 and do things in person and it's just
27:35 better and easier to get things done
27:38 this is very important
27:47 thank you too uh so the other aspect of
27:51 it when I was
27:53 reading it and hearing also is
27:56 a light that we have rules about virtual
28:00 um and I was thinking in terms of equity
28:04 the chair is obligated to be here in
28:06 person
28:07 how does it feel for that person are we
28:10 putting limitations on Who Wants to be
28:13 the chair that alone can drive someone
28:15 away say I don't want to be a chair they
28:17 want to do this
28:18 I'm just trying just to be fruitful here
28:25 yes considerations which if it's going
28:28 to be flexible do we have considerations
28:30 that is also flexible for that chair
28:32 that's great
28:36 but there is a provision if the chair
28:38 can't be
28:40 in person that the chair can designate
28:43 the the proxy the proxy yes right right
28:46 yeah can anyone explain to me why you
28:50 need to have people in person to have a
28:52 quorum
28:54 why is that necessary
28:57 well I think didn't you address that
28:59 when you said the that's that's the
29:01 eventual assuming that's making the
29:03 assumption that technology fails yes I
29:06 would say it's not it's not a
29:08 requirement I mean so this the
29:11 requirement is that there be a physical
29:13 meeting space uh for people to come and
29:16 listen to the meeting live so that does
29:19 mean that a staff person has to open the
29:22 door have the lights on have the
29:24 equipment working
29:26 you don't I mean from from what I
29:28 understand from talking to our attorneys
29:30 technically none of you need to need to
29:32 be are required to be in the room that's
29:34 why we're talking tonight
29:36 I think that the Quorum was a starting
29:39 point it's a it's a functional number
29:42 that we talk about and it's important to
29:44 the commission so it felt like a
29:46 starting point I do think if there are
29:48 technology issues it's just something to
29:50 be aware of that if people came down and
29:52 drove down to the meeting and there is
29:53 something prohibiting that a virtual
29:56 element that they the meeting can't
29:58 proceed
29:59 um how however I will um comment that
30:02 I've talked to some of the our staff
30:04 leads I was like Monica because we're
30:06 noticing that the public can comment
30:08 virtually I think my advice is that if
30:11 there's just some kind of outage or we
30:13 you know our equipment is not working if
30:15 if at all possible we would want to
30:17 reschedule the meeting we wouldn't want
30:19 to just plow ahead because we had four
30:21 people in the room so it's it's
30:23 something you can you know you should
30:25 talk about is whether you you want to
30:27 see that requirement and if you don't
30:30 then you can remove that and we can have
30:32 no requirement as to the number of
30:34 people in the room or we can have a
30:36 lesser requirement
30:38 um that's really up to you
30:41 so Commissioners disha was saying
30:43 basically you fulfilled the state
30:46 requirements
30:48 and I opened the meaning space and the
30:51 room we fulfill that requirement right
30:53 right so you have that wide range of
30:55 options options from that all the way to
30:57 requesting the Quorum in the room all
31:00 the way to that I really love to hear
31:03 your I love to hear your
31:06 so Facebook is many again uh
31:10 if there were people here and
31:14 we couldn't get out to the public we'd
31:16 have to reschedule anyway I would I
31:19 would recommend that I mean your meeting
31:21 can technically proceed but I would um
31:24 you could be opening up yourself for I
31:27 can't believe you moved ahead when I
31:29 wasn't able to participate right I mean
31:31 saying that it went out right now you
31:32 went through the public comment you have
31:34 a really light agenda four of you more
31:36 than four of you were in the room you
31:38 could wrap up your meeting but yeah I
31:40 think if it was at the top of the
31:41 meeting or it was you know you're making
31:43 your final recommendation on the uh the
31:45 grants you know and you have interested
31:48 people we would want to reschedule yeah
31:50 so it's I I talk about the that
31:53 requirement is that was something that
31:54 was in my mind when I wrote this but
31:57 it's not it's not a requirement by any
32:01 means and you could address that and
32:04 that's it I appreciate the fact that you
32:06 guys go through all this and give us a
32:08 starting point yeah okay absolutely you
32:11 know I like the grant said but you know
32:13 starting point then it would be in big
32:15 trouble so I really do appreciate that
32:17 and do it again
32:25 so ideally we should be able to vote and
32:29 adapt something next month yes and it'd
32:32 be nice if if I I have some Direction I
32:35 mean I've I've heard some input and I'm
32:38 happy to summarize that if that's
32:39 helpful but it would be it would be
32:42 great to so so far what I've heard is an
32:44 interest in more flexibility and a
32:46 majority of you definitely seem to
32:48 prefer not having a quorum like a
32:51 certain number of individuals required
32:54 and I'm also hearing uh the fact that
32:57 you there's some trust and you feel like
33:00 um you trust the Judgment of the
33:01 Commissioners to if they need to if they
33:03 if they need to attend virtually for
33:05 themselves they should be able to do
33:06 that we don't need to put parameters
33:08 around why or say that it's just um so
33:12 open that up a little bit so I've heard
33:13 those comments and that has seemed to
33:15 come from a majority I guess what would
33:17 be helpful is if there's any but I've
33:20 also heard that there's value in it
33:22 being in person that we can capture that
33:24 in the rules I guess I'm interested
33:25 would be interested if there's any
33:27 interest in putting any kind of
33:29 requirement other than just encouraging
33:32 [Music]
33:33 um in-person attendance
33:35 or or not and if you just want to have
33:38 it wide open and one more thing I'll add
33:40 you can amend these rules at any time I
33:42 think partly we're we're all trying to
33:44 figure this out
33:46 um so I expect I'm going around all the
33:48 boards for this first round
33:50 we can talk about this again you can
33:52 observe how it's going and right and
33:54 modify it in you know the next few
33:57 months even if you want to I do have one
33:59 more thing I can contribute
34:01 um Maury Edwards here again
34:03 um and that is that when you have a
34:06 hybrid model you've got some people in
34:08 person and some people are on the screen
34:11 you know it doesn't work as well
34:13 it's either if everybody's in person
34:16 it's better or if everybody's on Virtual
34:19 it's better but having the two of them
34:21 together just doesn't work as well if
34:23 somebody gets left out
34:26 it's hard it's and I think it is hard
34:29 for the harder for the chair and
34:31 speakers it's you know just making that
34:33 eye contact and feeling like you're
34:34 including everyone
34:36 um so I yes I agree but I also think you
34:40 know it's it's been occurring I'm not
34:42 sure if your commission meetings if
34:44 you've had anyone attend virtually yeah
34:46 yes most of our other commissions have
34:49 have to and you know it does or it does
34:52 work it's just it's a little
34:55 a little more complicated to to manage
34:59 and so yeah again Betty Brown here oh
35:05 again the whole concept of equity board
35:09 and human Commission
35:12 gives you that
35:14 just the names I'm gonna give you the
35:15 idea that you're talking about people
35:17 and what's best for for them and and
35:21 advancing in a direction that works for
35:25 for the people
35:27 and you know that's what it comes down
35:30 to is
35:31 it might feel inconvenient
35:34 to uh everybody to be here
35:37 and it might be a little inconvenient
35:39 for being on this on Virtual but
35:42 what's the best thing for to get that
35:46 information out to everybody and in this
35:48 world I'm afraid it's virtual
35:51 yeah
35:53 I need to see Monica sitting here by
35:55 herself
35:59 turning the lights off just let us know
36:04 but yeah I don't know I uh as far as
36:07 staff I'm not concerned about that I
36:08 think like he said and thank you so much
36:10 though for your concern it's also nice
36:12 and nice to appreciate all of you I
36:14 think like you said if we are thinking
36:16 about people what can provide us the
36:18 despite some inconveniences what can
36:20 provide the most flexibility to for
36:22 everyone right and that includes some
36:24 people who might not have a computer and
36:26 they might come here or that includes
36:28 some people who might have child care
36:30 issues or have other things and it's
36:32 very convenient to just hop on the
36:33 computer right
36:35 those are the questions that I love to
36:37 hear all of you including the chair
36:39 options and and the so so well said path
36:42 like is this gonna deter some people
36:44 from even as we are going to talk just
36:46 later in the meaning about
36:48 um onboarding new Commissioners
36:50 hopefully in a couple of months
36:52 um is is that gonna prevent anyone from
36:55 even applying if they see a very strict
