← Back to City Council Digest

City Council Services, Safety & Parks Committee Auto captions

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

6:30 PM · Council Chambers, 135 E. Sunset Way, Issaquah WA
Topic tracked across meetings:
FLOCK Camera System AB 9003 1/2
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3a
Minutes of January 28, 2025
packet pp.5–6
Staff report:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) 01-28-25 City Council Services, Safety & Parks Page (1) Committee Minutes CITY OF ISSAQUAH City Council Services, Safety & Parks Committee 6:30 PM Council Chambers, 135 E. January 28, 2025 MINUTES Sunset Way, Issaquah WA
4. AGENDA ITEMS
4a
FLOCK Camera System COM 0089
60 min · Chief Paula Schwan, Issaquah Police Chief · packet pp.7–25
Staff report:
Staff recommends Committee approve the use of the FLOCK camera system by the City of Issaquah and move the item forward to the full council for adoption.
0:23 welcome everyone I council member toam
0:24 Mars called the Tuesday February 25th
0:27 city council services safety and Parks
0:30 committee meeting to
0:31 order and uh the first thing that we
0:34 have on the agenda for this evening let
0:37 me just go to my uh packet here sorry
0:40 should have had it open already uh is
0:43 public
0:44 comment uh we do not have any members of
0:47 the public present with us in the room
0:50 uh Chris do we have any members of the
0:51 public online at this time we have no
0:54 virtual attendees at this time chair
0:56 Mars all right well then we will
0:58 continue forward word then um into our
1:02 next item which is approval of
1:07 minutes would you care to make a motion
1:10 Deputy council president sure I'll move
1:12 uh that we accept the minutes of the
1:14 January 28th 25 meeting I will second
1:18 that all those in favor say I I opposed
1:22 extensions that passes Two To Zero by
1:24 the way uh we had uh we did our re uh
1:29 what's word I'm looking for musical
1:31 chairs musical chairs uh for committees
1:35 and uh out with the old in with the new
1:37 uh we uh thank uh council member Joe for
1:40 being on the committee last year and
1:42 we'll be welcoming back council member
1:44 Ry uh onto this group but neither of
1:47 those individuals were available this
1:49 evening so Barb and I is what you get uh
1:52 with that we will move on to agenda item
1:54 Co 0089 flock camera system presented to
1:58 us by Chief Schwan
2:09 uh your
2:10 microphone there thank you very
2:13 much perfect thank
2:16 you okay excellent so um tonight we I'm
2:20 here to talk about flock cameras um
2:23 cameras that are actually been in our
2:25 city for a couple years now and that we
2:27 have access to and there's many
2:29 different jurisdictions around us that
2:31 are actually using these cameras so i'
2:33 just like to give you an overview of
2:34 what they are how many actually are in
2:36 our state how many um with our local
2:38 surrounding agencies that they have what
2:40 they can and cannot do some of the
2:42 misnomers and different things along
2:44 those lines next slide
2:47 please so the direction we're needed
2:49 from the safety and Services Commission
2:51 is we're asking that the service Safety
2:54 and Parks Council committee for input on
2:56 the discussion for purchasing flock
2:58 cameras as a supplement to to Aid law
3:00 enforcement in keeping citizens
3:04 safe next
3:06 slide so a little bit of background
3:08 about the cameras what an alpr or flock
3:12 camera is so an alpr camera there's a
3:15 misnomer and we've actually had these in
3:16 the cities for a very long time more
3:19 than 10 years they used to be and a lot
3:21 of jurisdictions have them on the cars
3:23 on the patrol cars specifically they
3:25 look a little awkward sometimes they
3:27 look like speakers on the top of the car
3:28 but they're actually cameras that are
3:30 watching all around so like when a car
3:32 pulls into a patrol car pulls into a
3:33 parking lot can read all the cameras
3:35 that are around them and we did have
3:37 those originally um when I came on
3:40 almost eight years ago now uh since then
3:43 and they were very time consuming
3:45 because we had to enter all the plates
3:47 in that came to us um so it was very uh
3:50 wasn't as effective as it could have
3:52 been these flock cameras aren't just an
3:55 alpr they don't just read license plates
3:57 so that is a little bit of a misnomer
4:00 um and that's what Alp it's an automatic
4:01 license plate reader and they use high
4:04 definition camera and Technology to read
4:07 license plates but we are the ones as
4:08 officers that have to upload and
4:10 Implement those different plates
4:12 themselves uh the First
4:14 Data first uh this data can then be
4:17 checked again with criminal database in
4:19 our systems for wanted website which is
4:22 our ncic which automatically connects to
4:24 that in our computer systems and so
4:26 these cameras are similar but they're
4:29 they're more than just the alpr now that
