← Back to City Council Digest

City Council Regular Meeting Auto captions

Monday, November 25, 2024

7:00 PM · Council Chambers, 135 E. Sunset Way, Issaquah WA
Topics tracked across meetings:
Newport Way Maple to Sunset Improvements Project (TR 023) Design Agreement Supplement AB 8889 5/5
School Zone Speed Camera AB 8894 3/3
Dept. of Commerce Grant for Gibson Hall Improvements AB 8917 2/2
King County Senior Center Grant AB 8923 2/2
2025 Property Tax Levy AB 8886 2/2
Section
Topic
3. SPECIAL BUSINESS
3a
Small Business Saturday Proclamation ID 1715
5 min · packet pp.5
Topics: Economic Development
Staff report:
SPECIAL BUSINESS a) CITY OF ISSA�AH Mayor's Office WASHINGTON 130 E. Sunset Way I P.O. Box 1307 Issaquah, WA 98027 (425) 837-3020 issaquahwa.gov
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
5a
Accounts: Payables and Payroll of Nov. 25, 2024, $11,179,360.16 ID 1740
Carried 7-0
Approve · packet pp.7–31
Topics: Budget
Staff report:
Finance Department P.O. Box 1307 Issaquah, WA 98027 PH: 425-837-3050 www.issaquahwa.gov
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
5b
Minutes: City Council Regular Meeting, Nov. 4, 2024
Carried 7-0
Approve · packet pp.33–37
Staff report:
CONSENT CALENDAR b) 11-04-24 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page (0000) CITY OF ISSAQUAH City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM Council Chambers November 4, 2024 MINUTES 135 E. Sunset Way
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
5c
Minutes: City Council Committee of the Whole, Nov. 12, 2024
Carried 7-0
Approve · packet pp.39–40
Staff report:
CONSENT CALENDAR c) 11-12-24 City Council Committee of the Whole Page (1) Minutes CITY OF ISSAQUAH City Council Committee-of-the-Whole 6:30 PM Council Chambers November 12, 2024 MINUTES 135 E. Sunset Way
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
5d
Newport Way Maple to Sunset Improvements Project (TR 023) Design Agreement Supplement AB 8889
Carried 7-0
Authorize · packet pp.41–98
Topics: Transportation
Staff report:
On March 5, 2018, City Council authorized a design contract with Perteet, Inc. (AB 7529) for the development of construction plans and specifications for the Newport Way - Maple to Sunset Project in the amount of $2,592,238.00. This agreement was extended with design supplement #1, on February 25, 2020.
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
5e
Amending Community Planning and Development Fees AB 8898
Carried 7-0
Adopt Ordinances · packet pp.99–144
Topics: Land UseBudget
Staff report:
Permitting fees are adopted in the Issaquah Municipal Code (IMC) 3.64, 16.04 and 16.06. IMC 3.64 establishes land use and site work permit fees, the fees for building/plumbing/mechanical permits and inspections are in the Construction Administrative Code in IMC 16.04, and International Fire Code operational permit fees are in IMC 16.06.
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
5f
Dept. of Commerce Grant for Gibson Hall Improvements AB 8917
Carried 7-0
Accept Grant; Authorize Agreement · packet pp.145–179
Staff report:
Kiwanis Club of Issaquah (Kiwanis) has a long history with Gibson Hall, participating in its initial construction from a park shelter to a meeting hall in 1948, and then leasing the building from the City since 1952 in a rent-free lease in exchange for expanding, maintaining, and managing the building for the benefit of the community. Kiwanis members remodeled the building extensively and added the north wing, which includes a kitchen and restrooms.
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
5g
King County Senior Center Grant AB 8923
Carried 7-0
Accept Grant; Authorize Agreement · packet pp.181–223
Staff report:
Approved by voters, the Veterans, Seniors and Human Services Levy (VSHSL) is a six-year property tax levy renewal to promote healthy living, housing stability, financial stability, social engagement, and service system improvement and service system access for veterans and military servicemembers and their respective families, seniors and their caregivers and vulnerable populations. The VSHSL expands and builds on the success of the former Veterans and Human Services levies approved by King County in 2005, 2011 and 2017.
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
5h
Human Services Pooled Funds Interlocal Agreement AB 8935
Carried 7-0
Authorize · packet pp.225–235
Topics: BudgetEquity
Staff report:
The cities, also known as Northeast Funders, currently operate under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dating to 2004 which provides for collaboration among the parties. The purpose of the proposed interlocal agreement is to continue to provide for a Human Services Pooled Fund to jointly contract for and administer a portion of their human services funds into single contracts with human services agencies and to cover costs associated with the Pooled Fund administration.
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
5i
Interlocal Agreements for Jail Services: Black Diamond, Buckley, Newcastle AB 8937
Carried 7-0
Authorize · packet pp.237–275
Staff report:
The City has a 72-bed jail and contracts with numerous local agencies to provide jail services for individuals who have committed misdemeanor offenses. Meanwhile, the cost of operating the jail continues to increase. As part of balancing the City's proposed 2025-26 budget, the City committed to reviewing the cost of operating the jail and adjusting the jail rates to be more in line with actual costs. The proposed agreements for jail services include 2025 rate increases as shown in the Financial Information section. The City will continue to analyze jail costs with the goal of full cost recovery. This analysis is likely to result in additional rate increases in future years.
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
5j
2024 Unclaimed Property Report, Cancellation of Unredeemed City Checks AB 8938
Carried 7-0
Approve Resolution · packet pp.277–282
Staff report:
On an annual basis, the City of Issaquah is required to report to the Washington DOR as well as any other applicable state(s), all checks that meet the definition of unclaimed property (RCW 63.30). In Washington State, the abandonment period for all unredeemed checks is one year. The 2024 reporting year includes an abandonment range of July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023.
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
5k
Jail Services Contract with Sunnyside AB 8943
Carried 7-0
Authorize · packet pp.283–297
Staff report:
The City has a jail which holds inmates with misdemeanor offenses. However, at times an individual may exceed the City's facility needs.
Roll call:
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
6. REGULAR BUSINESS
6a
2025 Property Tax Levy AB 8886
Adopt Ordinance · 20 min · packet pp.299–321
Topics: Land UseBudget
Staff report:
The City's authority to impose a property tax is derived from the Washington State Constitution and described in the Revised Code of Washing (RCW) Chapters 84.52 and 84.55. The revenues from property tax are considered general government revenues, meaning that this money is placed in the General Fund and can be used for any basic governmental service or goods such as public safety, planning, parks, or administration.
6b
Utility Tax Increase AB 8942
Adopt Ordinance · 30 min · packet pp.323–341
Topics: Land UseBudget
Staff report:
The State empowers cities and towns to levy utility taxes through the same general authority that allows the collection of the business and occupation (B&O) tax. It is important to distinguish the difference between utility rates and utility tax rates. While utility rates support the utilities themselves, utility tax revenues accrue to the General Fund and can be used for general government purposes. Utility taxes are levied upon the gross operating revenues of both public and private utilities and are typically passed directly onto the rate payers by the utilities themselves.
6c
School Zone Speed Camera AB 8894
Carried 6-1
Authorize · 45 min · packet pp.343–398
Topics: Public SafetySchools
Staff report:
The City’s current School Zone Safety Program was adopted in 2008 with a single location at 2nd Ave SE near Issaquah Middle School and High School. This program is meant to more safely address speeding behavior from drivers in school zone areas during school hours by transferring enforcement from a live, on-site police officer to an automated camera system. Revenues from this program are used to fund transportation and traffic improvements.
Roll call:
Moved by (main motion as amended) · seconded by
In favor: de Michele, Hall, Hunt, Joe, Marts, Reh
Opposed: Walsh
9. GOOD OF THE ORDER
9a
Upcoming Council Meetings
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION
10a
Executive Session - Property Acquisition per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) ID 1773
20 min
10b
Executive Session Pending/Potential Litigation, Action to Follow in Open Session ID 1772
15 min
11. OPEN SESSION
11a
Motion Regarding Executive Session Item
0:11 good evening and welcome everyone I'm
0:13 calling the November 25th city council
0:15 meeting to order this meeting is being
0:17 held one week later than normal due to
0:20 the impacts of the Veterans Day holiday
0:22 earlier this month as a reminder we
0:24 still continue to have a remote aspect
0:26 to our meetings and both staff members
0:28 and members of the public May be
0:30 participating in tonight's meeting
0:31 remotely via
0:33 webx we are hopeful that council member
0:36 Joe may be attending but he has let us
0:38 know that he's not feeling well so we'll
0:41 update and there is also technical
0:44 problems related to likely the storm
0:47 that happened last week so we'll let you
0:48 know if he joins our meeting if not he
0:51 has an excused absence before we get
0:53 started I'd like to announce that we
0:55 will be providing an update on the
0:57 Windstorm after the proclamation tonight
0:59 we doing that under special business so
1:02 the first item of the agenda this
1:04 evening is the Pledge of Allegiance and
1:05 I welcome you all to
1:08 join I pledge aliance to the flag United
1:12 States of America to the
1:25 rep the first item under special
1:27 business is ID 1715 this is small
1:30 business Saturday Proclamation and I'd
1:32 like to invite Chris with the city's
1:34 economic Vitality commission and Monica
1:36 with the greater isquat chamber and
1:40 Lindsay Pinkston from Isa from Highlands
1:43 Council and Jen Davis Hayes from our
1:45 staff to come and join me up over here
1:47 at the
1:55 podium evening thank you for making it
2:02 Dan you're G to join us
2:06 too we go cozy
2:09 cozy whereas the Saturday after
2:11 Thanksgiving every year is recognized as
2:14 small business Saturday and whereas the
2:16 city of isqua celebrates our local small
2:18 businesses and the contributions they
2:20 make to our local economy and community
2:23 and whereas according to the United
2:25 States small business administration
2:27 small businesses make up 99.7% % of all
2:30 businesses in the United States and
2:32 these small businesses are responsible
2:35 for 64% of new net jobs created since
2:39 1995 and whereas most consumers
2:41 understand the importance of supporting
2:43 local small businesses especially on
2:45 small business Saturday and report this
2:48 day encourages them to shop small all
2:50 year long and whereas issaqua loyal
2:53 encourages the isqua community to shop
2:55 local and small and community members
2:57 can find local small businesses this
2:59 this year by using visit isqua's holiday
3:02 shopping guide and whereas our vision
3:05 partners the collaboration of economic
3:07 development organizations support the
3:10 success of small businesses throughout
3:11 the
3:12 year and now therefore I Mary Le poly
3:15 the mayor of the city of isqua do
3:17 recognize November 30th 2024 to be small
3:20 business Saturday in the city of isqua
3:22 and I invite the community to join me in
3:24 shopping isqua Loyal by supporting small
3:27 businesses and Merchants and I would
3:30 like to invite Monica and Chris to come
3:32 to the microphone introduce yourself I
3:33 know you both have a few words to
3:37 share hi my name is Monica I'm with the
3:39 chamber and I would like to thank you
3:42 for the opportunity to speak this
3:44 evening and for the pro Proclamation
3:46 honoring Small Business Week it is truly
3:48 an honor to accept this recognition on
3:50 behalf of our small business community
3:53 in the wake of the recent Windstorm we
3:54 need to support our local businesses the
3:57 need to support our local businesses has
3:59 never been more crucial shopping locally
4:02 not only strengthens our economy economy
4:04 but also helps sustain the heart and
4:06 soul of our community during challenging
4:08 times thank you once again for
4:10 acknowledging the vital role that
4:11 businesses play in the fabric of our
4:13 city this Proclamation means a great
4:15 deal to all of us thank
4:23 you good evening City Council Members
4:25 Madame mayor um members of the public
4:28 and staff my name is Chris Richley I am
4:30 the economic Vitality commission chair
4:32 and local resident of
4:34 isqua uh when you think about small
4:36 business small business is the heart of
4:37 a community any thriving Community small
4:39 business is what drives it it it runs it
4:43 small businesses turn into big
4:44 businesses right but when you
4:46 specifically think about isqua you think
4:49 about places like Gilman Village the
4:51 highlands the work lofs just to name a
4:53 few they all need our support our heart
4:56 needs support because of the last couple
4:58 days a few days with the Windstorm the
5:00 power outage I encourage our community
5:03 to very much utilize the small business
5:05 Saturday not just Saturday but beyond I
5:08 would encourage our community to also
5:10 recommend visiting isqua to friends and
5:12 families from outside of isqua to come
5:14 and visit isqua so they can too support
5:17 the community that such as a small
5:19 business um our heart needs more support
5:21 now than recent
5:23 events with our diversity of small
5:25 businesses I'm confident small
5:26 businesses for everyone and some small
5:29 business success creates and maintains a
5:31 thriving Community thank you for the
5:34 proclamation thank you Monica and Chris
5:37 and you know in light of the storm what
5:39 they've said is just so important to our
5:41 local business environment so thank you
5:43 all and Round of Applause and then let's
5:45 throw a
5:48 picture okay are we a big enough group
5:50 should we move over ah whatever
5:56 okay we know the drill guys
5:59 time
6:07 [Music]
6:55 just letting everyone know council
6:56 member Joe was able to join us welcome
6:58 council member
7:01 the next item of special business is
7:04 unexpected update on the Windstorm that
7:06 we have been living with for the last
7:08 six days on November 19th and 20th we
7:11 had extremely high winds come through
7:13 iscoa creating damage to homes
7:15 businesses and critical infrastructure
7:17 throughout our community in response on
7:19 November 20th I issued an emergency
7:22 Proclamation I'd like to invite our
7:23 emergency manager Jared Snyder to
7:25 provide an update on the city's response
7:28 to the Storm come on up Jared glad
7:30 you're still awake nice to see yes a
7:33 minor
7:34 miracle not great all just share my
7:37 [Music]
7:56 screen even my computer is tired
8:01 all right fantastic uh can everyone see
8:03 the slides online and uh hear me okay
8:05 great well hello everybody um yes my
8:08 name is Jared Schneider I'm the
8:09 emergency manager for the city of isqua
8:11 um the events over the last week have
8:14 necessitated this visit so I'm happy
8:17 here to represent only a small fraction
8:20 of the response of the city of visa to
8:22 this event and I'm going to try to do my
8:24 best to portray everything that has
8:27 happened um in the in the last few days
8:29 and and all the good work that has
8:31 happened and will continue to
8:33 work so as the mayor said um November
8:36 19th was a historic event um
8:43 oh okay
8:47 oh okay all right that's better all
8:49 right yes okay thank you everybody um so
8:52 um yes as I mentioned you know it was a
8:54 historic event and in some ways you know
8:56 unprecedented event in in our community
8:59 and
9:00 um I know isqua experienced winds
9:02 upwards of 65 mph from an unusual
9:05 Direction the southeast through what is
9:07 known as the Cascade Gap that created um
9:10 quite a lot of damage for not only isqua
9:12 but many of our neighbors on the plateau
9:14 and south of us and so um isqua was
9:18 particularly hit hard much harder than
9:20 some of our other cities too especially
9:22 to the west of us um which was also a a
9:25 challenge you know to to have isolated
9:27 pockets of of disaster right in a in a
9:30 larger County so almost all customers
9:33 including facilities uh lost power as a
9:36 result of this event and some customers
9:38 and some residents are still without
9:40 power at the time of this presentation
9:42 so as you know we're going over over
9:44 this situation and what the respones has
9:46 looked like so far I just want to
9:48 highlight that we're still in the middle
9:50 of response and and you know only but
9:52 hours ago we are still working on things
9:54 related to um semi- emergent needs you
9:57 know for the community so I want to be
9:58 sensitive particular particularly to
9:59 those who may still be without power or
10:02 connectivity um as a result of the
10:04 Windstorm um we had widescale road
10:06 closures dark signals significant
10:09 property damages to homes and businesses
10:12 and other City infrastructure and so
10:15 this this was a major event for for our
10:17 city now I want to go over and highlight
10:20 some of the good work that we have done
10:22 so far and that continues to happen um
10:25 in response to this event so first we're
10:27 going to talk about Public Safety so so
10:29 police and fire they maintained heroic
10:32 response during the storm and and that's
10:33 not an understatement while winds were
10:35 still high and borderline unsafe
10:38 firefighters and police officers were
10:40 still going out on calls for only most
10:43 emergent ones but still to serve our
10:45 community so I want to recognize that
10:47 work that happened and just The Bravery
10:49 that those individuals displayed during
10:51 this event our jail continued excellent
10:54 service while on generator um dispatch
10:57 fielded a huge infl of calls 6177 calls
11:02 from the 19th to the 20th when in
11:05 comparison 237 calls were taken in
11:08 comparison from the 12th and 13th so um
11:11 for a group that's already you know
11:12 short staffed a lot of times that is a
11:14 tremendous effort and an impressive feat
11:17 in of itself East Side Fire and Rescue
11:20 responded to many calls for trees on
11:22 homes generator fires was a big part of
11:25 this incident especially in the days
11:26 after the Windstorm and then again uh
11:29 increased calls for Aid Human Services
11:32 provided Wellness checks and resources
11:34 to those who were most vulnerable during
11:35 this Windstorm and they did an excellent
11:39 job Public Works um had a very heavy
11:43 lift um during this incident um many
11:46 trees were U creating road closures but
11:49 what also made it so challenging too is
11:51 the intermixing of power lines and so
11:53 you know in that instance PSC has the
11:56 initial and uh response and the response
11:59 responsibility to first move those power
12:01 lines out of the way before Public Works
12:02 Crews can actually clear that road so
12:05 that was a limiting factor in this
12:06 response too and especially um why some
12:09 of these road closures you know may have
12:10 lasted longer than what we are used to
12:12 in some instances too so great
12:15 coordination by our Public Works Crews
12:17 to work with PSC to open up roads
12:19 following a closure and then not only
12:21 roads right but maintaining water sewer
12:24 and storm water service all through this
12:26 incident too you know critical
12:28 infrastructure is it takes maintenance
12:30 and it takes works and so what that
12:32 included was running generators out to
12:33 these locations making sure they were
