← Back to City Council Digest

Human Services Commission Auto captions

Wednesday, January 18, 2023

6:30 PM · 1h 42m
Topic tracked across meetings:
2022 Human Services Grants - Report 3/3
Section
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3a
Minutes of October 19, 2022
packet pp.3–4
Staff report:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) 10-19-22 Human Services Commission Minutes Page 1 CITY OF ISSAQUAH Human Services Commission 6:30 PM Steelhead Room, 235 1st Ave. October 19, 2022 MINUTES SE, Issaquah
4. AGENDA ITEMS
4a
20 min. Input
Tisha Gieser, City Clerk · packet pp.23
Staff report:
During the 2021-2022 Human Services funding cycle, the City of Issaquah funded 57 programs. Of these, 29 were included in a pooled program with other cities on the eastside, to help create efficiencies and decrease contractual burden for organizations. Administration for these pooled contracts was done jointly by staff from the 5 eastside cities, Bellevue, Kirkland, Issaquah, Redmond, and Sammamish, with payment being coordinated by the City of Bellevue.
4b
2022 Human Services Grants - Report
15 min · Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager · packet pp.25
Topics: BudgetEquity
Staff report:
ISSAQUAH HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION 2023 WORK PLAN - Draft
4c
2023 Human Services Commission Workplan - Update
20 min · Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager
Topics: Equity
5. REPORTS
5a
Chair Report
Monica Negrila, Human Services Manager
0:00 okay so I'm calling to order the uh
0:03 January 18th Human Services Commission
0:08 and
0:09 um I guess I will start by asking Monica
0:13 if there's any reason are we having
0:15 public comment this evening we don't
0:18 have anyone signed up for public
0:19 comments and nobody submitted any public
0:21 comments okay and I've been standing on
0:23 online or in the room in the comments
0:25 all right and um okay then we need to
0:29 vote on the approval of the minutes and
0:31 I'm sure the minutes are very fresh
0:34 in everybody's mind from October
0:40 um does anybody want to make a motion
0:45 all right a second okay all in favor say
0:49 hi hi okay
0:53 all right anybody
0:54 Nays okay they're approved
1:03 okay and then I think the next thing
1:06 we're gonna do is just move right into
1:08 tisha's presentation wonderful and I am
1:12 going to hi everybody I'm Tisha Geezer
1:14 I'm the city clerk I've met most of you
1:16 at least virtually if not in person
1:19 um it's nice nice to see you and see
1:21 names with faces thank you for your
1:23 service I'm always impressed with the
1:26 number of individuals we have volunteer
1:29 to serve on we have 13 advisory boards
1:32 in the city so
1:34 um a lot of spoken Brett and we're
1:35 really grateful to have your your input
1:37 on um so many important issues that are
1:40 coming before the city all the time
1:43 um so tonight I'm talking here to talk
1:46 to you about and I'm sorry I'm pulling
1:48 up my PowerPoint right now so I have a
1:50 do you have a few visuals to go along
1:53 with my presentation
1:55 was some of that included in the packet
1:58 was that the yeah okay okay I just want
2:00 to make sure I'm in the right place
2:04 so in your packet it starts on page 17 I
2:09 think yeah
2:12 okay
2:15 now it actually starts on page five
2:19 five yes the actual policy starts on
2:22 page 17. yeah
2:28 thank you
2:30 um so uh as you recall during during the
2:34 covid pandemic the commission met
2:36 entirely virtually for um
2:39 I mean I'm close to two years so the uh
2:43 the commission is subject to the state's
2:45 open public meetings act and I know you
2:47 can't believe you recently received
2:49 training on the action so one of the
2:51 requirements in that act is that you
2:53 have to have your meetings have to be
2:54 open to the public and so during covid
2:57 um the governor suspended the
2:59 requirement that we have an in-person
3:00 open door location for you but said
3:04 instead we needed to have a phone number
3:06 people could call in too so that you'd
3:08 hear hear your meeting and in our case
3:10 we've we purchased some software and we
3:12 allowed people to join by computer
3:15 so during the coveted pandemic there was
3:17 a governor and eventually the
3:19 legislature kind of put a pause on that
3:21 in person requirement
3:23 and
3:24 um in June uh the governor announced
3:27 that he was suspending that sort of
3:30 exception uh to the open public meetings
3:32 act and we were kind of resuming the
3:34 normal course of business however we do
3:37 now have a stipulation or a
3:41 should I call it we do still have we
3:43 have a provision in the open public
3:45 meetings act that anticipates
3:48 um a need to go all virtual again so if
3:50 we need to do that there's now rules in
3:52 place which is wonderful but that
3:54 in-person meeting requirement came back
3:56 into being July 1st believe your board
3:59 resumed in-person meetings in September
4:02 because we were trying to get this room
4:04 ready to just kind of figure things out
4:07 so all of our boards and commissions
4:09 came back
4:10 um in either July or in September and
4:12 the mayor um if you recall she sent a
4:14 few emails out and she really emphasized
4:16 she wanted boards and commissions
4:19 commissioned nurse in seats in in
4:22 physical meeting spaces but that we
4:25 would be offering a virtual uh option
4:27 for members of the public and presenters
4:30 that was the initial expectation
4:33 uh however the mayor's office and US
4:36 city staff heard feedback over those
4:38 first few months of coming back the
4:41 boarding commission members liked to
4:42 have the flexibility to attend virtually
4:45 as well we aren't running a virtual uh
4:48 meeting for all of our boards and
4:49 commission so your commission was one of
4:51 the ones selected to have that hybrid
4:53 meeting option and we purchased
4:55 equipment set up these rooms we have
4:57 three meeting rooms in the city that can
5:00 accommodate this
5:02 um so after hearing some feedback from
5:04 board and Commissioners the mayor asked
5:06 me to draft a policy to because no one's
5:09 rules sort of allow for virtual
5:11 participation it was just something we
5:13 started doing during covid so she asked
5:15 me to draft a policy to allow for
5:17 virtual uh participation button really
5:19 limited circumstances is
5:21 so I'm going to talk to you about this
5:23 draft policy which was in your packet
5:25 which is sort of you know coming coming
5:28 from the city
5:29 um but I I also want to start by saying
5:31 that the
5:32 um the rules about how the Commissioners
5:35 attend meetings are in the commission's
5:37 rules and regulations those are
5:39 controlled by you the Commissioners you
5:42 vote to make changes to those rules so
5:44 tonight I'm hoping you think about
5:46 expectations the group of you have both
5:49 now and in the future and for future
5:50 Commissioners and what you're looking
5:52 for and after I talk about the
5:54 maintenance of the draft policy I'll
5:56 share with you I've been taking this
5:58 Ranch to
5:59 I think I've been to about five or six
6:01 boards so far and so they're all
6:04 adopting slightly different versions you
6:06 know they all have salt share um some of
6:08 what the other boards are doing
6:11 so the policy is it's pretty short but
6:14 in case you didn't have a time time to
6:16 look at it let me tell you about some
6:18 key components so the draft policy says
6:21 that
6:22 um a essentially you would need to
6:25 request permission to attend virtually
6:27 and you would do that if if you are
6:29 unable to attend the meeting and you
6:32 know you could interpret unable to
6:34 attend in different ways the idea behind
6:37 that is if you have you know sort of a
6:39 medical situation you're recovering from
6:41 a procedure you're in quarantine you're
6:43 not feeling well you have a
6:44 transportation issue a child care issue
6:46 you're maybe traveling for a business
6:48 trip
6:49 um and not not in Issaquah so those are
6:52 some of the reasons that were intended
6:54 by that wording
6:56 um but it's meant to really emphasize
6:58 that if you're you're around and you
7:00 don't have any of those things impeding
7:03 your ability to attend that you would be
7:04 in person
7:10 um the policy also says that for a
7:13 quorum would be in person so that means
7:15 four of you would need to be here
7:17 physically for the need to proceed and
7:20 that's sort of for two reasons that's
7:21 one to again encourage that in-person
7:23 attendance and the second reason is we
7:25 have an issue with the technology
7:29 and we don't have four of you
7:31 that it needs to stop because we lose a
7:34 form so if there was a technical issue
7:36 we do have some awesome I.T stuff but if
7:38 there's a problem and pillow
7:41 um and we can't get the um equipment
7:44 working or if there's some sort of you
7:46 know internet outage or something like
7:48 that
7:49 um so that's the reason for the the
7:51 Quorum uh required in person
7:55 and then there's um some language in the
7:57 draft policy about if you do attend
7:58 virtually so if you reach out to Monica
8:00 and say you know I'm in Eastern
8:02 Washington but I'd like to still
8:03 participate at the meeting or I'm not
8:04 feeling well but I'd like to participate
8:06 in the meeting she would kind of confirm
8:08 that a quorum would be in person and uh
8:11 she would then know that you would be
8:13 virtual while attending virtually you
8:15 would be encouraged to indicate you're
8:17 there and able to participate in the
8:19 meeting by having your camera on as much
8:21 as possible
8:22 um and engaging with the group
8:24 um one thing this virtual attendance
8:26 option isn't meant to replace is is
8:28 needing an excused absence so if you're
8:30 really unwell if you are taking a
8:33 vacation and some time away for yourself
8:35 or with your family you know we want you
8:37 to to let us know and and request an
8:39 excused absence
8:41 um we don't want the virtual tenants to
8:43 make you feel like you need to attend
8:45 every in all meeting no matter where you
8:46 are
8:47 uh so back to the draft policy another
8:50 provision in it is that if you're the
8:53 chair
8:54 um you would be expected to be in person
8:55 or if you needed to attend virtually you
8:57 would ask if I share or have the
8:59 commission um nominate another person to
9:01 chair that meeting the chair would
9:03 always be someone in the room
9:11 talks about is it it sort of formalizes
9:14 the fact that your regular meetings um
9:16 will have this virtual option it is
9:18 something the city is committed to doing
9:21 um and barring some major unforeseen
9:24 issue we'll have all of your regular
9:26 meetings we'll have we'll publish that
9:28 WebEx link
9:29 um and ensure virtual attendance there
9:32 could I will say there could be some
9:34 special meetings if you decide to have
9:35 you know a social Gathering or a meeting
9:38 with a joint meeting with another board
9:39 or permission or a tour or something
9:41 like that we probably wouldn't offer a
9:43 virtual option
9:44 um but one of the real changes is to
9:46 just sort of document that intention
9:49 um and also clarify that the public can
9:51 make comments virtually and attend
9:52 virtually and also staff I don't know if
9:54 you've had any staff present to you
9:56 virtually but it is happening at some of
9:58 our other boards and commissions
10:00 um and then I added
10:01 um some language I noticed as I was
10:04 looking through the commission's rules I
10:06 was just kind of skimming it and we we
10:09 try and keep parity uh between our 13
10:11 board and commission's rules and I
10:14 noticed there was not a lot of language
10:16 around public comment and while all of
10:19 your meetings need to be open to the
10:21 public
10:23 um the the parameters under which people
10:25 provide public comment are up to you and
10:28 I would recommend adding some of this
10:30 language about what could be procedures
10:32 inappropriate so if someone is saying
10:35 um let's see the word the word in here
10:37 is pretty
10:38 um what page are you on oh I'm off sorry
10:41 I don't have your packet open I'm on
10:44 this Redline copy of the document okay
10:47 okay very good got it the last page so
10:52 actually the bottom of the second to
10:54 last so I added some language that's in
10:56 our other boarding commission rules that
10:58 just sort of say you know we'd like you
11:00 to state your name we'd like you to
11:01 limit your comments to five minutes but
11:03 the chair can adjust that time frame
11:05 we'd like you to give Monica if you come
11:08 with prepared comments it could be
11:09 helpful for her to have the written
11:11 comments
11:12 um and then we it talks a little bit
