I didn't mark down when I read it
okay good evening I will call to order
the May 6th meeting of the isqua
development commission uh tonight we
will be uh considering the application
excuse me the application from the isqua
school board and the agenda for the
evening will be that we'll have uh an
approval of minutes from uh our
preceding meeting on March 4th and then
the agenda items will be addressed uh
there are four separate items that will
be addressed tonight uh in this meeting
all of which have to do with the isqua
Middle School Master site plan and uh
the site development permit uh this
meeting will take the uh process of a
presentation by staff uh follow up by uh
appli the applicant and then uh public
comment and any members of the the
public that want to uhu uh make a public
comment we ask you to sign in please and
then when you go to the uh microphone to
identify yourself and give an address
and it can be a business address or a
home address whatever you whatever you
choose after that uh the commission will
uh make its decision regarding the final
final status of the uh items that we're
addressing so with that said uh we will
turn it over to Amy in the
city thank
you good evening the purpose of our
meeting tonight is for the development
commission to review four items that
were REM ended by the city council land
and chore committee um regarding the
isqua Middle School Master site plan and
sight development
permit so a little background uh to how
we got to hear um back in February 18
2015 the development commission um
reviewed side improvements building
design and construction phasing for the
U Middle School at the time um we
submitted a draft sea
determination and um this was what was
considered by the develop by the
development commission and at that
meeting there were three outstanding
items that the development commission
referred to the city council be and
these were the blank walls the traffic
study and mitigation and the final sea
determination so on March 12 2015 the
land and Shore commiss committee um
considered those three items and um in
addition to that staff brought to them a
new information on the parking on
Southeast Evans Street in addition to
those four items we also clarified the
information regarding the Wetland buffer
impacts of the expanded bus yard if you
recall there was a uh public comment
about the uh wetlands and um at that
time um I've I've clar I've actually
responded to the comment uh however the
information we were basing our staff
evaluation was not the um the most
updated
information so a little background for
uh for the sake of the audience um
especially those who uh did not see the
first
presentation um the the um site for this
middle new middle school is going in
basically in what is currently the isqua
high school and the Clark Middle School
campus and um The Proposal uh basically
includes uh
131,000 or almost
132,000 square feet of uh classrooms and
other additional um CL um spaces and um
the uh in addition to that there's um
going to be a new softball field and a
new track and field SL football field
field oh I'm sorry I'm just going to go
and and move this forward um so the
first item that was uh discussed at the
uh I'm sorry um I forgot to mention that
uh during the um during the uh land Ure
committee meeting basically the
committee remanded those items back to
the development commission and so the
first item was the sea review and as I'm
I mentioned earlier the the version of
the mitigated determination of not
non-significance that was presented to
the development commission was a draft
version and uh based on the uh comments
that were received by the applicant
during that particular meeting they
actually updated and revised their mdns
and this is what was then considered by
the land Ure committee and fi and what
was used for the actual publish
version um the bullet points here
basically takes you through the schedule
and uh the sequence of uh the milestones
for the sepa review and the termination
so um I'm just going to jump um uh to
the second bullet point where it talks
about how the the draft mdns was revised
which is I mentioned earlier and there
were two items that was reflected in
that draft and that includes the busard
improvements and the Wetland buffer
impacts and mitigation your staff packet
the I'm sorry the staff memo packet
includes basically a comparison of both
the draft mdns that uh you receed during
the first meeting and the new version
with the new text
highlighted and then after that uh the
applicant which is a school district
also um basically uh who serve the who
served as the lead Agency for the sea
review um went ahead and published the
um the final mdns for sea comment and
and um the appeal period ended on March
25th 2015 so we are here today um
basically knowing that basically the sea
review is completed and um during that
time of the comment and appeal period we
um the um is a called School District
received one comment and that comment
and the response from the school
district is also included in your packet
as exhibit 17 um just very quickly that
um the comment was O
sorry
oops the comment um basically uh focused
on uh the need for additional safe
pedestrian access or connections for the
school from Fourth Place Southeast this
is one of the residential streets just
north of Southeast Evans so the school
district responded to that and uh after
working with City staff uh we have
arrived to a reasonable uh solution with
by providing an additional um uh walkway
on the um east side of Fourth Place
Southeast currently there's already
a sidewalk on the west side of Fourth
Place Southeast which is primarily what
is used for accessing the school from
this neighborhood so having considered
all the uh the comments and uh uh uh
completing the um the uh comment and
appeal period for the sea staff
recommends that um the sea review and
mdns be sent forward as part of this
permit the next item is the
transportation impacts and mitigation so
this is just a review of what condition
we included in our staff report and
which was accepted by the development
commission at our last meeting um I'm
not going to read through everything I'm
just going to emphasize that this
acknowledges that we required the
applicant to provide an updated traffic
study and um that um we will identify
the appropriate and proportionate
traffic improvements to mitigate for any
impacts that are determined through that
traffic study so um Sheldon Lynn is here
to talk more about that updated traffic
study and where we're at with um the
analysis and the assessment of the
mitigation
thank you Amy my name is Sheldon Lynn
I'm the director of Public Works
engineering for the city of
isqua and as Amy mentioned uh the school
district was in the process of updating
a traffic impact analysis report at the
time in which the council landed Shore
met and so the issues of Transportation
were referred back to this commission
for its review and and the report
analysis has been complete and 10w uh
consulting firm is the one that did it
on behalf of the school
district and the city had requested that
two phases be analyzed uh for its
impacts one was the full buildout which
includes the site plan that Amy was
talking about which is over here on the
site where the middle school and the
high school are going to coexist uh when
the project and the MSP is fully
implemented uh the full buildout
includes taking the Tiger Mountain
Academy and the Clark Elementary and
moving it over here to where the current
Middle School is and so we felt that it
was important to evaluate the full
buildout conditions because bell times
may change traffic patterns change
things of that sort the other uh phase
we requested that they evaluate was the
interim phase and the interim phase is
when all four schools are operating here
along Second Avenue and no schools are
operating over here where the middle
school is while they're doing the
remodel and preparation for moving Tiger
Mountain Academy and the Clark
Elementary over
there out of that analysis came a series
of impacts which were identified in the
transportation
report one of the first impacts that
came to light was the impact at the
intersection of Sunset and Second
Avenue at this intersection it was
identified that there would be a need
for a traffic
signal the next intersection was
intersection of front and
sunset uh that intersection had an
increased delay associated with it
associated with the reconfiguration and
shifting traffic patterns from the
school district uh in the full buildout