12:35 operating correctly and refilling them
12:37 periodically and and to ensure that we
12:39 didn't have any Interruption of service
12:41 to water or firefighting capability as a
12:44 result public works also helped in
12:47 facilitating school reopenings so close
12:49 coordination with isqua school district
12:51 um to try to get as many students back
12:53 in school on Monday as possible and
12:56 again reestablishing traffic signal
12:57 systems you know to get those those dark
13:00 signals back online and and for Safe
13:01 Transportation and movement across the
13:04 city um one effort that I am
13:07 particularly proud of as a city is uh
13:09 resilience hubs and you know Council I
13:12 remember early on when I first started
13:13 here this was one of the ideas that we
13:15 were hoping to implement within the city
13:17 of isqua and um our planning truly paid
13:20 off as a result of this incident um you
13:23 know I think some of our some of our
13:24 favorite moments were spent in these
13:26 resilience hubs just seeing the
13:27 community together getting the help that
13:29 they needed and really having you know
13:31 this crossball nation of community that
13:33 doesn't always intermingle too so it was
13:36 it was uh a small moment of Beauty in a
13:39 in a dark time we opened up two
13:41 resilience hubs one was the senior
13:43 center and one was the Pickering Barn at
13:46 those locations there was charging
13:48 stations for small devices and medical
13:50 equipment there was free Wi-Fi coffee
13:53 water snacks Community Resources psse
13:56 was at the senior center uh to provide a
13:58 face someone to provide some insight
14:00 into outages um we had a food truck
14:03 support event at the Pickering barn and
14:06 then really you know those sites served
14:08 hundreds of community members and that
14:10 might be an underestimate honestly there
14:12 was much many many people who took
14:15 advantage of those Services Cougar mount
14:17 Middle School in partnership with the
14:19 city also opened up for a period of time
14:21 between 1200 and 4: uh to provide
14:23 charging and warmth for um particular
14:26 Talis residents who you know are
14:28 somewhat of a micro Island in some ways
14:30 so that was a huge lift and then we also
14:32 provided showers um at the pool which
14:35 was um something that the community was
14:37 was really asking for especially as this
14:39 event just dragged on to multiple
14:42 days I want to highlight some of the
14:44 good coordination that happened between
14:46 the city and partner agencies and also
14:48 highlight some of their good work so
14:49 isqua School District as we talked about
14:51 in the opening of Cougar Mountain Middle
14:53 School and just the collaboration that
14:54 happened there uh the preparation for
14:57 school's reopening by our Public Works
14:58 and parkops team clearing not only roads
15:01 but also walking paths as many of our
15:03 students you know use that as an option
15:05 to get to school and then also providing
15:07 connectivity support to esqua school
15:09 district um isqua School District had a
15:13 um service outage impact by the King
15:15 County inet Line being uh SED and so our
15:19 own it Department was able to help them
15:21 out with some connectivity and um just
15:23 hats off to Our IT department and just
15:25 the resilient communication lines that
15:27 we have and how we were able to maintain
15:29 internet access through this event East
15:33 Side Fire and Rescue uh they helped um
15:35 author and amplify safety messaging
15:37 around safe and proper use for
15:39 generators as I mentioned was a was a
15:41 element of this response and then uh
15:44 provided situational Awareness on
15:45 community status by joining our
15:47 coordination our EOC coordination calls
15:50 our emergency Operation Center
15:51 coordination calls as well uh to make
15:53 sure that we were appraised of each
15:54 other's
15:56 operations community outreach now this
15:59 event was a challenge for outreach and
16:01 for information due to the nature of the
16:04 incident large scale power outages and
16:06 disruption to things like cell phone
16:08 service and communication provided uh
16:10 unique challenges uh for this event so
16:13 uh with that we tried to pass out the
16:15 word on our many offerings through as
16:17 many Avenues as we could so that meant a
16:21 website Banner email alerts Insider
16:24 posts social media direct phone calls
16:27 from residents emails um and and really
16:30 a lot of media attention as well um all
16:32 local TV stations made their way to
16:34 isqua the 425 magazine uh we engaged
16:37 with them and then even National media
16:39 CNN Fortune AP and New York Times all
16:43 had uh interface with the city of isqua
16:45 through this event so uh quite a lot
16:47 quite a heavy lift there from our's Team
16:50 speaking of the complex nature of this
16:52 event and communication um one of the
16:55 methods that we utilized to get
16:56 information out was a very old school
16:58 method which is Flyers but it was a very
17:01 effective message and a very uh good way
17:03 in getting information out to impact the
17:05 community so we deployed um we on the
17:07 street signs in some of our hight
17:09 traffic areas um throughout the city had
17:12 certain volunteers distribute um Flyers
17:14 at grocery stores and Gathering areas um
17:18 had HOA connections and passed
17:20 information out that way and then had
17:22 field staff being Public Works police
17:24 and resilience hubs and C members you
17:26 know um in some cases being armed with
17:28 this information and you know police
17:30 officers and certain members actually
17:32 going physically to neighborhoods with
17:34 information to pass out these flyers um
17:37 um to Residents there so um huge
17:39 tremendous Outreach on the Flyers and
17:42 more to come as
17:43 well uh just wanted to highlight some
17:45 stats here on social Eng engagement
17:48 engagement was up uh 220% during this
17:51 event and we had a net gain of 609 new
17:54 followers on our social media a 340%
17:57 increase in total messages re received
17:59 social post average 73.1 engagements
18:02 while neighbors average 12.4 so you know
18:05 we attribute that to sharing information
18:06 you know that the community really
18:08 really needed right and then 1,200 views
18:11 on the May's videos on YouTube alone so
18:14 those were very well received thank you
18:17 mayor um we received some great comments
18:20 on social media um so we're just
18:23 highlighting a few of them here on these
18:24 slides you know these comments and these
18:26 thank yous really also mean a lot to I
18:28 know Public Works Crews and others who
18:29 are out in the field we we even uh tape
18:31 them up onto the wall so thank you
18:33 community for uh sharing these thank
18:34 yous they they really do mean a lot to
18:36 to those out in the
18:38 field want to highlight the business
18:40 support that was happening dur during
18:42 this event um we share what was open and
18:45 closed and that included uh grocery
18:46 stores and gas stations there was
18:49 frequent check-ins with businesses via
18:51 phone and inperson by the economic
18:53 development team um there was assistance
18:55 given to businesses where their uh
18:57 primary business was displaced um and so
18:59 we helped them out with new locations
19:01 hosted virtual meetings with uh the
19:03 mayor the chief of police chamber and
19:05 PSC um and that there was 85 businesses
19:08 attended in that Outreach um effort and
19:12 then uh we also helped um a hotel who
19:14 was storing or who was housing uh many
19:16 psse crews with um with parking because
19:19 there were so many crews that were in
19:21 psse or that were in the area that they
19:23 needed help finding uh locations to to
19:25 stay
19:27 overnight uh let's let's talk about
19:29 debris management um this is a uh
19:32 tremendous lift and will continue to be
19:34 a um a huge operation going on in the
19:37 city not only on city property but also
19:39 on private property so first let's talk
19:42 about the city element of it City crws
19:44 worked around the clock to clear roads
19:46 sidewalks parks and trails um public
19:48 works as of Sunday has filled 17 40 yard
19:52 dumpsters more than 1,200 cubic yards
19:55 and there's going to be much more where
19:57 that came from Park stage debris
20:00 collection sites for the city and um
20:02 hauling out started today and will
20:04 happen very
20:05 regularly
20:09 oops there we go these are some pictures
20:12 from one of our debris collection or
20:13 from our debris collection um event that
20:16 was at tibits Valley Park on Sunday um
20:20 it was a November 24th event like I
20:21 mentioned 249 Vehicles dropped off
20:24 debris uh we filled 12 40 yard dumpsters
20:27 and one truck with a community debris
20:30 there uh great volunteer effort we had
20:32 10 C volunteers five community
20:35 volunteers and and two staff members um
20:37 from Public Works
20:39 operations um Public Works uh or sorry
20:41 from Parks operations and public works
20:43 as well we're supporting that event uh
20:45 we have two more events scheduled on
20:47 December 1st and 8th so we're
20:49 anticipating high traffic for those
20:51 events too especially as word has gotten
20:52 out um about these events so we're happy
20:55 to have those offerings uh Recology is
20:58 Al is also offering additional csite
21:00 collection for the next two weeks and
21:01 that's through the 6th of November and
21:04 then transfer stations are taking debris
21:06 for free and and there is more to come
21:08 around this uh category too as as I
21:10 mentioned you know this is going to be
21:12 an ongoing effort and so expect more
21:14 information um about debris collection
21:16 in the
21:17 future I want to highlight um some work
21:20 that happened today uh Community rapid
21:22 impact survey was conducted between
21:25 Public Works engineering staff and uh
21:27 and uh building inspectors they did a
21:29 windshield assessment of the whole city
21:31 to better understand private property
21:34 damage um 29 properties were identified
21:36 for inspectors to take a closer look at
21:38 that'll happen in the coming days and
21:40 then there were some 40 more uh uh
21:43 private property um with some form of
21:45 damage that was albe it a little bit
21:46 more minor so we'll be engaging with
21:49 those properties and um making sure that
21:51 um they are safe but also aware of the
21:53 many resources that the city um is is
21:56 going to make available
21:59 um let's talk about recovery so as I
22:01 mentioned you know this operation is
22:03 still ongoing um we are transitioning
22:06 away from operations and into recovery
22:09 so we have stood up isqua recovery
22:11 coordination Center um here is just a
22:14 brief overview um of of what the
22:16 structure looks like I want to point out
22:18 that we have five kind of categories
22:20 where we are uh tracking recovery and
22:22 that is in terms of operations right
22:24 like actually supporting these groups
22:26 but also making sure that we're
22:27 documenting any cost impacts um and that
22:30 is within the debris Management Group a
22:32 private property damage group a business
22:35 Recovery Group infrastructure and
22:37 facility recovery so documenting City
22:39 impacts and then uh human services so
22:41 making sure our most vulnerable
22:42 populations are also um being supported
22:44 through through
22:46 recovery uh to highlight some of the few
22:48 highle items that we are interested in
22:51 when it comes to recovery um this is
22:54 really where this is something that
22:55 we're going to spend a lot of effort on
22:57 because it is has a huge financial
23:00 impact right to the city so um local
23:03 declarations help with quick action so
23:04 thank you mayor for the Declaration of
23:07 emergency um it's going to take
23:08 coordination with other agencies on cost
23:10 and damage assessment right so for for
23:13 um for federal funding and for State
23:15 funding when it comes to damages um
23:17 we're all in it together when it comes
23:19 to uh County debris and County damages
23:22 that we that we want to report so um
23:24 coordination and working with our
23:26 neighbors is essential um you may have
23:28 metion or noticed only a couple hours
23:30 ago that King County sent out actually a
23:33 call for damage to to Residents to make
23:36 sure that they self-report um if they
23:38 had damage to their private property the
23:40 reason being is we're trying to tell the
23:41 story right to the state and to the
23:43 federal government about what's happened
23:45 here you know in King County and and um
23:48 and the best way to do that is through
23:50 numbers right and so highly encourage
23:52 any members of the community to please
23:54 fill out that form um it really does
23:57 help us in stating our case when we when
23:59 we're taking this to the decision makers
24:02 um and really um if I haven't said it uh
24:05 the goal is federal and state funding
24:06 support that is what we are after so
24:09 we've stood up this group we're going to
24:11 work hard to try to get this for not
24:12 only the city government but also for
24:14 residents alike so um much more to come
24:17 on this in the in the near future it's a
24:19 pretty rapidly developing landscape um
24:21 but I wanted to highlight some of the
24:23 major areas that we're thinking about
24:24 now um so with that that is the end of
24:27 the presentation but I am also joined in
24:29 person and online by many of our great
24:32 Department directors and others who have
24:33 been involved in this response so um if
24:36 there's any questions we're happy to
24:37 field them now I think that's great
24:39 Jared thank you I am sure there's
24:41 questions I just before we open it up to
24:44 council I want to say that um I am so
24:47 grateful we have you in our organization
24:49 and I am so proud of the response um
24:52 this Citywide organization pivoted just
24:55 like they did in Co and people did jobs
24:57 that they didn't know that they would be
24:59 doing and they did them well and so very
25:02 very proud of the organization grateful
25:04 to getting help from the City of Kent
25:07 being able to have them give us some
25:09 building um um what's the RO Wally
25:13 building building inspection uh and
25:16 coordination and they're sharing
25:17 Resources with us and that's what we
25:19 want to do in this region and also
25:21 that's we were able to take advantage of
25:24 being able to shop and purchase things
25:26 in cities that still had that and bring
25:28 those resources back into our community
25:29 to be able to feed emergency responders
25:32 and have some things available at the
25:34 resiliency hubs many many lessons to be
25:37 learned um would love to have a post
25:40 recovery visit from you as well I'm sure
25:42 there's a lot more data to share than
25:43 what we've seen tonight Council I'll go
25:45 for
25:47 questions I'll do comments as well
25:49 questions and then we'll do comments oh
25:52 council member home yeah thanks just a
25:53 quick one and also just ditto so
25:55 impressed with our our city staff
25:56 stepping up to do what was needed so um
25:59 just thank you to everyone who
26:00 contributed um the King County call for
26:03 private property um that you were
26:06 talking about is that just for
26:07 unincorporated King County residents or
26:09 should residents in isqua listen in fill
26:12 out that form or not all yes all
26:15 residents City or unincorporated yes all
26:18 right thank you yeah and is that the
26:21 first time the county has sent out that
26:22 kind of correct that's great
26:25 yep any more questions and if there
26:27 aren't any more questions we'll go for
26:29 some comments if council members like to
26:31 do council member Mars followed by
26:34 council
26:36 president so I'm just going to briefly
26:38 put on my my 15-year hat and say um I
26:42 really appreciate the
26:44 transparency uh with which the
26:46 administration handled things this last
26:48 week um you know the city always Rises
26:52 to the occasion when emergencies happen
26:55 but this
26:56 emergency um I I think both as a council
26:59 member and as a
27:02 homeowner uh you know I had a lot better
27:04 visibility into what was going on in the
27:06 city's response and both the wonderful
27:09 way to see how hard the staff worked and
27:12 and Rose to the occasion but just you
27:14 know when you don't know when your power
27:15 is going to be back on when you don't
27:17 know when your internet is going to be
27:18 working again uh you know when the
27:21 lights are out down in the valley and
27:23 you're trying to figure out groceries
27:25 and and whatnot um just knowing uh
27:28 what's going on with the city and
27:29 getting that information helps so much
27:32 so thank you and the administration for
27:34 that transparency that just ran all the
27:36 way through this last week thanks
27:39 president yeah thank you Jared just
27:42 incredible emergency Operation Center um
27:46 management um incredible on the ground
27:49 staff work throughout the emergency I
27:51 sat in on most of those EOC calls and
27:53 seeing the teamwork the resiliency the
27:57 people being willing to do all of the
28:00 things yes um and help out the
28:03 troubleshooting and problem solving was
28:05 amazing um Public Works really gets a
28:08 special thanks for not only the visible
28:11 roadway and debris removal but also the
28:16 Unseen portions your water kept flowing
28:20 your toilets kept uh running flushing um
28:24 and all of that was because they were
28:26 able to put generators up and fuel those
28:28 generators in those spots um and keep
28:31 that
28:32 going uh the resiliency Hub at the
28:35 senior center was on inspiring the
28:38 quickness of getting that up the
28:40 community response the staff response to
28:43 that seeing seniors and multiple
28:46 languages and kids and all of the needs
28:50 come together was amazing I was there
28:53 for the first two days uh that place was
28:56 packed to the brim
28:59 um with people getting warm and charging
29:01 devices charging electric wheelchairs
29:04 and hearing aids um all things that were
29:07 just amazing to see so there's so much
29:11 more to convey about this and we're
29:14 still absolutely in recovery mode but I
29:17 really just want to start with a huge
29:18 thank you to our incredibly tired staff
29:21 and hope that you get a little bit of
29:23 recovery as well crossed thank you
29:25 council president any other comments
29:29 well thank you Jared thanks for coming
29:30 tonight on short notice and giving us a
29:32 presentation with h PowerPoint and all
29:35 very much appreciate thank you mayor
29:37 thank you more to
29:46 come still feeling tired and a little
29:48 bit emotionally overwhelmed but so very
29:50 very proud uh we're going to move into
29:53 the audience comments portion of
29:54 tonight's council meeting and the
29:55 members of the public May address their
29:57 Council at this time either in person or
30:00 virtually those who signed up in advance
30:02 to make comments will be called on first
30:04 if you're joining us virtually and would
30:05 like to make comments please raise your
30:08 virtual hand or send the host a chat
30:10 message that could be pressing the star
30:13 three on your phone or looking for a
30:15 hand icon if you're on a computer or
30:17 smartphone if you're in the room and did
30:21 not sign up I will still ask for other
30:22 speakers before we close this portion of
30:24 the meeting city clerk has anyone uh
30:27 signed up to speak for General audience
30:28 comments or indicated a desire to speak
30:30 this
30:31 evening no one has signed up in the room
30:33 and we do have a few members of the
30:35 public with us virtually but I'm not
30:37 seeing any raised hands at this point
30:41 and I'm looking in the room and I see
30:43 Chris and he's shaking his head no so we
30:46 do not have anyone in the room as well
30:48 so just a reminder though to folks you
30:51 can always get a hold of your Council by
30:53 submitting a written comment to them at
30:55 any time it is city council at isqua .