4:32 doesn't mean and I can tell you what
4:33 they're not that's another slide so um
4:35 next slide please so what a flat camera
4:38 is not it's not facial recognition in
4:41 fact the reality is they get a better
4:43 read from a car that's on the back end
4:46 so for example I'm getting a little bit
4:49 down in my comments but if we were to
4:51 put any of those in the Ingress or
4:53 egress of our city they would be on the
4:55 rear end facing of the vehicles and
4:58 that's what they're looking for most
4:59 read better on the back end of the car
5:01 than they ever do on the front and I
5:03 don't know if that's because they're
5:03 lower or what that reasoning is but they
5:06 do read mostly from the rear end of the
5:08 vehicle so we're not looking to do
5:11 facial recognition um it does not
5:13 collect biometric or sensitive
5:15 information like fingerprints um like
5:17 any other facial information at all or
5:20 anything specific regarding the vehicle
5:23 or the persons inside the vehicle more
5:24 specifically and it's not used for
5:26 tracking speed or parking violations
5:29 those again are not things that they're
5:30 used for um that's not what we're
5:32 recommending we're not going to use a
5:34 camera to zoom in and go oh okay there's
5:37 a parking violation there now I'm going
5:38 to send out a car in actuality we can't
5:41 even access these the ones that we
5:43 already have access to we're not allowed
5:46 to go into those because it's the
5:48 auditing process unless you have an
5:50 actual case number that you're there for
5:53 so we would have to have got called on
5:55 there being a case or crime in that area
5:57 or report that has a case number before
6:00 we could ever even access the cameras
6:02 for anything specific in any of the
6:04 areas next slide
6:06 please so things to know there's over 69
6:10 agencies in Washington to date with
6:12 active flock camera systems total of
6:15 four flock camera systems um actually
6:18 there's a total of four flock camera
6:20 systems sharing their data with the city
6:22 of isqua police department today but we
6:25 actually have 10 live flock cameras in
6:28 the city that are personally owned owned
6:30 or privately owned I should say and so
6:33 we don't yet have access to those other
6:35 six but there are six or 10 total in the
6:38 city and we do have access to four block
6:41 has a transparency page um I put the
6:43 link in there it's on the bottom um I
6:46 would highly recommend going in there it
6:48 gives all the type of data all the type
6:50 of information we can look up all the
6:53 access and different things that
6:54 different agencies have ran as far as
6:56 stolen plates they've caught in initial
6:59 uh initially had contact with all those
7:01 different things um very good page for
7:05 staff to be looking at and reviewing um
7:07 to see that everybody would have access
7:09 that for that as well for those of us
7:11 that would have those cameras in
7:13 place and um yeah it's open to the
7:15 public so any of our citizens would be
7:17 able also to go on there and view the
7:19 transparency page there's nothing that
7:21 we're hiding to show that we're looking
7:23 up you know your neighbor nobody can
7:24 look at your neighbor by having them
7:26 that's not the direction and there also
7:28 have a where they can't zoom into like
7:31 Windows that's that's not the idea
7:34 either um audits are easily tracked
7:37 through the flock system to ensure the
7:39 oversight and compliance with the actual
7:41 policy they have in place next slide
7:44 please here is a list of all the law
7:47 enforcement Partners in Washington which
7:49 there are great many of them and I have
7:52 a list of actually how many each one of
7:54 these cities have in place currently uh
7:57 just wanted to show you a large overview
7:59 of those 69 agencies next slide
8:03 please so current neighboring
8:05 jurisdictions which is very important
8:07 for us typically to see the ones that
8:08 are neighboring to us Redmond has 25
8:10 currently Clyde Hill and Madina it says
8:12 they have eight cameras but I know they
8:14 implemented a bunch more and I believe
8:16 there's a bunch more privately owned as
8:17 well this is the public owned ones
8:20 Normandy Park with two Lynwood has 25
8:23 Newcastle was seven Black Diamond with
8:25 six ritton 24 tuilla with 35 and Bonnie
8:29 Lake with 23 and that's just those
8:32 surrounding agencies and I know and I've
8:34 heard from several of these Chiefs
8:36 personally that they've been very
8:37 helpful in uh with a lot of crimes that
8:40 they've been able to uh either catch the
8:43 people in the act for example if we had
8:45 someone or one of our cameras on the
8:46 Ingress egress on South Front Street as
8:50 they're coming in off Hobart by the time
8:52 we all know with traffic especially
8:54 during certain hours of the day if
8:55 someone pass that camera with a stolen
8:58 car and they're coming into our city or
