← Back to City Council Digest

Development Commission Auto captions

Wednesday, November 18, 2020

7:00 PM · 1h 32m
Topic tracked across meetings:
Development Commission Get Acquainted, (D) organizational structure of the City after, and at the Commission 2/3
Section
1. CALL TO ORDER
1a
Commission Membership
packet pp.3
Staff report:
Development Commission About Staff Liaison Created in 1983, this commission reviews all land Lucy Sloman, use actions requiring a Level 3 review. The Land Development Manager Commission further serves as an advisory board Email to the City Council on land use actions requiring council approval (Level 5 review). Regular Members 2021* – Melvin Morgan The appearance of fairness doctrine prohibits 2021* – Kevin Price Development Commission members and City 2022 – Michael Brennan Council members from discussing the merit of 2022 – Richard Sowa specific land use development applications outside 2022 – Richard Sanford of the formal public meeting process. Citizens, 2023 – Patty Dillon however, may discuss any issue with the City's 2023 – Brooke Shore Development Services Department. Written comments are also welcome. Alternate Members Membership 2022 – Jon Ikeda The Development Commission is…
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
2a
Minutes of October 7, 2020
packet pp.5–11
Staff report:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) 10-07-20 Joint Development Commission & Page [0000] Planning Policy Commission Special Minutes
3. AGENDA ITEMS
3a
Development Commission (DC) Get Acquainted Event, (D) structure of the City after, and at the DC
Lucy Sloman, Land Development Manager
5. OTHER BUSINESS / ANNOUNCEMENTS
5a
The next meeting is scheduled for Dec. 2
0:00 and appreciate the technology richard i
0:03 think you need to give tim a heads up in
0:04 ten seconds
0:06 okay the tv guy okay
0:09 we're going to get started in 10 9
0:12 8 7 6 five
0:16 four three two one
0:20 all right i think i think we're started
0:22 now thanks for that reminder
0:24 kevin so is that good enough
0:27 that's good enough we uh welcome
0:30 everybody
0:31 uh this is going to be a pretty informal
0:33 meet and greet but we do have some
0:35 official business we have
0:37 uh approval of the minutes of our
0:40 october 7th 2020 meeting
0:42 and i'm going to make the assumption
0:45 that people have had the opportunity to
0:46 read those minutes and so i will ask if
0:48 anybody has any corrections or changes
0:50 to those minutes
0:57 hearing hearing none uh we're going to
1:01 administratively approve the minutes uh
1:03 without further discussion
1:05 so now uh the next agenda item is the
1:09 get acquainted part and lucy i think
1:12 you're it or
1:13 am i missing this no you're you're
1:16 absolutely right
1:17 um good evening chairperson soa
1:20 i am lucy sloman land development
1:22 manager
1:24 and um tonight we are joined by our two
1:27 new
1:28 uh commission members uh patty dillon
1:31 would you raise your hand teddy thank
1:33 you and
1:34 john ikeda did i say that correctly john
1:38 yeah you got it okay excellent
1:42 um and the um purpose of tonight's
1:45 um meeting is to get to know each other
1:47 so we'll do
1:48 some introductions uh hopefully it will
1:51 be fun
1:52 and then i will discuss some things
1:55 about the um
1:58 commission how it fits into the city's
2:01 organizational structure the kinds of
2:03 permits that come
2:04 how that that works um and
2:08 some other business and such
2:12 if there are questions um i'm not
2:16 i'm not quite seeing where the chat
2:17 function is but i feel like this
2:20 as an intent intended as an informal
2:23 meeting
2:24 um i don't know whether i will see
2:27 everyone but i
2:28 i think um we can try just having people
2:32 speak
2:32 up and um if that
2:36 becomes too chaotic then we'll try and
2:38 go back to the chat function
2:40 does that work
2:44 see lots of head nods excellent okay i
2:46 am now
2:47 going to attempt to share my screen
3:03 can you see my screen yet
3:11 yes yes yes okay
3:14 super um
3:20 just going to try and make you up yes
3:23 this is andrea
3:24 uh just so that you're aware your screen
3:28 is in kind of the presenter view format
3:31 such
3:32 that we're seeing your first slide and
3:35 then also a preview of your next slide
3:37 and any
3:38 notes that you might have added to the
3:41 bottom
3:42 and so i just wanted you to be aware of
3:45 what we're seeing
3:46 yes i don't have any really salacious
3:49 notes
3:50 but i um
3:53 this is where i'm going to try and get
3:55 out of it again
4:04 no you have to go to the top of the
4:06 screen and then a drop down menu will
4:08 appear for you
4:16 [Music]
4:19 it would be the primary screen that you
4:21 were um
4:25 watching the webex presentation on
4:36 okay let me try
4:50 sharing one a different way
5:06 is that just one that you're seeing now
5:09 there you go
5:10 yes yeah yeah i don't want to reveal too
5:12 much to you ahead of time
5:14 so um okay
5:18 um good evening um thanks for your
5:20 patience
5:21 uh with technology so we're going to
5:24 start with the introduction
5:26 part i would
5:30 like to just pose some
5:33 questions as an opportunity for us to
5:37 tell a little bit about ourselves um
5:42 the name length of time that you're
5:46 living in the city length of time on the
5:48 development commission
5:50 and then something about yourself you
5:52 are um
5:53 free to pick any or all of or another
5:57 uh question that um
6:01 you uh would like to tell the commission
6:04 about
6:05 and to give you a moment since i got to
6:08 read the
6:08 questions i actually typed the questions
6:11 i will start to give you a moment
6:14 to think about what you might want to
6:17 say
6:18 i'm lucy sloman as i mentioned i have
6:21 been
6:22 an employee of the city of isquas since
6:25 2012 but before that i was
6:29 a planning consultant providing staff
6:32 services and so
6:35 i've been doing that since 1996
6:39 so since the so last century
6:43 i have been the liaison to the
6:46 development commission
6:47 for i think three or four years
6:52 and
6:56 i'm not sure what my hobbies are right
6:58 now i mean there's so little that we can
7:01 i guess i would say i am binge watching
7:04 lots of
7:04 tv and learning how to operate
7:09 all kinds of remotes and different
7:11 programs
7:14 and i am a slippers and jeans person
7:17 i don't know that i own sweatpants um so
7:21 uh leaving the house is putting on shoes
7:23 which i haven't done for a very long
7:25 time
7:29 so um i
7:32 will maybe just call on people since
7:35 we're not in any particular
7:37 configuration
7:38 and maybe um why don't i do this i will
7:41 identify the next person and then they
7:43 get to pick the next one
7:45 so we'll be kind of a ball toss
7:48 and i will pick arthur schulte
7:53 okay thank you lucy uh first of all
7:54 welcome patty and john great to have you
7:56 on board
7:57 my name is arthur schulte i've i'm a
8:00 project manager for an architecture firm
8:02 in downtown seattle and i'm also
8:04 an adjunct professor at a local
8:06 technical college
8:07 teaching architecture software length of
8:10 time and living in the city
8:11 just under three years and just under
8:14 two years for a length of time on the
8:16 development commission
8:18 i guess something interesting about me
8:20 is i was born and adopted from vilnius
8:23 lithuania
8:24 it's been way back but almost seems like
8:27 yesterday
8:28 um and then uh traveled to the
8:31 to baltimore maryland was the first home
8:33 in the states before moving out here
8:35 and i've been here about 22 years in the
8:37 pacific northwest
8:38 and then regarding hobby biking
8:41 paddle boarding here on like some amish
8:44 and of course uh
8:45 hiking on the wonderful hiking paths
8:47 that we've got here as well
8:52 and then i guess i picked the next
8:53 person huh um
8:56 let's start with john you're up
8:59 hey my name is john akita i moved here
9:03 in 93 or so i'm a project manager with
9:06 the faa
9:07 uh built air traffic control towers from
9:10 my first ones in denver
9:12 been working at it for about 37 years
9:16 not on the development commission the
9:17 first time
9:19 my hobbies are biking like you say
9:23 i just bought an e-bike which is a gas
9:26 and um the other hobby i picked up
9:28 during covet is
9:29 carving wooden spoons so uh
9:34 that's kind of a that's a it's a
9:36 dangerous hobby because i've cut myself
9:37 a few times
9:41 doug uh jormink
9:48 um i'm doug yormick i am an assistant
9:51 planner with
9:52 the city i am one of uh the planners
9:55 that lucy sloman manages
9:57 i run the behind the scenes um manage
10:00 the chat and just make sure
10:03 to get the public comments organized
10:07 i don't live in the city i live in
10:08 seattle but i've been working for the
10:10 city for
10:11 going out four years in march
10:17 hobby um i run i hike
10:20 i guess all of the things that people in
10:22 the pacific northwest say that they do
10:24 um i do that um i do play a lot of
10:27 guitar as well
10:28 and um during covet i have really picked
10:31 it up and started playing a lot more
10:33 than i used to before
10:35 and um i don't own slippers because
10:38 they don't i can't find slippers my size
10:40 so i'm just
10:42 socks and jeans
10:49 oh and then i get to choose next so i am
10:52 going to choose
10:55 um uh richard sowa
11:06 you're still muted richard
11:12 there you go sorry i just was saying
11:15 that i'm richard sola
11:16 i uh been living in issaquah for 11
11:18 years now i've been on the commission
11:21 five years i think i don't know in there
11:23 four or five years
11:25 uh i uh
11:28 have i like to fish i work my uh
11:31 i volunteer at the esquasam hatchery
11:34 every day
11:36 try to convince the fish that uh i've
11:39 fed them every day so when they come
11:40 back in four or five
11:42 years they should remember me and and
11:44 honor me with being able to catch them
11:45 but it hasn't worked very well so far
11:48 i do i do wear shoes i do wear pants and
11:52 get to go outside i want one of the only
