Environmental Board · Wednesday, July 13, 2022 · City Council Digest

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

Minutes of May 11, 2022

packet pp.3–5

Open packet at p.3 ↗

Staff report:

APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) 05-11-22 Environmental Board Minutes Page [0000] CITY OF ISSAQUAH Environmental Board 6:30 PM Virtual Meeting May 11, 2022 MINUTES

Minutes of June 8, 2022

packet pp.7–9

Open packet at p.7 ↗

Staff report:

APPROVAL OF MINUTES b) 06-08-22 Environmental Board Minutes Page [0000] CITY OF ISSAQUAH Environmental Board 6:30 PM Virtual Meeting June 8, 2022 MINUTES

4. AGENDA ITEMS

Stormwater and Wastewater Master Plans (D)

Allen Quynn, Senior Engineer, Public Works Engineering · packet pp.11–35

Topics: Water

Open packet at p.11 ↗

Staff report:

The purpose of this presentation is to provide the Environmental Board an update on the Storm and Surface Water Master Plan (Plan). This presentation is for

5. REPORTS

Environmental Board Schedule

packet pp.37–38

Open packet at p.37 ↗

Staff report:

2022 Environmental Board Schedule (tentative) All meetings are at 6:30 unless noted otherwise. (updated 6/19/22)

3121 segments .txt ↗

0:00 ↗ vacation so i'm going to be doing our

0:03 ↗ first one in person and welcome it's

0:05 ↗ nice to see everybody's face

0:07 ↗ so finally

0:08 ↗ i'm glad to have you here

0:10 ↗ so welcome to our july 13th meeting of

0:13 ↗ the squad environmental board so due to

0:16 ↗ our hybrid format of tonight's meeting

0:18 ↗ i'm going to provide a few guidelines

0:20 ↗ and stacey's going to correct me when i

0:21 ↗ make mistakes

0:23 ↗ so we're going to have participants

0:24 ↗ attending in person and then also some

0:27 ↗ online

0:29 ↗ via the our remote system here

0:32 ↗ um so we need to speak clearly pause

0:34 ↗ frequently and state your name each time

0:36 ↗ before you speak

0:38 ↗ you don't have microphones nothing to

0:39 ↗ mute but the folks on the other side

0:41 ↗ need to mute their microphones if

0:43 ↗ they're not speaking please

0:45 ↗ for those of you on the remote side if

0:47 ↗ you're if you're having technical issues

0:49 ↗ try joining the meeting using a

0:51 ↗ different device smartphone or tablet or

0:53 ↗ use the call-in information in the

0:55 ↗ meeting invite to call into the meeting

0:59 ↗ um commissioners when you have the

1:00 ↗ desire to speak make a question or

1:02 ↗ comment um rather than type it in like

1:04 ↗ we have we've decided just to tip our

1:06 ↗ little sign up like that and then

1:09 ↗ i'll call on you as we go around the

1:11 ↗ room there

1:13 ↗ [Applause]