condition uh so the city has
a capital project listed for that
intersection uh the school district
wasn't uh driving 100% of that impact
and need for improvements there and so
the city is working to uh with the
school district on its proportionate
share of those
improvements next on the full build out
condition is at the intersection of
front Clark Newport Way uh due to some
changing conditions with bell times
traffic patterns associated with middle
school and Elementary School uh there
was a substantial delay uh at that
intersection associated with the new
school
activities and part of the the
mitigation for that is is is they have
to do some improvements alarm
clark on the East leg of the
intersection uh to accommodate the
traffic coming out onto Front Street so
that it doesn't impact the operations of
that intersection during peak
hours so mitigations were identified for
the school district to do improvements
uh to address the delays coming out on
Clark Street which would impact the
operations of that
intersection lastly at full
buildout staff identified and the report
identified a potential
for the driveway entrance on Southeast
Evans due to some
circulation uh potential issues with
parents maybe not dropping off at the
right place or entering at the right
place there was a potential that some
traffic impacts could occur on Evans
Street as associated with the use of
that driveway and so the district and
the city are working on operational
changes for the school district uh so
that they can minimize the potential for
that to happen uh on Southeast Evans and
so it should uh function
well those were the impact areas that
were associated with the full buildout
analysis as well as the identified
mitigations on the interim
phase where everything is operating over
here all four schools on this one
site the analysis identified substantial
delays coming out on Southeast Evans
wanting to turn left or right onto
Second
Avenue uh and so with that uh the
potential is there is to develop a right
turn dedicated Lane and a left turn
dedicated Lane coming out on Evans so
that the que doesn't back up on Evans
Street uh and it'll operate much better
that way uh there's not a lot of
pavement to be built or anything like
that and the school district is looking
at doing some striping improvements to
create two lanes coming out as well as
continuing the one lane coming in
uh the other interim impact was the
double left turns
coming in at the signal at the high
school that's currently there the
queuing analysis showed that it could
possibly pass and exceed the length of
the turn Pockets that are being
constructed uh the amount of mitigation
that would be required
to rectify that is probably not
warranted for an interim period so the
school district and the city is working
together are working together to develop
an operational and transportation demand
management plan to ensure that the the
backup doesn't exceed the CU lengths
that are constructed as part of this
project because the project is planning
on extending the existing double Q for
the left turn in any
case these were the impacts at full
buildout and inum that the
analysis uh showed and the arrangements
and how we're working with the district
to resolve the impacts and mitigate
them with that I will give it back to am
you want to go to the next slide
okay Amy if I can just uh make a note we
did not I missed the uh approval of the
minutes so when the staff presentation
is over we'll just go back and do it
then okay okay you want do
this
you so
so um just to wrap up uh this part of
the Pres um the presentation regarding
the transportation impacts and
mitigation um we wanted to you know I'm
just bringing back the same condition
that I showed earlier and the staff
recommendation which is basically to
forward the permit is presented and with
no change to um condition S
one
so now um I'm going to talk about the
blank walls uh this is the same slide
that I presented at our last uh public
hearing um it identifies all the uh
blank walls for the different um
elevations or facades of the uh building
and then I'm going to walk you through
each of them um this is the main entry
to the school and uh the blank walls
were primarily at the gym
and um um the lower elevation shows you
what is the proposed um revision it's
showing um that they will be providing
basically a seaing with a uh a uh uh
change in the uh texture and material
for the seating area and this will also
have a canopy uh as a weather protection
and and this will serve primarily to um
Pro provide some place for the children
to sit and wait while um their parents
uh before their parents pick them up
um so the next um elevation is the north
elevation in this in this case we have
two uh blank wall situations the red one
is the primary one that's visible from
the street and they are proposing
basically um extending the window um
elements um further uh and and
and as you will notice it is primarily
focus on the uh the the uh
uh the pattern of ir um uh a symmetry
that was uh basically established
because of the roof and um unlike all
the other um blank wall mitigation you
will notice that this this has a very
different approach and primarily because
we were looking at this as an element
that you will perceive and experience
from Evans and um normally you wouldn't
be standing right next to this wall
because this is uh closer to the service
area and then for the uh to on the left
side is actually the service Dock and uh
so part of what they're doing is making
the uh you know um as you can see there
is a bright yellow sliding metal door
there so part of the solution is to make
that fade or or blend in better with the
masonry material um and later on I'm
going to show you another side of the
service dock that's um that we
identified the other issue or I
shouldn't say issue the the other
consideration for that section is that
it's actually further back from
Southeast Evans and there will be um a
layer of parking right at the edge of
Evans and the property line and also um
a um basically a buffer priest so uh
that loading dock area will will not be
as prominent as even this side of the
building so on the west elevation um
this is the area where there's currently
an
open it it has a roof but it's an open
uh uh basketball court so originally um
this was where um I had um suggested
ideas about PE uh um maybe installing
some sort of sort of a school mural uh
what they're suggesting is actually what
I I consider something better which is
adding more um basketball baskets and uh
providing U opportunities for impromptu
play for the
kids and then the last elevation this is
the East which um uh captures the area
uh where the school where where the uh
faculty Lounge is and um so for this
basically it's showing that big um that
big wall over there um being um
mitigated by again extending the window
what I'm calling the ribbon the ribbon
windows and actually adding more windows
to um what is uh basically uh the uh the
food preparation area inside the
building and um the the the blue arrow
actually shows one of the blank walls um
along this Edge and they are proposed in
to provide some climbing vines this area
is a little trickier to um mitigate with
architectual features because the green
grass that you see on the bottom um
actually represents an area where most
of their mechanical equipment and um
other utility boxes will be located so
this is primarily a very of uh
utilitarian or functional uh area that
um um to some extent um will you know we
it will be more practical um not to have
something that's architectural in this
section and um the west elevation oh I'm
sorry no wonder sorry um
South did I just sorry I am pushing the
wrong buttons
okay there we go so um in conclusion um
we are staff is recommending that the
that because the applicant has addressed
all the condition this particular
condition for blank wall mitigation um
that we recommend to that we delete
condition C5 and this was basically the
same image that's in your staff
memo um the third item had to do with
the southeast Evans parking and um for
for this basically
this is again the slide that I showed um
at the last meeting and it gives you
kind of an idea of what the existing
conditions um uh Way Way Back Then and
um if you guys remember we had um or the
development commission actually had some
considerable discussion about the
parking in this area and uh the
challenges of monitoring and enforcing
the no parking um sign here
so um in in the in the process of trying