9:00 they took it and they're leaving our
9:01 city we would have access especially if
9:03 they were coming into our city probably
9:04 before they ever got to second half
9:06 because we would have people at the if
9:08 they were at the station or anywhere
9:09 else could get there and we could cut
9:10 them off before they even got very much
9:12 into our city because of how traffic is
9:14 now going out we would be able to let
9:16 County know and or go that direction and
9:19 then let other agencies know too to
9:21 catch those individuals if someone had
9:22 one of our own people that were our own
9:25 um neighborhoods that got their vehicle
9:27 stolen so those are nice pieces of
9:29 information to have and that's another
9:31 piece that they are utilized for next
9:33 slide
9:34 please local communities supporting or
9:37 actively utilizing the flock cameras the
9:39 HOAs currently that are in support or
9:41 currently have are the Highlands
9:43 Community High Grove Estates Association
9:46 mantro HOA and samamish Bluffs HOA
9:49 current flock cameras in a squad that
9:51 we're actually using um for the
9:53 businesses are Lowe's rally properties
9:56 and the woods and those three um have
9:58 given us access and there's one more as
10:01 well that we're working with um as far
10:03 as that fourth one next slide
10:06 please so there's different types of
10:09 flock cameras and that's why when you
10:11 saw these Pages you would see that there
10:13 were different prices and I'm going to
10:14 explain that a little bit so for this
10:17 one the Falcon the LPR it's used for the
10:20 two-lane roads so for example I already
10:22 talked about hobar Andor South Front
10:25 Street this would be the price of a
10:26 camera in that jurisdiction or area and
10:29 because because that's only a two-lane
10:30 roadway the ones that are more expensive
10:33 which is the next slide I can go into
10:34 this one but there's a reinc herring fee
10:36 of the 3,000 per contract per camera
10:38 year um or damage to the camera or theft
10:41 and there's the cost for the total of
10:43 800 per camera on that next slide please
10:47 this one is for the long range camera
10:48 which is more for the for Lane roads
10:50 like sr900 would be one that we might
10:53 use that for and so this is a location
10:56 that they would be and it's more
10:57 expensive because it's a wider range um
11:01 covers longer distance and so this
11:03 includes permits installation traffic
11:05 plans regular out maintenance of the
11:07 camera system reoccurring of 5,000
11:10 versus the three damage to the camera
11:12 theft um is the same $800 for the camera
11:15 itself next slide
11:18 please so local isqua examples recently
11:21 ipd Patrol was dispatched to a theft
11:23 from a vehicle a witness provided a
11:25 license plate from out of state but did
11:26 not know which state and a vehicle
11:29 called
11:30 using flock another officer was able to
11:32 find the state the license plate was out
11:34 of and obtain the image of the vehicle
11:36 from another City's flock camera which
11:38 allowed the officer to investigate
11:40 further next slide please so some other
11:44 possible examples of uses of this is
11:46 when we have Amber and silver alerts so
11:48 if we have Amber and silver alerts that
11:50 go out Statewide if they happen to come
11:52 into our city for any reason or if we
11:54 ourselves um hopefully not but if we
11:57 happen to have one and we push that out
11:59 out when we could find when and where
12:01 they left and what direction they were
12:03 traveling which is more data to give any
12:04 other agencies as well and track that
12:07 down another is a detective uh
12:09 detectives investigating recent
12:11 residential burglary we had no leads the
12:13 vehicle description was vague flock
12:15 cameras would have allowed them to
12:17 locate the vehicle license plate and
12:18 pursue the case more efficiently press
12:21 providing closer to the victim quicker
12:23 the other part to that is for example we
12:25 just had a robbery at Target moments
12:28 before I came over here with some
12:30 juveniles and the persons at the
12:32 hospital we would be able to track some
12:34 of those at different locations we did
12:36 some in we got some information U before
12:39 I came over here as well and that I
12:42 don't believe are in our slides but they
12:44 did a map and I'm going to send over
12:45 that email because I got that
12:47 information today so it was after these
12:49 slides but they did a overview and this
12:52 is what flock system does in the event
12:54 that this is something that you guys
12:56 approved or the council approved to go
12:58 or to go to council
12:59 the committee I it would be that flock
13:02 would come in and they can answer so
13:04 many different questions they have a
13:05 representative that has gone to numerous
13:07 councils and one of the things that they
13:09 do is a map of what they would how many
13:12 cameras it would take to get every