36:57 requirement one way or the other right
37:00 not to mention even just being willing
37:05 serve as a chair if they know that they
37:07 have more stringent requirements right
37:09 so it's all about how can we make it
37:11 better for everyone in the community and
37:13 making it accessible for people
37:15 so I love all the questions
37:18 I really liked thank you for mentioning
37:20 the fact that this is dynamic and that
37:23 we can adopt something now see how it
37:26 goes and then maybe after a few months
37:28 say okay what do you guys think do you
37:31 think it's working for us and then you
37:33 know and then we can either stick with
37:34 it or modify it some more but I really
37:36 like that
37:37 because then maybe what we could because
37:39 otherwise you guys we could be sitting
37:42 here this entire 90-minute meeting and
37:45 talking about this
37:46 you know what I mean so um
37:50 so should we just
37:54 um okay so what was the last thing you
37:56 said you wanted to know oh if there
37:58 needed to be something more than just
37:59 encourage people to attend or maybe you
38:02 don't even I mean the feeling I got from
38:04 the equity board is they I think they
38:05 don't even necessarily want to say that
38:07 they really want
38:09 um they really want it wide open I think
38:11 the
38:13 um so they've been the board that's you
38:14 know really wanted the most flexibility
38:16 and uh and we can do some minor worth
38:20 smithing I think I do have good input I
38:22 think uh based on the input I've heard I
38:24 think aligning your roles to those of
38:27 the equity board is probably
38:29 um both seem to have similar
38:31 perspectives on it
38:33 um and I and didn't I hear correctly
38:36 then that
38:37 um somebody wouldn't have to call up and
38:41 tell Monica that they're not kind right
38:44 we would so we would take we would
38:48 change it from a sort of right now it
38:51 says you need permission to attend
38:53 virtually it would be changed to sort of
38:56 a notification okay and that's maybe
38:59 something we could consider removing
39:00 eventually
39:02 I you know and I don't I don't know if
39:05 you have thoughts on that and and that's
39:07 something I mean in terms of attendance
39:09 whether it's first impersonal virtual I
39:12 think that informally I always try to
39:14 check in with you all right and that we
39:16 have kind of like my my expectation and
39:18 trying to send you reminders and sending
39:21 you notes about that please let me know
39:22 if you're not participating it's more
39:24 for all of you because I'm trying to
39:26 make sure if we don't have a quorum then
39:28 we should try to cancel the meaning in
39:30 advance and I don't want to put any two
39:33 three of you in a position of coming all
39:35 the way here and then we don't have
39:36 enough money right right so for from for
39:38 that perspective I don't know if you
39:40 need something in the rules we can put
39:42 something but I don't even know if we
39:43 need something in the rules or just
39:45 let's check in to make sure that there's
39:47 a quorum or like let me know if you
39:50 think you're not gonna be able to make
39:51 it even if it's last minute because or
39:54 even something that says um you know
39:57 Pat Manny um plan to attend personally
40:00 right just on on the uh the group email
40:04 that you send out so that everyone knows
40:07 that okay they're gonna be there
40:09 you can make your choices whatever well
40:12 I we have the option just to take out
40:13 the quorum
40:14 yeah
40:16 I'm talking about for information's sake
40:19 because right right right right right no
40:22 I I agree information's sake right but
40:25 that way you know if there's if there's
40:28 uh public here that there's somebody
40:30 here or or not you know so yeah no I
40:34 agree yeah I think for information we
40:37 should have a feel yeah otherwise it's
40:40 just like really too loosey-goosey yeah
40:42 yeah as a reminder currently the and we
40:46 you haven't delved into this and you do
40:48 have other items on your agenda to get
40:50 to so I will I will plan it um
40:52 move on here but the the chair would be
40:55 required a person would be required to
40:57 be in person and I will say I actually
40:59 think it could be beneficial to have you
41:02 know it does put a burden on the chair
41:04 if they're here in person but having the
41:06 vice chair or another commissioner have
41:08 an opportunity to chair a meeting I
41:10 think is actually a really helpful thing
41:12 because it gets people a little more
41:13 comfortable with it so I see that less
41:15 as a
41:17 um a requirement that the actual chair
41:19 would need to be here physically every
41:20 time and they would probably enjoy being
41:23 able to let someone else manage that
41:25 part of the meeting
41:27 um and attend virtually but I think at a
41:30 minimum if that provision stays that
41:32 person will probably need to communicate
41:33 with Monica so she knows um and as far
41:36 as that other notification I know
41:38 sometimes it's helpful to sort of know
41:39 as you're trying to ascertain like who's
41:41 am I looking for the door to open or am
41:44 I staring at my screen right that can be
41:46 kind of helpful but I don't know how
41:48 critical right
41:50 yeah and a little consideration what
41:53 else is thinking for the number of times
41:56 so who keeps the count
41:58 yeah
41:59 I had that same time yeah I I yeah I
42:03 wouldn't want that
42:04 you're talking about the condition where
42:07 uh 50 of meetings yeah they have to okay
42:12 Maury was here in in March but he wasn't
42:15 here in April I don't want to have it or
42:17 yeah but he was here but he was virtual
42:18 but no that's yeah we weren't really
42:20 sure if he was here
42:23 thank you for that because
42:30 first grade attendance list
42:37 I think when I when I heard from you
42:39 Lori is that I mean because you don't
42:42 think things are as effective if it's
42:44 hybrid you would prefer if we just all
42:46 went back to Virtual right if we all met
42:48 first that's my preference yeah is there
42:50 anybody else
42:53 and I guess that's not even an option
42:54 because Monica has to be down here
42:56 opening the road and that's I mean that
42:59 could be an option if like I would still
43:01 be virtually if I'm alone here
43:06 oh and then we would we would say that
43:08 the board chair doesn't have to be here
43:12 yeah you can can we say that Monica
43:14 doesn't have to be here
43:17 somebody has to be careful to offer to
43:20 offer the in-person option
43:22 I think that would just be too weird
43:24 for for you to be here and then us
43:27 what what do you guys think
43:29 GrubHub
43:32 while she's sitting here and again I
43:35 really like the idea we can adopt
43:37 something try it and decide that in
43:40 three months we're gonna get back
43:42 together and evaluate yeah
43:44 yeah so are you going to put something
43:47 together and yes send it to us between
43:49 now and next meeting I I can't yes I can
43:52 certainly do that I need to prepare some
43:54 things for the
43:55 two other boards who kind of provide
43:58 their input and I need to get back to
44:00 them with their their next draft so yes
44:02 we can do that in advance of your next
44:04 I'll tell you a month goes by quickly
44:08 yeah so is there any way that
44:13 that you draft something that everyone
44:16 accepts
44:18 for interim so that instead of doing 13
44:22 different things that okay this is what
44:25 we have see if it works for you
44:27 well and then
44:29 go from there are you talking about the
44:32 other boards that right yeah and you
44:34 know initially I think I thought was
44:36 let's try and standardize this but I I
44:38 also think that you know these are
44:40 you're each autonomous groups and you
44:44 have different Dynamics and different
44:45 you know different people participating
44:47 in different some different values even
44:50 and I think it's really within each
44:52 group's purview it's something that
44:54 belongs in your rules and so
44:57 um each group has talked through this
44:58 and has come up with something they're
45:00 comfortable with or is close to that and
45:02 so it's okay it's okay that there's some
45:04 variation and the way you did that by
45:07 giving this it started yeah and then
45:09 everyone's good kind of falling within
45:11 this I am going to try I'm trying to
45:13 though to
45:15 um as much as possible standardized so I
45:18 think your rules in the equity boards
45:19 would be really similar based on the
45:21 input you've provided so there will be
45:23 some similarities and then we'll go
45:25 we'll go from there see see what happens
45:28 thank you so much for your input thank
45:31 you so much
45:38 are you related to the geyser that used
45:40 to be the coach up at uh skyline no okay
45:43 I'm not
45:46 happy to meet another Tuesday
45:52 [Music]
45:55 watch
46:03 [Laughter]
46:12 thank you
46:14 okay so Monica you're on next
46:16 it's hard to go after this conversation
46:20 thank you Trish
46:22 um and hello
46:25 um board members because we were talking
46:28 about the equity board Commissioners
46:31 um I wanted to spend a few minutes in
46:34 providing you a little bit of an update
46:36 on the