30:58 goov the next item on our agenda this
31:01 evening is the consent
31:04 calendar I don't have any comments on
31:06 tonight's consent calendar but are there
31:08 committee chairs or chair designes who'
31:10 like to report on any of the consent
31:12 calendar items not seeing any indication
31:15 looking at council member Joe no the
31:18 consent calendar was distributed to
31:19 Council in advance and if authorized the
31:21 items on the consent calendar will be
31:23 considered together and approved by one
31:25 motion have the payables and payroll
31:27 been reviewed they have thank you very
31:30 much does any council member desire to
31:32 remove any item from the consent
31:34 calendar and consider it under regular
31:36 business not seeing anyone in the room
31:38 or council member Joe indicating that
31:40 desire would someone like to make a
31:41 motion council president I move to
31:45 approve the consent calendar as
31:47 distributed second it's been moved and
31:50 seconded um all those in favor can you
31:53 signify by saying I I
31:56 I those opposed
31:58 that carries unanimously 70 next item of
32:01 business is under regular business AB
32:04 8886 the 2025 property tax levy this
32:08 item was last before the city council at
32:10 the November 4th city council meeting
32:12 where a public hearing was conducted and
32:14 I'd like to and she's already up there
32:16 invite budget manager Susie monel to the
32:19 podium for a
32:22 presentation welcome Susie thank you
32:25 mayor Paulie pull this up
32:31 starting with property tax thank
32:33 you so uh thank you this is the second
32:37 time this item will be or the this item
32:39 will be here tonight um so uh the
32:42 purpose is we are hoping to adopt the
32:44 2025 property tax levy tonight um RCW
32:48 requires jurisdictions to hold a public
32:50 hearing which was conducted on November
32:52 4th um and tonight we are proposing
32:55 adoption since the November 4th public
32:58 hearing we've received a couple of
32:59 updates from the assessor's office and
33:02 the changes have been on the margins
33:04 they've been very minimal they will not
33:06 impact the estimated uh average
33:08 household impact um from what we
33:10 presented on November
33:13 4th um as a refresher um state law
33:16 allows Juris jurisdictions to increase
33:18 the amount of property tax received
33:20 annually by 1% plus the value of new
33:23 construction that came in since the last
33:25 year um so our 25 base Levy is about
33:28 10.6 million uh with the 1% increase at
33:32 about 106,000 the value of new
33:34 construction from 24 was about
33:37 41,000 and the county makes some
33:40 adjustments along the way which
33:41 accounted this time for about 27,000 so
33:43 our total 25 Levy is estimated at about
33:47 10.8 million and in comparison to 24
33:50 that's about 175,000 more than the prior
33:54 year uh so as a reminder the property
33:57 value for 2025 are expected to increase
34:00 by about 16% over this current year the
34:04 median residence value uh that we used
34:06 for 2024 was about
34:08 1.125 million we're now looking at about
34:11 1.3 million um so with that in mind the
34:15 estimated regular Levy due to the city
34:17 goes from about
34:18 $712 last year or this current year
34:20 excuse me to
34:22 $89 next year or about a $97
34:26 difference um looking at the median uh
34:29 the value of the median residence and
34:30 how this math plays out if we look at
34:33 that middle row the administration
34:35 recommendation and proposal is to take
34:37 that 1% increase over 24 if we do that
34:41 the median uh property value of 1.3
34:44 million would see $89 from the regular
34:47 levy1 124 from the excess Levy for a
34:49 total of
34:51 $933 if the city did not take the 1%
34:54 increase that would be $920 or a
34:56 difference of about
34:59 $13 um and uh this is also our
35:03 opportunity to show of the total
35:05 property tax bill that the issaqua
35:07 resident receives isqua accounts for
35:09 about 9% of that with the majority
35:11 coming from the state and local school
35:13 district
35:15 funds and that concludes my
35:18 presentation thank you very much
35:20 Susie uh does council have any
35:24 questions I'm seeing none from council
35:27 member Joe either uh would someone care
35:29 to make a motion council
35:32 president I move to adopt ordinance
35:36 number
35:39 3077 levying property taxes for the city
35:41 of isqua for the fiscal year commencing
35:44 January 1 2025 on all property both real
35:47 and personal in said city which is
35:50 subject to taxation for the purpose of
35:52 paying sufficient Revenue to carry on
35:54 the services of said City for the
35:56 ensuing year as required by
36:00 law second it's been moved and seconded
36:03 is there any Council
36:06 discussion not seeing any from on the
36:08 Diaz are from council member Joe um all
36:11 those in favor please signify by saying
36:15 I those opposed that vote carries seven
36:19 and0 we'll move on to the next item of
36:21 business which is also Susie monel this
36:23 is AB 8942 utility tax increase the
36:27 action before Council this evening is to
36:29 adopt the ordinance and Susie never left
36:31 the podium so Susie can do your
36:33 presentation for us thank you mayor
36:36 Paulie shifting gears from property tax
36:38 to utility
36:39 tax so tonight we are seeking Council
36:42 authorization to increase the utility
36:43 tax rate for cable television water
36:46 sewer and storm water utilities from 3%
36:48 in 2024 to 4 a half% in 25 and 6% in 26
36:54 this item was discussed as part of the
36:55 2526 budget development as
36:58 well so in overview the administration
37:01 proposal is to go from 3% in 24 to 4 and
37:05 a half% in 25 and 6% in 26 looking at
37:09 the comparisons to other uh
37:11 jurisdictions around us we are at the
37:13 low end at the moment at
37:14 3% um so going up to four and a half or
37:18 6% puts us right around in the middle of
37:21 the um of our peer
37:25 organizations um looking at a a uh so we
37:28 charge a lot of different rates
37:29 depending on uh the size of the pipes
37:32 the consumption um levels but as an
37:35 example um if we were to go from a 3%
37:39 rate for using water as the example at
37:41 about 2135 that would go up to about
37:44 $32 25 or about $42 26 but the total
37:50 raised from this um would be about 793
37:53 th000 in 2025 and an additional 1.5 m
37:57 ion in
37:59 2026 um we did get a question on how
38:02 this would impact uh rates versus tax um
38:06 on how this would play out so these
38:08 tables show the 24 average bonly bill
38:14 for each of the three wet utilities
38:15 water sewer and storm water um and then
38:18 what the impact would be for rates
38:20 versus Revenue if we were to stay at 3%
38:23 in 2025 or go to 4 and a half% in 2025
38:27 so that impact um if I go to the next
38:29 Slide the total impact um of the three
38:32 wet utilities going from 3% to 4 and a
38:35 half% would increase the average bonly
38:39 bill by about $5 um or about $28 for the
38:46 year and that concludes my
38:49 presentation thank you um Council
38:54 questions not seeing any from council
38:56 member Joe or on the Diz is there a
38:59 motion council president I move to adopt
39:02 ordinance
39:04 number
39:06 3078 amending chapter 5.32 of the isqua
39:10 municipal code relating to the utility
39:12 business and occupation tax for the
39:14 cable television water sewer and storm
39:16 water utilities providing for referendum
39:20 and establishing an effective
39:22 date
39:24 second it's been moved and seconded is
39:27 is there any Council
39:29 discussion not seeing any council member
39:31 Joe or indication on the Das all those
39:34 in favor of the motion please signify by
39:36 saying I
39:39 I those opposed motion carries 7 and o
39:43 thank you Susie we will move on to the
39:45 next agenda bill which is AB 8894 school
39:49 zone speed cameras the motion before
39:51 Council this evening is to authorize and
39:53 I'm inviting assistant to the city
39:55 administrator Dale Mary crimp to the
39:57 podium welcome
40:00 Dale good evening mayor members of the
40:03 city
40:04 council give me just a moment to pull up
40:25 slides excellent
40:27 good evening mayor city council Dale
40:30 Mary crimp assistant to the city
40:31 administrator and I am uh excited to be
40:34 here with you again this week um on our
40:37 much awaited topic of school's own speed
40:41 cameras the purpose of this evening's
40:43 presentation is to share with the full
40:45 Council the findings of the vendor
40:47 analysis and the potent of potential new
40:49 school zone speed camera locations to
40:52 present the administration's analysis
40:55 proposal and rationale for a new
40:58 location at isqua Valley Elementary
40:59 School and to obtain city council
41:02 recommendation on the administration's
41:04 proposal a bit of background
41:08 um I I will say actually before I come
41:10 to background th this information did go
41:13 to the council committee um earlier
41:16 earlier this fall um there have been a
41:18 couple additions to the presentation
41:19 made since then specifically the
41:21 addition of the equity impact assessment
41:24 that's required by law the delaying of
41:26 this item provided time for City staff
41:28 to complete that Equity impact
41:29 assessment so you'll see that's also
41:31 been included in the packet for
41:34 today so background um the school zone
41:37 speed camera program here in the city of
41:39 isqua was launched in 2008 with the
41:42 installation of two cameras at Second
41:44 Avenue South Southeast near isqua Middle
41:47 School and isqua High School the
41:49 Administration has considered adding
41:51 additional zones in the past but has
41:54 lacked the data and evidence
41:56 specifically needed to corroborate
41:59 safety concerns um and to demonstrate
42:03 Financial viability of any expansion of
42:05 the program this past May the
42:07 administration including our police
42:09 chief presented on the different types
42:12 of automatic camera enforcement the city
42:15 might consider in addressing the ongoing
42:17 dangerous or reckless driving behavior
42:20 specifically red light cameras or new
42:23 school zone safety
42:25 cameras at that Council committee
42:28 meeting the council committee directed
42:30 the administration to move forward with
42:32 a vendor study of school zone locations
42:34 and two School Zone locations one on
42:37 Newport Way Northwest near isqua Valley
42:40 Elementary School and a second on
42:41 Northeast Park Drive near Grand Ridge
42:43 Elementary
42:45 School the council committee also
42:47 instructed the vendor the administration
42:49 to move forward with a vendor analysis
42:51 of six different potential red light
42:53 camera enforcement locations
42:58 the red light study was conducted was
43:01 the first study conducted it was
43:02 conducted in June shortly after that
43:04 Council committee meeting this the study
43:07 provided an estimate of violations at
43:09 each intersection in every direction at
43:12 program maturity which is about 18
43:15 months after the installation of a new
43:18 program this data revealed that while
43:20 intersections continue to have dangerous
43:23 Behavior most of the dangerous behavior
43:25 is not the running of red lights that
43:28 would be captured by a red light photo
43:31 enforcement camera Chief gave a very um
43:33 a very great and very photofilled uh
43:36 presentation about when exactly the red
43:39 light camera would be triggered and when
43:40 it would take the photo um unfortunately
43:43 or fortunately we're not seeing a lot of
43:45 that but we are seeing other turning
43:47 behavior that a red light camera would
43:49 not catch and not be able to enforce the
43:53 exception um of course being on West
43:55 Lake samamish 5 6 um but most other
43:59 intersections studied would not have
44:01 more than one violation per day given
44:05 the relatively low incidents of
44:07 violations anticipated and the the
44:09 projected revenues likely would not
44:11 cover the high cost of installing those
44:13 cameras and administering the system the
44:16 administration will explore other ways
44:19 to um intervene in these situations
44:22 especially as the police department
44:23 continues to stand up their new Traffic
44:25 Unit
44:30 the vendor condu conducted a second
44:32 study um on potential new school zones
44:35 in the first week of September we waited
44:37 until later when school was in session
44:39 and the lights were flashing to gather
44:41 data um and data was collected for as
44:45 you can see in the attachments um data
44:47 was collected for 24 hours uh but then
44:51 potential violations were calculated
44:53 only during the current hours that the
44:54 school zone flashers are active so this
44:57 this is 8:30 to 4:00 p.m. on Monday
44:59 Tuesday Thursday and Friday and as was
45:01 astutely pointed out by council
45:03 president 8:30 to 2:10 on Wednesdays or
45:05 early release days as you can see
45:09 between um 1100 and nearly 1,600
45:13 violations were clocked during this four
45:16 days for about an average of 1,400 per
45:18 day um at a given location or at a given
45:21 Direction um only during school hours so
45:25 this is about 2,800
45:27 per day um when you think about a
45:29 Northbound and a
45:30 southbound this indicates that while
45:32 flashers and in one case speed
45:37 notifications they've been installed
45:39 they are letting drivers know that they
45:40 should be going slowly we still have a
45:43 lot of speeding and dangerous Behavior
45:45 happening in our school
45:49 zones now our analysis didn't stop there
45:52 it was important to establish the safety
45:54 concern that we have heard from the
45:56 community concerns around speeding near
45:58 schools um we also needed to make sure
46:00 similar with the red light cameras uh
46:03 that the the city could be prepared to
46:05 pay um for to up to put up and then to
46:08 administer this program and so as part
46:11 of the analysis done by the city to
46:13 understand the financial viability we
46:15 made some assumptions about revenue and
46:16 also around
46:18 expenditures um in order to determine
46:20 the financial feasibility the so
46:22 specifically can the city afford to
46:24 operate and administer an expanded
46:26 program
46:27 the following assumptions were made one
46:30 given that the study was conducted
46:32 during the first week of school um we
46:34 assumed that drivers are probably re
46:36 acclimating to those lights being
46:38 flashing and so we reduced um our
46:40 Baseline number both of drivers and
46:43 violators by um a slight percentage this
46:46 is spelled out in the in the memo as
46:48 well or in the AG agenda Bell we also
46:50 made the assumption that drivers will be
46:52 responsive to noticing um to being
46:55 noticed and to getting warning um
46:58 tickets part of the way that we've
46:59 rolled out our previous program that we
47:01 would roll out any new program would be
47:03 to First provide warning tickets before
47:06 you're cited um for speeding behavior
47:09 and we think that folks will respond to
47:11 those to some degree and violations will
47:13 stabilize um in response to some of
47:16 those first notices we also believe the
47:18 driver Behavior will respond to a new
47:20 camera on Newport Way Northwest less
47:23 dramatically due to the high frequency
47:25 of pass through traffic you're not
47:27 necessarily always getting the same
47:28 drivers and so they are less likely to
47:30 be as impacted um by a camera because
47:33 they may not expect it necessarily we
47:35 would expect routine drivers on that
47:37 road to change their behavior we also
47:39 know that the high volume of that
47:41 traffic is not necessarily always repeat
47:43 drivers we would expect drivers near
47:46 Grand Ridge Elementary to be quicker to
47:48 change um Northeast Park although a main
47:51 thoroughfare is an internal Street and
47:54 the majority of the traffic on that
47:55 street is coming out of and going into
47:58 the neighborhood there expect that folks
48:01 in their neighborhood are more
48:02 responsive to getting that ticket
48:04 because they don't forget getting that
48:06 ticket um the equity board which
48:09 considered the equity impact assessment
48:11 they all had a personal story about the
48:13 camera down here on southe on Second
48:15 Avenue
48:16 Southeast and we we made the assumption
48:19 that only about 50% of tickets are paid
48:21 and that is based off data um on our
48:23 current camera system um and the
48:25 frequency of payment
48:28 we also made some expenditure
48:30 assumptions um some of these aren't
48:32 assumptions they're just true facts um
48:34 So based on the the cost of cameras um
48:37 the annual lease cost is $57,000 for a
48:40 camera um that's under our current lease
48:42 terms with our vendor um and the lease
48:46 is a five-year lease the monthly ticket
48:49 overage fee is $5 per ticket over 800
48:52 per month per camera um also that the
48:55 annual cost of police Personnel to
48:57 process violations would be
48:59 $190,000 in salary and benefits per
49:02 full-time or limited term employee um
49:05 and that a similar um rate but at
49:08 145,000 in salary and benefits for the
49:11 court Personnel so the Personnel
49:12 required to both review the violations
49:16 um issue the citations and then manage
49:19 um the flow as those citations come in
49:21 to the court to be paid
49:27 I got ahead of my notes one
49:30 moment an analysis of the net revenues
49:33 indicates that both locations are
49:35 financially viable in the same way that
49:37 both locations have dangerous driving
49:39 behavior as a reminder any revenues
49:42 beyond the cost of leasing the cameras
49:45 and administering the program are
49:46 committed to capital projects for Road
49:48 and transportation improvements
49:50 especially the addition of sidewalks for
49:53 safe walking and Road redesign to slow
49:56 traffic
49:58 this data seen another way um visually
50:02 can be displayed here so you see each of
50:04 the different locations and their
50:06 projected net revenues over the course
50:08 of a 5-year lease
50:13 term I also wanted to add while the the
50:15 administration is recommending one
50:17 additional location I want to share a