11:56 volunteers that they allow to come on
11:58 the hatchery grounds for i've been there
11:59 for
12:00 eight years now so uh and
12:05 not very not very exciting
12:09 like oh i was going to say my first job
12:11 and my worst job
12:12 my best friend i was living in ogden
12:15 utah and he convinced me we were in
12:17 uh junior high school and he convinced
12:19 me that a good job would be to go pick
12:21 beans because we could make a lot of
12:23 money
12:24 and it was like 500 degrees temperature
12:27 about 400 percent humidity i lasted
12:31 about 20 minutes we got in a big bean
12:33 fight and tore down a whole bunch of
12:34 bean rose and they asked us to leave
12:40 not a good introduction to the working
12:42 world so we may as well stick with
12:44 richards how about richard sanford
12:47 hey welcome patty and john to the dc
12:50 my name is richard sanford and i moved
12:54 up to issaquah from the bay area in 1989
12:58 uh 31 years hard to believe
13:01 i've been on the dc for three and a half
13:05 years now
13:06 and unlike some of my
13:09 fellow uh all of my fellow commissioners
13:12 really
13:12 i don't have a background in
13:15 architecture or land use
13:16 or anything like that i joined the dc
13:19 right after
13:20 um retiring from boeing and there i was
13:23 a technical communicator
13:25 and project manager and so i guess the
13:28 powers that be
13:29 thought that i was technical enough to
13:31 take a chance with me so
13:32 i've been here for a while and uh let's
13:35 see hobby i also write some fiction on
13:37 the side
13:38 so after a while i'll try to sell you a
13:40 novel or two
13:42 that's about it so uh let's see
13:44 brookshire
13:45 are you out there
13:50 hello can you guys hear me yep yep
13:53 okay yes uh hi i'm brook shore i've
13:56 lived in
13:57 ithaca for over five years
14:00 and i've been on the development
14:02 commission for about a year and a half
14:05 and i also like
14:08 biking and i just bought a new pair of
14:12 slippers last week
14:13 because i decided i needed two pair
14:15 definitely wearing a lot of slippers
14:16 recently
14:20 and let's see
14:23 kevin do you want to go next
14:29 you're still muted kevin
14:39 how about now you're not muted anymore
14:43 all right well i'm i'm here i just
14:45 dropped my computer
14:47 i've regained my composure i'm uh
14:50 well welcome patty and john it's nice to
14:52 meet you
14:53 my name is kevin price i've been on the
14:55 commission since um
14:58 i guess it's 2016 now
15:01 and i moved to iskcon iskwan 2015 from
15:05 seattle
15:06 after living there for about 20 years um
15:12 let's see something about myself um
15:16 well hobby i have no hobby i recently
15:20 during
15:20 the global pandemic and political
15:23 uncertainty in the world decided to
15:25 start my own job
15:26 or my own business so i've gone out on
15:27 my own after working uh
15:30 with a company in seattle for the past
15:32 25 years so
15:33 it's just me in my basement so uh
15:36 it's so far so good i'm really enjoying
15:41 first job i was a junior ranger
15:44 for the city of boulder mountain parks
15:46 which was a really awesome job we got to
15:48 do trail maintenance
15:50 we got to build new trails and on the
15:53 occasion if you followed
15:55 some of the news coming out of colorado
15:56 this summer we also got to fight fires
16:00 so we were teenagers i was in junior
16:02 high doing this
16:03 out fighting fires i'm not sure they
16:06 would let you do that now but for
16:07 whatever reason we were fighting fires
16:09 um and while working virtually i can't
16:14 say enough i got some new slippers
16:16 these are spectacular you've got to try
16:18 them they fold down so they fit more
16:20 like a clog or you can put the heel up
16:22 it's just it's unbelievable but i i
16:25 strongly recommend slippers for uh
16:27 covered working um
16:30 let's see is patty out there
16:35 yes yes i'm here uh i'm patty dillon
16:38 i have lived in in fizzy claw for the
16:42 past
16:43 11 years and the
16:46 what ten before that um in
16:50 in seattle i i'm actually technically a
16:53 seattle native i
16:54 i was born here when my dad was in in
16:56 grad school and
16:58 moved around quite a bit california
17:00 colorado
17:01 calgary growing up and then made my own
17:05 way back here for
17:06 graduate school at uw and i've been here
17:09 since
17:10 i work i'm a civil engineer i work for a
17:12 water resources consulting firm
17:15 and um hobbies normally at this time of
17:19 year i would be coaching one or both of
17:21 my kids
17:22 um in basketball i've been a coach with
17:24 parks and rec
17:25 for um gosh i guess the past seven
17:29 seasons before this one
17:33 kind of same outdoor activities um kind
17:37 of one
17:38 interesting tidbit i worked as a white
17:40 water rafting guide for a year
17:43 outside sacramento in between
17:46 college and grad school so that's that's
17:48 always a little fun fact to share
17:51 mostly during covet i've been a a jeans
17:53 and shoes kind of person but i actually
17:55 just found
17:56 the most amazing pair of sweatpants that
17:58 i've ever owned i think i'm asking for
17:59 another one for christmas
18:02 so i can be converted
18:06 um let's see i get to see more of the
18:09 list here
18:12 um i guess how about mike brennan
18:17 great thanks patty nice to meet you and
18:20 you too john welcome to the commission
18:22 my name is mike brennan um i i grew up
18:25 on the east side of the mountains and in
18:27 wenatchee and moved
18:29 to this area about 33 years ago and and
18:32 uh have enjoyed every minute of it
18:35 here um been on the commission for over
18:38 10 years i lost tracks when you get up
18:40 into double figures you just you just
18:42 don't know anymore so
18:44 but it has been over 10 years and have
18:46 seen a lot of amazing projects come
18:48 through the commission
18:49 uh as this has grown and it's been a lot
18:51 of fun to be a part of that
18:54 i um i really enjoy the outdoors so i do
18:57 a lot of hiking some climbing biking
19:01 um you name it outside is is kind of the
19:05 place to hang out which has been good
19:07 during this
19:08 kind of period of proved since um you
19:11 can't do anything indoors so at least
19:12 outdoors is still open um i
19:15 um work from home um i
19:18 i work for the city of bellevue so just
19:20 to the to the
19:22 west of here um in the development
19:25 services department so i have a lot
19:27 of similar work that i do during the day
19:29 as with
19:30 what we deal with in the evening here at
19:31 the commission i am a jeans
19:34 i'm not a slippers guy i'm a socks guy
19:36 so jeans and
19:37 and heavy socks work great then you're
19:39 more mobile um
19:40 with your socks on so that's my
19:42 preference uh anyhow i will hand it to
19:45 uh commissioner morgan
19:50 well thank you mike um my name is mel
19:54 morgan and
19:54 and by the way mike is my next-door
19:57 neighbor so it was a short hand-off
20:00 uh we lived next door to each other for
20:02 26 years maybe i think and
20:06 um i've lived in in uh
20:09 here for 27 years i guess in the area
20:12 because
20:13 i actually live in sabaamish but when we
20:16 moved here
20:17 it was unincorporated king county and we
20:19 had an issaquah address
20:21 so um my address changed but
20:24 my address didn't change at the same
20:25 time so anyway so
20:28 living some amish but i've been here 27
20:30 years
20:31 and i've been on the development
20:33 commission now i think it's 25 years
20:36 um so i'm still learning um
20:39 i'm still trying to understand what i'm
20:40 doing but uh
20:42 it's it's been great and i applied to
20:44 the development commission originally
20:46 because
20:47 my background's a commercial real estate
20:48 appraisal
20:50 and i wanted to do something for the
20:52 city and i thought this was real estate
20:53 related
20:54 and it's been a fantastic experience and
20:57 i think john and patty will really enjoy
21:01 um probably the biggest hobby is hiking
21:04 although i did learn a new skill a new
21:06 kovitz skill this was my wife and i made
21:08 lefse
21:09 this weekend so um i'm sure we'll start
21:13 a business soon it was that good
21:16 my first job was in high school
21:19 working as a weekend dj in a country
21:21 music
21:22 radio station in shelton where i grew up
21:26 and my best job was in college when i
21:30 at the uw when i was a bartender at
21:32 dante's tavern
21:34 [Applause]
21:35 and uh and yeah i'll kind of wear
21:38 whatever's clean in the closet i guess
21:42 and i what's left
21:45 or whatever oh lefs is a potato bread
21:48 that's a
21:49 norwegian type of potato bran
21:54 thanks i'm probably the only one that
21:55 didn't know but i didn't know thank you
22:00 so i think is that it i think uh andrea
22:04 where did i oh there we go andrea
22:13 good evening everybody my name is andrea
22:16 snyder i'm the deputy city administrator
22:18 for the city of issaquah
22:20 and um and
22:24 also and i'm going to uh trump uh
22:27 lucy's announcement that i'm sure she's
22:29 going to make shortly i'm also serving
22:31 as the acting community planning and
22:33 development director
22:35 for those of you who know heath niven
22:38 who was our previous director his last
22:41 day with the city was on friday
22:43 so i will be serving as a director of
22:46 community planning and development until
22:48 we are able to fill the position and
22:51 find somebody else
22:53 to fill the role um
22:57 my i have served the city as deputy city
23:00 administrator
23:01 for almost two years now maybe we'll
23:04 call it a year and a half somewhere
23:06 between there
23:07 uh prior to that i served the city for
23:11 five years in economic development
23:14 and i've certainly served other cities
23:16 in the region including kirkland and
23:18 burien
23:19 and worked for king county um
23:22 the uh one of my
23:26 hobbies is i play ice hockey
23:30 though not right now because of coping
23:32 restrictions but
23:33 that would be something i'd be doing if