1:15 ↗ uh at the end of each topic we'll we'll

1:17 ↗ summarize the agreement uh around

1:19 ↗ recommendations

1:21 ↗ um tonight we have four excused absences

1:24 ↗ jamie being one they see our others

1:30 ↗ and laura

1:31 ↗ and do we need any alternates to be

1:33 ↗ serving as regular men yes

1:39 ↗ um i don't believe we're going to be

1:40 ↗ voting on anything tonight

1:42 ↗ and um

1:44 ↗ stacey do you want to do orientation to

1:46 ↗ the ford real quick great yeah just epic

1:48 ↗ orientation to the room since it's new

1:50 ↗ to all of us um bathrooms are in the

1:52 ↗ back uh kitchen if you need a water

1:55 ↗ refill it is over

1:57 ↗ to my left

1:58 ↗ emergency exit or out these two back

2:00 ↗ doors um and then if anyone is joining

2:04 ↗ on their computer just let me know so we

2:06 ↗ can make sure to disconnect your audio

2:07 ↗ so we don't get an audio feed

2:09 ↗ noted that no public internet that's

2:12 ↗ something maybe we can look into it so

2:14 ↗ if you do have other comments about the

2:16 ↗ room the setup um anything else that you

2:19 ↗ have a needs for journey just let me

2:21 ↗ know and we'll make a note to

2:23 ↗ accommodate that at the next meeting

2:28 ↗ do we need to do attendance

2:30 ↗ um

2:32 ↗ sure for the record let's do it

2:36 ↗ yeah that'd be great uh tommy anderson

2:38 ↗ here

2:40 ↗ uh nancy davidson here

2:42 ↗ cameron fisher yeah

2:45 ↗ dan hintz here

2:47 ↗ uh ashman hannah

2:59 ↗ do we have any public comments at this

3:01 ↗ time

3:02 ↗ i did not see any or i did not receive

3:05 ↗ any comments in writing ahead of the

3:07 ↗ meeting

3:08 ↗ i do not see any members of the public

3:11 ↗ online and we have no members of the

3:13 ↗ public in the brain

3:16 ↗ somebody steps in either online online

3:19 ↗ please let me know and then we'll go

3:20 ↗ through that process

3:23 ↗ otherwise next up is approval of our

3:24 ↗ minutes so we're approving the minutes

3:26 ↗ from the may 11th and the june 8th

3:31 ↗ are there any meetings on the minutes

3:32 ↗ that would like to be noted

3:39 ↗ it's 89

3:40 ↗ minutes are approved

3:45 ↗ say no public comments tonight we'll

3:47 ↗ move right in

3:48 ↗ i'm only on one topic tonight and it's

3:50 ↗ probably good because we're in a new

3:52 ↗ format so

3:53 ↗ plenty of time

3:54 ↗ so allen and gary are here to talk to us

3:56 ↗ tonight about the storm water and

3:58 ↗ wastewater master

4:10 ↗ i'm sorry you should have the presenter

4:12 ↗ control back

4:13 ↗ oh okay

4:16 ↗ okay

4:54 ↗ okay okay

4:57 ↗ all right good evening everybody my name

4:59 ↗ is alan quinn i'm a senior from one

5:00 ↗ engineer for the

5:02 ↗ city of the supply and i'll be

5:04 ↗ presenting the storm research water

5:06 ↗ master plan

5:08 ↗ final adoption

5:11 ↗ and i have gary schimmick he'll be here

5:14 ↗ as needed his support moral support uh

5:17 ↗ he's until his engineering manager and

5:19 ↗ then i have to i have the otak team

5:21 ↗ consultant firm that we hired to help us

5:24 ↗ develop a plan and and the team consists

5:27 ↗ of trista

5:28 ↗ bluskey

5:29 ↗ and

5:30 ↗ shayla jane and justice really

5:33 ↗ she

5:34 ↗ did a great job really doing recording

5:37 ↗ it's spearheading his whole effort she

5:39 ↗ late really needed

5:41 ↗ her grunt work she's an engineer and did

5:43 ↗ all the um analysis and all the

5:46 ↗ technical work so

5:47 ↗ welcome those two and i guess i just

5:49 ↗ want to start off by saying that i think

5:50 ↗ we met last time we met here was about a

5:53 ↗ year ago last spring

5:56 ↗ and that was the first meeting i think

5:57 ↗ that was a very inaugural environmental

5:59 ↗ board meeting um

6:01 ↗ and so

6:02 ↗ here we are again

6:03 ↗ thank you alex can i pause you for a

6:05 ↗ second sure would you like questions

6:06 ↗ comments as we go or wait till that

6:08 ↗ means wherever you prefer i can see

6:10 ↗ nancy's got a question so the agenda

6:13 ↗ topic is storm water and wastewater

6:15 ↗ master plans are you going to present

6:16 ↗ waste water as well no this is just the

6:18 ↗ storm surface water master plan so will

6:20 ↗ the wastewater plan be coming back in a

6:22 ↗ different time

6:23 ↗ i'm not sure yes they'll be coming back

6:25 ↗ at the

6:26 ↗ third quarter or fourth quarter yes okay

6:29 ↗ thank you

6:30 ↗ sorry for the confusion

6:32 ↗ sure

6:33 ↗ okay

6:34 ↗ so moving on here all right so the

6:36 ↗ purpose of me for this presentation is

6:38 ↗ really did this

6:40 ↗ explain where we're at it's really a

6:41 ↗ summary of all the work that's been done

6:43 ↗ quick summary and status and what we

6:46 ↗ need to complete this plan and get a

6:49 ↗ final adoption at the end of the year

6:51 ↗ we also want to present the final sort

6:53 ↗ of the product of all the effort that we

6:56 ↗ the culmination of all the work over the

6:58 ↗ last several years we initiate this

7:00 ↗ whole process back in

7:02 ↗ 2000

7:03 ↗ late 2019 really and then covered it and

7:06 ↗ so that sort of delayed things a bit but

7:08 ↗ um

7:09 ↗ but here we are so it's and that's going

7:11 ↗ to really consist of the final smos or

7:13 ↗ stillwater management options which is

7:15 ↗ another term that we use

7:17 ↗ would be projects actual cip projects

7:19 ↗ that we can implement including our cip

7:22 ↗ program

7:23 ↗ and then

7:25 ↗ within within like a 20-year time

7:27 ↗ horizon so

7:30 ↗ and the quick agenda summary so i'm

7:32 ↗ going to discuss what's going to be in

7:34 ↗ the final draft plan um schedule

7:37 ↗ the s map requirement

7:39 ↗ we'll get that a little bit later

7:41 ↗ prioritization process recap and smo

7:44 ↗ screening

7:46 ↗ for final cip so how we actually

7:48 ↗ got to these final 10

7:50 ↗ projects

7:52 ↗ the smo metrics we used to prioritize

7:54 ↗ these projects and the final list of 10

7:57 ↗ projects and then any questions

8:01 ↗ yes or when you have acronyms can we

8:03 ↗ divide before yes i will do that exactly

8:05 ↗ thank you

8:06 ↗ so

8:07 ↗ here's so basically what we need to do

8:09 ↗ so this plan um we're going to submit

8:12 ↗ well there's two different courses of

8:13 ↗ action one is it satisfies the

8:15 ↗ requirement in our nvds which is our

8:17 ↗ national pollution discharge elimination

8:19 ↗ system phase two permit

8:21 ↗ and that's the permit that allows us to

8:22 ↗ basically get it's a discharge permit so

8:24 ↗ we can actually discharge from water to

8:27 ↗ water to the us

8:28 ↗ part of that current requires that we

8:30 ↗ develop an s map or storm water

8:32 ↗ management action plan

8:34 ↗ and that is and so this is going to

8:36 ↗ satisfy part of that requirement but

8:38 ↗ it's also to help assist with developing

8:40 ↗ our cip list just as part of our

8:42 ↗ stormwater management

8:44 ↗ plan that we

8:45 ↗ currently have when i sort of update

8:47 ↗ that plan with these new projects

8:49 ↗ um so it really is going to consist of

8:51 ↗ in this well this plan was completed

8:53 ↗ it's in the draft form now will be

8:55 ↗ submitted to ecology for the review

8:57 ↗ they've been reviewing different parts

8:58 ↗ of this plan all along the last couple

9:00 ↗ years and then they're going to get the

9:01 ↗ final plan to review

9:03 ↗ and and then all concurrently we're

9:04 ↗ going to be

9:05 ↗ getting it reviewed through internal

9:07 ↗ staff

9:08 ↗ and then a debt that they get adopted by

9:10 ↗ the council in your november time frame

9:13 ↗ the plan consists of existing conditions

9:15 ↗ assessment which is we've already i

9:16 ↗ think we've discussed that at the last

9:18 ↗ meeting we went through with that but

9:19 ↗ all was that entailed that's a huge

9:21 ↗ amount of work to really

9:23 ↗ look at what the existing bases are like

9:25 ↗ in terms of water quality habitat

9:28 ↗ and flooding issues

9:30 ↗ they have a lot of stakeholder input for

9:34 ↗ issues basins of the city

9:35 ↗ in identifying

9:37 ↗ and so that really is all packaged in

9:39 ↗ that in that section the smo or water

9:42 ↗ management options list and metrics that

9:44 ↗ will be in there

9:45 ↗ that would be all the problems are all

9:47 ↗ the identified problems and then the

9:49 ↗ solutions to solve those problems

9:51 ↗ stable engagement there's a section on

9:53 ↗ how we got to this point in terms of

9:55 ↗ having everyone involved in the process

9:57 ↗ so that includes the public

9:59 ↗ agencies

10:00 ↗ internal staff

10:03 ↗ various committees boards and

10:06 ↗ city council so that's been huge over

10:08 ↗ the last couple years

10:10 ↗ um and the college needs to have that in

10:13 ↗ there as well so they can see that we've

10:14 ↗ actually followed the public process to

10:17 ↗ come up with you know

10:18 ↗ these projects

10:20 ↗ the final priority sml list um the

10:22 ↗ schedule and then button budget needs

10:26 ↗ adaptive management and then and then

10:28 ↗ based on prioritization and s map

10:31 ↗ so

10:32 ↗ keep moving along here

10:34 ↗ so i guess so once again s map that's

10:37 ↗ just another it's just this

10:39 ↗ thought process that we have to go

10:40 ↗ through and it's something that is part

10:42 ↗ of the nps permit that ecology requires

10:45 ↗ all cities to develop

10:47 ↗ within a certain time frame so

10:50 ↗ uh plan

10:52 ↗ completion schedule so as you can see

10:54 ↗ there i have there's really four touch

10:56 ↗ points with various committees and

10:58 ↗ boards

10:59 ↗ first one is of course the environment

11:00 ↗ board today tonight

11:02 ↗ then we're going to quickly turn around

11:04 ↗ and

11:05 ↗ present to the parks board and the end

11:07 ↗ of the month

11:08 ↗ in the early august

11:10 ↗ planning development and environmental

11:11 ↗ committee

11:13 ↗ and then in november will be the city

11:16 ↗ council adoption so

11:18 ↗ i also have a timeline for the this will

11:21 ↗ involve civa because we are looking at

11:23 ↗ you know this could have potential

11:24 ↗ changes to

11:26 ↗ yeah that you know land use all kinds of

11:29 ↗ things could evolve from this so we do

11:31 ↗ have to go through a secret review

11:33 ↗ process so we'll initiate that sometime

11:35 ↗ in august once we have the final draft

11:37 ↗ plan completed and then out for review

11:40 ↗ then it would be ecology

11:42 ↗ that's their review schedule

11:45 ↗ in there give them time to look at the

11:46 ↗ final product and provide any comments

11:49 ↗ and then internal city staff so i we've

11:52 ↗ been already working with the various

11:53 ↗ departments parks department has been

11:55 ↗ involved in this

11:57 ↗ operations

12:01 ↗ so you know we involved several

12:03 ↗ departments already

12:04 ↗ and

12:05 ↗ planning development they're really

12:07 ↗ looking at it

12:09 ↗ and

12:10 ↗ we're gonna try to get all those

12:11 ↗ comments incorporated and then

12:13 ↗ finalize it adjust all the comments

12:15 ↗ finalize and get it for the city council

12:18 ↗ november

12:21 ↗ smo and cfp crisis prioritization

12:24 ↗ process i'm going to let um otak and

12:27 ↗ just to take over this one

12:33 ↗ thanks alan can everyone hear me okay

12:36 ↗ yes wonderful okay i'm trista koblewski

12:40 ↗ from otak thanks for that nice

12:41 ↗ introduction earlier alan

12:43 ↗ we've been uh really pleased to be

12:45 ↗ working on this for the past i think we

12:47 ↗ actually started in 2018 so we've been

12:50 ↗ working on this for quite a while and

12:52 ↗ it's been it's a pretty ambitious plan

12:54 ↗ um and we're happy that it's coming to

12:56 ↗ the finish line so we wanted to just run

12:59 ↗ through a little bit about how we took

13:02 ↗ over 300 issues that we collected during

13:05 ↗ that initial phase when we were doing

13:08 ↗ the baseline assessments of all each

13:10 ↗ basin

13:11 ↗ and winnowed it down

13:13 ↗ step by step until we have reached a

13:15 ↗ capital improvement program of

13:18 ↗ 10 projects and i'm just gonna go over

13:21 ↗ this

13:22 ↗ pretty quickly and um

13:25 ↗ as far as i'm concerned if you have

13:26 ↗ questions during this slide it's fine um

13:29 ↗ i don't know that i'll be able to see

13:31 ↗ you so someone else will have to prompt

13:32 ↗ me

13:33 ↗ but we collected more than 300 issues

13:37 ↗ water quality issues

13:39 ↗ flooding issues erosion and

13:41 ↗ sedimentation and streams and

13:43 ↗ maintenance issues and we collected them

13:45 ↗ from a variety of sources a lot came

13:47 ↗ from city staff

13:49 ↗ some came from the public when we

13:51 ↗ went to the public and asked them to

13:54 ↗ put dots on a map and tell us where they

13:56 ↗ had concerns

13:58 ↗ other public reports of issues that came

14:01 ↗ in independently of that and other

14:03 ↗ agencies your neighbors and other

14:06 ↗ agencies stakeholders all contributed to

14:08 ↗ that list

14:10 ↗ and then the city

14:11 ↗ itself initiated a process with

14:14 ↗ its internal stakeholders and a few

14:16 ↗ invited stakeholders to select the top

14:19 ↗ issues from that quite large set

14:23 ↗ and they came up with uh 41

14:27 ↗ shoots

14:28 ↗ um

14:29 ↗ and those were spread throughout the

14:31 ↗ city in fact it was um

14:34 ↗ important that we had issues represented

14:38 ↗ in all of the basins

14:40 ↗ and it was also important that there

14:41 ↗ were issues representing all the

14:43 ↗ different types of issues that we had

14:45 ↗ collected

14:46 ↗ i also i neglected to mention i'm sorry

14:49 ↗ that habitat issues most of which are

14:52 ↗ culvert or fish passage barriers were

14:54 ↗ also included in that initial

14:57 ↗ so once we had the

15:00 ↗ top 41 issues representing again a

15:02 ↗ variety of issue types and spread

15:04 ↗ throughout the city

15:06 ↗ from that we selected

15:09 ↗ 23

15:11 ↗ to develop conceptual solutions for

15:15 ↗ real high-level solutions at that point

15:17 ↗ and we are calling those stormwater

15:19 ↗ management options smos as alan

15:21 ↗ mentioned before

15:24 ↗ this terminology comes from

15:26 ↗ the ecology grant that is funding part

15:29 ↗ of this work but not all of it

15:32 ↗ uh we selected

15:34 ↗ those 23

15:36 ↗ we had some similar criteria we wanted

15:38 ↗ to make sure there was a solution for

15:42 ↗ in that representative set for at least

15:45 ↗ partly

15:47 ↗ one in at least every basin at least one

15:49 ↗ in every basin

15:51 ↗ and again we wanted the set of solutions

15:53 ↗ to represent a variety

15:55 ↗ of

15:56 ↗ problems or issues

15:58 ↗ and we

15:59 ↗ importantly wanted to focus on what are

16:02 ↗ known as retrofits

16:04 ↗ and that is providing new water quality

16:07 ↗ or new flow control service to an area

16:10 ↗ that doesn't have water quality or

16:12 ↗ doesn't have flow control

16:14 ↗ um

16:15 ↗ because it was developed prior to

16:17 ↗ regulations requiring that

16:20 ↗ and one reason we wanted to focus on

16:22 ↗ that is that that is the

16:24 ↗ key

16:25 ↗ requirement of that s-map requirement in

16:29 ↗ your permit

16:30 ↗ and is also a key requirement of the

16:33 ↗ ecology grant that's funding part of

16:34 ↗ this work so it was really important

16:36 ↗ that we

16:37 ↗ um

16:38 ↗ ensure that there was a a number of

16:40 ↗ those retrofits in that set

16:43 ↗ after that set of 23 we applied

16:47 ↗ some metrics to them

16:49 ↗ and these metrics had been approved by

16:51 ↗ ecology under the grant and we can

16:53 ↗ actually look at what the metrics were

16:54 ↗ in the next slide i actually think gary

16:57 ↗ um and alan talked to you about them

17:00 ↗ before

17:02 ↗ when we were developing the list of

17:03 ↗ metrics

17:04 ↗ they reviewed what we were going to use

17:07 ↗ i can just go over that list again

17:09 ↗ we did

17:10 ↗ end up using essentially the same things

17:12 ↗ we talked about or you talked about with

17:14 ↗ gary and alan at that time

17:17 ↗ and the purpose of the metrics was to

17:19 ↗ create a ranking

17:20 ↗ of those solutions

17:23 ↗ and then from that ranked list

17:27 ↗ we chose 10 to develop a little further

17:30 ↗ into the capital improvement program

17:32 ↗ um and just to

17:34 ↗ set your mind at ease all the known

17:36 ↗ issues

17:38 ↗ of the entire set of smos whether or not

17:40 ↗ they floated to the top or not are all

17:43 ↗ going to be represented in the plan so

17:45 ↗ there'll be lists of everything in the

17:47 ↗ plan and the capital improvement

17:49 ↗ projects the 10 that floated to the top

17:52 ↗ will just be developed

17:55 ↗ further than the rest and will have

17:56 ↗ better cost information and more of an

17:59 ↗ idea of when those solutions will be

18:01 ↗ implemented but your plan

18:04 ↗ has developed so much information that

18:06 ↗ there will be a backlog of things that

18:07 ↗ you can work on for years to come

18:10 ↗ um with the information that we

18:12 ↗ developed in this plan so none of even

18:15 ↗ though 10 floated to the top nothing's

18:17 ↗ really been lost and and there's a

18:19 ↗ wealth of information that you can use

18:21 ↗ to continue solving problems over the

18:23 ↗ next several years

18:25 ↗ that was a really long so sorry i was

18:27 ↗ pretty verbose there i'll stop now

18:31 ↗ no that's great

18:32 ↗ thank you yeah i think it's important to

18:34 ↗ know that really this plan although it

18:35 ↗ will be adopted

18:38 ↗ by council it's a living document and it

18:40 ↗ can you know it will evolve and you know

18:42 ↗ every two years we go through a budget

18:45 ↗ process of developing civs and when we

18:47 ↗ develop that capital improvement program

18:49 ↗ we'll pull projects from

18:52 ↗ from the 10

18:53 ↗ and

18:54 ↗ incorporate it into the cip but it

18:56 ↗ doesn't mean that you know as things

18:57 ↗ change and other issues come up um

19:00 ↗ uh we could we could

19:01 ↗ adopt adjust it and it might be a

19:03 ↗ process where we you know

19:06 ↗ revise it at some point in the future so

19:08 ↗ i think it's important to know that we

19:10 ↗ want to keep all those all those

19:11 ↗ solutions in there

19:12 ↗ um but that we you know recognize we

19:15 ↗ have to really narrow down to the

19:17 ↗ select few that we can really drill down

19:19 ↗ and come up with detailed cost estimates

19:20 ↗ and

19:21 ↗ implementation of schedules for them so

19:25 ↗ all right moving on here so just go

19:27 ↗ through these again these sms from order

19:29 ↗ match option

19:30 ↗ metrics and prioritization so once again

19:32 ↗ we

19:33 ↗ here and i the last time we met a year

19:35 ↗ ago plus

19:37 ↗ we went through these um i think they

19:39 ↗ did we didn't ask for feedback and i

19:41 ↗ think you know generally speaking

19:42 ↗ everyone was okay with these

19:44 ↗ with these metrics in terms of how to

19:47 ↗ assign numerical value for each of these

19:49 ↗ and

19:51 ↗ it is a way to really

19:53 ↗ prioritize projects and so just real

19:56 ↗ quickly we looked at you know how well

19:57 ↗ does it actually solve the problem

19:59 ↗ um in terms of water quality and

20:01 ↗ flooding and habitat and how and a

20:03 ↗ direct benefit displacement we thought

20:05 ↗ that was important yeah almost on that

20:07 ↗ one just to remember i think that that

20:09 ↗ was actually added after a conversation

20:11 ↗ the benefit of this management that's

20:13 ↗ one that uh

20:15 ↗ from this discussion

20:16 ↗ uh ended up having to correct

20:26 ↗ [Music]

20:32 ↗ how much work will that involve to get

20:34 ↗ that

20:36 ↗ you know purchase that property due to a

20:37 ↗ project that's always something to

20:38 ↗ consider constructability

20:41 ↗ um

20:42 ↗ uh yeah so that's like obviously is it

20:46 ↗ special construction techniques or

20:48 ↗ things that are you know good at come to

20:50 ↗ cost

20:51 ↗ um

20:52 ↗ also involve you know utility conflicts

20:55 ↗ you know we have a huge duck bank you

20:57 ↗ know so that's another thing to consider

20:59 ↗ permitting is always important you know

21:01 ↗ how difficult will be the permanent

21:03 ↗ different agencies fish and wildlife

21:05 ↗ court of engineers and that really

21:07 ↗ drives like the timing

21:08 ↗ and so that's important costs and

21:10 ↗ funding opportunities so this is really

21:12 ↗ leveraging

21:13 ↗ grant funds which we've done a pretty

21:14 ↗ good job in the city is a quad course

21:18 ↗ you know our restoration projects street

21:19 ↗ habitat restoration projects so it's

21:21 ↗ really trying to you know leverage those

21:24 ↗ grant opportunities and the timing of

21:26 ↗ those grants so it's important

21:28 ↗ and timing plays into the grant

21:31 ↗ opportunities

21:32 ↗ um

21:33 ↗ and coordination partnership with others

21:35 ↗ so

21:36 ↗ you know whether we work with washington

21:37 ↗ state department transportation and when

21:39 ↗ they're doing projects so obviously the

21:40 ↗ culver replacement projects in i-90 that

21:43 ↗ are moving forward here in the next

21:44 ↗ couple years that's our opportunity time

21:46 ↗ to work with them to do projects in

21:48 ↗ conjunction with those projects so

21:50 ↗ that's a savings there

21:52 ↗ um and we'll talk about that later here

21:54 ↗ in the media

21:56 ↗ presentation of regulatory requirements

21:59 ↗ um

22:00 ↗ re-satisfying any kind of

22:02 ↗ mbds requirement obviously

22:05 ↗ environmental and social justice so we

22:07 ↗ looked at that a little bit and that's a

22:09 ↗ little tricky but

22:10 ↗ there there's a metrics that we applied

22:12 ↗ for that

22:13 ↗ that we can use

22:14 ↗ um trying to make sure we're

22:16 ↗ doing projects that are fairly

22:18 ↗ representative of the communities

22:20 ↗ and then finally the public input so

22:25 ↗ any questions on any of those

22:27 ↗ metrics

22:32 ↗ what um

22:34 ↗ what what are your metrics for

22:36 ↗ environment environment and equity

22:39 ↗ um you know trista maybe you can i think

22:41 ↗ shifter really develops those and that's

22:44 ↗ one thing we did within this law and

22:45 ↗ this presentation is sort of the

22:47 ↗ numerical values of these things i don't

22:49 ↗ think we could do that but maybe speak

22:51 ↗ to the

22:52 ↗ to that i couldn't hear i know that it

22:55 ↗ was about the social justice but i

22:57 ↗ couldn't hear the question

22:59 ↗ what are some of the things we

23:00 ↗ considered when we looked at the social

23:02 ↗ justice environmental i i think it was i

23:04 ↗ think

23:06 ↗ okay

23:07 ↗ yeah um

23:09 ↗ we

23:10 ↗ we did a pretty simple

23:12 ↗ um

23:14 ↗ analysis for that

23:16 ↗ and

23:17 ↗ let me

23:18 ↗ pull it up

23:19 ↗ we we looked by census tract

23:22 ↗ and we used the

23:24 ↗ environmental protection agency's

23:29 ↗ environmental justice screening tool

23:32 ↗ and

23:33 ↗ [Music]

23:34 ↗ they have an index value uh

23:38 ↗ that goes by census tract that uh

23:41 ↗ attempts to measure

23:42 ↗ numerous factors and uh

23:45 ↗ about um

23:47 ↗ social equity basically and uh condense

23:50 ↗ it all into a

23:52 ↗ single index value and we use the

23:54 ↗ demographic index value and what we

23:57 ↗ ended up doing was uh looking to see

23:59 ↗ where kind of the breaking points were

24:01 ↗ when we

24:02 ↗ mapped it in the city limits itself

24:06 ↗ and we ended up

24:08 ↗ trying to

24:10 ↗ give more points if there were

24:14 ↗ more inequality

24:16 ↗ issaquah doesn't have high levels of

24:18 ↗ inequality the index value is is

24:20 ↗ actually

24:21 ↗ um

24:23 ↗ compared across the entire united states

24:26 ↗ so there

24:27 ↗ there weren't uh

24:28 ↗ and when you

24:30 ↗ take it by an entire census tract it's

24:33 ↗ it's not um

24:34 ↗ very granular but we took um

24:37 ↗ census tracts that had above the 85th

24:39 ↗ percentile

24:40 ↗ of that index value and the higher index

24:44 ↗ value

24:45 ↗ indicates greater inequality

24:48 ↗ uh we gave those point are those

24:50 ↗ projects

24:52 ↗ an extra three points

24:54 ↗ um

24:55 ↗ we gave two points if the

24:57 ↗ index value is between the 70th and 85th

25:00 ↗ percentile

25:02 ↗ one point if it was between the 55th and

25:05 ↗ 70th percentile and no points if it was

25:07 ↗ below that

25:11 ↗ great thank you

25:12 ↗ thank you

25:16 ↗ okay cip status

25:18 ↗ so once again we selected ncip's as

25:23 ↗ explained a little bit about that

25:24 ↗ earlier

25:25 ↗ and currently working on developing the

25:28 ↗ concept designs and the cost estimates

25:30 ↗ so that's where the next phase is just

25:32 ↗ to start working we're working on those

25:34 ↗ now we're really going to get that

25:35 ↗ wrapped up in the next several couple

25:37 ↗ weeks to find out positive or second

25:39 ↗ health chance yes question

25:41 ↗ hi alan um so why ten cip projects

25:45 ↗ i have two questions that are kind of

25:46 ↗ tied together and why is there one in

25:49 ↗ each basin are we leaving something up

25:51 ↗ is there like if we did two in one basin

25:52 ↗ we'd get a better bang for a buck

26:04 ↗ and i think i think the ones we chose

26:06 ↗ are really good ones not like we

26:08 ↗ chose one where there's one really good

26:10 ↗ one that we decide well i mean it's like

26:12 ↗ it's gonna fall out because we have to

26:14 ↗ pick one for whatever basin and it

26:16 ↗ doesn't have one

26:18 ↗ it was low so i think all of them that

26:20 ↗ we chose were you know they made the top

26:22 ↗ 23 right everything was in this top 23

26:25 ↗ of

26:26 ↗ projects

26:27 ↗ um and so i think it's important to

26:29 ↗ remember that those 23 are still there

26:31 ↗ and we can still go back into those

26:34 ↗ projects at any time

26:36 ↗ and but i think we need to recognize

26:38 ↗ that we had to really narrow it down to

26:39 ↗ 10 just because that was a manageable

26:41 ↗ number that we could implement within a

26:43 ↗ reasonable amount of time given our

26:44 ↗ budget you know our funding and so forth

26:47 ↗ so that seemed like a good number to

26:49 ↗ shoot for

26:50 ↗ um

26:55 ↗ can i follow up on that so if you looked

26:58 ↗ at the 11th project that didn't make the

27:00 ↗ cut that was in maybe let's say the old

27:02 ↗ town neighborhood would you get a better

27:04 ↗ bang for your buck if you would have put

27:06 ↗ that project on the list instead of

27:07 ↗ something somewhere else and i just used

27:09 ↗ old town as a

27:11 ↗ as just one of the neighborhoods so i

27:13 ↗ guess i'm trying to understand

27:15 ↗ i still don't understand why we had to

27:17 ↗ have one in every base and one if you

27:19 ↗ look at it from a cost benefit what's

27:21 ↗ giving us the best

27:22 ↗ water quality and environmental benefits

27:25 ↗ what projects are doing the best for the

27:27 ↗ city

27:28 ↗ well i think well first of all

27:30 ↗ um

27:31 ↗ yeah i know you're saying by the way old

27:33 ↗ town is

27:34 ↗ is actually this is our part is quite a

27:36 ↗ highest priority of all of our of our

27:39 ↗ issues and the solutions so that's

27:41 ↗ that's number one

27:42 ↗ um

27:44 ↗ you know i i think it was just we just

27:46 ↗ felt it was important to to have one in

27:48 ↗ each basin i don't know

27:50 ↗ um

27:52 ↗ that was our criteria that we

27:53 ↗ established so you didn't hear that from

27:54 ↗ the community or the council didn't say

27:56 ↗ they wanted one in each basin was that

27:58 ↗ where you did you get any push that way

28:00 ↗ correct no no so that was just an

28:03 ↗ internal decision with me okay thank you

28:07 ↗ yeah i know trista if you wish to add on

28:08 ↗ that or i i think

28:12 ↗ no i think you covered it it was

28:14 ↗ it was a value from the beginning of

28:16 ↗ this

28:17 ↗ plan

28:18 ↗ um that it would be city-wide and

28:21 ↗ broadly cover the geographic area of the

28:24 ↗ city yeah i mean just try to represent

28:27 ↗ represent the city's best food

28:31 ↗ [Music]