50:18 bit more about why so given the clear
50:21 safety concerns at both locations and
50:24 the financial feasibility you may be
50:25 wondering why the admin Administration
50:27 is hesitating um on on recommending both
50:30 locations in June of this year a new law
50:33 went into effect across the state of
50:36 Washington this new law um which came
50:39 out of house bill
50:41 2384 provides cities with expanded
50:44 authority to use automated traffic
50:46 cameras but it also provides more
50:49 restrictions on revenues collected
50:52 specifically um in year four of a third
50:55 loc I should say for first isqua given
50:58 that we already have a school zone
50:59 safety program with one camera location
51:02 in it we are able to add a second camera
51:05 location at no change to how the
51:07 revenues can be used however any
51:09 location added after that would be
51:13 subject to new Revenue restrictions
51:15 specifically uh the Cooper Jones active
51:18 Transportation safety act and account um
51:21 following I believe starting in the
51:23 fourth year is what the notes say um 25%
51:26 % of revenues after operational costs
51:29 would be automatically first and
51:30 foremost diverted into that state
51:32 account which goes towards State
51:33 projects not towards our local
51:36 projects also um an equity assessment
51:39 was noted as required um that was part
51:41 of the new law as well that Equity
51:42 assessment as in your packet has already
51:44 been conducted on these two potential
51:47 locations so with this new um with the
51:51 with the understanding that a third
51:53 location would lead to um a reduction in
51:57 City revenues um in the fourth and fifth
51:59 year a 5year lease term on the cameras
52:02 here you can see the adjustment that
52:04 would make to the net revenues or seing
52:07 similarly if we were to focus in on what
52:09 we'd expect um from the Grand Ridge
52:12 Elementary location in the first
52:14 condition you see a flattening out but
52:16 in that second condition you see a real
52:19 drop um in 2020 28 when that Cooper
52:22 Jones Safety um account would come into
52:25 effect
52:28 the new information um so Council
52:31 committee thanks for bearing with a
52:33 little bit of additional information on
52:34 this go around a new element was
52:36 completed in the past month and is
52:39 legally required um is an equity impact
52:41 assessment the analysis revealed that of
52:44 the 22 Equity targets the city meets um
52:47 or met 15 including having lower than
52:50 average fines for our cameras many of
52:53 the jurisdictions around us charge up to
52:57 $290 um our current fines are
53:00 124
53:02 um and a legally sound plan for Revenue
53:05 distribution so a reinvestment in the
53:07 neighborhoods in which these cameras are
53:09 placed there were three opportunities
53:12 for Equity considerations during
53:14 implementation including increased uh
53:17 restorative opportunities for violators
53:20 in conversation with Chief Schwan um one
53:22 of the things that our Traffic Unit is
53:24 thinking about is how to offer
53:26 specifically um youth who might be
53:28 driving through these locations the
53:30 opportunity to engage in some traffic
53:32 school uh rather than just paying a fine
53:35 and so we've been in conversation about
53:36 some more opportunities that's one
53:38 example and then there were four
53:40 potential
53:41 concerns specifically around the
53:43 demographics of both of the
53:45 neighborhoods that we are considering
53:47 placing cameras in both in both
53:49 neighborhoods there are residents that
53:51 have higher than City average
53:53 representation of a historically
53:54 marginalized group along the area near
53:58 isqua Valley Elementary we have an older
54:00 on average population mostly um that
54:04 mostly have an average lower median
54:07 income than the remainder of the city so
54:09 seniors who are living on fixed incomes
54:12 and then around the neighborhood by
54:14 Grand Ridge Elementary we have more um
54:18 people of color that live in that
54:19 community in particular and commute in
54:21 and out of that Community as is spelled
54:23 out in the equity impact assessment
54:25 there sort of two sides of this coin one
54:28 is that when you place a camera in a
54:29 community the residents in that
54:31 Community are more likely to interact
54:33 with that camera I and so potentially
54:34 more likely to get a ticket however the
54:37 residents in that Community are also
54:39 more likely to benefit from that camera
54:41 as people's behavior changes and it
54:43 makes it safer for folks who are moving
54:46 around that community so you'll see it's
54:48 been marked as a concern um simply
54:51 because the the inclusion of a camera in
54:53 that location might oversample that
54:55 population but you can also see right
54:57 next to that concern there's a green
54:59 check because we think that the benefit
55:01 will also be felt by that Community
55:04 there's one additional note um the
55:06 commute uh the commuter Behavior and the
55:09 what we can understand through some data
55:11 analysis to be the origins of those
55:14 commuters through those different
55:15 stretches of Road um the commuters along
55:18 Newport Way Northwest are likely more
55:21 representative of the city of isqua as a
55:23 whole whereas the um more racially
55:27 representative and socioeconomically
55:29 representative whereas the commuters
55:31 coming in and out along Northeast Park
55:35 given that they are mostly residents of
55:36 that Community are more likely
55:38 representative of the residents of that
55:40 Community um so kind of convoluted way
55:43 of saying that because we're concerned
55:45 about the the impact of the residents in
55:49 that Community to the the additional
55:51 camera if we're also saying those
55:53 residents are likely the commuters going
55:55 in and out of that Community we would be
55:57 concerned in the same way that they
55:59 could sort of have the double um
56:00 interaction with that
56:02 camera um I will add that this Equity
56:05 assessment was shared uh at the November
56:08 meeting of the isquat equity board uh
56:11 they approved the findings of the
56:13 assessment and recommended it for
56:14 council's consideration with no
56:20 concerns so we come to options um there
56:23 are four options that we're presenting
56:25 this evening um there were three options
56:27 presented to the council committee when
56:29 they met in September uh the council
56:31 committee voted two to one in favor of
56:33 option four over option two in
56:36 preparation for this meeting the
56:37 administration considered a new third
56:39 option which is sort of another take on
56:41 option two a staggering um of the two
56:45 locations um this is we think this would
56:47 alleviate some of the the significant
56:50 concern that we have and that the equity
56:52 impact assessment also had on staff
56:54 capacity to ad administer the launch of
56:57 two new locations
56:59 simultaneously the administration
57:01 however is still recommending option
57:03 four due to concerns about Staffing to
57:05 administer two new locations the new
57:08 Revenue restrictions placed on a third
57:11 location and the interest in seeing if
57:13 behavior on this interior Street can be
57:15 changed through different methods
57:17 specifically the Staffing up of our
57:20 Traffic
57:22 Unit one additional visual I wanted to
57:25 share um similar to the visual I shared
57:27 before is just around the traffic
57:29 behavior in general so this slide and
57:31 the next slide show the flow of traffic
57:33 through these two areas um during the
57:37 whole of the day I think it's quite
57:40 noticeable um that traffic on Newport
57:43 Way um it remains High especially um
57:49 throughout the day um pretty consistent
57:52 traffic um and actually Northbound uh
57:55 deep increases pretty significantly like
57:57 the highest rates of traffic are
57:59 actually happening during school hours
58:02 along this stretch of
58:04 land Northeast Park Drive we see
58:07 actually kind of a little bit of a
58:08 different pattern so we actually see
58:10 higher volume of traffic outside of
58:12 times when the school zone camera would
58:14 be on this is another consideration that
58:16 we're making as we think about whether
58:18 or not we're ready to launch two new
58:21 locations at two different
58:24 places I I guess I maybe see that for
58:27 the second but the first one looks like
58:30 the peak tra uh no sorry um go to the
58:32 second slide yeah so the uh top one
58:38 which is the which direction well let's
58:41 B right there that seems like the peak
58:44 traffic is exactly when the cameras
58:45 would be on the the peak traffic is
58:49 right before it you're true right around
58:52 8:30 is still pretty high but the peak
58:54 traffic is right about 8:00 and then
59:00 6:00 and then with with eastbound it
59:03 peaks in the e in the uh evening hours
59:06 so we see a dip uh during school
59:09 hours thank
59:11 you so our proposal the administration
59:14 is proposing adding a second school zone
59:17 safety location at isqua Valley
59:19 Elementary both a Northbound and a
59:21 southbound camera um this would keep us
59:23 within the terms of the current uh city
59:26 code so that we'd have no new Revenue
59:28 restrictions it would also address the
59:30 high incidents of ongoing speeding even
59:32 when lights and a sign telling people
59:35 the speed that they are going are
59:37 flashing and with the high frequency of
59:39 pass through traffic um while this is a
59:41 minor detail the high incidence of pass
59:43 through traffic provides more favorable
59:45 Financial viability for the full 5-year
59:48 lease
59:49 term the administration is recommending
59:51 that the city council recommend the
59:54 addition of one school zone safety
59:56 location and that the mayor signed an
59:57 amendment to the agreement with ver
59:59 Mobility to add two cameras at this
1:00:01 location along Newport Way
1:00:03 Northwest timing and next steps uh the
1:00:06 equity impact assessment has already
1:00:07 been completed um we are hoping in this
1:00:11 month to move forward uh with
1:00:12 communication to the community
1:00:26 I've never uh worn out a microphone
1:00:30 um um and also to sign the contract
1:00:34 Amendment um but also to allow us to
1:00:37 some time to collaborate with the school
1:00:38 district on how we would communicate out
1:00:41 um and then January and February we
1:00:43 would hope to to install new cameras to
1:00:45 be able to go live before the end of q1
1:00:47 um so we can start getting warning
1:00:49 tickets out there but also provide uh
1:00:51 our court staff some time to staff up
1:00:54 and our our ipd team which has a
1:00:56 tentative plan some time to uh staff
1:00:59 their plan as
1:01:01 well so again this is the recommendation
1:01:04 um and I will take any questions and
1:01:06 before we go to questions I would like
1:01:08 to see if council member Marts who is
1:01:11 chair of services safety and Parks
1:01:13 committee is there anything you want to
1:01:15 summarize on the committee's
1:01:16 recommendations and then I already saw
1:01:17 council member Ray will have a question
1:01:20 I I would thank thank you Madame mayor
1:01:21 for the opportunity uh regarding this
1:01:23 bill at the September 30th 202 before
1:01:26 service sa services safety and Parks
1:01:28 committee meeting the administration
1:01:29 presented the reports from ver Mobility
1:01:32 as well as analysis on the financial
1:01:33 viability of each potential camera
1:01:35 location to the council members in the
1:01:37 committee the committee voted two to one
1:01:39 in a split decision between adding one
1:01:41 additional School Zone location at
1:01:43 Newport Way Northwest and adding a new
1:01:46 school zone location at both Newport Way
1:01:48 Northwest and Northeast Park Drive all
1:01:51 committee members were supportive of a
1:01:52 new location at isqua Valley Elementary
1:01:55 how however a minority of the committee
1:01:57 was also in support of adding a third
1:01:59 School Zone location at Grand Ridge
1:02:02 Elementary at Northeast Park Drive the
1:02:05 Administration has added additional
1:02:07 information on the feasibility of the
1:02:08 third tonight's meeting obviously uh so
1:02:12 this concludes my
1:02:14 report thank you council member and
1:02:16 council member before I go to you I
1:02:18 remember when we had committees you
1:02:19 always wanted that majority Minority
1:02:20 Report so you must have liked the way
1:02:23 council member it's presented that
1:02:25 council member right
1:02:26 um thanks um I I'm confused by the
1:02:30 analysis Das a third location slide and
1:02:33 particularly as it relates to diverted
1:02:35 to the Cooper Jones actor transport
1:02:38 Transportation safety account and I'm
1:02:41 reading this is 25% of Revenue after
1:02:43 operational cost get diverted but when I
1:02:45 look at the graph it looks like a 75%
1:02:47 reduction in our Revenue so it feels to
1:02:50 me like that's backwards
1:02:56 like 75% is getting
1:03:00 diverted I'll have to let me check the
1:03:02 numbers um but it shouldn't be
1:03:07 75% um it should be 25 of what's
1:03:09 remaining after um so it's it's a pretty
1:03:12 small amount that's remaining and we've
1:03:14 also got Staffing costs going up um I
1:03:17 can do a quick check on the math though
1:03:19 for you I what I'm seeing is really is a
1:03:21 75% reduction between 2027 and 2028 if
1:03:25 you look at going from nearly
1:03:27 $400,000 to just slightly over $100,000
1:03:30 so it just um is it if it is it's a 75%
1:03:35 diversion those numbers work if it's a
1:03:36 25% diversion those numbers look funky
1:03:39 to me okay I TR I trust that you you ran
1:03:42 them again I will I will check my
1:03:44 spreadsheet as well all
1:03:45 right council
1:03:49 president thank you let me get back to
1:03:52 questions okay Dale you provided us all
1:03:56 kinds of additional information since
1:03:58 the last services and safety and Parks
1:04:00 um can you talk about the difference
1:04:03 between potential infractions which
1:04:05 seems to be what Vera Mobility is
1:04:08 measuring here and citations which was
1:04:11 one of the numbers that you had given us
1:04:13 for the current cameras Second Avenue
1:04:17 Southeast um I'll start with that yes
1:04:21 and I can tell you there a couple of
1:04:22 different layers of that so they
1:04:24 provided potential um violations based
1:04:27 purely off of that capturing who is
1:04:31 speeding through the area um that number
1:04:35 we we still think is a is a little high
1:04:37 and so we estimate it down um for our
1:04:40 own calculations the difference between
1:04:43 violations and citations there are a few
1:04:45 things that could be happening one is
1:04:47 that in some cases as mentioned um for
1:04:50 some violators it'll be their first time
1:04:53 um violating the speed and so they will
1:04:55 get warning on their first goar around
1:04:57 regardless if it's during our
1:04:59 implementation period or if it's their
1:05:01 first time I know I have sped and gotten
1:05:04 a warning um through a school zone
1:05:06 myself I know I how dare I say it on the
1:05:08 record um citations also um might not be
1:05:13 issued to certain um in certain cases so
1:05:16 um the camera is an imperfect Tool uh it
1:05:19 requires taking a photo uh and that
1:05:22 photo being clear enough that you can
1:05:24 read the license plate in some cases the
1:05:26 license plate itself might be uded um
1:05:29 and thus that person can't necessarily
1:05:31 be cited uh so an unclear photo can lead
1:05:35 to someone violating but not being cited
1:05:39 a somehow masked um license plate might
1:05:44 also lead to that um a mismatch in
1:05:47 photos between uh the front of the car
1:05:49 in the back of the car U might also lead
1:05:51 to something not being cited um and then
1:05:53 there are exempt Vehicles so emergency
1:05:55 Vehicles they might violate the speed
1:05:58 but also not be cited um we did discuss
1:06:01 there's a at our current camera during a
1:06:04 a recent speed study there was a a a
1:06:07 notable discrepancy between in One
1:06:09 Direction um we're exploring that right
1:06:12 now U and we've got a question out to
1:06:13 our specifically out both to our um to
1:06:17 our police team to take a look and see
1:06:19 if that discrepancy continued in
1:06:22 subsequent periods and also out to our
1:06:24 vendor to see if we need to take a look
1:06:26 at the camera um and make sure that it's
1:06:28 capturing but that could lead to a
1:06:30 discrepancy between someone violating
1:06:31 and the citation actually being
1:06:33 issued okay so looking back at those um
1:06:37 Second Avenue Southeast ignoring the
1:06:39 Northbound where you said there's this
1:06:42 potential issue where it suggested only
1:06:44 30% um were being issued citations the
1:06:48 southbound is suggesting that
1:06:51 70% of potential violators were issued
1:06:55 citations so have we calculated that
1:06:58 into our
1:07:00 estimates here for the projected cameras
1:07:03 we have not um okay we have not because
1:07:06 it shouldn't be quite there shouldn't be
1:07:09 quite that discrepancy um and that was a
1:07:12 very small sample it was a sample of
1:07:14 four days and so we think that that is
1:07:17 not necessarily representative of what
1:07:21 we're seeing over time um
1:07:25 so we we haven't calculated that into
1:07:27 our overarching numbers for the news but
1:07:30 as a policy maker I have a little bit of
1:07:33 questionable data for making that
1:07:36 decision analysis on okay um and then
1:07:40 the last part of that question following
1:07:43 up on that so the violation rates for
1:07:45 Second Avenue
1:07:46 Southeast are just
1:07:49 5% it looks like and with looking at the
1:07:53 citation rates potentially as low as 2%
1:07:56 that's a lot lower than the projected
1:07:59 violation rates for these proposed
1:08:01 camera locations do we have a plan for
1:08:05 if citation rates are really that low
1:08:09 and revenue is that low for how we would
1:08:12 either budget off of this or pay for
1:08:16 program if the revenue is that much
1:08:18 lower than
1:08:20 anticipated that location has been