46:38 2021-2022 Human Services Grants as we
46:42 are closing uh that funding cycle and we
46:45 are working on
46:47 um developing contracts for the next
46:50 funding cycle typically we'd like to
46:52 provide a brief report at the end and to
46:56 give you some details you have in your
46:58 packet just a brief report on staff I
47:00 didn't put together another presentation
47:03 I thought that maybe we can talk a
47:05 little bit in person but I'm happy to
47:06 put the report up it's pretty brief and
47:09 uh basically one of the reasons why it's
47:11 pretty briefly said only about half of
47:13 the course we are able to go through so
47:16 I'm gonna give you a little bit of
47:18 information more and as as we are going
47:21 to go through the new contracts you're
47:23 going to know that that's how we set up
47:25 it's a similar pattern how we set up the
47:27 contracts for the new funding cycle but
47:30 um in 2021 2022 the the city supported
47:35 about 57 organizations not organizations
47:38 the programs
47:40 um and about half of those typically we
47:44 provide direct payments to and we
47:47 intensely
47:49 [Music]
47:52 conduct
47:53 [Music]
47:55 reports reviewings on the other half we
47:58 put into a pooled
48:00 um contract with the other cities on the
48:03 east side so we collaborate with the
48:06 cities of Bellevue Sammamish Kirkland
48:08 and Redmond and those organizations are
48:11 basically organizations that all of the
48:13 Cities fund for the same programs so
48:16 it's not it's a way to create some
48:18 efficiencies with those organizations
48:20 and so those programs enter into one
48:23 contract only and the City of Bellevue
48:26 manages that all of us are responsible
48:29 for reviewing reports and communicating
48:31 still with organizations but payment and
48:34 Contracting thing just goes through
48:35 those the reason why I want to tell you
48:37 a little bit more about this so you know
48:39 the difference is because I would love
48:41 to get your input on what's best moving
48:44 forward
48:45 for this year we do plan on having the
48:48 similar pattern and not changing
48:50 anything just because of timing and so
48:52 again some of the 42 programs that
48:55 you're from we are funding as a city and
48:57 you reviewed and made recommendations
49:00 for about half we are going to keep
49:02 in-house we are going to administer
49:05 in-house and then the other half again
49:07 it's going to go into that cold contract
49:09 I personally actually express some
49:12 concerns about this uh this option
49:15 um to my fellow colleagues on the other
49:17 cities
49:19 um in terms of equity I brought it up uh
49:22 and the reason is that I noticed that
49:25 it's I think it's a great option for
49:28 those organizations who are in the pool
49:29 contract because now I stop having five
49:32 different contracts with five different
49:34 cities they only have one but what I
49:36 noticed is that typically the large
49:38 organizations and those who had more
49:43 structures in place and more financial
49:45 resources or benefiting from the food
49:47 contracts whereas smaller organizations
49:50 that maybe you are more cultural based
49:53 or were funded only by one of the cities
49:55 did not have a couple of cities they did
49:58 not have the opportunity to be in the
49:59 pool contract so it creates a pros and
50:02 cons it's great as an idea but if it's
50:05 not made available to others it's just
50:07 perpetuates the inequities
50:10 um so from that perspective would love
50:13 to have a brief conversation with you
50:15 and actually that's also the reason why
50:16 just going back to the report for last
50:18 year we were not able to review that all
50:21 the reports because and again another
50:23 perhaps inequity the contracts that we
50:26 managed in order to meet our internal
50:28 Financial deadlines for closing the
50:30 books we required all the organizations
50:33 to submit the reports by the 5th of
50:36 January so they had to
50:38 um really to them right right after the
50:41 end of the year whereas all the pool
50:42 contracts they have by the 15th of each
50:45 month which was just
50:46 so they had extra time to review them
50:49 and so by the time we published the
50:50 agenda we didn't received yet all those
50:52 reports from everyone else so a long
50:54 story to tell you the organizations have
50:56 been doing a great job overall in uh um
50:59 always about 90 to 95 of the
51:02 organizations submit the reports on time
51:05 and they meet all the contractual
51:06 requirements as you see in the reports
51:08 about 93 of them from those that we are
51:11 able to review uh accomplished that so
51:15 um for those who were not able to meet
51:16 goals fully or not submit them on time
51:20 are really due to staff challenges that
51:23 they have
51:24 um or just having new staff not knowing
51:26 or just still covered related issues
51:29 that are still lingering but again we
51:31 did not notice any organization having
51:33 any ill intent or just you know any
51:36 fraud or abuse or anything of that of
51:38 public funds
51:40 so kind of like that's the beef overview
51:42 but I'm gonna stop now because I would
51:43 love to to get your points uh and and
51:46 thoughts on do you have ideas on kind of
51:48 like what would be best what not what
51:50 not would be best as as we are trying to
51:54 to be more Equitable in our funding
51:56 process and how we collaborate with
51:59 organizations I do have a question in
52:01 that discussion you had with the other
52:03 cities did anybody else feel the same
52:05 way you did uh absolutely I think they
52:07 they understood and they um they agreed
52:10 with my point and so I think a couple of
52:12 things that we brought on were what if
52:15 we move everyone to a food contract and
52:18 what that means in terms of resources in
52:21 terms of Staffing Resources and capacity
52:23 and Financial Resources So currently we
52:27 as the City of Issaquah we pay an
52:28 administrative fee to the city of
52:30 Bellevue for managing in addition to
52:32 paying the contracts
52:33 um and so the city of Bellevue has more
52:35 Staffing Resources so they have one
52:37 extra staff who just manages the pulled
52:39 contracts it does slow down the process
52:41 typically uh because for every uh pulled
52:45 Contracting the 20 some organizations we
52:47 also have extra meetings and we need to
52:49 collaborate with all the city staff to
52:51 make sure that everyone's on the same
52:53 page so it's a lot of that management
52:56 um so that was one idea was like okay
52:58 well if we move everyone to a pool
53:00 contracts but then that meant that each
53:02 of the cities had to contribute more
53:04 money and more staff and resources to do
53:06 that
53:07 um okay so then the other one was then
53:09 not to have put contracts at all but
53:12 then again so it's just it doesn't seem
53:13 like because I'm assuming this level
53:15 fish I'm assuming the whole reason you
53:18 have pool contracts is based on that's
53:21 based on the history of what you were
53:24 seeing and this was an attempt to make
53:26 it a more efficient process so it would
53:28 be it seems like it it seems like that
53:30 comes with a cost but it would you would
53:34 be reluctant it sounds like it would be
53:36 you'd be reluctant to give that up based
53:40 on how you got to where you are right
53:42 yes exactly and also to mention I think
53:45 when the pooled contract idea came about
53:48 and just to also make things more
53:50 efficient I think the staff at that time
53:53 and that was quite a few years ago
53:55 um created the pool contract also as a
53:57 way to make it easier for the staff who
53:59 are managing so organizations that
54:03 um already had the know-how and had the
54:05 resources and they knew that they would
54:07 be easy organizations to work with but
54:09 were pulling that contract without
54:11 knowing that unwillingly they were
54:14 creating inequities and then fairness
54:16 for that was cool because the people
54:18 that get lost in this are the so you say
54:21 you have a marginalized community and
54:23 you have a an organization or a program
54:25 that steps in to do something about it
54:27 but then they don't have the
54:29 infrastructure necessarily again yeah
54:33 and you used to be a department of one
54:36 exactly so that was also especially for
54:40 some smaller cities uh it was also an
54:43 age and now you're five but I realize
54:45 that some like the um Behavioral Health
54:47 would not necessarily be part of this
54:49 work right yeah yeah but yeah
54:59 so Define full contractors
55:03 okay so let's say
55:07 um we have a larger organization who
55:09 receives has multiple programs and
55:12 receives funding from the City of
55:14 Issaquah the city of Bellevue the city
55:16 of Sammamish Redmond and Kirkland right
55:19 and each of their commissions funded the
55:21 same programs
55:23 okay okay let's say a whole thing right
55:25 they have several programs and they all
55:27 receive funding from each of the Cities
55:29 so instead of us when we now because we
55:32 are now in the process of creating the
55:33 contracts for us to
55:36 um for them to start serving these
55:37 apartments and for us to pay them
55:39 instead of the City of Issaquah entering