to address um if you recall there was um
also a proposal for the relocation of
the existing reineer Trail along the
edge of this property and in their
process of trying to um show us how
they're going to do that they also
address the issue of parking and that's
through um reconfig figuring instead of
having parallel parking they are
proposing to have diagonal parking and
what it does is it creates um one SE one
side that is clearly marked for parking
and because of the width of the roadway
uh it is basically um hard or difficult
for anyone to park on the other side of
the
road and um this is again the
information that I presented last time
um regarding
just shows where the uh Trail was going
um as an alignment and at that time um
and the only reason I'm showing this is
because this builds up on the four
conditions that I will be uh presenting
next um the the combination of the
location of this trail with that
diagonal parking uh basically um um
allowed us to look at this more
holistically and um one of the things
that um I wanted to remind the
development commission is the condition
that was crafted during that meeting and
um I copied that text here basically um
I highlighted the section or this the
sentences that calls the city staff to
basically work with the applicant on the
final alignment of the gravel path and
also uh to for the city parks and
recreation staff to uh have the ability
to review the construction drawings of
this Trail during the site work or
lscape permit phase of the
project so since then we've actually
walked the site um we've invited Park
staff to go with us and um the
applicants consultants and um one of the
things that we had questioned at the
last meeting is whether or not they were
proposing the trail to locate in the to
be located in the in the right side of
uh you the roadway and uh after walking
the site we basically understood why
they were proposing um that particular
side of the roadway and um our Park
staff also concurred that for now that
is the best location so we recognize
that um in the future when the new
parking lot comes in this trail location
may not be ideal we don't know the exact
impacts until we see a future site plan
for that parking lot so for for now we
are addressing the current condition
assuming that there's no new parking lot
there and with that um we are
recommending two new conditions one
addresses the the requirement for the
applicant to provide a 10ft wide Public
Access easen for the trail what you see
as a graphic shows what's existing there
right now there is a 20 foot I'm sorry a
60 foot wide I'm sorry that's a wrong
number it's a 60 foot wide Public Access
easement and um it's shown as the blue
line on the graphic and um that was
installed a way you know as part of um
to facilitate access for for the uh for
the
isqua the isqua Sportsman's Club and
also for um the
trail that the public Trail um that's
owned by the city so in the process of
um City staff and park staff trying to
understand how the future Trail um will
be maintained we recognize that it's
important to ensure that we do have P
public access to that trail and then for
for d24 condition d24 was meant to
address further work that we need to um
that we need to look as as we consider
the final design and construction of
this Trail right now we can't identify
all the responsibilities until we know
all the details but this um allows us to
continue um working with the school
district to identify the the various
roles um and again just a little
background currently basically the
school district and um our parks
department staff shares the maintenance
responsibility for the existing
Trail um two add two more additional
conditions um
d22 regarding installing barriers or
ballards was actually uh something that
our parks department staff um requested
and d23
the highlighted text are basically for
the sake of our presentation tonight and
it basically addresses that future
condition when when um the school
district comes back with the uh proposal
for a new parking lot we would like to
revisit the location the design and uh
basically the future um impacts of this
parking lot on the the existing Trail
so in conclusion the items remanded by
the city council to the development
commission as presented at this public
hearing for this isaam middle school
complies with the requirements of the
master site plan and site development
permit and the community facility
standards in IMC
1807.2 ad0 subject to the proposed
conditions of approval provided in the
staff memo dated April 29 2014
2015
and um based on the submitted
application and plans the administration
recommends that the development
commission move to recommend to the city
council approval of the master site plan
and site development permit for issaqua
Middle School file numbers msp1
14-
00002 and sdp 14-
0000001 as described and evaluated in
the staff report dated February 18 2015
and staff memo dated April 29 2015
including exhibits 1 through 24 and
subject to the conditions as identified
in the staff report revised and added by
the development Commission in the
February 19 2015 recommendation and as
revised added in the staff memo at this
public hearing this is a little bit more
complicated than the type of
recommendation you usually see but this
is our way of capturing both what was um
discussed and accepted by the
development commission at the last
meeting and also at this meeting um and
secondly direct the development services
department to Revis the February 19 2015
findings of fact and conclusions which
air confirmed the development
commission's decision to recommend to
the city council approval of the master
site plan and the site development
permit for isqua Middle School file
numbers msp1 14-
00002 and sdp1 14-
0000001 the staff report dated February
18 2015 and this briefing memo dated
April 29 2015 will serve as the findings
of that that concludes my
presentation thank you thank you Amy um
as I mentioned earlier before we go to
the uh applicant any applicant uh
presentations we're going to go back and
review excuse me review and approve the
minutes uh from the previous meeting
that were included in the uh in the
packet does anyone have any requested
changes in the minutes Corrections
additions deletions so is there a motion
I move we approve the minutes I stated
is there a second a second second any
further
discussion all those in favor of
approving the minutes as presented
signify by saying I I opposed that
minutes are approved
right um at this point if there is uh a
member of the applicants party that
wishes to make any presentations uh to
the commission this is the time to do
it
uh Steve Crawford director of capital
project for this school district I don't
think we have anything that we would
necessarily want to present at this
point in time staff's done a nice job
all right thank
you are there any members of the public
that wish to make a comment or ask
questions
so this this constitutes this what this
means is that the staff and the
applicant have finished uh their
presentations and we're now opening the
public hearing to public comment okay uh
thank you David kapler 255 Southeast
Andrew Street um regards the sea I think
Mr R Mr rios's concerns about fourth
whatever place I guess it is um was um
legitimate and is being addressed that
is good good um the Wetland
issue um I think we've now settled down
the concerns about that there's still
some concerns and I'd like to see that I
wish the school district were taking a
um doing maybe more than the minimal
they have to do in terms of
the getting rid of the zinc covered
fence and just how it looks in the need
for new plantings and mitigation of the
actual Wetland that's just across from
the fence from their property especially
since it apparently were School District
people that uh caused the fire in there
which did not um cause some do which
harmed the vegetation in that area as it
was traffic
mitigation totally frustrated with the
uh the traffic plan here I believe it
encourages parents driving to school
those kids get the nice benches to sit
on but the kids waiting for the buses
don't have that at their place um I
think we're encouraged in
single automobile delivery of students
and pickup of students over bus the
district should be paying extra for that
when we do the mitigation because
they're going to be increasing the the
traffic at all those four points that
were shown earlier and I don't like
seeing School District money going to
extra
traffic um the blank
wall it's kind of like the sky Bridges