1:08:23 active for 16 years um and we've seen a
1:08:26 steady pretty steady decline over time
1:08:28 we've kind of leveled out now in the
1:08:30 last few years at this like 5 perish uh
1:08:33 we don't anticipate in the first five
1:08:35 years of this program that we would end
1:08:38 up anywhere close to that 5% especially
1:08:41 given where the current um just given
1:08:44 the current behavior of driving I do
1:08:46 think it is important to mention and has
1:08:49 been added in here this program should
1:08:50 be evaluated every year and it should
1:08:53 absolutely be considered for it is a
1:08:55 short it should be a shortterm
1:08:57 intervention um and so at the end of the
1:09:00 lease term the city should consider
1:09:02 whether or not it still needs to have
1:09:05 those locations active um especially as
1:09:08 we consider Road redesign along
1:09:10 different stretches of Road um we know
1:09:12 there are certain road redesigns that
1:09:14 hopefully we were able to pay for that
1:09:16 would change driver behavior and so
1:09:18 would be recommended this isn't a
1:09:20 program that should live in perpetuity
1:09:21 it's a program that should live for the
1:09:23 least term and be reevaluated
1:09:27 throughout thank you council member
1:09:29 Hall thank you I have two questions for
1:09:32 you and one for the state administrator
1:09:33 and that leads perfectly into one of my
1:09:35 questions that I had was um seems like
1:09:38 we have pretty good startup criteria in
1:09:41 terms of need and then Financial
1:09:42 viability but like especially with the
1:09:45 program that started by ISO high school
1:09:46 and by the way I grew up driving to ISO
1:09:48 high school driving by that camera doing
1:09:50 my best to go to school before or after
1:09:53 it was on um which why I joined the Jazz
1:09:56 Band so that's one trick to get around
1:09:57 it uh zero period um was do we have like
1:10:01 success criteria or shutdown criteria
1:10:03 like if we meet this definition of
1:10:06 success for this
1:10:08 timeline um we consider shutting down
1:10:10 the program is that something we've ever
1:10:12 thought about or is that something that
1:10:13 that we'll need to kind of get into in
1:10:15 the future you know it's not something
1:10:17 that we've defined yet um one of the
1:10:19 considerations in the equity impact
1:10:20 assessment is program evaluation um we
1:10:23 are required by law to ass annually on
1:10:27 rates of speeding rates of violation
1:10:29 rates of citation um I know our court
1:10:32 keeps great records on both gross and
1:10:35 net revenue um but I think one thing
1:10:38 that we will want to keep track of and
1:10:39 one thing as I look at the new law in
1:10:41 particular is a much closer attention to
1:10:44 what's changing in driver Behavior we
1:10:46 have Baseline data now um and so we can
1:10:48 use that to see year-over-year if we're
1:10:50 seeing the change we want to see
1:10:52 certainly if we're not seeing a change
1:10:54 we should be reconsidering a program the
1:10:56 the challenging part with this is the
1:10:57 least term locks Us in for 5 years um so
1:11:00 we know that it's not something that we
1:11:02 can say no to next year um that we would
1:11:05 be committed for a for a short period of
1:11:07 time um however it's important to know
1:11:09 and I didn't note in this presentation
1:11:11 but noted with the council committee um
1:11:14 a question came up about you know we're
1:11:15 anticipating changes to Newport Way um
1:11:18 those I confirmed with our engineering
1:11:20 team that those changes aren't ground is
1:11:23 not going to be broken until far after
1:11:25 after the 5-year leasee term so um but
1:11:27 to answer your success measures question
1:11:30 um I think we need to gather some data
1:11:32 to see Behavior change um all
1:11:35 indications of studies that have been
1:11:37 done show that behavior does change um
1:11:40 and we want to see how significantly we
1:11:42 impact Behavior through any
1:11:45 intervention looken like a True
1:11:47 Performance Management
1:11:49 specialist um okay great um the next one
1:11:51 is just to clarify the North and
1:11:53 southbound cameras don't count as two
1:11:55 separate cameras is that right with that
1:11:58 they are they are two separate cameras
1:11:59 so state law yeah under state law does
1:12:01 that trigger the one location so it's
1:12:04 it's done by locations done by school
1:12:06 zone like by School Zone location yeah
1:12:08 because you know it is it is a single
1:12:11 place so even though it's a camera
1:12:12 shooting this way and a camera shooting
1:12:14 this way like it's it the dangerous
1:12:16 behavior is happening in the location
1:12:18 not just necessarily along one side of
1:12:19 the street okay um thank you very much
1:12:23 um um so my next questions for you City
1:12:26 administrator so earlier today I given
1:12:28 you a call because I was still kind of
1:12:30 um in the same place I was during the
1:12:32 retreat not really understanding what
1:12:34 the safety concern was here especially
1:12:36 with the huge rideway ditches on each
1:12:38 side so I wasn't entirely um bought in
1:12:41 on the kind of pedestrian need there um
1:12:45 but I talked with the city administrator
1:12:47 who um um helped me think about it in
1:12:50 this other way that I hadn't even
1:12:51 thought about and I just wanted to make
1:12:52 sure the rest of the council heard it
1:12:53 too so would you would you be willing to
1:12:54 sh that with what we talked about I I
1:12:57 will try to recreate it was good so my
1:13:00 my my thoughts
1:13:01 um the term school zone speed cameras or
1:13:06 school safety zone we kind of say as
1:13:08 like one word uh and I think we
1:13:11 sometimes forget what this is and this
1:13:13 is a predesignated area uh that we have
1:13:17 concern about because it is a a thorough
1:13:19 Fair next to a school so why do we have
1:13:22 concerned about it well in the case of
1:13:24 uh Squad Valley Elementary uh there's a
1:13:27 playground right there uh we have kids
1:13:29 playing on that playground perhaps a
1:13:31 ball gets loose a ball gets loose on a
1:13:33 roadway uh child runs after it there's a
1:13:37 safety issue people walk to school um
1:13:40 there's just a lot of activity and so
1:13:42 prior to any discussion regarding a
1:13:44 camera enforcement there's already is a
1:13:46 school zone and so we've already
1:13:49 recognize that there is some danger
1:13:52 involved here and so what pursuing a du
1:13:55 Zone safety camera allows is allows us
1:13:58 additional enforcement in an area we've
1:14:00 already recognized as potentially being
1:14:02 dangerous and so making that area less
1:14:05 dangerous by changing the behavior of
1:14:08 the drivers so uh this is been discussed
1:14:12 at the council now you know nine 10
1:14:15 months now um it starts as a safety
1:14:18 issue it starts as already an area
1:14:20 that's been designated as one of concern
1:14:23 and we believe that by putting the
1:14:25 camera in that enhances safety in the
1:14:28 school zone so that you know when when
1:14:31 you look at why we're doing this we're
1:14:33 doing this for safety and we're doing it
1:14:35 because we've already recognized that
1:14:37 the area has the potential to be
1:14:39 dangerous uh given the roadways location
1:14:41 next to the school site so that was
1:14:44 hopefully helpful to you council member
1:14:46 Hall as we talk this afternoon I'm don't
1:14:48 know if it helps anyone else the council
1:14:51 but um I you know first and foremost the
1:14:54 administration looks at that this is a
1:14:55 safety concern at an area that's already
1:14:57 been designated as a an area of concern
1:15:01 council member H did you have additional
1:15:03 questions no I do have if the council
1:15:06 agrees I have a comment and a question
1:15:08 for Council is that
1:15:11 okay um so the question is first for
1:15:14 council member Ry would you like us to
1:15:16 take a five minute break so we can get
1:15:18 some verification on the drop that would
1:15:21 be really awesome because it it puts me
1:15:23 in an odd spot not knowing that yeah and
1:15:25 Dale would you need five minutes 10
1:15:27 minutes five minutes minutes okay and
1:15:29 the comment is that kind of picking up
1:15:32 on council member Halls that's you know
1:15:34 a performance manager data performance
1:15:37 managers that's what you expect from her
1:15:40 I just wanted to add in that um one of
1:15:43 the culture changes we are trying to
1:15:44 make in the administration is that we
1:15:47 are data informed but Valu driven and so
1:15:50 I appreciate that the administration
1:15:53 added the third example
1:15:55 it doesn't have to pencil out you can
1:15:58 actually decide that the community value
1:16:00 is that when you are talking to parents
1:16:02 of kids who attend these schools these
1:16:04 students parents are like you know yeah
1:16:07 we want you to be doing the things that
1:16:09 you think bring the highest level of
1:16:10 safety in these areas if they pencil out
1:16:14 or not and so let's look at the numbers
1:16:17 that Dale works at after the break and
1:16:18 think about the values that our
1:16:20 community have and the data that Dale
1:16:23 has brought to inform you on what kind
1:16:25 of decision you would be most
1:16:26 comfortable Mak so with that it
1:16:31 is uh let's see it is
1:16:34 8 let's come back at uh 8:25 that gives
1:16:39 you some restroom breaks as well so I
1:17:53 for e
1:18:50 and you're to you're totally
1:18:53 right doesn't make the hugest
1:19:08 difference I'm not sure how much easier
1:19:10 it's going
1:19:13 to yeah but we'll fix it
1:19:23 then e
1:19:54 well they're one and the same the table
1:19:57 is the is the chart
1:20:53 would e
1:24:51 pulling us back in from our short recess
1:24:54 going to hand it back over to Dale and
1:24:56 let's see if we have some updated
1:24:59 information we do so the Beauty and the
1:25:02 curse of the flexible spreadsheet is
1:25:03 that it is very easy to update your
1:25:06 numbers um so council member Ray thank
1:25:08 you for pointing out uh what was an a
1:25:10 data issue a data error in the
1:25:12 calculations around revenues what you
1:25:14 originally saw um in understanding the
1:25:16 impacts of the Restriction of HB uh 2384
1:25:20 was this pretty significant drop in 28
1:25:22 and 29 for a third location
1:25:25 um represented in the chart and then or
1:25:28 the the table and then the chart um a
1:25:30 quick look at the the spreadsheet
1:25:32 indicated that salary um had been not
1:25:36 included as an administrative cost um in
1:25:38 that calculation so it was it was
1:25:40 actually 25% of the gross revenues minus
1:25:43 the lease costs of the camera but not
1:25:46 the lease costs plus the salary costs of
1:25:49 the program to be administered and so
1:25:51 that counts as an administrative cost of
1:25:53 the program
1:25:55 um so once you factor in the
1:25:56 administrate the cost of the police
1:25:58 officers and the court staff to
1:26:00 administer the program as part of the
1:26:03 expenditure um assumed uh you see a
1:26:07 different drop in the grow in the net
1:26:10 revenues that the city would have so you
1:26:12 see this drop um is much less
1:26:16 significant this is not um include um
1:26:20 the we do pay a fee on top of any um
1:26:24 ticket over 800 that's not included
1:26:26 that's not covered um so if you're still
1:26:29 thinking like oh that's not quite the
1:26:30 correct percentage uh that amount is not
1:26:33 covered um as part of our assumed
1:26:36 expenditure um because it's on top of um
1:26:39 our agreement with our vendor but still
1:26:42 a significantly increased uh net revenue
1:26:46 prediction
1:26:49 there questions Council M Ray super
1:26:51 helpful thank you you're welcome Dale
1:26:53 appreciate it and people are still
1:26:55 looking at it so I'll hold for a second
1:26:57 to see if there's additional
1:27:00 questions council member hunt thank you
1:27:04 um it I I was quickly skimming it seems
1:27:08 to me that the uh earlier numbers that
1:27:11 we saw um are are used in the
1:27:14 administration's analysis and the and
1:27:16 the different options um on one of the
1:27:19 first Pages it talks about the $3
1:27:20 million net revenue difference for
1:27:23 example between the options which is not
1:27:25 quite which is not that um so I'm
1:27:28 wondering if in light of this difference
1:27:32 first of all if we need to make sure
1:27:33 that the um information that the public
1:27:35 gets about the analysis can be updated
1:27:38 uh throughout but then also um if we can
1:27:40 if you could walk through if that
1:27:42 changes the administration's uh thinking
1:27:45 on it a recommendation on it um because
1:27:47 it was it does seem that the analysis
1:27:49 was done with those other numbers MH um
1:27:52 I think we have some of the same we have
1:27:54 some of the same concerns um I think the
1:27:57 Staffing element is still a concern um
1:28:01 the the over the course of five years do
1:28:04 we see the traffic change faster than we
1:28:07 might have predicted we we might on an
1:28:10 internal Street um I think it alleviates
1:28:12 the financial component which was one
1:28:14 small part of our concern
1:28:17 um again which is why we provided four
1:28:19 options today this idea of Staggering
1:28:21 might be an in between to be considered
1:28:24 so council member hunt are you wondering
1:28:25 if there is like um instead of pick one
1:28:30 pick from these two recommendations is
1:28:32 that what you're asking if they've
1:28:33 shifted their recommendation that way uh
1:28:36 I would certainly want to know if if it
1:28:38 does shift the recommendation and also
1:28:40 if it if it in some other way changes
1:28:42 the recommendation of the staff because
1:28:45 it does seem that the numbers throughout
1:28:46 were using those earlier calculations C
1:28:49 the administrator
1:28:51 um again back to my uh earlier it's
1:28:54 about safety and so if uh we the council
1:28:58 believes that the second location at
1:29:00 Grand Bridge Elementary will enhance
1:29:01 safety um you know I think we've always
1:29:04 wanted to focus on that uh there are
1:29:06 operational concerns which are real and
1:29:08 I think if the council wishes to move
1:29:10 forward with both of these we would ask
1:29:13 that there be some a phase uh time that
1:29:16 we would got start with uh the Newport
1:29:19 Way location um and then give us a few
1:29:22 months to get settled make sure we have
1:29:24 the Staffing in place and then move
1:29:26 forward with the uh Grand Ridge
1:29:28 Elementary so perhaps we do one now uh
1:29:32 stage it for second quarter um and then
1:29:35 perhaps stage the the second one for the
1:29:38 beginning of the school year in the
1:29:41 fall thank you additional questions on
1:29:45 the revised information CC oh just
1:29:48 general questions okay what was the
1:29:50 other location concern you had expressed
1:29:53 earlier about Grand R you said something
1:29:55 about like Newport you have commuters
1:29:57 and residents but the one up in the
1:29:59 highlands would really mainly be
1:30:00 residents you expand on that or that the
1:30:03 commuters are the residents um and so
1:30:07 just when you notice in the equity
1:30:09 impact assessment um the population
1:30:13 directly surrounding the school and thus
1:30:15 most impacted by the camera location um
1:30:17 is has a higher percentage of people of
1:30:20 color um in our community and so they
1:30:23 would be
1:30:25 sort of additionally impacted I don't
1:30:27 think it's a a the equity board did not
1:30:30 find it to be a significant concern that
1:30:32 would outweigh moving forward with
1:30:33 camera installation especially given
1:30:35 some of the other mitigating um factors
1:30:39 that the board discussed and that are
1:30:40 recommended in the impact
1:30:42 assessment and I think it was sort if I
1:30:45 can just rephrase a bit Dale is that the
1:30:48 the people that would be receiving
1:30:50 citations come from a population that we
1:30:52 are concerned about when we do an
1:30:54 analysis people who would benefit most
1:30:56 from this are the same people because
1:30:58 it's their neighborhood their kids go to
1:31:01 those schools they commute so the equity
1:31:03 board kind of
1:31:05 went yeah definitely is a h yeah um I
1:31:10 guess this brings up another question
1:31:11 too um do we have a sense of when so you
1:31:15 said we're required by state law I
1:31:17 assume to evaluate a speed zone safety
1:31:20 camera program you know when that
1:31:22 happens and if Council chooses to do two
1:31:26 locations could we not wait to do a
1:31:29 second camera until after the evaluation
1:31:31 of the first and would that or would
1:31:34 that be helpful at all or we're required
1:31:36 to evaluate them annually um you would
1:31:40 not need to wait you could you could
1:31:43 Implement a location without waiting for
1:31:45 an evaluation on another location that
1:31:47 wouldn't necessarily be an issue so
1:31:49 there wouldn't necessarily be any
1:31:50 benefit to waiting for the whatever the
1:31:53 data that comes out of an evaluation we
1:31:55 could move forward with two locations
1:31:58 there wouldn't necessarily be anything
1:31:59 that would come out of the evaluation of
1:32:01 Newport that might benefit how we
1:32:02 Implement gramr that we can think of off
1:32:05 the top of our head I suppose likely no
1:32:07 because the the implementation of the
1:32:09 program is is pretty standardized I
1:32:12 think we would likely do the same
1:32:14 behavior in terms of partnership with
1:32:15 the schools getting information out
1:32:17 there um and we wouldn't necessarily
1:32:20 change the installation of the C those
1:32:22 cameras also we're going to learn really
1:32:25 different things about the traffic on
1:32:26 Newport Way Northwest than we are on
1:32:28 Northeast Park Drive um just given that
1:32:30 the traffic itself is different you can
1:32:31 even see in those graphs of when traffic
1:32:33 Peaks and VA and when it valleys is
1:32:36 really different um so I can't imagine
1:32:38 that we would learn a lot about what
1:32:40 would occur on on Northeast Park from
1:32:43 Newport Way and vice versa um so that
1:32:46 order wouldn't necessarily matter I