13:14 Ingress and egress in our city and I can
13:16 send you that link because they have it
13:18 all mapped out and they could show you
13:19 exactly everywhere and what they're
13:21 total this and again I'm not
13:23 recommending this part of it I think
13:25 there it's it's beneficial to have all
13:27 the information and scale down versus is
13:29 the other way around and not know what
13:30 that would look like so if we wanted
13:33 every Ingress and egress in and out of
13:34 our city would be 19 cameras if we
13:37 wanted every single major intersection
13:40 which would be 23 more cameras above
13:41 that again I'm not recommending
13:44 necessarily we get that many cameras um
13:46 number one the cost is very expensive uh
13:48 but number two that I don't know that we
13:51 have as much trouble in every single one
13:52 of those areas in and out of our city or
13:55 at those intersections I can tell you
13:58 that a lot of intersection
13:59 and major situ locations in many cities
14:02 have hugely benefited and Major Crimes
14:04 have been solved by having some of these
14:07 uh there also has been you might find
14:09 when you look up flock camera I believe
14:10 it's in Virginia but there was a lawsuit
14:12 that was filed because there was some
14:14 worry and concern about the fact that if
14:16 you have too many cameras what you're
14:18 doing is trying to be big brother and
14:19 track like where's someone going and
14:21 where they're going to and from that's
14:23 not the intent of the cameras where our
14:25 intent is to find and deter crime um
14:28 they put up big signs saying flock
14:29 cameras based on that camera and in and
14:32 out of the Cities so people have
14:33 knowledge and information we would put
14:35 it up on social media and let all the
14:36 citizens in neighborhoods know that
14:38 that's what was happening and that's
14:40 where they would even where they would
14:42 be placed it wouldn't be that they were
14:43 secret or we were trying to hide
14:45 anything and then we will have all the
14:46 audits as well which anybody or
14:48 specifically the Committees Andor
14:50 council could ask for an audit at any
14:52 point in time say hey I'd like to know
14:54 can you print that up or show me give me
14:56 the link so I can look it up and bring
14:58 those information as a report throughout
15:00 the year on how many times we've even
15:02 we've even utilized them and then if
15:04 we've got any leads or any crimes have
15:06 been committed um or caught and closed
15:09 because of the cameras as well because
15:11 then you could do it on a yearby year
15:12 basis to know if they've been beneficial
15:14 and helpful and how many crimes they
15:16 were part
15:17 of can you go next slide please so again
15:20 the directions needed and I'm happy to
15:22 answer any questions but we're asking
15:24 the administration is asking the service
15:25 of safety and Parks count or Council
15:27 committee for input on the discussion of
15:30 purchasing flock cameras as a supplement
15:32 to Aid law enforcement in keeping
15:34 citizens
15:37 safe so I'll start off with uh with a
15:41 question couple of questions um I'm not
15:44 I didn't see in your
15:47 presentation uh a scale but we were I
15:49 think you said six cameras was how we do
15:52 we do we have
15:53 a are you do you have a specific number
15:57 of cameras in mind for a project or are
16:00 we just talking about generally speaking
16:02 are we willing to entertain the concept
16:04 of flock cameras or is there a package
16:06 size year I would say giving you all the
16:09 information about to do all the Ingress
16:11 and egress we already currently have 10
16:13 that are privately owned and it was just
16:16 giving you the I guess putting out the
16:18 idea for to see what the citizens and
16:21 the council are interested in um not
16:25 necessarily a recommendation for those
16:27 specifically because I think that's it's
16:30 I can make a recommendation but I think
16:32 that would be a little bit later time if
16:35 the council is something that they
16:36 wanted to pursue got it I know that uh
16:40 well next question would be in your
16:43 example that you gave um it involved
16:47 interdepartmental uh cooperation the
16:50 example that you gave it sounded like um
16:53 we went we saw the flock from another
16:55 the flock data from another municipality
16:57 is that is that what you said in in the
17:00 example that we gave here the one with
17:01 the out ofate
17:03 plate no that's what what that just
17:05 means is we were able to run it in our
17:06 state computer because we could run it
17:08 down and we narrowed down to what the
17:10 colors were because um and the place
17:12 Itself by the numbers so we run it when
17:15 we run a plate it doesn't have to be
17:17 just in Washington when we run a plate
17:19 we don't have to attach a state we can
17:20 if we actually know the state which
17:22 makes it a lot faster but if we don't we
