Development Commission · Wednesday, June 8, 2016 · City Council Digest

1. CALL TO ORDER

Member Roster

packet pp.3

Previously discussed: Development Commission · Mar 2, 2016

Open packet at p.3 ↗

Staff report:

Contacts About Created in 1983, this commission reviews all land use actions Staff Liaison requiring a Level 3 review. The Commission further serves as an Christopher Wright, Project advisory board to the City Council on land use actions requiring Oversight Manager council approval (Level 5 review). Email

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

Meeting Minutes from March 2, 2016

packet pp.5–11

Previously discussed: Development Commission · Mar 2, 2016

▶ Watch from 0:56 Open packet at p.5 ↗

Staff report:

APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) Development Commission Page 1 of 7 March 2, 2016

3. AGENDA ITEMS

Go Issaquah: City’s Transportation Efforts

15 min · Emily Moon, Deputy City Administrator

Topics: Transportation

Commission Purview and Purpose

10 min · Lucy Sloman, Land Development Manager · packet pp.13–14

Open packet at p.13 ↗

Staff report:

Development Services th 1775 – 12 Ave. NW | P.O. Box 1307 Issaquah, WA 98027 425-837-3100 issaquahwa.gov

Silverado Development Agreement Public Hearing

60 min · Christopher Wright, Project Oversight Manager · packet pp.15–55

Open packet at p.15 ↗

Staff report:

This Agreement (“Agreement”) is made this ___ day of ____, 2016 by and between the City of Issaquah (“Issaquah” or the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and Silverado Senior Living Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Owner”). The City and Owner may also be referred to individually as a Party and collectively as the Parties.

Commission Training – VIDEO Records, Open Public Meetings, Records Management Decisions

60 min

Gateway Parking Revision - Update

10 min · Lucy Sloman, Land Development Manager · packet pp.57–76

Topics: Transportation

Open packet at p.57 ↗

Staff report:

Development Services th 1775 – 12 Ave. NW | P.O. Box 1307 Issaquah, WA 98027 425-837-3100 issaquahwa.gov

Election of Officers

10 min · Christopher Wright, Project Oversight Manager

Topics: Elections

311 segments .txt ↗

0:15 ↗ Okay, good evening and welcome to the meeting of the Issaquah Development Commission.

0:21 ↗ And tonight we're going to have a flexible schedule as I understand. It's been changed

0:27 ↗ three or four times, but we will have a description of what we're going to

0:31 ↗ do tonight from Christopher. The first thing that I'd like to do, first order of

0:36 ↗ business, is to welcome Kevin Price, who is our newest Development Commissioner. He'll be joining

0:42 ↗ us and these terms are for four years so Kevin will be with us for

0:46 ↗ the next four years and we're really looking forward to his counsel as things go

0:51 ↗ on and the issues that come up. The second thing that we'd like to do

0:56 ↗ before we get to the minutes, the approval of the minutes is give Christopher Wright

1:01 ↗ an opportunity to talk about the agenda because for those of you who don't have

1:06 ↗ it on speed dial, it has changed a couple of times. And yeah, so

1:12 ↗ Christopher, do you want to get up there and tell us what we're doing here?

1:21 ↗ That's different from what we were originally scheduled to do. This is different from what

1:26 ↗ was sent to you and it's actually been a little different from what's up here

1:29 ↗ right now. I like it. It's changing up to the last minute. So basically what

1:33 ↗ the agenda tonight will be is the approval of the minutes. Then we will have

1:38 ↗ our deputy city administrator Emily Moon give a presentation about how we're addressing traffic.

1:45 ↗ And then we will have a discussion about the Gateway Apartments and some changes they've

1:49 ↗ made to their plans. And then the Commission training, we were going to show a

1:55 ↗ video tonight and watch it all together, but instead what we're going to do is

2:01 ↗ email that to you. So you'll be getting that, and we may give you a

2:04 ↗ form to fill out signing that you've watched it and there may be some other

2:08 ↗ attachments with it but we're going to do that rather than all sit here and

2:11 ↗ watch it together. And there's also a piece of training too that Lucy

2:18 ↗ we had thought might do tonight but she's going to wait and do that next

2:21 ↗ week. So you do have a commission meeting next week as well and Lucy's going

2:27 ↗ to do her piece of the training then. And then at the last item on

2:31 ↗ the agenda I understand you want to have a discussion about the election of officers.