1:32:48 think the big Focus um is Staff capacity
1:32:53 uh to
1:32:54 stand up and to process citations um you
1:32:58 know it was it was mentioned um by staff
1:33:01 that or there there's also there's a
1:33:03 legal requirement for the video to the
1:33:06 photos to be processed in a certain
1:33:07 amount of time in order to issue the
1:33:09 citations um so you can't have this big
1:33:11 big backlog that goes on for months and
1:33:13 months um and we would need to make sure
1:33:15 that we have the staff to do that so
1:33:16 standing up to simultaneously wouldn't
1:33:19 necessarily allow us to be in
1:33:21 compliance thank you appreciate that
1:33:24 additional questions Dale thank you for
1:33:26 doing that quick recalculation and
1:33:28 bringing the information back ah count
1:33:31 council member hun thank you uh it's
1:33:34 it's mentioned in our materials that uh
1:33:37 it would be expected because the
1:33:38 population that's going by the Grand
1:33:40 Ridge Elementary School is in that
1:33:42 neighborhood lives in that neighborhood
1:33:44 um that they would likely be faster to
1:33:46 respond to the camera and have less
1:33:49 violations which from a safety
1:33:50 perspective is absolutely what we want
1:33:53 so if if we as a council went with a
1:33:55 different option what would be the
1:33:58 approach to make sure that we still have
1:34:00 that safety Improvement those traffic
1:34:02 reductions what could we do differently
1:34:04 that we are not doing now to see that
1:34:07 behavior change if we didn't put the
1:34:09 camera there yeah one consideration and
1:34:12 we talked about this at Council
1:34:13 committee as well is with the Staffing
1:34:15 up of our Traffic Unit um is a more
1:34:17 active ipd traffic presence um in that
1:34:20 particular area um we would expect to to
1:34:23 see pretty quick Behavior change with
1:34:25 that as well um that's not something
1:34:27 that we can scale you know as we know
1:34:30 one of the reasons we pursue cameras and
1:34:32 as an intervention for more consistent
1:34:34 violations is that we need to have our
1:34:36 police in other parts of the city
1:34:38 responding to other emergencies um but
1:34:40 we know we are tra Staffing up this
1:34:42 traffic unit um so they potentially have
1:34:44 some capacity for that um that's one
1:34:46 other option we also um council
1:34:50 president Walsh pointed out to me and I
1:34:51 did not know this um that we recently
1:34:53 installed uh new uh speed along with the
1:34:58 flashing beacons um indicators of speed
1:35:00 on uh Northeast Park Drive that's new
1:35:02 and so we actually don't yet know the
1:35:04 impact of that we could evaluate to see
1:35:06 if that changes behavior in any sort of
1:35:08 way um maybe yes maybe no I think given
1:35:12 that that exists already on Newport Way
1:35:13 Northwest and we haven't seen the change
1:35:16 again the the the types of traffic are
1:35:19 different on those two stretches um
1:35:21 these are all sort of questions so
1:35:22 there's some more information we could
1:35:24 gather um but I would say probably the
1:35:27 most likely would be a sort of focused
1:35:29 Traffic Unit
1:35:32 intervention coun Deputy council
1:35:34 president D Michelle so following up on
1:35:37 uh City administrator Bob Kit's comments
1:35:40 about it it's already identified as a a
1:35:43 high traffic um some somewhat dangerous
1:35:46 area to begin with do we have any
1:35:49 flexibility uh about the time span um I
1:35:52 mean I I know if we have a set number of
1:35:55 hours but can we move those hours and
1:35:58 possibly um take some of those hours
1:36:01 into that uh where we do see a high
1:36:04 level of
1:36:05 traffic um
1:36:08 violations just a thought that that
1:36:12 perhaps as a public facility and we all
1:36:15 know that schools are used for public
1:36:18 meetings and all kinds of school after
1:36:20 school events all the time so even with
1:36:25 the fact that they are quote unquote
1:36:26 after school we know that there are
1:36:28 activities occurring during those
1:36:30 periods even though it's not school
1:36:33 hours y yeah I have to say I I don't
1:36:37 know the answer to that currently off
1:36:39 the top of my head I know that in other
1:36:41 jurisdictions where they so Lake Forest
1:36:43 Park for example they had a school zone
1:36:46 um they chose to change the designation
1:36:48 of that uh stretch of uh Road from a
1:36:52 school zone to a speed zone that's
1:36:54 allowed under the new law that as I
1:36:57 mentioned there's a this new law allows
1:36:59 for an expanded use of cameras um
1:37:02 there's some additional demonstration of
1:37:04 need that needs to be made um including
1:37:08 more citations more collisions uh you
1:37:10 saw in the data in the equity impact
1:37:12 assessment and also the data that was
1:37:13 shared um as part of the question and
1:37:16 answer we do have a good amount of
1:37:18 speeding um we haven't had a significant
1:37:21 number of collisions and actually
1:37:22 collisions are a big data factor into re
1:37:27 um Reen not like not renaming but taking
1:37:30 something out of being a school zone
1:37:31 into being a speed zone um and so I'm
1:37:33 not sure that we currently have the data
1:37:35 uh to reassign an area I'm not I think
1:37:38 we have some good I believe um leeway
1:37:41 over our school zone hours um I I'd have
1:37:44 to look into exactly what we would be
1:37:46 able to constitute as a school zone hour
1:37:48 um that could be changed at a later date
1:37:50 that's not something that we would need
1:37:52 to change um
1:37:54 right now yeah additional
1:37:58 questions okay I'm looking at council
1:38:00 member Joe not sending a question um is
1:38:03 there someone prepared to make a motion
1:38:05 yes madame mayor I moveed to authorize
1:38:07 the addition of one school zone safety
1:38:09 camera location by isqua Valley
1:38:11 Elementary School at Newport Way
1:38:13 Northwest and authorize the mayor to
1:38:15 enter into and execute an amendment to
1:38:17 the agreement with Vera Mobility to add
1:38:19 two cameras at this
1:38:21 location there a second
1:38:24 second been moved and seconded um is
1:38:28 there Council discussion and Council
1:38:30 remarks I would like to speak to it so I
1:38:32 wanted to move the uh motion as it came
1:38:35 out of committee because it was uh that
1:38:37 is what the majority of the committee
1:38:39 supported but I would like to move at
1:38:41 this point an amendment I would like to
1:38:43 uh and I have given Tisha the language
1:38:45 for that although I do wonder if my
1:38:48 language was slightly off at the end but
1:38:50 um Tisha I don't know if you can put it
1:38:54 um but I'd like to authorize the
1:38:56 addition of two school zone safety
1:38:58 cameras located by a isqua Valley
1:39:01 Elementary School at Newport Way
1:39:02 Northwest and B Grand rdge Elementary at
1:39:05 Northeast Park Drive phase the
1:39:07 implementation per the administration
1:39:10 suggestion and authorize the mayor into
1:39:12 to enter into and execute an amendment
1:39:14 to the agreement with Vera Mobility to
1:39:16 add and here's where I put two cameras
1:39:18 but I should have said four cameras at
1:39:20 this location at these locations
1:39:24 is there a
1:39:27 second second it's been moved and
1:39:29 seconded
1:39:31 um just checking in with the city clerk
1:39:33 but at this point in time uh those
1:39:36 speaking to this would be speaking to
1:39:38 what is up on our screen up here yeah
1:39:41 the amendment I'd like to speak to why I
1:39:42 want to amend the original can we also
1:39:45 see the original motion up there as well
1:39:48 yeah I was going to ask council member
1:39:50 Mart would we treat this as a substitute
1:39:52 motion so this would
1:39:53 Place
1:39:55 sure it's however makes sense I just I
1:39:58 wanted to see if I got a second for
1:40:00 making a change to what came out of
1:40:02 committee not just immediately try to
1:40:04 substitute what came out of committee
1:40:06 with my own
1:40:07 preferred so let's get the uh original
1:40:10 motion back up there as well and while
1:40:13 that is happening if the substitute
1:40:16 motion mover would like to comment on it
1:40:19 in the second let's go ahead and start
1:40:20 talking about it I I sure would so so
1:40:24 first off and foremost and I think
1:40:25 everyone understands this it's not about
1:40:27 the revenue it's about the safety of our
1:40:29 kid um and the question here is is it
1:40:32 better to have a given set of cameras or
1:40:34 not to have a given set of cameras um we
1:40:38 have shown that and I love Chris's Eagle
1:40:41 Eye on the money and I'm so glad he
1:40:43 found that I'm pretty sure that even
1:40:45 before he found that change the net
1:40:47 summary over five years for all of these
1:40:49 cameras is a positive cash flow to the
1:40:51 city um but as long as we can afford it
1:40:55 I don't care how much revenue it brings
1:40:57 and I care about if it increases safety
1:41:00 for our kids um a couple of the things
1:41:02 that were discussed whether over time it
1:41:06 would compliance would go up I consider
1:41:09 Second Avenue sort of an internal Street
1:41:12 in the sense that most of the people who
1:41:13 go up at I go to St Michael's Episcopal
1:41:16 Church everybody goes Past St Michaels
1:41:18 is going to the going to this high
1:41:20 school they're not they're not headed
1:41:22 south um
1:41:23 uh secondly the Cooper Jones active
1:41:26 Transportation safety account well if
1:41:28 25% of the um excess Revenue goes to
1:41:32 State funding that seems like a nice
1:41:34 Equity uh feature not a bug um in terms
1:41:37 of a Traffic Unit if I can if I can go
1:41:40 to the public and they say hey um we're
1:41:43 going to have two traffic officers and
1:41:44 you're going to put them sometimes at a
1:41:46 place where you could have a camera to
1:41:47 solve the same problem but you're going
1:41:49 to make them go up there and and and sit
1:41:52 up there when when you could solve solve
1:41:53 it with a camera that doesn't seem to
1:41:54 make a lot of sense and then finally on
1:41:57 speed reporting lowering of speeds oh
1:42:00 that it were so because if it were so we
1:42:03 wouldn't have our brand new speed bump
1:42:05 on Mount Olympus Parkway because we have
1:42:07 informed uh drivers of their speed going
1:42:10 up that hill for an eternity and it
1:42:12 didn't do any good so I believe uh and
1:42:16 and finally one last thing the hardest
1:42:18 part about my 15 years on this Council
1:42:21 has been when folks who lived on
1:42:24 Northwest oakrest Drive told us that we
1:42:27 could have had the opportunity to lower
1:42:29 speeds on Newport way and that they
1:42:31 believe that that would have saved the
1:42:33 life of a child now you can argue uh
1:42:37 whether that was the case or not but
1:42:39 lower speeds save lives and lower speeds
1:42:42 around schools make sense and so this is
1:42:45 why I was proud to make this amendment
1:42:46 and hope my fellow council members will
1:42:48 support the amended language thank you
1:42:50 thank you I'll go to the second would
1:42:51 you like to speak and then we'll open it
1:42:52 up all council
1:42:54 members thank you Madame mayor well I
1:42:58 agree with um council member Marts I had
1:43:01 similar reasons for um supporting this
1:43:04 second motion I think also uh the
1:43:07 administration and bringing forward this
1:43:08 phased option which addresses some of
1:43:10 the concern around the Staffing um
1:43:12 hopefully hopefully um alleviates some
1:43:15 of that concern as well and so I
1:43:17 appreciate the administration bringing
1:43:18 that forward um and the bottom line is
1:43:23 I think
1:43:25 that uh the it's a feature not a bug to
1:43:28 use council member Mars's language about
1:43:30 that it's going to reduce um the speeds
1:43:33 faster on Grand Ridge Elementary because
1:43:36 it is a neighborhood that um that a lot
1:43:38 of the folks are going to be repeated
1:43:40 users of that stretch of road so you
1:43:42 know if we if we're looking to improve
1:43:44 safety and we think that is going to be
1:43:46 achieved maybe even faster at the second
1:43:48 location um we're seeing the same unsafe
1:43:51 behaviors at both locations
1:43:53 um I agree with council member Marts and
1:43:55 and am supportive of doing both uh both
1:43:59 zones and doing them in a phased manner
1:44:01 to address the Staffing constraints
1:44:03 other council members uh council member
1:44:05 Ray um thank you um I just want to say
1:44:10 um something I think you said mayor
1:44:11 Paulie which was we are data driven and
1:44:14 values based data informed and value
1:44:16 driven I was close I'm going to get us
1:44:19 all cards because Dale and I have been
1:44:22 testing each other on remembering it
1:44:23 that way it's it's really good because
1:44:25 um the data is
1:44:28 um um became clearer clearer as the
1:44:31 discussion evolved but the values were
1:44:33 always there and this was never a a
1:44:35 revenue thing it never should have been
1:44:37 a revenue thing this was always a safety
1:44:39 thing and so I think I came into tonight
1:44:41 kind of on the fence of where I was
1:44:43 coming down and as the numbers broke the
1:44:45 way the numbers broke it became really
1:44:47 clear to me that you know we we can we
1:44:50 can address our traffic issues and we we
1:44:53 can do it in a cost um cost effective
1:44:56 manner so I think uh I think the
1:44:59 analysis was great and I think this is
1:45:01 the way to go and I think that there's
1:45:03 there's an opportunity with uh Grand
1:45:05 Ridge and there's an opport clearly an
1:45:07 opportunity down in
1:45:09 Newport you additional council member
1:45:12 Hall um clarifying question as a matter
1:45:15 of fact um so my only concern with the
1:45:17 sub and by the way the substitute the
1:45:19 vote we're about to do would be on the
1:45:21 sub to make this something that we vot
1:45:23 on is that right okay um my only concern
1:45:26 is Staff capacity which is something
1:45:27 that was brought up so just a clarifying
1:45:29 question on the options slide that was
1:45:31 presented uh it says option three add to
1:45:34 but stagger implementation which seems
1:45:36 very reminiscent to this and it says
1:45:38 adding second location in Fall 2026 to
1:45:41 address staff capacity issues so I
1:45:43 wanted to make sure we're all on the
1:45:45 same boat that this second phased in one
1:45:47 would be fall 2026 and then to ask the
1:45:50 followup we feel like that amount of
1:45:52 time would would allow us to address
1:45:54 staff capacity concerns is that
1:45:57 right yes so that is slightly different
1:45:59 than what city administrator Bob quit
1:46:01 said about fall
1:46:02 2025 um the recommendation from Court
1:46:06 staff um in particular was 18 12 to 18
1:46:10 months after the launch of One camera
1:46:13 would give get us through what is
1:46:14 considered to be in uh very official
1:46:16 terms the bump um that we would expect
1:46:19 to see in technically second time
1:46:22 offenders
1:46:23 um second time violator so you get that
1:46:25 first warning and then you get your
1:46:26 first real ticket um normally that like
1:46:29 getting to maturity takes about 12 to 18
1:46:31 months um and so that would bring us to
1:46:33 the beginning of the subsequent school
1:46:35 year if we were to launch um this the
1:46:38 first new location um in q1 or early Q2
1:46:42 of this
1:46:47 yes and uh thank you council member Hall
1:46:51 we have two left to comment let's go to
1:46:54 council president Deputy council
1:46:56 president thank you um uh my opinion
1:47:01 differs on this I do not find this uh
1:47:06 compelling that we have a safety issue
1:47:11 in these areas I think the information
1:47:13 that was presented to services safety
1:47:15 and Parks early on showing the
1:47:18 collisions and activities at red light
1:47:24 was compelling and was something that we
1:47:27 should take a look at but given that
1:47:30 there are very few collisions in these
1:47:34 areas
1:47:36 and what I see as over 90% compliance
1:47:41 with a lower speed um volume in these
1:47:44 areas and even you know looking at the
1:47:47 buckets only around 4% going more than
1:47:51 five miles over at I'm having a hard
1:47:54 time understanding that there is a
1:47:58 compelling safety need
1:48:01 here compared to the cost to our
1:48:04 residents and in this case I think it's
1:48:07 particularly for the area of the
1:48:10 Highlands where you're talking about
1:48:12 residents who are going through there
1:48:15 multiple times per day um through that I
1:48:19 also hearken back to in 2017
1:48:23 the isqua highlands residents brought
1:48:26 their neighborhood speeding concerns to
1:48:29 the city and at that time there was no
1:48:33 school's Zone safety camera presented as
1:48:37 an option and in fact it was said
1:48:39 enforcement options are limited The
1:48:43 Conversation Over multiple meetings that
1:48:45 was had was we
1:48:48 need neighborhood resident education and
1:48:52 so they proposed signage and um adding
1:48:57 pavement markings to the street and um
1:49:02 flags for crossing streets and so I just
1:49:07 between that and the conversation
1:49:11 originally about the red light cameras
1:49:15 and the data showing
1:49:20 the fairly small number in my mind mind
1:49:23 of um speed violations and potential
1:49:26 citations I'm just not seeing this as
1:49:29 compelling um compared to the cost of
1:49:32 our residents you know we have all heard
1:49:35 from residents about the area on 2
1:49:38 Avenue um and how frustrating it is to
1:49:42 get a ticket I understand that area
1:49:45 because you've got multiple schools down
1:49:48 there and you've got high school drivers
1:49:51 who potentially need a larger
1:49:55 ramification than
1:49:57 just you know going the speed limit to
1:50:00 um keep them in a safe Zone but I'm just
1:50:03 not seeing based on the data here that
1:50:06 we really
1:50:08 have a major issue with speeding I also
1:50:13 don't it like there are other schools
1:50:16 that we could have looked at so I'm just
1:50:18 I'm having a hard time with the decision
1:50:21 making on this and um at this point I'm
1:50:26 going to be voting against the idea of
