Development Commission · Wednesday, October 15, 2025 · City Council Digest

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

Minutes of September 03, 2025

packet pp.5–9

Open packet at p.5 ↗

Staff report:

MINUTES DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 6:30 p.m. – Wednesday, September 3, 2025

4. PUBLIC HEARING

Site Development Permit Application for 60 Newport Way Townhomes, Quasi- Judicial (A)

Emily Medina, Senior Planner Cliff Low, Owner/Applicant Application No.: SDP23-00005; PRJ21- Location:60 Newport Way NW Parcel:2824069241 Applicant: Clifford Low Description: Site Development Permit NW. Public Hearing Order: · packet pp.11–751

Topics: Land UseTransportation

Open packet at p.11 ↗

Staff report:

STAFF REPORT Site Development Permit File No SDP23-00005 (PRJ21-00030) October 8, 2025

5. REGULAR BUSINESS

Vote on November Special Meeting Date

Emily Medina, Senior Planner

6. REPORTS

City Council Update

7. OTHER BUSINESS / ANNOUNCEMENTS

Upcoming Schedule

packet pp.753

Open packet at p.753 ↗

Staff report:

Development Commission 2025 Schedule (subject to change)

1051 segments .txt ↗

0:06 ↗ All right, good evening and welcome. I

0:07 ↗ would like to call the October 15th City

0:09 ↗ of Isqua Development Commission meeting

0:11 ↗ to order at 6:39 p.m. As a reminder, we

0:16 ↗ have a remote aspect to our meetings.

0:17 ↗ This means both staff and members of the

0:19 ↗ public may be participating in the

0:21 ↗ meeting meeting remotely via WebEx. For

0:24 ↗ those attending remotely, if you have

0:25 ↗ questions or issues, please send the

0:27 ↗ host a chat message or email staff at

0:29 ↗ emilyme

0:32 ↗ isqua wa.gov.

0:36 ↗ Excused absences for this meeting are

0:38 ↗ Commissioner Iicada, Brennan Price, and

0:41 ↗ Stancheek,

0:43 ↗ alternate member Jeff Mayo is filling on

0:45 ↗ as a regular member, and uh Commissioner

0:49 ↗ Foon is remote.

0:52 ↗ Our

0:54 ↗ first item of business is to take action

0:55 ↗ on meeting minutes for September 3rd,

0:57 ↗ 2025. Has everyone had a chance to

1:00 ↗ review the minutes?

1:02 ↗ How do we

1:05 ↗ talk to the people online?

1:08 ↗ >> Um, commissioners online, you can unmute

1:11 ↗ yourselves to speak. Commissioner Mayo,

1:12 ↗ if you could turn your camera on,

1:14 ↗ please. Thank you.

1:15 ↗ >> Sure.

1:20 ↗ >> Give me one second, please. having a

1:21 ↗ little difficulty. Just one second.

1:26 ↗ >> All right. Uh, all commissioners, are

1:28 ↗ are there any corrections to the

1:29 ↗ September 3rd minutes provided in the

1:31 ↗ agenda packet?

1:35 ↗ Hearing none, the minutes are approved

1:36 ↗ as submitted.

1:38 ↗ Next, I would like to open the floor to

1:40 ↗ any members of the public in person or

1:42 ↗ virtually who would like to make a

1:43 ↗ general comment, not about the 60

1:45 ↗ Newport Way project, but on general

1:47 ↗ topics. This will there will be an

1:49 ↗ opportunity later in the meeting for

1:51 ↗ those who would like to comment about

1:52 ↗ the project on tonight's agenda.

1:56 ↗ Miss Jackson, has anyone signed up to

1:58 ↗ make general public comments?

2:00 ↗ >> No, they have not.

2:02 ↗ >> Okay. Would anyone in person like to

2:04 ↗ make general public comments? Okay.

2:10 ↗ >> Is it a general comment or on 60

2:12 ↗ Newport?

2:21 ↗ Okay, then please wait. Yeah.

2:24 ↗ >> No, wait. Wait until later.

2:28 ↗ >> All right. No general comments.

2:32 ↗ The order of operation for this hearing

2:34 ↗ will be as follows. First, the purpose

2:35 ↗ of the public hearing followed by our

2:38 ↗ appearance of fairness doctrines. Then

2:40 ↗ we'll open the public hearing with a

2:42 ↗ staff presentation followed by applicant

2:44 ↗ presentation. Then open the floor to

2:46 ↗ public comment. Opportunity for rebuttal

2:48 ↗ by staff by applicant then staff and we

2:51 ↗ will close the public hearing followed

2:54 ↗ by commission deliberation

2:56 ↗ and commission action, motions,

2:58 ↗ amendments, discussions and vote. Then

3:01 ↗ we will conclude the agenda item on the

3:03 ↗ quasi judicial permit.

3:05 ↗ If for any reason the hearing cannot be

3:07 ↗ completed this evening, it may be

3:08 ↗ continued to a specific date.

3:12 ↗ The purpose of this public hearing is a

3:15 ↗ formal public hearing for the proposed

3:16 ↗ site development permit for 60 Newport

3:19 ↗ Way. The purpose of this hearing is to

3:21 ↗ solicit relevant public comment and

3:23 ↗ facilitate the review, discussion, and

3:25 ↗ decision on the application by the

3:27 ↗ development commission. This is a quasi

3:29 ↗ judicial hearing.

3:31 ↗ Miss Medina, please proceed with our

3:33 ↗ appearance of fairness disclosures.

3:48 ↗ There we go. Thank you, Commissioner

3:49 ↗ Sher. I'm just going to get my

3:50 ↗ presentation up and rolling.

4:00 ↗ [Music]

4:11 ↗ All right. So, we will go through the

4:12 ↗ appearance of fairness. If commissioners

4:14 ↗ online could just unmute themselves for

4:16 ↗ this portion to respond to each

4:17 ↗ question. Um, that would be great. I'm

4:20 ↗ Emily Medina, the senior planner with

4:21 ↗ the city of Isaakqua. Um, and in 60

4:23 ↗ Newport Way is one of my assigned

4:25 ↗ projects. Um so to go through uh the

4:28 ↗ parents of fairness the quasi judicial

4:30 ↗ decisions context um it requires

4:32 ↗ proceedings to be fair in fact and

4:34 ↗ appearance exparte contacts are

4:36 ↗ prohibited and the test is would a

4:38 ↗ disinterested person knowing the

4:40 ↗ totality of a decision maker's personal

4:42 ↗ interest in a matter be reasonably

4:43 ↗ justified in thinking that partiality

4:45 ↗ may exist. Decision makers who have

4:47 ↗ personal interest, prejudgment of issues

4:49 ↗ or partiality are disqualified from the

4:51 ↗ proceedings.