2:37 ↗ And that'll be it. All right. Thanks. Thank you, Christopher. So the next item on

2:42 ↗ the agenda is the review and approval of the minutes. Has everybody had an opportunity

2:47 ↗ to read them? And if so, are there any proposed changes in the minutes?

2:55 ↗ If not, is there? Move approval of the minutes. Second.

3:01 ↗ Mark second. From the mark second meeting. Second. Do we have a second? It

3:07 ↗ was a dual meaning word that I said there. A motion to approve the minutes

3:11 ↗ as they are recorded for the March 2nd meeting. Is there any discussion before we

3:15 ↗ vote? If not, all those in favor of approval, signify by saying aye. Aye. All

3:21 ↗ right, carries unanimously. All right,

3:27 ↗ we'll get to that later. So without any further ado, let's go ahead and go

3:32 ↗ to Goeysquois.

3:51 ↗ Good evening, I am Emily Moon, the Deputy City Administrator, and I'm happy to be

3:55 ↗ here tonight to talk to you about some of the ways that we are trying

4:00 ↗ to address the number one issue in our community, which is traffic and things related

4:06 ↗ to that.

4:12 ↗ So from our recent citizen survey to our business retention surveys,

4:18 ↗ this has been the loud and clear number one issue for

4:24 ↗ our residents and our business owners. And so at this moment in

4:29 ↗ time, we're taking a step back from the daily work and trying to communicate about

4:35 ↗ the comprehensive effort that we've put forward to try to address congestion,

4:41 ↗ mobility concerns, transit issues, and all things related to traffic.

4:48 ↗ And so we're going out into the community to provide that information. We're holding a

4:53 ↗ series of open houses that are more focused on their traffic task force recommendations, and

4:58 ↗ I'll talk about those in a minute. And we have a great deal of information

5:03 ↗ on our website as well. As all of you know, traffic's an

5:09 ↗ issue today, and we're anticipating that it will continue to be an issue into the

5:14 ↗ future. Part of the reason for that is because of

5:20 ↗ how our community is situated. We have many neighboring communities that need to travel

5:26 ↗ through Issaquah to gain access to I-90 and other regional destinations.

5:32 ↗ And so we have that sort of congestion that's apparent on a day like today

5:37 ↗ on Issaquah-Hobart Road when there's a problem on Highway 18 and at other times when

5:43 ↗ there's congestion in the region. Our location and topography

5:49 ↗ also creates some unique conditions for our community, our beautiful mountains, our lake,

5:55 ↗ make it challenging to build transportation infrastructure and have some efficiency in our network.

6:02 ↗ And we have manmade challenges as well, like the freeway that's dividing our town.

6:08 ↗ We also have made some past community decisions for a variety of reasons that have

6:14 ↗ situated us where we are today. Lots of people have asked us as we've been

6:18 ↗ working with the traffic task force about why the city won't consider building a bypass,

6:23 ↗ for example, on our south and southeast side. And two other

6:29 ↗ alternatives have been proposed recently and recently. in the past to

6:35 ↗ create another north-south route through Issaquah, a route that would go across Tiger Mountain, another

6:41 ↗ through Old Town via Third Avenue has been discussed. And both proposals created some division

6:47 ↗ in our community and it was ultimately decided by council or the task force or

6:52 ↗ both in some cases not to proceed with either. Lastly,

6:59 ↗ our region is very popular. People are continuing to move here and we don't anticipate

7:04 ↗ that that's going to slow down very significantly in the near future that would give

7:08 ↗ us a little bit of breathing room. And so we are trying to plan for

7:13 ↗ that increased demand of the future as well. So

7:19 ↗ here are a few things that we have done recently to try to tackle traffic

7:23 ↗ or mitigate some of the impacts. We've doubled traffic fees. We're working with

7:29 ↗ our regional partners on ways to collaborate on regional improvements. We're

7:35 ↗ enhancing pedestrian safety. We completed a pedestrian crossing study

7:41 ↗ last fall, and we're making it easier to get around on foot and bike. As

7:45 ↗ we know as a community, we value being able to use non-motorized transportation as well

7:51 ↗ and we're trying to build out that network. Lastly, our city is

7:57 ↗ contemplating a package of local transportation projects that might be referred to voters this fall.