17:24 can run it and put a generic like in a
17:26 region or we can do it United States
17:28 wide
17:29 and then we might get multiple returns
17:31 but having that information in and of
17:33 itself without knowing the state we were
17:35 able to run that and because of the
17:37 flock camera without even reading the
17:39 state and still be able to get a return
17:41 got it okay I miss I misunderstood
17:44 this pardon
17:48 questions um I just thought of one while
17:51 you were asking and that is you know you
17:53 talked about putting the signs up um how
17:56 do we communicate to the bad guys in the
17:58 back gals that they're also being
18:01 photographed is is that how somebody
18:03 would know oh I don't want to go to
18:05 isqua because they've got flocked
18:08 cameras that they could know that
18:09 because if we put we can even put the
18:11 signs on all the Ingress egresses that
18:13 we could get 19 signs going in and out
18:15 of the city um but we wouldn't they
18:18 would all know the whole point is for
18:20 everybody to know hopefully they
18:21 wouldn't want to come here and do that
18:22 anyway but it's pretty well known that
18:24 almost all the cities and even like
18:26 Lowe's has them a lot of the different a
18:29 lot of the lights with the cameras now
18:30 you're seeing some of those now are the
18:32 flock cameras and so they know that law
18:34 enforcement has access they know that
18:36 these people have access so they're
18:38 still committing crimes anyway this is
18:40 just a way for us to catch them a little
18:42 bit faster or catch them at all whereas
18:44 in the past maybe we didn't have that
18:46 option so they deter to go to different
18:48 cities that don't have as many or don't
18:49 have them at all so that's one of the
18:52 pieces that we're also considering in
18:54 that factor is trying to deter that
18:56 crime Andor have the access to the
18:58 information
18:59 sooner or like some of the other
19:01 agencies because if they come here and
19:03 they're in someone else's car it'll
19:05 trigger immediately on a stolen car so
19:08 that's a nice piece the minute someone
19:10 reports their car's stolen we get it
19:12 entered into the computer system they
19:14 literally could go from hypothetically
19:16 up in the highlands drive around town
19:19 because they stole someone's wallet or
19:20 somebody or their car and decided to go
19:22 to a gas station and if they pause for
19:25 you know a moment's time by the time our
19:26 officer gets there and confirms a plate
19:28 or whatever it's in the system before
19:29 maybe they leave the city well then we
19:32 can track that this was then when they
19:33 were last in our city or they haven't
19:34 left the city yet so that means we can
19:37 continue to search in our city or we
19:38 know they've left so we let neighboring
19:40 agencies know hey this car was just
19:42 stolen it's headed your way we can also
19:45 give that information and it gives again
19:47 faster opportunity to help those victims
19:49 get their property
19:52 back have we done an estimate of and and
19:56 again I you're not asking specific
19:58 number of cameras but let's just throw a
20:01 uh a notion out there you said there
20:03 were 19 if we wanted all the Ingress and
20:05 egress to the city do we understand what
20:07 the Staffing impact would be to uh to
20:10 manage the data stream of those 19
20:12 cameras so the one thing about these
20:15 cameras is we don't manage anything we
20:17 can't look at them we can't have someone
20:18 monitoring them it's not like people are
20:20 getting tickets every day hugely
20:23 different than like for example the
20:24 speed camera over by the school not the
20:27 same any way shape or form that one
20:29 every time there's a ticket which could
20:30 be hundreds a day someone has to monitor
20:32 and go through all those we only get the
20:35 cameras are going and look on the
20:37 cameras that's what that audits was
20:38 about if we have someone say for example
20:41 let's say South COA have a South Cove
20:44 has a camera and we go out there because
20:47 somebody's car was stolen or there was a
20:49 vehicle proud at three of the houses and
20:51 they tell us it was at certain time a
20:53 day we have to have a case number to be
20:54 able to go in there and attach that to
20:57 why we would look at that camera if we
20:59 don't we can't be looking at those
21:00 cameras we're not allowed we don't have
21:02 access to go in there it timestamps who
21:04 logged in what time they logged in what
21:06 it was for and if it's not attached to a
21:09 case number that actually was a legit
21:11 case or case number then we can't we
21:13 don't have access so it isn't like we're
21:15 monitoring or Staffing that on a regular
21:17 basis it's just for our detectives it's
21:19 another tool in our toolbx to go have
21:22 access to if there is a crime that's
21:24 been committed or we get reported to
21:26 us um so maybe I'm maybe I'm not