11:14 about the virtual attendance and then
11:16 lastly it has some parameters around you
11:19 know things that aren't allowed during
11:21 your public personal attacks I've seen
11:22 yeah exactly and that just gives the
11:25 chair some something to stand on if
11:27 there is someone that comes in is
11:29 disruptive you know you have this
11:30 published uh policy for your public
11:33 comment and it talks about what the
11:35 chair can do
11:37 um you know direct the person to their
11:38 seat and you have the staff and you
11:40 their microphone so this is sort of
11:42 separate from the virtual attendance
11:44 piece but it's something I'd recommend
11:45 adding or a version of this
11:49 uh so uh you've gotten the rundown of
11:54 this draft policy let me uh share with
11:56 you uh what some of the other boards and
11:58 commissions are are thinking about
12:00 related to this policy and my
12:02 expectation for tonight
12:04 I'd love to hear your input and um do
12:07 some tweaking if you have some tweaking
12:09 um to this policy and ask that you have
12:12 actually adopt these amendments to your
12:14 rules at your next meeting I'd like to
12:16 we want to have the language you know
12:18 um solidified so uh we can talk more
12:21 about it but that was my expectation for
12:23 uh tonight
12:25 uh so let me share some input we from
12:28 the other boards and commissions that
12:29 I've met with so far so two of the
12:31 boards um pretty much adopted the policy
12:34 as is
12:35 um that was our development commission
12:36 and our transportation Advisory Board
12:38 both groups um had a tendency and a real
12:42 um desire we were enjoying that
12:45 in-person element and I should I I
12:47 didn't talk about this earlier I should
12:49 mention one of the I talked a little bit
12:51 about that desire to have in-person
12:53 attendance for the Quorum and so if
12:55 there's we have a you know an internet
12:57 issue or computer issue your meeting can
13:00 proceed some other reasons why the mayor
13:03 was Advocate it continues to advocate
13:06 for that
13:07 um is there's just Synergy that comes
13:10 when you're in person and I think during
13:12 covid it was perceived that it was
13:14 difficult for some of the board and
13:16 commission members to just you know
13:18 connect with each other especially for
13:19 newer members and newer boards
13:21 um another reason why the mayor um has
13:24 has been an emphasis on that is just you
13:27 know one of the expectations of these
13:29 advisory boards is that they're a place
13:30 that the public can come and share their
13:32 input and so having people come into the
13:34 meeting room of course they can always
13:36 come virtually from the comfort of their
13:37 home but wanting to make sure that they
13:39 have some
13:40 people to connect with in the room so I
13:43 didn't share that earlier so those are
13:45 some of her
13:48 some of some of her rationale for that
13:50 interest not in person attendance and so
13:52 the first two words I mentioned really
13:54 that
13:56 that aligned with their feelings since
13:58 they adopted this policy almost as is
14:01 however I've since gone to the park
14:04 board environmental board and Equity
14:06 board and those three boards have really
14:09 um really liked the flexibility of the
14:12 virtual attendance and for for different
14:14 reasons so on the park boards one of our
14:16 larger boards so lots of board members
14:19 lots of newer board members and they are
14:20 really enjoying that flexibility you
14:23 know that some of them are parents are
14:25 dealing with commuting and have just
14:27 said that that's an element that they
14:29 want to retain and they feel that um
14:32 that it works well for their board so
14:35 um they haven't adopted a final version
14:36 but it will be modified from this
14:39 um the environmental board adopted the
14:41 policy last week and they um changed it
14:44 so they removed the requirement that a
14:47 certain number of board members be in
14:49 the room but instead said that all board
14:53 members would be expected to attend half
14:55 of the yearly meetings in person and
14:58 just and included some language really
15:00 emphasizing the in-person attendance but
15:03 took away the minimum number they also
15:05 took away sort of any kind of rap
15:08 for not attending so the wording
15:10 currently says if you're unable to
15:12 attend a person they wanted that removed
15:13 they wanted it to be flexible but they
15:16 want to encourage people to
15:18 come
15:18 um the equity board which I talked to a
15:20 few weeks ago really felt that to allow
15:22 for broad participation
15:25 um in recruiting members that they felt
15:27 it was important to have that virtual
15:29 attendance option for someone who might
15:31 have transportation issues a disability
15:33 be working multiple jobs just
15:36 um they felt that that is really
15:38 in-person attendance could be a barrier
15:40 and they want to remove barriers and
15:42 please if you have any other thoughts
15:44 but so they have not adopted a final
15:47 policy but we'll be making some changes
15:48 as well so
15:50 um that's what I have I welcome your
15:53 input
15:54 so I have a question you said one of the
15:58 other commissions they added language
16:01 that at least
16:02 they put in a number I'm I don't know 50
16:04 percent
16:05 you had to attend in person 50 of the
16:08 time but was there anything about just
16:10 attending meetings in general
16:12 I mean I think and most all of our
16:15 boards have an expectation that regular
16:17 members attend all meetings unless they
16:19 request an excused absence and actually
16:21 in most most of the boards have rules
16:23 actually in the ordinances that created
16:26 them saying if you miss three
16:28 consecutive meanings it could be caused
16:30 for removal so okay and one I'll just
16:33 share one thing that came up in the
16:35 conversation for the boards that want to
16:37 remove that minimum is you know thinking
16:39 about
16:40 um so is it are you okay if you're one
16:42 of two people you know in a meeting room
16:45 because if we if you take away that
16:46 minimum
16:48 um so their their compromise was you
16:51 know six roughly six meetings a year the
16:53 Commissioners will tend to be in the
16:55 room it could be that it's the same six
16:57 meetings I'm sure some of them will
16:59 attend all the meetings in person or
17:01 most you know it's just kind of what
17:03 dynamic you're looking for and think you
17:05 think works well for
17:07 um this commission and the work of your
17:09 commission
17:15 hey Brad
17:17 um when I first read this I thought my
17:19 first thought was that
17:22 kind of like the other uh committees is
17:24 that I'd like to see it opened up
17:28 um but being the fact that if you're
17:31 going to have a public coming in
17:34 you don't want an empty room when I'm
17:36 sitting in those chairs you know
17:39 but things are going more virtual so
17:43 this is going to be the only place where
17:44 there'd be an empty room and you're
17:45 looking at a screen
17:47 either so
17:49 yeah I I understand why the equity board
17:53 would want the flexibility
17:57 um I think
17:58 um you know that is moving towards being
18:02 able to pull more people in and
18:05 best thing that would go here too I
18:08 think for for the Human Service
18:11 Commission
18:12 so I'm I'm flexing back and forth right
18:17 there now he said that you mentioned uh
18:21 that we we were one of the only
18:22 commissions that went with the virtual
18:26 recently is that
18:28 um Ashley I may have misstated that if I
18:32 so we have 13 advisory boards currently
18:35 not all of the city
18:38 um committed to maintaining a like a
18:41 virtual component to about eight of them
18:43 three or nine because it takes a lot of
18:46 additional resources right
18:48 um so
18:50 Monica and I and I spent a lot of time
18:52 you know we spend a lot of time setting
18:54 up meetings in our virtual meeting
18:55 software we need specially equipped
18:57 rooms so a few of the boards that tend
19:00 to have less
19:01 um frequent public participation we've
19:04 we've just left as purely and they've
19:06 gone back to fully in person
19:09 um occasionally they're choosing to have
19:11 a hybrid meeting so that's what I meant
19:13 by that you are one of the eight or so
19:15 boards where the city felt it was
19:17 important that you have the continual
19:19 virtual option at least for the public
19:22 and then that's what you're discussing
19:24 is what that might look like for the
19:25 Commissioners so was The Advisory
19:27 board's choice to stay with the in
19:31 person
19:32 answer me
19:33 and not have the virtual element so of
19:36 the of the four or five that went where
19:40 the city said
19:41 um go ahead and just you know go back in
19:44 person I'll be honest most of them have
19:47 uh one of them is meeting tonight and
19:49 actually could not find a meeting room
19:51 that had this virtual we only have a few
19:53 meeting rooms with this technology so
19:55 um they're over at the community center
19:57 without a virtual element but we've been
19:59 trying to accommodate if they have a
20:01 higher profile meeting or have some
20:03 guested like to attend virtually we've
20:05 been accommodating that so they're kind
20:07 of a mix say
20:09 and we're still work and we're also
20:11 still figure you know to some extent
20:13 figuring this out
20:15 um those boards have not um
20:18 interestingly I haven't met with them to
20:20 discuss this yet I'm meeting with one of
20:22 one of them is our economic Vitality
20:24 commissioner I'm meeting with them next
20:25 month to talk about the policy and I'll
20:27 be really interested to hear what they
20:29 have to say because they have not had
20:31 the virtual option at every meeting like
20:33 you like your board has
20:36 so let me just I wanna for me I I've
20:40 really enjoy the flexibility for my
20:42 personal reasons but also thinking about
20:44 that flexibility I do recognize and I
20:48 see how the equity board will say let's
20:50 have it um have the flexibility here of
20:53 hybrid the hybrid system
20:56 um now I think we're gonna have to gauge
21:00 in terms of you know mostly this okay I
21:03 really recognize the human factors
21:05 coming together you know
21:08 um this certain element of us
21:09 interacting together however there's
21:12 also the other element of flexibility so
21:14 as many people as possible can
21:16 participate and not eliminating some of
21:18 the people who can say I really want to
21:20 be on the human condition but I can't
21:22 because of
21:23 XYZ personal reason or tonight
21:27 um if I if I I made an effort to come
21:30 here but I see how akola stayed home for
21:33 whatever reason for the reason I'm late
21:35 I'm sorry sorry so
21:38 so is like resources versus flexibility
21:43 um we have probably have to give
21:45 somewhere and it seems to me that many
21:48 of us who volunteer on this board come
21:51 with good faith in that we want to
21:54 invest we want that human connection
21:56 that's why we are doing this and uh just
21:59 by that it's like I think having a
22:01 flexible a hybrid situation uh
22:05 people who really still try to come in
22:07 person until they can't right so that's
22:10 those are the premises from which I'm
22:12 going we gain with that flexibility and
22:15 yes there are situations where okay if
22:18 only one or two people are in the room
22:20 you know
22:22 what happens but again it's all all
22:25 comes back to communication so if in
22:27 advance a week before we know that that
22:29 the uh this particular commission are we
22:33 all going to have one or two people and
22:35 they might not be okay then we have it
22:37 virtual and uh
22:40 knowing the Good Will of most of us
22:43 we're gonna just do those kind of things
22:46 when it's really needed and hopefully
22:48 we're gonna be together more than uh
22:51 more times and lesser time
22:53 you know
22:56 well I have a question oh no you go
22:59 ahead no you spoke first well I was just
23:01 gonna ask if just to start from the
23:04 Baseline would anybody
23:07 not be favorable to adapting the draft
23:11 as is
23:14 I mean does somebody feel strongly about
23:15 you know starting with the draft and
23:18 then making some amendments well rather
23:20 than getting to that why don't we have
23:21 everybody give their opinions first okay
23:23 because I have one okay but that's why I
23:26 was going to say you go Laurie Edwards
23:28 here yeah
23:29 um I
23:31 I do a lot of virtual stuff and uh in
23:34 fact
23:35 um have been doing a lot of virtual
23:37 stuff for a couple of years now and I
23:39 find that when I do that I have and
23:43 believe it or not I do other things