55:42 into a contract with them and Sammamish
55:43 entering into a separate contract and
55:45 and Bellevue and Redmond they only get
55:48 into one contract that's going to be met
55:50 on behalf of all of these five cities
55:52 that's managed by one city which is
55:54 about you
55:56 um request is the funds from Issaquah to
56:00 go into that pool I guess so Issaquah
56:03 will pay in the city of Bellevue twice a
56:05 year a large amount of money that covers
56:07 the funding for all the people of
56:09 non-pool organization would probably be
56:11 something like uh it's called Community
56:12 Services maybe exactly yes it's about
56:15 Community Services who now receives
56:17 funding from uh Issaquah Sammamish and
56:20 Bellevue
56:22 um or Redmond and then now they need to
56:24 enter into three separate contracts yeah
56:26 so somebody has to figure out
56:28 percentage-wise
56:31 how much each city is playing and
56:34 getting
56:35 [Music]
56:36 so what how do you feel about it how do
56:39 you feel I'm talking about it because I
56:42 don't think that it's right uh so for
56:45 now I think we agreed to continue as it
56:47 is for this year but it doesn't feel
56:49 right right it just doesn't feel right a
56:52 little smaller or the smaller
56:53 organizations so the decision has been
56:55 made for at least 2023 to continue to
56:59 continue this way it's gonna be an
57:01 emphasis put on
57:03 trying to alleviate this problem that
57:06 you're seeing this sir
57:14 thing as is for 2023s just right now we
57:18 just don't have the time but
57:22 we are also we don't want to hurt in
57:24 this the other organizations that now if
57:26 we pull out then the organizations are
57:29 in the food contract yeah you know and
57:31 so the intent is not to create more
57:33 upset there but intense would be to
57:35 support everyone right so you would want
57:38 to give a a quite a bit notice right
57:41 before making a change yeah I think for
57:45 me the bottom line here is that the
57:47 people that are the marginalized
57:49 population that receives the services
57:50 that's really who we should keep in mind
57:53 rather than
57:55 um you know who who it is that's doing
57:57 it or
57:59 um you know the services is really the
58:01 most important thing so if if there's a
58:05 community that's not receiving Services
58:06 because of this whole thing then that
58:09 should that then we should do away with
58:11 the pool well it
58:17 but I also I I get your point but I also
58:21 see how it's it's complex because it's
58:25 yeah it's not one way or the other it's
58:28 not a binary right right right
58:31 um and there has to be a level of
58:33 accountability because if you you can't
58:37 just be I mean this is so Cavalry you
58:40 can't just be
58:41 throwing money out to organizations and
58:43 and good programs and not expecting them
58:46 to be able to report back and it's use
58:50 of public funds so we have
58:52 Mr Monica are you actually seeing uh
58:56 populations that aren't being served
58:58 because of this cooling thing we don't
59:01 see at this time and I don't think that
59:03 we noticed this long enough to have
59:04 enough information I think the case that
59:08 um I was thinking about making is if we
59:10 have a small organization uh Madeline
59:13 new
59:14 um mentioned east of hot Community
59:15 Services it's a small organization 100
59:17 by volunteers now pays to have
59:27 can can the fact that now they have
59:29 additional requirements can that put
59:31 more strain on them not being able to
59:34 serve the people who needs that um
59:38 a number of their volunteer hours to
59:42 fulfilling certain yeah are there more
59:45 requirements if you're pool than if
59:47 you're not pulled they are less
59:49 requirement if you are pulled there's
59:51 less requirements if you're pulled okay
59:52 they've made that part more efficient
59:54 yes because that's more efficient you'll
59:57 have one scope of work one got it yeah
1:00:00 one like for example even the city in
1:00:04 order to enter into a contract with the
1:00:05 City of Issaquah you need to provide a
1:00:08 business license for the City of
1:00:09 Issaquah uh you need to provide
1:00:12 insurance for the City of Issaquah and
1:00:13 for the other cities that you're
1:00:15 receiving funding for if you're in a
1:00:17 pulled contract you only need to provide
1:00:18 that to one city and that's the city to
1:00:20 contract with which is well right yeah I
1:00:25 have two questions right away that
1:00:27 brings up yeah inequities yes exactly
1:00:30 right thank you for explaining that yeah
1:00:35 I might have missed it so
1:00:38 at this point
1:00:39 how have we Revisited who gets in the
1:00:43 pool and who doesn't get in the pool
1:00:46 it was Revisited a few months ago to
1:00:49 include some culture-based organizations
1:00:53 um because of this concern because of
1:00:55 this concern yes I'm sorry so that was
1:00:57 just kind of like a first step we all
1:00:59 recognized that it's a very half quarter
1:01:01 step and more needs to be done
1:01:06 goodness yeah and so then we with that
1:01:09 because the city of Bellevue did not
1:01:11 have Staffing capacity to take on more
1:01:12 we took off the pool
1:01:15 pulled some other larger organizations
1:01:17 but again it's just it was just the
1:01:20 first step in making a little bit of a
1:01:23 switch Yeah and for the food
1:01:26 um the organization that received the
1:01:29 poor money how do they report let's say
1:01:32 I put my money in the bowl am I reported
1:01:34 only for my numbers of my citizen that
1:01:37 get help no thank you that's so the
1:01:39 reporting for everyone that is one thing
1:01:41 that's constant for food and unfold
1:01:43 contracts because the way
1:01:46 um they are required to submit the
1:01:48 reporting on one form in one report form
1:01:52 to all of the Cities at the same time
1:01:54 there's a line item for each of the
1:01:56 Cities so that is the same for pulled
1:01:58 and non-old okay that yeah it's the
1:02:01 Contracting the contract requirements
1:02:03 and the costs that come with Contracting
1:02:05 that is oh so it's more costly it's more
1:02:09 costly for the non-pooled yes okay so
1:02:11 yeah yes because they need to have even
1:02:14 just they need to provide insurance for
1:02:17 all the CDs yeah yeah
1:02:20 so it's almost like you need additional
1:02:24 Staffing to help support the non-pool
1:02:27 but additional Staffing would mean less
1:02:29 money to go to the programs yes
1:02:32 how could how could theoretically
1:02:35 everybody be pooled if let's say
1:02:37 Issaquah Community let's say Issaquah
1:02:39 Community Services is only getting
1:02:41 a grant from Issaquah so I had so in
1:02:44 that case you you don't right so pools
1:02:47 would mean only for those organizations
1:02:49 that receive funding from multiple
1:02:51 cities
1:02:52 right from one it would be the same
1:02:54 right so there's no way we could put
1:02:55 everybody in the pool
1:02:57 there's no I mean yes there's no way
1:03:00 um because there are still organizations
1:03:02 but there are not very many organic
1:03:05 organic funding just from one city so
1:03:07 why can't you use the same rules
1:03:11 for those who are not for like
1:03:15 if you if you're
1:03:17 have a license Issaquah you're good for
1:03:20 development why can't why because each
1:03:24 city has these Services
1:03:26 they're working with that City so the
1:03:29 fact that you know that they have an
1:03:32 Issaquah license right it should be good
1:03:35 enough it's like it's like yeah it's
1:03:39 like when nurses like
1:03:42 most nurses reciprocity yeah that
1:03:45 represent that's the word sorry I can't
1:03:47 say it but not every state participants
1:03:49 in that so nurses have a tremendous
1:03:51 amount of flexibility within this 34
1:03:54 state I'm making that number up but
1:03:56 within that 34 State group but if they
1:03:59 want to go to one of the other states
1:04:00 they have to pass the nursing board in
1:04:02 that yeah yeah but then that's your
1:04:04 point I mean that is something I could
1:04:06 bring back that's a great retail meeting
1:04:09 and see if there are any cities who
1:04:10 would be willing to have reciprocity in
1:04:12 terms of this yeah basically the city
1:04:14 governments have their pool that says
1:04:16 okay we're in this group so we will
1:04:18 accept from this this if you have a
1:04:21 business license in Issa Bob will accept
1:04:23 that in the city of Sammamish or red
1:04:25 lender well maybe yeah
1:04:29 either increasing the pool for everyone
1:04:31 or going away from having the pool all
1:04:34 together but there have been some
1:04:36 efficiencies
1:04:38 yeah so that's I think the idea would be
1:04:41 right to just open the pool
1:04:43 if any of the smaller organizations
1:04:46 complained that are not in the pool well
1:04:48 I'm not sure that many of them know
1:04:50 right
1:04:54 and say okay if there's responsibility
1:04:57 rules for different city for a specific
1:05:00 uh type of
1:05:03 organization someone can say this is
1:05:05 discriminatory or this is
1:05:08 Equity too because well I have my
1:05:10 business although I don't serve these
1:05:13 commissions why can't I just bring my