21:30 understanding it I guess I assumed that
21:33 if a if a stolen vehicle entered the
21:36 city and it registered the license plate
21:39 of a vehicle that had been stolen it
21:40 would send an alert to you guys saying
21:43 hey I've just detected a stolen vehicle
21:46 correct so you would anticipate I mean
21:48 I'm looking at this book at this yaka U
21:52 page from December and it says assisted
21:53 in 29 arrests 785 wanted persons 681
21:59 warrants 58 stolen vehicles 33 stolen
22:02 plates eight violent persons six
22:04 protection orders I mean that represents
22:06 work for you guys right sure so do we
22:09 understand if we were to put 19 cameras
22:11 in my my concern is just and I'm I you
22:16 know this better than I do we have a
22:17 small police force and just to make sure
22:20 that this wouldn't create an undue
22:22 imposition by the am by the amount of
22:24 hits that would be coming in do we
22:26 understand what the expected hit rate
22:28 that we might see on 19 cameras and are
22:31 we ready for that with with our staffing
22:34 I would say 19 cameras um no we are not
22:37 ready for that I'm not going to give
22:39 false information um 19 cameras no I
22:42 don't think we're staff for that because
22:43 God forbid that we have 19 stolen cars
22:46 even at one time that come in through
22:48 those and so it would take a priority
22:51 and we would prioritize and that's what
22:53 it would look like so had we had 19
22:54 cameras it would be and they were all
22:56 implemented it would be a prioritization
22:59 no different than some of these other
23:00 agencies that you're seeing that are
23:02 smaller but have certain numbers of
23:04 cameras they don't have the officers to
23:06 do 23 you know Bell viw and different
23:08 ones Bell viw is in the process of
23:10 adding flat cameras as well they're not
23:11 on there because that's not finalized
23:13 yet but say Redmond for example for the
23:15 number of cameras they have if all those
23:16 hit at the same time they don't have the
23:18 Staffing for that either the hope is
23:20 that number one it's a deterrent and
23:22 then number two in the event that we
23:24 have them or a stolen car goes into one
23:26 of those communities yes it triggers a
23:27 camera or an alert to all the officers
23:30 and the Dispatch Center to let them know
23:32 that that happened now it's also a
23:34 property crime so if we have personal
23:36 crimes that are going on at the time
23:38 they would be prioritized after the fact
23:40 so in other words that stolen card would
23:42 take secondary to the victim and prop
23:45 personal crimes that are happening in
23:46 the city so that would be how it would
23:49 be prioritized and yes we would have
23:51 those were things that would have to be
23:52 done in those circumstances if we had
23:54 that many
23:55 cameras thank you that's a good
23:58 explanation I appreciate
24:00 it Deputy council president um so you
24:04 kind of alluded to that lawsuit in
24:05 Virginia and um so I'm sorry to have to
24:09 ask you this but um these cameras would
24:12 not be used to track for example
24:15 undocumented workers um and those kinds
24:17 of things I'm presuming in other words
24:20 we're going to Define crime as a crime
24:23 against property or a crime against
24:24 persons but not a crime against
24:26 immigration law right correct 100%
24:30 okay thank
24:32 you do we have any more questions before
24:36 we because um then we would uh check
24:39 again to see if we had any members of
24:40 the public online with us and then we
24:42 would go into deliberations let's do
24:44 that okay uh that's what we will do and
24:47 Chris I will ask you again whether any
24:48 members of the public are with us online
24:51 we have no members of the public in
24:53 attendance well then I will not give my
24:55 big public comment spiel can I make one
24:59 more of course brief comment um to your
25:02 question uh Deputy Council Barbara de
25:05 Michelle uh we are not going to be
25:07 tracking anybody that's not our goal is
25:09 to track anybody so not just
25:11 undocumented but we're not tracking
25:13 anybody by these it's to give us
25:15 information on where people entered and
25:18 um left our city last uh that have been
25:21 either committed a crime or that we were
25:24 um pursuing in uh an investigation but
25:28 not track and they're not to be tracking
25:30 it's for us to see if we can locate so
25:33 that's the difference in tracking in
25:35 locating are two different things um so
25:38 example if you got up in the morning we
25:39 wouldn't want to track you and find you
25:41 if you're making it and going oh she's
25:43 late for the meeting can we track her
25:45 and see where she's going they're
25:46 they're not for intended for any purpose
25:48 like
25:51 that all right well we don't have to we
25:54 have no members of the public with us uh
25:56 I will say that we did receive reive uh
26:00 a small amount of uh feedback from the