at Costco it took way too much time in
my view dealing with it but anyway it's
a lot better than the FICA type stuff
that's all over the high school so I'm
fine um parking and
Trail we do need it's nice to
have the a trail in front of where the
cars are going to be when the kids do
this angle
parking um they can then get other car
and walk on the trail to where they're
going to go to the the school that's a
safety Improvement but people are not
going to use that tra
rail they're going to continue cutting
in just north of the the those softball
fields come in through that gravel
parking lot and then connect with the U
the trail that on the north side of
Evans they're not going to go around
that um that area and it's just not
going to happen unless unless the
district decides to put a a fence in
there to block that which would not make
sense
um so I
think we'll just having that there for
safety for those kids that are doing
this angle
parking um which is going to be kind of
crazy when all those kids are coming out
the same time backing out I don't know
where they're going to go there's no
they're there's no simple U-turn area
back there um I'm not sure how they're
supposed to turn around or if they think
they're going to back all the way around
so they can be then headed uh westbound
I perhaps but I I think it's going to be
a problem when that high school parking
lot is figured out we'll have a lot
needs to be a lot done with that and
hopefully there's enough requirement in
the master site plan uh for thorough
evaluation and study of that future
parking lot and hopefully retention of
some
trees the two parking spots is a joke um
um and the process has been a real
concern here basically the district was
issued a clearing and grading permit
even though they put a different name on
it uh would be prior to uh approval of
the the the the school itself and the
master site plan um because there a
school district nobody's raised that
much fuss but um this is a terrible
precedent set and we need to to not be
doing that in the future in the school
district I I don't know why this went
from 2014 to 2015 a whole year to get an
extra story on the building but um um we
we need to have a a process that's
working better thank
you thank
you is there anyone else from the public
that uh wishes to
speak
my name is Connie Marsh and I have a
store at 1175 Northwest Gilman Boulevard
site
B 11 I also live in
town so the transportation demand
management plan is unclear I don't
understand what success would be and
when it would be required and what
components would be
required with that language
because it just cites some examples and
it says it could be something like this
and to me that does not address the
significant issue of basically
encouraging people to drive to school
and for parents to drop off their kids
at school rather than taking the bus
um it's it's clear that this is going to
be a difficult site for walking and
riding your bike and the buses sort of
seem to be subjugated to the back
because the will of the people is to use
their cars um if you're going to have a
transportation demand management plan it
needs to be required
when I don't know the answer to that but
there needs to be criteria and then what
is the what are the problems that it is
attend attempting to solve because
that's why you have a transportation
demand management plan as you are trying
to solve a problem but that problem is
not clear is
it so I think that language needs to be
changed and I don't know exactly who who
wrote The Language there you go invasive
weeds it seems
like it sounded like the city and the
school district have been responsible Co
cooperatively for the maintenance of the
trail and you know I've been I've
maintained the trail for about 10 years
and I stopped two years ago because I
just can't stand it
anymore so the other day when I was
working cutting broom on Lake tradition
Plateau I had a woman come up to me and
show me a picture of the Scotch broom
behind the high school saying wow you're
working up here why aren't you working
down there on that Trail look I took a
picture of how bad it is have you seen
this and she showed me the portion of
the trail that I gave up maintaining two
years ago and nothing changes I'm the
one M who is maintaining the trail so I
don't understand still who's maintaining
the trail someone needs
to but I don't know that the language
that you have provided will actually
make it happen because there's nothing
saying if no one does maintain the trail
what will happen the public easement
that was drawn my recollection is that
is actually a 60 foot public easement
that we could use have used as a road
for the southeast bypass so I don't
exactly understand how we're going to
have a public easement section on top of
what is already a public easement I
think it's a power easement of some sort
and uh I have one other story and then
I'm going to
clude with a thought
um I was up there and walking the dog
and having a happy day and I came out
and saw the clearing and Grading so
basically I I threw a a stink fit
because I was not expecting that but
while I was standing there watching all
the high school students using the
gravel
road uh it was a traffic jam there were
two inches between each car they were
going two miles an hour um and that was
that was just with the cars being able
to park freely I don't understand how
the backing up is going to work with
that because there was no room or space
and these are high school students so I
don't think high school students are
good at backing into lines of traffic at
the same point in time the sweeper was
moving along and the kids were trying to
get passed and the gravel was
flying and I thought to myself the road
needs to be paved and I haven't seen
anywhere that this road needs to be
paved I think that needs to be a
condition because there's going to be so
much traffic and it's going to be this
supposedly nice Corridor and right now
it just kicks up dust it kicks up rocks
I was
ducking um so I would like to add have
that added as a condition if this is
going to be used for high school parking
that the road be paved all the way from
where it's not paved now around the
corner past the gun club the conditions
are a little bit better um for what's
going to happen to the trail in the
future I don't like the placement of the
trail I think it makes it a much worse
Trail than it is now very noisy uh right
by the gun club but you've heard all
that before and you've seen my comments
before and I hope you can remember what
they are because I don't I'm sort of
disheartened I hate coming to the
meetings and feeling like it's a done
deal uh it's frustrating to have it go
into basically construction before we
have the public hearing and it made me
not want to come at all and uh you know
me I'm here and sometimes I'm grumpier
I'm really really grumpy with this one
thanks thank you is there anyone else
that cares to speak tonight member of
the public okay
yes please do and then when you get up
to the uh mic give your name and your
address
please all right my name is uh life
Stephanie uh I'm is AEL resident on uh
385 East Sunset way and I also work up
at the isoa Sportsman Club um the couple
things I just want to address some
others have already said it but I wanted
to restate the same
thing uh is that the the parking
situation for the high school students
up on uh the gravel road up towards the
range um we deal with problems there
every day uh that we're open uh I still
maintain we need emergency vehicle
access up there um and often the way
that students have parked in the past
and current ly it's being enforced a
little bit more um but we've had
problems with students parking all the
way out into the road uh to points where
we can't get a firet truck up there in
case we needed one uh now like I said
theyve worked on it and they're talking
about the angled parking which I have
the same concerns as the others about
the angled parking uh being that we
already also have issues with students
almost hitting I've been hit multiple
times almost by students I almost hit by
students
um I have many customers that same thing
almost get hit by students pulling out a
lot of them speed up and down the road
do burnouts
Donuts um and understand they high
school students you know they're they're
letting out things like that but it's a
hazard uh it needs to be addressed uh
the the other thing that I wanted to
then mention here was um same thing that
Connie had mentioned about the Gravel
Road it always gets torn up from