23:45 other than the Human Services Commission
23:49 I find that I can have a meeting from
23:51 four to six and then another meeting
23:54 from six till eight
23:56 um if I have to be someplace in person
23:59 that becomes real problematic
24:02 um and now the the flip side of that is
24:06 the the counter to that is in order for
24:09 me to participate I have to have a
24:11 computer I have to have the internet uh
24:14 and if I don't have those things then
24:16 that kind of precludes me being part of
24:19 the of the whole thing the other thing
24:21 is is I really get the idea I get the
24:23 the thing of being together in the same
24:27 room
24:30 and all the nuances that you get from
24:33 that
24:35 um however I can say that after two
24:38 years of being on the computer virtually
24:40 you know I get that now anyway I mean
24:43 I'm able to
24:45 zoom in on my Hollywood Squares screen
24:47 and and uh and and see people and know
24:52 that oh that's you know this is what
24:55 they're thinking or
24:57 so I like the flexibility I really do I
25:01 would like to be more virtual rather
25:04 than have to take the time to
25:06 drive down here drive home it just means
25:11 it's it's easier and more convenient to
25:13 be virtual
25:18 that one fish I when I read the your The
25:22 Proposal I thought it was very practical
25:25 I thought it made a lot of sense and I
25:27 appreciate having the flexibility but I
25:29 also appreciate having some parameters
25:31 around what virtual participation looks
25:33 like so having the chairperson present
25:35 here having a quorum present here I
25:38 think that's all very practical having
25:39 people that are participating virtually
25:42 having their screens on as much as
25:44 possible not that I ever would have
25:46 taken advantage of that to sweep the
25:47 kitchen with the screen off that was not
25:50 me but I I just thought I felt like
25:51 there was a lot of practical thoughtful
25:54 um parameters included in this I thought
25:58 it was great I appreciate having the
25:59 flexibility but I I'm I'm a fan of in
26:02 person and that's that's just me
26:05 oh Danny Brown here um
26:08 we also think about
26:10 new people coming in and age difference
26:14 in in their expectations right uh
26:18 virtual is nothing to
26:21 to the younger group right and if we
26:24 want that group to take over
26:27 this type of uh
26:29 agenda from the committee I think we
26:32 need to be open to the possibility that
26:36 they got their own world right and
26:39 that's part of the world is virtual and
26:42 if we fight that then we're not going to
26:44 get the participation from that group
26:53 um well
26:55 personally I think that it's nice to
26:58 have like flexibility because it's like
27:00 you said like implementation in like the
27:03 online world is like a must right now in
27:06 the younger generation Our Lives revolve
27:09 around our screens but um
27:13 I also think that it um
27:16 it's also important to have
27:19 um people in person again for that human
27:22 connection and also personally having
27:26 gone through school online I just feel
27:29 like it's better to have people and see
27:32 and do things in person and it's just
27:35 better and easier to get things done
27:38 this is very important
27:47 thank you too uh so the other aspect of
27:51 it when I was
27:53 reading it and hearing also is
27:56 a light that we have rules about virtual
28:00 um and I was thinking in terms of equity
28:04 the chair is obligated to be here in
28:06 person
28:07 how does it feel for that person are we
28:10 putting limitations on Who Wants to be
28:13 the chair that alone can drive someone
28:15 away say I don't want to be a chair they
28:17 want to do this
28:18 I'm just trying just to be fruitful here
28:25 yes considerations which if it's going
28:28 to be flexible do we have considerations
28:30 that is also flexible for that chair
28:32 that's great
28:36 but there is a provision if the chair
28:38 can't be
28:40 in person that the chair can designate
28:43 the the proxy the proxy yes right right
28:46 yeah can anyone explain to me why you
28:50 need to have people in person to have a
28:52 quorum
28:54 why is that necessary
28:57 well I think didn't you address that
28:59 when you said the that's that's the
29:01 eventual assuming that's making the
29:03 assumption that technology fails yes I
29:06 would say it's not it's not a
29:08 requirement I mean so this the
29:11 requirement is that there be a physical
29:13 meeting space uh for people to come and
29:16 listen to the meeting live so that does
29:19 mean that a staff person has to open the
29:22 door have the lights on have the
29:24 equipment working
29:26 you don't I mean from from what I
29:28 understand from talking to our attorneys
29:30 technically none of you need to need to
29:32 be are required to be in the room that's
29:34 why we're talking tonight
29:36 I think that the Quorum was a starting
29:39 point it's a it's a functional number
29:42 that we talk about and it's important to
29:44 the commission so it felt like a
29:46 starting point I do think if there are
29:48 technology issues it's just something to
29:50 be aware of that if people came down and
29:52 drove down to the meeting and there is
29:53 something prohibiting that a virtual
29:56 element that they the meeting can't
29:58 proceed
29:59 um how however I will um comment that
30:02 I've talked to some of the our staff
30:04 leads I was like Monica because we're
30:06 noticing that the public can comment
30:08 virtually I think my advice is that if
30:11 there's just some kind of outage or we
30:13 you know our equipment is not working if
30:15 if at all possible we would want to
30:17 reschedule the meeting we wouldn't want
30:19 to just plow ahead because we had four
30:21 people in the room so it's it's
30:23 something you can you know you should
30:25 talk about is whether you you want to
30:27 see that requirement and if you don't
30:30 then you can remove that and we can have
30:32 no requirement as to the number of
30:34 people in the room or we can have a
30:36 lesser requirement
30:38 um that's really up to you
30:41 so Commissioners disha was saying
30:43 basically you fulfilled the state
30:46 requirements
30:48 and I opened the meaning space and the
30:51 room we fulfill that requirement right
30:53 right so you have that wide range of
30:55 options options from that all the way to
30:57 requesting the Quorum in the room all
31:00 the way to that I really love to hear
31:03 your I love to hear your
31:06 so Facebook is many again uh
31:10 if there were people here and
31:14 we couldn't get out to the public we'd
31:16 have to reschedule anyway I would I
31:19 would recommend that I mean your meeting
31:21 can technically proceed but I would um
31:24 you could be opening up yourself for I
31:27 can't believe you moved ahead when I
31:29 wasn't able to participate right I mean
31:31 saying that it went out right now you
31:32 went through the public comment you have
31:34 a really light agenda four of you more
31:36 than four of you were in the room you
31:38 could wrap up your meeting but yeah I
31:40 think if it was at the top of the
31:41 meeting or it was you know you're making
31:43 your final recommendation on the uh the
31:45 grants you know and you have interested
31:48 people we would want to reschedule yeah
31:50 so it's I I talk about the that
31:53 requirement is that was something that
31:54 was in my mind when I wrote this but
31:57 it's not it's not a requirement by any
32:01 means and you could address that and
32:04 that's it I appreciate the fact that you
32:06 guys go through all this and give us a
32:08 starting point yeah okay absolutely you
32:11 know I like the grant said but you know
32:13 starting point then it would be in big
32:15 trouble so I really do appreciate that
32:17 and do it again
32:25 so ideally we should be able to vote and
32:29 adapt something next month yes and it'd
32:32 be nice if if I I have some Direction I
32:35 mean I've I've heard some input and I'm
32:38 happy to summarize that if that's
32:39 helpful but it would be it would be
32:42 great to so so far what I've heard is an
32:44 interest in more flexibility and a
32:46 majority of you definitely seem to
32:48 prefer not having a quorum like a
32:51 certain number of individuals required
32:54 and I'm also hearing uh the fact that
32:57 you there's some trust and you feel like
33:00 um you trust the Judgment of the
33:01 Commissioners to if they need to if they
33:03 if they need to attend virtually for
33:05 themselves they should be able to do
33:06 that we don't need to put parameters
33:08 around why or say that it's just um so
33:12 open that up a little bit so I've heard
33:13 those comments and that has seemed to
33:15 come from a majority I guess what would
33:17 be helpful is if there's any but I've
33:20 also heard that there's value in it
33:22 being in person that we can capture that
33:24 in the rules I guess I'm interested
33:25 would be interested if there's any
33:27 interest in putting any kind of
33:29 requirement other than just encouraging
33:32 [Music]
33:33 um in-person attendance
33:35 or or not and if you just want to have
33:38 it wide open and one more thing I'll add
33:40 you can amend these rules at any time I
33:42 think partly we're we're all trying to
33:44 figure this out
33:46 um so I expect I'm going around all the
33:48 boards for this first round
33:50 we can talk about this again you can
33:52 observe how it's going and right and
33:54 modify it in you know the next few
33:57 months even if you want to I do have one
33:59 more thing I can contribute
34:01 um Maury Edwards here again
34:03 um and that is that when you have a
34:06 hybrid model you've got some people in
34:08 person and some people are on the screen
34:11 you know it doesn't work as well
34:13 it's either if everybody's in person
34:16 it's better or if everybody's on Virtual
34:19 it's better but having the two of them
34:21 together just doesn't work as well if
34:23 somebody gets left out
34:26 it's hard it's and I think it is hard
34:29 for the harder for the chair and
34:31 speakers it's you know just making that
34:33 eye contact and feeling like you're
34:34 including everyone
34:36 um so I yes I agree but I also think you
34:40 know it's it's been occurring I'm not
34:42 sure if your commission meetings if
34:44 you've had anyone attend virtually yeah
34:46 yes most of our other commissions have
34:49 have to and you know it does or it does
34:52 work it's just it's a little
34:55 a little more complicated to to manage
34:59 and so yeah again Betty Brown here oh
35:05 again the whole concept of equity board
35:09 and human Commission
35:12 gives you that
35:14 just the names I'm gonna give you the
35:15 idea that you're talking about people
35:17 and what's best for for them and and
35:21 advancing in a direction that works for
35:25 for the people
35:27 and you know that's what it comes down
35:30 to is
35:31 it might feel inconvenient
35:34 to uh everybody to be here
35:37 and it might be a little inconvenient
35:39 for being on this on Virtual but
35:42 what's the best thing for to get that
35:46 information out to everybody and in this
35:48 world I'm afraid it's virtual
35:51 yeah
35:53 I need to see Monica sitting here by
35:55 herself
35:59 turning the lights off just let us know
36:04 but yeah I don't know I uh as far as
36:07 staff I'm not concerned about that I
36:08 think like he said and thank you so much
36:10 though for your concern it's also nice
36:12 and nice to appreciate all of you I
36:14 think like you said if we are thinking
36:16 about people what can provide us the
36:18 despite some inconveniences what can
36:20 provide the most flexibility to for
36:22 everyone right and that includes some
36:24 people who might not have a computer and
36:26 they might come here or that includes
36:28 some people who might have child care
36:30 issues or have other things and it's
36:32 very convenient to just hop on the
36:33 computer right
36:35 those are the questions that I love to
36:37 hear all of you including the chair
36:39 options and and the so so well said path
36:42 like is this gonna deter some people
36:44 from even as we are going to talk just
36:46 later in the meaning about
36:48 um onboarding new Commissioners
36:50 hopefully in a couple of months
36:52 um is is that gonna prevent anyone from
36:55 even applying if they see a very strict
36:57 requirement one way or the other right
37:00 not to mention even just being willing
37:05 serve as a chair if they know that they
37:07 have more stringent requirements right
37:09 so it's all about how can we make it
37:11 better for everyone in the community and
37:13 making it accessible for people
37:15 so I love all the questions