8:07 ↗ Developer fees have been increased at a minimum. They've been doubled for different

8:13 ↗ types of development. But even if development stopped tomorrow, we would still face transportation

8:19 ↗ challenges that I've spoken about. So like our neighboring cities, we're growing into more of

8:25 ↗ an urban environment, and we also live within state regulations that require us to plan

8:31 ↗ for growth. In Issaquah, we've made a very deliberate decision to prepare

8:37 ↗ for our future and this growth by protecting the things that we value most, our

8:42 ↗ existing neighborhoods like Front Street, and our forested mountain sides. That's

8:47 ↗ why in the next 15 years we've determined that our growth should be concentrated in

8:52 ↗ central Issaquah, as all of you know. And we're getting ready for that new development

8:57 ↗ as well to ensure that that new growth pays its way. And so we have

9:03 ↗ made changes in some of our impact fees.

9:10 ↗ Given our topography or geography, we know we need to have partners in tackling

9:16 ↗ traffic. And so we've been strongly advocating for more bus service, alternative

9:22 ↗ transportation, park and rides, and someday we hope light rail to Issaquah.

9:28 ↗ And we're working with our neighbors like the city of Sammamish and King County on

9:32 ↗ congestion that starts beyond our borders. I hope we're gonna have

9:38 ↗ some very tangible piece of news soon on that front. We've been working very hard

9:43 ↗ with King County to try to set the parameters for

9:48 ↗ intergovernmental agreement that will allow us to collaborate on a corridor study for Issaquah-Hobart Road

9:55 ↗ and prioritize that in a better fashion for their capital improvement program.

10:06 ↗ On pedestrian safety, with the goal in mind of providing a safe and convenient way

10:10 ↗ for our pedestrians and drivers to get around our community, we completed a review of

10:15 ↗ several priority crossings several months ago. We used community feedback along

10:21 ↗ with other criteria such as accident history to evaluate those top priority

10:27 ↗ crossings in town. Two corridors, East Sunset Way and Newport Way Northwest were also

10:32 ↗ evaluated for possible enhancements in addition with park

10:38 ↗ in Iskawa Highlands. Following that outreach and the input that we

10:44 ↗ received from the community, we released the findings of that study last October and we

10:50 ↗ have developed a list of capital improvement projects to implement them and address

10:56 ↗ the findings of that study. Those efforts were begun in 2015

11:03 ↗ and will carry, the majority of those projects will be completed this calendar year and

11:08 ↗ a few are in future years. In addition, we have education and enforcement efforts that

11:14 ↗ we have refined and stepped up and a significant public education campaign will be underway

11:20 ↗ this fall. We also spent quite a

11:26 ↗ bit of energy in the past working on our walk and roll program and we

11:31 ↗ developed that plan from input from bicyclists, pedestrians and community members. and we

11:37 ↗ created this plan as a way to identify missing links in that infrastructure and

11:43 ↗ an action plan for developing it on our existing corridors.

11:53 ↗ We do a good job in this community of leveraging grants and outside funds. One

11:58 ↗ example is we have secured $50 million in

12:04 ↗ transportation improvement funding for projects that are currently underway in North Issaquah,

12:10 ↗ the vicinity of East Lake Sam Parkway and the extension of

12:16 ↗ 62nd. But because grants and fees won't grow fast enough in the future to fund

12:21 ↗ the projects that we need now, we're also considering a package of local transportation projects

12:27 ↗ that could go to voters this fall. The traffic task force was a team of

12:31 ↗ volunteers that were appointed by the mayor in late 2015, and they recently made

12:37 ↗ recommendations to the mayor and to council on a potential package of transportation

12:43 ↗ projects. The council's now considering that package and engaging the community to get feedback

12:49 ↗ on those projects and on the potential of bringing a package forward.

12:56 ↗ Here's a map, it's probably a little difficult to see from where you are. It

13:00 ↗ lists all of the projects, I'll just list those verbally very quickly, but you can

13:04 ↗ see from the map that the proposed projects are located throughout Issaquah.