23:36 i could
23:36 and um
23:40 definitely slippers gal i have them on
23:42 right now
23:43 and you know i i'll i'm willing to check
23:46 out
23:47 the slipper recommendation but i'm
23:49 pretty happy with what i've got
23:51 so thank you for the opportunity to
23:52 introduce myself and it's great meeting
23:54 all of you
23:57 so um i feel compelled to say two things
24:00 one i sounded like a complete slug
24:03 compared to the rest of you
24:04 i have been out walking my neighborhood
24:06 quite a bit
24:07 i live in seattle like doug we don't
24:10 live that far apart although we're not
24:12 as close as mel and mike
24:14 and i have found because i'm in the u
24:16 district roosevelt area
24:19 covid central for seattle that
24:22 i am walking a lot of odd alleys and
24:24 side streets
24:25 and ravenna ravine and actually i can't
24:28 even go into the ravine a lot of times
24:29 because there's so many people in there
24:31 so i've been walking some very odd
24:33 routes to
24:34 avoid people and these are the best
24:38 slippers
24:39 these are my work slippers okay
24:43 i just got them for my birthday and
24:45 they're very warm and cozy
24:47 so i i'm advocating for these slippers
24:50 over kevin's but you know it's not a
24:52 competition
24:53 are they felt is that a wolf yes oh wow
24:56 i'm a little jealous but i can't have
24:58 anything that will um
25:00 attract dog hair in my house yes and
25:03 this would not work i'm finding that the
25:06 static electricity is pretty impressive
25:09 it's kind of like swiffers on the bottom
25:11 but anyway
25:12 i digress um so
25:15 um this is the uh kind of entertaining
25:18 portion
25:19 of the agenda now we're going to move on
25:21 to some business
25:23 of talking about the development
25:26 commission
25:28 and the first thing we're going to
25:29 address is how does the development
25:31 commission fit into the city
25:33 organization um
25:36 so you know like many things
25:39 in our country there are three branches
25:43 and both the development commission and
25:47 cpd as we call it now
25:50 is under the administration
25:54 and so sometimes
25:58 cpd is both making decisions
26:00 administrative decisions on certain
26:02 smaller permits and then making
26:04 recommendations
26:06 occasionally our recommendations are
26:08 directly to council
26:10 but more frequently our recommendations
26:12 are to the development commission
26:15 and likewise sometimes the development
26:17 commission makes decisions
26:19 and sometimes the development commission
26:22 makes recommendations and those
26:24 recommendations would go to the city
26:26 council for their decision
26:29 so what i'm now going to spend some time
26:31 on is the different kinds of permits
26:33 and why you would be making a
26:36 recommendation
26:38 why or when you're going to be making a
26:40 recommendation
26:41 or a decision
26:45 so first we're going to look at the
26:46 permits and the criteria for permits
26:50 and this is kind of our agenda for the
26:52 evening
26:54 we'll look at the permits and review
26:56 criteria
26:57 the main things that you all review are
27:00 site development permit permits or sdps
27:04 master site plans for msps
27:08 and development agreements we'll look at
27:11 the review process
27:12 at the commission some of your other
27:15 responsibilities
27:16 and then take any final questions
27:19 but i also want to identify that we're
27:21 looking for your input
27:23 so if over the course of the evening
27:26 you think of things that you think would
27:30 improve the way we provide information
27:32 to you
27:33 or how we do business please make notes
27:36 and share those at the end because this
27:39 is an opportunity for us to learn as
27:41 well
27:46 so generally there are as i mentioned
27:50 three kinds of permits um that you're
27:52 looking at
27:53 site development permits which is called
27:56 a level three review
27:58 master site plans which are a level five
28:01 review
28:02 and then development agreements so let
28:03 me let's look at those
28:05 in a little more detail a site
28:08 development permit we also have
28:10 administrative site development permits
28:12 what could be the trigger or threshold
28:15 for something
28:16 being a site development permit that
28:18 comes to the development commission
28:20 and depending on the part of town it
28:23 could be
28:23 the size of the property it could be the
28:26 size of the building
28:28 or the location and by that i mean
28:31 certain streets
28:33 will trigger uh it being
28:36 even a small site or small building
28:39 being treated as a site development
28:41 permit because
28:42 on those streets we think that there
28:44 should be a public conversation
28:47 about those permits for
28:50 site development permits the development
28:53 commission
28:54 is the decision maker and the process is
28:56 quasi-judicial
28:58 i have a slide in a minute explaining a
29:00 little more about what it means to be
29:02 quasi-judicial
29:05 master site plans
29:08 this tool is not used in the urban
29:11 villages or
29:12 central issaquah which is what these
29:14 abbreviations mean
29:15 they're so outside of those two areas
29:20 a master site plan is required when you
29:22 have a site that is five acres or more
29:25 and often you will see a master site
29:28 plan and a site development permit
29:30 coming together to the commission
29:33 in this case you're making a
29:35 recommendation to council
29:37 they will be the decision makers but it
29:39 is again
29:40 a quasi-judicial process lucy can i ask
29:43 a question you mentioned
29:45 you said five acres or more and the
29:47 slide says 15 acres
29:49 or greater i love when people listen to
29:51 me and actually pay attention
29:53 uh you're absolutely correct mel uh it
29:56 is 15 acres
29:57 okay um thank you um
30:01 and then development agreements um
30:03 generally development agreements are on
30:05 sites
30:06 greater than 15 acres not always we
30:09 sometimes use that
30:10 as a partnership tool um
30:13 for instance when the commission a few
30:16 years ago
30:18 reviewed the gilman work lofts project
30:22 that had a development agreement which
30:24 was not necessary because of the size of
30:26 the site but because
30:28 the city and the builder were partnering
30:30 on transportation improvements
30:32 and the development agreement was the
30:34 tool to capture
30:36 what that agreement was
30:40 so a development agreement is would come
30:43 to the commission
30:45 like costco when the council
30:50 or administration determines that it's
30:52 appropriate to pursue one
30:54 and then again you would also be making
30:57 a recommendation to counsel
31:01 and it's a legislative process typically
31:04 any questions before i go on to the next
31:06 slide
31:10 so quasi-judicial for any long-time
31:12 members
31:13 of the commission this will be painfully
31:15 familiar because we read through this
31:18 at every quasi-judicial public hearing
31:22 but for our new members i do want to
31:24 discuss this a little bit
31:27 so a quasi-judicial process
31:30 means that you're acting as a court and
31:33 so therefore the proceedings have to
31:35 both
31:35 be fair and appear fair and we do that
31:39 in two ways one
31:40 is by observing procedural due process
31:44 which means the procedures that we use
31:46 have to follow
31:48 a certain adopted rules and that we
31:51 focus on the relationship between the
31:53 decision maker
31:55 and the people who benefit from the
31:57 decision
31:58 um so generally it means that
32:01 all communication all consideration
32:05 of the project is
32:08 takes place during the public hearing
32:12 i will mention that staff are always a
32:15 resource we are considered a neutral
32:18 party
32:19 and so um always feel free as
32:21 commissioners to contact
32:23 me or the lead planner on a permit if
32:26 you have questions
32:28 it's our responsibility to keep you
32:30 within the proper bounds
32:32 with those questions and we're happy to
32:35 do that
32:37 this is i had put the slide in already
32:40 but many of you received if not all of
32:42 you received an email today
32:45 from a citizen regarding the providence
32:48 heights
32:49 high school and elementary school site
32:53 we have now asked that that citizen to
32:57 reserve his comments and send them to
32:59 staff
33:00 you would have seen all of these
33:02 comments anyway
33:04 but i would recommend that if you see
33:08 an email whose subject line is related
33:11 to a permit that is before you
33:13 or will be before you that you just
33:16 don't read it
33:16 um just forward it to me and ask
33:19 questions
33:20 and that way um it uh retains the
33:24 quasi-judicial
33:26 rules and that everything is taking
33:28 place within the public hearing
33:31 the second part about the quasi-judicial
33:34 process
33:34 is substantive due process and by that
33:37 we mean
33:38 that your decision is based on
33:41 regulations
33:42 that are adopted so um
33:45 if you love purple polka dot buildings
33:48 and think everything should be purple
33:50 polka dots and
33:52 the proposal comes in without purple
33:54 polka dots
33:55 and the rules do not require purple
33:57 polka dots
33:58 you will have to set aside your love of
34:01 purple polka dots
34:03 and make a decision based on the adopted
34:06 rule
34:08 you can save that for your slippers
34:11 i would like purple polka dot slippers
34:13 spring clips
34:17 okay so we're going to look at the land
34:19 use process and we're going to keep kind
34:20 of zooming
34:21 in on the part that is
34:26 the part where you really are the
34:28 commission is most involved
34:30 but i'm going to start by introducing
34:32 the full process
34:33 um so that you can kind of see your part
34:36 so um yeah i'm sorry can i
34:40 just a quick note on the due process the
34:43 could you
34:43 make a quick mention about emails
34:46 because i think that's one area where
34:48 it's easy to end up replying to
34:50 everybody on the commission we should