students doing donuts tearing up and
down the road it's and it's also just
very heavily used by I mean customers of
our range and
students um and I don't know how often
we have had to contact the city to regra
the road and it's always a huge hassle
unfortunately to get someone to come out
and do that I mean it gets really bad
currently it's been it's held up
actually since the last time they've
done it but I know it's only a matter of
probably another month to where we have
huge potholes a lot of customers at our
range complain that they can't often
they don't want to drive down the road
because it's just so bad um with
students Now parking on both sides of
the roads were forced to drive through
deep potholes when they're there um and
we've also for a long time thought that
it would be probably in everyone's best
interest for uh to pave the road which
would long-term keep cost down for the
city which has to now currently I for
years they've been just reg graveling
regra uh why not just do it right once
and then we just don't have to worry
about it anymore especially if traffic
is going to get heavier up there and
we're already doing a bunch of
construction um let's just pave it that
way students also not only will it be a
better road that doesn't need to be
constantly maintained but um a paved
road is not not going to be as inviting
at all for students to do burnouts drag
racing drifting uh they do that on
gravel roads we all know it's easy to do
that on a gravel road and people think
oh it's you know not a real Road and
that's where we can go goof off if it's
paved um then we're not going to see as
much of that um so that's all I had to
say here tonight thank you thank you
sir is there anyone else that would like
to uh comment on the record
before we
proceed if not we will close the public
hearing aspect of the meeting and we
will now go to the commi indivi give the
individual Commissioners an opportunity
to uh ask further questions uh the
clarifications so on Mr so do you want
to start if you
have I think my uh my concerns have been
addressed I I was really concerned about
the diagonal parking on Evans I I also
don't see how that necessarily is going
to create enough room to for because I
don't people are going to back out
through tra across two lanes of traffic
I guess I it just doesn't make sense to
me doesn't seem like a viable
plan that's it commissioner brenon I
guess on that same on that same point a
couple of comments um both from the
public and then just from me regarding
that so the I don't know that I quite
understood from looking at the staff
information about how circulation will
actually actually happen with parking
and where they turn around and and how
that how that how the logistics are
going to work getting people in and out
of that road and parking when school
when they're coming and leaving uh
school so if you could maybe explain a
little bit maybe the drawing you could
bring that drawing back up and explain a
little bit about what what does the what
do the logistics look like trying to get
those students in and out of those
parking stalls and down that road going
the other direction and if if I could uh
add to uh commissioner Brennan's
question if you could take into
consideration in this uh
explanation uh the traffic from the the
Sportsman's Club which is part of this
equation it's a factor in the equation
so if we're going to address this and I
think we should as he said let's uh
let's include that factor in the
equation I'm GNA have Steve Crawford um
respond to that um since it's they're
they'll be responsible for making sure
that all that circulation works on a
day-to-day
basis so currently students are parking
on both sides of
Evans there is adequate space for single
car parallel parking on either side of
Evans and a minimum of at least two 12T
travel Lanes in between so the roadway
is wide enough to provide for emergency
or any other vehicle
access as you have cars
parked headed eastbound
on the south side of the road they're
going to currently go up and they're
going to make a u-turn at the
intersection and head back
out cars that are parked headed west
currently drive up the road make a
U-turn and find a place to park headed
westbound on Evans so the diagonal
parking consolidates the parking to one
side of the road provides for marked
wheel stops provides an opportunity for
the school to assign
spaces if they so desire provides for a
walk path on the south side of the road
so there's immediate access out of the
cars on the side of the road where
they're parking and that leads back into
the school
campus that trail also provides for a
relocation of the existing section of
the reineer trail that currently goes
through the middle of the school camp
campus that trail is about at most 6 ft
wide in a lot of places it's 2 or 3 ft
wide it currently passes between 10 to
20 feet away from the existing upper
high school parking
lot passes between the building and the
tennis courts and connects up to the
trail at the South End of the
campus a trail a public access trail
running through the middle of the campus
is no longer a viable
option based on Safety and
Security so we've proposed to relocate
that
trail from the point where it connects
to Evans with a Crossing concrete
Crossing follow back around head back
south this is really the currently the
the alignment of the trail that was been
in place when the school uh at a the ISA
high school campus was under
construction so again it's
there's that's a little bit bigger
picture but this is the current
alignment of the trail along the old
railroad crossing right down next to the
parking lot where kids have been parking
forever down through adjacent to the
softball fields discus cage tennis
courts and connecting up back south so
it does represent a relocation of the
trail
uh there's more trees adjacent to the
trail in this location than there are
over here and then it connects back up
to the section of the trail this was the
location where there were two gravel
parking spaces
proposed based on previous public
comments I think the reality is that
there's not a lot of Trail access and
use during school hours so the diagonal
parking that'll be available along Evans
represents a pretty significant addition
of available parking for users after
school hours and on
weekends
one more question on the parking counil
you currently we have parallel parking
both sides of Evans up in that segment
so with the diagonal parking what's the
Delta between what's provided now in um
available parking versus what will be
allowed for provided for with the
diagonal parking I think there's about
37 spaces here in the diagonal parking
and then currently there's about 50
spaces in both uh directions
parallel and what what what is the
cross-section of the road how wide is
that there uh you got two travel lanes
and two 8T parking Lanes so it's 24 36
there's a 3940 ft I've personally
measured it all the way from one end to
the other and painted lines in to help
guide the students because we affected
to change over spring break so I know
personally that there is space for
parallel parking on both sides and two
minimum 12T travel Lanes thank you
again I'm going to make sure I get the
number so you said approximately 50
parallel parking spaces now and so
you'll be reducing it to 37 with the
diagonal
okay well well according to your drawing
there's 34 existing spaces okay 18 on
the North side and 16 on the South Side
okay and that the plan that you proposed
has a total of
37 29 on the angled in and then eight
along the side well my error and
recollection of numbers it it is a
little bit I believe a reduction in the
spaces that currently
exist you plan on um marking
the the the side where there will no
longer be parking allowed is it going to
be signed to posted as as no
parking Mark no parking now well no it
isn't right now after spring break it's
marked as parallel parking only on both
sides of the
road
okay and granted there has been some
issue in the past with students uh kind
of Helter Skelter parking the school is
aware of the fact that that is School
District property and that they do have
the ability to enforce that and there
has been some assistance with uh City
police uh particularly after spring
break and I know that uh there were some
TI tiets issued
today question Morgan sort of a side
question I guess with regard to the
trail the question that came up about
why not have the trail go across on the
north side of the softball field and
connect if people aren't going if
they'll continue doing that