13:13 ↗ This is the criteria that the Traffic Task Force used to evaluate the projects that

13:19 ↗ they wanted to consider. So they had a very good conversation about what was important

13:24 ↗ and what were the objectives they wanted to keep in mind. And this is the

13:28 ↗ list that they created. So from the top, I'll read these

13:34 ↗ just so audience can hear them. They wanted to consider projects where citizens were

13:40 ↗ having difficulties getting around. They wanted to work on projects that we could do with

13:45 ↗ local funding that we weren't going to be dependent, for example, on the state or

13:49 ↗ federal government to assist us with. They wanted to pick projects that would have a

13:54 ↗ visible impact, recognizing we need some action today, not just build it for

14:00 ↗ what the transportation needs might be in the future, but also attend to that. And

14:05 ↗ they wanted to pick projects that would have strong community support. They also wanted to

14:10 ↗ be mindful of our commitment to that non-motorized mobility and so they wanted to help

14:16 ↗ pedestrians and cyclists get around town. And they knew that council had an

14:22 ↗ obligation to find a way to fund our concurrency or level of service goals.

14:31 ↗ This is a map that's currently on our website and I'm gonna see if this

14:35 ↗ works and then if it doesn't, we'll go with plan B. The map is meant

14:41 ↗ to be interactive and so when you click on one of these icons, you should

14:46 ↗ be able to go on our website to project information. So this is the GO

14:52 ↗ ISSAQA website. This is the drill down page on local projects. And

14:59 ↗ if you select a particular project, some project specific information will

15:05 ↗ pop up for you, including the cost and a very short description. Might say a

15:09 ↗ word about that for a second. The projects that are on this

15:15 ↗ map by and large with a few exceptions are projects that

15:21 ↗ originated in a pre-existing document. So either they were on the walk and roll

15:27 ↗ program or they were on our transportation improvement program list or

15:32 ↗ TIP or they came up during the crossing study.

15:38 ↗ And they range in terms of how

15:44 ↗ designed the they are, so we have projects that are a simple line in the

15:49 ↗ TIP and are at the conceptual or study level. They have not been even

15:55 ↗ preliminarily designed, and then we have projects that are at the 90% design level. They

16:00 ↗ may even have grants attached to them, and so that's important to keep in mind.

16:05 ↗ We have a really broad spectrum of projects, but the task force started with existing

16:10 ↗ projects that they understood were already as community

16:16 ↗ desired or needed projects. So the council as they discuss

16:22 ↗ these will determine if they wanna pursue some or all or none of these

16:28 ↗ projects and so that dialogue is underway at this time. You can also see

16:34 ↗ that we have information on the website about developer fees, some more

16:40 ↗ specific information on what we did to raise those impact fees, our regional

16:46 ↗ collaboration efforts, the pedestrian safety, and the walk and roll. And the pedestrian safety is

16:52 ↗ where you can find some of the information on that crossing study that I've mentioned.

16:58 ↗ All right, if I was smart, I'd know how to toggle back a little bit

17:03 ↗ more easily, but.

17:09 ↗ And then lastly, I thought I'd share with you this video that we've, made and

17:14 ↗ it just sums up our traffic mitigation efforts thus far. A lot more to come.

17:21 ↗ I'm eager to tell the community all the different ways that we're trying to improve

17:25 ↗ this situation and even more so looking forward to collaborating with others on how

17:31 ↗ we can make a better future for our transportation network in Issaquah. So let's see

17:37 ↗ if this works.

17:45 ↗ learn and play. And we're not alone. In the next 15 years, Central Issaquah's population

17:50 ↗ and workforce are expected to more than double. Traffic is already a problem, and it's

17:55 ↗ not going away. That's why Issaquah isn't waiting for development to decide our fate. Instead,

18:01 ↗ we're tackling traffic now. Recently, we more than doubled traffic fees to ensure developers are

18:07 ↗ paying their fair share. We understand we can't tackle this issue alone, so we're advocating

18:12 ↗ for more bus service, park and rides, and someday light rail to Issaquah. And we're

18:17 ↗ working with our neighbors, like Sammamish and King County, on congestion that starts beyond our

18:21 ↗ borders. To get more people out of their cars, Issaquah is making it easier to

18:27 ↗ get around by foot or bike. Making our streets safer for pedestrians is also a

18:32 ↗ top priority. And since grants and fees won't grow fast enough to fund projects we

18:36 ↗ need now, Issaquah is considering a package of local transportation projects that could go to

18:41 ↗ voters this fall. Together we can tackle traffic. It's time to stop swimming upstream.