37:18 I really liked thank you for mentioning
37:20 the fact that this is dynamic and that
37:23 we can adopt something now see how it
37:26 goes and then maybe after a few months
37:28 say okay what do you guys think do you
37:31 think it's working for us and then you
37:33 know and then we can either stick with
37:34 it or modify it some more but I really
37:36 like that
37:37 because then maybe what we could because
37:39 otherwise you guys we could be sitting
37:42 here this entire 90-minute meeting and
37:45 talking about this
37:46 you know what I mean so um
37:50 so should we just
37:54 um okay so what was the last thing you
37:56 said you wanted to know oh if there
37:58 needed to be something more than just
37:59 encourage people to attend or maybe you
38:02 don't even I mean the feeling I got from
38:04 the equity board is they I think they
38:05 don't even necessarily want to say that
38:07 they really want
38:09 um they really want it wide open I think
38:11 the
38:13 um so they've been the board that's you
38:14 know really wanted the most flexibility
38:16 and uh and we can do some minor worth
38:20 smithing I think I do have good input I
38:22 think uh based on the input I've heard I
38:24 think aligning your roles to those of
38:27 the equity board is probably
38:29 um both seem to have similar
38:31 perspectives on it
38:33 um and I and didn't I hear correctly
38:36 then that
38:37 um somebody wouldn't have to call up and
38:41 tell Monica that they're not kind right
38:44 we would so we would take we would
38:48 change it from a sort of right now it
38:51 says you need permission to attend
38:53 virtually it would be changed to sort of
38:56 a notification okay and that's maybe
38:59 something we could consider removing
39:00 eventually
39:02 I you know and I don't I don't know if
39:05 you have thoughts on that and and that's
39:07 something I mean in terms of attendance
39:09 whether it's first impersonal virtual I
39:12 think that informally I always try to
39:14 check in with you all right and that we
39:16 have kind of like my my expectation and
39:18 trying to send you reminders and sending
39:21 you notes about that please let me know
39:22 if you're not participating it's more
39:24 for all of you because I'm trying to
39:26 make sure if we don't have a quorum then
39:28 we should try to cancel the meaning in
39:30 advance and I don't want to put any two
39:33 three of you in a position of coming all
39:35 the way here and then we don't have
39:36 enough money right right so for from for
39:38 that perspective I don't know if you
39:40 need something in the rules we can put
39:42 something but I don't even know if we
39:43 need something in the rules or just
39:45 let's check in to make sure that there's
39:47 a quorum or like let me know if you
39:50 think you're not gonna be able to make
39:51 it even if it's last minute because or
39:54 even something that says um you know
39:57 Pat Manny um plan to attend personally
40:00 right just on on the uh the group email
40:04 that you send out so that everyone knows
40:07 that okay they're gonna be there
40:09 you can make your choices whatever well
40:12 I we have the option just to take out
40:13 the quorum
40:14 yeah
40:16 I'm talking about for information's sake
40:19 because right right right right right no
40:22 I I agree information's sake right but
40:25 that way you know if there's if there's
40:28 uh public here that there's somebody
40:30 here or or not you know so yeah no I
40:34 agree yeah I think for information we
40:37 should have a feel yeah otherwise it's
40:40 just like really too loosey-goosey yeah
40:42 yeah as a reminder currently the and we
40:46 you haven't delved into this and you do
40:48 have other items on your agenda to get
40:50 to so I will I will plan it um
40:52 move on here but the the chair would be
40:55 required a person would be required to
40:57 be in person and I will say I actually
40:59 think it could be beneficial to have you
41:02 know it does put a burden on the chair
41:04 if they're here in person but having the
41:06 vice chair or another commissioner have
41:08 an opportunity to chair a meeting I
41:10 think is actually a really helpful thing
41:12 because it gets people a little more
41:13 comfortable with it so I see that less
41:15 as a
41:17 um a requirement that the actual chair
41:19 would need to be here physically every
41:20 time and they would probably enjoy being
41:23 able to let someone else manage that
41:25 part of the meeting
41:27 um and attend virtually but I think at a
41:30 minimum if that provision stays that
41:32 person will probably need to communicate
41:33 with Monica so she knows um and as far
41:36 as that other notification I know
41:38 sometimes it's helpful to sort of know
41:39 as you're trying to ascertain like who's
41:41 am I looking for the door to open or am
41:44 I staring at my screen right that can be
41:46 kind of helpful but I don't know how
41:48 critical right
41:50 yeah and a little consideration what
41:53 else is thinking for the number of times
41:56 so who keeps the count
41:58 yeah
41:59 I had that same time yeah I I yeah I
42:03 wouldn't want that
42:04 you're talking about the condition where
42:07 uh 50 of meetings yeah they have to okay
42:12 Maury was here in in March but he wasn't
42:15 here in April I don't want to have it or
42:17 yeah but he was here but he was virtual
42:18 but no that's yeah we weren't really
42:20 sure if he was here
42:23 thank you for that because
42:30 first grade attendance list
42:37 I think when I when I heard from you
42:39 Lori is that I mean because you don't
42:42 think things are as effective if it's
42:44 hybrid you would prefer if we just all
42:46 went back to Virtual right if we all met
42:48 first that's my preference yeah is there
42:50 anybody else
42:53 and I guess that's not even an option
42:54 because Monica has to be down here
42:56 opening the road and that's I mean that
42:59 could be an option if like I would still
43:01 be virtually if I'm alone here
43:06 oh and then we would we would say that
43:08 the board chair doesn't have to be here
43:12 yeah you can can we say that Monica
43:14 doesn't have to be here
43:17 somebody has to be careful to offer to
43:20 offer the in-person option
43:22 I think that would just be too weird
43:24 for for you to be here and then us
43:27 what what do you guys think
43:29 GrubHub
43:32 while she's sitting here and again I
43:35 really like the idea we can adopt
43:37 something try it and decide that in
43:40 three months we're gonna get back
43:42 together and evaluate yeah
43:44 yeah so are you going to put something
43:47 together and yes send it to us between
43:49 now and next meeting I I can't yes I can
43:52 certainly do that I need to prepare some
43:54 things for the
43:55 two other boards who kind of provide
43:58 their input and I need to get back to
44:00 them with their their next draft so yes
44:02 we can do that in advance of your next
44:04 I'll tell you a month goes by quickly
44:08 yeah so is there any way that
44:13 that you draft something that everyone
44:16 accepts
44:18 for interim so that instead of doing 13
44:22 different things that okay this is what
44:25 we have see if it works for you
44:27 well and then
44:29 go from there are you talking about the
44:32 other boards that right yeah and you
44:34 know initially I think I thought was
44:36 let's try and standardize this but I I
44:38 also think that you know these are
44:40 you're each autonomous groups and you
44:44 have different Dynamics and different
44:45 you know different people participating
44:47 in different some different values even
44:50 and I think it's really within each
44:52 group's purview it's something that
44:54 belongs in your rules and so
44:57 um each group has talked through this
44:58 and has come up with something they're
45:00 comfortable with or is close to that and
45:02 so it's okay it's okay that there's some
45:04 variation and the way you did that by
45:07 giving this it started yeah and then
45:09 everyone's good kind of falling within
45:11 this I am going to try I'm trying to
45:13 though to
45:15 um as much as possible standardized so I
45:18 think your rules in the equity boards
45:19 would be really similar based on the
45:21 input you've provided so there will be
45:23 some similarities and then we'll go
45:25 we'll go from there see see what happens
45:28 thank you so much for your input thank
45:31 you so much
45:38 are you related to the geyser that used
45:40 to be the coach up at uh skyline no okay
45:43 I'm not
45:46 happy to meet another Tuesday
45:52 [Music]
45:55 watch
46:03 [Laughter]
46:12 thank you
46:14 okay so Monica you're on next
46:16 it's hard to go after this conversation
46:20 thank you Trish
46:22 um and hello
46:25 um board members because we were talking
46:28 about the equity board Commissioners
46:31 um I wanted to spend a few minutes in
46:34 providing you a little bit of an update
46:36 on the
46:38 2021-2022 Human Services Grants as we
46:42 are closing uh that funding cycle and we
46:45 are working on
46:47 um developing contracts for the next
46:50 funding cycle typically we'd like to
46:52 provide a brief report at the end and to
46:56 give you some details you have in your
46:58 packet just a brief report on staff I
47:00 didn't put together another presentation
47:03 I thought that maybe we can talk a
47:05 little bit in person but I'm happy to
47:06 put the report up it's pretty brief and
47:09 uh basically one of the reasons why it's
47:11 pretty briefly said only about half of
47:13 the course we are able to go through so
47:16 I'm gonna give you a little bit of
47:18 information more and as as we are going
47:21 to go through the new contracts you're
47:23 going to know that that's how we set up
47:25 it's a similar pattern how we set up the
47:27 contracts for the new funding cycle but
47:30 um in 2021 2022 the the city supported
47:35 about 57 organizations not organizations
47:38 the programs
47:40 um and about half of those typically we
47:44 provide direct payments to and we
47:47 intensely
47:49 [Music]
47:52 conduct
47:53 [Music]
47:55 reports reviewings on the other half we
47:58 put into a pooled
48:00 um contract with the other cities on the
48:03 east side so we collaborate with the
48:06 cities of Bellevue Sammamish Kirkland
48:08 and Redmond and those organizations are
48:11 basically organizations that all of the
48:13 Cities fund for the same programs so
48:16 it's not it's a way to create some
48:18 efficiencies with those organizations
48:20 and so those programs enter into one
48:23 contract only and the City of Bellevue
48:26 manages that all of us are responsible
48:29 for reviewing reports and communicating
48:31 still with organizations but payment and
48:34 Contracting thing just goes through
48:35 those the reason why I want to tell you
48:37 a little bit more about this so you know
48:39 the difference is because I would love
48:41 to get your input on what's best moving
48:44 forward
48:45 for this year we do plan on having the
48:48 similar pattern and not changing
48:50 anything just because of timing and so
48:52 again some of the 42 programs that
48:55 you're from we are funding as a city and
48:57 you reviewed and made recommendations
49:00 for about half we are going to keep
49:02 in-house we are going to administer
49:05 in-house and then the other half again
49:07 it's going to go into that cold contract
49:09 I personally actually express some
49:12 concerns about this uh this option
49:15 um to my fellow colleagues on the other
49:17 cities
49:19 um in terms of equity I brought it up uh
49:22 and the reason is that I noticed that
49:25 it's I think it's a great option for
49:28 those organizations who are in the pool
49:29 contract because now I stop having five
49:32 different contracts with five different
49:34 cities they only have one but what I
49:36 noticed is that typically the large
49:38 organizations and those who had more
49:43 structures in place and more financial
49:45 resources or benefiting from the food
49:47 contracts whereas smaller organizations
49:50 that maybe you are more cultural based
49:53 or were funded only by one of the cities
49:55 did not have a couple of cities they did
49:58 not have the opportunity to be in the
49:59 pool contract so it creates a pros and
50:02 cons it's great as an idea but if it's
50:05 not made available to others it's just
50:07 perpetuates the inequities
50:10 um so from that perspective would love
50:13 to have a brief conversation with you
50:15 and actually that's also the reason why
50:16 just going back to the report for last
50:18 year we were not able to review that all
50:21 the reports because and again another
50:23 perhaps inequity the contracts that we
50:26 managed in order to meet our internal
50:28 Financial deadlines for closing the