4:53 ↗ I will go through these questions one by

4:55 ↗ one for the commissioners. Um and if you

4:57 ↗ could just respond in the affirmative or

5:00 ↗ no if um how you agree with these. Uh

5:03 ↗ number one, do you have a personal

5:04 ↗ interest financial or otherwise in the

5:06 ↗ outcome?

5:07 ↗ >> No.

5:08 ↗ >> No.

5:10 ↗ >> Does your employer have an interest

5:11 ↗ financial or otherwise in the outcome?

5:14 ↗ >> No.

5:14 ↗ >> No. Do you have any familial, social, or

5:18 ↗ business relationships or connections

5:19 ↗ with any of the parties or nonparties

5:21 ↗ who have an interest in the outcome?

5:23 ↗ >> No.

5:24 ↗ >> No.

5:25 ↗ >> Do you have any special knowledge about

5:26 ↗ the substantive or the merits of this

5:28 ↗ proceeding which would or could cause

5:30 ↗ you to perure the outcome?

5:32 ↗ >> No.

5:35 ↗ >> Will there be any prospective employment

5:37 ↗ for you or your family as a result of

5:39 ↗ the decision?

5:40 ↗ >> No.

5:41 ↗ >> No.

5:42 ↗ Do you own or control property within

5:44 ↗ 300 ft of the subject property?

5:47 ↗ >> No.

5:48 ↗ >> No.

5:49 ↗ >> Have you had any exparte communications

5:51 ↗ regarding this project?

5:53 ↗ >> No.

5:54 ↗ >> No.

5:56 ↗ >> Do you believe you can sit and hear this

5:57 ↗ matter fairly and impartially both as to

5:59 ↗ the respective positions of the

6:01 ↗ proponents and the opponents of this

6:02 ↗ matter?

6:03 ↗ >> Yes.

6:04 ↗ >> Yes.

6:05 ↗ >> Yes.

6:06 ↗ >> Uh questions for the audience. Does

6:09 ↗ anyone in attendance wish to challenge

6:10 ↗ the participation of any commissioner

6:12 ↗ based on the parents of fairness

6:13 ↗ doctrine?

6:16 ↗ If you have any objection, raise your

6:17 ↗ hand. Or if we have any virtual

6:18 ↗ attendees, they can type objection into

6:20 ↗ the chat window. Do we have any virtual?

6:23 ↗ All right.

6:25 ↗ All right. Thank you. Now, I open the

6:28 ↗ public hearing at 6:45 p.m.

6:33 ↗ First, we'll proceed with the staff

6:34 ↗ presentation. Emily, I'll need to swear

6:36 ↗ you in. Please state your name and

6:38 ↗ position with the city for the record.

6:40 ↗ >> Emily Medina, senior planner. Do you

6:42 ↗ swear by oath or affirmation that the

6:44 ↗ testimony you are about to provide is

6:46 ↗ true? I do. Thank you. Please proceed.

6:49 ↗ All right. Good evening everybody. We're

6:51 ↗ here to talk about the 60 Newport Way

6:53 ↗ site development permit.

6:57 ↗ So I will go through my presentation if

6:59 ↗ it would proceed.

7:02 ↗ There we go. Um project information,

7:05 ↗ it's located at 60 Newport Way

7:07 ↗ Northwest. Um it's in the Isiqua Valley

7:09 ↗ neighborhood. Zoning is multi-family

7:12 ↗ medium and the land use designation is

7:14 ↗ multif family residential. Um this

7:17 ↗ project is vested to the 2022 is aqua

7:20 ↗ municipal code um which is included as

7:22 ↗ an exhibit to the staff report.

7:25 ↗ So a summary of the proposal. This is a

7:27 ↗ two buildings each has three units and

7:29 ↗ is three stories. Um the garages are

7:33 ↗ underbuilding garages and there is

7:35 ↗ frontage improvements included with this

7:37 ↗ um project which in includes rightaway

7:39 ↗ dedication to the city. Um the primary

7:41 ↗ access is off Newport Way Northwest and

7:43 ↗ that includes onto a private drive that

7:45 ↗ goes in between the two buildings on the

7:47 ↗ site.

7:50 ↗ So um again this is vested to the old

7:55 ↗ code. So the presentation order may look

7:57 ↗ a little bit different to commissioners

7:58 ↗ than the previous couple because um

8:00 ↗ we're not looking at our 2025 code. So

8:03 ↗ parking circulation um two spaces per

8:05 ↗ unit are required and two spaces per

8:07 ↗ unit are provided in the garages. Of

8:09 ↗ those spaces, 60% are allowed to be

8:11 ↗ compact and 25% are proposed to be so.

8:16 ↗ Non-motorized facilities are required on

8:18 ↗ site which is essentially pedestrian

8:20 ↗ access. Um on site the applicant has

8:24 ↗ requested an AAS which is an

8:26 ↗ administrative adjustment of standards

8:28 ↗ um to reduce their internal walkway from

8:30 ↗ the required 5t width to 3 ft of width.

8:33 ↗ This is in order to help them make their

8:35 ↗ um impervious surface coverage for the

8:37 ↗ site um and the staff report goes

8:38 ↗ through the criteria needed to um get as

8:42 ↗ approval. staff does recommend approval

8:44 ↗ and feel all these criteria are met and

8:46 ↗ that a 3-foot width um doesn't violate

8:48 ↗ any of our regulations or have a

8:50 ↗ negative impact on the project.