1:05:16 services to the different city unless
1:05:18 they decide to open it up and say
1:05:21 um this uh reciprocity is open to all
1:05:24 the businesses yeah and that becomes
1:05:27 complex because then the city becomes
1:05:29 cities with those lines because they
1:05:31 want to keep their money in their City
1:05:32 most of the time
1:05:34 so it's a good idea let's try but I'm
1:05:37 just saying someone can say hey well
1:05:39 it's a much bigger a much bigger
1:05:41 question yes I mean yeah I mean you're
1:05:43 talking about going upstairs to talk to
1:05:46 people yeah yeah and I think again each
1:05:49 City that have the rules in terms of how
1:05:51 you spend public funds right so yeah
1:05:55 it's complex I really appreciate it
1:05:57 we have to come to agreement to go into
1:05:59 the pool in the first place right so at
1:06:03 some point it was an agreement that
1:06:04 we're going to pull this so continue
1:06:07 working right but it's the organizations
1:06:10 that can't happen yeah that aren't there
1:06:13 that can't get into the pool because
1:06:15 they're not big enough and
1:06:19 I just feel like the person I feel like
1:06:21 it would be a shame if you you've tried
1:06:23 to create a more efficient model process
1:06:27 and and it's coming up right yeah yeah I
1:06:32 agree so hopefully Mr cost yes yeah yeah
1:06:37 actually how unusual a metaphor yeah
1:06:41 but see it goes It goes back to
1:06:43 identifying those things that you know
1:06:46 they were created with big hearts but
1:06:49 yeah right and knowingly they created
1:06:51 these inequities that doesn't feel right
1:06:54 to perpetuate them we need to find a way
1:06:59 making sure that we can work with the
1:07:02 other cities to like make an equal or
1:07:05 make sure that multiple cities have like
1:07:07 similar rules because that would reduce
1:07:10 the need for people to even go into the
1:07:12 pool because if they already have let's
1:07:15 say the insurance and business contract
1:07:17 in Issaquah if it's the same exact
1:07:20 requirements in Bellevue and Sammamish
1:07:23 then they wouldn't need to go to the
1:07:26 pool since they already have all the
1:07:27 resources from one they can just control
1:07:29 C control V on to the other one so it
1:07:32 reduced the need to even get into the
1:07:35 pool in the first place which would
1:07:37 probably increase efficiency for that
1:07:40 smaller businesses who feel that it's um
1:07:43 there's some inequity when they go into
1:07:46 the pool they might be able to if it's
1:07:48 same it's the same rules just get this
1:07:52 basically the set one contract with one
1:07:55 and then like I said just Ctrl C control
1:07:57 V it with the others since it's the same
1:08:00 requirements rules and regulations
1:08:04 [Laughter]
1:08:16 thank you
1:08:18 okay Commissioners oh go ahead well I'm
1:08:21 just gonna say getting a city to say
1:08:24 okay you don't need to have a business
1:08:26 license with us if you have a business
1:08:27 license with Issaquah all you know
1:08:29 that's that's like a huge deal it is
1:08:32 that's a huge deal I mean that has to go
1:08:34 before City councils and all sorts of
1:08:36 things that's not an easy thing
1:08:39 pardon they're doing it with the pool
1:08:43 for certain size organizations yes
1:08:47 yes so you know you come back from well
1:08:50 you're you're you're actually the
1:08:53 organizations that can afford it are the
1:08:55 ones that you're not charging but the
1:08:57 smaller ones are the ones so yeah yeah
1:09:00 and the way it works with the pool
1:09:06 the Bellevue it's there's yeah right so
1:09:09 the only city that we have but you're
1:09:10 right we don't we fund the organizations
1:09:13 that are in the pool contract but we
1:09:15 don't have a direct contract with them
1:09:17 so then we can't ask for the business
1:09:18 license for that right but but you're
1:09:21 right you're absolutely right
1:09:24 um it's it's it's more complicated so
1:09:27 thank you though for for
1:09:30 um brainstorming with me and please
1:09:32 continue to think if you have other
1:09:33 ideas I think for now I would like to
1:09:36 work with with my colleagues um in the
1:09:38 region to try to see if we can expand
1:09:40 the pool that seems to be the most
1:09:43 reasonable
1:09:45 um to expand it to other organizations
1:09:47 but if you have other thoughts and
1:09:49 suggestions and ideas
1:09:51 what would be the reason why an
1:09:53 organization for instance will say I
1:09:54 don't want to get in the pool
1:09:57 um good point we actually I was thinking
1:09:59 about this too
1:10:01 um having a closer relationship with the
1:10:05 so those that are in a pulled contract
1:10:07 they don't have as close relationship
1:10:09 with with all of the Cities right so it
1:10:12 goes back to relationships so that is
1:10:13 one reason for why people might not want
1:10:16 the pool
1:10:18 but if they only have one city it goes
1:10:20 directly to Issaquah anyway right it
1:10:23 does so they do service a car residents
1:10:24 and we do need to
1:10:26 um review the reports and if they're
1:10:29 concerns we need to contact them but
1:10:31 there's not as much direct communication
1:10:33 as it is with the other organizations
1:10:36 that we directly contract with or
1:10:39 sometimes we get on the phone hey how do
1:10:41 you want this like it's a
1:10:42 dessert it's a perfect example harmonic
1:10:44 I'm working on this we want to change
1:10:46 our forms how do we track this there's a
1:10:48 collaborative we work together whereas
1:10:51 with the post contracts it's like okay
1:10:53 yes we approve the money or no we don't
1:10:55 approve because we need to wait on this
1:10:58 so it's a different type of relationship
1:11:02 great question Pat
1:11:07 thank you for the great great
1:11:09 conversation
1:11:13 what's that did we help did it help well
1:11:16 I think yeah I think it was helpful to
1:11:18 secure and even so some things that I
1:11:20 didn't think about that you brought up
1:11:22 and then just trying to see where to
1:11:25 tackle do we tackle with finance and
1:11:28 Contracting like procurement that each
1:11:30 of our individual cities is to see if
1:11:32 there's something that we can do there
1:11:34 see if we can expand the pool contract
1:11:37 and full contracts and see what can we
1:11:40 do in terms of Staffing and resources
1:11:42 for that the other stuff is another
1:11:44 option do we want to try to increase
1:11:48 amount of founding funding for
1:11:50 organizations who are not in the pool to
1:11:55 extra costs yeah
1:11:59 also provide more overhead yeah
1:12:03 exactly
1:12:04 also about mini pools I mean if there's
1:12:07 10 organizations like that that just
1:12:11 work with Issaquah in Bellevue right
1:12:13 exactly a secondary pool
1:12:16 I so appreciate you recognizing that and
1:12:19 bringing it up I think it's just it's a
1:12:23 Hazard of the industry right yeah so yes
1:12:27 no thank you but I think yeah I
1:12:29 appreciate it and actually now I'm gonna
1:12:31 segue into the next agenda item if I may
1:12:33 have more bed because as we talk about
1:12:35 the work plan item for 2023 as a small
1:12:38 refresher we well one of the
1:12:41 conversations that we had at our last
1:12:42 meeting in October was uh to to tell you
1:12:46 that typically during the off years this
1:12:49 is the of what we call off years because
1:12:51 you don't you don't repeat Brands uh we
1:12:53 encourage you to go and reach out to
1:12:55 organizations not reach out but go and
1:12:57 visit organizations we would reach out
1:12:59 on your behalf but go and visit
1:13:01 organizations and actually if you do
1:13:03 decide to move forward with visiting
1:13:06 some organizations this could be a
1:13:08 question for you to entertain with them
1:13:10 with pooled or non-pooled and perhaps
1:13:13 you can visit a few that are called a
1:13:15 few that are not pulled learning from
1:13:18 um and then with that though the one
1:13:20 question that I was going to bring back
1:13:22 to you so in October we were talking
1:13:25 about again the the benefit the pros and
1:13:28 cons about visiting organizations or
1:13:30 inviting organizations to come to your
1:13:33 meetings and also we talked about
1:13:35 another Equity
1:13:37 um or inclusion aspect of if you don't
1:13:41 visit all the organizations are you
1:13:43 going to be biased at the next funding
1:13:44 cycle now because you know of your
1:13:46 organizations so
1:13:49 um what we were suggesting
1:13:51 um or a staff we were suggesting at that
1:13:55 time is that perhaps you can
1:13:57 decide to visit all the organizations in
1:14:00 one category right or as I was thinking
1:14:04 a little bit more about this I had two
1:14:05 options in mind you can decide to visit
1:14:09 all the organizations and there are not
1:14:11 too many of them that are completely new
1:14:14 to receiving funding from the city this
1:14:16 funding cycle so they're new or because
1:14:20 culture-based organizations and uh uh
1:14:23 focus on inclusion and Equity was a big
1:14:25 aspect for us you can also decide to
1:14:27 visit those organizations for a more
1:14:30 cultural based and historically might be
1:14:33 smaller and then again just just get
1:14:36 them some feel for from them in terms of