50:30 books we required all the organizations
50:33 to submit the reports by the 5th of
50:36 January so they had to
50:38 um really to them right right after the
50:41 end of the year whereas all the pool
50:42 contracts they have by the 15th of each
50:45 month which was just
50:46 so they had extra time to review them
50:49 and so by the time we published the
50:50 agenda we didn't received yet all those
50:52 reports from everyone else so a long
50:54 story to tell you the organizations have
50:56 been doing a great job overall in uh um
50:59 always about 90 to 95 of the
51:02 organizations submit the reports on time
51:05 and they meet all the contractual
51:06 requirements as you see in the reports
51:08 about 93 of them from those that we are
51:11 able to review uh accomplished that so
51:15 um for those who were not able to meet
51:16 goals fully or not submit them on time
51:20 are really due to staff challenges that
51:23 they have
51:24 um or just having new staff not knowing
51:26 or just still covered related issues
51:29 that are still lingering but again we
51:31 did not notice any organization having
51:33 any ill intent or just you know any
51:36 fraud or abuse or anything of that of
51:38 public funds
51:40 so kind of like that's the beef overview
51:42 but I'm gonna stop now because I would
51:43 love to to get your points uh and and
51:46 thoughts on do you have ideas on kind of
51:48 like what would be best what not what
51:50 not would be best as as we are trying to
51:54 to be more Equitable in our funding
51:56 process and how we collaborate with
51:59 organizations I do have a question in
52:01 that discussion you had with the other
52:03 cities did anybody else feel the same
52:05 way you did uh absolutely I think they
52:07 they understood and they um they agreed
52:10 with my point and so I think a couple of
52:12 things that we brought on were what if
52:15 we move everyone to a food contract and
52:18 what that means in terms of resources in
52:21 terms of Staffing Resources and capacity
52:23 and Financial Resources So currently we
52:27 as the City of Issaquah we pay an
52:28 administrative fee to the city of
52:30 Bellevue for managing in addition to
52:32 paying the contracts
52:33 um and so the city of Bellevue has more
52:35 Staffing Resources so they have one
52:37 extra staff who just manages the pulled
52:39 contracts it does slow down the process
52:41 typically uh because for every uh pulled
52:45 Contracting the 20 some organizations we
52:47 also have extra meetings and we need to
52:49 collaborate with all the city staff to
52:51 make sure that everyone's on the same
52:53 page so it's a lot of that management
52:56 um so that was one idea was like okay
52:58 well if we move everyone to a pool
53:00 contracts but then that meant that each
53:02 of the cities had to contribute more
53:04 money and more staff and resources to do
53:06 that
53:07 um okay so then the other one was then
53:09 not to have put contracts at all but
53:12 then again so it's just it doesn't seem
53:13 like because I'm assuming this level
53:15 fish I'm assuming the whole reason you
53:18 have pool contracts is based on that's
53:21 based on the history of what you were
53:24 seeing and this was an attempt to make
53:26 it a more efficient process so it would
53:28 be it seems like it it seems like that
53:30 comes with a cost but it would you would
53:34 be reluctant it sounds like it would be
53:36 you'd be reluctant to give that up based
53:40 on how you got to where you are right
53:42 yes exactly and also to mention I think
53:45 when the pooled contract idea came about
53:48 and just to also make things more
53:50 efficient I think the staff at that time
53:53 and that was quite a few years ago
53:55 um created the pool contract also as a
53:57 way to make it easier for the staff who
53:59 are managing so organizations that
54:03 um already had the know-how and had the
54:05 resources and they knew that they would
54:07 be easy organizations to work with but
54:09 were pulling that contract without
54:11 knowing that unwillingly they were
54:14 creating inequities and then fairness
54:16 for that was cool because the people
54:18 that get lost in this are the so you say
54:21 you have a marginalized community and
54:23 you have a an organization or a program
54:25 that steps in to do something about it
54:27 but then they don't have the
54:29 infrastructure necessarily again yeah
54:33 and you used to be a department of one
54:36 exactly so that was also especially for
54:40 some smaller cities uh it was also an
54:43 age and now you're five but I realize
54:45 that some like the um Behavioral Health
54:47 would not necessarily be part of this
54:49 work right yeah yeah but yeah
54:59 so Define full contractors
55:03 okay so let's say
55:07 um we have a larger organization who
55:09 receives has multiple programs and
55:12 receives funding from the City of
55:14 Issaquah the city of Bellevue the city
55:16 of Sammamish Redmond and Kirkland right
55:19 and each of their commissions funded the
55:21 same programs
55:23 okay okay let's say a whole thing right
55:25 they have several programs and they all
55:27 receive funding from each of the Cities
55:29 so instead of us when we now because we
55:32 are now in the process of creating the
55:33 contracts for us to
55:36 um for them to start serving these
55:37 apartments and for us to pay them
55:39 instead of the City of Issaquah entering
55:42 into a contract with them and Sammamish
55:43 entering into a separate contract and
55:45 and Bellevue and Redmond they only get
55:48 into one contract that's going to be met
55:50 on behalf of all of these five cities
55:52 that's managed by one city which is
55:54 about you
55:56 um request is the funds from Issaquah to
56:00 go into that pool I guess so Issaquah
56:03 will pay in the city of Bellevue twice a
56:05 year a large amount of money that covers
56:07 the funding for all the people of
56:09 non-pool organization would probably be
56:11 something like uh it's called Community
56:12 Services maybe exactly yes it's about
56:15 Community Services who now receives
56:17 funding from uh Issaquah Sammamish and
56:20 Bellevue
56:22 um or Redmond and then now they need to
56:24 enter into three separate contracts yeah
56:26 so somebody has to figure out
56:28 percentage-wise
56:31 how much each city is playing and
56:34 getting
56:35 [Music]
56:36 so what how do you feel about it how do
56:39 you feel I'm talking about it because I
56:42 don't think that it's right uh so for
56:45 now I think we agreed to continue as it
56:47 is for this year but it doesn't feel
56:49 right right it just doesn't feel right a
56:52 little smaller or the smaller
56:53 organizations so the decision has been
56:55 made for at least 2023 to continue to
56:59 continue this way it's gonna be an
57:01 emphasis put on
57:03 trying to alleviate this problem that
57:06 you're seeing this sir
57:14 thing as is for 2023s just right now we
57:18 just don't have the time but
57:22 we are also we don't want to hurt in
57:24 this the other organizations that now if
57:26 we pull out then the organizations are
57:29 in the food contract yeah you know and
57:31 so the intent is not to create more
57:33 upset there but intense would be to
57:35 support everyone right so you would want
57:38 to give a a quite a bit notice right
57:41 before making a change yeah I think for
57:45 me the bottom line here is that the
57:47 people that are the marginalized
57:49 population that receives the services
57:50 that's really who we should keep in mind
57:53 rather than
57:55 um you know who who it is that's doing
57:57 it or
57:59 um you know the services is really the
58:01 most important thing so if if there's a
58:05 community that's not receiving Services
58:06 because of this whole thing then that
58:09 should that then we should do away with
58:11 the pool well it
58:17 but I also I I get your point but I also
58:21 see how it's it's complex because it's
58:25 yeah it's not one way or the other it's
58:28 not a binary right right right
58:31 um and there has to be a level of
58:33 accountability because if you you can't
58:37 just be I mean this is so Cavalry you
58:40 can't just be
58:41 throwing money out to organizations and
58:43 and good programs and not expecting them
58:46 to be able to report back and it's use
58:50 of public funds so we have
58:52 Mr Monica are you actually seeing uh
58:56 populations that aren't being served
58:58 because of this cooling thing we don't
59:01 see at this time and I don't think that
59:03 we noticed this long enough to have
59:04 enough information I think the case that
59:08 um I was thinking about making is if we
59:10 have a small organization uh Madeline
59:13 new
59:14 um mentioned east of hot Community
59:15 Services it's a small organization 100
59:17 by volunteers now pays to have
59:27 can can the fact that now they have
59:29 additional requirements can that put
59:31 more strain on them not being able to
59:34 serve the people who needs that um
59:38 a number of their volunteer hours to
59:42 fulfilling certain yeah are there more
59:45 requirements if you're pool than if
59:47 you're not pulled they are less
59:49 requirement if you are pulled there's
59:51 less requirements if you're pulled okay
59:52 they've made that part more efficient
59:54 yes because that's more efficient you'll
59:57 have one scope of work one got it yeah
1:00:00 one like for example even the city in
1:00:04 order to enter into a contract with the
1:00:05 City of Issaquah you need to provide a
1:00:08 business license for the City of
1:00:09 Issaquah uh you need to provide
1:00:12 insurance for the City of Issaquah and
1:00:13 for the other cities that you're
1:00:15 receiving funding for if you're in a
1:00:17 pulled contract you only need to provide
1:00:18 that to one city and that's the city to
1:00:20 contract with which is well right yeah I
1:00:25 have two questions right away that
1:00:27 brings up yeah inequities yes exactly
1:00:30 right thank you for explaining that yeah
1:00:35 I might have missed it so
1:00:38 at this point
1:00:39 how have we Revisited who gets in the
1:00:43 pool and who doesn't get in the pool
1:00:46 it was Revisited a few months ago to
1:00:49 include some culture-based organizations
1:00:53 um because of this concern because of
1:00:55 this concern yes I'm sorry so that was
1:00:57 just kind of like a first step we all
1:00:59 recognized that it's a very half quarter
1:01:01 step and more needs to be done
1:01:06 goodness yeah and so then we with that
1:01:09 because the city of Bellevue did not
1:01:11 have Staffing capacity to take on more
1:01:12 we took off the pool
1:01:15 pulled some other larger organizations
1:01:17 but again it's just it was just the
1:01:20 first step in making a little bit of a
1:01:23 switch Yeah and for the food
1:01:26 um the organization that received the
1:01:29 poor money how do they report let's say
1:01:32 I put my money in the bowl am I reported
1:01:34 only for my numbers of my citizen that
1:01:37 get help no thank you that's so the
1:01:39 reporting for everyone that is one thing
1:01:41 that's constant for food and unfold
1:01:43 contracts because the way
1:01:46 um they are required to submit the
1:01:48 reporting on one form in one report form
1:01:52 to all of the Cities at the same time
1:01:54 there's a line item for each of the
1:01:56 Cities so that is the same for pulled
1:01:58 and non-old okay that yeah it's the
1:02:01 Contracting the contract requirements
1:02:03 and the costs that come with Contracting
1:02:05 that is oh so it's more costly it's more
1:02:09 costly for the non-pooled yes okay so
1:02:11 yeah yes because they need to have even
1:02:14 just they need to provide insurance for
1:02:17 all the CDs yeah yeah
1:02:20 so it's almost like you need additional
1:02:24 Staffing to help support the non-pool
1:02:27 but additional Staffing would mean less
1:02:29 money to go to the programs yes
1:02:32 how could how could theoretically
1:02:35 everybody be pooled if let's say
1:02:37 Issaquah Community let's say Issaquah
1:02:39 Community Services is only getting
1:02:41 a grant from Issaquah so I had so in
1:02:44 that case you you don't right so pools
1:02:47 would mean only for those organizations
1:02:49 that receive funding from multiple
1:02:51 cities
1:02:52 right from one it would be the same
1:02:54 right so there's no way we could put
1:02:55 everybody in the pool
1:02:57 there's no I mean yes there's no way
1:03:00 um because there are still organizations
1:03:02 but there are not very many organic
1:03:05 organic funding just from one city so
1:03:07 why can't you use the same rules
1:03:11 for those who are not for like
1:03:15 if you if you're
1:03:17 have a license Issaquah you're good for
1:03:20 development why can't why because each