8:56 ↗ Residential standards um building

8:58 ↗ modulation is provided with the

8:59 ↗ balconies and entrances for each

9:01 ↗ building. It is compatible with the

9:03 ↗ surrounding residential character. Isqua

9:05 ↗ Valley has quite a few um threestory

9:08 ↗ multifamily developments within the

9:10 ↗ area. Um the staff report talks about

9:12 ↗ there's two single family homes right

9:13 ↗ next door um that are vastly different

9:16 ↗ um design uh styles um so it's not a

9:21 ↗ cohesive one that it needs to adhere to

9:23 ↗ in the adjacent areas. Um roof line

9:26 ↗ variation is provided in each building

9:28 ↗ and outdoor space is provided in two

9:30 ↗ locations. Um 288 ft required for

9:34 ↗ outdoor space and 3600 provided so far

9:37 ↗ exceeding the requirement. Um there is a

9:39 ↗ recommended condition around this to

9:40 ↗ create usability within the common

9:42 ↗ outdoor space. Um right now the spaces

9:45 ↗ are heavily landscaped um and don't the

9:48 ↗ staff doesn't feel it meets the intent

9:49 ↗ of a usable outdoor space. The

9:52 ↗ recommendation in the condition is for

9:53 ↗ the northwest space which you see on

9:55 ↗ your screen there to be revised to

9:57 ↗ create some usability. Um that that

9:59 ↗ space is recommended as the other

10:01 ↗ outdoor space um is not as accessible

10:03 ↗ and the outdoor spaces need to be able

10:05 ↗ to meet ADA standards.

10:08 ↗ For landscaping and trees, type three

10:10 ↗ perimeter landscaping is required um

10:12 ↗ which is along every setback and is

10:14 ↗ provided. Tree retention is required at

10:16 ↗ 25% and 53% is proposed. Replacement

10:20 ↗ trees are required for one tree for

10:22 ↗ every 6 in of tree removed. Um 27 trees

10:26 ↗ are required but only 22 are proposed.

10:28 ↗ So there is a condition to add five

10:29 ↗ extra trees to the site.

10:32 ↗ As far as environmental protection,

10:34 ↗ Isiqua Creek runs adjacent to this site.

10:37 ↗ Uh it is a shoreline of the state and it

10:39 ↗ has a 150 or excuse me, a 100 foot

10:41 ↗ buffer and a 15-ft building setback.

10:44 ↗ There's no development proposed in the

10:45 ↗ buffer or the setback. Um and there is a

10:48 ↗ separate shoreline permit that is

10:49 ↗ required and has been issued and

10:51 ↗ approved um for the project.

10:55 ↗ For lighting, there's a couple standards

10:56 ↗ that apply when it comes to multif

10:58 ↗ family. Um these are mostly centered

10:59 ↗ around the common area including the

11:01 ↗ foot candles required which is how um

11:03 ↗ bright a space is essentially phototric

11:06 ↗ and anal phototric analysis and cut

11:08 ↗ sheets will be required with

11:09 ↗ construction permitting. Um this is very

11:11 ↗ typical of our process that lighting is

11:12 ↗ specified during construction

11:14 ↗ permitting.

11:16 ↗ Um as this was the vested 2022 code we

11:19 ↗ use the design criteria checklist. Um

11:22 ↗ not going to go through every item on

11:24 ↗ there but I just broke it down by the

11:25 ↗ section headers. Um so it complies with

11:28 ↗ every section. Um the service and

11:30 ↗ storage areas isn't applicable and then

11:32 ↗ for landscape design um it complies as

11:34 ↗ conditioned as there is a recommended

11:35 ↗ condition around creating that usable

11:37 ↗ open space. Um the design criteria

11:40 ↗ checklist is included as exhibit A to

11:42 ↗ the staff report that goes through every

11:43 ↗ item.

11:47 ↗ So SEIPA environmental review um was

11:50 ↗ completed for this project. A

11:51 ↗ determination of non-significance was

11:53 ↗ issued in April of 2024. One comment

11:55 ↗ from neighbors was received with

11:57 ↗ concerns about construction dust and

11:59 ↗ materials um that staff responded to and

12:01 ↗ there was no appeal um associated.

12:05 ↗ So tonight the commission's possible

12:07 ↗ actions are approve as proposed, approve

12:10 ↗ with revised andor conditional or

12:12 ↗ additional conditions and deny. Um I've

12:15 ↗ created a recommended motion um which I

12:17 ↗ can leave up after the applicant

12:19 ↗ presentation and then bring up again

12:21 ↗ later. Um before I go to any questions,

12:24 ↗ since we do have two virtual attendants,

12:26 ↗ I just want to remind our virtual

12:28 ↗ attendees to unmute yourselves if you

12:30 ↗ would like to talk and um make sure that

12:32 ↗ when we're having discussion tonight to

12:35 ↗ give each other longer pauses to allow

12:37 ↗ our virtual commissioners to jump in and

12:39 ↗ there seems to be just a little bit of a

12:40 ↗ lag. So, we just want to make sure we're

12:42 ↗ having time for each other. All right,

12:45 ↗ with that, is there any questions?

12:48 ↗ >> No questions.

12:50 ↗ I do have one question just on the

12:51 ↗ timing. Um curious have in 22 and and a

12:56 ↗ sea permit and 24 and then to now how

12:59 ↗ long or why so long and you know

13:02 ↗ >> it was a long process. Um this condition

13:05 ↗ was not originally mine. It was a

13:06 ↗ planner um who's no longer with the

13:07 ↗ city. But uh from my understanding it

13:10 ↗ came in and there was a lot of confusion

13:12 ↗ and back and forth with the city about

13:14 ↗ um what the original proposal was if it

13:17 ↗ was allowed or not. Um, and that took up

13:19 ↗ quite a chunk of time of just figuring

13:22 ↗ out the gray area of our code of what

13:24 ↗ wanted to be done, if that was allowed.

13:26 ↗ And then the project was then revised to

13:29 ↗ meet standards. And so it just had a it

13:31 ↗ had a long lead time and a healthy chunk

13:34 ↗ of that had to do with some internal

13:36 ↗ staff discussions around um what was

13:38 ↗ allowed on site

13:40 ↗ >> and it's still in process. The previous

13:42 ↗ guidelines remain.

13:44 ↗ >> Yes.

13:45 ↗ >> Yeah.

13:45 ↗ >> Yes.

13:46 ↗ >> Okay.

13:47 ↗ >> Yes. They submitted a building

13:48 ↗ application with their SB. So that ve

13:50 ↗ that's what vested them to the previous

13:52 ↗ code is that their building permit um is

13:54 ↗ in process as well right now.

13:56 ↗ >> Great. Thank you.

13:57 ↗ >> You're welcome.

13:59 ↗ >> Question on the staff report. Uh page 12

14:02 ↗ of the report. It's on the traffic

14:04 ↗ analysis.