path mean continue through here no I
think Mr kler was saying that people
would when they get to the North End of
the softball field would cross over and
go north instead of going up and around
if I understood Mr kapler
correctly uh I took that to mean that
they would continue to cross and
continue to walk through the School site
in this old configuration when they get
to the softball field I think right
there they would nope the north end of
it they would cut right cut through
there is that correct there
isn't there isn't really a trail
there so I
so I guess we don't need a
trail I I I don't know it well enough so
I don't know if if again if it's for
putting a trail that people aren't going
to use but is there reason not to have a
trail along there if it's one that's
being
used um to my knowledge there wasn't a
trail there
and uh there are future plans for this
portion of the property to be developed
into part of the school campus okay so
it would be in essence a ways to develop
a trail that's going to again run
through the middle of a school
campus thank the other um
item the other item to add would be that
um you know there are two aspects of
using that one is the trail and the
other is
um encouraging students to not walk in
the road but to have a place Place away
from the moving cars so um even if Trail
users are making the shortcut that you
identified for the part uh students
getting in and out of the cars I think
there would still be a value um to have
that trail in that location running
because I was thinking you could have
the walkway for the students and the
trail two different items but again if
it's going through the school property
and you wouldn't want to in the future I
can understand that so I guess question
maybe this is for Sheldon perhaps the
question about Paving the
road
and people suggested doing that and then
sort of hear the thought process about
it Paving the road uh would help with
the maintenance issues with the gravel
being having to be replaced regraded
periodically uh I understand the city
does do that work when it's
requested
uh by Paving the road it
also would cause you know additional
storm water issues that would have to be
addressed uh that haven't been looked at
yet
so if the commission wanted to condition
it to be paved we'd have to evaluate
storm water conditions as construction
permits come up and figure out how to
address the storm water issues
associated with that
runoff thank you and I I I guess I
didn't want to infer that we know more
about Paving roads than we're not
Traffic Engineers certainly but just
wanted to just sort of hear thoughts on
it thank you and so I'd like to add a
comment there that the
area in this area is an area that the
school district has planned to provide
for future high school
parking if
there's consideration of a condition
that this road be paved as a part of
this project the school district will
move forward with the paving of our own
parking lot and we'll just eliminate any
parking in our use here this is a 60
foot easement that was granted to the
city for Access and utilities primarily
to serve the Sportsman's
Club so I that was a question was going
through my mind so it's not dedicated
City rway then it's easement okay it's
an easement
okay the the parking lot that the the
buildout parking lot that we're talking
about there
uh I I absolutely understand that this
question that I'm about to ask is is
futuristic but there has been as you
know there has been significant conern
concern expressed about the uh number of
students that are driving cars instead
of taking buses and the number of
parents that are are dropping kids off
and picking them up and so on um and I
I'm just curious as to what it would
take uh for the school in terms of a an
a school district program to encourage
parents and students is there a
possibility that you're not going to
need that let's put it that way the
parking yeah that is a real possibility
we have a bond committee working on the
future direction of high schools in the
district a primary question is a part of
that bond process is do we build another
high school if we maintain our current
Skyline isqua and Liberty high schools
isqua and Skyline will grow to
probably 25 2600 students by the year
2020 if we are
successful in the bond committee moving
forward with with the recommendation to
build a fourth high school we find
property and build a fourth High School
both Skyline and isqua and the new high
school would probably be about 1,600
students and you would find that the
population at is high school would
diminish considerably and it's now uh a
little over 21 so we go from 2100 to to
about 6600 if the new schools Bill MH
yes in that case uh
what in that eventuality what would the
purpose of that uh that area be in that
case if if it's determined that it's
not uh I'm just asking this question
because we're we're talking about what's
going to be done now as as as the next
step we would probably look at that as
something other than a parking
lot that if the student population goes
down the needs for the parking are
diminished
we are faced with serious growth issues
that land is very scarce very
expensive um that area including the
section north of Evans up to the gun the
Sportsman's Club South Boundary that's
all School District
property who knows what that might be at
some point in time in the future okay um
the likelihood is that at some point in
time it'll get developed to support the
population of students that continues to
grow in the area whether it's elementary
middle or high school kids I don't know
okay commiss Morgan did you have another
question okay I've got a I've got a
couple
um in the traffic management PL part you
talked
about the problem with Second Avenue and
sunset neutral traffic and
then new traffic signal at the
intersection of front and
sunset I've read that in the report too
and I'll leave that just what new
traffic
signal or is it
just you know changing the timing on
turns and stuff like that no it's it's
not a new signal at front and sunset but
what it would
there's new traffic signal intersection
of front and sunset in the staff report
that's probably a miswritten sentence
there by accident uh the front and
sunset signalized intersection as it is
today is actually in the city's Capital
program for reconstructing to provide
for increased capacity of each of the
four legs by providing turn uh
additional Lanes Northbound and South
bound uh which impact parking as well as
the East West legs of extending the
dedicated Lanes of traffic coming
through the intersection which will
allow the signal to operate more
efficiently and effectively so it's it's
not a brand new signal okay but it's a
reconstruction of that intersection to
increase its
capacity cheldon if I can I I also had a
question about that specific
intersection now we're talking about the
intersection with uh the library and
Jacks correct and and the Shell station
and the law office right so I don't
Envision those moving so are we talking
about restricting parking on the edges
of that to that would be what would be
required is a restriction on
parking there there's already some areas
that parking is restricted already uh
but we would have have to work within
the current pave section and so forth
It's not taking any of the property uh
that would impact buildings or anything
like that we're not talking about that
all right and the other intersection
that is one one of the ones that you
mentioned earlier is the intersection at
Clark and and Newport in Fr correct same
thing there same thing there working
within the existing right of ways not
taking property all the improvements of
at that intersection would either be on
the leg of Clark which is on the east
side of the intersection or possibly uh
creating another way another access
point coming out on First Avenue I
believe that's the street right next to
the community
center
okay okay that I just no point well
taken and I'd still be curious to you
we'll see it down the road I guess as to
what parking because it doesn't seem
like there's much room in there to
change turn turn lights and stuff it
it's very tight
and it it is a challenging project okay
one of the things for staff that we sort
of blew right by was the Wetland
buffer and I had a question in regards
to storm water
runoff and the staff report says there
going to be about 1,500 square feet due
to a new new
outfall will be mitigated the proposed
outfall will conveying storm water from
the busard into the buffer
area and