28:32 ↗ that's one thing on the following

28:34 ↗ presentations and then to the

28:36 ↗ subcommittee

28:37 ↗ that uh presentation to the

28:40 ↗ committee council committee that we

28:42 ↗ could show is that this is the

28:43 ↗ recommended recommended um

28:45 ↗ how should i say it uh distributed um

28:49 ↗ top ten

28:50 ↗ but if we were to go directly to the uh

28:55 ↗ straight numerically this is what it

28:57 ↗ would look like so basically it just

28:59 ↗ kind of shows those bookends of the

29:00 ↗ straight cut and this

29:02 ↗ and what the what the pros and cons

29:05 ↗ would be i think that would be an easy

29:06 ↗ way to do it with the distributed model

29:08 ↗ being

29:10 ↗ what we were talking about trying to

29:12 ↗ touch touch everything and there's some

29:14 ↗ there's you know you can explain that

29:16 ↗ very easily the pros and cons of cuts

29:18 ↗ that and then flip to exactly what

29:20 ↗ you're saying like oh okay

29:22 ↗ here's the projects exactly right and

29:24 ↗ that's kind of what i'm trying to

29:25 ↗ understand what did you leave out to get

29:28 ↗ it in every basin or what

29:30 ↗ i i know we're not seeing the top ten

29:31 ↗ projects

29:32 ↗ okay

29:33 ↗ so and that's kind of what i'm pushing

29:35 ↗ back on what's the top ten projects in

29:37 ↗ the city

29:39 ↗ yeah and we can look at that with that's

29:40 ↗ a good point we can look at that

29:41 ↗ comparison look if we just bring them by

29:43 ↗ score absolutely then we compare that to

29:46 ↗ you know okay what do we miss and i

29:48 ↗ think that's a great thing to present to

29:49 ↗ council because i think that same

29:51 ↗ question will come up

29:52 ↗ and maybe it's only one project wow you

29:54 ↗ guys did a great job you know that's you

29:56 ↗ know that really will come out really

29:57 ↗ well

29:58 ↗ i agree appreciate your comment thank

29:59 ↗ you

30:02 ↗ take those crystals

30:06 ↗ all right um final cip list in nap i

30:09 ↗ don't know tristan you want to

30:10 ↗ definitely not to say this one this is

30:12 ↗ just a give you an idea

30:14 ↗ of decisions in the city

30:16 ↗ so kind of geography of what we're

30:18 ↗ talking about the scale of the bay

30:21 ↗ size of both sizes of the basins

30:24 ↗ and

30:25 ↗ projects are um

30:28 ↗ sure you can go over this really quickly

30:31 ↗ um

30:33 ↗ so there are two three different types

30:36 ↗ of cip in this map

30:38 ↗ most of them are points and you can see

30:40 ↗ those as the

30:41 ↗ uh orange dots we have one that we are

30:45 ↗ calling a linear cip we uh in the

30:48 ↗ tibbetts basin right near its confluence

30:50 ↗ with like sammamish and then there is

30:52 ↗ one that's actually a study

30:55 ↗ oh i'm using my mouse i realize you

30:57 ↗ can't see my mouse um i'm gonna ask alan

31:00 ↗ i'm gonna request to control the screen

31:03 ↗ and then i think people will be able to

31:04 ↗ see my mouse

31:07 ↗ can you see my mouse moving around

31:10 ↗ yeah yeah

31:13 ↗ okay so this um polygon right here this

31:16 ↗ orange polygon um you see that i'm

31:19 ↗ tracing with my mouse is a cip study of

31:22 ↗ the old time uh old town area oh nope

31:26 ↗ you can't see my mouse now you might be

31:27 ↗ able to see my mouse

31:29 ↗ um this is the cip study of the old town

31:32 ↗ area

31:37 ↗ as you can see

31:39 ↗ there are four cips in the issaquah

31:42 ↗ creek basin

31:44 ↗ and the other basin that has multiples

31:48 ↗ is

31:49 ↗ um

31:53 ↗ pivots

31:55 ↗ i apologize actually it's schneider

31:58 ↗ and then um each of the others

32:01 ↗ or in laughing jacobs

32:02 ↗ has two depending on how you categorize

32:05 ↗ sp13 uh this could probably will be

32:07 ↗ treating runoff uh that goes both to

32:10 ↗ laughing jacobs and into park hill

32:13 ↗ so this is a

32:15 ↗ potentially a particularly effective cip

32:17 ↗ treating water water running off into

32:19 ↗ two different water bodies

32:21 ↗ um

32:23 ↗ and

32:24 ↗ yeah there's a table here at the bottom

32:27 ↗ allowing you to

32:28 ↗ coordinate or look up the number and see

32:31 ↗ what the project name is

32:33 ↗ and then on the next slide there is

32:35 ↗ actually a little more detailed list

32:38 ↗ which uh then you could change to the

32:40 ↗ next slide alan all right

32:42 ↗ do i have to do that because i have

32:43 ↗ control sorry i'm new at webex so i'm

32:46 ↗ not sure

32:48 ↗ i think so

32:49 ↗ i think you're still i don't know how

32:51 ↗ though

32:53 ↗ don't know how to move the slides

32:56 ↗ there we go

32:57 ↗ okay thanks

33:00 ↗ um so this is a slightly more detailed

33:02 ↗ list um

33:04 ↗ this is in order first by basin and then

33:07 ↗ by rank within the basin

33:11 ↗ and

33:12 ↗ what we had planned to do at this

33:14 ↗ meeting was take a kind of a quick look

33:17 ↗ a slightly more detailed look at each

33:19 ↗ one of these

33:20 ↗ cips

33:22 ↗ so the next few slides the next 10

33:24 ↗ slides really are

33:26 ↗ a map of each each one's location

33:29 ↗ and

33:30 ↗ gives us a chance to talk about what's

33:33 ↗ going on in that location and what we

33:35 ↗ think the solution is

33:40 ↗ i'm actually going to release control

33:42 ↗ if i can figure out how to do that

33:55 ↗ i just have one quick question so

33:58 ↗ about a year ago we were getting

34:00 ↗ feedback

34:01 ↗ so i don't have access to my internet

34:03 ↗ right now so i can't about the impact of

34:07 ↗ brake

34:07 ↗ linings and um

34:10 ↗ tires on

34:11 ↗ salmon and coconin

34:15 ↗ projects potentially look at what we can

34:17 ↗ do to improve things like that

34:20 ↗ well yeah

34:21 ↗ we'll get into that but really the

34:22 ↗ retrofit projects that we're going to

34:24 ↗ show you later here

34:26 ↗ they're addressing that so there's water

34:27 ↗ quality treatments

34:29 ↗ they're standard they're using

34:31 ↗ technology that's been around a while

34:33 ↗ and in fact city discipline we have a

34:35 ↗ doing a study with

34:37 ↗ tacoma to look at the 6bdq

34:41 ↗ treatment this is our existing facility

34:43 ↗ so we're actually sampling doing

34:44 ↗ sampling of

34:46 ↗ what's pond and a cartridge system and a

34:49 ↗ bio retention

34:50 ↗ system

34:51 ↗ three different types of water quality

34:53 ↗ technologies that they've been around

34:54 ↗ for you know 15 20 years

34:57 ↗ and testing the influence fluid

34:59 ↗ measurement measurements and looking at

35:00 ↗ the removal efficiencies of those types

35:02 ↗ of systems with the 6bd queue

35:05 ↗ specifically looking at that it looks

35:07 ↗ pretty promising i can't really go to

35:09 ↗ the data but it's looking pretty good

35:11 ↗ so at least for now it looks like that

35:14 ↗ those existing technologies are going to

35:16 ↗ work and treat that in addition to the

35:19 ↗ metals that they're designed to treat

35:22 ↗ and so um so yes we have several

35:24 ↗ projects that will be retrofit projects

35:26 ↗ where they're going to be treating

35:28 ↗ roadways and previous pollution

35:30 ↗ generating services that currently have

35:31 ↗ no treatment and that's so that's the

35:34 ↗ aim but that's really the big part of

35:35 ↗ what what ecology wants to see in these

35:39 ↗ guest map type

35:42 ↗ or smos is projects that really trigger

35:45 ↗ or target um retrofit projects

35:49 ↗ thanks for explaining that it's just

35:50 ↗ hard to see that when you read through

35:52 ↗ this so thank you sure could i have one

35:54 ↗ thing on that as well too just very

35:56 ↗ quickly

35:57 ↗ there was a council request i think last

35:58 ↗ year that we're working on to develop a

36:00 ↗ gis layer that shows all of our existing

36:04 ↗ treatment

36:05 ↗ and what's going to be really important

36:08 ↗ with that as we go through that is that

36:10 ↗ it's really an asset management set to

36:12 ↗ look at what what are the facilities we

36:14 ↗ have

36:15 ↗ when were they installed what what

36:16 ↗ technology they have

36:18 ↗ because we

36:19 ↗ you know alan and i were talking about

36:20 ↗ this it's very important to treat areas

36:22 ↗ that don't have

36:24 ↗ anything that's great but what about an

36:26 ↗ area that has a lot of traffic and was

36:29 ↗ you know developed in 1990 and has

36:31 ↗ really inferior technology

36:33 ↗ so

36:34 ↗ you know again we're a little ways away

36:36 ↗ from that but i think that's what you're

36:37 ↗ gonna you know see in the future's

36:39 ↗ comparison

36:40 ↗ of that that we want to you know um push

36:42 ↗ back a little bit on ecology if

36:44 ↗ necessary and say hey we understand this

36:46 ↗ basis doesn't have anything but when you

36:48 ↗ look over here we think we should maybe

36:50 ↗ skip this one for now and come back to

36:52 ↗ that but that's

36:58 ↗ when that work is all done we're gonna

36:59 ↗ have this gis mapping that's gonna show

37:01 ↗ where we have existing treatment what

37:03 ↗ area how much acreage is it treating

37:05 ↗ throughout the city what type of

37:06 ↗ treatment system is it and then look at

37:08 ↗ okay prioritizing retrofitting you know

37:11 ↗ maybe areas that have older

37:13 ↗ intention

37:14 ↗ or wet ponds which is lower you know

37:16 ↗ older technology maybe we can upgrade

37:18 ↗ those

37:19 ↗ to a more of a height

37:21 ↗ they call hands treatment to deal with

37:23 ↗ the heavy metals so

37:25 ↗ that's going to be a great tool to get

37:27 ↗ that going so so when you complete this

37:29 ↗ study on the 6ppdq

37:31 ↗ i'd be interested to hear the findings

37:33 ↗ of that and then if you're willing to

37:35 ↗ share that i think the the regional

37:38 ↗ subgroup would be very interesting yes

37:40 ↗ sure absolutely

37:42 ↗ yeah i you know at the various riot

37:45 ↗ meetings that i do attend the technical

37:47 ↗ committee meetings and

37:48 ↗ i've brought this up they've been

37:50 ↗ interested in that because because that

37:51 ↗ group is is looking at that as well and

37:54 ↗ so they wish to know that

37:56 ↗ this claw and either tacoma are

37:58 ↗ collaborating on this so

38:02 ↗ fantastic okay

38:06 ↗ um all right so this is okay so we're

38:08 ↗ gonna start with our

38:10 ↗ ten projects this is the first one

38:12 ↗ and it actually i'm not sure they're in

38:14 ↗ order of priority but they this one

38:16 ↗ happens to be the

38:19 ↗ top of

38:20 ↗ projects and this is very complicated

38:22 ↗ complex issues here

38:24 ↗ and uh it's really going to involve us

38:26 ↗ uh we're looking at a study we i mean

38:28 ↗ initially otac looked at

38:30 ↗ they

38:31 ↗ looked at sort of specific prop

38:34 ↗ or projects that could work but it

38:36 ↗ became pretty obvious pretty quickly

38:38 ↗ that this is a really complex solution

38:39 ↗ because you have

38:41 ↗ so much happening in the space in the

38:42 ↗ interview this yeah this area old town

38:44 ↗ you have the internet you have the squat

38:46 ↗ creek which has its own you know creates

38:49 ↗ its own problems with the floodplain

38:51 ↗ and then you have um

38:53 ↗ shallow groundwater you have

38:56 ↗ some high-intensity land use areas um

39:00 ↗ inferior poor infrastructure stormwater

39:02 ↗ old systole storm systems and so this

39:05 ↗ really is a

39:07 ↗ more complex problem that we could

39:08 ↗ really otec could have dealt with in

39:10 ↗ terms of coming up with solution and we

39:12 ↗ felt it was really

39:13 ↗ suited for a more detailed analysis um

39:17 ↗ and so i don't and i interested you're

39:18 ↗ going to maybe or i'm sorry she

39:21 ↗ was going to maybe hit on a few things

39:23 ↗ about this project

39:25 ↗ for civ

39:27 ↗ thanks one

39:27 ↗ can you hear me

39:30 ↗ yes

39:30 ↗ okay

39:31 ↗ yeah so i think just like alan mentioned

39:33 ↗ um this this area what you see um on the

39:36 ↗ map here um the orange polyline is

39:39 ↗ basically 370 370 acres it's old town

39:43 ↗ and the blue dots represent all these

39:45 ↗ issues that we know that are flooding

39:46 ↗ related issues that there's a lot of

39:48 ↗ flooding happening here

39:50 ↗ um on the left side that blue line that

39:52 ↗ you see is issaquah creek

39:54 ↗ and that sort of bluish polygon there

39:57 ↗ shows the floodplain so part of the

39:59 ↗ problem is that the isoqua creek itself

40:01 ↗ floods over its banks

40:03 ↗ and um if you actually zoom into the map

40:06 ↗ which i know we can't do here you'll see

40:08 ↗ you see that there's a lot of

40:09 ↗ development within the flood plain so

40:10 ↗ there's a lot of structures that get

40:12 ↗ affected by that flooding

40:15 ↗ the other

40:16 ↗ thing to note on this map so all those

40:18 ↗ hatches and yellow and green

40:20 ↗ there's an old old town sub-area plan so

40:23 ↗ the city is also planning to

40:25 ↗ develop these and so basically encourage

40:27 ↗ development in these areas

40:29 ↗ and you know there was consideration of

40:31 ↗ um allowing additional impervious on

40:34 ↗ some of these parcels

40:36 ↗ and so um there's there's also a thought

40:39 ↗ of because this area just like gary and

40:41 ↗ alan were both mentioning where there's

40:43 ↗ you know there may be some facilities

40:44 ↗ but they were designed to really old

40:46 ↗ standards they're not as effective

40:47 ↗ anymore

40:48 ↗ um and so as this development occurs um

40:51 ↗ the

40:52 ↗ the question was whether you know

40:54 ↗ regional facilities can be built um that

40:56 ↗ will provide flow control and water

40:58 ↗ quality

40:59 ↗ for all of this um newer or this

41:01 ↗ redevelopment happening in this area so

41:03 ↗ that was the other consideration

41:05 ↗ um the other third piece that alan

41:07 ↗ mentioned you know just because

41:08 ↗ stormwater infrastructure is old there

41:10 ↗ are pieces that just don't have any

41:12 ↗ pipes at all or catch basin they don't

41:14 ↗ have convenience infrastructure

41:16 ↗ and so that is also part of the reason

41:18 ↗ why it's really flat and there's just

41:20 ↗ like

41:20 ↗ local bonding that happens on streets

41:23 ↗ um and so because there's all of these

41:25 ↗ problems happening in this area and and

41:27 ↗ there is future development planned uh

41:29 ↗ the idea would be that this study would

41:31 ↗ look at you know look at modeling the

41:33 ↗ hydraulics of the stream um and also

41:36 ↗ modeling and you know seeing how the

41:38 ↗ stormwater infrastructure would interact

41:39 ↗ with the stream so it would be a

41:41 ↗ combination of both of those things

41:43 ↗ and then also seeing whether regional

41:44 ↗ facilities could be cited if they could

41:46 ↗ be considerations like alan which was

41:48 ↗ mentioning groundwater um

41:51 ↗ is is another one um but there'd just be

41:53 ↗ a lot of pieces to study um to be able

41:56 ↗ to come up with and it wouldn't be one

41:58 ↗ solution it would probably just to come

42:00 ↗ up with something comprehensive it would

42:01 ↗ need to be multiple smaller solutions in

42:03 ↗ this area

42:04 ↗ and so the study would basically look at

42:06 ↗ that um

42:08 ↗ and i think um it this study the thought

42:10 ↗ was that it would get coordinated with

42:12 ↗ king counties

42:13 ↗ they're studying issaquah creek and the

42:15 ↗ floodplain associated with the creek so

42:18 ↗ it would get coordinated with that

42:20 ↗ effort

42:21 ↗ and the effort that they're doing for

42:23 ↗ their channel migration study and i

42:25 ↗ think cis

42:27 ↗ allen you probably know what cis stands

42:29 ↗ for um but maybe you could talk to that

42:32 ↗ um

42:33 ↗ so i think that that's a great setup

42:34 ↗ yeah i just wanna so thank you for that

42:36 ↗ overview of this and i think i i'm

42:39 ↗ excited about this uh and i'll get it to

42:41 ↗ see us in a second but the

42:43 ↗ partnership which again we showed as a

42:44 ↗ metric this is huge right because cis is

42:48 ↗ a capital investment strategy

42:50 ↗ uh which i believe uh the king county uh

42:54 ↗ flood control district has about 800 000

42:57 ↗ set aside for issaquah

43:00 ↗ in

43:01 ↗ five and six i i will come back to you

43:03 ↗ and next to give you that access at that

43:05 ↗ date right that's that's kind of conduct

43:06 ↗ there actually um

43:09 ↗ studies to come up with potential

43:10 ↗ projects

43:11 ↗ currently this year they are doing a

43:13 ↗ flood uh plate study and next year

43:16 ↗ channel migration study so all of this

43:18 ↗ on there

43:19 ↗ within the flood control district

43:21 ↗ funding so really this this project that

43:23 ↗ we're highlighting here we're going to

43:26 ↗ propose with dallas in our cip to

43:28 ↗ partner with that so this really would

43:30 ↗ be a

43:33 ↗ county city partnership over the next

43:36 ↗ few years to look at you know very um

43:40 ↗ start with regional solutions that can

43:42 ↗ really get at reducing deep flows from

43:44 ↗ hearing these larger events

43:46 ↗ that is really the serious issue as all

43:48 ↗ of you know with the flooding and we and

43:51 ↗ the county is on board at least at this