26:02 public I would say that uh the light
26:05 feedback thus far has been positive I
26:08 haven't I have not seen any feedback
26:10 from the public that would have a
26:12 negative concern about this General
26:13 support for as as this being a
26:18 uh fair and Equitable addition to public
26:22 safety tools um should should we go
26:26 forward so
26:29 pardon
26:30 me so what do you think for uh
26:34 recommendation back to the
26:35 administration and to our fellow council
26:36 members so yeah I'm I'm generally very
26:39 positive about this and I did a mini
26:41 survey of about three people and they
26:44 were all they all gave me positive
26:45 feedback and said they thought it
26:47 sounded like a good idea so um but uh
26:51 and you know you heard this when we were
26:53 doing body cameras uh Chief Schwan
26:55 always concerned about the privacy of
26:58 our citizens and um and also I think
27:02 we're in a very um sensitive political
27:05 environment right now where there are
27:08 groups of people in our community who
27:10 are very very concerned about
27:11 surveillance and um people watching them
27:15 and so forth so my thought is let let's
27:18 go forward um and I I really appreciate
27:21 you coming to us with the idea of having
27:24 a conversation about this and a
27:26 discussion um before we get to the point
27:29 where we actually have a proposal on the
27:30 table and I'm just uh thinking that um
27:34 perhaps we can you you already talked to
27:37 HOAs and other groups about this but I'm
27:40 wondering if we could do a little bit of
27:41 more Outreach in some of the communities
27:43 that right now are feeling very fearful
27:45 about what's going on so uh for example
27:48 reaching out to the circle to talk to
27:50 the Hispanic community and so forth um
27:53 and just with information about what
27:56 this is and what this isn't I really
27:58 liked your slide that was what this
28:01 isn't um and explaining to people before
28:04 we get to the point of putting those
28:05 signs up um right now uh we have a
28:10 situation we're going to talk about
28:11 Communications at the council Retreat we
28:14 have uh a situation where uh rumors and
28:18 conspiracy theories and all kinds of
28:20 false information gets going in the
28:22 community before ahead of us and I'm
28:25 thinking let's get ahead of that and be
28:28 be a little bit more proactive and talk
28:30 to different communities that might be
28:32 fearful or where conspiracy theories
28:34 might take hold ahead of time to explain
28:37 what we're doing um and then so that
28:40 when uh people uh when these cameras go
28:42 in um people uh are armed with some
28:47 information ahead of time rather than us
28:50 being reactive after after the the fact
28:54 um but you know I also recognize that
28:57 some of our minority communities are
28:59 often the victims of crimes and would
29:02 very much welcome uh another level of
29:05 security for this community and so uh as
29:08 I said I generally I think this is a
29:11 good proposal and uh I think that it
29:14 would be uh something that we could use
29:16 that would be effective tool for law
29:18 enforcement so I say let's go ahead but
29:21 let's just think about how we
29:23 communicate this in this particular time
29:26 frame in this particular time of History
29:28 it might be really good for us to try to
29:30 get ahead of um of the um of the rumors
29:34 and the conspiracy theories uh instead
29:36 of be reactive to it does that make
29:39 sense to you yes ma'am oh
29:42 okay what's the old quote rumors make it
29:45 all the way around the world before
29:46 truth gets it gets their pants on or
29:48 something there's some some quote like
29:50 that yeah and I think I think maybe a
29:53 year ago we wouldn't have had this
29:55 concern uh but right now it it we're
29:58 just in a very volatile position uh in
30:02 environment I think everywhere in our
30:04 country right now and so I think we just
30:06 need to be very sensitive and and
30:09 considera of that thank you so for any
30:13 new uh Public Safety technology I asked
30:15 myself four questions when trying to
30:18 assess the value of it does it make the
30:20 public safer safer does it make our
30:22 officers safer does it make our officers
30:25 more effective and does it prevent or or
30:27 deter crime um I uh it definitely uh
30:33 seems like uh it would make officers
30:37 more effective and prevent or deter
30:39 crime um so you know the the net
30:43 positive of this seems obvious to me um
30:46 the cost uh seems Seems compared to so
30:50 many of the systems that uh are open to
30:52 municipalities this
30:54 seems uh ref ref refle
30:58 refreshingly uh reasonably priced
31:01 compared to although you know quantities
31:04 uh add up and everything but uh uh this
31:07 doesn't seem like uh shockingly
31:09 expensive the way say radios are
31:11 shockingly expensive as systems um so
31:14 I'm very positive I think that you've
31:16 pointed out you you've preemptively