34:52 not be
34:53 that's a great point um commissioner
34:55 morgan thank you very much for bringing
34:57 that up
34:59 what commissioner morgan is referring to
35:02 is that if for instance
35:05 a citizen or
35:08 myself or another staff person sends
35:11 an email out to the commission
35:15 if you have a question or you really
35:18 shouldn't be responding to a citizen but
35:20 if you're responding to
35:21 a staff person let's say you have a
35:24 question
35:26 and you think it might be useful to the
35:29 entire
35:30 commission really you should email the
35:32 staff
35:34 ask the question and then
35:38 allow the staff person and even suggest
35:42 to the staff person
35:43 that this might be useful information to
35:46 the entire commission
35:47 and then have the staff person send it
35:50 out to the full commission
35:51 so that we're preserving the record it's
35:54 easy to track
35:55 the concern is that even though
35:58 a um
36:02 email may seem innocuous it may create
36:06 a an effectively a meeting
36:10 even if you're and if you're if
36:13 commissioner morgan
36:14 contacts his neighbor commissioner
36:16 brennan and then commissioner brennan
36:18 contacts the chairperson we are
36:20 effectively creating
36:23 a serial meeting through that email
36:26 so all of it needs to happen within the
36:29 meeting
36:31 when the meeting has begun and so the
36:34 safest thing is just to always
36:36 only communicate with your staff person
36:40 or the commission lays on myself
36:44 and let us
36:48 make that communication more broadly to
36:50 the commission
36:52 does that answer your question
36:55 thank you
37:00 so in terms of the process um
37:04 uh this is cut for the land use portion
37:06 not the construction
37:08 portion just the land use portion um
37:11 we go from informal meetings to
37:14 decisions and so let me let me talk
37:16 about this a little bit
37:18 um staff once
37:22 a potential applicant contacts us
37:25 we'll have a couple of informal meetings
37:29 potentially
37:30 the first one might just be an
37:32 introduction if there's a large
37:34 team of consultants for instance
37:36 followed by a collaboration and at the
37:38 collaboration we are generally
37:41 making sure that they're using the right
37:43 codes
37:45 understanding their project asking
37:48 questions and just kind of getting the
37:50 lay of the land
37:52 then we move into a more structured
37:55 staff
37:56 process the first is a pre-application
37:59 meeting it has a
38:01 set of submittal requirements applicants
38:04 put this together
38:05 and the reviewers
38:11 all take a look at it and provide
38:13 comments which are then given to the
38:14 applicant with the goal
38:16 that when they submit their site
38:18 development permit or master site plan
38:21 it is going to be more compliant and
38:24 many issues can be addressed
38:28 once we've worked through any questions
38:32 comments with the site development
38:35 permit
38:37 then staff would begin working on a
38:40 staff report
38:42 the commission would then hold its
38:46 meetings
38:48 a notice of decision or recommendation
38:50 would be issued
38:51 once a decision is final either by the
38:55 council or the commission an appeal
38:58 could be filed
39:00 that doesn't happen that often but we
39:02 had one earlier this year for instance
39:06 and then once the appeal process has run
39:10 if there is one filed then we move
39:13 into the construction phase and
39:15 generally that's
39:16 review of construction permits
39:20 the actual construction inspections
39:23 and occupancy of the building
39:27 so now i'm going to kind of zoom in to
39:29 the next
39:31 a little bit more detailed look
39:35 so what i've circled is that
39:39 when the site development permit or
39:42 master site plan
39:43 is submitted that really is when we're
39:46 beginning to really think about the
39:48 process with the development commission
39:51 and with the development commission it's
39:53 the staff report
39:55 the commission meetings and the notice
39:58 of decision
39:59 that are really the key steps in the
40:02 process
40:04 that takes place at the commission
40:08 and so the staff report which
40:11 is um staff's evaluation
40:15 against the applicable codes
40:18 of the proposal as well as any
40:21 exhibits and
40:24 studies and public comment
40:28 all of that will be a packet
40:32 that the commissioners will receive
40:34 about a week before the commission
40:36 meeting
40:38 we will also have advertised the
40:41 commission meetings
40:43 depending i think most of these will
40:45 require
40:47 site posting mailing notices
40:51 to property owners within a certain
40:53 distance of the site
40:55 and a ad in the newspaper so there's
40:58 many different ways that we
41:00 attempt to make the community aware
41:04 that this proposal is coming in front of
41:06 the commission
41:09 when at the commission our typical
41:12 format
41:12 or a site development permit which is
41:15 the most common kind of permit that
41:17 comes to the commission
41:19 is this two-part public hearing format
41:24 at the first meeting the staff
41:27 and the applicant each introduced the
41:30 project
41:30 to the commission and to the public
41:34 and then the commissioners and public
41:36 get to
41:37 make some initial comments ask questions
41:41 get clarification
41:44 then following that meeting staff
41:47 prepare what we call
41:48 a briefing response memo and in that we
41:51 summarize the comments concerns
41:54 and additional information requests that
41:58 we've received
41:59 and the applicant and staff each respond
42:02 to those
42:03 providing context background
42:06 code information and it may result in
42:11 adding conditions removing conditions
42:14 editing conditions
42:16 and you'll again get that about a week
42:19 before the second part of the public
42:22 hearing
42:22 in which we'll go over those responses
42:26 take more public testimony to create a
42:29 record
42:30 and then the commission typically makes
42:32 a decision
42:34 the decision can be approval approval
42:36 with conditions
42:38 or denial those those are the general
42:40 three choices
42:44 and then a notice of decision
42:47 if the commission is the decision maker
42:50 or a notice of recommendation
42:52 if there's a recommendation to counsel
42:55 is prepared by staff
42:57 and then reviewed and signed by the
42:59 chairperson
43:00 on behalf of the commission
43:04 are there any questions that's a lot of
43:06 information
43:09 i have a couple questions when they're
43:11 going to the public hearings
43:12 and you're developing your questions are
43:14 they
43:18 for the meeting or and then if you have
43:22 collaboration between say commissioners
43:24 is this something that
43:25 you need to go through staff people for
43:28 all the discussion between commissioners
43:31 has to take place
43:32 uh at the public hearing um
43:36 and uh so that everyone has an
43:39 opportunity
43:40 to hear how each commissioner is
43:42 considering it
43:43 i will add though um because that is
43:47 brings up a really good point uh
43:49 commissioner ikeda
43:50 that um you are always welcome to send
43:54 questions ahead of time to staff people
43:58 it is very helpful for us to hear
44:01 especially if we need to collect
44:03 information
44:05 uh if we can incorporate uh that
44:08 into our presentations
44:11 it's very helpful to get those ahead of
44:13 time um because then we're
44:15 better able to actually provide the
44:18 information to the entire commission at
44:20 the same time
44:23 thank you you're welcome so any other
44:25 questions okay
44:26 yes if we get a notice of a meeting
44:30 and we're not exactly sure where how
44:32 that
44:33 where that is in the city or where that
44:34 is are we allowed to go to the site
44:38 yes um you know that has been something
44:41 that has gone
44:41 um back and forth chairperson so and i i
44:44 appreciate you asking
44:46 um we
44:50 we have to rely on the record
44:53 and um but a commissioner is allowed
44:56 to visit the site um
45:00 you cannot bring in um
45:03 new information so for instance if
45:07 one of you visited the site and even
45:10 though there was a wetland report
45:12 that said there are no wetlands on the
45:14 site
45:15 or the wetland is in this corner it
45:18 would not be appropriate for
45:19 commissioner to come in
45:21 and say no
45:24 i there is a wetland over here because
45:27 that
45:28 isn't part of the record but visiting
45:31 the site and just getting a sense
45:33 of what it looks like
45:37 walking around and just understanding it
45:40 in three dimensions
45:44 and making it more real than sometimes
45:46 the drawings
45:47 and various proposed materials
45:50 um that is appropriate does that make
45:53 sense that distinction
45:54 yes thank you
45:58 any more questions before i move on
46:04 arthur were you asking a question uh yes
46:06 sorry i do have another one
46:08 um and just to clarify uh having
46:11 discussions out in public with public
46:13 members and community that's
46:14 that's against the protocol right just
46:16 because that will that would trigger a
46:18 meeting technically
46:20 or actually that provide i guess that's
46:22 information that you would have to
46:23 disclose
46:24 at the at the meeting right if if you're
46:27 approached by a community member
46:30 just you know graciously tell them
46:33 you can't discuss it you hope that they
46:35 will come to the meeting
46:36 and give their comments there um but
46:39 that actually also brings up a good
46:40 point if you have visited the site it's
46:42 always a good idea
46:43 to identify that at the meeting
46:47 and just say i visited the site and
46:49 walked around
46:50 the idea is that no one should be
46:53 surprised by the things that have taken
46:55 place
46:56 so that if someone observed you walking
46:58 around the site
47:00 and then you didn't mention it um you
47:02 know where
47:03 no one's trying to hide anything and um