1:14:38 what's working what's not working what's
1:14:40 difficult in terms of funding
1:14:43 um including pulder and Uncle
1:14:45 so that's another item I wanted to bring
1:14:48 up for discussion for you tonight
1:14:51 okay I can't remember when we talked in
1:14:53 October I I kind of thought that I'm
1:14:56 going back to the first question which
1:14:58 was do we want them to come here or do
1:15:00 we want to go visit and I thought we had
1:15:02 come to the conclusion we would want to
1:15:04 go visit in that movie so that was my
1:15:06 understanding yes yeah and do these
1:15:09 visits happen during the day or just it
1:15:11 just typically during the day now in my
1:15:14 conversation with some of the
1:15:15 organizations
1:15:17 they shared that sometimes they have
1:15:19 events and they would love to invite you
1:15:22 to some events this way it feels more
1:15:24 collaborative and they don't feel like
1:15:26 they need to prepare us for an audit so
1:15:29 it doesn't feel so intrusive so we have
1:15:31 those options and so I put some you know
1:15:34 there are some organizations that they
1:15:35 want to just invite you to some this way
1:15:37 you get to see them in action and see
1:15:39 what they're doing so these visits then
1:15:41 aren't just brought to they're something
1:15:43 you set up ahead of time yes we schedule
1:15:45 based on so typically yeah I am you know
1:15:50 [Laughter]
1:15:58 so typically we would start with this is
1:16:01 the list depending on what you choose
1:16:02 this is the list of organizations that
1:16:04 you're gonna visit depending on what you
1:16:06 choose and then we create a sign up
1:16:09 sheet and and send it out to you and say
1:16:12 hey I'm interested in visiting this
1:16:13 organization or am I interested in
1:16:16 visiting this organization and based on
1:16:18 that then we would reach out to them get
1:16:20 some times and days that work for them
1:16:23 get you know availability from you and
1:16:25 do the match and then typically we we
1:16:28 say that it's easier to go in pairs of
1:16:30 at least two uh we ask enough to as you
1:16:34 know do a formal Quorum
1:16:37 so you can do two things
1:16:40 [Laughter]
1:16:49 there you go you can of course go by
1:16:53 yourself as well but I think it's
1:16:55 usually easier to just go to yeah yeah
1:16:57 and and you come back and at the next
1:16:59 meeting of the next Commission meeting
1:17:01 after your visit you come and share with
1:17:03 with the Commissioners
1:17:06 no that's it I like the idea of them
1:17:09 having something already going on you
1:17:12 know rather than just go and say you
1:17:15 know what's happening so it has to
1:17:17 actually take you through a tour rather
1:17:18 than you can participate or watch so
1:17:22 what do we need to do to set that up
1:17:25 uh so I think first thing is to decide
1:17:27 what organizations or what group of
1:17:30 organizations you would like to visit
1:17:32 would you like to visit just the new
1:17:34 organizations would you like to visit
1:17:36 the cultural based organizations or
1:17:38 something totally different maybe you
1:17:39 want to visit all the behavioral health
1:17:42 organizations
1:17:42 but we had our three different groups so
1:17:46 we looked at like
1:17:48 like one group would visit the
1:17:50 home and went through the financial I
1:17:54 don't know I can remember that the other
1:17:56 group was yeah so you had the homeless
1:17:58 Services you had the behavioral health
1:18:01 um uh and the physical health services
1:18:03 you had a cultural based organizations
1:18:05 and then you had other Community
1:18:07 Resources
1:18:10 um so I I wouldn't recommend because
1:18:11 that's all of them that's 42 of vanilla
1:18:13 programs that would be difficult I would
1:18:15 recommend choosing one so either you can
1:18:18 choose let's say our recommendations it
1:18:20 was either culture-based organizations
1:18:22 or if you want to just get across all of
1:18:25 them a little bit choose all the ones
1:18:27 that perhaps we funded for the first
1:18:29 time but what about have a mix of okay
1:18:32 maybe the cultural base and depending on
1:18:36 how many it turns out to be in the
1:18:37 cultural base and the new ones in other
1:18:39 categories yes I like I like say that
1:18:43 again it's a great idea so we chose a
1:18:45 cultural based organizations how many
1:18:47 whatever it is and the new ones only in
1:18:50 the other categories
1:18:53 and then next year we rotate
1:18:56 that's certainly enough
1:18:59 I'm sure you look at one mainly and you
1:19:01 make sure that everyone else is
1:19:04 well-rounded yeah and the new and the
1:19:07 new organizations know hey we're here
1:19:15 so and also you build relationships
1:19:18 I felt like there's a real opportunity
1:19:21 there yeah that's great well we're
1:19:24 talking about more time commission wise
1:19:26 as Commissioners too so
1:19:30 um it depends on how many volunteered
1:19:34 to do that then we're looking at uh
1:19:37 Monica we funded 42 programs right how
1:19:39 many organizations
1:19:41 uh I believe that is 30 some I'm sorry
1:19:45 no 30 30 some 30 something how many
1:19:48 nodes
1:19:50 um it's less than ten okay okay
1:19:54 so all together you have about 15 I
1:19:58 would say that's probably that's pretty
1:20:00 good numbers yes even less
1:20:03 I apologize I wanted to look at that
1:20:05 before the meeting and I didn't have a
1:20:06 chance the interesting uh
1:20:08 scheduled calendar put together when you
1:20:11 put all that in the one what if you were
1:20:14 just to send out a list to all the
1:20:16 Commissioners and have them
1:20:18 or is this too random just check
1:20:21 you know first of all how many would you
1:20:23 recommend we visit in a year
1:20:27 so definitely I think probably about 15
1:20:29 it's a Max I I like to keep it on each
1:20:32 person no not each person each each
1:20:34 person probably total each person
1:20:37 probably not more than two three it's
1:20:39 reasonable for even not to visit more
1:20:41 than two three organization okay so what
1:20:42 if you were just to send out a a chart
1:20:44 and say you know which ones do you
1:20:47 really want to visit
1:20:48 yeah so oh oh would you like me to sign
1:20:51 I can definitely send you all of the
1:20:52 organizations but I was going to take
1:20:54 how that can take out just the cultural
1:20:56 based and new ones and send you this
1:20:57 with that yeah and then I can of course
1:21:00 thank you also send you the list and
1:21:02 it's public we should have it by now on
1:21:03 the website too with all the
1:21:04 organizations that we found in case you
1:21:06 want to visit someone else yeah yeah
1:21:08 yeah okay so that that's the follow-up
1:21:10 of absolutely would be to send you the
1:21:13 list of the organizations and then
1:21:17 um you can start signing up and say okay
1:21:19 Commissioners please put your name next
1:21:21 to the one that you'd like but you're
1:21:23 thinking of just sending us the new ones
1:21:26 and the cultural based ones okay yeah
1:21:28 in addition to I can send you of course
1:21:30 like all of the organizations you have
1:21:32 that that's public information anyway
1:21:34 right so is there any way you can put
1:21:37 the set the program up so that when
1:21:40 um Tris checks one that it's not
1:21:42 available for others to check I can put
1:21:45 it on SharePoint so then you all see
1:21:47 everybody it's being checked by two
1:21:50 people yeah
1:21:56 that sounds great good starting point
1:22:02 great conversation thank you for the
1:22:04 feedback so that was my main update
1:22:06 about the work plan items did you have
1:22:08 the the draft work plan
1:22:11 um in in your agenda packet the other
1:22:13 quick question that I have for you
1:22:15 hopefully it's not going to be or
1:22:19 up too long of a conversation
1:22:21 um about a work plan item I'm trying to
1:22:24 plan for a joint meeting with the equity
1:22:26 board and I was hoping that we can do it
1:22:29 in February but the equity board is
1:22:32 getting pulled into two meetings in
1:22:34 February so they already have two
1:22:35 meetings in February I might postpone it
1:22:38 to either the equity board meetings in
1:22:40 March and invite you to their meeting or
1:22:43 invite them to your meeting in March so
1:22:46 our meeting in March is the 15th when is
1:22:49 theirs they they always meet on the
1:22:51 first Wednesday of the of the month
1:22:53 that'll be March 1st yes so I think my
1:22:57 question is do you have a preference do
1:22:59 you have an interest first of all I
1:23:01 think you would have an interest in a
1:23:03 joint meeting right yes very much so
1:23:06 yeah the equity board expressed interest
1:23:08 in all things Human Services I know that
1:23:11 we are due for a human services
1:23:12 strategic Plan update so we thought we
1:23:14 can just do a plastically board had a
1:23:16 visit from the Issaquah school district
1:23:18 and the Issa School District proposed
1:23:20 some collaboration items and all of them
1:23:23 were human services related so then I
1:23:25 said you know there are some great
1:23:27 connections so their meeting is on the
1:23:29 15th of March
1:23:37 their meetings it's at 6