31:18 addressed um some of the concerns that
31:20 people might have I think that um by
31:24 being uh by focusing on license plates
31:26 by not taking biometric data or data
31:29 about individuals I think that um I'm I
31:33 I feel like I can already have a
31:34 conversation with the public uh and that
31:37 if folks are concerned uh we do live in
31:39 an era where where people on both ends
31:42 of the spectrum have lots of opinions
31:44 about uh their privacy in public and and
31:47 whatnot but this seems to me uh to be uh
31:51 A system that uh uh it would be easy to
31:55 talk to the public about uh any concerns
31:57 they might have in that way although I I
32:00 share council member D Michelle's idea
32:02 that um we would definitely want to get
32:04 ahead of this and make sure that you
32:06 know it's far better to uh prevent
32:09 rumors from starting than trying to
32:10 stamp them out once they once they've
32:12 already started
32:14 so so I'm positive as well um City
32:18 administrator do you have what you were
32:20 looking for from us this evening is
32:21 there other information we could provide
32:23 for you uh thank you Mr chair uh Deputy
32:26 council president uh I believe what I'm
32:28 hearing from the committee is you are
32:30 all right with us moving forward um as
32:33 the chief has said we don't have a
32:34 specific plan in place so our next step
32:36 would be to put one together uh there
32:38 will be a financial impact to that uh we
32:41 will have to assess if that's something
32:42 we can absorb within current budgets or
32:45 if we'll need additional resources so
32:48 we'll come back to you with that um so
32:50 notification is sufficient once we make
32:53 a determination would you want us to
32:54 bring this back to the council the
32:56 dollar amounts could very well be within
32:59 the mayor's purchasing Authority so it
33:01 would not automatically come back before
33:03 the council so how would you like us
33:05 once we have a plan in place to let you
33:08 know and let the larger Community know I
33:10 mean that's a good question I think one
33:12 of the things that is informat
33:15 surprising and informative is the fact
33:16 that there flock cameras already out
33:18 there in the community and this hasn't
33:20 this isn't an issue that's been uh
33:22 become a problem and and that's even
33:26 flock cameras in private hand
33:28 right uh that don't have this
33:30 necessarily the same uh uh transparency
33:34 or or you know data auditing uh that we
33:37 would require um council member D
33:39 Michelle and as part of our our Council
33:41 leadership team how do you how do you
33:42 feel about this question about how this
33:44 comes
33:45 back uh
33:47 wow I you know I think I'm fine with it
33:50 just being a
33:52 notification um we have a good case
33:54 that's been put forward for doing this
33:57 and
33:58 um I feel like I could explain why we
34:00 were moving ahead so um let's let's do
34:04 it that way if it's yeah let's do it
34:06 that way and I'll be ready to if it
34:08 comes back on consent I'll be ready to
34:10 discuss it in my report if if somebody
34:13 on the council wants
34:14 me and our plan would not be to take it
34:17 to the full Council oh and even on
34:19 consent just that okay if you would like
34:22 us to we we could guess the
34:25 question yes I'm F I'm fine with that
34:29 okay so we would just notify via email
34:31 that's fine very good all right thank
34:33 you appreciate and thanks Chief thank
34:35 you so much for this presentation this
34:36 evening I think it was very very
34:38 effective particularly uh the Aima uh
34:42 reference information uh really helpful
34:44 to see how another city has implemented
34:46 I note that they've seen a reduction in
34:48 stolen cars over the last few years I
34:50 would also like to see a reduction in
34:52 the number of stolen cars thank you for
34:54 having me also I will forward you over
34:56 that email as well I'll forward it to um
34:59 Mr gski about the clerk to forward to
35:03 you guys regarding the mapping that they
35:06 have for the intersections and or all
35:08 the Ingress egress for our city so then
35:11 you would have a little bit more data
35:12 also on and to um City administrator so
35:17 that way everybody has access of
35:19 information and can see where they may
35:20 want those as well as I'll put some data
35:23 with that on where we've seen the
35:24 majority or most traffic happening to
35:27 where it may be that would be most
35:29 beneficial for the
35:31 recommendation great thank you so much
35:34 Chief uh and City administrator uh since
35:38 you've indicated you have everything you
35:39 need from us we're going to consider
35:41 this agenda item done uh Deputy council
35:44 president do you have any announcements
35:46 I do not I do not as well so therefore
35:48 we are adjoin adjourned adjoined joined
35:52 adjourned at uh 7:07 p.m thank you for
35:55 those watching at home