18:56 ↗ We have two upcoming events. We have a council work

19:02 ↗ session happening on the 13th, and we also have a traffic open house hosted

19:08 ↗ by the council that's happening on the 15th. And there's more information on the website

19:13 ↗ about those two events, but we encourage Everyone that has an interest to come and

19:18 ↗ attend on the 13th. It will be more of a dialogue between the council members

19:22 ↗ a more robust presentation about projects about the funding method

19:28 ↗ and then on the 15th it will be more an opportunity to dialogue resident resident

19:34 ↗ resident to council member. Also, we will have information present on the various

19:39 ↗ projects and the regional efforts, etc. So with that be happy to answer any questions

19:45 ↗ you might have. Emily, what is the,

19:53 ↗ the video talks about things that are going to happen now, as have you, and

19:58 ↗ I understand that's going to be one of the objectives is to communicate to citizens

20:02 ↗ and businesses in Issaquah that we are doing things now. But what, I didn't see

20:07 ↗ anything in there that tells potential ballot voters, what guarantees,

20:15 ↗ Guarantee is too strong a word, but what will they get? What is the city

20:21 ↗ saying, this is what our objective is in terms of how long it takes to

20:26 ↗ get across town or the hardcore things that you're looking at? Sure. So I can

20:31 ↗ answer that in a few different ways. First, it's important to note that the council

20:37 ↗ hasn't selected Projects are or even determined to refer something to voters so once

20:43 ↗ they have decided that that's what they want to do and we know which projects

20:46 ↗ and we'll be able to communicate it I believe a little bit more concisely and

20:49 ↗ effectively about the intended benefits of those projects and and of them together

20:56 ↗ So that so that's me kicking the can down the road just a little bit

21:00 ↗ for those reasons, but the task force picked their

21:06 ↗ a complement of projects to try to enhance

21:12 ↗ mobility in town. And what they meant by that was just make it easier for

21:17 ↗ people to get around to live their daily lives in this community, whether that's in

21:22 ↗ a car, on a bus, on foot, or by a bike. And so that's the

21:27 ↗ simple goal. The way in which we do that differs by project, and

21:34 ↗ the outcome of each of those projects is a little bit different. So some are

21:38 ↗ very much about increasing capacity or reducing travel time.

21:45 ↗ And then others are more about making it, parking structures was one I clicked on,

21:49 ↗ making it easier for people to drive to one spot, park, get out, and walk,

21:54 ↗ and therefore reduce the number of those small distance trips. So there are a variety

22:00 ↗ of projects, each with different outcomes, but in a nutshell, it was to improve our

22:06 ↗ mobility. But when this comes to fruition, or when whatever it

22:12 ↗ is actually comes to fruition, there will be explicit measurements or explicit

22:19 ↗ The goals will be explicit for each of these so that people will understand exactly

22:24 ↗ what they get for this work. Yes, that would be our intent, to make the

22:28 ↗ goals explicit. The actual measurement of outcomes will, in some cases for those projects that

22:33 ↗ haven't even been designed, will be determined in part by the design.

22:40 ↗ So it's a challenge. Any other questions from the

22:45 ↗ commission? So Emily, you noted that light rail is potentially in the future for the

22:51 ↗ city and sound transit board obviously is putting forward a package he's got a light

22:56 ↗ rail coming to Issaquah in 25 or so years which might be a while

23:02 ↗ but that being said what's the conversation been around the

23:07 ↗ implications of bringing light rail to the city MOST OF THE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT I

23:13 ↗ SAW ON THAT LIST ARE RESPONDING TO THE CURRENT PLAN FOR THE CITY AND

23:19 ↗ THE DIFFICULTY SOUTH. THE LIGHT RAIL NOW IS A WHOLE

23:25 ↗ DIFFERENT SORT OF A TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT THAT YOU PLAN AROUND. SO HAS THERE

23:31 ↗ BEEN CONVERSATIONS ABOUT THE LIGHT RAIL POTENTIAL CORRIDOR, WHAT THE POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS ARE TO THE

23:36 ↗ CITY'S CURRENT PLAN AND HOW THAT MIGHT NEED TO CHANGE? some of the investments that

23:40 ↗ might be contemplated now may get in the way of that in the future and

23:44 ↗ try to be aware of that. Yeah, excellent points. Definitely at

23:50 ↗ the forefront of our mind, but we have little information to work on right now.