1:50:28 either of the cameras but if there is
1:50:31 anything that somebody has to that they
1:50:34 find compelling I would be welcome to
1:50:36 hear it so council member D Michelle
1:50:39 it's whether you want to go last or
1:50:41 second last because I did miss council
1:50:43 member Joe yes let let council member
1:50:46 Joe go before me because I believe he
1:50:48 had his hand up before council member
1:50:50 Joe I'm sorry that I missed you
1:50:56 evening
1:50:58 um couple of things that I had kids that
1:51:01 attended IMS and um would walk them to
1:51:04 school from time to time and safety was
1:51:08 there because you had the the separation
1:51:11 from the road but um I I didn't feel
1:51:15 safe walking the kids to school and I I
1:51:19 think when we think about school zones
1:51:22 they're at 20 miles an hour because
1:51:24 that's the speed that if a car does make
1:51:27 contact with a child or another human
1:51:29 they're not going to
1:51:31 be seriously injured or or um more
1:51:35 injured than that and die potentially we
1:51:39 also have a significant elderly
1:51:41 population that goes from Hutchinson
1:51:43 house and some other facilities down
1:51:46 Newport way to go shopping at Safeway um
1:51:50 they're a population we haven't talked
1:51:52 about too much they're walking all the
1:51:55 way to Safeway along that route as well
1:51:57 so when I think of safety those are two
1:51:59 populations that I think are very
1:52:01 important to to consider and to um try
1:52:05 to keep um comfortable and secure in our
1:52:08 community and and welcome as
1:52:11 participants that can walk from place to
1:52:14 place I was originally supportive of the
1:52:16 the first uh motion coming out of
1:52:19 committee um council member marts
1:52:23 uh comments make a great deal of sense
1:52:24 to me so I'll be supporting the motion
1:52:26 this evening thank you thank you council
1:52:29 member Joe um Deputy council president D
1:52:32 Michelle uh thank you I will be
1:52:34 supporting the substitute motion as well
1:52:37 um and I too like council member Joe um
1:52:41 am uh grateful to council M Mars for um
1:52:44 for pushing this uh second um uh speak
1:52:48 camera um so it would be unanimous if we
1:52:51 were all together
1:52:53 again
1:52:55 um when this was first brought to our
1:52:57 attention and uh I I Drive Newport Way
1:53:00 almost every day and so that was sort of
1:53:02 just a no-brainer to me that that is
1:53:04 such a heavily traveled area and the
1:53:07 data again shows that a lot of people
1:53:09 are speeding there um and so that one
1:53:13 just absolutely makes sense um the
1:53:16 reason I was interested in exploring uh
1:53:18 the Grand Ridge area was because for
1:53:20 years and years I've heard from uh
1:53:23 parents and from uh other uh people that
1:53:26 this that that they felt that it was a
1:53:28 very dangerous place and then myself
1:53:30 driving up there in the dark and seeing
1:53:33 people speeding up there um uh when
1:53:37 there are pedestrians or when there is
1:53:39 an activity at Grand Ridge uh even
1:53:41 though it is maybe after hours uh
1:53:44 especially if it's raining and it's dark
1:53:47 it is really kind of scary up there so I
1:53:50 was interested in exploring that one in
1:53:52 addition um and um originally um the
1:53:57 idea that there were higher levels of
1:54:01 violations outside of the school hours
1:54:03 was my concern about taking that one but
1:54:07 um the more I thought about it the more
1:54:08 I thought uh part of this is normalizing
1:54:12 safe behavior um and if we can even if
1:54:16 it's during school hours begin to
1:54:18 normalize slowing down and staying
1:54:21 within the 20
1:54:22 M hour speed limit um uh perhaps we can
1:54:26 also impact that um area and then if we
1:54:29 can possibly look at Shifting the span
1:54:33 slightly I think that would be something
1:54:36 that we ought to explore and see if that
1:54:37 would uh also begin to normalize
1:54:41 um uh compliance speeds in that area so
1:54:46 I will be also supporting the proposed
1:54:48 substitute motion and um
1:54:53 I really love data informed values
1:54:57 driven wonderful that's a wonderful
1:54:59 statement getting you guys some coffee
1:55:00 mugs just say I'll take that coffee mug
1:55:04 so yes so thank you very much um Council
1:55:07 M Mar would you like a second round C
1:55:09 Merz I I would um I I just want to give
1:55:12 a little bit of history on this
1:55:16 um this issue I I first started talking
1:55:19 about concerns about Park Drive In about
1:55:23 2012 because I used to when I rode a
1:55:27 motorcycle full-time I would actually
1:55:29 have to pull off the side of the road
1:55:31 because people would tailgate me on the
1:55:33 way up Park Drive so aggressively CU on
1:55:37 a motorcycle if somebody Taps your back
1:55:39 wheel you're going under their car so
1:55:42 like half the time I would go up into
1:55:44 the highlands I would have to pull off
1:55:45 to let a tailgator get ahead of me and
1:55:48 uh so we've been talking about this for
1:55:50 a long time and one of the things and I
1:55:53 think it was mentioned um is the
1:55:55 possibility of a stoplight and you know
1:55:58 I'm at the point on Council where I'll
1:56:00 I'll think to myself we talked about
1:56:01 this three or four years ago and
1:56:03 somebody will tell me no it was 10 years
1:56:04 ago and I'm like okay well it's 10 years
1:56:07 ago we've been talking about a stoplight
1:56:08 in in that area for a long time so I
1:56:11 guess one of the things I would say to
1:56:14 Residents up there who are saying like
1:56:16 why is the council doing this to us you
1:56:19 know the alternative is to have a
1:56:20 stoplight there right and a stoplight I
1:56:24 I think a consistent 20 M an hour you
1:56:26 would like that more than you would like
1:56:28 a stoplight but we need to do um you
1:56:30 know we need to do something and this to
1:56:33 me is a is a fair way to do it and you
1:56:36 know I'm ready if if people up there
1:56:37 tell me that I'm I'm a grinch because
1:56:40 now they have to do the speed limit that
1:56:42 we've had in there already but we're
1:56:44 actually going to enforce it um you know
1:56:46 I can live with that uh but but to
1:56:49 please understand that the alternative
1:56:50 and may still it someday in the future
1:56:52 future be a be a stoplight and I think
1:56:54 it's going to slow you down through
1:56:55 there just as much as obeying the speed
1:56:57 limit would
1:56:58 thanks second round comments would any
1:57:01 other Council council member Hall yeah
1:57:04 technically at first since my my was
1:57:06 just clarifying comment and first Sor no
1:57:08 and totally fine um so I guess for me
1:57:12 it's just general comments I guess the
1:57:13 speeding data does seem compelling to me
1:57:16 I I guess in my mind and I definitely
1:57:17 didn't think this until today um you
1:57:21 know only takes one for there to be an
1:57:23 incident right and and if you accept the
1:57:24 claim that a school
1:57:27 zone describes a certain level of
1:57:31 uncertainty in the environment whereas
1:57:34 you might not be seeing something play
1:57:35 out in the data in terms of collisions
1:57:37 or um pedestrian near pedestrian misses
1:57:40 or something like that you accept the
1:57:42 claim that there is uncertainty in a
1:57:44 school zone then there are policy um
1:57:47 solutions that that can be used to
1:57:50 ensure that uncertainty is as certain as
1:57:53 you can be that was very circular but I
1:57:56 guess that's kind of where I'm thinking
1:57:58 at the moment um I appreciate the motion
1:58:02 and I think it makes sense though I
1:58:04 think I would personally I think I'll
1:58:06 probably vote no because I think I would
1:58:07 personally rather support the underlying
1:58:09 motion of moving forward with one
1:58:11 school's own camera at this time
1:58:13 especially since we wouldn't be
1:58:15 installing the second one until um going
1:58:17 into the fall of 2026 that might give us
1:58:20 some more time to understand the
1:58:22 evaluation of both um camera programs
1:58:26 what kind of exit criteria we might want
1:58:28 or exit success criteria we might want
1:58:31 for stopping a program um acknowledging
1:58:34 that that we're kind of built into these
1:58:36 term limits on the leases um and if
1:58:39 there are other schools to look at I
1:58:40 thought that was a good point um so to
1:58:42 me it just doesn't it makes sense to
1:58:44 might as might as well just do the one
1:58:46 and then wait and then have a broader
1:58:47 conversation including whether or not to
1:58:50 put this second camera at brand Ridge
1:58:52 since we have to wait some time there
1:58:56 um other things well actually the other
1:58:58 things I want to say I guess that can be
1:59:00 un the underlying motion right this is
1:59:03 more to speaking to this particular this
1:59:05 to the proposed substitute motion okay
1:59:07 well so that's what I'll say for now
1:59:09 okay that was council member Hall's
1:59:11 first round second round for anybody
1:59:14 else counc
1:59:16 Ray I have a second round question and
1:59:19 it deals with Contracting what's the
1:59:21 lead time
1:59:22 to um extend our contract with this
1:59:26 awfully wonderful group that does this
1:59:29 name I don't know I would have to get
1:59:31 back ver Mobility uh they're the ones
1:59:33 that currently operate our current
1:59:35 system uh we we renegotiate our contract
1:59:39 with them every five years on the
1:59:41 current camera we recently did that so I
1:59:45 I I think if your question is lead time
1:59:47 to negotiate a current addition yeah um
1:59:51 it does not take very long okay they are
1:59:53 ready to go okay so if we said let's uh
1:59:56 let's go tomorrow um within 3 months we
2:00:00 could have something up and run yeah I
2:00:02 me it will depend a little bit one of
2:00:03 the things that they consider is and and
2:00:05 they handle this but you know they do
2:00:07 all the installation um so Electric
2:00:10 hookup and things like that they are
2:00:12 they're they they are good friends with
2:00:13 psse um but um you know they they're
2:00:17 they're pros at this and they do this
2:00:19 for jurisdictions all around the area
2:00:21 may be pretty quick to act and what
2:00:23 about on the other side about are there
2:00:25 any um that you're aware of um
2:00:27 termination terms so if we we let's say
2:00:31 we set up a fiveyear contract with them
2:00:32 we say oh shs you know after three years
2:00:35 we're tired and we don't want to do it
2:00:36 anymore we are bound to a five-year
2:00:38 lease term at least for we're buy we're
2:00:40 buying it whether we use it or not we we
2:00:42 are buying it whether we use it or not
2:00:43 not for five years um we can turn we
2:00:46 could turn it off and eat the cost
2:00:48 purely of the lease um and not anything
2:00:51 else but
2:00:54 yes and Madam mayor members of the
2:00:56 council yeah if I could just add um we
2:00:59 want to make sure that the Outreach is
2:01:02 sufficient and so uh while the vendor
2:01:05 may be able to perform and have the the
2:01:07 technology in place we want to make sure
2:01:10 that if if we're moving forward with the
2:01:12 one at Ive that we've talked with the
2:01:14 neighbors we've talked with this the
2:01:15 school that there's been plenty of
2:01:18 opportunity because we would we don't
2:01:19 want people to say I didn't know or
2:01:22 they're going to say it anyway I guess
2:01:24 but that that that that we do our level
2:01:26 best to do that so um you know we would
2:01:29 come up with a a calendar um that would
2:01:32 match as close as possible the
2:01:33 technology but would error on the side
2:01:36 of making sure the community outreach is
2:01:41 complete okay Council right so um so I
2:01:46 wanted to kind of get some clarity on
2:01:48 lead time before making this comment but
2:01:50 if we really are talking about not doing
2:01:52 the second site until 2026 this is not a
2:01:56 decision we need to make today we have
2:01:58 plenty of time to make that in the
2:02:00 future um and that gives us time to
2:02:02 evaluate this is um thank you council
2:02:04 member Hall I that was very um
2:02:07 insightful gives us time to evaluate
2:02:09 whether this works it also gives us time
2:02:11 to um um fully assess and this Council
2:02:16 can decide you know a year from now that
2:02:19 it wants to move forward with a second
2:02:21 site and so we don't need to do that
2:02:22 today because we're not going to take
2:02:24 any action on that second site until
2:02:27 sometime probably in
2:02:29 2026 so there's there's there's you know
2:02:33 there's sort of about this thing about
2:02:35 urgency to make a decision because you
2:02:37 need to do it and then there's like well
2:02:39 I can I don't need to make that today so
2:02:41 if we're going with the phase if we were
2:02:43 going with the like we're going full out
2:02:44 we're doing it all we're going to be
2:02:46 ready for the 25 school year then we
2:02:49 would take action today but I think
2:02:50 we've got the luxury of some time and so
2:02:52 I'm kind of inclined to say if if our
2:02:55 mindset is we've got the luxury of time
2:02:57 let's just uh at this point um go with
2:03:00 one site and then we can come back next
2:03:03 year and um evaluate and say yeah let's
2:03:06 do another one so um we have a couple of
2:03:08 options here and I will go to council
2:03:10 president after um one of the options is
2:03:13 that the motion maker agrees to a
2:03:16 friendly amendment that suggests
2:03:18 installation of One cam camera and
2:03:20 referral the second camera back to his
2:03:23 committee that would allow the committee
2:03:25 to have a couple of touches before it
2:03:27 shows back up here that's an option one
2:03:30 option is to vote on this
2:03:32 motion have it pass or go down and then
2:03:37 consider it'll either be done or we'll
2:03:39 be looking at another alternate motion
2:03:41 so um is the motion maker wanting to
2:03:44 consider uh an amendment to his
2:03:47 substitute motion or or would you like
2:03:49 to just have a vote and move on to
2:03:51 another motion if it doesn't pass the
2:03:53 motion maker is very confused okay the
2:03:57 the motion maker uh didn't initially
2:04:00 have this phasing in there and was asked
2:04:01 to add the phasing the motion maker
2:04:04 thought the phasing would be as quickly
2:04:05 as possible and we seem to have morphed
2:04:08 into a fall of 2026 which was not at all
2:04:11 the motion Maker's intent the motion
2:04:13 Maker's intent was to phase it as soon
2:04:15 as next school year as soon as staff
2:04:17 could do it basically as soon as we got
2:04:19 past this hump which my understanding
2:04:21 was more like 3 to 6 months so that was
2:04:24 the motion Maker's intent which is why I
2:04:26 didn't put specific dates in there it
2:04:28 was as as as soon as we could because
2:04:30 it's a safety issue that was my intent
2:04:32 would um would it be appropriate this
2:04:34 time to take a break to allow you to
2:04:35 work with the city clerk on
2:04:37 clarification on your motion motion okay
2:04:40 how about we take a five minute
2:04:50 break
2:11:25 okay okay okay coming
2:11:29 back chance if you could flash when we
2:11:32 are live again that'd be
2:11:42 helpful so we are back on the air from
2:11:45 our break we've had some clarification
2:11:47 from our clerk I'm going to hand it back
2:11:49 to council member Marts thank you madam
2:11:51 mayor I would like to withdraw The
2:11:52 Substitute Amendment and move back to
2:11:55 the uh original motion that was seconded
2:11:57 is there any objection to the council
2:11:59 member withdrawing The Substitute motion
2:12:02 great that is off the table where we are
2:12:04 currently now is the original motion in
2:12:06 the packet has been moved and seconded
2:12:08 and council member marz you had
2:12:09 something you wanted to do thank you
2:12:11 Madame mayor I would like to propose uh
2:12:13 an addition to the original
2:12:15 motion and refer consideration of a
2:12:18 school zone speed camera at grandridge
2:12:20 elementary school to the services safety
2:12:22 and Parks Committee in first quarter
2:12:25 2025 is there a
2:12:27 second second it's been moved in
2:12:30 seconded council member Mars thank thank
2:12:33 you Madame mayor uh first of all I want
2:12:34 to thank council member Ray for pointing
2:12:36 out uh that the the timing on this that
2:12:40 there were question marks around the
2:12:41 timing uh on the original bill um my
2:12:45 understanding is that as I would like to
2:12:47 do this as soon as humanly possible but
2:12:50 there's a there's some question marks
2:12:51 around uh Staffing on the court side and
2:12:55 while there are these questions I would
2:12:57 like to give the administration time to
2:12:59 go have those conversations and come
2:13:01 back to the council once we have those
2:13:03 questions answered so that's why I moved
2:13:05 this uh this uh addition thank you
2:13:08 council member hunt you
2:13:09 seconded thank you Madame mayor I agree
2:13:12 with the motion Maker's intent with
2:13:14 council member Mar's intent I think the
2:13:16 intent of the proposed motion that we
2:13:18 were talking about minutes ago as well
2:13:19 as this motion is the same in my opinion
2:13:22 um and I uh look forward to hearing the
2:13:25 discussions out of services services and
2:13:28 safety um but um I'm on the same page as
2:13:31 far as both uh both school zones have
2:13:35 speeding issues and I would like to see
2:13:38 both of those addressed and as soon as
2:13:40 we can thanks opening it up to the other
2:13:42 five council members council
2:13:44 president thank you I'm wondering
2:13:46 thinking about this um potential
2:13:49 referral for services safety and parks
2:13:52 for a Grand Ridge Drive location or
2:13:55 Grand Ridge Elementary Park Drive
2:13:57 location um would it be possible to get
2:14:01 additional traffic um and potential
2:14:06 violation numbers for that location now
2:14:10 that we have um the
2:14:13 additional speed flashing there and um
2:14:17 would we anticipate potentially having
2:14:21 from the camera that would be already
2:14:25 launched or would it be
2:14:28 launched C president members of the