47:06 so that would be appropriate to mention
47:08 that as well
47:10 okay thanks out of curiosity lucy what
47:12 is the uh
47:13 is there a protocol for like note taking
47:15 during the meetings i mean if we're
47:16 taking notes is that something we have
47:19 um keep on record is is
47:22 is there any protocol for that um
47:27 at the end of this meeting i do have the
47:30 training tape
47:31 um uh or the how how last century is
47:35 that
47:35 i have the youtube video um so
47:39 from the may 2019
47:44 legal training that many of you attended
47:46 with the city attorney
47:47 and the city clerk and they do speak
47:50 about that in a little more detail
47:52 technically your notes
47:56 any notes on the staff reports that you
47:58 may have made
48:00 are public records that could be
48:02 requested
48:04 i have not um in my time seen those
48:08 be requested by an applicant or a member
48:11 of the public
48:12 but as i understand that they could be
48:14 requested
48:16 okay thank you now if after a
48:20 permit is approved you
48:23 recycle those materials because you're
48:25 done with them that's fine
48:27 you are not required to retain those
48:29 things but if you have
48:31 chosen to retain them and you are asked
48:33 to produce them
48:34 you would have to do so okay
48:37 and then and then after the decision is
48:39 made we're that we're free to be able to
48:41 discuss the project
48:43 with the public that as may present
48:46 itself correct
48:48 yes no
48:54 no no
48:58 no i'll i'll get
49:14 clarification
49:17 okay
49:23 so in addition to site development
49:26 permits and master site plans
49:29 there are some other responsibilities
49:33 that may
49:34 come to the development commission one
49:37 of those
49:38 are community conferences they don't
49:41 happen
49:41 that often i think we've had one
49:45 in each of the last two years and it may
49:48 have been
49:48 five or six years prior to that
49:51 a community conference is a
49:55 conversation between the public the
49:57 commission and an
49:58 applicant typically early
50:02 in the process
50:05 the kinds of permits that could trigger
50:08 that
50:08 is a preliminary plat in the urban
50:11 villages
50:12 urban villages are like issaquah
50:14 highlands or talus
50:16 or a master site plan so those
50:20 are the two kinds of permits that can
50:23 trigger
50:23 a community conference
50:27 another thing that the development
50:30 commission
50:31 is sometimes asked to participate in
50:34 is the review of regulations
50:39 you would not be the decision maker but
50:41 you might be asked to
50:43 use your expertise from reviewing
50:45 permits
50:47 and an example of that is that the city
50:50 is currently developing
50:52 new architectural standards for single
50:54 family
50:55 in old town and um the
50:58 development commission was asked to
51:01 jointly review those with the planning
51:05 policy commission
51:06 and participate in some of the early
51:08 workshops
51:10 and so like the review of regulations
51:13 there are times
51:14 when there are duties that are assigned
51:16 to the development commission
51:19 that may not be directly outlined in
51:22 your charter but
51:23 in which the city believes that the
51:26 development commission has some
51:28 expertise or insight to offer in
51:32 a process
51:42 so looking ahead um
51:46 my first look ahead
51:50 actually from last year which is that
51:52 the urban village development commission
51:55 duties were assigned to the development
51:57 mission and the planning policy
51:59 commission and the only reason why
52:02 i have included that here is because for
52:05 the new commissioners
52:07 you may not have known that we had two
52:10 commissions
52:11 an urban village development commission
52:13 and a development commission
52:16 the urban village development
52:18 commission's duties have been wrapped
52:19 into this commission but sometimes you
52:22 may hear of the uvdc
52:24 and i just wanted you to know what that
52:27 was
52:29 second rivers and streams uh
52:32 responsibilities
52:33 that commission has been
52:37 changed and has evolved into what is now
52:40 the environmental board um the uh
52:44 for the new commissioners rivers and
52:46 streams
52:47 would um review permits
52:50 um related to rivers and streams
52:55 and other critical areas
52:58 and now the some of those
53:00 responsibilities
53:01 um have been expanded and
53:04 um broadened uh in the establishment of
53:08 the environmental board
53:11 and uh so we won't be uh getting
53:14 materials um in the review that rivers
53:18 and streams previously provided
53:21 andrea's already touched on um keith
53:24 niven's departure
53:26 and her role as the interim director
53:30 i do want to note that our department
53:33 has changed its name we used to be
53:36 development services you would hear us
53:39 refer to dsd we are now community
53:42 planning
53:43 and development or cpd so
53:47 that's your new acronym for the evening
53:52 like with old town um
53:56 we are doing a major upgrade
53:59 in the next year year and a half of
54:02 title 18.
54:03 title 18 is one of the titles of the
54:06 issaquah municipal code
54:08 and it is devoted to land use it is
54:10 probably
54:11 the thickness of the land use code
54:14 equals or exceeds
54:15 all previous 17 titles so
54:19 it's a pretty significant section of the
54:22 municipal code
54:24 and there are several chapters
54:28 that we will want to discuss
54:31 and bring to the development commission
54:33 either
54:34 on your own or jointly with the
54:37 environmental board
54:39 so that will be one of the
54:42 responsibilities that we look forward to
54:46 you having this year to provide guidance
54:49 those
54:50 the land use code is one of the primary
54:52 tools
54:53 that the development commission uses to
54:57 review permits and so getting your
54:59 insights and input
55:02 to those changes is really important to
55:05 ensure
55:06 that we end up with a great product
55:11 upcoming permits and calendar
55:16 i am aware of two permits that will
55:19 be coming to the commission uh probably
55:23 in the next uh in the first quarter of
55:27 2021 one is
55:30 brown bear car wash which is on gilman
55:34 and it is a small site but
55:38 due to its location on gilman the site
55:40 development permit
55:42 is will be coming to the commission
55:45 the other permit that will be coming to
55:48 you
55:49 is the master psych plan and site
55:51 development permit
55:53 for the providence heights site which
55:55 contains both a high school and an
55:57 elementary school
55:58 the commission held a community
56:00 conference
56:02 for this in july
56:05 and we expect that the materials will
56:09 for the actual public hearing
56:13 will come to you as i said in the first
56:15 quarter
56:18 on the site development permit for brown
56:20 bear you would be the decision maker
56:22 for the master site plan and site
56:24 development permit
56:26 for the high school and elementary
56:28 school you would be making
56:30 a recommendation to counsel however
56:34 council makes their decision on all the
56:37 materials
56:38 that have been presented to the
56:40 commission so you have an important role
56:42 in asking questions and building a
56:44 record
56:46 and creating the materials on which
56:49 the council will make a decision
56:53 we will all the commissions and boards
56:56 in the city
56:58 are working to provide a calendar to
57:01 each commission that would be included
57:04 in the packet
57:05 ours is a little difficult more
57:07 difficult to put together
57:09 because we don't always know what will
57:11 be happening over the course of a year
57:13 but as we schedule or anticipate
57:18 permits and projects coming to you
57:22 such as title 18 or these permits we
57:25 will be
57:25 including a calendar in the materials
57:28 that come with each packet
57:30 so you just have that as a reference
57:34 and then lastly
57:41 the communication that i sent out last
57:44 week
57:45 providing an update on the appeal
57:48 of the evergreen ford
57:51 dealership we are going our goal
57:55 is to be providing those anytime
58:00 there is some action beyond
58:03 the commission's decision so in the case
58:07 evergreen ford that was an appeal
58:10 of the permit in the case
58:13 of for instance the providence heights
58:17 schools that would be to keep you
58:19 informed of
58:21 what takes place at council we
58:24 want to close that loop help
58:27 commissioners
58:28 know how your work evolves
58:32 or what happens with it and
58:36 just keep you informed
58:44 and so um before i go
58:47 into some resources for the commission
58:50 i wanted to find out if you had any
58:53 questions or
58:54 input that you care to share
58:58 lucy one question richard sanford
59:01 you mentioned appeal in one of the early
59:03 slides does that
59:04 always go to the hearing examiner or
59:07 other other options for that how does
59:09 that typically work
59:11 i think all the commission decisions
59:14 would go to the hearing examiner
59:18 council decisions if they are appealed
59:21 do not go to the hearing examiner i
59:23 believe they go to superior court
59:26 thanks lucy you mentioned
59:30 our earlier one of your slides had both
59:32 the quasi-judicial
59:34 process and the legislative process
59:37 could you
59:38 could you talk about the legislative
59:40 process a little bit or why it's called
59:42 that
59:44 um a development agreement
59:48 um when it's those big development
59:51 agreements kind of like
59:53 the um isqua highlands or for costco
59:58 that is treated
1:00:02 for a development agreement it's kind of
1:00:04 like adopting a code
1:00:07 such as the old town single-family
1:00:09 architectural standards
1:00:11 and the process that
1:00:14 those go through because they apply to
1:00:16 many properties
1:00:17 and not just one particular proposal
1:00:22 um is not quasi-judicial and it allows
1:00:26 the community to be in contact with the
1:00:30 decision-maker makers
1:00:32 and even advocate to the decision makers