23:56 ↗ The alignment of light rail has not been determined where

24:02 ↗ additional parking rides for our facilities have not been determined. So

24:09 ↗ it's difficult to speak to that. But having said that, we're talking about it. We've

24:14 ↗ expressed opinions and data to Sound Transit so that they have that in mind as

24:19 ↗ they start to contemplate those alignments. And we,

24:26 ↗ We have preferences, I think, things that I hope make sense. We want to make

24:32 ↗ sure that there's good connectivity to I-90 and our major

24:37 ↗ arterials for all of these transportation systems to work. I'm and

24:43 ↗ certainly we want to make sure that people have access so that gets back to

24:47 ↗ being able to find a place to park next to a light rail and so

24:52 ↗ we're trying to keep that in mind this question about not

25:00 ↗ not setting forth on a project that might need to be undone in the future

25:06 ↗ is definitely one that the task force talked about. It's one that we've discussed with

25:10 ↗ council and amongst staff. I don't believe that we have a project here

25:16 ↗ that would be hurt in any fashion by any alignment by sound

25:22 ↗ transit. So we definitely are keeping that in mind. It's also important to know that

25:28 ↗ we're not gonna be able, if council were to decide to pursue all nine of

25:33 ↗ these projects. We're not gonna start all nine of them on day one. We will

25:39 ↗ have to sequence them and therefore we'll have some additional planning time and be able

25:45 ↗ to be, continue to be thoughtful about our approach and we will begin to learn

25:50 ↗ more and more about sound transit as time goes on. Thank you.

25:58 ↗ Any other questions? Great, thank you very much. I would say that I'm glad to

26:04 ↗ see the city doing this because just as an individual, members of the staff know

26:08 ↗ this. I am frequently, unpleasantly surprised by how a little,

26:14 ↗ some of the, a lot of the residents of Issaquah actually know about what is

26:19 ↗ being planned, when the meetings are to discuss the issues and so on. So I'm

26:25 ↗ glad to see that the city is making what seems to be an accelerated to

26:30 ↗ communicate awareness of the problems and what we're doing about it. Great, thank

26:36 ↗ you. All right,

26:42 ↗ Lucy. Good evening.

27:04 ↗ So tonight we are bringing to you a minor

27:10 ↗ revision to the gateway SDP. You approved it last

27:15 ↗ September 2015. There are two people here to assist

27:22 ↗ if there are questions I can't answer. Jim Bedoya from VIA Architects is here

27:28 ↗ representing the applicant and Amy Tars who you know well who brought the permit through.

27:35 ↗ With some of the questions that came up today, I asked Amy to be here

27:40 ↗ because she knows this project at a level of detail that is beyond me.

27:47 ↗ So just to start with, I'm putting the site plan back up here. I knew

27:52 ↗ we would have some new members, and just in case it wasn't as fresh in

27:55 ↗ your minds as it is in ours. Just some of the things to point out.

28:01 ↗ This is Newport, I-90. The area that we're going to be talking

28:07 ↗ about is this area towards I-90. I just want to note that north is

28:13 ↗ up in this slide and all the rest of them, it's going to be rotated

28:17 ↗ to the right. For some reason, that's just the way we tend to draw up

28:23 ↗ this project. We staff

28:29 ↗ looked at the proposal to make this change Determined that this was a minor

28:34 ↗ revision that could be approved administratively however We

28:41 ↗ it is important to us to have transparency with Commission in the public we wanted

28:46 ↗ to We don't want surprises later on. So

28:52 ↗ this seemed like though it could be approved administratively, it seemed important to have a

28:58 ↗ discussion with the commission to hear your thoughts and

29:06 ↗ gather that before we moved on. So that's what we're here to do this evening.

29:11 ↗ So I have four slides just to try and illustrate the

29:16 ↗ changes that are involved in this revision. So now I've just rotated.

29:25 ↗ In all of these slides, on the left is the approved SDP and on the

29:30 ↗ right is the proposed revision. So in this case, you can see that the two

29:36 ↗ five-story buildings, number 17 and 18, had tandem

29:42 ↗ parking in this area and in this area. And what they have proposed to do

29:48 ↗ is move half, split the tandem basically into two

29:54 ↗ rows of head-end single stalls

Minutes for this meeting haven't been published yet. Council and committee minutes are approved at the next meeting and embedded as a consent-calendar attachment in that meeting's agenda packet — they will appear here once that next packet is processed.