1:03:24 city has these Services
1:03:26 they're working with that City so the
1:03:29 fact that you know that they have an
1:03:32 Issaquah license right it should be good
1:03:35 enough it's like it's like yeah it's
1:03:39 like when nurses like
1:03:42 most nurses reciprocity yeah that
1:03:45 represent that's the word sorry I can't
1:03:47 say it but not every state participants
1:03:49 in that so nurses have a tremendous
1:03:51 amount of flexibility within this 34
1:03:54 state I'm making that number up but
1:03:56 within that 34 State group but if they
1:03:59 want to go to one of the other states
1:04:00 they have to pass the nursing board in
1:04:02 that yeah yeah but then that's your
1:04:04 point I mean that is something I could
1:04:06 bring back that's a great retail meeting
1:04:09 and see if there are any cities who
1:04:10 would be willing to have reciprocity in
1:04:12 terms of this yeah basically the city
1:04:14 governments have their pool that says
1:04:16 okay we're in this group so we will
1:04:18 accept from this this if you have a
1:04:21 business license in Issa Bob will accept
1:04:23 that in the city of Sammamish or red
1:04:25 lender well maybe yeah
1:04:29 either increasing the pool for everyone
1:04:31 or going away from having the pool all
1:04:34 together but there have been some
1:04:36 efficiencies
1:04:38 yeah so that's I think the idea would be
1:04:41 right to just open the pool
1:04:43 if any of the smaller organizations
1:04:46 complained that are not in the pool well
1:04:48 I'm not sure that many of them know
1:04:50 right
1:04:54 and say okay if there's responsibility
1:04:57 rules for different city for a specific
1:05:00 uh type of
1:05:03 organization someone can say this is
1:05:05 discriminatory or this is
1:05:08 Equity too because well I have my
1:05:10 business although I don't serve these
1:05:13 commissions why can't I just bring my
1:05:16 services to the different city unless
1:05:18 they decide to open it up and say
1:05:21 um this uh reciprocity is open to all
1:05:24 the businesses yeah and that becomes
1:05:27 complex because then the city becomes
1:05:29 cities with those lines because they
1:05:31 want to keep their money in their City
1:05:32 most of the time
1:05:34 so it's a good idea let's try but I'm
1:05:37 just saying someone can say hey well
1:05:39 it's a much bigger a much bigger
1:05:41 question yes I mean yeah I mean you're
1:05:43 talking about going upstairs to talk to
1:05:46 people yeah yeah and I think again each
1:05:49 City that have the rules in terms of how
1:05:51 you spend public funds right so yeah
1:05:55 it's complex I really appreciate it
1:05:57 we have to come to agreement to go into
1:05:59 the pool in the first place right so at
1:06:03 some point it was an agreement that
1:06:04 we're going to pull this so continue
1:06:07 working right but it's the organizations
1:06:10 that can't happen yeah that aren't there
1:06:13 that can't get into the pool because
1:06:15 they're not big enough and
1:06:19 I just feel like the person I feel like
1:06:21 it would be a shame if you you've tried
1:06:23 to create a more efficient model process
1:06:27 and and it's coming up right yeah yeah I
1:06:32 agree so hopefully Mr cost yes yeah yeah
1:06:37 actually how unusual a metaphor yeah
1:06:41 but see it goes It goes back to
1:06:43 identifying those things that you know
1:06:46 they were created with big hearts but
1:06:49 yeah right and knowingly they created
1:06:51 these inequities that doesn't feel right
1:06:54 to perpetuate them we need to find a way
1:06:59 making sure that we can work with the
1:07:02 other cities to like make an equal or
1:07:05 make sure that multiple cities have like
1:07:07 similar rules because that would reduce
1:07:10 the need for people to even go into the
1:07:12 pool because if they already have let's
1:07:15 say the insurance and business contract
1:07:17 in Issaquah if it's the same exact
1:07:20 requirements in Bellevue and Sammamish
1:07:23 then they wouldn't need to go to the
1:07:26 pool since they already have all the
1:07:27 resources from one they can just control
1:07:29 C control V on to the other one so it
1:07:32 reduced the need to even get into the
1:07:35 pool in the first place which would
1:07:37 probably increase efficiency for that
1:07:40 smaller businesses who feel that it's um
1:07:43 there's some inequity when they go into
1:07:46 the pool they might be able to if it's
1:07:48 same it's the same rules just get this
1:07:52 basically the set one contract with one
1:07:55 and then like I said just Ctrl C control
1:07:57 V it with the others since it's the same
1:08:00 requirements rules and regulations
1:08:04 [Laughter]
1:08:16 thank you
1:08:18 okay Commissioners oh go ahead well I'm
1:08:21 just gonna say getting a city to say
1:08:24 okay you don't need to have a business
1:08:26 license with us if you have a business
1:08:27 license with Issaquah all you know
1:08:29 that's that's like a huge deal it is
1:08:32 that's a huge deal I mean that has to go
1:08:34 before City councils and all sorts of
1:08:36 things that's not an easy thing
1:08:39 pardon they're doing it with the pool
1:08:43 for certain size organizations yes
1:08:47 yes so you know you come back from well
1:08:50 you're you're you're actually the
1:08:53 organizations that can afford it are the
1:08:55 ones that you're not charging but the
1:08:57 smaller ones are the ones so yeah yeah
1:09:00 and the way it works with the pool
1:09:06 the Bellevue it's there's yeah right so
1:09:09 the only city that we have but you're
1:09:10 right we don't we fund the organizations
1:09:13 that are in the pool contract but we
1:09:15 don't have a direct contract with them
1:09:17 so then we can't ask for the business
1:09:18 license for that right but but you're
1:09:21 right you're absolutely right
1:09:24 um it's it's it's more complicated so
1:09:27 thank you though for for
1:09:30 um brainstorming with me and please
1:09:32 continue to think if you have other
1:09:33 ideas I think for now I would like to
1:09:36 work with with my colleagues um in the
1:09:38 region to try to see if we can expand
1:09:40 the pool that seems to be the most
1:09:43 reasonable
1:09:45 um to expand it to other organizations
1:09:47 but if you have other thoughts and
1:09:49 suggestions and ideas
1:09:51 what would be the reason why an
1:09:53 organization for instance will say I
1:09:54 don't want to get in the pool
1:09:57 um good point we actually I was thinking
1:09:59 about this too
1:10:01 um having a closer relationship with the
1:10:05 so those that are in a pulled contract
1:10:07 they don't have as close relationship
1:10:09 with with all of the Cities right so it
1:10:12 goes back to relationships so that is
1:10:13 one reason for why people might not want
1:10:16 the pool
1:10:18 but if they only have one city it goes
1:10:20 directly to Issaquah anyway right it
1:10:23 does so they do service a car residents
1:10:24 and we do need to
1:10:26 um review the reports and if they're
1:10:29 concerns we need to contact them but
1:10:31 there's not as much direct communication
1:10:33 as it is with the other organizations
1:10:36 that we directly contract with or
1:10:39 sometimes we get on the phone hey how do
1:10:41 you want this like it's a
1:10:42 dessert it's a perfect example harmonic
1:10:44 I'm working on this we want to change
1:10:46 our forms how do we track this there's a
1:10:48 collaborative we work together whereas
1:10:51 with the post contracts it's like okay
1:10:53 yes we approve the money or no we don't
1:10:55 approve because we need to wait on this
1:10:58 so it's a different type of relationship
1:11:02 great question Pat
1:11:07 thank you for the great great
1:11:09 conversation
1:11:13 what's that did we help did it help well
1:11:16 I think yeah I think it was helpful to
1:11:18 secure and even so some things that I
1:11:20 didn't think about that you brought up
1:11:22 and then just trying to see where to
1:11:25 tackle do we tackle with finance and
1:11:28 Contracting like procurement that each
1:11:30 of our individual cities is to see if
1:11:32 there's something that we can do there
1:11:34 see if we can expand the pool contract
1:11:37 and full contracts and see what can we
1:11:40 do in terms of Staffing and resources
1:11:42 for that the other stuff is another
1:11:44 option do we want to try to increase
1:11:48 amount of founding funding for
1:11:50 organizations who are not in the pool to
1:11:55 extra costs yeah
1:11:59 also provide more overhead yeah
1:12:03 exactly
1:12:04 also about mini pools I mean if there's
1:12:07 10 organizations like that that just
1:12:11 work with Issaquah in Bellevue right
1:12:13 exactly a secondary pool
1:12:16 I so appreciate you recognizing that and
1:12:19 bringing it up I think it's just it's a
1:12:23 Hazard of the industry right yeah so yes
1:12:27 no thank you but I think yeah I
1:12:29 appreciate it and actually now I'm gonna
1:12:31 segue into the next agenda item if I may
1:12:33 have more bed because as we talk about
1:12:35 the work plan item for 2023 as a small
1:12:38 refresher we well one of the
1:12:41 conversations that we had at our last
1:12:42 meeting in October was uh to to tell you
1:12:46 that typically during the off years this
1:12:49 is the of what we call off years because
1:12:51 you don't you don't repeat Brands uh we
1:12:53 encourage you to go and reach out to
1:12:55 organizations not reach out but go and
1:12:57 visit organizations we would reach out
1:12:59 on your behalf but go and visit
1:13:01 organizations and actually if you do
1:13:03 decide to move forward with visiting
1:13:06 some organizations this could be a
1:13:08 question for you to entertain with them
1:13:10 with pooled or non-pooled and perhaps
1:13:13 you can visit a few that are called a
1:13:15 few that are not pulled learning from
1:13:18 um and then with that though the one
1:13:20 question that I was going to bring back
1:13:22 to you so in October we were talking
1:13:25 about again the the benefit the pros and
1:13:28 cons about visiting organizations or
1:13:30 inviting organizations to come to your
1:13:33 meetings and also we talked about
1:13:35 another Equity
1:13:37 um or inclusion aspect of if you don't
1:13:41 visit all the organizations are you
1:13:43 going to be biased at the next funding
1:13:44 cycle now because you know of your
1:13:46 organizations so
1:13:49 um what we were suggesting
1:13:51 um or a staff we were suggesting at that
1:13:55 time is that perhaps you can
1:13:57 decide to visit all the organizations in
1:14:00 one category right or as I was thinking
1:14:04 a little bit more about this I had two
1:14:05 options in mind you can decide to visit
1:14:09 all the organizations and there are not
1:14:11 too many of them that are completely new
1:14:14 to receiving funding from the city this
1:14:16 funding cycle so they're new or because
1:14:20 culture-based organizations and uh uh
1:14:23 focus on inclusion and Equity was a big
1:14:25 aspect for us you can also decide to
1:14:27 visit those organizations for a more
1:14:30 cultural based and historically might be
1:14:33 smaller and then again just just get
1:14:36 them some feel for from them in terms of
1:14:38 what's working what's not working what's
1:14:40 difficult in terms of funding
1:14:43 um including pulder and Uncle
1:14:45 so that's another item I wanted to bring
1:14:48 up for discussion for you tonight
1:14:51 okay I can't remember when we talked in
1:14:53 October I I kind of thought that I'm
1:14:56 going back to the first question which
1:14:58 was do we want them to come here or do
1:15:00 we want to go visit and I thought we had
1:15:02 come to the conclusion we would want to
1:15:04 go visit in that movie so that was my
1:15:06 understanding yes yeah and do these
1:15:09 visits happen during the day or just it
1:15:11 just typically during the day now in my
1:15:14 conversation with some of the
1:15:15 organizations
1:15:17 they shared that sometimes they have
1:15:19 events and they would love to invite you
1:15:22 to some events this way it feels more
1:15:24 collaborative and they don't feel like
1:15:26 they need to prepare us for an audit so
1:15:29 it doesn't feel so intrusive so we have
1:15:31 those options and so I put some you know
1:15:34 there are some organizations that they
1:15:35 want to just invite you to some this way
1:15:37 you get to see them in action and see
1:15:39 what they're doing so these visits then
1:15:41 aren't just brought to they're something
1:15:43 you set up ahead of time yes we schedule
1:15:45 based on so typically yeah I am you know
1:15:50 [Laughter]
1:15:58 so typically we would start with this is
1:16:01 the list depending on what you choose
1:16:02 this is the list of organizations that
1:16:04 you're gonna visit depending on what you