43:52 ↗ point to looking at potentially site you

43:55 ↗ know looking at identifying and citing

43:57 ↗ the project in the county so we can pull

44:00 ↗ our resources there of course it could

44:01 ↗ be in the city as well but i think we're

44:04 ↗ both on the same page with the county

44:06 ↗ and the city is

44:07 ↗ let's let's where can we get you know

44:10 ↗ nancy used the biggest bank card here

44:12 ↗ where can we reduce peak flows as a

44:15 ↗ coordinate as coordinated agencies first

44:17 ↗ let's let's forget about it about the

44:19 ↗ jurisdictional boundary what makes most

44:22 ↗ sense and can we do that in a way that

44:24 ↗ also benefits habitat could it be an

44:26 ↗ off-stream type of story so so that's

44:28 ↗ where we're kind of headed with this and

44:30 ↗ it will be a multi-multi-year project

44:32 ↗ but a week at least

44:33 ↗ get started over the next couple years

44:35 ↗ working in concert with them i think

44:37 ↗ that's great working with the other

44:38 ↗ agencies and you had a question

44:40 ↗ yeah um i think that's one of my

44:42 ↗ questions gary do you give a definition

44:44 ↗ of what does cis actually say what's

44:45 ↗ your capital investment strategy

44:47 ↗ strategy and that were some of the

44:48 ↗ examples you're giving at the end you

44:50 ↗ know i guess i'm a little curious what

44:52 ↗ feasibility of region are sorry regional

44:54 ↗ facilities for development are i guess i

44:56 ↗ don't know what that means i'm curious

44:58 ↗ to give examples or explain that a

44:59 ↗ little bit more sure i can just think

45:01 ↗ about you know a couple just off-handed

45:03 ↗ allen can probably think of a few but

45:05 ↗ there's you know gray of course gray and

45:07 ↗ green in infrastructure right so i was

45:09 ↗ thinking of the the classic one would be

45:11 ↗ some type of um we've done this a little

45:14 ↗ bit

45:15 ↗ like that right

45:17 ↗ off channel storage right where you have

45:19 ↗ off channel storage and potentially

45:20 ↗ restoration you know

45:22 ↗ that you're going to have to peek flows

45:24 ↗ um during adventure for two months

45:27 ↗ so there would be some type of

45:29 ↗ something like that could be grey

45:31 ↗ infrastructure it could be some type of

45:33 ↗ uh i mean redmond has done this

45:36 ↗ quite a bit with their infiltration

45:39 ↗ galleries where collectors repeat flows

45:41 ↗ and then infiltrate so so it that that's

45:43 ↗ kind of what this would

45:45 ↗ get at is what are those possibilities

45:47 ↗ so the locations and then the type but

45:49 ↗ we're we're open to any tools okay any

45:52 ↗ tools and i'm sure chile has ideas of

45:55 ↗ this but i think something we looked at

45:56 ↗ is utilizing some existing park lands

45:59 ↗ and and where we could

46:01 ↗ use energies with parks and stormwater

46:04 ↗ doing joint facilities

46:06 ↗ where it could be in fact as a function

46:07 ↗ of the park but also function as office

46:09 ↗ channel storage

46:11 ↗ in fact we're looking at that with parks

46:12 ↗ master plan at the tip it's tip

46:15 ↗ apart the trivets

46:18 ↗ here

46:18 ↗ and because they're going to be looking

46:20 ↗ at redoing this whole master plan for

46:22 ↗ the park and we're working with

46:24 ↗ stormwater and this master plan to see

46:27 ↗ um you know what how we can

46:29 ↗ you know

46:30 ↗ site off channel type facilities that

46:33 ↗ would attenuate flows and so forth so

46:35 ↗ that's the idea it might involve land

46:37 ↗ purchases so that's part of this is

46:39 ↗ identifying parcels to purchase uh to do

46:43 ↗ these joints it could be a joint park

46:45 ↗ storm water you know flow control as

46:47 ↗ well as habitat i mean

46:49 ↗ so many things you can we can do here so

46:51 ↗ um

46:52 ↗ so yes and the other important thing to

46:54 ↗ note

46:55 ↗ you know this is

46:56 ↗ the modeling effort's huge right so the

46:58 ↗ county is going to really pay for that

47:00 ↗ effort to do all the hydraulic modeling

47:03 ↗ hydrologic update hydraulic hydrology

47:05 ↗ we're going to look at climate change

47:07 ↗ scoped in there with their consultant to

47:10 ↗ look at climate change precipitation

47:13 ↗ future float you know future persistence

47:15 ↗ precipitation how that will affect

47:17 ↗ you know the flip the model flows so

47:19 ↗ it's a huge effort and the counties you

47:21 ↗ know it's great that

47:22 ↗ the timing could be better for the

47:24 ↗ county obviously and the other thing the

47:26 ↗ final note is that the county does own

47:28 ↗ several

47:29 ↗ um

47:30 ↗ stable bank stabilization facilities in

47:33 ↗ issaquah and that in these facilities

47:36 ↗ that were put in years and years ago to

47:38 ↗ stabilize the bank mostly rock is what

47:40 ↗ it really consists of so they they want

47:42 ↗ to look at those facilities as part of

47:43 ↗ this effort and see where they you know

47:45 ↗ where they need to maybe modify them and

47:47 ↗ change them and put in more fish

47:49 ↗ friendly facilities

47:52 ↗ yeah there's a lot a lot there that i've

47:53 ↗ had

47:55 ↗ so

47:56 ↗ the answer is your question is yeah yes

47:58 ↗ sir

47:59 ↗ and do you have a question

48:00 ↗ yeah

48:01 ↗ um you mentioned

48:03 ↗ that collecting the water and then

48:05 ↗ releasing it later

48:07 ↗ could you could they be

48:09 ↗ could be collected into cisterns so you

48:11 ↗ could release it like later in the

48:13 ↗ summer when things need to be watered

48:18 ↗ um yeah so uh yeah i can speak from

48:21 ↗ experience on uh a basin in seattle

48:24 ↗ thornton creek a very large basement we

48:26 ↗ did this is updating myself a little bit

48:29 ↗ about 10 years ago

48:30 ↗ did look at that but that is that is

48:32 ↗ challenging to do to kind of to get the

48:34 ↗ the right of the the volume needed for

48:36 ↗ individual cisterns is it's it's it's

48:38 ↗ fairly large for a significant peak flow

48:41 ↗ like this so that that's something you

48:42 ↗ could look at this but it just

48:44 ↗ you have that what i would call an

48:46 ↗ operational issue with that to make sure

48:48 ↗ that that all the individual cisterns

48:51 ↗ no matter how large they are being

48:53 ↗ operated in the correct way like you're

48:54 ↗ saying so that

48:56 ↗ in the winter it's right they have to be

48:57 ↗ able to hold that back so that's

48:58 ↗ definitely a classic distributed system

49:01 ↗ but it's it's typically harder to make

49:04 ↗ that actually happen

49:05 ↗ when the rate's that heavy

49:07 ↗ and can ponds be used for that um

49:11 ↗ without worrying about mosquitoes

49:15 ↗ well we have we have ponds now yeah and

49:18 ↗ it is that's always an issue with

49:21 ↗ what they call like ponds which are

49:22 ↗ ponds that are designed to drain all the

49:24 ↗ way out they have

49:25 ↗ water sitting in all the time that's how

49:27 ↗ they work um in terms of water quality

49:29 ↗ and the water quality function of the

49:31 ↗ pond

49:32 ↗ um

49:32 ↗ yeah mosquitoes are always an issue but

49:35 ↗ the good news and i can speak to to that

49:37 ↗ because i when i worked with city renton

49:39 ↗ i was a west nile bio virus coordinator

49:41 ↗ and so part of what we did was to go out

49:44 ↗ and and treat our stormwater ponds

49:46 ↗ with waterside but the good news is it's

49:49 ↗ not an issue in this part of the country

49:50 ↗ in the northwest we don't really have

49:52 ↗ west nile virus we don't have it it

49:54 ↗ doesn't for some reason doesn't like

49:55 ↗ this area

49:56 ↗ the

49:57 ↗ mosquitoes that we have don't it's not

49:59 ↗ an issue here fortunately but there are

50:01 ↗ ways to treat the ponds if you think i

50:04 ↗ don't get all the details but yes it's

50:05 ↗ something to be aware of but

50:08 ↗ um

50:08 ↗ it's generally not an issue for here so

50:17 ↗ you know i'm not positive but i think

50:19 ↗ that the highlight of the super

50:20 ↗ highlands there are pond there's ponds

50:22 ↗ up there which the city maintains but i

50:24 ↗ think there's an agreement with the

50:25 ↗ homework associations up at the

50:27 ↗ highlands to use those costs

50:30 ↗ that's great

50:32 ↗ um thanks to my hopes just to speak up

50:34 ↗ to make sure that folks that are joining

50:35 ↗ remotely can hear and these are our

50:37 ↗ microphones so

50:42 ↗ well i guess it's kind of a question and

50:44 ↗ a comment so i would encourage you to

50:46 ↗ look at up for storage and recovery as

50:49 ↗ you're looking at these off-site storage

50:51 ↗ things the reason i'd say that is um

50:54 ↗ there's funding at ecology right now for

50:55 ↗ much of that work

50:57 ↗ and if you take that and you take your

50:59 ↗ wintertime water and you can inject it

51:01 ↗ back into where we're getting our

51:04 ↗ potable drinking water or in those areas

51:06 ↗ so we're still maintaining stream flows

51:08 ↗ there's opportunity to get greater water

51:10 ↗ rights for your drinking water system so

51:12 ↗ you have two utilities that are

51:14 ↗ benefiting this from the city so if

51:16 ↗ you're really looking at that kind of

51:18 ↗ system i'd really encourage you to think

51:20 ↗ outside the box and go into

51:22 ↗ looking at that i know two jurisdictions

51:24 ↗ right now that are getting funding from

51:26 ↗ apology to do that type of work so i

51:28 ↗ just encourage you to try and think

51:31 ↗ about uh if you're doing off-site

51:32 ↗ storage or something like that seeing if

51:34 ↗ you can potentially get into some kind

51:35 ↗ of piloting of injecting it and getting

51:39 ↗ greater water out for groundwater

51:41 ↗ right i think actually stacey could

51:42 ↗ maybe speak to this

51:44 ↗ psychology but

51:46 ↗ and the city was had to participate in

51:48 ↗ what they called in-stream flow

51:49 ↗ psychology's requirement where these

51:51 ↗ beaters accept their

51:53 ↗ wells the things that wells not in the

51:55 ↗ rural areas

51:57 ↗ but basically ecology was encouraging

52:01 ↗ to maintain history flows you know that

52:04 ↗ you come up with projects that will do

52:06 ↗ exactly what you're saying

52:07 ↗ and you're right there are there are

52:09 ↗ grants out there to um for those type of

52:11 ↗ projects

52:12 ↗ and so that's something we did look at

52:14 ↗ when that that whole that requirement

52:16 ↗ sort of well complicated but it went by

52:19 ↗ it basically never got completed and

52:21 ↗ ecology's not taking over

52:23 ↗ that whole process

52:25 ↗ but um so that's we can look at that and

52:27 ↗ i think some of these off-channel

52:28 ↗ projects that where you can have off

52:31 ↗ channel storage and allow the water to

52:33 ↗ infiltrate and recharge the groundwater

52:36 ↗ is beneficial for in-stream flows like

52:39 ↗ you said but the problem is is that

52:41 ↗ we're so far downstream in the system

52:43 ↗ that it's not

52:44 ↗ it's not as

52:46 ↗ is effective and unless

52:48 ↗ as opposed to being further up in the

52:49 ↗ watershed um that makes sense i would

52:52 ↗ push back on that comment on you just as

52:54 ↗ a comment and i would say that you if

52:56 ↗ you look at it

52:58 ↗ you know our well fields you're pretty

52:59 ↗ much down in the valley the city's

53:00 ↗ drinking water well fields so if you're

53:03 ↗ trying to put more water in there so you

53:05 ↗ can pump it out later it's not just for

53:07 ↗ in-stream clothes but also so you can

53:10 ↗ um continue to take water because your

53:12 ↗ groundwater walls you're growing down

53:13 ↗ your groundwater systems i i just think

53:16 ↗ there's an opportunity here that's

53:17 ↗ bigger than what you're talking about

53:19 ↗ here that's just my comment

53:20 ↗ okay we'll definitely put it as if we'll

53:22 ↗ consider that i think what ellen and i

53:24 ↗ can commit to again this this one i

53:26 ↗ think is i would dare say that the

53:28 ↗ largest project that we have here

53:31 ↗ on this list is that we would be coming

53:33 ↗ back to you

53:35 ↗ at a very early concept stage with uh

53:38 ↗ probably with the county as well so this

53:40 ↗ is something and so i think you know

53:42 ↗ particularly in this year but uh have

53:45 ↗ your your kind of solutions about you

53:47 ↗ know ponds cisterns i think you know

53:49 ↗ that's something we

53:50 ↗ we will kind of commit to saying we're

53:52 ↗ going to look at a full toolbox here and

53:54 ↗ we have to right we have to look at a

53:56 ↗ full toolbox here

53:57 ↗ um in coordination with the county and

53:59 ↗ kind of come back and we'll be back

54:00 ↗ early to the board on that with this

54:02 ↗ what this goes through because this will

54:03 ↗ be you know just a multi-year uh uh

54:07 ↗ this

54:09 ↗ this is a huge multi-year effort

54:10 ↗ multi-coordination so

54:12 ↗ committing to start off early having a

54:14 ↗ wide

54:15 ↗ right scope and then coming back coming

54:17 ↗ back again

54:20 ↗ so thank you guys

54:21 ↗ good comments very good thank you

54:25 ↗ all right moving on number two sp 28 29

54:30 ↗ avenue

54:31 ↗ southeast water volume improvement

54:33 ↗ project so this one is located in the

54:35 ↗ esquad basin so over by

54:38 ↗ um

54:40 ↗ so the i-90

54:42 ↗ interchange there

54:43 ↗ just north on

54:47 ↗ the east lake it's a match parkway so

54:48 ↗ this is the

54:50 ↗ gravel pit gravel plant

54:53 ↗ that road

54:54 ↗ um and so this area is probably

54:56 ↗ problematic where there's a growl area

54:59 ↗ that

55:00 ↗ when in heavy rains it mobilizes

55:02 ↗ sediment and it um

55:06 ↗ the heavy flows you know the velocities

55:08 ↗ erode the gravel and the sand and it

55:11 ↗ ends up into

55:12 ↗ entering the north fork of the sequat

55:14 ↗ creek

55:15 ↗ so you can just plume the sediment that

55:17 ↗ comes in the creek during

55:19 ↗ you know various storm events i'm not

55:21 ↗ sure what storm event but you know

55:23 ↗ fairly frequently

55:25 ↗ and so this really is a project that we

55:27 ↗ decided that we needed you know

55:29 ↗ high visibility in some ways and we

55:30 ↗ wanted to

55:32 ↗ try to reduce that sediment load into

55:34 ↗ the north fork

55:36 ↗ um

55:37 ↗ and also there's other issues with you

55:39 ↗ know the

55:41 ↗ travel

55:42 ↗ kit itself um this has been violations

55:45 ↗ of the industrial permit um similar to

55:48 ↗ our nvds industrial permit but they have

55:51 ↗ to manage their their runoff and there's

55:53 ↗ some violations there and so

55:56 ↗ we thought this would be a good project

55:57 ↗ to really try to do some treatment

56:00 ↗ because the north fork does you know

56:02 ↗ enter is a tributary to the creek

56:05 ↗ and it's important to treat that runoff

56:07 ↗ um

56:08 ↗ so it goes to the top and one of the

56:10 ↗ higher

56:11 ↗ uh prioritized projects so you're not

56:14 ↗ tristan if you want to add anything

56:16 ↗ on this

56:18 ↗ alan no i i think you covered it pretty

56:20 ↗ well it's it's a water quality

56:22 ↗ improvement project and a drainage

56:24 ↗ improvement project for uh 229th avenue

56:28 ↗ southeast

56:30 ↗ yeah just quickly add that watchdog

56:33 ↗ several years back now was in 2016 i

56:35 ↗ think did a culvert project

56:37 ↗ um

56:38 ↗ they actually realigned part of the

56:40 ↗ north fork

56:42 ↗ and put it to the culverts there to

56:44 ↗ across e6 parkway so

56:48 ↗ anyhow that maybe they've made a fish

56:50 ↗ passable they'll beat the ability

56:52 ↗ yeah

56:54 ↗ that gravel area you refer to that's

56:56 ↗ basically property

57:10 ↗ effort

57:20 ↗ more about that

57:22 ↗ we would need to investigate

57:24 ↗ whether a facility could be sighted

57:27 ↗ in or near that gravel but even if we

57:30 ↗ just um provide better drainage down

57:33 ↗ 229th avenue

57:35 ↗ southeast which is very steep street

57:37 ↗ uh it doesn't have drainage

57:39 ↗ infrastructure on that side of the road

57:41 ↗ and

57:42 ↗ runoff sheet flows onto that gravel area

57:45 ↗ so even if we just provide a collection

57:47 ↗ and conveyance system we'll have less

57:50 ↗ a muddy runoff onto

57:53 ↗ 6th 66th i'm sorry

57:56 ↗ because there won't be any run on into

57:58 ↗ the gravel so we'll have less run off

58:01 ↗ onto the

58:02 ↗ street likely

58:04 ↗ but we'll investigate also a water

58:07 ↗ quality facility

58:09 ↗ interesting

58:10 ↗ are you going to say something shaylee

58:12 ↗ oh i was just going to say is that this

58:13 ↗ also talks to i think um uh

58:16 ↗ when we were talking about 6ppd quinoa

58:19 ↗ like when we look at water quality that

58:20 ↗ this is like a street that has a lot of

58:22 ↗ trucks so

58:24 ↗ we would look at you know um trying to

58:26 ↗ use the bmps that might address that so

58:29 ↗ that that is something that we would you

58:31 ↗ know try to put in

58:32 ↗ so that um you know because of the dire

58:35 ↗ um runoff as well as metals from the

58:38 ↗ trucks and oil and grease so we'd be

58:39 ↗ looking at all of those pollutants um of

58:42 ↗ concern um in order to figure out which

58:44 ↗ facility or what type should put in

58:54 ↗ [Music]