2:14:31 council we'll go back to the committee
2:14:32 and ask those questions and we'll ask
2:14:34 what the committee would like us to to
2:14:36 gather if they'd like additional
2:14:37 information they want to hear from both
2:14:39 the police department and the the court
2:14:42 on implementation timing I think from
2:14:44 council member Mars that was the primary
2:14:47 concern so we'll we'll see what the
2:14:49 committee has to say and if they'd like
2:14:51 us to come back with additional
2:14:52 information we'll come back and council
2:14:53 president I think it's always
2:14:54 appropriate for a non-committee member
2:14:56 to poke and prod their committee members
2:14:58 on additional information that would be
2:15:00 useful to you thank you for doing that
2:15:02 um looking at any other comments from
2:15:04 any other council members on this uh not
2:15:07 seeing council member Joe's hand up
2:15:09 nothing in the room I'll reread it the
2:15:11 motion that has been moved seconded and
2:15:14 uh a suggested amendment is to authorize
2:15:16 the addition of one school's Zone safety
2:15:18 camera location by Isa Valley Elementary
2:15:21 school at Newport Way Northwest and
2:15:23 authorized the mayor to enter into and
2:15:24 execute an amendment to the agreement
2:15:26 with Vera Mobility to add two
2:15:28 cameras and refer consideration of a
2:15:31 school's zone speed camera at Grand
2:15:32 Ridge Elementary School to the services
2:15:34 safety and Parks Committee in 1 quarter
2:15:37 2025 and the city clerk has a
2:15:39 clarification um so we didn't
2:15:41 technically vote to add that second that
2:15:44 referral that um or you could just ask
2:15:46 if there's any objection any obje to
2:15:49 amending
2:15:51 seeing negative head nods and a
2:15:56 yes who does not have a concern is that
2:15:59 correct council member Joe nod yes if
2:16:00 you do not have a concern with adding it
2:16:02 yes we got it we have it there is no
2:16:05 objection to that
2:16:07 addition okay do any council members
2:16:10 want me to reread that in
2:16:12 whole okay uh then let's go ahead with
2:16:14 the vote all those in favor say I
2:16:17 I thank you all those all those opposed
2:16:21 nay that carries 6 to one thank you city
2:16:24 clerk thank you Council for your
2:16:27 consideration
2:16:30 uh yes the N nay vote was council
2:16:33 president and council member Joe did we
2:16:35 uh get your
2:16:37 vote I voted in favor I'm sorry if it
2:16:40 didn't record oh there that's great it
2:16:42 is 6 to one with the council president
2:16:45 opposed um thank you for all of that
2:16:48 working our way through our
2:16:49 parliamentary process uh we and thank
2:16:52 you Dale lots of questions and um lots
2:16:55 of good answers from you we're moving on
2:16:57 to committee and Regional reports and
2:16:58 we'll start with council member
2:17:00 Joe thank you the Cascade water Alliance
2:17:04 board meeting was canceled because of
2:17:07 storm uh last
2:17:10 Monday
2:17:12 um I reviewed the uh applications for
2:17:15 the ltac committee for
2:17:18 2025 we had uh are two hotels that
2:17:22 applied again and I think it was
2:17:26 seven people to fill the other two spots
2:17:31 uh I went over the recommendations with
2:17:34 staff and those recommendations have
2:17:36 been passed on to the mayor for further
2:17:40 consideration and that concludes my
2:17:42 report thank you thank you council
2:17:44 member Joe counc member Hall uh no
2:17:47 report oh actually
2:17:49 um it is fired for East Side Fire and
2:17:51 Rescue it's fire chief evaluation season
2:17:53 so just uh as it heads up to the uh
2:17:57 other board members and alternates I
2:17:58 have a draft I'll send that out to you
2:18:00 for any feedback you might have feel
2:18:01 free to just add anything you'd like
2:18:02 into it and I'll include mayor Paulie
2:18:05 and city city administrator b quitz as
2:18:06 well if you have any feedback um for
2:18:08 that process and that concludes my
2:18:10 report thank you very much council
2:18:12 member hunt thank you madam mayor on
2:18:14 November 21st um the salmon Recovery
2:18:17 Council of Ria 8 our Watershed met and
2:18:20 and um the main the main business that
2:18:25 was conducted was that the uh long
2:18:28 serving chair of that committee who's
2:18:30 council member Stokes of Belleview um is
2:18:33 is stepping down he's done an amazing
2:18:35 job for many years uh leading that group
2:18:39 um and has done an amazing just amazing
2:18:41 leadership across all of the cities in
2:18:44 the Watershed um so he is stepping down
2:18:46 the current Vice chair uh Redmond city
2:18:49 council member Vanessa critzer will be
2:18:51 serving as the chair and um Bothel
2:18:55 council member carsten kurd will be
2:18:57 serving as the new Vice chair um that
2:19:00 was the main order of business we also
2:19:02 got a lot of uh interim updates on and
2:19:05 data on the salmon um salmon counts it's
2:19:09 a complicated mixed bag it's also not
2:19:12 the final counts and so um I'm happy to
2:19:14 pass along that data um but it's there
2:19:18 were some good results and there were
2:19:20 some results where we know we need to
2:19:22 continue to work on the habitat
2:19:24 restoration and make sure that we have
2:19:25 sustainable population so it was a a
2:19:27 mixed um mixed
2:19:30 results on uh the next meeting is
2:19:33 January 16th um of the ri s Recovery
2:19:37 Council and then on November 6th uh
2:19:40 which was after our first meeting in
2:19:43 November of this committee so um uh
2:19:46 because this meeting was later um today
2:19:49 so the Planning Development environment
2:19:50 Comm did meet on November 6th we had uh
2:19:54 one item which was the missing middle
2:19:57 housing bills and we considered a number
2:20:01 of policy questions around how we could
2:20:04 both address um
2:20:07 hb110 uh encouraging and supporting more
2:20:10 missing middle uh housing which is
2:20:12 duplex um up to sixplex um and and also
2:20:17 you know how can we make sure that we
2:20:18 have more adus and more options for
2:20:20 smaller unit across the community uh
2:20:22 while fitting those units into existing
2:20:24 neighborhoods as well as complying with
2:20:27 this um state law and doing all of that
2:20:29 in the recently updated title 18 there
2:20:32 are a number of pretty complicated
2:20:34 policy um questions that were proposed
2:20:37 and discussed by the committee and the
2:20:39 committee also recommended some
2:20:44 additional uh reconfiguring of different
2:20:48 questions so basically we wanted to make
2:20:50 sure that there was flexibility in the
2:20:52 code to allow for the market to um
2:20:56 decide what combination of units and
2:20:58 density and and those different um
2:21:02 requirements would be would be possible
2:21:04 to build and so we did ask um with that
2:21:08 in mind for more options to be brought
2:21:11 forward to the committee and also more
2:21:12 options to be um potentially considered
2:21:14 by our volunteer uh planning policy
2:21:17 commission um so there was some
2:21:21 items where we agreed uh we we wanted to
2:21:25 make sure that it was easy and um uh
2:21:29 easy and easily understood how to make
2:21:31 these units and that developers would be
2:21:33 able to do that um but then there were
2:21:35 some things where we felt like we needed
2:21:36 more options so that will uh likely
2:21:39 return back to that
2:21:40 committee um also the the state
2:21:43 requirements are
2:21:45 not uh required until um many months
2:21:49 later so there's no urgency on adopting
2:21:52 those um so we do have some time I think
2:21:54 it's May
2:21:56 2026 so that concludes um the the
2:21:59 Planning Development environment
2:22:00 committee report and there is no meeting
2:22:02 of that Committee in
2:22:03 December thank you council member Ray I
2:22:06 have no report this evening thank you
2:22:08 council member Mars thank you madam
2:22:10 mayor the sound cities Association
2:22:11 public issues committee met on Wednesday
2:22:13 November 13th from 7: to 9:00 p.m. on
2:22:16 the agenda included an update on
2:22:18 Regional Safety Action Plan an update on
2:22:20 Public Health Seattle King County
2:22:22 strategic plan and a discussion of
2:22:23 on-site sewage septic code revision no
2:22:26 action was taken the council services
2:22:29 safety and Parks committee was scheduled
2:22:30 for Tuesday November 19th as many recall
2:22:33 uh that was an interesting evening to be
2:22:35 trying to hold a committee meeting and
2:22:37 the administration wisely recommended at
2:22:39 2 p.m that we cancel it and my power
2:22:41 went out about 45 minutes before uh the
2:22:44 meetings uh scheduled start time and we
2:22:46 did not uh feel the need to reschedule
2:22:48 that meeting uh this my report thank you
2:22:52 Deputy council president D
2:22:53 Michelle uh thank you mayor Paulie um
2:22:56 the easts side Transportation
2:22:58 partnership met on November the 8th and
2:23:01 uh we received a report on the
2:23:03 sustainable airport plan and then the
2:23:06 remainder of the meeting was spent on
2:23:07 2025 legislative priorities and we had
2:23:10 quite a lively discussion for about 45
2:23:13 minutes on that and I distributed the
2:23:16 revised uh legislative priorities uh or
2:23:21 um City administrator uh Bob quitz did
2:23:25 uh in case you want to take another look
2:23:26 at those and see if there's anything
2:23:28 that raises a red flag for you just let
2:23:30 me know otherwise those will be adopted
2:23:33 at the December meeting um East Side
2:23:36 Human Services Forum met on November the
2:23:37 14th and a board the board adopted the
2:23:40 2025 legislative priorities document for
2:23:44 that group and that was also circulated
2:23:46 to you and again if you have uh any
2:23:48 concerns please let me know
2:23:51 um and then uh leadership was
2:23:53 transferred to the 2025 officers uh who
2:23:57 are Paul L uh who who's the CEO of
2:24:00 friends of Youth he will be the uh new
2:24:03 chair for
2:24:04 2025 uh Vice chair will be BW council
2:24:07 member Janice son and um Lindsay Yokum a
2:24:11 school board member from the Lake
2:24:13 Washington school district will serice
2:24:15 secretary and we had a very good
2:24:17 discussion on future directions for the
2:24:19 Forum in 201 25 under um under chair
2:24:24 lali's Direction and then unfortunately
2:24:27 I was not able to attend the regional
2:24:30 transit committee meeting because it was
2:24:32 on November 20th and for the very same
2:24:34 reason we had other things to take care
2:24:36 of that day and that concludes my report
2:24:40 thank you council president thank you
2:24:43 the puga sound Regional Council growth
2:24:45 management policy board um has cancelled
2:24:49 I know it's it's such a long acronym um
2:24:53 has cancelled their meeting for December
2:24:55 and won't meet until January the King
2:24:57 County affordable housing committee will
2:24:59 meet this Thursday from 2: to 3:30 p.m.
2:25:04 virtually and we have potential action
2:25:06 to approve the housing element plan
2:25:09 review comment letters for Renton Clyde
2:25:12 Hill and Newcastle and also potential
2:25:15 comment letters for cities that
2:25:17 submitted late did not submit or in the
2:25:20 process of growth Target reconciliation
2:25:23 we have some cities that aren't going to
2:25:25 get their comp plans done quite in time
2:25:27 um so we have to figure out what the
2:25:28 letter is there and then potential
2:25:30 action to adopt the 2025 affordable
2:25:33 housing committee State Legislative
2:25:35 priorities and that concludes my report
2:25:38 thank you there was no mayor's report
2:25:39 this evening because I felt it was more
2:25:41 important to give you a winter um a
2:25:44 storm update so thanks for Jared for
2:25:47 doing that we're going to move into good
2:25:49 of the order um does any council member
2:25:50 have anything to share for good of the
2:25:53 order I have a couple little things okay
2:25:57 I believe you received a copy of these
2:26:01 booklets today we have some samples on
2:26:04 some work that Economic Development did
2:26:05 about how to do business in isqua I have
2:26:08 two different versions because I have
2:26:09 one in Spanish one in English you have
2:26:11 the English version there um really
2:26:14 excited to see this kind of guidance
2:26:15 being prepared for our businesses and
2:26:17 the other thing councilman Ry and I went
2:26:19 to the economic Summit that the B
2:26:23 chamber had and we have some extra
2:26:24 copies of there I'll pass a couple down
2:26:26 here in case someone would like to keep
2:26:28 it that is one of the best um
2:26:31 forecasting seminars that is out here on
2:26:33 the east side so they do a really great
2:26:35 job um there are some upcoming Council
2:26:37 meetings the next regular council
2:26:39 meeting is Monday December 2nd
2:26:42 anticipated agenda items include public
2:26:44 hearing on the
2:26:45 20226 budget comprehensive plan periodic
2:26:49 update adop adoption city-wide strategic
2:26:52 plan 5-year update 2025 city council
2:26:55 calendar Council vacancy process and
2:26:59 timeline um lots of stuff at that
2:27:01 meeting
2:27:03 um the city administrator winon okay and
2:27:07 that was it for the good of the order if
2:27:09 you'd like to add something go ahead um
2:27:12 members of the council there was another
2:27:14 meeting missed and that was the
2:27:15 legislative breakfast um oh yes I I I
2:27:19 don't know that we would be able to
2:27:21 replicate it in December we might in
2:27:24 January the legislature doesn't uh uh go
2:27:27 into session until the 13th I think
2:27:30 that's the correct date so if you would
2:27:32 want to do something after the first of
2:27:35 the year we could try but I don't know
2:27:38 that we could find a date in the month
2:27:40 of DEC we had difficulty finding the
2:27:41 date we had um but I wanted to ask the
2:27:45 question or you just want to let it
2:27:47 pass and make it a uh victim of the
2:27:53 storm that's president is the reason
2:27:56 that we're having a hard time finding a
2:27:58 day because of
2:28:00 our recess or because of facility and
2:28:05 Staffing
2:28:06 and I I I I think that there was just an
2:28:09 indication that from the from our
2:28:11 Representatives that the beginning of
2:28:13 December was just better I mean with the
2:28:15 storm we could revisit that uh then the
2:28:19 question is to the council are you
2:28:21 looking are you okay to do that and how
2:28:23 late into
2:28:24 December would you want to do it or we
2:28:27 can have Council leadership talk about
2:28:29 this this week but while you're all here
2:28:32 I wanted to raise the issue yeah I think
2:28:33 it's good to hear from everyone at least
2:28:36 myself I'm interested in having the
2:28:39 event and you know whatever we can work
2:28:42 out I think our legislators recognize
2:28:46 what a
2:28:47 uh what an issue we have and it would be
2:28:50 good to get together on that that's my
2:28:53 Merz yeah I I mean I would like to still
2:28:56 see if we can do it in December um I've
2:28:58 Got U I have a surprising amount of
2:29:01 availability this particular December
2:29:03 thank
2:29:04 you okay well thank we'll get started on
2:29:08 we have some work to do um the next item
2:29:11 on our agenda this evening is an
2:29:12 executive session ID
2:29:15 1773 executive session property
2:29:17 acquisition per RCW 42.3 .11 per1 penb
2:29:22 ID 1772 executive session pending
2:29:25 potential litigation action to follow an
2:29:28 open session
2:29:31 um these items are expected to take
2:29:34 approximately 15 minutes and action is
2:29:37 anticipated follow an open session and
2:29:39 these sessions are closed to the public
2:29:42 so we will go into executive session at
2:29:47 and do we need to have a break before we
2:29:50 go into session we had a couple this
2:29:52 evening already okay so we will go right
2:29:53 in at
2:29:59 9:30 anyone who's not part of the closed
2:30:02 session will remain in the main meeting
2:30:04 and you're welcome to stay in the main
2:30:05 meeting until it's
2:30:07 reconvened
2:30:18 Clerk
2:58:47 what do we want a metal one or do we
2:58:49 want a ceramic do we want
2:58:52 travel okay audio is coming back
2:58:58 on we'll figure it
2:59:00 out and he's going to Blink
2:59:09 us okay we are back in Open session at
2:59:12 10 o'l and would somebody like to make a
2:59:16 motion that's president I move to
2:59:19 authorize the mayor to execute
2:59:20 separation agreements with those staff
2:59:22 whose positions were eliminated as part
2:59:24 of the 2025 2026 budget process as
2:59:28 discussed in executive
2:59:30 session second it's been moved and
2:59:33 seconded uh is there any Council
2:59:36 discussion not seeing any from council
2:59:38 member Joe or anybody on the
2:59:40 Das um all those in favor please signify
2:59:43 by saying I I I I those opposed
2:59:48 that carries unanimously there being no
2:59:50 further business we are adjourned at
2:59:53 10:01

Attendance

Council / Members (7)
Barbara de Michele
Zach Hall
Victoria Hunt
Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness)
Tola Marts
Chris Reh
Lindsey Walsh
Staff (4)
Wally Bobkiewicz, City Administrator
Andrea Snyder, Deputy City Administrator
Rachel Bender Turpin, City Attorney
Tisha Gieser, City Clerk

Motions and votes (2)

APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. a) ID 1740 - Accounts: Payables and Payroll of Nov. 25, 2024, $11,179,360.16 MOTION: Approved. Page 39 of 79 CONSENT CALENDAR c) 11-25-24 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page (0000) b) Minutes: City Council Regular Meeting, Nov. 4, 2024 MOTION: Approved.…
Moved by WALSH · seconded by DE MICHELE
Carried 7-0
In favor: Barbara de Michele, Zach Hall, Victoria Hunt, Russell Joe (Attended Virtually due to Illness), Tola Marts, Chris Reh, Lindsey Walsh
Authorize the addition of one school zone safety camera location by Issaquah Valley Elementary School at Newport Way NW and authorize the Mayor to enter into and execute an amendment to the agreement with Verra Mobility to add two cameras at this location; and refer consideration of a school zone sp…
Moved by (main motion as amended) · seconded by
Carried 6-1
In favor: de Michele, Hall, Hunt, Joe, Marts, Reh
Opposed: Walsh