14:05 ↗ It says it was submitted to the city for

14:07 ↗ review which listed net new vehicle

14:09 ↗ trips as 2.12

14:11 ↗ per the IT trip generation manual. Could

14:14 ↗ you explain what that means? Does that

14:15 ↗ mean two trips per unit or

14:18 ↗ >> No, I um from my understanding I would

14:21 ↗ say that it so it is the net new trips

14:24 ↗ is the afternoon um PM peak hour trips

14:27 ↗ and they are given credit for the use

14:28 ↗ that was already on site. So there was a

14:30 ↗ use already on site. So that would

14:32 ↗ reduce the amount of um new trips.

14:35 ↗ Beyond that I would have to talk to our

14:37 ↗ engineer to get a better understanding

14:38 ↗ of it. But that that is my

14:40 ↗ understanding.

14:41 ↗ >> Yeah. the use that was already on site.

14:43 ↗ Is that a single family dwelling?

14:45 ↗ >> I believe it was a single family

14:46 ↗ dwelling. Yes.

14:47 ↗ >> So, here we have 12 autos in these

14:50 ↗ units, but only a difference of two

14:52 ↗ trips per day.

14:53 ↗ >> The trip manual bases it not on the

14:56 ↗ amount of cars that are on site, but but

14:58 ↗ on the the use um of the site. So, it

15:02 ↗ would be I believe the use would be

15:03 ↗ single family attached and then that

15:05 ↗ assigns a number of trips per unit

15:08 ↗ >> um which is

15:10 ↗ >> lower than one. And I can't remember the

15:11 ↗ exact amount. And then those are added

15:13 ↗ together.

15:13 ↗ >> Okay.

15:19 ↗ >> I see. I see.

15:21 ↗ >> Okay. Um

15:22 ↗ >> so there was a higher volume than a

15:24 ↗ single family house. Okay. Okay. That

15:27 ↗ explains it. Thank you.

15:29 ↗ >> Uh I have a question on the maximum

15:31 ↗ density.

15:32 ↗ >> Sure.

15:33 ↗ >> Uh it says

15:35 ↗ um units per acre. I think it's 5.66 66

15:39 ↗ but then proposed is six. Is that

15:43 ↗ >> um our code specifies that we um.5 is

15:46 ↗ the limit and we round up above that and

15:48 ↗ round down below it.

15:49 ↗ >> Okay. Thanks.

15:51 ↗ Any other commission questions?

15:54 ↗ Thank you. Now we'll proceed with the

15:56 ↗ applicant's presentation.

16:00 ↗ So you can come up here and speak into

16:02 ↗ the microphone so our um online can hear

16:05 ↗ you. And I will Are you going to hand

16:06 ↗ out

16:07 ↗ I sure can. I Why don't you hand those

16:10 ↗ out and I'll pull it up on my computer

16:11 ↗ for the ones online. It's the

16:14 ↗ elevations.

16:18 ↗ >> I I'll I'll pull it up online for them.

16:20 ↗ Don't know.

16:36 ↗ >> All right. I will need to swear you in.

16:39 ↗ Please state your name for the record.

16:41 ↗ >> My My name is Clifford Low.

16:44 ↗ >> And do you swear by oath or affirmation

16:46 ↗ that the testimony you're about to

16:47 ↗ provide is true?

16:48 ↗ >> I do. Thank you. Please proceed.

16:51 ↗ >> Thank you. Thank you, commissioners, and

16:52 ↗ Emily for that presentation. Guests, my

16:55 ↗ name is Cliff Lowe, and um I live in

16:58 ↗ Isukqua. We moved here a couple years

17:00 ↗ ago. We're super excited about the

17:02 ↗ community, born and raised in this area.

17:04 ↗ Um I'm proposing that we develop two

17:08 ↗ triplexes at 60 Newport Way. It's

17:11 ↗ replacing a office space, garage, and um

17:17 ↗ I think originally it was zoned built as

17:20 ↗ a single family home. And so it's a

17:22 ↗ roughly a quarter acre um 17,000 square

17:25 ↗ ft. Um we've kind of gone through the

17:28 ↗ process. It's I you brought up a good

17:30 ↗ point. It's been a few years. There's

17:31 ↗ been some delays as we're kind of

17:33 ↗ working through the code. So that's why

17:35 ↗ the the old code is in place. Um, but

17:38 ↗ basically I think most of the things

17:39 ↗ have been covered by Emily. Um, I think

17:42 ↗ the key thing is that we are super

17:44 ↗ excited about the fact that it's this

17:46 ↗ it's a high walking area. It's just

17:49 ↗ right off Sunset. And so um, what we're

17:52 ↗ excited about is it gives access to the

17:54 ↗ actual urban core um, of Isiqua through

17:57 ↗ the through um, just high walkability.

18:00 ↗ Um, I think most of the key things are

18:02 ↗ going on. It's gone through the

18:03 ↗ concurrency process and and SEPHA. So,

18:07 ↗ um I think we've done most the work

18:09 ↗ that's necessary. Um but we wanted to uh

18:12 ↗ have this opportunity obviously just to

18:14 ↗ answer any questions you guys might

18:15 ↗ have. Um hopefully you guys have had an

18:17 ↗ opportunity to to read the staff report.

18:19 ↗ I know some of the neighbors are here so

18:21 ↗ they have additional questions. Um feel

18:23 ↗ free to ask.

18:28 ↗ >> One question. Do are there any issues

18:29 ↗ you have with the conditions that have

18:31 ↗ been added to the staff report?

18:33 ↗ >> No. No, they seem totally reasonable. So

18:36 ↗ yeah, we'll be adjusting the open space

18:39 ↗ uh with the landscape plan. And I think

18:41 ↗ one of the things that can also be used

18:42 ↗ is the is the decks part of the open

18:45 ↗ space. So it makes sense because one of

18:46 ↗ the issues is how accessible it is. And

18:49 ↗ I think the decks will cover part of it.

18:51 ↗ But we'll definitely be reworking the

18:53 ↗ landscape to meet those needs.

18:57 ↗ Oh, and I think one of the questions is

18:59 ↗ um we want to make sure that the that um

19:02 ↗ Jean's um Jean, what's your last name?

19:06 ↗ >> McMullen. She has a property on the

19:08 ↗ southeast corner of our property and

19:11 ↗ part of her drain field um intrudes onto

19:13 ↗ our property. And so we want to make

19:15 ↗ sure that um that we don't infringe on

19:19 ↗ that. But I think one of the things

19:20 ↗ we've talked about is granting an

19:22 ↗ easement so that in the future if she

19:24 ↗ wants to tap into the public uh sewer

19:27 ↗ system, she can work on that.

19:31 ↗ >> Yes.