1:23:40 same room though I'm out of town March
1:23:42 1st so I have to I won't weigh in on the
1:23:45 whole conversation ours are always on
1:23:47 the 15th yeah on the third month
1:23:50 February 3rd Wednesday of February it's
1:23:53 been almost a year I'll get it done yet
1:23:56 it's still February 15th February 15 on
1:23:59 March 15 there because the days stay the
1:24:01 same yeah is it because of 28 I think
1:24:03 it's because of the 28 days in February
1:24:05 right yeah so you're just trying to
1:24:06 determine availability just just yeah a
1:24:10 little better you won't be here on the
1:24:12 15th of February
1:24:17 I'm on the plane
1:24:19 okay so I can gauge stuff we can always
1:24:22 go to a third option and choosing
1:24:24 something in the middle maybe you know
1:24:25 another day in um in March the problem
1:24:28 is that we are going to end up with the
1:24:29 room problem but we'll yeah any others
1:24:33 many Trish that's them good both those
1:24:36 days you can I think
1:24:42 I have no idea
1:24:44 I think there's March February 15 is the
1:24:48 problem
1:24:49 yeah I've got something going on in
1:24:52 March but I don't know dates yet
1:25:12 yes I'm sorry yeah I'm going to be out
1:25:15 of town March 1st to the 15th oh yeah
1:25:19 I might be back in time I don't have my
1:25:22 itinerary in front of me but I might be
1:25:23 back in time for our commission meeting
1:25:25 on the 15th I just that I don't have in
1:25:28 front of me okay so they'll have March
1:25:31 15th seems more reasonable it sounds
1:25:32 like okay okay we'll keep that as an
1:25:35 option March 15th and I'll follow up so
1:25:38 with other emails okay thank you so much
1:25:41 I know we are running a little bit
1:25:42 behind Trish so and that concludes okay
1:25:44 okay so we're gonna move on and I'm
1:25:47 gonna give my first chair report that
1:25:49 I've ever given and then you get to give
1:25:51 a report as well yes yeah okay so um
1:25:56 are you guys familiar with the voice
1:25:58 Mentor program in the school district
1:26:01 I have a voice Mentor yes I am familiar
1:26:04 okay I'm okay all right as well and yeah
1:26:06 and you probably saw the announcements
1:26:08 that went out
1:26:09 um they are the voice well first of all
1:26:12 I should explain for those people that
1:26:13 are familiar with it it started with the
1:26:15 school's foundation and then I don't
1:26:18 know how many years I don't know 20
1:26:20 years ago how long ago I don't know how
1:26:23 long it's been started a long time ago
1:26:24 it was it's called schools commission
1:26:25 yeah it started with us uh foundations
1:26:27 yeah yeah and then the school district
1:26:30 thought it was so valuable that they
1:26:31 just brought it into the school district
1:26:33 program announced run by the school
1:26:35 district and it's basically where they
1:26:39 match a Community member up with a
1:26:41 student that they feel needs another
1:26:45 adult presence in their life for
1:26:47 whatever reason and man when you can
1:26:50 chime in and say anything you want no
1:26:51 you're doing great and um it does it's
1:26:54 not a tutor it's not a tutor it can be
1:26:57 if you get together with the student and
1:27:00 the student really wants you to help
1:27:01 them with a subject or something I'm on
1:27:04 my second year as a mentor and
1:27:07 um last year we never pulled out a book
1:27:10 this all the the student just wanted to
1:27:12 talk talk talk talk which was great and
1:27:15 then this year
1:27:16 um I have actually I have a um
1:27:19 a Colombian middle school boy he and his
1:27:23 mom across the Rio Grande I assume
1:27:25 they're here illegally and
1:27:28 um we're having a great time he's
1:27:30 teaching me Spanish I'm teaching him
1:27:31 English
1:27:33 um and uh so you know it just you just
1:27:36 it's just to have another adult presence
1:27:38 and the school counselors kind of get a
1:27:42 sense of who can benefit and they will
1:27:44 make recommendations to I guess the
1:27:46 parents
1:27:47 somehow the school counselors kind of
1:27:50 decide you know I think the student can
1:27:52 use another adult in their life and and
1:27:55 then they must reach out to the family
1:27:56 or something I don't know how involved I
1:27:58 mean the family must sign off on it
1:28:00 right at some point but uh I don't know
1:28:04 if they have I don't know about that
1:28:05 yeah but anyways not it's not like us
1:28:08 the students in the school district just
1:28:10 walk up and say I want to be a voice
1:28:13 mentee they don't do it doesn't happen
1:28:16 that you don't self-select I think a
1:28:18 counselor gets involved but so and you
1:28:21 would have gotten this email too we just
1:28:23 we just got an email
1:28:25 they are in dire need of mentors
1:28:30 particularly men and particularly men of
1:28:33 color
1:28:36 okay and I think I I'm just assuming it
1:28:41 might have to do with a lot you guys all
1:28:43 know that the demographics are changing
1:28:45 and you know that and I had not heard
1:28:48 this term until about a year ago
1:28:50 the population of students in the school
1:28:52 the minority is now the majority yes so
1:28:57 it's minority majority and you can
1:29:00 probably speak to this as well too but
1:29:04 and it's wonderful I mean it's becoming
1:29:06 when I was talking to this one counselor
1:29:08 he said the school district really isn't
1:29:10 prepared because there is so I mean
1:29:12 we've got ukrainians here we've got um
1:29:16 tons of Spanish-speaking people
1:29:18 um and the school district really isn't
1:29:20 prepared to I mean they are trying to
1:29:23 figure out how they need to change to be
1:29:26 able to help all students all students
1:29:31 so you know one of the things they're
1:29:33 doing is they're putting out a big plea
1:29:34 for um I think everybody in this room
1:29:38 would be a great I think you have to be
1:29:40 um over 18. I think everybody here would
1:29:42 be a great mentor and they're
1:29:44 particularly looking to check my idea
1:29:46 they're particularly looking for men and
1:29:49 they're particularly looking for men of
1:29:50 color Manny I think you'd be great it's
1:29:53 a shame that Maddie doesn't already have
1:29:54 you know enough going on in his life we
1:29:57 just have to get him out of his garage
1:29:59 where he's making up making all those
1:30:02 beautiful pieces of woodwork
1:30:04 um so I'm gonna have
1:30:06 um because I know I'm not supposed to
1:30:08 email anybody or you know we're supposed
1:30:10 to have everything go through Monica I'm
1:30:11 going to send her something to send out
1:30:12 to everybody if you want to learn more
1:30:14 about the program
1:30:16 so and who who runs this there's two um
1:30:21 districts and Tina so it's a because
1:30:24 it's a school district program now yeah
1:30:26 so the email is actually voice
1:30:29 issaquah.webnet.edu yeah and the
1:30:32 commitment is
1:30:33 um I meet with the student and you know
1:30:35 you can talk about I mean it with one
1:30:37 student there's some mentors that have
1:30:39 six students I meet with one student
1:30:41 um for 45 minutes one period a week
1:30:45 so I mean it's not a huge commitment
1:30:47 and everything has to be done at school
1:30:50 the boundaries are very very clear and
1:30:53 you're not supposed to you know exchange
1:30:55 cell numbers or anything like that
1:31:01 the Human Services Commission funded the
1:31:04 program as a Steve funding it was part
1:31:07 of the non-profit when it was part of
1:31:09 the Issaquah schools Foundation
1:31:12 it started building up it got
1:31:14 transferred back to the city to them the
1:31:18 school district yeah
1:31:23 I mean it started with the foundation
1:31:25 yes it started with the foundation and
1:31:27 it got transferred to the school yeah
1:31:28 yeah no I'm sorry you got transferred to
1:31:31 us because this was such a valuable
1:31:33 program and
1:31:35 um yeah so my kids are the help well now
1:31:38 I don't know yeah I don't I I went to
1:31:41 the breakfast thing a while back I
1:31:42 couldn't tell you the exact numbers
1:31:43 they're having a real they have way more
1:31:46 students that have been identified for
1:31:48 support and they can provide one-on-one
1:31:51 mentors to work for yeah
1:31:54 um I've had I only have one student I've
1:31:56 had her since grade three she's a
1:31:58 sophomore now she has exceptional grades
1:32:01 take full credit
1:32:04 um but I I I have to say it's one of
1:32:07 those for me it's been one of those
1:32:08 things where I certainly get more out of
1:32:10 it yeah
1:32:11 I love it and most of the mentors will
1:32:14 say that yes and it's just yeah another
1:32:17 adult present that's all it is yeah I
1:32:19 think the biggest the hardest thing
1:32:21 about it in terms of getting more people
1:32:23 to do it is it it's all on the school
1:32:26 schedule so it's not like oh my evenings
1:32:29 are pretty free I can meet with someone
1:32:30 at you know after dinner it is it is
1:32:33 Monday through Friday and it is finding
1:32:35 the time during the day that works their
1:32:38 schedule so that's the to me that's been
1:32:40 the biggest challenge
1:32:42 yeah oh yeah you got a conference room I
1:32:45 get the conference room I have I have it
1:32:48 scheduled for the rest of the year and I