58:59 ↗ dealership there

59:00 ↗ [Music]

59:01 ↗ obviously they've been abandoned i'm

59:03 ↗ assuming since we've still got the

59:06 ↗ um old there

59:08 ↗ right right right you know i don't have

59:10 ↗ the update on that it's it's really the

59:13 ↗ permitting department you know where

59:14 ↗ that stands

59:16 ↗ it wasn't you know there had there was a

59:18 ↗ flood plain we had a flip plane map

59:20 ↗ update there that was never done and so

59:22 ↗ that was recently completed um to

59:26 ↗ a letter map revision basically

59:28 ↗ um

59:29 ↗ which which should have been done by

59:30 ↗ washdot you know post project you should

59:33 ↗ do a map right mapping post project it's

59:36 ↗ called willmar

59:38 ↗ and they did not do that so we ended up

59:40 ↗ doing that um

59:42 ↗ but yeah i don't know the status of the

59:43 ↗ uh

59:44 ↗ dealership

59:57 ↗ i mean they're doing their own treatment

59:58 ↗ on site of course for their impervious

1:00:00 ↗ parking and so forth but

1:00:02 ↗ um but this does i think that's a i

1:00:04 ↗ think it's a good comment because some

1:00:05 ↗ of the other comments that all three of

1:00:07 ↗ you made this is definitely one of those

1:00:09 ↗ partnership

1:00:10 ↗ projects where we will need to talk to

1:00:12 ↗ the stakeholders whether they're

1:00:14 ↗ whether they're part of the solution

1:00:19 ↗ [Applause]

1:00:23 ↗ i don't think it's a good point because

1:00:24 ↗ i'm not sure what

1:00:26 ↗ the plan is for southeast 60

1:00:30 ↗ 66 if there's if they're going to prove

1:00:32 ↗ that roadway they're required to do

1:00:33 ↗ their improvements along there

1:00:36 ↗ if they are then that would be obviously

1:00:38 ↗ yeah we would want to coordinate with

1:00:40 ↗ them

1:00:46 ↗ okay

1:00:46 ↗ and we have a question from dan as well

1:00:48 ↗ i i think it's most of an answer that's

1:00:50 ↗ why i just want to clarify something

1:00:51 ↗ like there's multiple owners of that

1:00:53 ↗ gravel op

1:01:02 ↗ you know but

1:01:03 ↗ um and it turned out that it was a

1:01:05 ↗ little more complicated than i thought

1:01:07 ↗ um in terms of it's not so much whether

1:01:09 ↗ land ownership but really there's some

1:01:10 ↗ utilities okay if we wanted to sort of

1:01:13 ↗ put in some conveys piping to take it to

1:01:15 ↗ the other

1:01:16 ↗ um

1:01:17 ↗ the other direction because right now it

1:01:19 ↗ goes into the north fork because of our

1:01:20 ↗ crew right and we were thinking of

1:01:21 ↗ taking it to the other

1:01:23 ↗ other

1:01:24 ↗ direction but then the problem with that

1:01:26 ↗ is you're separating the bases you're

1:01:27 ↗ taking water that was in one base

1:01:29 ↗ without the basin and that violates

1:01:32 ↗ you know depending how far they

1:01:33 ↗ recombine again that's not that's not a

1:01:35 ↗ good thing so i was just curious if

1:01:37 ↗ there's feasibility of you you mentioned

1:01:38 ↗ resurfacing this is the

1:01:40 ↗ slide here of actually paving it i don't

1:01:42 ↗ go by there much but i feel like when i

1:01:44 ↗ do you don't see

1:01:45 ↗ that parking lot i'm just curious if

1:01:46 ↗ there's you know for me that would make

1:01:48 ↗ even more sense you know i don't know if

1:01:49 ↗ that would be more cost efficient or

1:01:51 ↗ long-term benefits yeah you know the

1:01:53 ↗ conveyance system but i'm just curious

1:01:55 ↗ if that would be something

1:01:56 ↗ to explore um

1:01:58 ↗ in terms of actually just be paving that

1:02:00 ↗ section there but

1:02:01 ↗ right

1:02:03 ↗ thank you no i think dan i think that's

1:02:05 ↗ a great point too of you know these are

1:02:07 ↗ early you know the the concept phases i

1:02:10 ↗ think

1:02:12 ↗ looking at

1:02:13 ↗ um

1:02:14 ↗ you know yes we're looking kind of we're

1:02:17 ↗ talking about capital solutions but can

1:02:19 ↗ also be as we're going through these

1:02:20 ↗ things about well is there something

1:02:22 ↗ operationally or or repair or rehab-wise

1:02:25 ↗ that we could do that instead of a

1:02:26 ↗ capital project so i think that's right

1:02:28 ↗ you're going to see that with all these

1:02:29 ↗ projects as well too this is

1:02:31 ↗ you know from the

1:02:33 ↗ preliminary ranking these look like the

1:02:35 ↗ the best ones for a capital project but

1:02:37 ↗ there may be offshoots because of what

1:02:38 ↗ we find out right well i think you know

1:02:40 ↗ my bias is very habitat so you know

1:02:43 ↗ that's the actual buffer of the north

1:02:44 ↗ forward right there in that parking lot

1:02:46 ↗ so i can see some multi benefits there

1:02:47 ↗ too

1:02:48 ↗ great thank you thank you

1:02:50 ↗ put it back to work

1:02:53 ↗ that's my

1:02:55 ↗ solution for a lot of things

1:02:57 ↗ yeah yeah

1:02:58 ↗ all right next project

1:03:00 ↗ my

1:03:06 ↗ so this really came out of some of the

1:03:08 ↗ comments or issues that our maintenance

1:03:10 ↗ department

1:03:11 ↗ operations had identified

1:03:14 ↗ and this really is uh

1:03:15 ↗ um i think it's a good project because

1:03:17 ↗ it really is a lot of

1:03:19 ↗ targets a lot of different benefits

1:03:21 ↗ essentially what happens is water high

1:03:22 ↗ velocity closed during storm events come

1:03:24 ↗ down my hill creek which is this

1:03:27 ↗ creek right here

1:03:29 ↗ and

1:03:30 ↗ right before it there's a covert that

1:03:33 ↗ crosses a wildwood boulevard

1:03:36 ↗ um so right before that culvert and

1:03:38 ↗ inlet side of the cover there's a big

1:03:40 ↗ trash rack

1:03:42 ↗ and it kind of create like a

1:03:43 ↗ segmentation

1:03:45 ↗ uh basin of sorts where the water comes

1:03:47 ↗ down and it it

1:03:49 ↗ moves gravel which is a natural process

1:03:51 ↗ from the hillsides it's mass wasting

1:03:53 ↗ moves it down which you know you do want

1:03:55 ↗ gravel recruiting that's how you get

1:03:57 ↗ gravel into the streams that help

1:03:58 ↗ percentage fish responding

1:04:01 ↗ um

1:04:02 ↗ and so but the problem is that gravel

1:04:03 ↗ piles up there

1:04:05 ↗ and then it if it's not maintaining a

1:04:06 ↗ regular basis

1:04:08 ↗ you know bigger storms it just will

1:04:10 ↗ flood basically flood the roadway while

1:04:12 ↗ with boulevard southwest

1:04:15 ↗ and so a couple so by doing the project

1:04:17 ↗ we're proposing is really looking at

1:04:18 ↗ putting in a

1:04:20 ↗ bigger covert more likely a uh

1:04:23 ↗ a box cover if just passable and this is

1:04:26 ↗ also i believe just to identify it as a

1:04:28 ↗ fish passage

1:04:29 ↗ issue is that right

1:04:32 ↗ yes it is

1:04:33 ↗ okay so so yeah so in terms of the

1:04:36 ↗ issues we looked at also the the

1:04:37 ↗ database from wfw that has all the

1:04:40 ↗ identified fish passes you know issues

1:04:43 ↗ within the city of support and this is

1:04:44 ↗ one of them

1:04:46 ↗ um so basically put in a box culvert

1:04:48 ↗ that would make the fish passable and

1:04:50 ↗ then daylight everything else downstream

1:04:52 ↗ of there down to essop creek the stretch

1:04:54 ↗ that's in the park behind the park so

1:04:56 ↗ that could be maybe daylighted and so

1:04:58 ↗ that will provide some fish

1:05:01 ↗ habitat shin habitat

1:05:03 ↗ a fish passable fox culvert

1:05:06 ↗ um they allow the gravels to move

1:05:08 ↗ through um naturally and then of course

1:05:10 ↗ eliminate a maintenance headache

1:05:13 ↗ and save some money because because like

1:05:15 ↗ i said the city makes sense about their

1:05:17 ↗ periodic things and with that gravel so

1:05:30 ↗ next project sp 172

1:05:32 ↗ over capacity increase in front street

1:05:34 ↗ crossing the lewis lane temperature

1:05:39 ↗ so this project uh i don't trust it you

1:05:42 ↗ want to take this one on i think i'll

1:05:44 ↗ just kind of go over it but essentially

1:05:46 ↗ this is one that came up pretty

1:05:48 ↗ frequently there are a lot of hits on

1:05:50 ↗ issues here

1:05:51 ↗ that we identified for the

1:05:52 ↗ disappointment assessment that we've

1:05:54 ↗ done and all the output outreach and the

1:05:57 ↗ public comment where we had the map the

1:06:00 ↗ um

1:06:01 ↗ web map where people could

1:06:03 ↗ put pins and just discuss issues and

1:06:06 ↗ this this area really along um sixth

1:06:09 ↗ avenue southeast

1:06:11 ↗ there's a lot of

1:06:13 ↗ concerns of flooding along here

1:06:15 ↗ and

1:06:16 ↗ it's combination of some undersized

1:06:18 ↗ pipes there's also culvert crossing

1:06:21 ↗ or so this is lewis lane tributary up

1:06:24 ↗ here and then there's a trip to that

1:06:26 ↗ which is this one right here and it

1:06:27 ↗ crosses over across 36th avenue

1:06:29 ↗ southeast

1:06:31 ↗ and that culvert's undersized um

1:06:34 ↗ so the thought was here because it

1:06:36 ↗ seemed to be a

1:06:38 ↗ fair amount of public uh comment on this

1:06:41 ↗ that he would

1:06:42 ↗ look at investigating doing some type of

1:06:44 ↗ improvement along here whether it's

1:06:46 ↗ emphasizing the conveyance systems

1:06:49 ↗ putting into culver crossing here

1:06:51 ↗ um

1:06:53 ↗ to that effect so um

1:06:56 ↗ i don't know trista anyone else makes

1:06:58 ↗ tla

1:07:04 ↗ i think you've mostly covered it ellen

1:07:06 ↗ there's there's a lot of flooding

1:07:08 ↗ complaints in the area and

1:07:11 ↗ um the the project is really

1:07:13 ↗ investigating the drainage system and

1:07:15 ↗ coming up with a solution to

1:07:18 ↗ manage or avoid

1:07:20 ↗ not local flooding

1:07:23 ↗ okay

1:07:25 ↗ we need to do some investigation to to

1:07:27 ↗ figure out which um exact elements of

1:07:30 ↗ the

1:07:31 ↗ of the of the system

1:07:33 ↗ need to change but

1:07:35 ↗ that's really what it's intended to

1:07:36 ↗ solve

1:07:37 ↗ okay thank you so let me add one thing

1:07:39 ↗ here back to

1:07:40 ↗ something nancy said very early on is

1:07:42 ↗ that as we go through

1:07:44 ↗ these um

1:07:47 ↗ all these projects to the concept level

1:07:50 ↗ we'll be

1:07:52 ↗ better documenting

1:07:54 ↗ the cost of the project but also the

1:07:57 ↗ benefits as well right

1:07:59 ↗ so that is what you know this is why

1:08:01 ↗ it's great to have this playbook of of

1:08:04 ↗ all these projects that we

1:08:06 ↗ can't get to right away if we do find

1:08:08 ↗ that something

1:08:09 ↗ uh just is not looking right in terms of

1:08:12 ↗ cost benefit

1:08:13 ↗ uh you know that that's what we may have

1:08:15 ↗ it offering but we meet again i think

1:08:17 ↗ that's something we come back to you and

1:08:18 ↗ council

1:08:19 ↗ uh before before stopping it we would

1:08:22 ↗ say hey uh you know we're at 30 design

1:08:25 ↗ this is really really good

1:08:27 ↗ at the beginning now that we've dug into

1:08:29 ↗ it more

1:08:31 ↗ the cost benefit

1:08:32 ↗ even with the externalities of social

1:08:34 ↗ benefits of our developments might not

1:08:36 ↗ look good so i think uh you know that's

1:08:38 ↗ that's what we want to commit commit to

1:08:40 ↗ you as well is we're not just gonna

1:08:42 ↗ uh go go blind you know blinders out

1:08:45 ↗ with these projects we're gonna each

1:08:47 ↗ step we're gonna look at this and again

1:08:49 ↗ if something doesn't pan out we want to

1:08:51 ↗ come back to you and tell you why and

1:08:53 ↗ maybe we should put this on hold or you

1:08:55 ↗ know

1:08:56 ↗ or you know again something nancy said

1:08:58 ↗ to maybe maybe it's better for a later

1:08:59 ↗ time in combination with another project

1:09:04 ↗ that context

1:09:19 ↗ cove um

1:09:20 ↗ you have that

1:09:22 ↗ all right so

1:09:24 ↗ this project is over near the state park

1:09:26 ↗ um this is a portion of

1:09:30 ↗ snyder creek

1:09:32 ↗ um

1:09:32 ↗ the downs the portion downstream of i-90

1:09:35 ↗ uh so a couple things going on with this

1:09:37 ↗ project

1:09:38 ↗ um this was really i think one where we

1:09:41 ↗ felt we could

1:09:43 ↗ we could combine it or work with washed

1:09:45 ↗ on in terms of what they're doing

1:09:47 ↗ because they're they're

1:09:49 ↗ right now they have plans to

1:09:51 ↗ do several colder crossing replacements

1:09:53 ↗ or

1:09:54 ↗ replacement projects on i-90 to satisfy

1:09:56 ↗ the requirement to

1:09:58 ↗ you know meet the

1:10:00 ↗ mandate that they have to replace all

1:10:02 ↗ these culvers within a 10-year time

1:10:03 ↗ frame um

1:10:05 ↗ that are fish issues not they're not

1:10:08 ↗ fish possible

1:10:09 ↗ and so this is one of them uh

1:10:11 ↗ so basically the snyder creek is a

1:10:14 ↗ non-fish passable

1:10:16 ↗ culvert so they need to go in there and

1:10:17 ↗ replace this culvert

1:10:19 ↗ and we thought that well this would be a

1:10:21 ↗ good time to

1:10:22 ↗ look at doing some channel improvements

1:10:24 ↗ so this is really looking at so we try

1:10:26 ↗ to actually picking a mixed bag of water

1:10:28 ↗ quality projects flooding projects and

1:10:30 ↗ habitat projects

1:10:31 ↗ and this is one we thought would be a

1:10:33 ↗ good opportunity to do a stream

1:10:35 ↗ enhancement or habitat project

1:10:38 ↗ downstream by 90.