19:32 ↗ >> Question for you. Uh on the color board

19:34 ↗ there's material called Avante aluminum

19:36 ↗ and glass garage. Is that material

19:39 ↗ that's going to be used on the garage

19:40 ↗ doors?

19:41 ↗ >> I think so. Yes, that's I didn't bring

19:44 ↗ the color bar, but yes. And I know that

19:46 ↗ when I was talking to Vicki um Valerie,

19:49 ↗ she said that there's some there's you

19:51 ↗ can play with it a little bit. So those

19:53 ↗ that was the plan um a year and a half

19:55 ↗ ago, two years ago, but um Okay.

19:59 ↗ Appreciate uh the new colored elevations

20:02 ↗ that you provided for us uh especially

20:05 ↗ the printed ones tonight. They seem to

20:06 ↗ have a little bit more detail than the

20:08 ↗ ones we received earlier. Yes.

20:10 ↗ >> Yeah. And I'm especially looking at uh I

20:13 ↗ guess it would be the south end of

20:14 ↗ building one right there. In the view

20:17 ↗ before it had the appearance of almost a

20:20 ↗ building back with almost no detail in

20:23 ↗ it. But here I can see a couple of

20:24 ↗ materials and some vertical uh

20:27 ↗ separation and so on that adds variation

20:29 ↗ to that that. So that's important

20:32 ↗ because I think with the Newport Way

20:35 ↗ corridor project, we'll have lots more

20:36 ↗ people walking and biking there. And so

20:39 ↗ we wouldn't want a building that looks

20:41 ↗ like the back of a building, but it

20:42 ↗ looks as though you have that covered

20:44 ↗ here. So

20:44 ↗ >> yeah. No, I I do like how they turned

20:46 ↗ out. Actually, let me provide um my

20:48 ↗ email address because some of the people

20:50 ↗ that are online may want access to it.

20:52 ↗ We provided this packet in print. I

20:54 ↗ didn't think to to create an electronic

20:56 ↗ version. So my email address is cliff cl

20:59 ↗ i ff m as in michael lwgmail.com.

21:04 ↗ So feel free to reach out with any

21:05 ↗ questions or if you'd like that packet I

21:07 ↗ can send it to you. Also notice that uh

21:10 ↗ on the color board some of the material

21:12 ↗ colors weren't exactly like these. The

21:15 ↗ the roofing material onx black for

21:18 ↗ example looks like pure black in in the

21:21 ↗ color board but in the various

21:23 ↗ elevations here we have a lighter color.

21:25 ↗ >> Yes. So

21:27 ↗ you have a sense of which it might be.

21:30 ↗ >> We're we're moving more towards the

21:32 ↗ definitely towards the colored ones that

21:33 ↗ you

21:34 ↗ >> that we see here. Okay, that's great.

21:35 ↗ >> Exactly. That's great.

21:36 ↗ >> So

21:39 ↗ >> I think the contrast is much nicer. So

21:45 ↗ >> any commissioner questions online?

21:48 ↗ >> No questions.

21:55 ↗ in person. You guys

21:58 ↗ all right? Thank you.

21:59 ↗ >> Thank you.

22:00 ↗ >> Now, we'll move into the public comment

22:02 ↗ portion of the hearing. Miss Jackson,

22:04 ↗ has anyone signed up to comment on this

22:06 ↗ topic?

22:07 ↗ >> No, they have not.

22:08 ↗ >> Okay. Well, I see we have people in

22:10 ↗ person. So, um

22:13 ↗ >> do I remain here or do I?

22:14 ↗ >> Uh you can take a seat and then if

22:16 ↗ there's a question you need to answer,

22:17 ↗ you return up here. Thank you.

22:20 ↗ >> All right.

22:22 ↗ For those making comment in person,

22:24 ↗ please direct your comments to the

22:25 ↗ development commission and not

22:26 ↗ individuals. For in-person attendees,

22:29 ↗ you will need to step to the lectern.

22:32 ↗ When is your turn to speak, state your

22:34 ↗ name, speak clearly and pause frequently

22:36 ↗ and limit your comments to 5 minutes.

22:39 ↗ Personal attacks, obscene language,

22:41 ↗ derogatory remarks, and disruptive

22:42 ↗ behavior such as shouting, bullying,

22:44 ↗ clapping, and stomping feet will not be

22:46 ↗ permitted.

22:49 ↗ Is there anyone in person who would like

22:51 ↗ to speak

22:56 ↗ >> to this right here in the middle? Yeah.

23:02 ↗ >> Uh yeah. Um my name is Tenjian Kai. Uh

23:06 ↗ I'm the property owner in the 25.

23:12 ↗ Yeah. My name is Tenjian Kai. Uh I'm the

23:15 ↗ property owner in the 255 northwest

23:18 ↗ outer court. It's in the immediate north

23:21 ↗ of this project. Um so my cons uh I have

23:26 ↗ three concerns for this project. The

23:28 ↗ first one is the solar access. Um uh the

23:33 ↗ new town the new threetory townhouse

23:35 ↗ will be only a few feet uh close to the

23:40 ↗ border. So it seems like during the

23:43 ↗ winter time my home will be covered in

23:45 ↗ the shade for the entire day for months.

23:48 ↗ Uh so so I'm I want to know if the

23:52 ↗ developer have any plan to improve that.

23:56 ↗ Uh the second one is the privacy. Um I

24:00 ↗ saw in the in in the plan there are a a

24:05 ↗ big living room window as well as two

24:07 ↗ bedroom window that uh in the north side

24:10 ↗ of the townhouse. Uh these windows can

24:13 ↗ easily look look into my bedroom window

24:17 ↗ and the living room window. Uh as I

24:21 ↗ don't see the the windows in the in the

24:24 ↗ other townhouse in the north side of the

24:26 ↗ other townhouse. I want to know if the

24:29 ↗ developer can align this design and

24:31 ↗ remove these windows. Uh the third one

24:34 ↗ is the uh traffic. Um there will be a

24:39 ↗ new driveway in this prop in this

24:41 ↗ project and this driveway uh turns 90

24:45 ↗ degrees and it will directly point to my

24:49 ↗ uh bedroom window. So I'm worrying about

24:52 ↗ the headlights as well as the noise to

24:56 ↗ come into my home because there's no

24:58 ↗ buffer and the driveway directly go to

25:00 ↗ their borders. Yeah. Uh these are my

25:04 ↗ concerns. Thank you.

25:06 ↗ >> Thank you.

25:09 ↗ >> Would anyone else present like to speak?