1:16:06 choose and then we create a sign up
1:16:09 sheet and and send it out to you and say
1:16:12 hey I'm interested in visiting this
1:16:13 organization or am I interested in
1:16:16 visiting this organization and based on
1:16:18 that then we would reach out to them get
1:16:20 some times and days that work for them
1:16:23 get you know availability from you and
1:16:25 do the match and then typically we we
1:16:28 say that it's easier to go in pairs of
1:16:30 at least two uh we ask enough to as you
1:16:34 know do a formal Quorum
1:16:37 so you can do two things
1:16:40 [Laughter]
1:16:49 there you go you can of course go by
1:16:53 yourself as well but I think it's
1:16:55 usually easier to just go to yeah yeah
1:16:57 and and you come back and at the next
1:16:59 meeting of the next Commission meeting
1:17:01 after your visit you come and share with
1:17:03 with the Commissioners
1:17:06 no that's it I like the idea of them
1:17:09 having something already going on you
1:17:12 know rather than just go and say you
1:17:15 know what's happening so it has to
1:17:17 actually take you through a tour rather
1:17:18 than you can participate or watch so
1:17:22 what do we need to do to set that up
1:17:25 uh so I think first thing is to decide
1:17:27 what organizations or what group of
1:17:30 organizations you would like to visit
1:17:32 would you like to visit just the new
1:17:34 organizations would you like to visit
1:17:36 the cultural based organizations or
1:17:38 something totally different maybe you
1:17:39 want to visit all the behavioral health
1:17:42 organizations
1:17:42 but we had our three different groups so
1:17:46 we looked at like
1:17:48 like one group would visit the
1:17:50 home and went through the financial I
1:17:54 don't know I can remember that the other
1:17:56 group was yeah so you had the homeless
1:17:58 Services you had the behavioral health
1:18:01 um uh and the physical health services
1:18:03 you had a cultural based organizations
1:18:05 and then you had other Community
1:18:07 Resources
1:18:10 um so I I wouldn't recommend because
1:18:11 that's all of them that's 42 of vanilla
1:18:13 programs that would be difficult I would
1:18:15 recommend choosing one so either you can
1:18:18 choose let's say our recommendations it
1:18:20 was either culture-based organizations
1:18:22 or if you want to just get across all of
1:18:25 them a little bit choose all the ones
1:18:27 that perhaps we funded for the first
1:18:29 time but what about have a mix of okay
1:18:32 maybe the cultural base and depending on
1:18:36 how many it turns out to be in the
1:18:37 cultural base and the new ones in other
1:18:39 categories yes I like I like say that
1:18:43 again it's a great idea so we chose a
1:18:45 cultural based organizations how many
1:18:47 whatever it is and the new ones only in
1:18:50 the other categories
1:18:53 and then next year we rotate
1:18:56 that's certainly enough
1:18:59 I'm sure you look at one mainly and you
1:19:01 make sure that everyone else is
1:19:04 well-rounded yeah and the new and the
1:19:07 new organizations know hey we're here
1:19:15 so and also you build relationships
1:19:18 I felt like there's a real opportunity
1:19:21 there yeah that's great well we're
1:19:24 talking about more time commission wise
1:19:26 as Commissioners too so
1:19:30 um it depends on how many volunteered
1:19:34 to do that then we're looking at uh
1:19:37 Monica we funded 42 programs right how
1:19:39 many organizations
1:19:41 uh I believe that is 30 some I'm sorry
1:19:45 no 30 30 some 30 something how many
1:19:48 nodes
1:19:50 um it's less than ten okay okay
1:19:54 so all together you have about 15 I
1:19:58 would say that's probably that's pretty
1:20:00 good numbers yes even less
1:20:03 I apologize I wanted to look at that
1:20:05 before the meeting and I didn't have a
1:20:06 chance the interesting uh
1:20:08 scheduled calendar put together when you
1:20:11 put all that in the one what if you were
1:20:14 just to send out a list to all the
1:20:16 Commissioners and have them
1:20:18 or is this too random just check
1:20:21 you know first of all how many would you
1:20:23 recommend we visit in a year
1:20:27 so definitely I think probably about 15
1:20:29 it's a Max I I like to keep it on each
1:20:32 person no not each person each each
1:20:34 person probably total each person
1:20:37 probably not more than two three it's
1:20:39 reasonable for even not to visit more
1:20:41 than two three organization okay so what
1:20:42 if you were just to send out a a chart
1:20:44 and say you know which ones do you
1:20:47 really want to visit
1:20:48 yeah so oh oh would you like me to sign
1:20:51 I can definitely send you all of the
1:20:52 organizations but I was going to take
1:20:54 how that can take out just the cultural
1:20:56 based and new ones and send you this
1:20:57 with that yeah and then I can of course
1:21:00 thank you also send you the list and
1:21:02 it's public we should have it by now on
1:21:03 the website too with all the
1:21:04 organizations that we found in case you
1:21:06 want to visit someone else yeah yeah
1:21:08 yeah okay so that that's the follow-up
1:21:10 of absolutely would be to send you the
1:21:13 list of the organizations and then
1:21:17 um you can start signing up and say okay
1:21:19 Commissioners please put your name next
1:21:21 to the one that you'd like but you're
1:21:23 thinking of just sending us the new ones
1:21:26 and the cultural based ones okay yeah
1:21:28 in addition to I can send you of course
1:21:30 like all of the organizations you have
1:21:32 that that's public information anyway
1:21:34 right so is there any way you can put
1:21:37 the set the program up so that when
1:21:40 um Tris checks one that it's not
1:21:42 available for others to check I can put
1:21:45 it on SharePoint so then you all see
1:21:47 everybody it's being checked by two
1:21:50 people yeah
1:21:56 that sounds great good starting point
1:22:02 great conversation thank you for the
1:22:04 feedback so that was my main update
1:22:06 about the work plan items did you have
1:22:08 the the draft work plan
1:22:11 um in in your agenda packet the other
1:22:13 quick question that I have for you
1:22:15 hopefully it's not going to be or
1:22:19 up too long of a conversation
1:22:21 um about a work plan item I'm trying to
1:22:24 plan for a joint meeting with the equity
1:22:26 board and I was hoping that we can do it
1:22:29 in February but the equity board is
1:22:32 getting pulled into two meetings in
1:22:34 February so they already have two
1:22:35 meetings in February I might postpone it
1:22:38 to either the equity board meetings in
1:22:40 March and invite you to their meeting or
1:22:43 invite them to your meeting in March so
1:22:46 our meeting in March is the 15th when is
1:22:49 theirs they they always meet on the
1:22:51 first Wednesday of the of the month
1:22:53 that'll be March 1st yes so I think my
1:22:57 question is do you have a preference do
1:22:59 you have an interest first of all I
1:23:01 think you would have an interest in a
1:23:03 joint meeting right yes very much so
1:23:06 yeah the equity board expressed interest
1:23:08 in all things Human Services I know that
1:23:11 we are due for a human services
1:23:12 strategic Plan update so we thought we
1:23:14 can just do a plastically board had a
1:23:16 visit from the Issaquah school district
1:23:18 and the Issa School District proposed
1:23:20 some collaboration items and all of them
1:23:23 were human services related so then I
1:23:25 said you know there are some great
1:23:27 connections so their meeting is on the
1:23:29 15th of March
1:23:37 their meetings it's at 6
1:23:40 same room though I'm out of town March
1:23:42 1st so I have to I won't weigh in on the
1:23:45 whole conversation ours are always on
1:23:47 the 15th yeah on the third month
1:23:50 February 3rd Wednesday of February it's
1:23:53 been almost a year I'll get it done yet
1:23:56 it's still February 15th February 15 on
1:23:59 March 15 there because the days stay the
1:24:01 same yeah is it because of 28 I think
1:24:03 it's because of the 28 days in February
1:24:05 right yeah so you're just trying to
1:24:06 determine availability just just yeah a
1:24:10 little better you won't be here on the
1:24:12 15th of February
1:24:17 I'm on the plane
1:24:19 okay so I can gauge stuff we can always
1:24:22 go to a third option and choosing
1:24:24 something in the middle maybe you know
1:24:25 another day in um in March the problem
1:24:28 is that we are going to end up with the
1:24:29 room problem but we'll yeah any others
1:24:33 many Trish that's them good both those
1:24:36 days you can I think
1:24:42 I have no idea
1:24:44 I think there's March February 15 is the
1:24:48 problem
1:24:49 yeah I've got something going on in
1:24:52 March but I don't know dates yet
1:25:12 yes I'm sorry yeah I'm going to be out
1:25:15 of town March 1st to the 15th oh yeah
1:25:19 I might be back in time I don't have my
1:25:22 itinerary in front of me but I might be
1:25:23 back in time for our commission meeting
1:25:25 on the 15th I just that I don't have in
1:25:28 front of me okay so they'll have March
1:25:31 15th seems more reasonable it sounds
1:25:32 like okay okay we'll keep that as an
1:25:35 option March 15th and I'll follow up so
1:25:38 with other emails okay thank you so much
1:25:41 I know we are running a little bit
1:25:42 behind Trish so and that concludes okay
1:25:44 okay so we're gonna move on and I'm
1:25:47 gonna give my first chair report that
1:25:49 I've ever given and then you get to give
1:25:51 a report as well yes yeah okay so um
1:25:56 are you guys familiar with the voice
1:25:58 Mentor program in the school district
1:26:01 I have a voice Mentor yes I am familiar
1:26:04 okay I'm okay all right as well and yeah
1:26:06 and you probably saw the announcements
1:26:08 that went out
1:26:09 um they are the voice well first of all
1:26:12 I should explain for those people that
1:26:13 are familiar with it it started with the
1:26:15 school's foundation and then I don't
1:26:18 know how many years I don't know 20
1:26:20 years ago how long ago I don't know how
1:26:23 long it's been started a long time ago
1:26:24 it was it's called schools commission
1:26:25 yeah it started with us uh foundations
1:26:27 yeah yeah and then the school district
1:26:30 thought it was so valuable that they
1:26:31 just brought it into the school district
1:26:33 program announced run by the school
1:26:35 district and it's basically where they
1:26:39 match a Community member up with a
1:26:41 student that they feel needs another
1:26:45 adult presence in their life for
1:26:47 whatever reason and man when you can
1:26:50 chime in and say anything you want no
1:26:51 you're doing great and um it does it's
1:26:54 not a tutor it's not a tutor it can be
1:26:57 if you get together with the student and
1:27:00 the student really wants you to help
1:27:01 them with a subject or something I'm on
1:27:04 my second year as a mentor and
1:27:07 um last year we never pulled out a book
1:27:10 this all the the student just wanted to
1:27:12 talk talk talk talk which was great and
1:27:15 then this year
1:27:16 um I have actually I have a um
1:27:19 a Colombian middle school boy he and his
1:27:23 mom across the Rio Grande I assume
1:27:25 they're here illegally and
1:27:28 um we're having a great time he's
1:27:30 teaching me Spanish I'm teaching him
1:27:31 English
1:27:33 um and uh so you know it just you just
1:27:36 it's just to have another adult presence
1:27:38 and the school counselors kind of get a
1:27:42 sense of who can benefit and they will
1:27:44 make recommendations to I guess the
1:27:46 parents
1:27:47 somehow the school counselors kind of
1:27:50 decide you know I think the student can
1:27:52 use another adult in their life and and
1:27:55 then they must reach out to the family
1:27:56 or something I don't know how involved I
1:27:58 mean the family must sign off on it
1:28:00 right at some point but uh I don't know
1:28:04 if they have I don't know about that
1:28:05 yeah but anyways not it's not like us
1:28:08 the students in the school district just
1:28:10 walk up and say I want to be a voice
1:28:13 mentee they don't do it doesn't happen
1:28:16 that you don't self-select I think a
1:28:18 counselor gets involved but so and you
1:28:21 would have gotten this email too we just
1:28:23 we just got an email
1:28:25 they are in dire need of mentors
1:28:30 particularly men and particularly men of
1:28:33 color
1:28:36 okay and I think I I'm just assuming it
1:28:41 might have to do with a lot you guys all
1:28:43 know that the demographics are changing
1:28:45 and you know that and I had not heard
1:28:48 this term until about a year ago
1:28:50 the population of students in the school