that the municipal code allows storm
water runoff to be discharged into
Wetland buffers as long as it is
treated where is the storm water being
treated um so I have to I have to admit
that um I had a lot of assistance from
our environmental plan planner as far as
the determination and review of that
section so I was relying on his review
and he's actually un vacation um I'm
going to try my best to um un um to
explain that I guess I don't have a
Graphic um but basically uh all the
treatment will be included as part of
the Civil review and um just like with
all the others um the all the other
storm water in up in this project it
will all be treated on site and then
before it will um be
discharged Amy is it is it do you have
any is it going to be do you know if
it's going to be a percolation treatment
the percolation pits that or or
capabilities that will percolate the
runoff before it enters
uh looks like just a pipe hitting a
bunch of rocks and my my recollection
was it that it was retention the
treatment was
retention
reading Steve can provide some more
technical so in the report on page 21 of
84 there is a site plan that shows the
drainage into catch basins and a pipe
that runs down Southward to a treatment
uh filtration type system that then
discharges to the buffer
wetland
and there there's been a little bit of a
change this in terms of of this detail
from staff recommendation that the
outfall pipe was shortened up so that
there's a longer run before it reaches
the
Wetland okay I guess I I was just
looking at this nice color drawing on
page 19 and it's got new storm water
piping heading out into a bunch of
rocks so there's two different you know
one is to slow the flow and I think the
rocks that you're identifying is to
ensure that the flow is not such that it
erodes I'm not sure that's that to me
means that there's an awful lot of water
flowing if you're worried about rocks to
disperse the flow just wondering where
it's getting treated I so there's
a
on page
21 new manhole the filter structure
that's Upstream on the pipeline of the
manhole and the manhole provides for
flow control as well as the filter and
then the discharge and standard
discharge out of any storm water pipe is
a a rip wrap Rock area so that you're
just not having a sheet flow over the
surface
okay so there's a there's a filter
system in in under the road and then not
I
guess I'm beating a dead horse probably
but I got to tell you when I looked at
this drawing I of the parking on uh
Evans I thought that's going to that'll
work out pretty good because I
assumed falsely that there was going to
be nice lines drawn where the kids would
pull in and park even line and stuff
like that and now it looks like it's
just going to be a pile of gravel with a
concrete bumper that they're going to
aim at app Hazard like kids will
do well the bumpers at least provide
some delineation of parking spaces as
opposed to parallel parking that doesn't
have any
delineation well I was going to ask qu
because again I had just assumed it was
being black topped and I would think
that would be the smart thing to do but
cost money and I understand that and
there there's the percolation but
they've got wonderful new blacktop I
understand because it's over there on
one of the other roads in town that
allows for percolation through the black
top too I was going to ask about whether
there's restriction and
because I see it again as a problem with
the kids pulling in and at the end of
school backing out trying to do y turns
in there so that they can get out
quicker I don't think they're going to
pull out and drive all the way to that
turnaround and I wondered if there was
again when I thought it was being black
toed if there was a requirement to
potentially make it require backend
parking so in the morning when they're
not that enthusiastic about getting to
school
anyway they would take a little bit
longer to back in so that when they end
of school is and they want to leave they
can get right out uh I don't know about
that and then this turnaround up here I
don't
know I didn't I was just curious if
there was a bigger turnaround former if
that's just doing
a real
quick accelerate and crank the wheel
over hard to the left to spin around and
end up being a big burm eventually for
the boys to get out to the shooting
club um they seem to manage now and I I
know that the road gets wet it gets
muddy it gets rutted from time to time
but I haven't seen the circle or the
U-turn area at the te
become a banked corner from burnouts on
the way out if you were to do backin
parking it would have to be on the north
side of the road so that it it's on the
exiting side so then everybody would
have to cross the
road on their way to car no because they
could do the same thing they do now that
you get to their car by say yeah they
would cross here instead of no they
could drive up here in the morning turn
around come down and back in to the to
the south side of the
road
TR cross traffic no what he's saying is
they could go east hit the turnaround
come back down and then back into the
north side of the road he said back into
the south side of the road well you
could turn the you could make the 45
degree angle go the opposite direction
and then you could head east and back
into a space but when you get ready to
leave then I think you'd be more PR
you guys have thought a lot harder than
we have I I just as long as we're
talking about this it seems to me that I
heard I heard a consensus of opinion
from the public comments from Mr Lynn
and yourself that it would be best long
term in terms of Maintenance and so on
if that were paved well from the school
district point of view we would not be
interested in participating but we would
move forward with the paving of Our Own
parking lot and allow the city to go
ahead and provide a paved roadway to
access the Sportsman's Club the parking
lot being the one we've talked about
correct that is the future possible
future parking lot which if that became
a condition would move up on the
schedule because we wouldn't be
interested in Paving a
roadway okay
interesting anything else that's all
I've got
M uh question for Amy if you could pull
back up the um I think it's the South
elevation the two
comparisons elevation uh the overall
South elevation yeah the comparison of
the
two
yes so in the package the revised
elevation didn't have new trees in it
um are there new trees being
added as part of the
changes um I think when we looked at
this last time um they were showing I'm
sorry I don't have the SI plan what was
shown was almost like a foundation
Landscaping right up next to the gym
wall so because now what you uh what we
have is a seating area at the wall
they're providing a um a prvious paver
area and then the the trees are going to
be um located between um basically the
curb and what will be the future perious
area that's part of the seating area so
and and they will be in uh basically
tree grates like tree planters so it's
set up almost like in a more urban
sidewalk setting and and these are trees
that were added to the plan subsequent
to the initial exactly plan that we saw
before in the um the previous plan the
trees were actually closer to the gym
wall they were using it as their
screening and we said that wasn't
acceptable and so um the trees moved
closer to the street or the the drop off
area okay so I guess in my mind it's um
I was disappointed in this slide as a as
a presentation itself because
it you can look past it but it's in my
mind it's using the trees and the
revised elevation to try to obscure the
the blank
walls I'm we're aware of what they've
done in terms of adding the seating area
but we're looking at the walls of the
building and to throw some trees in
front of it in the revised
elevation to me is just trying to mask
something there that they didn't have to
do because in the package the trees
weren't there and it would have to me
but it's very frustrating you see
something like put up there it's like a
smoke screen in a way so not that it was
you're doing or anything because you
didn't create the graphic but it should
have just been shown both ways without
trees and Amy are those are those
deciduous or conifers deciduous they're
deciduous so they're almost like Street
trees so they four or five months out of
the year they're not going to have
leaves so chances
are thank you and and and just so um and
and I appreciate you calling that out I
didn't even realize I actually asked
them for a clearer um version of the
graphics for this presentation so