1:00:35 and so i think
1:00:39 for me that's the one i immediately
1:00:41 think of there may be other aspects that
1:00:43 are different
1:00:44 but um i think it's the relationship
1:00:47 between the decision makers and any
1:00:49 interested parties that is
1:00:51 distinct thank you
1:00:58 any input that came um up
1:01:01 uh while we were going through this yeah
1:01:04 this is richard i'd like to give a
1:01:07 commendation and then
1:01:08 and then give an exhortation the
1:01:10 commendation is to current commissioners
1:01:12 uh we get we get a bunch of material a
1:01:14 week before
1:01:15 our our meetings whatever they are and
1:01:18 it's usually that adequate amount of
1:01:21 time to go through
1:01:22 sometimes a whole lot of written
1:01:24 paperwork but it's really critical
1:01:26 because it gives us the opportunity to
1:01:28 be able to
1:01:29 get a sense of the project and and to
1:01:31 their credit
1:01:32 the current commissioners have done
1:01:34 really an outstanding job i think of
1:01:36 being able to go through
1:01:37 that material and be able to ask some
1:01:39 really meaningful questions
1:01:40 and and make comments uh the
1:01:43 encouragement or the exhortation is to
1:01:44 the new commissioners and i just
1:01:46 encourage you uh it's not it's not a
1:01:49 time to be bashful or afraid and it's a
1:01:51 time to be bold
1:01:52 and if something doesn't make sense or
1:01:54 if you notice things that don't
1:01:55 that you don't understand boy that the
1:01:58 time to be able to make comment on that
1:02:00 is during the meetings and it's really
1:02:02 really critical we look
1:02:03 we look forward to your uh your your
1:02:06 ability to be able to read that
1:02:07 from your backgrounds and be able to
1:02:09 pick out stuff that maybe some of the
1:02:10 others of us can't so
1:02:12 it's really a critical part we're
1:02:14 representing really representing the
1:02:16 community in a
1:02:18 large way and and so i just encourage
1:02:20 you to be uh
1:02:21 really careful as you read and take
1:02:23 notes and and be ready to ask questions
1:02:25 and make comments
1:02:30 and i would like to add something uh to
1:02:33 what uh
1:02:33 chairperson zoa said um along with
1:02:36 complimenting you all because i know you
1:02:38 put in a lot of effort um and uh
1:02:41 i know that's because of the big bucks
1:02:43 that we pay you all
1:02:46 um i really do appreciate
1:02:49 all the effort and i wanted to um take a
1:02:52 moment just to touch on
1:02:54 um the different roles of the alternates
1:02:57 and the regular uh commission members
1:03:00 uh our approach is to have
1:03:05 both the regular members and the
1:03:07 alternates
1:03:08 receive all the materials participate in
1:03:11 all the meetings
1:03:13 however when we get to the vote
1:03:17 the regular members would be the
1:03:20 commissioners who would vote the
1:03:22 alternate members would not have the
1:03:25 opportunity to vote
1:03:26 unless they have been asked
1:03:30 to stand in for a regular meet uh member
1:03:33 to meet a quorum but we feel it's
1:03:36 really important to have the alternates
1:03:39 fully participate
1:03:41 it uh is it makes for a rich
1:03:44 conversation
1:03:45 um we hope it makes it interesting and
1:03:48 engaging for the alternates
1:03:50 it means that you all function very well
1:03:52 together as a team because you're
1:03:54 familiar with the processes
1:03:56 and sort of the different personalities
1:04:00 and procedures of the commission
1:04:03 so for
1:04:06 90 percent of the time the roles are not
1:04:09 really distinct
1:04:11 and it's only when we get to an actual
1:04:13 vote on a recommendation or a decision
1:04:17 and how many how many votes do we how
1:04:20 many regular
1:04:21 members do we have for to a perform
1:04:25 uh so we have seven members and four
1:04:28 members
1:04:28 is a quorum okay
1:04:35 so just a quick comment um i appreciate
1:04:38 what um
1:04:40 what the chair said uh
1:04:44 participation that participation
1:04:45 information um hugely valuable
1:04:48 well and i know thinking about my first
1:04:50 commission meeting it is a little
1:04:51 intimidating
1:05:06 or really
1:05:09 willing to help answer those even
1:05:10 outside the commission as we leave you
1:05:11 down as long as
1:05:12 the material to the discussion that
1:05:15 we're having uh during the meeting
1:05:17 and then also did you mention that
1:05:20 you're going to provide additional
1:05:24 let's follow up to some decisions that
1:05:26 are uh coming out of the commission that
1:05:27 may be appealing
1:05:28 or making recommendations heading to the
1:05:30 city accounts for decision
1:05:32 really appreciate that because it's kind
1:05:35 of nice to know how the story ends if it
1:05:36 doesn't end with us
1:05:37 on the evening that we make the
1:05:38 decisions so
1:05:40 i appreciate that uh the initial
1:05:42 follow-up uh everything the information
1:05:45 uh the year was being provided
1:05:48 on the good good admission to see and
1:05:50 read so appreciate that
1:05:56 i don't know if everybody else heard
1:05:58 that real well your audio on my computer
1:06:00 wasn't very good
1:06:01 was i the only one
1:06:06 i had the same problem yeah
1:06:10 i'll just
1:06:13 connections before sorry about that i
1:06:15 think we're just slip reading mike
1:06:17 we're reading your lips
1:06:18 [Laughter]
1:06:25 any more questions or input
1:06:32 lucy could you share the powerpoint
1:06:36 sure thank you um and actually i was
1:06:39 just about to say that then
1:06:41 um i i can share the whole thing if
1:06:43 that's useful to you
1:06:45 i was in particular going to share the
1:06:48 next five or six slides because they're
1:06:50 about resources
1:06:51 and they have links um for the
1:06:54 commissioners to
1:06:55 those resources but i can share the
1:06:58 entire thing if that's useful
1:07:01 i'd appreciate it thank you sure i'd
1:07:04 appreciate it
1:07:06 great um be glad to
1:07:10 um so um
1:07:14 the next section is resources
1:07:17 but i do want to mention um as i did
1:07:19 earlier
1:07:20 that there is a um sort of the legal
1:07:24 framework
1:07:25 how to open meetings act work
1:07:29 what are your legal responsibilities and
1:07:31 requirements
1:07:33 um public records all of these things
1:07:37 are discussed discussed in the youtube
1:07:41 video that is shown at the bottom of the
1:07:44 slide
1:07:46 i will warn you it's a little over two
1:07:48 hours
1:07:49 so set aside a rainy day and
1:07:53 and if you would in particular for the
1:07:56 new commissioners we
1:07:58 do require that you watch this because
1:08:02 it ensures um it protects both you and
1:08:04 the city
1:08:05 and ensures that you understand the
1:08:07 rules in which you are operating so
1:08:10 um uh please um
1:08:13 make the time to watch that
1:08:19 so um here are some other resources um
1:08:23 that are available to you
1:08:26 to help you be prepared so
1:08:30 i'll start with some general ones at the
1:08:33 city's website
1:08:35 which the address is down here
1:08:39 there are a couple of things that can be
1:08:41 useful one is the notify me
1:08:44 which is this second from the left green
1:08:47 button
1:08:48 if you select that you can sign up for
1:08:52 various kinds of notifications it can be
1:08:55 based on a neighborhood
1:08:56 it could be based on a project it could
1:09:00 be based
1:09:01 on a topic that interests you such as
1:09:04 development so that's just a resource
1:09:08 that's available to anyone in the city
1:09:11 also at the website there is a
1:09:14 search function at the top if the
1:09:17 other resources we have provided um
1:09:20 you aren't finding what you're looking
1:09:22 for feel free to contact staff
1:09:25 or if it's on after hours or on the
1:09:28 weekend
1:09:29 or you just are curious feel free to put
1:09:32 something in there i've heard people
1:09:34 generally have pretty good luck with
1:09:36 the search function another
1:09:39 general resource that the city provides
1:09:44 is what we call the active projects map
1:09:47 this shows moderate to large size
1:09:51 projects that are either in review
1:09:55 which is why they're orange or in
1:09:57 construction
1:09:58 which is why they're gray and
1:10:01 at this site if you click on one of
1:10:03 these parcels either gray or
1:10:06 orange a panel will appear on the left
1:10:10 providing some basic information and the
1:10:12 planning lead
1:10:14 at the bottom of it it says view
1:10:17 related documents you can click on that
1:10:19 and another panel
1:10:21 opens and uh you can see
1:10:24 a selection of many of the documents
1:10:28 that have been submitted to the city and
1:10:32 that we make accessible to the public
1:10:35 anything that's submitted to the city is
1:10:37 available
1:10:39 but to try and keep the list workable
1:10:42 we generally select the ones that we
1:10:45 think will be of most interest to the
1:10:47 public
1:10:55 another thing that may be of interest
1:10:58 to the commissioners are various city
1:11:00 codes and standards
1:11:02 if you click on your government
1:11:06 on the right hand side is a selection of
1:11:09 different kinds of documents
1:11:11 the second from the top is city codes
1:11:14 standards and plans
1:11:16 and when you open that this is what you
1:11:18 would see
1:11:19 so there are lists of city codes
1:11:22 city standards and city plans
1:11:26 which may be useful
1:11:29 for the permit that you're reviewing
1:11:32 if you select municipal code
1:11:36 this is the page you will get um
1:11:40 i don't usually go in this way but if
1:11:42 you want to get to just
1:11:43 the land use code that's an easy way
1:11:46 to access it
1:11:54 um code publishing
1:11:59 is a company that publishes many
1:12:01 municipal codes
1:12:02 including ours and the address is at the
1:12:05 bottom of the page
1:12:08 when you you can see all the various
1:12:11 titles
1:12:11 that the city of issaquah has over here
1:12:15 this arrow is pointing at title 18.