1:32:50 meet the student at 9 45 every Tuesday
1:32:55 and Manny this is back in 2017 when this
1:32:59 was still a city project and this was
1:33:01 again this was seed funding so they were
1:33:03 starting but they they served 31 youth
1:33:06 in that year and it's it's hundreds now
1:33:08 yeah I'm sorry and you know what when
1:33:11 you get the email from Monica there will
1:33:13 be links and you can go out and look
1:33:14 into it yeah
1:33:18 yeah I was good okay so I'm done with
1:33:22 that and now you're on Preston Okay so
1:33:27 there's a lot of different
1:33:30 um there's a lot of different events
1:33:31 we're starting here at um at yeah but
1:33:35 but so I'm gonna tell you just a little
1:33:37 bit about all of them because there's
1:33:39 like a lot so our biggest one is our
1:33:44 state of mind conference so this will be
1:33:46 on March 18th that either one from one
1:33:49 to four or two to four and this will be
1:33:52 either at the community center or
1:33:54 gibsonette which is just like
1:33:56 12 steps down and um basically this is
1:34:01 um we're all going we're all inviting
1:34:04 speakers from around the community and
1:34:07 they're going to speak about mental
1:34:08 health so these can this is going to
1:34:10 include some of our topics that are
1:34:12 Stress Management mood substance abuse
1:34:15 suicide awareness and identity sexuality
1:34:18 so basically it's just like an awareness
1:34:21 raising event where people can learn
1:34:23 about like how learn more awareness
1:34:27 about the mental health and also learn
1:34:29 about like resources they can access if
1:34:31 they are experiencing a mental illness
1:34:34 so yeah that's one of our biggest events
1:34:37 and personally one of my favorites
1:34:39 and um the next event is our
1:34:42 environmental conference which will be
1:34:44 on the 25th
1:34:46 um this is um like state of mind but
1:34:49 it's more it hasn't ended but it's about
1:34:51 the environment so it'll include topics
1:34:54 like agriculture deforestation
1:34:56 electricity and heat and overfishing and
1:35:00 there'll be a call of action where
1:35:02 people can learn about how they can help
1:35:04 and how they can make a difference is
1:35:07 that March 25th
1:35:10 um yes March 25th it's also one to four
1:35:21 our mental conference will be held
1:35:23 online and
1:35:25 another March one we have a um tree
1:35:29 planning however this is very like early
1:35:32 but we're partnering with um a
1:35:35 organization called Mountain to sound
1:35:37 Greenways and they help do
1:35:40 um tree planting events and
1:35:42 environmental events so we're hoping
1:35:45 that we can make that a public event so
1:35:48 people can come down and help plant some
1:35:51 trees
1:35:52 and and what day is it
1:35:55 um it's not planned yeah okay mid mid
1:35:58 late March maybe early April
1:36:01 and then nearest one is on February 2nd
1:36:05 is our Civic engagement meeting and this
1:36:08 is a conference for students
1:36:10 specifically and they get to meet the
1:36:12 mayor and other politicians and they can
1:36:15 learn about how to make an impact on
1:36:16 their Community I heard there might be
1:36:19 an um uh activity where they can create
1:36:22 like a politicial campaign to get people
1:36:25 to vote for them
1:36:28 so you know if you need any ideas then
1:36:32 you know where to go
1:36:34 and finally we have different community
1:36:37 building events for different ages such
1:36:41 um the Issaquah kids triathlon Harry
1:36:44 Potter night dog bone donuts and our
1:36:47 newest one is a pet adoption event and
1:36:49 these all are like to be determined days
1:36:54 with all these events besides the one
1:36:56 that's virtual
1:36:58 state of mind
1:37:01 um we didn't realize that Gibson Ed was
1:37:04 going to cost so much money to reserve
1:37:06 so it will either be held at Gibson neck
1:37:09 if we can get the funds or the community
1:37:11 center but either way it will be the
1:37:13 same time and that environmental is held
1:37:16 online
1:37:17 um and Civic engagement
1:37:21 I can't see at the time if we rarely um
1:37:24 I know that there's posters we have
1:37:27 posters out and those will tell you
1:37:29 where it is and we're getting hopefully
1:37:33 we're going to be able to put it into
1:37:35 one of the school newsletters so if
1:37:38 y'all have any kids then you might see
1:37:40 it in the school newsletter but
1:37:44 Preston I'm so sorry if you already have
1:37:46 the pliers or any information that you
1:37:48 have you can also email it to me and
1:37:49 I'll share it with the rest of the
1:37:51 commission yes okay I'll do that because
1:37:54 I think I have a flower that would be
1:37:56 great yes that would be great thank you
1:37:58 and then um
1:38:01 all Harry Potter night the cat Triathlon
1:38:04 dodgeball and donuts I think these are
1:38:06 mostly considered towards
1:38:13 are supposed to be meant for teens
1:38:22 today
1:38:32 [Laughter]
1:38:35 most of these extra community building
1:38:38 events will all be held at the community
1:38:41 center obviously the tree planning will
1:38:44 not we'll probably find I think Mountain
1:38:47 December Greenway has a specific like
1:38:49 location where they help and I think
1:38:53 that's it for me thank you great thank
1:38:56 you very much
1:39:04 be on the commission
1:39:08 okay and you do you have something more
1:39:10 just one quick I know we talked a little
1:39:13 bit about joint meeting with Equity
1:39:14 board
1:39:15 just a heads up at the end typically at
1:39:18 the end of January and um beginning of
1:39:20 February our city typically starts
1:39:23 recruitment for new boards and
1:39:24 Commissioners
1:39:26 so I'm just wondering if we give heads
1:39:28 up and also ask around the room
1:39:31 um if you plan on continuing to staying
1:39:33 on the commission and your term is set
1:39:38 to expire please just get in touch with
1:39:40 me so then you can reapply or for any
1:39:43 reasons if you plan on stepping down
1:39:45 because also this is the time to let me
1:39:46 know so that we can plan for any
1:39:48 vacancies typically the recruitment as I
1:39:51 said starts at the end of this month
1:39:52 early next month then typically we do
1:39:55 interviews sometimes in March we make
1:39:57 those recommendations to the mayor in
1:39:59 April who then appoints new
1:40:02 Commissioners and those are also valid
1:40:05 by city council so then the new
1:40:07 Commissioners start on on May 1st and
1:40:11 existing terms and Commissioners uh end
1:40:14 on April 30th and everybody knows where
1:40:17 I mean I would have to go look at I
1:40:19 don't know when my term expires
1:40:20 everybody knows where to go look right
1:40:23 do you have it open right now
1:40:25 so high map is not here here uh today
1:40:29 um his term expires this year Pat your
1:40:32 term also expires this year uh Maury
1:40:35 also your term expires this year so yes
1:40:39 if you want to extend yes absolutely do
1:40:41 it formally uh you're gonna have to
1:40:43 formally just reapply but thank you for
1:40:45 letting me know because let me know how
1:40:50 also a vacancy that we did not feel last
1:40:52 time and then we also have uh probably
1:40:55 another vacancy for a math board member
1:40:59 for a commissioner who was not able to
1:41:01 attend since June so then that's going
1:41:03 to be also a vacant position so we have
1:41:05 two vacant positions automatically
1:41:09 I thought we actually had three
1:41:12 three vacancies there's Jamie
1:41:15 so that's the vacant position oh and
1:41:18 Jamie's is still there us know that
1:41:20 you're absolutely right Jane um Jamie
1:41:22 Jamie's still there I thought that the
1:41:24 vacant position was genius but you're
1:41:25 right Jamie's there I saw her name yes
1:41:27 so you have three positions or
1:41:29 automatically bacon in understand
1:41:31 Commissioners that right
1:41:33 it may decides to step down
1:41:36 um hopefully not but this is a Great
1:41:38 Commission would be great one too
1:41:40 I got the three years already
1:41:45 man a year 20. my turn is over
1:42:13 [Music]
1:42:16 is planning on returning
1:42:19 um her at the end of February so
1:42:21 probably you're gonna see her at the
1:42:23 meeting in March
1:42:25 and that's that's it concludes anything
1:42:27 else so if you don't have any
1:42:28 announcements
1:42:30 okay anything for the go to the order I
1:42:32 think we've probably
1:42:34 interjected some of that throughout the
1:42:35 meeting anyways okay all right meeting
1:42:37 adjourned all right thank you thank you
1:42:40 very much

Attendance

Council / Members (8)
Jaime Fajardo, absent excused
Patricia Sadate-Ngatchou
Trish Bloor
Kiran Singh, absent unexcused
Manny Brown
Maury Edwards
Madeline Fish
Preston Miele, Youth Advisory Board Representative
Staff (3)
Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager
Tisha Gieser, City Clerc
Elina Pan, Volunteer-Intern

Recommendations & actions (2)

Sentences extracted from the narrative containing words like recommended, requested, directed, moved, or approved. Best-effort — verify against the full minutes for context.

  • EDWARDS motioned and FISH seconded.
  • There being no proposed edits, the minutes were approved by unanimous consent.