25:15 ↗ >> Good evening. I'm Jean McMullen. own the

25:18 ↗ house just to is that north? You said

25:20 ↗ north

25:21 ↗ >> east

25:23 ↗ >> south

25:24 ↗ >> southeast

25:25 ↗ >> southeast.

25:26 ↗ >> And I'm Katie McMullen. I'm her daughter

25:28 ↗ >> and she lives in the house that's next

25:30 ↗ door. Um

25:33 ↗ >> third generation of owning that house.

25:35 ↗ Um our our main concern is the water

25:38 ↗ line runs through Cliff's property and

25:40 ↗ we are also on a septic. Um

25:44 ↗ concerns about being able to hook up. I

25:47 ↗ have found that I do have an easement

25:50 ↗ through Dalbotton's property that was

25:52 ↗ purchased by the city but um

25:56 ↗ I just

25:57 ↗ >> we're

26:00 ↗ trying not to be an island but next to

26:02 ↗ the city uh next to the creek. Cliff,

26:04 ↗ thank you for addressing that earlier.

26:05 ↗ I'm not supposed to talk to

26:07 ↗ >> Yeah, thank you for addressing that

26:09 ↗ earlier. Um but our main concern is

26:11 ↗ accessibility to city sewer, city water,

26:15 ↗ um should we need that in the future and

26:17 ↗ what that looks like with development in

26:19 ↗ between us and Newport Way.

26:22 ↗ >> We met with Patrick Kenny and Elaine

26:24 ↗ came out and said that our waterline

26:27 ↗ would be protected. Um so that needs to

26:30 ↗ be addressed somehow with the final

26:33 ↗ plan. Um and then uh parking is a

26:37 ↗ concern for us because of the park that

26:41 ↗ has been created back there. Um two cars

26:44 ↗ per unit uh per square footage. We

26:47 ↗ realize there will probably be some kids

26:49 ↗ or teenagers or whatever and they will

26:52 ↗ most likely come back to park on the

26:54 ↗ back um on our driveway.

26:57 ↗ >> Yeah, if looking at it, our driveway

26:59 ↗ extends to Jen's driveway and that

27:01 ↗ street on Alder. Um, so the concern

27:05 ↗ would be the pass through on our uh

27:07 ↗ driveway.

27:10 ↗ >> Those are our concerns. Thank you.

27:12 ↗ >> All right. Thank you.

27:19 ↗ >> And is there anyone else who would like

27:21 ↗ to speak?

27:23 ↗ Okay.

27:25 ↗ Um, does the applicant have any rebuttal

27:28 ↗ to these comments?

27:36 ↗ Yeah, sure. I I appreciate those

27:38 ↗ comments. So, a couple things. I um Jen

27:40 ↗ is Jen.

27:42 ↗ >> Yeah. So, I will provide the renderings

27:44 ↗ so he can see. Just be prepared. I think

27:46 ↗ there's like 50 ft of distance, not so I

27:50 ↗ get that it's feels intrusive. So, but

27:52 ↗ I'll at least get provide those

27:53 ↗ renderings for you. And then yeah, I

27:55 ↗ think in the staff report they requires

27:57 ↗ that we and we would absolutely make

27:59 ↗ sure that your water lines protected and

28:01 ↗ so I think that's part of the purpose of

28:03 ↗ creating an easement. I think one of the

28:04 ↗ reasons when when we originally applied

28:06 ↗ is we wanted to immediately add you as

28:08 ↗ part of the project but the problem is

28:11 ↗ that you are in the um the is it called

28:13 ↗ the native growth area? It the wetland

28:16 ↗ buffer and so if we applied it brings

28:19 ↗ all the wetland issues involved. Um but

28:22 ↗ if we provide an easement then you can

28:24 ↗ apply for to access the sewer line so we

28:28 ↗ can bring it pretty close to the wet

28:30 ↗ wetland buffer and so that'll allow this

28:33 ↗ is just a sewer line waterland will be

28:35 ↗ will be will be added but I think that's

28:37 ↗ the it's a really good solution. The

28:39 ↗ reason why I think it's a good solution

28:40 ↗ is that you can continue to use the

28:42 ↗ septic system until it fails and then

28:44 ↗ when it fails you have an easement for

28:46 ↗ perpetuity so that you can access um you

28:50 ↗ have rights to access the sor line and

28:52 ↗ so yeah and so I think those are the

28:55 ↗ main issues.

28:56 ↗ >> Okay. Um I also noted the parking

28:59 ↗ question.

29:00 ↗ >> Oh yes. So I it there is that challenge,

29:03 ↗ but it is meeting this the city code and

29:06 ↗ I think there's it's close to rapid

29:08 ↗ transit and it's you know it's downtown

29:10 ↗ and so I think yeah it's I could if I

29:14 ↗ yeah I recognize that there is that

29:16 ↗ challenge. So

29:18 ↗ >> okay thank you and staff do you have a

29:21 ↗ rebuttal to the comments?

29:24 ↗ Um

29:25 ↗ so as was mentioned, our engineer

29:29 ↗ Patrick Kenny and um Elaine Goober went

29:31 ↗ out to look at the um property and there

29:34 ↗ are two conditions on our staff report

29:36 ↗ that require um the protection of the

29:38 ↗ septic and water line and that's also um

29:41 ↗ so it's condition on the staff report

29:42 ↗ which means that's be met and then it

29:43 ↗ will also be evaluated with the

29:44 ↗ construction permits. And as far as the

29:47 ↗ park in the back of the property, um

29:50 ↗ that's what I was talking about about

29:52 ↗ making the front one usable versus the

29:54 ↗ back being heavily vegetated um and not

29:56 ↗ a usable open space. Um so it has um the

30:00 ↗ plantings and trees. And then below that

30:03 ↗ is the buffer and the um uh the stream

30:08 ↗ setback and that will be required as

30:09 ↗ part of construction fencing to uh

30:11 ↗ construction permitting to have a split

30:12 ↗ rail fence along it so that it can't be

30:14 ↗ accessed um to and to protect the

30:17 ↗ critical area. Um so that will be

30:19 ↗ required that it's fenced. So just

30:21 ↗ wanted to add those two details to that

30:23 ↗ as well. Okay.

30:27 ↗ >> Yep.

30:30 ↗ What is split rail?

30:33 ↗ >> Need to come to the mic.

30:34 ↗ >> Oh, yeah.

30:35 ↗ >> Yeah. Can you turn on the mic and speak

30:37 ↗ into that?