whatever I received I just included in
my report or in my slides yeah I
understand thank
you anything
else I one more question um regarding
the circulation and there was a during I
think Sheldon during your comments about
some issues uh backing up onto Evans
Street because of some may uh drop off
challenges that in the internal
circulation can you explain a little bit
more about what the mitigation is for
that we have a lot of activity going on
over at May on Evans Street and anything
we can do to minimize the impact that
going to happen if we start queuing up
back on the street as we're trying to
get back into the school that starts to
become and a lot of cars are idling out
there challenging I think actually I'm
GNA have to have either Jeff Shram of
10w or Steve Crawford because a lot of
that has to do with the internal
controls on the school district uh
property to help manage the flow of the
parent and students and buses and all
that together
plan yeah we we did have a lot of
conversation about this during the the
last meeting about the circulation about
some of the challenges that that was
creating so it sounds like we still are
working on
that so there's been some concern
that parents who are supposed to drop
off in the front of the building and
exit back out through the traffic light
might find coming in on Evans in through
past the loading dock and down past here
to access that an attractive
alternative so what we've talked about
is the fact that a there's going to be a
gate back here we're showing a gate at
this point and there's the potential to
add a gate at this point so that
basically our traffic in these areas our
staff for parking and buses enter on
Evans and come down and drop off both
middle and high school students before
they exit back out at the traffic light
so the control for those parents is
gate at this point which basically
precludes anybody accessing the area and
coming back around the east side of the
building and
and that gate would also preclude or it
would make it very frustrating if some
parent decided to leave here and instead
of going out at the traffic light go
back around this way and find that it's
blocked and have to turn around and come
back I suppose we could put another gate
here we had to but I think that what
would be found quickly is that exiting
back out through the traffic light is a
more expedient exit than if you were to
try and go back out and exit at devans
which is not a signal controlled
intersection so basically the the
control is
Gates so the gates would be what closed
as needed they would be automated gates
with card Keys how what's the thinking
to are they are they there just as
mitigation as necessary how would they
function if you close the gates then the
staff's going to have the same challenge
trying to get to the parking some some
of the staff would access through Evans
other staff here if if it was determined
that that was the problem and the gates
needed to be closed then the staff that
park on the Eastern side of the building
would enter at
this at the traffic light and come back
around to the east side of the building
okay so those gates are going to be
installed as part of the project we're
going to install the gates and the
closure and or open time
periods would be determined by by
practice okay thank
you Morgan commissioner Brennon
commission Sila pres um the issues the
questions that I had the clarifications
uh are U have all been addressed but I'm
I'm going to venture out on the limb
here and recognize that I'm about to
comment on something that this
development commission uh simply is
going to make an obser I'm going to make
an
observation uh for what it's worth I
attended two weeks ago I attended an all
day sustainability Summit AT ISO high
school that was one of the most
impressive things that I've participated
in in a long time and it was uh
primarily
students uh from isad school district uh
high schools and middle schools and
businesses that uh participate ated in
this and talked about uh programs
measurement of success goals uh
definable uh contributions and so on to
the objective of increasing
sustainability of of the individual
schools and the school system at whole
and there were some marvelous ideas
including some programs that are already
in
effect uh there was nothing mentioned
about uh
vehicles uh about uh an a concerted
effort
to address the increasing number of
private vehicles that are being used to
bring children students to school
whether they're driven by the students
or uh by parents of the students or by
somebody else that's picking them up and
Dr off and I personally think that's a
uh there's a a very significant
opportunity for the isqua school
district which is recognized as a leader
uh in in the Seattle metropolitan area
uh to take a real serious look at a
systemwide effort to educate students uh
and parents and uh administrators to
identify specific goals for reducing car
traffic in the schools and it's not just
for the environment it's for ultimate
expenses uh so if you have have to you
know pave less parking lots and things
like that and accommodate cars and
signals for the city and everything uh I
mean we're talking 10 15 20 years from
now but uh there's so much emphasis on
that subject in this area by so many
different government and non-government
entities that it just seems like a
marvelous opportunity for the isqua
school district to look at what is a
significant problem that we're here
tonight primarily talking about vehicle
traffic so I I you know for what it's
worth and maybe I ought to attend a a
school district meeting and and make
that recommendation as a as a private
citizen but uh the the issue does affect
us I mean it's it's come up here and
it's a significant part of our time and
in spirit of of cooperation and
continuing the the quality of life that
we have here in isiga I just I think
it's a an excellent opportunity that
could be pursued by everybody involved
the city the private sector uh the
school and we could we could get on the
map nationally by some that kind of
program because I I know this is
happening everywhere where they're
contending with more and more students
that are driving to school instead of
walking biking taking buses so that's
that's an uh an unusual recommendation I
recog I recognize that coming from the
development commission but I think it's
an opportunity that really needs to be
recognized so with
that if there are no further comments
additions
questions okay then we will move to
excuse me the final uh step that we're
going to take tonight which is uh to uh
proceed with a motion for recommendation
to city council regarding the isqua
school middle school approval with
conditions go forward go forward Mr
chair I move that the development
commission recommended the city council
approval of the master site plan and the
site development permit for isqu Middle
School B numberers msp1 14-
00002 and sdp
14- 0000001 is described and eval
evaluated in the staff report dated
February 18
2015 and staff memo dated April 29th
2015 including exhibits 1 through
24 and subject to the conditions as
identified in the staff report revised
and added by the development Commission
in the February 19th 2015 recommendation
and as revised and added in the staff
memo at this public hearing
second it's been moved and seconded to
approve is there any further
discussion I guess i' I guess like to
point out and terms of the different
aspects of it the blank wall I think
they've done an adequate job of
addressing the blank wall issues the
main questions we
have if there's no further
discussion all those in favor of
approving the motion as presented
signify by saying I I was opposed name
motion carries
unanimously there
is Mr chair I move that the development
commission direct the development
services department to revise the
February 19th 2015 findings of fact and
conclusions which affirm the development
commission's decision to recommend to
the city council approval of the S of
the master site plan and site
development permit for isqua Middle
School file numbers MSP p 14-
00002 and sdp1 14-
000000001 the staff report dated
February 18th
2015 and this briefing memo dated April
29th uh 2015 will serve as the findings
of fact I second moved and seconded is
there any further
discussion if not all those in favor of
this motion signify by saying I I
opposed motion
carries uh is there any new business
that any Commissioners wish to bring up
staff if not
the May 8th 6th pardon me meeting of the
isquad development commission is
adjourned