1:28:52 the minority is now the majority yes so
1:28:57 it's minority majority and you can
1:29:00 probably speak to this as well too but
1:29:04 and it's wonderful I mean it's becoming
1:29:06 when I was talking to this one counselor
1:29:08 he said the school district really isn't
1:29:10 prepared because there is so I mean
1:29:12 we've got ukrainians here we've got um
1:29:16 tons of Spanish-speaking people
1:29:18 um and the school district really isn't
1:29:20 prepared to I mean they are trying to
1:29:23 figure out how they need to change to be
1:29:26 able to help all students all students
1:29:31 so you know one of the things they're
1:29:33 doing is they're putting out a big plea
1:29:34 for um I think everybody in this room
1:29:38 would be a great I think you have to be
1:29:40 um over 18. I think everybody here would
1:29:42 be a great mentor and they're
1:29:44 particularly looking to check my idea
1:29:46 they're particularly looking for men and
1:29:49 they're particularly looking for men of
1:29:50 color Manny I think you'd be great it's
1:29:53 a shame that Maddie doesn't already have
1:29:54 you know enough going on in his life we
1:29:57 just have to get him out of his garage
1:29:59 where he's making up making all those
1:30:02 beautiful pieces of woodwork
1:30:04 um so I'm gonna have
1:30:06 um because I know I'm not supposed to
1:30:08 email anybody or you know we're supposed
1:30:10 to have everything go through Monica I'm
1:30:11 going to send her something to send out
1:30:12 to everybody if you want to learn more
1:30:14 about the program
1:30:16 so and who who runs this there's two um
1:30:21 districts and Tina so it's a because
1:30:24 it's a school district program now yeah
1:30:26 so the email is actually voice
1:30:29 issaquah.webnet.edu yeah and the
1:30:32 commitment is
1:30:33 um I meet with the student and you know
1:30:35 you can talk about I mean it with one
1:30:37 student there's some mentors that have
1:30:39 six students I meet with one student
1:30:41 um for 45 minutes one period a week
1:30:45 so I mean it's not a huge commitment
1:30:47 and everything has to be done at school
1:30:50 the boundaries are very very clear and
1:30:53 you're not supposed to you know exchange
1:30:55 cell numbers or anything like that
1:31:01 the Human Services Commission funded the
1:31:04 program as a Steve funding it was part
1:31:07 of the non-profit when it was part of
1:31:09 the Issaquah schools Foundation
1:31:12 it started building up it got
1:31:14 transferred back to the city to them the
1:31:18 school district yeah
1:31:23 I mean it started with the foundation
1:31:25 yes it started with the foundation and
1:31:27 it got transferred to the school yeah
1:31:28 yeah no I'm sorry you got transferred to
1:31:31 us because this was such a valuable
1:31:33 program and
1:31:35 um yeah so my kids are the help well now
1:31:38 I don't know yeah I don't I I went to
1:31:41 the breakfast thing a while back I
1:31:42 couldn't tell you the exact numbers
1:31:43 they're having a real they have way more
1:31:46 students that have been identified for
1:31:48 support and they can provide one-on-one
1:31:51 mentors to work for yeah
1:31:54 um I've had I only have one student I've
1:31:56 had her since grade three she's a
1:31:58 sophomore now she has exceptional grades
1:32:01 take full credit
1:32:04 um but I I I have to say it's one of
1:32:07 those for me it's been one of those
1:32:08 things where I certainly get more out of
1:32:10 it yeah
1:32:11 I love it and most of the mentors will
1:32:14 say that yes and it's just yeah another
1:32:17 adult present that's all it is yeah I
1:32:19 think the biggest the hardest thing
1:32:21 about it in terms of getting more people
1:32:23 to do it is it it's all on the school
1:32:26 schedule so it's not like oh my evenings
1:32:29 are pretty free I can meet with someone
1:32:30 at you know after dinner it is it is
1:32:33 Monday through Friday and it is finding
1:32:35 the time during the day that works their
1:32:38 schedule so that's the to me that's been
1:32:40 the biggest challenge
1:32:42 yeah oh yeah you got a conference room I
1:32:45 get the conference room I have I have it
1:32:48 scheduled for the rest of the year and I
1:32:50 meet the student at 9 45 every Tuesday
1:32:55 and Manny this is back in 2017 when this
1:32:59 was still a city project and this was
1:33:01 again this was seed funding so they were
1:33:03 starting but they they served 31 youth
1:33:06 in that year and it's it's hundreds now
1:33:08 yeah I'm sorry and you know what when
1:33:11 you get the email from Monica there will
1:33:13 be links and you can go out and look
1:33:14 into it yeah
1:33:18 yeah I was good okay so I'm done with
1:33:22 that and now you're on Preston Okay so
1:33:27 there's a lot of different
1:33:30 um there's a lot of different events
1:33:31 we're starting here at um at yeah but
1:33:35 but so I'm gonna tell you just a little
1:33:37 bit about all of them because there's
1:33:39 like a lot so our biggest one is our
1:33:44 state of mind conference so this will be
1:33:46 on March 18th that either one from one
1:33:49 to four or two to four and this will be
1:33:52 either at the community center or
1:33:54 gibsonette which is just like
1:33:56 12 steps down and um basically this is
1:34:01 um we're all going we're all inviting
1:34:04 speakers from around the community and
1:34:07 they're going to speak about mental
1:34:08 health so these can this is going to
1:34:10 include some of our topics that are
1:34:12 Stress Management mood substance abuse
1:34:15 suicide awareness and identity sexuality
1:34:18 so basically it's just like an awareness
1:34:21 raising event where people can learn
1:34:23 about like how learn more awareness
1:34:27 about the mental health and also learn
1:34:29 about like resources they can access if
1:34:31 they are experiencing a mental illness
1:34:34 so yeah that's one of our biggest events
1:34:37 and personally one of my favorites
1:34:39 and um the next event is our
1:34:42 environmental conference which will be
1:34:44 on the 25th
1:34:46 um this is um like state of mind but
1:34:49 it's more it hasn't ended but it's about
1:34:51 the environment so it'll include topics
1:34:54 like agriculture deforestation
1:34:56 electricity and heat and overfishing and
1:35:00 there'll be a call of action where
1:35:02 people can learn about how they can help
1:35:04 and how they can make a difference is
1:35:07 that March 25th
1:35:10 um yes March 25th it's also one to four
1:35:21 our mental conference will be held
1:35:23 online and
1:35:25 another March one we have a um tree
1:35:29 planning however this is very like early
1:35:32 but we're partnering with um a
1:35:35 organization called Mountain to sound
1:35:37 Greenways and they help do
1:35:40 um tree planting events and
1:35:42 environmental events so we're hoping
1:35:45 that we can make that a public event so
1:35:48 people can come down and help plant some
1:35:51 trees
1:35:52 and and what day is it
1:35:55 um it's not planned yeah okay mid mid
1:35:58 late March maybe early April
1:36:01 and then nearest one is on February 2nd
1:36:05 is our Civic engagement meeting and this
1:36:08 is a conference for students
1:36:10 specifically and they get to meet the
1:36:12 mayor and other politicians and they can
1:36:15 learn about how to make an impact on
1:36:16 their Community I heard there might be
1:36:19 an um uh activity where they can create
1:36:22 like a politicial campaign to get people
1:36:25 to vote for them
1:36:28 so you know if you need any ideas then
1:36:32 you know where to go
1:36:34 and finally we have different community
1:36:37 building events for different ages such
1:36:41 um the Issaquah kids triathlon Harry
1:36:44 Potter night dog bone donuts and our
1:36:47 newest one is a pet adoption event and
1:36:49 these all are like to be determined days
1:36:54 with all these events besides the one
1:36:56 that's virtual
1:36:58 state of mind
1:37:01 um we didn't realize that Gibson Ed was
1:37:04 going to cost so much money to reserve
1:37:06 so it will either be held at Gibson neck
1:37:09 if we can get the funds or the community
1:37:11 center but either way it will be the
1:37:13 same time and that environmental is held
1:37:16 online
1:37:17 um and Civic engagement
1:37:21 I can't see at the time if we rarely um
1:37:24 I know that there's posters we have
1:37:27 posters out and those will tell you
1:37:29 where it is and we're getting hopefully
1:37:33 we're going to be able to put it into
1:37:35 one of the school newsletters so if
1:37:38 y'all have any kids then you might see
1:37:40 it in the school newsletter but
1:37:44 Preston I'm so sorry if you already have
1:37:46 the pliers or any information that you
1:37:48 have you can also email it to me and
1:37:49 I'll share it with the rest of the
1:37:51 commission yes okay I'll do that because
1:37:54 I think I have a flower that would be
1:37:56 great yes that would be great thank you
1:37:58 and then um
1:38:01 all Harry Potter night the cat Triathlon
1:38:04 dodgeball and donuts I think these are
1:38:06 mostly considered towards
1:38:13 are supposed to be meant for teens
1:38:22 today
1:38:32 [Laughter]
1:38:35 most of these extra community building
1:38:38 events will all be held at the community
1:38:41 center obviously the tree planning will
1:38:44 not we'll probably find I think Mountain
1:38:47 December Greenway has a specific like
1:38:49 location where they help and I think
1:38:53 that's it for me thank you great thank
1:38:56 you very much
1:39:04 be on the commission
1:39:08 okay and you do you have something more
1:39:10 just one quick I know we talked a little
1:39:13 bit about joint meeting with Equity
1:39:14 board
1:39:15 just a heads up at the end typically at
1:39:18 the end of January and um beginning of
1:39:20 February our city typically starts
1:39:23 recruitment for new boards and
1:39:24 Commissioners
1:39:26 so I'm just wondering if we give heads
1:39:28 up and also ask around the room
1:39:31 um if you plan on continuing to staying
1:39:33 on the commission and your term is set
1:39:38 to expire please just get in touch with
1:39:40 me so then you can reapply or for any
1:39:43 reasons if you plan on stepping down
1:39:45 because also this is the time to let me
1:39:46 know so that we can plan for any
1:39:48 vacancies typically the recruitment as I
1:39:51 said starts at the end of this month
1:39:52 early next month then typically we do
1:39:55 interviews sometimes in March we make
1:39:57 those recommendations to the mayor in
1:39:59 April who then appoints new
1:40:02 Commissioners and those are also valid
1:40:05 by city council so then the new
1:40:07 Commissioners start on on May 1st and
1:40:11 existing terms and Commissioners uh end
1:40:14 on April 30th and everybody knows where
1:40:17 I mean I would have to go look at I
1:40:19 don't know when my term expires
1:40:20 everybody knows where to go look right
1:40:23 do you have it open right now
1:40:25 so high map is not here here uh today
1:40:29 um his term expires this year Pat your
1:40:32 term also expires this year uh Maury
1:40:35 also your term expires this year so yes
1:40:39 if you want to extend yes absolutely do
1:40:41 it formally uh you're gonna have to
1:40:43 formally just reapply but thank you for
1:40:45 letting me know because let me know how
1:40:50 also a vacancy that we did not feel last
1:40:52 time and then we also have uh probably
1:40:55 another vacancy for a math board member
1:40:59 for a commissioner who was not able to
1:41:01 attend since June so then that's going
1:41:03 to be also a vacant position so we have
1:41:05 two vacant positions automatically
1:41:09 I thought we actually had three
1:41:12 three vacancies there's Jamie
1:41:15 so that's the vacant position oh and
1:41:18 Jamie's is still there us know that
1:41:20 you're absolutely right Jane um Jamie
1:41:22 Jamie's still there I thought that the
1:41:24 vacant position was genius but you're
1:41:25 right Jamie's there I saw her name yes
1:41:27 so you have three positions or
1:41:29 automatically bacon in understand
1:41:31 Commissioners that right
1:41:33 it may decides to step down
1:41:36 um hopefully not but this is a Great
1:41:38 Commission would be great one too
1:41:40 I got the three years already
1:41:45 man a year 20. my turn is over
1:42:13 [Music]
1:42:16 is planning on returning
1:42:19 um her at the end of February so
1:42:21 probably you're gonna see her at the
1:42:23 meeting in March
1:42:25 and that's that's it concludes anything
1:42:27 else so if you don't have any
1:42:28 announcements
1:42:30 okay anything for the go to the order I
1:42:32 think we've probably
1:42:34 interjected some of that throughout the
1:42:35 meeting anyways okay all right meeting
1:42:37 adjourned all right thank you thank you
1:42:40 very much