30:38 ↗ >> Let's speak.

30:39 ↗ >> Hello,

30:40 ↗ >> Katie McMullen. Back up. Um, would the

30:42 ↗ split rail be between our house and the

30:46 ↗ development or would that be on the city

30:48 ↗ side?

30:49 ↗ >> The um split rail is going to be on

30:52 ↗ their we can only require them to put it

30:54 ↗ on their property. So, it's going to be

30:55 ↗ along the buffer on their property which

30:57 ↗ is behind the rear building. Um, so the

31:01 ↗ buffer, you know, it extends onto their

31:02 ↗ property and then it comes back. So,

31:04 ↗ it's going to be along this is the

31:05 ↗ building. It's going to be along this

31:07 ↗ side.

31:08 ↗ >> Got it. Okay. Just trying to get visuals

31:10 ↗ with.

31:11 ↗ >> Yes. And I um will provide my email too

31:13 ↗ and I can we can talk and I can show you

31:15 ↗ where it is.

31:16 ↗ >> Appreciate it.

31:17 ↗ >> Sure.

31:18 ↗ >> Is it possible to pull up like Google

31:20 ↗ Earth, Google map?

31:21 ↗ >> Sure. has to.

31:37 ↗ All right.

31:42 ↗ So,

31:44 ↗ just put a

31:46 ↗ just put a point on it.

31:50 ↗ Um, this is our project property and I

31:53 ↗ believe this is your property.

31:56 ↗ >> Yes. Okay. And then the creek is back

31:59 ↗ here.

32:08 ↗ >> Okay. And the the split rail fence would

32:09 ↗ be along that property line.

32:11 ↗ >> Let me just pull up the actual So this

32:14 ↗ Oh, too much.

32:19 ↗ So this is the property line right here.

32:21 ↗ And the split split rail fence is going

32:23 ↗ to go along the buffer to protect the

32:25 ↗ critical area.

32:29 ↗ Yep. This is the property line. This

32:31 ↗ kind of dashed. And then the split rail

32:33 ↗ fence will go right here along the

32:35 ↗ property line or sorry not along along

32:38 ↗ the buffer.

32:43 ↗ >> Yes.

32:45 ↗ Okay.

32:46 ↗ >> And that that buffer area should not be

32:48 ↗ used.

32:49 ↗ >> The buffer area cannot and shall not be

32:52 ↗ used.

32:52 ↗ >> Yeah. There'll be signage.

32:53 ↗ >> Correct. So the split split rail fence

32:56 ↗ will get critical area signage along it

32:58 ↗ that says like this is a protected

33:00 ↗ habitat.

33:01 ↗ >> Don't go in there.

33:06 ↗ >> It will curve along with the uh to

33:08 ↗ follow the buffer of the creek.

33:14 ↗ to the microphone.

33:15 ↗ >> Would you mind turning on the microphone

33:16 ↗ just for our online commissioners?

33:19 ↗ >> Um, in one of the renderings there was a

33:22 ↗ a bit of a dispute

33:24 ↗ um with where the apple tree is and

33:28 ↗ Ging's property. It looked like it came

33:30 ↗ onto the road um that was actually part

33:34 ↗ of our street.

33:37 ↗ Uh I am not following.

33:40 ↗ >> Yeah, I'm trying to find

33:42 ↗ >> there was a dispute about the tree or

33:45 ↗ the property line or the property line.

33:48 ↗ >> Uh it it is the property line

33:52 ↗ but where

33:54 ↗ >> so

33:59 ↗ >> this

34:00 ↗ >> the word

34:04 ↗ I think

34:04 ↗ >> that's the apple tree. So that will be

34:07 ↗ protected.

34:09 ↗ >> Okay.

34:11 ↗ [Music]

34:13 ↗ >> Okay.

34:14 ↗ >> To the microphone, please. Sorry, you

34:16 ↗ have to speak into the microphone.

34:17 ↗ >> GG.

34:19 ↗ >> How do I point it out? How do you point

34:20 ↗ it out? Can you take your arrow

34:23 ↗ >> and then where the property line ends

34:25 ↗ will

34:28 ↗ the split rail

34:30 ↗ go to the property line and then head

34:33 ↗ north.

34:36 ↗ at a straight angle to meet Jingen's

34:38 ↗ fence, I guess.

34:39 ↗ >> So, the the split rail is only going to

34:42 ↗ go along the buffer. So, you can see the

34:43 ↗ 15 foot buffer is this right here. So,

34:45 ↗ it's going to go like this

34:46 ↗ >> and stop right there.

34:48 ↗ >> Correct.

34:49 ↗ >> Okay.

34:49 ↗ >> Because the buffer continues this way

34:51 ↗ and we require the split rail fence

34:53 ↗ along buffer for the protection of the

34:54 ↗ critical area.

34:58 ↗ >> Okay. Do you see?

34:59 ↗ >> So, the tree is with going to be within

35:00 ↗ what's going to be a vegetated area.

35:04 ↗ The tree is pretty full right now, so I

35:06 ↗ think it overgrows. But the split will

35:09 ↗ go to

35:12 ↗ >> I guess it won't go all the way to where

35:15 ↗ the property line is at.

35:17 ↗ >> Yeah, it's not going to go to the corner

35:18 ↗ of the property.

35:19 ↗ >> Okay. All right.

35:21 ↗ >> What's your Just help me understand.

35:24 ↗ >> No, just Well, we were talking about

35:26 ↗ parking and then Oh, there was going to

35:28 ↗ be a fence put in, but now the fence

35:30 ↗ will not go all the way to the end of

35:32 ↗ the property line. Okay. So, but

35:35 ↗ >> Oh, sorry everyone. Um, so yeah,

35:37 ↗ applicant, please come to the microphone

35:38 ↗ to speak.

35:39 ↗ >> Yeah,

35:41 ↗ >> you can go to come to this one.

35:42 ↗ >> Yeah.

35:45 ↗ >> So, in all likelihood, well, we'll be

35:48 ↗ fencing the north the northeast portion.

35:51 ↗ So, I mean, that's partly it's creating

35:53 ↗ the the the space for the tenants.

35:55 ↗ They're going to want their their space.

35:58 ↗ So I I my my thought is they might we

36:02 ↗ could we could look at putting a fence

36:05 ↗ on the northeast portion between the

36:06 ↗ split rail and and the north property

36:09 ↗ line.

36:09 ↗ >> Okay.