1:10:41 ↗ still in what we're doing now with

1:10:43 ↗ right now in construction there's the

1:10:44 ↗ city's doing this lower squad creek

1:10:46 ↗ restoration project it's a great project

1:10:48 ↗ there near costco where we're

1:10:51 ↗ restoring you know we're putting in side

1:10:53 ↗ channels back water channels and

1:10:55 ↗ putting in large wooded debris and that

1:10:57 ↗ would be completed at the end of this

1:10:59 ↗ year so i'll

1:11:00 ↗ be more about that just

1:11:02 ↗ going to go out and look at it but

1:11:03 ↗ anyhow this is the kind of thing worth

1:11:05 ↗ talking about here

1:11:06 ↗ um doing some improvements along this

1:11:08 ↗ portion of schneider creek

1:11:11 ↗ you know basically if if washout's going

1:11:13 ↗ to come in with a culvert to

1:11:15 ↗ upsize make it fish passable then it

1:11:16 ↗ only makes sense to then improve

1:11:18 ↗ downstream section

1:11:20 ↗ um for fish so

1:11:24 ↗ so coordination watchdog

1:11:26 ↗ opportunity there to share some new

1:11:29 ↗ design efforts um

1:11:31 ↗ yeah so any questions on that trista

1:11:35 ↗ anything jaylen

1:11:38 ↗ um there

1:11:40 ↗ there's been some uh wetland and

1:11:42 ↗ riparian

1:11:43 ↗ enhancements

1:11:45 ↗ just fyi

1:11:46 ↗ and the um city parks department

1:11:49 ↗ uh downstream in the vicinity of our

1:11:52 ↗ project area has been doing native plant

1:11:55 ↗ plantings for a while i believe they've

1:11:57 ↗ finished that effort

1:11:59 ↗ but

1:12:00 ↗ the

1:12:00 ↗ in-stream enhancement would be

1:12:03 ↗ designed to kind of coordinate or

1:12:05 ↗ complement the more riparian upland uh

1:12:09 ↗ plantings that parks has taken care of

1:12:11 ↗ so this is one where

1:12:13 ↗ we hope by coordinating with both

1:12:15 ↗ washdot and the park the city parks

1:12:17 ↗ efforts that we do really get a lot of

1:12:20 ↗ things for the buck on this type of

1:12:22 ↗ project

1:12:24 ↗ a little bit on there if i may i think

1:12:26 ↗ this one will also i think we've talked

1:12:28 ↗ about be highly competitive in grant uh

1:12:31 ↗ grant opportunities for for a couple of

1:12:34 ↗ reasons well

1:12:35 ↗ primarily well two two reasons one the

1:12:38 ↗ coordination with the watchdog project

1:12:40 ↗ but two other work that has already gone

1:12:42 ↗ on so i think those two

1:12:45 ↗ is the third that it's somewhat limited

1:12:48 ↗ scope and area so i think this is gonna

1:12:50 ↗ this is one that you know really ranked

1:12:52 ↗ high in that that

1:12:53 ↗ you know potential opportunities

1:12:55 ↗ for grants uh grant funding which again

1:12:58 ↗ we're pretty successful at uh here at

1:13:00 ↗ esquad uh but this is

1:13:09 ↗ what's on the upstream side of what's on

1:13:11 ↗ the other side of the freeway where is

1:13:13 ↗ that down at formula or is that

1:13:15 ↗ down through here is it

1:13:24 ↗ [Music]