1:12:19 each of these in title 18 is a different
1:12:22 chapter
1:12:23 so there are zoning procedures
1:12:29 annexations parking landscape
1:12:33 and so any of these codes may be useful
1:12:37 i will tell you that one
1:12:40 confusing aspect about city codes which
1:12:43 is why we are reworking
1:12:44 title 18 is
1:12:48 that these codes may not apply
1:12:52 in some areas of the city
1:12:55 section 1819 has
1:12:59 a lot of codes in it 1819
1:13:03 is old town 1819a
1:13:06 is central issaquah which actually isn't
1:13:09 at code publishing you have to go to the
1:13:12 document center which i'll show you in a
1:13:13 minute um
1:13:16 itaqua highlands and talus have
1:13:18 replacement regulations that were
1:13:20 adopted
1:13:22 um this can make it a little confusing
1:13:25 to find
1:13:26 where the relevant codes are again feel
1:13:28 free to contact staff
1:13:32 and we'll try and help guide you through
1:13:35 which codes apply
1:13:36 to the project at hand
1:13:43 so i have a question i guess for
1:13:46 long-term
1:13:47 commissioners um how long do you feel
1:13:50 like it it took you to
1:13:52 to get a handle on at least some of the
1:13:54 the code basics or
1:13:56 is that i mean i'm sure it's an ongoing
1:13:58 process and
1:13:59 and always checking back but just
1:14:01 curious
1:14:02 how long it took to kind of get a
1:14:04 working knowledge of
1:14:07 where you're looking for most of this
1:14:08 information
1:14:13 um i'll i'll jump in and and um say that
1:14:17 generally you'll find that uh everything
1:14:20 is really well explained in the staff
1:14:22 report
1:14:23 and so the information that um
1:14:25 [Music]
1:14:26 you can refer to the code but generally
1:14:28 the staff has always
1:14:30 put everything you would need to know in
1:14:33 the report itself
1:14:35 um for the most part
1:14:39 okay that's great
1:14:43 and patty this is richard sanford and so
1:14:46 to pick up on commissioner morgan's
1:14:48 comment often the staff report
1:14:50 contains references to specific
1:14:53 uh titles or sections of the code so
1:14:56 they'll be right there in the staff
1:14:57 report so if you can
1:14:59 get to the code then it's easy to look
1:15:01 it up from there
1:15:08 thanks
1:15:10 any additional questions on that one
1:15:15 so um i just want to point out
1:15:18 um there is a section of our website
1:15:21 called the document center
1:15:24 it used to be listed overtly but
1:15:28 i think staff were the main people who
1:15:31 to the document center rather than
1:15:34 clicking on that
1:15:35 those code and standards list
1:15:40 but sometimes that's the easiest way for
1:15:44 you to find what you're looking for and
1:15:47 the document center is still there it
1:15:50 just doesn't show up
1:15:51 on the website when you at the main page
1:15:55 so if you enter this address it will
1:15:58 take you to
1:15:59 the document center some of the areas
1:16:01 you might be
1:16:02 interested in is under development
1:16:06 central issaquah if you click on this
1:16:10 triangle it opens up and expands and
1:16:12 then again with
1:16:13 development and design standards and you
1:16:16 can see
1:16:17 there are several different groupings
1:16:20 and then you get the specific documents
1:16:22 so for instance if you were interested
1:16:24 in parking and you wanted to check
1:16:26 something that you'd seen
1:16:28 in a in the staff report read the actual
1:16:32 language
1:16:33 this is one way that you might go about
1:16:36 getting to that specific
1:16:37 set of code provisions to read more
1:16:41 about it
1:16:43 in addition the comprehensive plan
1:16:46 is available here as well as any
1:16:49 development agreements
1:16:50 so for instance
1:16:54 we still have development agreements
1:16:56 with rowley properties
1:16:59 with lakeside industries and with
1:17:02 swedish hospital there are more but
1:17:04 just to take those three if you wanted
1:17:08 see more of the land use
1:17:12 regulations that are in the development
1:17:14 agreement and apply
1:17:16 to a project that had come before the
1:17:18 commission
1:17:20 this would be where you would find that
1:17:22 development agreement information
1:17:25 lucy i have a question richard sanford
1:17:27 sometimes
1:17:28 looking to code i've seen that there are
1:17:30 references to ordinances
1:17:32 and they're not linked where do you find
1:17:34 ordinances are they in the
1:17:36 document center where are those um
1:17:39 i believe that if you go to um
1:17:43 i can't do it right now but it's um
1:17:47 at our website if you um oh
1:17:50 let me show you um uh
1:17:53 actually i think the next slide will
1:17:55 help you with that
1:17:57 um this is
1:18:00 again if you go to your government
1:18:04 and under officials boards and
1:18:07 commissions
1:18:07 when you click on that it takes you to a
1:18:09 page where you can
1:18:11 select which commission at the bottom
1:18:15 of each of these pages it says archive
1:18:18 center
1:18:20 and if you click on archive center it
1:18:23 will take you to the cities archive and
1:18:25 i believe
1:18:26 it has um agendas
1:18:30 minutes and i think ordinances as well
1:18:35 so uh if you needed to
1:18:38 see the actual ordinance that's um
1:18:42 the way you would get to it okay great
1:18:44 thanks
1:18:46 so um this is my last slide and and i
1:18:48 know that sometimes i get questions from
1:18:51 commissioners
1:18:52 uh about uh you know how long is my term
1:18:56 and what is our meeting night or
1:18:59 i want to see something from a past
1:19:01 meeting and
1:19:02 i i'm happy to answer those questions
1:19:06 and you may be able to find it at the
1:19:08 page for
1:19:09 uh whichever board or commission um
1:19:12 you're interested in
1:19:14 so um this top box
1:19:17 shows um sort of the different steps uh
1:19:20 i've gone to it's kind of like a web
1:19:22 address
1:19:25 at the top of the page is the staff
1:19:26 liaison and a link
1:19:28 to email them regular commissioners and
1:19:32 their terms
1:19:33 are listed here alternate members and
1:19:35 their terms are listed here
1:19:37 and then information about our meeting
1:19:39 times are here
1:19:41 generally only the last three meetings
1:19:45 shown here with active links and then
1:19:48 you have to go into the archive center
1:19:50 to access
1:19:53 meetings that are further back
1:19:58 and that's my last slide
1:20:01 any other questions or thoughts um
1:20:05 lucy this is johnny ketta it looks like
1:20:07 my name's misspelled
1:20:08 oh okay thanks that's that's not good
1:20:14 i will check on that thank you
1:20:24 so uh if if nobody has
1:20:28 other questions or comments uh it seems
1:20:31 appropriate do i have to officially open
1:20:33 the opera
1:20:33 for public comment i know uh connie
1:20:36 marsh would like to
1:20:37 make public comment so i'd like to open
1:20:40 that time for her now
1:20:43 okay let's see if i can can you hear me
1:20:46 yes you can
1:20:49 oops there we go so uh
1:20:53 well one that's the first time i've
1:20:55 actually ever
1:20:56 heard the process
1:21:00 described two development commissions
1:21:04 in that way so i think that's a step in
1:21:07 the right direction
1:21:09 oh i'll introduce myself i'm connie
1:21:11 marsh
1:21:12 um i have a tendency to try to comment
1:21:17 on a lot of the development issues
1:21:20 i don't wait for kovid to wear pajamas i
1:21:23 just wear pajamas
1:21:24 all the time and preferably with those
1:21:27 shoes and socks in public so you can
1:21:29 just get used to that
1:21:30 and i have a hobby of two enormous dogs
1:21:33 that i go out and reign and transfer
1:21:35 around
1:21:35 so uh
1:21:39 but i have an entirely different
1:21:41 perspective
1:21:43 on development commission than staff
1:21:47 and development commission itself does
1:21:51 uh it is it
1:21:55 it is it is only somewhat
1:21:58 a finely run machine from my perspective
1:22:04 the um the one indicator of that is the
1:22:07 name change of the department just
1:22:10 got turned to community planning and
1:22:12 development
1:22:13 because uh i i think the city
1:22:17 decided that the community
1:22:21 was one of the least emphasized
1:22:24 voices in development commission
1:22:27 and now in development projects so
1:22:30 development
1:22:31 commission is really interesting because
1:22:34 you all are supposed to follow and
1:22:38 uphold the code and code tends to be
1:22:42 presented to you by staff
1:22:45 as you all said and they lay it out
1:22:48 and um that is staffed perspective
1:22:52 on how code should be implemented
1:22:56 and the code especially our code now
1:22:58 which is really freaking fragmented and
1:23:00 difficult to use i mean it's
1:23:01 crazy but it can be interpreted in
1:23:05 many different ways and not all of those
1:23:09 are the ways that the community
1:23:12 would prefer now what i found in doing
1:23:15 an appeal
1:23:17 is that what that
1:23:20 tilts to what staff provides