36:10 ↗ >> So so it'll create a barrier. So it's

36:12 ↗ not perfect because people could

36:13 ↗ probably hop over the fence and go

36:15 ↗ around, but I think there's there's

36:16 ↗ enough of a barrier to

36:18 ↗ >> impede most reasonable people except for

36:21 ↗ homeless people as you've learned. So

36:23 ↗ >> Okay.

36:26 ↗ >> Okay. Okay.

36:26 ↗ >> Does that answer the question?

36:29 ↗ >> I think so. Yeah.

36:30 ↗ >> Okay.

36:30 ↗ >> Okay. Thank you everyone.

36:35 ↗ >> All right.

36:36 ↗ >> Question for

36:37 ↗ >> Yes.

36:38 ↗ >> Just one more. Um

36:39 ↗ >> Sure.

36:40 ↗ >> Uh Miss Medina. So I understand. So

36:43 ↗ there's no requirement for guest parking

36:46 ↗ in the 202 code for projects of this

36:49 ↗ size. Is that right?

36:50 ↗ >> There is not not in the 22 code or in

36:52 ↗ the or in our current code either.

36:54 ↗ >> Okay. Thank you. Any

36:57 ↗ other commissioner questions?

37:02 ↗ >> All right.

37:04 ↗ >> I guess just one just in terms of

37:07 ↗ shading things like that. There isn't

37:10 ↗ something that would require a change to

37:13 ↗ >> There is not

37:14 ↗ >> not in code.

37:18 ↗ >> All right. Are there any objections to

37:19 ↗ closing the public hearing?

37:22 ↗ Hearing no objections, I now close the

37:24 ↗ public hearing at

37:26 ↗ 7:16 p.m.

37:30 ↗ Now it's time to move into the

37:31 ↗ deliberation portion of the meeting.

37:33 ↗ First, we need to make a motion. Is

37:35 ↗ there a motion on the item before the

37:36 ↗ commission?

37:40 ↗ Madam Chair, I move the the development

37:43 ↗ commission approved the site development

37:44 ↗ permit for 60 Newport Way SDP23-

37:48 ↗ 00005

37:51 ↗ associate administrative adjustment

37:52 ↗ standard AA S24

37:56 ↗ 00003

37:58 ↗ as described in evaluating the staff

37:59 ↗ report dated October 8, 2025

38:02 ↗ with exhibits A through O subject to the

38:05 ↗ conditions therein and as amended

38:06 ↗ tonight. And I move that the development

38:09 ↗ commission direct the community planning

38:10 ↗ department and development department to

38:12 ↗ prepare findings of fact and conclusions

38:14 ↗ for review and approval by the

38:16 ↗ development commission chair affirming

38:18 ↗ the development commission's decision to

38:20 ↗ approve SDP23-00005

38:25 ↗ and AAS24-00003

38:29 ↗ subject to the conditions listed in the

38:31 ↗ staff report dated October 8, 2025

38:34 ↗ with exhibits A through O subject to the

38:37 ↗ conditions therein and as amended

38:39 ↗ tonight.

38:41 ↗ >> Second.

38:42 ↗ >> Thank you.

38:45 ↗ And do we have any discussions or

38:47 ↗ amendments?

38:51 ↗ I guess the only discussion I can

38:53 ↗ appreciate the issue with shading but if

38:56 ↗ the code I think I am on

38:59 ↗ um with the can understand concerns

39:02 ↗ about that but if the code doesn't

39:04 ↗ require a change that we couldn't force

39:07 ↗ a change

39:11 ↗ I wonder if uh landscape screening might

39:14 ↗ be a possible solution to Mr. Kai's

39:17 ↗ issues. I'm not sure if there's enough

39:19 ↗ room to do that, but it might meet the

39:21 ↗ visibility problems.

39:26 ↗ Overall, I have a sense um it's a

39:28 ↗ handsome design and I think it provides

39:32 ↗ a needed housing type area.

39:39 ↗ >> Thank you. Any comments or discussion

39:42 ↗ online?

39:44 ↗ No,

39:47 ↗ it looks great by the way. Yes.

39:54 ↗ >> Anything further? All right.

39:57 ↗ Uh, with the deliberation concluded, it

40:00 ↗ is time for the commission to take

40:01 ↗ action on the item before us.

40:04 ↗ All in favor of the motion say I.

40:07 ↗ >> I.

40:08 ↗ >> I.

40:09 ↗ >> All right. The motion is approved.

40:12 ↗ This concludes the 60 Newport Way site

40:14 ↗ development permit. A notice of decision

40:16 ↗ will be issued by staff within seven

40:18 ↗ days.

40:21 ↗ And uh any updates from staff for the

40:25 ↗ commission?

40:27 ↗ Yes, we have another agenda item tonight

40:29 ↗ which is um well supposed to be

40:32 ↗ establishing a quorum for a November

40:34 ↗ meeting but um right now the commission

40:37 ↗ or staff is looking at November 19th as

40:40 ↗ a commission meeting. Um this would be

40:42 ↗ for the Isakqua High School um and

40:45 ↗ elementary school site major amendment.

40:47 ↗ Um, so if commissioners present can

40:49 ↗ confirm if November 19th um would work

40:53 ↗ and I will send out a follow-up email to

40:55 ↗ all the other commissioners as well.

40:58 ↗ >> Yes, for me.

40:59 ↗ >> Same.

41:01 ↗ >> Yes.

41:03 ↗ >> Yes.

41:05 ↗ >> Great. We will at minimum have a quorum

41:08 ↗ um and we will ensure it's in person

41:11 ↗ next time and I will follow up with an

41:13 ↗ email with the other commissioners to

41:14 ↗ confirm as well.

41:16 ↗ Great. Otherwise, um, as far as no no

41:19 ↗ council updates or, um, anything like

41:21 ↗ that.

41:22 ↗ >> All right. Thank you to staff, the

41:25 ↗ applicant, and members of the public.

41:27 ↗ There being no further business before

41:28 ↗ the commission, I adjourn the meeting at

41:30 ↗ 7:20

Approved minutes

Extracted from the next meeting's packet, where this meeting's minutes were approved as a consent-calendar attachment.

Open PDF

Attendance

Council / Members (5)

Shore

Commissioners Fasehun (virtual)

Mayo (virtual)

Morgan

Sanford

Staff (1)

Amanda Jackson, Meeting Assistant Emily Medina, Associate Planner 2. Approval of Minutes a) Minutes of September 3, 2025