1:13:29 ↗ okay

1:13:36 ↗ that is all city is this a small part of

1:13:38 ↗ it on private property near the mouth of

1:13:39 ↗ schneider creek or is most of the

1:13:42 ↗ creek wealth and city

1:13:44 ↗ property there in the park it's hard to

1:13:46 ↗ tell this man um you know i'm not

1:13:48 ↗ entirely sure some of them might be like

1:13:50 ↗ the outlet there that they're like maybe

1:13:53 ↗ on private property so there might be

1:13:54 ↗ like a top of the neighborhood

1:13:57 ↗ yeah okay cool yeah good point good

1:14:01 ↗ point

1:14:02 ↗ um so okay

1:14:05 ↗ let's do one next one here

1:14:07 ↗ sp 65 uberridge or convenience

1:14:09 ↗ improvements so

1:14:11 ↗ yeah the problem is you don't really

1:14:13 ↗ have an idea

1:14:14 ↗ about where this is we had that map

1:14:16 ↗ earlier that showed it um all the

1:14:17 ↗ projects but

1:14:19 ↗ it's kind of hard to tell when you zoom

1:14:20 ↗ in with where it is but this is up on

1:14:22 ↗ cougar ridge so

1:14:24 ↗ um it's a snyder creek basin so just

1:14:25 ↗ upstream of the creek we're just looking

1:14:27 ↗ at upstream along the hillside cougar of

1:14:29 ↗ cougar mountain

1:14:31 ↗ off the newport way

1:14:33 ↗ does that give you a sense of what we're

1:14:34 ↗ talking about here

1:14:36 ↗ anyhow it's a

1:14:38 ↗ subdivision where there's a flooding not

1:14:40 ↗ only along uh what within 193rd place

1:14:43 ↗ but also southeast 56th street which has

1:14:46 ↗ occurred in the past

1:14:47 ↗ once again when we get these highest

1:14:49 ↗ velocity storm storms where the

1:14:52 ↗ there's erosion and scouring of you know

1:14:54 ↗ the hillside

1:14:55 ↗ and it deposits

1:14:57 ↗ um

1:14:59 ↗ gravel and sediment just upstream of the

1:15:01 ↗ where it connects so

1:15:03 ↗ the base of the stream connects into the

1:15:05 ↗ system here

1:15:07 ↗ storm system here and then

1:15:09 ↗ the gravel deposits there clogs it's not

1:15:12 ↗ maintained but sufficiently enough it

1:15:14 ↗ you know

1:15:15 ↗ because if we get big enough storm but

1:15:17 ↗ it just overwhelms

1:15:19 ↗ the storage behind that um structure the

1:15:22 ↗ inlet structure with the

1:15:25 ↗ trash rack on it

1:15:26 ↗ um that it will flood and so someone

1:15:29 ↗ another project we i talked about

1:15:30 ↗ earlier

1:15:32 ↗ this would

1:15:33 ↗ essentially

1:15:35 ↗ improve

1:15:36 ↗ that um

1:15:40 ↗ do something to prove that whether it's

1:15:41 ↗ putting in a the problem here is you

1:15:43 ↗ know it's a little bit different because

1:15:45 ↗ there's no cream there's no spark print

1:15:47 ↗ right next to it so

1:15:49 ↗ the problem is that the sediment would

1:15:50 ↗ go into the storm system the

1:15:52 ↗ local storm system which is

1:15:54 ↗ so that would have to involve some type

1:15:56 ↗ of uh

1:15:58 ↗ yeah i guess that's something we have to

1:15:59 ↗ think about how would we do there um

1:16:03 ↗ more likely of sizing made sizing the

1:16:05 ↗ pipes to the collection system

1:16:07 ↗ so that's a little bit tricky tricky one

1:16:09 ↗ i don't trust it do you want to add

1:16:11 ↗ anything to that

1:16:12 ↗ i think there's an issue about access

1:16:14 ↗ for maintenance as well so we'll be

1:16:16 ↗ looking at improving

1:16:18 ↗ maintenance access are ensuring that

1:16:19 ↗ it's easier to maintain

1:16:21 ↗ as well as requiring less frequent

1:16:23 ↗ maintenance um

1:16:25 ↗ this uh partly made it on the

1:16:27 ↗ the priority list because of the

1:16:30 ↗ amount of effort that

1:16:32 ↗ city operations is putting into

1:16:33 ↗ maintaining

1:16:34 ↗ that um

1:16:37 ↗ that structure

1:16:38 ↗ uh needing to

1:16:40 ↗ to

1:16:41 ↗ suck out the sediment so frequently

1:16:45 ↗ and um even not being able to keep up

1:16:47 ↗ with it so that uh at times the

1:16:49 ↗ neighborhood does flood a little bit

1:16:52 ↗ so

1:16:52 ↗ should

1:16:53 ↗ improve the situation for city

1:16:55 ↗ operations and we'll be considering

1:16:57 ↗ maintenance access

1:17:02 ↗ for clarification here this the

1:17:04 ↗ open channel is coming from the left in

1:17:06 ↗ the storm system at that first purple

1:17:08 ↗ square correct

1:17:11 ↗ yeah so likely it would involve maybe

1:17:13 ↗ like tristan said better access and some

1:17:16 ↗ type of a more formal

1:17:19 ↗ structure that you that's still going to

1:17:21 ↗ have to collect the sediment i mean

1:17:22 ↗ there's no getting around that we can't

1:17:24 ↗ pass it through

1:17:25 ↗ otherwise it would go into the it it's

1:17:27 ↗ not like we can pass it through to a

1:17:30 ↗ decree

1:17:31 ↗ so

1:17:32 ↗ um

1:17:33 ↗ so it's going to involve a

1:17:35 ↗ yeah you know it's just a

1:17:37 ↗ maintenance type facility that will have

1:17:39 ↗ to be made you know where they're going

1:17:40 ↗ to come in with trucks factor trucks to

1:17:42 ↗ clean it out

1:17:43 ↗ but just a more efficient system i guess

1:17:46 ↗ as opposed to how it is now which is

1:17:47 ↗ just it just fills up too frequently so

1:17:50 ↗ maybe it involves excavating more you

1:17:52 ↗ know to put in a large type of

1:17:53 ↗ segmentation basin or something like

1:17:55 ↗ that

1:17:56 ↗ um goodness can be blending in when we

1:17:58 ↗ get into looking at the upstream

1:18:00 ↗ resources right what are the sources

1:18:02 ↗ is there something you can use

1:18:05 ↗ the amount of segmentation that's

1:18:07 ↗ occurring or something

1:18:09 ↗ yeah

1:18:10 ↗ like i said it's a natural process

1:18:11 ↗ that's how our creeks get they're

1:18:13 ↗ replenishing their gravel and that's

1:18:15 ↗ we're sort of choking it out with these

1:18:17 ↗ when we built these storm systems but so

1:18:19 ↗ we got to figure out a way to

1:18:20 ↗ um

1:18:21 ↗ trap it and so it doesn't flood and

1:18:23 ↗ remove the material

1:18:25 ↗ more efficiently basically down to

1:18:27 ↗ so

1:18:29 ↗ yeah

1:18:30 ↗ any more comments questions

1:18:33 ↗ when the gravel gets removed then is it

1:18:36 ↗ put into the issaquah creek in an area

1:18:39 ↗ that might need some credible yeah

1:18:41 ↗ there's not there's no requirement for

1:18:42 ↗ that it's not like mitigating anything

1:18:44 ↗ it basically our crews just i think they

1:18:47 ↗ actually get a stockpile and dry it out

1:18:49 ↗ a bit and then they get set off i'm not

1:18:51 ↗ sure where they send it

1:18:53 ↗ exactly we have several of these

1:18:55 ↗ facilities actually one right here

1:18:57 ↗ uh this uh tibbetts banner cementation

1:19:01 ↗ basis which is just right off of this

1:19:02 ↗ creek or this creek right here and in

1:19:04 ↗ fact that's the one

1:19:06 ↗ where we're and it might as well bring

1:19:07 ↗ it up now even though it's on our top 10

1:19:09 ↗ it's maybe it's not our top 10 because

1:19:11 ↗ we're already addressing it so there's a

1:19:13 ↗ study out there

1:19:14 ↗ um

1:19:15 ↗ that we're going to begin that's going

1:19:17 ↗ to look at how we can

1:19:18 ↗ remove that cementation basin and allow

1:19:20 ↗ the gravel to

1:19:23 ↗ migrate through

1:19:24 ↗ and not cause flooding

1:19:26 ↗ um

1:19:27 ↗ we're plenty to gravel downstream

1:19:29 ↗ and we're of course limiting all the

1:19:31 ↗ maintenance costs because right now

1:19:32 ↗ we're spending like 40 000 a year i

1:19:34 ↗ think to maintain this segmentation

1:19:36 ↗ basis move gravel out of it

1:19:38 ↗ requires permitting you know our

1:19:40 ↗ operations permitted every couple of

1:19:42 ↗ years so

1:19:43 ↗ so i've worked with crowd unlimited we

1:19:45 ↗ got a grant from king county to study

1:19:48 ↗ this system correct study this system

1:19:50 ↗ all the way so so this is a good example

1:19:52 ↗ of

1:19:53 ↗ you know like leveraging grant money um

1:19:56 ↗ it's gonna solve the problems to save us

1:19:58 ↗ money in the long run it's gonna help

1:20:00 ↗ eliminate flooding

1:20:02 ↗ and help the fish um

1:20:04 ↗ so

1:20:05 ↗ but it's not in this list because we're

1:20:06 ↗ already addressing because these are

1:20:08 ↗ projects that are not you know we're

1:20:10 ↗ going to incorporate into our cip this

1:20:12 ↗ would already use in our city

1:20:14 ↗ in the future so that's great news thank

1:20:15 ↗ you so much for doing that well i

1:20:17 ↗ actually carry this uh experience a lot

1:20:19 ↗ of that effort to

1:20:21 ↗ get right now

1:20:25 ↗ all right uh sp 43 east lakes managed

1:20:27 ↗ parts of the water quality fit so here's

1:20:29 ↗ the first one that will be a register

1:20:31 ↗ that we're going to talk about part of

1:20:32 ↗ the retrofit project

1:20:34 ↗ um this is on the e6 match parkway

1:20:37 ↗ that we identified as an area that has

1:20:39 ↗ high adt

1:20:41 ↗ and of course we have this

1:20:43 ↗ adt

1:20:44 ↗ that has a average daily uh

1:20:47 ↗ traffic so to count it how much

1:20:50 ↗ how many trips do you does the average

1:20:52 ↗ of the trips rather um and so as i

1:20:55 ↗ figure what the threshold is for high is

1:20:57 ↗ but it basically has a lot of traffic

1:20:59 ↗ yeah on a daily basis generating a lot

1:21:01 ↗ of pollution a lot of tire dust a lot of

1:21:02 ↗ oils and grease

1:21:04 ↗ so this would be a prime candidate to do

1:21:06 ↗ some type of retrofit um as gary

1:21:08 ↗ mentioned earlier with our this gis

1:21:10 ↗ layer we're trying to put together

1:21:12 ↗ you know this would

1:21:13 ↗ this gis layer

1:21:15 ↗ when it's fully built out would

1:21:17 ↗ basically identify areas like this that

1:21:19 ↗ hey you know there's no treatment here

1:21:21 ↗ this road is built in the whenever 70s

1:21:25 ↗ and so back then there's no treatment

1:21:28 ↗ and so um

1:21:29 ↗ and it has high adt so we should

1:21:31 ↗ definitely target this as a it's a

1:21:33 ↗ registered project

1:21:35 ↗ um

1:21:36 ↗ so that's what that's a good example of

1:21:38 ↗ what we're proposing to do

1:21:43 ↗ oh and uh

1:21:45 ↗ yeah and this was included yeah and so

1:21:48 ↗ this project was also so let me just

1:21:50 ↗ back one more thing i want to add in

1:21:52 ↗ addition to the effort we're doing here

1:21:53 ↗ with the stormwater master plan for

1:21:55 ↗ issaquah the city of amish is also

1:21:57 ↗ developing what's called the lapping

1:21:58 ↗ jacobs creek basin plan and the city

1:22:00 ↗ partnered with them to because

1:22:03 ↗ about

1:22:04 ↗ 20

1:22:05 ↗ percent of the watershed at black and

1:22:08 ↗ jacob's creek is invisible even though

1:22:10 ↗ the majority of it is up in the spanish

1:22:13 ↗ plateau it you know the most

1:22:15 ↗ important part in terms of issues is

1:22:17 ↗ actually the support so latin gig of

1:22:20 ↗ creek is uh

1:22:21 ↗ very important for copenhagen

1:22:25 ↗ they use that system for spawning and so

1:22:28 ↗ it's a critical habitat for them

1:22:30 ↗ and so

1:22:31 ↗ um so it's part of lafayette jacob's

1:22:33 ↗ basin plan that samantha's developed

1:22:36 ↗ we basically are going to use their

1:22:38 ↗ information we took their plan that they

1:22:39 ↗ finally finalized and we pulled off peel

1:22:42 ↗ off some of the projects that they came

1:22:43 ↗ up with and so we didn't have to you

1:22:45 ↗ know basically be redundant in our

1:22:47 ↗ efforts and this is one of the one of

1:22:48 ↗ two that that we're going to use that

1:22:51 ↗ they recommended

1:22:53 ↗ so once again we could try to

1:22:54 ↗ collaborate as much as we could with

1:22:55 ↗ them

1:22:57 ↗ to develop this cip

1:23:01 ↗ any questions

1:23:04 ↗ sp230 yes

1:23:06 ↗ is

1:23:08 ↗ is the high school are the schools

1:23:10 ↗ they're being built gonna be um

1:23:13 ↗ a big issue for that

1:23:15 ↗ project uh well they're gonna i mean

1:23:17 ↗ that the high school and elementary

1:23:18 ↗ school but yeah well they're going to

1:23:20 ↗ have to do their own mitigation right

1:23:22 ↗ they're going to provide their own

1:23:23 ↗ treatment for their site in terms of

1:23:25 ↗ water quality detention so it's not

1:23:27 ↗ really so this is only so this is

1:23:29 ↗ actually this is on not even we're going

1:23:31 ↗ to get to that there's another project

1:23:32 ↗ closer to that to the school district

1:23:35 ↗ projects but this is zoe front and it's

1:23:36 ↗ on east valley or e6 match parkway so

1:23:39 ↗ it's not really going to be impacted by

1:23:41 ↗ the school

1:23:42 ↗ by the school

1:23:44 ↗ those two schools however

1:23:46 ↗ this project uh sb230 southeast 43rd way

1:23:50 ↗ road way historic treatment

1:23:53 ↗ water chamber pressure fit that is just

1:23:55 ↗ downstream of those two schools

1:23:58 ↗ but once again

1:24:00 ↗ even though the schools will discharge

1:24:02 ↗ into the system that does end up down

1:24:05 ↗ here they do have to do their own

1:24:06 ↗ treatment so this is strictly treating

1:24:09 ↗ the runoff from um

1:24:11 ↗ uh southeast 43rd

1:24:14 ↗ retrofitting to treat it and the city

1:24:16 ↗ upstream of that just upstream is a

1:24:18 ↗ section of southeast 43rd where

1:24:21 ↗ the city did a single signal project and

1:24:24 ↗ it's an

1:24:24 ↗ intersection improvement project maybe

1:24:26 ↗ two years ago

1:24:28 ↗ and that that project did put in two

1:24:30 ↗ water quality or two detention tanks and

1:24:33 ↗ a monitor wetland on your weapons to

1:24:36 ↗ treat that area

1:24:37 ↗ so this would just kind of help to

1:24:40 ↗ um continue that treatment all the way

1:24:42 ↗ down

1:24:48 ↗ yeah

1:24:49 ↗ sp

1:24:50 ↗ 32 westlakes managed parkway water

1:24:52 ↗ quality retrofit

1:24:55 ↗ so this is the lewis creek

1:24:56 ↗ basin um

1:24:59 ↗ i know so you want to take this one on

1:25:00 ↗ or or maybe uh i guess let me take it

1:25:03 ↗ off i think i'll do this one as well so

1:25:06 ↗ this project is another retrofit project

1:25:08 ↗ so once again a washcloth is going to be

1:25:11 ↗ in the process of designing and they're

1:25:13 ↗ going to replace the little street cover

1:25:16 ↗ with a

1:25:18 ↗ 50 million dollar

1:25:20 ↗ covert a series of four box covers

1:25:22 ↗ across i-90

1:25:24 ↗ so this could be

1:25:25 ↗ working with them trying to coordinate

1:25:27 ↗ with them and part of that work is it

1:25:29 ↗ kind of involves actually modifying west

1:25:31 ↗ lake spanish parkway because

1:25:34 ↗ of the way that

1:25:35 ↗ the creek goes underneath it goes

1:25:37 ↗ underneath i-90 also goes underneath the

1:25:38 ↗ west six members parkway because of the

1:25:40 ↗ great issues in order to get a box cover

1:25:42 ↗ in there they have to raise grade of uh

1:25:45 ↗ west six mountain parkway so they're

1:25:46 ↗ gonna do some they're gonna modify that

1:25:48 ↗ roadway a bit and we thought well that's

1:25:51 ↗ a great time to once again go in there

1:25:53 ↗ and work with them

1:25:54 ↗ and

1:25:56 ↗ maybe

1:25:57 ↗ collaborate together a joint project at

1:25:59 ↗ the same time

1:26:00 ↗ do a meeting of tearing up the road

1:26:02 ↗ let's go ahead and put in some treatment

1:26:04 ↗ a system to treat them run off on that

1:26:05 ↗ roadway

1:26:16 ↗ yeah okay

1:26:17 ↗ and of course that would that would help

1:26:19 ↗ treat you know high pollutants that

1:26:21 ↗ enter lewis creek which once again says

1:26:23 ↗ very extreme

1:26:25 ↗ highly productive strain um so it has

1:26:28 ↗ those benefits as well so it seemed to

1:26:30 ↗ make a logical sense to

1:26:32 ↗ to

1:26:33 ↗ target this

1:26:34 ↗ for a retrofit so

1:26:36 ↗ the treatment area to this looks fairly

1:26:40 ↗ small

1:26:42 ↗ yeah i think i don't know we talked

1:26:44 ↗ about that um

1:26:46 ↗ how big that area would be

1:26:49 ↗ the although the dot is in one location

1:26:53 ↗ um we

1:26:54 ↗ we there might actually be several like

1:26:56 ↗ smaller facilities along

1:26:59 ↗ a longer extent

1:27:01 ↗ of

1:27:02 ↗ um uh west lake samamish

1:27:05 ↗ parkway there um so

1:27:09 ↗ we'd be treating um probably

1:27:12 ↗ more than that so as gary mentioned

1:27:15 ↗ washdot will have a requirement to

1:27:16 ↗ provide treatment for any pavement they

1:27:18 ↗ modify as part of their culvert

1:27:20 ↗ replacement project

1:27:22 ↗ and what we would be proposing to do

1:27:24 ↗ is

1:27:26 ↗ coordinate with them and at the same

1:27:27 ↗ time provide

1:27:29 ↗ either an upsized facility or additional

1:27:33 ↗ facilities that could be constructed and

1:27:35 ↗ roughly

1:27:37 ↗ roughly the same phasing to treat more

1:27:40 ↗ area

1:27:42 ↗ and we've got

1:27:44 ↗ we could go either direction um from the

1:27:47 ↗ the crossing

1:27:49 ↗ over lewis creek or both directions um

1:27:52 ↗ for facilities in the right-of-way

1:27:55 ↗ and

1:27:56 ↗ again this is

1:27:58 ↗ a road that has quite a lot of traffic

1:28:00 ↗ so that 6ppd equino

1:28:03 ↗ issue the tire wear particles and

1:28:06 ↗ its a

1:28:07 ↗ significant impact on fish

1:28:10 ↗ is something we'd be keeping in mind and

1:28:12 ↗ making sure that we select

1:28:15 ↗ uh

1:28:16 ↗ sf are types of bmps that can treat 6ppd

1:28:20 ↗ equinome or remove it i should say from

1:28:22 ↗ the

1:28:23 ↗ runoff

1:28:40 ↗ so okay here's some great projects we're

1:28:43 ↗ going to work on but then there's this

1:28:44 ↗ huge backlog and uh the tools and

1:28:47 ↗ methods and our understanding of the

1:28:50 ↗ science behind all this is improving

1:28:52 ↗ that greatly

1:28:54 ↗ and uh

1:28:55 ↗ is there any hope

1:28:57 ↗ that our backlog would uh get smaller or

1:29:00 ↗ will the backlog

1:29:02 ↗ just keep getting bigger and bigger

1:29:04 ↗ um

1:29:05 ↗ uh

1:29:06 ↗ i don't know

1:29:07 ↗ how would you measure the city of

1:29:09 ↗ issaquah's response to these problems

1:29:12 ↗ compared to other jurisdictions

1:29:15 ↗ kind of in line with the what is typical

1:29:19 ↗ in

1:29:20 ↗ the jurisdiction from this area or

1:29:23 ↗ city universe boy doing a bang-up job

1:29:26 ↗ above and beyond what others are doing

1:29:28 ↗ or how do we know

1:29:32 ↗ a few questions there one of the just

1:29:33 ↗ the backlogs of two things on the back

1:29:35 ↗ one

1:29:36 ↗ um when you look in the project we're

1:29:38 ↗ kind of proposing here at the backlog

1:29:40 ↗ that we have now

1:29:42 ↗ uh what we'll be

1:29:43 ↗ you know we're working on our 23-24

1:29:45 ↗ budget right now just be good to see

1:29:47 ↗ that you're going to see a few of these

1:29:48 ↗ projects on there but not a lot

1:29:50 ↗ the current rate study and uh ends of 25

1:29:54 ↗ so we'll probably 24 be starting a new

1:29:57 ↗ five to six year rate studying all these

1:29:59 ↗ this backlog will somehow be worked into

1:30:02 ↗ that

1:30:03 ↗ uh for these projects but for the larger

1:30:04 ↗ map backlogger one will stop

1:30:07 ↗ i think you're gonna you're just gonna

1:30:08 ↗ unfortunately in the stormwater world

1:30:10 ↗ we're gonna keep it be addressing issues

1:30:12 ↗ for quite a while so i think we're gonna

1:30:15 ↗ be addressing these and then there's

1:30:17 ↗ gonna be more

1:30:18 ↗ more coming up

1:30:20 ↗ just as i mean that just seems to be the

1:30:22 ↗ nature of stormwater whether it's

1:30:24 ↗ flooding due to you know climate change

1:30:26 ↗ or just more particular pollutants that

1:30:29 ↗ we didn't know are causing issues but

1:30:30 ↗ now we know they're causing issues so

1:30:32 ↗ the number first of all but i think you

1:30:34 ↗ know this is definitely

1:30:36 ↗ um

1:30:37 ↗ a good portion of the backlog but i

1:30:39 ↗ don't think there's this is going to end

1:30:40 ↗ it and then compared to where we are you

1:30:42 ↗ know frankly i think we're you know

1:30:45 ↗ again we can maybe show this

1:30:47 ↗ this could be a maybe another discussion

1:30:49 ↗ but i i'd say we are very high on the

1:30:52 ↗ high end of how we're approaching storm

1:30:54 ↗ water in this o'clock for the region um

1:30:58 ↗ redmond for our support it's another

1:30:59 ↗ good example

1:31:00 ↗ um but there

1:31:02 ↗ for the number of for the amount of

1:31:04 ↗ population that we have

1:31:06 ↗ uh for our cip

1:31:09 ↗ when you look at that it's pretty

1:31:10 ↗ impressive

1:31:11 ↗ uh the variety of products especially on

1:31:13 ↗ the restoration end

1:31:15 ↗ that alan talked about earlier one of

1:31:17 ↗ the things we really are trying to do

1:31:18 ↗ here is address flooding

1:31:21 ↗ water quality and habitat and i think

1:31:24 ↗ you know

1:31:24 ↗ we look at portfolios for other cities

1:31:26 ↗ and

1:31:27 ↗ counties in the area we're pretty high

1:31:29 ↗ up there and i think we have that

1:31:31 ↗ respect you know we talk to

1:31:34 ↗ others in our jurisdiction they're

1:31:36 ↗ pretty pretty impressed with what we do

1:31:37 ↗ here in that uh

1:31:39 ↗ not that we don't know work to do we do

1:31:42 ↗ yeah i mean yeah there's a and we have

1:31:44 ↗ this i mean i can

1:31:47 ↗ give it yeah

1:31:49 ↗ present it but there's a

1:31:51 ↗ there's a

1:31:52 ↗ map and a list of all the restoration

1:31:55 ↗ looking at restoration for example the

1:31:56 ↗ ball pressure recreation project this

1:31:57 ↗ supply has done over the last like 20

1:31:59 ↗ years and it's quite impressive this has

1:32:01 ↗ a map of every project we've done

1:32:04 ↗ um

1:32:05 ↗ how much it costs

1:32:06 ↗ when it was completed

1:32:08 ↗ and so we

1:32:10 ↗ we really i think from the restoration

1:32:11 ↗ standpoint we do a great job we follow

1:32:13 ↗ the riot 8 um sam recovery plan which is

1:32:16 ↗ this you know basically they look

1:32:18 ↗ through the simple process they rank

1:32:20 ↗ projects that would help

1:32:22 ↗ do the best job recovering salmon

1:32:24 ↗ and so we're following that list they're

1:32:27 ↗ going in that that plan and plugging the

1:32:29 ↗ projects that we're high priority in

1:32:31 ↗ there and putting them in and we're

1:32:32 ↗ completing one of those projects right

1:32:34 ↗ now

1:32:35 ↗ and in our security we have another

1:32:37 ↗ project that's from that list called the

1:32:39 ↗ squat

1:32:40 ↗ valley

1:32:41 ↗ south

1:32:42 ↗ restoration project so i think yes i

1:32:44 ↗ think this quest did a great job with

1:32:46 ↗ the restoration end of it you know makes

1:32:49 ↗ it a little infrastructure and it's it's

1:32:50 ↗ going to be a never-ending

1:32:53 ↗ you know job