1:23:25 is is like has so much standing
1:23:30 that it is almost impossible to to
1:23:33 overturn and so if you remember when you
1:23:38 through the process and we created sort
1:23:41 neighborhood descriptions for the
1:23:43 central issaquah plan
1:23:45 areas i think i think you all were
1:23:47 involved in that
1:23:49 it said this is what we intend for these
1:23:51 neighborhoods
1:23:52 to be and so this concept
1:23:55 of intent um
1:23:58 is more of what i look at when i see
1:24:02 code going through it's like well what
1:24:04 do we
1:24:05 want that neighborhood to be what does
1:24:07 the community
1:24:08 see for their town not only now but long
1:24:13 like in for their kids and their kids
1:24:15 kids what do we want this town to be
1:24:18 and these neighborhood descriptions are
1:24:20 supposed to in theory
1:24:22 guide staff direction on on
1:24:26 the code because you know there's always
1:24:28 this room
1:24:30 so when lucy's talked about okay we have
1:24:33 this process
1:24:34 where we go to a meeting and we
1:24:36 introduce each other
1:24:38 i sort of feel like this is the point in
1:24:40 time where
1:24:41 you introduce the the vision
1:24:44 of what that neighborhood should be
1:24:47 and this is the basis of where
1:24:51 the the development should begin it's
1:24:54 like how does this fit in with
1:24:55 our town and then you look at the code
1:24:59 and you say
1:24:59 okay how how does does this
1:25:03 work on through but this sets the mind
1:25:05 of the developer and the
1:25:07 expectations of what our community has
1:25:10 for that
1:25:11 area of our town now we don't have this
1:25:14 for every area
1:25:15 though i think that we should and so
1:25:18 um the the
1:25:24 at this point we we don't do that enough
1:25:27 and when i saw this agenda and i read
1:25:30 input um i
1:25:33 i took it as how can we make the process
1:25:37 better for the community i i didn't take
1:25:40 it as much as an
1:25:42 educational section so i see that little
1:25:45 line and i'm going for it whether you
1:25:47 like it or not
1:25:48 so the concept of staff being neutral
1:25:51 i think it's super hard for staff to be
1:25:53 neutral when staff
1:25:54 talks to a developer all the time and
1:25:58 you know they want you know what they
1:26:00 and and so you have a tendency to want
1:26:03 to accommodate people as human nature
1:26:05 right
1:26:05 you all come all of with your own
1:26:08 expectations
1:26:09 and the public we come with our our own
1:26:12 expectations and there
1:26:15 that you guys have this sort of fine
1:26:18 balance of
1:26:19 how to try to meld these things oh wait
1:26:21 it's starting to sound like the federal
1:26:23 government
1:26:23 i'm i'm sorry but
1:26:27 um one of the things that makes it hard
1:26:29 for the community
1:26:31 is that when we
1:26:35 speak there's no community rebot and
1:26:38 without a community rebut it makes it
1:26:42 very hard for the community's voice to
1:26:44 be solid so
1:26:45 i would ask that there actually be sort
1:26:49 summation of the community comments
1:26:51 because say if six people commented
1:26:55 on six topics that would be 36 topics
1:26:58 that you guys would be having to
1:26:59 remember
1:27:00 and then try to decide whether you
1:27:02 agreed or disagreed
1:27:04 and so in these meetings i think it
1:27:06 would be excellent to just
1:27:07 establish some of those those tools to
1:27:10 make it easier for
1:27:12 everybody to do uh the very best thing
1:27:15 for the community
1:27:16 they could and um
1:27:19 let's see here i'm sorry i have to look
1:27:21 at my note
1:27:23 oh the uh the the presentation
1:27:27 needs to be uh also include
1:27:30 all of the surrounding
1:27:34 parcels of land to understand the
1:27:36 connectivity because
1:27:37 our town is filled with connections be
1:27:40 it water or roads
1:27:42 and then when you go to roads
1:27:45 there is a disconnect in our roads
1:27:49 because
1:27:50 a development commission is often told
1:27:52 that they don't have
1:27:53 purview over the roads
1:27:57 connections and how they interface with
1:28:00 the public right-of-way
1:28:01 and so that's title 12 and i was just
1:28:05 reading that today because i read code
1:28:06 for fun
1:28:08 that little discrepancy needs to be
1:28:11 resolved in order to make your
1:28:13 jobs better and for us to get a better a
1:28:16 product and
1:28:20 the other thing that we need to do is we
1:28:22 need to ensure
1:28:24 that all of the documents and all public
1:28:26 comment make it onto the record
1:28:28 because during my appeal i found that
1:28:30 those didn't that did not happen
1:28:33 and that was really concerning to me we
1:28:36 need to review the green
1:28:37 sheets lucy did not go into the green
1:28:40 sheets
1:28:41 and maybe that is part of something that
1:28:44 could be provided to the new people
1:28:46 but basically they give you checklists
1:28:49 where they show whether they think
1:28:51 they've accomplished the particular code
1:28:53 items and they're not very refined and
1:28:56 things you could drive a truck
1:28:57 through them and let's see
1:29:00 oh i'm i'm so almost done you guys oh
1:29:04 last one's important um the active
1:29:07 projects
1:29:08 map as far as i know
1:29:11 does not show changes that are new
1:29:14 so when you read the active project map
1:29:17 it all looks like it is of the same age
1:29:19 there's also an
1:29:20 active projects list where all of the
1:29:23 changes to the projects are highlighted
1:29:26 so that you can understand what has been
1:29:28 changed in the last 30 days because
1:29:31 otherwise you can just get lost in the
1:29:33 entire
1:29:34 thing and
1:29:37 there you go uh that is my
1:29:40 quick and swift boy wouldn't it be nice
1:29:43 to have this
1:29:44 all be better uh update so dc
1:29:48 in the last year you've done an amazing
1:29:50 job and i look forward to more
1:29:52 whining at you and hope that you will
1:29:54 enjoy my new
1:29:55 sets of pajamas from the upcoming
1:29:57 holidays thank you
1:30:02 well we appreciate your comments uh miss
1:30:04 marsh and uh look forward to dealing
1:30:07 with you
1:30:07 on many further occasions so we
1:30:10 appreciate that and
1:30:11 as we've said and you may not or may or
1:30:14 may not recall
1:30:16 our our effort or our desire is to have
1:30:19 as many people come to our public
1:30:21 meetings and
1:30:22 and opportunities to provide input
1:30:25 because they have changed
1:30:26 they have changed the course of what we
1:30:28 did and what we allowed and
1:30:30 and it's really vital and so as you
1:30:33 continue to be engaged i just encourage
1:30:36 you to
1:30:38 talk to your friends and neighbors and
1:30:40 help them be part of the solution as
1:30:42 so thank you
1:30:47 so uh it looks like the only
1:30:50 unless there's other i don't know if
1:30:52 there's anybody other
1:30:53 in the public from the public other than
1:30:55 connie
1:30:58 doug could you confirm that whether
1:31:01 there is anyone else on i i don't
1:31:03 see anyone there is not anyone else
1:31:06 okay so it looks like uh
1:31:10 the only other business or announcements
1:31:13 is that our next scheduled meeting it's
1:31:16 december 2nd at 20 20 at 7 p.m
1:31:20 sharp and we'll i guess it'll be a
1:31:24 a cis a webex meeting as well at this
1:31:27 point
1:31:28 um do we have i'm not sure that there's
1:31:32 any permits scheduled for review
1:31:34 um there is the standing meeting here
1:31:36 are correct
1:31:37 is um december 7th but i would
1:31:40 anticipate that that and certainly the
1:31:42 21st is
1:31:44 um are going to be canceled but um
1:31:48 uh one of the staff people will check in
1:31:50 as we get a little bit closer
1:31:53 so i i would just ask our two new
1:31:55 commissioners
1:31:56 did you both get emails today or did you
1:31:59 uh communication
1:32:03 yeah i did i did great okay
1:32:06 so it looks like everybody's hit and and
1:32:08 as as lucy said
1:32:10 if the meetings canceled that that
1:32:12 notice gets sent out pretty early
1:32:13 so uh if there's no other
1:32:17 business no other questions no other
1:32:18 concerns
1:32:20 i appreciate you all your tenants and
1:32:23 like i said
1:32:25 it was a it was a grand year uh we did
1:32:28 some fun stuff and
1:32:29 uh i look forward to being equally fun
1:32:32 this next year so uh
1:32:33 hope y'all have a a great holiday uh
1:32:36 a great uh thanksgiving and and
1:32:40 christmas or whatever you choose to sell
1:32:42 however you choose to celebrate
1:32:44 that thank you for the presentation and
1:32:48 again happy
1:32:49 happy holidays to everyone
1:32:53 thanks and nice to meet all of you

Attendance

Council / Members (1)
Administration/
Staff (1)
Richard Sowa, Chair Lucy Sloman, Land Development Mgr. Mel Morgan, Vice Chair Andrea Snyder, Deputy City Administrator Michael Brennan Doug Yormick, CP&D Assistant Planner Patty Dillon Jon Ikeda, Alt. Kevin Price Richard Sanford Arthur Schulte, Alt. Brooke Shore