Development Commission About Staff Liaison Created in 1983, this commission reviews all land Christopher Wright, use actions requiring a Level 3 review. The Project Oversight Manager Commission further serves as an advisory board to Email the City Council on land use actions requiring council approval (Level 5 review). Regular Members 2018 – Jasmina Mihova The appearance of fairness doctrine prohibits 2018 – Raymond Leong Development Commission members and City 2018 – Richard Sowa Council members from discussing the merit of 2019 – Michael Brennan specific land use development applications outside 2019 – Randolph Harrison of the formal public meeting process. Citizens, 2020 – Melvin Morgan however, may discuss any issue with the City's 2020 – Kevin Price Development Services Department. Written comments are also welcome. Alternate Members 2018 – Robert Bakh Membership 2018 – Carl…
Sentences extracted from the narrative containing words like
recommended, requested, directed,
moved, or approved. Best-effort — verify
against the full minutes for context.
He explained the proposed signage plan, noting that no other changes to the size or the number of signs are being requested.
He asked staff to clarify that the Development Commission is being asked to review approval of sign location only tonight and that staff will be conducting the review and approval of the applicant’s sign permit…
He said he feels that the application for an AAS should be approved.
HARRISON asked staff to explain the City’s reservations about approving this request.
SANFORD clarified that, if the amendment is not approved, what would be the maximum number of signs that would be allowed.
Wright clarified that if this adjustment is denied, then potentially other tenants in the building could put up more signs, including on the first and second floors of the building where none exist today.
MORGAN clarified we could end up with multiple signs if this AAS is denied.
Recommendation MOVED BY MORGAN, SECONDED BY BAKH that the Development Commission approve an Administrative Adjustment of Standards, AAS17-00009, for the Highmark Medical Office Building, File No.
He suggested we make it clear, as Wright requested in his opening statements, why we are doing this; denying this AAS could result in a proliferation of signs, which the Commission finds unacceptable.