1:32:54 ↗ to identify where we have failing

1:32:56 ↗ infrastructure and

1:32:57 ↗ and that's where asset management can

1:32:59 ↗ come in and so there's this yeah store

1:33:01 ↗ monitors there's a lot of

1:33:03 ↗ job security at stormwater

1:33:05 ↗ and with all the all the permitting

1:33:07 ↗ requirements

1:33:08 ↗ and i want to add that we do leverage a

1:33:10 ↗ lot of grant funding also from ecology

1:33:13 ↗ to do these retrofits so there's money

1:33:15 ↗ out there specifically targeting

1:33:16 ↗ retrofits

1:33:17 ↗ and

1:33:18 ↗ we've already got three three grants for

1:33:21 ↗ three different projects for the ecology

1:33:23 ↗ that would be based

1:33:25 ↗ on this list other areas that we

1:33:26 ↗ identified as high priority high use

1:33:29 ↗ high intensity high collision generating

1:33:31 ↗ areas that we're going to be treating

1:33:32 ↗ blends in old town

1:33:34 ↗ dogwood street there's gonna be one

1:33:36 ↗ there um actually 200 on the camera so

1:33:40 ↗ so that's

1:33:41 ↗ so we're still like i said this is only

1:33:43 ↗ what we've identified for this for this

1:33:46 ↗ process but there's you know there's so

1:33:47 ↗ many other projects that are on this on

1:33:49 ↗ this

1:33:50 ↗ list that aren't the top 10 and who

1:33:52 ↗ knows as time involved goes on we may

1:33:54 ↗ try to

1:33:55 ↗ save this other one because one of the

1:33:57 ↗ things is we look at frequency of issue

1:34:00 ↗ how does it occur

1:34:01 ↗ and

1:34:02 ↗ and so some of these problems have been

1:34:04 ↗ identified as problems but you know the

1:34:06 ↗ last couple years we haven't quite maybe

1:34:08 ↗ seen as much of an issue so but then

1:34:10 ↗ there could be another also another

1:34:12 ↗ problem that

1:34:13 ↗ comes up and so then i said this has to

1:34:15 ↗ be a fluid document where we can

1:34:18 ↗ modify as needed but this is our best

1:34:21 ↗ guess

1:34:22 ↗ not a guest we look really hard at all

1:34:24 ↗ the issues and try to come up with some

1:34:27 ↗ methodical way to narrow it down to

1:34:29 ↗ something we can manage in our budget

1:34:31 ↗ you know we have loads of funds and

1:34:33 ↗ um

1:34:34 ↗ so

1:34:36 ↗ trying to leverage other other sources

1:34:37 ↗ of funding as best we can so let's

1:34:41 ↗ yes it's it's liz is never going to go

1:34:58 ↗ are are we adding to the list because of

1:35:02 ↗ uh future development

1:35:04 ↗ mistakes or you know i'm i'm guessing

1:35:07 ↗ that we've raised the bar on them the

1:35:09 ↗ future uh development is not added as

1:35:13 ↗ much as we did with the past because we

1:35:15 ↗ didn't know that right now we do know

1:35:17 ↗ better and so there is hope i guess it's

1:35:20 ↗ my fever this is all lizard problems

1:35:23 ↗ around the wild i mean like he said that

1:35:25 ↗ yes

1:35:28 ↗ our stormwater requirements new

1:35:30 ↗ development

1:35:31 ↗ has they have higher way high standards

1:35:33 ↗ now that so they're mitigating doing a

1:35:35 ↗ pretty good job of mitigating all their

1:35:37 ↗ taxes

1:35:40 ↗ here i think what we want to

1:35:43 ↗ do with alan turner asset mentioned i

1:35:45 ↗ think we want to be eliminating

1:35:47 ↗ surprises right

1:35:49 ↗ new issues so that we

1:35:50 ↗ better understand how infrastructure is

1:35:52 ↗ working

1:35:54 ↗ likely to fail we can then plan ahead

1:35:56 ↗ for it so that we can keep those stable

1:35:59 ↗ great rates profile so that we know how

1:36:01 ↗ much how much work we could take on and

1:36:04 ↗ not get a really surprised like oh my

1:36:06 ↗ goodness like this facility just failed

1:36:08 ↗ out of the blue

1:36:11 ↗ you're going to see going forward as we

1:36:13 ↗ better understand the system works by

1:36:15 ↗ taking this more of a asymmetry

1:36:20 ↗ fancy

1:36:21 ↗ question so last time you were here we

1:36:23 ↗ talked a little bit about doing

1:36:25 ↗ partnerships with private entities you

1:36:27 ↗ know maybe instead of always doing it

1:36:29 ↗ through title 18 like

1:36:31 ↗ doing a stormwater facility you know on

1:36:33 ↗ their property per se instead of just

1:36:35 ↗ buying into a regional facility along

1:36:38 ↗ the way you know thinking bigger of

1:36:40 ↗ getting something like a bigger bang for

1:36:41 ↗ our buck and it seems like the work

1:36:43 ↗ you're doing in the old town sub basin

1:36:45 ↗ is an opportunity or something like that

1:36:47 ↗ to happen uh are you still considering

1:36:50 ↗ that

1:36:51 ↗ absolutely

1:36:53 ↗ little projects here and there just get

1:36:55 ↗ a big one and you nailed it

1:36:56 ↗ and really brought that up so as

1:36:59 ↗ i think that's part of the tool kit so

1:37:01 ↗ we what we talked about earlier right

1:37:04 ↗ for old this is going to be probably a

1:37:06 ↗ number of solutions right but let's say

1:37:08 ↗ that a regional facility is part of the

1:37:11 ↗ part of the part of the solution

1:37:13 ↗ one of the then we talked about how to

1:37:15 ↗ finance it so one thing we could do it

1:37:17 ↗ could not just be uh yeah this is this

1:37:19 ↗ is really pushing the cutting edge again

1:37:21 ↗ other people's have done this but

1:37:22 ↗ instead of just being counting in city

1:37:24 ↗ this could be private developers could

1:37:26 ↗ pay into this

1:37:27 ↗ instead of doing something on their

1:37:29 ↗ property if we feel there's a bigger

1:37:31 ↗ benefit so absolutely

1:37:37 ↗ you mentioned title 18 title 16 is also

1:37:40 ↗ i think you've seen a touch on that as

1:37:42 ↗ before

1:37:43 ↗ uh with the floodplain management and

1:37:44 ↗ stormwater code we're allowed to do that

1:37:46 ↗ so so we actually it gives us um

1:37:49 ↗ the turtle current titles give us the

1:37:52 ↗ authority to do that if it makes sense

1:37:54 ↗ so we we actually have that opening to

1:37:56 ↗ do that so we just now have to look at

1:37:58 ↗ how um

1:38:13 ↗ um so yeah that would be something to

1:38:14 ↗ look at that's a big you know it's a lot

1:38:17 ↗ that's a great opportunity to get a

1:38:18 ↗ better yeah better banking

1:38:21 ↗ my second question

1:38:23 ↗ if i can add just one piece to that i

1:38:26 ↗ think when we're doing sophie and lou

1:38:28 ↗ the other interesting pieces you could

1:38:30 ↗ also look at low impact development plus

1:38:32 ↗ retrofit facilities so some of the

1:38:33 ↗ things you were talking about in terms

1:38:35 ↗ of you know you were talking about

1:38:36 ↗ cisterns there's just other ways the

1:38:38 ↗ whole idea behind low impact development

1:38:40 ↗ is you infiltrate as much as possible in

1:38:42 ↗ a more distributed fashion so the idea

1:38:44 ↗ would be you know if the developers

1:38:46 ↗ could do portion of low impact

1:38:47 ↗ development on their properties and then

1:38:49 ↗ also connect into a regional facility so

1:38:52 ↗ there would be various kinds of

1:38:53 ↗ combinations and it would incorporate a

1:38:55 ↗ lot of the things that you guys are

1:38:57 ↗ talking about so

1:38:58 ↗ that would be studied as part of the

1:39:00 ↗ study i guess just wanted to add that

1:39:05 ↗ then my second question for you is

1:39:08 ↗ your

1:39:09 ↗ relationship with parks and how because

1:39:11 ↗ they're a big part of it and i guess

1:39:13 ↗ what's triggering this is they recently

1:39:15 ↗ sold some carpet and credits over here

1:39:18 ↗ on

1:39:18 ↗ cooper mountain i think it wasn't

1:39:20 ↗ um

1:39:23 ↗ they had some land that they acquired um

1:39:26 ↗ they have and they're saving the trees

1:39:29 ↗ and someone bought the carton credits

1:39:32 ↗ and they brought that presentation to us

1:39:33 ↗ and i guess

1:39:35 ↗ the thing i'm thinking about is

1:39:37 ↗ how was your interaction with parks

1:39:39 ↗ because they have big parcels of land

1:39:41 ↗ that they manage

1:39:43 ↗ that are great opportunities and

1:39:44 ↗ locations that it seems like there

1:39:46 ↗ should be a great a big partnership with

1:39:48 ↗ modern parks

1:39:50 ↗ actually there is a very good

1:39:51 ↗ relationship so i work with denver bank

1:39:53 ↗ all the time

1:39:54 ↗ um

1:39:55 ↗ and in fact we collaborate on several

1:39:57 ↗ projects but in the past in fact the

1:39:59 ↗ project that i'm that i'm constructing

1:40:01 ↗ now lowers the car creek habitat

1:40:03 ↗ restoration project over by costco and

1:40:06 ↗ that was

1:40:07 ↗ uh as parks we work with car parks we

1:40:09 ↗ actually use stormwater funds

1:40:12 ↗ because they don't you know

1:40:13 ↗ to actually make the purchase to buy the

1:40:15 ↗ properties once they get identified for

1:40:17 ↗ purchase and then we can do a joint we

1:40:20 ↗ do a joint project here so that's the

1:40:22 ↗ joint project where we're putting in all

1:40:24 ↗ this salmon habitat we're also putting

1:40:26 ↗ in a trail through there

1:40:27 ↗ um and we've done it with other projects

1:40:30 ↗ all alongside our creek so yes

1:40:33 ↗ understand that jennifer

1:40:35 ↗ is off and if you mentioned her name

1:40:38 ↗ she's going to be part of the uh the

1:40:40 ↗ king county collaborative work so she's

1:40:42 ↗ uh

1:40:43 ↗ we're we're actually uh announced part

1:40:45 ↗ of this as well

1:40:46 ↗ starting a monthly uh just meeting with

1:40:48 ↗ king count everybody everybody

1:40:50 ↗ floodplain king county anthony

1:40:52 ↗ we're getting included for that for the

1:40:54 ↗ next couple years just so we're

1:40:55 ↗ completely coordinated so uh and no

1:40:58 ↗ bringing their parks focuses on youtube

1:40:59 ↗ too but yeah just it feels like a really

1:41:01 ↗ good collaboration here uh

1:41:04 ↗ you know two examples issaquah creep of

1:41:07 ↗ course nintendo's we're

1:41:09 ↗ just really working together

1:41:10 ↗ collaboratively

1:41:11 ↗ thanks very very much

1:41:16 ↗ any other comments from the board

1:41:19 ↗ thank you for your presentation uh you

1:41:21 ↗ guys have clearly done your homework i

1:41:22 ↗ think the projects you're bringing is a

1:41:25 ↗ good subset um of the ones you looked at

1:41:28 ↗ i think it's a good distribution

1:41:30 ↗ across the city and a good combination

1:41:32 ↗ of different types of projects that

1:41:33 ↗ you're looking at

1:41:34 ↗ i would encourage you that as time goes

1:41:36 ↗ on you you both mentioned that it's an

1:41:38 ↗ ever-changing world in stormwater

1:41:40 ↗ be flexible don't commit to a certain

1:41:43 ↗ set of projects and get too far down the

1:41:45 ↗ road because we all know that

1:41:47 ↗ regulations change

1:41:49 ↗ and they can change drastically in the

1:41:51 ↗ next five years so i've taken approach

1:41:53 ↗ of looking at these every few years

1:41:55 ↗ and it's a quick ad in terms of you know

1:41:58 ↗ the types of whether we chose projects

1:42:00 ↗ so the flooding habitat restoration and

1:42:03 ↗ we did have that discussion with i know

1:42:05 ↗ with council we talked about and wanted

1:42:06 ↗ to get their feedback where they thought

1:42:08 ↗ the priority women wanted to be i think

1:42:10 ↗ they you know everyone you know flooding

1:42:12 ↗ is obviously a big concern but they said

1:42:14 ↗ don't forget about the habitat it's

1:42:16 ↗ quite santa central

1:42:18 ↗ you know the conversations with

1:42:20 ↗ council president hunt on medication and

1:42:22 ↗ she really you know

1:42:24 ↗ she really likes to be involved in all

1:42:25 ↗ the stand recovery efforts and sees that

1:42:28 ↗ those restoration practices are

1:42:29 ↗ important so we want to make sure we

1:42:31 ↗ include those in there

1:42:32 ↗ um

1:42:33 ↗ so

1:42:34 ↗ we are saying and i will tell you um i

1:42:37 ↗ work regionally in the starring water

1:42:39 ↗ world quite a bit

1:42:40 ↗ and tom to your point of uh is this

1:42:43 ↗ about being progressive with their cip

1:42:45 ↗ work i think in the world of stormwater

1:42:47 ↗ yeah they are that's what stacks up with

1:42:49 ↗ the other cities and all around here

1:42:53 ↗ thank you gentlemen

1:43:09 ↗ great job

1:43:10 ↗ thanks

1:43:13 ↗ bye

1:43:15 ↗ bye bye

1:43:16 ↗ bye

1:43:21 ↗ all right stacy let's flip this along do

1:43:23 ↗ we have any reports from the

1:43:24 ↗ environmental board um yeah i'll just

1:43:26 ↗ talk about the board schedule and then a

1:43:28 ↗ quick update on the icap implementation

1:43:31 ↗ um it's a board schedule no major

1:43:33 ↗ updates have been made to that since our

1:43:34 ↗ last meeting i do need to confirm with

1:43:38 ↗ uh cpd that they'll be here in august to

1:43:40 ↗ talk about the national environmental

1:43:42 ↗ checklist

1:43:43 ↗ um and if we're especially incorporating

1:43:45 ↗ the feedback that the board provided to

1:43:46 ↗ them in our spring meeting um you may

1:43:48 ↗ know lucy left the city so some of that

1:43:51 ↗ work i think they're still figuring out

1:43:52 ↗ how to hand off

1:43:54 ↗ um so just a possibility that we may

1:43:56 ↗ need to delay that topic but i'll work

1:43:58 ↗ with them this month um to try and team

1:44:00 ↗ that up

1:44:01 ↗ um the other topic for august i'm

1:44:03 ↗ excited about

1:44:04 ↗ is to talk about our update on the

1:44:07 ↗ climate vulnerability assessment um

1:44:09 ↗ we'll probably have some discussion

1:44:11 ↗ questions coming to the board and then

1:44:14 ↗ from um our staff will also be here to

1:44:16 ↗ give us an update on the emergency

1:44:18 ↗ management

1:44:19 ↗ [Applause]

1:44:21 ↗ in august

1:44:23 ↗ um and just to note nancy to you uh

1:44:26 ↗ mentioned the wastewater i apologize

1:44:28 ↗ that was a carryover from an old

1:44:30 ↗ schedule that ended up on our agenda for

1:44:32 ↗ tonight but as gary mentioned we will be

1:44:35 ↗ bringing you the wastewater plan um

1:44:38 ↗ quarter three

1:44:41 ↗ can i ask another special question

1:44:44 ↗ and i know parks had mitch that they

1:44:45 ↗ would like to come back and talk with us

1:44:47 ↗ again about what their parks master plan

1:44:49 ↗ and stuff is yeah i don't know what

1:44:51 ↗ they're thinking but i'm just telling

1:44:52 ↗ them

1:44:53 ↗ some time to share okay great i'll check

1:44:55 ↗ it out

1:45:01 ↗ any other questions feedback on board

1:45:03 ↗ schedule

1:45:06 ↗ all right

1:45:07 ↗ um just brief update on icap

1:45:09 ↗ implementation we are just launching our

1:45:12 ↗ heat pump campaign finally um

1:45:14 ↗ we're gonna have our first workshop for

1:45:16 ↗ residents at the end of this month we'll

1:45:18 ↗ be doing a lot of promotion about that

1:45:20 ↗ over the next few weeks um there'll be

1:45:22 ↗ workshops done happening about every

1:45:24 ↗ three two to three weeks after that

1:45:27 ↗ through september

1:45:29 ↗ i presented to the planning development

1:45:32 ↗ and environment committee of the council

1:45:35 ↗ last month to request the funding for

1:45:38 ↗ the low-income

1:45:39 ↗ component of that program they were very

1:45:41 ↗ supportive they wanted to see more

1:45:43 ↗ budget and

1:45:44 ↗ effort going to that component of the

1:45:46 ↗ program in the future

1:45:48 ↗ um i'll be putting that request to full

1:45:50 ↗ council on monday it's actually going to

1:45:52 ↗ be

1:45:53 ↗ on the consent agenda so we're hoping to

1:45:55 ↗ receive that support on monday

1:45:59 ↗ clean buildings program we presented

1:46:03 ↗ on that program to the council committee

1:46:05 ↗ back in june

1:46:07 ↗ there were some concerns recommendations

1:46:10 ↗ for

1:46:11 ↗ shifting our priorities with less of a

1:46:14 ↗ focus on um

1:46:16 ↗ companies

1:46:18 ↗ um our lights are blinking in here billy

1:46:21 ↗ so

1:46:23 ↗ he's telling us it's too late time to go

1:46:25 ↗ home um so we're we've

1:46:29 ↗ somewhat shifted

1:46:31 ↗ not necessarily shifted the focus

1:46:32 ↗ shifted um a component of that program

1:46:35 ↗ to look at energy efficiency in existing

1:46:38 ↗ buildings

1:46:39 ↗ not solely focused on the buildings i

1:46:41 ↗ have to comply with the clean building

1:46:43 ↗ standard

1:46:44 ↗ but also working with other buildings

1:46:46 ↗ that are

1:46:47 ↗ interested in doing energy efficiency

1:46:49 ↗ upgrades um so a bit of repackaging of

1:46:52 ↗ that program and that will also go to

1:46:54 ↗ council on monday

1:46:57 ↗ um

1:46:58 ↗ we did put out an rfp for support of

1:47:01 ↗ that work

1:47:03 ↗ back a month or so ago and we've

1:47:05 ↗ identified

1:47:06 ↗ a consultant that we'd be working with

1:47:09 ↗ um assuming that council approves that

1:47:10 ↗ budget request so we'll be ready to go

1:47:13 ↗ and negotiate that scope of work

1:47:15 ↗ after monday if it's approved

1:47:18 ↗ climate vulnerability assessment much

1:47:20 ↗ more will come to you in august on that

1:47:22 ↗ but work is underway we held our first

1:47:25 ↗ staff workshop at that end of june and

1:47:28 ↗ we're now scoping the community

1:47:29 ↗ engagement piece

1:47:31 ↗ we

1:47:33 ↗ heard positively from department of

1:47:35 ↗ commerce that um that we are successful

1:47:38 ↗ in a grant opportunity from them that

1:47:41 ↗ will allow us to greatly expand

1:47:43 ↗ our community engagement piece as well

1:47:45 ↗ as the

1:47:46 ↗ types of tools that come out of this

1:47:48 ↗ program that types of communication

1:47:50 ↗ tools that come out of the assessment

1:47:52 ↗ um so we'll have a lot more direct

1:47:54 ↗ interaction with communities that are

1:47:56 ↗ probably highly at risk for climate

1:47:58 ↗ impacts but we'll also be building in

1:48:00 ↗ some broader community engagement

1:48:02 ↗ opportunities

1:48:03 ↗ somewhat similar to what was done for

1:48:05 ↗ the icap development

1:48:07 ↗ um that commerce grant i'll talk more

1:48:10 ↗ about that in august but it will also

1:48:13 ↗ provide us resources to integrate

1:48:15 ↗ results of the climate vulnerability

1:48:16 ↗ assessment into the comprehensive plan

1:48:20 ↗ um there's a number of parallel

1:48:21 ↗ conversations happening with king county

1:48:23 ↗ on wildfire preparedness and heat events

1:48:27 ↗ they're launching a big heat planning

1:48:29 ↗ strategy

1:48:30 ↗ so we're working to really intersect

1:48:32 ↗ that effort with the vulnerability

1:48:33 ↗ assessment as well as with the emergency

1:48:35 ↗ management plan so a lot going on um

1:48:38 ↗ there

1:48:39 ↗ a couple more quick updates uh community

1:48:41 ↗ climate challenge we've been really

1:48:43 ↗ working on team leader recruitment i

1:48:46 ↗ think's really important and the issue

1:48:49 ↗ is trail club has gotten very involved

1:48:51 ↗ has been doing a big recruitment

1:48:54 ↗ um

1:48:55 ↗ our

1:48:56 ↗ the collaborative cities the four cities

1:48:58 ↗ that are partnering on this we're

1:48:59 ↗ bringing on an outreach coordinator that

1:49:01 ↗ will be working across the city starting

1:49:03 ↗ next week so hoping to get

1:49:06 ↗ a lot more publicity out engagement

1:49:08 ↗ they'll be going out and meeting with

1:49:10 ↗ different groups around the city to get

1:49:12 ↗ them involved there's interest from some

1:49:15 ↗ students about starting a climate

1:49:16 ↗ challenge cup they've been doing this in

1:49:18 ↗ spokane so

1:49:20 ↗ we're going to start talking with some

1:49:21 ↗ of the schools about

1:49:23 ↗ about that and getting these involved

1:49:26 ↗ performance dashboard we're continuing

1:49:28 ↗ to take the feedback we heard from the

1:49:30 ↗ board uh a couple meetings ago uh make

1:49:33 ↗ requirements to that we'll be coming

1:49:34 ↗ back to you

1:49:35 ↗ in a couple of months to

1:49:37 ↗ provide an update

1:49:39 ↗ um lead for cities billy

1:49:42 ↗ really has been taking the lead on

1:49:43 ↗ working on collecting data

1:49:45 ↗ for that certification program um not

1:49:49 ↗ many updates there except we're just

1:49:50 ↗ plugging away with collecting data

1:49:53 ↗ that we'll eventually submit to try and

1:49:55 ↗ get a certification fee

1:49:58 ↗ last i just wanted to mention um was our

1:50:00 ↗ budget process is underway

1:50:03 ↗ um i'm focusing really on look at the

1:50:06 ↗ next two years and what icap

1:50:07 ↗ implementation

1:50:09 ↗ it was anticipated through the

1:50:11 ↗ development of the icap um so putting in

1:50:14 ↗ budget requests around building and home

1:50:16 ↗ electrification energy efficiency and

1:50:19 ↗ senate incentives

1:50:21 ↗ looking at implementing the

1:50:22 ↗ vulnerability assessment

1:50:25 ↗ work for the municipal buildings on

1:50:27 ↗ renewable energy and decarbonization eb

1:50:30 ↗ charging a lot of potential budget items

1:50:33 ↗ we're still working on packaging that up

1:50:36 ↗ and then it will go to council for

1:50:38 ↗ discussion

1:50:39 ↗ um what won't be seen in there i think

1:50:42 ↗ is where a lot of our work might shift

1:50:44 ↗ in the next year or so to more policy

1:50:47 ↗ regulations um because we really

1:50:49 ↗ anticipate that's a lot of

1:50:51 ↗ the staff time um so that may not be

1:50:54 ↗ seen in the budget but that's really

1:50:56 ↗ where probably a lot of our efforts will

1:50:58 ↗ shift and

1:50:59 ↗ hopefully in collaboration with all of

1:51:00 ↗ you we'll be working through those

1:51:02 ↗ together

1:51:04 ↗ so that is all i have for updates um

1:51:06 ↗ happy to take questions on that and then

1:51:08 ↗ the other thing uh just wanted any

1:51:10 ↗ feedback on the room any other needs you

1:51:13 ↗ have i heard

1:51:14 ↗ making sure we can get some internet

1:51:15 ↗ access because folks probably want to

1:51:17 ↗ pull the materials up

1:51:19 ↗ on their computers but feel free if you

1:51:22 ↗ have other feedback just grab me after

1:51:24 ↗ them

1:51:26 ↗ any questions on icap

1:51:29 ↗ items

1:51:32 ↗ great job with all of that yeah

1:51:34 ↗ thank you any announcements from any of

1:51:37 ↗ the board members

1:51:43 ↗ well thank you stacey for pulling this

1:51:44 ↗ together and thank you everybody for

1:51:46 ↗ successful first in-person meeting again

1:51:49 ↗ it's nice to see you all

1:51:52 ↗ right thank you have a good night

1:51:54 ↗ thanks billy

Approved minutes

The minutes PDF below is the canonical record. Structured parsing of attendance and motions for this body's minutes format is not yet implemented — open the PDF for the full content.

Open PDF